20210929 Ver 1_ePCN Application_20210506

DWR
Division of Water Resources
Initial Review
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
October 26, 2020 Ver 3.3
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
6 Yes
✓ No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
CYesr No
Change Only 1 needed.
BIMS # Assigned* Version#*
20210929 1
Is a payment required for this project?*
6 No payment required
✓ Fee received
✓ Fee needed - send electronic notification
Select Project Reviewer*
Chad Turlington:eads\ccturlington
Information for Initial Review
Reviewing Office *
Fayetteville Regional Office - [phone]
1a. Name of project:
COURTESY COPY ATMC Great Grant II - Robeson County - Lumber River Crossing
1a. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Kim Williams - Land Management Group
lb. Primary Contact Email:* lc. Primary Contact Phone:*
[e-mail]
Date Submitted
5/6/2021
Nearest Body of Water
Lumber River
Basin
Lumber
Water Classification
B; Sw
Site Coordinates
Latitude:
34.327498
Pre -Filing Meeting Information
ID#
Pre -filing not required
Pre -fling Meeting or Request Date*
3/26/2021
Longitude:
-79.048205
Attach documentation of Pre -Filing Meeting Request here:*
ATMC Pre_Filing Info.pdf
[phone]
Version
1
66.43KB
A. Processing Information
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Robeson

Columbus
Is this a NCDMS Project
✓ Yes f• No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
✓ Yes 6 No
la. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
r Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
17 Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
1b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
17 Nationwide Permit (NWP)
I— Regional General Permit (RGP)
I— Standard (IP)
lc. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
✓ Yes G No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number: 12 - Utility Lines
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number: Multiple NWP #'s (specify below)
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
NWP 57
ld. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
7 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
1— Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
1— Individual Permit
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
If. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
✓ Yes t No
I— 401 Water Quality Certification - Express
I— Riparian Buffer Authorization
lg. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
✓ Yes f No
lg. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
✓ Yes rNo
Acceptance Letter Attachment
lh. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
✓ Yes (No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
✓ Yes t'No
B. Applicant Information
Id. Who is applying for the permit?
I— Owner I7 Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?*
t • Yes r No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
NC DOT
2b. Deed book and page no.:
2c. Responsible party:
c/o Charles Miller
2d. Address
G Yes r No
r Yes 6 No

Street Address
PO Box2157
Address Line 2
A State / Province / legion
Lumberton NC
Postal / Zip Code Country
28359 USA
2e. Telephone Number: 2f. Fax Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
3. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
3a. Name:
Brent Brinson; Director - Outside Plant Engineering
3b. Business Name:
ATMC
3c. Address
Street Address
640 Whiteville Road NW
Address Line 2
aty State / Rovince / legion
Shallotte NC
Postal / ZZp Code Country
28470 USA
3d. Telephone Number: 3e. Fax Number:
[phone] [phone]
3f. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:
Kim Williams
4b. Business Name:
Land Management Group
4c. Address
Street Address
3805 Wrightsville Avenue; Suite 15
Address Line 2
(Sty State / Province / Region
Wilmington NC
Postal / Zip aide Country
28403 USA
4d. Telephone Number: 4e. Fax Number:
[phone] [phone]
4f. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
Agent Authorization Letter*
Signed authorization form rev.pdf
195.88KB
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Project Information
1b. Subdivision name:
(if appropriate)
lc. Nearest municipality/ town:
Fair Bluff & Marietta
2. Project Identification

2a. Property Identification Number:
NC DOT ROW
2b. Property size:
- 4 miles
2c. Project Address
Street Address
Hwy 904
Address tine 2
cay State / Province / legion
Marietta NC
Postal / Zip Code Country
28340 USA
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:*
Lumber River
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:*
B; Sw
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Lumber
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030402031404
4. Project Description and History
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:*
The site is a utility line corridor that will run parallel to Hwy 904. The corridor is located within an existing NC DOT Right of Way. Though portions of the corridor are wooded, the NCDOT
is allowing this project alignment to remain within 10 feet of the pavement edge, which tends to be consistently maintained.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
r Yes 6' No r Unknown
4d. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of the project site. (for DWR)
Fair Bluff River Crossing_NW_Topo.pdf 1.82MB
Fair Bluff River Crossing_SE_Topo.pdf 1.81 MB
4e. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey map depicting the project site. (for DWR)
Fair Bluff River Crossing_NW Soils.pdf 1016.92KB
Fair Bluff River Crossing_SE_Soils.pdf 1002.64KB
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
5 acres
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
- 80 LF (4 stream crossings within 20' wide corridor)
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:*
This project is a partnership between Atlantic Telephone Membership Corporation (ATMC) and Brunswick Electric Membership Corporation (BEMC) to deliver critical broadband service
with minimum 50 Megabits per second (Mbps) and up to 1 Gigabits per second (Gbps) maximum symmetrical speeds to unserved and underserved areas of Robeson County via a
100% fiber to the home network constructed by ATMC. No wetland or stream impacts are needed to install the line. However, the line will be directionally bored under the Lumber River,
a Section 10 Waters.
4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:*
The project consists of the construction of a fiber optic cable that will run along Hwy 904 from Fair Bluff to where Affinity Road intersects with Hwy 904. The line will initially run along the
north side of the road near Fair Bluff. Once it crosses the Lumber River, the line will then cross to the other side of the road and run along the south side of Hwy 904 the rest of the
project area. ATMC will be constructing (3) 1.25" SDR11 conduits to jet fiber optic cable.
The line will be directionally bored under all wetlands and streams, including the Lumber River. For each bore, there will be a 3' x 3' x 3' bore pit and a 3' x 3'x 3' receiving pit (see
detail). A bentonite slurry solution will be used in the directional boring process. The bore will be a minimum of 8 feet below the Lumber River and a minimum of 2 feet below all other
wetlands and streams. Upland areas will be open cut to install the line. All material and equipment will be stored in uplands. Additionally, no trees will be removed during installation of
the line.
4j. Please upload project drawings for the proposed project.
ATMC Site Plan 5-4-21 rev.pdf 3.09MB
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
r Yes
Comments:
r No r Unknown
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
r Preliminary r Approved 6' Not Verified r Unknown r N/A

Corps AID Number:
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
5d1. Jurisdictional determination upload
Fair Bluff_Preliminary Sketch.pdf
DP1-UP.pdf
DP1-WET. pdf
6. Future Project Plans
Corey Novak, Christian Preziosi, and Wes Fryar
LMG
6a. Is this a phased project?*
✓ Yes f• No
6.15MB
243.46KB
245.11KB
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
ATMC plans to install other fiber optic cable lines in Robeson County as part of a larger initiative.
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
la. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
r Wetlands r Streams -tributaries
E Open Waters r Pond Construction
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
The applicant will directionally bore the line under streams and wetlands to avoid impacts to these resources.
r Buffers
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
The applicant will directionally bore the line under streams and wetlands to avoid impacts to these resources.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
✓ Yes a No
2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why:
No wetland or stream impacts are proposed.
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
✓ Yes ( No
If no, explain why:
Site is located within the Lumber River Basin.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?*
✓ Yes 6'No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
• Yes r No
Comments:
G. Supplementary Information

