20090501 Ver 2_401 Application_20130113

//Ak
SUMMIT
ENGINEERING • LABORATORY- SURVEYING
December 12, 2012
Ms. Cyndi Karoly
NCDWQ— Wetlands and Stormwater Branch
512 N Salisbury St
9th Floor Archdale Building
Raleigh NC 27603
Re: Chestnut Place 11 Stallings, NC
Dear Cyndi:
oq - osoi v;�-
We are working with Scott Twiddy of Carolina Development Solutions on a subdivision in Stallings, NC
known as Chestnut Place II. The project was previously permitted but unfortunately the permits have lapsed.
Scott Twiddy has discussed the project with Steve Kichefski and Michael Burkart to determine the process to re -file /
the project. Both parties agreed that we should resubmit the original PCN and supporting documents along with a
project narrative describing the project.
Project Narrative:
Chestnut Place II is a residential subdivision located in the Town of Stallings, NC. Reece Gibson was the original
applicant and now wishes to proceed with development. The plan remains the same as previously submitted with
no new or additional impacts. The only change to the plan was that the original "Micky Mouse" design culvert
consisting of one 60" CMP and two 54" CMP has been replaced with two 60" CMP. A copy of the revised culvert is
included with this submittal. The length of the culvert is unchanged and the inverts provide for continuous flow
through one pipe with a 6" floodplain bench for the second pipe.
Please call me at 803 - 493 -5393 or Scott Twiddy at 803 - 389 -3387 if you require additional information.
Thank you for your assistance with this project.
Sincere
KEITH INS, E
PRESIDENT
Summit Land Services, PC
W �GONIQ
DEC 1 4 2012
`%0%kirlrrorrrrr
,•PAN CARd
bf
SF,AL -
026153 i
IN
rrrr ►,,,ill,,,,,,

.r `

Y
Reese Gibson
4512 River Rd
Stanfield, NC 28163
704 -888 -8376
DATE November 17, 2012
To whom it may concern:
We the undersigned, hereby authorize Scott Twiddy and Carolina Development Solutions, LLC. to
act on our behalf in all manners relating to Chestnut Place II subdivision located in Stallings, NC
including, requests for information, permitting and signing of all documents relating to these matters.
Any and all acts carried out by Scott Twiddy and Carolina Development Solutions, I.I.C. on our
behalf shall have the same affect as acts of our own.
This authorization is valid until further written notice.
Sincerely,
Reese Gibson

�— — - - -- — - - - -- - -- WII.MINGTOND);STRICT - — --
Action ID. SAW - 2009 -00936 Cotmty: Union USGS Quad: Matthews
GENERAL PERMIT (REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE) VERIFICATION
Property Owner / Authorized Agent: Mr. E. Reese Gibson
Address: 4512 River Road
Stanfield, NC 28163
Telephone No.:
Size and location of property (water body, rxiad nunt/humter,%vvn, eta.): CbeftufPtace 11
development located on an agprox. 22 acre tract north of Chestaat Lane• near Ind_
Description of projects area and activity: This permit Megrim impacts to 0.21 acre of wetlands and
385 LF of Urs to West Rork. Twddvemile Creek (180 XY determined to bs intermittent with
"animportim" aouatic function and 80 LF temporary for atiW line) in ass glgoa with
6onstrncdon of a residential development. Mitieation for wetland impacts will be a6: nigoshed
throamdr allowing the former pond bed (which is currently w wWs) to return to a stream and
wetland area and preservation of the remaining lamer wetland area on the prepwty, ,
Applicable Law: ® Section 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1344)
❑ Section 10 (Rivers and Harbors Act, 33 USC 403)
Authorization: Regional General Permit Number:
Nationwide Permit Number. 22
Your work is authorized by the above referenced permit provided it is accomplished in strict woe with the
atteclied conditions and your submitted plans. Any violation of the attached condihoaa or deviation from your
sub
--- It plans may subject the permittee to a stop work order, a restoration order and/or appropriate legal action.
This verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below unless the nationwide authorization
is modified, suspended or revoked. M, prior to the expiration date identified below, the nationwide permit
sumormMon is reissued and/or modified, this verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified
below, provided it complies with all requirements of the modified nationwide permit. If the nationwide permit
suthorizatioa expires or is suspended, revoked, or a modified, such that the activity would no longer comply with
the tuns and conditions of the nationwide permit, activities which have- eoaxineneed (La., are under action) or
are under contract to ca®mence in reliance upon the nationwide pernt, will remain authorized provided the activity
is completed within twelve months of do date of the nationwide permit's expiration, modification or revocation,
unless discretionary authority has been exercised on a case4* -case basis to modify, suspend or revoloe the
andiorization
Activities subject to Section 404 (as indicated above) may also require an individual Section 401 Water Quality
Certification. You should contact the NC Division of Water Quality (telephone [phone] to determine
Section 401 requirements.
For activities occurring within the twenty coastal counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area
Management Act (CAMAS prior to begmmaing work you must contact the N.C. Division of Coastal Management.
This Delmhnent of the Army verification does not relieve the penmaittee of the responsibility to obtain any other
required Federal; State or local approvaWperants.
If there are any questions regarding this verification, any of the conditions of the Permit, or the Corps of
Y ProSTS!, PleM contact Sieve Chapin at 828-271-7990.
Corps Regulatory Official Steve Chapin Date: May 26.2M9
Expiration Date of Verification: Way 26.2011

