20202025 Ver 1_ePCN Application_20210428

DWR
Division of Water Resources
Initial Review
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
October 26, 2020 Ver 3.3
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
6 Yes
✓ No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
CYes r No
Change Only 1 needed.
BIMS # Assigned* Version#*
20202025 1
Is a payment required for this project?*
✓ No payment required
✓ Fee received
6 Fee needed - send electronic notification
Reviewing Office *
Raleigh Regional Office - [phone]
Information for Initial Review
la. Name of project:
The Point South
la. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Jennifer Burdette
lb. Primary Contact Email:*
b u rdette@mcadamsco. co m
Date Submitted
4/28/2021
Nearest Body of Water
Harris Creek
Basin
Neuse
Water Classification
C; NSW
Site Coordinates
Latitude:
35.904642
Pre -Filing Meeting Information
ID#
20202025
Pre -fling Meeting or Request Date*
1/18/2021
Longitude:
-78.455435
Attach documentation of Pre -Filing Meeting Request here:*
01-AWH20000-Point-pre-Oiling complete-2021-01-28.pdf
What amout is owed?*
r $240.00
6 $570.00
Select Project Reviewer*
Stephanie Goss:eads\szgoss
lc. Primary Contact Phone:*
[phone]
Version
1
728.48KB
A. Processing Information
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Wake

Is this a NCDMS Project
C- Yes f No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
C- Yes f No
la. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
[7 Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
r Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
Has this PCN previously been submitted?*
C- Yes
G No
1b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
fJ Nationwide Permit (NWP)
r Regional General Permit (RGP)
r Standard (IP)
lc. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
✓ Yes C- No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number: 29 - Residential Developments
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
Id. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
17 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
r Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
r Individual Permit
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
If. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
C- Yes f No
F. 401 Water Quality Certification - Express
7 Riparian Buffer Authorization
lg. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
(' Yes C No
lg. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
C- Yes r No
Acceptance Letter Attachment
lh. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
CYes (7 No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
C- Yes a No
B. Applicant Information
Id. Who is applying for the permit?
[7 Owner r Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?*
6 Yes r No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
Ashton Raleigh Residential, LLC
2b. Deed book and page no.:
DB 17720, PG 1568; DB 17720, PG 1506; DB 17720, PG 1542; &DB 17720, PG 1655
2c. Responsible party:
Raymond Rinker
2d. Address
✓ Yes 6' No
✓ Yesr No

Street Address
5711 Six Forks Rd, Ste 300
Address Line 2
City State / Province / Region
Raleigh NC
Postal / Zip Code Country
27609-3888 USA
2e. Telephone Number: 2f. Fax Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:
Jennifer Burdette
4b. Business Name:
McAdams
4c. Address
Street Address
2905 Meridian Parkway
Address Line 2
City
Durham
Postal / TZp Code
27713
4d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
4f. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
Agent Authorization Letter*
02-AWH20000-Agent Auth-Ashton.pdf
State / Rovince / Region
NC
Country
USA
4e. Fax Number:
788.31 KB
C. Project Information and Prior Project History C^U
1. Project Information
1b. Subdivision name:
(if appropriate)
lc. Nearest municipality/ town:
Rolesville
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
1768266125, 1768044257, 1758930017 &
1768068057
2b. Property size:
264
2c. Project Address
Street Address
0 East Young St; 1006 Rolesville Rd; 1002 E Young St; 0 Jonesville Rd
Address Line 2
Cily State / Rovince / Region
Wake Forest NC
Postal / Zip Code Country
27587 USA
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:*
Harris Creek
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:*
C; NSW
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*

Neuse
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030202010703
4. Project Description and History
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:*
The site consists of primarily of young pine forest with hardwood tree species occupying the riparian areas. There are a
home and several outbuildings on the property. Land use in the vicinity of the project consists of mixed pine/hardwood
forest, agriculture, rural homesteads and residential subdivisions. Please refer to the attached USGS Location Map (Figure 1), Wake County Soil Survey Map (Figure 2B) and Aerial
Map (Figure 3 - attached after Figure 2B) for more information on
the project setting.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
r Yes ( No r Unknown
4d. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of the project site. (for DWR)
03-AWH20000_ThePoint-South_Fig 1 USGS.pdf 1.57MB
4e. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey map depicting the project site. (for DWR)
04-AWH20000_ThePoint-South_Fig 2B SS.pdf 2.27MB
05-AWH20000_ThePoint-South_Fig 3 Aerial.pdf 6.07MB
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
10,224
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
12
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:*
The purpose of the project is to provide townhomes and single-family homes to serve the current and future residents of Rolesville.
4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:*
The project is a planned unit development consisting of approximately 319 townhomes and 485 single-family homes with a relatively small area of commercial development near East
Young Street. Infrastructure necessary to support the development includes roads, sanitary sewer, stormwater control measures, an amenity center, open spaces, greenway trails and
parks. There are three ponds located on the site. Pond 3 is proposed to be drained. Ponds 1 and 2 require rehabilitation of their dams to meet dam safety requirements. Development
will proceed in three construction phases as demarcated on the attached Overall Impact Map Exhibit. Detailed Impact Area Insets (1-12) are also attached to show the stream, wetland
and buffer impacts that are required for the development.
4j. Please upload project drawings for the proposed project.
06-AWH20000 - ImpactMap Set.pdf 7.21MB
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
6' Yes
Comments:
r No r Unknown
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
6' Preliminary r Approved r Not Verified r Unknown r N/A
Corps AID Number:
SAW-2008-00871
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
Lyle Phillips
Withers & Ravenel
5d. List the dates of the Corp jurisdiction determination or State determination if a determination was made by the Corps or DWR
James Lastinger, USACE conducted a field review of the site on January 15, 2019 and provided the attached email stating that the PJD would be issued at the time of permitting.
DWR issued the attached buffer determination (RRO# 18-446) for the site on January 16, 2019.
5d1. Jurisdictional determination upload
07-Approved Wetland Buffer Delineation Exhibit - 01.25.2019.pdf
08-AWH20000-Point S-USACE PJD EM.pdf
09-AWH20000-Point S-NCDWR - Buffer Letter.pdf
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
6 Yes C No
335.29KB
32.21 KB
7.41MB

7b. If yes, explain.
As indicated above, the development will proceed in three construction phases. This application requests authorization for only for the first phase of the development. The second
phase of the development is expected to follow the first but the timing for construction will depend on the progression of the first phase. It is anticipated that the third phase may not
proceed for several years.
Impacts are depicted and quantified for all phases. Impacts in phase 2 and 3 are labeled as future impacts. An Overall Impact Inventory is attached at the end of the application.
Permanent loss of stream totals 0.0497 acre and Waters of the US totals 0.45 acre for the entire project making the overall project eligible for a Nationwide Permit.
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
No
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
la. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
17 Wetlands
r Open Waters
2. Wetland Impacts
fJ Streams -tributaries
✓ Pond Construction
fJ Buffers
2a. Site #*(?)
2a1 Reason (?)
2b. Impact type * (?)
2c. Type of W.*
2d. W. name *
2e. Forested*
2f. Type of
Jurisdicition*(?)
2g. Impact
area*
W1-Area 1
Construction Access
T
Headwater Forest
0
Yes
Both
0.001
(acres)
W2-Area 4
Construction Access
T
Headwater Forest
O
Yes
Both
0.003
(acres)
W3-Area 4
Fill
P
Headwater Forest
O
Yes
Both
0.001
(acres)
W4-Area 5
Permanent Conversion
T
Headwater Forest
A
Yes
Both
0.044
(acres)
W5-Area 6
Excavation
T
Headwater Forest
C
Yes
Both
0.128
(acres)
W6-Area 6
Fill
P
Headwater Forest
C
Yes
Both
0.029
(acres)
W7-Area 6
Construction Access
T
Headwater Forest
C
Yes
Both
0.007
(acres)
W8-Area 6
Excavation
T
Headwater Forest
D
Yes
Both
0.023
(acres)
W9-Area 6
Excavation -loss
P
Headwater Forest
D
Yes
Both
0.052
(acres)
W10-Area 8
Permanent Conversion
T
Headwater Forest
F
Yes
Both
0.034
(acres)
W11-Area 9
Fill
P
Headwater Forest
G
Yes
Both
0.090
(acres)
2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact
0.240
2g. Total Wetland Impact
0.412
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0.172
3a. Reason for impact (?)
3b.Impact type*
3c. Type of impact*
3d. S. name *
3e. Stream Type*
(?)
3f. Type of
Jurisdiction*
3g. S. width*
3h. Impact
length*
S1
Rd Crossing -Area 1
Temporary
Other
UT to Harris Creek (3)
Perennial
Both
6
Average (feet)
18
(linear feet)
S2
Rd Crossing -Area 1
Permanent
Culvert
UT to Harris Creek (3)
Perennial
Both
7
Average (feet)
63
(linear feet)
S3
Rd Crossing -Area 1
Permanent
Rip Rap Fill
UT to Harris Creek (3)
Perennial
Both
6
Average (feet)
20
(linear feet)
S4
Dam Culvert -Area 4
Permanent
Dam construction
UT to Harris Creek (3)
Perennial
Both
1
Average (feet)
1
(linear feet)

S5
Dam Riprap-Area 4
Permanent
Rip Rap Fill
Ur to Harris Creek (3)
Perennial
Both
1
Average (feet)
16
(linear feet)
S6
Dam Const. Access -Area 4
Temporary
Other
UT to Harris Creek (3)
Perennial
Both
2
Average (feet)
3
(ling feet)
87
Dam Riprap-Area 6
Permanent
Rip Rap Fill
UT to Harris Creek (4)
Perennial
Both
3
Average (feet)
6
(ling feet)
S8
Dam Excavation -Area 6
Temporary
Excavation
UT to Harris Creek (4)
Perennial
Both
5
Average (feet)
37
(ling feet)
S9
Dam Excavation -Area 6
Temporary
Excavation
UT to Harris Creek (5)
Perennial
Both
3
Average (feet)
27
(linear feet)
S10
SS Crossing -Area 8
Temporary
Excavation
UT to Harris Creek (8)
Perennial
Both
3
Average (feet)
36
(linear feet)
3i. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0
3i. Total permanent stream impacts:
106
3i. Total stream and ditch impacts:
227
3j. Comments:
Other = construction access
Permanent Stream Loss = 64 If and 0.010 ac
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWR)
6a. Project is in which protect basin(s)?
Check all that apply.
Neuse
r Catawba
r Goose Creek
r Other
3i. Total temporary stream impacts:
121
✓ Tar -Pamlico
✓ Randleman
✓ Jordan Lake
6b. Impact Type
6c. Per or Temp
6d. Stream name
6e. Buffer mitigation required?
6f. Zone 1 impact
6g. Zone 2 impact
B1 - Area 1 - AA
P
LfT to Harris Creek (3)
No
6,221
4,167
B2 - Area 2 - AMA
P
LfT to Harris Creek (P1)
Yes
947
1,298
B3 - Area 3 - AA
P
LfT to Harris Creek (P2)
No
2,521
1,106
B4 - Area 4 - AA
P
LJT to Harris Creek (P1)
No
6,673
3,198
B5 - Area 6 - AA
P
LfT to Harris Creek (P2)
No
19,206
1,863
B6 - Area 6 - AA
P
LfT to Harris Creek (P2)
No
0
2,835
6h. Total buffer impacts:
Total Temporary impacts:
Total Permanent impacts:
Total combined buffer impacts:
6i. Comments:
Zone 1
0.00
Zone 1
35,568.00
Zone 2
0.00
Zone 2
14,467.00
Zone 1 Zone 2
35,568.00 14,467.00
DA = Deemed Allowable; AA = Allowable upon Authorization; & AMA = Allowable w/Mitigation upon Authorization
Supporting Documentation
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:

