740107_Inspection_20201119

ivision of Water Resources
ivision of Soil arid Water: Conser
ther Agency
Type of Visit: ® Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: ® Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:
Farm Name:
Owner Name:
V1.jc( 4,9fr)
5 ✓
?1
jobGvr S
sa3'
Arrival Time:
Departure Time:
Owner Email:
Phone:
County: l Region:
Mailing Address: � -Rvv r1 ✓ ` C Gpj1 U) 412, i I J C / O 3 `1
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title:
Latitude:
Integrator:
Phone:,
Srni 1--1s(;e. c
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
c� e- can Co ?col -GC+ , i lc4;^ec it
a n vc.J 06, 447ct iaki, (�>
o'brFau-1,/ Cloclt6si-
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) n Yes ❑ ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3
2/4/2015 Continued

(Facility Number: ''A 4 - (0r1
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Date of Inspection: (
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
❑ Yes yOrK. El NA ❑NE
❑ Yes D No 0 NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes E1No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes
❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environment9l-threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect lanfi application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes Q N ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes V(10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes IZKlo ❑ NA ❑ NE
e
❑No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Excessive Ponding Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): -S i
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ['No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes N D NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes <o ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes Itpe ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps D Lease Agreements ❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ‹o ❑ NA ❑ NE
D Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: r( OL
-1 /
Date of Inspection: I 1
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
❑ Yes
O Yes
❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
El NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑NE
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
❑ Yes o
El Yes ✓'NNo
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ,/ No
❑ Yes11
No
❑ Yes [ No
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
Confluents (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommend
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
S� I j-(S)- S-1 4-(cj. w/ I41Ocks-1-- f ram,
2n o s 4) A
Cory 29J,� dl s l v >2.
-41vi)
lrcc\i,n G-1 2Q `A c):75 per.,
'II I CC % �S yG�rcJI�C 0�4�'Jo tcl ubl Zro7J�
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes [ N
or any other comments.
15 a jkat
❑ NA ❑ NE
El NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑NE
El NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑NE
El NA ❑NE
fte-CPerror c ,
v) ov d O , a''r �
.\,1A6ist) 19 (52 - a!
-n e44 '''LP 1 V-c.I,�
p v
vi`ef2,6L vo/ G i el-.,-
k756 f/ ;Seams
e i6 wig 66
COY r-��hC �'7 ; rra
jet
a?,
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
)--rive co,
t--7V
Phone: � LP -a 3 9
Date: II—) c1--ao
Gtqi
2/4/2015