20210920 Ver 1_CE_Cattlemans_Road__Bridge_141_replacement_20210503

v2019.1 n/a Type I(A) CE Page 1
Type I or II Categorical Exclusion Action Classification Form

STIP Project No. n/a
WBS Element DF17112.2049800
Federal Project No. n/a

A. Project Description:

Emergency bridge replacement for bridge #141 on SR 1585 (Cattleman’s Road) in Iredell County.

Existing bridge is a two-lane bridge consisting of three 40’ spans with steel girders and timber deck.
The existing superstructure is 20’-0” wide with a clear roadway width of 19’-3” and has two 9’ lanes
with 1’ shoulders. The foundations consist of timber piles at the end bents and at the interior bents.
The existing interior piers were located at the edge of the stream.

The proposed bridge replacement consists of three spans with a total length of 150’-0”’ with the interior
piers located outside the normal stream flow. The superstructure will have two 10’ foot lanes with 3’-
11” shoulders to prevent storm water from discharging directly into the stream. The bridge will be
designed using Sub-Regional Tier Guidelines with a design speed of 60 mph. The bridge length is
based on the approved hydraulic reports. The roadway grade and alignment will be approximately in
the same location as the existing structure.

Traffic has been detoured from SR 1585 (Cattleman’s Road) to SR 1581 (Damascus Church Road) to
NC 115 to SR 1583 (Mountain View Road and back to SR 1585 (Cattleman’s Road). The off-site
detour is approximately 4.3 miles.

B. Description of Need and Purpose:

The current bridge was completely washed out in a flood event in November 2021. The two existing
timber bents were completely washed away and all three of the existing spans were washed
downstream and deposited along the banks downstream.

Replacement of the bridge is necessary to restore service for vehicular traffic on SR 1585
Approximately 210 cars per day, buses, farm usage and emergency response use this route and with
a detour route of 4.3 miles, closing the bridge permanently is not a viable option.

Prior to the flood event, the bridge was listed as “functionally obsolete” with a rating of 60 out of a
possible 100. The superstructure and deck components were rated 6 out of a possible 9 and the
substructure was rated a 5 out of a possible 9.

C. Categorical Exclusion Action Classification:

Type I(A) - Ground Disturbing Action

D. Proposed Improvements:

28. Bridge rehabilitation, reconstruction, or replacement or the construction of grade separation to
replace existing at-grade railroad crossings, if the actions meet the constraints in 23 CFR
771.117(e)(1-6).

v2019.1 n/a Type I(A) CE Page 2

E. Special Project Information:

Project has no impacts to any historic properties or archaeological sites eligible for listing on the
National Register of Historic Places.

Estimated Costs:

Construction - $1,450,000
ROW - $15,000
Utility - $50,000

Estimate Traffic:
Current ADT - 210 vpd
Design ADT - 280 vpd
TTST - 2%
Dual - 2%

Design Exceptions: Design exceptions are anticipated for this project for vertical curvature.

Pedestrian and Bicycle Accommodations: SR 11585 is not part of a designated bicycle route.
There are no sidewalks or pedestrian paths located along the project corridor. No recommendation are
being made for bicycle or pedestrian facilities on the bridge.

Bridge Demolition: Iredell bridge #141 is constructed of steel girders and timber deck with timber
piers. Three of the bridge spans has washed out along the downstream benches and will be removed
with minimal impacts to the stream. The remaining portions of the bridge can be removed using
standard demolition practices.

Alternate Design: No alternate designs were considered due to the condition of the bridge post-flood
and a no build alternative would not be acceptable due to the volume of traffic served by SR 1585. The
existing alignment and grades are acceptable under the Subregional Design criteria so no alternate
alignments were considered.

Public Involvement: Several property owners who live along this route have called and inquired
about the time line for replacement of the bridge. Property owners adjacent to the bridge have been
contacted and notified of the ROW and easements required to replace this bridge.