A
sum
it
6 n a
lo• ,
�ds
#A 60
od"m
dm
F-
'm
/-ROADWAY
FACE
SURF
SUR
CE
690-
CONCRETE
HEADWALL
685
<
—4n
ROAOWAY
P-SD\ r (w
SURFACE
680-
�-'MVEPZ
�77 90'
—
-L'-'-V' -
-6('�
70' , -l\ A
677 40'
Upp
'UPPER
/r-677 ...
r-677 20'
yu
IN VEMT �60 RCP
R 5
P-SD 35 (CB)
RCP
675
P-SD 33
(CB-T-
CHANN E--
o.
DlIrUM
El.EV
ROPOSED CULVERT
F600I)PLAIN BVIGH
6" ABOVE MAIN
670 0+00
0+50
P-SD 36 (CB) TO CONSIST OF TWO 60" RCP
IN%SRT V- gr, ow CHANNEL INVER r
IF
PIPES . PROPOSED HEADWALL TO
BE DESIGNED BY OTHER AND
BENCH ELEVATION
9-- -3-f 00-
SUBMITTED TOWN OF STALLINGS
La
ENGINEER PRIOR TO FINAL
(n
APPROVAL
CULVERT PLAN VIEW
CULVERT PROFILE
CULVERT SECTION
LJ
z
z
1--
MS.

i
I
690
690
/ r
/ l
I
Roadway
j/ /
/
Roadway
Surface
/
NORM E
'
Surface
685
CONS N
_S "RCP A
AT
Q \
685
-
Concrete
60 "RCP /
Headwall
�'
I
�' ;•
54 "RCP 54 "RCP
r
/
680
i i
I B
HEADWALL
680
77.40'
I Invert I
---
676.70'
1 / `
-I
_?4_RCP I
New
.
A
_
77.90'
Inver/ 6p•RCP
Stream
HEADWALL 1 1 ♦
Channel Bench 6"
677.20' Invert
B
Main
675
/ I
675
InAbove
Typal Both
X
Main Channel Sides of Channel
- - -7 -
Invert 6" Below
Bench Elevation
670
670
0 +00
0 +50
0 +00
0 +50 1 +00 1 +50
CULVERT PLAN VIEW
CULVERT SECTION A —A
I
I
CULVERT SECTION B —B

-�A
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins
Governor Director
Mr. E. Reese Gibson
4512 River Road
Stanfield, NC 28163
Subject: Chestnut Place, Phase II
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification with Additional Conditions
Dear Mr. Gibson:
Dee Freeman
Secretary
June 5, 2009
DWQ# 09 -0501
Union County
You have our approval, in accordance with the general certification and those conditions listed below,
to impact 385 linear feet (If) of unnamed stream (perennial and intermittent) to West Fork Twelve Mile Creek in
order to construct the subdivision in Union County, as described in your application received by the Division of
Water Quality (DWQ) on May 4, 2009. After reviewing your application, we have determined that this project is
covered by Water Quality General Certification Number 3705, which can be viewed on our web site at
http:// h2o.enr.state.nc.ustncwetiands. The General Certification allows you to use Nationwide Permit Number
29 once it is issued to you by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Please note that you should get any other
federal, state or local permits before proceeding with your project, including those required by (but not limited
to) Sediment and Erosion Control, Non - Discharge, and Water Supply Watershed regulations.
The above noted Certification will expire when the associated 404 permit expires unless otherwise
specified in the General Certification. This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described
in your application. If you change your project, you must notify us in writing, and you may be required to send
us a new application for a new certification. If the property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of the
Certification and approval letter; and is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions.
In addition to the requirements of the certification, you must also comply with the following conditions:
1. The Mooresville Regional Office shall be notified in writing once construction at the approved impact areas
has commenced.
2. Storm Water: 1) Deed restrictions limiting impervious area on each lot to less than 24% is required and shall
be recorded prior to change of ownership, 2) a storm water management plan may be submitted, or 3) an
increase in open space. Any of these alternatives is acceptable. Failure to provide written notification to
the Mooresville Office of the preferred choice within 60 days of this notice may result in the withdrawal of this
Certification.
3. All wetlands, streams, surface waters, and riparian buffers located on the project site where impacts are not
allowed shall be clearly marked (example- orange fabric fencing) prior to any land disturbing activities.
Mooresville Regional Office %=� Location• 610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301, Mooresville, NC 28115 Phone: (704) 663 - 1699 \Fax: [phone]\ Customer Service: 1- 877 -623 -6748 !r�
Internet, www ncwateraualrtv.ora
An Equal Opportunity /Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled /10% Post Consumer Paper

4. Use of native vegetation and other soft stream bank stabilization techniques must be used where practicable
instead of riprap or other bank hardening methods. If riprap is necessary, it shall not be placed in the
streambed, unless approved by the DWQ.
5. Storm water discharge structures at this site shall be constructed in a manner such that the potential
receiving streams (of the discharge) will not be impacted due to sediment accumulations, scouring or erosion
of the stream banks.
6. Sediment and erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or waters without prior approval from
DWQ. If approved, they shall be removed and the natural grade restored within two months of the date of
the close outtstabilization of the given drainage area.
7. Upon completion of the project, the applicant shall complete and return the enclosed °Certificate of
Completion" form to the 401 NVetlands Unit of the NC Division of Water Quality.
8. Continuing Compliance. The applicant (Reese Gibson) shall conduct all activities in a manner so as not to
contravene any state water quality standard (including any requirements for compliance with section 303(d)
of the Clean Water Act) and any other appropriate requirements of state and federal law. If DWQ determines
that such standards or laws are not being met (including the failure to sustain a designated or achieved use)
or that state or federal law is being violated, or that further conditions are necessary to assure compliance,
DWQ may reevaluate and modify this certification to include conditions appropriate to assure compliance with
such standards and requirements in accordance with 15 A NCAC 2H.0507(d). Before codifying the
certification, DWQ shall notify the applicant and the US Army Corps of Engineers, provide public notice in
accordance with 15A NCAC 21-1.0503, and provide opportunity for public hearing in accordance with 15A
NCAC 21-1.0504. Any new or revised conditions shall be provided to the applicant in writing, shall be provided
to the United States Army Corps of Engineers for reference in any permit issued pursuant to Section 404 of
the Clean Water Act, and shall also become conditions of the 404 Permit for the project.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing.
You must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written
petition that conforms to Chapter 1508 of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative
Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699 -6714. This certification and its conditions are final
and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act.
If you have any questions, please telephone Mr. Alan Johnson in the Mooresville Regional Office at 704 -663-
1699 or Ms. Cyndi Karoly in the Central Office in Raleigh 919 - 733 -9721.
Sincerely,
for Coleen H. Sullins
Attachments - - - - -- - - -- - -- - -- -- -- - - -- - - - -- - - - -
cc: Army Corps of Engineers, Asheville
Ian McMillan, Wetlands Unit
Len Rindner

