20130121 Ver 1_Application_20130208

2 0 1 3 0 1 2 '� Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre - Construction Notification PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 14 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes
® No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
N 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ® Riparian Buffer Authorization
le. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes N No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
❑ Yes
® No
1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
® Yes
❑ No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project:
17BP.2.R.15 Beaufort 241
2b. County:
Beaufort
2c. Nearest municipality / town:
Washington
2d. Subdivision name:
N/A
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
17BP.2.R.15
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
North Carolina Department of Tramsportation
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
N/A
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
N/A
3d. Street address:
105 Pactolus Highway NC 33 P.O. Box 1587
3e. City, state, zip:
Greenville, NC 27835
3f. Telephone no.:
252 - 439 -2800
3g. Fax no.:
252 - 830 -3341
3h. Email address:
jbjohnson @ncdot.gov
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent ® Other, specify: Division 2 Environmental Officer
4b. Name:
Jay B. Johnson
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
North Carolina Department of Transportation
4d. Street address:
P.O. Box 1587
4e. City, state, zip:
Greenville, NC 27835
4f. Telephone no.:
252- 439 -2800
4g. Fax no.:
252- 830 -3341
4h. Email address:
jbjohnson @ncdot.gov
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
5c. Street address:
5d. City, state, zip:
5e. Telephone no.:
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
Page 2 of 10'
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
17BP.2.R.15 Beaufort 241 Bridge to Pipe Replacement
SR 1530 Baseline Road over Branch of Pungo Creek
Latitude: 35.612543 Longitude: -
1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
76.877400
(DD.DDDDDD) ( -DD DDDDDD)
1c. Property size:
N/A acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
Fork Swamp Branch of Pungo Creek
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C; Sw; NSW
2c. River basin:
Tar - Pamlico
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
SR 1530, Baseline Road is a paved Secondary State Highway. Woodlands and agriculture dominate the landscape.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0 Sq.Ft. (0 Acres) of Wetland Impacts for the Bridge to Pipe Replacement.
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
60' This site is part of a longer adjacent stream system.
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
Bridge to pipe replacement; the existing bridge has deteriorated and needs replacing.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The existing 36' long timber bridge on timber pilings will be replaced with a proposed 45'x 22' -1" x 9' -3" aluminum box
culvert.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
El Yes ®No El Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
❑ preliminary ❑ Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency /Consultant Company:
Name (if known):
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

