SW8140906_Historical File_20170801

E'rtergy, Mineral &
Land Resources
ENVIRONMENTAL QAJALITY
August 1, 2017
State of NC through the NC -Dept. of Public Safety, NC National Guard
Attn: LTC Rodney Newton
1636 Gold Star Drive
Raleigh, NC 27607
Subject: State Stormwater Management Permit No. SW8140906
National Guard Readiness Center
Redevelopment with Sand Filters Project
New Hanover County
Dear LTC Newton:
ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
secretary
TRACY DAVIS
Director
The Wilmington Regional Office received a complete, State Stormwater Management Permit Application
for the subject project on July 31, 2017. Staff review of the plans and specifications has determined that
the project, as proposed, will comply with the Stormwater Regulations set forth in Title 15A NCAC
211.1000 effective January 1, 2017. We are forwarding modified Permit No. SW8 140906 dated August
1, 2017, for the construction, operation and maintenance of the stormwater control measures (SCMs),
built -upon areas, as well as the stormwater collection system and/or vegetated conveyance system
associated with the subject project. Please replace the previously approved plan sheets with the attached
modified and approved versions.
This permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until October 14, 2022 and shall be subject to the
conditions and limitations as specified therein, and does not supersede any other agency permit that may
be required. Please pay special attention to the permit conditions regarding the operation and
maintenance of the SCMs, stormwater collection system, and/or vegetated conveyances; the limitation of
built -upon area; modification of the project; the procedures for changing ownership of and/or transferring
the permit; and the need to renew the permit. Please also pay attention to the permit conditions that
requires the recordation of deed restrictions and protective covenants, easements, and the maintenance
agreement, which must all be provided along with certification upon completion of the project. Failure to
comply with these requirements will result in future compliance problems.
The following modifications are included and covered by this permit:
1. October 14, 2014 Permit: This permit covered redevelopment of a portion of the 40.856ac
project area. It permitted one infiltration basin.
2. August 1, 2017 Permit:
a. Summary: Circumstances have required that the 2014 design be reconfigured. The
modified permit will redevelop the area previously -permitted in 2014 and it will
redevelop additional area, but the project area will remain 40.856ac. The project uses
two sand filters for stormwater treatment. The two sand filters as well as additional area
are located inside the drainage area for a dry pond. The dry pond does not receive
impervious area treatment credit because it is not a primary SCM per 15A NCAC 02H
.1002(46). It provides peak flow detention as required by 15A NCAC 02H .1003(5).
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Energy, Mincral and Land Resources
Wilmington Regional office 1 127 CardlnW Drive Extension I Wilmington, NC 28405
9107%7T.15

State Stormwater Permit No. SW8 140906
Page 2 of 2 r
b. Redevelopment: This project meets the two redevelopment requirements: !
i. Net Increase in Impervious Area is Treated: As summarized in Section I(1) and
in Table 1 of Attachment B, the project treats the net increase in impervious area
as required by 15A NCAC 02H .1003(3)(d).
ii. Equal or Better Stormwater Control: In the 1988 pre-existing condition,
stormwater was conveyed offsite via a series of pipes and channels without
treatment. The system to be constructed collects a significant portion of that
water for treatment. Other areas have also been disconnected so that water from
impervious surfaces sheet flows over vegetated areas.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this permit are unacceptable, you have the right to
request an adjudicatory hearing by filing a written petition with the Office of Administrative Hearings
(OAH). The written petition must conform to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes and
must be filed with the OAH within thirty (30) days of receipt of this permit. You should contact the OAH
with all questions regarding the filing fee (if a filing fee is required) and/or the details of the filing process
at 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-6714, or via telephone at 919-431-3000, or visit their
website at www.NCOAH.com. Unless such demands are made this permit shall be final and binding.
If you have any questions, or need additional information concerning this matter, please contact Kelly
Johnson in the Wilmington Regional Office, at [phone].
Sincerely,
"X.Tracy Davis, P.E., Director
Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
Enclosures: Attachment A — Designer's Certification Form
Attachment B — Built -Upon Area Allocation
GDS/kpj: \\\Stormwater\Permits & Projects\2017\140906 HD\2017 08 permit 140906
cc: Jamie Gollings, PE, Jacobs Engineering
Inspector, New Hanover County Building Inspections
NCDOT District Engineer
New Hanover County Engineering
Wilmington Regional Office Stormwater File
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Energy. Mineral and Land Resources
Wilmington Regional Office 1 127 Cardinal Drive Extension I Wilmington, NC 28405
910 796 7215

State Stormwater Permit No. SW8 140906
Page 2 of 2
b. Redevelopment: This project meets the two redevelopment requirements:
i. Net Increase in Impervious Area is Treated: As summarized in Section I(1) and
in Table 1 of Attachment B, the project treats the net increase in impervious area
as required by 15A NCAC 02H .1003(3)(d).
ii. Equal or Better Stormwater Control: In the 1988 pre-existing condition,
stormwater was conveyed offsite via a series of pipes and channels without
treatment. The system to be constnicted collects a significant portion_ of that
water for treatment. Other areas have also been disconnected so that water from
impervious surfaces sheet flows over vegetated areas.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this permit are unacceptable, you have the right to
request an adjudicatory hearing by filing a written petition with the Office of Administrative Hearings
(OAH). The written petition must conform to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes and
must be filed with the OAH within thirty (30) days of receipt of this permit. You should contact the OAH
with all questions regarding the filing fee (if a filing fee is required) and/or the details of the filing process
at 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-6714, or via telephone at 919-431-3000, or visit their
website at www.NCOAH.com. Unless such demands are made this permit shall be final and binding.
If you have any questions, or need additional information concerning this matter, please contact Kelly
Johnson in the Wilmington Regional Office, at [phone].
Sincerely,
s
OF ,
, Tracy Davis, P.E., Director
Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
Enclosures: Attachment A— Designer's Certification Form
Attachment B — Built -Upon Area Allocation
GDS/kpj: %StormwaterTermits & Projects120171140906 HD12017 08 permit 140906
cc: Jamie Gollings, PE, Jacobs Engineering
Inspector, New Hanover County Building Inspections
NCDOT District Engineer
New Hanover County Engineering
Wilmington Regional Office Stormwater File
,4
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
Wilmington Regional Office 1 127 Cardinal Drive Extension I Wilmington, NC 28405
910 796 7215

State Stormwater Management
Permit No. SW8 140906
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
DIVISION OF ENERGY, MINERAL AND LAND RESOURCES
STATE STORIMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT
REDEVELOPMENT WITH SAND FILTERS PROJECT
In accordance with the provisions of Article 21 of Chapter 143, General Statutes of North
Carolina as amended, and other applicable Laws, Rules, and Regulations
PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO
State of NC through the NC Dept. of Public Safety, NC National Guard
National Guard Readiness Center
2414 Infantry Road, Wilmington, New Hanover County
FOR THE
construction, operation and maintenance of two (2) sand filters ("stormwater control measures" or
"SCMs") which have been permitted as primary SCMs per 15A NCAC 02H .1002(37). The project
also contains a dry pond which is permitted as a secondary SCM, which is for hydraulic benefits and
not total suspended solids removal per.1002(46) and .1003(5). This permit is issued in compliance
with the provisions of Title 15A NCAC 2H .1000 effective January 1, 2017 (the "stormwater rules") and
the approved stormwater management plans, application, supplement(s), specifications, and other
supporting data (the "approved plans and specifications") as attached and/or on file with and
approved by the Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources (the "Division" or "DEMLR") and
considered an enforceable part of this permit.
This permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until October 14, 2022 and shall be subject to
the following specified conditions and limitations:
I. DESIGN STANDARDS
This permit is effective only with respect to the management and volume of stormwater
described in the approved plans and specifications. The maximum amount of built -upon area
(BUA) allowed for the entire project is summarized in Attachment B, Tables 1 and 2. The total
allocated impervious area is 267,530 square feet to be constructed on the site. The dry pond
does not receive impervious area treatment credit because it is not a primary SCM per 15A
NCAC 02H .1002(46). The dry pond provides peak flow detention as required by 15A NCAC
02H .1003(5). As shown in Attachment B Table 2, the dry pond is able to accommodate an
additional 54,450 square feet of future impervious area via a future permit modification (if the
54,450 square feet is also treated by a primary SCM). Therefore, the total impervious area is
321,980 square feet (which is equal to the 267,530 square feet allocated plus the potential
54,450 square feet of future impervious.) Additionally, there was 181,038sf of impervious area
in place prior to 1988 as demonstrated on the permitted plans an in Attachment B Table 1.
Since the total allocated impervious area for the project is 267,530sf the project must treat at
least (267,530sf-181,038sf=) 86,492sf of impervious area. As shown in Attachment B Table 1,
the project provides two sand filters which treat 63,162sf and 61,855sf (total=125,017sf).
Therefore, this project meets the 15A NCAC 02H .1003(3)(d) requirement.
Page 1 of 5

State Stormwater Management
Permit No. SW8 140906
2. The drainage areas for the on -site stormwater systems will be limited to the amounts of built -
upon area indicated in this permit and the approved plans and specifications. The runoff from all
built -upon area within the permitted drainage areas of this project must be directed into the
permitted stormwater control measures. The stormwater control measures labeled Sand Filter 1
and Sand Filter 2 have been designed using the runoff treatment method to handle the runoff
from 63,162 and 61,855 square feet of built -upon area, respectively. This permit does not
provide any allocation of built -upon area for future development in the drainage area of either
sand filter.
3. A 50-foot wide vegetative setback must be provided and maintained adjacent to all surface
waters, measured horizontally from the normal pool elevation of impounded structures, from the
top of bank of each side of streams or rivers, and from the mean high waterline of tidal waters,
perpendicular to the shoreline in accordance with the stormwater rules and the approved plans
and specifications.
4. The stormwater control measure(s) is(are) permitted based on the design criteria presented in
the sealed, signed and dated supplement and as shown in the approved plans and
specifications. These stormwater control measures must be provided and maintained at the
design condition_ The approved supplement is incorporated by reference into this permit.
5. The peak flow from the 10-year storm event shall not cause erosion downslope of the
stormwater outlet discharge point.
6. The sand filter shall be maintained in a manner that results in a drawdown of at least two inches
per hour at that sand surface.
II. SCHEDULE OF COMPLIANCE
The project shall be constructed in accordance with the conditions of this permit and the
approved plans and specifications.
2. The on -site stormwater system shall be entirely constructed, vegetated, and operational prior to
the construction of any development, per the approved plans and specifications.
3. During construction, erosion shall be kept to a minimum and any eroded areas of the on -site
stormwater system will be repaired immediately. If the stormwater system is used as an Erosion
Control device, it must be restored to design condition prior to operation as a stormwater
treatment device, and prior to occupancy of the facility.
4. All stormwater control measures, stormwater collection systems vegetated conveyance systems,
and/or maintenance accesses must be located in public rights -of -way, dedicated common areas
that extend to the nearest public right-of-way, and/or permanent recorded easements that
extend to the nearest public right-of-way for the purpose of inspection, operation, maintenance,
and repair.
5. The permittee shall at all times provide and perform the operation and maintenance necessary,
as listed in the signed Operation and Maintenance Agreement, to assure that all components of
the permitted on -site stormwater system functions at the approved design condition. The
approved Operation and Maintenance Agreement is incorporated by reference into this permit
and must be followed in its entirety and maintenance must occur at the scheduled intervals.
6. The operation and maintenance agreement must be recorded with the Office of the Register of
Deeds.
7. Records of maintenance activities must be kept and made available upon request to authorized
personnel of the Division. The records will indicate the date, activity, name of person performing
the work and what actions were taken.
8. The final plats for the project must be recorded with the Office of the Register of Deeds. The
recorded plat must reference the Operation and Maintenance Agreement and must also show all
public rights -of -way, dedicated common areas, and/or permanent drainage easements, in
accordance with the approved plans.
Page 2 of 5

State Stormwater Management
Permit No. SW8 140906
9. The permittee is responsible for verifying that the proposed built -upon area for the entire project
does not exceed the maximum allowed by this permit.
10. Upon completion of the project, the permittee shall determine whether or not the project is in
compliance with the permitted plans and take the necessary following actions:
a. If the permittee determines that the project is in compliance with the permitted plans, then
within 45 days of completion, the permittee shall submit to the Division one hard copy and
one electronic copy of the foiiowing:
i. The completed and signed Designer's Certification provided in Attachment A
noting any deviations from the approved plans and specifications. Deviations
may require approval from the Division;
ii. A copy of the recorded maintenance agreement;
iii. Unless already provided, a copy of the recorded deed restrictions and protective
covenants; and
iv. A copy of the recorded plat delineating the public rights -of -way, dedicated
common areas and/or permanent recorded easements, when applicable.
b. If the permittee determines that the project is not in compliance with the permitted plans,
the permittee shall submit an application to modify the permit within 30 days of completion
of the project or provide a plan of action, with a timeline, to bring the site into compliance.
11. No person or entity, including the permittee, shall alter any component shown in the approved
plans and specifications. Prior to the construction of any modification to the approved plans, the
permittee shall submit to the Director, and shall have received approval for modified plans,
specifications, and calculations including, but not limited to, those listed below:
a. Any modification to the approved plans and specifications, regardless of size including the
stormwater control measures, built -upon area, details, etc.
b. Redesign or addition to the approved amount of built -upon area or to the drainage area.
c. Further development, subdivision, acquisition, lease or sale of any, all or part of the project
area as reported in the approved plans and specifications.
d. Altering, modifying, removing, relocating, redirecting, or resizing of any component of the
approved stormwater control measure, stormwater collection system and/or vegetative
conveyance system shown on the approved plan.
e. The construction of any allocated future BUA.
f. The construction of any permeable pavement for BUA credit that was not included in the
approved plans and specifications. The request must include a soils report identifying the
type of soil, the Seasonal High Water Table elevation and the infiltration rate.
g. The construction of any 57 stone area or trails to be considered a permeable surface that
were not included in the approved plans and specifications.
h. Other modifications as determined by the Director.
12. The Director may notify the permittee when the permitted site does not meet one or more of the
minimum requirements of the permit. Within the time frame specified in the notice, the permittee
shall submit a written time schedule to the Director for modifying the site to meet minimum
requirements. The permittee shall provide copies of modified plans and certification in writing to
the Director that the changes have been made.
13. Prior to transfer of the permit, a file review and site inspection will be conducted by Division
personnel to ensure the permit conditions have been met and that the project and the on -site
stormwater system is in compliance with all permit conditions. Any items not in compliance must
be repaired, replaced restored, or resolved prior to the transfer. Records of maintenance
activities performed to date may be requested.
III. GENERAL CONDITIONS
Any individual or entity found to be in noncompliance with the provisions of a stormwater
management permit or the requirements of the stormwater rules is subject to enforcement
procedures as set forth in NCGS 143 Article 21.
Page 3 of 5

State Stormwater Management
Permit No. SW8 140906
2. The issuance of this permit does not preclude the permittee from complying with and obtaining
any and all other permits or approvals that are required in order for this development to take
place, as required by any statutes, rules, regulations, or ordinances, which may be imposed by
any other Local, State or Federal government agency having jurisdiction. Any activities
undertaken at this site that cause a water quality violation or undertaken prior to receipt of the
necessary permits or approvals to do so are considered violations of NCGS 143-215.1, and
subject to enforcement procedures pursuant to NCGS 143-215.6.
3. In the event that the facilities fail to perform satisfactorily, the permittee shall take immediate
corrective actions. This includes actions required by this Division and the stormwater rules such
as the construction of additional or replacement on -site stormwater systems. These additional or
replacement measures shall receive a permit from the Division prior to construction.
4. This permit is not transferable to any person or entity except after notice to and approval by the
Director. The permittee shall submit a completed and signed State Stormwater Request Form
for Permit Transfer or Permit Information Update, accompanied by the supporting
documentation as listed on the form, to the Division at least 60 days prior to any one or more of
the following events:
a. An ownership change including the sale or conveyance of the project area in whole or in
part, except in the case of an individual lot sale that is made subject to the recorded deed
restrictions and protective covenants;
b. Bankruptcy;
c. Foreclosure, subject to the requirements of Session Law 2013-121;
d. Dissolution of the partnership or corporate entity, subject to NCGS 57D-2-01(e) and NCGS
57D-6-07;
e. A name change of the current permittee;
f. A name change of the project;
g. A mailing address change of the permittee;
5. The permittee is responsible for compliance with all of these terms and conditions until such time
as the Division approves the transfer request. Neither the sale of the project, in whole or in part,
nor the conveyance of common area to a third party constitutes an approved transfer of the
permit.
6. The permittee grants Division Staff permission to enter the property during normal business
hours for the purpose of inspecting all components of the permitted project.
7. The permit issued shall continue in force and effect until the permittee files a request with the
Division for a permit modification, transfer, renewal, or rescission; however, these actions do not
stay any permit conditions.
8. Approved plans, application, supplements, calculations, operation and maintenance agreement,
and specifications for this project are incorporated by reference and are enforceable parts of the
permit. A copy of this permit, application, supplements, operation and maintenance agreement,
and approved plans and specifications shall be maintained on file by the permittee at all times.
9. Unless specified elsewhere, permanent seeding requirements for the on -site stormwater system
must follow the guidelines established in the North Carolina Erosion and Sediment Control
Planning and Design Manual.
10. The issuance of this permit does not prohibit the Director from reopening and modifying the
permit, revoking and reissuing the permit, or terminating the permit for cause as allowed by the
laws, rules, and regulations contained in Title 15A NCAC 2H.1000 and NCGS 143-215.1 et.al.
11. A permit renewal request must be submitted at least 18b days prior to the expiration date of this
permit. The renewal request must include the appropriate application, documentation and the
processing fee as outlined in Title 15A NCAC 02H.1045(3).
Page 4 of 5

State Stormwater Management
Permit No. SW8 140906
Permit modified and reissued this the 1st day of August 2017.
NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
A� SIL-4
,,Tracy Davis, E., Director
Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission
Permit Number SW8 140906
Page 5 of 5

State Stormwater Management
Permit No. SW8 140906
Attachment A: Designer's Certification Form
National Guard Readiness Center
Stormwater Permit No. SW8 140906
New Hanover County
Designer's Certification
I, , as a duly registered in the State of
North Carolina, having been authorized to observe (periodically/weekly/full time) the construction of
the project,
(Project)
for (Project Owner) hereby state that, to the best of my
abilities, due care and diligence was used in the observation of the project construction such that the
construction was observed to be built within substantial compliance and intent of the approved plans
and specifications.
The checklist of items on page 2 of this form is a part of this Certification.
Noted deviations from approved plans and specifications:
Signature
Registration Number
Date
SEAL
cc: NCDEQ-DEMLR Regional Office
Inspector, New Hanover County Building Inspections
Page 1 of 2

State Stormwater Management
Permit No. SW8 140906
General Certification Requirements: Sand Filters
1. The drainage area to the system contains approximately the permitted acreage.
2. The drainage area to the system contains no more than the permitted amount of built -
upon area.
3. All the built -upon area associated with the project is graded such that the runoff drains
to the system.
4. All roof drains are located such that the runoff is directed into the system.
5. The inlets are located per the approved plans and do not cause short-circuiting of the
system.
6. The permitted amounts of surface area and/or volume have been provided.
7. All required design depths. are provided.
8. All required parts of the system are provided.
9. The required dimensions of the system are provided, per the approved plan.
10. All components of the stormwater control measure are located in either recorded
common areas, or recorded easements.
Page 2 of 2

State Stormwater Management
Permit No. SW8 140906
Attachment B: Data Summary Tables
Table 1
SW8140906 - National Guard Readiness Center
Redevelopment Summary
Impervious Area Teated.
125,017
Sand Filter #1:
63,162
Filter#2:
61,855
@ 86,492
-267,530
_Sand
impervious Required to Treat'`-u
{-267,.5:30-182,0385
July 21, 2017, Impervious Total:
Pre-1988 Impervious Remaining
121,414
New Impervious
146,116
Pre-1988 Impervious Total:
181,038
per 15A NCAC 02H .1003(3)(d)
Table 2
SW8140906 - National Guard Readiness Center
Impervious Area Summary - July 25, 2017
Inside Dry Pond DA
Outside Dry
Pond DA
Total Project
Areas
Sand
Filter #1
Sand
Filter #2
To Dry Pond,
but not to
Sand Filters
Dry Pond
Total;
Total Project Area/Drainage Area
.
67,082
84,936
127,647
279,665
1,500,022
1779 687
,
40.856
1.540
1.950
-
2.930
6.420
34.436
Onsite Drainage Area
67,082
84,936
127,647
279,665
1,500,022
1779,687
Offsite Drainage Area
0
0
0
0
0
Impervious Area Total y�
63,162
61,855
73,191
198,198
_0
123,782
321,980
Allocated Impervious:
63,162
61,855
18,731
143,748
123,782
267,530
Onsite Buildings
35,719
0
0
35,719
-
35,719
Onsite Streets
0
0
1,578
1,5781
1,578
Onsite Parking
27,443
61,855
0
89,298
14,006
103,304
Onsite Sidewalks
a
01
1,457
1,457
4,058
5,515
Other Onsite
0
0
0
0
0
_
-
-
-
Offsite Drainage Area
0
0
0
ExWng BUA
0
0
15,696
15,6961
105,718
121,414
Future Impervious Available Via Permit Modification.- 2
01
0
54,450
54,4501
01
54,450
'The dry pond treats water draining from two sand filters as well as additional area.
27rhe dry pond has been designed to accommodate an additional 54,450ft2 of impervious that can be permitted in the future.
However, since the dry pond is a secondary SCM the 54,450ft2 will have to also be treated by a primary SCM.
s'rhe total property area is 41.29ac. There are 0.434ac of coastal wetlands, and so the project area is 40.856ac.
"The receiving stream is UT to Smith Creek. The stream index is 18-74-63. The stream classification is C; SW.
ft2
ac
ft2
ft2
ft2
W
ft2
ft2
fj2
fe
ft2
ft2
ft2
ft2
Page 1 of 1

DEMLR USE ONLY
Date eiv d
Paid
Lan 't N
a �-
Apphcable R es: ❑ oastal SW-4995 ❑ Coastal SW - 2008 ❑ Ph II - Post Construction
(select all that apply) ❑ Non -Coastal SW- HQW/ORW Waters ❑ Universal Stormwater Management Plan
❑ Other WQ Mgmt Plan
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT APPLICATION FORM
This form may be photocopied for use as an original
I. GENERAL INFORMATION
1. Project Name (subdivision, facility, or establishment name - should be consistent with project name on
plans, specifications, letters, operation and maintenance agreements, etc.):
National Guard Readiness Center
2. Location of Project (street address):
2414 Infantry Road
City:Wilmington County -New Hanover Zip,28405
3. Directions to project (from nearest major intersection):
From the intersection of US 74 (Martin Luther King Tr. Parkway) and SR 1175 (N Kerr Ave.),travel north on
N. Kerr Ave. Anvrox. 0.8 mile. Turn left onto Control Tower Road and travel ayprox 014 mile Turen left
onto Infantry Road and travel =rox. 0.2 mile. Site is on the left.
4. Latitude:340 15' 47" N Longitude:77° 53' 35" W of the main entrance to the project.
II. PERMIT INFORMATION:
1. a. Specify whether project is (check one): []New ®Modification ❑ Renewal w/ Modificationt
tRenewals with modifications also requires SWU-102 - Reneeual Application Form
b.If this application is being submitted as the result of a modification to an existing permit, list the existing
permit numberSW8140906 , its issue date (if known) 10 [14/14 and the status of
construction: ❑Not Started ❑Partially Completed* N Completed* *provide a designer's
certification
2. Specify the type of project (check one):
❑Low Density ®High Density ❑Drains to an Offsite Stormwater System ❑Other
3. If this application is being submitted as the result of a previously returned application or a letter from
DEMLR requesting a state stormwater management permit application, list the stormwater project
number, if assigned, and the previous name of the project, if d'
Brent than currently
proposed,
EC E 1 VE
4. a. Additional Project Requirements (check applicable blanks; information on req
ed e e is can
obtained by contacting the Customer Service Center at 1-877-623-6748):
,
�Y�
❑CAMA Major NSedimentation/Erosion Control: 7 a
Disturbed Area
❑NPDFS Industrial Stormwater ❑404/401 Permit: Proposed Impacts
b.If any of these permits have already been acquired please provide the Project Name, Project/Permit
Number, issue date and the type of each permit:
5. Is the project located within 5 miles of a public airport? ❑No EYes
Form SWLT 101 Version Oct. 31, 2013 Pagel of 6

If yes, see S.L. 2012-200, Part VI: '- FtpJl2ortal.ncdenr.org/web/1r/rules-and-regulations
III. CONTACT INFORMATION
1. a. Print Applicant / Signing Official's name and title (specifically the developer, property owner, lessee,
designated government official, individual, etc. who owns the projertl:
Applicant/Organization:State of North Carolina through the NC Dent. of Public Safety NC National Guard
Signing Official & Title:LTC Rodney Newton
b. Contact information for person listed in item 1a above:
Street Address:1636 Gold Star Drive
City:RaleigLi State:NC Zip:27607
Mailing Address (if applicable):
City: State: Zip:
Phone: 919 ) 664-6062 Fax: ( )
Email:[e-mail]
c. Please check the appropriate box. The applicant listed above is:
® The property owner (Skip to Contact Information, item. 3a)
❑ Lessee* (Attach a copy of the lease agreement and complete Contact Information, item 2a and 2b below)
❑ Purchaser* (Attach a copy of the pending sales agreement and complete Contact Information, item 2a
and 2b below)
❑ Developer* (Complete Contact Information, item 2a and 2b below.)
2. a. Print Property Owner's name and title below, if you are the lessee, purchaser or developer. (This is the
person who owns the property that the project is located on):
Property Owner/Organization:
Signing Official & Title:
b. Contact information for person listed in item 2a above:
Street Address:
City: State: Zip:
Mailing Address (if applicable):
City:
Phone:
Email:
State: Zip:
Fax: ( I
3. a. (Optional) Print the name and title of another contact such as the projects construction supervisor or other
person who can answer questions about the project:
Other Contact Person/OrganizationNC National Guard
Signing Official & Title:Vickie Dudick, Director of Environmental Management
b. Contact information for person listed in item 3a above:
Mailing Address:1613 Gold Star Drive
City:Raleigh State:NC Zip:27607
Phone: (984 ) 664-6186
Email:[e-mail]
4. Local jurisdiction for building permits:
Fax: (__)
Point of Contact: Phone #:
Form SWU-101 Version Oct. 31, 2013 Page 2 of 6
ECEIVE
By:

IV. PROJECT INFORMATION
CO
,z
V V
1. In the space provided below, br_ iefly summarize how the stormwater runoff will be treated.
Sand Filters ahead of Dry Pond
2. a. If claiming vested rights, identify the supporting documents provided and the date they were approved:
❑ Approval of a Site Specific Development Plan or PUD Approval Date:
❑ Valid Building Permit Issued Date:
❑ Other: Date:
b.If claiming vested rights, identify the regulation(s) the project has been designed in accordance with:
❑ Coastal SW -1995 ❑ Ph 11- Post Construction
3. Stormwater runoff from this project drains to the Cape Fear River basin.
4. Total Property Area: 41.29 acres 5. Total Coastal Wetlands Area: 0.434 acres
6. Total Surface Water Area: 0 acres
7. Total Property Area (4) - Total Coastal Wetlands Area (5) - Total Surface Water Area (6) = Total Project
Area+:40.856 acres
+ Total project area shall be calculated to exclude thefollowing. the normal pool of imvounded structures, the area
between the banks of streams and rivers, the area below the Normal Higgh Water line or Mean High Water
(MHW) line, and coastal wetlands landward from the NHW (or MHW) line. The resultant project area is used to
calculate overall percent built upon area (BLIA). Non -coastal wetlands landward of the NHW (orMHW) line may
be included in the total project area.
8. Project percent of impervious area: (Total Impervious Area / Total Project Area) X 100 = 28.43 %
9. How many drainage areas does the project have?3 (For high density, count 1 for each proposed engineered
stormwater BMP. For low density and other projects, use 1 for the whole property area)
10. Complete the following information for each drainage area identified in Project Information item 9. If there
are more than four drainage areas in the project, attach an additional sheet with the information for each
area provided in the same format as b ov rike l Sa-A A Calk -1 L�,
Basin ormation
DrainageAreal
DrainageArea2
Drah&geArea3
Drama' Area
Receivin tream Name
UT to Smith
Creek
UT to Smith
Creek
UT to Smith
Creek
_
Stream Class *
C;Sw
C;Sw
C;Sw
Stream Index Number
18-74-63
18-74-63
18-7
Total Drainage Area (sf)
67,082
84,936
N9,665
On -site Drainage Area (sf)
67,082
84,936
279,665
Off -site Drainage Area (sf)
-
- A
-
Proposed Impervious Area**
63,
61,85
143,748
% Impervious Area** total
94.2
72.8
51.4
I n ous' * Surface Area
Drainage Area
Drama ea _
Drainage Area _
Drainage Area _
On -site Buildings/Lots (sf)
35,719-
-
35,719
On -site Streets (sf)
-
-
12,069
On -site Parking (sf)
27,443
61,855
N,, 78,807
On -site Sidewalks (sf)
-
-
1457
Other on -site (sf)
-
_
_ 4-11
Future (sf)
-
-
54,450
Off -site (sf)
-
_
_
Existing BUA— (s
-
-
15,696
Total (sf):
63,162
61,855
198,198
* Stream Cl 4 and Index Number can be determined at. ht : ortal.ncdenr.or e IVY
mppee ious area is defined as the built upon area including, but not limited to, ingJs,%ad' psidewaalks, gravel areas, etc. ��
Form SWU 101 Version Oct. 31, 2013 Page 3 of 6 BY.