The applicant obtained a delineation of surface waters and wetlands on the site prior to designing the project to avoid and minimize impacts to these
resources to the maximum extent practicable. To provide adequate access, three road crossings are proposed. The road crossing at Area 1 is
necessary to provide a second access point for large number of townhomes and single-family homes. Road crossings at Area 11 and 12 are
unavoidable. Road stubs to the property boundaries have been planned to avoid future stream impacts except one at Impact Area 7 where a stream
bisects the two properties. Road crossings have been designed to cross streams at a perpendicular angle and riprap below culverts will be buried in
the stream bed to maintain the pre -construction dimensions of each channel to minimize the impacts to stream channels.
Wetland impacts have been avoided with a few necessary exceptions. The linear wetland at Impact Area 9 was impractical to avoid with the road
network required for adequate access. Minimizing the impact by limiting it to the road crossings was considered. However, due to the fill slopes
required for the roads, the remaining wetlands would only be two small pockets of wetland separated by development.
Most of the wetland impact results from rehabilitation of the dam for Pond 2. Maintenance of this dam has been neglected causing the pond to
discharge over the dam at each end. These continuous discharges have developed wetlands on the dam but are also creating actively eroding
gullies. Due to the risk of dam failure, NCDEQ — Dam Safety requires the dam to be rehabilitated or breached. The rehabilitation plan will involve
increasing the dam height, re -enforcing the back of the dam with suitable material, and constructing a new re -enforced primary spillway. Wetland area
that occurs on the dam and upstream of where the new spillway will discharge (W6 & W9) will be permanently lost. Several measures have been
planned to minimize the impact of the dam rehabilitation on wetlands and streams. Topsoil from the wetland areas proposed to be impacted will be
stripped and conserved to use in restoring the wetlands on the lower portion of the embankment once the subsoil has been replaced with suitable fill
material. The primary spillway has been designed to discharge at the start point of the existing channel to maintain the hydrology of the stream and
adjacent wetlands. A small culvert will be installed to maintain the hydrology of the existing stream channel on the opposite end of the dam from the
primary spillway. The pre -construction dimension, pattern and profile of these channels (S8 & S9) will be restored after the embankment has been
replaced with suitable soil material including within the riprap stabilization installed within the western channel (S7). A stormwater outlet has been
designed to provide an additional source of hydrology for the wetland in this area. Pond 3 will be breached. This will require a temporary wetland
impact (W7) to stabilize the breach. Filter fabric will be placed under the riprap to ensure successful restoration of this area once the pond bottom is
stabilized with vegetation. Details of the dam rehabilitation are attached at the end of the application.
Open water areas of the pond will be impacted by road widening (Impact Area 2 & 3) and the dam rehabilitations (Impact Areas 4 & 6). Due to the
proximity of Pond 2 to the existing road, the road widening impact is unavoidable. Open water impacts from the dam rehabilitation are also
unavoidable. Increasing the dam height will permanently impact the open water along the dam. Although material added to the back of the dam will
change the bottom elevation, this work will not result in a loss of open water. Areas of construction access with the open water areas have been
designated as temporary impacts.
There are two proposed sanitary sewer crossings to connect the development to the existing sanitary sewer system (Impact Areas 5 & 7). Both cross
the riparian buffer and wetlands perpendicularly. A bore and jack is proposed to install the crossing at Impact Area 5 to avoid impacting the stream
where it isn't straight. The temporary wetland impacts will require permanent conversion of these forested wetlands to herbaceous wetlands.
Justification and measures to minimize impacts to streams and wetlands also apply to the riparian buffers on the site. All riparian buffer impacts are
either deemed allowable or allowable upon authorization except for Area 2 where the road widening requires a non -perpendicular impact to the buffer
and is allowable with mitigation upon authorization.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
A sediment and Erosion Control Plan for the project will be planned and approved by the Wake County Stormwater and Erosion Control Division,and
the project will comply with the supplementary NPDES Construction Stormwater Permit (NCG010000). Additionally, the water level of Ponds 1 and 2 will
be pumped down and discharged in manner to prevent erosion and will allow the dam rehabilitation and road crossing construction to occur in the dry.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
( Yes r No
2c. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
IJ DWR fJ Corps
2d. If yes, which mitigation option(s) will be used for this project?
17 Mitigation bank r Payment to in -lieu fee r Permittee Responsible
program Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
Neu -Con Wetland & Stream Umbrella Mitigation Bank
3b. Credits Purchased/Requested (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Quantity:
Stream 128
Riparian wetland 0.43
Riparian buffer 4,788
Attach Receipt and/or letter
10-AWH20000-Point S-Stream SOA.pdf
11-AWIg20000-Point S-Wetland SOA.pdf
138.53KB
139.41KB
3c. Comments
Because stream loss for the overall project (0.050 ac/247 If) exceeds the 0.02 ac and 150 If thresholds for mitigation, mitigation for 0.010 ac and 64 If
of stream loss in the first construction phase is proposed at a ratio of 2:1 for a total of 128 stream credits. Wetland impacts in the first phase of
construction (0.173 ac) exceed the 0.10 ac threshold for mitigation. Wetland mitigation for these impacts is proposed at a 2:1 ratio requiring 0.344 ac
of wetland credits. This phase of the project also involves 0.078 ac of permanent wetland conversion that requires mitigation at a 1:1 ratio. The total
amount of wetland credits proposed for mitigation is 0.43 acre.

6. Buffer mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) - required by DWR
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires buffer mitigation? If yes, you must fill out this entire form - please contact DWR for more
information.
6' Yes
r No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact.
6c. Reason for impact
6d. Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e. Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
Nonperpendicular Road Widening
947
3
2,841
Zone 2
Nonperpendicular Road Widening
6f. Total buffer mitigation required
4788
1,298
1.5
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, is payment to a mitigation bank or NC Division of Mitigation Services proposed?
6' Yes rNo
6h. Attach the acceptance letter from the mitigation bank or NC Division of Mitigation Services.
12-AWH20000-Point S-Buffer SOA.pdf
118.56KB
6j. Comments:
EBX-Neuse I, LLC Neuse Riparian Buffer Umbrella Mitigation Bank or EBX Upper Neuse Riparian Buffer Umbrella Mitigation Bank
1.947
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR) u
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
R Yes r No
What type of SCM are you providing?
r- Level Spreader
r- Vegetated Conveyance (lower SHWT)
r- Wetland Swale (higher SHWT)
I7 Other SCM that removes minimum 30% nitrogen
r Proposed project will not create concentrated stormwater flow through the buffer
Diffuse Flow Documentation
13-AWH20000-Point S-SMP Narrative.pdf
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?*
✓ Yes a No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
✓ Yes ( No
954.65KB
2c. Does this project have a stormwater management plan (SMP) reviewed and approved under a state stormwater program or state -approved local government stormwater
program?
( • Yes
✓ NA- project disturbs < 1 acre
2d. Which of the following stormwater management program(s) apply:
(7 Local Government r State
Local Government Stormwater Programs
7 Phase II 17 NSW r USMP r Water Supply
Please identify which local government stormwater program you are using.
Rolesville
Comments:
r No
Per Town of Rolesville regulations, stormwater management on this site shall meet the stormwater management performance standards for development set forth in the Rolesville
Unified Development Ordinance Article 7, Section 7.5.4 — Standards.
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation

la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*
✓ Yes (No
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?*
✓ Yes (No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
✓ Yes (No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
This application covers the entire project, which is not anticipated to result in additional development.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
( Yes r No r N/A
4b. Describe, in detail, the treatment methods and dispositions (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project. If the wastewater will be treated
at a treatment plant, list the capacity available at that plant.
Wastewater generated from the development will be discharged to the existing sanitary sewer system.
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
( Yes rNo
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
( Yes rNo
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Raleigh
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
✓ Yes
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
✓ Yes ( No
f- No r Unknown
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
( Yes r No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
✓ Yes ( No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
✓ Yes (No
5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
✓ Yes ( No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
McAdams submitted a protected species assessment to the USFWS on February 3, 2021. The email of the submittal, self certification letter and
species conclusion table are attached.
Consultation Documentation Upload
14-AWH20000-USACE Protected Sps Docs.pdf 1.67MB
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
✓ Yes (No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
NOAA Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) Mapper (http://wuw.habitat.noaa.gov/protection/efh/efhmapper/), accessed April 28, 2021.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
( Yes rNo
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*

Byrum Farm appears to be listed on the National Register under Criterion A. An environmental review request was submitted to SHPO on February 2,
2021. We have not yet received a response to initiate the consultation process.
7c. Historic or Prehistoric Information Upload
15-AWH20000-Point S-SHPO EMs.pdf 734.6KB
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-yearfloodplain?*
C- Yes r No
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
FEMA FIRM 3720176800J, effective 5/2/2006.
Miscellaneous
Comments
The overall project impact summary and dam rehabilitation plans are attached below.
Miscellaneous attachments not previously requested.
16-AWH20000-Point S-Overall Impact Inventory.pdf
17-AWH2000-Point S-Downstream Dam Rehab.pdf
412.98KB
1.05MB
Signature
*
I7 By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief; and
• The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401 certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Jennifer Burdette
Signature
[/6,r.401t etiatGf. z'fi
Date
4/28/2021

la MCADAMS
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
PIN:
1768266125, 1768044257, 1758930017 & 1768068057
Name:
Ashton Raleigh Residential, LLC— POC: Raymond Rinker
Address:
5711 Six Forks Rd, Ste 300, Raleigh, NC 27609-3888
Phone:
919-232-3655
Email:
[e-mail]
Project Name:
The Point South
Project Number:
AWH-20000
Project Manager:
Mike Sanchez/Jennifer Burdette
US Army Corps of Engineers — Wilmington District
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
Re: Wetlands Related Consulting and Permitting
NC Division of Water Resources
401 & Buffer Permitting Branch
512 N. Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27604
To Whom It May Concern:
I hereby designate and authorize The John R. McAdams Company, Inc. to act on my behalf as my agent in obtaining
verification of wetland delineations and processing of permit applications for the project listed above.
I, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property/properties identified herein, do authorize
representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) and NC Division of Water Resources
to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -site investigation and issuing a
determination associated with Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction under Section 404 of the Clean
Water Act/Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 and/or Waters of State and/or Riparian Buffer Rules.
This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project.
NOTICE: This authorization, for liability and professional courtesy reasons, is valid only for government officials to
enter the property when accompanied by The John R. McAdams Company, Inc. staff.
Raymond Rinker
Print Name *Signature
Vice President of Land Development
Title (if applicable)
11/04/2020
Date
creating experiences through experience 2905 Meridian Parkway, Durham, NC / 919. 361. 5000

SHADE AVE
Brown
Lea- e
UPCHURCH
Legend
31
Project Area
NOTES:
1. USGS; 7.5 MINUTE, QUAD, ROLESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA; 2019
2. LAT: 35.904642, LONG: -78.455435
44rON TRL
PULLEY
oc
gij
MCADAMS
FIGURE 1. USGS TOPOGRAPHIC VICINITY MAP
THE POINT - SOUTH
ROLESVILLE, WAKE COUNTY, NC
0 1,000 2,000
Feet
1 inch = 2,000 feet
VERSION: 1
DATE: 10/19/2020
JOB NO: AWH-20000
DRAWN BY: pierzga
M:\Projects\AshtonWoods\AWH-20000\04-Production\Natural Resources\ GIS\AWH20000_PointSouth_Fig 1 USGS.mxd, 10/19/2020 3:20:05 PM, pierzga

