20130046 Ver 1_401 Application_20130113

RCFLLP
ECS CAROLINAS, LLP
"Setting the Standard for Service"
Geotechnical • Construction Materials - Environmental • Facilities NC Registered Engineering Firm F -1078
January 16, 2013
Ms. Karen Higgins
NC DWQ, 401/Wetlands Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699 -1650 2 0 1 3 0 0 4 0
Subject: Pre - Construction Notification Application
Request for 401 Water Quality Certification & Riparian Buffer Authorization
Griffin Mill - Bedstone Drive Extension
Greensboro, Guilford County, North Carolina
ECS Project 09.21953
Dear Ms. Higgins:
Please find five copies of the Pre - Construction Notification Application for the above referenced
site. The site is located southeast of Bedstone Drive, in Greensboro, Guilford County, North
Carolina. The site contains wooded land. Structures are not located on the site. The site is
being developed with a residential subdivision and an associated access road. ECS completed
a wetland delineation for the proposed road crossing in October 2012. Mr. Andrew Williams
with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and Ms. Sue Homewood with the North
Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources — Division of Water Quality
(NCDENR -DWQ) verified the delineation on January 15, 2013
The road crossing will unavoidably impact 148 linear feet of stream channel and 0.23 acres of
wetland. In addition, 11,571.91 square feet of riparian stream buffer will be impacted. Due to
the stream impacts being less than 150 linear feet, stream mitigation should not be required.
Based on the wetland impacts being greater than 1/10"' of an acre, wetland mitigation will be
required (USACE 2:1). Buffer mitigation should not be required due to the road crossing
impacting less than 150 linear feet (or less than 1 /3rd acre of riparian buffer), in accordance with
the NCDENR -DWQ Red Book as an "allowable" with authorization activity.
On behalf of Evans Engineering, Inc., I am requesting that a 401 Water Quality Certification
and Riparian Buffer Authorization be issued to authorize the permanent impact (culvert and
Hp rap) to 148 linear feet stream channel (mitigation not required) and the permanent impact
(fill) to 0.23 acres of wetland (USACE 2:1). Due to the amount of wetland impacts being greater
than 0.10 acres, mitigation for wetland impacts is required at a 2:1 ratio. Compensatory
mitigation is proposed through the NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) to purchase
0.50 acres of wetland credits (EEP Acceptance Letter attached). The proposed mitigation
should satisfy the USACE mitigation requirements. Private mitigation banks have been
contacted and do not have available credits. There are no additional wetland or stream impacts
proposed at this time
�Imvlz
JAN Y S 2013
4811 Koger Boulevard o Greensboro, NC 27407 o T: 336- 856 -7150 • F: 336 -856-
ECS Carolinas, LLP • ECS Florida, LLC • ECS Mid - Atlantic, LLC ^ ECS Southeast, LLC • ECS Texas, LLP

Request for 401 Water Quality Certification & Ripadan Buffer Authorization
Griffin Mill - Bedstone Drive Extension
Greensboro, Guilford County, North Carolina
ECS Project 09.21953
Please feel free to contact me at (336) 856 -7150 if you have any questions concerning this
request or if additional information is required. Thank you in advance for your timely
consideration of this matter.
Sincerely,
ECS Carolinas, LLP
Bradley S. Luckey
Environmental Staff Project Manager
/4J 14-
Michael T. Brame, PWS
Environmental Principal
Attachments: Pre - Construction Notification Application
401 Water Quality Certification Fee - $240.00
2

20130045
of W AT"
`off pG Office Use Only:
=' Corps action ID no.
° DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
M .
Pre - Construction Notification C Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit ❑Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: NWP 29 or General Permit (GP) number.