Attachment B
Table 2
SW8 140906 - National Guard Readiness Center
Impervious Area Summary - July 25, 2017
Inside Dry Pond DA
Outside Dry
Pond DA
Total Project
Area
Sand
Filter #1
Sand Filter
#2
To Dry Pond,
but not to
Sand Filters
Dry Pond
Total'
4
Total Project Area/Drainage Area
67,082
84,936
127,647
279,665
1,500,022
1,779,687
1.5401
1.9501
2.9301
6.4201
34.4361
40.856
Onsite Drainage Area
1 67,082
84,936
127,647
279,665
1,500,022
1,779,687
Offsite Drainage Area
0
01
0
01
01
0
Impervious Area Total
63,1621
61,855
73,181
198,198
123,782
321,980
Allocated Impervious:
63,162
61,855
18,731
143,748
123,782
267,530
Onsite Buildings
35,719
0
0
35,719
-
35,719
Onsite Streets
0
0
1,578
1,578
1,578
Onsite Parking
27,443
61,855
0
89,298
14,006
103,304
Onsite Sidewalks
0
0
1,457
1,457
4,058
5,515
Other Onsite
0
0
0
0
-
-
Offsite Drainage Area
0
0
0
0
-
-
Existing BUA
0
0
15,696
15,696
105,718
121,414
Future Impervious Available Via Permit Modification.2
0
0
54,4501
54,450
0
54,450
'The dry pond treats water draining from two sand filters as well as additional area.
2The dry pond has been designed to accommodate an additional 54,450ft2 of impervious that can be permitted in the future.
However, since the dry pond is a secondary SCM the 54,450ft2 will have to also be treated by a primary SCM.
3The total property area is 41.29ac. There are 0.434ac of coastal wetlands, and so the project area is 40.856ac.
4The receiving stream is UT to Smith Creek. The stream index is 18-74-63. The stream classification is C; SW.
ft2
ac
ft2
ft2
ft2
ft2
ft2
ft2
ft2
ft2
ft2
ft2
ft2
ft2

'"`Report only that amount of existing BUA that will remain after development. Do not report any existing BLLA that
is to be removed and which will be replaced by new B1dA.
11. How was the off -site impervious area listed above determined? Provide documentation. N/A
Projects in Union County: Contact DEMLR Central Office staff to check if the project is located within a Threatened &
Endangered Species watershed that may be subject to more stringent stormwater requirements as per 15A NCAC 02B
.0600.
V. SUPPLEMENT AND O&M FORMS
The applicable state stormwater management permit supplement and operation and maintenance (O&M) forms
must be submitted for each BMP specified for this project. The latest versions of the forms can be downloaded
from httn://12ortal.ncde vq/ws/su./bmp-manu-.
VI. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
Only complete application packages will be accepted and reviewed by the Division of Energy, Mineral and
Land Resources (DEMLR). A complete package includes all of the items listed below. A detailed
application instruction sheet and BMP checklists are available from
http//yortal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ws/su/statesw/forms docs. The complete application package should be
submitted to the appropriate DEMLR Office. (The appropriate office may be found by locating project on the
interactive online map at hqp: / /portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ws/su/maps.)
Please indicate that the following required information have been provided by initialing in the space
provided for each item. All original documents MUST be signed and initialed in blue ink. Download the latest
versions for each submitted application package from
http://vortal.ncdenr.org/web/wa/ws/su/statesw/forms docs.
Initials
1. Original and one copy of the Stormwater Management Permit Application Form. 3EG
2. Original and one copy of the signed and notarized Deed Restrictions & Protective Covenants /A
Form. (if required as per Part VII below)
3. OriginaI of the applicable Supplement Form(s) (sealed, signed and dated and O&M
agreement(s) for each BMP.
4. Permit application processing fee of $505 payable to NCDENR. (For an Express review, refer to \ L4t,
httn://www.ppyhelp.org/j2g=/MgEto m2wess.html for information on the Express program
and the associated fees. Contact the appropriate regional office Express Permit Coordinator for
additional information and to schedule the required application meeting.)
5. A detailed narrative (one to two pages) describing the stormwater treatment/management for 3-(4
6. A USGS map identifying the site location. If the receiving stream is reported as class SA or the TF�
receiving stream drains to class SA waters within Y2 mile of the site boundary, include the 1/2
mile radius on the map.
7. Sealed, signed and dated calculations (one copy).
8. Two sets of plans folded to 8.5" x 14" (sealed, signed, & dated), including:
a. Development/Project name.
b. Engineer and firm.
c. Location map with named streets and NCSR numbers.
d. Legend.
e. North arrow.
f. Scale.
g. Revision number and dates.
h. Identify all surface waters on the plans by delineating the normal pool elevation of
impounded structures, the banks of streams and rivers, the MHW or NHW line of tidal
waters, and any coastal wetlands landward of the MHW or NHW lines.
Delineate the vegetated buffer landward from the normal pool elevation of impounded
structures, the banks of streams or rivers, and the MHW (or NHW) of tidal waters.
i. Dimensioned property/project boundary with bearings & distances.
j. Site Layout with all BUA identified and dimensioned.
k. Existing contours, proposed contours, spot elevations, finished floor elevations.
1. Details of roads, drainage features, collection systems, and stormwater contro V E
Form SWU-101 Version Oct. 31, 2013 Page 4 of n JUL 1! 1 M?
BY:

m. Wetlands delineated, or a note on the plans that none exist. (Must be delineated by a
qualified person. Provide documentation of qualifications and identify the person who
made the determination on the plans.
n. Existing drainage (including off -site), drainage easements, pipe sizes, runoff calculations.
o. Drainage areas delineated (included in the main set of plans, not as a separate document).
p. Vegetated buffers (where required).
9. Copy of any applicable soils report with the associated SHWT elevations (Please identify S G
elevations in addition to depths) as well as a map of the boring locations with the existing
elevations and boring logs. Include an 8.5"xll" copy of the NRCS County Soils map with the
project area clearly delineated. For projects with infiltration BMPs, the report should also
include the soil type, expected infiltration rate, and the method of determining the infiltration rate.
(Infiltration Devices submitted to WiRO: Schedule a site visit for DEMLR to verify the SHWT prior
to submittal, [phone].)
10. A copy of the most current property deed. Deed book 1121 Page No: 0020 J eG
11. For corporations and limited liability corporations (LLC): Provide documentation from the NC
Secretary of State or other official documentation, which supports the titles and positions held
by the persons listed in Contact Information, item la, 2a, and/or 3a per 15A NCAC 2H.1003(e).
The corporation or LLC must be listed as an active corporation in good standing with the NC
Secretary of State, otherwise the application will be returned.
h!W://www.secrgtia.state.nc.us/Corl2orations/­CSeardi.aspx
VII. DEED RESTRICTIONS AND PROTECTIVE COVENANTS
For all subdivisions, outparcels, and future development, the appropriate property restrictions and protective
covenants are required to be recorded prior to the sale of any lot. If lot sizes vary significantly or the proposed
BUA allocations vary, a table listing each lot number, lot size, and the allowable built -upon area must be
provided as an attachment to the completed and notarized deed restriction form. The appropriate deed
restrictions and protective covenants forms can be downloaded from tt W:Z porial.ncdenr.org;webdr,state-
stormwater rorms does. Download the latest versions for each submittal.
In the instances where the applicant is different than the property owner, it is the responsibility of the property
owner to sign the deed restrictions and protective covenants form while the applicant is responsible for ensuring
that the deed restrictions are recorded.
By the notarized signature(s) below, the permit holder(s) certify that the recorded property restrictions and
protective covenants for this project, if required, shall include all the items required in the permit and listed
on the forms available on the website, that the covenants will be binding on all parties and persons claiming
under them, that they will run with the land, that the required covenants cannot be changed or deleted
without concurrence from the NC DEMLR, and that they will be recorded prior to the sale of any lot.
VIII. CONSULTANT INFORMATION AND AUTHORIZATION
Applicant: Complete this section if you wish to designate authority to another individual and/or firm (such as a
consulting engineer and/or firm) so that they may provide information on your behalf for this project (such as
addressing requests for additional information).
Consulting Engineer:Tamie E. Gollings, P.E.
Consulting Firm: Tacobs
Mailing Address:111 Corning Road, Suite 200
City:Cary ._ State:NC Zip:27518
Phone: (919 ) 859-5752 Fax: [phone]
Email:iamie. gollingp!%acobs.com
VC PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION (if Contact Information, item 2 has been filled out, complete this
section)
I, (print or type name of person listed in Contact Information, item 2a) . certify that I
own the property identified in this permit application, and thus give permission to (print or type name of person
listed in Contact Information, item 1a) with (print or type name of organization Iisted in
Contact Information, item 1a) to develop the project as c rentl proposed. A cr
of the lease agreement or pending property sales contract has been provided withrbi ��
the party responsible for the operation and maintenance of the stormwater system.
Form SWU-101 Version Oct. 31, 2013 Page 5 of 6
BY:

As the legal property owner I acknowledge, understand, and agree by my signature below, that if my
designated agent (entity listed in Contact Information, item 1) dissolves their company and/or cancels or
defaults on their lease agreement, or pending sale, responsibility for compliance with the DEMLR Stormwater
permit reverts back to me, the property owner. As the property owner, it is my responsibility to notify DEMLR
immediately and submit a completed Name/Ownership Change Form within 30 days, otherwise I will be
operating a stormwater treatment facility without a valid permit. I understand that the operation of a
stormwater treatment facility without a valid permit is a violation of NC General Statue 143-215.1 and may
result in appropriate enforcement action including the assessment of civil penalties of up to $25,000 per day,
pursuant to NCGS 14:3-215.6.
Signature: Date:
a Notary Public for the State of . County of
. do hereby certify that
before me this _ day of
personally appeared
and acknowledge the due execution of the application for
a stormwater permit. Witness my hand and official seal,
SEAL
My commission expires
X, APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION
I, (print or type name of person listed in Contact Information, item Ia) Rodney Newton
certify that the information included on this permit application form is, to the best of my knowledge, correct and
that the project will be constructed in conformance with the approved plans, that the required deed restrictions
and protective covenants will be recorded, and that the proposed project complies with the requirements of the
applicable stormwater rules under 15A NCAC 2H .1000 and any other applicable state stormwater
requirements. /1
Signature: i2) Date:
I, E • , a Notary Public for the State of r i4+ .. col l�� . County of
l�� u �{�,r,•vd , do hereby certify that "��� D� hew*-. personally appeared
before me this ii day of '5c.Ii 1 Zoi`i , and acknowledge the due execution of the application for
a stormwater permit. Witness my hand and official seal, �G
tF.. C0y.-e
oviRe��a����
Form SWU-101 Version Oct. 31, 2013
SEAL
My commission expires & rU6C.. 12 7-0 16
ECEIVE
JUL t 1 2011
Page 6 of 6
BY:

BS'
111 Corning Road. Suite 200
Cary, North Carolina 27518 U.S.A.
Ph. 919.85C.5000 Fax [phone]
To: Kelly Johnson
NC Dept. of Environmental Quality
127 Cardinal Drive Extensoin
Wilmington NC 28405
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
Project No.: F6W72100
Date: 27-Jul-2017
Sent Via: Fedex
Jaimie 0ollings
Jairnie Gollings
Dial: 919-859-5752
Fax: [phone]
Date
Description
QTY
27 July 2017
1 Civil New Proposed Impervious Cover
2
'ECEIVE
JUL 3 20V
We care about Quality. One or more team members may have contributed to the comple
Please contact the originator If you have any comments or suggestions to Improva
CIOA&
g
qeottl -
I of I

Johnson
From: Johnson, Kelly
Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2017 9:06 AM
To: 'Gollings, Jamie E.'
Cc: Amer, Ryan; Weaver, Cameron
Subject: RE: [Non-DoD Source] RE: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington Express Review
These numbers look good. If you can just update whatever supporting materials need to be updated, and send that in
we can get this one out.
Thanks,
KJ
From: Gollings, Jamie E. [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2017 6:49 PM
To: Johnson, Kelly <[e-mail]>
Cc: Arner, Ryan <[e-mail]>; Weaver, Cameron <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [Non-DoD Source] RE: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington Express Review
Kelly,
It took some number crunching and detailing out some things, but we came to resolution on these tables. Attached are
fully completed Tables 1 & 2. Below is a summary of how to get to the numbers in those tables.
Tahla 1
Table 2
Pre-1988 Impervious Remaining: This is the total of the 1988 impervious area remaining within the pond area +
Total Outside of the Pond Area = 15,696 + 105,718 = 121,414 sf See also Table 2
New Impervious: Total Impervious — Existing to Remain = 267,530—121,414=146,116 sf See Also Table 2
Outside of the Dry Pond DA Allocated Impervious = total project — dry pond total = 267,530—143,748=123,782
sf
Existing Built Upon Area to Remain Outside of Dry Pond DA = Total untreated — proposed untreated=123,782 —
14,006 — 4,058=105,718 sf
Other numbers have been filled in to help complete the story. I think this will help tremendously in terms of
following the numbers
Please take a look and let us know if this satisfies your needs or you need anything else.
Thanks,
Jamie E. Gollings, PE I Civil Engineer
JACOBS
1 `1 Cornirg Road, Suite 20, Caiy, NC= 275,;B
^.;:ljact: rJtf,�:919.fiF9.o762
iamie.gollings(aZiacobs.com I www.jacobs.com
From: Johnson, Kelly[mailto:[e-mail]
Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2017 11:14 AM

To: Gollings, Jamie E. <[e-mail]>
Cc: Arner, Ryan <[e-mail]>; Weaver, Cameron <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [Non-DoD Source] RE: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington Express Review
Jamie,
I have attached the draft permit so that you can see the intent of this. There will be two tables. Table 1 shows the
redevelopment summary. Table 2 shows the impervious area summary. Both tables are referenced in the
permit. Table 2 will also replace the table in the application, scanned below. The table in the application shows that
there are 54,450sf of "future" impervious that can be allocated at a later date. Over the past few days we have
determined that that "future" is to the dry pond, but not to the sand filters (as opposed to being potentially outside of
the dry pond... I just wasn't sure about that originally). So, hopefully that is more clearly reflected in Table 2. The table
in the application also didn't address the total 40.856ac project area, and so hopefully this table shows that that whole
area is included but there is no future allocation for it.
The final two numbers that I cannot figure out are:
1. 135,735sf. If there are 15,696sf of "existing remaining" to the dry pond but not to a sand filter, and there is
69,332sf of "existing remaining" outside of the dry pond, then those numbers total to 85,028sf rather than
135,736sf?
2. 131,794: If there are 143,748 total to the dry pond, and of that amount 15,696 is "existing", then the difference
of those two numbers (the amount that is "new impervious") is 128,052 rather than 131,794.
I have attached the Excel file as well. I just need to get these numbers to balance out. Then, the table in the application
needs to be updated (just crossed out and Table 2 will become the new table in the application). And, if any data on the
plans or otherwise in the package needs to be updated then we need to do that as well.
Thanks,
KJ
Ae�a*it l�
swa 140W6. r .i':t,a..a'.Gvow
i !t•;Y^+!�iitch4 �`9". �I iA!•;��+�r: r�?(i.�r�.i�#..��
267�
MJ�.Y.y ris rJS`' .lw ai4 131./19't
u�atl.
d4N.�i'S+`!:.:te►iFErR9fi+'YiA
oe?, IVAKA( W§1 ..1t01Jji4d)
\Where ?s this nvrnbee in Table T?
Where is this nwnber in Table 2?

Aftuhm"All
Table 2
SW8 140906 - National Guard Readiness Center
Impervious Area Summary - July 25. 2017
If,
Ate 4,
rY4='
7ota; Project Area,/Ckrjinage Area
--4
Onsite 2LS�2� Ales
IIA'Iv4iL� IV-71" 271I.Wi
v - A.,
OfIsille 22!a!§' Area
Impervious Area Total
"s
-10
Allocated Impervious:
6-3v{ 4l.*155 IsIcI.1;
Onsite eviklings
j
Onsite Streets
m;
Onsde Parking
Onsite Sidewalks
Other Onsitekit
White Drainage Area
Existing SUA
The dry pond treats water draining from t wo sand Fliers as well as additional area.
'The dry pond has been designed to ac c ornmDdat e an additional 54,450ft' of tm pervious that can be permitted in tree future.
However, since the dry pond is, a secondary SCM the 54,45W will have to also be treated by a primary SC M-
I -The total PrOiNtIv's-11'an. 41.. 19a(, There are 0.434&c of coastal wetlands, and so The project area is 40.8556c.
`The receiving stream isUT IbS"YahOttk The stream index i,% 18-74-63,
-t-'

10. CuInpletc 0K. following u^te:rnut►on for e.Kh dr-muge area tiefuran,►hon ittm 9. 1f th►-re
are more than four dr u t4-t c• nveae in the prord, attach an addition -A -,heel with 0w information for r.'teh
area providrel u► tkw-wfnm%- to ortnt it t ; u v
Basin Infurniat►on �.
Vnr 'e Area I
Urauta e: Arta 2
Viah6tim Area 3
Uraina Ares
Riveiving a trearn Name
UT to'>mith
(,T(X.k
Ur to "W"ith
C're+ek:
UT to ;5nnith
( re+ck
e
.4ftlam C'la-ti '
C lsw
C «"5v►'
C ;•'S`w
Stream Index Number�
18.74-03
18.744*0
18.744KI
'fatal Dranui , > ArIm (st) .. _�.._...
_ 67X62
84,
�,
On-%itv Dr.u. Antra f%i1
01(w
84, ?ttr
Off•sily Dmina ,, Arra l4_fj
�141
Pretpostvl ngvrviou-% Ary i**
#3; 2
61X''s
�?Vt
zap Imyerviuus Are°i"it'3�
.�z..�44.2
1At 1 'V:i1�15#�:4tiia ICi� 1�►tt i W
0 antes Iti�iM1Ri131 : L�t� tf.{� x
—. ......
I14r wi o Are'.i
;�'! t1
._.._-�_._-_,_ ��.....-
Dra �Avwt
• _ - �.... _
_.. «• _.________. .. .. _ ... ..�
t.3f4=�it4•:7�t1�"'i t":5 �kkf1_
� �`t
(in -site l'.u#ir (�!l
;".�'l°�
f►fd�`k � 7ft�ti
u �
t r;tesidewami ist7
—
r-�re
.�o. L r
f tni' ,, t t.`. +xM i 'i R#t:t _t Pa yr I of
i . ��t., rii k� A. r
From: Gollings, Jamie E. [mailto:jamie.GollingsPiac:,)bs.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2017 9:36 AM
To: Johnson, Kelly <[e-mail]>
Cc: Arner, Ryan <Ryan.arner 'acobs.com>
Subject: RE: [Non-DoD Source] RE: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington Express Review
Kelly,
I am not 100% sure that I understand what you need, but here is my shot at describing things after digging in some more
and double checking numbers.
198,198 sf impervious drains to the dry pond, and there will be 267,530 total impervious on the site after the
improvements of this project. The difference of 69,332 sf will not drain to the pond.
Jamie E. Gollings, PE I Civil Engineer
JACOBS
111 Coming Rc,ad. Suite: 200, Car;, N, 97518
4 C.-tsct: Office:916850.5752
iamie.gollings(cDiacobs.com j www.iacobs.com
From: Johnson, Kelly [mailto:kelly.p.iohnson@ncdenr.„ov]
Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 10:52 AM
To: Gollings, Jamie E. <[e-mail]>
Subject: FW: [Non-DoD Source] RE: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington Express Review
4

I'm good with everything else. The permit is drafted, and so it can go out once we get the numbers. I am doing
inspections this afternoon at some point, but if it comes in today I can get it out early next week.
Thanks,
Kelly
From: Johnson, Kelly
Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 10:16 AM
To: 'Gollings, Jamie E.' <Iamie.Gollin s 'acobs.com>
Subject: RE: [Non-DoD Source] RE: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington Express Review
Or maybe like this...
Impervious Area Total
Inside Dry Pond DA
Outside Dry Pond DA
Sand
Filter
#1
Sand
Filter #2
To Dry
Pond, but
not to
Sand Filter
Dry
Pond
Total'
Outside
Dry Pond
DA
Total
Project
Receiving Stream
UT to Smith Creek
Stream Class
C; SW
Stream Index Number
18-74-63
Total Drainage Area
67,082
84,936
127,647
279,665
Onsite Drainage
Area
67,082
84,936
127,647
279,665
Offsite Drainage
Area
0
0
0
0
Impervious Area Total
63,162
61,855
73,181
198,198
267,530
Onsite Buildings
35,719
0
0
35,719
Onsite Streets
0
0
1,578
1,578
Onsite Parking
27,443
61,855
0
89,298
Onsite Sidewalks
0
0
1,457
1,457
Other Onsite
0
0
0
0
Future'
0
0
54,450
54,450
Offsite Drainage
Area
0
0
0
0
Existing BUA
0
0
15,696
15,696
'The dry pond treats water draining from two sand filters as well as additional
area.
'The dry pond has been designed to accommodate an additional 54,450ft' of impervious that
can be permitted in the future. However, since the dry pond is a secondary SCM the 54,450ft'
will have to also be treated by a primary SCM.
Please check the number in
yellow
From: Johnson, Kelly
Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 10:12 AM

To:'Gollings, Jamie E.' <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [Non-DoD Source] RE: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington Express Review
Do you want to set it up like this? I'm just trying to rectify 267,530 for the total overall. I am not sure that I understand
what is inside the dry pond's DA and what is outside. d Would this be a clearer wayto do that? Excel attached.
Impervious Area Total
Sand
Filter
#1
Sand
Filter #2
Not to
Sand
Filter
Dry
Pond
Total'
Outside
Dry
Pond
DA
Total
Project
Receiving Stream
UT to Smith Creek
Stream Class
C; SW
Stream Index Number
18-74-63
Total Drainage Area
67,082
84,936
127,647
279,665
Onsite Drainage
Area
67,082
84,936
127,647
279,665
Offsite Drainage
Area
0
0
0
0
Impervious Area Total
63,162
61,855
73,181
198,198
267,530
Onsite Buildings
35,719
0
0
35,719
Onsite Streets
0
0
1,578
1,578
Onsite Parking
27,443
61,855
0
89,298
Onsite Sidewalks
0
0
1,457
1,457
Other Onsite
0
0
0
0
Future
0
0
54,450
54,450
Offsite Drainage
Area
0
0
0
0
Existing BUA
0
0
15,696
15,696
'The dry pond treats water draining from two sand filters as well as additional area.
2The dry pond has been designed to accommodate an additional 54,450ft2 of impervious
that can be permitted in the future. However, since the dry pond is a secondary SCM the
54,450ft' will have to also be treated by a primary SCM.
Please check the number in
yellow
From: Johnson, Kelly
Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 10:06 AM
To:'Gollings, Jamie E.' <[e-mail]>
Subject: FW: [Non-DoD Source] RE: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington Express Review
Also.... Sorry, meant to put this in the same email...
Since the total 267,530 below is greater than the total impervious to the dry pond, 198,198sf I will clarify that the
difference in these two numbers (267,530-198,198=69332) is in the project but not draining to the dry pond. I think that
that is what you are saying with these numbers?

From: Johnson, Kelly
Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 10:00 AM
To: 'Gollings, Jamie E.' <lamie.Collinesrobs.rom>
Subject: RE: [Non-DoD Source] RE: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington Express Review
Jamie,
I am working through this this morning. Is there a typo here?
3. C&levIations (per I$A NCAC .1042{2)Jf)j.
a AppkatTpn Summary lable update:
Respcinse: See revised table below
T flNLrMq k�' _
S1rVS rare \7 ! LM Laer 1] I frne M �.ww L1M1�r 1. z:
!sr 50►f+r+
Serokm Clan
t1t av Srnilk Crteli a—�
C, %V
54.4wnr+dw IirtTtiie
1�74-i3
total Ar"
L1C4s� A
1111"Y
2r4S+�7
o" t D1 A+ta
6IM2 4+"A
171�b1I
7
Olhkm bralvmV Ar*1
4 Q
D
C
&-gMrV6OW%A's4few1
63,164 61,#SS
S7s;S
]l�111
Oyeq A-J Q•�hr
CIWM4 5trettr
Osw larl
s5.7:9 a
{ o
441
- --- ..:. o. _ a
G
3,S_f4-
W19
3,5Ti
. _ . C
O0r4 orwt - ----- - -
4
sa,:sa
—4—
".:0
'The Ccy 00'rW Iteati .vatet dminknq fmm two sa-4 7i lets ai we4l,a4.a0h4?sal area
'The dry pond has been designed to mcommodate an addttTonal 54,4501tj of
rmpervlous that can be permitted in the future However, since the dry pond in a
sec "tied t PB .SA',d it' will have to also be treatrd try z premaiy K&T
Thanks,
KJ
.ACE, ��

From: Gollings, Jamie E. [mailto:Jamie.Gollin s lacobs.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2017 2:14 PM
To: Johnson, Kelly <[e-mail]>
Cc: Weaver, Cameron <[e-mail]>; william.s.burriola.milC► rail.m`I; rodne�na4i,![e-mail];
Langenfeld, Paul <Paul.Langenfeld @iacobs,com>; Wainwright, Thomas J. <Thc:nze "'-'rlwriaht d�cobs.rcm>; Ruff,
_ ��L_— �_._—
Brian P Sr NFG NG NCARNG (US) <brian.p.r-..:[e-mail]>; Caldwell, Kent Eric MAJ USARMY NG NCARNG (US)
<[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [Nan-DoD Source] RE: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington Express Review
Kelly,
Revised plans and calculations should reach your office tomorrow via Fed Ex. Attached are our responses to your
comments. Please let us know if you need anything else or have further questions.
Thanks,
Jamie E. Gollings, PE I Civil Engineer
JACOBS
:o r+:rig'Rea 1. Ezutf-- 0:0, Carta NC 2 513
jamie.gollinas ci-jacobs.com j www.jacobs.com
From: Johnson, Kelly [mailto:kelly.p.iahnson ncderr ov]
Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2017 11:55 AM
To: Gollings, Jamie E. <[e-mail]>
Cc: Weaver, Cameron <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]: [e-mail];
Langenfeld, Paul <Paul.Langenfeld iacobs.com>; Wainwright, Thomas J. <Thom,,s.Wain±_vri ht @ 'acobs.com>
Subject: RE: [Non-DoD Source] RE: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington Express Review
Jamie,
Please see below in blue.
From: Gollings, Jamie E.[mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2017 11:23 AM
To: Johnson, Kelly <[e-mail]>
Cc: Weaver, Cameron <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]; [e-mail];
Langenfeld, Paul <[e-mail]>; Wainwright, Thomas J. <Thomas.Wainwri ht iacabs.com>
Subject: RE: [Non-DoD Source] RE: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington Express Review
Kelly,
Thanks again for your prompt review. Please see below for our plan of approach or clarification needed.
Regards,
Jamie E. Gollings, PE I Civil Engineer
JACOBS
Office: 1 i 1 Comina E oed, SR 't.e 00, Cary, NC 27515
Contact: Office:919.g5� .5752
iamie.gollings(cD_iacobs.com ; www.jacobs.com

From: Johnson, Kelly [mailtJ:kelly.o.iohnson ncder,i-.gov]
Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2017 2:52 PM
To: Gollings, Jamie E. <JaF,,ie.Coili-'iacobs.cem>
Cc: Weaver, Cameron <cameron.v!eaverG�)ncdenr. ;o_v>; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
Subject: RE: [Non-DoD Source] RE: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington Express Review
Jamie,
I have gone through the entire package, and I have incorporated all my comments into a single letter. This is the
"Request for Additional Information Letter", which will be handled via email in lieu of a formal letter.
1. Attached Table: Please see the attached table "2017 07 addinfo 140906" for a summary of the items needed.
This table is cross-referenced with the regulations supporting the requests. This table also references the two
items below. Rec-_ived, -thank you.
Redevelopment [per 15A NCAC .1003(3)(d)]: This is a redevelopment project that will treat impervious area in
excess of the pre-1988 amount per 15A NCAC 02H .1003(3)(d). Redevelopment projects have two requirements
per 15A NCAC 02H .1002(41) and GS143-214.7:
a. Requirement #1: Treat the net increase in impervious from pre-1988
i. Amount of Redevelopment: You will redevelop 181,038sf (and treat above that amount). Since
the total impervious for the site is 297,515sf you will have to treat at least (297,515sf-
181,038sf=) 116,741sf of impervious area. You have two sand filters which treat 63,162sf and
61,855sf (total=125,017sf), and so you have met the .1003(3)(d) requirement. We will confirm
the numbers but that appears to be the only action item here. If we need to do anything else,
please advise. Please just confirm numbers.
ii. Pre-1988 (1981) Map: Please provide two full-sized plans showing that there was 181,038sf of
impervious area before State Stormwater permitting began in 1988. Map will be provided
referencing information on the data source (digitized from aerial dated xxxxxxxx).
iii. Numeric Summary: I have developed the following summary based on my review of the
documents which I would like to include in the permit text. If corrections are needed, please
advise. (The two tables provided in this email are provided in the Excel file containing the words
"excel_BUA". We will review, verify and/or correct the numbers. It sounds like this will be in
the permit language only and we don't need to place this on any plans or calculations
documents. Please confirm. Please just confirm numbers.
Redevelopment Summary
Impervious Area Treated:
125,017
Sand Filter#12:
63,162
Sand Filter #22:
61,855
Impervious Required to Treat:
(= 297, 515 -181, 038sf)
116,477
July X, 2017, Impervious Total:
297,515
Pre-1988 Impervious Remaining
180,774
New Impervious
116,741
Pre-1988 Impervious Total:
181,038
b. Requirement #2: Redevelopment projects must provide equal or greater treatment of stormwater than
the pre-1988 configuration. Please submit a short qualitative summary (that is backed up by the pre-
1988 plans where necessary) demonstrating that you have met this requirement. We will provide a
narrative on this.
3. Calculations [per 15A NCAC .1042(2)(f)]:

