820035_Compliance Inspection Routine_20210416 (2)

�ryof WaterxResources , ;'
Division of Soil and'Water Conservation"
D.Otheriaion Agency ',
Type of Visit: ""!.Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit:toutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:
`i�Vtvla
Farm NameCflt
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
tt
Arrival Time:
farm4. I Nc
Departure Time:
Owner Email:
Phone:
County:C.AI,f' PAP
•
N Region: f �O
LASERFICHEEO
APR 1 q 2n2I
UtQ/UVVH WQROS
FAYETTEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
Facility Contact: LQt1 J III II I DNS Title: (nag Phone:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes
vo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yesp ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes �NNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes .b.No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page I of 3
5/12/2020 Continued

Facility Number: Qsj. -
Waste Collection & Treatment
Date of Inspection: %yjl fej;,�
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1
Identifier:
Spillway?: NO
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
I
Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
Structure 5
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 6
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yeseti•No ❑ NA
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground 0 Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 101bs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of AcceptableeCrop Window
❑ Evideencee(ofnWind Drr�fft ❑[Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): CIXI( I Q 1 Bermuda/1 "/l I Ia i t �) I a), I
❑ Yes 'No ❑ NA
❑ YesISLI‘lo ❑ NA
13. Soil Type(s): (Ma `7 (clan
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
❑ Yes EIo ❑ NA
❑ Yes b-No ❑NA
❑ Yes RNo ❑ NA
❑ Yes IctZlo
❑ YesARNo
❑ Yes �No
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ YesNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
0 YesNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ YesNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 1:1\No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yesw-JNo 0 NA 0 NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall 0 Stocking ❑ Crop Yield 0 120 Minute Inspections 0 Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes 4 o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

'Facility Number:
Date of Inspection: if f l(ppi
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
IS Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
6--17- I B1
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field 0 Lagoon/Storage Pond 0 Other:
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
O Yes
❑ No
❑ No
❑ No
❑ NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑NE
✓�siN
O
N t . f1Ym wa& t INQgt.Gre4 IN 200 4CO
tl. mow lQ'JN7N Bah K
wdtc,h vire ra re a)G cl h d «OGI aN
wooer. tot- of oh/age IN jg3ootJ
jJriti coo-.
$oh coo- > —(3?) ,7 4/
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
/J+ Phone: tin • ?16' glib
Date: 11'14"
2/4/2015