820018_Compliane Inspection Routine_20210415

iyision of Water Resource
Division of Sod and
Other Ageney,
Type of Visit: q Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Q Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:
Arrival Time: EP j% Departure Time:
tt�� ('� �J n /� �1`
Farm Name: � ne�y brro y�i 0i ttu m t I " Owner Email:
Owner Name: «i► chord So ei
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Phone:
County: AMON Region: KO
ENTERED TO
LASERFICHE
APR 19 2021
re\ bald
Title:
DEQ/DWR WORDS
FAVFTTEvu I F AEG1QNIPL ()Meg
Phone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
[r4,ag a
Certified Operator: Certification Number: 1 ID 181
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Certification Number:
Latitude:
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
Longitude:
❑ Yes 'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes...bkNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 1:S.,No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes lallo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes "SLNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ' No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3
5/12/2020 Continued

Facility Number: y''2„ -
Waste Collection & Treatment
Date of Inspection: Ili I5121
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes �No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes "'MNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?: Iri
Designed Freeboard (in): 17
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes N No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes fi No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? WI re erects
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
maintenance or improvement?
"ISLYes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes"laJIo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yestl_No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop TYpe(s): whe4 tMfl bean
13.SoilType(s): NOR , NOB
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes No 0 NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes] No ❑ NA 0 NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA 0 NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design 0 Maps 0 Lease Agreements 0 Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. El Yes No El NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ElWeekly Freeboard ElWaste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste 'Franfers ❑ Weather Code
0 Rainfall 0 Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections 0 Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes No 0 NA 0 NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued
❑ Yes NI No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes clNo ❑NA ❑NE

'Date of Inspection: e^�f ;�� ,�
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit. ❑ Yes .15„No
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check `Yes ❑ No
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
Facility Number: bra - 1
❑ NA
❑ NA
LOII9Ni LgooN a Gi /,
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes 'bilk ❑NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ YeNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concem? ❑ YesTh`No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yeso ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes---ELNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes No 0 NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA 0 NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
- y Moon ne2cf S worn in) bare areal
ND dine to (Mil furn No- Incite/WI IN 9.j9/0-.
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
rIm, f orpinot
Phone: 1 (t E9�r ql IS
Date: 9I r5/3I
2/4/2015