20201093 Ver 2_B-5813 MCDC_20210426

11/07/18 1of 7
MINIMUM CRITERIA DETERMINATION CHECKLIST

TIP Project No.: B-5813

State Project No.:45767.1.1

Project Location: Bridge No. 132 over Dutch Buffalo Creek on NC 73 in Mount
Pleasant, Cabarrus County.

Project Description: The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT), plans
to replace Cabarrus County Bridge No. 132 on NC 73 over Dutch Buffalo Creek (refer to
Figure 1). The existing bridge has two 12-foot lanes and is approximately 190 feet long
with a reinforced concrete deck girder superstructure. The bridge was built in 1920, and
was rehabilitated in 1952.

The proposed project, B-5813, is state funded. The proposed cross section is a two 12-foot
lane with a center 12-foot left turning lane with eight foot shoulders. A minimum of 11 feet
of vertical clearance has been provided. The project is scheduled for right of way
acquisition in February 2019 and let in February 2020. The project would require a
realignment of NC 73, with a project length of approximately 1,800 feet. Traffic will be
maintained on the existing roadway while constructing the new alignment. Minor ROW
acquisition will be required (refer to Appendix A).

Purpose and Need: NCDOT Bridge Management Unit records indicate Bridge No. 132
has a sufficiency rating of 7.68 out of a possible 100 for a new structure. The bridge is
considered structurally deficient due to superstructure condition appraisal of 4 out of 9, a
substructure condition appraisal of 4 out of 9, and a deck condition of 4 out of 9 according
to Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) standards, and is approaching the end of its
useful life. The bridge also meets the criteria for functionally obsolete due to a deck
geometry appraisal of 2 out of 9.

Bridge No. 132 carries 8,200 vehicles per day with 10,800 vehicles per day projected for
the future. Components of both the concrete superstructure and substructure have
experienced an increasing degree of deterioration that can no longer be addressed by
maintenance activities. The bridge is approaching the end of its useful life. Replacement
of the bridge will result in safer traffic operations by providing a left turn lane to SR 2604
(Dutch Rd).

Anticipated Permit or Consultation Requirements: The proposed project has been
designated as a Minimum Criteria Determination Checklist for the purposes of State
Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation. It is anticipated that a Nationwide or
Regional General Permit along with its corresponding Water Quality Certification (WQC),
will be applicable for this project. A Nationwide Permit (NWP) 33 may also apply for
temporary construction activities such as stream dewatering, work bridges, or temporary
causeways that are often used during bridge construction or rehabilitation. The U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers (USACE) holds the final discretion as to what permit will be required
to authorize project construction. If a Section 404 permit is required, then a Section 401
WQC from the North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR) will be needed.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 98D4C64C-6191-4D87-A296-F071E0BB2BEF
11/07/18 2of 7
Special Project Information:

Environmental Commitments: Greensheet commitments are located at the end of the
checklist.

Estimated Costs (Pending): The estimated costs, FY 2018, are as follows:

Utility $ 180,900 (NCDOT)
R/W $ 201,000 (NCDOT)
Const. $ 4,470,000 (STV Engineers Inc.)
Total $ 4,851,900

Estimated Traffic:
Current 2016 8,200 vpd
Year 2040 10,800 vpd
TTST 1%
Dual 4%

Accidents: A crash analysis provided by NCDOT (Date: 2/14/17) on NC 73 (Franklin St)
from 500 feet west of Bridge 132 to 500 feet east of the bridge. The crash analysis was
performed using NCDOT’s TEAAS system with a study period of five years, from January
1, 2012 to December 31, 2016. Eleven crashes occurred within the vicinity of the project.
The crash analysis found the Total Crash Rate for crashes per 100 million vehicle miles to
be 343.06 which is higher than the comparable state average of 181.73.

In January 2018, a capacity analysis was completed that analyzed the intersection of NC
73 and SR 2604 (Dutch Rd). The analysis found the intersection warranted a left turn lane
of 75 feet of storage. However, due to the close proximity of Bridge No. 132 to the nearby
intersection, it was recommended that the turn lane be extend to the west across the bridge
(approximately 550 feet) prior to tapering back to the two-lane cross-section of NC 73.

Design Exceptions: There are no anticipated design exceptions for this project.

Pedestrian and Bicycle Accommodations: An existing bicycle route, Cabarrus County
Bicycle Route No. 2-Northern Route, utilizes NC 73 at this bridge location. The North
Carolina Division of Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation requested four foot minimum
paved shoulder (five foot preferred), as well as bicycle safe railing. These requested
accommodations were included in the projects designs.