NOTE: The following Type I(C) Actions (NCDOT-FHWA 2019 CE Agreement, Appendix A) only
require completion of Sections A through D to substantiate and document the CE classification: 1,
5, 8 (signs and pavement markings only), 11, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 19, and 20; or several other Type I
Action subcategories identified in past NCDOT-FHWA CE Programmatic Agreements (see
Appendix D). Pre-approval as a CE does not exempt activities from compliance with other
federal environmental laws.
v2019.1 n/a Type I(A) CE Page 3
F. Project Impact Criteria Checklists:

F2. Ground Disturbing Actions – Type I (Appendix A) & Type II (Appendix B)

Proposed improvement(s) that fit Type I Actions (NCDOT-FHWA CE Programmatic Agreement,
Appendix A) including 2, 3, 6, 7, 9, 12, 18, 21, 22 (ground disturbing), 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, &/or 30;
&/or Type II Actions (NCDOT-FHWA CE Programmatic Agreement, Appendix B) answer the project
impact threshold questions (below) and questions 8 – 31.

 If any question 1-7 is checked “Yes” then NCDOT certification for FHWA approval is required.
 If any question 8-31 is checked “Yes” then additional information will be required for those questions
in Section G.

PROJECT IMPACT THRESHOLDS
(FHWA signature required if any of the questions 1-7 are marked “Yes”.) Yes No
1 Does the project require formal consultation with U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS) or National Marine Fisheries Service (NMF S)? ☐ 
2 Does the project result in impacts subject to the conditions of the Bald and Golden
Eagle Protection Act (BGEPA)? ☐ 
3 Does the project generate substantial controversy or public opposition, for any
reason, following appropriate public involvement? ☐ 
4 Does the project cause disproportionately high and adverse impacts relative to low-
income and/or minority populations? ☐ 
5 Does the project involve a residential or commercial displacement, or a substantial
amount of right of way acquisition? ☐ 
6 Does the project require an Individual Section 4(f) approval? ☐ 
7
Does the project include adverse effects that cannot be resolved with a
Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) under Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act (NHPA) or have an adverse effect on a National Historic
Landmark (NHL)?
☐ 
If any question 8-31 is checked “Yes” then additional information will be required for those questions in
Section G.
Other Considerations Yes No
8 Is an Endangered Species Act (ESA) determination unresolved or is the project
covered by a Programmatic Agreement under Section 7?  ☐
9 Is the project located in anadromous fish spawning waters? ☐ 
10
Does the project impact waters classified as Outstanding Resource Water (ORW),
High Quality Water (HQW), Water Supply Watershed Critical Areas, 303(d) listed
impaired water bodies, buffer rules, or Submerged Aquatic Vegetation (SAV)?
 ☐
11 Does the project impact Waters of the United States in any of the designated
mountain trout streams? ☐ 
12 Does the project require a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Individual
Section 404 Permit? ☐ 
13 Will the project require an easement from a Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission (FERC) licensed facility? ☐ 
v2019.1 n/a Type I(A) CE Page 4
Other Considerations for Type I and II Ground Disturbing Actions (continued) Yes No
14
Does the project include a Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act
(NHPA) effects determination other than a No Effect, including archaeological
remains? ☐ 
15 Does the project involve GeoEnvironmental Sites of Concerns such as gas
stations, dry cleaners, landfills, etc.? ☐ 
16
Does the project require work encroaching and adversely affecting a regulatory
floodway or work affecting the base floodplain (100-year flood) elevations of a
water course or lake, pursuant to Executive Order 11988 and 23 CFR 650 subpart
A?
☐ 
17 Is the project in a Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) county and substantially
affects the coastal zone and/or any Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ☐ 
18 Does the project require a U.S. Coast Guard (USCG) permit? ☐ 
19 Does the project involve construction activities in, across, or adjacent to a
designated Wild and Scenic River present within the project area? ☐ 
20 Does the project involve Coastal Barrier Resources Act (CBRA) resources? ☐ 
21 Does the project impact federal lands (e.g. U.S. Forest Service (USFS), USFWS,
etc.) or Tribal Lands? ☐ 
22 Does the project involve any changes in access control or the modification or
construction of an interchange on an interstate? ☐ 
23 Does the project have a permanent adverse effect on local traffic patterns or
community cohesiveness? ☐ 
24 Will maintenance of traffic cause substantial disruption? ☐ 
25 Is the project inconsistent with the STIP, and where applicable, the Metropolitan
Planning Organization’s (MPO’s) Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)? ☐ 
26
Does the project require the acquisition of lands under the protection of Section 6(f)
of the Land and Water Conservation Act, the Federal Aid in Fish Restoration Act,
the Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration Act, Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA),
Tribal Lands, or other unique areas or special lands that were acquired in fee or
easement with public-use money and have deed restrictions or covenants on the
property?
☐ 
27 Does the project involve Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) buyout
properties under the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP)? ☐ 
28 Does the project include a de minimis or programmatic Section 4(f)? ☐ 
29 Is the project considered a Type I under the NCDOT Noise Policy? ☐ 
30 Is there prime or important farmland soil impacted by this project as defined by the
Farmland Protection Policy Act (FPPA)?  ☐
31 Are there other issues that arose during the project development process that
affected the project decision? ☐ 

