WQCS00089_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20210506

ROY COOPER
Governor
DIONNE DEL.LI-GATTI
SrSerrebary
DANIEL SMITH
Dr4cT#
Mr. Jeff Cash, City Manager
City of Cherryville
116 South Mountain St.
Cherryville, NC 28021
NORTH CAROL! NA
Ertirfroplf110.rtiVid Quality
May 6, 2021
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Permittee: City of Cherryville Wastewater Collection System
Permit No. WQCS00089
Gaston County
Dear Mr. Cash:
Mr. Tony Parker of the Mooresville Regional Office of the NC Division of Water Resources (DWR
or the Division) conducted a compliance evaluation inspection (CEI) of the cities wastewater
collection system (WWCS) on May 4, 2021. The assistance of Mr. Kevin Abernathy during the
inspection was greatly appreciated. A copy of the inspection report is attached for your records
and inspection findings are summarized below with action items.
Site/System Review
1. The following system components were inspected:
a. Four Pump stations were inspected. Issues noted. Please see attached report for
details.
b. Numerous manholes inspected. One issue noted. Please see attached report for
details.
c. Two R/W's inspected. No issues noted.
d. One aerial inspected. One issue noted at upstream manhole. Please see attached
report for details.
2. As you are aware, owners of permitted collection systems must comply with their permit
and all rules listed under NC Administrative Code 15A NCAC 02T .0400, et seq. The
City's compliance status with each of these rules is summarized below:
a. 15A NCAC 02T .0403(a)(1): Requires that the system be effectively maintained
and operated at all times to prevent discharge to land or surface waters and any
contravention of ground or surface water standards.
ME CV)
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
610 East Center Avenue I Suite 301 I Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
704-663-1699

Observations: The City had one SSO for the review period.
Compliance Status: Compliant
b. 15A NCAC 02T .0403(a)(2): Requires that a map of the wastewater collection
system be developed and actively maintained.
Observations: The City uses various paper maps which show locations of lines,
direction of flow, manholes and pump stations and other details.
Compliance Status: Compliant
c. 15A NCAC 02T .0403(a)(3): Requires that an operation and maintenance (O&M)
plan be developed and implemented, which includes inspection frequency,
preventative maintenance schedule, and overflow response.
Observations Records were available for all activities. An overflow response plan
was available. An O/M plan is being developed.
Compliance Status: Compliant
d. 15A NCAC 02T .0403(a)(4): Requires that the permittee or its representative
inspect pump stations that are not connected to a telemetry system (i.e., remote
alarm system) every day (i.e., 365 days per year) and pump stations that are
connected to a telemetry system at least once per week.
Observations: The pump stations are being inspected and monitored as required.
Compliance Status: Compliant
e. 15A NCAC 02T .0403(a)(5): Requires that the permittee or its representative
inspect high -priority sewers (HPS - as defined in 15A NCAC 02T .0402(2)) at least
once every six months and document the inspections.
Observations: The city maintains high priority lines and they are being inspected
and documented as required.
Compliance Status: Compliant
f. 15A NCAC 02T .0403(a)(6): Requires that the permittee or its representative
conduct a general observation of the entire wastewater collection system at least
once per year and document same.
Compliance Status: Compliant.