The adopted Carolina Thread Trail Master Plan for Cabarrus County (August 2009)
indicates a planned greenway, the Dutch Buffalo Creek Greenway, traveling under the
bridge. The Cabarrus County Active Living and Parks Department Director confirmed on
June 18, 2018, that the proposed greenway is not funded. On July 6, 2018, Cabarrus
County confirmed that none of the parcels surrounding Bridge No. 132 are owned by the
County, Parks and Recreation Department, or have publicly owned easements on them.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 98D4C64C-6191-4D87-A296-F071E0BB2BEF
11/07/18 3of 7
Alternative Analysis:

No Build – The no build alternative would not replace a deficient bridge, and thus is not
a viable option.

Rehabilitation – Rehabilitation would only provide a temporary solution to the structural
deficiency of the bridge.

New Alignment with Onsite Detour (Preferred Alternative) – A new alignment for
NC 73 is preferred because it will allow the addition of a left turn lane on Cabarrus
Bridge 132 on NC 73. An onsite detour will be utilized to maintain traffic on the existing
roadway.

Offsite Detour – An approximate six-mile offsite detour was evaluated but was not
feasible due to concerns regarding the number of school busses using the bridge, EMS
response time, and concerns raised by the Mount Pleasant Town Planner regarding the
road conditions. Comments from the Mount Pleasant Town Planner noted the offsite
detour utilizes very narrow, rough, and rural roads that do not have the capacity to
handle the traffic volumes in the event of bridge closure for a significant period of time.

Agency Comments: Start of Study letters were sent to the Cabarrus County Planning
Department, Cabarrus-Rowan MPO, the NC Department of Parks and Recreation,
NCDENR, NC Division of Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation, and the US Army
Corps of Engineers in December of 2015.

Input forms were sent to the Mount Pleasant Fire Department Fire Chief, Town of Mount
Pleasant Planner, and the Cabarrus County Schools Transportation Technical Planner in
May of 2016. Comments were received back in May of 2016. The Mount Pleasant Fire
Department Fire Chief, Town of Mount Pleasant Planner, and the Cabarrus County
Schools Transportation Technical Planner all expressed concern regarding the potential
high level of impact if the bridge was closed for up to a year.

Floodplain: Dutch Buffalo Creek, which crosses under Bridge No. 132, is located in a
FEMA Zone AE Floodplain. The Hydraulics Unit will coordinate with the NC
Floodplain Mapping Program (FMP), to determine status of project with regard to
applicability of NCDOT’S Memorandum of Agreement, or approval of a Conditional
Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) and subsequent final Letter of Map Revision
(LOMR).

Public Involvement: A landowner notification letter was sent on February 16, 2016, to
all property owners affected directly by this project to inform them of representatives
being present on their property. The letter indicated the following, “Please note that if
the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has already issued a Jurisdictional Determination on
your property confirming the presence of streams and/or wetlands, or if you have
general questions or comments about the project, contact the NCDOT Planning
Engineer Jonathan Carr by phone [phone], or via email at [e-mail].”
No comments have been received to date.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 98D4C64C-6191-4D87-A296-F071E0BB2BEF
11/07/18 4of 7

Enhanced Voluntary Agricultural District Property: The project includes one parcel,
located in the northwest bridge quadrant, totaling 86 acres that is part of a Cabarrus
County EVAD. The project would require approximately .88 acres of new right of way
from the EVAD parcel. If the EVAD property holder refuses settlement, prior to pursuing
condemnation, the right of way Branch must contact Project Development to coordinate
with the Cabarrus County VAD Board to schedule a public meeting. The Cabarrus County
VAD ordinance provides that no state or local public agency or governmental unit may
formally initiate any action to condemn any interest in qualifying farmland within a
Cabarrus County VAD until such agency or unit has requested the advisory board to hold
a public hearing on the proposed condemnation. Appropriate commitments are located in
the greensheet.

PART A: MINIMUM CRITERIA

YES NO
1. Is the proposed project listed as a type and class of activity allowed under
the Minimum Criteria Rule in which environmental documentation is not
required?

If the answer to number 1 is “no”, then the project does not qualify as a
minimum criteria project. A state environmental assessment is required.

