Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20110438 Ver 2_401 Application_2013011311- 043 8 U a- I I coEngineering A division of The John R. McAdams Company, Inc. LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL To: Ms. Karen HioQins / Mr. Eric Kulz NC Division of Water Quality Wetlands & Stormwater Branch 1650 Mad Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699 Re: Neuse Buffer Authorization - Modification Carolina Country Club - Irrigation Reservoir I am sending you the following item(s): Date: January 22, 2013 ** HAND DELIVER ** Job No.: CCC -09006 COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 1 CD with files of submittal 5 letters, agent authorization forms 5 PCN Forms, maps These are transmitted as checked below. ❑ As requested ❑ For your use rul r -- rn Copy to: Signed: Kevin Yates Senior Envir FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY ® Copy Letter of Transmittal Only to File ❑ Copy Entire Document to File 2905 Meridian Parkway, Durham, North Carolina 27713 PO Box 14005, RTP, North Carolina 27709 Consultant rr EcoEngineering A division of The John R. McAdams Company, Inc. LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL To: Ms. Karen Higgins / Mr. Eric Kulz NC Division of Water Quality Wetlands & Stormwater Branch 1650 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699 Re: Neuse Buffer Authorization - Modification Carolina Country Club - Irrigation Reservoir I am sending you the following item(s): Date: January 22, 2013 ** HAND DELIVER ** Job No.: CCC -09006 COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 1 CD with files of submittal 5 letters, agent authorization forms 5 PCN Forms, maps These are transmitted as checked below: ❑ As requested ® For approval ® For review and comment Remarks: Copy to: ❑ For your use FI Signed: Kevin Yates Senior Envir FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY ® Copy Letter of Transmittal Only to File ❑ Copy Entire Document to File 2905 Meridian Parkway, Durham, North Carolina 27713 PO Box 14005, RTP, North Carolina 27709 Consultant Research Triangle Park, NC Post Office Box 14005 Reseach Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709 2905 Meridian Parkway Durham, North Carolina 27713 800. 733 -5646 919 - 287 -4262 919 -361 -2269 Fax www.ecoengr.com EcoEngineering A division of The John R. McAdams Company, Inc. January 18, 2013 Ms. Karen Higgins Mr. Eric Kulz DWQ 401 Coordinator NC DWQ - 401 Unit 512 North Salisbury Street (Archdale Building) Raleigh, NC 27604 Re: DWQ Project # 11 -0438 Neuse Buffer Authorization Modification Carolina Country Club — Irrigation Reservoir Raleigh, North Carolina Dear Ms. Higgin and Mr. Kulz: On behalf of the Carolina Country Club, we are applying for a modification of the Neuse Buffer Authorization Certification issued August 4, 2011 (DWQ Project # 11 -0438) due to unforeseen circumstances associated with construction of an irrigation reservoir and impacts to Zone 1 and Zone 2 of the Neuse Buffer. The proposed project is in the center of the golf course of the Carolina Country Club (CCC) located at 2500 Glenwood, within the Neuse River Basin of North Carolina. • Signed Agent Authorization • Original DWQ GC/Neuse Buffer Auth.(Project # 11 -0438) • Pre - Construction Notification • Fig.l - USGS Quad —Raleigh West • Fig.2- Wake County Soil Survey • Fig.3- Existing Conditions • Fig.4- Existing Conditions /w.Aerial (Reference Original Application) • Fig.5- Overall Impact w. Inset 1 • Fig.6- Overall Impact w. Aerial • Fig.7- Buffer Mitigation Map • Picture Exhibit • USACE Upland Data Form WETLAND /STREAM MAPPING: There is approximately 1,480 linear feet of Beaverdam Creek (Perennial Stream "A ") and 58 linear feet of Intermittent Stream `B" within the project area. Stream forms for Streams A & B enclosed. There is a total of 3,531 linear feet of Beaver Dam with the property boundary of CCC. Both Beaverdam Creek and Stream `B" are depicted on the USGS quad and /or Wake County Soils Survey (Figure 1 & 2), therefore both stream features are subject to the Neuse River Buffer Rules. There are no jurisdictional wetlands Ms. Karen Higgins /Mr. Eric Kulz CCC Irrigation Reservoir January 22, 2012 Page 2 of 7 within the project area. The land in and around the project area has been altered over the years to meet the needs of the golf course and surrounding properties, that includes Beaverdam Creek and Stream B. Per our on -site visit with Mr. Ian McMillan of NCDWQ, on April 21, 2011, he confirmed that intermittent Stream Feature B, currently begins just south of the maintenance building and really only captures run -off from the maintenance building, parking lot, and small forested area to the west of the maintenance building. It is mostly a rip -rap lined channel, before it enters into a 90 -foot corrugated plastic pipe, which then empties into Beaverdam Creek (See Picture Exhibit, Pies 1 -9 /Stream Forms for Streams A & B). Although there is quite a bit of bedrock, the banks of Beaverdam Creek are lined with rip -rap throughout the project area, and have historically eroded in most areas. There are Special Flood Hazard Areas (SFHAs, or 100 -year floodplain and floodway) located on property owned by Carolina Country Club as depicted on FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) Panel 372017 0500J, effective May 2, 2006. Special Flood Hazard Areas in this case are composed of both floodway and floodway fringe areas. The proposed project contains Beaverdam Creek and an unnamed tributary, which drain to Crabtree Creek, and into the Neuse River (HUC 03020201). PROJECT LOCATION/HABITAT: Carolina Country Club (CCC) is located at 2500 Glenwood Avenue, within the beltline in the center of suburban Raleigh. CCC consists of an 18 -hole golf course, tennis courts, pool, clubhouse, parking lot, and various maintenance buildings that encompasses approximately 171 acres. Beaverdam Creek bisects the property in a northeast direction and has a length of approximately 3,500 feet within the golf course property. An aesthetic pond is located along the eastern edge of the golf course and is adjacent to Beaverdam Creek. The CCC property is bound by Glenwood Avenue to the south and Granville Road to the north. The proposed project area is located in the central portion of the golf course, adjacent to the maintenance facilities (Figure 1- 3,5,6).. There is a City of Raleigh sewer line running through the proposed project area, which consist of mainly fescue and sedges, with a sparsely forested thicket area made up of mostly red maple, sweet gum, loblolly pine, and tulip poplar, with a pasture of sedges and fescue grasses. There are few mature Sycamores and Tulip poplars adjacent to Beaverdam Creek and within the vicinity of the proposed intake structure, there is manicured Bermuda grass adjacent to the fairway, with a few River Birch trees adjacent to Beaverdam Creek. Land use within the vicinity of the project is high -end single - family residential, light commercial, and office. Glenwood Avenue (Hwy. 70) is a major artery through the city of Raleigh, which is adjacent to the property boundary. CCC -09000 Ms. Karen Higgins /Mr. Eric Kulz CCC Irrigation Reservoir January 22, 2012 Page 3 of 7 BACKGROUND / ADDITIONAL BUFFER IMPACTS: In May 2008 Carolina Country Club retained EcoEngineering to evaluate potential options that would provide the Carolina Country Club (CCC) with a long term solution to its water usage needs. The primary goals of this study were to identify feasible alternative water sources for irrigation and also plan for increased future water supply needs. During this study a water budget for the course was completed, future water needs were documented and summarized, the potential for stormwater harvesting at several locations was evaluated, and an initial estimate of wetland and stream permitting requirements was conducted. Based on the information provided by CCC, the golf course is currently the second largest user of the City of Raleigh water supply, using between 200,000 to 300,000 gallons of water per day, annually. Based on current and projected future irrigation needs for Carolina Country Club (CCC), an alternate source of irrigation water will be required for the property. Several options have been explored with Carolina Country Club by EcoEngineering, including new reservoirs in several locations across the project site, above- ground and below - ground cistern systems, wells, and use of the existing pond dammed on the east side of Beaverdam Creek. Based on these findings, the most viable alternative was to withdraw water from Beaverdam Creek, and store it in an adjacent reservoir to be utilized for irrigation. This design is for an above - ground, offline reservoir located on the west side of Beaverdam Creek in the vicinity of the existing maintenance building for the golf course. The most effective design for an offline reservoir is to locate it adjacent to Beaverdam Creek at or close to the same elevation of normal flows within the creek. The most practical location and only option to construct a reservoir is in the proposed location within the 13 -acre semi - wooded area just south of the maintenance facility in the center of the golf course (Figures 5, 6, & 7). Due to the design criteria of capturing only gravity fed, storm flows, there are proposed stream and Neuse Buffer impacts associated with the proposed project. A detailed alternatives analysis was included within the original application. • An on -site meeting with Mr. Ian McMillan was conducted on 04/21/2010, to discuss the proposed project and make aNeuse Buffer determination, on the historically altered "Stream B ", however there was not a formal Neuse Buffer determination letter issued. • There was also an in office pre- application meeting held on August 2, 2010, with NCDWQ representatives Ian McMillan and Amy Chapman to discuss the project as currently proposed. CCC -09000 Ms. Karen Higgins /Mr. Eric Kulz CCC Irrigation Reservoir January 22, 2012 Page 4 of 7 • The Corps was invited to our pre - application meetings, however, in discussing the proposed project with Mr. Jamie Shern, Wake County Corps representative, on April 8, 2010, he was comfortable with the project as proposed and has deferred to NCDWQ for on -site stream jurisdiction and the best professional judgement of EcoEngineering staff for stream and /or wetland confirmation. DWQ Permit Approved The DWQ General Certification (GC 3821) and Neuse River Buffer Authorization was issued August 4, 2011 (DWQ Project # I1 -0438) for 96 linear feet of perennial stream impact (30 linear feet of permanent impact and 66 linear feet of temporary impact), and 58 linear feet of intermittent stream impact. 8,573 square feet of Zone 1 and 20,623 square feet of Zone 2 of the Neuse River Buffer was also permitted in association with the project. Corps Permit Although there was multiple pre - application discussions with Mr. Jamie Shern of the USACE, more than 45 days elapsed since the original submittal of the USACE (Corps) Nationwide Permit 18 (NWP 18) and Nationwide Permit 39 (NWP 39) Permit Application for proposed impacts associated with CCC's Water Harvesting Pond. According to CFR (Vol 72/No.47) NWP General Condtion 27(a)(2) the "CCC Water Harvesting Pond" PCN application went STATUTORY, automatically authorized under NWP 18 and NWP 39 as proposed in the PCN. Stormwater Pipe Re- Alignment Upon commencement of construction, several issues arose which prohibit installation of a portion of the stormwater conveyance pipe, as previously proposed, which has resulted in additional impacts proposed to Zones 1 and 2 of the Neuse Buffer, adjacent to Beaverdam Creek. Mr. Jim Halley discussed these issues in a telephone conversation with Ms. Karen Higgins, and Mr. Eric Kulz on December 20, 2012. A portion of the stormwater conveyance pipe, which runs from the intake at Beaverdam Creek and parallel to Beaverdam Creek, discharging to the irrigation reservoir, must be re- aligned for the following reasons. Upon commencement of construction a sewer manhole was discovered in the alignment of the stormwater pipe which was previously thought to be abandoned due its locked and degraded condition. The City of Raleigh would CCC -09000 Ms. Karen Higgins /Mr. Eric Kulz CCC Irrigation Reservoir January 22, 2012 Page 5 of 7 not allow for additional crossing of the sanitary sewer at less than 45 degrees with the previous storm pipe alignment. An alternative alignment to take the storm pipe on the north side of the sewer easement and directed to the irrigation pond was deemed unfeasible due to shallow bedrock at almost every drill boring location on the north side of the existing sewer easement. Hence, these constraints required the stormwater pipe to be re- routed parallel to the sewer easement from the intake structure at Beaverdam Creek to a location approximately 70 feet east of the cart path and back to junction box # 5, impacting 3,071 square feet of zone 1 and 1,322 square feet of zone 2 within the Neuse Buffer. However the additional buffer impacts are located within an existing grassed fairway of the golf course, which is void of forested vegetation (See Pics I & 2, enclosed). This additional impact area will be restored upon completion of construction. According to the Neuse River Riparian Buffer Rules — Table of Uses, due to the non - perpendicular crossing of the stormwater pipe in Zone 1, its use is deemed "Allowable with Mitigation" and the non - perpendicular crossing in Zone 2 is deemed "Allowable ". TOTAL ADDITIONAL NEUSE BUFFER IMPACTS: Buffer Impact Location Type o Impact yp f p Zone I Red Hatch Zone 2 Green Hatch Inset 1 Installation Impact Area "A" for intake 3,071 1,322 Permanent structure /pipe TOTAL 3,071 1,322 * The buffer within the area of additional buffer impacts are located within an existing grassed fairway of the golf course, which is void of forested vegetation. RIPARIAN BUFFER MITIGATION: There are additional proposed buffer impacts of 3,071 square feet of zone 1 and 1,322 square feet of zone 2 within the Neuse Buffer, associated with the stormwater pipe re- alignment. According to the Neuse River Riparian Buffer Rules — Table of Uses, due to the non - perpendicular crossing of the stormwater pipe in Zone 1, its use is deemed "Allowable with Mitigation" and the non - perpendicular crossing in CCC -09000 Ms. Karen Higgins /Mr. Eric Kulz CCC Irrigation Reservoir January 22, 2012 Page 6 of 7 Zone 2 is deemed "Allowable ". Mitigation will be required at a 3:1 ratio totaling 9,213 square feet of buffer mitigation credits to offset the 3,071 square feet of Zone 1 impacts. The required buffer mitigation totals 9,213 square feet and we are providing 9,350 square feet of buffer mitigation credits. We have chosen to re- vegetate an area along Beaverdam Creek within the Country Club's property which is mostly void of vegetation aside from one row of river birch trees and a few invasive species. See Area 2 of the "Neuse Buffer Restoration Plan" and "Figure 7: Stream Buffer Restoration Map" for location. The area proposed for buffer restoration is located approximately 20 feet south and upstream from the irrigation reservoir's outfall structure, and is just downstream from "Buffer Restoration Area- I", which is the area to be planted to offset buffer impacts associated with original permit. Buffer Restoration Area -2, similar to # 1, has been cleared and maintained for at least 20 years. There is a picture and plan view of the proposed buffer restoration area in the Revised Figure 7. There is a stand of Chinese Privet and Honeysuckle that will be removed within this area, and the area will be planted with at least 2 native hardwood species and at a density sufficient to provide 320 trees per acre at maturity. Enclosed is a detailed buffer restoration planting plan, maps, and monitoring plan for the proposed area. The proposed buffer restoration area will be protected with a Declaration of Restrictions to be recorded with Wake County. Enclosed is an example of the Declaration of Restrictions to be conveyed. This area will also be staked off and "Do Not Mow" signs will be placed around the perimeter of this area. AVOIDANCE and MINIMIZATION: The City of Raleigh would not allow for additional crossing of the sanitary sewer at less than 45 degrees with the previous storm pipe alignment. An alternative alignment to take the storm pipe on the north side of the sewer easement and directed to the irrigation pond was deemed unfeasible due to shallow bedrock at almost every drill boring location on the north side of the existing sewer easement. The riparian buffer impacts have been minimized to the least amount necessary to install and maintain the stormwater pipe. The additional buffer impacts are located within an existing grassed fairway of the golf course, which is void of forested vegetation, which minimizes impacts to more robust riparian buffer areas. CCC -09000 Ms. Karen Higgins /Mr. Eric Kulz CCC Irrigation Reservoir January 22, 2012 Page 7 of 7 DIFFUSE FLOW: There is no new impervious surface associated with the proposed project and only one point of discharge, which is the outlet from the proposed pond back into Beaver Dam Creek. All overland flow will be captured into the pond before discharge and directed into the outlet during storm events that are above normal pool. There was also an in office pre- application meeting held on August 2, 2010, with NCDWQ representatives Mr. Ian McMillan and Ms. Amy Chapman to discuss the project as currently proposed and diffuse flow measures. Since the pond is not a stormwater treatment device, Ms. Amy Chapman recommended discharging the flow from the outlet right through a velocity dissipater directly into Beaverdam Creek, as depicted on the construction drawings and impact maps. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT: The proposed development is located within the Neuse River basin and will be subject to the stormwater management requirements set forth in Section 10, Chapter 9 of the City of Raleigh regulations. Per City of Raleigh regulations, stormwater management on this site shall address two primary issues: (1) peak discharge rates and (2) water quality management. However there is no new impervious surface associated with the project, therefore no stormwater management plan is required. Consideration of this project is greatly appreciated. If you should have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me at (919) 287 -4262. Sincerely, EcoEngineering A division of The John R. McAdams Company, Inc. Kevin Yates Senior Environmental Consultant .Project Manager Enclosures CCC -09000 \0F W A7R�G IMMEMEMEMEMOM I 1 Office Use Only: Corps action ID no. DWQ project no. Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008 Page 1 of 16 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Form A. Applicant Information 1. Processing 1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit 1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: or General Permit (GP) number: 1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? as ❑ No 1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply): 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit 401 Water Quality Certification — Express X Riparian Buffer Authorization 1 e. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401 Certification: ❑ Yes X No For the record ❑ Yes only for Corps Permit: X No 1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program. ❑ Yes X No 1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h below. ❑ Yes X No 1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑Yes X No 2. Project Information 2a. Name of project: Carolina Country Club 2b. County: Wake 2c. Nearest municipality / town: Raleigh 2d. Subdivision name: 2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no: 3. Owner Information 3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: Carolina Country Club 3b. Deed Book and Page No. Deed Book: 11905 /Page No. 0433 3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if applicable): Bob Wright 3d. Street address: 3e. City, state, zip: Raleigh, NC 27607 3f. Telephone no.: 919 - 865 -1900 3g. Fax no.: 919 - 865 -1901 3h. Email address: Page 1 of 16 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version C. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ), continued 4. Applicant Information (if different from owner) 4a. Applicant is: Agent Other, specify: 4b. Name: Property Identification 4c. Business name (if applicable): 1a. 4d. Street address: PIN # 1705142018 4e. City, state, zip: Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): 4f. Telephone no.: 1 c. 4g. Fax no.: 171.74 acres 4h. Email address: Surface Waters 5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable) 5a. Name: Kevin Yates 5b. Business name (if applicable): EcoEngineering, A division of The John R. McAdams Company 5c. Street address: 2905 Meridian Parkway 5d. City, state, zip: Durham, NC, 27713 5e. Telephone no.: 919 - 287 -4262 5f. Fax no.: 919- 361 -2269 5g. Email address: yates@ecoengr.com B. Project Information and Prior Project History 1. Property Identification 1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): PIN # 1705142018 1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 35.821747 °N Longitude: - 78.657214 °W (DD.DDDDDD) (- DD.DDDDDD) 1 c. Property size: 171.74 acres 2. Surface Waters 2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to proposed project: Beaverdam Creek 2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: C; NSW 2c. River basin: Neuse River (03020201) C. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ), continued 3. Project Description 3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: Carolina Country Club (CCC) is located at 2500 Glenwood Avenue, within the beltline in the center of suburban Raleigh. CCC consists of an 18 -hole golf course, tennis courts, pool, clubhouse, parking lot, and various maintenance buildings that encompasses approximately 171 acres. Beaverdam Creek bisects the property in a northeast direction and has a length of approximately 3,500 feet within the golf course property. An aesthetic pond is located along the eastern edge of the golf course and is adjacent to Beaverdam Creek. The CCC property is bound by Glenwood Avenue to the south and Granville Road to the north. The proposed project area is located in the central portion of the golf course, adjacent to the maintenance facilities (Figure 1, 2, and 8).. There is approximately 1,480 linear feet of Beaverdam Creek (Perennial Stream "A) and 58 linear feet of Intermittent Stream "B" within the project area. Both Beaverdam Creek and Stream "B" are depicted on the USGS quad and /or Wake County Soils Survey (Figure 1 & 2), therefore both stream features are subject to the Neuse River Buffer Rules. There are no jurisdictional wetlands within the project area. The land in and around the project area has been altered over the years to meet the needs of the golf course and surrounding properties, that includes Beaverdam Creek and Stream B. Per our on -site visit with Mr. Ian McMillan of NCDWQ, on April 21, 2011, he confirmed that intermittent Stream Feature B, currently begins just south of the maintenance building and really only captures run -off from the maintenance building, parking lot, and small forested area to the west of the maintenance building. It is mostly a rip -rap lined channel, before it enters into a 90 -foot corrugated plastic pipe, which then empties into Beaverdam Creek (See Picture Exhibit, Pics 1 -9). Although there is quite a bit of bedrock, the banks of Beaverdam Creek are lined with rip -rap throughout the project area, and have historically eroded in most areas. There are Special Flood Hazard Areas (SFHAs, or 100 -year floodplain and floodway) located on property owned by Carolina Country Club as depicted on FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) Panel 372017 0500J, effective May 2, 2006. Special Flood Hazard Areas in this case are composed of both floodway and floodway fringe areas. There is a City of Raleigh sewer line running through the proposed project area, which consist of mainly fescue and sedges, with a sparsely forested thicket area made up of mostly red maple, sweet gum, loblolly pine, and tulip poplar, with a pasture of sedges and fescue grasses. There are few mature Sycamores and Tulip poplars adjacent to Beaverdam Creek and within the vicinity of the proposed intake structure, there is manicured Bermuda grass adjacent to the fairway, with a few River Birch trees adjacent to Beaverdam Creek. Land use within the vicinity of the project is high -end single - family residential, light commercial, and office. Glenwood Avenue (Hwy. 70) is a major artery through the city of Raleigh, which is adjacent to the property boundary. 3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: There are no jurisdictional wetlands within the current proposed project boundary. 3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: There is approximately 1,480 linear feet of Beaverdam Creek (Perennial Stream "A ") and 58 linear feet of Intermittent Stream "B" within the project area. Stream forms for Streams A & B enclosed. There is a total of 3,531 linear feet of Beaver Dam with the property boundary of CCC. 3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: The purpose of the proposed project is to provide an irrigation reservoir for the Carolina Country Club golf course. 3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: BACKGROUND / ADDITIONAL BUFFER IMPACTS: In May 2008 Carolina Country Club retained EcoEngineering to evaluate potential options that would provide the Carolina Country Club (CCC) with a long term solution to its water usage needs. The primary goals of this study were to identify feasible alternative water sources for irrigation and also plan for increased future water supply needs. During this study a water budget for the course was completed, future water needs were documented and summarized, the potential for stormwater harvesting at several locations was evaluated, and an initial estimate of wetland and stream permitting requirements was conducted. Based on the information provided by CCC, the golf course is currently the second largest user of the City of Raleigh water supply, using between 200,000 to 300,000 gallons of water per day, annually. Based on current and projected future irrigation needs for Carolina Country Club (CCC), an alternate source of irrigation water will be required for the property. Several options have been explored with Carolina Country Club by EcoEngineering, including new reservoirs in several locations across the project site, above - ground and below - ground cistern systems, wells, and use of the existing pond dammed on the east side of Beaverdam Creek. Based on these findings, the most viable alternative was to withdraw water from Beaverdam Creek, and store it in an adjacent reservoir to be utilized for irrigation. This design is for an above - ground, offline reservoir located on the west side of Beaverdam Creek in the vicinity of the existing maintenance building for the golf course. The most effective design for an offline reservoir is to locate it adjacent to Beaverdam Creek at or close to the same elevation of normal flows within the creek. The most practical location and only option to construct a reservoir is in the proposed location within the 13 -acre semi - wooded area just south of the maintenance facility in the center of the golf course (Figures 5, 6, & 7). Due to the design criteria of capturing only gravity fed, storm flows, there are proposed stream and Neuse Buffer impacts associated with the proposed project. A detailed alternatives analysis was included within the original application. • An on -site meeting with Mr. Ian McMillan was conducted on 04/21/2010, to discuss the proposed project and make a Neuse Buffer determination, on the historically altered "Stream B ", however there was not a formal Neuse Buffer determination letter issued. • There was also an in office pre - application meeting held on August 2, 2010, with NCDWQ representatives Ian McMillan and Amy Chapman to discuss the project as currently proposed. • The Corps was invited to our pre - application meetings, however, in discussing the proposed project with Mr. Jamie Sherri, Wake County Corps representative, on April 8, 2010, he was comfortable with the project as proposed and has deferred to NCDWQ for on -site stream jurisdiction and the best professional judgement of EcoEngineering staff for stream and /or wetland confirmation. DWO Permit Approved The DWQ General Certification (GC 3821) and Neuse River Buffer Authorization was issued August 4, 2011 (DWQ Project # 11 -0438) for 96 linear feet of perennial stream impact (30 linear feet of permanent impact and 66 linear feet of temporary impact), and 58 linear feet of intermittent stream impact. 8,573 square feet of Zone 1 and 20,623 square feet of Zone 2 of the Neuse River Buffer was also permitted in association with the project. Corps Permit Although there was multiple pre - application discussions with Mr. Jamie Shern of the USACE, more than 45 days elapsed since the original submittal of the USACE (Corps) Nationwide Permit 18 (NWP 18) and Nationwide Permit 39 (NWP 39) Permit Application for proposed impacts associated with CCC's Water Harvesting Pond. According to CFR (Vol 72/No.47) NWP General Condtion 27(a)(2) the "CCC Water Harvesting Pond" PCN application went STATUTORY, automatically authorized under NWP 18 and NWP 39 as proposed in the PCN. Stormwater Pipe Re- AlilInment Upon commencement of construction, several issues arose which prohibit installation of a portion of the stormwater conveyance pipe, as previously proposed, which has resulted in additional impacts proposed to Zones 1 and 2 of the Neuse Buffer, adjacent to Beaverdam Creek. Mr. Jim Halley discussed these issues in a telephone conversation with Ms. Karen Higgins, and Mr. Eric Kulz on December 20, 2012. A portion of the stormwater conveyance pipe, which runs from the intake at Beaverdam Creek and parallel to Beaverdam Creek, discharging to the irrigation reservoir, must be re- aligned for the following reasons. Upon commencement of construction a sewer manhole was discovered in the alignment of the stormwater pipe which was previously thought to be abandoned due its locked and degraded condition. The City of Raleigh would not allow for additional crossing of the sanitary sewer at less than 45 degrees with the previous storm pipe alignment. An alternative alignment to take the storm pipe on the north side of the sewer easement and directed to the irrigation pond was deemed unfeasible due to shallow bedrock at almost every drill boring location on the north side of the existing sewer easement. Hence, these constraints required the stormwater pipe to be re- routed parallel to the sewer easement from the intake structure at Beaverdam Creek to a location approximately 70 feet east of the cart path and back to junction box # 5, impacting 3,071 square feet of zone 1 and 1,322 square feet of zone 2 within the Neuse Buffer. However the additional buffer impacts are located within an existing grassed fairway of the golf course, which is void of forested vegetation (See Pics I & 2, enclosed). This additional impact area will be restored upon completion of construction. According to the Neuse River Riparian Buffer Rules — Table of Uses, due to the non - perpendicular crossing of the stormwater pipe in Zone 1, its use is deemed "Allowable with Mitigation" and the non - perpendicular crossing in Zone 2 is deemed "Allowable ". C. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ), continued 4. Jurisdictional Determinations 4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property / X Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown project (including all prior phases) in the past? Comments: NCDWQ Only 4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type Preliminary Final N/A of determination was made? 4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency /Consultant Company: EcoEngineering Name (if known): Kevin Yates / George Buchholz 4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation. • An on -site meeting with Mr. Ian McMillan was conducted on 04/21/2010, to discuss the proposed project and make a Neuse Buffer determination, on the historically altered "Stream B ", however there was not a formal Neuse Buffer determination letter issued. • There was also an in office pre - application meeting held on August 2, 2010, with NCDWQ representatives Ian McMillan and Amy Chapman to discuss the project as currently proposed. • The Corps was invited to our pre - application meetings, however, in discussing the proposed project with Mr. Jamie Shern, Wake County Corps representative, on April 8, 2010, he was comfortable with the project as proposed and has deferred to NCDWQ for on -site stream jurisdiction and the best professional judgement of EcoEngineering staff for stream and /or wetland confirmation. 5. Project History 5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for X Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown this project (including all prior phases) in the past? 5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions. DWQ Permit Approved The DWQ General Certification (GC 3821) and Neuse River Buffer Authorization was issued August 4, 2011 (DWQ Project # 11 -0438) for 96 linear feet of perennial stream impact (30 linear feet of permanent impact and 66 linear feet of temporary impact), and 58 linear feet of intermittent stream impact. 8,573 square feet of Zone 1 and 20,623 square feet of Zone 2 of the Neuse River Buffer was also permitted in association with the project. Corps Permit - Statutory Although there was multiple pre - application discussions with Mr. Jamie Shern of the USACE, more than 45 days elapsed since the original submittal of the USACE (Corps) Nationwide Permit 18 (NWP 18) and Nationwide Permit 39 (NWP 39) Permit Application for proposed impacts associated with CCC's Water Harvesting Pond. According to CFR (Vol 72/No.47) NWP General Condtion 27(a)(2) the "CCC Water Harvesting Pond" PCN application went STATUTORY, automatically authorized under NWP 18 and NWP 39 as proposed in the PCN. 6. Future Project Plans 6a. Is this a phased project? X Yes No 6b. If yes, explain. There is a proposal to relocate the maintenance building, redesign the golf course, and add some indoor tennis courts within the country club property over the next five years. However, the proposed irrigation reservoir is an immediate need in irrigating the current golf course and is being treated as an independent project at this point. C. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ), continued C. Proposed Impacts Inventory 1. Impacts Summary 1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply): ❑ Wetlands Streams - tributaries X Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction 2. Wetland Impacts If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted. 2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f. Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction number - Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ - non -404, other) (acres) Temporary T W1 ❑ P X T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps [-]No ❑ DWQ W2 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ W3 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑No ❑ DWQ 2g. Total wetland impacts 2h. Comments: None with currently proposed project. 3. Stream Impacts If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this question for all stream sites impacted. 3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g. Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact number - (PER) or (Corps - 404, 10 stream length Permanent (P) or intermittent DWQ - non -404, width (linear Temporary (T) (INT)? other) (feet) feet) ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ 3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 3i. Comments: C. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ), continued 4. Open Water Impacts (N /A) If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of the U.S. then indiv dually list all open water impacts below. 4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e. Open water Name of waterbody impact number — (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres) Permanent (P) or Temporary T 01 ❑P ❑T 02 ❑P ❑T 4f. Total open water impacts 4g. Comments: S. Pond or Lake Construction (N /A) If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below. 5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e. Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland Pond ID Proposed use or purpose of (acres) number pond Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded P1 P2 5f. Total 5g. Comments: 5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no: 5i. Expected pond surface area (acres): 5j. Size of pond watershed (acres): 5k. Method of construction: 6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ) If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form. 6a. X Neuse ❑Tar- Pamlico El Other Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman 6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g. Buffer impact number — Reason for Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact Permanent (P) impact Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet) or Temporary T required? Inset 1 Installation Impact Area for intake Beaverdam Creek Yes 3,071 1,322 Permanent structure /pipe 6h. Total buffer impacts 3,071 1,322 6i. Comments: * The buffer within the area of additional buffer impacts are located within an existing grassed fairway of the golf course, which is void of forested vegetation. Zone 1 impacts will require mitigation. C. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ), continued D. Impact Justification and Mitigation 1. Avoidance and Minimization 1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project. The City of Raleigh would not allow for additional crossing of the sanitary sewer at less than 45 degrees with the previous storm pipe alignment. An alternative alignment to take the storm pipe on the north side of the sewer easement and directed to the irrigation pond was deemed unfeasible due to shallow bedrock at almost every drill boring location on the north side of the existing sewer easement. The riparian buffer impacts have been minimized to the least amount necessary to install and maintain the stormwater pipe. The additional buffer impacts are located within an existing grassed fairway of the golf course, which is void of forested vegetation, which minimizes impacts to more robust riparian buffer areas. 1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques. - The temporary construction corridors required for the project within the Neuse River Buffer will fall mainly within currently cleared areas of the property, minimizing temporary impacts from construction. All in- stream structures and /or disturbance will be carried out from high - ground, during dry conditions to minimize sedimentation. - Proper sedimentation and erosion control methods will be utilized during all phases of construction and installation as described in the Erosion Control Plan sheet reviewed and approved by the NC Division of Land Quality and City of Raleigh. All work will take place during dry conditions and can be facilitated from high, non - jurisdictional, stable ground adjacent to the Neuse Buffer. The contractor shall install silt fence, inlet protection, sediment traps, diversion ditches, tree protection, clearing only as necessary to install these devices. All erosion and sediment control measures will be checked for stability and operation following every runoff producing rainfall , but in no case less than once every week. Any needed repairs will be made immediately to maintain all measures designed. An erosion control inspections report is required and will be kept by the owner's representative. 2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State 2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for ❑ Yes X No impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? 2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ❑ DWQ ❑ Corps ❑ Mitigation bank 2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this El Payment to in -lieu fee program project? X Permittee Responsible Mitigation 3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank 3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: 3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity C. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ), continued 3c. Comments: 4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program 4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached. ❑ Yes 4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet 4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold 4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet 4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres 4f. Non- riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres 4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres 4h. Comments: 5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan 5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan. C. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ), continued 6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ 6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires X Yes No buffer mitigation? 6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the amount of mitigation required. 6c. 6d. 6e. Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation (square feet) (square feet) Zone 1 Installation for intake structure /pipe 3,071 3 (2 for Catawba) 9,213 Zone 2 1.5 6f. Total buffer mitigation required: 6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank, permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund). The required buffer mitigation totals 9,213 square feet and we are providing 9,350 square feet of buffer mitigation credits. We have chosen to re- vegetate an area along Beaverdam Creek within the Country Club's property which is mostly void of vegetation aside from one row of river birch trees and a few invasive species. See Area 2 of the "Neuse Buffer Restoration Plan" and "Figure 7: Stream Buffer Restoration Map" for location. The area proposed for buffer restoration is located approximately 20 feet south and upstream from the irrigation reservoir's outfall structure, and is just downstream from "Buffer Restoration Area- 1", which is the area to be planted to offset buffer impacts associated with original permit. Buffer Restoration Area -2, similar to 9 1, has been cleared and maintained for at least 20 years. There is a picture and plan view of the proposed buffer restoration area in the Revised Figure 7. There is a stand of Chinese Privet and Honeysuckle that will be removed within this area, and the area will be planted with at least 2 native hardwood species and at a density sufficient to provide 320 trees per acre at maturity. Enclosed is a detailed buffer restoration planting plan, maps, and monitoring plan for the proposed area, entitled "Neuse Buffer Restoration Plan ".. The proposed buffer restoration area will be protected with a Declaration of Restrictions to be recorded with Wake County. Enclosed is an example of the Declaration of Restrictions to be conveyed. This area will also be staked off and "Do Not Mow" signs will be placed around the perimeter of this area. 6h. Comments: C. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ), continued E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ) 1. Diffuse Flow Plan 1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified X Yes ❑ No within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules? 1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why. Comments: There is no new impervious surface associated with the proposed project and only one point of discharge, which is the outlet from the proposed pond back into Beaver Dam Creek. All overland flow will be captured into the pond before discharge and directed into the outlet during storm events that are above normal pool. There was also an in office pre- application meeting held on August 2, 2010, X Yes No with NCDWQ representatives Mr. Ian McMillan and Ms. Amy Chapman to discuss the project as currently proposed and diffuse flow measures. Since the pond is not a stormwater treatment device, Ms. Amy Chapman recommended discharging the flow from the outlet right through a velocity dissipater directly into Beaverdam Creek, as depicted on the construction drawings and impact maps. C. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ), continued 2. Stormwater Management Plan 2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? No new impervious 2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? Yes X No 2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: Comments: 2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan: The proposed development is located within the Neuse River basin and will be subject to the stormwater management requirements set forth in Section 10, Chapter 9 of the City of Raleigh regulations. Per City of Raleigh regulations, stormwater management on this site shall address two primary issues: (1) peak discharge rates and (2) water quality management. However there is no new impervious surface associated with the project, therefore no stormwater management plan is required. X Certified Local Government 2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? DWQ Stormwater Program DWQ 401 Unit 3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review 3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? City of Raleigh ❑ Phase II 3b. Which of the following locally - implemented stormwater management programs X NSW ❑ USMP apply (check all that apply): ❑ Water Supply Watershed ❑ Other: 3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been Yes No attached? 4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review ❑ Coastal counties ❑ HQW 4a. Which of the following state - implemented Stormwater management programs apply ❑ ORW (check all that apply): X Session Law 2006 -246 ❑ Other: 4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been attached? A copy of the plan has been submitted, but has not yet been approved ❑ Yes No by the City of Raleigh. 5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review 5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? X Yes ❑ No 5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? X Yes ❑ No F. Supplementary Information 1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement) 1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the Yes ® No use of public (federal /state) land? 1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ❑ Yes ® No (North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? 1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.) ❑ Yes ❑ No Comments: 2. Violations (DWQ Requirement) 2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑ Yes ® No or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)? 2b. Is this an after - the -fact permit application? ❑ Yes ® No 2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): 3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement) 3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in El Yes ® No additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? 3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description. The intended purpose of this project is for irrigation of an existing golf course. There are no plans for additional golf holes within the Carolina Country Club property, nor is there any land within or adjacent to expand the existing golf course. 4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement) 4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non- discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility. The existing sanitary sewer line running through the project will only be relocated so that it avoids the footprint of the proposed pond. There will be no new wastewater generated from the proposed project. Page 13 of 15 PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement) 5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ❑ Yes ® No habitat? 5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ❑ Yes ® No impacts? ❑ Raleigh 5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. ❑ Asheville 5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat? The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Serive web site ( http:// www. fws.gov /nc- es /es /countyfr.htmi) was accessed on April 18, 2011 to determine threatened and endangered species which may potential occur within Wake County. Based on field surveys coducted within the project area, it is believed threatened and endagered species and their habitat are not present. The North Carolina Natural Heritage Protection Virtual Workroom internet service (accessed April 18, 2011) does not lists any federally protected species within a 2 mile radius of the project area. 6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement) 6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑ Yes ® No 6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat? The North Carolina Natural Heritage Protection Virtual Workroom internet service (accessed April 18, 2011) does not lists any federally protected species within a 2 mile radius of the project area. The Clean Water Management Trust Fund we site (http: // 216. 237 .216.18 /cwmtfweb /default.aspx) was accessed on April 18, 2011 to determine whether the proposed project would impact Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) and it was determined that EFH is not present within the proposed project study area. 7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement) 7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ❑ Yes ® No status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in North Carolina history and archaeology)? 7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources? A review of the list of properties and districts in North Carolina entered in the National Register of Historic Places ( http: / /www.hpo.ncdcr.gov /nrlist.htm) for Wake County did not reveal any listing within the proposed project study area. It is believed the proposed project will not occur in or near an area that has been designated as having historic or cultural preservation status by the state, federal, or tribal governments. 8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement) 8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA- designated 100 -year floodplain? ® Yes ❑ No 8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: There is an approved (CLOMR) flood study which has approved impacts to the 100 -year floodplain. 8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? (FIRM) Panel 3720170500J Kevin Yates ` G I A 'LIZ i3 Date A licant/A ent' i nature Applicant/Agent's Printed Name u PIG 1. Facing Impact Area A— Beaverdam Creek — Intake Structure in center of photo. PxOaecr NO. ccc-09000 "': Pictures—Route SCME: N/A DATE: 05-01-2011 Carolina Country Club Proposed Irrigation Reservoir RALEIGH, NC r-9--officoEngineering 1!M A division of The John R. McAdams CompanY, 1w- RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC P.O. BOX 14005 ZIP 27700-4005 (919) 361-5000 PIC 2. Facing left bank of Beaverdom Creek® Intake Structure approximately located where current rip—rap is on for left of picture. PROJECT NO. CCC_090()() Pictures—Route Carolina Country Club SCALE: N/A Proposed Irrigation Reservoir DATE: 05-01-2011 RALEIGH, NC AftoEngineering A division ofTW John R. McAdams Company, Inc. RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, KC P.O. BOX 14005 ZIP 27709-4005 (919) 361-5000 fz� PIC 3. Facing north at approximate Tailwater Location of Proposed Pond. Standing in the current Sanitary Sower Easement. PROTECT NO. CC0 _09000 " Pictures—Route bl�: N/A DATE: 05-01-2011 Carolina Country Club Proposed Irrigation Reservoir RALEIGH, NC Aftengineering A division 0f11W Sohn R­ McAdam COMP&W, fac- RESEARCH TRIANGLE PAM NC P.O. BOX 14005 ZW 27709-4005 (919) 361-5000 tv PIC 4. Facing North, standing on left bank of Beaverdam Creek. Highly eroded, and denuded stream buffer section. PROJECT NO. CCC_09000 FILENAME: Pictures—Route SCAM: N/A DATE: 05-01-2011 Carolina Country Club Proposed Irrigation Reservoir RALEIGH, NC AftoEngineerinq A division 0f11eJ01M PL McAdRMCOMP-y-h- RESEARCH TRIANGLE PAM NC P.O. BOX 14005 ZIP 27709-4005 (919) 361-5000 PIC 5. Facing South toward proposed pond location, and standing in proposed pond berm location. Headwaters of Stream B are on left, before it is rip-rapped. PROJECT NO. CCC_09000 " Pictures-Route SCAM: N/A DATE; 05-01-2011 Carolina Country Club Proposed Irrigation Reservoir RALEIGH, NC 'EcoEngineednq LMA division of The John R- McAdEn" COMPany, "" MEARCH TRIANGLE PAM NC P.O. BOX 14005 ZIP 27709-4005 (910) 361-5000 tl In In PIC 6. Facing southeast, toward Stream B, heavily armored and capturing surface runoff. Standing approximately on proposed pond berm location. Small Shrub—Scrub stream buffer on lower left bank, mostly denuded elswhere. PROIECT NO- CCC_09000 " Pictures—Route SCAM: N/A DATE: 05-01-2011 Carolina Country Club Proposed Irrigation Reservoir RALEIGH, NC AftoEngineering A diislan of The Jbhn R. McAdams COMP-Y, Inc. RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK. NC P.O. BOX 14005 ZIP 27709-4005 (91l) 361-5000 PIC 7. Facing Southeast. Closer view of Intermittent Stream B. Standing on right bank of Stream 0, before it goes into plastic culvert in center of picture. PI10JECr NO- CCC_09000 FB.ER"3SE' Pictures—Route SCAM: N/A DATE: 05-01-2011 Carolina Country Club Proposed Irrigation Reservoir RALEIGH, NC F-MlEcoEngineering IVIA division OMW John R- McAdso" c0o p , " RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK NC P.O. BOX 14005 ZIP 27709-4005 (919) 361-5000 PIC B. Facing Northeast. Facing lower section of Stream B. before it takes left turn and flows into plastic pipe and then empties into Beaverdam Creek. PROJECT NO. CCC_09000 IILENAimll: Pictures—Route SCAM: N/A DATE: 05-01-2011 Carolina Country Club Proposed Irrigation Reservoir RALEIGH, NC AftoEngineering A division ofllie John R. McAdams Company. W- RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC P.O. BOX 14005 ZIP 27709-4005 (919) 361-5000 PIC 9. Facing south and Beaverdarn Creek in center of photo. Approximate pond outlet is proposed to be located on right side of photo at rip—rap grass bank transition. PROJECT NO. ccc-09000 FILENAME: Pictures —Route Carolina Country Club PD- i U SCAM N/A Proposed Irrigation Reservoir RALEIGH, NC DATE: 05-01-2011 AftoEngineering' A &vmm of The John R. WA&US CaMMY, br- RESMCH TRIANGLE PAM NC P.O. Box 14005 ZIP 27709-4005 (919) 361-5000 M6EWR North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman Governor Director Secretary August 4, 2011 nn DWQ Project # 11 -0438 Wake County Mr. Bob Wright AUG Carolina Country Club 12 2011 2500 Glenwood Avenue 0 Raleigh, North Carolina 27608 Subject Property: Carolina Country Club Beaverdam Creek. [030402, 27- 33 -15, C, NSW] Approval of 401 Water Quality Certification and Authorization Certificate per the Neuse River Buffer Protection Rules (15A NCAC 2B.0233) with Additional Conditions Dear Mr. Wright: You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to place fill within or otherwise impact 96 linear feet of perennial stream (30 linear feet - permanent impact and 66 linear feet temporary impact), 58 linear feet intermittent impact and 8,573 square feet of Zone 1 Neuse River protected riparian buffer, and 20,623 square feet of Zone 2 Neuse River protected riparian buffer, as described in your application dated May 5, 2011, and received by the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) on May 9, 2011, with additional information received on July 29, 2011, to construct the proposed irrigation reservoir project at the site. After reviewing your application, we have decided that the impacts are covered by General Water Quality Certification Number(s) 3821 (3821). The Certification(s) allows you to use Nationwide Permit(s) NW 18 and NW39, when issued by the US Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE). In addition, you should obtain or otherwise comply with any other required federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your project including (but not limited to) Erosion and Sediment Control, and Non - discharge regulations. Also, this approval to proceed with your proposed impacts or to conduct impacts to waters as depicted in your application shall expire upon expiration of the 404 or CAMA Permit. This approval is for the purpose and design that you described in your application. if you change your project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application. If the property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter and is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions. If total fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre of wetland or 150 linear feet of stream, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H.0506 (h). This approval requires you to follow the conditions listed in the attached certification and any additional conditions listed below. The Additional Conditions of the Certification are: 1. Impacts Approved The following impacts are hereby approved as long as all of the other specific and general conditions of this Certification (or Isolated Wetland Permit) are met. No other impacts are approved including incidental impacts: Wetlands, Buffers, Stormwater, Compliance and Permitting Unit (WeBSCaPe) 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699 -1650 Phone: 919 - 807 -63001 FAX: 919 -807 -6494 Internet: http: / /portal.ncdeni.org /web /wq /ws An Equal Opportunity t Affirmative Action Employer Carolina Country Club Page 2 of 4 August 4, 2011 Type of Impact Amount Approved nits Plan Location or Reference Stream - perennial 96[(Iinear feet) 30 linear feet permanent impact and 66 linear feet temporary impact] PCN application page 8 of 16 Stream - intermittent 58 ( ;ear het)': PCN a lication age 8 of 16 Buffers Zone 1 8,57$106s are $ )'' s `:PCN application pages 10 of 16 Buffers Zone 2 1 20,6' ( are ft.) t%�,2 I 1PCN application pages 10 of 16 2. No waste, Spoil, Solids, 0 1 it � �f Aiiy hind 1 � i`l f Info waste, spoil, solids, r fil o any kind shall occur in tlands, waters, or riparian areas beyond the footprint of the imp Ar n Notification. All construction activities, including the design, installation, operation, and maintenance of sediment and erosion control Best Management Practices, shall be performed so that no violations of state water quality standards, statutes, or rules occur. 