f
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ® Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
W1 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W3 ❑ P FIT
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
29. Total wetland impacts
None
2h. Comments: No wetland impacts
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 ®P ❑ T
Pipe
Branch of Pungo
® PER
❑ Corps
10'
45'
Creek
❑ INT
® DWQ
S2 ❑ P ® T
Pipe
Branch of Pungo
® PER
❑ Corps
10'
40'
Creek
❑ INT
® DWQ
S3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
85'
3i. Comments: 85 linear feet of Stream Impacts.
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
4b.
4c.
4d.
4e.
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact number -
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
T
-Temporary
01 ❑P ❑T
02 ❑P ❑T
03 ❑P ❑T
04 ❑P ❑T
4f. Total open water impacts
None
4g. Comments: None
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
5b.
5c.
5d.
5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose
(acres)
number
of pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
None
5g. Comments: None
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse ®Tar- Pamlico El Other:
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
69.
Buffer impact
number-
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
T
impact
required?
-Temporary
131 ®P ❑ T
Fill
Branch of Pungo Creek
®Nos
555
340
B2 ® P ❑ T
Fill
Branch of Pungo Creek
® Yes s
180
0
B3 ® P ❑ T
Fill
Branch of Pungo Creek
® Yes s
130
5
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments: See Sheet 5 -A for Total Buffer Impacts
Page 5 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
4b.
4c.
4d.
4e.
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact number-
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
01 ❑P ❑T
02 ❑P ❑T
03 ❑P ❑T
04 ❑P ❑T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
5b.
5c.
5d.
5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose
(acres)
number
of pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse El Tar-Pamlico El Other:
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number -
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary T
impact
required?
131 ® P ❑ T
B 4 Fill
Branch of Pungo Creek
® Nos
80
40
B2 ❑P ❑T
El Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
945
385
6i. Comments: 0.02 Acres of Buffer Zone 1 Impacts and 0.009 Acres of Buffer Zone 2 Impacts.
Page A 10
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
There are no 404 Wetland Impacts for this project and no Coastal Wetland Impacts; However there are 945 square feet of
Buffer Zone 1 Impacts and 385 square feet of Buffer Zone 2 Impacts due to the installation of a 45'x 22' -1" x 9' -3" aluminum
box culvert to replace the existing bridge. The Utility Relocation will have no 404 WEtland Impacts nor Buffer Impacts.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Use of existing roadway to operate construction equipment; no equipment will enter wetlands.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ® No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑' Mitigation bank
El Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: _
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
\ linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g.'Coastal (tidal).wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
S. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
❑ Yes ® No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone'of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c.
6d.
6e.
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
N/A
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
® Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Comments: Stormwater will diffuse flow through vegetated uplands before entering
® Yes ❑ No
stream.
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
N/A Roadway /Bridge Project %
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
® Yes ❑ No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
Stormwater will diffuse flow through vegetated uplands before entering stream.
❑ Certified Local Government
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
® DWQ 401 Unit
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
N/A
❑ Phase II
3b.
Which of the following locally - implemented stormwater management programs
❑ NSW
El USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other: N/A
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ® No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a.
Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006 -246
❑ Other: NPDES Permit
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ® No
attached?
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the
® Yes
❑ No
use of public (federal /state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes
® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes
❑ No
letter.)
Comments:,
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes
® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after - the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes
® No
2c.
If you answered "yes' to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes
® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered 'yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a.
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non- discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N/A
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered'Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near,an area with federally, protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with'the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes 9 No
impacts?
❑ Raleigh
5c. If yes, ind icate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d. ' What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered, Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
Onsite field investigation by Jay Johnson "No, Effect"
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an'area designated as essential,fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. What, data -sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
Mr. Travis Wilson, NCWRC - See Attached Letter
7. Historic.or Prehistoric Cultural "Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will,this project occur in or near an.area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
'in
❑Yes. ®,No
status (e.g., National Historic:Trust designation or properties significant
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b.. What data sources did you use to determine whether, your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
NCDOT HEU Historic Architecture'and Archaeology -:See Attached Letter
8, Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA- designated 100 -year floodplaln? ® Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes; explain noisy project meets FEIUTA requirements: Designed to no -rise standards.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the.floodplain determination? FEMA FIRM Maps
lay' [3: Johnson �°) �;
February 1,
2013
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name ; /App a , i�Agent's Signature
! Date
i (Agent's signature S valid ogiy if an authorization letter from the applicant
t i,
is provided.)
Page 10 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

TI
tntsq Tfqc
kln Alt ttnf�r,
�x
11 -11 -0067 j
NO SURVEY REQUIRED FORM
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project No: BRIDGE NO. 241 County. Beaufort
WBS No: 17BP.2.R.15 Document: Minimum Criteria Sheet
F. A. No: n/a Funding: ® State ❑ Federal
Federal (USACE) Permit Required? ® Yes ❑ No Permit Type: Nationwide
Project Description: Replace Bridge No. 241 over Fork Swamp on SR1530 (Baseline Rd) in Beaufort
County, North Carolina. Replace the existing 36ft long by 20.Ift wide timber bridge with a proposed
pipe /aluminum box culvert. The archaeological APE is defined as a 400ft. long (200ft. from each bridge
endpoint) and 60ft wide corridor (row) centered upon the bridge location and SR1530 center -line.
SUMMARY OF CULTURAL RESOURCES REVIEW
Brief description of review activities, results of review, and conclusions:
A map review and site file search was conducted at the Office of State Archaeology on Monday,
November 28, 2011. No previously recorded archaeological sites are situated within the currently defined
APE, project study area, or general vicinity. A review of NRRP listed archaeological properties /districts
within Beaufort County identified no such resources within or adjacent to the presently defined APE.
Furthermore, topographic maps, historic maps (NCMaps website), USDA soil survey maps (Me &
Ly /poorly drained), archaeological reference materials, and aerial photographs (Google) were
utilized/inspected to gauge environmental factors that may have contributed to historic or prehistoric
settlement within the project limits, and to assess the level of modern, agricultural, hydrological, and
other erosive -type disturbances within and surrounding the archaeological APE.
Brief Explanation of why the available information provides a reliable basis for reasonably predicting
that there are no unidentified historic properties in the APE:
Topographic maps and aerial photographs evidence channelized ditches throughout the agricultural fields
that characterize the project study area and those sections surrounding it. This denotes the former and on-
going reclaimation of marginal swamp /marsh lands for agricultural pursuits. Prior to the draining of this
area, and without any elevated landforms, prehistoric and historic occupants would not have settled in
such a formidable and poorly drained swamp environment. Due largely to the diminutive scope of the
proposed project and relatively minute construction footprint subsuming only the existing right -of -way,
significant archaeological or cultural resources are unlikely to be affected by the project. Aerial
photographs and NRCS soil data demonstrate that the project area is largely typified by poorly
drained/hydric soils and largely uninhabitable, reclaimed swampland. No further archaeological work is
recommended for this Division 2 low impact bridge replacement project.
"No Surrey Reyutred" form for Minor Tran. portanon Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement
NCDOT Archaeology & Historic Architecture Groups