If yes, under which category? Category #8
(Highway or railway modernization by
means of the following activities, which
involve less than a total of 10 cumulative
acres of ground surface previously
undisturbed by highway or railway
construction, limited to a single project,
noncontiguous to any other project
making use of this provision:
a) resurfacing, restoration, or
reconstruction;)

If either category #8, #12(i) or #15 is used complete Part D of this checklist.

PART B: MINIMUM CRITERIA EXCEPTIONS

YES NO
2. Could the proposed activity cause significant changes in land use
concentrations that would be expected to create adverse air quality
impacts?

3. Will the proposed activity have secondary impacts or cumulative
DocuSign Envelope ID: 98D4C64C-6191-4D87-A296-F071E0BB2BEF
11/07/18 5of 7
impacts that may result in a significant adverse impact to human
health or the environment?

4. Is the proposed activity of such an unusual nature or does the
proposed activity have such widespread implications, that an
uncommon concern for its environmental effects has been
expressed to the Department?

5. Does the proposed activity have a significant adverse effect on
wetlands; surface waters such as rivers, streams, and estuaries;
parklands; prime or unique agricultural lands; or areas of
recognized scenic, recreational, archaeological, or historical value?

6. Will the proposed activity endanger the existence of a species on
the Department of Interior's threatened and endangered species list?

7. Could the proposed activity cause significant changes in land use
concentrations that would be expected to create adverse water
quality or ground water impacts?

8.

Is the proposed activity expected to have a significant adverse
effect on long-term recreational benefits or shellfish, finfish,
wildlife, or their natural habitats?

PART C: COMPLIANCE WITH STATE AND FEDERAL REGULATIONS

YES NO
9. Is a federally protected threatened or endangered species, or its
habitat, likely to be impacted by the proposed action?

10. Does the action require the placement of temporary or permanent
fill in waters of the United States?

11. Does the project require the placement of a significant amount of
fill in high quality or relatively rare wetland ecosystems, such as
mountain bogs or pine savannahs?

12. Is the proposed action located in an Area of Environmental
Concern, as defined in the coastal Area Management Act?

13. Does the project require stream relocation or channel changes?

Cultural Resources
14. Will the project have an “effect” on a property or site listed on the
National Register of Historic Places?

DocuSign Envelope ID: 98D4C64C-6191-4D87-A296-F071E0BB2BEF
11/07/18 6of 7
15. Will the proposed action require acquisition of additional right of
way from publicly owned parkland or recreational areas?

Response to Question 9:
Habitat for the Carolina Heelsplitter (Lasmigona decorata) exists within the project study
area. A review of the NC Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) records, last accessed on
April 23, 2018, indicated no element occurrence (EO) for the Carolina Heelsplitter located
within a 5-mile buffer of the project bridge. The closest occurrence (EO ID 21454) is
located in Goose Creek, approximately 17 stream miles downstream from the project
location. This occurrence was first observed on August 26, 1987, and last observed on
September 29, 2015. On September 22, 2016, a mussel survey was conducted for these
species. A total of 3.5 person-hours of survey time was spent in the survey location with
two species of freshwater mussels found [Eastern Elliptio (Elliptio complanate) and
Carolina Creekshell (Villosa vaughaniana)]. The results indicate that the study area
supports a sparse freshwater mussel fauna of common species. Carolina Heelsplitter
individuals were not found during the survey. Previous surveys in the vicinity of the
subject bridge have resulted in no discovery of Carolina Heelsplitter within a 10-mile
radius of the study location. Based on the presence of degraded habitat, distance to known
Carolina Heelsplitter records, and these survey results, completion of the proposed project
will not affect this species. Therefore, a biological conclusion of “No Effect” was reached
for both the Carolina Heelsplitter.

Suitable habitat for Schweinitz's sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii) is present in the
study area along roadside shoulders. A review of the July 2016 NCNHP database on
August 12, 2016, indicates no known occurrences within 1.0 mile of the study area. A
survey of the study area was conducted on August 23, 2016 during the flowering survey
window. No plants or stems were found during the survey.

The Natural Resources Technical Report (NRTR) also disclosed an unresolved Biological
Conclusion for the Northern long eared bat (NLEB). Since this project is state funded, the
USACE will act as the lead federal agency for issues related to the NLEB. The USACE
has developed a Standard Local Operations Procedure for Endangered Species (SLOPES)
to address NLEB when they are the lead agency, which NCDOT will follow for this
project. This procedure applies to projects in NCDOT Divisions 9-14. The requirements of
the SLOPES for the NLEB will be completed prior to Let and will be submitted to the
USACE. A Biological Conclusion is not required.

