20210274 Ver 1_ePCN Application_20210504

DWR
Division of Water Resources
Initial Review
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
April 4, 2021 Ver 4
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
6 Yes
✓ No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
C Yes ( No
Change only 1 needed.
BIMS # Assigned*
20210274
Is a payment required for this project?*
✓ No payment required
✓ Fee received
6 Fee needed - send electronic notification
Reviewing Office *
Raleigh Regional Office - [phone]
Information for Initial Review
la. Name of project:
O'Neil Overlook
la. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Jennifer Burdette
lb. Primary Contact Email:*
b u rdette@mcadamsco. co m
Date Submitted
5/4/2021
Nearest Body of Water
UT to Neuse River
Basin
Neuse
Water Classification
WS-IV; NSW
Site Coordinates
Latitude:
35.660212
A. Processing Information
Version#*
What amout is owed?*
F $240.00
r $570.00
Select Project Reviewer*
Stephanie Goss:eads\szgoss
lc. Primary Contact Phone:*
[phone]
Longitude:
-78.446775
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Johnston
Is this a NCDMS Project
✓ Yes G No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
✓ Yes G No
Pre -Filing Meeting Information
Is this a courtesy copy notification?*
✓ Yes f• No

ID#
20210274
Version
1
Pre -fling Meeting or Request Date
2/8/2021
Attach documentation of Pre -Filing Meeting Request here:
Click the upbad button or drag and drop files here to attach document
01-SPEC20041-ONeil-Prefiling Complete-2020-03-11.pdf
Re type nest be FCF
la. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
fJ Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
I— Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
Has this PCN previously been submitted?*
✓ Yes
(' No
1b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
I7 Nationwide Permit (NWP)
I- Regional General Permit (RGP)
I— Standard (IP)
lc. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
• Yes r No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number:
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
Id. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
17 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
I— Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
I— Individual 401 Water Quality Certification
29 - Residential Developments
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
If. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
✓ Yes (- No
880.93KB
I— 401 Water Quality Certification - Express
I— Riparian Buffer Authorization
lg. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
✓ Yes ( No
lg. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
✓ Yes rNo
Acceptance Letter Attachment
1h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
✓ Yes rNo
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
✓ Yes ( No
F Yes r No
r Yes S No
B. Applicant Information
u
Id. Who is applying for the permit?
fJ Owner 17 Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?*
6 Yes r No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
J & B Real Estate Consultants, LLC
2b. Deed book and page no.:
DB 05748, PG 0448; DB 05388, PG 0816; DB 05625, PG 0462; DB

2c. Contact Person:
James Lipscomb
2d.Address
Street Address
328 E. Main Street
Address tine 2
Clty State / Province / legion
Clayton NC
Postal / Zp Code Country
27520-2464 USA
2e. Telephone Number: 2f. Fax Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
Suburban Real Estate, Inc
2b. Deed book and page no.:
DB 05638, PG 0412
2c. Contact Person:
H. Harper Whitley, Jr.
2d. Address
Street Address
POBox759
Address tine 2
Clly State / Province/ legion
Smithfield NC
Postal / Zip Code Country
27577 USA
2e. Telephone Number: 2f. Fax Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
3. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
3a. Name:
James Lipscomb
3b. Business Name:
J & B Real Estate Consultants, LLC
3c.Address
Street Address
328 E. Main Street
Address Line 2
air State / Province / Region
Clayton NC
Postal / Zip Code Country
27520-2464 USA
3d. Telephone Number: 3e. Fax Number:
[phone]
3f. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:
Jennifer Burdette
4b. Business Name:
McAdams Company
4c. Address

Street Address
2905 Meridian Parkway
Address Line 2
Dty
Durham
Postal / Zip aide
27713
4d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
4f. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
Agent Authorization Letter*
02-SPEC20041-ONeiI-J&B-Agent Auth.pdf
03-SPEC20041-ONeil-Suburban-Agent Auth.pdf
State / Province / legion
NC
Country
USA
4e. Fax Number:
462.33KB
44.14KB
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Project Information
1b. Subdivision name:
irf appropriate)
lc. Nearest municipality/ town:
Clayton
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
166910-45-1911, 166910-45-4651, 166910-
35-8704, 166910-45-0119,166910-45-1211,
166910-45-2119 & 166910-45-3212
2c. Project Address
Street Address
206, 210, 214 & 218 Oakdale Avenue & 934 N O'Neil St
Address Line 2
aty
Clayton
Postal / Zip aide
27520
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:*
UT to Neuse River
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:*
WS-IV; NSW
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Neuse
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030202011103
2b. Property size:
19
State / Province / legion
NC
Country
USA
4. Project Description and History
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:*
Most of the project area consists of upland mixed hardwood and some pine forest. Approximately two acres in the northwest portion of the site were part of a rural residence and
included mowed and maintained lawn. Land use in the vicinity of the project primarily consists of forest land and residential subdivisions with a landscaping company and pastureland to
the south. Please refer to the attached USGS Location Map (Figure 1), Wake County Soil Survey Map (Figure 2B) and Aerial Map (Figure 3 - attached after Figure 2B) for more
information on the project setting.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
r Yes r No r Unknown
4d. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of the project site. (for DWR)
04-SPEC20041ONeilOverlook Fig1USGS V2.pdf 1.77MB
4e. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey map depicting the project site. (for DWR)
05-SPEC20041_Oneil_Overlook_Fig2b_Buffer Subj SS.pdf 2.04MB
06-SPEC20041_ONeil_Overlook_Fig 3 Aerial V2.pdf 4.68MB

4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0.02
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
2,430
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:*
The purpose of the project is to provide single-family homes to serve the current and future residents of Clayton
4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:*
The project is a residential development of single family homes and necessary infrastructure including roads, sanitary sewer, stormwater system and a stormwater control measure.
Road access from Oakdale Avenue and lot development will proposed to impact the uppermost portion of deeply -incised and actively eroding channel.
4j. Please upload project drawings for the proposed project.
07-SPEC20041-ONeil-Impact Map.pdf 1.76MB
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
6 Yes
Comments:
C No O Unknown
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
6' Preliminary C Approved C Not Verified C Unknown C N/A
Corps AID Number:
SAW-2020-01031
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
Wyatt Brown
Brown's Environmental Group, Inc.
5d. List the dates of the Corp jurisdiction determination or State determination if a determination was made by the Corps or DWR
On September 30, 2020, Chris Hopper with USACE conducted a field review of the original delineation and the area of additional lots along Oakdale Avenue that were added to the
project. A PJD for the site has not been issued. DWR provided a buffer determination letter for Feature B on December 16, 2016 and a second buffer determination letter for Features
A, C, D on January 7, 2020. Figure 4. Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination/Buffer Map shows the streams and wetlands present on the site and start points identified by DWR.
5d1. Jurisdictional determination upload
08-SPEC20041-O'Neil-Fig4 PJD-BUF Map.pdf
09-SPEC20041-Stream Determination 226 Oakdale-2016-12.pdf
10-SPEC20041-N. Oneill St. buffer letter - 1-7-20.pdf
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
' Yes (7 No
177.82KB
3.95MB
2.93MB
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
la. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
r Wetlands
r Open Waters
3. Stream Impacts
fJ Streams -tributaries
✓ Pond Construction
r Buffers
3a. Reason for impact (?)
3b.Impact type*
3c. Type of impact*
3d. S. name *
3e. Stream Type*
(?)
3f. Type of
Jurisdiction*
3g. S. width *
3h. Impact
length*
S1
Road crossing & lot fill
Permanent
Culvert
UT to Neuse River
Intermittent
Both
4
Average (feet)
135
(linear feet)
34
Dissipator
Permanent
Rip Rap Fill
UT to Neuse River
Intermittent
Both
4
Average (feet)
12
(linear feet)
3i. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0

3i. Total permanent stream impacts: 3i. Total temporary stream impacts:
147 0
3i. Total stream and ditch impacts:
147
3j. Comments:
Permanent Stream Loss = 0.20 ac
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
The applicant obtained a delineation of surface waters and wetlands on the site prior to designing the project to avoid and minimize impacts to these
resources to the maximum extent practicable. It is important to note that the ridge between Stream 1 and 2 near their confluence is narrow with
adjacent steep slopes that make development of this area unfeasible.
To provide safe ingress/egress, two access points are required when the proposed number of lots exceeds 30. Construction of a second entrance
adds considerable e q ense to a subdivision of this size making it impractical to build the additional roadway without the offset of additional lots.
Although direct impact to Stream 2 would be minimized by the elimination of Lot 17, extending the fill farther downstream creates a more stable
condition for downstream water quality. The nonjurisdictional channel above the start point of Stream 2 (Street C road crossing) is very unstable and
appears to contribute a significant amount of sediment downstream as shown in photographs 1 and 2 of NCSAM Assessment Appendix A photos.
Stream 2 scored as medium quality primarily due to the stream's riparian buffer area. The upper section of the stream is deeply incised with actively
unstable banks (Photos 6 & 7) and sediment filled pools (Photo 8). Stream stability improves downstream of the project area.
McAdams' stream restoration engineer reviewed the attached alternative plan (Preliminary Grading & Drainage Plan — C5.01) that utilizes retaining
walls along the road and Lot 15 to minimize the stream impact. The engineer explained that retaining walls would be at continued risk because the
current instability of the stream would not be corrected. The instability does not appear to be cause solely from the existing stormwater outlet from
Oakdale Avenue since the northern streambank is also eroding. Moving the fill downstream slightly reduces the drainage area of the stream and
relocates the existing stormwater outlet to discharge downstream beyond the actively eroding stream banks and incorporates a riprap dissipator.
Additionally, the avoided section of stream would be surrounded by two retaining walls and a steep slope that would provide minimal connection to the
surrounding landscape. As mentioned above, moving the start point of the stream lower in the valley facilitates stream stability and leaves higher
functioning stream and riparian area.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
A sediment and Erosion Control Plan for the project will be planned and approved by Town of Clayton, and the project will comply with the
supplementary NPDES Construction Stormwater Permit (NCG010000).
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
✓ Yes ( No
2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why:
Proposed stream impact does not involve more than 0.02 acre of stream loss.
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
6 Yes rNo
What type of SCM are you providing?
n Level Spreader
n Vegetated Conveyance (lower SI-WT)
I— Wetland Swale (higher SHWT)
17 Other SCM that removes minimum 30% nitrogen
n Proposed project will not create concentrated stormwater flow through the buffer
Diffuse Flow Documentation
11-Stormwater Statement 2020-11-02.pdf
12-2020-75-SD-O'NEIL OVERLOOK - PLAN SET 3-18-21.pdf
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?*
✓ Yes G No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
✓ Yes f No
2.25MB
11.49MB
2c. Does this project have a stormwater management plan (SMP) reviewed and approved under a state stormwater program or state -approved local government stormwater
program?
✓ Yes r No
✓ N/A - project disturbs < 1 acre

2d. Which of the following stormwater management program(s) apply:
I7 Local Government r State
Local Government Stormwater Programs
fJ Phase II fJ NSW r USMP 17 Water Supply
Please identify which local government stormwater program you are using.
Town of Clayton
Comments:
The Stormwater Management Plan narrative and construction drawing are attached.
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*
✓ Yes 6No
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?*
✓ Yes r No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
✓ Yes 0- No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
This application covers the entire project, which is not anticipated to result in additional development.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
✓ Yes rNor N/A
4b. Describe, in detail, the treatment methods and dispositions (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project. If the wastewater will be treated
at a treatment plant, list the capacity available at that plant.
Wastewater generated from the development will be discharged to the existing sanitary sewer system.
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
✓ Yes r No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
t: Yes r No
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Raleigh
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
✓ Yes
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
✓ Yes 6- No
C' No r Unknown
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
t: Yes r No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
✓ Yes G No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
✓ Yes r No
5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
✓ Yes 0'No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
McAdams submitted a protected species assessment to the USFWS on February 3, 2021. The email of the submittal, self certification letter and
species conclusion table are attached.
Consultation Documentation Upload

13-SPEC20041-ONeiI-USACE T&E Docs.pdf 1.02MB
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
✓ Yes ( No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
NOAA Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) Mapper (http://ww.v.habitat.noaa.gov/protection/efh/ethmapper/), accessed April 30, 2021.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
✓ Yes ( No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
The attached letter from the State Historic Preservation Office dated April 28, 2021 indicates that the agency has no comments on the project as
proposed.
7c. Historic or Prehistoric Information Upload
14-SPEC20041-ONeil-Recd SHPO Response-2021-04-28.pdf 148 32KB
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-yearfloodplain?*
✓ Yes 6'No
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
FEMA FIRM 3720166900K, effective 6/20/2018
Miscellaneous
Comments
Miscellaneous attachments not previously requested.
15-SPEC20041-ONeiI-NCSAM-Stream 2 Pkg.pdf
16-05.01 - GRADING & DRAINAGE_alternate-G&D PLAN.pdf
1.86MB
1.56MB
Signature
*
Fi By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief; and
• The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401 certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Jennifer Burdette
Signature
c.,76,.tz et e-t ,
Date
5/4/2021

iJ MCADAM S
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
All Blanks To Be Filled In By The Current Property Owner
PIN:
166910-35-8714, 166910-45-0119, 166910-45-1211, 166910-45-2119, & 166910-45-
3212
Name:
J & B Real Estate Consultants, LLC
Address:
328 E. Main Street, Clayton, NC 27520-2464
j coPhone/Email: "I(�//1-"laia__I/O-I 1 lame s 0 h�'( 1-fT1'Z. W k1/1
Project Name:
O'Neil Overlook
Project Number:
SPEC-20041
Project Manager:
Jennifer Burdette
US Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
NC Division of Water Resources
401 & Buffer Permitting Branch
512 N. Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27604
Re: Wetlands Related Consulting and Permitting
To Whom It May Concern:
I hereby designate and authorize The John R. McAdams Company, Inc. to act on my behalf as my agent in obtaining
verification of wetland delineations and processing of permit applications for the project listed above.
I, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property/properties identified herein, do authorize
representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) and NC Division of Water Resources
to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -site investigation and issuing a
determination associated with Water of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction under Section 404 of the Clean Water
Act/Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 and/or Waters of State and/or Riparian Buffer Rules.
This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project.
NOTICE: This authorization, for liability and professional courtesy reasons, is valid only for government officials to
enter the property when accompanied by The John R. McAdams Company, Inc. staff.
�am�S [- - U`eSl,Drylbi Jac u GSikt
Print Property Owner Cvr id 0,4115,
Title (if applicable)
Date
creating experiences through experience 2905 Meridian Parkway, Durham, NC / 919. 361. 5000