Ap6
Legend
Project Area
LoF3
!
LoC P1
LcD e
v
7 `I \New Bethel
ApB2 . Churt
EiuFi \1
PRO,JEGTTAREA
WkE
too S2-
WkE
WkC-C)
LwC
ApF32
DuC:
LwC
WkE
°Dv
wB
Lot?
ApB2
DoC7
WY
❑uB
S12
LoD
i wf / APC2
/ Dub .
LwC ApB2
i t1
APC2
ApN2
Cn ApC2`
ir�1
<UND>NOTES:</UND>
1. NRCS; SOIL SURVEY SHEETS 22 & 23, WAKE COUNTY, NC (1970)
gij
MCADAMS
FIGURE 2B. BUFFER SUBJECTIVITY SOIL SURVEY
THE POINT - SOUTH
ROLESVILLE, WAKE COUNTY, NC
0 660 1,320
Feet
1 inch = 1,320 feet
VERSION: 1
DATE: 10/19/2020
JOB NO: AWH-20000
DRAWN BY: pierzga
M:\Projects1AshtonWoods1AWH-20000\04-Production\Natural Resources\GISWWH20000_PointSouth_Fig 2B SS.mxd, 10/19/2020 4:29:44 PM, pierzga

/
MCADAMS
FIGURE 3. AERIAL MAP
THE POINT - SOUTH
ROLESVILLE, WAKE COUNTY, NC
N
0 275 550
Feet
1 inch = 550 feet
VERSION: 1
DATE: 10/19/2020
JOB NO: AWH-20000
DRAWN BY: pierzga
M:\Projects\AshtonWoods\AWH-20000\04-Production\Natural Resources\GISWWH20000_PointSouth_Fig 3 Aerial.mxd, 10/19/2020 4:49:30 PM, pierzga

i•
I
\ \I
�\ r
\ I
` I
RETAIN IfiG
WALL (TN(P.)
//-- KtIAININI� •/• •1
WALL (TYP.) �v�— ✓ • /• •
\\/ -.•*"..i ce • Ei<ISTIN8• • • •/ • • • �
INSETS
111=1001
In..` I l . / ,/i/
I
p
Irr r \ \
I�\\II ', /
I.
111\ 1 \
1111 1/If/�/I
\1
,1l1
I\\\ /
j 1111/l1/l lj 1
il 1)i, 11� \N`,? ,%\\\�\P� 11 I / 1 i.II1 M;,1,!� ,, tit ��
M PACT
AREA 9='
1
1 ,.
1 1 I1/./I
`' irl///'/r-Tll(fii 1 //!! r% ,-. \,.,1 11)1(,, r 7 I,bl1:\\;V\::
) .A•\\ \\ 1\1W
1
Il\�\' \rt )
r 7
1�\1p�l 4
-11,r"„s'M-'l:'a-i/'4A.9-#7lI4t.tlL,,,i1d-,‘1,fd:7?..',:°:,1:/li1
:-_:--1,iai_I_-1:1,1r.[
14. T-ii.1
/'"-' I�:x:,i;/4:)
r:k-1-/-.i-7r-,r••-
Ems- --
1i-4-tk!;--.".1---r1-:_s;1-7—l--1r_I:-_ik-t1i,:,_:.,..-1._i6,._-..'..,1'.=-_,'.7,_'_-,_
g1=
l_:
1I i'1ar w,414I
i 9
M PACT
AREA 7 4;
\y`J
IMPACT
AREAS rt
IMPACT
AREA 11
CONSTRUCTION
PHASE LINE
PACT _
�5
� M1J -
,
I1VI PACT
AREA 2
,\. I M PACT
AREA 1
'/,IMVI PACT
AREA 3
friAt
I 1,,,A
et
HI I�
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 250 500
1000
1 inch = 500 ft.
0
PLAN INFORMATION
w
z
m >
oz
W . U =
U v)
04. 27. 2021
0
TOWN OF ROLESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
E
0
E
1
1

LD
Ni
0
z
m
LD
LD
B1
MANENT ZONE 1
NEUSE RIPARIAN BUFFER 4PACT
(6,221 SF)
z 1 1
ml /
/
50' MRB BUFFER
/I
IW1 (WETLANL 0)
TEMPORAfY WE AND
0.0014 AC (60 F)
I ! I
B1
PERMANENT ZONE 2
NEUSE RIPARIAN BUFFER
(4,167 SF)
STORMWATER CONTROL
MEASURE "A"
(WET POND)
IMPA
IMPACT
I"
0
Im
50 NRB BUFFER
S1 (STREAM 3)
TEMPORAf�Y STREAM
IMPACT (118 LF, 108 SF)
LD LD14)
1 \ ,
3 RCP l..........
(CULVERT 1............... 1 . . . . . ...........
/(61 LF) /............
-millENAPIlrasill la
\
\
\
\
• D7
\
S3 (STREAM 3)
PERMANENT\STREAM
IMPACT (RIP *RAP)
(20 LF, 128 \)
j
J
VELOCITY DISSIPATOR
18'Lx9'Wx18"THK.
CLASS "B" RIP RAP
IMPACT AREA 1
I m
LEGEND:
EXISTING WETLAND
PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT (CULVERT)
I I I PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT (RIP RAP)
TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT
ZONE 1 NEUSE RIPARIAN BUFFER IMPACT
ZONE 2 NEUSE RIPARIAN BUFFER IMPACT
WETLAND IMPACT (TEMPORARY)
WETLAND IMPACT (PERMANENT)
I t ▪ ▪ 1 OPEN WATER IMPACT (TEMPORARY)
717
OPEN WATER IMPACT (PERMANENT)
S2 (STREAM 3)
PERMANENT STREAM
t IMPACT (CULVERT) 6�
63 LF, 427 SF)Lo
CD
/ �q
\L
IVE
BLIC R/W)
0
GRAPHIC SCALE
10 20
40
1 inch = 20 ft.
Drawings \AW H2O000-CD-P
M:\Projects\Ashton W oods\AW H-20000\04-P r
PLAN INFORMATION
z
J
04. 27. 2021
Lu
IMPACT EXHIBIT - IMPACT AREA 1
TOWN OF ROLESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA

\
\
/\
\
\
\\
�/ \\ �/
/ \\ \Nl
\)(
I
\\ P\
\ ,i
/ \
Sp \\ /,i
\ NR6 I eUr,... , \
l / \
�/ \
/ \_
\ ///// --- \
\
\
/ / 132 \\ i l
/ / PERMANENT ZONE 1 /i
1
/ / NEUS RIPARIAN /\
/ / \ BUfFER IMPACT / \
' \ I I
/ /// /�947 SF) /, \
//
// \ 1\ I
I
/ \ I
/ /' / B2 \\
j /' PERMANENT ZONE 2 I
' /\ NEUSE RIPARIAN
/ BUFFER IMPACT
0
\(1298 SF)
EXISTING POND
TO REMAIN
GRAPHIC SCALE
10 20
\
\ • �\
\ \\\ fir. . \
\\\ \.
\\ \WITH B2 EL0W \ \\ . \
IMPACT SPORTED .1\
o \
\ o `c S.
\ �\ \ o \\ S\
4\\ \\ \.
\\ N \\ \ s \
\
\\\\\\ \ \
\\\ \ \ \ \ fir°
\ I \\
E STING EDGE \\\\
\ 0\AVEMENT \�
\\N
\\ oO
Gti
o /�' \\\ ti s
\i \_ .......�'?!... \ \\ A -GAF
\\
\\° \
\\ \
\\ \
\\ \
of �. \
•
IMPACT AREA 2
(EAST YOUNG STREET WIDENING)
40
1 inch = 20 ft.
1
IN
oIA \ \
Im \ ° `o \
\
r�
I \ \ IZ IN
LEGEND:
EXISTING WETLAND
\ \
\ \
\\
\\
PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT (CULVERT)
mill PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT (RIP RAP)
TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT
ZONE 1 NEUSE RIPARIAN BUFFER IMPACT
ZONE 2 NEUSE RIPARIAN BUFFER IMPACT
WETLAND IMPACT (TEMPORARY)
WETLAND IMPACT (PERMANENT)
OPEN WATER IMPACT (TEMPORARY)
OPEN WATER IMPACT (PERMANENT)
1•
1
7
\ IM CT REPORTED
WIT B3 BELOW
•
\ \
\ 'STING EDGE
0 \PAVEMENT
01 (POND 2) \\
PERMANENT OPEN \\
WATER IMPACT \\\\
0.0260 AC (1132 SF) \\ N%
/
\
EXISTING POND \ \
\ \\
TO REM -A* 4- \ \ \
\ / \\• \\
\ \
\ \ /
•
\
\ / \ B3 \\ /
PERMANENT ZONE 1 >\
\NEUSE RIPARIAN /
BUFFER IMPACT / \
(2521 SF) \\ \ •
\ PERMANENT ZONE 2 \\
NEUSE RIPARIAN \
\ . :.::.::.
BUFFER IMPACT \ / y /
\ (1106 SF) �� l.. .: ..::. \
\
\
\
\
/
6i�
111147:111.4.7.17;01111417-10-111ellgi
Ti$4401
i�►earl
:IPA:- ‘,,
\ r��s> \ ..:::: \
It \ /
\/
/// \\ e�F \ ` \
/\
C 3
(EAST YOUNG STREET WIDENING) / \\ �\ / �\
a wings \AW H2O000-CD-P kg
s\AshtonWoods\AWH-20000\04-Pr
PLAN INFORMATION
04. 27. 2021
PHASES 1-10 AND 14
TOWN OF ROLESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA

DAM EMBANKMENT IN THIS AREA
TO BE REMOVED AND REPLACED
PER DIRECTION OF ON -SITE
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER
B4
ZONE 1
NEUSE RIPARIAN BUFFER IMPACT
(6,673 SF)
B4 /
ZONE 2 /
NEUSE RIPARIAN BUER IMPACT
(EXISTING GRAVELO'IRT ROAD)
(3,198 SF)
B4
ZONE 2
IMPACT REPORTED ABOVE
z zI
Irn m `1 1
N �I
W2 (WETLANDI O)
TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT
0.0033 AC (144 F) �, I
II I
IW3 (WETLANDI 0)
PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACT
(RIP RAP APRON)I
I0.0014 AC (59 SIB)
50' NRB BUFFER
02 (POND 1)
TEMPORARY OPEN
WATER IMPACT
0.0472 AC (2,058 SF)
03 (POND 1)
PERMANENT OPEN
WATER IMPACT
0.0006 AC (25 T
S4 (§TREAM 3)
PERMANENT STREAM
IMPACT (CULVERT)
(1 LF, 6.05 SF)
N
0
S5 (STREAM 3)
PERMANENT �iTREAM
IMPACT (RIP RAP)
(16 LF, 20 F)
S6 (STREM 3)
TEMPORARY TREAM
IMPACT (3 L , 6 SF)
PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT (RIP RAP)
PLAN INFORMATION
IMPACT EXHIBIT - IMPACT AREA 4
04. 27. 2021
a
0
TOWN OF ROLESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA

/
/ /
/
/
\ /
\\ \
\\
\ `.
\ \ '`•
\ \
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
♦
•
•
•
•
•
—
ZONE 2
ZONE
DONE
O EM D 1 ALLOWAB�E
NEUSE IPARIAN BUFFER IMPACT
-----94 SF)
BORE AND JACK
SANITARY SEWER
ZONE j -
W4 (WETLAND A)
TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT
0.0435 AC (1,894 SF)
ZONE
/
♦
♦
♦
♦
/
\fr
PROPOSED ,D0°TY\
OF RALEIGH SANIT.AR1TN
N SEWER EASEMENT \ I
IMPACT AREA 5
♦
♦
y
LEGEND:
EXISTING WETLAND
PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT (CULVERT)
I m- PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT (RIP RAP)
TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT
ZONE 1 NEUSE RIPARIAN BUFFER IMPACT
ZONE 2 NEUSE RIPARIAN BUFFER IMPACT
WETLAND IMPACT (TEMPORARY)
WETLAND IMPACT (PERMANENT)
rt 1 OPEN WATER IMPACT (TEMPORARY)
1
OPEN WATER IMPACT (PERMANENT)
DEEMED ALLOWABLE
ZONE 2
NEUSE RIPARIAN BUFFER \\
IMPACT
1,476 SF)
/
I
I♦♦
♦♦
`♦
/
•
•
/
/
\
�j
0
GRAPHIC SCALE
10 20
40
1 inch = 20 ft.
Drawings \AW H2O000-CD-P
M:\Projects\Ashton W oods\AW H-20000\04-P r
PLAN INFORMATION
04. 27. 2021
H
Z
0
a
W
1
1-
TOWN OF ROLESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA

'1
DEEMED /
\ \ \ ALLOWABL
o> \ ZONE 2 /
\ \\ ,NEUSE RIPARIAN
[SUFFER IMPACT
c>\\� �}76 SF) 1
\ \ \ I
\\\ I
\\ o> 1 DAM EMBANKMENT IN THIS AREA
\
\\ \ TO BE REMOVED AND REPLACED
\ \ I 1 PEP DIRECTION OF ON —SITE
\r 1 I GEATECHNICAL ENGINEER
C I / I fI I
% I/ gIl I I
\1
I % in
IIi \ i' 1
1I I j \
II ,
II II oI I i' /
I I I 1 I . i
• 1 II I 1 i /
I I 1 /_\
'
1
41_I TrMPO ARY / /
ij/
r STOCKILE AREA /
I I D I 7� I
01 1
\' 1 / 1 1 0i
I / / 1 11
/ / / /
/ / / /
I 1 to/ / 1
// / / / 5 / / to
/ /
I /
/
1 I
/ I 1 1
/ I
1 *!�.,
/ 1 ���\
/ / 1 t..Z4� •j1)?
/ 1 11��:*1,<
/ / / 1i1►'!�1�•1���/
/ / 1'4 iiiV►'/
pa, 011,214-2,4
/ / / j',,III, ,51),
/ l igi;1410' 41)7.1•). 0
/ / / $ / �/ .l, .
/ /
a
------1/ A /
/
a W5 (WETLAND C)
TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT
0.1280 AC (5,577 SF) � :<:.:. i:.<`. Q
AM )
o (WETLAND C) N \: % « ��PERMANENT STREAM
PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACT Cu1.IMPACT
0.0288 AC (1,253 SF) 2:` (RIP RAP)
�1\I Ni
y �.. (6 LF, 19 SF)
1 W7 (WETLAND C)
/ TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT I
/ 0.0070 AC (304 SF)
/ /
/ / /
/
/ / / /
o*/ / / /
/
ti/ / / /
/ / 1 /
/ / / /
Sp.N / /
/ 4
Rg 9,FF // / 1
Fp // // r /
/
B5 J
IMPACT REPORTED BELOW \
I \
1
I \
I
\
(„ \ \
W
+ '�'to \
+ + CO,
c +
EXISTING POND
TO REMAIN
04 (POND 2)
PERMANENT NO LOSS
OPEN WATER IMPACT
0.1523 AC (6,634 SF)
CD ZONE 1
+ �� Cp NEUSE RIPARIAN
+ �,_ BUFFER IMPACT
+ + "---"\--. c (19,206 SF)
+ + \ --1,CD,
CD
+ - \ -1-
LEGEND:
EXISTING WETLAND
PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT (CULVERT)
m- PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT (RIP RAP)
TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT
ZONE 1 NEUSE RIPARIAN BUFFER IMPACT
ZONE 2 NEUSE RIPARIAN BUFFER IMPACT
WETLAND IMPACT (TEMPORARY)
r �
WETLAND IMPACT (PERMANENT)
OPEN WATER IMPACT (TEMPORARY)
OPEN WATER IMPACT (PERMANENT)
- +
+ +
05 (POND 2)
PERMANENT OPEN
WATER IMPACT
0.1481 AC (6,452 SF)
B5
7 ,/
7/ ,
i
' B5
'
i ZONE 2
FILTER BERM \ NEUSE RIPARIAN ` \ J ;I,
B 863E SF) PACj __ I M PACT AREA 6
(1 OF 3)
S8 (STREAM 4)
TEMPORARY STREAM
IMPACT (37 LF, 177 Se)
0
co
ZONE `
ZONE 2
0
GRAPHIC SCALE
10 20
40
1 inch = 20 ft.
Drawings \AW H2O000-CD-P
M:\Projects\Ashton W oods\AW H-20000\04-P r
PLAN INFORMATION
04. 27. 2021
m w r
o m
Q Y
w w < < F
—'ICC0et
LI 0 000
P
TOWN OF ROLESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA

+DLO:
EXISTING POND
TO REMAIN
•
0
\1
05 (POND Z}-- 1- - /- ��+
IMPACT,f7E�ORTED ON0 �-
Lp IMPlef AREA 6 (1 OF 3) vo + - �+
+ + - Lp �_ IMPACT AREA 6 (1 OF 3T- 6—�0,� + +�
+
+ + + + `°� LO + :� + +`�- + 0::*.
��
•-- ilititilliikallNearclikillailiqw.v. + + + + -i- r - -/-
- + -i- -i- + + + W* *./...:.W.W 1 .
arAi
a34 AVM NM rii
� ��� 7�.11fettri����r��►�a���►aze-�,�=mom ��������� -� "NV
B5
IMPACT REPORTED ON
IMPACT AREA 6 (1 OF 3)
LEGEND:
III
r
L�
J
EXISTING WETLAND
PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT (CULVERT)
PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT (RIP RAP)
TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT
ZONE 1 NEUSE RIPARIAN BUFFER IMPACT
ZONE 2 NEUSE RIPARIAN BUFFER IMPACT
WETLAND IMPACT (TEMPORARY)
WETLAND IMPACT (PERMANENT)
+ 1 OPEN WATER IMPACT (TEMPORARY)
OPEN WATER IMPACT (PERMANENT)
04(`RQND 2)
IMPACT RRER TED ON
ai - --- -- ----- ----
-- , --
,-
OD
Zo
CO — _ — ---'
: ........_
ZONE 1 —-------� �� /'
ZONE 2
_�i' .� /
-/ /
--'- / / Y
IMPACT AREA 6
(20F3)
I 7
\// /7/
7/ /
/ /
/
/
0
GRAPHIC SCALE
10 20
40
1 inch = 20 ft.
Drawings \AW H2O000-CD-P
M:\Projects\Ashton W oods\AW H-20000\04-P r
PLAN INFORMATION
04. 27. 2021
P
TOWN OF ROLESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA

LEGEND:
EXISTING WETLAND
PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT (CULVERT)
r PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT (RIP RAP)
TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT
ZONE 1 NEUSE RIPARIAN BUFFER IMPACT
ZONE 2 NEUSE RIPARIAN BUFFER IMPACT
WETLAND IMPACT (TEMPORARY)
r
+
+ +
WETLAND IMPACT (PERMANENT)
OPEN WATER IMPACT (TEMPORARY)
OPEN WATER IMPACT (PERMANENT)
B5
ZONE 1
IMPACT REPORTER9N-
IMPACT AREA--6- (1 OF 3)
ZONE 2
<V
EXISTING POND
TO REMAIN
•a;
/W8 (WETLAND D)
/ TEMPORARY WETLAND IMP,gVT
0.0232 AC (1,011 F)
IL
N/
i
04 (POND 2)
IMPACT REPORTED ON
IMPACT AREA 6 (1 OF 3)
1 05 (POND 2)
IMPACT REPORTED ON
IMPACT AREA 6 (1 OF
(
B6
ZONE 2
NEUSE RIPARIAN
BUFFER I.'1PACT
2, 83\5 -SF)
(
1
9 (STREAM 5)
TEMPORARY STREAM
IMIPACT (27 LF, 66 SF)
\
•
IMPACT AREA 6
(3 OF 3)
BUFFER
1
°\ W9 (WETLAND D)
PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACT
0.0524 AC (2,281 SF)I
\ I
\ I
\ I
DAM EMBANKMENT IN THIS AREA
TO BE REMOVED AND REPLACED
PER DIRECTION OF ON —SITE
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER //J
i
N
((n
a
a
a
a
H -
m --
0
B6
IMPACT REPORTED BELOW
GRAPHIC SCALE
10 20
40
1 inch = 20 ft.
Drawings \AW H2O000-CD-P
M:\Projects\Ashton W oods\AW H-20000\04-P r
PLAN INFORMATION
w
z
L
04. 27. 2021
a
P
TOWN OF ROLESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA

- 01
01
01
/
7
PROPOSED 30' CITY
OI` R*LEICH_SANITARY
SEWER EASEMENT— — —
DEEMED
ALLOWABLE
ZONE 2
NEUSE RIPARIAN
BUFFER IMPACT
(3,421 SF
0
\- o'v 7
LEGEND:
IMPACT REPORTED
BOVE
PROPOSED 30' CITY
OF RALEIGH SANITARY
SEWER EASEMENT
01
01
EXISTING WETLAND \-,4,
\
111 PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT(CULVERT) \
1 1 1 ■ PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT (RIP RAP) -� --
1 1 1 TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT �I
m
1
1
J
r+
ZONE 1 NEUSE RIPARIAN BUFFER IMPACT co
ce
ZONE 2 NEUSE RIPARIAN BUFFER IMPACT
to
of
WETLAND IMPACT (TEMPORARY)
WETLAND IMPACT (PERMANENT)
OPEN WATER IMPACT (TEMPORARY)
OPEN WATER IMPACT (PERMANENT)
7
IMPACT AREA 7
DEEMED
ALLOWABLE
ZONE 2
NEUSE RIPARIAN
BUFFER IMPACT I
(1,177 SF)
-r
ZONE 2
ZONE
- - — GRAPHIC SCALE
0 10 20
40
1 inch = 20 ft.
ngs\AW H2O000-CD-P
M:\Projects\Ashton W oods\AW H-20000\04-P r
PLAN INFORMATION
04. 27. 2021
IMPACT EXHIBIT - IMPACT AREA 7
TOWN OF ROLESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA

STORMWATER CONTROL
MEASURE "E"
(WET POND)
/
-DEEMED
- ALLOWABLE
ZONE 2
NEUSE RIPARIAN
BUFFER IMPACT
/
/s/
�\
�� /
�.� /
PROPOSED 30' CITY
OF RALEIGH SANITARY
SEWER EASEMENT
i
/
/
/
/
//
I / EXISTING
I SSMH
1
1
//
/
/, /
/
/
/ /
,, /
A°/
--
/
/
/ /
IEXISTINGi20CITY OF
/ RALEI811 SANITARY
I/ WAR EASEMENT
/
//
/ / /
%
/ /
/
/
/
/
j
/
so,
/1/ti/
F _
0
S10 (STREAM 8)
TEMPORARY STREAM /
IMPACT (35 LF, 10y SF
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
DEEMED ALLOWABLE
ZONE 2
NEUSE RIPARIAN/�UFFER IMPACT / /
(1,397 SF) / /
r
/,�0. /\ /
IMPACT AREA 8
/
LEGEND:
EXISTING J4/
WETLAND
/
DVLMED ALLOWABLE
?ONE 1 /
/NEUSE RIPARIAN BUFFER IMPACT
/ (2,073 SF)
EXISTING WETLAND
PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT (CULVERT)
PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT (RIP RAP)
TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT
ZONE 1 NEUSE RIPARIAN BUFFER IMPACT
ZONE 2 NEUSE RIPARIAN BUFFER IMPACT
WETLAND IMPACT (TEMPORARY)
WETLAND IMPACT (PERMANENT)
+ 1 OPEN WATER IMPACT (TEMPORARY)
/
/
W10 (WETLAND F) /
TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT
/0.0337 AC (1,469 S)
/
01
i
•1
1
/
01 /�
OPEN WATER IMPACT (PERMANENT)
/
01 —
0
PROPOSED 30' CITY
OF RALEIGH SANITARY
SEWER EASEMENT
GRAPHIC SCALE
10 20
40
1 inch = 20 ft.
Drawings \AW H2O000-CD-P
M:\Projects\Ashton W oods\AW H-20000\04-P r
PLAN INFORMATION
04. 27. 2021
P
TOWN OF ROLESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA

/
/
/ / \
/
/ // �\�
i / / // . /
W11 (WETLAND G)
PERMA ENT WETLAND IMPACT
0.0901 C (3,925 SF)
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
•
•
•
•
•
IMPACT AREA 9
(1 OF 2)
LEGEND:
III
r
1
L
J
/
EXISTING WETLAND
PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT (CULVERT)
PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT (RIP RAP)
TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT
ZONE 1 NEUSE RIPARIAN BUFFER IMPACT
ZONE 2 NEUSE RIPARIAN BUFFER IMPACT
WETLAND IMPACT (TEMPORARY)
WETLAND IMPACT (PERMANENT)
I t OPEN WATER IMPACT (TEMPORARY)
OPEN WATER IMPACT (PERMANENT)
/
/
/
/
0
-
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
- l•
1,•?...4.0 Xs,
•
•
•
9N F
GRAPHIC SCALE
10 20
40
1 inch = 20 ft.
Drawings \AW H2O000-CD-P
M:\Projects\Ashton W oods\AW H-20000\04-P r
PLAN INFORMATION
04. 27. 2021
TOWN OF ROLESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA

W11 (WET
IMPACT REPORTE
IMPACT AREA 9 (1 0
IMPACT AREA 9
(2 OF 2)
LEGEND:
EXISTING WETLAND
i PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT (CULVERT)
I I I PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT (RIP RAP)
TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT
ZONE 1 NEUSE RIPARIAN BUFFER IMPACT
ZONE 2 NEUSE RIPARIAN BUFFER IMPACT
WETLAND IMPACT (TEMPORARY)
WETLAND IMPACT (PERMANENT)
OPEN WATER IMPACT (TEMPORARY)
OPEN WATER IMPACT (PERMANENT)
I
+ +
0
zz
zz
/
/
/
/
/
GRAPHIC SCALE
10 20
40
1 inch = 20 ft.
Drawings \AW H2O000-CD-P
M:\Projects\Ashton W oods\AW H-20000\04-P r
PLAN INFORMATION
04. 27. 2021
m r
Y Z
w w a <
Jxcc
u U 0 cn 0
TOWN OF ROLESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA

/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
7
/
/
/
/ \
/
/
/
/
/
/
FUTURE
PERMANENT /WETLAND IMPACT
0.0547 AC (2,382 SF)
o^
O
O\
\ I I
1 1
I 1
1 I
o i
/ 1 1
/ / 1 1 .
/I 1
1
1
1
/
18" RCP
CULVERT
(115 LF) \
\
\
FUTURE
PERMANENT ZONc 1
NEUSE RIPARIAN
IBUFFER IMPACT 1 I
(3I 54 SF) I III
1 I 1
1 i II
I
LEGEND:
r, EXISTING WETLAND
1 1 1 PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT (CULVERT)
PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT (RIP RAP)
1 11 TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT
ZONE 1 NEUSE RIPARIAN BUFFER IMPACT
ZONE 2 NEUSE RIPARIAN BUFFER IMPACT
WETLAND IMPACT (TEMPORARY)
WETLAND IMPACT (PERMANENT)
rt 1 OPEN WATER IMPACT (TEMPORARY)
OPEN WATER IMPACT (PERMANENT)
IMPACT AREA 10
N / / / / /
9 / / / / /
.7 / /
/ / / /
// / /
i /// / /
/ / / / /
/ �/ / / 9
// / / /
// / /
// / /
/ /
/ // / / ' 9
/ / / /
/ / / / /
/ / / / /
/ / / / /
/ / / / /
/ / / / 9
/ / / /
/ / / / /
/ / / / / / // // / // ////
/// VELOCITY DISSIPATOR
—/ / /18'Lx10'Wx18" THK! /g
/ / ¶ / CLASS "B" RIP jAP j
/ / / / - \.
/ / 1
/ \ I 119
\1 1
FUTURE i
I PERMANENT ZONE ll
' NEUSE RIPARIAN 1p
BUFFER IMPACT
'(4Q8 SF)
/ I \\
/ 1
\ \r
/ 1 \ \I
\
/ / \
1 i \ NI
Z ro
1 1 �Z m �\
1 \ I 1 n) 1
1 �
I 11 50' NRB BUFFER 111
to
�� 1
1 �� � 1
I \ `\ \\ I i
I I \1 \I \
\ \ \\ I 15
I 1 \� \ I 1 1
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 10 20
40
1 inch = 20 ft.
77
1,32:23 PM, William
ion Drawings \Current Drawings \AWH2O000-CD-Pkg-01-IM1.dwg, 4/27/202
M:\Projects\AshtonWoods\AWH-20000\04-Produc
PLAN INFORMATION
04. 27. 2021
m
• m
▪ Y Z
Li, Li, < <
JxcOQ
uU0V)0
TOWN OF ROLESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
E
0
0
N
E

1-
z
O
a
W
H

Designer
Drawn By
Checked By
++e
Scale
Date
w+aou
lob No
02180290.00
AM 16
JECT TO
RS
STREAM 14
SUBJECT TO BUFFERS
STREAM 13
SUBJECT TO BUFFERS
•
STREAM 2
SUBJECT TO BUFFS'
S AM 19
SUBJECT TO BUFFERS •
WETLAND L
WETLAND M
STREAM 17
SUBJECT TO BUFFERS
WETLAND N
WETLAND K
. WETLAND -A
STREAM 8
SUBJECT TO._
BUFFERS
STRII 9
NOTSUCTTO
WETLAND G BUFFERS
STREAM 15 WETLAND H
trNOT SUBJECT
TO BU ERS
_ STREAM 10
SUBJECT TO BUFFERS
STREAM 11
AUBJECT TO BUFFERS
WETLAND I
50' NEUSE
RIPARIAN BUFFER
\-100' ROLESVILLE
RIPARIAN BUFFER
ROLESVILLE
ROLESVILLE YOUNG STREET - PUD
WAKE COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
WETLAN
50' NEU
RIP ' IAN B
STREAM 1
SUBJECT TO BUFFERS
POND 3'\
NairSUBJECT TO
MIMUFFERS
WETLAND C
REAM 6
STREAM 7 s TO BUFFERS
SUBJECT TO BUFFERS
WETLAND I
STOP JURISDI6.TIONAL STR
RESTART JURISDICT.
STREAM 12
,SUBJECT TO BUFFERS
fi
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 275 550
1 inch = 550 ft.
POND 1
SUBJECT TO BUFFERS
WETLAND 0
_
sT
SUBJECT
PON 12
SUBJECT TO BUF
SUBJECr
STREAM
NOT SUBJECT
BUFFERS. `a
REAM 4
TO BUF
STREAM
1. Wet.- - , ..
NOTES:
1) WETLAND DELINEATION AND JURISDICTIONAL STATUS WAS FIELD VERIFIED (SAW-2008-00871)
BY JAMES LASTINGER OF THE USACE ON 01/15/2019.
2) BUFFER DETERMINATION ISSUED BY NCDWR (RRO#18-446) ON 01/22/2019.
3) WETLAND/STREAM/POND/BUFFER LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE, BASED ON GPS LOCATION,
WAKE CO. GIS DATA AND TOPOGRAPHIC INTERPRETATION.
WETLAND/BUFFER DELINEATION EXHIBIT
WithersRavenel
.14 pp Engineers Planners Surveyors
Sheet No
WB-1

fires
EBX-Neuse I, LLC Stream and Wetland Banks
Statement of Availability April 27, 2021
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
April Norton
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Center, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
Re Project: The Point - South
This document confirms that Ashton Raleigh Residential, LLC (Applicant) for the The Point - South
(Project) has expressed an interest to utilize 128.00 Stream Mitigation Credits the EBX-Neuse
sponsored Neu -Con Wetland & Stream Umbrella Mitigation Bank, specifically 128.00 stream credits
from the Blackbird Site, in the Neuse HUC 03020201. As the official Bank Sponsor, EBX-Neuse I, LLC,
attests to the fact that mitigation is available for reservation at this time.
These mitigation credits are not considered secured, and consequently are eligible to be used for alternate
purposes by the Bank Sponsor, until payment in full is received from the Applicant resulting in the
issuance of a Mitigation Credit Transfer Certificate by the bank acknowledging that the Applicant has
fully secured credits from the bank and the Banker has accepted full responsibility for the mitigation
obligation requiring the credits/units.
The Banker will issue the Mitigation Credit Transfer Certificate within three (3) days of receipt of the
purchase price. Banker shall provide to Applicant a copy of the Mitigation Credit Transfer Certificate and
a documented copy of the debit of credits from the Bank Official Credit Ledger(s), indicating the permit
number and the resource type secured by the applicant. A copy of the Mitigation Credit Transfer
Certificate, with an updated Official Credit Ledger will also be sent to regulatory agencies showing the
proper documentation.
If any questions need to be answered, please contact me at 919-209-1075.
Best Regards,
Caitlan B. Parker
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC
701 E. Bay Street, Suite 306
Charleston, SC 2922.903

fires
EBX-Neuse I, LLC Wetland and Wetland Banks
Statement of Availability April 28, 2021
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
April Norton
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Center, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
Re Project: The Point - South
This document confirms that Ashton Raleigh Residential, LLC (Applicant) for the The Point - South
(Project) has expressed an interest to utilize 0.45 Wetland Mitigation Credits the EBX-Neuse sponsored
Neu -Con Wetland & Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank, specifically 0.45 wetland credits from the
Blackbird Site, in the Neuse HUC 03020201. As the official Bank Sponsor, EBX-Neuse I, LLC, attests to
the fact that mitigation is available for reservation at this time.
These mitigation credits are not considered secured, and consequently are eligible to be used for alternate
purposes by the Bank Sponsor, until payment in full is received from the Applicant resulting in the
issuance of a Mitigation Credit Transfer Certificate by the bank acknowledging that the Applicant has
fully secured credits from the bank and the Banker has accepted full responsibility for the mitigation
obligation requiring the credits/units.
The Banker will issue the Mitigation Credit Transfer Certificate within three (3) days of receipt of the
purchase price. Banker shall provide to Applicant a copy of the Mitigation Credit Transfer Certificate and
a documented copy of the debit of credits from the Bank Official Credit Ledger(s), indicating the permit
number and the resource type secured by the applicant. A copy of the Mitigation Credit Transfer
Certificate, with an updated Official Credit Ledger will also be sent to regulatory agencies showing the
proper documentation.
If any questions need to be answered, please contact me at 919-209-1075.
Best Regards,
Caitlan B. Parker
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC
701 E. Bay Street, Suite 306
Charleston, SC 2922.903

fires
EBX Buffer Mitigation Banks
Statement of Availability April 27, 2021
NC Division of Water Resources
Stephanie Goss
512 N. Salisbury St.
Archdale Building, 9th floor
Raleigh, NC 27604
Re Project: The Point - South
This document confirms that the Ashton Raleigh Residential, LLC (Applicant) for the The Point -
South (Project) has expressed an interest to utilize 4,788.00 Square Feet of Riparian Buffer Mitigation
Credits from one or both of the following banks, EBX-Neuse I, LLC Neuse Riparian Buffer Umbrella
Mitigation Bank or EBX Upper Neuse Riparian Buffer Umbrella Mitigation Bank. Specific bank sites
that will be debited will either be Buffalo Branch, Bucher, Selma Mill, Cedar Grove, Ezell, Polecat, Stone
Creek, Hannah Bridge, Meadow Spring, Poplar Creek, Uzzle and/or Hatley, all located in HUC
03020201. As the official Bank Sponsor, EBX-Neuse I, LLC and EBX, attests to the fact that mitigation
is available for reservation at this time.
These mitigation credits are not considered secured, and consequently are eligible to be used for alternate
purposes by the Bank Sponsor, until payment in full is received from the Applicant resulting in the
issuance of a Mitigation Credit Transfer Certificate by the bank acknowledging that the Applicant has
fully secured credits from the bank and the Banker has accepted full responsibility for the mitigation
obligation requiring the credits/units.
The Banker will issue the Mitigation Credit Transfer Certificate within three (3) days of receipt of the
purchase price. Banker shall provide to Applicant a copy of the Mitigation Credit Transfer Certificate and
a documented copy of the debit of credits from the Bank Official Credit Ledger(s), indicating the permit
number and the resource type secured by the applicant. A copy of the Mitigation Credit Transfer
Certificate, with an updated Official Credit Ledger will also be sent to regulatory agencies showing the
proper documentation.
Please contact me at 919-209-1075 or [e-mail] if you have any questions or need additional
information.
Best Regards,
Caitlan B. Parker
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC
701 E. Bay Street, Suite 306
Charleston, SC 29403
Bank Sponsor — EBX-Neuse I, LLC or Environmental Banc & Exchange (EBX)