Chestnut Place II
Indian Trail, Union County 2 Od9 °°Ft36
North Carolina
Joint Application Form and Supporting Documentation for
1..
NATIONWIDE PERMITS THAT REQUIRE NOTIFICATION
TO CORPS OF ENGINEERS AND NCDENR
Prepared For
Mr. E. Reese Gibson
4512 River Road
Stanfield, NC 28163
Prepared By
Leonard S. Rindner, PWS
Environmental Planning Consultant
3714 Spokeshave Lane
Matthews, NC 28105
(704) 904 -2277
April 25, 2009

a
f WA orF9
- - -- - - - - -- - Office LlseOnbK - -- - - - - -- - - -- -
� G
y Corps action ID no.
c < DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. AppUcant Information'
1. Processing
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
® Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number. 29 and 12 or General Permit (GP) number.
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
® Yes
❑ No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certifcation - Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification - Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authofizition
1e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-Geu fee-program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so. attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program.
❑Yes
No
1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. N yes, answer 1h
below.
❑ Yes
® No
1h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2. Project hdormation
2a. Name of project:
Chestnut Place II
2b. County:
Union County
2c. Nearest municipality / town:
Indian Trail
2d. Subdivision name:
Chestnut Place II
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
N/A
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Mr. E. Reese Gibson
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
3024,401; 2045,574; 4096,140; 3793, 243; 3793, 240; 4370,126; 3805,444; 3802,801
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Mr. E. Reese Gibson
3d. Street address:
4512 River Road
3e. City, state, zip:
Stanfield, NC 28163
3f. Telephone no.:
704 888 8376
- - - - - - -- -- - -- - -- -
- -- - - - -
3g. Fax no.:
704 8881861
3h. Email address:
N/A
___Page I of 10
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent IN Other, specify:
4b. Name:
WE
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
t
M. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
MA RM IQ -
4h. Email address:
S. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
`
t
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
5c. Street address: �q
•
5d. City, state, iip:
5e. Telephone no.:
5f. Fax no.:
Q „
5g. Email address:
t
V
Page 2 of 10

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
07- 147 - 149; 150 ;151A;152A;153A;142C;143G;142A
1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.0721 LongitWe: - 80.7069
(DD.DDDDDD) (- DD.DDDDDD)
1c. Property size:
+/- 22 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
proposed project
UT of West Fork Twelvemile Creek
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water.
C
2c. River basin:
Catawba
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Forested; disturbed; new and existing residential subdivisions
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
Approximately 1.5 acres
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
+/ -1200 -1500 (includes likely stream in proposed pond bed
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project
Residential Subdivision
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Single Family Residential Subdivision - earth moving equipment will be used to prepare lots and roads
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
❑Yes No Unknown
4b. H the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
❑ Preliminary ❑ Final
4c. ff yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency /Consultant Company: Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC
Other.
4d. ff yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
S. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
TO Yes ®No F-1 Unknown
5b. ff yes, explain in detail according to "help file' instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. ff yes, explain.

A �
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
N there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number -
Type of.impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404,10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWG - non404, other)
(acres)
Temporary
W1 ®P ❑ T
Fill
PEM1C - drained
0 Yes
® Corps
Pond bed
® No
® DWG
.03
W2 ®P ❑ T
Fill
PEM1C - drained
❑ Yes
® Corps
pond bed
® No
® DWG
.07
W3 ®P ❑ T
Fill
PSS1A
® Yes
® No
® Corps
® DWG
.07
W4 ® P ❑ T
Fill
PSS1A
® Yes
® No
® Cow
® DWG
.03
W5 ®P ❑ T
Fill
PSS1A
® Yes
® No
® Corps
® DWG
.01
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
[]No
❑ DWG
2g. Total wetland impacts
0.21
2h. Comments: 0.10 acres is in a proposed drained pond bed
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404,10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
_
intermittent
DWO - non.404,
width
(linear feet)
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
S 1 ❑ P ®T
NWP 12 -
UT of West Fork
® PER
® Corps
4,.64
80' temp
sewedine
Twelvemile Ck
❑ INT •
® DWG
4' -6'
S2 ®P ❑ T
Road Crossing
Same
® PER
❑ INT
® Corps
® DWG
currently
partially
125 If
impounded
S3 ®P ❑ T,
Fill
Same
[I PER
® INT
® Corps
® DWG
3'
if
unimportant
int. stream
S4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWG
S5 []POT
❑ PER
0 Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWG
S6 ❑ P [IT
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWG
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
385 If
3i. Comments: Stream in Seweriine Crossings will be restored -15' maximum maintenance corridor, 180 linear feet
unimportant intermittent stream 19.5 and 21.75 per NCDENR Guidelines; linear feet of stream estimated for road crossing
Page 4 of 10
- - -- PCON Form - Version -1- 3- Becember -1 @, 2M Version
I
I