1. Environmental Documentation
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*
✓ Yes f• No
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?*
✓ Yes GNo
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
✓ Yes ( No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The purpose of this project is to provide internet access to an essting, underserved population.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
✓ Yes ( No r N/A
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
6. Yes r No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
✓ Yes ('No
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
✓ Yes
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
✓ Yes t No
G No r Unknown
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
✓ Yes t7 No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
✓ Yes a No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
✓ Yes G No
5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
r: Yes r No
If yes, please provide details to include type of percussive activity, purpose, duration, and specific location of this activity on the property.
ATMC_Percussive.pdf 64.43KB
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
The NC Natural Heritage Program and USFWS IPaC databases were reviewed to determine the known presence of rare species. According to the
NHP, no federally listed species are known to occur on or within a one mile radius of the site. The USFWS IPaC database identified the northern long-
eared bat, red -cockaded woodpecker, wood stork, American alligator, Cooley's meadowrue, and Michaux's sumac as potentially occurring in the
region. Forested areas within the site support a pine -hardwood canopy with a fairly dense shrub layer and would not provide suitable habitat for the
RCW. Forested areas within the site may support appropriate roosting habitat for the NLEB. However, the species is not known to occur in Robeson
County. The wood stork, American alligator, and Cooley's meadowrue may occur within the streams and/or wetlands within the corridor. However,
these areas will be bored and no impacts to this habitat will occur. Michaux's sumac could potentially be located in uplands within the corridor.
However, most of the uplands within the corridor is a maintained DOT ROW and no trees will be removed as part of this project. Therefore, no impacts
to federally listed species are anticipated.
Consultation Documentation Upload
IPaC_ Explore Location resources.pdf
project_report_lumber_river_crossing_29303_29303. pdf
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
✓ Yes 6' No
2.8MB
1.63MB
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
NOAA EFH Mapper

7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
rYes (No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
The NC State Historic Preservation Office HPOWEB GIS mapping resource was used to determine the presence of cultural or historic resources. No
resources are identified within or adjacent to the site.
7c. Historic or Prehistoric Information Upload
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?*
(Yes rNo
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
Engineer will ensure the project meets any FEMA requirements
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
FEMA Flood Map Service Center website
Miscellaneous
Comments
Miscellaneous attachments not previously requested.
Fair Bluff River Crossing_MN_NC OneMap.pdf
Fair Bluff River Crossing_SE_NC OneMap.pdf
Fair Bluff River Crossing_Vicinity.pdf
Signature
*
rJ By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
1.2MB
1.14MB
1.8MB
• The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief; and
• The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401 certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Kim Williams
Signature
`1rCfCKe
Date
5/6/2021

LMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP
a DAVEY* company
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
I/we, the undersigned, hereby authorize Land Management Group to act as our agent in the
preparation and representation of information related to the Section 404/401 permit
application for the ATMC Robeson GREAT Grant II project located in Robeson and
Columbus Counties, NC. All questions regarding this project should be directed to Land
Management Group.
Sincerely,
Applicant
Brent Brinson
Print Name
03/16/2021
Date
www.Imgroup.net • [e-mail] • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
3805 Wrightsville Avenue, Suite 15 • Wilmington, NC 28403

.41r. n-z� ..SiG.� r . • � �fi1F
- _ ... — -
at-
- _ -.--
4.
- 4, 5- — —.
• ,-- _a..
.i _-.. -.t5 - = . _
•
—� - .
f
yfier.ki' -- - ''' ....,-,. .--.41.- .-tu.)--, --a.-
._:r?, .
1 , y -�: ii6d,_
.--.",4-- _ _,r,d! - - -
i,F..
.! i .-- tiLdr1_ �71 � i+1� T -
ki
±itr �rJ i�
_�Lf -4 --
— aili% —
i•
- 1- it l:e..
.
u4- -02., ••
cif
3L ik. .•�1.J1a . —
�- .
•
C..11.1 f.
r. 3fYi.r
di,_
•
••
• �'•�1�_ �^ -J--
•U
• .'L
�Jr
—S .
•
«vim
-
aS -,}ti.. 1
J1 • _ YJrn y . }ar i '
_ sl.AL • .yam • ',ilia i �i 4 _ ... a..,
- �. r.r.. •-lr.•
-�:,..� "F�``_:ill
_. _ .4. r ;., Ire ., J -4
•
•
�: _ - -
. �LJ _
_Luz. :411.
- -- � -'k—.r .. ��• - a1+rL yam_
' }4 ,try• i k 'Y1-�-
' __ail A "
ti�i.ir .. V S.r--
sri ERE; Garrn ;'c) OpenStreetMap contributors
A
0 350 700 1,400
Feet

-
_ t
_� --.• Y _• � • kill-, +11
f_. -
1+41 �``- Y—��a vim- _..iJ�.
.,..ii k.rdi-, 7 d.*4(4•.' :::.N—r- -....!!4A. - ._yej4:5_.. • .-- —
_ _
_4 Cli_
Y + _.. —
•
..._ •........ N,_•-' ._.....,,,.
L.
tk
Hie_.4—.:.
~_ .� r — ;.:fir•.. '....._ � .� e . �
W..liri -- --up
.,fir
r'f ,fig • • -- rd
fir. - lr -1 L ,i µ-n-
tLi1. -
'IL.. ,
•
_ 14
• ��li_ .5`r� r
1.4 . - .tip fd
._.
ti�,
d- �1��
r4J
� .....Ube__. Yl IY1 _ — i t .
},irr
Lillr_, -
_-4
_A JJJ -
=.11 ..
—Ja
_ 1 _
-.
L
N
A 0 300 600 1,200
Feet
•
HERE, Garmin, ('c) Open tr Map con butor

N
A 0 350 700 1,400
Feet

N
A 0 300 600 1,200
Feet

N
0 350 700 1 ,400 A
Feet

A
0 300 600 1,200
Feet

RiV'' _
© OpenStreetMap (and) contributors, CC -BY -SA
N
A 0 750 1,500 3,000
Feet

SON GREAT GRANT II\DRAWINGS\21.07005 ATMC ROBESON GREAT GRANT II LUMBER RIVER CROSSING2.DWG PLOT DATE 5/4/2021 2:23 PM TONY MINTZ
0
0
2
mcgill
712 Village Road SW
Suite 103
Shallotte, NC 28470
910.755.5872
NC Firm License # C-0459
mcg i I I associ ates. co m
DATE
MAY 2021
OFFICE MANAGER
M. NORTON
PROJECT MANAGER
A. LAPINSKY
PROJECT #
21.07005
DESIGNER
T. MINTZ
REVIEWER
K. WILLIAMS
ATMC ROBESON
GREAT GRANT II
ROBESON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
1,800
GRAPHIC SCALE
0
900
1,800
3,600
DIVISION VALUE = 1,800 FEET
LUMBER RIVER CROSSING
SEE SHEET C-109 FOR
PLAN AND PROFILE
LUMBER RIVER CROSSING
OVERALL SHEET
SHEET
C-101

SON GREAT GRANT II\DRAWINGS\21.07005 ATMC ROBESON GREAT GRANT II LUMBER RIVER CROSSING2.DWG PLOT DATE 5/4/2021 2:23 PM TONY MINTZ
0
0
2
END
DIRECTIONAL
BORE
WETLANDS
CROSSING
(SEE DETAIL)
START
DIRECTIONAL
BORE
Cable will be directionally bored under wetlands
and streams. No impacts area proposed.
LEGEND
PROJECT ROUTE
404 WETLAND DELINEATION LINES
404 WETLAND/WATERS MAPPED LINES
PERENNIAL STREAMS
NON —JURISDICTIONAL DITCHES
END DIRECTIONAL BORE
END DIRECTIONAL BORE
WETLANDS CROSSING
(SEE DETAIL)
START DIRECTIONAL BORE
L WETLANDS
CROSSING
(SEE DETAIL)
START DIRECTIONAL BORE
END DIRECTIONAL BORE
WETLANDS CROSSING
(SEE DETAIL)
START DIRECTIONAL BORE
END DIRECTIONAL BORE
rWETLANDS CROSSING
(SEE DETAIL)
START DIRECTIONAL BORE
mcgill
712 Village Road SW
Suite 103
Shallotte, NC 28470
910.755.5872
NC Firm License # C-0459
mcg i I I associ ates. co m
DATE
MAY 2021
PROJECT #
21.07005
OFFICE MANAGER
M. NORTON
DESIGNER
T. MINTZ
PROJECT MANAGER
A. LAPINSKY
REVIEWER
K. WILLIAMS
ATMC ROBESON
GREAT GRANT II
ROBESON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
250
0
125
250
500
GRAPHIC SCALE
DIVISION VALUE = 250 FEET
LUMBER RIVER CROSSING
INSET
SHEET
C-102