Response to Question 10:
Build bridge on new alignment upstream of existing bridge while using existing bridge
will require a Nationwide Permit #14 – Linear Development. Potential permanent fill
impacts from a new northwest bridge abutment may occur to the tributary stream to Dutch
Buffalo Creek, but will be avoided if possible and minimized if necessary. Temporary
impacts from debris may result from the demolition of the existing bridge which will
occur after traffic has been routed to the new alignment.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 98D4C64C-6191-4D87-A296-F071E0BB2BEF
11/07/18 7of 7

PART D :( To be completed when either category #8, 12(i) or #15 of the rules are used.)

16. Project length: 1,800 feet

17. Right of Way width: Existing ROW: 60 feet
Proposed ROW: 80 feet

18. Project completion date: ROW Date: February 2019
LET Date: February 2020

19. Total acres of newly disturbed ground
surface:

2.7 acres

20. Total acres of wetland impacts: 0

21. Total linear feet of stream impacts: Approximately 270 feet of
temporary impacts

22. Project purpose: Replace Bridge No. 132 on NC 73
over Dutch Buffalo Creek

Reviewed by: Date:
Elizabeth Scott, EI, STV Engineers Inc.

Date:
Garland Haywood, PE, NCDOT Division
Bridge Program Manager

Date:
Kevin Fischer, PE, NCDOT Structures
Management Unit

DocuSign Envelope ID: 98D4C64C-6191-4D87-A296-F071E0BB2BEF
11/7/2018
11/8/2018
11/26/2018

Minimum Criteria Determination Checklist Page 1 of 1
Green Sheet
November 2018
PROJECT COMMITMENTS
Bridge No. 132 over Dutch Buffalo Creek on NC 73 in Cabarrus County
WBS No. 45767.1.1
STIP B-5813

Structure Management Unit, Project Manager
FEMA Coordination
The Hydraulics Unit will coordinate with the NC Floodplain Mapping Program
(FMP), to determine status of project with regard to applicability of NCDOT’S
Memorandum of Agreement, or approval of a Conditional Letter of Map Revision
(CLOMR) and subsequent final Letter of Map Revision (LOMR).

This project involves construction activities on or adjacent to FEMA-regulated
stream(s). Therefore, the Division shall submit sealed as-built construction plans
to the Hydraulics Unit upon completion of project construction, certifying that the
drainage structure(s) and roadway embankment that are located within the 100-
year floodplain were built as shown in the construction plans, both horizontally
and vertically.

Enhanced Voluntary Agricultural District (EVAD)
The project includes one parcel totaling 86 acres that is part of a Cabarrus County
EVAD. The project would require approximately .88 acres of new right of way
from the EVAD parcel. If the VAD property holder refuses settlement, prior to
pursuing condemnation, the right of way Branch must contact Project
Development to coordinate with the Cabarrus County VAD Board to schedule a
public meeting. The Cabarrus County VAD ordinance provides that no state or
local public agency or governmental unit may formally initiate an y action to
condemn any interest in qualifying farmland within a Cabarrus County VAD until
such agency or unit has requested the advisory board to hold a public hearing on
the proposed condemnation.

Division Ten, Division Bridge Program Manager
Northern-Long Eared Bat (NLEB)
The USACE has developed a Standard Local Operations Procedure for
Endangered Species (SLOPES) to address NLEB when they are the lead agency,
which NCDOT will follow for this project. This procedure applies to projects in
NCDOT Divisions 9-14. The requirements of the SLOPES for the NLEB will be
completed prior to Let and will be submitted to the USACE. A Biological
Conclusion is not required.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 98D4C64C-6191-4D87-A296-F071E0BB2BEF
Service Layer Credits: NC C enter for GeographicInformation & Analysis
!Z
!Z
!Z
!Z!Z
!Z
!Z!Z!Z!Z!Z!Z
$+
#*Cabarrus County B-5813B STNC HWY 73 EDUTCH RDC STA STREID ST
B
O
WMA
N

B
A
R
R
I
E
R

R
D CHI
PPENDALE AVERED ANGUS DRE FRANKLIN ST
BLUEBERRY STCROWELL STEASTOVER DRWADE ST
P
R
EST
O
N D
R
Daniel Barrier House
First Congregational Church
William B. Reed House (Gone?)Dutch Buffalo CreekTIP Project B-5813
Bridge Replacement Bridge No.132over Dutch Buffalo Creek on NC 73Cabarrus County
Source: USDA Geospatial Gateway;NCOneMap; USFWS
LEGEND
#*Bridge Location
Project Study Area
Floodplain
Parcel
EVAD Parcel
Stream
$+Church
!Z Historic Site
/
0 250 500
Feet
October 2018
Zion Wesley AMEZion Church
NC HWY 73 E
FIGURE 1-LOCATION MAP
DocuSign Envelope ID: 98D4C64C-6191-4D87-A296-F071E0BB2BEF

