20080911 Ver 1_More Info Requested_20130204

Strickland Bev
From: Richmond, Martin
Sent Monday, February 04, 2O134:33 PM
To: Williams, Kelly
Cc: Sthok|ond, Bev; Higgins, Karen; K4enitt, Katie
Subject: RE: bailey's landing subdivision
Thanks Kelly, I'm trying to figure out if our401 (08-0911) which is Phase 111 (276 perennial feet— if you add the crossing I
saw, it's 3OO+ ft) applies orif this is the entire subdivision.
Thanks for your help with this-
From: Williams, Kelly
Sent: Monday, February O4,2O1]4:O7PM
To: Richmond, Martin
Cm: Strickland, Bev; Higgins, Karen; Merritt, Katie
Subject: RE: bailey's landing subdivision
| have an entry in our DB for Bailey's Landing Phase 3- owner Kirk Leone- consultant was Brandon McLamb (same
address as Mike Stewart ([hapanokeRoad).
Acceptance letter was issued 11/13/08. | never received any permits and it was never invoiced and has not paid.
Acceptance expired August 2OO9.
|t may not have been on the unpaid list at all ifit was never invoiced.
Impacts requested look like this:

I don't have any other Bailey's Landing in our D8' several other Stewart Proctor projects all paid except for Suutherby
Bluffs inGarner.
| can keep hunting if you need meto.
Kelly Williams
N[EEP In-Lieu Fee Program Coordinator
direct (M-Th) 919J07.8915 (note new #)
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699'1652
EEP^m Raleigh office has moved and is now located in the N.C. Dept. of Environment and Natural Resources Building at217West
Jones 5t, Suite 3O00A, Raleigh, N.C.276Q3. Parking and visitor access information |m available on the EEPae6mite.

E -mail correspondence to and fi-om this ad'd'ress may be subject to the North Carolina Public Record's Laiv and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Richmond, Martin
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2013 3:02 PM
To: Williams, Kelly
Cc: Strickland, Bev; Higgins, Karen; Merritt, Katie
Subject: bailey's landing subdivision
Kelly— I've recently had my hands full with the purchase of what was supposed to be Phase III at Bailey's Landing. Then I
heard a rumor that the original developers never paid the required mitigation for Phase I?
I was able to issue a new letter to the new owner for the back phase (which I think is Phase III). There was already a pipe
in the creek, the consultant (Jay Keller) said he thinks there was a pipe there already and the new one replaces on old
one. I didn't believe it then and I don't believe it now. This impact— in my opinion —would have pushed them over a
possible IP threshold.
The site is off Tryon Rd, directly south of Dillard Drive. I think I have the new owners all taken care of, but...
The new owner talked about how hard it was to get info from the original owners and their engineer Mike Stewart. In
putting this together, it made sense why he could not ever get info from the current owners or their engineers: because
they still owe mitigation and want nothing to do with this site.
Is there any way we can confirm this payment or non - payment? I want to give everyone the benefit of the doubt, so I
will, but if they owe mitigation I would like to know about it. These can be very difficult to deal with, but I'll do what I
can to get what we are owed — if we are owed for the impacts currently in place.
Thanks much,
Martin
Katie — do you remember this one being on our list of sites that owe?