SON GREAT GRANT II\DRAWINGS\21.07005 ATMC ROBESON GREAT GRANT II LUMBER RIVER CROSSING2.DWG PLOT DATE 5/4/2021 2:23 PM TONY MINTZ
0
0
2
END DIRECTIONAL BORE
START DIRECTIONAL BORE
WETLANDS
CROSSING
(SEE DETAIL)
END DIRECTIONAL BORE
START DIRECTIONAL BORE
WETLANDS
CROSSING
(SEE DETAIL)
Cable will be directionally bored under wetlands
and streams. No impacts area proposed.
LEGEND
PROJECT ROUTE
404 WETLAND DELINEATION LINES
404 WETLAND/WATERS MAPPED LINES
PERENNIAL STREAMS
NON —JURISDICTIONAL DITCHES
WETLANDS
CROSSING
(SEE DETAIL)
END DIRECTIONAL BORE
START
DIRECTIONAL
BORE
mcgill
712 Village Road SW
Suite 103
Shallotte, NC 28470
910.755.5872
NC Firm License # C-0459
mcg i I I associ ates. co m
DATE
MAY 2021
OFFICE MANAGER
M. NORTON
PROJECT MANAGER
A. LAPINSKY
PROJECT #
21.07005
DESIGNER
T. MINTZ
REVIEWER
K. WILLIAMS
ATMC ROBESON
GREAT GRANT II
ROBESON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
250
GRAPHIC SCALE
0
125
250
500
DIVISION VALUE = 250 FEET
LUMBER RIVER CROSSING
INSET
SHEET
C-103

SON GREAT GRANT II\DRAWINGS\21.07005 ATMC ROBESON GREAT GRANT II LUMBER RIVER CROSSING2.DWG PLOT DATE 5/4/2021 2:23 PM TONY MINTZ
2
END DIRECTIONAL BORE
WETLANDS
CROSSING
(SEE DETAIL)
WETLANDS
CROSSING
(SEE DETAIL)
Cable will be directionally bored under wetlands
and streams. No impacts area proposed.
LEGEND
PROJECT ROUTE
404 WETLAND DELINEATION LINES
404 WETLAND/WATERS MAPPED LINES
PERENNIAL STREAMS
NON —JURISDICTIONAL DITCHES
START DIRECTIONAL BORE
END DIRECTIONAL BORE
START DIRECTIONAL BORE
,'i
mcgull
712 Village Road SW
Suite 103
Shallotte, NC 28470
910.755.5872
NC Firm License # C-0459
mcg i I I associ ates. co m
DATE
MAY 2021
OFFICE MANAGER
M. NORTON
PROJECT MANAGER
A. LAPINSKY
PROJECT #
21.07005
DESIGNER
T. MINTZ
REVIEWER
K. WILLIAMS
ATMC ROBESON
GREAT GRANT II
ROBESON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
250
GRAPHIC SCALE
0
125
250
500
DIVISION VALUE = 250 FEET
LUMBER RIVER CROSSING
INSET
SHEET
C-104

SON GREAT GRANT II\DRAWINGS\21.07005 ATMC ROBESON GREAT GRANT II LUMBER RIVER CROSSING2.DWG PLOT DATE 5/4/2021 2:23 PM TONY MINTZ
0
0
2
END DIRECTIONAL BORE
START DIRECTIONAL BORE
WETLANDS
CROSSING
(SEE DETAIL)
Cable will be directionally bored under wetlands
and streams. No impacts area proposed.
LEGEND
PROJECT ROUTE
404 WETLAND DELINEATION LINES
404 WETLAND/WATERS MAPPED LINES
PERENNIAL STREAMS
NON —JURISDICTIONAL DITCHES
mcgull
712 Village Road SW
Suite 103
Shallotte, NC 28470
910.755.5872
NC Firm License # C-0459
mcg i I I associ ates. co m
DATE
MAY 2021
PROJECT #
21.07005
OFFICE MANAGER
M. NORTON
DESIGNER
T. MINTZ
PROJECT MANAGER
A. LAPINSKY
REVIEWER
K. WILLIAMS
ATMC ROBESON
GREAT GRANT II
ROBESON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
250
0
125
250
500
GRAPHIC SCALE
DIVISION VALUE = 250 FEET
LUMBER RIVER CROSSING
INSET
SHEET
C-105

SON GREAT GRANT II\DRAWINGS\21.07005 ATMC ROBESON GREAT GRANT II LUMBER RIVER CROSSING2.DWG PLOT DATE 5/4/2021 2:23 PM TONY MINTZ
0
0
2
Cable will be directionally bored under wetlands
and streams. No impacts area proposed.
W1E11E11E11E111
LEGEND
PROJECT ROUTE
404 WETLAND DELINEATION LINES
404 WETLAND/WATERS MAPPED LINES
PERENNIAL STREAMS
NON —JURISDICTIONAL DITCHES
WETLANDS
CROSSING
(SEE DETAIL)
END DIRECTIONAL BORE
mcgill
712 Village Road SW
Suite 103
Shallotte, NC 28470
910.755.5872
NC Firm License # C-0459
mcg i I I associ ates. co m
DATE
MAY 2021
PROJECT #
21.07005
OFFICE MANAGER
M. NORTON
DESIGNER
T. MINTZ
PROJECT MANAGER
A. LAPINSKY
REVIEWER
K. WILLIAMS
ATMC ROBESON
GREAT GRANT II
ROBESON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
250
0
125
250
500
GRAPHIC SCALE
DIVISION VALUE = 250 FEET
LUMBER RIVER CROSSING
INSET
SHEET
C-106

SON GREAT GRANT II\DRAWINGS\21.07005 ATMC ROBESON GREAT GRANT II LUMBER RIVER CROSSING2.DWG PLOT DATE 5/4/2021 2:23 PM TONY MINTZ
2
WETLANDS
CROSSING
(SEE DETAIL)
Iijeams.NoimPactsareaProPosed.
able will be directionally bored under wetlands
LEGEND
PROJECT ROUTE
404 WETLAND DELINEATION LINES
404 WETLAND/WATERS MAPPED LINES
PERENNIAL STREAMS
NON —JURISDICTIONAL DITCHES
END DIRECTIONAL BORE
START DIRECTIONAL BORE
WETLANDS
CROSSING
(SEE DETAIL)
END DIRECTIONAL BORE
4
I START DIRECTIONAL BORE
mcgill
712 Village Road SW
Suite 103
Shallotte, NC 28470
910.755.5872
NC Firm License # C-0459
mcg i I I associ ates. co m
DATE
MAY 2021
OFFICE MANAGER
M. NORTON
PROJECT MANAGER
A. LAPINSKY
PROJECT #
21.07005
DESIGNER
T. MINTZ
REVIEWER
K. WILLIAMS
ATMC ROBESON
GREAT GRANT II
ROBESON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
250
GRAPHIC SCALE
0
125
250
500
DIVISION VALUE = 250 FEET
LUMBER RIVER CROSSING
INSET
SHEET
C-107

