820184_Compliance Inspection Routine_20210415

acility Nntnbe
Kt glm' 9(RP
'01;' } Resoixrceg
td:
O Division of Soil
tte• Conservation^, .<
OtherAgency
Type of Visit: O'Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 6-Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:
Farm Name:
Arrival Time:
:00
mainh.cLd uveaock
Owner Name: C V'en I ma I irgi �I
Mailing Address:
Departure Time:
IQ:15
Owner Email:
Phone:
County: 5-,t rn WVoo Region:
ENTERED TO
Region:
FKO
APR 1 9 2021
Physical Address: / �f
Facility Contact: 1oAd m c i�} rsh all
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
DEQ/DWR WQROS
II II `` /� cviLLt HEUIONAL OFFICE
Title: ownet- h Phone:
(1
Latitude:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
Precba �e
�g3g�l
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3
2/4/2015 Continued

(Facility Number:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
No
(Date of Inspection: i/ t1? / j/
5. Are there any immediate threat to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes -1SI, No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes n. No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes Fi No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes In,No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window Evidence of Wind Driift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): GOQSittl barn() �(1 GI I IQ !, i / Q�rai N)
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
Structure 5
0.No ❑ NA
®,.No ❑ NA
Structure 6
❑ NE
❑ NE
13. Soil Type(s): IOVIC AT) wagrtt 1 i,Na Ito 1 J)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑ Yes RNo ❑ NA
❑ YesIo ❑ NA
❑ Yes 171-No
❑ Yes '❑,No
❑ Yes 1-NTo
❑ Yes `O.No
❑ Yes `RNo
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Other:
No ❑ NA
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA El NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes IKI,No ❑ NA ❑ NE
O Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on
Page 2 of 3
❑ Yestl‘No ❑ NA ❑ NE
gat on equipment? ❑ YeNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: eg, - i FYI
Date of Inspection: i lc/ 2
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes 1:12No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes 'NI ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes NNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes .RNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
0 Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
IDYes q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes \\No El NA ❑NE
Note: 4ve tO (ov14 % n W4'5111" lNGrer.-fQ'j IN aoao.
hgl-Vc9t OUage-e4
Reviewer/Inspector Name: "r� ( 1:— IKa I e fbn �D-t Phone: q i 9 - �f - 97) J
, '/ I ` �`' v1 li 1of
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: 4 , - U .-2) �t / Date: I $3 1L
Page 3 of 3
2/4/2015