3. Erosion and sediment control practices must be in full compliance with all specifications governing the proper design, installation and operation and maintenance of such Best Management Practices in order to protect surface waters standards: a. The erosion and sediment control measures for the project must be designed, installed, operated, and maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Planning and Design Manual. b. The design, installation, operation, and maintenance of the sediment and erosion control measures must be such that they equal, or exceed, the requirements specified in the most recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Manual. The devices shall be maintained on all construction sites; borrow sites; and waste pile (spoil) projects, including contractor -owned or leased borrow pits associated with the project. G. Sufficient materials required for stabilization and/or repair of erosion control measures and stormwater routing and treatment shall be on site at all times. 4. Sediment and Erosion Control Measures Sediment and erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or waters without prior approval from the Division. If placement of sediment and erosion control devices in wetlands and waters is unavoidable, design and placement of temporary erosion control measures shall not be conducted in a manner that may result in dis- equilibrium of wetlands or stream beds or banks, adjacent to or upstream and downstream of the above structures. All sediment and erosion control devices shall be removed and the natural grade restored within two (2) months of the date that the Division of Land Resources or locally delegated program has released the project; 5. Protective Fencing The outside buffer, wetland or water boundary and along the construction corridor within these boundaries approved under this authorization shall be clearly marked with orange warning fencing (or similar high visibility material) for the areas that have been approved to infringe within the buffer, wetland or water prior to any land disturbing activities; Carolina Country Club Page 3 of 4 August 4, 2011 6. Diffuse Flow All stormwater shall be directed as diffuse flow at non - erosive velocities through the protected stream buffers and will not re- concentrate before. discharging into the stream as identified within 15A NCAC 2B.0233(5). However, if diffuse flow as per 15A NCAC 02B.0233(5) is not achieved, then the DWQ shall be notified and corrective actions to restore diffuse flow shall be taken if necessary to impede the formation of erosion gullies. At no time shall stormwater from the proposed development be piped directly through the buffer without prior DWQ written authorization. 7. Certificate of Completion Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification or applicable Buffer Rules, and any subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to return the attached certificate of completion to the Wetlands, Buffers, Stormwater, Compliance and Permitting Unit (WeBSCaPe), North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699 -1650. Violations of any condition herein set forth may result in revocation of this Certification and may result in criminal and/or civil penalties. The authorization to proceed with your proposed impacts or to conduct impacts to waters as depicted in your application and as authorized by this Certification, shall expire upon expiration of the 404 or CAMA Permit. If you wish to contest any statement in the attached Certification you must file a petition for an administrative hearing. You may obtain the petition form from the Office of Administrative Hearings. You must ftie the petition with the Office of Administrative Hearings within sixty (60) days of receipt of this notice. A petition is considered filed when it is received in the Office of Administrative Hearings during normal office hours. The Office of Administrative Hearings accepts filings Monday through Friday between the hours of 8:00am and 5:00pm, except for official state holidays. The original and one (1) copy of the petition must be filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings. The petition may be faxed - provided the original and one copy of the document is received by the Office of Administrative Hearings within five (5) business days following the faxed transmission. The mailing address for the Office of Administrative Hearings is: Office of Administrative Hearings 6714 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699 -6714 Telephone: (919) -431 -3000, Facsimile: (919)- 431 -3100 A copy of the petition must also be served on DENR as follows: Ms. Mary Penny Thompson, General Counsel Department of Environment and Natural Resources 1601 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699 -1601 Unless such a petition is filed, this Certification shall be final and binding. Carolina Country Club Page a of 4 August 4, 2011 This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act and the Neuse riparian buffer protection rule as described within 15A NCAC 2B .0233. If you have any questions, please telephone Karen Higgins or Ian McMillan at 919- 807 -6300. Si cerely,� Coleen H. Sullins CHS /ijm ' Enclosures: GC3821 Certificate of Completion cc: USACE Raleigh Regulatory Field Office Lauren Witherspoon, DWQ Raleigh Regional Office DLR Raleigh Regional Office File Copy Kevin Yates, EcoEngineering, A Division opf John R. McAdams Company, 2905 Meridian Parkway, Durham, NC 27713 Filename: 110438CarolinaCountryC lub(Afake)401_N'BR PROJECT N0. FOR -OHZZ7 SOILS NM.P F4]EcoEngineering FILENAME: 2008 -06 -08 FOR08227X- SW.DWG A division of T110 John R. McAdams Company, Inc. SCALE: CAROLINA COUNTRY CLUB AS NOTED RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC RALEIGH, NORM CAROLINA P.O. BOX 14005 ZIP 27709 -4005 DATE: 06 -24 -2008 (919) 361 -5000 Legend Figure 1: Vicinity Map [AftoEngineering A division of The John R. McAdams company. Inc. PressurizedWaterMain GravitySewer USGS Map: RALEIGH WEST, Created 1968, Photorevised 1988 0 255 510 1,020 1,530 2,040 0 Feet 1 inch equals 1,000 feet 3 -18 -09 Since 1974 T1 -J EJ JOHN R. MCADAMS COMPANY', ING AGENT' AU`I'IIORIZA'1'10N FOIZM All 131aulis'Fo Be lolled In I3 The Carrell# I'ro erl Owtler Name: Carolina Country Club --- Address: 2500 Glenwood Avenue, Raleigh, NC 27608 Phony': c?19- 865 -1900 _ I'r<>ject Nw, `crip(ion: 1'€� lrrikuttion Res'.' Project Numbcc r'('C`- OcJO00 Project Mann >�:: Mctc: 05/01/2011 U,S, Army Corps of Engineers Mtn: Jamie Shern Raleigh Regulatory Field Office 3331 Heritage'l-rade Drivc, Suite 105 Wake 1 orest, NC 27587 Re: Wetlan,.s. " -I 1ted Consultilc, " A Permitting jo ;\ horn It May Conc t : ,, CCC Go11 P alcigh, NC, K,ovin Yates I, the current property owner, hereby designate and authorize The lolua R. McA.datns Company, Ine. to act in my behalf as nay agent in the processing of permit applications, to furnish upon request supplemental information in support of applications, etc. from this day forward. The 5A day of May 2011. This notification supersedes any previous correspotldetice concerning the agent for this protect. NO'HCE: ''his authorization, f"11- liability and pr' ;Fc.ssional courtesy c . wi mis, is valid 0111,, 'lc l f f- govenim, -, officials to cuto•• €iie p►ope>ty ;c p R, "i- darns Comp,,,,, ll!c. staff. You >:: ,;!d call The Jol., R. '~McAdams (..c,,,:i):.n }•, Ille. to al"c ::Ilge a site meeting; pl-iol, to visiting the site. � C C_ t t,o TPritit PropertyOwnerSi nature Cc: Mr. lan McMillan NCDi,NR -DWQ 512 i:bury Street (Ai Building) Raleigh, ; ; ' '17004 CIVIL ENGINEERING • LAND PLANNING • SURVEYING PO Box 14005 • Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 • (919) 361 -5000 • fax (919) 361 -2269 www.joh nr €ncada ms.corn WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont 4, Project/Site: ( a (�b 11AA1(' City /County: ' �� Sampling Date: Applicant/Owner: Col. 611,16 State: Sampling Point: Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range: Landform (hilislope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope ( %): Subregion (LRR or ML�R a tA): Let: - oe t ,i %% � 1 �'t � Long: X, (d -) 7�i i Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: l ' e °rnn &-44A �( NWl ciassification: Are climatic/ hydrologic conditions on the site typical Ivor this time of year? Yes_ No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes 12K— No Are Vegetation Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes 4— No is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 47—, within a Wetland? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required- check all that apply) _ Surface Soil Cracks (B6) _ Surface Water (Al) _ True Aquatic Plants (1314) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) _ High Water Table (A2) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) _ Drainage Patterns (1310) Saturation (A3) — Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Moss Trim Lines (B16) _ _ Water Marks (B1) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ^ Dry- Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (132) , Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) — Crayfish Burrows (C8) _ _ Drift Deposits (133) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) _ Algal Mat or Crust (84) _ Other (Explain In Remarks) — Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Iron Deposits (85) — Geomorphic Position (D2) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) _ Shallow Aqultard (D3) ^_ Water- Stained Leaves (139) i Microtopographic Relief (D4) _ Aquatic Fauna (B13) — FAC- Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No `' Depth (inches): - Water Table Present? Yes No — Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes No ' Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No'—" — ncludes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous Inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version GRADING NOTES 1. THE RETAINING WALL ALIGNMENT SHOWN ON THESE PLANS DEPICTS THE LOCATION OF THE FRONT FACE OF THE RETAINING WALL AT THE BOTTOM OF WALL. 2. RETAINING WALLS ARE TO BE DESIGN -BUILD PROJECT(S) BY THE CONTRACTOR. IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO OBTAIN FINAL CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS FROM A REGISTERED ENGINEER AND GAIN ALL REQUIRED PERMITS NECESSARY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE RETAINING WALLS. 3. RETAINING WALLS SHALL BE ASSUMED TO BE BACKFILLED WITH OFF -SITE BORROW MATERIAL OR PROCESSED FILL UNLESS CONTRACTOR CAN PROVIDE OWNER WITH CONFIRMATION FROM THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER AND THE RETAINING WALL DESIGNER THAT READILY AVAILABLE ON -SITE SOILS CAN BE USED. 4. THE TOP AND BOTTOM OF WALL ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IDENTIFY FINISHED GRADE ELEVATIONS ONLY. THE EXTENT THAT THE RETAINING WALL WILL BE EXTENDED BELOW GRADE TO THE FOOTING SHALL BE IDENTIFIED ON THE RETAINING WALL CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS. 5. ALL RETAINING WALLS OVER 30" HIGH SHALL HAVE A SAFETY FENCE. SEE DETAIL. 6. ALL WALLS OVER 5' TALL WILL REQUIRE A BUILDING PERMIT. 7. ALL DIMENSIONS AND GRADES SHOWN ON THE PLANS SHALL BE FIELD VERIFIED BY THE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE OWNER IF ANY DISCREPANCIES EXIST PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH CONSTRUCTION FOR NECESSARY PLAN OR GRADE CHANGES. NO EXTRA COMPENSATION SHALL BE PAID TO CONTRACTOR FOR ANY WORK DONE DUE TO DIMENSIONS OR GRADES SHOWN INCORRECTLY ON THESE PLANS IF SUCH NOTIFICATION HAS NOT BEEN GIVEN. B. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE AWARE THAT ITEMS SUCH AS STORM DRAINAGE STRUCTURES, PIPING, GUARDRAILS, ETC. MAY BE WITHIN WALL GEO -GRID TIE - BACKS. 9. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL SPILLING CURB AND GUTTER SECTION IN ALL LOCATIONS WHERE PARKING LOT AND DRIVE AISLE GRADES ARE DIRECTING RUN -OFF AWAY FROM THE CURB AND GUTTER. GRADING LEGEND Q FLARED END SECTION (FES) ENDWALL (EW) CATCH BASIN (CB) DROP INLET (DI) ■ STORM SERVICE INLET (YI) • STORM SERVICE ROOF -DRAIN O STORM MANHOLE (JB) ©Q2i1 ZEN 09I1•r.Tjr;l:a:lli ti LINE BREAK SYMBOL TOP & BOTTOM CURB ELEVATIONS TW= 223.00 -TOP OF WALL ELEVATION BW= 213.00 - BOTTOM OF WALL ELEVATION (NOTE: BOTTOM OF WALL IS GROUND ELEVATION NOT WALL FOUNDATION) +250.60 SPOT ELEVATION STORM DRAINAGE STORM SERVICE LINE. 8" HDPE 01.0% MIN. SLOPE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. DRAINS SHALL BE DIP WHEN COVER IS / / LESS THAN 12 INCHES. // / / / // / / / / / -TP -TP -TP - TREE PROTECTION LD LD LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE \VA / / �/ / / 00, WOODED AREA 11 zol 250 252 10' CONTOUR 2' CONTOUR - - - - -- 250- - - - - -- - / / /// - EXISTING 10' CONTOUR - � / / � / / / / / / / / ol I I � ' / � I / / } •a , ,\- 1 - - - - - -- 252 - - - - -- -- �// / / / / . • �� / EXISTING 2' CONTOUR EASEMENT LINE > \\ / r / // / / �/ ,� /SEX• REM / I11 MH /(TO BE / R OVE / /w i RISER -9 POS / -0 ACT ARE 77 - 77 ol \nVA 232' A\ \V' \ \ I \ E SSMH SSW 2, A V A Ol ti i \ �� -23U � \AV A V A No �.v- -ftr / / / / / / / / / / / I I I I I •I / 8 IMPACT E 00 AREA _ %i�Y \ •, ��r �Ij - .- - _ � - - - -_ / / /// ��_ /, /; / � I I ICI I � / ,� _ :.,; v_�•� -.v . *� /- �� / - % I I � • v � I ss x / I I 1 ��I I // • I / // EXIST / INcl OF�RALEI � I \ I .. • = ' _ - . -,- _ _ v / � I , V / / / r�/ /� - -f- � - \ v \ � v v A to � �� v A / \ LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE %/ „_t' / / / / / % // ♦ N �/ B R[�i EEC - - " \ / / / / l // ♦ P I �P OF B (TYP.)� - - - --�� /'� / /I _- v v F10 11 WAY _ Cm F DISTURBANCE (TYA.)1 / / \ \ • �/� -ISO / / ♦7 / / / / / // ,(./ / III - -/ •/ v _ N ,� Ii /jam / j \ �[ I i�� ���••��/ -- N, PHOTO OF PROPOSED 45 = / ,,, ,� 2/ / / % / o o s ......I. :..... /f= �` 1p I I I T RESTORATION AREA \ 4 = = J / i / 2 V / 40 PER NENT I OF /R�yL�IC�H _ IT SEWEf ME i/ WIT �..� / A / I SSM / / 10 MPORA10Y ONSWCTi ♦ - / \ J - EW -1 .� r INV. OUT= 218.41 �1 . - �. 1 / / / / / / 2 `� / / ENT N ,EIT �VSIDIE (TYP = / 9,350 SF OF BUFFER J -� ZONE 2. 2,614 S.F. OF / � , / / �� /- � �/ , � � ti / / , , � \ � RIM = 229.31 / �// / / � /i / - / l / / /i�:� MTTIGATION FOR �� �� INV. IN= Zi70 (JB -3) BUFFER MITIGATION FOR ' ' ' / / / / / / ,' STORMWATER 017. - _ _ _ - - - - , / / / "IMPACT AREA C" JB -3 - <,._ �t ° �. - - - - - , / / % // ; - • / /i / \ , // / l '� l PIPE IMPACTS TO ZONE 1 RIM= 225.50 - / f +■►;rte r / - 232 - ♦ / / / / / / / 1 INV. IN- 220.05 (JB -4) 1 / -� INV. OUT= 219.95 �o / / / / / /i \ ♦ / \\ / / / \ - / ZONE 1. 4,642 S.F. OF - /� / I / g I �/ A\ - �♦T� -� - / 0• / RIM- 22s.3o / � / / / A\ /� � _ - / - ♦ / INV. IN- 220.88 (JB -5) BUFFER MTTIGATION i ` / /i' - , / - / / �♦ -� _ / - ./ / INV. ouT= 22o.7s "IMPACT /. // / 1 / ♦ / a - / / / /- -- / \ ♦ / JB -5 FOR IMPACT AREA C/ / I / ✓ _ - �♦ / I• - - - / / j RIM = 231.70 / /� I �`' '� 1 / 9 / / \ _ / j / I I / :� -. / - - - y 1 1 /� - - / / INV. IN= 224.66 (JB -6) Z� ♦/ / / I I) / i /♦ I / �� \ I / \ /■ / INV. OUT= 224.56 / /� v - - - -- / _/. / / ✓ �j r / �I. /� / L. / / / - / / - - -- ■ �/ / l / ♦ / // / / / / - -- _ \ \,\ / III \ RIM 234.48 - - - -/ /'\ �Ylr / / / l ♦ / / - XtST�IG -CI1' OF�ALEIGH \ / / v i / / / / ��o / / / - % •■ �r 1 / ♦ / I / _ / - - V A / / / ■1 INV. IN= 225.50 (RISER -7) SANITARY �VYER- EASE1v1ELLT VA V / / /� / / ' / / / / / / / / / ' / / ( � - /IMPACT AREA) �) / - i / / / // - - - - _ V / / / / ■ I INV. OUT= 225.40 _ 1 YP. v _ / \ / / \ . / / V A � / RISER -7 _ -245- / � ��/ / ♦ / / � V / ( � � � ( T /R= 230.60 - _ 24 3- I / / /// / �♦� � / / / f - - �■► / / � / / � _ � _ - � \ � �� \ \ \ < � � I 1 INV. O UT= 225.75 / EW -8 V - INV. OUT= 216.00 -240 7 RISER -9 I - �� JB -4 / /i /� J PROPOSED STREAM AND NEUSE BUFFER IMPACTS \ / � / / �� T /R= 228.00 _ _ i ) / / l ' ' ♦ / INV. OUT= 217.00 _ / / / / i / ji ' /, - LEGEND � \� i /lid � / /i/ � EX SSMH / =7%` -r \ r i i i / / L9 I / Lo A / I� NOTE: (NEUSE BUFFER IMPACTS IN SQUARE FEET (S.F.) AND ACREAGE (ac.) zs4 Ek � 4 A I EX. ZONE 1 BUFFER IMPACT �� - ,// / / / / I / / " v� - / j % / / ) / / / IMPACT AREA A : 944 S.F. 0.022 AC. = _��- j?iIMPACT AREA 111MIT� o�DISTURBA f �- / / . . \(T'R // IMPACT AREA B 11,1119 S.F. 0.026 AC. IMPACT AREA "C" 6.510 S.F. 0.149 AC. \3- ■ ■ \ \ -_ ' /i - - - _ 1 / �/ l I l / /� /� / -� / / / / / / / / TOTAL IMPACT 8,573 S.F. 0.197 AC. � v _ � �� � � ■ ■ �, A A � 5i `,�! / Z0� .moo o-'� . , ' - � // / / ✓ � � � � � / l / / // ZONE 2 BUFFER IMPACT IMPACT AREA "A" 3,573 S.F. 0.082 AC. \ •Yi ,Z_ '� 'i ■ ■ ■ ■ ■`■ iii ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ T �/ - - \ /i / �/ / / - //i i // " " \ - / � \ _ << yC,•' � �' � f IMPACT AREA B 9,659 S.F. 0.222 AC. _7 /13��d / _ .