SON GREAT GRANT II\DRAWINGS\21.07005 ATMC ROBESON GREAT GRANT II LUMBER RIVER CROSSING2.DWG PLOT DATE 5/4/2021 2:23 PM TONY MINTZ
0
0
2
Cable will be directionally bored under wetlands
and streams. No impacts area proposed.
PROJECT ROUTE
404 WETLAND DELINEATION LINES
404 WETLAND/WATERS MAPPED LINES
PERENNIAL STREAMS
NON —JURISDICTIONAL DITCHES
mcgull
712 Village Road SW
Suite 103
Shallotte, NC 28470
910.755.5872
NC Firm License # C-0459
mcg i I I associ ates. co m
DATE
MAY 2021
OFFICE MANAGER
M. NORTON
PROJECT MANAGER
A. LAPINSKY
PROJECT #
21.07005
DESIGNER
T. MINTZ
REVIEWER
K. WILLIAMS
ATMC ROBESON
GREAT GRANT II
ROBESON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
250
GRAPHIC SCALE
0
125
250
LUMBER RIVER CROSSING
SEE SHEET C-109 FOR
PLAN AND PROFILE
41105
illiI 1.1
500
DIVISION VALUE = 250 FEET
LUMBER RIVER CROSSING
INSET
SHEET
C-108

07005-ATMC ROBESON GREAT GRANT II\DRAWINGS\21.07005 ATMC ROBESON GREAT GRANT II LUMBER RIVER CROSSING2.DWG PLOT DATE 5/4/2021 2:23 PM TONY MINTZ
404 WETLANDS LINE
PLAN
SCALE: 1 "= 50'
LUMBER RIVER
404 WETLANDS LINE
RECEIVING PIT
1 1/4" FIBER_
OPTIC CABLE
NC 904
LAUN
761+50
0+00
1+00
2+00
3+00
3+595
404
70
I
WETLANDS LINE
PROFILE
70
SCALE: HORIZ. 1"= 50'
VERT. 1"= 5'
7
LINE
404 WETLANDS
65
/
65
/ RECEIVIN
\ �1
/
/
�HING
60
1
1
1
E
EXISTING GRADE
/
/
60
PIT
\
-1-
- - - - -
-----,
.., ..._,-. t,
55
55
8'
MIN.
1 1/4"
OPTIC
FIBER
CABLE
-0+50
0+00
1+00
2+00
3+00
3+50
Cable will be directionally bored under wetlands
and streams. No impacts area proposed.
G PIT
712 Village Road SW
Suite 103
1V1
e 1 I I Shallotte, 8NC 28470
NC Firm License # C-0459
DATE
MAY 2021
PROJECT #
21.07005
OFFICE MANAGER
M. NORTON
DESIGNER
T. MINTZ
PROJECT MANAGER
A. LAPINSKY
REVIEWER
K. WILLIAMS
ATMC ROBESON
GREAT GRANT II
ROBESON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
SCALE AS NOTED
LUMBER RIVER CROSSING
PLAN AND PROFILE
SHEET
C-109
mcg i I I associ ates. co m

07005-ATMC ROBESON GREAT GRANT II\DRAWINGS\21.07005 ATMC ROBESON GREAT GRANT II LUMBER RIVER CROSSING2.DWG PLOT DATE 5/4/2021 2:23 PM TONY MINTZ
3'x3'x3' DIRECTIONAL
BORE PIT
STREAM
1 i" FIBER OPTIC CABLE
3'x3'x3' DIRECTIONAL
BORE PIT
R/W
UPLANDS
W W W W
W W W W W
W W WETLANDS. W W W W
W W
W W W W W W W W W
W W W W W •' W
W W W
W W W W W
W W W W W W W
W W W W W W W W W
R/W
W W W W W WETLANDS W
W W W W
W W W
UPLANDS
EOP
EOP
ROAD/BRIDGE
TYPICAL STREAM/WETLANDS
CROSSING PLAN
NOT TO SCALE
UPLANDS
3'x3'x3' DIRECTIONAL
BORE PIT
UPLANDS
1 i" FIBER OPTIC CABLE
TYPICAL STREAM/WETLANDS
CROSSING PROFILE
NOT TO SCALE
3'x3'x3' DIRECTIONAL
BORE PIT
Cable will be directionally bored under wetlands
and streams. No impacts area proposed.
712 Village Road SW
Suite 103
Ihth1
le 1 I I Shallotte, 8NC 28470
NC Firm License # C-0459
DATE
MAY 2021
PROJECT #
21.07005
OFFICE MANAGER
M. NORTON
DESIGNER
T. MINTZ
PROJECT MANAGER
A. LAPINSKY
REVIEWER
K. WILLIAMS
ATMC ROBESON
GREAT GRANT II
ROBESON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
NOT TO SCALE
TYPICAL STREAM / WETLANDS
CROSSING PLAN AND PROFILE
SHEET
C-110
mcg i I I associ ates. co m

Legend
Project Area — 21,730 linear ft
404 Wetland Delineation Lines
404 Wetland/Waters Mapped Lines
Perennial Streams
Non -Jurisdictional Ditch — 1,600 linear ft
Map Pages
A
B
C
D
E
Data Points
NOTE: This is not a survey. All boundaries and distances are considered approximate. This
represents a preliminary map prepared from field sketches. A survey of delineated areas an
review and approval by the US Army Corps of Engineers is recommended prior to specific
site planning. 404 Wetland/Waters Mapped Lines have not been delineated. These Mapped
Lines have been digitized from aerial photography with limited ground-truthing.
Lumber River - Section 10
L:\WETLANDS\2021 WETLANDS FILES\LMG21.035 ---
Fair Bluff River Crossing - NC 904, McGill
Boundaries are approximate and not meant to be absolute.
Map Source: NC One Map Latest Aerial Imagery
Fair Bluff River Crossing- NC 904
Robeson & Columbus Counties
Map Date: 04-20-2021
LMG21.035
,LMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP
a DAVEY. company
3805 Wrightsville Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
[phone]
Wetland Delineation Map
Overview
1 of 6
0 900 1,800 3,600
Feet
Scale applies to 11X17" print.

Legend
Project Area — 21,730 linear ft
404 Wetland Delineation Lines
404 Wetland/Waters Mapped Lines
Perennial Streams
Non -Jurisdictional Ditch — 1,600 linear ft
Map Pages
A
B
C
D
E
Data Points
NOTE: This is not a survey. All boundaries and distances are considered approximate. This
represents a preliminary map prepared from field sketches. A survey of delineated areas and
review and approval by the US Army Corps of Engineers is recommended prior to specific
site planning. 404 Wetland/Waters Mapped Lines have not been delineated. These Mapped
Lines have been digitized from aerial photography with limited ground-truthing.
•
, 7 may . E"•
' Ea, CIIMIL,ew-f h,IND oo- Arta. _
Cl
L:\WETLANDS\2021 WETLANDS FILES\LMG21.035 ---
Fair Bluff River Crossing - NC 904, McGill
Boundaries are approximate and not meant to be absolute.
Map Source: NC One Map Latest Aerial Imagery
Fair Bluff River Crossing- NC 904
Robeson & Columbus Counties
Map Date: 04-20-2021
LMG21.035
,LMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP
a DAVEY. company
3805 Wrightsville Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
[phone]
Wetland Delineation Map
Sheet A
2 of 6
0 200 400 800
Feet
Scale applies to 11X17" print.