•11rr
A4it r
hic k DAMS.
A rjNE Au THowrihrioN oQIH
�i �� � iIr#li� irI 1>� �� ��r■rI!
Nworaiirmik-
*plod Mont.
Proipt thanker
ARON :
1 660 P3416400.1
$1.04.rbin 1__• liteto
PCP am SIIMPTriffikl. 77
amid croririoi
WC 41
LIS }' wpM Q'1 (ripiLW P
Itglirth Ihrid
Mil I ilereair Trio a4ti7o. l
Win V5111
IC*iiwRi WOW I
Ka 1 IOW +irm+t'1q E mei
si!. M. lasiuriii Sl M.
5,NCI N
ilr Whirl rrfr 04111141 r,lnry P uwrrmt1
T. Ww4eli III MST Cprtfoldrrd
I h f r *#r CIO Lp r'•ii f* W id-dr h#r i 1 f rrF k 1.404aerri CVNIAllere. I r>< r i ikt CNN Prep Imo{ 85 rw111 pua I rr I I.
ire rIiIr atron i•eII■r.d prc rtiNr l weld! l 9poOcaLwr*d I'or Mr wood Ntibed abut'
I. Chia undo r Ho rd . ■ fru R NEW I rood mom. odf r osord o f drops* l M iiN aprrrEas *reified d hew, do a.rl hciri i i'
rIPITIAPnild Col Mt 'boor e.rKII. I,+ &Tr of C p4 Cor r r (C ) Irid I*G 4*r'I Ql Wild! i
[a er144 u +' Lhr prto¢+er1Y Nrriwi ornGi•d Pad Cry 0.0310114 dti•ni Q,•, 1* I rreiVol416zr. ■n •irl Ifl( ■
cicerrnmemn avrix.uptici i.'Itfr wirer of the u.1 e4 F*Aker fan %Malcom Li ier Set t A' am
Art Wo I i i d R #lihren odd kidtO'4 A€1 oil Iin anal ad *i 4 CO S+Iavvrogii RIR I 6404r k
Elf icalUan iu r rr* i+* Pwid0Clvi gkerlorIM8141141 tofi yrt'wi bf+4 &#i N Pfil! P. wined
1
FJ�TI��� Tt loot 1A.L 1 ihi ibralljakihedil remokk. mid .- • l■r ,'pw*mmL Cob d
order du privierF wM 114 1011141i 1L 504411111164 AK. IPA.
41.11L-5 V.,.:11"4 ri 0114\
Final Proodmr Owner
Tldl I d + +t+ l

Burdette, Jennifer
From: [e-mail]
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2021 12:01 AM
To: Burdette, Jennifer
Cc: [e-mail]
Subject: Pre -Filing Time Clock has been reached for SPEC-20041 O'Neil Overlook - 20210274
Ver 1
Attachments: DWR Pre -Filing Meeting Request Form.pdf
CAUTION: This email is NOT from McAdams. DO NOT click links or open attachments unless you verify the sender and content.
The North Carolina Division of Water Resources has received the Pre -Filing Meeting Request Form for SPEC-20041
O'Neil Overlook that you submitted on 2/8/2021. The ID number for that project is 20210274, Version 1.
Your Pre -Filing Meeting Request has now reached the 30 calendar days' requirement and your application can now be
accepted.
When you submit your application please upload a copy of the attached document in this email.
This email was automatically generated by Laserfiche workflow. Please do not respond to this email address, as
responses are not monitored.
1

Legend
Project Area
NOTES:
1. USGS; 7.5 MINUTE, QUAD, CLAYTON, NORTH CAROLINA; 201962. LAT: 35.660212, LONG:-78.446775
gij
MCADAMS
FIGURE 1. USGS TOPOGRAPHIC VICINITY MAP
O'NEIL OVERLOOK
CLAYTON, JOHNSTON COUNTY, NC
0 1,000 2,000
Feet
1 inch = 2,000 feet
VERSION: 2
DATE: 4/29/2021
JOB NO: SPEC-20041
DRAWN BY: burdette
M:\Projects\!FORSPEC\SPEC-20041 Lipscomb On -Call Natural Resource Consulting\04-Production\Natural Resources\ONeil\GIS\SPEC20041_ONeil_Overlook_Fig1_USGS.mxd, 4/29/2021

Project Area
-42
fM-110 ` l V'I 1 ��n- �"!VI ':•••••• 1 WVl-4 - -- ,. Y f-t 171.-
NOTES:
1. NRCS; SOIL SURVEY SHEET 1, JOHNSTON COUNTY, NC (1994)
gij
MCADAMS
FIGURE 2B. BUFFER SUBJECTIVITY SOIL SURVEY
O'NEIL OVERLOOK
CLAYTON, JOHNSTON COUNTY, NC
0 1,000 2,000
Feet
1 inch = 2,000 feet
VERSION: 1
DATE: 4/30/2021
JOB NO: SPEC-20041
DRAWN BY: burdette
M:\Projects\!FOR-SPEC\SPEC-20041 Lipscomb On -Call Natural Resource Consulting\04-Production\Natural Resources\ONeil\GIS\SPEC20041_Oneil_Overlook_Fig2b_Buffer Subj SS.mxd,

FIGURE 3. AERIAL MAP
O'NEIL OVERLOOK
CLAYTON, JOHNSTON COUNTY, NC
MCADAMS
N
A
0 75 150
Feet
1 inch = 150 feet
VERSION: 2
DATE: 4/30/2021
JOB NO: SPEC-20041
DRAWN BY: burdette
M:\Projects\!FOR-SPEC\SPEC-20041 Lipscomb On -Call Natural Resource Consulting\04-Production\Natural Resources\ONeil\GIS\SPEC20041_ONeil_Overlook_Fig 3Aerial.mxd, 4/30/2021 9:12:03AM, burdette

IJMVMIVIJ MIVV IIVVVL LIVVIIVLLf�IIV VI rl. LArI-XLJJLI I-XLJLI-XV LJ 1 1 J I.V IVIIVI VIV LMVV VL/F I-XIV111 MIVV V IIILIl rI-XVr Lf-X1 I I-XIVIIIJ IIV IIILJL FLMIVJ. II ILJL FLMIVJ IVV 1 I V UL IALF I-XVVVVLVI VI IMIVVLV VIA VVFILV IIV MINI 1 VIA VVI !MI JVLV LI\I Mf-XL II IL IV UL MJJIVIVLV IV MINI 1111[AV rP1n1 I VVIIIIVV 1 I II IL LArI-XLJJLV VV I -XI I ILIV FLI-XIVIIJJIVIV MIVV VVIVJLIV 1 VI MVMIVIJ MIVV 1IVVVL LIVVIIV LLf�IIV VI rl..
t
J
/5
HILL
HILL
G 21
220M
8
f�IL�
\ \IP\
CO
0
0
I
/
z
/14
• • •
m~�
0 z
m
\ F 0 FKAOYCR.EL
BA E L�\ \ \\\\\\ \ /' 1 \
/ DB 4391[A\A
PG 416 E
6E
TAGi 05\� 990 8b
PN 16691 —35L�9 85ZONI :USE: VACA
0.43 A
ACCESS EASEMENT N/F
PB 71 PG 87
FOFO F. KABASELE
JOYCE R. KABASELE
DB 4391 PG 416
TAG 05E99018L
N 166910-35-9807
ZONING: R—E
l S NGLE FAMILY
7 0.67 AC
77
M7Lo
Q
I 1
CD 1'9
o_
= C�
m�z
N O z
▪ O (0 O
co
c9N
z
CD
\ \ //
//////
O
LO
0
zzc=n��zLn
O cn Z z 0
w Q v)0c00 U1
= Z Q co N
o ~ c'
cn
11\\\ \ 1 \ I 1111
1 1 \
, ( / // \ `\\\
I I I / �
I ///))�I
J
(
)
�/ L S1 PERMANENT
STREAM IMPACT
135 LF
/11 . (868 SF/0.020AC)
OAKDALE AVE
60' PUBLIC R/W
1
S2 PERMANENT
NO LOSS STREAM
IMPACT
12 LF
(48 SF/0.001AC)
8'X12' RIPRAP TO BE
BURIED IN STREAMBED TO
MAINTAIN CHANNEL
DIMENSIONS
tzco
I)( 0°1 \
LEGEND:
RESOURCE CONSERVATION AREA
ir
ir
7////%-- II
/7
0)
Uri
CL
cn - 0 cn
z
777/
0
MMOO
ci
Cn
LEGEND
PROPOSED
MAJOR CONTOURS
EXISTING
MINOR CONTOURS
EXISTING
MAJOR CONTOURS
PROPOSED
MINOR CONTOURS
PROPOSED
STORM PIPE
CURB INLET
FLARED END SECTION
EXISTING STORM PIPE
295
294
220
221
11111111111
NOTE:
1. THIS IS A PRELIMINARY DESIGN. FUTURE DETAILED
ANALYSIS OF THE SITE MAY DETERMINE THE NEED FOR
RETAINING WALLS IN OR AROUND THE SCM AREA.
oLn
L J
cnz —0
Cn
REVISED
5/4/2021 2:23 PM
kRELIMINAR3
GRAPHIC SCALE
c0 COu) CO CO
22222
22222
00000
00000
02000
000 ,D CD CD
314 EAST MAIN STREET
0
Lo
cm (NI
cts
.Lc,
0
FIRM # C-4187
EC
L OVERLOOK
TOWN OF CLAYTON, JOHNSTON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
CC .7c
oo
DESIGN
DCA
DRAWN
CHECKED
DCA
HORIZONTAL SCALE
SEE GRAPHIC SCALE
VERTICAL SCALE
N/A
DATE
05/22/2020
50 0
25 50
200
1 inch = 50 ft.
JOB NO.
SHEET

Akahi
SIMI)
po
4g(IP
LEGEND
QProject Area
— — Streams
Wetlands
— Roads
FIGURE 4. PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION/BUFFER MAP
O'NEIL OVERLOOK
CLAYTON, JOHNSTON COUNTY, NC
M:\Projects\!FORSPEC\SPEC-20041 Lipscomb On -Call Natural Resource Consulting\04-Production\Natural Resources\ONeil\GIS\SPEC20041-ONeil-Fig4 PJD-BUF Map.mxd, 4/30/2021 10:36:20 AM, burdette
N
A
0 75 150
Feet
1 inch = 150 feet
VERSION: 1
DATE: 4/30/2021
JOB NO: SPEC-20041
DRAWN BY: burdette

An—le,� ADAMS & HDDGE
ENGINEERING, PC
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
STATEMENT
O'NEIL OVERLOOK
TOWN OF CLAYTON
JOHNSTON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
PREPARED BY
EVA KING, PE
ADAMS & HODGE ENGINEERING P.C.
NOVEMBER 2, 2020
RO
039159
.. I
: _
)41,6-niso,
, WO, ,
„l illlllll

STORMWATER NARRATIVE

An—ls. ADAMS & HDDGE
ENGINEERING' PC
O'Neil Overlook
Town of Clayton
Johnston County, North Carolina
Stormwater Management Statement
November 2020
The site for the O'Neil Overlook project is located off O'Neil Street, North East of Main Street
in the Town of Clayton ETJ in Johnston County, North Carolina.
The project consists of one rerecorded parcel from the original parcel Tax ID 05H02199S PIN
166910-45-8700. The proposed use for this site is a subdivision with 37 single family residential
lots.
The existing site is mostly wooded areas with no buildings. There is a small portion of grassed
area with some fencing.
According to Firm Map 3720166900K dated 06/20/2018, the site is located in zone X, area of
minimal Flood Hazard.
According to Johnston County GIS, the site is not located withing the ESA, but approximately
2/3 of the project is within the water supply watershed. With this finding we are limited to a
density of 2 lots per acre for the lots that contain any protected area. There are 13.09 acres of
WSA-IV-PA area located across 26 lots in the proposed subdivision. This brings our density in
this area to 1.99 lots per acre.
As shown in the attached calculations, the impervious density of the site is kept below 38%. A
Wet Pond is being considered as a SCM to meet municipal requirements for stormwater.
Revisions to the earlier proposed gradings allows the majority of the site to enter the SMC via
pipe conveyance or overland flow. The pond will outflow in the outer 20 feet of the adjacent
riparian buffer as allowed per Neuse River Basin buffer rules 15A NCAC 02B. A detailed Point
of Analysis calculation comparing pre and post conditions will be provided during CD submittals
at each point where water leaves the site.
The proposed subdivision consists of two entrance streets and two interior cul-de-sacs all with
valley curb and gutter and sidewalk on both sides of the street.
Preliminary Nitrogen Calculations included show the SCM to reduce Nitrogen export to below 6
lbs/ac/yr as required for residential communities. Since the final nitrogen offset is allowed to be
no more than 3.60 lb/ac/yr, an additional off -set payment will be required.
ADAMS & HODGE ENGINEERING, PC • 314 E Main Street, Clayton, NC 27520 • 919-243-1332 • Firm # C-4187
November 2, 2020

NITROGEN EXPORT

ADAMS & HDDDE
ENGINEERING, , PC
Preliminary TN Calculations - O'Neil Overlook - Town of Clayton
This project is partially located within the ESOD area
13.09 acres of the project are within the ESOD, and 4.33 acres are outside of the ESOD
The impervious area limit (without Attenuation & Land Dedication) for Residential
Development for this project is 38
Impervious Calculations: sqft
Roadways: 54,276
37 Lots @ 4,750sgft/lot: 175,750
Other (SW, Driveway in ROW, CBU, etc.) 20,647
Total: 250,673
ac
1.25
4.03
0.47
5.75
7.15%
23.16%
2.72%
33.03%
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
Type of Land Cover
Site Area
(Acres)
TN Export Coeff.
(Ibs/ac/yr)
TN Export
by Land
Use (Ibs/yr)
TN Export
From Site
(Ibs/ac/yr)
Perm. preserved undisturbed open space
(forest, unmown meadow)
2.69
0.6
1.61
Perm. preserved managed open space
(grass, landscaping, etc.)
8.98
1.2
10.77
Impervious surfaces (roads, parking
lots, driveways, roofs, paved storage
areas, etc.)
5.75
21.2
122.00
TOTAL
17.42
134.38
Average for Site
7.71
ALLOWABLE NITROGEN EXPORT:
ACTUAL NITROGEN EXPORT IS:
3.60 Ib/ac/yr
7.71 Ib/ac/yr
SCM measure required
to reduce TN export to
below 6 Ibs/ac/yr and
additional buy down will
be required if value
remains above 3.6
Ibs/ac/yr
10/30/2020

APPENDIX
VICINITY MAP
FIRMETTE
SOILS MAP
USGS MAP

* * * DISCLAIMER
Johnston County assumes no legal responsibility for the information represented here.
Ire, IllIllIl 141
■►1111110#�:i:•
viva; oqi/% $►IHIu #
" \(\7
Scale: 1:12000 - 1 in. = 1000 feet
(The scale is only accurate when printed landscape on a 8 1/2 x 11 size sheet with no page scaling.)
Johnston County GIS
May 21, 2020