ti
SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
See attached: ® Map(s) ® Previous Survey Info ❑ Photos
❑ Photocopy of County Survey Notes
FINDING BY NCDOT CULTURAL RESOURCES PROFESSIONAL
NO SURVEY REQUIRED
NCDOT Cultural Resources Specialist
❑Correspondence
"Aro Surrey Required "form for A4mor 7ransportaaon Projects as Qual fed to the 1007 Programmatic Agreement
NCDOT Archaeology & Historic Architecture Groups
Date

F
REQUEST FOR CULTURAL
RESOURCES REVIEW FORM
Project 7rackmg No. (Internal Use)
ll-ll -0 ©�7
MEMORANDUM TO:
Drew Joyner, Human Environment Unit
1598 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699 -1598
ENTERED NOd 21
201A
ATTENTION:
Matt Wilkerson, Archaeology Supervisor
�s'f 'tF- 'Q;
r,� l it.: j c� g
x� j
Mary Pope Furr, Historic Architecture Supervisorm--
=•.+.t
FROM:
First Last Mike Sutton
Title Division 2 Environmental Specialist
<<
SUBJECT:
Request for Cultural Resources Review On Beaufort
Baseline Road Over Fork Swamp Bridge to Box Culvert
Replacement
County
Beaufort
DATE:
November 9, 2011
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project No: N/A County: Beaufort
WBSNo: 17BP2.R.15 Document: Minimum Criteria Sheet
E.A. No: N/A Funding: ® State ❑ Federal
USGS Quad: Bunyan USGS Quad Map Sheet Number 7 of The Soil Survey of Beaufort County
Project Description: Beauforl 241, Replace Existing 36' Long by 20.1 ' Wide Timber Bridge with a
Proposed Pipe /Aluminum Box Culvert ; SR 1530, Baseline Road Over Fork Swamp atG� f(G .��
!V 'C #r\J& - -0
Purpose & Need.• The purpose of this project is to replace the Existing Bridge, built in 1977, with a
Proposed Pipe and /or Aluminum Box Culvert.
SCHEDULING AND CONTACT INFORMATION
Date Needed: December, 2011
Engineer.- PE Maria Rogerson, Tel [phone] Email marogerson @ncdot_gov
DESIGN INFORMATION
Project Length: 1000 Feet 500 Feet From Each End of the Existing Bridge
Exist. R/W.-
Exist. Speed Limit:
Exist. X- Section:
Detour Route:
Structure Type:
60'
55
N/A
None
Timber Floor on Timber
Pilings
Proposed R/W: 60'
- Proposed Speed Limit. 55
Year Built: 1977

Brame, Bill Jr.
From: Johnson, Jay B
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2012 3:27 PM
To: Spillers, Shelby L
Cc: Brame, Bill Jr.; Rogerson, Maria A
Subject: RE: Bridge 241 Beaufort
Thank You!
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From: Spillers, Shelby L
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2012 3:25 PM
To: Johnson, Jay B
Cc: Furr, Mary Pope
Subject: Bridge 241 Beaufort
Hi Jay,
I have completed the survey for the above referenced bridge and have found no historic properties. Let me know if you
have any questions.
Thanks and have a great day!
Shelby Spillers
NC DOT - Architectural Historian
1598 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699 -1598
Office 919 - 707 -6088_
Fax 919 - 212 -5785
Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third
parties.
1

Brame, Bill Jr.
From:
Lane, Stephen
Sent:
Tuesday, November 29, 2011 4:01 PM
To:
Sutton, Michael W
Cc:
Rogerson, Maria A; Johnson, Jay B
Subject:
RE: Beaufort 241
Hi Mike,
I visited the proposed bridge replacement project at Bridge 241 on SR1530(Baseline Road) over Fork Swamp in Beaufort
County with Jay and determined that the project is not located within one of DCM's AECs and therefore will not require
a permit from the Division of Coastal Management. Please let me know if I can be of any further assistance with this
project.
Sincerely,
Stephen Lane
Coastal Management Representative
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From: Sutton, Michael W
Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 20112:17 PM
To: Lane, Stephen
Cc: Rogerson, Maria A; Johnson, Jay B
Subject: Beaufort 241
Hey Mr. Stephen .... We would like to get a CAMA Jurisdictional Call on Beaufort 241 .... Thank You, Sir .... mike
Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third
parties.