Application Summary Table: Please make the following corrections:
Dry Pond Drainage Area'
Sand
Filter #1
Sand
Filter #2 1
Not to Sand
Filter
Dry Pond
Total
Receiving Stream
UT to Smith Creek
Stream Class
C; SW
Stream Index Number
18-74-63
Total Drainage Area
67,082
84,936
127,647
279,665
Onsite Drainage Area
67,082
84,936
127,647
279,665
Offsite Drainage Area
0
0
0
0
Impervious Area Total
63,162
61,855
73,181
198,198
Onsite Buildings
35,719
0
0
35,719
Onsite Streets
0
0
12,069
12,069
Onsite Parking
27,443
61,855
-10,491
78,807
Onsite Sidewalks
0
0
1,457
1,457
Other Onsite
0
0
0
0
Future
0
0
54,450
54,450
Offsite Drainage Area
0
0
0
0
Existing BUA
0
0
15,696
15,696
'The dry pond treats water draining from two sand filters as well as additional
area.
Please check the number in
yellow We w'll review and
confirm/update.
"future" area cannot be treated solely in a dry pond because it is a secondary
SCM. Please advise on how we can appropriately document that the dry
pond has the capacity for the additional impervious but also acknowledge
that primary treatment would be required. We included some language in
the report documents as a record. is there some way that we can record this
now such that this aspect of stormwater for the site doesn't have to be
revisited in the future? Can we replace the 0's with "Primary SCM Required"?
How about this? (Revised Excel file attached.)
Dry Pond Drainage Area'
Sand Filter
#1
Sand Filter
#2
Not to Sand
Filter
Dry Pond
Total
Receiving Stream
UT to Smith Creek
Stream Class
C; SW
Stream Index Number
18-74-63
Total Drainage Area
67,082
84,936
127,647
279,665
Onsite Drainage
Area
67,082
84,936
127,647
279,665
Offsite Drainage
Area
0
0
0
0
Impervious Area Total
63,162
61,855
73,181
198,198
10

Onsite Buildings
35,719
0
0
35,719
Onsite Streets
0
0
12,069
12,069
Onsite Parking
27,443
61,855
-10,491
78,807
Onsite Sidewalks
0
0
1,457
1,457
Other Onsite
0
0
0
0
Future2
0
0
54,450
54,450
Offsite Drainage
Area
0
0
0
0
Existing BUA
0
0
15,696
15,696
'The dry pond treats water draining from two sand filters as well as additional area.
2The dry pond has been designed to accommodate an additional 54,450ft2 of
impervious that can be permitted in the future. However, since the dry pond is a
secondary SCM the 54,450ft2 will have to also be treated by a primary SCM.
Please check the number in yellow
Calculations (continued):
a. See below
b. Please show the SHWT in msl rather than ft on the supplement. Please clarify. The spreadsheet prepared by
NCDEQ has both built into the system. My only option for data input is a number. Thanks for catching
that. This is the first sand filter that DEMLR has issued under the new rules using this new form, and so I will
advise the Central Office to correct the "ft" that K inseris automatically, and replace it with "fmsl". In the
meantime, please just cross out "ft" and write in "fmsl". I apologize for the confusion.
c. Please select if the sand filters will be pre -cast or poured in place on the supplement. The NCDEQ spreadsheet
does not allow that field to be filled out. Do I handwrite this in. I agree that the form is not intuitive. You can
type in the orange cell below the question, but not to the right of the question.
22
23 ■ t SwNT Ckvabon ( i5�)-
24 R T Type O(W4 rder (open ce t krAV ) e
25 i0 r. tiasea om re)e d ft reef wow pee <ast or ow-m-place e
26
d. Please show the soil type (A/B/C/D) in the calculations in support of the CN values. Appendix A of the report
contains the soils information including the name of the soil and HSG classification. The CN's used are based off
of the previously prepared/approved report. Except for areas that don't drain to our SCM's, the site is
composed'of 2 different soils, both of which would have been represented in the previously approved Tripp
documents with established CN's, which were used in our calculations. Can we use these by reference? If we
don't and we have differing data sources (and we all know that there can be some variances between sources),
it opens the door for calculations that show different existing conditions flows even if we do nothing, which
seems to have a lot of potential to create confusion on a site with existing permitting history and these only
relate to the pervious areas. Feel free to call if it may be helpful to discuss. I had not meant to make this
difficult. I was really just looking to have "Type A" soils in the text of the calculations. I wasn't looking for cross-
referenced sources.
e. Please show the thickness of the concrete on the bottom of sand filter #2 in order to show the "bottom"
elevation of the sand filter. We will add this dimension to the sections.
11

Please remember to confirm that any revised information is presented consistently throughout the application
documents including calculations, supplements, narrative, and plans. Please also remember to provide two hard copies
and one electronic copy of any updated documents per 15A NCAC 02H.1042(2).
The requested information should be received in this Office prior to July 20, 2017, or the application will be returned as
incomplete. If the project is returned and you wish to re -submit to the Express Program, you will need to reschedule the
project through the Express Coordinator for the next available review date and will need to resubmit all required items
at that time, including the application fee.
If additional time is needed to submit the requested information, please email your extension request to the Division at
the email address provided below. The request must indicate the date by which the requested information is expected
to be submitted, which shall be no later than 5 business days past the original due date.
The construction of any impervious surfaces, other than a construction entrance under an approved Sedimentation
Erosion Control Plan, is a violation of NCGS 143-215.1 and is subject to enforcement action pursuant to NCGS 143-
215.6A.
Please label all packages and cover letters as "Express" and reference the State assigned project number on all
correspondence.
Thanks,
Kelly
From: Johnson, Kelly
Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2017 2:58 PM
To:'Gollings, Jamie E.' <[e-mail]>
Cc: Weaver, Cameron <cameron.v_jeaver@ncdenr.&ov_>; Rhonda Hall <[e-mail]>;
'[e-mail]' <[e-mail]>;'[e-mail]'
<rodney.d.newton. mil @mail.mil>
Subject: RE: [Non-DoD Source] RE: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington Express Review
All,
Thanks for meeting today. Here is the list of initial items that are needed for the State Stormwater review:
1. Plan Sheets: Please submit two full-size plan sets of the following sheets:
a. Project Area with bearing/distance lines
Drainage areas for the two sand filters and for the dry pond
1981 map quantifying the impervious area in -place prior to 1988 (181,038sf)
CS300: Please add spot elevations/contours along the far edges of the pavement showing that the water
will drain into the system.
2. Signature Authority Letter: Please submit a copy of the letter showing that Mr. Newton can sign for the National
Guard forthis permit.
3. Redevelopment: This is a redevelopment project that will treat impervious area in excess of the pre-1988 amount
per 15A NCAC 02H .1003(3)(d). Redevelopment projects have two requirements per 15A NCAC 02H .1002(41) and
GS143-214.7:
Requirement #1: Treat the net increase in impervious from pre-1988
i. Amount of Redevelopment: You will redevelop 181,038sf (and treat above that amount). Since the
total impervious for the site is 297,515sf you will have to treat at least (297,515sf-181,038sf=)
116,741sf of impervious area. You have two sand filters which treat 63,162sf and 61,855sf
(total=125,017sf), and so you have met the .1003(3)(d) requirement.
ii. Numeric Summary: I have developed the following summary based on my review of the documents
which I would like to include in the permit text. If corrections are needed, please advise.
Redevelopment Summary
Impervious Area Treated: 1 125,017
12

Sand Filter #1Z:
63,162
Sand Filter #21:
61,855
Impervious Required to Treat':
(=297,515-181, 038sf)
116,477
July X, 2017, Impervious Total:
297,515
Pre-1988 Impervious Remaining
180,774
New Impervious
116,741
Pre-1988 Impervious Total:
181,038
1per 15A NCAC 02H .1003(3)(d)
2Neither sand filter has "future" area available.
b. Requirement #2: Redevelopment projects must provide equal or greater treatment of stormwater than the
pre-1988 configuration. Please submit a short qualitative summary (that is backed up by the pre-1988 plans
where necessary) demonstrating that you have met this requirement.
4. Application Summary: While generating the redevelopment summary, I found two items in the application table
that may need to be corrected:
Dry Pond Drainage Areal
Sand
Filter#1
Sand
Filter#2
Not to Sand
Filter
Dry Pond
Total
Receiving Stream
UT to Smith Creek
Stream Class
C; SW,
Stream Index Number
18-74-63
Total Drainage Area
67,082
F 84,936
127,647
279,665
Onsite Drainage Area
67,082
84,936
127,647
279,665
Offsite Drainage Area
0
0
0
0
Impervious Area Total
63,162
1 61,855
1 73,181
1 198,198
Onsite Buildings
35,719
0
0
35,719
Onsite Streets
0
0
12,069
12,069
Onsite Parking
27,443
61,855
-10,491
78,807
Onsite Sidewalks
0
0
1,457
1,457
Other Onsite
0
0
0
0
Future
0
0
54,450
54,450
Offsite Drainage Area
0
0
0
0
Existing BUA
0
0
15,696
15,696
'The dry pond treats water draining from two sand filters as well as additional
area.
Please check the number in yellow
"future" area cannot be treated solely to a dry pond because it is a secondary
SCM.
Sheets Removed: The following sheets have been removed from the submittal package: CS400, CS401, CS701,
CS702, CS704, CS705, CS706, CS707, CS708, CS709, L-110.
13

Thanks,
Kelly
From: Johnson, Kelly
Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 1:44 PM
To:'Gollings, Jamie E.' <[e-mail]>
Cc: Weaver, Cameron <[e-mail]>; Rhonda Hall <rhonda.hall@ncdertr. ov>
Subject: RE: [Non-DoD Source] RE: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington Express Review
Jamie,
I have cc'd Cameron and Rhonda (I suspect she may be reviewing the E&SC). I can't speak for what E&SC will need. For
stormwater, you need a single copy of all original/signed documents, a single copy of any supporting documents such as
the soils report and calculations, and two full plan sets.
Kelly
From: Gollings, Jamie E. [mailto:Jamie.Gallin s iacobs.corri
Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 1:37 PM
To: Johnson, Kelly <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [Non-DoD Source] RE: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington Express Review
Kelly,
As a followup to my voicemail,
• As of right now, our intent is to take the following approach and include with our documents: "Then,
demonstrate that permit modifications do not exceed that amount, and that they provide equal or better
treatment of impervious area. Or, the other way to do this is to compare pre-1988 with the proposed design on a
drainage -area basis without addressing the entire site."
• Can you verify how many copies of each document you will need for the submittal or refer me to the
appropriate weblink? Please keep in mind that it is both Stormwater and Erosion Control Express Review.
Thanks,
Jamie E. Gollings, PE ( Civil Engineer
JACOBS
y,e: 'i'i 1 Cc -ring Ro?:l: Suite 20Car,, N" 2%b.;0
L.c:^�-uct: Gi+ice: 919.859.5752i
jamie.gollings(a)-iacobs.com j www.iacobs.com
From: Johnson, Kelly[mailto:[e-mail]
Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 12:20 PM
To: Gollings, Jamie E. <[e-mail]>
Cc: Weaver, Cameron <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [Non-DoD Source] RE: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington Express Review
Jamie,
I overlaid the county GIS with the plan you sent me this morning in the first diagram below. The current (2014) permit
covers the entire tract that the National Guard owns, as shown by the land inside the green line "below" Control Tower
Drive. (Just to clarify, I want to make sure that you understand that that whole project area will need to be re -permitted
in tomorrow's application. You probably already realize that, but I just want to make sure since I don't see the project
area on the plan from this morning.) I then overlaid the drainage area for the infiltration basin that was permitted in
14

2014 in diagram 2 (it isn't a perfect overlay, but you get the idea.) From the file, it looks like the area that is covered
mainly by proposed sand filter #2 (the DA on the left in diagram 1) is constructed per the 2014 plans because the
infiltration basin is certified. It looks like you all plan to reconfigure that area, take out the infiltration basin, and use a
sand filter. The area that goes to sand filter #1 is being redeveloped from area that was not previously permitted to be
redeveloped. Diagram 3 is on file from the 2014 permit. It shows the impervious area that was in place in 1981. (State
Stormwater permitting began in 1988, and so the 2014 engineer submitted that to establish that he didn't have to treat
all of the impervious area on the tract.)
In 2014, the engineer showed that his drainage area contained impervious area that was in place well before 1988, but
since it drained to the infiltration basin he treated all of the impervious area in the basin. (As I am sure you know, that is
because all impervious in a drainage area has to be accounted for in order to ensure that it can all "fit" in the treatment
facility). There was a small section of impervious area, as shown in Diagram 4, that he could not collect (likely because
the driveway had to meet the crown of an existing road.) In retrospect, I probably should have quantified that amount
of impervious in the permit. But, I did not (probably because it was so small).
I have been trying to figure out the best way to document the redevelopment of this site, especially since they have
been (and may continue to) make regular changes to the permit. Per .1002(41) and GS143-214.7, redevelopment must
have impervious that is equal or less than the previous project and provide equal or better stormwater treatment. If the
footprint of impervious is being increased, then the project falls under .1003(3)(d) and it needs a high -density permit for
the net increase of impervious area. I have talked with other staff here to determine the best way to go about
this. There are at least two ways, but there may be others. The most complete method would be to quantify the
impervious area inside the entire project area using a pre-1988 map. Then, demonstrate that permit modifications do
not exceed that amount, and that they provide equal or better treatment of impervious area. Or, the other way to do
this is to compare pre-1988 with the proposed design on a drainage -area basis without addressing the entire site. We
will have to work this out tomorrow.
Thanks,
Kelly
Diagram 1

Diagram 2
Diagram 3
0
J �4
r�
�= r
16

Diagram 4
r
-----Original Message -----
From: Gollings, Jamie E. [mailto:Jamie.Gollings iacoas.com]
Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 9:40 AM
To: Johnson, Kelly <[e-mail]>
17

Cc: Weaver, Cameron <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [Non-DoD Source] RE: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington Express Review
Kelly,
Please call me when you have a moment. In the mean time, the attached shows existing vs. proposed impervious
impacts. I don't believe that the existing permit involved any existing impervious impacts.
Yes, the sand filters will be designed to the 2017 manual.
Jamie E. Gollings, PE I Civil Engineer
JACOBS
Office: 111 Corning Road, Suite 200, Cary, NC 27518
Contact: Office:919.859.5752
[e-mail] I www.jacobs.com
-----Original Message -----
From: Johnson, Kelly [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Friday, July 07, 2017 12:56 PM
To: Gollings, Jamie E. <[e-mail]>
Cc: Weaver, Cameron <[e-mail]>
Subject: FW: [Non-DoD Source] RE: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington Express Review
Jamie,
I am just trying to make sure I understand what is being proposed. Have you designed the new sand filter per the new
regulations (the 2017 rule)? Also, is this just a standard high density permit, or is there a redevelopment component,
too? (I just looked quickly at the current permit, and I didn't see any redevelopment but I wanted to verify that.)
Thanks,
Kelly
-----Original Message -----
From: Weaver, Cameron
Sent: Friday, July 07, 2017 12:26 PM
To: Moody, Cale D LTC USARMY NG NCARNG (US) <[e-mail]>
Cc: Dudick, Vickie A NFG NG NCARNG (US) <vickie.a.dudick.nfg@mail. mil>; Scott, Georgette
<[e-mail]>; Johnson, Kelly <[e-mail]>; Newton, Rodney D LTC USARMY NG
NCARNG (US) <[e-mail]>; Caldwell, Kent Eric MAJ USARMY NG NCARNG (US)
<kent.e.caldwel1.mil @mail.mil>; Burriola, William S II CW2 USARMY NG NCARNG (US) <[e-mail]>;
Harper, William W II MAJ USARMY NG NGB ARNG (US)<[e-mail]>; Garcia, Karla M CIV NG NGB
(US) <[e-mail]>; Meilinger, Derek T MAJ USARMY NG NCARNG (US)
<[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [Non-DoD Source] RE: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington Express Keview
Thanks to Kelly (and I know I owe you!), I have been able to schedule this review as was requested for Tuesday 7/11, at
10am.
We look forward to seeing the engineer and owner representative here for this meeting. Let me know of any
outstanding issues.
Cameron
18

Cameron Weaver
Environmental Assistance Coordinator -Wilmington Regional Office NCDEQ-Division of Environmental Assistance and
Customer Service
127 Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405
910-796-7303
NCDEQ NEW WEBSITE: http://deq.nc.gov/
DEACS NEW WEBSITE: http://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/environmental-assistance-customer-service
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties.
-----Original Message -----
From: Moody, Cale D LTC USARMY NG NCARNG (US) [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Friday, July 07, 2017 12:15 PM
To: Weaver, Cameron <[e-mail]>
Cc: Dudick, Vickie A NFG NG NCARNG (US) <[e-mail]>; Scott, Georgette
<[e-mail]>; Johnson, Kelly <[e-mail]>; Newton, Rodney D LTC USARMY NG
NCARNG (US) <[e-mail]>; Caldwell, Kent Eric MAJ USARMY NG NCARNG (US)
<[e-mail]>; Burriola, William S II CW2 USARMY NG NCARNG (US) <[e-mail]>;
Harper, William W II MAJ USARMY NG NGB ARNG (US)<[e-mail]>; Garcia, Karla M CIV NG NGB
(US) <[e-mail]>; Meilinger, Derek T MAJ USARMY NG NCARNG (US)
<[e-mail]>
Subject: RC: [Non-DoD Source] RE: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington Express Review
Cameron,
Thank you very much! We appreciate every effort to move up the review date.
Normally we would not request this but we are receiving FY13 funds ($15M) for the construction of a new National
Guard Readiness Center to be constructed on the same land as the current which was damaged by Act of Nature
(Hurricane Irene 2011). Due to this being FY13 funds, they must be awarded by 30SEP2017 or they expire and the
project will not happen. The timeline we are up against is the EN reviews must be completed and the 30 day period also
completed prior to 17 AUG 2017 in order not to delay the already stringent timeline. This new NCNG Readiness Center
will additionally be an economic asset to the Wilmington area. Again, we certainly appreciate any effort to get this
review completed as soon as possible.
Thank you,
Cale D. Moody, PLS
LTC, EN
Fulltime: CFMO Deputy/Business Manager
Office: [phone]
M-Day: CDR, 105th EN BN (RHINO 6)
Office: [phone]
Mobile: [phone]
[e-mail]
19

-----Original Message -----
From: Weaver, Cameron [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Friday, July 07, 2017 11:58 AM
To: Moody, Cale D LTC USARMY NG NCARNG (US) <[e-mail]>
Cc: Dudick, Vickie A NFG NG NCARNG (US) <[e-mail]>; Scott, Georgette
<[e-mail]>; Johnson, Kelly <[e-mail]>
Subject: FW: [Non-DoD Source] RE: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington Express Review
All active links contained in this email were disabled. Please verify the identity of the sender, and confirm the
authenticity of all links contained within the message prior to copying and pasting the address to a Web browser.
Hi LTC Moody:
After hearing third -hand about your situation, I wanted to reach out to you directly. We make every effort to
accommodate client schedules, but reviews are scheduled based on when the complete requests are received in our
system and are spaced to allow the individual attention that is needed to expedite the Express Permit application
reviews. We have a very limited staff available to conduct Express Reviews. In this case, after conversing via emails with
Ms. Dudick, this review was already moved up once in our scheduling by more than a week by switching with the NGRC
project in Jacksonville.
I have now reached out to additional staff to see if they can accommodate your request, and I will let you know when
our office is able to review your project.
I will be in touch soon.
Cameron
Cameron Weaver
Environmental Assistance Coordinator -Wilmington Regional Office NCDEQ-Division of Environmental Assistance and
Customer Service
127 Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405
910-796-7303
NCDEQ NEW WEBSITE: Caution-http://deq.nc.gov/ DEACS NEW WEBSITE:
Caution-http://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/environmental-assistance-customer-
service
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties.
-----Original Message -----
From: Dudick, Vickie A NFG NG NCARNG (US) [Caution-mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2017 4:28 PM
To: Weaver, Cameron <[e-mail]>
20

Cc: Scott, Georgette <[e-mail]>; Newton, Rodney D LTC USARMY NG NCARNG (US)
<[e-mail]>; Burriola, William S II
CW2 USARMY NG NCARNG (US)<[e-mail]>; Gollings, Jamie E. <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [Non-DoD Source] RE: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington Express Review
Cameron- Per our conversation this afternoon, the NCARNG would like to switch the Jacksonville express review with
Wilmington's review date. This puts Wilmington submittal meeting scheduled for 7/25 @ 11am at the Wilmington DEQ
office and Jacksonville scheduled for 8/2. Thank you for your consideration.
Vickie A. Dudick
Director of Environmental Management
North Carolina National Guard
1636 Gold Star Drive
Raleigh, NC 27607
984-664-6186
[e-mail]
-----Original Message -----
From: Weaver, Cameron [Caution-mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2017 9:38 AM
To: Dudick, Vickie A NFG NG NCARNG (US) <[e-mail]>
Cc: Scott, Georgette <[e-mail]>; Newton, Rodney D LTC USARMY NG NCARNG (US)
<[e-mail]>; Burrioia, William S II
CW2 USARMY NG NCARNG (US) <[e-mail]>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] RE: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington Express Review
All active links contained in this email were disabled. Please verify the identity of the sender, and confirm the
authenticity of all links contained within the message prior to copying and pasting the address to a Web browser.
Hi Vickie.
You should be hearing from Jamie Gollings, your consultant of record on the request. This meeting has been scheduled
forAugust 2 at 11 AM here at the Wilmington DEQ offices.
Let me know of any issues.
Cameron
21

Cameron Weaver
Environmental Assistance Coordinator -Wilmington Regional Office
NCDEQ-Division of Environmental Assistance and Customer Service
127 Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405
910-796-7303
NCDEQ NEW WEBSITE: Caution-Caution-http://deq.nc.gov/
DEACS NEW WEBSITE:
Caution-Caution-http://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/environmental-assistance-c
ustomer-
service
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties.
-----Original Message -----
From: Dudick, Vickie A NFG NG NCARNG (US) [Caution-Caution-mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2017 8:33 AM
To: Weaver, Cameron <[e-mail]>
Cc: Scott, Georgette <[e-mail]>; Newton, Rodney D LTC USARMY NG NCARNG (US)
<[e-mail]>; Burriola, William S II
CW2 USARMY NG NCARNG (US)<william.s.burriola.mil@mail. mil>
Subject: RE: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington Express Review
Cameron- Any update on the Express Review for the NCARNG permits? Is the
NCARNG on the schedule or do you need anything additional from us? Has
another Reviewer been assigned? Thank you for your prompt attention.
Vickie A. Dudick
22

Director of Environmental Management
North Carolina National Guard
1636 Gold Star Drive
Raleigh, NC 27607
984-664-6186
vickie'.a.dudick.nfg@mail. miI <
Caution-Caution-mailto:[e-mail] >
-----Original Message -----
From: Weaver, Cameron [Caution-Caution-mailto:[e-mail] < Caution-Caution-
mailto:[e-mail] > ]
Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 3:21 PM
To: Dudick, Vickie A NFG NG NCARNG (US) <[e-mail] < Caution-Caution-
mailto:[e-mail] > >
Cc: Scott, Georgette <[e-mail] < Caution-Caution-mailto:[e-mail] > >
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] RE: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington
Express Review
All active links contained in this email were disabled. Please verify the
identity of the sender, and confirm the authenticity of all links contained
within the message prior to copying and pasting the address to a Web
browser.
23

Hi Vickie
The quickness of the review is directly proportional to the completeness of
the initial permit application packet that is brought to and discussed in
the submittal meeting. The review meeting is scheduled so that the reviewer
is able to put their attention on that particular project immediately, but
it is a balancing act between ongoing Express reviews in house already with
the reviewer and when the reviewer will be able to issue the permit from the
latest Express submittal. The 30 days covers the reasonable assumption that
two rounds of additional information will be needed from the applicant to
complete the review. The more complete the application, the faster the
overall turnaround for permit issuance.
I'll be in touch on Monday with a date that a reviewer will be able to meet
concerning the Express Review.
Let me know of any other issues.
Cameron
Cameron Weaver
Environmental Assistance Coordinator -Wilmington Regional Office
NCDEQ-Division of Environmental Assistance and Customer Service
127 Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405
910-796-7303
24

NCDEQ NEW WEBSITE: Caution-Caution-Caution-http://deq.nc.gov/
DEACS NEW WEBSITE:
Ca ution-Caution-Ca ution-http://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/environmental-assi
stance-c
ustomer-
service
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North
Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
-----Original Message -----
From: Dudick, Vickie A NFG NG NCARNG (US)
[Ca ution-Caution-Caution-mailto:[e-mail]1]
Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 2:48 PM
To: Weaver, Cameron <[e-mail] < Caution-Caution-mailto:[e-mail] > >
Cc: Burriola, William S II CW2 USARMY NG NCARNG (US)
<[e-mail] <
Caution-Caution-mailto:[e-mail] > >'
Subject: RE: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington Express Review
Cameron- Just want to clarify what you told us on the phone today- After the
DEQ office meeting and acceptance, 30 days is required for express
permitting? My understanding is the Express review for Erosion Control
averages 1.6 days and express review for Storm Water control averages 7.6
days. Please let us know if this has changed from the attached. Thank you.
Caution -Caution -Ca ution-http://deq.nc.gov/permits-regulations/express-permit
25

ting
-----Original Message -----
From: Dudick, Vickie A NFG NG NCARNG (US)
Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 1:25 PM
To:'[e-mail]'<[e-mail] < Caution-Caution-
mailto:[e-mail] > >
Cc: Burriola, William S II CW2 USARMY NG NCARNG (US)
<[e-mail] <
Caution-Caution-mailto:[e-mail] > >; Morris, Thomas S NFG NG NCARNG (US)
<[e-mail] <
Caution-Caution-mailto:[e-mail] > >; Newton, Rodney D LTC USARMY NG NCARNG (US)
<[e-mail] <
Caution-Caution-mailto:[e-mail]
Subject: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington
Cameron- Per our conversation today, the NCARNG requests another Reviewer to
expedite the National Guard Readiness Center Stormwater and Land Quality
Express Permit Review. This project is a Federal contract with fiscal year
2017 funds which must be executed prior to September 30, 2017. Solicitation
of bids can occur but the permits must be secured before the bids can be.
opened. Please note my correct email below. Thank you for your
consideration.
Vickie A. Dudick
Director of Environmental Management
North Carolina National Guard
1636 Gold Star Drive
26

Raleigh, NC 27607
984-664-6186
[e-mail] <
Caution-Caution-mailto:[e-mail] >
NOTICE -This communication may contain confidential and privileged information that is forthe sole use of the
intended recipient. Any viewing, copying or distribution of, or reliance on this message by unintended recipients is
strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message
and deleting it from your computer.
_i ro +' C:,. . _ ._ = c-. ,. .. :r:l '::rnldti^ t'�'.. I' .. _ _ L �:� Vi4N: h �: rc- ^rt. A - ny
, t
_.. , - :r.t ;. -_ rr = ; jnia ,�;c' r•,-:c' :.:-r i... 1.� pmi,.it 1L.,. '_f ,.•L,l-- -- _,': (?4i'i\`Ca_ tiiic`+
r ...-y , . • .. ...• : , * �..._ I -If ir 7: it . {' irC',S .-L
..E ..I _ - - - -.5- -
..�._.... 'iC ....- :1;.� _.. ........ ......t ,._.._ .. _u'r-. _ ..t lvCd:..a�.r.,t•'
C�, C. ..- . t;...ii 'C.`.i�`,•.L{. :' y� .. �.. :C'Ci'.­:.
n r,i :y :.'f.'.'"::.::-t C: _,ra_.I - j/,.. _. i ;Y.. :731 I'. i::' -.:i•_ u; -.. Z Uii. 'tr sided 3t cir,iC-.1t. Any
C.' r:. I . _ _ 1.!,:`Ti`5C. . j `_ .'.n:�. I� ;ti`iCL'f FYrtl:"•a4',`%.-'..., ;'C=� !ti3JC � _.,,..•.,:�,�j ',l.;c_
t.y rt yy - co .. r: .. ..r. f ."A .. ir', .I Y' S- ^ul.
Lr CCiY.:. it .J.:Y:..'_iC 1 CGIF C M of i't: li,,i;.t ii� rt:Ir}'.Lil;. i n-,
t"° .:`::°Ir• �, uOr ;'�f._- :. �`.` `citi'jr-n :,f, N. _:, _.,.� rr:_::...:,.:.':Jy ur;ir'ir::r::;cd reci[^ .:�:= is ari�i:iy F,r'a?tibi't:�:3. if `;:: � i'i_�Ve :' CB!'18U tills
sage iii encor, G! e CnL 558Cje and de.;;'.ilic Fr. UC r
ro::�. cofitaii: CE: niic ._rr..`.. 1�. � 'i` :: uj Itlrarmation that is far di,_ t - of tt,e. ir:Et'!tc icd rocip.ie nz. Asty
^r Cfis:ribatir.n of, :r i ffar" ;,: on'.stis r.3e_� _ : by uisint::'tf' erirJ;�..,.: is r,x'ia)`! n-f' ,°t' r3. li' '��= have received this
r:r, {eas nolA y� us .,Y:JP::iic'1:..ly .� y:'1y - �r� - r:". '.i�. j C o;n
27

Johnson, Kell
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments
Johnson, Kelly
Friday, July 21, 2017 10:52 AM
'Gollings, Jamie E.'
FW: [Non-DoD Source] RE: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington Express Review
2017 07 excel_BUA 140906.xlsx
I'm good with everything else. The permit is drafted, and so it can go out once we get the numbers. I am doing
inspections this afternoon at some point, but if it comes in today I can get it out early next week.
Thanks,
Kelly
From: Johnson, Kelly
Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 10:16 AM
To:'Gollings, Jamie E.' <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [Non-DoD Source] RE: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington Express Review
Or maybe like this...
Impervious Area Total
Inside Dry Pond DA
Outside Dry Pond DA
Sand
Filter
#1
Sand
Filter #2
To Dry
Pond, but
not to
Sand Filter
Dry
Pond
Total'
Outside
Dry Pond
DA
Total
Project
Receiving Stream
UT to Smith Creek
Stream Class
C; SW
Stream Index Number
18-74-63
Total Drainage Area
67,082
84,936
127,647
279,665
Onsite Drainage
Area
67,082
84,936
127,647
279,665
Offsite Drainage
Area
0
0
0
0
Impervious Area Total
63,162
61,855
13P 1811
198,198 1
267,530
Onsite Buildings
35,719
0
y 0
35,719
Onsite Streets
0
0
1,578
1,578
Onsite Parking
27,443
61,855
0
89,298
Onsite Sidewalks
0
0
1,457
1,457
Other Onsite
0
0
0
0
Future2
0
0
54,450
54,450
Offsite Drainage
Area
0
0
0
0
Existing BUA
0
0
15,696
15,696
'The dry pond treats water draining from two sand filters as well as additional
area.