National Flood Hazard Layer FI RMette
FEMA
Legend
78°27'5"W 35°39'49"N
C' LAY TON ETRJ -
370139
AREA.0DMINIMAL =L@®D_HA ARD
370139
■
Zone X
1 © 01r]z , Orh©irnnc
pril 2020
0 250 500
1,000
1,500
Feet
2,000
1:6,000
78°26'27"W 35°39'19"N
SEE FIS REPORT FOR DETAILED LEGEND AND INDEX MAP FOR FIRM PANEL LAYOUT
SPECIAL FLOOD
HAZARD AREAS
Without Base Flood Elevation (BFE)
Zone A, V, A99
With BFE or Depth ZoneAE, AO, AH, VE, AR
Regulatory Floodway
OTHER AREAS OF
FLOOD HAZARD
OTHER AREAS
GENERAL
STRUCTURES
OTHER
FEATURES
MAP PANELS
a _
0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard, Areas
of 1% annual chance flood with average
depth less than one foot or with drainage
areas of less than one square mile zonex
Future Conditions 1% Annual
Chance Flood Hazard zonex
"Area with Reduced Flood Risk due to
Levee. See Notes. zonex
Area with Flood Risk due to Leveezone D
NO SCREEN Area of Minimal Flood Hazard
Effective LOMRs
Area of Undetermined Flood Hazard
- — - - Channel, Culvert, or Storm Sewer
i i i i i i i Levee, Dike, or Floodwall
20.2 Cross Sections with 1% Annual Chance
77.5 Water Surface Elevation
- - Coastal Transect
- sr,-w- Base Flood Elevation Line (BFE)
Limit of Study
Jurisdiction Boundary
Coastal Transect Baseline
- — Profile Baseline
Hydrographic Feature
▪ Digital Data Available
▪ No Digital Data Available
• Unmapped
N
The pin displayed on the map is an approximate
point selected by the user and does not represent
an authoritative property location.
This map complies with FEMA's standards for the use of
digital flood maps if it is not void as described below.
The basemap shown complies with FEMA's basemap
accuracy standards
The flood hazard information is derived directly from the
authoritative NFHL web services provided by FEMA. This map
was exported on 9/24/2020 at 10:34 AM and does not
reflect changes or amendments subsequent to this date and
time. The NFHL and effective information may change or
become superseded by new data overtime.
This map image is void if the one or more of the following map
elements do not appear: basemap imagery, flood zone labels,
legend, scale bar, map creation date, community identifiers,
FIRM panel number, and FIRM effective date. Map images for
unmapped and unmodernized areas cannot be used for
regulatory purposes.

z
35° 39'45"N
E
E
35° 39' 26" N
730870
Custom Soil Resource Report
Soil Map (O'Neil Overlook)
2
Oct] Gawp may wok [bc ealid amOQ°
731050
731140
730870 730960 731050 731140
N N
Map Scale: 1:4,000 if printed on A landscape (11" x 8.5") sheet.
0 50 100
200
731230
731230
Meters
300
Feet
0 153 330 E00 900
Mapprojedion: Web Mercator Conerwordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 17N WGS84
9
731320
CeB
PaD
731410
731320 731410
731500
731500
731590
731590
731680
731680
35° 39' 45" N
35° 39'26"N

The National Map Advanced Viewer
Coo Per ;;()
EIeir S..:h ;,�1;fY j,•
-1
1-
9/24/2020, 10:41:56 AM
1:18,056
0 0.13 0.25
0.5 mi
0 0.2 0.4
0.8 km
USGS The National Map: National Boundaries Dataset, 3DEP Elevation
Program, Geographic Names Information System, National Hydrography
Dataset, National Land Cover Database, National Structures Dataset, and
National Transportation Dataset; USGS Global Ecosystems; U.S. Census
USGS
USGS The National Map: National Boundaries Dataset, 3DEP Elevation Program, Geographic Names Information System, National Hydrography Dataset, National Land Cover Database, National

c
VICINITY MAP
NTS
EN
DEVELOPER/APPLICANT:
J&B REAL ESTATE
CONSULTANTS, LLC.
328 E MAIN ST.
CLAYTON, NC 27520
CONTACT: JAMES LIPSCOMB 919-323-3720
MAJOR SUBDIVISION PLAN
FOR
O'NEIL OVERLOOK
2020-75-SD
IN
TOWN OF CLAYTON,
JOHNSTON COUNTY,
NORTH CAROLINA
SHEET INDEX
SHEET TITLE
SHEET No.
SEALED BOUNDARY C1.00
EXISTING CONDITIONS C1.01
SITE PLAN & PRELIMINARY PLAT C2.01
PEDESTRIAN & VEHICULAR ROUTING PLAN C2.02
PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN C3.01
PRELIMINARY EROSION CONTROL PLAN C4.01
PRELIMINARY GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN C5.01
PLAN & PROFILE C6.01
PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN L1.01
REGULATORY STANDARDS DT1.00
REVISED
3/18/2021 7:56 AM
J
ADAMS Si. HODGE
ENGINEERING, PC
314 EAST MAIN STREET
CLAYTON, NC 27520
919-243-1332 [e-mail]
FIRM # C-4187
O'NEIL OVERLOOK
TOWN OF CLAYTON, JOHNSTON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
JUKE 1, 2020
October 30, 2020 1st TRC COMMENTS
December 04, 2020 2nd TRC COMMENTS
February 05, 2021 3rd TRC COMMENTS
March 03, 2021 4th TRC COMMENTS
*March 18, 2021 5th TRC COMMENTS
T.O.C. PROJECT: 2020-75-SD
J

map
t
LINE
BEARING
DISTANCE
L 1
S82°24' 13"E
15.13'
L2
S82°46'35"E
19.04'
L3
S73°34'28"E
23.40'
L4
S76°45'09"E
5.92'
L5
S71°24'17"E
20.21'
L6
S43°51'56"E
29.90'
L7
S51°01'57"E
28.22'
L8
S59°50' 16"E
15.63'
L9
S24°30'59E
11.73'
L10
S56°08'06"E
12.20'
L11
N82°03'03"E
6.07'
L12
N23°42'53"W
8.93'
L13
N01°58'09"E
7.63'
L14
N82°04'23"E
11.49'
L15
S69°36'34"E
15.56'
L16
N84°05'34"E
20.77'
L17
S69°39'37"E
15.34'
L18
S62°58'36"E
12.33'
L19
S44°32' 18"E
21.51'
L20
S88°00'09"E
11.46'
L21
S38°31'51 "E
11.90'
L22
S 19°36' 14"E
13.48'
L23
S84°09'43"E
10.08'
L24
N61°05'04"E
31.40'
L25
N83°28'47"E
16.83'
L26
S74°29'03"E
14.75'
LINE
BEARING
DISTANCE
L27
S34°30'27"E
9.12'
L28
S6736'29"E
20.40'
L29
S74°49'39"E
23.93'
L30
S56°57'27"E
23.97'
L31
S72°51'13"E
21.81'
L32
S56°22'35"E
11.28'
L33
S45°44'03"E
15.93'
L34
N46°53'31 "E
8.67'
L35
N 15°58'58"E
8.06'
L36
N52°37'23"E
7.74'
L37
S73°52' 1 1 "E
22.99'
L38
S21°59'07"E
31.07'
L39
S2730'09"E
66.34'
L40
S60°08'20"E
26.14'
L41
S09°02'40"E
35.69'
L42
S52°37'25"E
27.36'
L43
S76° 14'38"E
43.95'
L44
S42°55'45"E
23.31'
L45
S05°29'52"E
33.14'
L46
S82°37'30"E
58.01'
L47
N46°32'36"E
59.78'
L48
S37°59'24"E
37.02'
L49
N89°43'46"E
27.53'
L50
N22°21'37"E
48.39'
L51
S29°55'37"E
30.15'
L52
S28°06' 17"E
43.97'
e
PF
LINE
BEARING
DISTANCE
L53
S25°42'07"E
23.59'
L54
S69°36'34"E
45.83'
L55
S71 °47' 18"E
42.75'
L56
N35°42'21 "E
9.77'
L57
N05°56'34"W
69.35'
L58
S69°51'39'E
53.12'
L59
S42°32'06"E
39.09'
L60
S68°01'24"E
33.59'
L61
SOZO8'17"E
27.23'
L62
S14°21'04"W
27.95'
L63
S62°27'58"W
27.94'
L64
S60°57'31 "W
30.45'
L65
S16°57'10"W
36.42'
L66
S21°20'52"W
20.24'
L67
S48°20'51 "W
19.85'
L68
N68°57'29"W
30.91'
L69
N21°38'55"E
32.17'
L70
S69°43' 19"W
20.08'
L71
S35° 1 6'41 "W
41.27'
L72
S10°33'20"E
47.99'
L73
S26° 18'23"E
25.77'
L74
S80° 17'51 "W
20.64'
L75
S88°21'39'W
44.06'
L76
S00°08'52"E
31.76'
L77
S89°59'31 "W
99.09'
L78
S89°59'31 "W
100.01'
GW �I
LINE
BEARING
DISTANCE
L79
S89°59'31 "W
100.01'
L80
S89°59'31 "W
99.26'
L81
N89°11'34"W
99.71'
L82
N89° 1 1 '34'W
100.00'
L83
N89° 1 1 '34'W
100.00'
L84
N89°11'34'W
99.26'
L85
N00°39'31 "E
206.57'
L86
N00°39'31 "E
205.15'
L87
N00°39'31 "E
203.72'
L88
N44°56'28"E
0.54'
L89
N42°53' 1 1 "E
97.74'
L90
S62°20'57"W
151.30'
L91
N42°53' 1 1 "E
49.84'
L92
N89°38'48"W
136.25'
L93
N89°38'48"W
113.81'
L94
N72°29'26"E
43.81'
L95
N62°20'57"E
151.30'
L96
N69°48'46"E
35.40'
FEATURE NOT
SUBJECT TO TOWN OF
CLAYTON STREAM 1
BUFFER SETBACKS \
UDC 155.502 (A)(1)I/)\ j/
I12�� `
5PecAt
/$/ J0/// // 9/ //1
-E-ELLf-�/ 41 J'G b//g/ //a //
/� ; �/ , /� FEATURE START POINT , J
66'PER DWR LETTER
DATED 01/07/2020
" WATER METER TO f/���
BE ABANDONED, j"5
TO THIS POINT ��
� � EXISTING �����
i,• I /i //// .I I/ ^r',_ o�L ��CC NI(`C I INIC 4 �d/G
CURVE
RADIUS
ARC LENGTH
CHORD LENGTH
CHORD BEARING
C1
690.00'
56.35'
56.35'
N45° 13'36"E
FEATURE NOT
SUBJECT TO TOWN OF
CLAYTON STREAM
BUFFER SETBACKS
UDC 155.502 (A)(1)
\ " EXISTING ` j
\ \
1��
1'1l \\\\�\ EXIT
CONTOURS
/ NC>GR1,D 00RD'FNATE,�
N: 695 89. 0 3
EJ 21663346
S8`a°59'31"W 0'
252
A i - -4,
J _ I zs,759
4,2rAdriPVAIPIOVAPArallreVAPararArArVAIWIPWM4011rea 11154144'
260
/AO ArA42141AWAVAAISVAIPAr4V/AEVE;Airr Wr'r4411fF /A , A r '
41'
AraWAVAWADWAY7 AW - 'Aar - Airw-
I'. A�/.
APB:;°
NC C
PG
5H03 •90
6900 55-92
ZON G: R
U . : VA T
0.7 ' AC
FEATURE START POINT
PER DWR LETTER
DATED 01/07/2020
LEGEND
EXISTING
MAJOR CONTOUR
MINOR CONTOUR
6" WATERLINE
12" WATERLINE
OVERHEAD POWERLINE
POWER POLE
SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE
SANITARY SEWER PIPE
FIRE HYDRANT
EXISTING STORM PIPE
WATERSUPPLY WATERSHED
RIPARIAN BUFFER
WETLANDS
SLOPES >25% WITH AN AREA
OF 5,000 SF OR MORE
G A R Q •,
stctl.SS 6%4/,
4- Q
2 4
•
G N •• b.
REVISED
3/3/2021 7:30 AM
PRELIMINARY J
100 0
GRAPHIC SCALE
50 100
200
-6"WL
- 295 - -
- 294 - -
6 WL -
12 WL
OPW
O
ss
FH
V //
+ + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + +
400
( IN FEET )
1 inch = 100 ft.
SOURCES OF INFORMATION:
1. EXISTING SURVEY OF SITE PROVIDED BY TRUE LINE SURVEYING, P.C., 205
W. MAIN STREET, CLAYTON, NC 27520, DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2020
2. EXISTING TOPO OF SITE PROVIDED BY TRUE LINE SURVEYING, P.C., 205 W.
MAIN STREET, CLAYTON, NC 27520, DATED APRIL 1, 2020
3. PARCEL INFORMATION FROM JOHNSTON COUNTY GIS DATED 2018
4. EXISTING WATER & SEWER MAIN INFROMATION TAKEN FROM TOWN OF
CLAYTON GIS MAP.
5. NC DWR BUFFER CALL LETTER DATED JANUARY 07,2020.
6. WETLANDS DELINEATION PROVIDED BY BROWN'S ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP
242 BATTEN FARM RD, SELMA, NC 27576
11
co co
zzzz
2222
0000
0,00
HHHH
Z.NcO+r
00000
OV Uf)M
>ch0oo
UJ N M
314 EAST MAIN STREET
E
0 00
CV •
LC) t�
C\1 0 M
• -
zDM
z • N CV
Q �
a,
U O
FIRM # C-4187
W
i7
0
0
1
0
a
w
2
E
W
W
2
2
W
L OVERLOOK
W
O
TOWN OF CLAYTON, JOHNSTON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
z
z <
• E2
�z
Z
O J
UO
Z W
F- 0
Cn 0
X Z
W
DESIGN
DCA
DRAWN
ADS/ARG/MAF/EK
CHECKED
DCA
HORIZONTAL SCALE
SEE GRAPHIC SCALE
VERTICAL SCALE
N/A
DATE
05/22/2020
JOB NO.
SHEET
C 1.01