MCADAMS NARRATIVE > AWH-20000
THE POINT
Stormwater Impact Analysis
GENERAL DESCRIPTION
The Point is a proposed residential development in Rolesville, North Carolina, located between Highway 401 and East
Young Street/Rolesville Road. The development is approximately 300 acres, divided into a northern parcel (to be
developed at a later date) and a southern parcel. This Stormwater Impact Analysis covers the development of the
southern parcel only. The development will consist of approximately 804 lots, a mixture of townhomes and various
types of single-family housing, thirteen stormwater control measures, sidewalks, roadways, greenway trail, and
associated infrastructure.
The project site is located in the Neuse River Basin, and drains to Harris Creek (Peeples Creek / Wake Crossroads Lake)
(BIMS # 27-26) and is classified as C;NSW. Per Town of Rolesville regulations, stormwater management on this site shall
meet the stormwater management performance standards for development set forth in the Rolesville Unified
Development Ordinance Article 7, Section 7.5.4 — Standards.
The regulations are as follows:
(B) Standards Based on Project Density
(4) Development Standards for High -Density Projects High -Density Projects shall implement stormwater control
measures that comply with each of the following standards, in addition to the General Standards found in subsection B
of this Section:
(a) The measures shall control and treat runoff from the first inch of rain. Runoff volume drawdown time shall
be a minimum of48 hours, but not more than 120 hours.
(b) All structural stormwater treatment systems used to meet these requirements shall be designed to have a
minimum of 85 percent average annual removal for Total Suspended Solids (TSS).
(c) All Development and Redevelopment projects required to manage storm water shall provide permanent on -
site BMPs to lower the nitrogen export amounts as part of the storm water management plan. BMPs are to be
in accordance with and as specified in the Design Manual.
(d) Structural and Non-structural BMPs shall be used to ensure there is no net increase in peak flow leaving the
site from the pre -Development conditions for the one-year, 24-hour storm. Runoff volume drawdown time
shall be a minimum of48 hours, but not more than 120 hours.
(e) General engineering design criteria for all projects shall be in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .1008(c), as
explained in the Design Manual;
(f) All Development and Redevelopment shall be located outside the Riparian Buffer Zone and the Flood
Protection Zone. These Zones shall be in accordance with the following provisions:
i. Except where other applicable buffer standards are more restrictive, the Riparian Buffer Zone shall
extend a minimum of 50 feet landward of all Perennial and Intermittent Surface Waters. The most
restrictive standards shall apply.
ii. The Riparian Buffer Zone shall remain undisturbed unless otherwise permitted by this section.
iii. The Flood Protection Zone shall extend throughout the FEMA 100-year floodplain as identified on
the current Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) published by FEMA. The Flood Protection Zone shall
remain undisturbed unless otherwise permitted by this section.
iv. No Development or Redevelopment is permitted within the Riparian Buffer Zone or the Flood
Protection Zone except for stream bank or shoreline restoration or stabilization, water dependent
structures, and public or private projects such as road crossings and installations, utility crossings and
installations, and greenways, where no practical alternatives exist.
creating experiences through experience 2905 Meridian Parkway, Durham, NC 27713 / 919. 361. 5000

MCADAMS NARRATIVE > AWH-20000
v. Permitted activities within the Riparian Buffer Zone and the Flood Protection Zone shall minimize
impervious coverage, direct runoff away from surface waters to achieve diffuse flow, and maximize the
utilization of Non-structural BMPs.
vi. Where the Riparian Buffer Zone and the Flood Protection Zone both are present adjacent to surface
waters, the more restrictive shall apply.
(g) The approval of the stormwater permit shall require an enforceable restriction on property usage that runs with
the land, such as recorded deed restrictions or protective covenants, to ensure that future Development and
Redevelopment maintains the site consistent with the approved project plans. Buffer widths and locations shall be
clearly delineated on all plans, final plat, and as-builts.
(B) General Standards
(1) Downstream Impact Analysis The downstream impact analysis must be performed in accordance with the "ten
percent rule," and a copy of the analysis must be provided with the permit application. The purpose of the downstream
impact analysis is to determine if the project will cause any impacts on flooding or channel degradation downstream of
the project site. The analysis must include the assumptions, results and supporting calculations to show safe passage
of post -Development design flows downstream. This analysis shall be performed at the outlet(s) of the site, and
downstream at each tributary junction to the point(s) in the conveyance system where the area of the portion of the
site draining into the system is less than or equal to ten percent of the total drainage area above that point.
(2) Standards for Stormwater Control Measures
(a) Evaluation According to Contents of Design Manual All stormwater control measures and stormwater
treatment practices (or BMPs) required under this ordinance shall be evaluated by the Stormwater
Administrator according to the policies, criteria, and information, including technical specifications and
standards and the specific design criteria for each stormwater practice, in the Design Manual. The Stormwater
Administrator shall determine whether proposed BMPs will be adequate to meet the requirements of this
ordinance.
(b) Determination of Adequacy; Presumptions and Alternatives Stormwater treatment practices that are
designed, constructed, and maintained in accordance with the criteria and specifications in the Design Manual
will be presumed to meet the minimum water quality and quantity performance standards of this ordinance.
Whenever an applicant proposes to utilize a practice or practices not designed and constructed in accordance
with the criteria and specifications in the Design Manual, the applicant shall have the burden of demonstrating
that the practice(s) will satisfy the minimum water quality and quantity performance standards of this
ordinance. The Stormwater Administrator may require the applicant to provide the documentation,
calculations, and examples necessary for the Stormwater Administrator to determine whether such an
affirmative showing is made.
(c) Separation from Seasonal High Water Table For BMPs that require a separation from the seasonal high-
water table, the separation shall be provided by at least 12 inches of naturally occurring soil above the seasonal
high-water table.
CALCULATION METHODOLOGY
Rainfall data for this area in the Rolesville, NC region is from NOAAAtIas 14. This data contains a depth -duration -
frequency (DDF) table describing rainfall depth versus time for varying return periods in the area. These rainfall
depths are input into the meteorological model within PondPack for peak flow rate calculations. Please
reference the precipitation information within the Miscellaneous Site Information section of this report for
additional information.
■ On -site and off -site soils were determined using best available GIS data sources.
creating experiences through experience 2 of 4

MCADAMS NARRATIVE > AWH-20000
■ Soil Conservation Service Curve Numbers (SCS CN) were selected from Table 2 of the USDA TR-55 for the land
use that is most similar to the zoning type or cover condition.
Land cover conditions for the pre -development condition were taken from survey provided by WithersRavenel
and aerial imagery for the site. Land cover conditions for the post -development condition were taken from the
proposed layout. Offsite cover conditions were based on GIS-based zoning mapping, provided by the Town of
Rolesville.
The time of concentration was calculated using SCS TR-55 (Segmental Approach, 1986). The Tc flow path can
be divided into three segments: overland flow, concentrated flow, and channel flow. The travel time was then
computed for each segment, from which the overall time of concentration was determined by taking the sum
of each segmental time.
■ Existing topographic information used in this analysis is from survey provided by WithersRavenel and QL2 LiDAR
from North Carolina's Spatial Data Download.
■ PondPack Version V8i was used in determining the pre- & post -development peak flow rates for the 1- and
10-year storm events, as well as routing calculations for the proposed stormwater control measures.
■ For 100-year storm routing calculations, a "worst -case" condition was modeled in order to ensure the proposed
facility would safely pass the 100-year storm event. The assumptions used in this scenario are as follows:
- The starting water surface elevation in the facility, just prior to the 100-year storm event, is at the invert
of the secondary orifice. This scenario could occur as a result of a clogged primary orifice or a rainfall
event that lingers for several days. This could also occur as a result of several rainfall events in a series,
before the low -flow orifice has an opportunity to draw down the storage pool.
- Approximately 1-foot of freeboard is provided between the peak elevation during the "worst -case"
scenario and the top of the dam for the proposed facility.
To meet the above Town of Rolesville standards, thirteen stormwater control measures (SCMs) have been proposed.
DISCUSSION OF RESULTS
PEAK RUNOFF CONTROL REQUIREMENTS
As shown in the Summary of Results section of this SIA, the proposed stormwater control measures provide the
necessary peak runoff control for the proposed build -out condition of the development such that there are no
calculated increases in the 1- and 10-year storm events at any point of analysis leaving the site.
POLLUTANT AND NUTRIENT CONTROL REQUIREMENTS
The proposed SCM is designed to the Minimum Design Criteria of the NCDEQ Stormwater Design Manual. Therefore,
the proposed development is treated for 85% TSS removal and provides nitrogen and phosphorus treatment.
creating experiences through experience 3 of 4

MCADAMS NARRATIVE > AWH-20000
CONCLUSION
If the development on this tract is built as proposed within this report, then the requirements set forth in Town of
Rolesville regulations will be met without additional stormwater management facilities. However, modifications to the
proposed development may require that this analysis be revised. Some modifications that would require this analysis
to be revised include:
1. The proposed site impervious surface exceeds the amount accounted for in this report.
2. The post -development watershed breaks change significantly from those used to prepare this report.
The above modifications may result in the assumptions within this report becoming invalid. The computations within
this report will need to be revisited if any of the above conditions become apparent as development of the proposed
site moves forward.
creating experiences through experience 4 of 4

Burdette, Jennifer
From: Burdette, Jennifer
Sent: Wednesday, February 3, 2021 2:53 PM
To: [e-mail]
Subject: The Point South online project review certification letter
Attachments: AWH20000_ThePoint-South_T&E Pkg_Optimized.pdf
Review package attached, thanks.
Jennifer Burdette I Sr. Environmental Consultant, Water Resources
McAdams
2905 Meridian Parkway, Durham, NC 27713
office 919. 361. 5000 x137 I direct 919.287.0743 I cell 919.422.3605 I [e-mail]
www.mcadamsco.com I linkedin I twitter I instagram I join our team
gl iMcADAMs
creating experiences through experience

United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Field Office
P.O. Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Date: 2/3/2021
Self -Certification Letter
Project NameThe Point South
Dear Applicant:
Thank you for using the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) Raleigh Ecological
Services online project review process. By printing this letter in conjunction with your
project review package, you are certifying that you have completed the online project
review process for the project named above in accordance with all instructions
provided, using the best available information to reach your conclusions. This letter,
and the enclosed project review package, completes the review of your project in
accordance with the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531-1544, 87 Stat.
884), as amended (ESA), and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (16 U.S.C.
668-668c, 54 Stat. 250), as amended (Eagle Act). This letter also provides
information for your project review under the National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (P.L. 91-190, 42 U.S.C. 4321-4347, 83 Stat. 852), as amended. A copy of this
letter and the project review package must be submitted to this office for this
certification to be valid. This letter and the project review package will be maintained
in our records.
The species conclusions table in the enclosed project review package summarizes
your ESA and Eagle Act conclusions. Based on your analysis, mark all the
determinations that apply:
El
El
El
"no effect" determinations for proposed/listed species and/or
proposed/designated critical habitat; and/or
"may affect, not likely to adversely affect" determinations for proposed/listed
species and/or proposed/designated critical habitat; and/or
"may affect, likely to adversely affect" determination for the Northern long-
eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis) and relying on the findings of the January 5,
2016, Programmatic Biological Opinion for the Final 4(d) Rule on the
Northern long-eared bat;
111 "no Eagle Act permit required" determinations for eagles.