Non -Jurisdictional Ditch — 1,600 linear ft
L:\WETLANDS\2021 WETLANDS FILES\LMG21.035 ---
Fair Bluff River Crossing - NC 904, McGill
Boundaries are approximate and not meant to be absolute.
Map Source: NC One Map Latest Aerial Imagery
Fair Bluff River Crossing- NC 904
Robeson & Columbus Counties
Map Date: 04-20-2021
LMG21.035
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP
a DAVEY. company
3805 Wrightsville Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
[phone]
NOTE: This is not a survey. All boundaries and distances are considered approximate. This
represents a preliminary map prepared from field sketches. A survey of delineated areas and
review and approval by the US Army Corps of Engineers is recommended prior to specific
site planning. 404 Wetland/Waters Mapped Lines have not been delineated. These Mapped
Lines have been digitized from aerial photography with limited ground-truthing.
Wetland Delineation Map
Sheet B
3 of 6
0 200 400 800
Feet
Scale applies to 11X17" print.

NOTE: This is not a survey. All boundaries and distances are considered approximate. This
represents a preliminary map prepared from field sketches. A survey of delineated areas and
review and approval by the US Army Corps of Engineers is recommended prior to specific
site planning. 404 Wetland/Waters Mapped Lines have not been delineated. These Mapped
Lines have been digitized from aerial photography with limited ground-truthing.
Non -Jurisdictional Ditch -1.8OOlinear ft
L:\WETLANDS\2021WETLANDS F|BS\LMG21.O35—
FarBluff River Crossing NC0O4.McGill
Boundaries are approximate and not meant tobeabsolute.
Map Source: NCOne Map Latest Aerial Imagery
Fair Bluff River Crossing- NC 904
Robeson & Columbus Counties
Map Date: 04-20-2021
LMG21.035
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP
a==="==company
oeooWrightsville Avenue
vw|mmgmn. wczo4oa
Wetland Delineation Map
Sheet C
O 200 400 800
Feet
Scale applies to 11X17^ print.

�nn�nn� Non -Jurisdictional Ditch -1.8OOlinear ft
L:\WETLANDS\2021WETLANDS F|BS\LMG21.O35—
FarBluff River Crossing NC0O4.McGill
Boundaries are approximate and not meant tobeabsolute.
Map Source: NCOne Map Latest Aerial Imagery
Fair Bluff River Crossing- NC 904
Robeson & Columbus Counties
Map Date: 04-20-2021
LMG21.035
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP
a==="==company
oeooWrightsville Avenue
vw|mmgmn. wczo4oa
NOTE: This is not ounxey. All boundaries and distances are considered approximate. This
represents a preliminary map prepared from field sketches. A survey of delineated areas and
review and approval by the US Army Corps of Engineers is recommended prior to specific
site planning. 404 Wetland/Waters Mapped Lines have not been delineated. These Mapped
Lines have been digitized from aerial photography with limited ground-truthing.
Wetland Delineation Map
Sheet D
O 200 400 800
Feet
Scale applies to 11X17^ print.

Legend
Project Area — 21,730 linear ft
404 Wetland Delineation Lines
404 Wetland/Waters Mapped Lines
Perennial Streams
Non -Jurisdictional Ditch — 1,600 linear ft
Map Pages
A
B
C
D
E
Data Points
NOTE: This is not a survey. All boundaries and distances are considered approximate. This
represents a preliminary map prepared from field sketches. A survey of delineated areas and
review and approval by the US Army Corps of Engineers is recommended prior to specific
site planning. 404 Wetland/Waters Mapped Lines have not been delineated. These Mapped
Lines have been digitized from aerial photography with limited ground-truthing.
NC911,Boa,rd
L:\WETLANDS\2021 WETLANDS FILES\LMG21.035 ---
Fair Bluff River Crossing - NC 904, McGill
Boundaries are approximate and not meant to be absolute.
Map Source: NC One Map Latest Aerial Imagery
Fair Bluff River Crossing- NC 904
Robeson & Columbus Counties
Map Date: 04-20-2021
LMG21.035
,LMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP
a DAVEY. company
3805 Wrightsville Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
[phone]
Wetland Delineation Map
Sheet E
6 of 6
0 200 400 800
Feet
Scale applies to 11X17" print.

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R
OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
(Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Fairbluff Crossing
Applicant/Owner: ATMC
City/County: Fair Bluff Town/Columbus Sampling Date: 2/15/2021
Investigator(s): Wes Fryar - LMG
State: NC Sampling Point: DP -UP
Section, Township, Range: Fairbluff
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): convex
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 133A Lat: 34.327498
Soil Map Unit Name: Johnston soils
Slope (%): 1-2
Long: -79.048205 Datum: NAD83
NWI classification: Uplands on NWI
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No X (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No _
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland?
Yes No X
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
_
Water (A1) Fauna (B13) Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
_Surface _Aquatic _Sparsely
High Water Table (A2) Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U) Drainage Patterns (B10)
_ _ _
Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ _ _
Water Marks (B1) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ _ _
Sediment Deposits (B2) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ _ _
Drift Deposits (B3) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ _ _
Mat or Crust (B4) Muck Surface (C7) Position (D2)
_Algal _Thin _Geomorphic
Iron Deposits (B5) Other (Explain in Remarks) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ _ _
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
_
Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Sphagnum Moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
X
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
OWT>24". According to Antecedent Precipitation vs Normal Range based on NOAA's Daily Global Historical Climatology Network site conditions
were wetter than normal at the time of the field work.
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point:
DP -UP
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius ) % Cover Species? Status
1. Pinus taeda 30 Yes FAC
2. Liquidambar styraciflua 20 Yes FAC
3. Acer rubrum 10 No FAC
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
60 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 30 20% of total cover: 12
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius )
1. Symplocos tinctoria 10 Yes FAC
2. Liquidambar styraciflua 10 Yes FAC
3. Persea borbonia 10 Yes FACW
4. Morella cerifera 5 No FAC
5.
6.
7.
8.
35 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 18 20% of total cover: 7
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius
1. Chasmanthium laxum
2. Persea borbonia
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
2
2
No FACW
No FACW
4 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 2 20% of total cover: 1
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius
1. Gelsemium sempervirens
2. Smilax rotundifolia
3.
4.
5.
15 Yes FAC
10 Yes FAC
25 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 13 20% of total cover: 5
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 7 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 7 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
(B)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.01
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point:
DP -UP
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Typel Loc2 Texture
0-4 10YR 3/1
4-8 10YR 4/1
8-24 10YR 5/1
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Remarks
Sandy 50% coated
Sandy 50% coated
Sandy
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) _
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)_
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR 0, S)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
(LRR S, T, U)
unless otherwise noted.)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
Barrier Islands 1 cm Muck (S12)
(MLRA 153B, 153D)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR 0)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR 0, P, T)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
(MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
(MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR 0)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(outside MLRA 150A)
Reduced Vertic (F18)
(outside MLRA 150A, 150B)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, T)
Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
(MLRA 153B)
_ Red Parent Material (F21)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
(outside MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154)
_ Barrier Islands Low Chroma Matrix (TS7)
(MLRA 153B, 153D)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present?
Yes No X
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R
OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
(Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Fairbluff Crossing
Applicant/Owner: ATMC
City/County: Fair Bluff Town/Columbus & Robeson Sampling Date: 2/15/2021
Investigator(s): Wes Fryar - LMG
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): depression
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 133A Lat: 34.327220
Soil Map Unit Name: Johnston soils
State: NC Sampling Point: DP -WET
Section, Township, Range: Fair Bluff
Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 0-1
Long: -79.047978 Datum: NAD83
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?
NWI classification: Freshwater forested/shrub
Yes No X (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes X No
Yes X No
Yes X No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes X No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
_
Water (A1) Fauna (B13) Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
_Surface _Aquatic _Sparsely
X High Water Table (A2) Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U) Drainage Patterns (B10)
_ _
X Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ _
X Water Marks (B1) Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) -Season Water Table (C2)
_Oxidized _Dry
Sediment Deposits (B2) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ _ _
Drift Deposits (B3) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ _ _
Mat or Crust (B4) Muck Surface (C7) X Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Algal _Thin
Iron Deposits (B5) Other (Explain in Remarks) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ _ _
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
_
X Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Sphagnum Moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 2
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 2
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
According to Antecedent Precipitation vs Normal Range based on NOAA's Daily Global Historical Climatology Network site conditions were wetter
than normal at the time of the field work.
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP -WET
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius
1. Liquidambar styraciflua
2. Pinus taeda
3. Acer rubrum
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
40 Yes FAC
15 Yes FAC
15 Yes FAC
70 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 35 20% of total cover: 14
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius )
1. Liquidambar styraciflua 20 Yes FAC
2. Morella cerifera 10 Yes FAC
3. Ilex glabra 10 Yes FACW
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
40 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20 20% of total cover: 8
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius
1. Carex comosa
2. Juncus effusus
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
8
2
Yes OBL
Yes OBL
10 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 5 20% of total cover: 2
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius
1. Gelsemium sempervirens
2. Smilax laurifolia
3.
4.
5.
15 Yes FAC
10 Yes FACW
25 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 13 20% of total cover: 5
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 10 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 10 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
(B)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.01
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP -WET
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Typel Loc2 Texture
0-4 10YR 2/1
4-10 10YR 3/1
10-18 10YR 4/1
18-24 10YR 3/2 80 10YR 5/6
Mucky Loam/Clay
Loamy/Clayey
Loamy/Clayey
Remarks
20 C M Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
X 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) _
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR 0, S)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
(LRR S, T, U)
X
unless otherwise noted.)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
Barrier Islands 1 cm Muck (S12)
(MLRA 153B, 153D)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR 0)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR 0, P, T)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
(MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
(MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR 0)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(outside MLRA 150A)
Reduced Vertic (F18)
(outside MLRA 150A, 150B)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, T)
Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
(MLRA 153B)
_ Red Parent Material (F21)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
(outside MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154)
_ Barrier Islands Low Chroma Matrix (TS7)
(MLRA 153B, 153D)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present?
Yes X No
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain — Version 2.0