VICINITY MAP
NTS
NOTE:
1. ALL SIDEWALKS SHALL BE 5' WIDE.
2. ALL OPEN SPACE SHALL BE MAINTAINED BY HOA.
LINE
BEARING
DISTANCE
L1
S82°24'13"E
15.13'
L2
S82'46'35"E
19.04'
L3
S73'34'28"E
23.40'
L4
S76°45'09"E
5.92'
L5
S71'24'17"E
20.21'
L6
S43°51'56"E
29.90'
L7
S51'01'57"E
28.22'
L8
S59°50' 16"E
15.63'
L9
S24'30'59"E
11.73'
L10
S56°08'06"E
12.20'
L11
N82'03'03"E
6.07'
L12
N23°42'53'W
8.93'
L13
NO1'58'09"E
7.63'
L14
N82°04'23"E
11.49'
L15
S69'36'34"E
15.56'
L16
N84°05'34"E
20.77'
L17
S69'39'37"E
15.34'
L18
S62°58'36"E
12.33'
L19
S44'32'18"E
21.51'
L20
S88°00'09"E
11.46'
L21
S38'31'51"E
11.90'
L22
S19°36'14"E
13.48'
L23
S84'09'43"E
10.08'
L24
N61°05'04"E
31.40'
L25
N83'28'47"E
16.83'
L26
S74°29'03"E
14.75'
SITE
ENTRANCE
10'x70' SIGHT
DISTANCE
TRIANGLE
/ (TYP.)
10' CLASS A
ALTERNATIVE 1
LANDSCAPE BUFFER
SIGN EASEMENT
(TO BE SUBMITTED AND
APPROVED SEPARATELY)
/ o
N/F N 0,
JAMES HILL m
/ SARAH HILL
A DB 4664 PG 201 1
TAG 05 •220M
PN 166911 5515 ,
Z. IING: 8
\USE: SINGLE 'MILY
0.22
LINE
BEARING
DISTANCE
L27
S34'30'27"E
9.12'
L28
S67'36'29" E
20.40'
L29
S74'49'39" E
23.93'
L30
S56'57'27"E
23.97'
L31
S72'51'13"E
21.81'
L32
S56'22'35"E
11.28'
L33
S45'44'03" E
15.93'
L34
N46°53'31 "E
8.67'
L35
N15'58'58"E
8.06'
L36
N52°37'23"E
7.74'
L37
S73'52' 1 1 "E
22.99'
L38
S21'59'07"E
31.07'
L39
S27'30'09" E
66.34'
L40
S60'08'20"E
26.14'
L41
S09'02'40" E
35.69'
L42
S52'37'25"E
27.36'
L43
S76' 14'38" E
43.95'
L44
S42'55'45"E
23.31'
L45
S05'29'52" E
33.14'
L46
S82'37'30"E
58.01'
L47
N46'32'36"E
59.78'
L48
S37'59'24"E
37.02'
L49
N89'43'46"E
27.53'
L50
N22°21'37"E
48.39'
L51
S29'55'37"E
30.15'
L52
S28'06'17"E
43.97'
10' CLASS 'A'
ALTERNATIVE 1
LANDSCAPE BUFFER
40x38
40(MAX)
10,010 SF
0.23 AC
,043 SF
40x38
(MAX)
40x50
(TYP.)
STOP BAR
(TYP.)
40x50
(TYP.)
,026 SF
LEGEND:
(RCA) RESOURCE
CONSERVATION AREA
WATERSUPPLY WATERSHED
WETLANDS
OPEN SPACE
(OUTSIDE OF RCA)
PORTION OF CLASS "B"
LANDSCAPE BUFFER
0.20
40x50
ITYP
STOP SIGN
(TYP.)
40x50
(TYP.)
CBU
EASEMENT
11,415 SF
0.26 AC
LINE
BEARING
DISTANCE
L53
S25'42'07"E
23.59'
L54
S69'36'34'E
45.83'
L55
S71'47'18'E
42.75'
L56
N35'42'21 "E
9.77'
L57
N05'56'34'W
69.35'
L58
S69'51'39"E
53.12'
L59
S42'32'06'E
39.09'
L60
S68'01'24"E
33.59'
L61
S02'08'17'E
27.23'
L62
S14'21'04"W
27.95'
L63
S62'27'58'W
27.94'
L64
S60'57'31"W
30.45'
L65
S16'57'10'1N
36.42'
L66
S21'20'52"W
20.24'
L67
S48'20'51'1N
19.85'
L68
N68'57'29"W
30.91'
L69
N21'38'55'E
32.17'
L70
S69'43'19"W
20.08'
L71
S35' 16'41 "W
41.27'
L72
S10'33'20"E
47.99'
L73
S26' 18'23'E
25.77'
L74
S80' 17'51 "W
20.64'
L75
S88'21'39'W
44.06'
L76
S00'08'52"E
31.76'
L77
S89'59'31'W
99.09'
L78
S89'59'31"W
100.01'
ACCESS EASEMENT
APB 71 PG 87
40x50 10,638
(TYP.) 0.2
30" VALLEY 3 /
CURB AND , �a
GUTTER
N/F
FOFO F. KABASELE
JOYCE R. KABASELE
DB 4391 PG 416
TAG 05E99018L
PN 166910-35-9807
ZONING: R-E
USE: SINGLE FAMILY
0.67 AC
5' SIDEWALK
(TYP.)
STREET 'B'
CUL-DE-SAC
LENGTH 149.87
FT
40x50
(TYP.)
12,757 SF
0.29 AC
S89°59'31'" 4,410.50'
CBU (/) J
LOCATION M rn <
Zw LT)ce
w (1)
EASEMENT MAY SHIFT OR CHANGE
LOCATION AS CONSTRUCTION
PLANS ARE FINALIZED.
OPEN
SPACE
0.30 AC
13,247.43 SF
PROPOSED
RETAINING
WALL
LINE
BEARING
DISTANCE
L79
S89'59'31'W
100.01'
L80
S89°59'31 "W
99.26'
L81
N89'11'34'1N
99.71'
L82
N89'11'34"W
100.00'
L83
N89' 1 1 '34'1N
100.00'
L84
N89' 1 1 '34'1N
99.26'
L85
N00'39'31"E
206.57'
L86
N00'39'31 "E
205.15'
L87
N00'39'31"E
203.72'
L88
N44'56'28'E
0.54'
L89
N42'53'11"E
97.74'
L90
S62'20'57'W
151.30'
L91
N42'53'11"E
49.84'
L92
N89'38'48'W
136.25'
L93
N89'38'48"W
113.81'
L94
N72'29'26'E
43.81'
L95
N62'20'57'E
151.30'
L96
N69'48'46"E
35.40'
16+00
0x50
(TYP.
Ati
4�11111MWA PAIMIll
BUILDING FOOTPRINT
(TYP.)
,750 SF,
0.20
A
31" : .00'
OPEN SPACE TABLE
ACRES
NET USEABLE LAND
13.31
REQUIRED OPEN SPACE 1,245 SF/LOT
1.058
OPEN SPACE PROVIDED
2.09
**NOTE: NET USEABLE LAND WAS DETERMINED BY REMOVING THE RCA (4.11 AC) FROM
THE TOTAL PROPERTY SIZE (17.42 AC)
40x50
N 89°5
,400 SF
BUILDING
SETBACKS
(TYP.)
,108 SF
1 , 28 SF
10' PRIVATE
DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
4,746 S
0.57
(OUT
E RC
,495 SF
49 A
19+00
°59'31"
40x49
(M
11,843
RIPARIAN
BUFFER
(TYP)
CBU
LOCATION
10' PRIVATE
DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
CBU
EASEMENT
STREET 'A'
CUL-DE-SAC
LENGTH 149.58 FT
_ CD
rnz
(0OZN
(O
co
•
CURVE
C1
9,624 SF 40x50
0.22 AC (TYP,)
(OUT SIDE RCA
9,308 SF
0.
PROJECT
BOUNDARY
, 4 SF
0.34 A
UTS I
10
3
25 AC
E
STREET'D'
CUL-DE-SAC
LENGTH 134.32 FT
O'NEIL OVERLOOK LOT STANDARDS
ZONING
UNIT TYPE
LOT STANDARDS
Density
(dwelling
units/
acre)
MINIMUM SETBACKS (FT.)
BUILDING STANDARDS
Min. Lot
(Area
rft)
Min. Lot
Width (LF)
(At bldg.
setback)
Max. Lot
Co (%) ge
Max.
Impervious
Surface
(%)
Front
Side
Side
Street
Rear
BUILDING
SEPARATION
Max. Height
(ft.)
R-8
SINGLE FAMILY
8,000
60
35
55
5
25
10
15
25
10
35
N/F
FOFO F. KABASELE
JOYCE R. KABASELE
DB 4391 PG 416
TAG 05E990180
PN 166910-35-9985
ZONING: R-E
USE: VACANT
N.43 AC
10' CLASS 'B'
ALTERNATIVE 1
LANDSCAPE BUFFER
9,115 SF
0.21AC
(OUTSIDE RC
8,285 SF
0.19 AC)
40x50
(TYP.)
FEATURE START
POINT PER DWR
LETTER DATED
01/07/2020
9,227 SF
OUSTSIDE R
8,048 S
0.18
40
(
FEATURE NOT SUBJECT TO TOWN
OF CLAYTON STREAM BUFFER
SETBACKS UDC 155.502 (A)(1)
10' PRIVATE
DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
OUTSI
RC
2 SF
19 AC
40x5
(TY
,032 SF
0.18
450
P.)
DRIVEWAY
(TYP)
PROPOSED
RETAINING
WALL
RADIUS
690.00'
40x50
(TYP.)
0,713
ARC LENGTH
56.35'
x50
(TYP.)
8,535
PROJECT
BOUNDARY
CHORD LENGTH
56.35'
PrSF
19 AC
SF
24 AC
SF
. 4 AC
TSIDE
9,73
0.
F
AC)
89°59'
CHORD BEARING
N45'13'36"E
20'x20 SIGHT
DISTANCE
TRIANGLE
(TYP.)
40x50
x50
(TYP.
PUBL ' R/W
O'NEIL OVERLOOK SITE DATA CHART
PARCEL OWNER
J&B REAL ESTATE CONSULTANTS, LLC
SUBURBAN REAL ESTATE
PARCEL OWNER ADDRESS
328 E. MAIN ST, CLAYTON, NC 27520
PO BOX 759, SMITHFIELD, NC 27577
PARCEL IDENTIFICATION
PROPERTY SIZE (SF)
05H021991 / 166910-35-8704
05H02207W / 166910-45-4651
2.237 AC / 97,458 SF
13.309 AC / 579,757 SF
PARCEL OWNER
SUBURBAN REAL ESTATE
PARCEL OWNER ADDRESS
PO BOX 759, SMITHFIELD, NC 27577
PARCEL IDENTIFICATION
05H03189K/166910-45-0119, 05H03189L/166910-45-1211, 05H03189M/166910-45-2119 &
05H03189N/166910-45-3212
PROPERTY SIZE (SF)
0.46 AC/20,151 SF, 0.47 AC/20,443 SF, 0.47 AC/20,586 SF, & 0.47 AC/20,602 SF
PROPERTY SIZE (SF) TOTAL
THIS SUBMITTAL 17.42 ACS / 758,997 SF
PROPERTY LOCATION
TOWN OF CLAYTON (TO BE ANNEXED)/CLAYTON TOWNSHIP
EXISTING/PROPOSED ZONING
R-E / R-8
EXISTING USE
RESIDENTIAL & UNDEVELOPED RESIDENTIAL
PROPOSED USE
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
PROPOSED NUMBER OF SINGLE FAMILY LOTS
37 LOTS
PROPOSED GROSS DENSITY
37 UNITS / 17.42 ACS = 2.12 UNITS PER AC
MAX ALLOWABLE IMPERVIOUS PER LOT
55%
PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA (% OF TOTAL SITE)
38%
PROPOSED PERVIOUS AREA (% OF TOTAL SITE)
62%
TOTAL RESOURCE CONSERVATION AREA
4.11 ACS / 179,031.6 SF
ELECTRIC PROVIDER
TOWN OF CLAYTON
WATER PROVIDER
TOWN OF CLAYTON
SEWER PROVIDER
TOWN OF CLAYTON
WATERSHED PROTECTION OVERLAY
YES WSA-IV-PA
WATERSHED PROTECTION AREA
570,260 SF/13.09 AC
WATERSHED PROTECTION DENSITY
26 UNITS = 1.99 UNITS PER ACRE
FEATURE NOT SUBJECT TO
TOWN OF CLAYTON
STREAM BUFFER SETBACKS
UDC 155.502 (A)(1)
ACE
AC
,793
NOTE:
1. THERE ARE NO AREAS OF 100 YEAR FEMA FLOOD ON PROPERTY
FLOOD PANEL NO. 3720177000 K eff. DATE 06/20/2018 & 3720177100 K eff. 05/02/2006.
2. RESOURCE CONSERVATION AREAS (RCA) WILL BE PERMANENTLY SET
ASIDE/PRESERVED ACCEPT ON LOTS 13, 14, 15, 16 & 17. IMPACTS TO (RCA) WILL
REQUIRE A VARIANCE FROM TOWN OF CLAYTON. ALL REQUIRED STATE OR
FEDERAL PERMITS FOR IMPACTS WILL BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.
3. ANNEXATION SHALL TAKE PLACE AND WILL BE COMPLETE PRIOR TO FINAL PLAT
PER UDC 155.600(C)(1).
THIS IS A PRELIMINARY DESIGN. FUTURE DETAILED ANALYSIS OF THE SITE MAY
DETERMINE THE NEED FOR RETAINING WALLS IN OR AROUND THE (SCM)
STORMWATER CONTROL MEASURE AREA.
PARKING REQUIREMENTS
§ 155.401(C)(2) FOR SINGLE-FAMILY, (2) SPACES REQUIRED
PER UNIT. PROVIDED (2) SPACES IN DRIVEWAY, (2) SPACE
IN GARAGE; TOTAL OF (4) SPACES PROVIDED PER UNIT.
120 SPACES TOTAL.
WETLANDS
(TYP)
r26.3r
ArAgrerAir 4'
on... .OcN
u �LOOL< 0 -LnIru m~ cr)
cn 04=a 0'' .. NNO- Ir
in Z(7� Z • �U (,� - JW = I ..-I
Jd'0�ZZ6, om2Z CZ0„ 0 0
QooU�o ' M (00 :'N030• zZ
en N I r o -' N _ <0.0�N
4
4 4
4
4
FEATURE START POINT
PER DWR LETTER
DATED 01/07/2020
REVISED
3/18/2021 7:43 AM
RELIMINARY
N/F
2 ST-ATEGI► NC C
D: 464 PG ..8
TAG 5H03 990
PN .6900 55-• 92
ZON IG: R
U. : VA NT
IMPERVIOUS AREA CALCULATIONS*
TOTAL AREA
(SQUARE FEET)
% OF TOTAL SITE
IMPERVIOUS AREA
(SQUARE FEET)
% IMPERVIOUS AREA OF THE
TOTAL SITE
RESIDENTIAL LOTS
396,622
52.26%
212,750
28.03%
RIGHT-OF-WAYS**
93,380
12.30%
71,905
9.47%
RESOURCE CONSERVATION AREAS***
177,908
23.44%
0
0.00%
TOTAL OPEN SPACE****
91,087
12.00%
0
0.00%
TOTAL AREA
758,997
100.00%
284,655
37.50%
*NOTE: AREAS AND CALCULATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. ACTUAL ACREAGE WILL BE DETERMINED DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PLAN PROCESS.
**NOTE: RIGHTS -OF -WAY INCLUDES STREETS, SIDEWALKS AND PORTIONS OF DRIVEWAY WITHIN THE R/W.
***NOTE: RESOURCE CONSERVATION AREAS INCLUDE RIPARIAN BUFFER AREAS, OPEN WATER BODIES, 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN AND SLOPES >25% PER UDC 155.500 (B)(3)
****NOTE: OPEN SPACE INCLUDES, AMENITIES, GREENWAYS, FEATURES IN PARKS PARKS, ACTIVE AND PASSIVE SPACES, ETC.
60
0
GRAPHIC SCALE
30 60
( IN FEET )
1 inch = 60 ft.
120
240
I
cop coHH
wzzzzz
wwww
22222
22222
00000
00000
00000
CCCCCC
Z NCO U)
000000
-NNNNN
O V V V z
UJ o00,
LL ONNMM
���000
314 EAST MAIN STREET
0
N
N
0
z
z
0
J
0
W
i�
0
0
I
(1)
0
L OVERLOOK
w
O
DESIGN
DCA
FIRM # C-4187
0
a
w
2
E
w
w
2
2
w
TOWN OF CLAYTON, JOHNSTON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DRAWN
ADS/ARG/MAF/EK
CHECKED
DCA
HORIZONTAL SCALE
SEE GRAPHIC SCALE
VERTICAL SCALE
N/A
DATE
05/22/2020
JOB NO.
SHEET
C2.01