'The dry pond has been designed to accommodate an additional 54,450ft' of impervious that
can be permitted in the future. However, since the dry pond is a secondary SCM the 54,450ft'
will have to also be treated by a primary SCM.
Please check the number in
yellow
From: Johnson, Kelly
Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 10:12 AM
To: 'Gollings, Jamie E.' <Jamie.Gallinf;s@;acobs.com>
Subject: RE: [Non-DoD Source] RE: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington Express Review
Do you want to set it up like this? I'm just trying to rectify 267,530 for the total overall. I am not sure that I understand
what is inside the dry ponds DA and hat is outside
' . Would this be a clearer wayto do that? Excel attached.
w
Impervious Area Total
Sand Sand Not to Dry Outside Total
Filter Filter #2 Sand Pond Dry Project
#1 Filter Total' Pond
DA
Receiving Stream UT to Smith Creek
Stream Class C; SW
Stream Index Number 18-74-63
Total Drainage Area 67,082 84,936 127,647 1 279,665
Onsite Drainage
Area 67,082 84,936 127,647 279,665
Offsite Drainage
Area 1 0 0 0 0
Impervious Area Total 63,162 61,855 73,181 1 198,198 1 267,530
Onsite Buildings 35,719 0 0 35,719
Onsite Streets 0 0 1,578 1,578
Onsite Parking 27,443 61,855 0 89,298
Onsite Sidewalks 0 0 1,457 1,457
Other Onsite 0 0 0 0
Future 0 0 54,450 54,450
Offsite Drainage
Area 0 0 0 0
Existing BUA 0 0 1 15,696 15,696
'The dry pond treats water draining from two sand filters as well as additional area.
'The dry pond has been designed to accommodate an additional 54,450ft2 of impervious
that can be permitted in the future. However, since the dry pond is a secondary SCM the
54,450ft' will have to also be treated by a primary SCM.
Please check the number in
yellow
'The dry pond treats water draining from two sand filters as well as additional area.
'The dry pond has been designed to accommodate an additional 54,450ft2 of impervious
that can be permitted in the future. However, since the dry pond is a secondary SCM the
54,450ft' will have to also be treated by a primary SCM.
Please check the number in
yellow

From: Johnson, Kelly
Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 10:06 AM
To: 'Gollings, Jamie E.' <Jamie,Goilings w'acojs.com>
Subject: FW: [Non-DoD Source] RE: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington Express Review
Also.... Sorry, meant to put this in the same email...
Since the total 267,530 below is greater than the total impervious to the dry pond, 198,198sf I will clarify that the
difference in these two numbers (267,530-198,198=69332) is in the project but not draining to the dry pond. I think that
that is what you are saying with these numbers?
From: Johnson, Kelly
Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 10:00 AM
To: 'Gollings, Jamie E.' <Jamie.GollinF,s acohs.com>
Subject: RE: [Non-DoD Source] RE: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington Express Review
Jamie,
I am working through this this morning. Is there a typo here?
3

3. Calculations [per 15A NCAC .1042(2)(f)j:
a. Application Summary Table Update:
Response: See revs ed t--40;) below.
_ -
Dry Pond Drair..ate Area°
sand Ritz K
sand Filter Dry Pond iotal
Receiving Stream
_....
UT to Smith Creek
Stream Class
C, sw
18.74.63
Stream Index dumber
1 otal DraInage Area
6HVI,, 84,936
127,647
127,647
...�,..�®
279,6b,
279.GW--
Onsite Drainage Area
IS3.Uts2 84,936
�— — ...: 0 0
f°srt Oe Drainage Area
Impervious Area Total
..�.-.......—
�1,E'vr
57,485
1W19P
ter.
ondto tlu,lding.1
�5.t:9
a-.
0
- _ , -
0
.-. ..
oome Streets . _ _
0
' _
1,578
1,510
Onsitr Parking
- t
0
Onsrte !Wawa:ks
0
0
i
1, 4S7
r
9
y,aEdS
Other Ons d
C ?t
0 0
i 0
j 54,450
Fui.sra'
.ite Draina�c A -ea
0
0
0
rr
+
Usti-W RUA
G
0 t
15,696
15,bs9,
'The dry pond treats water dralintrit, from two sand filters as wetl as additional Area.
qhe dry pond has been designed to acct mnwdate an additonai 54,4SDft of
impervious that (in be permitted in the futurehowever, since the dry pond is a
secondary SCM the 54,450ft" will have to also be treated by a primary SCM.
Thanks,
KJ
From: Gollings, Jamie E. [mail:o:Jamie.Gollings acob�com
Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2017 2:14 PM
To: Johnson, Kelly <k�[e-mail]>
Cc: Weaver, Cameron <[e-mail]>; williarii.s.burriola.mil@rrl�,il.mil; [e-mail];
Langenfeld, Paul <Paul.Langenfeld iacobs.com>; Wainwright, Thomas J.<Tiiomas.Wainwr![e-mail]>; Ruff,
Brian P Sr NFG NG NCARNG (US) <[e-mail]>; Caldwell, Kent Eric MAJ USARMY NG NCARNG (US)
<[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [Non-DoD Source] RE: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington Express Review
Kelly,
Revised plans and calculations should reach your office tomorrow via Fed Ex. Attached are our responses to your
comments. Please let us know if you need anything else or have further questions.
Thanks,
Jamie E. Gollings, PE ( Civil Engineer
JACOBS
Office: 111 Coming SUite 200. Carr, NO : -,51 S
=c:ntact: 04.1 ~e-,:919.6 9.5752
iamie.gollingsMacobs.com I www.jacobs.com
From: Johnson, Kelly[mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2017 11:55 AM

To: Gollings, Jamie E. <[e-mail]>
Cc: Weaver, Cameron <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]; rodnev.d.ne,r.ton.mil n:ail.anil;
Langenfeld, Paul <[e-mail]>; Wainwright, Thomas J. <Thomas.Wainwri ht@i cobs.com>
Subject: RE: [Non-DoD Source] RE: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington Express Review
Jamie,
Please see below in blue.
From: Gollings, Jamie E. mailto_Jamie.GollingsCujiacobs.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2017 11:23 AM
To: Johnson, Kelly <kell [e-mail]>
Cc: Weaver, Cameron <[e-mail]>; william.s.burrio:[e-mail] rodney.d.newton.mi) mail.inil;
Langenfeld, Paul <Pau![e-mail]>; Wainwright, Thomas J. <Thomas.Wainwri ht@jacobs.�.om>
Subject: RE: [Non-DoD Source] RE: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington Express Review
Kelly,
Thanks again for your prompt review. Please see below for our plan of approach or clarification needed.
Regards,
Jamie E. Gollings, PE I Civil Engineer
JACOBS pp--
iamie.gollingsCcbacobs.com ; www.iacobs.com
From: Johnson, Kelly mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2017 2:52 PM
To: Gollings, Jamie E. <[e-mail]>
Cc: Weaver, Cameron <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]; rodney.d.newton.mil mail.mil
Subject: RE: [Non-DoD Source] RE: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington Express Review
Jamie,
I have gone through the entire package, and I have incorporated all my comments into a single letter. This is the
"Request for Additional Information Letter", which will be handled via email in lieu of a formal letter.
1. Attached Table: Please see the attached table "2017 07 addinfo 140906" for a summary of the items needed.
This table is cross-referenced with the regulations supporting the requests. This table also references the two
items below. Received, thank you.
Redevelopment [per 15A NCAC .1003(3)(d)]: This is a redevelopment project that will treat impervious area in
excess of the pre-1988 amount per 15A NCAC 02H .1003(3)(d). Redevelopment projects have two requirements
per 15A NCAC 02H .1002(41) and GS143-214.7:
a. Requirement #1: Treat the net increase in impervious from pre-1988
i. Amount of Redevelopment: You will redevelop 181,038sf (and treat above that amount). Since
the total impervious for the site is 297,515sf you will have to treat at least (297,515sf-
181,038sf=)116,741sf of impervious area. You have two sand filters which treat 63,162sf and
61,855sf (total=125,017sf), and so you have met the .1003(3)(d) requirement. We will confirm
the numbers but that appears to be the only action item here. If we need to do anything else,
please advise. Please just confirm numbers.

ii. Pre-1988 (1981) Map: Please provide two full-sized plans showing that there was 181,038sf of
impervious area before State Stormwater permitting began in 1988. Map will be provided
referencing information on the data source (digitized from aerial dates' xxxxxxxx).
iii. Numeric Summary: I have developed the following summary based on my review of the
documents which I would like to include in the permit text. If corrections are needed, please
advise. (The two tables provided in this email are provided in the Excel file containing the words
"excel_BUA". We wi!I review, verify and/or correct the numbers. It sounds li'::e this will be in
the permit language only and we don't need to place this on any plans or calculztions
documents. Please confirm. Please just confirm numbers.
Redevelopment Summary
Impervious Area Treated:
125,017
Sand Filter #12:
63,162
Sand Filter #22:
61,855
Impervious Required to Treat':
(=297, 515-181, 038sf)
116,477
July X, 2017, Impervious Total:
297,515
Pre-1988 Impervious Remaining
180,774
New Impervious
116,741
Pre-1988 Impervious Total:
181,038
Requirement #2: Redevelopment projects must provide equal or greater treatment of stormwater than
the pre-1988 configuration. Please submit a short qualitative summary (that is backed up by the pre-
1988 plans where necessary) demonstrating that you have met this requirement. We will provide a
narrative on this.
Calculations [per 15A NCAC .1042(2)(f)]:
a. Application Summary Table: Please make the following corrections:
Dry Pond Drainage Areal
Sand
Filter #1
Sand
Filter #2
Not to Sand
Filter
Dry Pond
Total
Receiving Stream
UT to Smith Creek
Stream Class
C; SW
Stream Index Number
18-74-63
Total Drainage Area
67,082
84,936
127,647
279,665
Onsite Drainage Area
67,082
841936
127,647
279,665
Offsite Drainage Area
0
0
0
0
Impervious Area Total
63,162
61,855
73,181
198,198
Onsite Buildings
35,719
0
0
35,719
Onsite Streets
0
0
12,069
12,069
Onsite Parking
27,443
61,855
-10,491
78,807
Onsite Sidewalks
0
0
1,457
1,457
Other Onsite
0
0
0
0
Future
0
0
54,450
54,450
Offsite Drainage Area
0
0
0
0
Existing BUA
0
0
15,696
15,696

'The dry pond treats water draining from two sand filters as well as additional
area.
Please check the number in
yellow We will review and
confirm/update.
"future" area cannot be treated solely in a dry pond because it is a secondary
SCM. Please advise on how we can appropriately document that the dry
pond has the capacity for the additional impervious but also acknowledge
that primary treatment would be required. We inc=uded some language in
the report documents as a record. Is there some way that we can record this
now such that this aspect of stormwater for the site doesn't have to be
revisited in the future? Can we replace the 0's with "Primary SCM Required"?
How about this? (Revised Excel file attached.)
Dry Pond Drainage Area'
Sand Filter
#1
Sand Filter
#2
Not to Sand
Filter
Dry Pond
Total
Receiving Stream
UT to Smith Creek
Stream Class
C; SW
Stream Index Number
18-74-63
Total Drainage Area
67,082
84,936
127,647
279,665
Onsite Drainage
Area
67,082
84,936
127,647
279,665
Offsite Drainage
Area
0
0
0E
0
Impervious Area Total
63,162
61,855
73,181
198,198
Onsite Buildings
35,719
0
0
35,719
Onsite Streets
0
0
12,069
12,069
Onsite Parking
27,443
61,855
-10,491 .
78,807
Onsite Sidewalks
0
0
1,457
1,457
Other Onsite
0
0
0
0
Future'
0
0
54,450
54,450
Offsite Drainage
Area
0
0
0
0
Existing BUA
0
0
15,696
15,696
'The dry pond treats water draining from two sand filters as well as additional area.
'The dry pond has been designed to accommodate an additional 54,450ft' of
impervious that can be permitted in the future. However, since the dry pond is a
secondary SCM the 54,450ft' will have to also be treated by a primary SCM.
Please check the number in yellow
Calculations (continued):
a. See below

w2
y`1
14
Z5
�F
Please show the SHWT in msl rather than ft on the supplement. Please clarify. .i he: spreadsheet prepared by
NCDEQ has both built into the system. My only option for data input is a number. Thanks for catching
that. This is the first sand filter that DEMLR has issued under the new rules using this new form, and so I will
advise the Central Office to correct the "ft" that it inserts automatically, and replace it with "fmsl". In the
meantime, please just cross out "ft" and write in "fmsl". I apologize for the confusion.
c. Please select if the sand filters will be pre -cast or poured in place on the supplement. The NCDEQ spreads;feet
does not allow that field to be filled out. Do I handwrite this in. I agree that the form is not intuitive. You can
type in the orange cell below the question, but not to the right of the question.
Srt :%T e.*-" al. i mn tM7S4
t 4 pc t ftr (open or 4 oK-.O
e. i„sie-a d£'S roe, itt* riser i1 t3f..' wt-casi o' raaJ`•',n-;�s3:e.
Please show the soil type (A/B/C/D) in the calculations in support of the CN values.
contains the soils information including the name of the soil and HSG classification.
i3n =
F
F
Appendix A of the report
The CN's used are based off
of the previously prepared/approved report. Except for areas that don't drain to our SCM's, the site is
composed of 2 different soils, both of which would have been represented in the previously approved Tripp
documents with established CN's, which were used in our calculations. Can we use these by reference? If we
don't and we have differing data sources (and WE all know that there can be some variances between sources),
it opens the door for calculations that show different existing conditions flows even if we do nothing, which
seems to have a lot of potential to create confusion on a site with existing permitting history and these only
relate to the pervious areas. Feel free to call if it may be helpful to discuss. I had not meant to make this
difficult. I was really just looking to have "Type A" soils in the text of the calculations. I wasn't looking for cross-
referenced sources.
e. Please show the thickness of the concrete on the bottom of sand filter #2 in order to show the "bottom"
elevation of the sand filter. We will add this dimension to the sections.
Please remember to confirm that any revised information is presented consistently throughout the application
documents including calculations, supplements, narrative, and plans. Please also remember to provide two hard copies
and one electronic copy of any updated documents per 15A NCAC 02H.1042(2).
The requested information should be received in this Office prior to July 20, 2017, or the application will be returned as
incomplete. If the project is returned and you wish to re -submit to the Express Program, you will need to reschedule the
project through the Express Coordinator for the next available review date and will need to resubmit all required items
at that time, including the application fee.
If additional time is needed to submit the requested information, please email your extension request to the Division at
the email address provided below. The request must indicate the date by which the requested information is expected
to be submitted, which shall be no later than 5 business days past the original due date.
The construction of any impervious surfaces, other than a construction entrance under an approved Sedimentation
Erosion Control Plan, is a violation of NCGS 143-215.1 and is subject to enforcement action pursuant to NCGS 143-
215.6A.
Please label all packages and cover letters as "Express" and reference the State assigned project number on all
correspondence.
Thanks,
Kelly
From: Johnson, Kelly
Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2017 2:58 PM

To: 'Gollings, Jamie E.' <Jam;e.Gollinas iacobs.com>
Cc: Weaver, Cameron <carneron.%kleavernndenr.eov>; Rhonda Hall <rhonda.hall 9- ncdenr.kov>;
'[e-mail]' <william.s.burriola.mil@ma l.mil>; '[e-mail]'
<rodney.d.newton.miIPmail.mil>
Subject: RE: [Non-DoD Source] RE: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington Express Review
All,
Thanks for meeting today. Here is the list of initial items that are needed for the State Stormwater review:
1. Plan Sheets: Please submit two full-size plan sets of the following sheets:
a. Project Area with bearing/distance lines
b. Drainage areas for the two sand filters and for the dry pond
c. 1981 map quantifying the impervious area in -place prior to 1988 (181,038sf)
d. CS300: Please add spot elevations/contours along the far edges of the pavement showing that the water
will drain into the system.
Signature Authority Letter: Please submit a copy of the letter showing that Mr. Newton can sign for the National
Guard for this permit.
Redevelopment: This is a redevelopment project that will treat impervious area in excess of the pre-1988 amount
per 15A NCAC 02H .1003(3)(d). Redevelopment projects have two requirements per 15A NCAC 02H .1002(41) and
G5143-214.7:
a. Requirement #1: Treat the net increase in impervious from pre-1988
i. Amount of Redevelopment: You will redevelop 181,038sf (and treat above that amount). Since the
total impervious for the site is 297,515sf you will have to treat at least (297,515sf-181,038sf=)
116,741sf of impervious area. You have two sand filters which treat 63,162sf and 61,855sf
(total=125,017sf), and so you have met the .1003(3)(d) requirement.
ii. Numeric Summary: I have developed the following summary based on my review of the documents
which I would like to include in the permit text. If corrections are needed, please advise.
Redevelopment Summary
Impervious Area Treated,
125,017
Sand Filter #1Z:
63,162
Sand Filter #22:
61,855
Impervious Required to Treat':
(=297,515-181, 038sf)
116,477
July X, 2017, Impervious Total:
297,515
Pre-1988 Impervious Remaining
180,774
New Impervious
116,741
Pre-1988 Impervious Total:
181,038
1per 15A NCAC 02H .1003(3)(d)
2Neither sand filter has "future" area available.
b. Requirement #2: Redevelopment projects must provide equal or greater treatment of stormwater than the
pre-1988 configuration. Please submit a short qualitative summary (that is backed up by the pre-1988 plans
where necessary) demonstrating that you have met this requirement.
4. Application Summary: While generating the redevelopment summary, I found two items in the application table
that may need to be corrected:
Dry Pond Drainage Areal
Sand
Filter #1
Sand
Filter #2
Not to Sand
Filter
Dry Pond
I Total

Receiving Stream
UT to Smith Creek
Stream Class
C; SW
Stream Index Number
18-74-63
Total Drainage Area
67,082
84,936
127,647
279,665
Onsite Drainage Area
67,082
84,936
127,647
279,665
Offsite Drainage Area
0
0
0
0
Impervious Area Total
63,162
61,855
73,181
198,198
Onsite Buildings
35,719
0
0
35,719
Onsite Streets
0
0
12,069
12,069
Onsite Parking
27,443
61,855
-10,491
78,807
Onsite Sidewalks
0
0
1,457
1,457
Other Onsite
0
0
0
0
Future
0
0
54,450
54,450
Offsite Drainage Area
0
0
0
0
Existing BUA
0
0
15,696
151696
'The dry pond treats water draining from two sand filters as well as additional
area.
Please check the number in yellow
"future" area cannot be treated solely in a dry pond because it is a secondary
SCM.
5. Sheets Removed: The following sheets have been removed from the submittal package: CS400, CS401, CS701,
CS702, CS704, CS705, CS706, CS707, CS708, CS709, L-110.
Thanks,
Kelly
From: Johnson, Kelly
Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 1:44 PM
To:'Gollings, Jamie E.' <[e-mail]>
Cc: Weaver, Cameron <cameron.wPaver ncdenr.gov>; Rhonda Hall <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [Non-DoD Source] RE: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington Express Review
Jamie,
I have cc'd Cameron and Rhonda (I suspect she may be reviewing the E&SC). I can't speak for what E&SC will need. For
stormwater, you need a single copy of all original/signed documents, a single copy of any supporting documents such as
the soils report and calculations, and two full plan sets.
Kelly
From: Gollings, Jamie E. [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 1:37 PM
To: Johnson, Kelly <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [Non-DoD Source] RE: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington Express Review
Kelly,
10

As a followup to my voicemail,
• As of right now, our intent is to take the following.approach and include with our documents: "Then,
demonstrate that permit modifications do not exceed that amount, and that they provide equal or better
treatment of impervious area. Or, the other way to do this is to compare pre-1988 with the proposed design on a
drainage -area basis without addressing the entire site."
• Can you verify how many copies of each document you will need for the submittal or refer me to the
appropriate weblink? Please keep in mind that it is both Stormwater and Erosion Control Express Review,
Thanks,
Jamie E. Gollings, PE ! Civil Engineer
JACOBS
Rua6� lou;tc j), ice. ''. ICI v �718
[e-mail] I www.jacobs.com
From: Johnson, Kelly [mailtgnk: !y . ohnsor @ncdenr.gov]
Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 12:20 PM
To: Gollings, Jamie E. <[e-mail]>
Cc: Weaver, Cameron <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [Non-DoD Source] RE: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington Express Review
Jamie,
I overlaid the county GIS with the plan you sent me this morning in the first diagram below. The current (2014) permit
covers the entire tract that the National Guard owns, as shown by the land inside the green line "below" Control Tower
Drive. (Just to clarify, I want to make sure that you understand that that whole project area will need to be re -permitted
in tomorrow's application. You probably already realize that, but I just want to make sure since I don't see the project
area on the plan from this morning.) I then overlaid the drainage area for the infiltration basin that was permitted in
2014 in diagram 2 (it isn't a perfect overlay, but you get the idea.) From the file, it looks like the area that is covered
mainly by proposed sand filter #2 (the DA on the left in diagram 1) is constructed per the 2014 plans because the
infiltration basin is certified. It looks like you all plan to reconfigure that area, take out the infiltration basin, and use a
sand filter. The area that goes to sand filter #1 is being redeveloped from area that was not previously permitted to be
redeveloped. Diagram 3 is on file from the 2014 permit. It shows the impervious area that was in place in 1981. (State
Stormwater permitting began in 1988, and so the 2014 engineer submitted that to establish that he didn't have to treat
all of the impervious area on the tract.)
In 2014, the engineer showed that his drainage area contained impervious area that was in place well before 1988, but
since it drained to the infiltration basin he treated all of the impervious area in the basin. (As I am sure you know, that is
because all impervious in a drainage area has to be accounted for in orderto ensure that it can all "fit" in the treatment
facility). There was a small section of impervious area, as shown in Diagram 4, that he could not collect (likely because
the driveway had to meet the crown of an existing road.) In retrospect, I probably should have quantified that amount
of impervious in the permit. But, I did not (probably because it was so small).
I have been trying to figure out the best way to document the redevelopment of this site, especially since they have
been (and may continue to) make regular changes to the permit. Per .1002(41) and GS143-214.7, redevelopment must
have impervious that is equal or less than the previous project and provide equal or better stormwater treatment. If the
footprint of impervious is being increased, then the project falls under .1003(3)(d) and it needs a high -density permit for
the net increase of impervious area. I have talked with other staff here to determine the best way to go about
this. There are at least two ways, but there may be others. The most complete method would be to quantify the
impervious area inside the entire project area using a pre-1988 map. Then, demonstrate that permit modifications do
not exceed that amount, and that they provide equal or better treatment of impervious area. Or, the other way to do
this is to compare pre-1988 with the proposed design on a drainage -area basis without addressing the entire site. We
will have to work this out tomorrow.
11

Thanks,
Kelly
Diagram I
w
Diagram 2
Diagram 3
•43
■
■
12

I, 130
.t -4C)
Diagram 4
Carves }iaww Gw4
A4fW Waft tam NHC GiS
a
r
-----Original Message -----
From: Gollings, Jamie E. [ma Ito:[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 9:40 AM
To: Johnson, Kelly <[e-mail]>
13

Cc: Weaver, Cameron <cameron.weaver@ncdenr.g<ov>
Subject: RE: [Non-DoD Source] RE: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington Express Review
Kelly,
Please call me when you have a moment. In the mean time, the attached shows existing vs. proposed impervious
impacts. I don't believe that the existing permit involved any existing impervious impacts.
Yes, the sand filters will be designed to the 2017 manual.
Jamie E. Gollings, PE I Civil Engineer
JACO BS
Office: 111 Corning Road, Suite 200, Cary, NC 27518
Contact: Off ice:919.859.5752
[e-mail] I www.jacobs.com
-----Original Message -----
From: Johnson, Kelly [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Friday, July 07, 2017 12:56 PM
To: Gollings, Jamie E. <[e-mail]>
Cc: Weaver, Cameron <[e-mail]>
Subject: FW: [Non-DoD Source] RE: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington Express Review
Jamie,
I am just trying to make sure I understand what is being proposed. Have you designed the new sand filter per the new
regulations (the 2017 rule)? Also, is this just a standard high density permit, or is there a redevelopment component,
too? (I just looked quickly at the current permit, and I didn't see any redevelopment but I wanted to verify that.)
Thanks,
Kelly
-----Original Message -----
From: Weaver, Cameron
Sent: Friday, July 07, 2017 12:26 PM
To: Moody, Cale D LTC USARMY NG NCARNG (US) <[e-mail]>
Cc: Dudick, Vickie A NFG NG NCARNG (US) <vickie.a.dudick.nfg@mail. mil>; Scott, Georgette
<[e-mail]>; Johnson, Kelly <[e-mail]>; Newton, Rodney D LTC USARMY NG
NCARNG (US) <[e-mail]>; Caldwell, Kent Eric MAJ USARMY NG NCARNG (US)
<[e-mail]>; Burriola, William S II CW2 USARMY NG NCARNG (US) <william.s.burriola.mil @mail.mil>;
Harper, William W II MAJ USARMY NG NGB ARNG (US) <william.w.harper6.mil@n:mail.mil>; Garcia, Karla M CIV NG NGB
(US) <[e-mail]>; Meilinger, Derek T MAJ USARMY NG NCARNG (US)
<[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [Non-DoD Source] RE: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington Express Review
Thanks to Kelly (and I know I owe you!), I have been able to schedule this review as was requested for Tuesday 7/11, at
10am.
We look forward to seeing the engineer and owner representative here for this meeting. Let me know of any
outstanding issues.
Cameron
14

Cameron Weaver
Environmental Assistance Coordinator -Wilmington Regional Office NCDEQ-Division of Environmental Assistance and
Customer Service
127 Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405
910-796-7303
NCDEQ NEW WEBSITE: http://deq.nc.gov/
DEACS NEW WEBSITE: http://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/environmental-assistance-customer-service
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties.
-----Original Message -----
From: Moody, Cale D LTC USARMY NG NCARNG (US)[mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Friday, July 07, 201712:15 PM
To: Weaver, Cameron <[e-mail]>
Cc: Dudick, Vickie A NFG NG NCARNG (US) <vickie.a.dudick.nfg@ mail. mil>; Scott, Georgette
<[e-mail]>; Johnson, Kelly <[e-mail]>; Newton, Rodney D LTC USARMY NG
NCARNG (US) <rodney.d.newton.mil@ mail. mil>; Caldwell, Kent Eric MAJ USARMY NG NCARNG (US)
<[e-mail]>; Burriola, William S II CW2 USARMY NG NCARNG (US) <[e-mail]>;
Harper, William W II MAJ USARMY NG NGB ARNG (US) <[e-mail]>; Garcia, Karla M CIV NG NGB
(US) <[e-mail]>; Meilinger, Derek T MAJ USARMY NG NCARNG (US)
<[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [Non-DoD Source] RE: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington Express Review
Cameron,
Thank you very much! We appreciate every effort to move up the review date.
Normally we would not request this but we are receiving FY13 funds ($15M) for the construction of a new National
Guard Readiness Center to be constructed on the same land as the current which was damaged by Act of Nature
(Hurricane Irene 2011). Due to this being FY13 funds, they must be awarded by 30SEP2017 or they expire and the
project will not happen. The timeline we are up against is the EN reviews must be completed and the 30 day period also
completed prior to 17 AUG 2017 in order not to delay the already stringent timelihe. This new NCNG Readiness Center
will additionally be an economic asset to the Wilmington area. Again, we certainly appreciate any effort to get this
review completed as soon as possible.
Thank you,
Cale D. Moody, PLS
LTC, EN
Fulltime: CFMO Deputy/Business Manager
Office: [phone]
M-Day: CDR, 105th EN BN (RHINO 6)
Office: [phone]
Mobile: [phone]
[e-mail]
15