v2019.1 n/a Type I(A) CE Page 5
G. Additional Documentation as Required from Section F (ONLY for questions marked ‘Yes’):

Question 8 – Threatened and Endangered Species:

Northern long-eared bat
USFWS Recommended Survey Window: June 1 – August 15

Biological Conclusion: May Affect; Not Likely to Adversely Affect
During field investigations on December 11, 2020 the area was assessed for suitable bat habitat. The area
adjacent to the bridge being forested was found to provide suitable habitat. Natural Heritage Program
records document the nearest Northern Long-Eared Bat location approximately 32 miles northwest of the
proposed project area. The closest listed underground mine, per NHP database is the O F Patterson
Mine, 6.4 miles southwest of the project. There are currently no known hibernaculum or maternity roost
trees in Division 12 counties for NLEB; therefore, the minor tree clearing associated with this DOT project
would be exempted from incidental take under the 4(d) Rule streamlined consultation form. Per guidance
from USFWS personnel, concurrence is granted by citing the following website and a 30-day response
period is waved. http://www.fws.gov/asheville/htmls/project_review/NLEB_in_WNC.html

Question 10 – 303(d) streams:

The North Carolina 2018 Final 303(d) list of impaired waters identifies Snow Creek as an impaired water
due to exceeding the criteria of fish community. Snow Creek is shown in Figure 2 and more details can be
found in the NRTR. Design includes replacement of the failed bridge on same location, see Roadway
Plans.

Question 30 – Prime or Important Farmland Soils:

The project is located in an area with Prime Farmland, Dan River and Comus soils and also Farmland of
Local Importance soils, Woolwine-Fairview-Westfield complex. The project area consists of roadway right
of way and an active steam channel with a small riparian buffer. There appears to be some active
agricultural operations within the project area.

v2019.1 n/a Type I(A) CE Page 6

H. Project Commitments (attach as Green Sheet to CE Form):

NCDOT PROJECT COMMITMENTS

STIP Project No. n/a
Bridge Replacement
Iredell County
Federal Aid Project No. n/a
WBS Element DF17112.2049800

Division 12 Construction – 303(d) listed streams
The North Carolina 2018 Final 303(d) list of impaired waters identifies Snow Creek as an impaired water
due to exceeding the criteria of fish community. Therefore, NCDOT will implement Design Standards for
Sensitive Watersheds.

Division 12 Project Development - Prime or Important Farmland Soils
This project is located within an area with Farmland of Local/Statewide Importance soils.
If federal funds are used for the project, a farmland evaluation will be conducted prior to
construction.
v2019.1 n/a Type I(A) CE Page 7
I. Categorical Exclusion Approval:

STIP Project No. n/a
WBS Element DF17112.2049800
Federal Project No. n/a

Prepared By:

Date Jeffrey L. Wyatt, Division Environmental Officer
North Carolina Department of Transportation, Division 12

Prepared For:

Reviewed By:

Date Steven Rackley P.E. Bridge Project Manager
NCDOT Division 12

☐ Approved
 If NO grey boxes are checked in Section F (pages 2
and 3), NCDOT approves the Type I or Type II
Categorical Exclusion.

☐ Certified
 If ANY grey boxes are checked in Section F (pages 2
and 3), NCDOT certifies the Type I or Type II
Categorical Exclusion for FHWA approval.
 If classified as Type III Categorical Exclusion.

Date Mark E. Stafford P.E. Division Engineer
North Carolina Department of Transportation

FHWA Approved: For Projects Certified by NCDOT (above), FHWA signature required.