l
l 1
LEGEND:
■ . . . . . . . . I
r z
RESIDENTIAL STREET (50' R/W)
(30" VALLEY CURB)
RESOURCE CONSERVATION AREA
1
1
/
/
TREET 'B'
CU -DE-SAC
LENGTH 149.87 FT
/
/
-0 -0 -0 -0
N
N
STREET
50' PUBLIC R/W
w
w
CC
CD a
STREET 'D'
CUL-DE-SAC
LENGTH = 134.32 FT
3:1 (MAX.)
CUT OR FILL
L
5'
7
50' RNV
6'
27.0' B/B
6'
5'
SIDEWALK
1 /4"/ft.
TREE STRIP
5' CONC.
SIDEWALK
11.0' EOP
11.0' EOP
TREE STRIP I SIDEWALK
2.5'
Slope 1/4
WATER MAIN
3" S9.5B SUPERPAVE
ASPHALT MIX
ASPHALT MIX TO BE PLACED
IN TWO (2) LIFTS -
FIRST LIFT: 1 - 1/2"
SECOND LIFT: 1 - 1/2"
(TO BE VERIFIED BY CBR)
RESIDENTIAL STREET SECTION
2.5'
30" VALLEY
CURB 1/4"/ft.
Slope 1/4"/ft.
(STREETS 'A', 'B', 'C' & 'D')
NOT TO SCALE
\_ 5' CONC.
SIDEWALK
3.5"OF STONE
UNDER CURB (TYP.)
8" AGGREGATE BASE COURSE
ON COMPACTED GRADE
STREET 'A' —
CUL-DE-SAC
ENGTH = 149.58 FT
NOTE: LOCATE ONE STREET
TREE EVERY 40'
3:1 (MAX.)
CUT OR FILL
SEE TYPICAL
STREET SECTION
50' R/W
36'
SAME ASPHALT
Ir SURFACE AS
STREET TYPICAL
SLOPE
AS REQUIRED
SAME BASE
MATERIAL AS
STREET TYPICAL
2.5'
SECTION A —A
5' 0.5'
DEWALK
1/4"/ft.
TYPICAL ASYMMETRICAL CULDESAC
I- I- 1- I - i- I - If if i- If if If if i-
NO SCALE
50' R/W
36'
SAME ASPHALT
SURFACE AS
STREET TYPICAL
SLOPE
AS REQUIRED
SAME BASE
MATERIAL AS
STREET TYPICAL
2.5'
SECTION A —A
SYMMETRICAL CUL—DE—SAC WITH
CURB & GUTTER
(RESIDENTIAL STREET)
NOT TO SCALE
If __ If If If If
7
50
5' 0.5'
DEWALK
1/4"/ft.
3'•
GAR0 •,
i24
•s
GIN -; ),ova
REVISED
2/5/2021 7:36 AM
[PRELIMINAJ
0
GRAPHIC SCALE
25 50 100
7
200
CO W
zzz
z
www
g2
000
000
000
HHH
CO -S-2
Z — N m
O O O 0
o
co--
>m00
314 EAST MAIN STREET
FIRM # C-4187
W
i�
0
0
(1)
0
0
a
w
2
E
W
W
2
2
w
L OVERLOOK
w
0
TOWN OF CLAYTON, JOHNSTON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DESIGN
DCA
DRAWN
ADS/ARG/MAF/EK
CHECKED
DCA
HORIZONTAL SCALE
SEE GRAPHIC SCALE
VERTICAL SCALE
N/A
DATE
05/22/2020
JOB NO.
OAKDALE AVE
60' PUBLIC R/W
(IN FEET)
1 inch = 50 ft.
SHEET
C2.02

lJ /'1 V/'11VIJ MIVV IIVVVL LIVVIIV LL nIIV V rl. LAr nLJJLI nLJLn V LJ I IJ I.V IVIIVIVIV L/YVV l.Vr InIVII I MIVL/ V II ILn rnVI-Ln1 I nIVII IJ IIV II ILJL rLP11VJ. II ILJL rLP11VJ /'1nL IVV I IV UL nLr nVVVI.LV,11P11VVL1-, Vn I.Vr ILL/ IIV /YINI I VnIVI Vn IVI/'11V IVLn VVI I/'11JVLV Ln IVVn',AL IIILI IV UL /'1JJIV IVLV IV P11VI 11II1,V r/'1n1 I VVI II IVV I I InJ1 VU I P111VIIVV II IL LArnLJJLL/ VV nI I ILIV rLnIVIIJJIVIV /'11VV l.V111J1-IV I VI /'1 V/'11VIJ MIVL/ IIVVVL LIV VIIVLLnIIV V, rl..
LEGEND:
RESOURCE CONSERVATION AREA
NOTE:
REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS IS A SEPARATE
PROCESS. APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTAL DOES NOT CONSTITUTE CD
APPROVAL.
EXISTING
12" WATERLINE
CUT IN 12"x6" TEE
WITH (2) 12" GV
(1)6"GV
PP
SITE
ENTRANCE
a
RELOCATED
FIRE HYDRANT
V
\`/ N/F /
/ JAMES HILL
SARAN HILL
DB 4664 PG 201 •
TAG 05H1220M
\-Thl 16691. 3'-5515 I Ze' ING: ' 8
USE: SINGLE F; MILY'
0.22
4
/
•
PORTION OF
WATERLINE
TO BE EXTENDED
7,
EXISTING
6" WATERLINE
/
00
i O
c"
N ••
LLJ
cn
SSMH
•P=292.84
I N=284.96
INV •. =284.86
5
•
•
N
0
i
NO 00 J
O-) N—
D00L«O0�
BORE & JACK
BEND
GW
•`
ti
MI
TEMPORARY
BLOW OFF
146
CUT IN 6"x6" TEE
WITH (2) 6" GV
s
<0O
o *
v�
*.*
0. t
c0 I I < d- }
C9mO�mwQ UQ-OCODp�
z o 00 0-CE0CoI I<
o �oozz7 0Q c�',`,,LnOc Q
Q`O O-)z-o c� tl
>R • 0 cc'0 wQ �ooz�°'
LL_ P- — Lil D — COO 01 z z d
fl-
,21 z z C Qa �o(Do
EL� mI— ..
LL 0 Z
z
0_
TOP=284.89
COVERED
FIRE HYDRANT
ASSEMBLY
(TYP.)
J )
N _J
IIQ
\ 0 O 0- 0 W Q
= _1z <L1J�LnOzO —
O�,. O' -z
0NO 0,(7)o
J QQCONL••
c
z
0
\,l
PP
i
STORM P
N/F
FOFO F. KABASELE
JOYCE R. KABASELE
DB 4391 PG 416
TAG 05E990180
PN 166910-35-9985
ZONING: R-E
USE: VACANT
0.43 AC
N/F
FOFO F. KABASELE
JOYCE R. KABASELE
DB 4391 PG 416
TAG 05E99018L
PN 166910-35-9807
ZONING: R-E
USE: SINGLE FAMILY
0.67 A('
_. -
EASEMENT MAY SHIFT OR CHANGE
LOCATION AS CONSTRUCTION
PLANS ARE FINALIZED.
OPEN
SPACE
0.30 AC
13,247.43 SF
6"x6" TEE WITH (3)
6" GATE VALVES '
PROPOSED
RETAINING WALL
10' PRIVATE
DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
WATER & SEWER
SERVICES (TYP.)
FIRE HYDRANT
ASSEMBLY
(TYP.)
EXISTING
FIRE HYDRANT
6" W
STREET 'A'
0' PLBLIC R.'W (27' B-B
6"x6" TEE w/
(3) 6" GV
I._ - •MIS ■ •=
�u
lap
•
� I�
>_
Cn 0ON _J
LLJ 00
o 0 eE QU
Li Q 0_ or wQ
zz �LLnOI zoLn
�0oanzz0
LLJ Q NO O CO O (n
I z m < CO N
m ~ v W
z D
6" WL
6" WL
SS
SSMH
TQRT2809i
INV IN=272.72
INV OUT=272.04
SS SS
SS
SS
SSMH
TOP=269.87
INV IN=258.27
INV OUTI—
ss
6"WL
10
w
w
SS
6"WL
■I ■■ °
e
I
FIRE HYDRANT
ASSEMBLY
(TYP.)
0►
mA
440
411
was 0
•
N J �
drin,0ss
6"WL
SS
✓V
WL
Opw
Wt
-a
Adrartart944)01/
IIi►_�I
10' PRIVATE
DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
27
20' PUBLIC UTILITY
EASEMENT
10' PUBLIC ACCESS &
MAINTENANCE EASEMENT
■
26
16
• 1
SS
MH
•
FIRE HYDRANT
ASSEMBLY
(TYP.)
II �,
71fiommE■III■i °
19
kVA1 \
14111
41fr'i®
�N
Ar,4„,
1r1I I ..1044
FIRE HYDRANT
ASSEMBLY
(TYP.)
PROPOSED
RETAINING WALL
15
6'x6" TEE WITH
(3) 6" GATE
VALVES
67
fr
i
20' PUBLIC UTILITY
EASEMENT
° 40#4o
���
22
0
111
1
LLJ
z
1
0
�11
VVL �—
aw
ss ss ,-
EXISTING PIPE
TO BE FIELD VERIFIED
SITE
ENTRANCE
—611W
IE TO
EX SEWER
CUT IN 6"x6" TEE
WITH (3) 6" GV
-D
SS
" WL
6.. EtAKDALAkE
60' PUBLIC R/W
OPEN CUT STREET
& REPAIR
NEW DOGHOUSE
MANHOLE
6" V4L
SS
\
I• I� I•
10' PRIVATE
DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
FIRE HYDRANT
ASSEMBLY
(TYP.)
\
L J
Q 01
w0- •
o�
J Da I I z
121-
QQ - m
z (•' c� = >a0
zm Lnoz t
m000-,zw0
00o�� Q CD N
m
0_
°'Ln00I
24
SSMH
INV IN=255.12
TOP=265.11
SS
SS
SS
OpW
/‘8
/
Op
12" WL OA
Opp
12" WL
FH
12" WL
12" WL
WV
Op,
GW
PP
4
SCM 4
JAPt
Vdik*Aff
50'
RIPARIAN
BUFFER
10' PUBLIC ACCESS &
MAINTENANCE EASEMENT
/ /
OPEN SPACE
1.79 AC
77,793 SF
/
OPW
12"
OPW
- AAA* a -
i--/ ,,
44,
BOUNDARY
(TYP.) ���'
IN- IN-
Don cn-z
HYDRANT LOCATION
TYPICAL FIRE
SERVICES LOCATION
TYPICAL WATER/SEWER
IN- IN -
'moo 00
LLI
cn
NOTE:
WATERLINE IS TO BE INSTALLED FOLLOWING
MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. WHEN
THE PROPOSED LAYOUT OF THE WATERMAIN
EXCEEDS THE ALLOWED DEFLECTION,
APPROPRIATE SIZE AND DEGREE OF MJ ELBOWS
SHALL BE INSTALLED. EXAMPLES INCLUDE BUT
ARE NOT LIMITED TO SHARP CURVES,
CUL-DE-SACS, UNDER STORM DRAIN, UNDER
DRAINAGE WAYS, ETC. BOWED WATERMAINS WILL
NOT BE ACCEPTED.
50
0
LEGEND
PROPOSED
6" WATERLINE SDR-21
GATE VALVE
HYDRANT
WATER METER FOR 3/4" SERVICE
CONNECTION
8" GRAVITY SEWER
SDR-35
SANITARY MANHOLE
SANITARY CLEANOUT
PROPOSED STORM PIPE
CURB INLET
FLARED END SECTION
6"WL
ss
111111111111
WASTE WATER FLOW:
RESIDENTIAL
9,250 GPD/UNIT
TOTAL = 9,250 GPD
IEEE
4
•
o
CL
N/F
C2 STRATEGIC NC LL(
DB 4642 PG 668
TAG 05H031990
PN 166900-55-029
ZONING: R-8
USE: VACANT
•
cc
617
REVISED
3/3/2021 7:38 AM
GRAPHIC SCALE
25 50
100
200
1 inch = 50 ft.
2222
2222
314 EAST MAIN STREET
c co
ct (NI
FIRM # C-4187
0
0 a
1.4 E
5 5
L OVERLOOK
TOWN OF CLAYTON, JOHNSTON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
Lll
DESIGN
DCA
DRAWN
CHECKED
DCA
HORIZONTAL SCALE
SEE GRAPHC SCALE
VERTICAL SCALE
N/A
DATE
05/22/2020
JOB NO.
SHEET

FOR GRAPHIC PURPOSES SILT
FENCE AND LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
ARE SHOWN SEPARATED. SILT
FENCE IS TO BE INSTALLED AT THE
ACTUAL LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE.
THIS SHEET IS FOR GRADING AND
EROSION CONTROL PURPOSES
ONLY. DO NOT USE THIS SHEET FOR
STORM DRAIN INSTALLATION.
JOHNSTON COUNTY AND TOWN OF
CLAYTON RESERVES THE RIGHT TO
MODIFY THE EROSION AND
SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLAN IF
THE EXISTING PLAN OR ITS
IMPLEMENTATION PROVE TO BE
INADEQUATE.
ALL DITCHES/SWALES ARE TO BE
IMMEDIATELY LINED USING NAG S150 OR
SOD UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED.
PROPOSED CONCRETE
WASHOUT
(MAY BE RELOCATED
AS NECESSARY)
CONSTRUCTION
ENTRANCE
(TYP.)
i
J
3
SS
00 J
C5l CN
000Lc) o0�
C • 0 O Ln c U 0
Z 0 0� cn Ln0 CD--
0�o'-zzo
Q,t ODz(-7)
x02 QcoO
woF-'- w
Cr)
z
w
•
•
! !
QQ
z
•
•
000
Q N
0
SS
ACCESS EASEMENT N/F
PB 71 PG 87
FOFO F. KABASELE
JOYCE R. KABASELE
DB 4391 PG 416
TAG 05E99018L
N 166910-35-9807
ZONING: R-E
/ SJ,NGLE FAMILY
0.c) 7 AC
NPDES/STORMWATER
INSPECTION BOX
W/6" RAIN GAGE
! !
LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE
(TYP.)
! !
LEGEND:
RESOURCE CONSERVATION AREA
--77/rc
\\ \\ \\.
s \\ ,\\ \\\ \ ,,\\
\ \ FO�FO \
\ KABA E \ I \ \ I J 1
�/ O C R. KAII\A EL \ 1 1\ 1 \ \ I I I 1\
B 4391 PG
PN 1 6691 -351-9 85\ I 1 1 \\\ 1 I I
f / ZONI E� 1 / 1\� \
USE: VACA 1 J I 1 \\I
0.43A ) 1 I I I/ )) I
J / � t / /// 1J �,
//
BOUNDARY
(TYP.)
SEDIMENT
BASIN
DBL SILT
FENCE
(TYP.)
50' RIPARIAN
BUFFER
CE
z Q = co 0 �
wQ�o�z6
w Q,.00(.00
= Z m<(DN
o~� LJ
z 0
0
LIMITS OF ;!---
DISTURBANCE
(TYP.) i
items,
AL
-
SILT FENCE
OUTLET W/ J-HOOK
POND TO BE USED AS
SEDIMENT
BASIN DURING
CONSTRUCTION
247
246�
245
LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE
(TYP.)
SILT FENCE
OUTLET W/ J-HOOK
—I
e \I
eE
ALcVZ/
DBL SIFENCELT
\ -4\
SILT FENCE
OUTLET W/J-HOOK
OD
LLI
cn
0
Ln
0
LEGEND
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
MAJOR CONTOUR
EXISTING
MINOR CONTOUR
EXISTING
MAJOR CONTOUR
PROPOSED
MINOR CONTOUR
PROPOSED
SKIMMER BAFFLES
SILT FENCE
SILT FENCE OUTLET
PERMANENT DIVERSION
DITCH
O 0 0 0 0
ARC INLET PROTECTION
WATTLE
CHECK DAM
SKIMMER WEIR
DITCH LINER -
NAG350 OR EQUAL
CONSTRUCTION
ENTRANCE
XXXX
INLET PROTECTION
DISTURBED AREA
13.25 AC
Z
CL
50
ui
Z
CL
25
+—
REVISED
2/5/2021 7:51 AM
RELIMINAFITI1
GRAPHIC SCALE
50
100
200
CO W
co v2-2
-
314 EAST MAIN STREET
0
0
0
as
FIRM # C-4187
Cc
(1)
0
L OVERLOOK
TOWN OF CLAYTON, JOHNSTON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
0
fY
Lil
DESIGN
DCA
DRAWN
CHECKED
DCA
HORIZONTAL SCALE
SEE GRAPHIC SCALE
VERTICAL SCALE
N/A
DATE
05/22/2020
JOB NO.
CC
60' PUBLIC R/W
SS
SS
1 inch = 50 ft.
SHEET