-----Original Message -----
From: Weaver, Cameron [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Friday, July 07, 2017 11:58 AM
To: Moody, Cale D LTC USARMY NG NCARNG (US) <[e-mail]>
Cc: Dudick, Vickie A NFG NG NCARNG (US) <[e-mail]>; Scott, Georgette
<[e-mail]>; Johnson, Kelly <[e-mail]>
Subject: FW: [Non-DoD Source] RE: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington Express Review
All active links contained in this email were disabled. Please verify the identity of the sender, and confirm the
authenticity of all links contained within the message prior to copying and pasting the address to a Web browser.
Hi LTC Moody:
After hearing third -hand about your situation, I wanted to reach out to you directly. We make every effort to
accommodate client schedules, but reviews are scheduled based on when the complete requests are received in our
system and are spaced to allow the individual attention that is needed to expedite the Express Permit application
reviews. We have a very limited staff available to conduct Express Reviews. In this case, after conversing via emails with
Ms. Dudick, this review was already moved up once in our scheduling by more than a week by switching with the NGRC
project in Jacksonville.
I have now reached out to additional staff to see if they can accommodate your request, and I will let you know when
our office is able to review your project.
I will be in touch soon.
Cameron
Cameron Weaver
Environmental Assistance Coordinator -Wilmington Regional Office NCDEQ-Division of Environmental Assistance and
Customer Service
127 Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405
910-796-7303
NCDEQ NEW WEBSITE: Caution-http://deq.nc.gov/ DEACS NEW WEBSITE:
Caution-http://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/environmental-assistance-customer-
service
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties.
-----Original Message -----
From: Dudick, Vickie A NFG NG NCARNG (US) [Caution-mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2017 4:28 PM
To: Weaver, Cameron <[e-mail]>
16

Cc: Scott, Georgette <[e-mail]>; Newton, Rodney D LTC USARMY NG NCARNG (US)
<rodney.d.newton.mil@ mail. mil>; Burriola, William S II
CW2 USARMY NG NCARNG (US) <[e-mail]>; Gollings, Jamie E. <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [Non-DoD Source] RE: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington Express Review
Cameron- Per our conversation this afternoon, the NCARNG would like to switch the Jacksonville express review with
Wilmington's review date. This puts Wilmington submittal meeting scheduled for 7/25 @ 11am at the Wilmington DEQ
office and Jacksonville scheduled for 8/2. Thank you for your consideration.
Vickie A. Dudick
Director of Environmental Management
North Carolina National Guard
1636 Gold Star Drive
Raleigh, INC 27607
984-664-6186
[e-mail]
-----Original Message -----
From: Weaver, Cameron [Caution-mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2017 9:38 AM
To: Dudick, Vickie A NFG NG NCARNG (US) <[e-mail]>
Cc: Scott, Georgette <[e-mail]>; Newton, Rodney D LTC USARMY NG NCARNG (US)
<[e-mail]>; Burriola, William S II
CW2 USARMY NG NCARNG (US) <[e-mail]>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] RE: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington Express Review
All active links contained in this email were disabled. Please verify the identity of the sender, and confirm the
authenticity of all links contained within the message priorto copying and pasting the address to a Web browser.
Hi Vickie.
You should be hearing from Jamie Gollings, your consultant of record on the request. This meeting has been scheduled
forAugust 2 at 11 AM here at the Wilmington DEQ offices.
Let me know of any issues.
Cameron
17

Cameron Weaver
Environmental Assistance Coordinator -Wilmington Regional Office
NCDEQ-Division of Environmental Assistance and Customer Service
127 Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405
910-796-7303
NCDEQ NEW WEBSITE: Caution-Caution-http://deq.nc.gov/
DEACS NEW WEBSITE:
Caution-Caution-http://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/environmental-assistance-c
ustomer-
service
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties.
-----Original Message -----
From: Dudick, Vickie A NFG NG NCARNG (US) [Caution-Caution-mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2017 8:33 AM
To: Weaver, Cameron <[e-mail]>
Cc: Scott, Georgette <[e-mail]>; Newton, Rodney D LTC USARMY NG NCARNG (US)
<rodney.d.newton. mil @mail.mil>; Burriola, William S II
CW2 USARMY NG NCARNG (US) <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington Express Review
Cameron- Any update on the Express Review for the NCARNG permits? Is the
NCARNG on the schedule or do you need anything additional from us? Has
another Reviewer been assigned? Thank you for your prompt attention.
'Vickie A. Dudick
18

Director of Environmental Management
North Carolina National Guard
1636 Gold Star Drive
Raleigh, NC 27607
984-664-6186
[e-mail] <
Caution-Caution-mailto:[e-mail] >
-----Original Message -----
From: Weaver, Cameron [Caution-Caution-mailto:[e-mail] < Caution-Caution-
mailto:[e-mail] > ]
Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 3:21 PM
To: Dudick, Vickie A NFG NG NCARNG (US) <[e-mail] < Caution-Caution-
mailto:[e-mail] > >
Cc: Scott, Georgette <[e-mail] < Caution-Caution-mailto:[e-mail] > >
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] RE: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington
Express Review
All active links contained in this email were disabled. Please verify the
identity of the sender, and confirm the authenticity of all links contained
within the message priorto copying and pasting the address to a Web
browser.
19

Hi Vickie.
The quickness of the review is directly proportional to the completeness of
the initial permit application packet that is brought to and discussed in
the submittal meeting. The review meeting is scheduled so that the reviewer
is able to put their attention on that particular project immediately, but
it is a balancing act between ongoing Express reviews in house already with
the reviewer and when the reviewer will be able to issue the permit from the
latest Express submittal. The 30 days covers the reasonable assumption that
two rounds of additional information will be needed from the applicant to
complete the review. The more complete the application, the faster the
overall turnaround for permit issuance.
I'll be in touch on Monday with a date that a reviewer will be able to meet
concerning the Express Review.
Let me know of any other issues.
Cameron
Cameron Weaver
Environmental Assistance Coordinator -Wilmington Regional Office
NCDEQ-Division of Environmental Assistance and Customer Service
127 Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405
910-796-7303
20

NCDEQ NEW WEBSITE: Caution-Caution-Caution-http://deq.nc.gov/
DEACS NEW WEBSITE:
Caution-Caution-Caution-http://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/environmental-assi
stance-c
ustomer-
service
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North
Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
-----Original Message -----
From: Dudick, Vickie A NFG NG NCARNG (US)
[Ca ution-Caution-Caution-mailto:vickie.a.dudick.nfg@mail. mil]
Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 2:48 PM
To: Weaver, Cameron <[e-mail] < Caution-Caution-mailto:[e-mail] > >
Cc: Burriola, William S II CW2 USARMY NG NCARNG (US)
<[e-mail] <
Caution-Caution-mailto:[e-mail] > >
Subject: RE: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington Express Review
Cameron- Just want to clarify what you told us on the phone today- After the
DEQ office meeting and acceptance, 30 days is required for express
permitting? My understanding is the Express review for Erosion Control
averages 1.6 days and express review for Storm Water control averages 7.6
days. Please let us know if this has changed from the attached. Thank you.
Caution -Caution -Ca ution-http://deq.nc.gov/permits-regulations/express-permit
21

ting
-----Original Message -----
From: Dudick, Vickie A NFG NG NCARNG (US)
Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 1:25 PM
To: '[e-mail]'<[e-mail] < Caution-Caution-
mailto:[e-mail] > >
Cc: Burriola, William S II CW2 USARMY NG NCARNG (US)
<[e-mail] <
Caution -Ca ution-mailto:william.s.burriola.miI@mail. miI > >; Morris, Thomas S NFG NG NCARNG (US)
<[e-mail] <
Caution -Ca ution-mailto:thomas.s.morrisl.nfg@mail. miI > >; Newton, Rodney D LTC USARMY NG NCARNG (US)
<[e-mail] <
Caution-Caution-mailto:[e-mail]
Subject: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington
Cameron- Per our conversation today, the NCARNG requests another Reviewer to
expedite the National Guard Readiness Center Stormwater and Land Quality
Express Permit Review. This project is a Federal contract with fiscal year
2017 funds which must be executed prior to September 30, 2017. Solicitation
of bids can occur but the permits must be secured before the bids can be
opened. Please note my correct email below. Thank you for your
consideration.
Vickie A. Dudick
Director of Environmental Management
North Carolina National Guard
1636 Gold Star Drive
22

Raleigh, NC 27607
984-664-6186
[e-mail] <
Caution-Caution-mailto:[e-mail] >
NOTICE - This communication may contain confidential and privileged information that is for the sole use of the
intended recipient. Any viewing, copying or distribution of, or reliance on this message by unintended recipients is
strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message
and deleting it from your computer.
r) C!*,:;',�-Ii4caww rra-v..-.. i c..., .j i.:"•_. _. _ . ,.:�� Of the- intended rexa{'rient. Any
Viewing, copying or d istri bution of _ cA _ r.t s .;,_u have received this
messaae in error, prase nottfv u r "ohvii.r ; ..c, r...rr:, .a.jr.. :.'� r :r
t Ar•%-,
^c; ;ir i= at:_:.. _r C 11 a. , a I ,:.., _.. _ i- ..i
and dci' .+r
:Y!C:- _ C,1arcc.r r K:.'il:c.J i :�:'_: _.rir.:r...�r�c:
"tr€:'it-.-i..;, C I ." ._ t r-�-...•
.` y. - €'�- r _
_. ri rr, t; : r... to i.; ? i� _f, rr . . .
23

Johnson, Kell
From: Johnson, Kelly
Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2017 11:55 AM
To: 'Gollings, Jamie E.'
Cc: Weaver, Cameron; [e-mail]; [e-mail];
Langenfeld, Paul; Wainwright, Thomas J.
Subject: RE: [Nun-DoD Suurce] RE: National Guard Readiness Center vviimington Express Review
Attachments: 2017 07 excel BUA 140906.xlsx
Jamie,
Please see below in blue.
From: Gollings, Jamie E. [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday. July 13. 2017 11:23 AM
To: Johnson, Kelly <[e-mail]>
Cc: Weaver, Cameron <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]; [e-mail];
Langenfeld, Paul <[e-mail]>; Wainwright, Thomas J. <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [Non-DoD Source] RE: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington Express Review
Kelly,
Thanks again for your prompt review. Please see below for our plan of approach or clarification needed.
Regards,
Jamie E. Gollings, PE I Civil Engineer
JACOBS
Office: 111 Corning Road, Suite 200, Cary, NC 27518
Contact: Office: 919.859.5752
iamie.aollings0jacobs.com I www.*acobs.com
From: Johnson, Kelly fmailto: kellv.r).iohnson0ncdenr.eovl
Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2017 2:52 PM
To: Gollings, Jamie E. <[e-mail]>
Cc: Weaver, Cameron <cameron.weaver0ncdenr.eov>; [e-mail] rodnev.d.newton.milCa-Dmail.mil
Subject: RE: [Non-DoD Source] RE: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington Express Review
Jamie,
I have gone through the entire package, and I have incorporated all my comments into a single letter. This is the
"Request for Additional Information Letter", which will be handled via email in lieu of a formal letter.
1. Attached Table: Please see the attached table "2017 07 addinfo 140906" for a summary of the items needed.
This table is cross-referenced with the regulations supporting the requests. This table also references the two
items below. Received, thank you.
Redevelopment [per 15A NCAC .1003(3)(d)]: This is a redevelopment project that will treat impervious area in
excess of the pre-1988 amount per 15A NCAC 02H .1003(3)(d). Redevelopment projects have two requirements
per 15A NCAC 02H .1002(41) and GS143-214.7:
a. Requirement #1: Treat the net increase in impervious from pre-1988
f. Amount of Redevelopment: You will redevelop 181,038sf (and treat above that amount). Since
the total impervious for the site is 297,515sf you will have to treat at least (297,515sf-
181,038sf=) 116,741sf of impervious area. You have two sand filters which treat 63,162sf and
61,855sf (total=125,017sf), and so you have met the .1003(3)(d) requirement. We will confirm

the numbers but that appears to be the only action item here. If we need to do anything else,
please advise. Please just confirm numbers.
ii. Pre-1988 (1981) Map: Please provide two full-sized plans showing that there was 181,038sf of
impervious area before State Stormwater permitting began in 1988. Map will be provided
referencing information on the data source (digitized from aerial dated xxxxxxxx).
iii. Numeric Summary: I have developed the following summary based on my review of the
documents which I would like to include in the permit text. If corrections are needed, please
advise. (The two tables provided in this email are provided in the Excel file containing the words
"excel_BUA". We will review, verify and/or correct the numbers. It sounds like this will be in
the permit language only and we don't need to place this on any plans or calculations
documents. Please confirm. Please just confirm numbers.
Redevelopment Summary
Impervious Area Treated:
125,017
Sand Filter #11:
63,162
Sand Filter #21:
61,855
Impervious Required to Treat':
(=297,515-181, 038sf)
116,477
July X, 2017, Impervious Total:
297,515
Pre-1988 Impervious Remaining
180,774
New Impervious
116,741
Pre-1988 Impervious Total:
181,038
b. Requirement #2: Redevelopment projects must provide equal or greater treatment of stormwater than
the pre-1988 configuration. Please submit a short qualitative summary (that is backed up by the pre-
1988 plans where necessary) demonstrating that you have met this requirement. We will provide a
narrative on this.
3. Calculations [per 15A NCAC .1042(2)(f)]:
a. Application Summary Table: Please make the following corrections:
Dry Pond Drainage Area'
Sand
Filter #1
Sand
I Filter #2
Not to Sand
I Filter
Dry Pond
Total
Receiving Stream
UT to Smith Creek
Stream Class
C; SW
Stream Index Number
18-74-63
Total Drainage Area
67,082
84,936
127,647
279,665
Onsite Drainage Area
67,082
84,936
127,647
279,665
Offsite Drainage Area
0
0
0
0
Impervious Area Total
63,162
61,855
73,181
198,198
Onsite Buildings
35,719
0
0
35,719
Onsite Streets
0
0
12,069
12,069
Onsite Parking
27,443
61,855
-10,491
78,807
Onsite Sidewalks
0
0
1,457
1,457
Other Onsite
0
0
0
0
Future
0
01
54,450
54,450

Offsite Drainage Area 01 01 01 0
Existing BUA 01 01 15,696 1 15,696
'The dry pond treats water draining from two sand filters as well as additional
area.
Please check the number in
yellow We will review and
confirm/update.
"future" area cannot be treated solely in a dry pond because it is a secondary
SCM. Please advise on how we can appropriately document that the dry
pond has the capacity for the additional impervious but also acknowledge
that primary treatment would be required. We included some language in
the report documents as a record. Is there some way that we can record this
now such that this aspect of stormwater for the site doesn't have to be
revisited in the future? Can we replace the 0's with "Primary SCM Required"?
How about this? (Revised Excel file attached.)
Dry Pond Drainage Area'
Sand Filter
#1
Sand Filter
#2
Not to Sand
Filter
Dry Pond
Total
Receiving Stream
UT to Smith Creek
Stream Class
C; SW
Stream Index Number
18-74-63
Total Drainage Area
67,082
84,936
127,647
279,665
Onsite Drainage
Area
67,082
841936
127,647
279,665
Offsite Drainage
Area
01
0
0
0
Impervious Area Total
63,162
61,855
73,181
198,198
Onsite Buildings
35,719
0
0
35,719
Onsite Streets
0
0
12,069
12,069
Onsite Parking
27,443
61,855
-10,491
78,807
Onsite Sidewalks
0
0
1,457
1,457
Other Onsite
0
0
0
0
Future
0
0
54,450
54,450
Offsite Drainage
Area
0
0
0
0
Existing BUA 1
0
0
15,696
15,696
'The dry pond treats water draining from two sand filters as well as additional area.
2The dry pond has been designed to accommodate an additional 54,450ft2 of
impervious that can be permitted in the future. However, since the dry pond is a
secondary SCM the 54,450ft2 will have to also be treated by a primary SCM.
Please check the number in yellow
3

Calculations (continued):
a. See below
b. Please show the SHWT in msl rather than ft on the supplement. Please clarify. The spreadsheet prepared by
NCDEQ has both built into the system. My only option for data input is a number. Thanks for catching
that. This is the first sand filter that DEMLR has issued under the new rules using this new form, and so I will
advise the Central Office to correct the "ft" that it inserts automatically, and replace it with "fmsl". In the
meantime, please just cross out "ft" and write in "fmsl". I apologize for the confusion.
c. Please select if the sand filters will be pre -cast or poured in place on the supplement. The NCDEQ spreadsheet
does not allow that field to be filled out. Do I handwrite this in. I agree that the form is not intuitive. You can
type in the orange cell below the question, but not to the right of the question.
22� SAND FILTER MDC FROM 02H .1056
23 1#1 SHOIT elevation ynislj 13 tq t
24 01 Type of sand filter (open or closed —4.
—
2 #1 if dosed, describe i; the filter =i,>:III be pre -castor pour -In -place
26 you can type here
i
d. Please show the soil type (A/B/C/D) in the calculations in support of the CN values. Appendix A of the report
contains the soils information including the name of the soil and HSG classification. The CN's used are based off
of the previously prepared/approved report. Except for areas that don't drain to our SCM's, the site is
composed of 2 different soils, both of which would have been represented in the previously approved Tripp
documents with established CN's, which were used in our calculations. Can we use these by reference? If we
don't and we have differing data sources (and we all know that there can be some variances between sources),
it opens the door for calculations that show different existing conditions flows even if we do nothing, which
seems to have a lot of potential to create confusion on a site with existing permitting history and these only
relate to the pervious areas. Feel free to call if it may be helpful to discuss. I had not meant to make this
difficult. I was really just looking to have "Type A" soils in the text of the calculations. I wasn't looking for cross-
referenced sources.
e. Please show the thickness of the concrete on the bottom of sand filter #2 in order to show the "bottom"
elevation of the sand filter. We will add this dimension to the sections.
Please remember to confirm that any revised information is presented consistently throughout the application
documents including calculations, supplements, narrative, and plans. Please also remember to provide two hard copies
and one electronic copy of any updated documents per 15A NCAC 02H.1042(2).
The requested information should be received in this Office prior to July 20, 2017, or the application will be returned as
incomplete. If the project is returned and you wish to re -submit to the Express Program, you will need to reschedule the
project through the Express Coordinator for the next available review date and will need to resubmit all required items
at that time, including the application fee.
If additional time is needed to submit the requested information, please email your extension request to the Division at
the email address provided below. The request must indicate the date by which the requested information is expected
to be submitted, which shall be no later than 5 business days past the original due date.
The construction of any impervious surfaces, other than a construction entrance under an approved Sedimentation
Erosion Control Plan, is a violation of NCGS 143-215.1 and is subject to enforcement action pursuant to NCGS 143-
215.6A.
Please label all packages and cover letters as "Express" and reference the State assigned project number on all
correspondence.
Thanks,
Kelly

From: Johnson, Kelly
Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2017 2:58 PM
To:'Gollings, Jamie E.' <[e-mail]>
Cc: Weaver, Cameron <[e-mail]>; Rhonda Hall <[e-mail]>;
'[e-mail]' <[e-mail]>; 'rod ney.d.newton.m!I@mail. mil'
<[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [Non-DoD Source) RE: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington Express Review
All,
Thanks for meeting today. Here is the list of initial items that are needed for the State Stormwater review:
1. Plan Sheets: Please submit two full-size plan sets of the following sheets:
a. Project Area with bearing/distance lines
b. Drainage areas for the two sand filters and for the dry pond
c. 1981 map quantifying the impervious area in -place prior to 1988 (181,038sf)
d. CS300: Please add spot elevations/contours along the far edges of the pavement showing that the water
will drain into the system.
2. Signature Authority Letter: Please submit a copy of the letter showing that Mr. Newton can sign for the National
Guard for this permit.
Redevelopment: This is a redevelopment project that will treat impervious area in excess of the pre-1988 amount
per 15A NCAC 02H .1003(3)(d). Redevelopment projects have two requirements per 15A NCAC 02H .1002(41) and
GS143-214.7:
a. Requirement #1: Treat the net increase in impervious from pre-1988
i. Amount of Redevelopment: You will redevelop 181,038sf (and treat above that amount). Since the
total impervious for the site is 297,515sf you will have to treat at least (297,515sf-181,038sf=)
116,741sf of impervious area. You have two sand filters which treat 63,162sf and 61,855sf
(total=125,017sf), and so you have met the .1003(3)(d) requirement.
ii. Numeric Summary: I have developed the following summary based on my review of the documents
which I would like to include in the permit text. If corrections are needed, please advise.
Redevelopment Summary
Impervious Area Treated:
125,017
Sand Filter #12:
63,162
Sand Filter #22:
61,855
Impervious Required to Treat'.
(=297, 515-181, 038sf)
116,477
July X, 2017, Impervious Total:
297,515
Pre-1988 Impervious Remaining
180,774
New Impervious
116,741
Pre-1988 Impervious Total:
181,038
'per 15A NCAC 02H .1003(3)(d)
2Neither sand filter has "future" area available.
b. Requirement #2: Redevelopment projects must provide equal or greater treatment of stormwater than the
pre-1988 configuration. Please submit a short qualitative summary (that is backed up by the pre-1988 plans
where necessary) demonstrating that you have met this requirement.
4. Application Summary: While generating the redevelopment summary, I found two items in the application table
that may need to be corrected:
Dry Pond Drainage Area'

Sand I Sand I Not to Sand I Dry Pond
Filter #1 Filter #2 Filter Total
Receiving Stream
UT to Smith Creek
Stream Class
C; SW
Stream Index Number
18-74-63
Total Drainage Area
67,082
84,936
127,647
279,665
Onsite Drainage Area
67,082
84,936
127,647
279,665
Offsite Drainage Area
0
0
0
0
Impervious Area Total
63,162
61,855
73,181
198,198
Onsite Buildings
35,719
0
0
35,719
Onsite Streets
0
0
12,069
12,069
Onsite Parking
27,443
61,855
-10,491
78,807
Onsite Sidewalks
0
0
1,457
1,457
Other Onsite
0
0
0
0
Future
0
0
54,450
54,450
Offsite Drainage Area
0
0
0
0
Existing BUA
0
01
15,696
15,696
'The dry pond treats water draining from two sand filters as well as additional
area.
Please check the number in yellow
"future" area cannot be treated solely in a dry pond because it is a secondary
SCM.
5. Sheets Removed: The following sheets have been removed from the submittal package: CS400, CS401, CS701,
CS702, CS704, CS705, CS706, CS707, CS708, CS709, L-110.
Thanks,
Kelly
From: Johnson, Kelly
Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 1:44 PM
To:'Gollings, Jamie E.' <[e-mail]>
Cc: Weaver, Cameron <[e-mail]>; Rhonda Hall <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [Non-DoD Source] RE: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington Express Review
Jamie,
I have cc'd Cameron and Rhonda (I suspect she may be reviewing the E&SC). I can't speak for what E&SC will need. For
stormwater, you need a single copy of all original/signed documents, a single copy of any supporting documents such as
the soils report and calculations, and two full plan sets.
Kelly
From: Gollings, Jamie E. fmailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 1:37 PM
To: Johnson, Kelly <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [Non-DoD Source] RE: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington Express Review

Kelly,
As a followup to my voicemail,
• As of right now, our intent is to take the following approach and include with our documents: "Then,
demonstrate that permit modifications do not exceed that amount, and that they provide equal or better
treatment of impervious area. Or, the other way to do this is to compare pre-1988 with the proposed design on a
drainage -area basis without addressing the entire site."
• Can you verify how many copies of each document you will need for the submittal or refer me to the
appropriate weblink? Please keep in mind that it is both Stormwater and Erosion Control Express Review.
Thanks,
Jamie E. Gollings, PE I Civil Engineer
JACOBS
Office: 111 Corning Road, Suite 200, Cary, NC 27518
Contact: Office: 919.859.5752
iamie.aollings(M-iacobs.com I www.iacobs.com
From: Johnson, Kelly[mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 12:20 PM
To: Gollings, Jamie E. <[e-mail]>
Cc: Weaver, Cameron <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [Non-DoD Source] RE: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington Express Review
Jamie,
overlaid the county GIS with the plan you sent me this morning in the first diagram below. The current (2014) permit
covers the entire tract that the National Guard owns, as shown by the land inside the green line "below" Control Tower
Drive. (Just to clarify, I want to make sure that you understand that that whole project area will need to be re -permitted
in tomorrow's application. You probably already realize that, but I just want to make sure since I don't see the project
area on the plan from this morning.) I then overlaid the drainage area for the infiltration basin that was permitted in
2014 in diagram 2 (it isn't a perfect overlay, but you get the idea.) From the file, it looks like the area that is covered
mainly by proposed sand filter #2 (the DA on the left in diagram 1) is constructed per the 2014 plans because the
infiltration basin is certified. It looks like you all plan to reconfigure that area, take out the infiltration basin, and use a
sand filter. The area that goes to sand filter #1 is being redeveloped from area that was not previously permitted to be
redeveloped. Diagram 3 is on file from the 2014 permit. It shows the impervious area that was in place in 1981. (State
Stormwater permitting began in 1988, and so the 2014 engineer submitted that to establish that he didn't have to treat
all of the impervious area on the tract.)
In 2014, the engineer showed that his drainage area contained impervious area that was in place well before 1988, but
since it drained to the infiltration basin he treated all of the impervious area in the basin. (As I am sure you know, that is
because all impervious in a drainage area has to be accounted for in order to ensure that it can all "fit" in the treatment
facility). There was a small section of impervious area, as shown in Diagram 4, that he could not collect (likely because
the driveway had to meet the crown of an existing road.) In retrospect, I probably should have quantified that amount
of impervious in the permit. But, I did not (probably because it was so small).
I have been trying to figure out the best way to document the redevelopment of this site, especially since they have
been (and may continue to) make regular changes to the permit. Per .1002(41) and GS143-214.7, redevelopment must
have impervious that is equal or less than the previous project and provide equal or better stormwater treatment. If the
footprint of impervious is being increased, then the project falls under .1003(3)(d) and it needs a high -density permit for
the net increase of impervious area. I have talked with other staff here to determine the best way to go about
this. There are at least two ways, but there may be others. The most complete method would be to quantify the
impervious area inside the entire project area using a pre-1988 map. Then, demonstrate that permit modifications do
not exceed that amount, and that they provide equal or better treatment of impervious area. Or, the other way to do
7

this is to compare pre-1988 with the proposed design on a drainage -area basis without addressing the entire site. We
will have to work this out tomorrow.
Thanks,
Kelly
Diagram 1
.�� . ■..
rra•'• � r1 l. f
Fes'
jo
t
Diagram 2
8

Diagram 3
9

Diagram 4
A
goo -for,
-----Original Message -----
From: Gollings, Jamie E.fmailto:Jamie.GoilinesCa)iacobs.coml
Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 9:40 AM
To: Johnson, Kelly <kelly.p.iohnsonCc ncdenr.eov>
10

Cc: Weaver, Cameron <cameron.weaver(@ncdenr.eov>
Subject: RE: [Non-DoD Source] RE: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington Express Review
Kelly,
Please call me when you have a moment. In the mean time, the attached shows existing vs. proposed impervious
impacts. I don't believe that the existing permit involved any existing impervious impacts.
Yes, the sand filters will be designed to the 2017 manual.
Jamie E. Gollings, PE I Civil Engineer
JACOBS
Office: 111 Corning Road, Suite 200, Cary, NC 27518
Contact: Office:919.859.5752
[e-mail] I www.jacobs.com
-----Original Message -----
From: Johnson, Kelly [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Friday, July 07, 201712:56 PM
To: Gollings, Jamie E. <[e-mail]>
Cc: Weaver, Cameron <[e-mail]>
Subject: FW: [Non-DoD Source] RE: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington Express Review
Jamie,
1 am just trying to make sure 1 understand what is being proposed. Have you designed the new sand filter per the new
regulations (the 2017 rule)? Also, is this just a standard high density permit, or is there a redevelopment component,
too? (I just looked quickly at the current permit, and I didn't see any redevelopment but I wanted to verify that.)
Thanks,
Kelly
-----Original Message -----
From: Weaver, Cameron
Sent: Friday, July 07, 201712:26 PM
To: Moody, Cale D LTC USARMY NG NCARNG (US) <[e-mail]>
Cc: Dudick, Vickie A NFG NG NCARNG (US) <[e-mail]>; Scott, Georgette
<[e-mail]>; Johnson, Kelly <[e-mail]>; Newton, Rodney D LTC USARIV 1' NG
NCARNG (US) <[e-mail]>; Caldwell, Kent Eric MAJ USARMY NG NCARNG (US)
<[e-mail]>; Burriola, William S II CW2 USARMY NG NCARNG (US) <[e-mail]>;
Harper, William W II MAJ USARMY NG NGB ARNG (US) <[e-mail]>; Garcia, Karla M CIV NG NGB
(US) <[e-mail]>; Meilinger, Derek T MAJ USARMY NG NCARNG (US)
<[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [Non-DoD Source] RE: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington Express Review
Thanks to Kelly (and I know I owe you!), I have been able to schedule this review as was requested for Tuesday 7/11, at
10am.
We look forward to seeing the engineer and owner representative here for this meeting. Let me know of any
outstanding issues.
Cameron
11