g.
15A NCAC 02T .0403(a)(7): Requires that overflows and bypasses from the
system be reported to the Division's Mooresville Regional Office in accordance
with 15A NCAC 02B .0506(a), and that public notice must be provided as required
by G.S. 143-215.1C.
Observations: SSO's have been reported with this system for this review period.
The NC regulations and statutes, which cover the reporting requirements for SSOs,
are found in NC Administrative Code 15A NCAC 02B .0506(a) and NC General
Statute 143-215.1C, respectively. You may access the NC regulations online at the
NC Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH) website at:
http://www.oah.state.nc.us/rules/ and the NC General Statutes online at the NC
General Assembly's website at:
http://www.ncga.state.nc.us/gascripts/Statutes/StatutesTOC.pl. You may wish to
review them to ensure you are fully familiar with all requirements.
When reporting SSOs to DWQ, you must call the Mooresville Regional Office
(MRO) at 704-663-1699 during normal business hours. If outside normal business
hours, you must report the spill to the NC Division of Emergency Management at
1-800-858-0368. Please note that all reportable SSOs must be reported within 24
hours of the occurrence, or first knowledge, of the SSO. Please also note that voice
mail or faxed messages are not considered as the initial verbal report. You must
talk to and report the spill to a live person.
Compliance Status: Compliant
h. 15A NCAC 02T .0403(a)(8): Requires that a grease control program be developed
and implemented as follows:
1. For publicly owned collection systems, the Grease Control Program shall
include at least bi-annual distribution of grease education materials to users.
2. Grease education materials shall be distributed more often than required
above if necessary to prevent grease -related sanitary sewer overflows.
Observations: Educational info is provided to all customers via mail outs 2/year.
Compliance Status: Compliant.
15A NCAC 02T .0403(a)(9): Requires that right-of-ways (ROW) and easements
be maintained to allow for personnel and equipment accessibility.
Observations: Lines and R/W's are maintained and documented.
Compliance Status: Compliant.

J.
15A NCAC 02T .0403(a)(10): Requires that documentation be kept for all
activities you undertake to comply with the requirements of 15A NCAC 02T .0403,
subparagraphs (a)(1) through (a)(9), for a minimum of three years, with the
exception of the map, which shall be maintained for the life of the system.
Observations: Records were reviewed for high -priority line inspections, and
observation of the entire system.
Compliance Status: Compliant
The attached inspection report should be self-explanatory; however, if you have any questions
regarding the inspection report or this letter please contact Tony Parker at 704-663-1699 or
[e-mail].
Attachments:
BIMS Inspection Report
CC: MRO
Central Files
PERCS Unit (e-copy)
Sincerely,
DocuSigned by:
[L14.14e44, H Pzut4
F161FB69A2D84A3...
for
W. Corey Basinger, Regional Supervisor
Mooresville Regional Office
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: WQCS00089
SOC:
County: Gaston
Region: Mooresville
Effective: 09/01/16
Effective:
Contact Person: Robert Kevin Abernathy
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications: CS2,
Primary ORC: Robert Kevin Abernathy
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Expiration: 08/31/24
Expiration:
Owner : City of Cherryville
Facility: Cherryville Collection System
116 S Mountain St
Title: Water & Sewer Super
Certification: 988005
NC0044440 City of Cherryville - Cherryville WWTP
Inspection Date: 05/04/2021 Entry Time 10:OOAM
Primary Inspector: Tony Parker
Secondary Inspector(s):
Reason for Inspection: Follow-up
Permit Inspection Type: Collection
Facility Status: Compliant
Question Areas:
▪ Miscellaneous Questions
▪ Capital Improvement Plan
▪ Inspections
▪ Lines
Cherryville NC 280213421
Exit Time: 01:30PM
Phone: [phone]
Phone: [phone]
Phone: [phone]
Inspection Type: Collection System Inspect Non Sampling
system management and operation
❑ Not Compliant
(See attachment summary)
▪ General
▪ Map
▪ Spill Response Plan
▪ Manholes
▪ Sewer & FOG Ordinances
▪ Reporting Requirements
▪ Spills
▪ Pump Stations
Page 1 of 7

Permit: WQCS00089 Owner - Facility: City of Cherryville
Inspection Date: 05/04/2021
Inspection Type : Collection System Inspect Non Sampling Reason for Visit: Follow-up
Inspection Summary:
Page 2 of 7