ll FivfiwIJ F%IV V F1 J V V C CIV V I IV CCRIIV V, rl. CnrnLJJL 1 RCJCR V CJ I I J I.V IVIIVI V IV LF%VV l.vr 1 nI V n I F%IV V lJ I nCR rnvrCn l 1 nI V n I J Ilv I nLJC rLFiwJ. I n LJC rLFiw3 r%RC ivy! iv DC nLrnvvvl.Lu, l.nfiw'LU vR l.vrl Lv I lv File 1 FLRIVI vR IVIF%IV IV CR VV nr% I JUL VCR, IvLR r%RC I n C l I lJ DC F%JJI V wLLJ I lJ Fily l I n IR V rr%R I I VV I I nlJL) I FIR.) I VD! F%I IV I IV V I nC Cnr nLJJCv VV RI I I LIv rCnwI IJJww F%IV V l.vwJCw I yr F%LM IVIJ F%IV V F1 J V V C CIV V I IV CCRI IV V, rl..
HILL /
HILL
G 21
220M
8
f�IL�
0
0
•
O N
DO 0LnCO<
I <
c�00�cU Q
<
z 0 0) CC
X,�OOzcDV <o
oLno-z0 o<
< 01 z0 � J c�
X 0
< COW <
ry
cn z <
z z z <�
W
z
,--
KABA ELt
OYC R. KA A�EL
I F-
DB 43911 PG 416 \
j TAG 05E990 8b
PN 16691 -35-�
9 85\
ZONI : E
USE: VACA
0.43 A
ACCESS EASEMENT N/F
PB 71 PG 87
FOFO F. KABASELE
JOYCE R. KABASELE
DB 4391 PG 416
TAG 05E99018L
N 166910-35-9807
ZONING: R-E
l S NGLE FAMILY
7 0.6-7 AC
• •�• •
297'
M7••�
<
Q — In co co
J — O I 1
J
u 2 d O�
= 1
zz 00o oz
CE N z
w °C30�O
> m Q O N
J 0
/ /
z
O
O
Ln
0
1
I , \ \\ II� I 1\\ \ iii\ \\\ )\/ )\11/
11� II II( / /\ \\\\• ///)/
/
//1 / )))Il// JJ/
/ //� //
.j/ /
EXISTING
STORM
PIPE
—247
246
245
PROPOSED
RETAINING —
WALL
OAKDALE AVE
60' PUBLIC R/W
/f
— u)"7
•
CD z UJ /
c\ L
Q
\\\\
\-\
\I i N\\
/ /
i
,0> i -cam //� /Jc, ' t_wLii,T,'N5,7c
_,_i__if„1-7
1.
..-0.-‹-,- / /)A,- <12 v°z\>..
/ r ° ° LC'nj
ir—
;—. --____:----) ' \ ' \
\\
c
50'
RIPARIAN
BUFFER
LEGEND:
RESOURCE CONSERVATION AREA
- >-
LJ
cn 0 cn
0
cri
LJ
Z
LEGEND
PROPOSED
MAJOR CONTOURS
EXISTING
MINOR CONTOURS
EXISTING
MAJOR CONTOURS
PROPOSED
MINOR CONTOURS
PROPOSED
STORM PIPE
CURB INLET
FLARED END SECTION
EXISTING STORM PIPE
295
294
220
221
11111111111
NOTE:
1. THIS IS A PRELIMINARY DESIGN. FUTURE DETAILED
ANALYSIS OF THE SITE MAY DETERMINE THE NEED FOR
RETAINING WALLS IN OR AROUND THE SCM AREA.
L J
cnz -0
Z
REVISED
2/5/2021 8:03 AM
kRELIMINARj
GRAPHIC SCALE
HHH
ZZZ
222
222
HHH
CO
314 EAST MAIN STREET
Lo
c co
.Lc,
0 0
FIRM # C-4187
EC
(1)
0
L OVERLOOK
TOWN OF CLAYTON, JOHNSTON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
CC .7c
DESIGN
DCA
DRAWN
CHECKED
DCA
HORIZONTAL SCALE
SEE GRAPHIC SCALE
VERTICAL SCALE
N/A
DATE
05/22/2020
50
25 50 100
200
1 inch = 50 ft.
JOB NO.
SHEET

r
/
STREET "A" CBU DETAIL
SCALE: 1:20
7
K.,
LEGEND:
(RCA) RESOURCE CONSERVATION
AREA
PORTION OF CLASS "B"
LANDSCAPE BUFFER
TOTAL LENGTH OF CLASS "A" BUFFER : ± 161 L.F.
TREES/SHRUBS REQUIRED FOR LENGTH OF BUFFER:
(3) CANOPY TREES
(3) UNDERSTORY TREE
(20) SHRUBS
I1-Yc
I1-Zs
11-Zs
I1-Yc
"dre,
w „rot \
12-Lp�
PLANTINGS PER 100' LENGTH OF BUFFER
CLASS "A" BUFFER - ALTERNATIVE 1 PLANTING SCHEME
REQUIRED PER 100':
(2) CANOPY TREES
(2) UNDERSTORY TREE
(12) SHRUBS
Class "A" Buffer
ALTERNATIVE 1
0
TOTAL LENGTH OF CLASS "B" BUFFER : ± 336 L.F.
TREES/SHRUBS REQUIRED FOR LENGTH OF BUFFER:
(7) CANOPY TREES
(10) UNDERSTORY TREE
(67) SHRUBS
0
PLANTINGS PER 100' LENGTH OF BUFFER
CLASS "A" BUFFER - ALTERNATIVE 1 PLANTING SCHEME
REQUIRED PER 100':
(2) CANOPY TREES
(3) UNDERSTORY TREE
(20) SHRUBS
Class "B" Buffer
ALTERNATIVE 1
/
TAG 05
PN 16691
Z
\USE:
/
/
N/F
/ JAMES HILL
SARAH HILL
DB 4664 PG 201 u
220M
5515 •
8 /
MILY
u
u
O
N/F
FOFO F. KABASELE
JOYCE R. KABASELE
DB 4391 PG 416
TAG 05E99018L
PN 166910-35-9807
ZONING: R-E
USE: SINGLE FAMILY
0.67 AC
N/F
FOFO F. KABASELE
JOYCE R. KABASELE
DB 4391 PG 416
TAG 05E990180
PN 166910-35-9985
ZONING: R-E
USE: VACANT
N.43 AC
EXISTING TREES TO BE
USED TO SATISFY
LANDSCAPE BUFF
REQUIREMENT
STREET "B" CBU DETAIL
SCALE: 1:20
/,
!��®Ii1WWWAfti1��i1\ri��\V.Y�\�® IEVAMIA10 11•\�1�®\T/I�Ir
\tli
®�iill iw� W
w �i oiEAffMEEialil•MEMEMEMEUEEMNAMMEMNAM
4
/
<°- ) co co M
1 1 <
§—LoM�wQ
0-O
2 1 -I0
ZC000llu
OZ—O
> co~ ON Lii
Z D
0
..
�n�/
EXTERIOR
WALL OF
RESIDENCE
NOTE:
BUILDER WILL MAINTAIN
THE HVAC MANUFACTURER'S
RECOMMENDED CLEARANCES
AROUND EACH HVAC UNIT
NOTE:
HVAC UNIT WILL BE SCREENED
WITH EITHER SCREEN FENCE PANELS
OR
AN EVERGREEN HEDGE CONSISTING
OF ±3 COMPACTA HOLLY ON 3 SIDES
(ILEX CRENATA 'COMPACTA')
MIN. 24" HT. AT INSTALLATION
TYPICAL HVAC SCREENING
•
0
ce
z
•
f
1 I—
Plant Symbol Key
CANOPY TREE:
UNDERSTORY TREE:
0
SHRUB:
LANDSCAPE PLANT LIST
QTY
SYMBOL
BOTANICAL NAME
COMMON NAME
COMMENTS
HEIGHT AT
PLANTING
WIDTH
ROOT
47
13
31
7
3
6
37
59
CANOPY TREES
Qp
Zs
Bc
UNDERST
Rb
Fh
Yc
SHRUBS
Bh
Lp
QUERCUS PHELLUS
ZELKOVA SERRATA
TAXODIUM DISTICHUM
)RY TREES
CERCIS CANADENSIS
ILEX ATTENUATA 'FOSTERII#2'
PRUNUS YEDOENSIS
ILEX CORNUTA 'BURFORDII NANA'
WILLOW OAK
GREEN VASE ZELKOA
BALD CYPRESS
2.5" CAL MIN.
2.5" CAL MIN.
2.5" CAL MIN.
REDBUD 2" CAL MIN.
FOSTER HOLLY #2
AKEBONO YOSHINO CHERRY 2" CAL MIN.
DWARF BURFORD HOLLY
LOROPETALUM CHINENSE'ZHU ZHOU' ZHUZHOU LOROPETALUM =
8'
8'
8'
4'-5'
4'-5'
4'-5'
6' 3'-4'
4'-6' 3'-4'
6' 3'-4'
24"
24"
B&B
B&B
B&B
B&B
B&B
B&B
7 GAL
7 GAL
NOTES
1. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING PLANT QUANTITIES AND IS TO NOTIFY THE CONTRACTOR ASAP OF ANY DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN
THE PLANT LIST AND THE PLAN
2. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL ADJUST ANY BUFFER PLANTING AS NEEDED TO MAINTAIN REQUIRED CLEARANCES AROUND TRANSFORMERS, GENERATORS,
DRAINAGE FACILITIES, AND OTHER UTILITIES THAT REQUIRE CLEARANCES FOR ACCESS
3. ALL LANDSCAPED AREAS SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH AN AUTOMATICALLY OPERATED IRRIGATION SYSTEM THAT WILL ADEQUATELY COVER ALL LIVING PLANT
MATERIAL. SUCH SYSTEM SHALL INCLUDE A RAIN SENSOR.
4. ALL LANDSCAPED AREAS SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN AN ATTRACTIVE AND HEALTHY CONDITION. DEAD OR DISEASED PLANTINGS SHALL BE REMOVED AND REPLACED
IN ATIMELY FASHION.
5. ALL MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SHALL BE SCREENED ENTIRELY FROM VIEW.
6. PLUMBER TO COORDINATE WITH BUILDER AND LANDSCAPER PRIOR TO INSTALLING WATER AND SEWER CONNECTIONS TO AVOID CONFLICTS.
nN _J
00M
)- I I Q U
W MincewQ
(noo
Za 00J•:1-
Z't 0-Z0
O)Z-
Q00 0,000
Om w
ma z D
a
Z
N
0
0
N
r)
M
1)
M
CO
0
0�
— J
CS) co 00
00I 1<0
MLo cc <
02 1 U
z0
OZZO
0(00(n
Q c0 N
Z D
CL
wv
STREET YARD TREES
1. STREET YARD TREES SHALL BE REQUIRED ALONG ALL
ROAD WAYS AT THE RATE OF ONE CANOPY TREE PER LOT
OR ONE CANOPY TREE FOR EVERY 40 LINEAR FT. (SPACE
A MAXIMUM OF 50 FT. APART).
2. ALL STREET YARD TREES SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF TWO
AND ONE-HALF CALIPER INCHES AT TIME OF PLANTING.
3. INSTALLER OF TREES AND UTILITIES WILL WORK
TOGETHER TO AVOID CONFLICTS.
37 LOTS = 37 STREET TREES REQUIRED
77 STREET TREES PROVIDED
60
44•.• )0/1,
A.-
0
ft4
REVISED
3/18/2021 7:51 AM
I PRELIMINARY
l
GRAPHIC SCALE
30 60
120
240
HHFHH
wwwww
22222
22222
00000
00000
02000
&iv-2-2-4s-4s
Z ANC V�
000000
-NNNNN
>M000 O00—
LLIONNMM
d'��000
314 EAST MAIN STREET
E
0 oo
N •
L
N 0 (NI
U -c
Zccv
(;�
0 E N
1—
Q a0)
J ©
O O
c
FIRM # C-4187
W
0
0�
00.
ID
(64 W
W
5
Z
5
Z
w
L OVERLOOK
TOWN OF CLAYTON, JOHNSTON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
PRELIMINARY
LANDSCAPE PLAN
DESIGN
DCA
DRAWN
ADS/ARG/MAF/EK
CHECKED
DCA
HORIZONTAL SCALE
SEE GRAPHIC SCALE
VERTICAL SCALE
N/A
DATE
05/22/2020
JOB NO.
SHEET
L1.01
( IN FEET )
1 inch = 60 ft.