Cameron Weaver
Environmental Assistance Coordinator -Wilmington Regional Office NCDEQ-Division of Environmental Assistance and
Customer Service
127 Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405
910-796-7303
NCDEQ NEW WEBSITE: http://deq.nc.gov/
DEACS NEW WEBSITE: http://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/environmental-assistance-customer-service
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties.
-----Original Message -----
From: Moody, Cale D LTC USARMY NG NCARNG (US)[mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Friday, July 07, 2017 12:15 PM
To: Weaver, Cameron <[e-mail]>
Cc: Dudick, Vickie A NFG NG NCARNG (US) <vickie.a.dudick.nfg@mail. miI>; Scott, Georgette
<[e-mail]>; Johnson, Kelly <[e-mail]>; Newton, Rodney D LTC USARMY NG
NCARNG (US) <rodney.d.newton.mil@mail.m!I>; Caldwell, Kent Eric MAJ USARMY NG NCARNG (US)
<[e-mail]>; Burriola, William S II CW2 USARMY NG NCARNG (US)<[e-mail]>;
Harper, William W II MAJ USARMY NG NGB ARNG (US)<william.w.harper6.mil@maiLm!I>; Garcia, Karla M CIV NG NGB
(US) <[e-mail]>; Meilinger, Derek T MAJ USARMY NG NCARNG (US)
<[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [Non-DoD Source] RE: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington Express Review
Cameron;
Thank you very much! We appreciate every effort to move up the review date.
Normally we would not request this but we are receiving FY13 funds ($15M) for the construction of a new National
Guard Readiness Center to be constructed on the same land as the current which was damaged by Act of Nature
(Hurricane Irene 2011). Due to this being FY13 funds, they must be awarded by 30SEP2017 or they expire and the
project will not happen. The timeline we are up against is the EN reviews must be completed and the 30 day period also
completed prior to 17 AUG 2017 in order not to delay the already stringent timeline. This new NCNG Readiness Center
will additionally be an economic asset to the Wilmington area. Again, we certainly appreciate any effort to get this
review completed as soon as possible.
Thank you,
Cale D. Moody, PLS
LTC, EN
Fulltime: CFMO Deputy/Business Manager
Office: [phone]
M-Day: CDR, 105th EN BN (RHINO 6)
Office: [phone]
Mobile: [phone]
[e-mail]
12

-----Original Message -----
From: Weaver, Cameron [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Friday, July 07, 201711:58 AM
To: Moody, Cale D LTC USARMY NG NCARNG (US) <[e-mail]>
Cc: Dudick, Vickie A NFG NG NCARNG (US) <[e-mail]>; Scott, Georgette
<[e-mail]>; Johnson, Kelly <[e-mail]>
Subject: FW: [Non-DoD Source] RE: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington Express Review
All active links contained in this email were disabled. Please verify the identity of the sender, and confirm the
authenticity of all links contained within the message prior to copying and pasting the address to a Web browser.
Hi LTC Moody:
After hearing third -hand about your situation, I wanted to reach out to you directly. We make every effort to
accommodate client schedules, but reviews are scheduled based on when the complete requests are received in our
system and are spaced to allow the individual attention that is needed to expedite the Express Permit application
reviews. We have a very limited staff available to conduct Express Reviews. In this case, after conversing via emails with
Ms. Dudick, this review was already moved up once in our scheduling by more than a week by switching with the NGRC
project in Jacksonville.
1 have now reached out to additional staff to see if they can accommodate your request, and I will let you know when
our office is able to review your project.
I will be in touch soon.
Cameron
Cameron Weaver
Environmental Assistance Coordinator -Wilmington Regional Office NCDEQ-Division of Environmental Assistance and
Customer Service
127 Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405
910-796-7303
NCDEQ NEW WEBSITE: Caution-http://deq.nc.gov/ DEACS NEW WEBSITE:
Caution-http://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/environmental-assistance-customer-
service
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties.
-----Original Message -----
From: Dudick, Vickie A NFG NG NCARNG (US) [Caution-mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2017 4:28 PM
To: Weaver, Cameron <[e-mail]>
13

Cc: Scott, Georgette <[e-mail]>; Newton, Rodney D LTC USARMY NG NCARNG (US)
<[e-mail]>; Burriola, William S II
CW2 USARMY NG NCARNG (US) <[e-mail]>; Gollings, Jamie E. <[e-mail]>
Subject: -RE: [Non-DoD Source] RE: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington Express Review
Cameron- Per our conversation this afternoon, the NCARNG would like to switch the Jacksonville express review with
Wilmington's review date. This puts Wilmington submittal meeting scheduled for 7/25 @ 11am at the Wilmington DEQ
office and Jacksonville scheduled for 8/2. Thank you for your consideration.
Vickie A. Dudick
Director of Environmental Management
North Carolina National Guard
1636 Gold Star Drive
Raleigh, NC 27607
984-664-6186
[e-mail]
-----Original Message -----
From: Weaver, Cameron [Caution-mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2017 9:38 AM
To: Dudick, Vickie A NFG NG NCARNG (US) <[e-mail]>
Cc: Scott, Georgette <[e-mail]>; Newton, Rodney D LTC USARMY NG NCARNG (US)
<[e-mail]>; Burriola, William S II
CW2 USARMY NG NCARNG (US) <william.s.burriola.mil@mail. mil>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] RE: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington Express Review
All active links contained in this email were disabled. Please verify the identity of the sender, and confirm the
authenticity of all links contained within the message prior to copying and pasting the address to a Web browser.
Hi Vickie.
You should be hearing from Jamie Gollings, your consultant of record on the request. This meeting has been scheduled
forAugust 2 at 11 AM here at the Wilmington DEQ offices.
Let me know of any issues.
Cameron
14

Cameron Weaver
Environmental Assistance Coordinator -Wilmington Regional Office
NCDEQ-Division of Environmental Assistance and Customer Service
127 Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405
910-796-7303
NCDEQ NEW WEBSITE: Caution-Caution-http://deq.nc.gov/
DEACS NEW WEBSITE:
Caution-Caution-http://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/environmental-assistance-c
ustomer-
service
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties.
-----Original Message -----
From: Dudick, Vickie A NFG NG NCARNG (US) [Caution-Caution-mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2017 8:33 AM
To: Weaver, Cameron <[e-mail]>
Cc: Scott, Georgette <[e-mail]>; Newton, Rodney D LTC USARMY NG NCARNG (US)
<[e-mail]>; Burriola, William S II
CW2 USARMY NG NCARNG (US) <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington Express Review
Cameron- Any update on the Express Review for the NCARNG permits? Is the
NCARNG on the schedule or do you need anything additional from us? Has
another Reviewer been assigned? Thank you for your prompt attention.
Vickie A. Dudick
15

Director of Environmental Management
North Carolina National Guard
1636 Gold Star Drive
Raleigh, NC 27607
984-664-6186
[e-mail] <
Caution-Caution-mailto:[e-mail] >
-----Original Message -----
From: Weaver, Cameron [Caution-Caution-mailto:[e-mail] < Caution-Caution-
mailto:[e-mail] > ]
Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 3:21 PM
To: Dudick, Vickie A NFG NG NCARNG (US) <[e-mail] < Caution-Caution-
mailto:[e-mail] > >
Cc: Scott, Georgette <[e-mail] < Caution-Caution-mailto:[e-mail] > >
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] RE: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington
Express Review
All active links contained in this email were disabled. Please verify the
identity of the sender, and confirm the authenticity of all links contained
within the message prior to copying and pasting the address to a Web
browser.
16

Hi Vickie.
The quickness of the review is directly proportional to the completeness of
the initial permit application packet that is brought to and discussed in
the submittal meeting. The review meeting is scheduled so that the reviewer
is able to put their attention on that particular project immediately, but
it is a balancing act between ongoing Express reviews in house already with
the reviewer and when the reviewer will be able to issue the permit from the
Iatest.Express submittal. The 30 days covers the reasonable assumption that
two rounds of additional information will be needed from the applicant to
complete the review. The more complete the application, the faster the
overall turnaround for permit issuance.
I'll be in touch on Monday with a date that a reviewer will be able to meet
concerning the Express Review.
Let me know of any other issues.
Cameron
Cameron Weaver
Environmental Assistance Coordinator -Wilmington Regional Office
NCDEQ-Division of Environmental Assistance and Customer Service
127 Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405
910-796-7303
17

NCDEQ NEW WEBSITE: Caution-Caution-Caution-http://deq.nc.gov/
DEACS NEW WEBSITE:
Caution-Caution-Caution-http://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/environmental-assi
stance-c
ustomer-
service
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North
Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
-----Original Message -----
From: Dudick, Vickie A NFG NG NCARNG (US)
[Caution-Caution-Caution-mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 2:48 PM
To: Weaver, Cameron <[e-mail] < Caution-Caution-mailto:[e-mail] > >
Cc: Burriola, William S II CW2 USARMY NG NCARNG (US)
<[e-mail] <
Caution-Caution-mailto:[e-mail] > >
Subject: RE: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington Express Review
Cameron- Just want to clarify what you told us on the phone today- After the
DEQ office meeting and acceptance, 30 days is required for express
permitting? My understanding is the Express review for Erosion Control
averages 1.6 days and express review for Storm Water control averages 7.6
days. Please let us know if this has changed from the attached. Thank you.
Caution-Caution-Caution-http://deq.nc.gov/permits-regulations/express-permit
18

ting
-----Original Message -----
From: Dudick, Vickie A NFG NG NCARNG (US)
Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 1:25 PM
To:'[e-mail]'<[e-mail] < Caution-Caution-
mailto:[e-mail] > >
Cc: Burriola, William S II CW2 USARMY NG NCARNG (US)
<[e-mail] <
Caution-Caution-mailto:[e-mail] > >; Morris, Thomas S NFG NG NCARNG (US)
<[e-mail] <
Caution-Caution-mailto:[e-mail] > >; Newton, Rodney D LTC USARMY NG NCARNG (US)
<[e-mail] <
Caution-Caution-mailto:[e-mail]
Subject: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington
Cameron- Per our conversation today, the NCARNG requests another Reviewer to
expedite the National Guard Readiness Center Stormwater and Land Quality
Express Permit Review. This project is a Federal contract with fiscal year
2017 funds which must be executed prior to September 30, 2017. Solicitation
of bids can occur but the permits must be secured before the bids can be
opened. Please note my correct email below. Thank you for your
consideration.
Vickie A. Dudick
Director of Environmental Management
North Carolina National Guard
1636 Gold Star Drive
19

Raleigh, NC 27607
984-664-6186
[e-mail] <
Caution-Caution-mailto:[e-mail] >
NOTICE - This communication may contain confidential and privileged information that is for the sole use of the
intended recipient. Any viewing, copying or distribution of, or reliance on this message by unintended recipients is
strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message
and deleting it from your computer.
NOTICE - This communication may contain confidential and privileged information that is for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any
viewing, copying or distribution of, or reliance on this message by unintended recipients is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
message in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer.
NOTICE - This communication may contain confidential and privileged information that is for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any
viewing, copying or distribution of, or reliance on this message by unintended recipients is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
message in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer.
20

qrO IN% -*I RsibA)66
J/�CO BS"
111 Corning Road, Suite 200
Cary, North Carolina 27518 U.S.A.
Ph. 919.859.5000 Fax [phone]
17 July 2017
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, North Carolina 27601
Attn: Kelly Johnson, Stormwater
Subject: North Carolina National Guard Readiness Center
Response Letter to First Comments
Plans Reviewer(s):
Please see the below for an item -by -item response to plan review comments:
1. Attached Table: Please see the attached table "2017 07 addinfo 140906" for a summary of the
items needed. This table is cross-referenced with the regulations supporting the requests. This
table also references the two items below.
Response: Refer to the attached annotated version of the table for item -by -item responses
included in the table.
Redevelopment [per 15A NCAC .1003(3)(d)]: This is a redevelopment project that will treat
impervious area in excess of the pre-1988 amount per 15A NCAC 02H
.1003(3)(d). Redevelopment projects have two requirements per 15A NCAC 02H .1002(41) and
GS143-214.7:
a. Requirement #1: Treat the net increase in impervious from pre-1988
i. Amount of Redevelopment: You will redevelop 181,038sf (and treat above that
amount). Since the total impervious for the site is 297,515sf you will have to
treat at least (297,515sf-181,038sf=) 116,741sf of impervious area. You have
two sand filters which treat 63,162sf and 61,855sf (total=125,017sf), and so you
have met the .1003(3)(d) requirement.
OResponse: In review of the numbers above, we believe there was a misunderstanding of
w- the numbers provided. After further review, the total impervious for the proposed
condition of the site has been determined to be 267,530 sf (includes 2014 additions and
2017 changes). Therefore, (267,530 sf-181,038 sf =) 86,492 sf of impervious must be
treated. As stated above, this requirement is met with the 125,017 sf impervious
treated by the sand filters and dry pond.
ii. Pre-1988 (1981) Map: Please provide two full-sized plans showing that there
was 181,038sf of impervious area before State Stormwater permitting began in
1988.
✓Ieesponse: This mapping is now including in the drawin€
III. Numeric Summary: I have developed the following summary based on my
review of the documents which I would like to include in t Mm'lt�t� If
JUL 2 0 2017
BY:

DR
corrections are needed, please advise. (The two tables provided in this email
are provided in the Excel file containing the words "excel_BUA".
Redevelopment Summary
Impervious Area Treated:
125,017
Sand Filter #12:
63,162
Sand Filter #21:
61,855
Impervious Required to Treat':
(=297, 515-181, 038sfi
116,477
July X, 2017, Impervious Total:
297,515
Pre-1988 Impervious Remaining
180,774
New Impervious
116,741
Pre-1988 Impervious Total:
181,038
Response: Based upon the revised numbers included in the response to item 2(a) above,
the numbers in the table above have been revised to the following:
Redevelopment Summary
mpervious Area Treated:
125,011,
Sand Filter #11:
63,16:
Sand Filter #22:
61,85:
mpervious Required to Treat':
=267,530-I81., 038s,t)
86,492
July 18, 2017, Impervious Total:
267,530
Pre-1988 Impervious Remaining
135,736
New Impervious
131,794
Pre-1988 Impervious Total:
181,038
. Requirement #2: Redevelopment projects must provide equal or greater treatment of
stormwater than the pre-1988 configuration. Please submit a short qualitative
summary (that is backed up by the pre-1988 plans where necessary) demonstrating that
you have met this requirement.
Response: Language has been added to the Stormwater Calculations Report executive
summary to address this item and a plan sheet is included in the plan set.

3. Calculations (per 15A NCAC .1042(2)(f)]:
a. Application Summary Table Update:
Response: See revised table below.
Dry Pond Drainage Areal
Sand Filter #1
Sand Filter #2
1 Not to Sand Filter
Dry Pond Total
Receiving Stream
UT to Smith Creek
Stream Class
Q SW
Stream Index Number
18-74-63
Total Drainage Area
67,082
84,936
127,647
279,665
Onsite Drainage Area
67,082
84,936
127,647
279,665
Offsite Drainage Area
0
0
0
0
Impervious Area Total
63,162
61,855
57,485
8,198
Onsite Buildings
35,719
0
0
35,719
Onsite Streets
0
0
1,578
1,578
Onsite Parking
27,443
61,855
0
99,298
Onsite Sidewalks
0
0
1,457
1,457
Other Onsite
0
0
0
0
Futurez
0
0
54,450
54,450
Mite Drainage Area
0
0
0
0
Existing BUA
0
0
15,696
15,696
'The dry pond treats water draining from two sand filters as we a tional area.
'The dry pond has been designed to accommodate an additional 54,450ft2 of
impervious that can be permitted in the future. However, since the dry pond is a
secondary SCM the 54,450ft2 will have to also be treated by a primary SCM.
4. Ple e show the SHWT in msl rather than ft on the supplement.
Response: Table has been manually altered accordingly.
5. Please select if the sand filters will be pre -cast or poured in place on the supplement.
l/' Response: Table now shows the sand filters as poured in place.
6. Pleases ow the soil type (A/B/C/D) in the calculations in support of the CN values.
Response: This information is now shown on the sand filter sizing calculations.
7. Please show the thickness of the concrete on the bottom of sand filter #2 in order to show the
"bottom",elevation of the sand filter.
--Response: Refer to sand filter details for this information.
If you should have any questions or comments, please contact Jamie Gollings at 919.600.1163
or [e-mail] for more information.
Thank you for your assistance and please let us know if there is anything else you need.
Best Regards,
JACOBS ENGINEERING
Jamie E. Gollings P.E.

C
ci
c 3
�L
u
C
y y
N N
C
C
r
w R -� 3 0
C R
O
�+
v
N
Y a
�, N +� °' c
h N •R.' N
S l�
vYi E
w
y0.• R
E
R
OD C P
N 07 -° ; a Ln
RCL
C w �V�1
6 1O
c
Z=
6 a
c N
CL
o
m a d
M. N a
�,;
v
H
c aw+ 2 w y
CL
c R
N
,�
c R
3 •?r •O
E
N
O ° N
W
o w
pyp
�7
R
N
O *'
5 d c
roe x
m a
y C
C
_R
'-" O
c ►°1+ m
+o+ N° w Ln
w E ,S io
w
3 C
w$
p
"-O
m
E=
c w Cp
w e~ o
O
•m u
Q
O fl.
c
O
L
O
d
N
p
w 00 10
a a
aN+
e
Lca w
N
0a!
+s„
`� T 07 Gn
�+
R
m b c O
N
N a
W
LY0 tYa
d
V V d
cp C 'Yn V
I L
o f eo
o°
a �O
s-
w
> C L
+� 3 W N
—9
d
2
Y O e
m a
LA N
w
o a
U
3
v
a
R 10
•�
C
mo o 3
R
,� 3
a p
��
R
a N
R M
cu
o
N
Y N
R
01
'a+
L
R
R a {i
w
C
N w
''n y
C
R
a 0
L w
U N aN+
G C
C
L Q. 00 O
y. R C N
.
O oo r
w R
aL+ R a
pwi0
G R
_
U O. w
a }' O
a y
C a-w+ O C L
a
0X C E x r
U O �'
°�
0X y Q,a='
y w N
R R w �• °C y
a
E w u. a s!
R m
E C O
C o
w 3
-a
a a a
w Lu° � e
m
r
+= N
3 c
C
a wO
w .0
u a
y c
aZi
7 N
_3
N R
N p,
>~
Q y
3
01 O
o f d
M Y Oe
Q
w R 0
i
N
pR0
N a s 0 N
VCL
y
RI w t `
h O
N
N O
N O C
Y N E
w O aw.' N a
R N a Q '-
R G +' O
R N—
R a
R O'
LL C
w w
0 tic
N
o Q 5 w c w
aoe m
nw''°'°o°Q �'aae
a
0.w
aoe.0
�c
az Ea oe
re
L 0
L
c-
O R
R C w Y
` Y R N
w
a
3 Y C
>
o
R R iL m
Y
R
E
w o
+ o
c m
id
° m a c °
w u
c E CL
m m
w w
E
a)
r-
+� w o ° w
y O
3
G
w Q Y
E o ±' o
u U
L
3 La
R
L w i
+; R Y E= o
- R
M
Y
L
O D
.N c 3 a G y
R
N +'
w
O> .O
w N
O
a m
a CL
c
i R E c a
C
u
w a
c N `o R o a3i
O R
c s
a
w .N c 'v
�°
.Lw.
Qj
.X �-
o �:
O .�
R
+' N a0+ n O
R
R
m a
N
O
y:C
(U a R
u
1O
-O
,aww
O 1 Q r N y-
o
�
� v
v
w
4'
F-
X w L
w ai
c
aai
N u U R Y a 0
Y
m
'O
lu 4
O
m
N w
aR+ O O
m
L L' R 'N
w
C
Y �
C
N
•�
Y 'O y LNa
N w fl.
f0
u u
+R.'
U
2� O _7
a M u +' ,$ "O > U
•O
t`
R w
U
w a
u
c 'O i w
ja >- E
"O C c
°
w
'O A *' G N w 0
a
°
7 U
C
L
w R N U
O 7 w
'U
Q; j0
O
w L w r N N w -
N
V1
v
' G
O
U R
C
7
°-
E:^ ;� C
U
v
R a W
G.
m N U L R
3 a ., N
p
m
7 C
a
L
_�
u R c +.
w w
e K
N
a c a
R
d
a c
E E O N
u
w
Y
�_
O
w
a
7
E `o
c
-
v c
o
" a
3
e
w
m
a fO ,�
m
m �'
'N U
c
w
m= t +°_: `o' c w owa
y
O
E
c O O
L a R
R a
'� 'U
v ti
w
N N L' �-' w R
ti N G a a .O
•�
Q a
c
+R+ E ..
N L-'
w 0
m
C
w w
O
R
w
aci
-° w
3°
R C Gl O Ln p
d c
E
o
Y
w
O
-° R
,L
R
°N' °
O.
O'
1vvO�L
U
�O C
'"
"°
L
O a+
'N 7 m L C
R O' 3
U R a
w O"
O
vwi E LR.7 'J_ L = O- LY.7 G
7 N +' w w 7 R
o
'N
a
w
w
U L
E
:°
O G
O
Y
G L G Y O
j:.' -
w i
w
a •O +'
w R
2r
a GJ O w L L i a
w O N
0a
C G
N
a
N N
N N
R
U O
C 'y
a
R .J, y'
L
Y
L
N
w y -_
R u=
w
E�
O
w di
•O
m
X a/ X c w
:L aL+
5
00 .� +-'
w
CD m F, w o Q
U U>
o
Lu c w o Ln
w o
N o o
a
'� E v = Ln N u
v .n
a
Lu m Luo
t
c
cu
y
w E
E
E
E
E
E
3
u
u
u
G
+-'
Li
O
ul
C
N Y
G
LA +N.
C
Ln aN.'
G
Ln +r
C
w
w
w
w
C
N o
w
G
O E
C
O E
O E
p
O
u
C
co
U
C
R
U
G
R
u
G
R
'N
Q
7 m
m U
M w
U
M w
U
m w
u .L
'~' w
U i
}' w
U i
c
w
Y
C
w
c
w
C
w
c a
Q Cr
a Cr
a Q
a cr
_a
c
Y
c
Y
c
Y
c
x
m a
in a
a m
0 ee
a m
a z
a w
a oc
a m
a ac
a w
Q
fO
m
i
w
_
L
go
E
M
s-i
N
N
N
N
N
00
00
00
a0
7
z
w
M
o
O
a
N
v
N
v
N
a
N
v
N
v
O
Ln
O
Ln
O
m
O
Ln
3
Qr
0
ei
O
ai
O
e-I
O
a -I
ClO
r•I
N
O
O
O
O
O
�--I
e-1
r•I
r•I
a••I
N
m
a

w
wW
o
\ 2
2
~ IC
CL C.
2
�ckk
ul Cc\
0§
&
$ w u
\ §
■e
a$
__CL@
■
@
k
In
§
f
3 e
0
o c
}bB£�
Ea
2
& -us
�E
��
2
§■q2■
2I
_
2�
cu u
20
k ° w
a
0 § 2
■
=
E §
f t .
.
}
_
}
� §
±
> k
�
!
$
:E0
/� \
-0k
0
e2.
§ § %
f
2 L ƒ
2 $
k
k
/ k
u `
o E;- e.
;
3 t
§2k2)f�
o
f}m2J
�
£ 2 K
$ o � � ®
;
\
�
�
■ E 2
i
2£
a
m2E;
$ =S22
01
E k o E}
.0 Ln
{§>
w f§ 2
o
o■
E§:B
m a 2,§ 5
% I§
2§ k t
u ; = 2
ukIn
4E�■
•®
/g!
\■ P
R t e-.
E\
0§
N§§
;{§�§£§
f2a$
o=
§§ t.■ E E
E_
w
o§ C k
2 I§ W Z b%
k
■»§»'0 e
2 m$
2 o
o �
e■_
o� c
E
0
0
0
k
f
E
§
E
\
2Ln
LU
�
2£
3
23
z
.
§
§
§§
.
_
CD
§
$

Johnson, Kelly
From: Johnson, Kelly
Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2017 2:55 PM
To: 'Gollings, Jamie E.'
Cc: Weaver, Cameron; '[e-mail]'; 'rod ney.d.newton. [e-mail],
Subject: RE: [Non-DoD Source] RE: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington Express Review
Jamie,
I apologize that the following got cut off of the previous email:
Calculations (continued):
a. See below
b. Please show the SHWT in msl rather than ft on the supplement.
c. Please select if the sand filters will be pre -cast or poured in place on the supplement.
d. Please show the soil type (A/B/C/D) in the calculations in support of the CN values.
e. Please show the thickness of the concrete on the bottom of sand filter #2 in order to show the "bottom"
elevation of the sand filter.
Thanks,
Kelly
From: Johnson, Kelly
Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2017 2:52 PM
To: 'Gollings, Jamie E.' <[e-mail]>
Cc: Weaver, Cameron <[e-mail]>;'william.s.burriola.miI@maiLmil'
<[e-mail]>;'[e-mail]' <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [Non-DoD Source] RE: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington Express Review
Jamie,
I have gone through the entire package, and I have incorporated all my comments into a single letter. This is the
"Request for Additional Information Letter", which will be handled via email in lieu of a formal letter.
1. Attached Table: Please see the attached table "2017 07 addinfo 140906" for a summary of the items needed.
This table is cross-referenced with the regulations supporting the requests. This table also references the two
items below.
2. Redevelopment [per 15A NCAC .1003(3)(d)]: This is a redevelopment projectthat will treat impervious area in
excess of the pre-1988 amount per 15A NCAC 02H .1003(3)(d). Redevelopment projects have two requirements
per 15A NCAC 02H .1002(41) and GS143-214.7:
a. Requirement #1: Treat the net increase in impervious from pre-1988
i. Amount of Redevelopment: You will redevelop 181,038sf (and treat above that amount). Since
the total impervious for the site is 297,515sf you will have to treat at least (297,515sf-
181,038sf=) 116,741sf of impervious area. You have two sand filters which treat 63,162sf and
61,855sf (total=125,017sf), and so you have met the .1003(3)(d) requirement.
ii. Pre-1988 (1981) Map: Please provide two full-sized plans showing that there was 181,038sf of
impervious area before State Stormwater permitting began in 1988.
iii. Numeric Summary: I have developed the following summary based on my review of the
documents which I would like to include in the permit text. If corrections are needed, please
advise. (The two tables provided in this email are provided in the Excel file containing the words
"excel BUA".