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
® Yes ❑ No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ® Riparian Buffer Authorization
le. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
®Y� ❑ No
1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes ® No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ® No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project:
Griffin Mill - Bedstone Drive Extension
2b. County:
Guilford
2c. Nearest municipality / town:
Greensboro
2d. Subdivision name:
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
7CCC, LLC
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
Book 007357, Page 02229
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d. Street address:
7 B Corporate Center Court
3e. City, state, zip:
Greensboro, NC 27408
(336) 282 -4127 p
3f. Telephone no.:
3g. Fax no.:
(336) 282 -3797 UU
3h. Email address:
[e-mail]
W NA -wA �QU
Brand,
Page 1 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent ® Other, specify: Civil Engineer
4b. Name:
Mr. Anthony Lester
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
Evans Engineering
4d. Street address:
4609 Dundas Drive
4e. City, state, zip:
Greensboro, NC 27407
4f. Telephone no.:
(336) 854 -8877
4g. Fax no.:
(336) 854 -8876
4h. Email address:
adl @evans- eng.com
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Bradley S. Luckey
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
ECS Carolinas, LLP
5c. Street address:
4811 Koger Boulevard
5d. City, state, zip:
Greensboro, NC 27407
5e. Telephone no.:
(336) 856 -7150
5f. Fax no.:
(336) 856 -7160
5g. Email address:
bluckey@ecs[imfted.com
Page 2 of 13
PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property ldentl lcation
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
7857691721, 7857690680, 7857650478, 7857599474,
7857507495,7857596306 and 7857592311
Latitude: 36.1690532 Longitude: -
1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
79.824354
(DD.DDDDDD) (- DD.DDDDDD)
1c. Property size:
19.86 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
Reedy Fork
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
WS -III, NSW, CA
2c. River basin:
Cape Fear
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The site contains undeveloped, wooded land. Structures are not located on the site The site is located in a residential
area of Greensboro.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
1.029 acres
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
1,786 feet
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the proposed project is to provide road access to develop the site with single family residences. Road
access will be provided by the extension of Bedstone Drive, which is currently located near the northwest site boundary.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The overall project consists of developing the site with a 40 lot residential sub - division. In order to provide access to the
residential lots, Bedstone Drive must be extended from the northwest site boundary. To facilitate the extension of
Bedstone Drive, the crossing location must be cleaned and graded. As part of the grading and to provide access to the
proposed residential sub - division, 148 linear feet of stream channel will be pipied with 72" RCP and filled with rip -rap. In
addition, is is necessary to fill 0.23 acres of wetland and disturb 11,571.91 square feet of riparian stream buffer. Graders,
haulers, excavators and cranes will be used during the grading and construction activities on the site.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Comments: Andy Williams and Sue Homewood
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
❑ Preliminary ® Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency /Consultant Company: ECS Carolinas, LLP
Name (if known): Bradley Luckey/Michael Brame
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
Corps & DWQ Site Visit = January 15, 2013.
Page 3 of 13
PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
® Yes ❑ No
6b. If yes, explain.
The project is Phase II of the Griffin Mill Residential Sub - Division. Phase I of the sub - division was constructed sometime
between 2006 and 2008. Stream and wetland impacts were avoided during Phase I of the sub - division. Plans for the
subdivision were submitted and approved by the City of Greensboro at that time (View Attachments). The plans that
were previously approved by the City of Greensboro included three phases (two south of Trosper Road and one north of
Trosper Road). The plans previously approved by the City of Greensboro show a road crossing in the approximate
vicinity of the one being proposed. The sub - division lot layout was designed/plotted such that the only stream/wetiand
impacts are the ones being proposed within this permit application.
Following the construction of Phase I of the sub - division, the site was sold to the current landowner and developer. At
this time, the portion of residential subdivision north of Trosper Road is not anticipated. Phase II will be the final phase of
the development of the sub - division. Additional stream or wetland impacts are not anticiapted at this time.
Page 4 of 13
PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ® Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non -404, other)
(acres)
Tem ora
W1 ®P ❑ T
Fill
® Yes
® Corps
0.22
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W2 ®P ❑ T
Fill
® Yes
® Corps
0.01
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ p ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ p ❑ T
❑ Yes
rF1
❑ Corps
No
❑DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
2h. Comments: A total of 0.23 acres of wetlands will need to filled for the construction of the Bedstone Drive extension.
Mitigation will be required due to cumulative wetland impacts being greater than 0.10 acres. Mr. Andrew Williams of the
USACE has determineted that the wetland mitigation ratio is 2:1. The mitigation will be satisified through payment to the EEP.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
number -
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
Permanent (P) or
(PER) or
intermittent
(Corps - 404, 10
DWO — non -404,
stream
width
length
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 ®P ❑ T
Culvert/ Rip Rap
Unnamed
® PER
❑ INT
® Corps
® DWQ
3
148
S2 ❑ P [IT
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
148
3i. Comments: 148 linear feet of stream will be impacted by the proposed road crossing. Mitigation should not be required
due to the stream impacts being less than 150 linear feet.