Permit: WQCS00089 Owner - Facility: City of Cherryville
Inspection Date: 05/04/2021
Inspection Type : Collection System Inspect Non Sampling Reason for Visit: Follow-up
General
Is there a properly designated primary ORC and at least one back-up of proper grade?
Are logs being reviewed by the system management or owner on a regular basis?
# What is that frequency?
# Are there any issues being addressed currently or any in the planning stages?
Is there a specific pump failure plan available for all pump stations?
Does plan indicate if pump parts/new pumps are in spare parts/equipment inventory?
Are new/significantly upgraded pump stations equipped with anti -corrosion materials?
Does the permittee have a copy of their permit?
# Is permit expiring within the next 6 months?
If Yes, has the Permittee applied for renewal?
Comment: The current permit expires 8/31/2024.
Sewer and FOG Ordinances
Is Sewer Use Ordinance (SUO) or other Legal Authority available?
Does it appear that the Sewer Use Ordinance is enforced?
Is there a Grease Control Program that legally requires grease control devices?
What is the standard grease trap cleaning requirement in the FOG ordinance?
Is Grease Control Program enforced via periodic inspections/records review?
Is action taken against violators?
# Have satellite systems adopted an equivalent or more stringent ordinance?
Is grease/sewer education program documented with req'd customer distribution?
# Are other types of education tools used like websites, booths, special meetings, etc?
If Yes, what are they? (This can reduce mailing to annual.)
FOG info mailed out 2/year.
Comment:
Capital Improvement Plan
Has a Capital (CIP) or System Improvement Plan been developed and adopted?
Is it designated for wastewater only or does it have a dedicated section?
Does CIP cover three to five year period of earmarked improvements?
Does CIP include description of project area?
Does CIP include description of existing facilities?
Does CIP include known deficiencies?
Does CIP include forecasted future needs?
Comment:
Map
Yes No NA NE
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
weekly
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ •❑ ❑
❑ ❑ • ❑
Yes No NA NE
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
variable
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ • ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ • ❑
Yes No NA NE
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
Page 3 of 7

Permit: WQCS00089 Owner - Facility: City of Cherryville
Inspection Date: 05/04/2021
Inspection Type : Collection System Inspect Non Sampling Reason for Visit: Follow-up
Is there a overall sewer system map?
Does the map include:
Pipe Type (GS/FM)
Pipe sizes
Pipe materials (PVC, DIP, etc)
Pipe location
Flow direction
Approximate pipe age
Pump station ID, location and capacity
# Force main air release valve location & type
# Location of satellite connections
Is the map being updated for changes/additions within 1 year of activation?
Comment: The city uses various paper maps.
Reporting Requirements
# Have there been any sewer spills in the past 3 years?
If Yes, were they reported to the Division if meeting the reportable criteria?
If applicable, is there documentation of press releases and public notices issued?
Is an Annual Wastewater Performance Report being filed with the Division, if required?
Is the report being made available to all its sewer customers?
# How is it being made available?
Comment:
Inspections
Are adequate maintenance records maintained?
Are pump stations being inspected at the required frequency?
# Is at least one complete functionality test conducted weekly per pump station?
Is there a system or plan in place to observe the entire system annually?
Is the annual inspection documented?
# Does the system have any high -priority lines/locations?
Are inspections of HPL documented at least every 6 months?
Are new lines being added to the HPL list when found or created?
Comment: All activities were documented.
Spill Response Action Plan
Is a Spill Response Action Plan available?
Is a Spill Response Action Plan available for all personnel?
Does the plan include:
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑ •
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ • ❑
❑ ❑ • ❑
Yes No NA NE
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
on request
Yes No NA NE
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
Page 4 of 7

Permit: WQCS00089 Owner - Facility: City of Cherryville
Inspection Date: 05/04/2021
Inspection Type : Collection System Inspect Non Sampling Reason for Visit: Follow-up
24-hour contact numbers
Response time
Equipment list and spare parts inventory
Access to cleaning equipment
Access to construction crews, contractors, and/or engineers
Source of emergency funds
Site sanitation and cleanup materials
Post-overflow/spill assessment
Does the Permittee appear to respond within 2 hours of first knowledge of a spill?
Comment: SSO's have been reported during this review period.
Spills
Is system free of known points of bypass?
If No, describe type of bypass and location
Are all spills or sewer related issues/complaints documented?
# Are there repeated overflows/problems (2 or more in 12 months) at same location?
# If Yes, is there a corrective action plan?
Comment:
Lines/Right-of-Ways/Aerial Lines
Please list the Lines/Right of Ways/Aerial Lines Inspected:
Academey St outfall R/W. No issues noted, East Drive R/W and aerial. Issues noted. The 2nd U/S manhole
had a large rootball protuding around a tap in the M/H. The root ball needs to be removed and the M/H
rehabed.
Are right-of-ways/easements maintained for full width for access by staff/equipment?
If No, give details on temporary access:
R/W's were and maintained.
Is maintenance documented?
Are gravity sewer cleaning records available?
Has at least 10% of lines older than 5 yrs been cleaned annually?
Were all areas/lines inspected free of issues?
Comment: Maintenance records were available.
Manholes
Please list the Manholes Inspected:
Numerous M/H's inspected. One issue was noted at the E Dr R/W aerial as mentioned above.
Are manholes accessible?
# Are manhole covers/vents above grade?
Are manholes free of visible signs of overflow?
Are manholes free of sinkholes and depressions?
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑ •
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑•❑
❑ ❑•❑
Yes No NA NE
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
Page 5 of 7