Redevelopment Summary
Impervious Area Treated:
125,017
Sand Filter #12:
63,162
Sand Filter #22:
61,855
Impervious Required to Treat':
(=297,515-181, 038sf)
116,477
July X, 2017, Impervious Total:
297,515
Pre-1988 Impervious Remaining
180,774
New Impervious
116,741
Pre-1988 Impervious Total:
181,038
Requirement #2: Redevelopment projects must provide equal or greater treatment of stormwater than
the pre-1988 configuration. Please submit a short qualitative summary (that is backed up by the pre-
1988 plans where necessary) demonstrating that you have met this requirement.
3. Calculations [per 15A NCAC .1042(2)(f)]:
a. Application Summary Table: Please make the following corrections:
Dry Pond Drainage Areal
Sand
Filter #1 I
Sand
Filter #2 I
Not to Sand
Filter
Dry Pond
Total
Receiving Stream
UT to Smith Creek
Stream Class
C; SW
Stream Index Number
18-74-63
Total Drainage Area
67,082
84,936
127,647
279,665
Onsite Drainage Area
67,082
84,936
127,647
279,665
Offsite Drainage Area
0
0
0
0
Impervious Area Total
63,162
61,855
73,181
198,198
Onsite Buildings
35,719
0
0
35,719
Onsite Streets
0
0
12,069
12,069
Onsite Parking
27,443
61,855
-10,491
78,807
Onsite Sidewalks
0
0
1,457
1,457
Other Onsite
0
0
0
0
Future
0
0
54,450
54,450
Offsite Drainage Area
0
0
0
0
Existing BUA
0
0
1 15,696
15,696
'The dry pond treats water draining from two sand filters as well as additional
area.
Please check the number in yellow
"future" area cannot be treated solely in a dry pond because it is a secondary
SCM.
Please remember to confirm that any revised information is presented consistently throughout the application
documents including calculations, supplements, narrative, and plans. Please also remember to provide two hard copies
and one electronic copy of any updated documents per 15A NCAC 02H.1042(2).
The requested information should be received in this Office prior to July 20, 2017, or the application will be returned as
incomplete. If the project is returned and you wish to re -submit to the Express Program, you will need to reschedule the

project through the Express Coordinator for the next available review date and will need to resubmit all required items
at that time, including the application fee.
If additional time is needed to submit the requested informatian, please email your extension request to the Division at
the email address provided below. The request must indicate the date by which the requested information is expected
to be submitted, which shall be no later than 5 business days past the original due date.
The construction of any impervious surfaces, other than a construction entrance under an approved Sedimentation
Erosion Control Plan, is a violation of NCGS 143-215.1 and is subject to enforcement action pursuant to NCGS 143-
215.6A.
Please label all packages and cover letters as "Express" and reference the State assigned project number on all
correspondence.
Thanks,
Kelly
From: Johnson, Kelly
Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2017 2:58 PM
To: 'Gollings, Jamie E.' <[e-mail]>
Cc: Weaver, Cameron <cameron.weaver@ncdenr..ov>; Rhonda Hall <rhonda.hail@ncdenr.g_ov>;
'[e-mail]'<william.s.burriola.myLLomail.mil>; '[e-mail]'
<[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [Non-DoD Source] RE: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington Express Review
Al I,
Thanks for meeting today. Here is the list of initial items that are needed for the State Stormwater review:
1. Plan Sheets: Please submit two full-size plan sets of the following sheets:
a. Project Area with bearing/distance lines
b. Drainage areas for the two sand filters and forthe dry pond
c. 1981 map quantifying the impervious area in -place prior to 1988 (181,038sf)
d. CS300: Please add spot elevations/contours along the far edges of the pavement showing that the water
will drain into the system.
2. Signature Authority Letter: Please submit a copy of the letter showing that Mr. Newton can sign for the National
Guard for this permit.
Redevelopment: This is a redevelopment project that will treat impervious area in excess of the pre-1988 amount
per 15A NCAC 02H .1003(3)(d). Redevelopment projects have two requirements per 15A NCAC 02H .1002(41) and
GS143-214.7:
Requirement #1: Treat the net increase in impervious from pre-1988
i. Amount of Redevelopment: You will redevelop 181,038sf (and treat above that amount). Since the
total impervious for the site is 297,515sf you will have to treat at least (297,515sf-181,038sf=)
116,741sf of impervious area. You have two sand filters which treat 63,162sf and 61,855sf
(total=125,017sf), and so you have met the .1003(3)(d) requirement.
ii. Numeric Summary: I have developed the following summary based on my review of the documents
which I would like to include in the permit text. If corrections are needed, please advise.
Redevelopment Summary
Impervious Area Treated =
125,017
Sand Filter #11:
63,162
Sand Filter #22:
61,855
Impervious Required to Treat'.
(=297,515-181,038sp
116,477

1i
July X, 2017, Impervious Total: 297,515
Pre-1988 Impervious Remaining 180,774
New Impervious 116,741
Pre-1988 Impervious Total: 181,038
'per 15A NCAC 02H .1003(3)(d)
2Neither sand filter has "future" area available.
b. Requirement #2: Redevelopment projects must provide equal or greater treatment of stormwater than the
pre-1988 configuration. Please submit a short qualitative summary (that is backed up by the pre-1988 plans
where necessary) demonstrating that you have met this requirement.
4. Application Summary: While generating the redevelopment summary, I found two items in the application table
that may need to be corrected:
Dry Pond Drainage Area'
Sand
Filter #1
Sand I
Filter #2
Not to Sand
Filter
Dry Pond
Total
Receiving Stream
UT to Smith Creek
Stream Class
C; SW
Stream Index Number
18-74-63
Total Drainage Area
67,082
84,936
127,647
279,665
Onsite Drainage Area
67,082
84,936
127,647
279,665
Offsite Drainage Area
0
0
0
0
Impervious Area Total
63,162
61,855
73,181
198,198
Onsite Buildings
35,719
0
0
35,719
Onsite Streets
0
0
12,069
12,069
Onsite Parking
27,443
61,855
-10,491
78,807
Onsite Sidewalks
0
0
1,457
1,457
Other Onsite
0
0
0
0
Future
0
0
54,450
54,450
Offsite Drainage Area
0
0
0
0
Existing BUA
0
0
15,696
15,696
'The dry pond treats water draining from two sand filters as well as additional
area.
Please check the number in yellow
"future" area cannot be treated solely in a dry pond because it is a secondary
SCM.
Sheets Removed: The following sheets have been removed from the submittal package: CS400, CS401, CS701,
CS702, CS704, CS705, CS706, CS707, CS708, CS709, L-110.
Thanks,
Kelly
From: Johnson, Kelly
Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 1:44 PM

To: 'Gollings, Jamie E.' <Jamie.Gollin�;s[��iacobs.com>
Cc: Weaver, Cameron <cameron.weaver(al; cdenr.eov>; Rhonda Hall <rho!id ,.J-rali@ icderir.gok,>
Subject: RE: [Non-DoD Source] RE: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington Express Review
Jamie,
I have cc'd Cameron and Rhonda (I suspect she may be reviewing the E&SC). I can't speak for what E&SC will need. For
stormwater, you need a single copy of all original/signed documents, a single copy of any supporting documents such as
the soils report and calculations, and two full plan sets.
Kelly
From: Gollings, Jamie E. Lmailto:Jamie Gollinki_.?j4cobs.cgm]
Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 1:37 PM
To: Johnson, Kelly <kelly.p.'ohnscn 1i1 denr.eov>
Subject: RE: [Non-DoD Source] RE: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington Express Review
Kelly,
As a followup to my voicemail,
• As of right now, our intent is to take the following approach and include with our documents: "Then,
demonstrate that permit modifications do not exceed that amount, and that they provide equal or better
treatment of impervious area. Or, the other way to do this is to compare pre-1988 with the proposed design on a
drainage -area basis without addressing the entire site."
• Can you verify how many copies of each document you will need for the submittal or refer me to the
appropriate weblink? Please keep in mind that it is both Stormwater and Erosion Control Express Review.
Thanks,
Jamie E. Gollings, PE I Civil Engineer
JACOBS
10 IN 2 7 r
iamie.aollingsCcDjacobs.com i www.iacobs.com
From: Johnson, Kelly [mailto:kelly.p.iohnson ncdenr.gov]
Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 12:20 PM
To: Gollings, Jamie E. <[e-mail]>
Cc: Weaver, Cameron <cameron.weaver ncdenr.gov>
Subject: RE: [Non-DoD Source] RE: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington Express Review
Jamie,
I overlaid the county GIS with the plan you sent me this morning in the first diagram below. The current (2014) permit
covers the entire tract that the National Guard owns, as shown by the land inside the green line "below" Control Tower
Drive. (Just to clarify, I want to make sure that you understand that that whole project area will need to be re -permitted
in tomorrow's application. You probably already realize that, but I just want to make sure since I don't see the project
area on the plan from this morning.) I then overlaid the drainage area for the infiltration basin that was permitted in
2014 in diagram 2 (it isn't a perfect overlay, but you get the idea.) From the file, it looks like the area that is covered
mainly by proposed sand filter #2 (the DA on the left in diagram 1) is constructed per the 2014 plans because the
infiltration basin is certified. It looks like you all plan to reconfigure that area, take out the infiltration basin, and use a
sand filter. The area that goes to sand filter #1 is being redeveloped from area that was not previously permitted to be
redeveloped. Diagram 3 is on file from the 2014 permit. It shows the impervious area that was in place in 1981. (State

Is
Stormwater permitting began in 1988, and so the 2014 engineer submitted that to establish that he didn't have to treat
all of the impervious area on the tract.)
In 2014, the engineer showed that his drainage area contained impervious area that was in place well before 1988, but
since it drained to the infiltration basin he treated all of the impervious area in the basin. (As I am sure you know, that is
because all impervious in a drainage area has to be accounted for in order to ensure that it can all "fit" in the treatment
facility). There was a small section of impervious area, as shown in Diagram 4, that he could not collect (likely because
the driveway had to meet the crown of an existing road.) In retrospect, I probably should have quantified that amount
of impervious in the permit. But, I did not (probably because it was so small).
I have been trying to figure out the best way to document the redevelopment of this site, especially since they have
been (and may continue to) make regular changes to the permit. Per .1002(41) and GS143-214.7, redevelopment must
have impervious that is equal or less than the previous project and provide equal or better stormwater treatment. If the
footprint of impervious is being increased, then the project falls under .1003(3)(d) and it needs a high -density permit for
the net increase of impervious area. I have talked with other staff here to determine the best way to go about
this. There are at least two ways, but there may be others. The most complete method would be to quantify the
impervious area inside the entire project area using a pre-1988 map. Then, demonstrate that permit modifications do
not exceed that amount, and that they provide equal or better treatment of impervious area. Or, the other way to do
this is to compare pre-1988 with the proposed design on a drainage -area basis without addressing the entire site. We
will have to work this out tomorrow.
Thanks,
Kelly
Diagram 1
r
Y
K
a
r
Diagram 2
+ r
6

I
L
F
Diagram 3
IF

liken ftm N?Hcl
N
Ar
Va E I -IV
. -% 13.3. :3
Diagram 4
PEI'
Now
ow
sow -
IF
Ix
ik
V
-----Original Message -----
From: Gollings, Jamie E. [mailto:Jamie.Goilings@-!acobs.com]
Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 9:40 AM
To: Johnson, Kelly <[e-mail]>

Cc: Weaver, Cameron <c rreron.�,,,?z [e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [Non-DoD Source] RE: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington Express Review
Kelly,
Please call me when you have a moment. In the mean time, the attached shows existing vs. proposed impervious
impacts. I don't believe that the existing permit involved any existing impervious impacts.
Yes, the sand filters will be designed to the 2017 manual.
Jamie E. Gollings, PE I Civil Engineer
JACO BS
Office: 111 Corning Road, Suite 200, Cary, NC 27518
Contact: Office: 919.859.5752
[e-mail] I www.jacobs.com
-----Original Message -----
From: Johnson, Kelly [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Friday, July 07, 2017 12:56 PM
To: Gollings, Jamie E. <Jamie.Gollings@jacobs:com>
Cc: Weaver, Cameron <[e-mail]>
Subject: FW: [Non-DoD Source] RE: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington Express Review
Jamie,
I am just trying to make sure I understand what is being proposed. Have you designed the new sand filter per the new
regulations (the 2017 rule)? Also, is this just a standard high density permit, or is there a redevelopment component,
too? (I just looked quickly at the current permit, and I didn't see any redevelopment but I wanted to verify that.)
Thanks,
Kelly
-----Original Message -----
From: Weaver, Cameron
Sent: Friday, July 07, 2017 12:26 PM
To: Moody, Cale D LTC USARMY NG NCARNG (US) <[e-mail]>
Cc: Dudick, Vickie A NFG NG NCARNG•(US) <vick![e-mail]>; Scott, Georgette
<[e-mail]>; Johnson, Kelly <[e-mail]>; Newton, Rodney D LTC USARMY NG
NCARNG (US) <rodney.d.newton.mil@ mail. mil>; Caldwell, Kent Eric MAJ USARMY NG NCARNG (US)
<[e-mail]>; Burriola, William S II CW2 USARMY NG NCARNG (US) <[e-mail]>;
Harper, William W II MAJ USARMY NG NGB ARNG (US)<[e-mail]>; Garcia, Karla M CIV NG NGB
(US) <[e-mail]>; Meilinger, Derek T MAJ USARMY NG NCARNG (US)
<[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [Non-DoD Source] RE: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington Express Review
Thanks to Kelly (and I know I owe you!), I have been able to schedule this review as was requested for Tuesday 7/11, at
10am.
We look forward to seeing the engineer and owner representative here for this meeting. Let me know of any
outstanding issues.
Cameron

Cameron Weaver
Environmental Assistance Coordinator -Wilmington Regional Office NCDEQ-Division of Environmental Assistance and
Customer Service
127 Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405
910-796-7303
NCDEQ NEW WEBSITE: http://deq.nc.gov/
DEACS NEW WEBSITE: http://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/environmental-assistance-customer-service
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties.
-----Original Message -----
From: Moody, Cale D LTC USARMY NG NCARNG (US)[mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Friday, July 07, 2017 12:15 PM
To: Weaver, Cameron <[e-mail]>
Cc: Dudick, Vickie A NFG NG NCARNG (US) <vickie.a.dudick.nfg@mail. miI>; Scott, Georgette
<[e-mail]>; Johnson, Kelly <[e-mail]>; Newton, Rodney D LTC USARMY NG
NCARNG (US) <rodney.d.newton. mil @mail.mil>; Caldwell, Kent Eric MAJ USARMY NG NCARNG (US)
<[e-mail]>; Burriola, William S II CW2 USARMY NG NCARNG (US) <william.s.burriola.mil @mail.mil>;
Harper, William W II MAJ USARMY NG NGB ARNG (US)<[e-mail]>; Garcia, Karla M CIV NG NGB
(US) <karla.m.garcia4.civ@mail. mil>; Meilinger, Derek MAJ USARMY NG NCARNG (US)
<derek.t.meilinger.miI@mail. mil>
Subject: RE: [Non-DoD Source] RE: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington Express Review
Cameron,
Thank you very much! We appreciate every effort to move up the review date.
Normally we would not request this but we are receiving FY13 funds ($15M) for the construction of a new National
Guard Readiness Center to be constructed on the same land as the current which was damaged by Act of Nature
(Hurricane Irene 2011). Due to this being FY13 funds, they must be awarded by 30SEP2017 or they expire and the
project will not happen. The timeline we are up against is the EN reviews must be completed and the 30 day period also
completed prior to 17 AUG 2017 in order not to delay the already stringent timeline. This new NCNG Readiness Center
will additionally be an economic asset to the Wilmington area. Again, we certainly appreciate any effort to get this
review completed as soon as possible.
Thank you,
Cale D. Moody, PLS
LTC, EN
Fulltime: CFMO Deputy/Business Manager
Office: [phone]
M-Day: CDR, 105th EN BIN (RHINO 6)
Office: [phone]
Mobile: [phone]
[e-mail]
10

-----Original Message -----
From: Weaver, Cameron [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Friday, July 07, 2017 11:58 AM
To: Moody, Cale D LTC USARMY NG NCARNG (US) <[e-mail]>
Cc: Dudick, Vickie A NFG NG NCARNG (US) <vickie.a.dudick.nfg@ mail. mil>; Scott, Georgette
<[e-mail]>; Johnson, Kelly <[e-mail]>
Subject: FW: [Non-DoD Source] RE: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington Express Review
All active links contained in this email were disabled. Please verify the identity of the sender, and confirm the
authenticity of all links contained within the message prior to copying and pasting the address to a Web browser.
Hi LTC Moody:
After hearing third -hand about your situation, I wanted to reach out to you directly. We make every effort to
accommodate client schedules, but reviews are scheduled based on when the complete requests are received in our
system and are spaced to allow the individual attention that is needed to expedite the Express Permit application
reviews. We have a very limited staff available to conduct Express Reviews. In this case, after conversing via emails with
Ms. Dudick, this review was already moved up once in our scheduling by more than a week by switching with the NGRC
project in Jacksonville.
I have now reached out to additional staff to see if they can accommodate your request, and I will let you know when
our office is able to review your project.
I will be in touch soon.
Cameron
Cameron Weaver
Environmental Assistance Coordinator -Wilmington Regional Office NCDEQ Division of Environmental Assistance and
Customer Service
127 Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405
910-796-7303
NCDEQ NEW WEBSITE: Caution-http://deq.nc.gov/ DEACS NEW WEBSITE:
Ca ution-http://deq. nc.gov/about/divisions/environmenta I-assista nce-customer-
service
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties.
-----Original Message -----
From: Dudick, Vickie A NFG NG NCARNG (US) [Caution-mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2017 4:28 PM
To: Weaver, Cameron <[e-mail]>
11

Cc: Scott, Georgette <[e-mail]>; Newton, Rodney D LTC USARMY NG NCARNG (US)
<[e-mail]>; Burriola, William S II
CW2 USARMY NG NCARNG (US) <[e-mail]>; Gollings, Jamie E. <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [Non-DoD Source] RE: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington Express Review
Cameron- Per our conversation this afternoon, the NCARNG would like to switch the Jacksonville express review with
Wilmington's review date. This puts Wilmington submittal meeting scheduled for 7/25 @ 11am at the Wilmington DEQ
office and Jacksonville scheduled for 8/2. Thank you for your consideration.
Vickie A. Dudick
Director of Environmental Management
North Carolina National Guard
1636 Gold Star Drive
Raleigh, NC 27607
984-664-6186
[e-mail]
-----Original Message -----
From: Weaver, Cameron [Caution-mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2017 9:38 AM
To: Dudick, Vickie A NFG NG NCARNG (US) <vickie.a.dudick.nfg@ mail. mil>
Cc: Scott, Georgette <[e-mail]>; Newton, Rodney D LTC USARMY NG NCARNG (US)
<rodney.d.newton. [e-mail]>; Burriola, William S II
CW2 USARMY NG NCARNG (US) <[e-mail]>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] RE: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington Express Review
All active links contained in this email were disabled. Please verify the identity of the sender, and confirm the
authenticity of all links contained within the message prior to copying and pasting the address to a Web browser.
Hi Vickie.
You should be hearing from Jamie Gollings, your consultant of record on the request. This meeting has been scheduled
forAugust 2 at 11 AM here at the Wilmington DEQ offices.
Let me know of any issues.
Cameron
12

Cameron Weaver
Environmental Assistance Coordinator -Wilmington Regional Office
NCDEQ-Division of Environmental Assistance and Customer Service
127 Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405
910-796-7303
NCDEQ NEW WEBSITE: Caution-Caution-http://deq.nc.gov/
DEACS NEW WEBSITE:
Ca ution-Caution-http://deq. nc.gov/about/divisions/envi ronmental-assistance-c
ustomer-
service
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties.
-----Original Message -----
From: Dudick, Vickie A NFG NG NCARNG (US) [Caution-Caution-mailto:vickie.a.dudick.nfg@mail. mill
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2017 8:33 AM
To: Weaver, Cameron <[e-mail]>
Cc: Scott, Georgette <[e-mail]>; Newton, Rodney D LTC USARMY NG NCARNG (US)
<[e-mail]>; Burriola, William S II
CW2 USARMY NG NCARNG (US)<[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington Express Review
Cameron- Any update on the Express Review for the NCARNG permits? Is the
NCARNG on the schedule or do you need anything additional from us? Has
another Reviewer been assigned? Thank you for your prompt attention.
Vickie A. Dudick
13

Director of Environmental Management
North Carolina National Guard
1636 Gold Star Drive
Raleigh, NC 27607
984-664-6186
[e-mail] <
Caution-Caution-mailto:[e-mail] >
-----Original Message -----
From: Weaver, Cameron [Caution-Caution-mailto:[e-mail] < Caution-Caution-
mailto:[e-mail] > ]
Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 3:21 PM
To: Dudick, Vickie A NFG NG NCARNG (US) <[e-mail] < Caution-Caution-
mailto:[e-mail] > >
Cc: Scott, Georgette <[e-mail] < Caution-Caution-mailto:[e-mail] > >
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] RE: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington
Express Review
All active links contained in this email were disabled. Please verify the
identity of the sender, and confirm the authenticity of all links contained
within the message prior to copying and pasting the address to a Web
browser.
14

Hi Vickie.
The quickness of the review is directly proportional to the completeness of
the initial permit application packet that is brought to and discussed in
the submittal meeting. The review meeting is scheduled so that the reviewer
is able to put their attention on that particular project immediately, but
it is a balancing act between ongoing Express reviews in house already with
the reviewer and when the reviewer will be able to issue the permit from the
latest Express submittal. The 30 days covers the reasonable assumption that
two rounds of additional information will be needed from the applicant to
complete the review. The more complete the application, the faster the
overall turnaround for permit issuance.
I'll be in touch on Monday with a date that a reviewer will be able to meet
concerning the Express Review.
Let me know of any other issues.
Cameron
Cameron Weaver
Environmental Assistance Coordinator -Wilmington Regional Office
NCDEQ-Division of Environmental Assistance and Customer Service
127 Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405
910-796-7303
is

NCDEQ NEW WEBSITE: Caution-Caution-Caution-http://deq.nc.gov/
DEACS NEW WEBSITE:
Caution-Caution-Caution-http://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/environmental-assi
stance-c
ustomer
service
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North
Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
-----Original Message -----
From: Dudick, Vickie A NFG NG NCARNG (US)
[Ca ution-Caution-Caution-mailto:vickie.a.dudick.nfg@mail. mi1]
Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 2:48 PM
To: Weaver, Cameron <[e-mail] < Caution-Caution-mailto:[e-mail] > >
Cc: Burriola, William S II CW2 USARMY NG NCARNG (US)
<[e-mail] <
Caution-Caution-mailto:[e-mail] > >
Subject: RE: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington Express Review
Cameron- Just want to clarify what you told us on the phone today- After the
DEQ office meeting and acceptance, 30 days is required for express
permitting? My understanding is the Express review for Erosion Control
averages 1.6 days and express review for Storm Water control averages 7.6
days. Please let us know if this has changed from the attached. Thank you.
Caution-Caution-Caution-http://deq.nc.gov/permits-regulations/express-permit
16

ting
-----Original Message -----
From: Dudick, Vickie A NFG NG NCARNG (US)
Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 1:25 PM
To: '[e-mail]'<[e-mail] < Caution-Caution-
mailto:[e-mail] > >
Cc: Burriola, William S II CW2 USARMY NG NCARNG (US)
<[e-mail] <
Caution-Caution-mailto:[e-mail] > >; Morris, Thomas S NFG NG NCARNG (US)
<[e-mail] <
Caution-Caution-mailto:[e-mail] > >; Newton, Rodney D LTC USARMY NG NCARNG (US)
<[e-mail] <
Caution-Caution-mailto:[e-mail]
Subject: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington
Cameron- Per our conversation today, the NCARNG requests another Reviewer to
expedite the National Guard Readiness Center Stormwater and Land Quality
Express Permit Review. This project is a Federal contract with fiscal year
2017 funds which must be executed prior to September 30, 2017. Solicitation
of bids can occur but the permits must be secured before the bids can be
opened. Please note my correct email below. Thank you for your
consideration.
Vickie A. Dudick
Director of Environmental Management
North Carolina National Guard
1636 Gold Star Drive

Raleigh, NC 27607
984-664-6186
[e-mail] <
Caution-Caution-mailto:[e-mail] >
NOTICE - This communication may contain confidential and privileged information that is for the sole use of the
intended recipient. Any viewing, copying or distribution of, or reliance on this message by unintended recipients is
strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message
and deleting it from your computer.
�,r : !e s u! of
is
18

Johnson, Kelly
From:
Johnson, Kelly
Sent:
Monday, July 10, 2017 12:20 PM
To:
'Gollings, Jamie E.'
Cc:
Weaver, Cameron
Subject:
RE: [Non-DoD Source] RE: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington Express Review
Jamie,
I overlaid the county GIS with the plan you sent me this morning in the first diagram below. The current (2014) permit
covers the entire tract that the National Guard owns, as shown by the land inside the green line "below" Control Tower
Drive. (Just to clarify, I want to make sure that you understand that that whole project area will need to be re -permitted
in tomorrow's application. You probably already realize that, but I just want to make sure since I don't see the project
area on the plan from this morning.) I then overlaid the drainage area for the infiltration basin that was permitted in
2014 in diagram 2 (it isn't a perfect overlay, but you get the idea.) From the file, it looks like the area that is covered
mainly by proposed sand filter #2 (the DA on the left in diagram 1) is constructed per the 2014 plans because the
infiltration basin is certified. It looks like you all plan to reconfigure that area, take out the infiltration basin, and use a
sand filter. The area that goes to sand filter #1 is being redeveloped from area that was not previously permitted to be
redeveloped. Diagram 3 is on file from the 2014 permit. It shows the impervious area that was in place in 1981. (State
Stormwater permitting began in 1988, and so the 2014 engineer submitted that to establish that he didn't have to treat
all of the impervious area on the tract.)
In 2014, the engineer showed that his drainage area contained impervious area that was in place well before 1988, but
since it drained to the infiltration basin he treated all of the impervious area in the basin. (As I am sure you know, that is
because all impervious in a drainage area has to be accounted for in order to ensure that it can all "fit" in the treatment
facility). There was a small section of impervious area, as shown in Diagram 4, that he could not collect (likely because
the driveway had to meet the crown of an existing road.) In retrospect, I probably should have quantified that amount
of impervious in the permit. But, I did not (probably because it was so small).
I have been trying to figure out the best way to document the redevelopment of this site, especially since they have
been (and may continue to) make regular changes to the permit. Per .1002(41) and GS143-214.7, redevelopment must
have impervious that is equal or less than the previous project and provide equal or better stormwater treatment. If the
footprint of impervious is being increased, then the project falls under .1003(3)(d) and it needs a high -density permit for
the net increase of impervious area. I have talked with other staff here to determine the best way to go about
this. There are at least two ways, but there may be others. The most complete method would be to quantify the
impervious area inside the entire project area using a pre-1988 map. Then, demonstrate that permit modifications do
not exceed that amount, and that they provide equal or better treatment of impervious area. Or, the other way to do
this is to compare pre-1988 with the proposed design on a drainage -area basis without addressing the entire site. We
will have to work this out tomorrow.
Thanks,
Kelly
Diagram 1
1

Diagram 2
Diagram 3

:afd
's`Ol £ i 130
Diagram 4
:} f. ..,
t, f
/�r'O`ti.
�yJ/1
.Owl
-----Original Message -----
From: Gollings, Jamie E.[mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 9:40 AM
To: Johnson, Kelly <[e-mail]>

Cc: Weaver, Cameron <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [Non-DoD Source] RE: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington Express Review
Kelly,
Please call me when you have a moment. In the mean time, the attached shows existing vs. proposed impervious
impacts. I don't believe that the existing permit involved any existing impervious impacts.
Yes, the sand filters will be designed to the 2017 manual.
Jamie E. Gollings, PE I Civil Engineer
JACOBS
Office: 111 Corning Road, Suite 200, Cary, NC 27518
Contact: Office:919.859.5752
[e-mail] I www.jacobs.com
-----Original Message -----
From: Johnson, Kelly [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Friday, July 07, 2017 12:56 PM
To: Gollings, Jamie E. <[e-mail]>
Cc: Weaver, Cameron <[e-mail]>
Subject: FW: [Non-DoD Source] RE: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington Express Review
Jamie,
I am just trying to make sure I understand what is being proposed. Have you designed the new sand filter per the new
regulations (the 2017 rule)? Also, is this just a standard high density permit, or is there a redevelopment component,
too? (I just looked quickly at the current permit, and I didn't see any redevelopment but I wanted to verify that.)
Thanks,
Kelly
-----Original Message -----
From: Weaver, Cameron
Sent: Friday, July 07, 2017 12:Zb PM
To: Moody, Cale D LTC USARMY NG NCARNG (US) <cale.d.moody.mil@mail. mil>
Cc: Dudick, Vickie A NFG NG NCARNG (US) <[e-mail]>; Scott, Georgette
<[e-mail]>; Johnson, Kelly <[e-mail]>; Newton, Rodney D LTC USARMY NG
NCARNG (US) <[e-mail]>; Caldwell, Kent Eric MAJ USARMY NG NCARNG (US)
<[e-mail]>; Burriola, William S II CW2 USARMY NG NCARNG (US) <[e-mail]>;
Harper, William W II MAJ USARMY NG NGB ARNG (US) <[e-mail]>; Garcia, Karla M CIV NG NGB
(US) <karla.m.garcia4.civ@mail. mil>; Meilinger, Derek T MAJ USARMY NG NCARNG (US)
<[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [Non-DoD Source] RE: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington Express Review
Thanks to Kelly (and I know I owe you!), I have been able to schedule this review as was requested for Tuesday 7/11, at
10am.
We look forward to seeing the engineer and owner representative here for this meeting. Let me know of any
outstanding issues.
Cameron

Cameron Weaver
Environmental Assistance Coordinator -Wilmington Regional Office NCDEQ-Division of Environmental Assistance and
Customer Service
127 Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405
910-796-7303
NCDEQ NEW WEBSITE: http://deq.nc.gov/
DEACS NEW WEBSITE: http://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/environmental-assistance-customer-service
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties.
-----Original Message -----
From: Moody, Cale D LTC USARMY NG NCARNG (US) [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Friday, July 07, 201712:15 PM
To: Weaver, Cameron <[e-mail]>
Cc: Dudick, Vickie A NFG NG NCARNG (US) <[e-mail]>; Scott, Georgette
<[e-mail]>; Johnson, Kelly <[e-mail]>; Newton, Rodney D LTC USARMY NG
NCARNG (US) <[e-mail]>; Caldwell, Kent Eric MAJ USARMY NG NCARNG (US)
<[e-mail]>; Burriola, William S II CW2 USARMY NG NCARNG (US) <[e-mail]>;
Harper, William W II MAJ USARMY NG NGB ARNG (US)<[e-mail]>; Garcia, Karla M CIV NG NGB
(US) <[e-mail]>; Meilinger, Derek T MAJ USARMY NG NCARNG (US)
<[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [Non-DoD Source] RE. National Guard Readiness Ceni.er Wilmington Express Review
Cameron,
Thank you very much! We appreciate every effort to move up the review date.
Normally we would not request this but we are receiving FY13 funds ($15M) for the construction of a new National
Guard Readiness Center to be constructed on the same land as the current which was damaged by Act of Nature
(Hurricane Irene 2011). Due to this being FY13 funds, they must be awarded by 30SEP2017 or they expire and the
project will not happen. The timeline we are up against is the EN reviews must be completed and the 30 day period also
completed priorto 17 AUG 2017 in order not to delay the already stringent timeline. This new NCNG Readiness Center
will additionally be an economic asset to the Wilmington area. Again, we certainly appreciate any effort to get this
review completed as soon as possible.
Thank you,
Cale D. Moody, PLS
LTC, EN
Fulltime: CFMO Deputy/Business Manager
Office: [phone]
M-Day: CDR, 105th EN BN (RHINO 6)
Office: [phone]
Mobile: [phone]
[e-mail]