N/A
Date for John F. Sullivan, III, PE, Division Administrator
Federal Highway Administration

Note: Prior to ROW or Construction authorization, a consultation may be required (please see
Section VII of the NCDOT-FHWA CE Programmatic Agreement for more details).

NCDOT Division 12
4/14/2021
X
4/19/2021
4/20/2021
v2019.1 n/a Type I(A) CE Page 8

ATTACHMENT A

FIGURES AND AGENCY COORDINATION

£¤64
"X90
")115
")90£¤64
Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan,
Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand),
NGCC, (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
Vicinity | Figure 1
Bridge 141 Replacment | Iredell County
DF17112.2049800 | SR 1585 | Cattleman's Road
State of North Carolina
Department of Transportation
1 in = 8,333 ft
0 8,3334,166.5
FeetU
Bridge 141
Snow CreekSnow CreekSource: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus
DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community
Environmental Features | Figure 2
Bridge 141 Replacment | Iredell County
DF17112.2049800 | SR 1585 | Cattleman's Road
State of North Carolina
Department of Transportation
Legend
Study Area
Streams
303(d) list
1 in = 208 ft
0 208104
FeetU
Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society, i-cubed
Figure 3
Bridge 141 Replacment | Iredell County
DF17112.2049800 | SR 1585 | Cattleman's Road
State of North Carolina
Department of Transportation
Legend
Study Area
1 in = 833 ft
0 833416.5
FeetU
H i
s t o r
i c A
r
c h i
t e
c
t u r e a n d L a n d s
c
a p e s N O S U R V E Y R E Q U I R E D f o r m f o r M
i
n o r T r a n s p o r t a t
i
o n P r o j e
c
ts a s Q u a l
i
f
i
e d
i
n t
h
e 2 0 0 7 P r o g r a m m a t
i c A
g r e e m e n t .
P a g e 1 o f 3
H I S T O R I C A R C H I T E C T U R E A N D L A N D S C A P E S
N O S U R V E Y R E Q U I R E D F O R M
T h i s f o r m o n l y p e r t a i n s t o H i s t o r i c A r c h i t e c t u r e a n d L a n d s c a p e s f o r t h i s p r o j e c t .I t
i s n o t v a l i d f o r A r c h a e o l o g i c a l R e s o u r c e s .Y o u m u s t c o n s u l t s e p a r a t e l y w i t h t h e
A r c h a e o l o g y G r o u p .
P R O J E C T I N F O R M A T I O N
P r o j e c t N o :C o u n t y :I r e d e l l
W B S N o .:D F 1 7 1 1 2 . 2 0 9 8 0 0 D o c u m e n t
T y p e :
F e d e r a l C E
F e d .A i d N o :F u n d i n g :S t a t e F e d e r a l
F e d e r a l
P e r m i t (s ):
Y e s N o P e r m i t
T y p e (s ):
F H W A U S A C E D W R
P r o j e c t D e s c r i p t i o n :R e p l a c e f a i l e d B r i d g e 1 4 1 o v e r S n o w C r e e k o n S R 1 5 8 5 (C a t t l e m a n ’ s
R o a d )
S U M M A R Y O F H I S T O R I C A R C H I T E C T U R E A N D L A N D S C A P E S R E V I E W
D e s c r i p t i o n o f r e v i e w a c t i v i t i e s ,r e s u l t s ,a n d c o n c l u s i o n s :
R e v i e w o f H P O q u a d m a p s ,H P O G I S i n f o r m a t i o n ,h i s t o r i c d e s i g n a t i o n s r o s t e r ,a n d i n d e x e s w a s
u n d e r t a k e n o n J a n u a r y 1 2 ,2 0 2 1 .B a s e d o n t h i s r e v i e w ,t h e r e a r e n o e x i s t i n g N R ,S L ,L D ,D E ,o r
S S p r o p e r t i e s i n t h e A r e a o f P o t e n t i a l E f f e c t s ,w h i c h i s d e f i n e d o n t h e f o l l o w i n g m a p s .A v i s u a l
s u r v e y o f t h e A P E i d e n t i f i e d n o s t r u c t u r e s w i t h i n t h e A P E .T h e r e a r e n o N a t i o n a l R e g i s t e r l i s t e d
o r e l i g i b l e p r o p e r t i e s a n d n o s u r v e y i s r e q u i r e d .I f d e s i g n p l a n s c h a n g e ,a d d i t i o n a l r e v i e w w i l l b e
r e q u i r e d .
W h y t h e a v a i l a b l e i n f o r m a t i o n p r o v i d e s a r e l i a b l e b a s i s f o r r e a s o n a b l y p r e d i c t i n g t h a t t h e r e
a r e n o u n i d e n t i f i e d s i g n i f i c a n t h i s t o r i c a r c h i t e c t u r a l o r l a n d s c a p e r e s o u r c e s i n t h e p r o j e c t
a r e a :
H P O q u a d m a p s a n d G I S i n f o r m a t i o n r e c o r d i n g N R ,S L ,L D ,D E ,a n d S S p r o p e r t i e s f o r t h e
I r e d e l l C o u n t y s u r v e y ,I r e d e l l C o u n t y G I S / T a x i n f o r m a t i o n ,a n d G o o g l e M a p s a r e c o n s i d e r e d
v a l i d f o r t h e p u r p o s e s o f d e t e r m i n i n g t h e l i k e l i h o o d o f h i s t o r i c r e s o u r c e s b e i n g p r e s e n t .T h e r e
a r e n o N a t i o n a l R e g i s t e r l i s t e d o r e l i g i b l e p r o p e r t i e s w i t h i n t h e A P E a n d n o s u r v e y i s r e q u i r e d .
S U P P O R T D O C U M E N T A T I O N
M a p (s )P r e v i o u s S u r v e y I n f o .P h o t o s C o r r e s p o n d e n c e D e s i g n P l a n s
F I N D I N G B Y N C D O T A R C H I T E C T U R A L H I S T O R I A N
H i s t o r i c A r c h i t e c t u r e a n d L a n d s c a p e s N O S U R V E Y R E Q U I R E D