Applicant Page 2
We certify that use of the online project review process in strict accordance with the
instructions provided as documented in the enclosed project review package results in
reaching the appropriate determinations. Therefore, we concur with the "no effect" or
"not likely to adversely affect" deteiiiiinations for proposed and listed species and
proposed and designated critical habitat; the "may affect" determination for Northern
long-eared bat; and/or the "no Eagle Act permit required" determinations for eagles.
Additional coordination with this office is not needed. Candidate species are not
legally protected pursuant to the ESA. However, the Service encourages consideration
of these species by avoiding adverse impacts to them. Please contact this office for
additional coordination if your project action area contains candidate species.
Should project plans change or if additional information on the distribution of
proposed or listed species, proposed or designated critical habitat, or bald eagles
becomes available, this determination may be reconsidered. This certification letter is
valid for 1 year. Information about the online project review process including
instructions, species information, and other information regarding project reviews
within North Carolina is available at our website http://www.fws.gov/raleigh/pp.html.
If you have any questions, you can write to us at [e-mail] or please contact
Leigh Mann of this office at 919-856-4520, ext. 10.
Sincerely,
/s/Pete Benjamin
Pete Benjamin
Field Supervisor
Raleigh Ecological Services
Enclosures - project review package

Species Conclusions Table
Project Name: The Point - South
Date: 2/1/2021
Species / Resource Name
Conclusion
ESA Section 7 / Eagle Act Determination
Notes / Documentation
Red -cockaded Woodpecker
Picoides borealis
No suitable habitat present
No effect
Habitat assessment conducted 11/4/2020
indicates no potential habitat present
(mature pine stands with little midstory
encroachment absent)
Neuse River Waterdog
Necturus lewisi
Suitable habitat present
May affect, not likely to adversely affect
Habitat assessment conducted 11/4/2020
indicates suboptimal habitat present
Carolina Madtom
Noturus furiosus
Suitable habitat present
May affect, not likely to adversely affect
Habitat assessment conducted 11/4/2020
indicates suboptimal habitat present
Atlantic Pigtoe
Fusconaia masoni
Suitable habitat present
May affect, not likely to adversely affect
Habitat assessment conducted 11/4/2020
indicates suboptimal habitat present
Dwarf Wedgemussel
Alasmidonta heterodon
Suitable habitat present
May affect, not likely to adversely affect
Habitat assessment conducted 11/4/2020
indicates potential habitat (perennial
streams with stable banks and extensive
roots holding soils in place) present
Michaux's Sumac
Rhus michauxii
Suitable habitat present,
species not present
May affect, not likely to adversely affect
11/4/2020 survey by McAdams consultant
indicates absence
Northern Long-eared Bat
Myotis septentrionalis
Suitable habitat present
No effect
NLEB not listed for Wake County
Bald Eagle
Haliaeetus leucocephalus
Unlikely to disturb nesting
bald eagles
No Eagle Act permit required
No known nest within 660' of project area
Critical Habitat
No critical habitat present
No effect
Acknowledgement: I agree that the above information about my proposed project is true. I used all of the provided resources to make an
informed decision about impacts in the immediate and surrounding areas.
� � I
Signature /Title
2/1/2021
Date

Burdette, Jennifer
From: Manning, Heaven
Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2021 3:28 PM
To: DCR - Environmental_Review
Cc: Burdette, Jennifer
Subject: FW: AWH20000 The Point South Project Review Request
Attachments: AWH20000 - Cultural Resources Env Review Pkg.pdf; AWH20000 The Point South
Project Review Request
Hello, to whom it may concern:
I submitted the attached project review request package for the proposed Point South Project in Rolesville, NC on
2/2/2021 (see attached package and email below). We requested consultation regarding the project's impact to cultural
resources.
I just wanted to follow-up on this request and would like a status update for this project. Please let me know if you have
any questions or need anything else. I appreciate your time, consideration, and patience.
Thank you,
Heaven Manning, PWS I Environmental Consultant, Water Resources
McAdams
2905 Meridian Parkway, Durham, NC 27713
[e-mail]
www.mcadamsco.com I linkedin I twitter I instagram I join our team
El MCADAMS
r raatina experiences through experience
From: Manning, Heaven
Sent: Tuesday, February 2, 2021 2:34 PM
To: [e-mail]
Subject: AWH20000 The Point South Project Review Request
To whom it may concern:
Attached please find the project review request for the proposed Point South Project in Rolesville, NC. We are
requesting consultation regarding the project's impact to cultural resources. Please let me know if you have any
questions or need anything else.
Thank you,
Heaven Manning, PWS I Environmental Consultant, Water Resources
McAdams
2905 Meridian Parkway, Durham, NC 27713
[e-mail]
www.mcadamsco.com I linkedin I twitter I instagram I join our team
1

!JMCADAMS
creating experiences through experience
2

The Point South
Overall Impact Inventory
Area
ID LF/AC SF Type Buffer Z1 Z2 Type Classification Overall Project Totals LF/AC SF AC
1 S1 18 108 T B1 6221 4167 P AA
S2 63 427 P Permanent Stream 247 2167 0.050
S3 20 128 P-no loss P-No Loss Stream 114 7618 0.175
W1 0.001 60 T Temp Stream 161 831 0.019
2 B2 947 1298 P AMA Permanent Wetland 0.228
Temp Wetland 0.240
3 01 0.026 1132 P B3 2521 1106 P AA
P-No Loss Open Water 0.152
4 S4 1 1 P B4 6673 3198 T AA Permanent Open Water 0.175
S5 17 20 P-no loss Temporary Open Water 0.047
S6 3 6 T
W2 0.003 144 T Permanent WOTUS 0.452
W3 0.001 59 P
02 0.047 2058 T
03 0.001 25 P
5 W4
0.044 1894 T
6 S7 6 19 P-no loss
S8 37 177 T
S9 27 66 T
W5 0.128 5555 T
W6 0.029 1275 P
W7 0.007 304 T
W8 0.023 1011 T
W9 0.052 2281 P
04 0.152 6634 P-no loss
05 0.148 6452 P
7
8 S10
W10
35 104 T
0.034 1469 T
9 & 9A W11 0.090 3925 P
2324 1476 P DA Construction Phase 1 LF/AC SF AC
B5 19,206 1863 T AA Permanent Stream 64 428 0.010
B6 2835 T AA P-No Loss Stream 43 167 0.004
Temp Stream 120 461 0.011
Permanent Wetland 0.172
Temp Wetland 0.240
P-No Loss Open Water 0.152
Permanent Open Water 0.175
Temporary Open Water 0.047
3421 P DA Permanent WOTUS 0.358
1177 P DA
905 P DA
2073 1397 P DA
10 Future W
0.055 2382 P
Future
354 408 P DA
11 Future S 102 717 P
Future S 20 142 T
Future S 33 180 P-no loss
Future
8656 5630 P AA
12 Future S 21 228 T
Future S 81 1022 P
Future S 38 637 P-no loss
Future
6709 4353 P AA