-----Original Message -----
From: Weaver, Cameron [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Friday, July 07, 2017 11:58 AM
To: Moody, Cale D LTC USARMY NG NCARNG (US) <[e-mail]>
Cc: Dudick, Vickie A NFG NG NCARNG (US) <[e-mail]>; Scott, Georgette
<[e-mail]>; Johnson, Kelly <[e-mail]>
Subject: FW: [Non-DoD Source] RE: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington Express Review
All active links contained in this email were disabled. Please verify the identity of the sender, and confirm the
authenticity of all links contained within the message prior to copying and pasting the address to a Web browser.
Hi LTC Moody:
After hearing third -hand about your situation, I wanted to reach out to you directly. We make every effort to
accommodate client schedules, but reviews are scheduled based on when the complete requests are received in our
system and are spaced to allow the individual attention that is needed to expedite the Express Permit application
reviews. We have a very limited staff available to conduct Express Reviews. In this case, after conversing via emails with
Ms. Dudick, this review was already moved up once in our scheduling by more than a week by switching with the NGRC
project in Jacksonville.
I have now reached out to additional staff to see if they can accommodate your request, and I will let you know when
our office is able to review your project.
I will be in touch soon.
Cameron
Cameron Weaver
Environmental Assistance Coordinator -Wilmington Regional Office NCDEQ-Division of Environmental Assistance and
Customer Service
127 Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405
910-796-7303
NCDEQ NEW WEBSITE: Caution-http://deq.nc.gov/ DEACS NEW WEBSITE:
Ca ution-http://deq.nc.gov/a bout/divisions/envi ronmenta I -assistance -customer -
service
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties.
-----Original Message -----
From: Dudick, Vickie A NFG NG NCARNG (US) [Ca ution-mailto:vickie.a.dudick.nfg@mail. mill
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2017 4:28 PM
To: Weaver, Cameron <[e-mail]>

Cc: Scott, Georgette <[e-mail]>; Newton, Rodney D LTC USARMY NG NCARNG (US)
<[e-mail]>; Burriola, William S II
CW2 USARMY NG NCARNG (US) <[e-mail]>; Gollings, Jamie E. <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [Non-DoD Source] RE: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington Express Review
Cameron- Per our conversation this afternoon, the NCARNG would like to switch the Jacksonville express review with
Wilmington's review date. This puts Wilmington submittal meeting scheduled for 7/25 @ 11am at the Wilmington DEQ
office and Jacksonville scheduled for 8/2. Thank you for your consideration.
Vickie A. Dudick
Director of Environmental Management
North Carolina National Guard
1636 Gold Star Drive
Raleigh, NC 27607
984-664-6186
[e-mail].
-----Original Message -----
From: Weaver, Cameron [Caution-mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2017 9:38 AM
To: Dudick, Vickie A NFG NG NCARNG (US) <vickie.a.dudick.nfg@ mail. mil>
Cc: Scott, Georgette <[e-mail]>; Newton, Rodney D LTC USARMY NG NCARNG (US)
<[e-mail]>; Burriola, William S II
CW2 USARMY NG NCARNG (US) <[e-mail]>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] RE: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington Express Review
All active links contained in this email were disabled. Please verify the identity of the sender, and confirm the
authenticity of all links contained within the message prior to copying and pasting the address to a Web browser.
Hi Vickie.
You should be hearing from Jamie Gollings, your consultant of record on the request. This meeting has been scheduled
forAugust 2 at 11 AM here at the Wilmington DEQ offices.
Let me know of any issues.
Cameron

Cameron Weaver
Environmental Assistance Coordinator -Wilmington Regional Office
NCDEQ-Division of Environmental Assistance and Customer Service
127 Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405
910-796-7303
NCDEQ NEW WEBSITE: Caution-Caution-http://deq.nc.gov/
DEACS NEW WEBSITE:
Caution-Caution-http://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/environmental-assistance-c
ustomer-
service
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties.
-----Original Message -----
From: Dudick, Vickie A NFG NG NCARNG (US) [Caution-Caution-mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2017 8:33 AM
To: Weaver, Cameron <[e-mail]>
Cc: Scott, Georgette <[e-mail]>; Newton, Rodney D LTC USARMY NG NCARNG (US)
<rodney.d.newton. mil @mail.mil>; Burriola, William S II
CW2 USARMY NG NCARNG (US)<[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington Express Review
Cameron- Any update on the Express Review for the NCARNG permits? Is the
NCARNG on the schedule or do you need anything additional from us? Has
another Reviewer been assigned? Thank you for your prompt attention.
Vickie A. Dudick

Director of Environmental Management
North Carolina National Guard
1636 Gold Star Drive
Raleigh, NC 27607
984-664-6186
[e-mail] <
Caution-Caution-mailto:[e-mail] >
-----Original Message -----
From: Weaver, Cameron [Caution-Caution-mailto:[e-mail] < Caution-Caution-
mailto:[e-mail]> ]
Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 3:21 PM
To: Dudick, Vickie A NFG NG NCARNG (US) <[e-mail] < Caution-Caution-
mailto:[e-mail] >>
Cc: Scott, Georgette <[e-mail] < Caution-Caution-mailto:[e-mail] > >
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] RE: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington
Express Review
All active links contained in this email were disabled. Please verify the
identity of the sender, and confirm the authenticity of all links contained
within the message prior to copying and pasting the address to a Web
browser.
9

Hi Vickie.
The quickness of the review is directly proportional to the completeness of
the initial permit application packet that is brought to and discussed in
the submittal meeting. The review meeting is scheduled so that the reviewer
is able to put their attention on that particular project immediately, but
it is a balancing act between ongoing Express reviews in house already with
the reviewer and when the reviewer will be able to issue the permit from the
latest Express submittal. The 30 days covers the reasonable assumption that
two rounds of additional information will be needed from the applicant to
complete the review. The more complete the application, the faster the
overall turnaround for permit issuance.
I'll be in touch on Monday with a date that a reviewer will be able to meet
concerning the Express Review.
Let me know of any other issues.
Cameron
Cameron Weaver
Environmental Assistance Coordinator -Wilmington Regional Office
NCDEQ-Division of Environmental Assistance and Customer Service
127 Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405
910-796-7303
10

NCDEQ NEW WEBSITE: Caution-Caution-Caution-http://deq.nc.gov/
DEACS NEW WEBSITE:
Caution-Caution-Caution-http://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/environmental-assi
stance-c
ustomer-
service
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North
Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
-----Original Message -----
From: Dudick, Vickie A NFG NG NCARNG (US)
[Ca ution-Caution-Caution-mailto:vickie.a.dud [e-mail]
Sent: Thursday, June 1S, 2017 2:48 PM
To: Weaver, Cameron <[e-mail] < Caution-Caution-mailto:[e-mail] > >
Cc: Burriola, William S II CW2 USARMY NG NCARNG (US)
<[e-mail] <
Caution-Caution-mailto:[e-mail] > >
Subject: RE: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington Express Review
Cameron- Just want to clarify what you told us on the phone today- After the
DEQ office meeting and acceptance, 30 days is required for express
permitting? My understanding is the Express review for Erosion Control
averages 1.6 days and express review for Storm Water control averages 7.6
days. Please let us know if this has changed from the attached. Thank you.
Ca ution-Caution-Ca ution-http://deq.nc.gov/permits-regulations/express-permit
11

ting
-----Original Message -----
From: Dudick, Vickie A NFG NG NCARNG (US)
Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 1:25 PM
To: '[e-mail]'<[e-mail] < Caution-Caution-
mailto:[e-mail] > >
Cc: Burriola, William S II CW2 USARMY NG NCARNG (US)
<[e-mail] <
Caution-Caution-mailto:[e-mail] > >; Morris, Thomas S NFG NG NCARNG (US)
<[e-mail] <
Caution-Caution-mailto:[e-mail] > >; Newton, Rodney D LTC USARMY NG NCARNG (US)
<[e-mail] <
Caution-Caution-mailto:[e-mail]
Subject: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington
Cameron- Per our conversation today, the NCARNG requests another Reviewer to
expedite the National Guard Readiness Center Stormwater and Land Quality
Express Permit Review. This project is a Federal contract with fiscal year
2017 funds which must be executed prior to September 30, 2017. Solicitation
of bids can occur but the permits must be secured before the bids can be
opened. Please note my correct email below. Thank you for your
consideration.
Vickie A. Dudick
Director of Environmental Management
North Carolina National Guard
1636 Gold Star Drive
12

Raleigh, NC 27607
984-664-6186
[e-mail] <
Caution-Caution-mailto:[e-mail] >
NOTICE -This communication may contain confidential and privileged information that is for the sole use of the
intended recipient. Any viewing, copying or distribution of, or reliance on this message by unintended recipients is
strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message
and deleting it from your computer.
13

Johnson, Kelly
From: Johnson, Kelly
Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 20172:58 PM
To: 'Gollings, Jamie E.'
Cc: Weaver, Cameron; Rhonda Hall;'[e-mail]';
'[e-mail]'
Subject: RE: [Non-DoD Source] RE: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington Express Review
All,
Thanks for meeting today. Here is the list of initial items that are needed for the State Stormwater review:
1. Plan Sheets: Please submit two full-size plan sets of the following sheets:
a. Project Area with bearing/distance lines
b. Drainage areas for the two sand filters and forthe dry pond
c. 1981 map quantifying the impervious area in -place prior to 1988 (181,038sf)
d. CS300: Please add spot elevations/contours along the far edges of the pavement showing that the water
will drain into the system.
2. Signature Authority Letter: Please submit a copy of the letter showing that Mr. Newton can sign for the National
Guard for this permit.
3. Redevelopment: This is a redevelopment project that will treat impervious area in excess of the pre-1988 amount
per 15A NCAC 02H .1003(3)(d). Redevelopment projects have two requirements per 15A NCAC 02H .1002(41) and
GS143-214.7:
a. Requirement #1: Treat the net increase in impervious from pre-1988
i. Amount of Redevelopment: You will redevelop 181,038sf (and treat above that amount). Since the
total impervious for the site is 297,515sf you will have to treat at least (297,515sf-181,0385f=)
116,741sf of impervious area. You have two.sand filters which treat 63,162sf and 61,855sf
(total=125,017sf), and so you have met the .1003(3)(d) requirement.
ii. Numeric Summary: I have developed the following summary based on my review of the documents
which I would like to include in the permit text. If corrections are needed, please advise.
Redevelopment Summary
Impervious Area Treated:
123,017
Sand Filter #12:
63,162
Sand Filter #22:
61,855
Impervious Required to Treat':
(=297,515-181,03Rsf)
116,477
July X, 2017, Impervious Total:
297,515
Pre-1988 Impervious Remaining
180,774
New Impervious
116,741
Pre-1988 Impervious Total:
181,038
1per 15A NCAC 02H .1003(3)(d)
2Neither sand filter has "future" area available.
b. Requirement #2: Redevelopment projects must provide equal or greater treatment of stormwater than the
pre-1988 configuration. Please submit a short qualitative summary (that is backed up by the pre-1988 plans
where necessary) demonstrating that you have met this requirement.
4. Application Summary: While generating the redevelopment summary, I found two items in the application table
that may need to be corrected:

J
Dry Pond Drainage Area'
Sand
Filter #1
Sand
Filter #2
Not to Sand
Filter
Dry Pond
Total
Receiving Stream
UT to Smith Creek
Stream Class
C; SW
Stream Index Number
18-74-63
Total Drainage Area
67,082
84,936
127,647
279,665
Onsite Drainage Area
67,082
84,936
127,647
279,665
Offsite Drainage Area
0
0
0
0
Impervious Area Total
63,162
61,855
73,181
198,198
Onsite Buildings
35,719
0
0
35,719
Onsite Streets
0
0
12,069
12,069
Onsite Parking
27,443
61,855
-10,491
78,807
Onsite Sidewalks
0
0
1,457
1,457
Other Onsite
0
0
0
0
Future
0
0
54,450
54,450
Offsite Drainage Area
0
0
0
0
Existing BUA
0
0
15,696
r 15,696
'The dry pond treats water draining from two sand filters as well as additional
area.
Please check the number in yellow
"future" area cannot be treated solely in a dry pond because it is a secondary
SCM.
5. Sheets Removed: The following sheets have been removed from the submittal package: CS400, CS401, CS701,
CS702, CS704, CS705, CS706, CS707, CS708, CS709, L-110.
Thanks,
Kelly
From: Johnson, Kelly
Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 1:44 PM
To:'Gollings, Jamie E.' <[e-mail]>
Cc: Weaver, Cameron <[e-mail]>; Rhonda Hall <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [Non-DoD Source] RE: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington Express Review
Jamie,
I have cc'd Cameron and Rhonda (I suspect she maybe reviewing the E&SC). I can't speak for what E&SC will need. For
stormwater, you need a single copy of all original/signed documents, a single copy of any supporting documents such as
the soils report and calculations, and two full plan sets.
Kelly
From: Gollings, Jamie E. [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 1:37 PM

To: Johnson, Kelly <kelly.p.ichnson@nc,�,enr.go;.,
Subject: RE: [Non-DoD Source] RE: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington Express Review
Kelly,
As a followup to my voicemail,
• As of right now, our intent is to take the following approach and include with our documents: "Then,
demonstrate that permit modifications do not exceed that amount, and that they provide equal or better
treatment of impervious area. Or, the other way to do this is to compare pre-1988 with the proposed design on a
drainage -area basis without addressing the entire site."
• Can you verify how many copies of each document you will need for the submittal or refer me to the
appropriate weblink? Please keep in mind that it is both Stormwater and Erosion Control Express Review.
Thanks,
Jamie E. Gollings, PE I Civil Engineer
JACOBS f1 f
ary
jamie.aollings(Q-jacobs.com ! www.iacobs.com
From: Johnson, Kelly [mailto:kelly.r). [e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 12:20 PM
To: Gollings, Jamie E. <[e-mail]>
Cc: Weaver, Cameron <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [Non-DoD Source] RE: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington Express Review
Jamie,
I overlaid the county GIS with the plan you sent me this morning in the first diagram below. The current (2014) permit
covers the entire tract that the National Guard owns, as shown by the land inside the green line "below" Control Tower
Drive. (Just to clarify, I want to make sure that you understand that that whole project area will need to be re -permitted
in tomorrow's application. You probably already realize that, but I just want to make sure since I don't see the project
area on the plan from this morning.) I then overlaid the drainage area forthe infiltration basin that was permitted in
2014 in diagram 2 (it isn't a perfect overlay, but you get the idea.) From the file, it looks like the area that is covered
mainly by proposed sand filter #2 (the DA on the left in diagram 1) is constructed per the 2014 plans because the
infiltration basin is certified. It looks like you all plan to reconfigure that area, take out the infiltration basin, and use a
sand filter. The area that goes to sand filter #1 is being redeveloped from area that was not previously permitted to be
redeveloped. Diagram 3 is on file from the 2014 permit. It shows the impervious area that was in place in 1981. (State
Stormwater permitting began in 1988, and so the 2014 engineer submitted that to establish that he didn't have to treat
all of the impervious area on the tract.)
In 2014, the engineer showed that his drainage area contained impervious area that was in place well before 1988, but
since it drained to the infiltration basin he treated all of the impervious area in the basin. (As I am sure you know, that is
because all impervious in a drainage area has to be accounted for in order to ensure that it can all "fit" in the treatment
facility). There was a small section of impervious area, as shown in Diagram 4, that he could not collect (likely because
the driveway had to meet the crown of an existing road.) In retrospect, I probably should have quantified that amount
of impervious in the permit. But, I did not (probably because it was so small).
I have been trying to figure out the best way to document the redevelopment of this site, especially since they have
been (and may continue to) make regular changes to the permit. Per .1002(41) and GS143-214.7, redevelopment must
have impervious that is equal or less than the previous project and provide equal or better stormwater treatment. If the
footprint of impervious is being increased, then the project falls under .1003(3)(d) and it needs a high -density permit for
the net increase of impervious area. I have talked with other staff here to determine the best way to go about

this. There are at least two ways, but there may be others. The most complete method would be to quantify the
impervious area inside the entire project area using a pre-1988 map. Then, demonstrate that permit modifications do
not exceed that amount, and that they provide equal or better treatment of impervious area. Or, the other way to do
this is to compare pre-1988 with the proposed design on a drainage -area basis without addressing the entire site. We
will have to work this out tomorrow.
Thanks,
Kelly
Diagram 1
Ai
i
L
Diagram 2
4

Diagram 3

ximnj i%�eaaraasa
p9 i A*Pai Iaktn tom v L JI SS
rp
kL'
�c
id
Diagram 4
woo
Wyi
X.
07+
�I F►
_ .
-----Original Message -----
From: Gollings, Jamie E. fmailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 9:40 AM
To: Johnson, Kelly <[e-mail]>
6

Cc: Weaver, Cameron <c._r: rc��.weaverL•'nci£nl.;^v>
Subject: RE: [Non-DoD Source] RE: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington Express Review
Kelly,
Please call me when you have a moment. In the mean time, the attached shows existing vs. proposed impervious
impacts. I don't believe that the existing permit involved any existing impervious impacts.
Yes, the sand filters will be designed to the 2017 manual.
Jamie E. Gollings, PE I Civil Engineer
JACOBS
Office: 111 Corning Road, Suite 200, Cary, NC 27518
Contact: Office: 919.859.5752
[e-mail] I www.jacobs.com
-----Original Message -----
From: Johnson, Kelly [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Friday, July 07, 2017 12:56 PM
To: Gollings, Jamie E. <[e-mail]>
Cc: Weaver, Cameron <[e-mail]>
Subject: FW: [Non-DoD Source] RE: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington Express Review
Jamie,
I am just trying to make sure I understand what is being proposed. Have you designed the new sand filter per the new
regulations (the 2017 rule)? Also, is this just a standard high density permit, or is there a redevelopment component,
too? (I just looked quickly at the current permit, and I didn't see any redevelopment but I wanted to verify that.)
Thanks,
Kelly
-----Original Message -----
From: Weaver, Cameron
Sent: Friday, July 07, 2017 12:26 PM
To: Moody, Cale D LTC USARMY NG NCARNG (US) <[e-mail]>
Cc: Dudick, Vickie A NFG NG NCARNG (US) <[e-mail]>; Scott, Georgette
<[e-mail]>; Johnson, Kelly <[e-mail]>; Newton, Rodney D LTC USARMY NG
NCARNG (US) <[e-mail]>; Caldwell, Kent Eric MAJ USARMY NG NCARNG (US)
<[e-mail]>; Burriola, William S II CW2 USARMY NG NCARNG (US) <william.s.burriola.mil @mail.mil>;
Harper, William W II MAJ USARMY NG NGB ARNG (US)<[e-mail]>; Garcia, Karla M CIV NG NGB
(US) <[e-mail]>; Meilinger, Derek T MAJ USARMY NG NCARNG (US)
<derek.t.meilinger.mil@mail. mil>
Subject: RE: [Non-DoD Source] RE: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington Express Review
Thanks to Kelly (and I know I owe you!), I have been able to schedule this review as was requested for Tuesday 7/11, at
10am.
We look forward to seeing the engineer and owner representative here for this meeting. Let me know of any
outstanding issues.
Cameron

Cameron Weaver
Environmental Assistance Coordinator -Wilmington Regional Office NCDEQ-Division of Environmental Assistance and
Customer Service
127 Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405
910-796-7303
NCDEQ NEW WEBSITE: http://deq.nc.gov/
DEACS NEW WEBSITE: http://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/environmental-assistance-customer-service
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties.
-----Original Message -----
From: Moody, Cale D LTC USARMY NG NCARNG (US) [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Friday, July 07, 2017 12:15 PM
To: Weaver, Cameron <[e-mail]>
Cc: Dudick, Vickie A NFG NG NCARNG (US) <[e-mail]>; Scott, Georgette
<[e-mail]>; Johnson, Kelly <[e-mail]>; Newton, Rodney D LTC USARMY NG
NCARNG (US) <[e-mail]>; Caldwell, Kent Eric MAJ USARMY NG NCARNG (US)
<[e-mail]>; Burriola, William S II CW2 USARMY NG NCARNG (US) <[e-mail]>;
Harper, William W II MAJ USARMY NG NGB ARNG (US) <[e-mail]>; Garcia, Karla M CIV NG NGB
(US) <[e-mail]>; Meilinger, Derek MAJ USARMY NG NCARNG (US)
<[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [Non-DoD Source] RE: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington Express Review
Cameron,
Thank you very much! We appreciate every effort to move up the review date.
Normally we would not request this but we are receiving FY13 funds ($15M) for the construction of a new National
Guard Readiness Center to be constructed on the same land as the current which was damaged by Act of Nature
(Hurricane Irene 2011). Due to this being FY13 funds, they must be awarded by 30SEP2017 or they expire and the
project will not happen. The timeline we are up against is the EN reviews must be completed and the 30 day period also
completed prior to 17 AUG 2017 in order not to delay the already stringent timeline. This new NCNG Readiness Center
will additionally be an economic asset to the Wilmington area. Again, we certainly appreciate any effort to get this
review completed as soon as possible.
Thank you,
Cale D. Moody, PLS
LTC, EN
Fulltime: CFMO Deputy/Business Manager
Office: [phone]
M-Day: CDR, 105th EN BN (RHINO 6)
Office: [phone]
Mobile: [phone]
[e-mail]

-----Original Message -----
From: Weaver, Cameron [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Friday, July 07, 2017 11:58 AM
To: Moody, Cale D LTC USARMY NG NCARNG (US) <[e-mail]>
Cc: Dudick, Vickie A NFG NG NCARNG (US) <[e-mail]>; Scott, Georgette
<[e-mail]>; Johnson, Kelly <[e-mail]>
Subject: FW: [Non-DoD Source] RE: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington Express Review
All active links contained in this email were disabled. Please verify the identity of the sender, and confirm the
authenticity of all links contained within the message prior to copying and pasting the address to a Web browser.
Hi LTC Moody:
After hearing third -hand about your situation, I wanted to reach out to you directly. We make every effort to
accommodate client schedules, but reviews are scheduled based on when the complete requests are received in our
system and are spaced to allow the individual attention that is needed to expedite the Express Permit application
reviews. We have a very limited staff available to conduct Express Reviews. In this case, after conversing via emails with
Ms. Dudick, this review was already moved up once in our scheduling by more than a week by switching with the NGRC
project in Jacksonville.
I have now reached out to additional staff to see if they can accommodate your request, and I will let you know when
our office is able to review your project.
I will be in touch soon.
Cameron
Cameron Weaver
Environmental Assistance Coordinator -Wilmington Regional Office NCDEQ-Division of Environmental Assistance and
Customer Service
127 Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405
910-796-7303
NCDEQ NEW WEBSITE: Caution-http://deq.nc.gov/ DEACS NEW WEBSITE:
Caution-http://deq. nc.gov/about/divisions/environmental-assistance-customer-
service
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties.
-----Original Message -----
From: Dudick, Vickie A NFG NG NCARNG (US) [Caution-mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2017 4:28 PM
To: Weaver, Cameron <[e-mail]>

Cc: Scott, Georgette <[e-mail]>; Newton, Rodney D LTC USARMY NG NCARNG (US)
<[e-mail]>; Burriola, William S II
CW2 USARMY NG NCARNG (US) <william.s.burriola.mil@mail. mil>; Gollings, Jamie E. <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [Non-DoD Source] RE: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington Express Review
Cameron- Per our conversation this afternoon, the NCARNG would like to switch the Jacksonville express review with
Wilmington's review date. This puts Wilmington submittal meeting scheduled for 7/25 @ 11am at the Wilmington DEQ
office and Jacksonville scheduled for 8/2. Thank you for your consideration.
Vickie A. Dudick
Director of Environmental Management
North Carolina National Guard
1636 Gold Star Drive
Raleigh, NC 27607
984-664-6186
[e-mail]
-----Original Message -----
From: Weaver, Cameron [Caution-mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2017 9:38 AM
To: Dudick, Vickie A NFG NG NCARNG (US) <vickie.a.dudick.nfg@ mail. mil>
Cc: Scott, Georgette <[e-mail]>; Newton, Rodney D LTC USARMY NG NCARNG (US)
<[e-mail]>; Burriola, William S II
CW2 USARMY NG NCARNG (US) <[e-mail]>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] RE: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington Express Review
All active links contained in this email were disabled. Please verify the identity of the sender, and confirm the
authenticity of all links contained within the message prior to copying and pasting the address to a Web browser.
Hi Vickie.
You should be hearing from Jamie Gollings, your consultant of record on the request. This meeting has been scheduled
forAugust 2 at 11 AM here at the Wilmington DEQ offices.
Let me know of any issues.
Cameron
10

Cameron Weaver
Environmental Assistance Coordinator -Wilmington Regional Office
NCDEQ-Division of Environmental Assistance and Customer Service
127 Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405
910-796-7303
NCDEQ NEW WEBSITE: Caution-Caution-http://de.q.nc.gov/
DEACS NEW WEBSITE:
Caution-Caution-http://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/environmental-assistance-c
ustomer-
service
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties.
-----Original Message -----
From: Dudick, Vickie A NFG NG NCARNG (US) [Caution-Caution-mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2017 8:33 AM
To: Weaver, Cameron <[e-mail]>
Cc: Scott, Georgette <[e-mail]>; Newton, Rodney D LTC USARMY NG NCARNG (US)
<[e-mail]>; Burriola, William S II
CW2 USARMY NG NCARNG (US) <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington Express Review
Cameron- Any update on the Express Review for the NCARNG permits? Is the
NCARNG on the schedule or do you need anything additional from us? Has
another Reviewer been assigned? Thank you for your prompt attention.
Vickie A. Dudick
11

Director of Environmental Management
North Carolina National Guard
1636 Gold Star Drive
Raleigh, NC 27607
984-664-6186
[e-mail] <
Caution-Caution-mailto:vickie.a.dudick.nfg@mail. miI >
-----Original Message -----
From: Weaver, Cameron [Caution-Caution-mailto:[e-mail] < Caution-Caution-
mailto:[e-mail] > ]
Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 3:21 PM
To: Dudick, Vickie A NFG NG NCARNG (US) <[e-mail] < Caution-Caution-
mailto:[e-mail] > >
Cc: Scott, Georgette <[e-mail] < Caution-Caution-mailto:[e-mail] > >
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] RE: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington
Express Review
All active links contained in this email were disabled. Please verify the
identity of the sender, and confirm the authenticity of all links contained
within the message prior to copying and pasting the address to a Web
browser.
12

Hi Vickie.
The quickness of the review is directly proportional to the completeness of
the initial permit application packet that is brought to and discussed in
the submittal meeting. The review meeting is scheduled so that the reviewer
is able to put their attention on that particular project immediately, but
it is a balancing act between ongoing Express reviews in house already with
the reviewer and when the reviewer will be able to issue the permit from the
latest Express submittal. The 30 days covers the reasonable assumption that
two rounds of additional information will be needed from the applicant to
complete the review. The more complete the application, the faster the
overall turnaround for permit issuance.
I'll be in touch on Monday with a date that a reviewer will be able to meet
concerning the Express Review.
Let me know of any other issues.
Cameron
Cameron Weaver
Environmental Assistance Coordinator -Wilmington Regional Office
NCDEQ-Division of Environmental Assistance and Customer Service
127 Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405
910-796-7303
13

NCDEQ NEW WEBSITE: Caution-Caution-Caution-http://deq.nc.gov/
DEACS NEW WEBSITE:
Caution-Caution-Caution-http://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/environmental-assi
stance-c
ustomer-
service
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North
Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
-----Original Message -----
From: Dudick, Vickie A NFG NG NCARNG (US)
[Caution-Caution-Caution-mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 2:48 PM
To: Weaver, Cameron <[e-mail] < Caution-Caution-mailto:[e-mail] > >
Cc: Burriola, William S II CW2 USARMY NG NCARNG (US)
<[e-mail] <
Caution-Caution-mailto:[e-mail] > >
Subject: RE: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington Express Review
Cameron- Just want to clarify what you told us on the phone today- After the
DEQ office meeting and acceptance, 30 days is required for express
permitting? My understanding is the Express review for Erosion Control
averages 1.6 days and express review for Storm Water control averages 7.6
days. Please let us know if this has changed from the attached. Thank you.
Caution-Caution-Caution-http://deq.nc.gov/permits-regulations/express-permit
14

ting
-----Original Message -----
From: Dudick, Vickie A NFG NG NCARNG (US)
Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 1:25 PM
To: '[e-mail]'<[e-mail] < Caution-Caution-
mailto:[e-mail] > >
Cc: Burriola, William S II CW2 USARMY NG NCARNG (US)
<[e-mail] <
Caution-Caution-mailto:[e-mail] > >; Morris, Thomas S NFG NG NCARNG (US)
<[e-mail] <
Caution-Caution-mailto:[e-mail] > >; Newton, Rodney D LTC USARMY NG NCARNG (US)
<[e-mail] <
Caution-Caution-mailto:[e-mail]
Subject: National Guard Readiness Center Wilmington
Cameron- Per our conversation today, the NCARNG requests another Reviewer to
expedite the National Guard Readiness Center Stormwater and Land Quality
Express Permit Review. This project is a Federal contract with fiscal year
2017 funds which must be executed prior to September 30, 2017. Solicitation
of bids can occur but the permits must be secured before the bids can be
opened. Please note my correct email below. Thank you for your
consideration.
Vickie A. Dudick
Director of Environmental Management
North Carolina National Guard
1636 Gold Star Drive

Raleigh, NC 27607
984-664-6186
[e-mail] <
Caution-Caution-mailto:[e-mail] >
NOTICE - This communication may contain confidential and privileged information that is for the sole use of the
intended recipient. Any viewing, copying or distribution of, or reliance on this message by unintended recipients is
strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message
and deleting it from your computer.
_I r_
16