Kate Husband January 12, 2021
N C D O T A r c h i t e c t u r a l H i s t o r i a n D a t e
2 1 0 1 0 0 0 4
Project Tracking No. (Internal Use)
P r o j e c t T r a c k i n g N o .
2 1 0 1 0 0 0 4
2 0 2 0 P R O G R A M M A T I C A G R E E M E N T A R C H A E O L O G Y T E A M “ N O N A T I O N A L R E G I S T E R E L I G I B L E O R L I S T E D A R C H A E O L O G I C A L S I T E S P R E S E N T ” F O R M
1 o f 1 5
N O N A T I O N A L R E G I S T E R O F H I S T O R I C P L A C E S
E L I G I B L E O R L I S T E D A R C H A E O L O G I C A L S I T E S
P R E S E N T F O R M
T h i s f o r m o n l y p e r t a i n s t o A R C H A E O L O G I C A L R E S O U R C E S f o r t h i s p r o j e c t .
I t i s n o t v a l i d f o r H i s t o r i c A r c h i t e c t u r e a n d L a n d s c a p e s .Y o u m u s t c o n s u l t
s e p a r a t e l y w i t h t h e H i s t o r i c A r c h i t e c t u r e a n d L a n d s c a p e s T e a m .
P R O J E C T I N F O R M A T I O N
P r o j e c t N o :C o u n t y :I r e d e l l
W B S N o :D F 1 7 1 1 2 . 2 0 4 9 8 0 0 D o c u m e n t :F e d e r a l C a t e g o r i c a l E x c l u s i o n
F . A .N o :F u n d i n g :S t a t e F e d e r a l
F e d e r a l P e r m i t R e q u i r e d ?Y e s N o P e r m i t T y p e :U S A C E ;D W R
P r o j e c t D e s c r i p t i o n :
R e p l a c e B r i d g e 1 4 1 o n S R 1 5 8 5 ( C a t t l e m a n ' s R d . )o v e r S n o w C r e e k i n I r e d e l l C o u n t y .T h i s i s a n
e m e r g e n c y b r i d g e r e p l a c e m e n t d u e t o a f l a s h f l o o d e v e n t .T h e f a i l e d 2 0 f t .w i d e s t e e l a n d t i m b e r
b r i d g e w i l l b e r e p l a c e d o n t h e s a m e a l i g n m e n t w i t h a 3 3 f t .w i d e c o n c r e t e b r i d g e .T h e A r e a o f
P o t e n t i a l E f f e c t s (A . P . E . )i s a p p r o x i m a t e l y 1 2 2 m e t e r s ( 4 0 0 f t . )l o n g a n d 7 6 m e t e r s ( 2 5 0 f t . )w i d e .
T h e p r o j e c t i s s t a t e f u n d e d a n d w i l l r e q u i r e f e d e r a l p e r m i t s ,s o t h i s r e v i e w i s c o n d u c t e d p u r s u a n t
t o S e c t i o n 1 0 6 o f t h e N a t i o n a l H i s t o r i c P r e s e r v a t i o n A c t .
S U M M A R Y O F A R C H A E O L O G I C A L F I N D I N G S
T h e N o r t h C a r o l i n a D e p a r t m e n t o f T r a n s p o r t a t i o n (N C D O T )A r c h a e o l o g y T e a m h a s r e v i e w e d
t h e s u b j e c t p r o j e c t a n d d e t e r m i n e d :
