630004_Compliance Inspection Rountine_20210427

Division; of Water.Resoitrcegt'.,
Division; of Soil and Water Conse
Other Ageody.
...:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Type of Visit: 'Q Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: \ Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:
Farm Name:
Arrival Time:
1n 0
Departure Time:
iced Fare
Owner Name: \ I bfol K€rn i t-Gfrul l
Owner Email:
Phone:
County:f 1Qpre,
Region: ff0
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: (Y11 1 0 Li I Kvq Title:
L1 ) )
Latitude:
Integrator:
Phone:
ttxlic
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
1006177
❑ Yes ' No ❑NA El NE
❑ Yes IV No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
❑Yes yNo ❑NA El NE
❑ Yes n No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 63 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3
5/12/2020 Continued

Facility Number: - Q`
Date of Inspection: tr
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
Structure 1
LosgDON a
Ho
Structure 2 Structure 3
❑ Yes
O Yes
Structure 4 Structure 5
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 6
❑ Yes p No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes cNo DNA ❑NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? mow I Q DoN 'Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
O Yes ElsNo D NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes *lallo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes "No ❑ NA ❑ NE
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes '\No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN 0 PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus 0 Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.CropType(s): re SCV2 P4corhK2
13. Soil Type(s): G l CJ i- I-eQ d )
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those de ignated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP 0 Checklists 0 Design 0 Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes,, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No El NA 0 NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboards 0 Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis 0 Waste Trans rs ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Sticking ❑ Crop Yield 0 120 Minute Inspections / 0 Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections / 0 Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes....Tht.i io ❑ NA 0 NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes "%lallo
❑ Yes'UNo
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑Yes'No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes RN() ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes 'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
El Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes "lasNo ❑ NA ❑ NE

Facility Number:( - [}�
Date of Inspection: 2#I
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check D Yes
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field
❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Yes ISRNo ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes .NNo ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
une +rca�Xulgy.!+axacFur3 6ai4etleriexplu! �I�r4It>14p fuse ht4Qa4?o Zlag; @Mi4g4$J914tF;
MOt lu2 VqcNt IN�eiek IN ago.
\Aot%i it a form9
(Jock-dial-ionic/1 s ✓
Gtaci ai�aty�i> cringe svk.✓ d2 z
t�� �1?il24
d,ty
GOiIbr t'IDW. duc by lzzja,l2l
crop 4 ./
wt. now ig5oON c�CKS,
❑Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes ] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes �J'No D NA ❑ NE
Reviewer/Inspector Name: .0 l C,
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of
2/4/ 015