ATMC Robeson GREAT Grant II
Robeson County, NC
Percussive Activities Information
The project involves the installation of a fiber optic cable, which will be directionally bored
under wetlands and streams. The directional bore method may be considered a percussive
activity. This work will be conducted as quickly as possible and will occur within the hours
allowed by the authority having jurisdiction.

IPaC Information for Planning and Consultation U.S. Fish &Wildlife Service
IPaC resource list
This repollf6E4DocorfitAVailyprieoNtaah&tigictmoiv@aetilliedirEmrisgsstvithtsift& diidriticXl habitat
(col lectivi 1615@fttlirha RTi" S4i6ds§4i3"rieWUl zU orFisAywodelli Wiitjji5g� Ws (USFWS)
jurisdicticirtiOamitknown or expected to be on or near the project area referenced below. The list
may also include trust resources that occur outside of the project area, but that could potentially be
directly or indirectly affected by activities in the project area. However, determining the likelihood
and extent of effects a project may have on trust resources typically requires gathering additional
site -specific (e.g., vegetation/species surveys) and project -specific (e.g., magnitude and timing of
proposed activities) information.
Below is a summary of the project information you provided and contact information for the USFWS
office(s) with jurisdiction in the defined project area. Please read the introduction to each section that
follows (Endangered Species, Migratory Birds, USFWS Facilities, and NWI Wetlands) for additional
information applicable to the trust resources addressed in that section.
Location
Columbus and Robeson counties, North Carolina
Local office
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
t. [phone]
la [phone]
MAILING ADDRESS
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
PHYSICAL ADDRESS
551 Pylon Drive, Suite F
Raleigh, NC 27606-1487
00a,
s\3\-

Endangered species
This resource list is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an analysis of project
level impacts.
The primary information used to generate this list is the known or expected range of each species.
Additional areas of influence (AOI) for species are also considered. An AOI includes areas outside of
the species range if the species could be indirectly affected by activities in that area (e.g., placing a
dam upstream of a fish population even if that fish does not occur at the dam site, may indirectly
impact the species by reducing or eliminating water flow downstream). Because species can move,
and site conditions can change, the species on this list are not guaranteed to be found on or near the
project area. To fully determine any potential effects to species, additional site -specific and project -
specific information is often required.
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act requires Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary
information whether any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area
of such proposed action" for any project that is conducted, permitted, funded, or licensed by any
Federal agency. A letter from the local office and a species list which fulfills this requirement can only
be obtained by requesting an official species list from either the Regulatory Review section in IPaC
(see directions below) or from the local field office directly.
For project evaluations that require USFWS concurrence/review, please return to the IPaC website
and request an official species list by doing the following:
1. Draw the project location and click CONTINUE.
2. Click DEFINE PROJECT.
3. Log in (if directed to do so).
4. Provide a name and description for your project.
5. Click REQUEST SPECIES LIST.
Listed species
land their critical habitats are managed by the Ecological Services Program of the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the fisheries division of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (NOAA Fisheries?).
Species and critical habitats under the sole responsibility of NOAA Fisheries are not shown on this
list. Please contact NOAA Fisheries for species under their jurisdiction.
1. Species listed under the Endangered Species Act are threatened or endangered; IPaC also shows
species that are candidates, or proposed, for listing. See the listing status page for more
information. IPaC only shows species that are regulated by USFWS (see FAQ).
2. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an office of the
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of Commerce.
The following species are potentially affected by activities in this location:

Mammals
NAME STATUS
Northern Long-eared Bat Myotis septentrionalis
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9045
Birds
Threatened
NAME STATUS
Red -cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7614
Wood Stork Mycteria americana
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8477
Reptiles
NAME
American Alligator Alligator mississippiensis
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/776
Flowering Plants
NAME
Cooley's Meadowrue Thalictrum cooleyi
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3281
Michaux's Sumac Rhus michauxii
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/speci es/5217
Endangered
Threatene
'43‘141/4:4\4
STATUS
SAT
STATUS
Endangered
Endangered

Critical habitats
Potential effects to critical habitat(s) in this location must be analyzed along with the endangered
species themselves.
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS AT THIS LOCATION.
Vigratory birds
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act
land the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act?.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to migratory
birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider implementing
appropriate conservation measures, as described below.
1. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
Additional information can be found using the following links:
• Birds of Conservation Concern http://www.fws.gov/birds/management/managed-species/
birds-of-conservation-concern.php
• Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds
http://www.fws.gov/birds/management/project-assessment-tools-and-guidance/
conservation-measures.php
• Nationwide conservation measures for birds
olv>%'
The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the USFWS Birds
of Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your project location. To learn
more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how this list is generated, see the FAQ
below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this location, nor a guarantee that every bird on
this list will be found in your project area. To see exact locations of where birders and the general
public have sighted birds in and around your project area, visit the E-bird data mapping tool (Tip:
enter your location, desired date range and a species on your list). For projects that occur off the
Atlantic Coast, additional maps and models detailing the relative occurrence and abundance of bird
species on your list are available. Links to additional information about Atlantic Coast birds, and
other important information about your migratory bird list, including how to properly interpret and
use your migratory bird report, can be found below.
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures to
reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE SUMMARY at
the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be present and breeding in your project
area.
NAME