Appendix A
DocuSign Envelope ID: 98D4C64C-6191-4D87-A296-F071E0BB2BEF
POT Sta. 10+00.00PC Sta. 10+50.00PT Sta. 13+01.21PC Sta. 16+64.07PT Sta. 20+67.9410+0015+0020+00PI Sta 18+67.57
D
L = 403.87'
T = 203.50'
R = 1,330.00'
PI Sta 11+75.98
D
L = 251.21'
T = 125.98'
R = 1,330.00'
-L- POC STA. 14+80.00
BEGIN TIP PROJECT B-5813
12'12'12'12'12'DUTCH BUFFALO CREEKDUTCH BUFFALO CREEKNC 73 47'-3"9/27/2018r:\roadway\proj\alt's\preferred alt1\B5813_rdy_psh01_Alt1.dgnmabdelaziz8/17/99DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
0 100502550
Scale : 50
MATCHLINE -L1- STA 24+50 (SHEET 5)DESIGN DATA
DESIGN STANDARDS =
=DESIGN SPEED 60 MPH
=ADT 2016 8,200
=ADT 2040
=T
=
=
=
=
FUNC. CLASS
MIN. RADIUS
MAX. GRADE
=
TERRAIN
DESIGN EXCEPTION
6%
MAJOR COLLECTOR
REGIONAL
1330'
NONE
10,800
7%
ROLLING
O
BRIDGE LENGTH
BRIDGE SKEW
BRIDGE TYPE
=
=
=
260'
90
GIRDER BRIDGE
SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
1B-5813
R/W SHEET NO.
CONCEPT DATED
9/27/2018
SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE
CONCEPT PLANS
NC License Number F-0991
Charlotte, NC 28202
900 West Trade St., Suite 715
STV Engineers, Inc.
EXISTING ROADWAY
MAINTAIN TRAFFIC ON
NEW ALIGNMENT
PREFERRED CONCEPT
B-5813
CABARRUS COUNTY
.02.02 POINT
GRADE
12'12'12'
BRIDGE TYPICAL SECTION
L-L1-C
1'-7.5"4'1'-7.5"4'
44' CLEAR ROADWAY
47'-3" OUT TO OUT
ROADWAY TYPICAL SECTION
POINT
GRADE
12'8'8'12'12'18'6'
11' W/ GR 11' W/ GR
4'
FDPS
4'
FDPS
6:1
.08
4:16:1
.02.02.08
30'
6:1
4:12:1
10'
GROUND
ORIGINAL GROUND
ORIGINAL
L-L1-C
F
F
F
F
F
F
C
F
C
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
C
C
F F
F
F
F
F
DocuSign Envelope ID: 98D4C64C-6191-4D87-A296-F071E0BB2BEF
PC Sta. 25+19.55PT Sta. 30+56.45POT Sta. 33+08.1725+00PI Sta 27+91.70
D
L = 536.90'
T = 272.16'
R = 1,330.00'30+00-L- POT STA. 32+00.00
END TIP PROJECT B-5813
12'12'12'12'12'NC 73SR 2604(DUTCH ROAD)9/27/2018r:\roadway\proj\alt's\preferred alt1\B5813_rdy_psh02_Alt1.dgnmabdelaziz8/17/99Scale : 50
MATCHLINE -L1- STA 24+50 (SHEET 4)DESIGN DATA
DESIGN STANDARDS =
=DESIGN SPEED 60 MPH
=ADT 2016 8,200
=ADT 2040
=T
=
=
=
=
FUNC. CLASS
MIN. RADIUS
MAX. GRADE
=
TERRAIN
DESIGN EXCEPTION
6%
MAJOR COLLECTOR
REGIONAL
1330'
NONE
10,800
7%
ROLLING
O
BRIDGE LENGTH
BRIDGE SKEW
BRIDGE TYPE
=
=
=
260'
90
GIRDER BRIDGE
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
0 100502550
SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
2B-5813
R/W SHEET NO.
CONCEPT DATED
9/27/2018
SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE
CONCEPT PLANS
NC License Number F-0991
Charlotte, NC 28202
900 West Trade St., Suite 715
STV Engineers, Inc.
EXISTING ROADWAY
MAINTAIN TRAFFIC ON
NEW ALIGNMENT
PREFERRED CONCEPT
B-5813
CABARRUS COUNTY
ROADWAY TYPICAL SECTION
POINT
GRADE
12'8'8'12'12'18'6'
11' W/ GR 11' W/ GR
4'
FDPS
4'
FDPS
6:1
.08
4:16:1
L-L1-C
.02.02.08
30'
6:1
4:12:1
10'
GROUND
ORIGINAL GROUND
ORIGINAL
.02.02 POINT
GRADE
12'12'12'
BRIDGE TYPICAL SECTION
L-L1-C
1'-7.5"4'1'-7.5"4'
44' CLEAR ROADWAY
47'-3" OUT TO OUT
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
C
F
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C CCFCFCFCFFFFF
F
DocuSign Envelope ID: 98D4C64C-6191-4D87-A296-F071E0BB2BEF
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED5/28/99SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
3B-5813
9/27/2018r:\roadway\proj\alt's\preferred alt1\B5813_rdy_psh03_Alt1.dgnmabdelazizDOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
490
500
510
520
530
540
550
560
570
580
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32
R/W SHEET NO.
CONCEPT DATED
9/27/2018
SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE
CONCEPT PLANS
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL)
0 50 1002550
PROFILE (VERTICAL)
0 10 20510
NC License Number F-0991
Charlotte, NC 28202
900 West Trade St., Suite 715
STV Engineers, Inc.
23 242122
33 34 35 36 37 38
490
500
510
520
530
540
550
560
570
580
490
500
510
520
530
540
550
560
570
480
490
500
510
520
530
540
480
PREFERRED CONCEPT
PREFERRED CONCEPT
BEGIN GRADE
ELEV = 540.89'
-L1- STA. 14+80.00
DS = 60 MPH PROPOSED GRADE
EXISTING GROUND
PI = 17+70.00
EL = 529.45'(-)3
.9448%
(+)0.3022%
VC = 580'
K = 137
ELEV = 549.80'
-L1- STA. 32+00.00
DS = 65 MPH
DS = 60 MPH
EXISTING GROUND
PROPOSED GRADE
PI = 27+25.00
EL = 532.34'
(+)0.3022%(+)3.9206%
VC = 500'
K = 138
PI = 30+85.00
EL = 546.45'
(+)3.9206%(+)2.9130%
VC = 220'
K = 218
END GRADE
DocuSign Envelope ID: 98D4C64C-6191-4D87-A296-F071E0BB2BEF
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Preliminary Estimate
TIP No.B-5813 Func County:Cabarrus
Route
From CONSTR. COST
Typical Section $4,470,000
Prepared By:G. McCauley Date 9/27/2018
Requested By:Date
Line
Item Des
Sec
No.Description Quantity Unit Price Amount