Page 5 of 13
PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
4b.
4c.
4d.
4e.
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact number
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
— Permanent (P)
or Temporary
01 ❑P ❑T
02 ❑P ❑T
03 ❑P [IT
04 ❑P ❑T
4E Total open water impacts
4g. Comments: No open water impacts are proposed.
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
5b.
5c.
5d.
5e.
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose of
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
number
pond
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
Stormwater
0.24
P2
R Total
5g. Comments: The pond will treat stormwater at least 85% TSS. In addition, a bio -cell will be constructed on the northwest
portion of the site that will treat a drainage area of 0.68 acres. The stormwater management plan is being submitted to the City
of Greensboro separate of this application.
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
0.24
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
8.95
5k. Method of construction:
Excavated in high ground.
Page 6 of 13
PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
[:1 ❑ Tar -Pamlico ®Other. Jordan Lake
Project is in which protected basin?
Cataw Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number —
Reason for
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P)
impact
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
or Temporary
required?
131 ®P ❑ T
Permanent
Road
Unnamed
❑ Yes
®No
7719.26
4392.26
Crossing
B2 ❑P ❑T
El Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑P ❑T
❑Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
7719.26
4392.26
6i. Comments: The site is located within the Cape Fear River Basin in an area that has been designated as WS -III. In addition,
the site is located within the Lake Jordan Watershed. The road is crossing the stream buffer as near to 90 degrees as
possible, taking into account large topographic gradients in the vicinity of the crossing. Buffer mitigation should not be
required due to the road crossing impacting less than 150 linear feet (or less than 1 /3rd acre of riparian buffer), in accordance
with the NCDENR -DWQ Red Book as an allowable activity.
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Due to the use of the site for residential development, a road must be constructed to provide access to the site. Adjacent
properties of the site are not owned by the owner /developer of the site. Therefore, there is not other option to access the site
for the proposed development.
Phase I of the sub - division was constructed sometime between 2006 and 2008. Plans for the sub - division were submitted
and approved by the City of Greensboro at that time (View Attachments). The plans that were previously approved by the City
of Greensboro included three phases (two south of Trosper Road and one north of Trosper Road). The plans previously
approved by the City of Greensboro show a road crossing in the approximate vicinity of the one being proposed. The sub-
division lot layout was designed/plottted such that the only stream/wetland impacts are the ones being proposed within this
permit application.
Lot layout of Phase II of the sub - division has been re- designed, since being approved by the City of Greensboro. The re-
deisgn of Phase II eliminates a road that was stubbed to the eastern part of the sub - division in the vicinity of an off -site stream.
This will eliminate potential for future stream and wetland impacts, if development activities occur in the future on the adjacent
property east of the site.
The road crossing will impact 148 linear feet of stream. In order to minimize stream impacts, endwalls have been designed
that are approximately six feet tall. The road crossing has been designed in an area of the stream that is relatively straight. In
addition, the crossing has been designed to cross at the narrowest point of the wetlands that are located adjacent to both
sides of the stream, thus signigicantly reducing wetland impacts. Clearing and grading limits for the road crossing have been
minimized to the maximum extent possible, taking into account severe topographic gradients in the vicinity of the road
crossing.
The road crossing has been designed to cross as near to perpendicular of the stream as possible given severe topographic
gradients in the vicinity of the stream. The road can not cross the stream exactly at 90 degrees due to road grades being in
excess of 10 -12 %. The current road has been designed to cross at a maximum grade of 5-6% with an average of a 3%
grade. The road has been designed with an average grade of 3% due to safety concerns. The concerns regarding safety for
roads with excessive grades include but are not limited to poor visibility, limited site lines and potential increases for accidents
during inclement weather conditions. Furthermore. aradina to level the PYhnitinn sInno ic nt%f fomcihln A. ....1., S,
Page7of13
PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

rock and excessive grading costs.
