20210854 Ver 1_No Written Concurrence_20210428

Carpenter,Kristi
From:Steenhuis, Joanne
Sent:Wednesday, April 28, 2021 9:04 AM
To:Shaver, Brad E CIV USARMY CESAW (USA); Burhans, Terry
Cc:Baker CIV Jessi O; Wing, Mickey; Carpenter,Kristi
Subject:RE: \[External\] RE: RE: MCB Camp Lejeune - Railroad Trestle Replacements
All,
The DWR has no objection to the proposed project and has found that the project does not require written
concurrence. Please be reminded that you must still comply with the activity specific conditions and the general
conditions set forth in GC# 4132 that corresponds to the USACE’s NW 3.

For future reference the DWR has assigned this project a DWR# 20210854

Joanne Steenhuis

From: Shaver, Brad E CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, April 26, 2021 1:02 PM
To: Burhans, Terry <[e-mail]>
Cc: Baker CIV Jessi O <[e-mail]>; Wing, Mickey <[e-mail]>; Steenhuis, Joanne
<[e-mail]>; Carpenter,Kristi <[e-mail]>
Subject: \[External\] RE: RE: MCB Camp Lejeune - Railroad Trestle Replacements

CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to
Report Spam.

Thank you Terry I will be on the lookout for the White Oak Trestle once it clears Laserfiche.

All,

As far as the Queens Creek Trestle, the action does require the use of Nationwide 3 but it does not require prior notice.
Therefore, the Corps is in agreement that the Base may use NW 3 for the Queens Creek Trestle replacement.

I have included the plans of record and a full copy of NW 3.

If you have any questions please don’t hesitate to give me a call,

Brad Shaver
USACE, PM

From: Burhans, Terry <[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, April 26, 2021 10:45 AM
To: Shaver, Brad E CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>; Steenhuis, Joanne
<[e-mail]>; Carpenter,Kristi <[e-mail]>
Cc: Baker CIV Jessi O <[e-mail]>; Wing, Mickey <[e-mail]>
Subject: \[Non-DoD Source\] RE: MCB Camp Lejeune - Railroad Trestle Replacements
1

Good Morning Brad and Joanne,

I hope all is well. I wanted to let you know that I was able to update and resubmit the PCN for the White Oak River
Trestle Replacement Project.
(original project #20210751, Version 1)
I believe I was able to address the issues that we discussed.
Please let me know if you have additional questions or concerns on that project.

Also, as we had discussed, the plans for the Queen Creek Trestle have been separated out.
They are attached to this email (along with a cover letter) for your review.
There are no proposed permanent impacts to any waters at the Queen Creek site.
Please take a look and let me know if you have any additional questions or concerns on that project.

Cheers

Terry Burhans PWS, CPSS | Environmental Scientist
8000 Regency Parkway, Suite 600 | Cary, NC 27518 | \[O\] 919-481-5775 | \[M\] 858-243-9900
[e-mail] | www.mbakerintl.com

2