Clearing and Grubbing 1.0 Acre $20,000.00 $20,000.00
Earthwork 9,050 CY $50.00 $452,500.00
Drainage New Location 0.01 Miles $200,000.00 $2,000.00
Fine Grading 5,490 SY $10.00 $54,900.00
Pavement Widening SY $-
New Pavement 5,490 SY $75.00 $411,750.00
Pavement Resurfacing 1,177 SY $20.00 $23,540.00
Subgrade Stabilization 2,692 SY $5.00 $13,460.00
Erosion Control 1.2 Acres $50,000.00 $60,000.00
Traffic Control 1.000 LS $30,000.00 $30,000.00
Thermo and Markers 0.300 Miles $30,000.00 $9,000.00
Structures
ML / Creek 47'3"Wx260'L 12,285.00 SF $150.00 $1,842,750.00
RC Box Culverts
LF
Utility Construction
Relocate Existing Water Line 200 LF $500.00 $100,000.00
Relocate Existing Sewer Line 150 LF $500.00 $75,000.00
Misc. & Mob (15% Strs&Util)$302,662.50
Misc. & Mob (45% Functional)$484,717.50
Lgth 0.33 Miles Contract Cost …………..…………..…………..$3,882,280.00
E. & C. 15%…………..…………..…………..$582,342.00
Construction Cost …………..…………..…………..$4,464,622.00
DocuSign Envelope ID: 98D4C64C-6191-4D87-A296-F071E0BB2BEF