There is approximately 1.029 acres of wetland, approximately 1,786 linear feet of stream channel and a 0.241 acre pond that
exist on the site. The remaining 0.779 acres of wetland, approximately 1,638 linear feet of stream channel and the 0.241 acre
pond are being avoided. In addition, undisturbed buffers (inner 30 feet on both sides of stream) and vegetated buffers (outer
70 feet on both sides of stream) will be established on the portions of the stream channel that will not be impacted.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
The clearing limits will be staked and silt fence will be used. A temporary coffer dam will be installed upgradient of the
proposed culvert within the area of stream that will be permanently impacted with rip rap. During construction, water will be
pumped around or diverted into by -pass channels in the construction area. All temporary impacts will take place within the
limits of the permitted impacts. Upon completion of culvert installation, the temporary sand bag coffer dams will be removed
and stream flow will be diverted through the culvert. Following construction, disturbed slopes will be stabilized with permanent
seeding, matting and temporary slope linings. Best management practices will be implemented during construction activities to
avoid sediment discharge into downgradient streams and wetlands. A Temporary "Culvert Crossing - Pump Around" for
Culvert Installation exhibit is included on the Culvert Crossing Plan generated by Evans Engineering that is included as an
attachment.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
® Yes ❑ No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ® Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project?
® Payment to in4ieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete If Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
3c. Comments: Private mitigation banks are not available in this watershed.
4. Complete If Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
® Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
0.25 acres
4f. Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments: EEP has accepted 0.25 acres of wetland credits (EEP Acceptance Letter is attached -EEP has verbally
approved 0.50 acres).
5. Complete If Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 8 of 13
PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
❑ Yes ® No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c.
6d.
6e.
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments: The site is located within the Cape Fear River Basin in an area that has been designated as WS -III. In
addition, the site is located within the Lake Jordan Watershed. The road is crossing the stream buffer as near to 90
degrees as possible, taking into account large topographic gradients. Buffer mitigation should not be required due to the
road crossing impacting less than 150 linear feet (or less than 1 /3rd acre of riparian buffer), in accordance with the
NCDENR -DWQ Red Book as an "allowable" activity.
Page 9 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
® Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Comments: Stormwater run-off will be discharged directly into stormwater retention
❑ Yes ® No
pond and/or bio -cell.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
16.68%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
® Yes ❑ No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
A 0.24 acre stormwater pond has been designed to treat stormwater runoff. The stormwater pond has been designed to
treat at least 85°x6 total suspended solids. In addition, a bio-retention cell has been designed to treat 0.68 acres of
drainage area. The current proposed construction will create 16.68% impervious surfaces. The stormwater pond has
been designed to treat stormwater based on the site being 16.68% impervious. The stormwater plan is being mailed to
the City of Greensboro for review and is not included in this permit application.
® Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
Greensboro
® Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally- implemented stormwater management programs
® NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
® Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other.
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ® No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
4a. Which of the following state- implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ HQW
El ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006 -246
❑ Other.
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ® No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
® Yes ❑ No
Page 10 of 13
PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
FZYes ❑ No
F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes ® No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
❑ Yes ® No
Comments: A NEPA or SEPA is not required as part of this project.
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after - the -fad permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
We are not aware of additional development that will result which will impact nearby downstream water quality.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non - discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Wastewater from the residences will be disposed of by municipal sewer service provided by the City of Greensboro. No
stream or wetland impacts will occur that are assoicated with sewage disposal and/or installation of sewage lines.
Page 11 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

S. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Raleigh
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
ECS consulted the Natural Heritage Program Website to determine if federally protected endangered or threatened
species inhabit the Lake Brandt, NC Quadrangle (the quadrangle that contains the site). There are no federally listed
protected endangered or threatened species that have been identified on this quadrangle.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? I ❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
Based on our knowledge of the site, the site is not located in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat. We did
not observe fish inhabiting the stream during our site visits. Best management practices and the construction of stormwater
ponds will prevent sediment from entering down gradient waterbodies which may contain fish.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in ❑Yes No
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
We reviewed the SHPO Map (http: / /gis.ncdcr.gov/hpowebo to identify historic and/or archaeological resources of the site.
The SHPO map did not identify historic and/or cultural resources on the site or in the vicinity of the site. A copy of the map
is included as an attachment.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA - designated 100 -year floodplain? TEE11 Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? North Carolina Floodplain Mapping Program,
Attachments
Bradley S. Luckey 1 -16 -13
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name App nt/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is Drovided.)