UADAMS AND HODGE ENGINEERING, PC EXPRESSLY RESERVES ITS COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT AND OTHER PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THESE PLANS. THESE PLANS ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED OR COPIED IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER, NOR ARE THEY TO BE ASSIGNED TO ANY THIRD PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING THE EXPRESSED WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT OF ADAMS AND HODGE ENGINEERING, PC.
1
RRE1
R 4 oiM li
r
1
1
1
1
I
USPS ACCESS MANEUVERING
SPACE — MULTIPLE UNIT
EASEMENT
CBU
(TYP.)
5' SIDEWALK
BOC
EOP
ROW
o
t*
TYPICAL CBU LAYOUT
SCALE: 1:20
NOTE:
CBU MUST BE PERMITTED BY TOC
INSPECTION PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.
/
BUILDING
SETBACK
BOC
EOP
TYPICAL LOT LAYOUT
SCALE: 1:20
BUILDING
SETBACK
TYPICAL
HOUSE BOX
18'
WIDTH (TYP.) '
DRIVEWAY
10' "I
BUILDING
SETBACK
BUILDING
SETBACK
5' SIDEWALK
TREE STRIP
PUBLIC STREET
(27' B-B)
BOC
EOP
O'NEIL OVERLOOK LOT STANDARDS
ZONING
UNIT TYPE
LOT STANDARDS
Density
(dwelling
units/
acre)
MINIMUM SETBACKS (FT.)
BUILDING STANDARDS
Min. Lot
Area
(Sq.ft.)
Min. Lot
Width LF
(At bldg.)
setback)
Max. Lot
Coverage
(%)
Max.
Impervious
Surface
(%)
Front
Side
Side
Street
Rear
BUILDING
SEPARATION
Max. Height
g
(ft.)
R-8
SINGLE FAMILY
8,000
60
35
55
5
25
10
15
25
10
35
© Copyright 1997-2014 United States Postal Service
NOTES TO A/E:
24.00 MIN. re 34.00 -V""v"' 34.00 24.00
1
P4.00
2.00
16.00 MN.
32.00 MAX.
rt
Locsi
T
1
Tg
..
L____I
I
T
—1
BRO(
I
I
MIN.
EXPP
— CHM
LANE
EDGE
ADJC
PAVE
SLOE
PER
MR
_ _I
CBU
OUTLINE
PLAN
SECTION
M FINISH
5.5X 0.50 ANCHOR
NSION BOLTS.
IFER EDGES IN
SCAPE AREAS , TOOL
S FLUSH WITH
INING SURFACES IN
D AREAS.
E SURFACE .25 INCH
FOOT ON ALL SIDES
DRAINAGE.
BUTYL RUBBER PAD
(WITH METAL PEDESTAL ONLY)
MATCH EXISTING GRADE IN
PAVED AREAS
SLOPE SURFACE .25 INCH PER FOOT
ON ALL SIDES FOR DRAINAGE
4 RODS ON 14.00 CENTERS MAXIMUM.
EA. WAY
OPTIONAL COMPACT
GRAVEL OR CRUSHED
STONE (OMIT WHERE
SOLID ROCK OCCURS).
MAX. FROST DEPTH
FIRM UNDISTURBED
SOIL OR WELL
COMPACTED SOIL
NOTES:
1. CONCRETE SHALL HAVE A COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF 3,000 PSI © 28 DAYS, CONTAIN 4%
MIN. — 6% MAX. AIR ENTRAINMENT AND BE PLACED WITH A 3.50 — 4.50 SLUMP IN
ACCORDANCE WITH ACI 301
. 'El FIR IN TE L RO'
0 FOR To STk A6 5. G''D 0.
3. EXPANSION BOLTS SHALL BE EQUIVALENT TO THE FOLLOWING PROVIDERS:
o. HILTI KWIK BOLT (www.us.hilti.com) II-1/2" DIAMETER x 5-1/2"
OVERALL LENGTH
GALVANIZED, CATALOG #: 000-453-696
KB II 12-512, STAINLESS STEEL; CATALOG #: 000-454-744
ENSURE THAT THE MIN. EMBEDMENT IN CONCRETE IS AT LEAST 3-1/2".
b. ITW RAMSET REDHEAD TRUBOLT (www.ramset—redhead.com)
GALVANIZED, 1/2" DIAMETER x 7' OVERALL LENGTH; CATALOG
NUMBER: WS-1270G
ENSURE THAT THE MIN. EMBEDMENT IN CONCRETE IS AT LEAST
4-1/8".
C. RAWL STUD (www.rawl.com)
GALVANIZED, 1/2" DIAMETER x 5-1/2" OVERALL LENGTH; CATALOG
NUMBER: 7724
ENSURE THAT THE MIN. EMBEDMENT IN CONCRETE IS AT LEAST
4 A 3 CBU CONFIURATION IS DEPICTED. A 2 OR 4 CBU CONFIGURATION MAY BE USED AS LONG
AS THEY ARE ARRANGED IN GROUPS SUCH THAT THE OVERALL DIMENSION OF THE CONCRETE
BASE DOES NOT EXCEED 16 FEET.
Detail: CLUSTER BOX UNIT (CBU) INSTALLATION —
Faa. Cn. Seat. Para. Detail
M TI �UJ1'JiL ,...J... ... ,.... ,.... .. .. .. .. .. ..... ,. ,.
G 1 — 2 — 0 el
CAD File:
Scale: 0 /2" 1 "
1/2' = 1'-0"
USPS SDL Issued: 10/1/2016
../usps/library/details/G1-2-0e1
Last Revised: 10/27/2016
1--,1--1-1-1
UNITED STATES STANDARD DETAIL LIBRARY
POSTAL SERVICE.
30 1/2"
vitaITM Cluster Box Unit - Type III
57 5/8"
. D
• D
• D
• D
•
•
•
•
•
o•o e
•
•
• D
• D
•
•
o®
16 1/8"
•
o® D
45"
FRONT VIEW
NOTES:
62"
18
SIDE VIEW
1. This unit is approved for USPS and private applications.
2. Decorative mailbox accessories sold separately and are USPS Approved
products.
3. Pedestal should be installed with included Rubber Pad;
mounting hardware not included, refer to installation manual for
recommendations.
4. Florence "F" series CBU is Officially Licensed by USPS:
License#CDSEQ-08-B-0012
47 3/8"
61 1/2"
12"
PEDESTAL
t
141/2"
4" 12"
10"
12"
PEDESTAL BASE
BOLT PATTERN
DOOR CHART
DOOR TYPE
DIMENSION (HEIGHTx WIDTH)
TENANT
3-3/8'012-13/16"
10" PARCEL
10-1/4'012-13/16"
13" PARCEL
13-3/4'012-13/16"
OUTGOING SLOT
3/4'
-3/4'
PRODUCT SERIES:
vital TM CLUSTER BOX UNIT
(OR APPROVED SUBSTITUTE)
1570-16
A FL RENCE SCALEM°DEL NO16
NE
manuFacturing company
5935 Corporate Drive • Manhattan, KS 66503
www.florencemailboxes.com • [phone]
A GIBRALTAR INDUSTRIES COMPANY
DRAWING NUMBER
1570-16CS
REV
A
LAS9/26/REV2012 DATE
DRAWN BY
AFD
CLUSTER MAILBOX UNIT
NOT TO SCALE
PRELIMINARY
1
REVISED
3:24 pm, Nov 02, 2020
co
z
w
2
2
0
co co
O
..R-
z
Z
Oo
cooLu
314 EAST MAIN STREET
FIRM # C-4187
W
L7
0
0
I
0
0
a
0
2
EC
W
W
2
0
2
W
L OVERLOOK
_Z
O
TOWN OF CLAYTON, JOHNSTON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DESIGN
DCA
DRAWN
ADS/ARG/MAF/Ek
CHECKED
DCA
HORIZONTAL SCALE
SEE GRAPHIC SCALE
VERTICAL SCALE
N/A
DATE
05/22/2020
JOB NO.
SHEET
DT1.00
J

Burdette, Jennifer
From: Burdette, Jennifer
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2021 8:49 AM
To: Ellis, John
Subject: RE: DUE DATE: APRIL 1, 2021 Fw: [EXTERNAL] O'Neil Overlook online project review
certification letter
Attachments: SPEC20041- ONeil Overlook- T&E Ltr pkg.pdf
Thanks John
It was the result of an incomplete revision. My apologies for the confusion. The revised package is attached.
Thanks,
Jen
Jennifer Burdette I Sr. Environmental Consultant, Water Resources
McAdams
2905 Meridian Parkway, Durham, NC 27713
office 919. 361. 5000 x137 I direct 919.287.0743 I cell 919.422.3605 I [e-mail]
www.mcadamsco.com I linkedin I twitter I instagram I join our team
M MCADAMS
creating experiences through experience
From: Ellis, John <[e-mail]>
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2021 8:03 AM
To: Burdette, Jennifer <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: DUE DATE: APRIL 1, 2021 Fw: [EXTERNAL] O'Neil Overlook online project review certification letter
CAUTION: This email is NOT from McAdams. DO NOT click links or open attachments unless you verify the sender and content.
give me a call if you want to discuss
From: Ellis, John <john [e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2021 5:39 PM
To: Burdette, Jennifer <[e-mail]>
Subject: Fw: DUE DATE: APRIL 1, 2021 Fw: [EXTERNAL] O'Neil Overlook online project review certification letter
Jennifer,
On the decision table you have that suitable habitat is present and in another column you have no suitable
potential habitat present. I suggest you change. I suggest you change them both to no suitable potential
habitat present.
i

John
From: Mann, Leigh <leigh [e-mail]> on behalf of Raleigh, FW4 <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2021 5:14 PM
To: Ellis, John <john [e-mail]>
Subject: DUE DATE: APRIL 1, 2021 Fw: [EXTERNAL] O'Neil Overlook online project review certification letter
From: Burdette, Jennifer <[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 9, 2021 9:10 PM
To: Raleigh, FW4 <[e-mail]>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] O'Neil Overlook online project review certification letter
This email has been received from outside of DOI - Use caution before clicking on links, opening attachments, or
responding.
Review package attached for review. Thanks
Jennifer Burdette I Sr. Environmental Consultant, Water Resources
McAdams
2905 Meridian Parkway, Durham, NC 27713
office 919. 361. 5000 x137 I direct 919.287.0743 I cell 919.422.3605 I [e-mail]
www.mcadamsco.com I linkedin I twitter I instagram I join our team
!JMCADAMS
creating experiences through experience
2

U.S.
FIEAI &WILDLIFE
SERVICE
United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Field Office
P.O. Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Date: 3/ 11 /21
Self -Certification Letter
Project Name O'Neil Overlook
Dear Applicant:
Thank you for using the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) Raleigh Ecological
Services online project review process. By printing this letter in conjunction with your
project review package, you are certifying that you have completed the online project
review process for the project named above in accordance with all instructions
provided, using the best available information to reach your conclusions. This letter,
and the enclosed project review package, completes the review of your project in
accordance with the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531-1544, 87 Stat.
884), as amended (ESA), and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (16 U.S.C.
668-668c, 54 Stat. 250), as amended (Eagle Act). This letter also provides
information for your project review under the National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (P.L. 91-190, 42 U.S.C. 4321-4347, 83 Stat. 852), as amended. A copy of this
letter and the project review package must be submitted to this office for this
certification to be valid. This letter and the project review package will be maintained
in our records.
The species conclusions table in the enclosed project review package summarizes
your ESA and Eagle Act conclusions. Based on your analysis, mark all the
determinations that apply:
❑✓
o
o
"no effect" determinations for proposed/listed species and/or
proposed/designated critical habitat; and/or
"may affect, not likely to adversely affect" determinations for proposed/listed
species and/or proposed/designated critical habitat; and/or
"may affect, likely to adversely affect" determination for the Northern long-
eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis) and relying on the findings of the January 5,
2016, Programmatic Biological Opinion for the Final 4(d) Rule on the
Northern long-eared bat;
"no Eagle Act permit required" determinations for eagles.

Applicant Page 2
We certify that use of the online project review process in strict accordance with the
instructions provided as documented in the enclosed project review package results in
reaching the appropriate determinations. Therefore, we concur with the "no effect" or
"not likely to adversely affect" determinations for proposed and listed species and
proposed and designated critical habitat; the "may affect" determination for Northern
long-eared bat; and/or the "no Eagle Act permit required" determinations for eagles.
Additional coordination with this office is not needed. Candidate species are not
legally protected pursuant to the ESA. However, the Service encourages consideration
of these species by avoiding adverse impacts to them. Please contact this office for
additional coordination if your project action area contains candidate species.
Should project plans change or if additional information on the distribution of
proposed or listed species, proposed or designated critical habitat, or bald eagles
becomes available, this determination may be reconsidered. This certification letter is
valid for 1 year. Information about the online project review process including
instructions, species information, and other information regarding project reviews
within North Carolina is available at our website http://www.fws.gov/raleigh/pp.html.
If you have any questions, you can write to us at [e-mail] or please contact
Leigh Mann of this office at 919-856-4520, ext. 10.
Sincerely,
/s/Pete Benjamin
Pete Benjamin
Field Supervisor
Raleigh Ecological Services
Enclosures - project review package

Species Conclusions Table
Project Name: O'Neil Overlook
Date: 3/11/2021
Species / Resource Name
Conclusion
ESA Section 7 / Eagle
Act Determination
Notes / Documentation
Red -cockaded woodpecker
(Picoides borealis)
No suitable habitat present
No effect
Habitat assessment indicates no potential habitat present (mature
pine stands are absent within the project area)
Neuse River Waterdog
(Necturus lewisi)
No suitable habitat present
No effect
Habitat assessment indicates no potential habitat present.
Carolina Madtom (Noturus
furiosus)
No suitable habitat present
No effect
Habitat assessment indicates no potential habitat present.
Atlantic Pigtoe (Fusconaia
masons)
No suitable habitat present
No effect
Habitat assessment indicates no potential habitat present.
Dwarf Wedgemussel
(Alasmidonta heterodon)
No suitable habitat present
No effect
Habitat assessment indicates no potential habitat present.
Critical habitat
No critical habitat present
No effect
Bald Eagle
Unlikely to disturb nesting
bald eagles
No Eagle Act permit
required
No known nest with 660' of project review area
Northern Long-eared Bat
Suitable habitat present
No effect
NLEB not listed for Johnston County
Acknowledgement: I agree that the above information about my proposed project is true. I used all of the provided resources to make an
informed decision about impacts in the immediate and surrounding areas.
nature /Title
3/11/2021
Date

North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M. Bartos, Administrator
Governor Roy Cooper Secretary D. Reid Wilson
April 28, 2021
Jennifer Burdette
McAdams
2905 Meridian Parkway
Durham, NC 27713
[e-mail]
Re: Construct O'Neil Overlook residential development, O'Neil Street, Clayton, Johnston County,
ER 21-0725
Dear Ms. Burdette:
Thank you for your letter of March 9, 2021, regarding the above -referenced undertaking. We have
reviewed the submittal and offer the following comments.
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected
by the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36
CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill -Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-814-6579
or [e-mail]. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the
above referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
kew. Ramona Bartos, Deputy
State Historic Preservation Officer
Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax: [phone]-6898

NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT RESULTS
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
USACE AID #: NCDWR #:
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle,
and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same property, identify and
number all reaches on the attached map, and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User Manual for detailed descriptions
and explanations of requested information. Record in the "Notes/Sketch" section if supplementary measurements were performed. See the
NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA (do not need to be within the assessment area).
PROJECT/SITE INFORMATION:
1. Project name (if any): O'Neil Overlook 2. Date of evaluation: 2/16/21
3. Applicant/owner name:
5. County:
7. River basin:
J & B Real Estate Consultants, LLC
Johnston
Neuse
8. Site coordinates (decimal degrees, at lower end of assessment reach):
4. Assessor name/organization:
6. Nearest named water body
on USGS 7.5-minute quad:
35.659116, -78.44689
H. Manning (McAdams)
Neuse River
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
Stream 2 (Feature
9. Site number (show on attached map): B) 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated (feet): 135
11. Channel depth from bed (in riffle, if present) to top of bank (feet): 0.5 ❑Unable to assess channel depth.
12. Channel width at top of bank (feet): 4 13. Is assessment reach a swamp steam? Yes No
14. Feature type: ❑Perennial flow ®Intermittent flow ❑Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM CATEGORY INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone: ❑ Mountains (M) ® Piedmont (P) ❑ Inner Coastal Plain (I)
16. Estimated geomorphic
valley shape (skip for
Tidal Marsh Stream):
17. Watershed size: (skip
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18. Were regulatory considerations evaluated? ®Yes No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
❑ Outer Coastal Plain (0)
▪ Section 10 water
❑ Essential Fish Habitat
❑ Publicly owned property
❑ Anadromous fish
❑A
(more sinuous stream, flatter valley slope)
®Size 1 (< 0.1 mi2) Size 2 (0.1 to < 0.5 mi2)
❑ Classified Trout Waters
▪ Primary Nursery Area
❑ NCDWR Riparian buffer rule in effect
O 303(d) List
®B
(less sinuous stream, steeper valley slope)
Size 3 (0.5 to < 5 mi2) Size 4 (>_ 5 mi2)
®Water Supply Watershed (01 Oil ❑III ®IV ❑V)
❑ High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
®Nutrient Sensitive Waters
❑CAMA Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)
❑ Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
❑ Designated Critical Habitat (list species)
19. Are additional stream information/supplementary measurements included in "Notes/Sketch" section or attached? ®Yes ❑No
1. Channel Water - assessment reach metric (skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
®A Water throughout assessment reach.
❑ B No flow, water in pools only.
❑ C No water in assessment reach.
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction - assessment reach metric
❑ A At least 10% of assessment reach in -stream habitat or riffle -pool sequence is severely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impoundment on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach (examples: undersized or perched culverts, causeways that constrict the channel, tidal gates, debris jams,
beaver dams).
®B NotA
3. Feature Pattern - assessment reach metric
❑ A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern (examples: straightening, modification above or below culvert).
®B Not A
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile - assessment reach metric
®A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile (examples: channel down -cutting, existing damming, over
widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of these
disturbances).
❑ B Not A
5. Signs of Active Instability - assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include
active bank failure, active channel down -cutting (head -cut), active widening, and artificial hardening (such as concrete, gabion, rip -rap).
❑ A < 10% of channel unstable
❑ B 10 to 25% of channel unstable
®C > 25% of channel unstable