O •
because stream is currently-impounded with a old farm pond that will be drained. _
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
- Permanent (P)
or Temporary
4b.
Name of
waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01 ❑P ❑T
02 ❑P ❑T
03 ❑P ❑T
04 ❑P ❑T
4E Total open water impacts
4g. Comments: Existing pond is proposed to be drained
& Pond or Lake Construction
N pond or lake constnxtton proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID
number
5b.
use or purpose
of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
SE Total
5g. Comments: N/A
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
-9. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
Page 5of10
-- - - -- — PCN Foirn - Version 1.3 December 10, 200a- Verstotr

6. Buffer impacts (for Q - - -- --------- - - - - -- - - - -- -- - - -- -- - - --
N project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this forrn.
Sa•
❑ Nauss ❑ Tar - Pamlico ❑ Other.
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number —
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P)
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
or Temporary
impact
required?
61 ❑P ❑T
❑Yes
❑ No
B2 ❑P ❑T
❑Yes
❑ No
B3 []POT
❑Yes
[]No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments:
D. Impact Justificatiorgand Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The project layour was modified to avoid unnecessary imnpacts to streams by sewertinm layout; lot layout was modified to
avoid approximate 1 acre wetland; pond will be removed to allow stream and wetland areas to renaturalize. With the exception
of primary road crossing impacts to wetland areas are limited to former pond bed areas and small pockets and disturbed areas
and unimportant intermittent streams. Impacts to the perennial stream and the large wetland area will be minimized. A house
pad is depicted on all the lots with wetlands to demonstrate adequate room for constriction. Approximately 3 to 4 lots were
eliminated in order to preserve large wetland area.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
As depicted on the site plan, wetland areas will be adequately barricaded and or marked to minimize the potential of
inadvertent stream or wetland impacts. Site is subject to amn approved Sedimentation and Erosion Control Plan.
2. Compensatory Mitigation br impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
® Yes ❑ No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ® Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
❑Payment to in-lieu fee program
project?
® Perrnittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete N Using a Mitigation Bards
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: '
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
Page 6 of 10
-- --- PCiWFonn — Version 't. 8A%rsiom - --

Page 7 of 10
- -- -- - -- - - -- - -PCN-1 =orm -- tfersion--1.3-Decembert0, 2008- Vemiorr-
I
1
I
i
1
i
I
i
i
3c. Comments:-
4. Complete N Making a Payment to In4lau Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. ff using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
[] warm [] cool []cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
S. Complete if Using a Penmittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. ff using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Weiland impacts over III acre include sections of a pond bed of a disturbed on -line farm pond to be drained. Other
wetland impacts are to small areas. The developer proposes to preserve the remaining larger wetland area and allow the
former pond bed to renraturaliize to a stream and wetland area.
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) - required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that
requires buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes . ® No
6b. N yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requites mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. N buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g.. payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-6eu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10
- -- -- - -- - - -- - -PCN-1 =orm -- tfersion--1.3-Decembert0, 2008- Vemiorr-
I
1
I
i
1
i
I
i
i

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
Within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules? Q Yes
Q No
1b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Comments:
Q Yes Q No
2 Stormt+vater Ma ement Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this
Project? less the 24%
2b. Does this projet c require a Stormwater Ma
• nagement Plan? Q Yes 0 N
2c- If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Mara9ement Plan, explain why,
less than 24 /°; lot development is not a high density► /con��� development area for the development is
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then
Provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ Certified Local Government
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
3. t".ertifted Local ❑DWQ 401 Unit
GoMernment Stormwater Review
' In w�a19vemmenYs jurisdiction is this project?
3b. Which of the followi g programs ❑ Phase 11
ng locally - implemented storrnwater management ❑ NSW
aPPIY (check all that apply): Q NSW
❑ Water Supply Watershed
Q Other.
3c. Has the approved Stoffnwater Management agement Plan with proof of approval been Q Yes
Q No
4. DWQ Stormwater program Review
4a. Which of the followi LOO4th stal counties
(cthick all that n9 state- implemented sormwater management programs apply
apply)
on Law 2006 -246
4b• Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with propf of a
attached? approval been
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review - Q Yes .Q No
- -
5a- Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ❑Yes ❑ No
Q as Q No
— __ -- — _ - --
--Page 8 of 10 _ __ _ _
- - - - - - PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version - - - - — -

•
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
F. Supplementary Inkn —ndion - - --
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes ® No
. use of public (federal/state) land?
1b. If you answered "yes' to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered yes" tor the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500), isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 26.0200)?
2b. Is this an after- the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c. If you answered `yes° to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violatiorr(s):
3. Cumulative bnpacts (DWQ Requirement) '
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered yes' to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no,* provide a short narrative description.
Project is a small infill residential subdivision tied in with existing roads and infrastructure.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non - discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Municipal' sanitary sewer
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
JaYes ❑ No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes f@ No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
-
5d. What data sources did you use to deter (nine whetheryyour site ouId 'mpact,Endan ered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat? S +Q. e*& d�Ldiv iwx- � oti roc 'a=rt.
��. sow
V+esenoo- a 9b1n 47. gE-1� +re�e►C
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
wvJW t\oviieL.a*V / � e �otl/vo t% Iisi'-Xz
T. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes g No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data so rtes did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or arc sological resources?
Neier F�e'iei<�'r a& r� �S ion
B. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA- designated 100 -year floodpiain?
❑ Yes J0 No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
l�%
Applicant/Agent's Prirtted Name
Applicant/Agent's Sign re
Date
(Agents signature is valid only if an WOorization
letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 10 of 10
3