BREEDING SEASON (IFA
BREEDING SEASON IS INDICATED
FORA BIRD ON YOUR LIST, THE
BIRD MAY BREED IN YOUR
PROJECT AREA SOMETIME WITHIN
THE TIMEFRAME SPECIFIED,
WHICH IS A VERY LIBERAL
ESTIMATE OF THE DATES INSIDE
WHICH THE BIRD BREEDS ACROSS
ITS ENTIRE RANGE. "BREEDS
ELSEWHERE" INDICATES THAT THE
BIRD DOES NOT LIKELY BREED IN
YOUR PROJECT AREA.)
Dunlin Calidris alpina arcticola Breeds elsewhere
10116
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird
Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA0
Prothonotary Warbler Protonotaria citrea Breeds Apr 1 to Jul 31
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.
_.41ff% 1SNOe
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds.
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize impacts to all birds at any
location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly important when birds are most likely to occur
in the project area. When birds may be breeding in the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and
avoiding their destruction is a very helpful impact minimization measure. To see when birds are most likely to occur
and be breeding in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures or permits
may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of infrastructure or bird species
present on your project site.
What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) and other species that
may warrant special attention in your project location.
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network
(AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets and is queried
and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as occurring in the 10km grid cell(s) which your project intersects,
and that have been identified as warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle
(Eagle Act requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to offshore activities or
development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your project area. It is not
representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list of all birds potentially present in your
project area, please visit the AKN Phenology Tool.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds potentially occurring
in my specified location?

The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data provided by the Avian
Knowledge Network (AKN). This data is derived from a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen science
datasets .
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information becomes available. To
learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and how to interpret them, go the
Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me about these graphs" link.
How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering, migrating or present year-round in my project area?
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding, wintering, migrating or year-
round), you may refer to the following resources: The Cornell Lab of Ornithology All About Birds Bird Guide or (if
you are unsuccessful in locating the bird of interest there), the Cornell Lab of Ornithology Neotropical Birds guide. If
a bird on your migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated with it, if that bird does occur in your
project area, there may be nests present at some point within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds elsewhere" is
indicated, then the bird likely does not breed in your project area.
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern throughout their range
anywhere within the USA (including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands);
2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the
continental USA; and
3. "Non -BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on your list either because of
the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or (for non -eagles) potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from
certain types of development or activities (e.g. offshore energy development or longline fishing).
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made, in particular, to
avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC species of rangewide concern. For
more information on conservation measures you can implement to help avoid and minimize migratory bird impacts
and requirements for eagles, please see the FAQs for these topics.
Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species and groups of
bird species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal
also offers data and information about other taxa besides birds that may be helpful to you in your project review.
Alternately, you may download the bird model results files underlying the portal maps through the NOAA NCCOS
Integrative Statistical Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic
Outer Continental Shelf project webpage.
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use throughout the year,
including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this information. For additional information on
marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study and the nanotag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam Loring.
What if I have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid violating the Eagle
Act should such impacts occur.
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report

The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of birds of priority
concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for identifying what other birds may be in
your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in
my specified location". Please be aware this report provides the "probability of presence" of birds within the 10 km
grid cell(s) that overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look
carefully at the survey effort (indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the "no data" indicator (a
red horizontal bar). A high survey effort is the key component. If the survey effort is high, then the probability of
presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack
of data and, therefore, a lack of certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting
point for identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might be there,
and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you know what to look for to
confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement conservation measures to avoid or minimize
potential impacts from your project activities, should presence be confirmed. To learn more about conservation
measures, visit the FAQ "Tell me about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to
migratory birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page.
Facilities
-(P
National Wildlife Refuge lands\\00°P
Any activity proposed on lands managed by the National Wildlife Refuge system must undergo a
'Compatibility Determination' conducted by the Refuge. Please contact the individual Refuges to
discuss any questions or concerns.
THERE ARE NO REFUGE LANDS AT THIS LOCATION.
Fish hatcheries
THERE ARE NO FISH HATCHERIES AT THIS LOCATION.
Wetlands in the National Wetlands Inventory
Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under Section 404
of the Clean Water Act, or other State/Federal statutes.
For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the local U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers District.
Please note that the NWI data being shown may be out of date. We are currently working to update
our NWI data set. We recommend you verify these results with a site visit to determine the actual
extent of wetlands on site.
This location overlaps the following wetlands:

FRESHWATER EMERGENT WETLAND
PEM1 C
FRESHWATER FORESTED/SHRUB WETLAND
PFO1 F
PSS1 C
PFO 1 /4C
PFO1C
PFO4A
PSS1 F
PSS4B
FRESHWATER POND
PAB/EM1 F
RIVERINE
R2UBH
A full description for each wetland code can be found at the National Wetlands Inventory website
Data limitations
The Service's objective of mapping wetlands and deepwater habitats is to produce reconnaissance level information
on the location, type and size of these resources. The maps are prepared from the analysis of high altitude imagery.
Wetlands are identified based on vegetation, visible hydrology and geography. A margin of error is inherent in the
use of imagery; thus, detailed on -the -ground inspection of any particular site may result in revision of the wetland
boundaries or classification established through image analysis.
The accuracy of image interpretation depends on the quality of the imagery, the experience of the image analysts,
the amount and quality of the collateral data and the amount of ground truth verification work conducted.
Metadata should be consulted to determine the date of the source imagery used and any mapping problems.
Wetlands or other mapped features may have changed since the date of the imagery or field work. There may be
occasional differences in polygon boundaries or classifications between the information depicted on the map and
the actual conditions on site.
Data exclusions
Certain wetland habitats are excluded from the National mapping program because of the limitations of aerial
imagery as the primary data source used to detect wetlands. These habitats include seagrasses or submerged
aquatic vegetation that are found in the intertidal and subtidal zones of estuaries and nearshore coastal waters.
Some deepwater reef communities (coral or tuberficid worm reefs) have also been excluded from the inventory.
These habitats, because of their depth, go undetected by aerial imagery.
Data precautions
Federal, state, and local regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over wetlands may define and describe wetlands in a
different manner than that used in this inventory. There is no attempt, in either the design or products of this
inventory, to define the limits of proprietary jurisdiction of any Federal, state, or local government or to establish the
geographical scope of the regulatory programs of government agencies. Persons intending to engage in activities
involving modifications within or adjacent to wetland areas should seek the advice of appropriate federal, state, or
local agencies concerning specified agency regulatory programs and proprietary jurisdictions that may affect such
activities.

■ ■m
—E■~■ NC DEPARTMENT OF
■ EI= NATURAL AN❑ CULTURAL RESOURCES
■.■■■
March 16, 2021
Kim Williams
Land Management Group, Inc.
3805 Wrightsville Avenue; Suite 15
Wilmington, NC 28403
RE: Lumber River Crossing
Dear Kim Williams:
Roy Cooper, Governor
D. Reid Wilson, Secretary
Walter Clark
Director, Division of Land and Water Stewardship
NCNHDE-14203
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
A query of the NCNHP database indicates that there are records for rare species, important natural
communities, natural areas, and/or conservation/managed areas within the proposed project
boundary. These results are presented in the attached `Documented Occurrences' tables and map.
The attached `Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is documented within the project area or indicated within a one -mile
radius of the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS) for guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
https://www.fws.gov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
Also please note that the NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional
correspondence if a Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Land and Water Fund
easement, or an occurrence of a Federally -listed species is documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at rodnev.butlerncdcr.aov or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOVRCES
Q 121 W. JONES STREET. RALEIGH. NC 27603 • 16S1 MAIL SERVICE CENTER. RALEIGH. NC 27699
OFC 'M9.707.9120 • FAX [phone]