Page 12 of 13
PION Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

if /f
iy'�1,�i
Iof' '
If I r 1 yr
111, rh1,'11/1'� �
off
'llllll
1!liid!I!i!!i!1!, I—
'iii
/III /
/ 11 1111 11111
•,�� 41
iii
,11 I
,1 1/, 1, 1
of i l%
r'
.I1
li
A
0
Irl I
„ s
of
I, /
1 /r 4/
' 1
- - -- ! " j1 1 a ,
II ♦ L •
of •
III ra
IMP
�
B
Y
It , I 1
�p
f
�
BB •
•
a
lib
3
Q
6
1
II
a
a
lid
l
- - -- ! " j1 1 a ,
II ♦ L •
of •
III ra
�
B
Y
It , I 1
�p
f
�
BB •
•
a
lib
3
Q
6
1
II
a
a
- - -- ! " j1 1 a ,
II ♦ L •
of •
11 iill
If of
v � U 1, ;I t �^Z \\\1 \,1111f 1 1;;
1 fill
- 14,1111,V
1 1 I //I
Nl
,. 1 1 1• 1'll '
Iiili�l'
of
of
of jo
' I
1 111 `♦ �-
1/1 ` \
i
I /
1 / /
i
01
III ra
�
11" 11"
It , I 1
v 1 1�, 3,
f
a r
,j����•:` ii'�i
1
11 iill
If of
v � U 1, ;I t �^Z \\\1 \,1111f 1 1;;
1 fill
- 14,1111,V
1 1 I //I
Nl
,. 1 1 1• 1'll '
Iiili�l'
of
of
of jo
' I
1 111 `♦ �-
1/1 ` \
i
I /
1 / /
i
01
III ra
11" 11"
It , I 1
V l
R j
s
r�
V
o�

\�' 1 onus oLQ • . � ' � ` \P
1� r. r Ainwo
LEWIS
kN. `
TATION I I 1 �`S 45 4 / _ — —_ - -- - -= +� °` 00- C
DB 2
ell
O
IL\ \\MIE7LANDS
11
I EX
- --
7.�9
---- - - - - +- I • `\ r ��\\�` + tt A J \ \ ,moo /1 ��
164 1 / ^ 1� 1 49 •' ' -- -- - - -- -- - --
1 ti\\ 610 SF V / I \ 1 \L/ �' �4B) x -
I ♦1 j�jll AI /ll/ 11 �� + I�1\ / I /\ 1 51 1 1 8,0} .rSF 'l 48 �'/ / - - --- - --- - -- - -- - -
\ I I I 11 I l l I r / / r I ITT `.� ` Y I r I f 958 sI 1 1 1T 119 g 1 I i 7,296h�' /
1!``'/ - 1y1 111 \ \',J I` Viml'/ 1 53 <7•'I 1 \ `I 1 \ 1 e 1 ' ♦7 ' -� - - --
` -- -r- 1 IiI ;`r �` ' %l�l 1 \`\`I ��`\ it ^ \ I O 1 ;1 1 \ \,1 L_\_J 1� - ��` N// f L - - - -__ -`
9,036 sF \ 1 L ` _ � - -'
_4r. 99 �F 9 I `\\ 1 1 � �9Et9� '�1 ♦ \ 1 \ -
O A/
Zri r '1_
•` �- 4r 1 \ I'II 1 7.OSF A4.463/5F - --
"� ,
22 j (`. \II ii 1� It :li {' � >,�i /me�(��`(�+'�; +�i / �� ♦� y � -- .,,/7 /' ��t\ i /�/ �
\ \:' "`, I , 675E "'k ' \ y "1755
( r
'r I'• `\Y\ g / 1 /
ii
2a 1 43 / 1� i\ /41,634 SF� % /
1 / 1 it
1991sFi Ir / 8.534 SF/
7.376 Ij
zs, n
=4? ` ` ; .•�\\``.`; � �' ,` \\\ \I, 1 '\ \`\ 4448 >" 1 { \\ , 1 + ' , _ I Y pl. ,
��L ►�\\\ \` \\Z \ \1\ �,```1 \� +` \\ `\ 1 \ \`I 1 \; \1 \`� _ r�_1 /CITY'OF GREENSBORO
s
ENS I I \ v \ " \ \\t `�l\ �l l\ \ I \1 1 r i \�i\ F EL # 0089341
\ `�� \�ti {\ \ -J� / 1 4i� l r \ 1 I I 1 \ I �. 1 I I 11 I I moo' 1 \ PIN: \ 7857589523
1 P\\\ 1 1 1 r+ I' l 1 I le J06 SFI 1 I . '� 6. SF 1 1 1 7 ».507/ of 1 \