Response Moratorium Beaufort 241.txt
From: Wilson, Travis W.
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 11:26 AM
To: Sutton, Michael W
Cc: Rogerson, Maria A; Johnson, Jay B
Subject: RE: Beaufort 241
WRC does not have any specific concerns with this project.
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From: Sutton, Michael W
sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2011 2:31 PM
To: Wilson, Travis W.
Cc: Rogerson, Maria A; Johnson, Jay B
subject: Beaufort 241
Hey Mr. Travis... Division 2 plans to replace Beaufort 241, Bridge to Pipe; we would
like to know if a moratorium exists in this location... Many Thanks ... mike
Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records
Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
Page 1

ort 241\b241_ddc2jpsh_ per —t.dgn
y O
O y
mm i o
og N
rn
ryl
V)tn y y
mGa ° °m n u
il-I nr A
co LA
Ln (n �� z
C n
rn
a
mm
NC)D
rnrn
��
N�
Z D
o m �-
CE)
Iv - 00 =0 Ln
�0 G ox�z
>C)n O(-0
W N F\) F-
r-
000 O
-r1
6>
U-1
I� \yJ I� \yJ
rn m
n n
2 o s
imam
Y
.,I +
CA
M)
D o0
U) m
Q
mn
= C
Q'
z cn r
� O zq
OWD
NLO
M cn
O
Loo
°moo-
y�
O
z��00
Dc'
C7
n � 0 6�
O
U-1
NOr-
O
_j D
c
c O
l9
N
NC)D
rnrn
��
N�
Z D
o m �-
CE)
Iv - 00 =0 Ln
�0 G ox�z
>C)n O(-0
W N F\) F-
r-
000 O
-r1
6>
U-1
I� \yJ I� \yJ
rn m
n n
2 o s
imam
Y
.,I +
L.I
CJ
N N
---- -Z ZS„ T
Z
n
M
N
b
(n � n �
u+000
arnarn
P
V
C.+,l
w
L
n
I
I
m
W
0
rn
C
Z!
fil
O
N
O
M.M
rJ +
I r
I
I
\,I
® 1m
® I / A�
iirnl�.
I' I rn
I
I
I
I
I�
1+
�uCO
---100
r
m m
X X
� N
cZi
100'09 Z
c�
aFAMoNs
0
CA
M)
C)
Z 713
Q
mn
o
nc
r-
� O zq
zz
C13 N
Ln =
y
�
N
oCz
y�
z�
mrn
o
n�
� D
co �:u
m
i NBC
L.I
CJ
N N
---- -Z ZS„ T
Z
n
M
N
b
(n � n �
u+000
arnarn
P
V
C.+,l
w
L
n
I
I
m
W
0
rn
C
Z!
fil
O
N
O
M.M
rJ +
I r
I
I
\,I
® 1m
® I / A�
iirnl�.
I' I rn
I
I
I
I
I�
1+
�uCO
---100
r
m m
X X
� N
cZi
100'09 Z
c�
aFAMoNs
0
CA
o�
Cc
Cn m
�rn
W
0
r-
� O zq
zz
C13 N
Ln =
y
�
N
O
Oo
y�
N�C
C
cz
`
�
cz
� D
co �:u
m
i NBC
1l
rn
r—�C
NZ�W
>X�0
%0
ZZS± 4Z�
<<
\Q 0MiiM,
rn
w ZT`
O mM
Z
y
N
o
m ���
� N�rqiirn,,
N N
�� o2°po2
rn
rn
y
POT Stoo /0+00-00
CA
o
CC)
Cc
Cn m
�
W
' CGc�
r-
cz
"I
zz
C13 N
rn�
NQ
O
°rz, ago
z
N
Z
y
N
o
m ���
� N�rqiirn,,
N N
�� o2°po2
rn
rn
y
POT Stoo /0+00-00
z)Nd�-9
POT
/99
0
0
y m
� c
ED rri L4
V) rrl
rn
� m
p OD
�n Tn t = 0� N g y
�o rn rn rrnz o�w° a
tN�OOlaic
::o No r�,1 N rr, k ,+ Q a
c�� °o8 � ter"
_ 00 2g
to :10 rrl
rri o r'' s Rz
g crn
2 11
rn
0
o
t o
� 2 C
o
o �
CA
o
CC)
D ID
Cn m
�
= C
C
r-
cz
"I
zz
C13 N
6� (
Loo
O
°rz, ago
z
O
Oo
DC-)
coo
n�:u00
Ul
NOr
O
� D
co �:u
o
co O
z)Nd�-9
POT
/99
0
0
y m
� c
ED rri L4
V) rrl
rn
� m
p OD
�n Tn t = 0� N g y
�o rn rn rrnz o�w° a
tN�OOlaic
::o No r�,1 N rr, k ,+ Q a
c�� °o8 � ter"
_ 00 2g
to :10 rrl
rri o r'' s Rz
g crn
2 11
rn
0
o
t o
� 2 C
o
o �
CA
o
CC)
m
-1 -0 �o
N
cow
�O00
cz
"I
zz
C13 N
rri
ul
0
C7O�N
6�
cn
00
cs D N
�y
orn
�rn
zt
o
0
rn
y
z)Nd�-9
POT
/99
0
0
y m
� c
ED rri L4
V) rrl
rn
� m
p OD
�n Tn t = 0� N g y
�o rn rn rrnz o�w° a
tN�OOlaic
::o No r�,1 N rr, k ,+ Q a
c�� °o8 � ter"
_ 00 2g
to :10 rrl
rri o r'' s Rz
g crn
2 11
rn
0
o
t o
� 2 C
o
o �
7� N
00 m C) O
cs,
D
O
C�
Cl N
C-) O
D
F
Stoo 14 +49088 m
v O
co
z
�v
0
0
8MS
xC)
z Sp
s� Wro
.z �m
am a�
zZ zy
0
m
Z
0
CA
o
CC)
z z
m m
-1 -0 �o
cow
�O00
zz
C13 N
>
ul
0
C7O�N
6�
cn
00
cs D N
7� N
00 m C) O
cs,
D
O
C�
Cl N
C-) O
D
F
Stoo 14 +49088 m
v O
co
z
�v
0
0
8MS
xC)
z Sp
s� Wro
.z �m
am a�
zZ zy
0
m
Z
0

