820201_Compliance Inspection Routine_20210415

�r b11[1l1/4-, fin ;ij),'4
Q.pivision af Water Resources
Q Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Qocher ,Agency
Type of Visit:
Reason for Visit:
Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:
Farm Name:
1116
t .a1 coN Farms
IC: �G
Arrival Time:
Owner Name: i 1GD 1i F eWrGo N
Mailing Address:
Physical Address: Facility Contact: �Q OR 1 n
earCDN
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
aayo5
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
1
Departure Time:
i1:00
Owner Email:
Phone:
County: cQlllp1Vl" Region: FIL
ENTERED TO
LASEnrICHE
APR 19
Title:
DEQ/DWR WOROS
rAYETfEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
Phone:
Latitude:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
Longitude:
❑ YesNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes%tallo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes‘b.No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ YernNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes (-13.-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [h No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3
5/12/2020 Continued

Facility Number: R - 0 l
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Date of Inspection:
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Structure 1
Designed. Freeboard (in): - --I 7
Observed Freeboard (in):
Z G
Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
❑ YesNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes"R.No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes 1:1,No
❑ Yes ,�No
or environmental th
❑ Yes'No
❑ Yes "El,t90
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA El NE
reat, notify DWR
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ Ye o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
❑ NE
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ YestNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window velf❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ID Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): Cbl(N) Vv hLQ t) Got be ; , V'eirmAi c , 5m all 9m
13. Soil Type(s): N OrfDI K
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists El Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑ Yes lallo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
ID Yes E o ID NA ❑NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes �I No El NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes�`'�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes--Rlo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application El Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Date of Inspection: I 1 Q
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes El.allo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ['Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concem?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
❑ YesNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes allo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ YesNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes\ allo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Ye»NNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Yes No El NA ❑NE
❑ Yes�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
bee*, ' n.ew CjivdgQ Gurvel Iq;t- one 3116
l 1 rc olet 2012 L4V oN2_ tN ba DI(
Reviewer/Inspector Name: Kat( QJ�) I l t Ol
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
co-4-ein-
Phone: 1 `1 * Ll Ci" 97 l s
Date: 1 t & 121
2/4/2015