6. Streamside Area Interaction — streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB).
LB RB
❑ A ❑A Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
❑ B ❑B Moderate evidence of conditions (examples: berms, levees, down -cutting, aggradation, dredging) that adversely affect
reference interaction (examples: limited streamside area access, disruption of flood flows through streamside area, leaky
or intermittent bulkheads, causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching [including mosquito ditching])
®C ®C Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no floodplain/intertidal zone access
[examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction, bulkheads, retaining walls, fill, stream incision, disruption
of flood flows through streamside area] or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access [examples: impoundments, intensive
mosquito ditching]) or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a man-made feature on an
interstream divide
7. Water Quality Stressors — assessment reach/intertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
❑ A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone (milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen, stream foam)
❑ B Excessive sedimentation (burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
❑ C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
❑ D Odor (not including natural sulfide odors)
❑ E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in "Notes/Sketch"
section.
❑ F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
❑ G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
❑ H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone (removal, burning, regular mowing, destruction, etc)
❑ 1 Other: (explain in "Notes/Sketch" section)
Little to no stressors
8. Recent Weather — watershed metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought; for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a drought.
❑ A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
❑ B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
®C No drought conditions
9. Large or Dangerous Stream — assessment reach metric
❑ Yes No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes, skip to Metric 13 (Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition).
10. Natural In -stream Habitat Types — assessment reach metric
10a. ®Yes No Degraded in -stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in -stream hardening [for example, rip -rap], recent dredging, and snagging)
(evaluate for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams only, then skip to Metric 12)
10b. Check all that occur (occurs if > 5% coverage of assessment
❑ A Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses
(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
®B Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent
vegetation
❑ C Multiple snags and logs (including lap trees)
❑ D 5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
❑ E Little or no habitat
reach) (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
❑ F 5% oysters or other natural hard bottoms
❑ G Submerged aquatic vegetation
❑ H Low -tide refugia (pools)
❑ 1 Sand bottom
❑ J 5% vertical bank along the marsh
❑ K Little or no habitat
Check for Tidal
Marsh Streams
*********************************REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS****************************
11. Bedform and Substrate — assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
11 a. ❑Yes No Is assessment reach in a natural sand -bed stream? (skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11 b. Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
®A Riffle -run section (evaluate 11c)
®B Pool -glide section (evaluate 11d)
❑ C Natural bedform absent (skip to Metric 12, Aquatic Life)
11 c. In riffle sections, check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach — whether or not submerged. Check
at least one box in each row (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present (NP) = absent, Rare
(R) = present but < 10%, Common (C) = > 10-40%, Abundant (A) = > 40-70%, Predominant (P) = > 70%. Cumulative percentages
should not exceed 100% for each assessment reach.
NP R C A P
® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Bedrock/saprolite
® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Boulder (256 — 4096 mm)
® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Cobble (64 — 256 mm)
❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Gravel (2 — 64 mm)
❑ ❑ ❑ ® ❑ Sand (.062 — 2 mm)
❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Silt/clay (< 0.062 mm)
® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Detritus
® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Artificial (rip -rap, concrete, etc.)
11d. ®Yes No Are pools filled with sediment? (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)

12. Aquatic Life — assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a. ®Yes No Was an in -stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No, select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. No Water ❑Other:
12b. ®Yes No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes, check all that
apply. If No, skip to Metric 13.
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to "individuals" for Size 1 and 2 streams and "taxa" for Size 3 and 4 streams.
❑ ❑Adult frogs
❑ Aquatic reptiles
❑ Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses (include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
❑ ❑Beetles
❑ ❑Caddisfly larvae (T)
❑ ❑Asian clam (Corbicula)
• ❑Crustacean (isopod/amphipod/crayfish/shrimp)
❑ ❑Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
❑ ❑Dipterans
❑ ❑Mayfly larvae (E)
❑ ❑Megaloptera (alderfly, fishfly, dobsonfly larvae)
❑ ❑Midges/mosquito larvae
❑ Mosquito fish (Gambusia) or mud minnows (Umbra pygmaea)
❑ ❑Mussels/Clams (not Corbicula)
❑ ❑Other fish
❑ ❑Salamanders/tadpoles
• ❑Snails
❑ ❑Stonefly larvae (P)
❑ ❑Tipulid larvae
❑ ❑Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and upland runoff.
LB RB
®A ®A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
❑ B ❑B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
❑ C ❑C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area (examples: ditches, fill, soil compaction,
livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees, drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage — streamside area metric (skip for Size 1 streams, Tidal Marsh Streams, and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB) of the streamside area.
LB RB
❑ A ❑A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water >_ 6 inches deep
❑ B ❑B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
®C ®C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the normal
wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
❑ Y ❑Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
®N ®N
16. Baseflow Contributors — assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
❑ A Streams and/or springs (jurisdictional discharges)
❑ B Ponds (include wet detention basins; do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
❑ C Obstruction passing flow during low -flow periods within the assessment area (beaver dam, leaky dam, bottom -release dam, weir)
❑ D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating (iron in water indicates seepage)
®E Stream bed or bank soil reduced (dig through deposited sediment if present)
❑ F None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors — assessment area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
❑ A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach (includes areas excavated for pump installation)
❑ B Obstruction not passing flow during low -flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex: watertight dam, sediment deposit)
❑ C Urban stream (>_ 24% impervious surface for watershed)
❑ D Evidence that the streamside area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
❑ E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
®F None of the above
18. Shading — assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider "leaf -on" condition.
®A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category (may include gaps associated with natural processes)
❑ B Degraded (example: scattered trees)
❑ C Stream shading is gone or largely absent

19. Buffer Width — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider "vegetated buffer" and "wooded buffer" separately for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) starting at the top of bank out
to the first break.
Vegetated
LB RB
❑A ❑A
®B ®B
❑ C ❑C
❑D ❑D
❑E ❑E
Wooded
LB RB
❑A ❑A
®B ❑B
❑C ®C
❑D ❑D
❑E ❑E
20. Buffer Structure
Consider for left
LB RB
®A ❑A
❑ B ®B
❑ C ❑C
❑D ❑D
❑E ❑E
>_ 100 feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
From 50 to < 100 feet wide
From 30 to < 50 feet wide
From 10 to < 30 feet wide
< 10 feet wide or no trees
— streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Vegetated" Buffer Width).
Mature forest
Non -mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees < 10 feet wide
Maintained shrubs
Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream (Abuts), does not abut but is
within 30 feet of stream (< 30 feet), or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream (30-50 feet).
If none of the following stressors occurs on either bank, check here and skip to Metric 22:
Abuts < 30 feet
LB RB LB RB
❑ A ❑A ❑A ❑A
❑ B ❑B ❑B ❑B
❑ C ❑C ❑C ❑C
❑ D ❑D ❑D ❑D
30-50 feet
LB RB
❑ A ❑A
❑ B ❑B
❑ C ❑C
❑ D ❑D
Row crops
Maintained turf
Pasture (no livestock)/commercial horticulture
Pasture (active livestock use)
22. Stem Density — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Wooded" Buffer Width).
LB RB
®A ®A Medium to high stem density
❑ B ❑B Low stem density
❑ C ❑C No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream (parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation > 10 feet wide.
LB RB
®A
❑ B
❑ C
®A
❑ B
❑ C
The total length of buffer breaks is < 25 percent.
The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
The total length of buffer breaks is > 50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first) as it contributes to
assessment reach habitat.
RB
❑ A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native species,
with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed of native
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear -cutting or clearing or
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata or
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proportions. Mature canopy is absent or communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non -characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single species or no vegetation.
25. Conductivity — assessment reach metric (skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a. ❑Yes No Was conductivity measurement recorded?
If No, select one of the following reasons. No Water ❑Other:
25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement (units of microsiemens per centimeter).
❑A < 46 ❑B 46 to < 67 ❑C 67 to < 79 ❑D 79 to < 230 ❑E >_ 230
LB
®A
❑ B
❑ B
❑ C ®C
Notes/Sketch:
Assessment completed during an extended period of wetter than normal conditions and rained 0.64 the night before assessment was completed.

Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
Stream Site Name O'Neil Overlook Date of Assessment 2/16/21
Stream Category Pb1 Assessor Name/Organization H. Manning (McAdams)
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N)
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream)
YES
YES
YES
Intermittent
USACE/ NCDWR
Function Class Rating Summary All Streams Intermittent
(1) Hydrology LOW LOW
(2) Baseflow HIGH HIGH
(2) Flood Flow LOW LOW
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation LOW LOW
(4) Floodplain Access LOW LOW
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer HIGH HIGH
(4) Microtopography NA NA
(3) Stream Stability LOW LOW
(4) Channel Stability LOW LOW
(4) Sediment Transport LOW LOW
(4) Stream Geomorphology MEDIUM MEDIUM
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction NA NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow NA NA
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA NA
(1) Water Quality MEDIUM MEDIUM
(2) Baseflow HIGH HIGH
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation HIGH HIGH
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration HIGH HIGH
(3) Thermoregulation HIGH HIGH
(2) Indicators of Stressors NO NO
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance LOW NA
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration NA NA
(1) Habitat MEDIUM HIGH
(2) In -stream Habitat LOW MEDIUM
(3) Baseflow HIGH HIGH
(3) Substrate LOW LOW
(3) Stream Stability LOW LOW
(3) In -stream Habitat LOW HIGH
(2) Stream -side Habitat HIGH HIGH
(3) Stream -side Habitat MEDIUM MEDIUM
(3) Thermoregulation HIGH HIGH
(2) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat NA NA
(3) Flow Restriction NA NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA NA
(3) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat NA NA
(2) Intertidal Zone NA NA
Overall
MEDIUM MEDIUM

la MCADAMS
SUPPORTING PHOTOGRAPHS > SPEC-20041
Supporting Photographs
Photo 1. View of erosion on south bank above the start point of Stream 2 & existing stormwater outlet (7/27/20)
Photo 2. View of View of erosion on south bank above the start point of Stream 2 (7/27/20)
creating experiences through experience 1 of 4

la MCADAMS
SUPPORTING PHOTOGRAPHS > SPEC-20041
Photo 3. View of Stream 2 start point and channel above (7/27/20)
Photo 4. View from Stream 2 start looking downstream (7/27/2020)
creating experiences through experience 2 of 4

la MCADAMS
SUPPORTING PHOTOGRAPHS > SPEC-20041
Photo 5. Upper section of Stream 2 looking upstream during assessment (2/16/2021)
Photo 6. Example of Stream 2 active bank erosion (2/16/2021)
creating experiences through experience 3 of 4

la MCADAMS
SUPPORTING PHOTOGRAPHS > SPEC-20041
Photo 7. Example of Stream 2 incision (2/16/2020)
Photo 8. Example of Stream 2 sediment filled pools (2/16/2021)
creating experiences through experience 4 of 4

lJ/'1V/YIVIJ',IVV IIVVVL LIVVIIVLLf�IIV VI rl. LArI-XLJJLI I-XIJLI-XV LJ I IJ I.V IVIIVI VIV 1-P1VV VVrII-XIVI11 ',INV V IIILIl rI-XVrLI-XI I I-XIVII I IIV IILJL rLP11VJ. IILJL rL/'11VJ P1I-X1- IVV I I V UL I VI IMIVVLV /YINI I VV I IPI I JUL V Lf� IVVf�MI,L II ILI I V UL PIJJIVIVLV IV /YINI II III-XV 1--P1nl I VVI I I IVV I I II-XJI VU I/'111VIIVV IIII- LArI-XLJJLV VV Ill I ILIV rLI-XIVIIJJIVIV /'11VV VVIVJLIV I VI /'1V/YIVIJ',IVV IIVVVL LIVVIIV LLf�IIV VI rl..
LEGEND:
RESOURCE CONSERVATION AREA
LEGEND
t
HILL
HILL
J G 21
220M
-55/(5/
8
f�IL�
\ \IP\
■
z
o z
0
)/14 /-//
• • •
___,-7 4 \\ \\\ \\ . \\\
\\\\\\\\\\\\ \\ \ 0 \ \\\\
e0YC\ R. [A\AS\EL \
0.43 AC
ACCESS EASEMENT
JOYCE R. KABASELE
TAG 05E99018L
N 166910-35-9807
ZONING: R-E
IV
M7co
0
MOH
kilMORM,
Ada!, IMMO ,
A,„t:
cn
z
tlY 11! IP
ral
IF
1111r4Will
Wit II
60' PUBLIC R/W
II<L)
CL
0
PROPOSED
MAJOR CONTOURS
EXISTING
MINOR CONTOURS
EXISTING
MAJOR CONTOURS
PROPOSED
MINOR CONTOURS
PROPOSED
STORM PIPE
CURB INLET
FLARED END SECTION
EXISTING STORM PIPE
295
294
220
221
NOTE:
1. THIS IS A PRELIMINARY DESIGN. FUTURE DETAILED
ANALYSIS OF THE SITE MAY DETERMINE THE NEED FOR
RETAINING WALLS IN OR AROUND THE SCM AREA.
oLn
Cfri
REVISED
1/29/2021 8:40 AM
kRELIMINAA
GRAPHIC SCALE
co w
zzz
LuLuLu
222
2,22
000
H
314 EAST MAIN STREET
0
Lo
as
FIRM # C-4187
EC
cn
L OVERLOOK
TOWN OF CLAYTON, JOHNSTON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
CC .7c
oo
DESIGN
DCA
DRAWN
CHECKED
DCA
HORIZONTAL SCALE
SEE GRAPHIC SCALE
VERTICAL SCALE
N/A
DATE
05/22/2020
50 0
25 50 100
200
1 inch = 50 ft.
JOB NO.
SHEET