> _ / v / /�f \ \ V �• / \``as�9 i / //� // / / I / - ��/ IMPACT AREA "C" 7.391 S.F 0.170 AC. z - - �� .�_ IMPACT AREA-- 100 Y / / \� \� _ _ _ • �� / _ // / /� /�� / / / -� / / / TOTAL IMPACT 20,623 S.F. 0.473 AC. / \ !)AM � -- = -� „A„ __ oodj,4Y/ /VAS - _ �_ "' v� __ / /�►� i / / /� /� /// / / /� / //� - - � / / / / / // / k - - STREAM IMPACT - TEMPORARY /� " � - � / / \ - - � / -/ / / / �/ / � � � / � � IMPACT AREA A (OPEN WATER) 254 S.F. 0.006 AC. 19 YDS3 \ ��� / �\ ' / Vv v ✓ / � - = - , • ♦/� j �/ /// / / / / �/ IMPACT AREA "B" OPEN WATER 181 S.F. 0.004 AC. 13 YDS3 l - I / - ' l / / A \� A j / - v / / • /� �i i / - TOTAL I M PACT ( ) 435 S.F. 0.010 AC. 32 YDS3 _ _ - / i ■� ■•�•�� ��� / // TOP O� E �� / i / t /� / / / / BEAVER IA \ / / / i • A l � �/ r� j- �� �j // / / / / +�/ _ - \ \ STREAM IMPACT - PERMANENT _ IMPACT AREA B OPEN WATER 295 S.F. 0.007 AC. 22 YDS3 / �� • •y -� - •� T IMPACT AREA C 58 L.F. _ _ �/ ♦� / •� -��- • ��/ //� / j- - /� \ �H ■ ■i■ - _ _ �'�- - - - / / / - / / / _/ TOTAL IMPACT 295 S.F. 0.007 AC. 22 YDS3 58 L.F. ► _ _� v � /� / , � �'�•_�� � �_ _ / /_ GRAPHIC SCALE \ 1-0 YEA - / / / % / ��/ . / / / / i - - - _ FLOOD PLAIN �� V / - �_ - / 40 0 20 40 a0 �_� 11111 1 \ / /�� - -� ----- ;- / / / /i /// >> - - /7 - - 400 4mi 1 inch 40 ft. = FINAL DRAWING - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION E • W � L z ° U U Z Fez° O „ v, W 2 `� m a .� p p 0 d U w z�" 0 Wo Z L) 0 U W c LuwCqem ■ P: c� v� W o w CL a 0 N Z o o Z 0­, o N > Ld w w a a U o to �E­4 � �0Z � z r., a O fox �Oaa z zz a E-, 00 P-; w a a z L) L) 0 u w "z Oz o O p V 0 :� 0 W U �z 0w 5 PROJECT NO. CCC -09000 FILENAME: CCC09000 -01 -FI G7 DESIGNED BY: DLP DRAWN BY: DLP SCALE: 1 " = 40' DATE: 01 -21 -2013 FIGURE 7 LEGii�END GENERAL NOTES , 1. ALL UTILITIES OR STRUCTURES NOT INDICATED FOR REMOVAL OR 8. VERIFY ALL ILLUSTRATED KNOWN UNDERGROUND ELEMENTS. NOTIFY THE �/ / / / ! ✓ f BORE HOLE = _ = = = DRIVEWAY CULVERT MODIFICATION ARE TO REMAIN AND BE PROTECTED FROM DAMAGE. ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY IF UNKNOWN ELEMENTS ARE DISCOVERED THAT WOULD / / / / / / / j / / / / j / J I I I ( I I I (I I I � ' \ ~ \ \ / i \ \� \ gp STORM DRAIN NECESSITATE MODIFICATION TO THE PROPOSED DESIGN. / / / / / / / / / / / / j I I III ,0 /Ir \ \ *' - - ������ � \ \ 11 ® SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE 2. ALL WASTE MATERIAL GENERATED FROM DEMOLITION ACTIVITIES SHALL BE / f %/ %� i f / / / j % 1 l 8 I I f / I l / ��l \ \ \ \ OU OVERHEAD UTILITY LINE DISPOSED OF OFF-SITE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE RULES AND 9. PROTECT ALL ADJACENT PROPERTIES, THE GENERAL PUBLIC AND ALL OF THE / / / % / f , / / / / / / / I I 1 / % J 11 / J l \ \ / r - \ \� " , \ \ Q SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT REGULATIONS. OWNER'S FACILITIES. SHOULD DAMAGES OCCUR, REPAIR IMMEDIATELY AS / / / / X / / / / 1 / ( l l \ .l t \ \ \�` \ \ wv UE UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER, TO THE OWNER'S SATISFACTION. / / / / f /f / / / f / / i / % / j 1 J l l' 1 / l l \ \ \ ri \�\ \ N WATER VALVE UT UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE 3. EXISTING SURVEY INFORMATION WAS TAKEN FROM AN UNRECORDED / / // /'- // / / / / ! I/ / J // / / / // 7 l l l l J J J I � l l ( \ \ \ ,�� - � � � e� � _ � �\ \ \ \ \ \ WATER METER SURVEY BY THE JOHN R. MCADAMS COMPANY, INC. TOPO IS A 10. ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE LOCAL, / / / / �' - ` / /// / / / / / / / (I I ( I I \ „� \ \ \ \ \ \ \ W WATER LINE COMBINATION OF FIELD SURVEY AND LIDAR. STATE AND OSHA REGULATIONS. [///// // / f / / f r / / // / / / // / / / / / ///I// � I 1 I I',' , -\ \\� � _ - ' � \ � �� _\ \ � \� \ \ 6 FIRE HYDRANT 4. INSTALL TREE PROTECTION FENCING PRIOR TO BEGINNING CLEARING 11. ALL EXISTING VAULTS MANHOLES STORM DRAIN STRUCTURES CLEANOUTS ,/ / / / / i-' o-er / - - / / / / j / / / / / III I / \ ` ��` n \ \\ \ �`� �� SS SANITARY SEWER LINE OPERATIONS. CALL CITY OF RALEIGH EROSION CONTROL INSPECTOR FOR > ' / / / // / / r / / / / / / / / / �% 11 I I I / \ \ 23 // (3/} \ \+\ \ V -� \ ® TELEPHONE PEDESTAL ETC. SHALL BE ADJUSTED AS NEEDED TO MATCH F[NISH-GRADE. (( ( / / / % / I r// / / / % / / / i I I 1 1 \ \ \ \� // \ \ \ � G GAS LINE INSPECTION AND APPROVAL PRIOR TO BEGINNING CLEAR AND GRUBBING / / / �' / / / / j I / \ \ d TELEPHONE MANHOLE ACTIVITIES. 12. ALL PAVEMENT OR CONCRETE TO BE REMOVED SHALL BE SAW CUT TO I I ( / ! / / / / %� fj f / -- ` - %r / j / f % / / / / j f /J / I I 1 I \ \\ -23Z � / 'Ie \ / r �/ FO FIBER OPTIC PROVIDE A STRAIGHT AND UNIFORM JOINT FOR NEW PAVEMENT, SIDEWALK, OR ) ) / / / ( / ! / / f / / / / ( / ` \ 2 ,. / \ / E1 ELECTRIC BOX 5 TO MINIMIZE DAMAGE TO EXISTING TREES NEAR THE INTERIOR EDGE OF CURB AND GUTTER, ETC. ANY EXISTING PAVEMENT, SIDEWALK, CURB AND / i f / / j 1 / %f r r / , / / / / / / f j I I \ \ - �,,,,/ � sp 7 , � a( 1 - X X FENCE LINE BUFFERS AND STREETSCAPES, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CUT 2 -FT DEEP GUTTER, ETC. THAT MUST BE REMOVED TO ALLOW NEW CONSTRUCTION SHALL / / / / l l l f / f / - r ' / / / / / / / / I I ''� zl I- �' \ * LIGHT POLE TRENCHES ALONG THE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE, SO AS TO CUT, RATHER BE REMOVED AND REPAIRED PER THE SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAILS OR TO // / / N i / / / / I e / / / // j / j / -I' - `- \ \ SSM v� \ \ '0� - - 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN THAN TEAR ROOTS. MATCH PRE -CONSTRUCTION CONDITIONS (WHETHER OR NOT SHOWN ON THE ' j / / / / / / / / / / --' ' ` / r / / / / R1 =230.7 6 ti POWER POLE 1 / / / / / ,.' , / / / / / / / / / \� 1 ( \ \ 24 DRAWINGS TO BE REMOVED / / / t _ - - / � I IN= 21. C'a \ \ - - 50' NEUSE RIVER BUFFER g, TREE PROTECTION FENDING SHALL BE MAINTAINED ON THE SITE UNTIL ALL }` / / / / // / / / / j / / / (,(, / f/ / '� Oft owfte\ \ INV. UT=221. \\ \ �` WijCURB INLET CATCH BASIN SITE WORK IS COMPLETED AND THE FINAL SITE INSPECTION PRIOR TO THE / / / / / /// f f f - _ - ��` / / / / / \ ` �\ 13. ALL DIMENSIONS AND GRADES SHO ON THE PLANS SHALL BE FIELD / STORM DRAINAGE MANHOLE TREE LINE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (C.O.) IS SCHEDULED. THE FENCING SHALL VERIFIED BY THE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR / / ryh`` // � // / / // �i / f/� • / / / / / // .i ® -,� \_ \ \ \ \\ \ Tc - Tc TREE CONSERVATION AREA BE REMOVED PRIOR TO FINAL SITE )NSPECTiON FOR THE G.O. SHALL NOTIFY THE OWNER IF ANY DISCREPANCIES EXIST PRIOR TO / / / / I / / / / / // / / - / i �, / r // / k ,,- - - � \ \ \�\\ Q YARD INLET PROCEEDING WITH CONSTRUCTION FOR NECESSARY PLAN OR GRADE f°�4 / / / / / / / / / / 1�8� Q r TERNII.TENT_STRFAM / / // / s\ %N \ �� EXISTING 4a C OF RALEIGH \ \ TP TP TREE PROTECTION FENCE 7. PRIOR TO DEMOLISHING EXISTING STRUCTURES MAKE AN INSPECTION FOR / / / / j l / /� l .� / / P \ 3 SANITARY S EASEME \\ \ CHANGES. NO EXTRA COMPENSATION SHALL BE PAID TO THE !"/ / ! �, / / / / / !'�� /'� r / \ \ - ANY HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. CONTACT ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY IF ANY ti / / / / / / / J l rf ---, r / �'--.� � j'` off\ \ \\- CONTRACTOR FOR ANY WORK DONE DUE TO DIMENSIONS OR GRADES / / / ! // / / / / / ,, (_ - -= - / 4 �p /- \\ ( / - - LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ARE DISCOVERED. CAP AND REMOVE UTILITY SHOWN INCORRECTLY ON THESE PLANS #F SUCH NOTIFICATION HAS NOT / / / / / / / i / \� '� / r \� ,11> SERVICES, FUEL TANKS AND SEPTIC SYSTEMS. ALL WORK TO BE - / / /// / // ! / / \ '01.4 --/ / \ \ BEEN GIVEN. / -, \ 1-1 PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE FEDERAL, STATE AND / / / / / / /////// %/ / //// / _„/ � \ \ / A- - � �' 3 \ 6 LOCAL REGULATIONS. / / \\ / i 1.1 2 � \ -7, , / \ J \ \ t ' \ \ \ _ - \ / / / / d g / // }-t/ � / " l \ _ \ I � -\ \ \ \ \ \ \ _ -- ' �- ,- f / ,f / / / f /F / "' q,°` / / R(M�,2 9hff r // \ �` / - ' r f / I I / j/ f `-- \ - \ \ \ \ / / ~ \ \ / \ � s --�" L \ \ \ \ \ \ / / / / / / / / /{N f/ �2 . / 11 / \ � , /j F I € j - � \ L i \ -� - --' \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ ` _ / / / / / / /� f / // / / ) \ -1 a0 Y zzy \ \ I \ \ - \ / / / / / / / // / / '� / // / // /f // f f / // / .11 ) I Pl1�IN \ `4, -- \ / / \\\ \ \ \ \ \ l \ \ - / / / / / ! ®. C ' / ) ! � (TYP.} \ \ \ wry / //\ \ \ i 1 11\ \ \ \ \ \ \ } / \ - - ?,b / / // / �j / / \ - \ \ \ v // / / � .\ / / / �F \ / / / / / / / f / / / / / / / r�// / / // / r / ta� ! / / / // \ - \ ,od,e \ \ \ \s ,' \ /--� ~- '/ -�) \ SII} 1 i \\ \ \I � I I I E ~-� _ �_ -/ / / / f// /ry° / // / // // ( f `�, \ \ .� \ \ / 1 I \ I I _ - - °� / / t r f / / / j " / / / f f O� � a r \ / /f \ I I \ - -_ / / 1� / / / / �° // /i/ // / e / A r / /! � !`, - ! \ r- / 23� s \ \ \\ \ ti \\ / -/ / \ J / \ I \ \ , \ --- --__ \ - / I / / / / / / Y 1 I � \ -.I �-� � � \ \ - \ / r' � �. - f \ \. / � I I \ \\ \ \ > ~ -' -�°'` / / 1 / I l / / / / j j j // / � j � / �a f l ® \ � /I '� \ -,- -., \ \ _. � \ ,. '� __/ / I I I \ i r \ \ o \ / ��� ` -- _ / / / / / 1 / I i / f // / / / / l ® � / o�/ s / / \ / ` I I I \ \ ( r \ - - -26Q- j / / / l / / / J III 1 l�/ / jr / / / j ( \ - _ -' IT l % #,� - �� V \ \ "., - i \ `/ I I '-kms/ i f \ \ \ l \ 1 i \ \\ \ -� \ / j / f / / // I // ` // I / / \ (x/ •� ■�■ s \ o �/ \ ` �/ I / / / / _ \ \ o \ '\ / \ \ \ / / j / j / 1 / I I J I 4 I ( \ \\� I0 --\ 'i - � a"a►- ' - "_ \ j - (( \ - ® \ `"",�- 'i \ `,,, 234 = ' ` - s / \ \ � , or --� I \ I \ / - \ \ \ \ \ \ -- - - - e / / / / / 1 I I E t 1 l I Ip I , - % \ ♦ • r► \'_ F I I ` \ • r \ 23Yii \t s I \ / X 1 / / / / \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 1 / /l / / / I - \ t I I Ex.19a LF 18 HDPE e \ ' ♦ % `*-= Zy% - \, \ \ \ v \ \ 1 I - \ / 1 /►� / \ / I l \\ \ I \ \ \ _ - / / ///1 1/// IIfINI►II Il 1 II / -���-- ,,�''/ �\ ?. -�� \ \�® �� _� •♦ ` / i k \ / 22o' -'f ' '' \�� \ SSM i' / _ / ! 1 1 \ - '/ 1 / ( l I I { I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 I / ; • !' - \ \ ,. ';C ` ' x / i /�/ / / 1 I ( I } I 1 \ \ / l / f / 1 ( I I I i I % / 4 �'� � I / %- � �. I \ \ \ ®®�. - \ _� %- / /' - - ) J I 1-1 -®� / / / / f I , I I I I 1 I I � \ \ / / 1 j j / / I 1 1 N { I I I ! 1 i *11 1 , ♦, / / -.� .. `\� \ �. - > / --- f i I � I I1-' r • /- 1 I �f f // e ? - ��� \ '\ � N=2 9 0 / I f j � I \ / - --P.14 / / / ✓ �'I 1 I i I 1 I � 1 I � \\ \ \ / > _ - - _ _.a._ � ) / / I I � I I I I ( ! I I I I I I 1 � (� / / ♦ / ��`� � � / // / ! � � � � � �_' \ \ - iN a7< 1 -1 \ \ / / / / I I I I 1 \ \ \ / / I I L L I ' I I I I I I'll �` I > s / -_ - - �. . , \ \ -m - ; 218.E ' / f / -- - -1 / / 1 \ 1 1 I I 1 1 I \ \ \ / / I I 1 III 1 I 1 f I I 1 I EX/ L - 18 �� , �, l / r / _ \ '`�. \ " ss / ( / - / I / 1 ( ! I I I I I I I f ♦ / / �- �� / / / 11r \\ \\ - ' c \ �\ � 1 I / \ \ \ � __; / / / / \ \ I I 1 ( ! / 1 \ / / / p 1 I I I I J ,f J �. / / / r, - \\ \� �`"'- F, \ 1 /1 ( \ �. �/ - / \ 1 I I I ( I / / \ i I 1 I I I I II Iff 1JJ / r / //� \ //. �`:` \\ \\ N"� �� I / t \ \ \ \ \ / -- --- / e \/ I / I I / l l l / i \ NII I I % /•` / - // `�/ // / _ \\` � } - -° - 11 tt\\ �/ / / 1 I I J l 11 I I 1 I I I I I f I(/ I ( / I%� // // - f oz Ie / \ ` \ \ _ / I I / / / / / \, / I l I I 1 l l l l i l l \\ I / 1 / / ® j/// Y\� I / / f . ��\ \ -� ,\�� Ns 1 \ \ \ \ \ _ � - - - Y - - � / / I I I I I / / I N / / 1 I 1 \ 1 ! i 1 I / ♦ I j // / - EXIS`TIN el OF- EI \ i " `,(�, I /°f / / f 1 -sANrr s E \ �\ \ \ - E 1 \ \ \ - I I / / %� \ I �Irr I \� j / I \ \ \ / \ t \\\\\ ��___- _ ��f / ,' i I 1 I I / 1 \� f I i I 1 I \ \ \ \ i11 I / l / // / /e / ) j _ , ��\" _� `i\\ 1�i o \ \ _ - / 1 I I I 1 / I I I I ry I ? \�\ / . / / // ', / ., ,� f ,- - t 1 \\ \\ \ \ 1 1 �( \\ \ \ \ \ \ \; --- -11 I--- ( ,' / / / / ( l / / 1 / 1 t I I I 1 I / J 1 0 \ \((f 1' r \ ♦ // ,/ / // ® \ z 1 \ \ \ - ti / ! / / I I l I \ \ \\` / // // /i / �/(/� _ ♦ \ ~\ \_\ toy /1 \ \ \ \ \ / I I I I / / / / \\ \ / 1 z2 i / / 1 / i - - \ \ -- `\ �\ \ _ I 1 1 / / s' / l I \ 1 I ! N I I I 1 I I' o / i / �-- 22- \ I \\ \\ \� 1\ ,, �y \ \ \ \ \ / \ \ I ` / / 1 / / , l / l \ 1 i N ( I 1 / / // l I / ,• j/ //i'�// �l I I I / - -/� \`^�` � ,��_ *' ~- �� \ \ \ _ _ _ / \ / , / / / I I I I ! r l f �1 l l t� e r -i / / / I I I I r \\ \� �� -v \ \ 1--- \ / a / �� Y r w, I- - - - - ( \ - - -I _ I \ �� / / r z / / / /.- ____.-- / / // f/ / / / J / f I j// / :, ` \ � / / /,Ih r / !/�41, / I f / /I itLi / �® \ % "_= _� �..:: _ \\ \ I / / / ,-1 2�� / / / l / ! j / / / / / / /j = f r / r �' , _%- �\\ � � \: - _ _ _ - \ \ , / ! f l l l 1 l -' \ \- l l l l J l l l J J l / $/ / / �, j 1 / / / / / / - ..- \� \ ---\ \ \ \ I , / �, i/ / / / l / / / .-� \ j l / l I 111 // /�// �, B R E _ ^�®,,� ,'It k" �y`�'--/� r n --- \� \ \ \ J 1 / e / i �� / j �/ / J f / l l l l) ! l / / f / P aF IS ( _( ®�� `� \ ,. 3-'' _- / / / / / / 1 I l i . , \ \ / / / 1 / / 1 / 111/� ,,�' / / / / ee / /� / / I �•. _ \\ \ ` --- __ ,` i \ \ \ \ \ I / I l r / / ,__ ,; I / '_ - � ,,- /f / / / / 1 f / I I 1 � � \ \ / ; /// / / / /f ' / j � ///i� / I I 1 / /. I / / j / / /� / � � � / / j 1 � I ' I I I j f \ ^- .,, ` / � _ � , � 1 \\ \� \ i / / I 1 \ / // /j{� / / /. / a / Jl I 1 EAR I �I 1 \ - \ \ \ / / e / / / / 1 /j \ / /// / //1 I , ,�\ \ i / , i (v I J l / / - ,- 1 / - - / �/ -' / f / // i/ l f / • I ® / /i� // / / / I (T d / / FLo q wbY 1 \ \ \ \ l / , % / "" / f / 1 / / \ \ � - '/ / / / / r / j/// /l . / / i /i / / /® / I ; \ / / ��,, l I ` - __,` � \ '\ \ \I l l / / e f / % / .,, I k / 1 \ Z / / / f i,- ,� / J \ \ \ \ \\ _ ` - / / '�' / / / 1-1 ' / �, -` , / / / / / / , \ - / / / f/ // / --- j//j (l l l r '� / / µ, , / i \ \ I / / ♦ �^ '� 'a • / \ \ \ / / / / / / / �/ / \ \\ �/ /i//i/ /i1 (/ I f / 11 1 / / //% ! / ® r t (11l 1 / I / I ®`� l / ) / / / / " '3'` s If \ \ \ \ \ \ \ (\ � / / / / / f / / / / / / /\ - / - �! t/ ��� / l l / J ( I o ,i ,, o 7/�, • / - \ \ \ \ /r f z / / / / r/ \\ ,\` - ''`'e / �l(/ "',/�' / i / / //� ` `°j / % Off' '� /f s ^� r \ \ / / / / / / ,/ / 1 1 z4 / /i l r/ / / 1 / I % / / }<> �` �, / �,. \mm w I ( 1 �4 a • / / ./ I / \ \ \\ \ -- / // ,-� ---'r . / / / / / /1 / 1 \ 2 - / (r_ / // / j \ I / /a ,, /M '0- ®f® / '� I i '� / \ \ - --- - / f 1 _ % / I / / i // /1 I ¢ t 1 t , t -i f \ \ \\ ___ - // ' 'f . ` r' �- / / / / //f /// i l ~��,_` _ / ;Jl /�1 \/ / / j/ / /� / 14 /�%//�, /; / �// ,/ // I JI jj \�1 1 /1//1 % '�� Y / / / ,\ / / / / �,,/ -r- r / \ \ \\ \ \ - - _ _ _ / - 25 / / j / l / 1 / I 1 EaFy MH / / f j / l / / �// /' Y / w� f / \ y -- I� �l I 1 C l s / - / ,.�- \ \ \ \ `� - \ f? �_ \ /,i� / r - \ ` / l/ � / / l f F f 1 / I -� : - . I iN=2 �/ 1 ♦ 'l or �' // lI -/ `♦' - j/ \ .-- \\ \ \ \\ - - - �� / / / f j `� ' (f / / / / / / f \ 239- ',t X23', / �� , 1 /� j �// / / / // j y�' 1/ \ / `�" 11 r '� _. /.- \ \ \ � \\ \ \ \ \ - - /11 / /r \ / / - \\ / / / ♦ 1 j �`'1111-1111h/ / � �1' \ / / ,_ _, .-1 --- \ \ \ \ - - _ _�' / / e / / / r--::7 - i '�V f//' r„ / / // i / if / � / J / a f / \ \ \ 11 1-1 \ \ _. - - - - _ r r i r/ / - , -- / -I- I / j / f /! / -- \ I ,` \ \ t � \ \ •� \_----- - ✓ __, / \ /f / //// // / / f, \ // - , /,O -_/ / j // �/ / __/ ( I , \/ !� \ `` / \� --- e�,,, / / / / / j ? - X32- _. i /" ♦ % l / / l I / ,' -\ / \ \ \ \.--- /' - - / \ 1-1/ / / / / / / \\ ) / {�((- /r�/ \/ / */ / _ / / /�/I�■■■ ra■■■a■■ _ / / % �\ \ \ \ _ , \ 250 / / / % / / / \\�\ 6'` ® / "'" / !� r \ \ % / / ♦ \e / \ I / f ,>►'� _ / / \ \ \ ", I',, - J.... _ - - ,,r l \ \ / " / / / / / /' r / / "I - 4 �F i -% /_11/ I / / / � � ` z`T -'\ � � - / / �- o� \ - '� ---�. - __,,,- / --- ,_-.. \ / s' / j// / / / /% z/ /f -�'� I 1 I ' '' �` � Jss !Zti$ �®a, / N / ♦ / i, �/ / W/ / ` 7 \ \ '_ _ / ®� \ I /` j/ i - \\ / \ \ \� - - --- /\\ \ �r - / / / / / / � //! I I L vo / / : `` =' -I / /` .` \ / - '� / - - \ '\ \/ / • \ - Ex15T1+�IG �4_.-CEA'-6F RALEIGH _ \ \ / / / "3 / / / �D / % _ _ / ♦ ` / ♦/ / / / - - ' - 1 \ \ / / r �\ / \ \ - _ SANFfARY �1ulENT _ - \\ � 1 // / / / / / / / / - � / i .' ( / - / / e /� i - - - ' \ / / / r/ / \ \ _ _ 4`s --' ; \ - � / / / i \ // I ( I I f i' � -T ,--'__ ri "� e \ \ 1 /1 \ / / t ' \ ` \ / _� \_ 2- - -- - - - :_--_�--_ \\ - - s / / - L - / --- % / / / / / ` " "® / ✓` / ( lIzz-_ I : I j f ♦� / / -f--- �/ j j s _ -- / - - \ \ \ / < I e ( jw \ \ _ _- - __-, / - _ /® \ \ \ - -�� - ;- 8 BAR __-- e�-_ ��I - -- //��/ / / / / / q / ,I I 1 ♦ /1j% �\ , `I ff/ j �` / / �-�_---% /% // /- - \�� �/� ! \ \ " \�\\ l 06 PLAIN - - - - / / r / / ♦ \�� / /♦ / / _ - - ` ' \ ) / i _ _ _ _ EX. -§ -- 4a _ - - e ( r e/ ( !♦ e N / ,•- s -_ `/ / \ -- ' \ ` -234 - _ \ - - l \ RIM=235. / s�i ! 5s / / `♦ %/ / ♦ / f _ / \ �C J / \ - - _ - \ RlM 3 .5 - - - - \� INV. IN=226-2' / .moi / „ \ / \ ♦ / T, j/ / r , r 4#1/ / / /! / i J �� \ \ \ \ \ / / - _ INV. -22`T. / e - j / 'o < :'. i ♦- / f , _ _ /�- `\ \ \ -- l \ k l \ / W. =21J > �� - _ - - - - _ i \ ; INV. ouT22s.1 / / 1 / I / 60 or �/ f _ \ i \ \ \ / { \■I I / \ Ti / ti Ono ---- `� t /� / / / / /(//�% / n % /i/i,� //!/ // \ < \ /I l J // )2 I \ \ �.� \, _._.-- % / I / - ti, '"� it a - \ \ \ f•' .�' / / / �/ / �,/ / J� �... "' I `� / / l j 1 / `' / / , . , / / f / ! / /. % ....-^' �' f �,,, '^ ` = _ - „� ,,� \ \ \ \ I ! l J ( t J -- - - -y \ \\ 1 / 9 2 / �� l �C C 1, /j fr / /,,, - -1 \ l \ ( I' I,I I // - __ - . '..�. / i r ft ,�` , \ , O 1 . f- / �' i ,% V-. / / ,�92 .,1 \ \\�... .; ,� : ii , ,, ,''/ ' , ,'- .� - O, \ � i f ; � \ .� ' �' / / / -234_ -E -� r /- ♦/ \ \�� Il I- f/ f e- / /e/- �- \ \\/\\ � I I() 1 I 1 % / / r �^ - - ////- -- /- \ \ \ I S / j a� / } /J / ! e% `, � r /� f l: - i// �//// / / /` �- \ \ \ 235 '�- \ \ �- -' % r i, / �2, -� ♦ e / / / ,- N% r-----/--------\ \ \ \ p p t�' C -'! / ® T 3 \\ \ \ ?hz' 1.1/ r e - / r / ♦ / r r ` '// - / ` / / j- '/ - \ _ \ ` \ / \ /�l �1[ t`QIV EL. 3�2®� �O..J OOt1 � / /'l t /i/ / �f \ • / / - \ \ ./\ � - - / • ®' o. ® a a as \ 2S� / i "`� % (� / /` / f f \\ =- _ / %/ �/ � 0, . - s r y --- 1 ` / / / /// �/ , " - \ \ ��- � \ \ -, \r 7 / e ♦ ♦ / * /���. - \ ...� L �. \ _ 1 / e� .� - / %% /WET NDS NOTES �s, s. r • F y. C> /� °0 ® �^rC �, a / / _`� �.� �• il` .�... a /.\ / / ^""""�a.'." ,,,.e t �- w ^ ,.:� % % f/ / '/`;.-'''� ..._ l /� /! / \ 'f { '��^0.\ �,� / �%. \ 'o°� "�,� +/'�.. •--y • r'i ®■ i ■ ■ �'� ■ #j, # ■ S a { .�- -� ..-ai s3�, ,ra �a ? / /.'" ,,,.. / �. % f -! / �/' '`� \ \'r , w Z z ,.,, -- \cV Q-� / - / \ \ r- _ -� - k; r/f//-/ r ,r ,,, r / / / \ 1. NCDWQ ON-S{TE PRE -APPLICATION f NEUSE BUFFER DETERMINATION �% _ 'qi ,� - 100 Y - - t L ' �� / r ` / / \ \ MEETING CONDUCTED WITH MR. IAN McMiLLAN HELD ON 04/21/2010. / ' - - ` '_ / / / �' , / / ` ' / / \ \ \/ 2. NCDWQ PRE -APPLICATION FOLLOW-UP MEETING HELD ON 08/02/2010 TO _ / �.