r
~ 7 . i
I
I
� ��•` f j �! — . ,may'
r
� Taeptlag

).7333333° W
►�
M
M
co
M
M
O
O
C0
M
►i
O
CD
CD
O
O
N
co
FA
0
0
0
0
0
LO
O
Ln
M
80.7166666° W
80.7000000° W
80.6833333° W
).7333333° W
80.7166666° W
80.7000000° W
;j
Vil
80.6833333° W
M
M
M
M
Cl)
O
O
Lo
M
ou
CD
to
CD
CD
O
LO
M
Z
0
D
X)
n
Name: MATTHEWS Location: 035.0721279° N 080.7069192° W CHESTNUT PLACE
Date: 2/9/2009
Scale: 1 inch equals 2000 feet HUC: 03050103
APPROXIMATE SITE LOCATION
Copyright (C) 1997, Maptech, Inc

Al -68: WETLAND AREA r
r 11 -14: RPW (INTERMITTENT STREAM)
C 1 , K1 - 4: WETLAND AREA
K1 - 4: WETLAND AREA
..-••, 1 G1 -b6t 171- Z ; LINCAK
L1 -7: WETLAND AREA WETLAND AREA .. y
11- 22:POND EDGE
•
r ;•
' � � • � � _ _ ,� �_ 61 -11: WETLAND AREA
'.rw ti
(TIES TO PVC PIPE)
h
F1 -4: RPW (INTERMITTENT STREAM WITH UNDERGROUND
�i
'`` SECTIONS) SUBJECT TO U.S.A.C.E. INTERPRETATION
M1- 35:RPW (PERENNIAL STREAM)
CONTINUES OFF SITE �( El - 6: RPW (INTERMITTENT TO PERENNIAL STREAM)
!' D1- 5: WETLAND AREA `
` SfIFE i
C1 -15: RPW (PERENNIAL STREAM) - CONTINUES OFF SITE 3
a•
CHESTNUT PLACE
JURISDICTIONAL WATERS OF THE U.S. STUDY
02 -09 -09
APPROXIMATE MAP - WATERS OF THE U.S
*FOR SURVEY AND STUDY PURPOSES ONLY
SUBJECT TO U.S.A.C.E. VERIFICATION

35` 4'33"
35-4-8"
Soil Map —Union County, North Carolina
m
d' Map Scale: 1:5,480 if printed on A size (8.5" x 11") sheet.
(V
V
N Meters
m° 0 50 100 200 300
Feet
0 300 600 1,200 1,800
U_?U%� Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 2.1
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey
CHESTNUT PLACE
APPROXIMATE SITE LOCATION
2/9/2009
Page 1 of 3
35° 4' 33"
35" 4'8"

Soil Map —Union County, North Carolina
MAP LEGEND
MAP INFORMATION
Area of Interest (AOI)
Very Stony Spot
Map Scale: 1:5,480 if printed on A size (8.5" X 11 ") sheet.
Area of Interest (AOI)
� Wet Spot
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:24,000.
Soils
Other
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for accurate map
Soil Map Units
measurements.
Special Line Features
Special
Point Features
Gully
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Blowout
Web Soil Survey URL: http : / /websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov
®
Borrow Pit
Short Steep Slope
Coordinate Y
System: UTM Zone 17N NAD83
X
Clay Spot
..� - Other
This product is generated from the USDA -NRCS certified data as of
Political Features
the version date(s) listed below.
Closed Depression
Cities
Soil Survey Area: Union County, North Carolina
Gravel Pit
Water Features
Survey Area Data: Version 10, Oct 19, 2007
Gravelly Spot
Oceans
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: 6122/2006
la
Landfill
Streams and Canals
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
A
Lava Flow
Transportation
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
f f Rails
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting
,Aj,
Marsh or swamp
of map unit boundaries may be evident.
K
Mine or Quarry
�+" Interstate Highways
Q
Miscellaneous Water
US Routes
0*
Perennial Water
Major Roads
v
Rock Outcrop
f+. Local Roads
+
Saline Spot
Sandy Spot
Severely Eroded Spot
Sinkhole
p
Slide or Slip
0
Sodic Spot
Spoil Area
40
Stony Spot
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 2.1 2/9/2009
"� Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 3

Soil Map -Union County, North Carolina
Map Unit Legend
union CouMyt. Narft Carolina @MMI
Map UnItsymbot
Map Unit Mama
Arras N AOE
PeccentOAOt
ApB
AuB
Appling sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
Appling -Urban land complex, 2 to 8 percent
27.5
6.3
23.0% i
52%:
slopes
CeB2
Cecil gravelly sandy day loam, 2 to 8 percent
7.51
6.3%
slopes, eroded
I
r--
CeC2
Cecil gravelly sandy day loam, 8 to 15 percent
F 03
0.2%
slopes, eroded
ChA
Chewada silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes,
21.6
18.0%
frequently flooded
HeB
Helena tine sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
53.8
44.9%
Tatum gravelly silty day loam, 2 to 8 percent 2.8
2.3%
7-
slopes, eroded
Totals for Area of Interest ! 119.8
100.0% ,
Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 2.1 219/2009
___ Conservation Service _ Nations -Cgope Wye S -oH-Su vey _ pa„R 3of 3__