`
m
1,
I
I
�
I
1�
rom Nn
I �omnmA
o
0 z U
'
If
`I
f
'Iw
s
��
0
O d m 5 m Nb~ m- Ufz °y�br°a zo
m <
xO
c Z C �m -- ZOOpmnC y
c � N °ivy n
u � A pO�nOUmp
wmO�Ow2NZ ° °N OZ
C. A Ow�N
TT
mNNyO
vZ OiwNDNm�D
o _ mo •xm�m
_
_
_
_
rIR
_
---------
_
°
It
TM
k
11
111
11
Ill
I
0
N
O
°
O
AI
pprr
2m
O o
—BZ 2 ��N O
\ °r
SHERRON W. ASKEW
BEULAH- 'r OB 697 PC 584 _
08 950 PG 1050 °sAis^
<xp
� Ri G O W SR 15j 0 OAS_ ELINE FD 2U'OSi oAWO
SR 1532� m zn
BASEUNE _c -- -
--sue
n r RALPH M ROELOFS °
H_ _ LARO -1 Zg_ i m L" OB 656 PC 13B
OB $EULA95 PWC 0 50
I
z
of
_
=
,LL
K
TT
Z
K
I} }
f
i
I
A I
ZB I NI
r
o
-
°
i
r
z I
I 11
MI
-
I
~
III
-
-
NAD 835NSRSD 2007
C
lill
I
J
Z
I
T
-
F!
.b
m
N
3
_
_
yi
,v
o
o f
11
j
I
Hoop
mzz<
m
I
Z,
i _
��'DZ
N,o
'
°�
~p
�=D�
o
mc')
�O
N�
m
OJ
m
DO
TOTO
�
<
—
=O
❑
❑
❑
O
Z.
m � ➢ _ _
N ? - w o
m_ N
_
s x! Z � �
E D A_ A n° NU ❑CnN� O
Z°
C C m r f m N mzz� z m
p p _� ~ __ °
-
�L�"'w
fn
I
"Dm
1N
,gym°
Z
o
r
U
CDO
z
�
1
CD
1
D
❑
x °
El D El c m
a o o� �� ➢� a o
N= o
z Im