pµuE I 1 \ \a\�� `` \\f Jkr+ �[/„°""""°' I \1 I , \1 I 1 1 I / �' \ I ZOINING RS -40
\t`\ka\\ \ \♦� t``�cCv.1 \\ 1 1 1
wEiLAN�S ;\ \ \ 1 1\1 ) II I I I \ \\,\%\ 1 \ \ III 11 1 1 1 1 \ 31 1 I I I I 1 r f I / 1 = I I '
�\ 1, i1� ` \1 `IIO. WbF ' I Ir, I I \ 1 I� I 1
136
� O \ ♦ 1 1 , \ \ \ ``� 1 } 1 1 ' � \ \ ` 11 \-` .L 1 1\ d I 1 � I 9.684 sdl
% a ♦��� 1 t`Ap \ \V� \ \` 1t Lj I Mt \\ (
39
—1 \ \ \\ \\ \\ • I \ IELEMENTS
` \\ssa Acs \ \ \ \\ \I 1 \,0,,,9\�F � I I ri
\ 8 245
\ ` I 1 � � � `�\ \ \��\ \\ `� � ♦ C+` � \\ `�, ; \\ \ ./ 1 i1.1i716 Sf I
- r O \ �. \\\•J P h l 1 1 1 I \\ \ \
FIN MILL
SECTION
+ _
34 PG. 147 — - - - --
4 + T`- a /� r _ \` —
84, PG. 785 f 1 i _ -- -- - -�� -- - -- SeoRO 1T _
OF 2223 PG. %8B _ -- I MAW
DENSITY LIMITS.
GREENSBORO WATERSHED. WS 01 WCA (HIGH- DENSDY OPTION)
TIER 3. 302 BlA MAX
TIER 4 402 MA MAX
TIER 3 ALLOWANCE . 1289 ACRES X 302 - 387 ACRES ALLOWED
TIER 3 BUA SHOWN - 2.24 ACRES
TIER 4 ALLOWANCE • 6 97 ACRES X 402 MAX - 2 79 ACRES ALLOWED
TER 4 UNITS SHOWN - 1 07 ACRES
TOTAL ALLOWED - 6 70 ACRES
TOTAL SHOWN - 3 31 ACRES
1. WATERSHED' GREENSBORO WCA TIERS 3 Q 4 -REEDY FORK WS III
2 TOTAL BUILT UPON AREA
STREETS 42.179 SF
LOTS 32 O 3.000 SF /LOT = 96.000 SF
StOEWALKS. 6.142 SF
TOTAL - 144.321 SF (16 682)
3. DISTANCE TO NEAREST FLOOD PLAIN >2.000'
4 AVERAGE 2 SLOPE +/_ 149%
5 OISTURBED AREA. TIER 3 802 MAX
TIER 4 852 MAX
TIER 3 DISTURBANCE ALLOWED - 449.191 SF
SHOWN = 248.589 SF (442)
TIER 4 DISRIRBANCE ALLOWED - 258,071 SF
SHOWN - 57,970 SF (192)
94 THE PROCESS OF OBTAINING ALL OF THE NECESSARY
APPROVALS FROM THE STATE AND CORPS FOR THE
STREAY CROSSINGS AND AND DISTURBANCE
srtE DArA
TOTAL AREA *1986 ACRES
TAX MAP PARCELS 0137489. 0137392. 0137394. 0137415 -8
WATERSHED. GREENSBORO WCA TIERS 3 k 4 REEDY FORK WS D
PROPOSED ZONING* CD -R5
AREA IN ROW *1 59 AC
AREA IN COMMON ELEMENTS *11 46 AC
AREA IN LOTS *6.81 AC
TOTAL PHASE 11 AREA * 19.86 AC
GRAPHIC SCALE
n e ■ � m
L a ,ter l
1 bab - So tL
70CC, LL.0
78 CORPORATE CENTER COURT
fitEO1580R0, INC 27408
TELEPIpNE 338- 282 -4127
CONTACT: HERB PARKS

C/L EX. STREAM
(L43 TO L71)
I
I
P.B.169, PG. 19
D.B.6284, PG. 785
"This certifies that this copy of this plat accurately depicts the boundary of the jurisdiction
of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act as debein, ned by the undersigned on this date.
Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination of
Section 404 jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from
this date. This determination was made utilizing the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands
Delineation Manual."
Name:
Title:
Date:
AID:
COMMON aEMEN7S
P.B. 184, PG 148
GRAPHIC SCALE
40 0 20 40 80 160
( IN FEET )
I inch = 40 ft.
UNE TABLES(SEE MAP 3)
PAXLECT GRIFFIN MII.L PHASE II
WETLAND MAPS
GREENSBORO. NORTH CAROUNA
MAP 1
iL 4(r
14.
DECEMBER 7. 1074
OEOMM 40. 274
4
'.� N
I
P.B.169, PG. 19
D.B.6284, PG. 785
"This certifies that this copy of this plat accurately depicts the boundary of the jurisdiction
of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act as debein, ned by the undersigned on this date.
Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination of
Section 404 jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from
this date. This determination was made utilizing the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands
Delineation Manual."
Name:
Title:
Date:
AID:
COMMON aEMEN7S
P.B. 184, PG 148
GRAPHIC SCALE
40 0 20 40 80 160
( IN FEET )
I inch = 40 ft.
UNE TABLES(SEE MAP 3)
PAXLECT GRIFFIN MII.L PHASE II
WETLAND MAPS
GREENSBORO. NORTH CAROUNA
MAP 1
iL 4(r
14.
DECEMBER 7. 1074
OEOMM 40. 274
4

770
760
750
X. p F-� - - - --
7�RMA�jE I
COMM N710N pOjya- -
t4N ELEMENT -
b
'd
PLAN VIEW
SCALE i' . 40'
PROFILE VIEW
HOR SCALE 1" . 40'
VERT SCALE i" . 4'
J \
o
M
aw
.Qr
wr
.mw
e°Oennl .tea ior1lOw �omn°.sA° rPOLM7.,*� �
SECTION A -A
TEMPORARY 'CULVERT CROSSING - PUMP AROUND"
FOR CULVERT INSTALLATION
gggomm a - A r a� Lam ®.>m D/ramlRr a
�wr no Ira as m a amts N 1C m11AAGla1 uao 1N[ wa Nw
a 1a mnaclol nwe
n W1mIl vmlume
a'�ma v°Yaws.o ®r ®two w°aWOm�D mmio ml�s e�oami m
t•SIOIr IGa.Q V k Wmilll W ■.la. 11[ wWA (IC)
mlCiwnnfY vnew no cm, —w0
1 aA'ir1 MAi i Irt m .Irf 1{p. IYW ML I�Aw O 10.O1.YY
tdW m019O m .RA SAY S OwRaK0O1 L� ma w...o ro
mlo.ao .uwe aw. aawo wool a
ma as re 4m
uAiael�o. �moe� nm rAa.e to oamo
a r6rw1. ar vocz wYm mr w Ma mo at o 1w
o m�o1 ma1A1ROd �� moa 10bIlI owlr. nml larG
a�O�i mvona�nr mnm rm a$r ®an mr
W--
n rtln
vAa 1R.aQ la1 v sum, wcn slat maawat [AOa mr amt
. wo otaTOS as
clerw..., wr±l w. YCACr
WILAN 0► CLLWfr Arm YRI RAF IY li'
w[IIAIm W eaACAC r or admr AND RIP PAP PAC, 0.73 K
- F-
FO-11�I�i C
'��98j•�T�� rm.,f��mcm.'1'
_ /�j r•1 caa�rNnaoo
oc�r�amo
`�:, t,N ©rNrTaram
a�a�arc�r>,r-4
Iln r>marztamr11
c>turrroo
•�� ft'[G7rd'0071 7
�Irir' r�r_arcroo
a7ornaram
- _ Ti W j
l
gi:i.+i
r-n
a
_ o "W
oc�
IF
i_'J06
'�° Gla7r
aur_ac
r�or
C:'�1El 7 �
EVANS ENGINEERING, INC.