TOP OF DAM = EL. 376.00
CONTRACTOR SHALL LINE THE EMERGENCY SPILLWAY
WITH ARMOUR FLEX OR ENGINEER APPROVED
EQUIVALENT. THE ANCHOR PATTERN FOR INSTALLATION
SHALL BE THE ANCHOR PATTERN SHOWN BELOW. THE
LINER SHALL BE INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURER'S
SPECIFICATIONS.
CONTRACTOR SHALL LINE THE
EMERGENCY SPILLWAY WITH
ARMOUR FLEX OR ENGINEER
APPROVED EQUIVALENT.
TOP OF DAM = EL. 376.00
VELOCITY DISSIPATOR
NCDOT CLASS I RIPRAP
NORMAL POOL = EL. 373.00
TO EXTEND TO EXIT
CHANNEL
100-YEAR WSEL = EL. 375.90 1 1 1—III
III I I
10-YEAR WSEL = EL. 375.24
_
III
-
oM
—
III
I
—I
i
���
1-YEAR WSEL = EL. 374.39
—
4IP Iloilo. do aro.—
Or yr
I—�
EMERGENCY SPILLWAY = EL. 373.00
5
5
1
—III
I
III III III III III III III III III III
III III III III III III III III ��
20' (MIN)
1
11'
_
I
���0"."
**
�
I
1 1 1
III
1
1
II
CROSS
SECTION
C'-C'
CONTRACTOR SHALL TRENCH THE
LINER INTO THE GROUND A MINIMUM
OF 12". THE TRENCH SHALL THEN
BE BACKFILLED AND COMPACTED TO
EMERGENCY SPILLWAY DETAIL THE SAME SPECIFICATIONS AS THE
DAM EMBANKMENT.
N.T.S.
N.T.S
��; �� v v
i / - -�
v v v
EXISTING
/ / WETLAND `\\
(TYP.) ��ii``
i % — 9
/—111=1I
*
I I
SL I=III—W
� v �—
�_�S
v �.
I—
III-
— I11-1 1-1
III I III—
Ili 1=1
= �-I� ICI
II hI
I —I fY fly
1 I�fi
v to
I
At
'-''i
fze
-:%%%
�i
1 1 _
I I
l' I I
I Ih
I 11�
I
Tl-
-
x6 0 DAM EMBANKMENT IN THIS AREA �` v ti , yvv
TO BE REMOVED AND REPLACED v v
PER DIRECTION OF ON SITE
�,' v v v v v v v v v v
6 ��-GEOTECHNICALENGINEER �
(APPROXIMATE EXTENTS) �� v v * v v v v v v v v v v v
1 -�. TOPSOIL REMOVED FROM• :
'frJURISDICTIONAL WETLAND AREA TO BE
-
STOCKPILED AND REAPPLIED IN THE ,, �_-\
v, w_ WETLAND AREA AT THE COMPLETION OF �-�o
THE DAM REHABILITATION.
/ LIMITS OF
°>
�.
v
w
v �a v vv v v \\\\\\\\\
�D
\ v v v
�a \ \ • •
A
v v v
\ \
_ _ _ _ _ �
—
v v v v vv v
EXISTING \
WETLAND
(TYP.)
•.
/
v
'O
0,,
�9��
c(s
v
v
o
'
��
v
v
w
\
LIMITS
DISTURBANCE
(TYP.)
OF
v
�
�o
vv
v
(
o
/
v
v
�o
`v �--
\
vv
/
1
\ `
\
�
/ / _ _ v
v .
ENDWALL PER NCDOT STD. 838.80=11
\ 'III=11=1
,// I INV.OUT(12"�)=372.00
�� ��
— —
I I— I
I I-�-I 11=W
=1 III
—
I
��
1*
*DISTURBANCEYQ
6 (TYP.)
/
33 LF 12"� DIP @ 3.03% v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v
/ —I ICI I ►' :
I=I1;�
•
I_ /
��
,� , � , I , I I
/ J i I1=
/ �, �/, � /,,�I /I �, �, �, Eli —III
/ G =
I I ICI I I
-�I11 W
III=■
_l —I .�
S ten: �I
=
INV. 373.00
6\
�, * * * * * �, �, * * * * * * * * * * �, �, * * * * * * * *
�' v
/ /
�
/
I /'
/
/
/
\ '
/
_'/
//�
y
v /
�/
v /v/
/ *
**
*
v v
I=1 I I —I
VELOCITY DISSIPATOR � —
NCDOT CLASS'B' RIPRAP _ _ `�/�
8.0'LX6.0'WX9"THICK ��v�
��
/ 1;. I'•���
1
�1% �I /
1
I
/.' I I \
��� v ) v
v
�/
/
�v
�� vv
`�
1
1 \ 1
/ / / /
'� II
/ LIMITS OF
/ r/ . 1 1
// I /I DISTURBANCE
(TYP.)
1
\ \
/v
\ v �
EXISTING
WETLAND
(TYP.)
,i, �
I r l l l '�I�l
v
m�
19
I
to
I
I I
, I I I
I I 9
\ \
1
,�
\
2.5:1
C
I1II
1
�6
*
�
�II
SLOPE.
(TYP.)
*
11\\*
�I*I
s
v1
gv
VA
v v� v
\\\
Vv
/ A v
v
* * * * * * v v * * * * * * * * * *
// ;�
6
/ * * v * * * * v */ * * * * * * * *
* * * * a �/ * v * * * * * * * * *
* * * * * kfr * * * * * * * *
* * l * * y • 4, * * * * * * * *
4, v v * a v * v v * * * * * * *
v \ v * * v_ * v v * * * * * * * * * *
DAM EMBANKMENT TO BE
6
WIDENED IO FT ON THE*
* * * * * * * *
UPSTREAM FACE OR PER THE
* * * * * * * * * *
�� DIRECTION OF THE GEOTECHNICAL \fr
ENGINEER. y
* Iv * * * * v * * v v * * * * * *
* * * v * v v * * v\ v * * * * * v
I 3�
I A
A A
DAM EMBANKMENT TO BE RAISED * * * * * ,i, /
1 2 FT TO ELEV. 376.00 / /
v v v v v/ v v v v v v
(
�; �, �, �, �, �, �,
* * * * .v* * .v�
) .li ,rc,
v -_-
1SOPE
�, �//
/ /
v �o av v v v * * v v * N / * * v ,I/
�, „ / .I. ,V * * I * * */ * * .i. /.i.
v .i. / ,I
1:
* *
1� I I .fr 7.
* * * * *
0 00 * v v v * v v * * * * *
•
vowlZ 2� (o� v �1 * v * * v * *1 * * * v *
O \\
v v 6 v / * /� 1�
v v
* v
*
v
v/
v v
.fr
v v
v 'I/
v
/
Ji 1./
1
* v
tea.
)///
v
/
/
/
/
1�/
* * * v
�'
* * * *
/ * *
/ *
v/
*
✓
/
1 i
•/. /
:I:
/ (
/
/ ///
: , //�
/ /
/
;
/
/
�/�
,
�/
/
��
/
/
,
,'
v ,'
,� v * * *
* •.
i
i
�
/ _/
�,
�'
/'.
// ��/
/ ,/
,-
i
/
/ /
/
,/
,
/
/
��
�69
�v
��
to
■v
3
�®��!�
�II��i�I
��O
\__--
.�
u
\
•
�®
��2
��
.�►���
iI
r
T
o
Mg
r��
■�®
■r■ram.
—■■■
\ \ �i■■■
��
\
\\ \V
`��
■.■■
.�A�.■
\I �____
■
'�.._..._
ail/
\��
o� ov
--
,
z
■._..._.
..._...
.._�.
■
�o
.
...
■■■�■■■
"�
�■
.
�■
�■
\
.-
_. `1
■
■■■■�
■■■
O�,
ems■
imIIII
L�
■■�■■■
■om■
��►
M.
®
of �/
- �� .� o
��
■■■�■
.
��
k
r���
�'-_
IN1.pI—!;i_:,,�.�..:
�,.
►1
..__._.�__..�/
�®L..®.�
rIIL.._..
II=MM11Mi
ber
INi
ME
i,
.!:
- i O� O�
..�..■
INl.
_ _
-_...�...�
I
III®
i
1
•
�
.
MIL.
I
■•
■•
o d of \
I
II
Ni...
::
:■
��
4160
VELOCITY DISSIPATOR
�.�
NCDOT CLASS I RIPRAP�����1•PIIL
��®
.._
TOEXTENDTOEXIT
�■�
������
■■®■■*
CHANNEL
��
��
�'�
-___
LIMITS OF o
�, DISTURBANCE
�� (TYP.)
/
9
/
_ _
- -
-�
_
GRAPHIC SCALE\
0 5 10
/
•Vvv
��
/
CONTRACTOR
EMERGENCY
ARMOUR
,--
o,
� O
% /
I\
20
S
I�
o
���
SHALL
SPILLWAY
FLEXOR
APPROVED EQUIVALENT.
\
\
of
0
��
tr
o
Or
��
LINE THE
WITH
ENGINEER
vv
\
\
\
\
pip
V
\
v
v
vv
\
\
V \
\
v
V
A
v
\
V
\
\ II
i�
\
/
�v
v
��
�A\
\
V A
\
\ \
\
__ _
-
-
�O
,� O
9
Off`
F� r��
,��
v v .
\`•
A
v
�p
\
\ .�
�\
v
�\
�
��
�-
o
•
—
�-
-_
`�
��
C)
/
a
\
•�
<o
w vvv2 0o I * 1/
\ v I
/ // I��
* * * v * v v v v v/ v v v v v .1./
\�
�
* * v �� v- '- �V v v v
* * * -- * * * -- * * * *v__* �v
7_\ �y v
w �� v * * v v v— z �� — v * * o/°`
— _ =1I1
vv
v
v v: �i�`
��
L��
I v `'' vv .v * vv * * * * * I
�o v v v v v v v �� v v v v
1 v a v v ,d v v v * * vl *
1 '
* * *
�i
* * * *
>v 1
I I —I
*
...*
* * * I I 1-1
�--�
v v v v .._ �v v v 9
_ _ /I
_ �, �, - �,- - - „b- - -* - - _* - - `J< .1, (
V---' I I
1C.'
\ \ `
�'—��
I I I
IJ=�
I ICI
I I—_ I ISI
1 1—
"
�71�
�*
.I V�
1I I 1�—k , .
I I�II'� ; I�IILII.
J� �:II_:_:.
I I�� �IIIIYii .111���21111�IIL.
\ ��nL"Ind°�ii�n�"I ' ii�
1 m2 n
1L n SnA
• III IIL"III�II 'L.11l
Yi.�lll�lll�
A 6II
v. v. v. v. d v. v. v. I I
A / / / / I ,
IL"In�ll! \ / s / / , I
mi - / /
III IIL"I \\\"`��KCC \ / y • • / /
\ y - / /
l
1
II
1 j
I
I
1'. ,
\--- �1112111� dllll� ill /
1 1 �-����..II�IIL"III�II
/
_ //
II IIL"III�II II IIL"III�II I J
�- ------ y.— _.1. J sJ III III III / /
), A Mlle.
. ulnl2
_ VELOCITY DISSIPATOR — I -� ®� III „T_ III
V ` / /
- -� NCDOT CLASS I RIPRAP I�Y9w.Iw�c.1n"m2°p �ilunl2n"il�mr�! �.-"
_ - \ �� J / _ "v ;:�:�v'k' III����_:="� IIII�IIL.,:_:::-. I.�III / /
_ — — — \ , ,) - - ',I�IT�,-Ilan 2::_: .. II�nl2 :/ • / r /
7 \ TO EXTEND TO EXIT T:.:-.r ....;. I�i2111 oII�;: i... / ,
�/
— CHANNEL A 1:�J �.�".- IIe•III2 v v v v v
/ � • •j�IIIL" /• / / I
o ���..z II' I v v v LIMITS OF / ! (
I �� �� � I �I I1=� -' DISTURBANCE j
` �' l 11 � .vvv �►
`--til ( _,/
`.�=1
CONTRACTOR SHALL LINE THE
I ICI I..,.� ,� .� I I
a
�
�� /'
�'/ ��� j EMERGENCY SPILLWAY WITH I
1 � ARMOUR FLEX OR ENGINEER
1 APPROVED EQUIVALENT.
/ 1 v o QU /
�\ ih 1V / / \ I
�
�_ 11=11H 11'N 1=1��
I —i1= 1 I I 1=1��i
1 1 IJ—�
o I 111— 1 1—` —11
1=1
7/
7/
—
1 / GRAPHIC SCALE
=1 1� ----�'' 0 20 40 80
v
1 DAM EMBANKMENT IN THIS AREA 1
�I TO BE REMOVED AND REPLACED
___ A !^ PER DIRECTION OF ON -SITE ,
��i
- -g I I —III __./'ss
__.,-/-----_,
-- i _ / // _-4
1 inch = 40 ft.
1 inch = 10 ft. \ �_
o\ \ / /
A ��
\HI—
��
v GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER ___ ss �� ss __•-7--
v (APPROXIMATE EXTENTS) Of / �- %- „ / _--- v
\
\� \` VI�v DOWNSTREAM POND PLAN VIEW -- /
//
\ \ //// A
DOWNSTREAM POND PLAN VIEW
1". 40'
1"=40' PRELIMINARY DRAWING - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
MCADAMS
The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.
2905 Meridian Parkway
Durham, NC 27713
phone [phone]
fax [phone]
license number: C-0293, C-187
www.mcadamsco.com
(/1
z
0
(/)
W
0
LJ_
W
uJ
J
J
(/')
uJ
0
J
cc
LJ_
0
z
0
z
0
cc
U
0
z
0
uJ
REVISIONS
NO. DATE
PLAN INFORMATION
PROJECT NO. AWH-20000
FILENAME AWH20000-DAM
CHECKED BY JES
DRAWN BY BMS
SCALE AS NOTED
DATE 04. 16. 2021
SHEET
DOWNSTREAM DAM
REHAB PLAN

Burdette, Jennifer
From: [e-mail]
Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2021 12:02 AM
To: Burdette, Jennifer
Cc: [e-mail]
Subject: Pre -Filing Time Clock has been reached for The Point South - 20202025 Ver 1
Attachments: DWR Pre -Filing Meeting Request Form.pdf
The North Carolina Division of Water Resources has received the Pre -Filing Meeting Request Form for The Point South
that you submitted on 12/28/2020. The ID number for that project is 20202025, Version 1.
Your Pre -Filing Meeting Request has now reached the 30 calendar days' requirement and your application can now be
accepted.
When you submit your application please upload a copy of the attached document in this email.
This email was automatically generated by Laserfiche workflow. Please do not respond to this email address, as
responses are not monitored.
1

DWR Pre -Filing Meeting Request Form
ID#*
Regional Office *
Reviewer List*
20202025
Version*
Raleigh Regional Office - [phone]
Stephanie Goss
Pre -Filing Meeting Request submitted 12/28/2020
Contact Name * Jennifer Burdette
Contact Email Address* [e-mail]
Project Name * The Point South
Project Owner* Ashton Raleigh Residential, LLC
Project County* Wake
Owner Address: Street Address
5711 Six Forks Rd
Address Line 2
Ste 300
City State / Rovince / Region
Raleigh NC
Fbstal / Zip Code Country
27609-3888 United States
Is this a transportation project?* C Yes ( No
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
l 401 Water Quality Certification - I— 401 Water Quality Certification -
Reg ula r Express
I— Individual Permit I— Modification
I— Shoreline Stabilization
Does this project have an existing project ID#?*
C Yes ( No
Do you know the name of the staff member you would like to request a meeting with?
N0
Please give a brief project description below.*
The proposed project is an approximately 296-acre mixed -use
development consisting of approximately 800 units of single-family
home and townhome lots, a 12-acre retail area, road network,
recreational components and associated utilities and stormwater
management infrastructure.

Please give a couple of dates you are available for a meeting.
1/18/2021
Please attach the documentation you would like to have the meeting about.
AWH20000_ThePoint-South_Fig 1 USGS.pdf 1.57MB
pdf only
By digitally signing below, I certify that I have read and understood that per the Federal Clean Water Act Section
401 Certification Rule the following statements:
• This form completes the requirement of the Pre -Filing Meeting Request in the Clean Water Act Section 401 Certification
Rule.
• I understand by signing this form that I cannot submit my application until 30 calendar days after this pre -filing
meeting request.
• !also understand that DWR is not required to respond or grant the meeting request.
Your project's thirty -day clock started upon receipt of this application. You will receive notification regarding meeting location
and time if a meeting is necessary. You will receive notification when the thirty -day clock has expired, and you can submit an
application.
Signature
Submittal Date 12/28/2020