Permit: WQCS00089 Owner - Facility: City of Cherryville
Inspection Date: 05/04/2021
Inspection Type : Collection System Inspect Non Sampling Reason for Visit: Follow-up
Are manhole covers present?
# Are manholes properly seated?
# Are manholes in good condition?
# Are inverts in good condition?
Is flow unrestricted in manholes?
Are manholes free of excessive amounts of grease?
Are manholes free of excessive roots?
Are manholes free of excessive sand?
Are manhole vents screened?
Are vents free of submergence?
Are manholes free of bypass structures or pipes?
Comment: One rootball noted previously.
Pump Stations
Please list the Pump Stations Inspected:
Cedar St P/S # 1, Stonewood Estates P/S # 2, REA P/S # 3 & Tot Delinger P/S # 4. One issue noted at REA
P/S. The wet well at this P/S had a saturated oil appearence. The only customer on this P/S is REA which is
an industrial complex which manfactures transformers. This needs to be thoroughly investigated.
# Number of duplex or larger pump stations in system
# Number of vacuum stations in system
# Number of simplex pump stations in system
# Number of simplex pump stations in system serving more than one building
How many pump/vacuum stations have:
# Atwo-way "auto polling" communication system (SCADA) installed?
# A simple one-way telemetry/communication system (auto -dialer) installed?
For pump stations inspected:
Are they secure with restricted access?
Were they free of by-pass structures/pipes?
Were wet wells free of excessive grease/debris?
# Do they all have telemetry installed?
Is the communication system functional?
Is a 24-hour notification sign posted ?
Does the sign include:
Owner Name?
Pump station identifier?
# Address?
Instructions for notification?
24-hour emergency contact numbers?
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
❑•❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑•
❑ ❑ ❑•
• ❑ ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
10
0
0
0
5
5
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
❑•❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
Page 6 of 7

Permit: WQCS00089 Owner - Facility: City of Cherryville
Inspection Date: 05/04/2021
Inspection Type : Collection System Inspect Non Sampling Reason for Visit: Follow-up
Are audio and visual alarms present?
Are audio and visual alarms operable?
# Is there a backup generator or bypass pump connected?
If tested during inspection, did it function properly?
Is the back-up system tested at least bi-annually under normal operating conditions?
# Does it have a dedicated connection for a portable generator?
# Is the owner relying on portable units in the event of a power outage?
# If Yes, is there a distribution plan?
If Yes, what resources (Units/Staff/Vehicles/etc) are included in Plan?
The City has 4 sites with a dedicated generator. One site has a quick connect for a portable generator. The
city has one portable generator that would serve 6 P/S's. The portable unit would need to be wired in to 4
locations if needed. The city also uses a pumping contractor for pumping out wet wells. The city has 5 P/S's
w/telementry & 5 w/SCADA.
# Does Permittee have the approved percentage of replacement simplex pumps?
Is recordkeeping of pump station inspection and maintenance program adequate?
Do pump station logs include at a minimum:
Inside and outside cleaning and debris removal?
Inspecting and exercising all valves?
Inspecting and lubricating pumps and other equipment?
Inspecting alarms, telemetry and auxiliary equipment?
Comment: Pump station visits were well documented.
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ •❑
❑ ❑ •❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
Page 7 of 7