ENGUHMM - SURVEY01IM
4809 DUNDAS DRIVE GREENSBORO. NC 47407
PHONE: (336)&54-8877 FAX [phone]
WIL
1 ALL C01131mGOd110 O TO THE COY OF
OREDC111Om mOMMIM AND 6POtB101JWL4
2 C "Z m11 TO VOIDT Omw wm IOrwTaa
Q Au Coll a mm PAma To CONS=C0mL
1 Cm11aCOR 10 COMPLY WIN TIME NH
FOR 09mamnmI OF NI61mS
per Law rawl['t i Mr-
9M11110,
CULVERT CROSSING '
PLAN

Pmnposel for EnvbnnmwW Semk"
Phan 2 Qdffln AfllJ SuMMon
Gremboro, NoM Carolm
ECS ProposalNo. 09.19?*P
Oolober 11, 2012
ECS Carolinas, LLP
AGENT AUTHORIZATION
This form authorizes ECS to act as our agent In strearnMetland matters Inoluding U,S. Army
Corps of Engineers and North Carolina Division of Water Quality field verif edon and permit
applioadon.
.. /l ► .Li �
Telephone Number. (331A 7M—,412-1
Fax Number. 133 0 39:3
E-mail Address: T yg & bOSfInG. 01)m
Signature. 6"-.ev� Date: 10- .2 —�.�-

F la meat
PROGRAM
January 14, 2013
Anthony Lester
Evans Engineering
4609 Dundas Drive
Greensboro, NC 27407
Project: Griffin Mill Phase II- Bedstone Drive Ext.
Expiration of Acceptance: July 14, 2013
County: Guilford
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is willing to accept
payment for compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced project as indicated in the table below. Please
note that this decision does not assure that participation in the NCEEP will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation
for project impacts. It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact these agencies to determine if payment to the NCEEP will be
approved. You must also comply with all other state. federal or local government permits regulations or authorizations associated
with the MRosed activity including SL 2009 -337• An Act to Promote the Use of Compensatory Mitigati
S.L. 2011 -343. on Banks as amended by
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. H we have not received a copy of the
issued 404 Permit/401 Certificadon/CAMA permit within this time frame, this acceptance will expire. It is the applicant's
responsibility to send copies of the permits to NCEEP. Once NCEEP receives a copy of the permit(s) an invoice will be issued based
on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must be made prior to conducting the authorized work. The amount of the In-
Lieu Fee to be paid to NCEEP by an applicant is calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed at www.nceep.net.
Based on the information supplied by you in your request to use the NCEEP, the impacts that may require compensatory mitigation are
summarized in the following table. The amount of mitigation required for this impact is determined by permitting agencies.
impact
River
Basin
CU
Location
Stream (feet)
Wetlands (acres)
Buffer I
(Sq. Ft.)
Buffer II
(Sq. Ft.)
Cold
Cool
Warm
Riparian
Non-Riparian
Coastal Marsh
Cape Fear
03030002
0
0
0
0.25
0
0
0
0
Upon receipt of payment, EEP will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. The mitigation will be performed in
accordance with the N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources' Ecosystem Enhancement Program In -Lieu Fee
Instrument dated July 28, 2010.
Thank you for your interest in the NCEEP. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Kelly Williams at
(919) 707 -8915.
cc: Karen Higgins, NCDWQ Wetlands/401 Unit
Andy Williams, USACE - Raleigh
Sue Homewood, NCDWQ - Winston -Salem
Bradley Luckey, agent
File
Sincerely,
XXe Klimek
ding Director
Our JIA&
1,
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699 -1652 / 919 -919 -707 -8976 / www.neeep.net

C7
_.
iF
N
s
riven
m
A
W
tte
s
N
'r`.
a
a
ipaciY.'°rt'F
����-�
i8¢
tr
fl
r
v�
s'A
�5
2
r
g�
a
p
olvog
3
j