T h e r e a r e n o N a t i o n a l R e g i s t e r l i s t e d A R C H A E O L O G I C A L S I T E S w i t h i n t h e p r o j e c t ’ s a r e a
o f p o t e n t i a l e f f e c t s .( A t t a c h a n y n o t e s o r d o c u m e n t s a s n e e d e d . )
N o s u b s u r f a c e a r c h a e o l o g i c a l i n v e s t i g a t i o n s w e r e r e q u i r e d f o r t h i s p r o j e c t .
S u b s u r f a c e i n v e s t i g a t i o n s d i d n o t r e v e a l t h e p r e s e n c e o f a n y a r c h a e o l o g i c a l r e s o u r c e s .
S u b s u r f a c e i n v e s t i g a t i o n s d i d n o t r e v e a l t h e p r e s e n c e o f a n y a r c h a e o l o g i c a l r e s o u r c e s
c o n s i d e r e d e l i g i b l e f o r t h e N a t i o n a l R e g i s t e r .
A l l i d e n t i f i e d a r c h a e o l o g i c a l s i t e s l o c a t e d w i t h i n t h e A P E h a v e b e e n c o n s i d e r e d a n d a l l
c o m p l i a n c e f o r a r c h a e o l o g i c a l r e s o u r c e s w i t h S e c t i o n 1 0 6 o f t h e N a t i o n a l H i s t o r i c
P r e s e r v a t i o n A c t a n d G S 1 2 1 1 2 ( a )h a s b e e n c o m p l e t e d f o r t h i s p r o j e c t .
B r i e f d e s c r i p t i o n o f r e v i e w a c t i v i t i e s ,r e s u l t s o f r e v i e w ,a n d c o n c l u s i o n s :
S e e a t t a c h e d r e p o r t
(T h i s p r o j e c t f a l l s w i t h i n a N o r t h C a r o l i n a C o u n t y i n w h i c h t h e f o l l o w i n g f e d e r a l l y r e c o g n i z e d t r i b e s
h a v e e x p r e s s e d a n i n t e r e s t :C h e r o k e e N a t i o n ;C a t a w b a I n d i a n N a t i o n .W e r e c o m m e n d t h a t y o u
e n s u r e t h a t t h i s d o c u m e n t a t i o n i s f o r w a r d e d t o t h e s e t r i b e s u s i n g t h e p r o c e s s d e s c r i b e d i n t h e c u r r e n t
N C D O T T r i b a l P r o t o c o l a n d P A P r o c e d u r e s M a n u a l . )
S U P P O R T D O C U M E N T A T I O N
S e e a t t a c h e d :M a p ( s )P r e v i o u s S u r v e y I n f o P h o t o s C o r r e s p o n d e n c e
O t h e r :
P r o j e c t T r a c k i n g N o .
2 1 0 1 0 0 0 4
2 0 2 0 P R O G R A M M A T I C A G R E E M E N T A R C H A E O L O G Y T E A M “ N O N A T I O N A L R E G I S T E R E L I G I B L E O R L I S T E D A R C H A E O L O G I C A L S I T E S P R E S E N T ” F O R M
2 o f 1 5
S i g n e d :
C A L E B S M I T H 4 /1 2 / 2 0 2 1
N C D O T A R C H A E O L O G I S T D a t e