~ s 4 i 'S ° } is ./" ree l �✓ / ,'� - "� y .� / f -."''� / / / / /' IM, Io / - - .. \ / L M . r _\ - -- - - /� / -, % ( _ l' - - _ \ DISCUSS POND PROJECT AS CURRENTLY PROPOSED. - - f „G a ` / I'7 I >i _./ ./' J �;.� i ,ns ,' J x 7; ::_:' ..}.:..: 11 L __ / r/ / / % \ ;, _ / r - <..? t ,..,.._ I ! '_' -:: �. ,,., ' ",4a+ t 1.1e n ;,....:, 'fir.. ,'� \ _. \ i' / Li /f .i-' -'' f '- __- ...• --' '� -'/ / �\ J £ � _'; / / s .., . ( I%,s . .:,r.. ., \ - ♦ _ / / r / , - - - \ \ 3. USAGE HAS BEEN ENGAGED ON THE SCOPE OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT + ;,.:.-�. ...__. "`..1 / ,- .a••-.,.. ..,tw,,-,:.n .mss _...�_., ,.,--+ t' i._.:;,d -r." ..:,._.. / ,��`^�,. .- -��► /� / /tt7 ./ �- .,i-�' / _ a `L� l / . :y.. - �' / / , \ AND PROPOSED IMPACTS. HOWEVER THEY HAVE DEFERRED TO NCDWQ ar> /{ 1 i -' / T`` / / / / / - - - - - f AND OUR BEST PROFESSIONAL JUDGMENT ON PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF �%-� ® Na, - i \ \ / - \ _� 'I�" / / i , - / / - - - - - �/ \ \tl'~�. JURISDICTIONAL STREAM IMPACTS. ! J ` � W i3+ / , ,<_.. \\ / _ //f r \ \ / / f �/ /�%/.� / / / / r'� / / / i J eel / , _ ,.., ��, : ' . vr,. "- \ / \ - '`'/''• .-- "- ....-- _ -� ', s" l o � % //' .i / / / / "'z �'­_ '� 1 / '' \ l \ \ `■ * ■ s 4. • • \ p _ j-,,�� _ _ l / / / ��,,.,� _.' , , _- -l♦ _ /Z// �.j - / / / / / /' f / ✓ / -` � ' ) 4. STREAM "A" - 1,480 LF WITHIN PROJECT AREA 's a / i \ _ - '� ®- .�,r '� / / / '� t \ STREAM °B" - 58 LF WITHIN PROJECT AREA 4 �, ®` • • \\'°' /moi - a / 1f / _.� , .%.: _-\ \ - - % ( ® - I / S j / s / / i j 1 \ r \ I 4} ♦ ♦ \ a� - Qp \ ■ j , / i - \�5= - - _ / / / / f / , - - - - _ \ � THERE ARE NO JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS WITHIN THE PROJECT AREA. v - 1 - - I� 1 ®�� c _ / �11 \ \ ♦ / / /1'"- .a �, -_ , :: ■ a�� �� a -w a I - / - - - i / / / , , _ - - J 0 • r■ : ■;,f - - ` \ \ -��/ i - -_ _ _ - - / / / / / `j GRAPHIC SCALE / �\ �� %( \ "`t av \ \ � � �" � / � _ � / \� a► +c - � -."'�„ = _ - ✓ % / /� / / r'/ / ,- .- / ' /� / / % e / / ✓ - - _ l - � ., \ ` - I - _ _ - `- J �� "� �/ / - _ / / /*/►', � , ,,, _.►_� _ - - -- ---,- - ` ':__ __ i -- ' / / / e / / / / / ! / / - __ - - _ \ / \ 4Q 0 20 4I 8I // / - 101 l � �1 o � i / s' -o �-_ \ - - Vii- � � � ! .. - - � -- -- r i /�i '_ / f / / / � / f / , / ./` / / - \ \6m ow m 1 400 v t ` `._-- IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII --� /� / 1 / -- s-��_ - \� _ - ='! 4 y , = _ _ i_'� % _ '� _ - - - - - - - - = � T- -�- --_� :%%� i - i s / _ ' ,,- / e 1-1 / / / - - - _ - ! \ \ 1 inch = 40 ft. FINAL DRAWING - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION c E W w ■ � �' cit L. g z U Q W 0 [� ' p o L4z � m W �cm • �z g 02 oS. 0 }a PIIi 0; I w V j C � 4z8 w� ■ 1 h 4 9 0 o W ";a o m ;� � m C:, > � c� R e; 04 N �� o S "m W m z O 0 co 2 5 W a a m cxm w `�"! U o � E-4 r- r- = NQr-z Z��a QU)O� Upas" �Qx ol.a z I -a E'' 00 0 W � � I Z U = 0 m " 104 u w z Q t1� P ' O a ;z) Q 0 0 Wf'0 W �-r z ::) imm-4 M Q Vf PROJECT No. CCC_ 09000 FILENAME: CCC09000-XC2 DESIGNED BY: DLP DRAWN BY: DLP SCALE: 1 " = 40' DATE: 07-27-2011 FIGURE 31 McADAMS: I 1111111 III GRADING NOTES GRADING LEGEND _ l / / f ,,P /! / // f // f / J / /f /� /, / - ' 23� \ \ �\ � \ 1 \\¢ '� \� \ ,� PLANS DEPICTS THE LOCATION OF THE / / / / / / / / J / // / / J / f ( / 6 \ ��� \ - \ �\ \ 1. THE RETAINING WALL ALIGNMENT SHOWN ON THESE PL FLARED END SECTION FES STORM DRAINAGE / / , e` 1 J / / f / / / / / / V ``� \ - - \ \ \ FRONT FACE OF THE RETAINING WALL AT THE BOTTOM OF WALL t ) / e / / , x ,, y� f'° \ 4. /, ." o� �\ \ \ \ \ " \ \\ \ I 1, STORM SERVICE LINE. 8" HDPE / / / / / / / / / / / f / / / / \ r ! / \\ \ \� \ TO BE DESIGN -BUILD PROJECTS BY THE CONTRACTOR. IT SHALL BE ,. -, 01.0% MIN. SLOPE UNLESS / `'/ ! / / / /// / / / / // / f / f `"__° t 2. RETAINING WALLS ARE t) / / / / \ \ / \ \ \ \ \ ' CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS FROM A t } ENDwALL Ew .r e° / /, / / f / / ' I \ 5,p �i r/ j / \\ \ \ \ \ __\ \ \ \ THE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO OBTAIN FINAL CONSTRU OTHERWISE NOTED. DRAINS � ,,.l / / / / i / ,.� / J l 7.'5 / : ' \ \ REGISTERED ENGINEER AND GAIN ALL REQUIRED PERMITS NECESSARY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE DIP WHEN COVER IS i' ,- / / / / ///-// / r / i t z OF THE RETAINING WALLS, CATCH BASIN (CB) LESS THAN 12 INCHES. I / � / / / ' , 3f / � I \ i � \ \ _\ \ \ \ \ \ r I l r / /,/ /� // / {r I ° \ \ \� \� \ \ 3. RETAINING WALLS SHALL BE ASSUMED TO BE BACKFiLLED WITH OFF -SITE BORROW MATERIAL OR T (DI) , f / / / / / / / / / / / r '' / / / i I I I \ - �O/ - .�l, J� °' n \ \ \ \ \, - PROCESSED FILL UNLESS CONTRACTOR CAN PROVIDE OWNER WITH CONFIRMATION FROM THE DROP fNLE ( ) -TP TP TP ®. E PROTECTION / } e _' \ � l / / / / / / / / / / i I 3f > ` WALL DESIGNER THAT READILY AVAILABLE l / '�, i � / / r ,/ qy / � j � 23 \� ,,� 6 � � \ \� L ^.- --t > GEOTECHNiCAL ENGINEER AND THE RETAINING STORM SERVICE INLET (YI} � t / / / / J I I CP / \ / LD LD LIMITS of DISTURBANCE / it 11 1 1 // / r / // / j J/ �/ ! I I 4 I _2R ° \� / rl ON -SITE SOILS CAN BE USED. 1 / 4. THE TOP AND BOTTOM OF WALL ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IDENTIFY FINISHED ® STORM SERVICE ROOF -DRAIN WOODED AREA / / . \ / / r f / ) / / , I / ` / / / is /P / \ '� -- �\ GRADE ELEVATIONS ONLY, THE EXTENT THAT THE RETAINING WALL WILL BE EXTENDED BELOW 1 / / / // / / / / / J / ,b / / / / / / / / I , � \ � GRADE TO THE FOOTING SHALL BE IDENTIFIED ON THE RETAINING WALL CONSTRUCTION 250 / N / / j/ '� // I \ �` , � \\ \ 10' CONTOUR � /- / , // /// / / / / / r / ( �,_ Ilk DRAWINGS. STORM MANHOLE (JB} 1 ' / // I / / / / / / 1 _ \ \ Z \ \\\ \�40 252 ,/ /� / / / / , / / I , / i / / / / // SSMH �, \ , + A SAFETY FENCE:` SEE DETAIL. 2' CONTOUR / ,� f/ / /JJ / I / l J/ J / / // / B \ \ \ 5. ALL RETAINING WALLS OVER 30" HIGH SHALL HAVE / l// / / %-. DRAINAGE FLOW ARROW - - - - -- 250 - - - - -- EXISTING 10' CONTOUR ' ° � i ' /� j // // / / � 1 / / � / / ) \ \\ 6. ALL WALLS OVER 5' TALL WILL REQUIRE A BUILDING PERMIT. - - - - - -- 252_ - - - -- EXISTING 2' CONTOUR = � -/ /,//// / / % ./ ..^ J /' '/! `k /, 7� \\ \ \\ \ \\ � LINE BREAK SYMBOL / 1, '// / / / / / / / % \ \\ 7. ALL DIMENSIONS AND GRADES SHOWN ON THE PLANS SHALL BE FIELD VERIFIED BY THE EASEMENT LINE ,7 /� r` // // / / / / / / / / �=_/ r / // \ \ 23 - � \ \ \\ ,l R PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE OWNER IF ANY " !// / / / i ( f.' CONTRACTO 250.50 � ` ,�.,, , .''�/ / � '- =�-' / �' / \\ `�' ,�' }j \ \� � DISCREPANCIES EXIST PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH CONSTRUCTION FOR NECESSARY PLAN OR 250,00 TOP &BOTTOM CURB ELEVATIONS \ \ \ \ `\ \ , it "I, j / � �/ / / // / � � // ti� / / 1 (l �� � _ � // � � \ \� \ \ ( / GRADE CHANGES. NO EXTRA COMPENSATION SHALL BE PAID TO CONTRACTOR FOR ANY WORK \ \ - fi,, / / � \ -� l \ / INS OR GRADES SHOWN INCORRECTLY ON THESE PLANS IF SUCH \ \ ~ \ - .� ,.% �/ �' / / / / / / f / / / \ \ .I r \ \ \ \ \ \ DONE DUE TO DIMENSIONS TW= 223,00 -TOP' OF WALL ELEVATION \\\ NOTIFICATION HAS NOT BEEN GIVEN. BW= 213.00 - BOTTOM OF WALL ELEVATION ` \ \ \ - - _ \ � -_ I / 11 STRUCTURES PIPING, (NOTE: BOTTOM OF WALL IS GROUND ;ti,, . \ \ -_ `' \ ,,- , - f„ / i / / ham' / / h� - \ ( 1 SHALL BE AWARE THAT ITEMS SUCH AS STORM DRAINAGE , -_ _, / / / J / / / / O 8. CONTRACTOR �, .�` r / / tr � \ ",. '���`�'°9 �.. / GUARDRAILS, ETC. MAY BE WITHIN WALL GEO -GRID TIE-BACKS. ELEVATION NOT WALL FOUNDATION) - a \ \ - \ \;�- \\ �i �, °/// rf // / // / //� %f /f /i / j� / �p • REM 2 �°����' - \ \\ , 9. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL SPILLING CURB AND GUTTER SECTION IN ALL LOCATIONS WHERE + 250.60 SPOT ELEVATION \ \ \ - ' / , / / / / / / / / / / ' / , 2 - WAY FROM THE CURB AND \ \ � � .l / / ,� / / / / / / / / ! / �--- - - -- \ \ \ \ PARKING LOT` AND DRIVE AISLE GRADES ARE DIRECTING RUN OFF A - .__,, / / / \ \ \ ._._ � - _ - - ,- ,' / / % / / / / / / / / / / / / / M / ' IMPACT AREA 2 _ - - -2 \ \ \ \ \ \ GUTTER. �..._ ---- ,l / / / - -� \ / / / f / / j / \& E �' \ \ \ \ \ \ - / / / / r/ / / / / / / I L`� \\ \ \ \ c __ -- -- - 1 l 1 i 1 \ i 5 i I -z- __ �, r / � / / / / J ��/ / J /j / H 3 i !-\ 1 \ - -® \ `\ y �' / ° \ i / ,� 1 I I i I � \ 1 I { \ \ /' / l / / /J �/ % - / / MISER s �. \ 1 \ s \ � I 1, / / \ / / \ _ /`_J / \ \ , / , III \ \ \ �� \ \ \ \ > / ` 1- - , e� / / f / / / 1 / l 1/ // / / // // / j / / l ra \ ■I \1 - \ - _ - / z__ �__/ / 1 \ "f/ I I I I / l \ \ \ \ \ f / 1 � �' ` _ / / / J f j / / �/ J / / / / /( YtJs \ \� / / \ / { e { \ 260- / f \. \ \ -- - I _ / / \/ / �/ as to i E . IMPACT AREA® \ _ \\ \ 1 1 i \ {i ` f`/ l / - \ \ \ \ � \ ) \ / / / / / //I ,\ l i i -� - �� ®, \ \ /\ - I \ \ \ \ / / o I \ \`%\ \ / - ° - / / 1 / / / / \ .A- i I \ \ - I I I 1 t / . * 2a`-'. - " \ \® � \ \ --� "� ♦ / / 1 / \ � / / f / J/ / / i 1 I i i 1 i \ \ r l / I I I I i �i l I I I i , f� .. - - \ \ ® / " / I i - ,,_-, /// i ► I i I i I i` \\ / / i I i` i °, I, y 1 ♦� -� \ \�� \\ - 1 / / � / °� ` / / f / - -� I I i I I 1 \ \ 1 ' - - - - _ J I I I i i I I f / - - � - , �.\ SSW - , / / / ! I � ��/ / / i I i i ` ` _1 \ t/ - / i I I I I i I f i I I /� - f /� \ \\ ~ \ \\ Ex.f p \ _ _ -- \ / / J / --� I I I \ 1 \ ` ( 1 i I I // / l /� -� \ \\ ` \ n . ss /� / / ( r - - - - - / / / / \ I I I i I / � 1 \ \ i l 1 I I 1 I I I I / / / P �'° ---. \ 2 t o I ", "' I { \ / f f \ , \ I i I I / .:. ,, \ ,- - I 1 I I I I I i I I I �. / . / // ,� / \� - / ! \ � �; ` 1 `�- - _7` / I / { ` \ \ \ i ____ / / / \ l % J A I I I l r I l l I i I g / II Y. � / / / ` ' / - \� - -� i / 1 / \ \ \ / f i i / l / \ l I I is / i tiry / .' / ► -� ; r r / EXISFIN CI �01� I \ 2 '"`� / \ \ \ \ \ �• �/ - -- - � � / / 1 I I f / - l 1 ' 1 1 / 1 f / / /1 i \1 1,= lr S�"WER E T \ \� \ ' \ \ \ \ \ ___ \ J 1 1 ) / / \ I 1 I I 1 1 ( 1; / ti / ' /�1 !� \ 1 \ \� \\ Ion t j \ \ \ \ \ \ -- ", -�� / / r j 1 1 / 1 / / // //� / , I 11 - \�` �\\\ \ \ \ \ \ \ I / r 1f ? / I .11 l I / 1 1C� i j I I / / / \ \\ / / / /oj I �� ; - - , \ • [' \ \ \ - 1 i ! 1 / : / N 1 / i I \ / 24 % f r / i �,'/ i ( - - \ ®`\ Lam-- - � ,� . \ - I I ' / / / f 1 / l l \\ \ / \ i I N I '� / / % r / rO/i /,, / I 230 4 \ » 4 \ \\ \ / -\ \ \ / \ // / / / / / / 1 C I \\ \ \ � - --f '\ I \ / f / i / l_/ 1 I I / / / / / / / -/ / // / / l ! r-� 'C \\ \\\ - \ \ \ \ \ \ - I I \ ✓ / % / / / / / LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE- // / / .� / / / ,f.: / / / l i I / \ \ -- ��* - _,�e\�- -_ ^- - / \' \ f / l l l / if / / �-- / I - - � , - -z�� Q } \ I / �1d / / / / / / \ / / ` 1 ® / / /, f // !l // l I \y` - _ �- - - - _� \\\-\ ,r I _- - - -- \. - - 1 \ \ I I ,/ .� / / r / /� i l 1 / l / l l r ;,,: " / \j \ °�- --- 2 0 t 1. , /.. I / / i l / / / / *. / / / /�. /i i.. / / B R A K- . _ - . N � � -� \ =-/ \ \ 1. - - - - __ \ ` \ \ I r / ��f ' � / / / l / / / / ,_ 1\ \ / / - // . ♦ / ./ /� // \ _ / / I i ®� � /' = � - ­­ � \ -_ �i �. ` - \.,.: - _ - \ ` \ \ I , / / / / -1 / / / / / / / ( \ \ f 25 / l % r �i / ,�1 / ii °/ `" , 1 ` / / / �/ 7 i' , - -- -_-_ \ / f \\ \1 \ \\ � \ _ \ \ \ \ \ \ I r / / / / / / / / / / / I I \ - -- / / /f // /€ // /. / /,/ // . 1 £I, / J J / / �1 y I i I ll \ L N- �t _ � \ ` ') 1 / / % 1 t { \ / • I /, /j a / / / J / / / / ' O 14EAR / \ \ -- \ \ \ \ \I / I / i / / i / ! / / I I \ \ \ f f / / / /// , !'' / f /. f / /1 l /J` I t T 1 r �� FLOW wkY� \ - \ \ \ \ \\ % I / / /f / i / / 1 % / ! \\ / �' // / ' / / f I /l /° /`.F � E /f f // , i � / \ (TYFk) / / / , �N -. ./. L 11 I I \ - -� \ / / / / \ � -T / / // j /� / / l / 11 \ \ \ \ _ \ ---- l 1 / / l /i /! -- / / / f t O / / / i i 1 f 1 I/ / - \ / ✓ 260 % / - / / / / i { ♦ a .. \ \ \ ` \ \ \ .®_-\ / / j j -1 / / / / \ \ -250 / / ♦ / � / / t I I I I I // /` •/ � � \ \ \ \ \ \- \ / / / ,% / // // ,,, / i / f � // \ \ / ♦ / / / r / j i ® /\ s■ _ a ■a ■■ ■' / , - """ ll'ilil�l IF / , "', 0 0 7�, .I- I ) - \ \ \ \ - \" \ \ "i / / / / / / f / / \ ` / / / / / /� I I l t `A ,-/ ' ` \ \ - \ r 1- ,e'' 1.1 / '' / / / / / l \ - -24s_ - r / // / / / / / / / � �* .- / `1 • I � � � ` r,. '� - = 218.41 r - \ \ \ - - - s , , ' - r / / / / / 1 / / / y \ / //� / / - / ` > .r /,/ ./r. - , INV. our / \ \ \ ` � - - _ _' �`/ `'l r''- o r , ' / / / / / ~ z �3 1 r / i ////, / ; .. � _ 4 �, / ) I / / \ \ \ / - / / / / % \ i / /j a i \ / �° R M 230.00 ` ` 1 ` / INV. IN =219.70 (JB -3) \ - I I r ` f ENT OF/ 1 A - --� / / I° . / I INV. OUT= 219.60 - e / / - \ \ - / r 25�- / i l l / { a \ I / / \ \� \ \ / - - - / / / t / I i l / / i I � -240-` / SS it / // SEW M y�/ wIr \ vi X � i / - ,--- - - \ \ \ \ \ _ _ `_ __ / e� - / 1- / / - i I / / l r \ - -- _/ / - // I/ M O ONSMU I / - _ / \ - \ / JB -3 - a --' ,,, - \ / / / t l / \ -- S � Q / _w_ 1 l RIM = 230.00 / \ \ - - \ { / - -\ ,� / '` ° ° i / / / / \ z38 ----- - --- ' _ / _ S / ' / - EY" N,E Lei KSIDJE (TY / � \ /f J \ N INV. IN= 220.05 (JB -4} / i \ \\ / ! / l /, i / // \ \ \ - - - _ \ / / / / / / / / / / i / / / 6 �` `°� 32 ��/ / / /.+/ / ' i / I / INV. OUT = 219.95 1-1 ol / \ - \ / / / / / / /* / R / /// / - - \ `� _ - / .- / „� / / " � / / t / ) / / / ♦ H I l� // `/ \ / INV. IN= 220.88 (JB 5) \ _ - r / / / / f// / \ -'' -' RiM =230.oa r/ ' \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ - - - - - = ..-- ' r -1 --- / x / / / / / %' i / / / \_ ' - r � / / /. J `/% �/ / / ®// / � ! -� INV, OUT = 220.78 - - - l - .� / / / r / �' 232 - \ / f { / f /� { ° I I / RIM = 231.00 - / � \ / / °' \ -, I °r I/ / C\ �t° '� /, ♦� �l \ / f / s INV. IN= 222.35 (JB -6) / / ___ i % , �2�,0 / / / / �/ f / / r � - f \\ I �- ,r \ \,\ \ \ - / / INV. OUT= 225.25 _��7 \ \ / 1 /° ,� ♦� RIM= 230.00 \ \ ~ - / \ / / / / / / /� //� ( I �i t / / ~R ~`.,.' -� / ®/ / \ ° / j - - / r ° - - \ \ 1 / INV. IN= 222.97 JB -7) [ N __ / / \ \ \ \ _ \ \ '� / / /'f / / / / �/ / 1 / i / / / ?` i l / f - - - \ - INV. oUr =222s - , \ \ 'I - - - \ _'- - / / / / J / r / I -- °� ` � / / l 111 t J ® // I I L__ - - / / --- -- \ \ I '� - ' V /y °/ INV. IN= 225.50 (RISER -7) / ^ \ \ _ _ __ - - I / - / / ,o ° !i / ryti $ v / ®� , - - ° - ®/ f RNV OUT 223.91 /` �i / / 1 / / `I (l / \ - - _ / / e2 / / � / ♦ % / / _ ° - \ / / \ RISER -7 -- / / - - - - - - - - - - - - _\ \ I / / 1 ` r / / / °tip° ; I j /ti / / IMPACT AREAS ( J / / ® / / /- - - / % / f ■j r ` T/R= 230.5a / \ ` - _ - - - - - \\ \ j / � , � / / / % / - , 99 $x" (/ _ % _ - / /' \ \ �'1 \ / / J / ( \ INV. oUT= 225.75 --- ., \�` - -_ _ °- - -_ °" \ \\ - / ; \ " �° / I/ / / .," / �) 3 1- 1 = I ,,." 1 //' ®' / / --- /i r/ �,� - °\ \\ `/ ( < < 1 ( ■I \ ` EW -8 - ' /� -245" - =- - - \ \\ - / r - L - o -1 / / .,__ / f � / (� / �\ (; f -� / - \ 1 - s i i p �%' / / 1 ✓F/ I � _ .. V %// ®/ / / - - � i i /�� - ` \ \ \ \ \� \ \ = g 1 INV. OUT= 216.00 �`" - - _z43- - f - -- - - I 1N RALEIGH­- ° / / / e e i / j 1 '\ I // / / r- - :� � , , . �- - \ �\ j ` \ i �I �9 / RISER -9 _. - - � ,_ - \ \ -- - - \ ANITA S 'LNT / �° \�\ �� } � '�� / /�/ /�' /r r' r f' / i ! r !•- _ \ t \ \ \ T /R= 228.00 - - - _ 1 ` -- __ _ r .11 i ' 111 / / / INV. OUT-2117.00 / ,� / '- //e /� \ __ _- - _..- - - - `r / / pl), OF DISTURB CE / ./ / / i�� 23g _ - -- - _� � \� %" ,.: - ... // / _\ JB -4 / o� = " I � f / /i- PRQP ®SED STREAM ANC NEUSE O I CTS Ew -10 _ _ \ ` '� / f i W // J// /i / j�/ INV. OUT =228Aa - - -- - \ \ / /,- / �- -- _ \ _ � _1 e/ / 1_ � / / ,� \� p �li : , „,- /// , LEGEND on 4 _ - L , ""--� �,...�. %" GM1/ 4J�7"7 / l� ! - _- \ \ \ '/ .°'r / eye '� / i �/' / - > +e. „r - \ \ "/ -1 / / * u' / / r � ( 4 - // / ,�/� / /�,/ NOTE. (NEUSE BUFFER IMPACTS IN SQUARE FEET (S.F.) AND ACREAGE (AC.) TjG= 232,50 s \ `'' ..-: \ '� l r / / ,� 36 RC ` - � - 3\\,_ �\ -, rill i - �, i t ) '� '`� ��` ° / _ P \\ / / / INV. N= 229.51 EX. 24 RCP - .,� - 234 - - �- - �- ♦? / ti ; ''' 1 f $ _../ ,. / / INV. OUT= 229.41 __ i � �,� / \ \ l \ ! I i j�" I ; 6 yR �i / - / _„ r ♦ / i /ff� I }/ / / / / / ZONE 1 BUFFER IMPACT ORIGINAL DIET INCREASE TOTAL �i 7-IMPACT AREA \ ` 1 i / - �- ``♦ '--i/ %,r` fi::. °�� /� f I: /// %/ / IMPACT AREA "AN 19 119 s F. o'.o2s AC. 3,C171S.F. C�.O710AC 1,019 S.F. ® <026 AC, + � :As: s23 ~low ' \\� \\ \ \ 2�0 / / '�� J e . l - \ / ' ♦♦ � / �,r^`; // / / / /�i / / / IMPACT AREA pBp 0 IMPACT AREA / Q 2¢y \ \ \ \� - f /'� ,.• \ / /♦ / / %� l r. j//// // - /. ' / 1 AC. 11,644 S.F. 0.027 AC. _ _ f r "� \ \ "fie/ --- r , �" f 1 / l / // i ' / / TOTAL IMPACT 8 573 S.F. SF 0.197 AC. 3,071 S.F. S,F. 0.0 ■s ■■■ as■■■s■�_" ■ '� _ �R i�ss ■ \ \ -� __ ! / F/ - / ! _ ! i / /// // // %� S yr ' - / ' 1-1 11 r s, \ /.� a ®® \ // \ e^ / j \ \�- - ��}` "..•f i \ i r"' ` �/i �/ J� f f! r / ORIGINAL _ TOTAL - \ 4 s _ - l,�• \ �t - - - "'" 4. 4 r , Y '.,. n , . ` // T// /.-,. _ ✓ �-R ZONE 2 BUFFER IMPACT ~� , / '� -_ :r«, i / ` ■'� _ _ / -_ y _ ` // IMPACT AREA °A� 3,573 S.F. 0,082 AC. "° 4,895 S.F. 0.1 12 AC r :,._ a s ■.,� ■ ■ ■mot. ■ f ■ / _ �f /.- -� 0 9 659 S.F. 0.222 AC. 1, {, ,/ . ■ ■ - Y , : / / / r IMPACT AREA B 9,659 S.F. 0.222 AC. r �. \ ,,r _ . / \ r \ ww / i / / p 7 391 S F 0.170 AC, 7, - r / / 4 91 SF 4170 AC 0 w \ / �� ,� r IMPACT ARE 7 3 _ \ 'l' „ .. 7 100 Y - 1 r L S.F. 4.504 AC. _;. - 1 - / _ 3 P / _ ice,/ / / r� ,. _ ", 21,945 S 1 \ ,� e -- �� // / / / /i �/ L f /' r r TOTAL IMPACT 24.623 S.F. 0.473 AC.` \ 1, - \ ��F�OOD / \ J �J r 11 4 "1 r `_ 1:? T Y it / '�..� ./ ��� /,� /\ - .., j�! "v.. .yam -r^" `...,.^..,J // / ,-/ / .-- .- ..-- .-- .-' 1\ .,' / -�. �' .i- \n� ,-�' �/ ...v "`+t « , ..\ Y, r // / P/ / / j / f., s„ f s REA «x \ \ / % / / i STREAM IMPACT TEMPORARY k _ - _ _ K. ''`�- � IMPACT A -: r , 4 \ - _ _ - _ �, •-'/ / / --° z -1 1 i :, :9 . ,, { '% \ , - =--. _ / / I / A OPEN WATER 254 S.F. 0.006 AC 19 YDS3 \ ". f � -' �� - - - �♦ / - / / s / / IMPACT AREA ( ) 1 . > , ;. - _ 3 f A ': Vie°. ,, '�' % \ - - - T ♦ / / /// „f � f � � 13 YDS3 1 \ / s . ,, \ / _/ �{/ ''� - / IMPACT AREA B (OPEN WATER) 18i S F O.Oa4 AC g� / 7 , i \ I .!'. a ., ti,..... -' / \ \ `e % / / 435 S.F. 0.010 AC 32 YDS3 I _ ( \ _ __- / �, �/ / �._ s // / / / e'er/ / / s TOTAL IMPACT S - / mil / I ter . f x " '' / \ r'`� �\ ,,� ♦ / / // r r f / / - ! ® ,�( ( � ' X r '�. ,; / / _ �$ RffAlyl �.REEIC\ \= / 7 > /®p , , / �, ® / / / �' / e / / e 4 / `s - " _/ r--. \ - % ✓ / _ �9F 'BANK\ W4YJ-.- i I'' / • • �// -/ .G--" �' r -~ + a - \ � ` / �^ � --- - r �` I U - - - - / -'.s / / - STREAM IMPACT - PERMANENT �. :,.� '�' •... a ♦ ® \�• f / / / / / / / ! - \h ..c :.= e ' / / �, /� // ! / / / ' IMPACT AREA °B" (OPEN WATER) 295 S.F. x.007 AC. 22 YDS3 I'll f _ 58 LE. _ _ �� _ _ - - - - - - + _ _ - - 1 f -1 / ✓ / '_ ! TOTAL IMPACT 295 S.F. 0.007 AC. 22 YD 58 L.F. GRAPHIC SCALE - aa� YEAR `- s / \ - -"\ -jI \� �\ a �'4/� z � _' -- ..�'^"�a„-a� i� -._ ®`.r =; ��� j %J, / / / i . �/ ! i / / / / / / i ! 4d 4 2Q 4d 80 ,� N - ---1 `� �,, # \. S ", ` ���., - --ter_ J"'r_. ___. _ _ - - - -. - - - - �- s /:: / f , / / / f f r,�'' A ./ / / - / _ \ /i r - (TYP•} �` - L = % .