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Intersecting the Project Area
Lumber River Crossing
March 16, 2021
NCNHDE-14203
Element Occurrences Documented Within Project Area
axono EO ID
Group
Scientific Nam ommon Name
Lases Element Accuracy
Observation Occurrence
Date Rank
Federal ' State Global State
Status Status Rank Rank
Amphibian 35428
Dragonfly or 33361
Damselfly
Dragonfly or 33366
Damselfly
Freshwater Fish15184
Freshwater Fish36947
Freshwater Fish36948
Vascular Plant 24760
Ambystoma mabeei
Stylurus ivae
Stylurus townesi
Cyprinella sp. cf.
zanema
Notropis chalybaeus
Notropis chalybaeus
Gelsemium rankinii
Natural Areas Documented Within Project Area
Site Name
Ashpole Swamp/Flat Swamp Confluence
Lumber River Swamp/Devils Elbow
Mabee's Salamander
Shining Clubtail
Townes' Clubtail
Thinlip Chub
Ironcolor Shiner
Ironcolor Shiner
Swamp Jessamine
1974-08-09
1965-09-11
1970-10-03
2016-06-22
1961-06-26
2005-08-04
2007-04-07
Representational Rating
R3 (High)
R3 (High)
H 3-Medium
H 3-Medium
H 3-Medium
E 3-Medium
H 3-Medium
E 3-Medium
CD 3-Medium
Collective Rating
C4 (Moderate)
C5 (General)
Managed Areas Documented Within Project Area*
Managed Area Name ner Type
Lumber State Natural and Scenic River NC DNCR, Division of Parks and Recreation State
Lumber National Wild and Scenic River US National Park Service Federal
Threatened
Significantly
Rare
Significantly
Rare
Special
Concern
Significantly
Rare
Significantly
Rare
Special
Concern
Vulnerable
G4 S2
G4 S1?
G3 SH
G2Q S2
G4 S2S3
G4 S2S3
G5 S1S2
NOTE: If the proposed project intersects with a conservation/managed area, please contact the landowner directly for additional information. If the project intersects with a Dedicated Nature Preserve
(DNP), Registered Natural Heritage Area (RHA), or Federally -listed species, NCNHP staff may provide additional correspondence regarding the project.
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at https://ncnhde.natureserve.ora/help. Data query generated on March 16, 2021; NCNHP, Q4 January 2021. Please
resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
source
Page 2 of 6

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Lumber River Crossing
March 16, 2021
NCNHDE-14203
Element Occurrences Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Taxonomic EO ID Scientific Name Common Name Last
Group
f i
Amphibian 35428
Amphibian 35492
Amphibian 35560
Animal 15201
Assemblage
Dragonfly or 33739
Damselfly
Dragonfly or 33769
Damselfly
Dragonfly or 33361
Damselfly
Dragonfly or 33366
Damselfly
Dragonfly or 33789
Damselfly
Freshwater Fish15184
Freshwater Fish36947
Freshwater Fish36948
Natural
Community
Natural
Community
9688
17495
Ambystoma mabeei Mabee's Salamander
Eurycea quadridigitata Dwarf Salamander
Pseudacris nigrita
Waterbird Colony
Somatochlora
georgiana
Somatochlora
georgiana
Stylurus ivae
Stylurus townesi
Triacanthagyna trifida
Cyprinella sp. cf.
zanema
Notropis chalybaeus
servation O
Date
1974-08-09
1948-03-29
Southern Chorus Frog 1956-02-10
Waterbird Colony
Coppery Emerald
Coppery Emerald
Shining Clubtail
Townes' Clubtail
Phantom Darner
Thinlip Chub
Ironcolor Shiner
Notropis chalybaeus Ironcolor Shiner
Blackwater
Bottomland
Hardwoods (High
Subtype)
Blackwater
Bottomland
Hardwoods (High
Subtype)
2008-04-30
2004-Pre
2004-Pre
1965-09-11
1970-10-03
2004-Pre
2016-06-22
1961-06-26
2005-08-04
2017-09-14
2010
Element Accuracy
Rank
H 3-Medium
H 4-Low
H 4-Low
C 4-Low
H? 5-Very
Low
H? 5-Very
Low
H 3-Medium
H 3-Medium
H? 5-Very
Low
E 3-Medium
H 3-Medium
E 3-Medium
A 4-Low
ccurrence
B? 3-Medium
Federal
Status
State Global State
tatus Rank Rank
Threatened G4 S2
Special G5 S1
Concern
Significantly G5
Rare
GNR
Significantly G3G4
Rare
Significantly G3G4
Rare
Significantly G4
Rare
Significantly G3
Rare
Significantly G5
Rare
Special G2Q
Concern
Significantly G4
Rare
Significantly G4
Rare
S2
S3
S1?
S1?
S1?
SH
SH
S2
S2S3
S2S3
G3G4 S2S3
G3G4 S2S3
Page 3 of 6

Element Occurrences Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Taxonomic
Group
Natural
Community
Natural
Community
Natural
Community
Natural
Community
Natural
Community
Natural
Community
Natural
Community
Reptile
Vascular Plant
30965 Blackwater
Bottomland
Hardwoods (Low
Subtype)
30026 Blackwater
Bottomland
Hardwoods (Low
Subtype)
30039 Blackwater
Bottomland
Hardwoods (Swamp
Transition Subtype)
802 Blackwater Levee/Bar
Forest
11066 Cypress --Gum Swamp
(Blackwater Subtype)
30041 Cypress --Gum Swamp
(Intermediate
Subtype)
12073 Sand and Mud Bar
(Blackwater Sand Bar
Subtype)
34709 Farancia
erytrogramma
23215 Ditrysinia fruticosa
Vascular Plant 24760 Gelsemium rankinii
EO ID Scientific Name Common Name Last
Observation
DAM
2010
2010
2010
1990-09-30
2017-09-14
2010
1990-09-30
Rainbow Snake 1963-06-02
Sebastian -bush 2008-05-14
Swamp Jessamine 2007-04-07
Natural Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Site Name epresentational Rating
Ashpole Swamp/Flat Swamp Confluence R3 (High)
Lumber River Swamp/Devils Elbow R3 (High)
Ashpole Swamp/NC 41 R3 (High)
Element
Occurrence
Rank
A 4-Low
Accuracy Federal
Status
B? 3-Medium
B? 3-Medium
B? 3-Medium
A 4-Low
B? 3-Medium
A? 4-Low
H 3-Medium
A 4-Low
CD 3-Medium
Collective Rating
C4 (Moderate)
C5 (General)
C5 (General)
State
Status
Significantly
Rare
Special
Concern
Vulnerable
Special
Concern
Vulnerable
Global State
Rank Rank
G4? S3
G4? S3
G3G5 S3
G2G3 S2S3
G4? S4
G4 S3S4
G2G3 S2S3
G4 S3
G5 S2
G5 S1S2
Page 4 of 6

Natural Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Site NamE Representational Rating
Bluff Swamp/Princess Ann Swamp R2 (Very High)
Managed Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
•
Collective Rating
C3 (High)
'anage• A rea ame wne Owner Type
Lumber State Natural and Scenic River NC DNCR, Division of Parks and Recreation State
Lumber National Wild and Scenic River US National Park Service Federal
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at https://ncnhde.natureserve.ora/help. Data query generated on March 16, 2021; source: NCNHP, Q4 January 2021. Please
resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 5 of 6

March 16, 2021
Project Boundary
O Buffered Project Boundary
NHP Natural Area (NHNA)
ID Managed Area (MAREA)
NCNHDE-14203: Lumber River Crossing
1:48,890
0 0.4 0.8
0 0.5 1 2 km
1.6 mi
Sources' Esri, HERE, Garmin,, Intermap, increment P Corp_. GEBCO, USGS,
FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esn Japan,
METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS
User Community
Page 6 of 6