4 O ♦ 4
` fill I
r
`rl
�J
i

Fiji
NON-EROSIVE DISCHARGE
q pr
|

POND BED to.03AC WETLAND IMPACT
125 LF STREAM IMPACT
AS To a
POND TO BE DRAINED
POND BED ±0.07AC WETLAND IMPACT low
| '
'
|
.�
~

i
I
690
690
/
Roadway
/ /
/
'
Roadway
Surface
,
NORM B HED
CONS)STr
RT
I
Surface
685
6 RCP A D
A
0 \
685
Concrete
•
-�
60 "RCP �
Headwall
i
54 "RCP 54 "RCP��
I
�
680
i i
I B
HEADWALL
680
677.40'
Invert
—
l<
�_I
_54_'RCP_ I
676.70' New
��
15�
677.80'
Invert 60 "RCI
Stream
HEADWALL I I A JG
_
Channel Bench 6"
677.20' Invert
B
Above Main Channel
675
/ I
675
Invert
Invert Typical Both
7
x
Main Channel of Channel
7' l
Invert 6" Below
_
Bench Elevation
670
670
0 +00
I
0 +50
0 +00
0 +50 1 +00 1 +50
CULVERT PLAN VIEW
CULVERT SECTION'A —A
I
I
i
I
I
t
i
CULVERT SECTION B —B

IMPERVIOUS AREA
CALCULATIONS
Total Site Area
944523
sf
24% of Total Area
2
sf
Impervious Area in
Sidewalks,
104315
sf
Pavement, and C &G
Impervious Area in
Extra Long Shared
2000
sf
Driveway
Amount of
Impervious Area
120371
sf
Available Per Lot
Total # of Lots
54
lots
Average Impervious
Area Allowable Per
2229
sf
Lot
Average Impervious
Area of Driveway
570
sf
(28.5' x 20)
Average Impervious
Area of Sidewalk to
48
sf
House (12'x 4)
Average Impervious
Area Allowable Per
1611
sf
House Pad
Proposed House
su
ft
Pad Length
Proposed House
32
ft
Pad Width
Proposed Actual
Impervious House
160
sf
Pad Area

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section IV of the JD Fotm Insuixtitinal Guidebook.
A. REPGIRTCOMPLF.TION DATE FOR APPROVEDJURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD):
B. DISTRICT OFFICE. FILE NAME. AND NUMBER:
ASHEVILLE REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
ISI Patton Avenue, Room=
Asheville. North Carolian 29801006
Applicant: Reese Gibson, In" Trap, NC
C. PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Chestnut Place. RPWs: CAN, F/F,1; WTLD's: AB, D, G/H, K,
L. IMPDMT 1
Str&:Nc Coumy/petishlborough: Union County City: Indian T I
Centa000rdmat e; ofsite oat/longindegrce decimal fommt): Lat35A7213°1 Long. 80.7(692 °IF,
Universal Transverse Merl:
Name of nearest watabod)r West Fork Twelvemrle Crock
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (7N W) into which the aww resource flows: Catawba River
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC): 03030103: Lowe Catawba River
®
Chad if mapddiagram of review area and/or pome tial jurisdictional arras is/are available upon request.
® Check if other sites (erg, of Nte mitigation sines, disposal sites, etc...) are associated with this action and are recorded on a
diffaad.1D faros.
D. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
IN Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
® Field Determination. Date(s):
SECTION It: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A. RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OFJURISDICTION.
Thee `hwvw le waters ojth U.S " within Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR pan 329) in the
review area. [Required]
® Waters subjcct to the ebb and flow of the tide
® Watent am presently used, or have boar used in the past, or may be mmgb'ble for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce.
Explain:
B. CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There 99- waters o %the U.S" within Clears Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in the review, area. [ Required]
1. Waters of the US.
a, ladicate presahaof waters of U.S. In review area (check all that apply):'
RiTNWs, including territorial seas
Wetlands adjacan to TNWs
g Relatively pamarhern watets= (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Non-RPWs that flow directly or 6kdnectly into TNWs
Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indinectly into TNWs
r R1 Wetlands adjacera to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands adjacent to ran -RPWs dot flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Impoundments of jute isdutiaml waters
Isolated (i t: or i te) waters. including isolated wetlands
Is. Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U.S. in the review area:
N(xh- wctlard waters: 1000 linear fat 4 - 9 width (fl) anNor apes.
Wetlands: +/- 1.5 - 1.6 acres.
Boxes checked below shall be smrted by ding the appmpnate sections in Section III below.
'For pnapoms of this form an RP W is defined at a tributary that is not a TN W and that typically flows year -nwnd or has continuos flow at least - wasonally"
(e.g., typically 3 months).

e. Limits (boundaries) of jurisdielion based on:
Elevation of esmblished OHWM (i( known):
2 Nou- muleted watem edmds (ebeek if appikeMe)
Q Poomtially jurolo Tonal waters and/or wetlands were assessed wahm the review area and determined to be Trot jurisdictional.
Explain:

A. TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWa
Section agenda
Sectim II b try e � �adjsoatt to TNWk.
If am
and Scetion III.D.1 ; e fuse. m a9"ntie r esomee is a wetland adjaeeat to TN "esomet b e dons ooze
Seelloa III.B below complete SeeHoas III.A.1 and L
I. TNW
Identify TNW:
&nn- r= rational sappmtmg &ermivat.:
J' Wedand adfaoeat to TN W
Summarize rational supporting 000chnion that 'Mad is "
went °:
k CHARACTERIS MS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT IS NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS pF ANYJe regardlog fts"n'tt"M of the not then�r,def J � and -ha adjeen
� been H amY. and h helps "M am" imbacdm over
manfhtl W'), L � opIcany� year -rodad or have Weor�now flow ��ria see "relativdy p e abaft (Pereambd) Raw, skip to Sefte,11r D.2. as Irk a� aa9�e resoew it" sannotaft Iss �t a types
skip to Seedon III-DA rec* *Ming a t i,,TN � Pe u, Yea now,
wetland that l agacM to but that does not dhecffy abut s4 RPW
EP"bali sperms i° rKOrd say avaibble fatorr tkU a ae:ns evalmfM& Corp �
doup a si8urxant name flndmg' b not not rcN as l (and ��t if any) M between a
If ft waterpsth/ IS not an RPW, or a welbud water, even
cOudder the tdbft" in cc aaterbody has a sipdkmt oex with a TNW. ud ft� �� t D "► require additional �a to deter�e if the has Matytksl Pmrposes, the M rabinsidan Oft afl of its adjaeent � d0. the of eVAcant neso eooihlipn mot
batary and Drib adjaoertt weumae @ needest esafuetion mat Combine,, for
the ildbubry, Sftd m 111.11,2 fpr� nshe If Me Jp rovers a trllpdary i"be t wed in the JD request is Sect iRd ° The determfoatiorr wbetlFer a n 111.11.3 for all wed sC COOOWO Section 111.11,1 for nents esbb 1s ed in Sectlon III.0 below. �Y. both O°�e
I• Cbaractertsttes orate -TNWs OW OM 4111`11110b or indir�, I� TNW
(I) General Area Conditkms:
Drainages (Wetfared stay dta dramage)131I1
Average annual mwbll: 49 inches area) +/ 45
Average amntal snowloll: inches
(11) Pbyskal Charaeterfodm.
(a) ��hq�r+llLT�IIaI:
Tnbut -Y flows directly uW TNW.
Tnburtazy flows doeugh �tnbutanes before entering TNW.
Pr*a Waters are river mites fimo TNW
P 40a Waters arc alines 6arrF RPW.
Project Watts are aerial (straight) Folks fiom TNW
Protect waters are ,attar (stra
Prajea Waters toss or save as sate) units from RPW.
loft daries. Explain: No
W Note tlrat des Instraetional Guidebook contains wMhianl infomuuion
West. RBWd'nBuMaks Q;t
fires Washes aFd enawnal feaomes generally and Fn the aril

w
Identify flow route tb TNW . Seasonal RPW 1 and seasonal RPW E/F flow into p pip miaFRPW C/M; whWh flows -
thraugh the site, to flow into West Fork Twelvantle Crock, which flows into Twelvemtle Crock, which empltes directly
into the Catawba River(TNW)..
Tributary senate order, i'known:
(b) Sti691check all beLfill :
TrIotary is: NaWml
Artificial (man- made). Explain:
❑ Manipulated (masFahe eel). Explain:
Tributmry, propeltin will► respect to top ofban k (estimate):
Average width:4' - S' feat
Averap depth: 2'- 3' feet
Avenue side slopes: 22.11
tn'batary substrate (clerk all that apply):
bles ❑c Muck
nam
H Cob
Bedrodk ❑Vegetation. Typd%cov -..
❑Other. Explain:
Tribu arymrditionlambility [e g., fly eroding. sloughing bat>bl Explain: Some steep coding hanks.
Pregam of'ruaffifflef000l omnplexes. Explanc Not peseut
Tributary gemnetry M
TnUdary gradient (apprmkmm' average slope): 1-2 %
(c) llmia
Tdxfty provides, for -''n` . ,
Fetkmaa avaw nu I I of flow eves in review area/year: ,(
Describe flow repro Seasonal flows with mgt. from storm evoke.
Other information an thuation and volww.
Sur&= flow is: it
Characteristics:
Subsurface few loom n Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) oast performed:
Tnbulwy has (check all that apply):
® BW and banks
OHWM6 (check all ndicatms that apply):
® dear, natural Itne .i.q. eel on the bank ® the prseaoe of litter and debris
® dhanom in the character of soil ® destruction of terrestrial weetation
❑ shelving ❑ the I , 4, e of wrack line
® vegemtion matted down, bent, or absaht ® sediment sorting
® leaf Inter dishubod or washed away ® scour
® sedfutem deposidou ® multiple observed or predicted (low events
8 Water staining ❑ abrupt change m plam ommmhmity
othcr(hao:
❑DiscahtinuosOHWM.7 Explain:
If faexmrs other than the OH WM were used to determine lateral extort ofCWA jurisdictiM (chuck all that apply):
® High Tide Line indicated by: ® Mean High Water Mark indicated by:
❑ oil or sewn line along shone objects ❑ survey to available datum
❑ fine shell or dens depoetts ( foreshore) ❑ phystrsl rnarinngs;
❑ physical markiiWIdmhacte istics ❑ veg -tiom linestchanges in vegftdion types.
teal gauges
other (last):
(Iii) Cbaemical Characteristics:
Characterize tributary (e.g., water color is clear, discolored, oily film. water quality; general watershed characteristics, etc ).
Explain: Water was generally clear..
s Flow roue can be described by idetifymg e.g, tributary a. which flows through the review area, to flow hmo mbutmy b, which then flows into 7'N W.
6A natural or man made discontinuity to the OHWM don not necessarily sever jurisdiction (e.g., where the stream kempokarily flows underground, or where
the OHWM her been removed by development or agricultural practices). Where them is a break in the OHWM that a unrchdod to the wateabody's flow
regime (e.g. flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert), the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the beak.
rlbrd. -- _