--- �'`-�`�' -- - -� - - ` `% i� ''� / / �, �-, / / / / / - Y iIICh _ 40 ft. - � / / i/ ��� ^ r -- =- =%i i _ --- - -- _- - - - -_- --._' -- _ -- '-i� sl °,/ i // ,r/ / / � / I/ / \s _"'' / // / /. ��,,. ='°` .°^-. \ \. t -\�.°V - `�/ q ! °�-= - ice- �_ '- ��,. '- - - °' -� - _ - `s' --"�.. "'-"` �i i -'' .-� //� i ,.�, ,/ ",/� -I - `,,. / ,�,` -°` ``° _' ,� \ \ � - � � '" - _ _ -::_ - - \ - - - - - - - -- - ! = ..� /r � - `` - FINAL DRAW - N0 RE \ ,/�f / / \l\ - -_ - \ i - - 11 j - -- - -- "'- -- .! T - - - ING T LEASED FOR C ®NSTRUCTION PROPOSED STREAM AND NEUSE BUFFER IMPACTS LEGEND NOTE- (NEUSE BUFFER IMPACTS IN SQUARE FEET (S.F.) AND ACREAGE (AC.) ZONE 1 BUFFER IMPACT ORIGINAL NET INCREASE TOTAL IMPACT AREA *A*: 944 S.F. 0.022 AC. 3,071 S.F. 0.071 AC 4,015 S.F. 0.092 AC. IMPACT AREA "B" 1,119 S.F. 0.026 AC. 0 0 1.119 S.F. 0.026 AC. IMPACT AREA !Q" 6,510 S.F. 0,149 AC, 0 0 8.510 S,F� Q.119 AC, TOTAL IMPACT 8,573 S.F. 0.197 AC. 3,071 S, F. O�071 AC. 11,644 S.F. 0.027 AC. —238 ZONE 2 BUFFER IMPACT ORIGINAL TOTAL 0.112 AC. 4,895 S.F. IMPACT AREA "B" 9,659 S.F. 0.222 AC. 0 0 9,659 S.F. 0.222 AC. IMPACT AREA "A" 3,573 S.F. 0.082 AC. IMPACT AREA "C" 7,391 S.F 0. 170 AC, 0 7.391 S.F. 0. 170 AQ, . ... . 21,945 S.F. 0.504 AC. TOTAL IMPACT 20,623 S.F. 0.473 AC. -A- (OPEN WATER) 254 S.F. 0.006 AC. 19 Yw AREA STREW IMPACT - TEMPORARY IMPACT IMEAQJ AREA -B- (OPEN WATER) 181 S.F. 0,004 AC, la yw TOTAL IMPACT 435 S.F. 0.010 AC. 32 YDS` — X 232— STREAM IMPACT - PERMANENT IMPACT AREA -13- (OPEN WATER) 295 S.F. 0.007 AC. 22 YDS3 IMPACT AREA "C" 58 L.E. TOTAL IMPACT 295 S.F. 0.007 AC. 22 YDS-3 58 LF. / rl, ZONE 1 AND ZONE 2 CLEARING FOR INTAKE PIPE MAINTENANCE CORRIDOR PARALLEL IN ZONE 2 ONLY G 40' CITY OF R&EI H PERPENDICULAR IN ZONE 1: (30 LF) Ll RZ;m"ARY SEWE� EASEMEN VD JB-4 _JOO YEA 10 FLOOD LAIN EX.SSMIH 8 ORA* 1LID DfS-T-URBANCE-'-"' C? LIM" ?I, c7p-) EX. M 6 z -7 -7- # IMPACT AREA,,� z z 0 (SEE INSET 2)- -ISNI Z 0-/t m6vwE jy')S� �yNE _f78r.Fj 's, 7,51, ;� I ACT AREA A ALLOWABLE BUFER IMPACT AREA IMPACT "A" Imp ALLOWABLE BUFER "A 4� IMPACT -4;US-ER--7 -100 YEAR ---6v*x6' RISER PLACED FLOOD WAY BANK IL "N' BEAVERD-Wfi�t-eREEK D s-- (2,111 S.F.) Top- 0 A- ADDITION�L ZONE 2 IMPACTS RON A- 6', Ale'�� �M Null VRR 40N,/FA IMPACTS X /7"t F. 7- 70- --w a /41f/ 4p 77 . . ......... . x $0 rZA cNz z Ld 2WE- 0 � 8 (3) pq 1.4 ca c: C-5 00 0 c: A I �l 't 0 COD tj w 4.4 rA E- ;a 0 > co 0 pa clz IL 0 N cn Z 0 0 z 0-4 0 cl) U) P--4 5; > W 124 1-4 C\z 0 cq E--4 0 R C) U) 0 -< M U =E-1 oz 1-4 0 0 z 0 Ej o :�o z PROJECT NO. CCC— 09000 FILENAME. DESIGNED BY' DLP DRAWN BY- DLP SCAIE: 1" = 20' DATE: 07-27-2011 INSET 1 IMF! c �s ■ ® s ACT A. 99 A 99 d 99 s 79 f N '# �.,.�,� / w � fit' E, .s] r 4 � ^Y"�c F f L v , R , , f... . __,_ . _ �.., �.._.f. r. _._. _ .. r .,_.,.f .r� -,:. y ._ _.... r _.._ >._. .�!l��i.T..�!� . :. , _ �.�,,�„ks, _ 3..:����a�i; -� _. - s : - -.�'" 4 _,_ .,._s^" . __ _�. ,�.., 2_. .,., .. 4 _ _. �', _.,. .. k �..._,<- :.:__>�...1 w , . - �'�,•s,� , ,'4� ,..., -�-�� '" 99p 39 Y9 .-. 77 Eye E .� s � � U .. C7 O cn A• „ a H a Q W t, pq� LU -.!� a z w N9 N O d 4 � o N o W Ot t z U2 0 0 OO O rn V+ '02 ]W L- as z �c �c x O�°aaU CA6 ���III gun uu� mil u mW �!�illl 9 9 4pl pppll 91 I I ulllll uuull a LIlollllll uluq ills° ql Ill,ll Illi�l II II',II III,II � II . I�� L uull wolouuol lllllll I I I u IIIIIIIII III II uwl IIIIII IIIIIIII IIIILIII ICI IIII I, li I I� II III III III II II II II II I III ,ulllll Iluw ��lul IInI� �laVIllw, lllmu (IIIIIIIII IIII gull loull�llamullll� „lull) Iluw �uul luu� ,ullll unl�, �IIIV lllu� III II II II III II ulll luuo ,null lllou. �uull luu� IIGum I IlpuuIllllll l CO IIIIIIIUIIIII I IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII I SITE DATA TABLE PROPERTY PHYSICAL ADDRESS: 2500 GLENWOOD AVENUE RALEIGH, NC 27608 PROJECT DESIGNER: ECOENGINEERING — A DIVISION OF THE JOHN R. McADAMS COMPANY, INC. 2905 MERIDIAN PARKWAY DURHAM, NC 27713 (919) 361 -5000 BUFFER 1 OF 5 COVER SHEET RESTORATION RESTORED ZONE AREA ACRES SEEDING NOTES 1 0.11 AC. 1 1 0.06 AC. 2 2 0.19 AC. 1 2 0.03 AC. 2 TOTAL 0.39 AC. HIIIII 1plll II II IIII 1111l �III uI luIIII pll�„ „�loq wu�l��u'ulllllplll lllllll 111" lldl ���IIIIIVIUIIUalumouVUllilllll° „�Illl loummloullll� IIIIIIiIlilluummuloV ��I�lul �Illllllrmuuplpllllllllll NEUSE BUFFER RESTORATION PLAN GENERAL NOTES WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA PROJECT NUMBER: CCC -09006 DATE: JANUARY 21, 2013 PROPERTY OWNER: CAROLINA COUNTRY CLUB 2500 GLENWOOD AVENUE RALEIGH, NC 27608 1. ALL BUFFER RESTORATION AREAS TO BE SEEDED TO SPECIFICATIONS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 2. ALL AREAS OUTSIDE OF THE CONSERVATION EASEMENT TO REMAIN IN THEIR NATURAL CONDITION, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED FOR REMOVAL DUE TO INVASIVE SPECIES. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS IN FIELD. ANY DISCREPANCIES SHALL BE REPORTED TO THE OWNER AND DESIGNER, PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. 4. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR HAVING ALL UTILITIES LOCATED 48 HOURS PRIOR TO MOBILIZATION TO THE SITE. "CALL BEFORE YOU DIG." TOLL FREE NUMBER (800- 698 - 4949). 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES (IF ANY). 6. EXCESS SOILS AND DEBRIS WILL BE HAULED OFF THE PROJECT SITE AND DISPOSED OF AT A LOCATION TO BE DETERMINED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND APPROVED BY THE DESIGNER. NO EXCESS SOIL OR DEBRIS WILL BE WASTED ON —SITE, UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED (IN WRITING) BY THE PROPERTY OWNER. 7. TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ACCESS TO THE BUFFER RESTORATION SITES SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE PROPERTY OWNER. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RECEIVE APPROVAL FROM THE PROPERTY OWNER, EASEMENT OWNER, AND DESIGNER FOR THE ACCESS POINTS. SHEETINDEX 1 OF 5 COVER SHEET 2 OF 5 BUFFER RESTORATION PLANTING PLAN 3 OF 5 PLAN ING NOTES 4 OF 5 SEEDING NOTES 5 OF 5 PLAN LING DETAILS SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION EVENTS THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE FOLLOWING GENERAL SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION: 1. SET UP STAGING AREAS AND ACCESS ROADS. INSTALL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES, SILT FENCE, AND SILT FENCE OUTLETS (AS REQUIRED). SEE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DETAILS FOR ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS. 2. CONTRACTOR TO STOCKPILE AND STAGE MATERIALS ONLY AT THE LOCATIONS SHOWN ON THE PLANS UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE DESIGNER. NO WASTE STOCKPILING IS ALLOWED. ALL WASTE MATERIALS MUST BE REMOVED FROM THE FLOODPLAIN AND THE PROJECT SITE. 3. REMOVE INVASIVE SPECIES WHERE PRESENT. STOCKPILE BAGGED INVASIVE SPECIES AND HAUL OFF —SITE (SEE INVASIVE SPECIES CONTROL ON SHEET 4). 4. PREPARE PLANTING AREAS AS NEEDED. APPLY TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT SEED. SEE PLANTING NOTES AND SEEDING NOTES (SHEETS 3 & 4) FOR ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS. 5. PLANT SITE ACCORDING TO THE PLANTING SPECIFICATIONS. 6. IN SEEDED AREAS, TO LIMIT EROSION POTENTIAL, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL LIMIT SUB —GRADE AND FINISH GRADE PREPARATION TO AREAS THAT WILL BE PLANTED IMMEDIATELY. PREPARED AREAS SHALL BE MOISTENED PRIOR TO SEEDING WHEN THE SOIL IS DRY, BUT CARE SHALL BE TAKEN TO NOT CREATE MUDDY CONDITIONS. 7. COMPLETE ALL FINAL SITE WORK NECESSARY TO COMPLETE THE PROJECT AftoEngineering A division of The John R. McAdams Company, Inc. ENGINEERS • PLANNERS • SURVEYORS• ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK• CHARLOTTE 2995 Keridian Pukway, Durham NC 27719 990 - 793{6999. m johmmcadams.com-License No.: C -0299 SHEET 1 OF 6 , / / I / I / / E / 1 , I I i s- \ \ I (11� ill. If X11 , 1 :.:..:: tI ' GRAPHIC S 200 0 100 t \�y 1 inch \� 200 r It I BUFFER IF ` Aft A 2 1 I II I / I I , I I I I + I I i BEAVERDAM CREEK -BUFFER F ESTORA\TIO PROPOSED BUFFER AREA 1 \ \ \\ RESTORATION AREA 1 7,500 SQ. FT. 0.17 ACRES \ I1 1 REQUIRED MITIGATION ZONE 1 — 4,484 SQ. FT. I' ZONE 2 — 2,772 SQ. FT. 7,256 SQ. FT. TOTAL \ \`\ 0.17 AC. TOTAL \\ \\ ADDITIONAL REQUIRED BUFFER \ MITIGATION (AREA 2) CA \ ZONE 1 — 9,213 SQ. FT. 20 400 \`\ 0.21 ACRES ft. \\ PROPOSED MITIGATION \\ \ ZONE 1 — 9,350 SQ. FT. 0.22 ACRES \\ \ 1 V \ 1 \1 \ \ I \ I 1 1 \ I 1 1 ; 1 � I ` / \ , 1` �-a \ , Q 0 \ \\ \ -o 0 0 GENERAL NOTES 1. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ACCESS TO THE BUFFER RESTORATION AREAS SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE PROPERTY OWNER AND EASEMENT OWNER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RECEIVE APPROVAL FROM THE PROPERTY OWNER, EASEMENT OWNER, AND DESIGNER FOR THE ACCESS POINTS. 2. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, THE LOCATION(S) OF TEMPORARY STOCKPILE AREAS AND TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION STAGING AREAS SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE PROPERTY OWNER AND EASEMENT OWNER. TABLE 2: PLANTING AREAS BUFFER SPECIES COMMON NAME ExISTIN ;`` RESTORED ZONE AREA � TREE 1 0.11 AC. ,�• 1 ,PROPOSED 2 2 0.19 AC. R40ATION POI+D 2 � 2 TOTAL 0.39 AC. TREE BARE ROOT 8 X 8 QUERCUS NIGRA WATER OAK TREE BARE ROOT 8 X 8 ` r\ \ \ I OVERCUP OAK TREE -N \ QUERCUS LAURIFOLIA LAUREL OAK TREE BARE ROOT 8 X 8 } TULIP POPLAR i / BARE ROOT 8 X 8 CORNUS FLORIDA FLOWERING DOGWOOD SHRUB BARE ROOT /CONTAINERIZED 8 X 8 MYRICA CERIFERA WAX MYRTLE SHRUB BARE ROOT /CONTAINERIZED 8 X 8 AESCULUS SYLVATICA PAINTED BUCKEYE SHRUB BARE ROOT /CONTAINERIZED 8 X 8 ILEX OPACA I AMERICAN HOLLY I SHRUB I BARE ROOT CONTAINERIZED 1 8 X 8 CARPINUS CAROLINIANA IRONWOOD SHRUB BARE ROOT /CONTAINERIZED 8 X 8 ARONIA ARBUTIFOLIA \ \ I (11� ill. If X11 , 1 :.:..:: tI ' GRAPHIC S 200 0 100 t \�y 1 inch \� 200 r It I BUFFER IF ` Aft A 2 1 I II I / I I , I I I I + I I i BEAVERDAM CREEK -BUFFER F ESTORA\TIO PROPOSED BUFFER AREA 1 \ \ \\ RESTORATION AREA 1 7,500 SQ. FT. 0.17 ACRES \ I1 1 REQUIRED MITIGATION ZONE 1 — 4,484 SQ. FT. I' ZONE 2 — 2,772 SQ. FT. 7,256 SQ. FT. TOTAL \ \`\ 0.17 AC. TOTAL \\ \\ ADDITIONAL REQUIRED BUFFER \ MITIGATION (AREA 2) CA \ ZONE 1 — 9,213 SQ. FT. 20 400 \`\ 0.21 ACRES ft. \\ PROPOSED MITIGATION \\ \ ZONE 1 — 9,350 SQ. FT. 0.22 ACRES \\ \ 1 V \ 1 \1 \ \ I \ I 1 1 \ I 1 1 ; 1 � I ` / \ , 1` �-a \ , Q 0 \ \\ \ -o 0 0 GENERAL NOTES 1. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ACCESS TO THE BUFFER RESTORATION AREAS SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE PROPERTY OWNER AND EASEMENT OWNER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RECEIVE APPROVAL FROM THE PROPERTY OWNER, EASEMENT OWNER, AND DESIGNER FOR THE ACCESS POINTS. 2. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, THE LOCATION(S) OF TEMPORARY STOCKPILE AREAS AND TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION STAGING AREAS SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE PROPERTY OWNER AND EASEMENT OWNER. TABLE 2: PLANTING AREAS BUFFER SPECIES COMMON NAME RESTORATION RESTORED ZONE AREA ACRES TREE 1 0.11 AC. 1 1 0.06 AC. 2 2 0.19 AC. 1 2 0.03 AC. 2 TOTAL 0.39 AC. TREE TABLE 1: PLANTING ZONE PIEDMONT BOTTOM LAND FOREST SPECIES COMMON NAME GROWTH HABIT PROPAGATION METHOD SPACING QUERCUS PHELLOS WILLOW OAK TREE BARE ROOT 8 X 8 PLATANUS OCCIDENTALIS SYCAMORE TREE BARE ROOT 8 X 8 QUERCUS PAGODA CHERRYBARK OAK TREE BARE ROOT 8 X 8 BETULA NIGRA RIVER BIRCH TREE BARE ROOT 8 X 8 QUERCUS NIGRA WATER OAK TREE BARE ROOT 8 X 8 QUERCUS LYRATA OVERCUP OAK TREE BARE ROOT 8 X 8 QUERCUS LAURIFOLIA LAUREL OAK TREE BARE ROOT 8 X 8 LIRIODENDRON TULIPIFERA TULIP POPLAR TREE BARE ROOT 8 X 8 CORNUS FLORIDA FLOWERING DOGWOOD SHRUB BARE ROOT /CONTAINERIZED 8 X 8 MYRICA CERIFERA WAX MYRTLE SHRUB BARE ROOT /CONTAINERIZED 8 X 8 AESCULUS SYLVATICA PAINTED BUCKEYE SHRUB BARE ROOT /CONTAINERIZED 8 X 8 ILEX OPACA I AMERICAN HOLLY I SHRUB I BARE ROOT CONTAINERIZED 1 8 X 8 CARPINUS CAROLINIANA IRONWOOD SHRUB BARE ROOT /CONTAINERIZED 8 X 8 ARONIA ARBUTIFOLIA RED CHOKEBERRY SHRUB BARE ROOT /CONTAINERIZED 8 X 8 SHEET 2 OF 6 z b w 4 0. O ° Z W C e N d � W d © z W Ua O�� U�� s Za� U 0 z 0 0 L O 0 ~ 0 N of � N I U II N U CD °z m v � z McADAMS GENERAL RESTORATION NOTES 1. THE PLANTING STOCK SHALL BE GROWN WITHIN THE PIEDMONT REGION BY NURSERIES WITHIN 200 MILES OF THE PROJECT SITE. THE SEED SOURCES FOR THE PLANT MATERIAL SHALL ALSO BE FROM THE PIEDMONT REGION AND SHALL BE OBTAINED WITHIN 200 MILES OF THE PROJECT SITE. PLANT STOCK AND SEED MIXES MAY BE USED FROM NURSERIES BEYOND THE 200 MILE LIMIT WITH THE APPROVAL OF THE DESIGNER. 2. THE CONTRACTOR (I.E. PLANTING SUPERVISOR) INSTALLING THE VEGETATION SHALL HAVE ONE OF THE FOLLOWING QUALIFICATIONS / CERTIFICATIONS: CERTIFIED LANDSCAPE TECHNICIAN, CERTIFIED PLANT PROFESSIONAL, REGISTERED FORESTER. REGISTERED LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR. OR CERTIFIED NURSERYMEN. 3. THE CONTRACTOR (I.E. PLANTING SUPERVISOR) WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MANAGING ALL ACTIVITIES INVOLVING PERMANENT PLANTING, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING: SITE PREPARATION FOR PLANTING, EXOTIC PLANT REMOVAL (WHERE SPECIFIED), SEEDLING HANDLING AND STORAGE, PLANTING OPERATIONS, QUALITY CONTROL INSPECTIONS, AND MANAGING PLANT COMPETITION. 4. THE PLANTING PERIOD FOR THIS PROJECT SHALL BE BETWEEN NOVEMBER 15 AND MARCH 1 (I.E. LATE FALL OR WINTER, IF THE GROUND IS NOT FROZEN, TO EARLY SPRING BEFORE GROWTH BEGINS). PLEASE NOTE PLANTING SHALL NOT TAKE PLACE IF ANY OF THE FOLLOWING OCCUR: (1) THE TEMPERATURE IS BELOW 327, (2) THE SOIL TO BE EXCAVATED FOR THE PLANT HOLE IS FROZEN, OR (3) THE SOIL TO BE USED FOR BACKFILLING IS FROZEN OR T00 WET. 5. FOR ALL PLANTED MATERIAL (BAREROOT / CONTAINERIZED SEEDLINGS AND PERMANENT SEEDING), THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING (I.E. A WARRANTY) AN 80% SURVIVAL RATE FOR THE DURATION OF THE FIRST YEAR MONITORING PERIOD. ANY COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH REPLACING PERMANENT PLANTINGS THAT DO NOT SURVIVE THE FIRST YEAR SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. PLEASE NOTE THE ONE -YEAR MONITORING PERIOD BEGINS UPON ACCEPTANCE OF THE PERMANENT PLANTINGS BY THE DESIGNER. AT THE END OF THE FIRST YEAR MONITORING PERIOD, AN ON -SITE INSPECTION WILL BE CONDUCTED BETWEEN THE CONTRACTOR AND DESIGNER. AT THAT TIME, THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE DIRECTED ACCORDINGLY ON REPLACEMENT OF ANY NECESSARY PLANTINGS. 6. THE ONE -YEAR WARRANTY SHALL INCLUDE MORTALITY AND POOR GROWTH DEFECTS, BUT SHALL NOT INCLUDE DEFECTS RESULTING FROM ABUSE BY OTHER PARTIES AND ABNORMAL WEATHER CONDITIONS. PLEASE NOTE THE 80% SURVIVAL RATE IS A MINIMUM STANDARD AND THE CONTRACTOR MAY PROVIDE ADDITIONAL MEASURES THEY DETERMINE WILL BE BENEFICIAL TO PLANT SURVIVABILITY. ANY ADDITIONAL MEASURES WILL BE CONSIDERED PART OF THE 80% SURVIVAL CLAUSE AND WILL NOT CONSTITUTE A CHANGE ORDER. THIS MAY INCLUDE, BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO, SOIL AMENDMENTS. IRRIGATION. AND MULCH. 7. IN ORDER TO ELIMINATE COMPETITION WITHIN THE BUFFER RESTORATION AREAS, THE EXISTING VEGETATION MAY BE SPRAYED WITH AN AQUATIC HERBICIDE. THE PARTY APPLYING THE HERBICIDE SHALL BE PROPERLY LICENSED IN THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA. PLEASE REFER TO SHEET 4 "INVASIVE SPECIES CONTROL" FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 8. THERE IS AN EXISTING BARBED WIRE FENCE LOCATED WITHIN THE BANK PARCEL AREA (PLEASE NOTE THIS IS NOT SHOWN ON THE PLAN VIEW). THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE THE BARBED WIRE ONLY. ALL POSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FENCE SHALL REMAIN IN PLACE. THE REMOVED BARB WIRE SHALL BE DISPOSED OFFSITE IN AN APPROPRIATE MANNER. PLEASE NOTE ALL COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH REMOVAL AND DISPOSAL OF THE BARBED WIRE SHALL BE PART OF THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE (I.E. A CHANGE ORDER WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED FOR THIS WORK). SPECIES SELECTION 1. THE PERMANENT PLANTINGS, AS LISTED IN TABLE 1 ON SHEET 2, WILL BE PLANTED IN THE DESIGNATED PLANTING ZONES ONLY (SEE HATCHED AREAS ON SHEET 2). PLANT SUBSTITUTES WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED FOR THIS PROJECT AS FLEXIBILITY HAS BEEN INCLUDED BELOW IN NOTE #3. PLEASE NOTE IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO ENSURE THAT AN ADEQUATE NUMBER OF PLANTINGS ARE AVAILABLE DURING THE SPECIFIED PLANTING PERIOD. PLANT DISTRIBUTION NOTES 1. PLANT SPACING SHALL BE BASED ON A 8' X 8' GRID. THIS SPACING REFERS TO PLANTING THE PLANTS EACH 8 FEET APART FROM EACH OTHER IN ALL DIRECTIONS. THIS SPACING DOES NOT RELATE TO PLANTING DISTANCE AT THE ZONE BOUNDARY. 2. PLANT DISTRIBUTION SHALL BE RANDOM AND IS DEFINED AS FOLLOWS: RANDOM DISTRIBUTION - TAKE ALL PLANTS AND MIX THE PLANTS SO THAT THEY ARE ALL PLANTED RANDOMLY. IF DONE PROPERLY, SOMETIMES TWO OR MORE OF THE SAME SPECIES WILL BE PLANTED ADJACENT TO EACH OTHER AND OTHER TIMES THERE MAY ONLY BE ONE PLANT OF A SPECIES COMPLETELY SURROUNDED BY ONE OR MORE OTHER SPECIES. THE PLANTING CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO RANDOMLY DISTRIBUTE CONTAINERIZED AND BARE -ROOT / TUBLING PLANTINGS. IN GENERAL, 50% OF EACH PLANTING ZONE (7 TOTAL) SHALL BE CONTAINERIZED PLANTINGS AND 50% SHALL BE BARE -ROOT / TUBLING PLANTINGS. 3. THE FIRST PLANTING ROW SHOULD BEGIN ih OF THE PLANTING DISTANCE IN FROM THE OUTER EDGE OF THE PLANTING ZONE. THE ENTIRE ZONE SHALL BE PLANTED FULLY AT THE DESIGNATED SPACING. THE PLANTING ZONE IS TO BE PLANTED TO WITHIN �/z THE DESIGNATED PLANT SPACING DISTANCE FROM ANY EDGE OF THE ZONE. IN ALL CASES, PLANTS SHALL BE PLANTED UNTIL PLANTS ARE PLACED TO WITHIN A MAXIMUM OF 3/4 OF THE PLANT SPACING DISTANCE FROM THE EDGE OF THE PLANTING ZONE. 4. THE CORRECT SPACING OF VEGETATION WITHIN THE PLANTING ZONE SHOULD BE CHECKED BY THE PLANTING SUPERVISOR ON A REGULAR BASIS DURING PLANTING. DOCUMENTATION OF EACH INSPECTION SHALL BE KEPT BY THE SUPERVISOR AND SHALL BE MADE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION UPON REQUEST. PLEASE NOTE ANY COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH CHECKING THE PLANT SPACING / DOCUMENTATION ARE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. PLANTING SPECIFICATIONS 1. THE STORAGE, HANDLING, AND PLANTING OF BARE -ROOT / CONTAINERIZED SEEDLINGS WILL FOLLOW THE PROCEDURES OUTLINED IN THE NC DIVISION OF FOREST RESOURCES (NCFS) "POCKET GUIDE TO SEEDLING CARE AND PLANTING STANDARDS ", 6th EDITION. JANUARY 2007. ONLY THE HIGHEST QUALITY BARE ROOT / CONTAINERIZED SEEDLINGS SHALL BE PLANTED. THE PLANTED SEEDLINGS SHALL HAVE WELL - DEVELOPED FIBROUS ROOT SYSTEMS AND HEALTHY BUDS. 2. ALL BARE ROOT / CONTAINERIZED SEEDLINGS SHALL BE DORMANT AT TIME OF ACQUISITION AND PLANTING. 