BEA UFORT 241 BRIDGE TO PIPE REPLACEMENT
SR 1530, BASELINE ROAD OVER FORK SWAMP
REPLACE EXISTING 36' LONG BY 20.1' (OUT TO OUT) TIMBER FLOOR ON TIMBER CAPS
AND TIMBER PILES WITHA PIPE /BOX CULVERT WBS ELEMENT NUMBER 17BP.2.R.15
BUNYAN VSGS QUAD MAPAND MAP NUMBER 3720663800 J
SHEET NUMBER 7 OF THE SOIL FIRM PANEL 6638 J
SURVEY OF BEA UFORT COUNTY PAMLICO 03020104 NOVEMBER 9, 2011
FORK SWAMP C; Sw, NSW TAR- PAMLICO BASIN
ML-
ir
CL
�+ 1
� G
`� \ j —_ •� � .• T 1.
°
Bea r Dam R , ♦ n
.. a ,.;,. d(0> W E
1 > _.L
BEAUFORT 241
Y= 684609.3300
X= 2630831.5735
N 35 ^- 36' -45'►
W 76A -5V-39" r
N 35.612543 DEGREES
W 76.877400 DEGREES
1l
�~ \ 1 inch = 2,000 feet
1 . 0 800 1,600 3,200 4,800 6,400
/ Feet
i 1 1 —�.

BEA UFORT 241 BRIDGE TO PIPE REPLACEMENT
SR 1 530, BASELINE ROAD OVER FORK SWAMP
REPLACE EXISTING 36' LONG BY20.1' (OUT TO OU7) 77MBER FLOOR ON TIMBER CAPS
AND 77MBER PILES WITHA PIPEBOX CULVERT WBS ELEMENT NUMBER 17BP.2.R.15
BUNYAN USGS QUAD MAPAND
FIRM PANEL 6638 J AMPNUMBER 3720663800 J
SHEET NUMBER 7 OF THE SOIL
PAMLIC0 03020104
NOVEMBER 9, 2011
SURVEY OF BEA UFORT COUNTY
TAAMLICO BASIN
R P
FORK SWAMP C;Sw;NSW
l
th
- sesElina &d - =
0. 5:4
0241 . -
N
_
1.1 r
13ee r Dam ROG
F
W E
r y
!!
S
--
4
n Ln
`
_ _
P w015
` `'cs�` ~
�
�JoHn•nn Fid I _ J If -y
< r _ T
_ � Y
BEA UFORT241
Y= 684609.3300
X= 2630831.5735
N35 A -36W5"
W 76^- 52' -39"
N 35.612543 DEGREES
W 76.877400 DEGREES
'
IN
1 inch = 2,000 feet
0 800 1,600 3,200 4,800 6,400
Feet
_ a

BEA UFORT 241 BRIDGE TO PIPE REPLACEMENT
SR 1530, BASELINE ROAD OVER FORK SWAMP
REPLACE EXISTING 36'L ONG BY20.P (OUT TO 0 U7) TIMBER FLOOR ON TIMBER CAPS
AND TIMBER PILES WITHAPIPE/BOX CULVERT WBS ELEMENT NUMBER 17BP.2.R15
BUNYAN USGS QUAD MAPAND MAPNUMBER 3720663800 J
SHEET NUMBER 7 OF THE SOIL FIRM PANEL 6638 J
SURVEY OF BEA UFORT COUNTY PAMLICO 03020104 NOVEMBER 9, 2011
FORK SWAMP C;Sw;NSW TAR- PAMLICO BASIN
v
12
rn
c
0
J
CL
Baseline Rd 060241 0
0
o _
Bea
156 n Dam Rd W E
c
' ephone Ln S _
Johnson Rd
49
0601
BEA UFORT 241 060150
Y= 684609.3300 go aF`a s
X= 2630831.5735'S2e
a Bo
N35 A -36-45"
W 76^ -52' -3911
N 35.612543 DEGREES
W 76.877400 DEGREES a
\11 l .,_
1 inch = 2,000 feet
0 800 1,600 3,200 4,800 6,400
Feet