3. ALL BARE -ROOT SPECIES SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM OF FOUR (4) FIRST ORDER LATERAL ROOTS (FOLR) THAT EXCEED 1 MM IN DIAMETER. SEEDLINGS THAT DO NOT POSSESS THE MINIMUM NUMBER OF FOLR SHALL BE CULLED FROM PLANTING. BARE -ROOT TREE SPECIES SEEDLINGS THAT WILL FORM THE CANOPY MUST HAVE A MINIMUM ROOT COLLAR DIAMETER (RCD) OF % INCH. SEEDLINGS WITH LESSER RCD'S CULLED FROM PLANTING. 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PAY CLOSE ATTENTION TO THE HANDLING OF THE PLANT MATERIAL DURING CONSTRUCTION TO PREVENT INJURY TO OR DRYING OUT OF THE TRUNK, BRANCHES, OR ROOTS. FREEZING OF THE PLANT ROOTS SHALL ALSO BE PREVENTED. 5. UNLESS THEY ARE PROMPTLY PLANTED, IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING DELIVERY TO THE PROJECT SITE, ALL PLANTS WITH BARE ROOTS SHALL BE HEELED -IN CONSTANTLY MOIST SOIL OR SAWDUST (IN A MANNER CONSISTENT WITH GENERALLY ACCEPTED HORTICULTURAL PRACTICES). 6. IF THE PLANTING AREA IS LOCATED ON COMPACTED SOIL, THE SOIL IN THIS AREA SHALL BE LOOSENED TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 1 -FOOT. SEEDLINGS MAY BE PLANTED IN HOLES MADE BY A MATTOCK, DIBBLE, PLANTING BAR, OR OTHER PROVIDED THE MEANS ARE APPROVED BY THE DESIGNER. ROOT STOCK SHALL BE PLANTED IN A VERTICAL POSITION WITH THE ROOT COLLAR LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 0.5- INCHES BELOW THE SOIL SURFACE. THE PLANTING TRENCH OR HOLE SHALL BE WIDE ENOUGH TO ALLOW ROOTS TO SPREAD OUT AND DOWN WITHOUT J- ROOTING. AFTER PLANTING, THE SOIL AROUND THE SHRUB OR TREE SHALL BE TAMPED FIRMLY TO REMOVE POTENTIAL AIR POCKETS. 2. PRIOR TO PLANTING, A WRITTEN LIST (SIGNED BY THE PLANTING SUPERVISOR) OF THE ACTUAL SPECIES PURCHASED FROM THE 7 NURSERY (AND IN WHAT PERCENTAGES OF THE TOTAL) MUST BE DELIVERED TO THE DESIGNER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL. 3. THE PLANTING ZONES SHALL BE PLANTED WITH AT LEAST SIX OF THE LISTED 'TREE" SPECIES AND THREE OF THE LISTED "SHRUB" SPECIES AS DEPICTED ON TABLE 1. NO MORE THAN 20% OF ANY ONE SPECIES SHALL MAKE UP EACH PLANTING ZONE (7 TOTAL). NO SPECIES SHALL MAKE UP LESS THAN 10% OF THE EACH PLANTING ZONE (7 TOTAL). IN ADDITION, THE PLANTING CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE THE PLANTINGS CONSIST OF 50% CONTAINERIZED PLANTS (MIN. SIZE 1- GALLON) AND 50% BARE -ROOT / TUBLINGS. 4. THE PLANTING SUPERVISOR SHALL ENSURE THAT THE MINIMUM PLANTING DENSITY OF 436 TO 681 INDIVIDUAL SPECIES (TREE AND /OR SHRUB) PER ACRE IS MET WITHIN EACH PLANTING ZONE (7 TOTAL). 5. PRIOR TO SEEDING /APPLICATION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE DESIGNER WITH SEED MIX INFORMATION, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: GERMINATION RATES, NOXIOUS WEED SEEDS, AND DATE / LOCATION OF HARVEST. THIS INFORMATION MUST BE REVIEWED / APPROVED BY THE DESIGNER. 6. AFTER PLANTING, A WRITTEN LIST (SIGNED BY THE PLANTING SUPERVISOR) OF THE ACTUAL SPECIES INSTALLED (AND IN WHAT PERCENTAGES OF THE TOTAL) MUST BE DELIVERED TO THE DESIGNER FOR REVIEW BEFORE FINAL APPROVAL (I.E. - START OF THE ONE -YEAR MONITORING PERIOD) OF THE PLANTING WILL BE ISSUED. TO PROMOTE PROPER GROWTH, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DEEPLY TILL AND SCARIFY THE PLANTING ZONES TO ENSURE THAT THE ROOT GROWTH OF THE PLANTS WILL NOT BE IMPEDED BY COMPACTED SOIL. ANY SUB - SURFACE HARDPANS WITHIN THE PLANTING ZONE SHALL BE ELIMINATED. RIPPING, DISKING, OR RAKING SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ALL AREAS TO BE SEEDED TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 3 INCHES TO 4 INCHES. 8. STRAW MULCH SHALL BE PLACED: (1) AROUND THE BASE OF EACH SEEDLING /PLANT IN A MINIMUM 4" TO 6" LAYER AND (2) OVER ALL SEEDED AREAS. 9. IN SEEDED AREAS, TO LIMIT EROSION POTENTIAL, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL LIMIT SUB -GRADE AND FINISH GRADE PREPARATION TO AREAS THAT WILL BE PLANTED IMMEDIATELY. PREPARED AREAS SHALL BE MOISTENED PRIOR TO SEEDING WHEN THE SOIL IS DRY, BUT CARE SHALL BE TAKEN TO NOT CREATE MUDDY CONDITIONS. 10. THE PLANTING ZONE SHALL NOT BE GRADED LEVEL. MICROTOPOGRAPHY IS DESIRED TO PROMOTE DIFFUSE FLOW AND SURFACE WATER STORAGE. MICROTOPOGRAPHICAL DEPRESSIONS SHALL NOT BE GREATER THAN 6 INCHES IN DEPTH. 11. UPON COMPLETION OF FINAL GRADING, THE PLANTING SUPERVISOR SHALL CONDUCT A SITE ASSESSMENT TO DETERMINE IF THE SOIL IS APPROPRIATELY PREPARED FOR PLANTING. IF ANY PROBLEMS EXIST, THEY SHALL BE NOTED AND CORRECTED BEFORE PLANTING MAY COMMENCE. SHEET 3 OF 6 L U d W4 O° 0 V W U � � 0. w U Al d Ua 0 O�� U�� s Za0 0 rZ4 U 0 O J o rn o w u) I c� U Z v o m 0 z F W v � z a m m o McADAMS TEMPORARY SEEDING TEMPORARY SEEDING SHALL BE APPLIED AS NEEDED DURING CONSTRUCTION TO STABILIZE BARE OR DISTURBED AREAS OF SOIL AND AT THE COMPLETION OF ALL GRADING AND EARTHWORK ACTIVITIES WITHIN A PARTICULAR AREA OF THE SITE. PERMANENT SEED MAY BE DISTRIBUTED WITH TEMPORARY SEED. PERMANENT SEED MAY BE APPLIED IN PLACE OF TEMPORARY SEED ONLY IF TEMPORARY SEED PERFORMANCE CRITERIA CAN BE MET USING PERMANENT SEED. SEEDBED PREPARATION APPLY LIME ACCORDING TO SOIL TEST RECOMMENDATIONS. SOILS WITH A PH OF 6 OR HIGHER NEED NOT BE LIMED. IF RECENT TILLAGE OPERATIONS HAVE RESULTED IN A LOOSE SURFACE, ADDITIONAL ROUGHENING MAY NOT BE REQUIRED EXCEPT TO BREAK UP LARGE CLODS. IF RAINFALL CAUSES THE SURFACE TO BECOME SEALED OR CRUSTED, LOOSEN IT JUST PRIOR TO SEEDING BY DISKING, RAKING, HARROWING, OR OTHER SUITABLE METHODS. SEEDING METHODS EVENLY APPLY SEED USING A CYCLONE SEEDER, DRILL, CULTIPACKER SEEDER, OR HYDROSEEDER. IN SEEDED AREAS, TO LIMIT EROSION POTENTIAL, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL LIMIT SUB —GRADE AND FINISH GRADE PREPARATION TO AREAS THAT WILL BE PLANTED IMMEDIATELY. PREPARED AREAS SHALL BE MOISTENED PRIOR TO SEEDING WHEN THE SOIL IS DRY, BUT CARE SHALL BE TAKEN TO NOT CREATE MUDDY CONDITIONS. 2. MULCH WITH CLEAN WHEAT STRAW. 3. AFTER SEEDING, APPLY MULCH TO AREAS UNDER HARSH CONDITIONS SUCH AS AREAS THAT HAVE BEEN GRADED. 4. RESEED AND MULCH AREAS WHERE SEEDLING EMERGENCE IS LESS THAN 80% COVERAGE, OR WHERE EROSION OCCURS, AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. DO NOT MOW. PROTECT FROM TRAFFIC AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE. MAINTENANCE PLAN 1. ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES (IF ANY) WILL BE CHECKED FOR STABILITY AND OPERATION FOLLOWING EVERY RUNOFF — PRODUCING RAINFALL BUT IN NO CASE LESS THAN ONCE EVERY WEEK. ANY NEEDED REPAIRS WILL BE MADE IMMEDIATELY TO MAINTAIN ALL PRACTICES AS DESIGNED. 2. SEDIMENT WILL BE REMOVED FROM BEHIND THE SEDIMENT FENCES WHEN IT BECOMES APPROXIMATELY SIX (6) INCHES DEEP AT THE FENCE. THE SEDIMENT FENCE WILL BE REPAIRED AS NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN A BARRIER. ALL SEEDED AREAS WILL BE RESEEDED AS NECESSARY AND MULCHED ACCORDING TO SPECIFICATIONS IN THE VEGETATIVE PLAN. BECAUSE THE GOAL OF THE RESTORATION IS TO ESTABLISH A SELF MAINTAINING VEGETATED CORRIDOR, MAINTENANCE SHOULD BE MINIMAL. TABLE 4 — PERMANENT SEED MIX SPECIES SPECIES (COMMON NAME) MIN. PERCENTAGE Andropogon gerardii (A. furcatus) (Big Bluestem (Turkey Foot Bluestem)) 30 Panicum virgatum (Switchgrass) 10 Panicum clandestinum (Dichanthelium c.) (Deer Tongue) 10 Rudbeckia hirto (Black Eyed Susan) 10 Elymus riparius (Riverbank Wild Rye) 10 Asclepias syriaca (Common Milkweed) 1 Baptisia australis (Blue False Indigo) 1 Carex vulpinoidea (Fox Sedge) 1 Chomaecristo fasciculato (Cassia f.) (Partridge Pea) 1 Cornus amomum (Silky Dogwood) 1 Desmodium canadense (Showy Tick Trefoil) 1 Elymus virginicus (Virginia Wild Rye) 2 Eupatorium fistulosum (Joe Pye Weed) 1 Eupatorium maculatum (Spotted Joe Pye Weed) 1 Eupatorium perfoliatum (Boneset) 1 Euthamia graminifolia (Solidago g.) (Grass Leaved Goldenrod) 2 Heliopsis helianthoides (Ox Eye Sunflower) 2 Juncus effusus (Soft Rush) 2 Monarda fistulosa (Wild Bergamot) 2 Penstemon digitalis (Tall White Beard tongue) 2 Rhus typhina (R. hirta) (Staghorn Sumac) 2 Schizachyrium scoparium ( Andropogon scoparius) (Little Bluestem) 2 Sorghastrum nutans (Indiangrass) 2 Verbena hastata (Blue Vervain) 1 Vernonia gigantea (V. altissima) (Giant Ironweed) 1 Viburnum dentatum (Arrow Wood) 1 TOTAL = 100 PERMANENT SEEDING 1. PERMANENT SEEDING WILL BE REQUIRED ONCE ALL PLANTING OF TREE AND SHRUB SPECIES HAS BEEN COMPLETED WITHIN THE PLANTING ZONE. PERMANENT SEEDING SHALL OCCUR IN CONJUNCTION WITH TEMPORARY SEEDING WHEN APPLICABLE. 2. PERMANENT SEED MIX SHALL CONTAIN THE LISTED SPECIES AT THE MINIMUM PERCENTAGE SHOWN. 3. SPECIES FOR THE PERMANENT SEED MIX WERE DERIVED FROM RIPARIAN BUFFER MIX ERNMX -178 FROM ERNST CONSERVATION SEEDS, PA. 4. PERMANENT SEED MIX SHALL CONTAIN A MINIMUM OF 20 OF THE LISTED SPECIES IN THE MINIMUM PERCENTAGE SHOWN. 5. SEE TEMPORARY SEEDING GUIDELINES FOR SEEDBED PREPARATION. 6. SEED MAY BE APPLIED WITH TEMPORARY SEED OR OVER SEEDED WHEN TEMPORARY SEEDING HAS BEEN COMPLETED. 7. MULCH IF PERMANENT SEED IS SOWN DURING WINTER OR THE TEMPORARY PLANTING IS NO LONGER PRESENT. 8. RESEED AND MULCH AREAS WHERE SEEDLING EMERGENCE IS LESS THAN 80% COVERAGE, OR WHERE EROSION OCCURS, AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. DO NOT MOW. PROTECT FROM TRAFFIC AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE. 9. SEE TEMPORARY SEEDING GUIDELINES FOR MAINTENANCE PLAN 10. PERMANENT SEED SHALL BE APPLIED IN ALL DISTURBED AREAS AT A RATE OF 15 LBS /ACRE. INVASIVE SPECIES CONTROL PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE THE AREAS WHERE INVASIVES ARE TO BE REMOVED / TREATED WITH HERBICIDE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNER, EASEMENT OWNER, AND THE DESIGNER. 2. REMOVE CHINESE PRIVET (LIGUSTRUM SINESE), MULTIFLORA ROSE (ROSA MULTIFLORA), AND JAPANESE HONEYSUCKLE (LONICERA JAPONICA) FROM THE DESIGNATED WOODED AREAS (AS SPECIFIED IN NOTE #1) WITHIN THE BANK PARCEL AREA. 3 4. TABLE 3 — TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL SEEDING SEASON SEEDING DATES ECOREGION SPECIES SCIENTIFIC NAME RATE (LB /ACRE) SOIL AMENDMENTS MAINTENANCE FALL AUGUST 15 — JANUARY 1 PIEDMONT ANNUAL RYE (GRAIN) SECALE CEREALE 120 FOLLOW SOIL TESTS FOR LIME AND 750 LB /ACRE OF SEE TEMPORARY SEEDING LATE WINTER AND EARLY JANUARY 1 — MAY 1 PIEDMONT ANNUAL RYE (GRAIN) SECALE CEREALE 120 SPRING 10 -10 -10 FERTILIZER MAINTENANCE PLAN SUMMER MAY 1 — AUGUST 15 PIEDMONT GERMAN MILLET ECHINOCHLOA CRUSGALLI 40 KtrtKtNUL: Jm Olen, M. u. ea. I`Jono. Norm uaroilna trosion ana Jealment Uontroi Planning ana ueslgn Manual. Kalelgn, Nu: Norm uaroma Jealmentation uontroi uommission, Norm Carolina , and the North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service. 511 pp. Section 6.10.1. THE TRUNKS, BRANCHES, AND VINES OF THESE SPECIES WILL BE BAGGED & REMOVED FROM THE SITE WITH MINIMAL DISTURBANCE TO THE SOIL SURFACE. LIQUID HERBICIDE CONTAINING GLYPHOSATE WILL BE APPLIED TO ALL AREAS WHERE THE CHINESE PRIVET, MULTIFLORA ROSE, AND JAPANESE HONEYSUCKLE HAVE BEEN REMOVED. PLEASE NOTE THE USE OF HERBICIDES WILL REQUIRE THE APPROVAL OF THE PROPERTY OWNER, EASEMENT OWNER, AND THE DESIGNER. ONLY EPA APPROVED AQUATIC FORMULATIONS SHALL BE USED, WITH THE FOLLOWING CHEMICALS BANNED FROM USE: • NON— AQUATIC HERBICIDES • COPPER SULFATE SHEET 4 OF 6 -O)g !� � z 0z � bW�d LU4N0. O W O z M .a M W � a tiWm W d © z w Ua O�� U�� s 0 Za� U co O J O a- 0-) O w cn I lk� c� U Of Z U r` U O o m z F w v � z a m m o McADAMS INSERT BAR AT ANGLE SHOWN AND PUSH FORWARD TO UPRIGHT POSITION. PUSH BAR FORWARD FROM PLANTER FIRMING SOIL AT TOP OF ROOTS. DON'T EXPOSE ROOTS TO AIR DURING FREEZE OR PLANT IN FROZEN GROUND. REMOVE BAR AND PLACE SEEDLING AT CORRECT DEPTH FILL IN LAST HOLE BY STAMPING WITH HEEL. PLANT SEEDLINGS UPRIGHT — NOT AT AN ANGLE. INSERT BAR TWO INCHES TOWARD PLANTER FROM SEEDLING. FIRM SOIL AROUND SEEDLING WITH FEET. DO NOT BEND ROOTS SO THAT THEY ANGLE UPWARDS OUT OF THE GROUND. DIBBLE DETAIL NOT TO SCALE PULL BAR TOWARD PLANTER FIRMING SOIL AT BOTTOM OF ROOTS. TEST PLANTING BY PULLING LIGHTLY ON SEEDLING. ALWAYS PLANT IN SOIL — NEVER LOOSE LEAVES OR DEBRIS. PACK SOIL TIGHTLY. PLANTING INSTRUCTIONS PLANTING TECHNIQUES: 1. ENSURE THAT ROOTS, ONCE REMOVED FROM POT, ARE STRAIGHTENED AND FACE DOWNWARD. 2. CREATE PLANTING AREA FOR EACH PLANT AND EXCAVATE PIT. 3. PLACE PLANTS IN PIT INSURING ROOTS ARE FACING COMPLETELY DOWNWARD. 4. HEEL IN SOIL AROUND PLANT AND PROCEED TO NEXT PLANTING LOCATION. 5. NEWLY PLANTED PLANTS NEED TO BE FASTENED TO THE SUBSTRATE FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF NEW ROOTS 6. ROOTS SHALL BE SPREAD IN THEIR NORMAL POSITION. ALL BROKEN OR FRAYED ROOTS SHALL BE CUT OFF CLEANLY. 7. THE DIAMETER OF THE PITS FOR ALL VEGETATIVE STOCK SHALL BE AT LEAST THREE TIMES THE DIAMETER OF THE ROOT MASS. PLANT PIT WALL SHALL BE SCARIFIED PRIOR INSTALLATION. 8. SET THE PLANTS UPRIGHT, IN THE CENTER OF THE PIT. THE BOTTOM OF THE ROOT MASS SHOULD BE RESTING ON UNDISTURBED SOIL. 9. PLACE THE BACKFILL AROUND THE BASE AND SIDES OF THE MASS, AND WORK EACH LAYER TO SETTLE BACKFILL AND TO ELIMINATE VOIDS AND AIR POCKETS. WHEN PIT IS APPROXIMATELY 3 FULL, WATER THOROUGHLY BEFORE PLACING REMAINDER OF THE BACKFILL. WATER AGAIN AFTER PLACING FINAL LAYER OF BACKFILL. 10. BROKEN OR DAMAGED PARTS WILL BE CUT BACK TO UNDAMAGED TISSUE, LEAVING AS MUCH GREEN BASAL TISSUE AS POSSIBLE ABOVE THE ROOTS. IF MORE THAN FIFTY PERCENT (50 %) OF THE PLANT IS DAMAGED THEN CONTRACTOR SHALL REPLACE THE PLANT. CONTAINER STOCK /BARE ROOT: 1. STOCK SHALL HAVE BEEN GROWN IN A CONTAINER LONG FOR THE ROOT SYSTEM TO HAVE DEVELOPED SUFFICIENTLY TO HOLD ITS SOIL TOGETHER ONCE REMOVED FROM THE CONTAINER. 2. CONTAINER PLANTS WILL NEED TO BE WATERED REGULARLY AND PLACED IN SHADY CONDITIONS UNTIL PLANTING OCCURS. 3. BARE ROOT PLANTS ARE FOR IMMEDIATE PLANTING, OTHERWISE SEE D) BELOW. 4. IF BARE ROOTS SPECIMENS ARE NOT TO BE PLANTED WITHIN FOUR (4) DAYS, TEMPORARY HOLDING OF BARE ROOT SPECIMENS ARE TO BE COVERED ENTIRELY BY A SUITABLE MEDIUM (ETC. SOIL, SAWDUST, MULCH OR THE LIKE) AND WATERED REGULARLY SO AS NOT TO DRY OUT. PLANT LOCATIONS: 1. NEW PLANTINGS SHALL BE LOCATED WHERE SHOWN ON PLAN EXCEPT WHERE CHANGES HAVE BEEN APPROVED IN PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION. 2. NECESSARY ADJUSTMENTS SHALL BE MADE ONLY AFTER APPROVAL BY THE OWNER OR THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. WATER: WATER SHALL BE POTABLE AND SHALL NOT CONTAIN ELEMENTS TOXIC TO PLANT LIFE. SEEDBED PREPARATION 1. CHISEL COMPACTED AREAS AND SPREAD TOPSOIL 3 INCHES DEEP OVER ADVERSE SOIL CONDITIONS, IF AVAILABLE. 2. RIP THE ENTIRE AREA TO 6 INCHES DEPTH. 3. REMOVE ALL LOSE ROCK, ROOTS, AND OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS LEAVING SURFACE REASONABLY SMOOTH AND UNIFORM. 4. PER ONE TIME ONLY, APPLY LIME UNIFORMLY AND MIX WITH SOIL. 5. CONTINUE TILLAGE UNTIL A WELL— PULVERIZED, FIRM, RESONABLY UNIFORM SEEDBED IS PREPARED 4 TO 6 INCHES DEEP. 6. SEED ON FRESHLY PREPARED SEEDBED AND COVER. 7. MULCH IMMEDIATLEY AFTER SEEDING AND ANCHOR MULCH. 8. INSPECT ALL SEEDED AREAS AND MAKE NECESSARY REPAIRS OR RESEEDINGS WITHIN THE PLANTING SEASON, IF POSSIBLE. 9. CONSULT INSPECTOR ON MAINTENANCE TREATMENT AFTER PERMANENT COVER IS ESTABLISHED. SHEET 5 OF 6 -O)g !� z z� bW�d w 4 0. 0 z W � a tiWm W d © z w Ua O�� U�� s 0 Za� U co O J o rn o w u) r I c� U Z u u o m °z F w v � z a m m o McADAMS RIPARIAN BUFFER RESTORATION MONITORING PLAN 1. THE RIPARIAN BUFFER RESTORATION SITE WILL BE MONITORED FOR FIVE CONSECUTIVE YEARS OR UNTIL THE REQUIRED SUCCESS CRITERIA HAS BEEN MET AS DETERMINED BY NC DWQ AND ECOENGINEERING. MONITORING ACTIVITIES WILL BEGIN IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING THE COMPLETION OF THE RIPARIAN PLANTING PLAN IN ORDER TO ADDRESS ANY POTENTIAL PROBLEMS AS THEY OCCUR. IF QUESTIONS OR PROBLEMS ARISE FOLLOWING THE SUBMITTAL OF THE MONITORING REPORTS TO THE APPROPRIATE AGENCY REPRESENTATIVES, IF ISSUES OR PROBLEMS ARE IDENTIFIED, THE RECIPIENTS OF THE REPORT ARE REQUESTED TO CONTACT THE OWNER (OR THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE) FOR THE PURPOSE OF DISCUSSING THE MONITORING DATA AND ASSOCIATED SUCCESS CRITERIA. 2. THE GOAL IS TO ESTABLISH A NATIVE FORESTED RIPARIAN PLANT COMMUNITY WITHIN A MINIMUM OF 50 FEET FROM THE PROPOSED TOP OF THE BANKFULL CHANNEL ALONG WITH THE REMOVAL OF EXOTIC VEGETATION DURING CONSTRUCTION IMPLEMENTATION AND THE ELIMINATION OF CURRENT EMBANKMENT MAINTENANCE PRACTICES. THE REQUIRED BUFFER MITIGATION IS 7,256 SQUARE FEET AND WE ARE PROVIDING 7,500 SQUARE FEET. 3. THE PRIMARY FOCUS OF THE VEGETATIVE MONITORING WILL BE SOLELY ON THE TREE AND SHRUB STRATUM, ALTHOUGH HERBACEOUS SPECIES ENCOUNTERED MAY ALSO BE RECORDED. THE TARGET DENSITY FOR THE RIPARIAN BUFFER IS TO ESTABLISH A MINIMUM OF 320 STEMS PER ACRE AFTER 3 YEARS WITH NO MORE THAN 10 % MORTALITY IN SUBSEQUENT YEARS OR A MINIMUM OF 260 — 320 STEMS PER ACRE AT THE END OF THE 5 —YEAR MONITORING PERIOD. VEGETATION MONITORING WILL OCCUR BETWEEN AUGUST AND OCTOBER. 4. ALL MONITORING METHODOLOGIES FOLLOW THE MOST CURRENT TEMPLATES AND GUIDELINES PROVIDED BY EEP (EEP, 2006; EEP, 2009). VEGETATION PLOT PHOTOGRAPHS WILL BE COLLECTED FOR EACH VEGETATION PLOT. PHOTOGRAPHS WILL BE TAKEN AT HIGH RESOLUTION USING AN OLYMPUS FE -115 5.0 MEGAPIXEL DIGITAL CAMERA. GPS LOCATION INFORMATION WILL BE COLLECTED USING A TRIMBLE GEO XT HANDHELD MAPPING GRADE GPS UNIT. STREAM AND VEGETATION PROBLEM AREAS WILL BE NOTED IN THE FIELD ON AS —BUILT PLAN SHEETS. VEGETATION MONITORING PLOTS WILL BE MARKED IN THE FIELD BY PLACING ORANGE FLAGGING. MONITORING TAXONOMY FOLLOWS FLORA OF THE CAROLINAS, VIRGINIA, GEORGIA, AND SURROUNDING AREAS (WEAKLEY 2007). STEM HEIGHT WILL BE MEASURED WITH A FOLDING ONE —METER RULE. DIAMETER AT BREAST HEIGHT AND DECIMETER HEIGHT WERE MEASURED WITH CALIPERS. THE SURVIVAL DATA WILL BE MONITORED USING SAMPLE PLOTS (USACE, 2003) AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MOST RECENT VERSION OF THE EEP DOCUMENT ENTITLED "CONTENT, FORMAT, AND DATA REQUIREMENTS FOR EEP MONITORING REPORTS ". PER THE MONITORING AND SUCCESS CRITERIA RE— PLANTING WILL BE CONDUCTED PER THE BUFFER RESTORATION PLAN PROTOCOL, AS NEEDED, DURING THE MONTHS OF NOVEMBER THROUGH MARCH TO ACHIEVE THE SUCCESS CRITERIA. IF QUESTIONS OR PROBLEMS ARISE FOLLOWING THE SUBMITTAL OF THE MONITORING REPORTS TO THE APPROPRIATE AGENCY REPRESENTATIVES, IF ISSUES OR PROBLEMS ARE IDENTIFIED, THE RECIPIENTS OF THE REPORT ARE REQUESTED TO CONTACT THE OWNER (OR THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE) FOR THE PURPOSE OF DISCUSSING THE MONITORING DATA AND ASSOCIATED SUCCESS CRITERIA. IF THE SITE IS NOT FUNCTIONING AS EXPECTED A SITE VISIT WILL BE SCHEDULED WITH THE NC DWQ SO THAT A REMEDIATION PLAN CAN BE CREATED AND IMPLEMENTED. SHEET 6 OF 6 -O)g !� z bW�d w 4 N� 0. OO z� W � a tiWm W d ©z m w U a 0 U z aaz 0 O �z p U 0 co O J O rn O w (n r I c� U Z u u o 5 m w L G. v1 D McADAMS