(iv eiob®i - C6sraKeeiatfes. ctiaael euppora (elick an -tbii i fy): - - - - - - -
Riparian coriidor. Characteristics (type, average width): Foraged, I W +/
Wetland fFmga asumoaiatm Tn'bmtaries have abutting wetlands.
® Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed specks. Explain findings:
❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain finding:
WOtherenr munuxaally-sensitivespecnes. Explain findings:
Aquaudwildh6divermity. Explain fndaW Chmmds support habitat for amph& am
2. Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to son TKW mat flow directly or hrdreedy lob TRW
(i) Physical Charaetaistks:
(a)
Properties:
Wetland size: awes
Welland type, Explain:
Wetlendquality. Explain:
Project wcd mds cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain
(b)
(c)
Flow is. hWbk,. Explain: a.
Surfim flow is:
ClmaaaistKS:
Submr($a flow: MOM Explain 6r 11 gs:
❑Dye (or odm) teat pafomaxt
U Directly abutting
❑
Not directly abutting
❑ Discrete wedu d hydrologic connection. Explain:
❑ Ecoh>gmm connection. Explain:
❑ Separated by bamlbmria. Explain:
Project wedandsar^ "'river miles fromTNW.
Project waters are aerial (straight) ides from TN W.
Flow is liom .
Fsfmsft approximate location of mdourl as within the �fioodplaia
(6) Chemical Characterkid
Characterize wetland system (erg, water color is clear, brown, al film on arbor, water gnkr, general watershed
characteristics; etc.). Explain:
Idenofy specific pollutargs, rfknown.
(11) Btdogamal Charaetaisdes. Wetland supports (check nd that M*):
❑ Riparian buffer. Charade atics (type, average width):
Vegetation type/puccnt cover. Explain:
Habitat for.
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain finding:
❑ Other a mmnadulysertsitive species. Explain findings:
❑ Agaaudwildlife diversity. Explain findings:
3. Charaderistles otag wetlands adjaent to flee tribumry (itauy)
All weUmd(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis: MMM.
ApproxkMdy ( ) acres in total are being considered in the ounarlative analysis.

— - For cub wetb nd, specify the -folk * g: - - - -- — -- - - -
t]ka* ahuto (yjW Srm (in acreal Directly aluds? (Y/N1 Cize fin acm%
Summarize overall biological, chemical and physical fwuxiems being pafomm&
C. SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION
A signUiatnt sews analysis will assess the few characteristics and f®dioas of the tributary itself aid the tlmcdow performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine If they dgnHieasgy died the cheadcal, physical. and bislogieai bttegity
of a TNW. For tub of the totlowfng sltwtiow6 a significant nexus exists If do tributary. In combination with all of its adjacent
wedands, has more than a speculative or insubstantial died on the chemical, physical and/or biological bstegir" of a TNW.
Con" ratiaa when evaluating siguilieast oem Include, but are not gmlted to the volmae, duration, and frequency of the flow
of water In the tributary and its proximity to a TNW, and the function performed by the tributary and all Its z4a est
wetlands. It is not appropriate to determine sigoilieast weans hared solely on may If dureshoW otdistasee (e g. between a
tributary and Its adjacent wetiend or between a tributary and the TNW} SimUarb, the fad an adjacent wetland tits wilbha or
outside of s floodpldn b not set* eve of signiBnst sews.
Draw connections between the features documet. 'and the cileem as the I", as khnglfied In the Rapines Guidance and
discussed In the Instructional Gaddebook Fad:tors to consider include. for example
• Dora the tributary, in combination with its ac jaam wetlands (if any), have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TNWs, or to reduce the amaont of pollutions or flood waters reaching a TNW?
• Does the tributary, in cwmbitmtion with its a4momt wetlands (if any), provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and
other species, such as feeding, wasting, spawning, or rearing young for species that are present in the TKWY
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjaemt wcdmnds (ifany), have the capacity to hmhA mrtriass and organic carbon that
supportdownstieani bodwebs?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its a*aa>tt wetlands (ifany), have other relationships to the physical, chemical, or
biological integrity ofthe TNW?
Note: the above Ed edeamiderationa b not inclusive and other functions ohserved or Imows to occur should be documented
below:
1. Sigtn KM nexus 8ndlags for n owRPW that has no adjacent wetlands and tows directly or indrectly We 11 W Explain
N fig of presence or absence ofsignificm nexus below, based.on the tributary itdf, then go to Section 111.13:
i Significant nexas findhip for rmwRPW and Its adjacent wetlands, where the non,RPW Bows &Me* or (udire ft into
TN Ws. Explain findings of presence or abseoea of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in cornbiration with all of its
adjacent wetlands, then ®o to Section 111.1):
3. S'ignifitabt noes findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do no directly abet the RPW. Explain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tnUdary in oea ftabon with all of as a*wm wetlands, than go to
Section 111.1):
D. DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS. THE SUBJECT WATERSIWETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLY):
1. TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands. Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area:
IM TNWs: linear feet width (ft). Or, akxes.
sr • Wetlands a*Wnt ro TN Ws: saes.
Z RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
®
Tributaries of TN Ws where tributaries typically flow year-round are jurisdictional. Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perermral: Perennial RPW C/M was observed to have geomorphology, biology and hydrologic flow chaactarsucs
consistent with perennial streams. The chamnd was observed to have a dear bed and bank, consistent flow, fish, and substrate
sorting. See JD package and North Carolina Stream Identification form for RPW C/M.
® Tributaries ofTNW where tributaries have continuous flow "sensonii!V (erg., typically three months each year) are
jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section 111.B. Provide rationak indicating that tributary Rows
seasonally: RPW 1 was observed to have genr orphokrgy, biology and hydrologic flow characteristics consistent with

- inurnmartstresms. andf4m h— - --
Carolia Stream Idaatficatum form for RPW J.
RPW FJF was observed to have pomorphology, biology and hydrologic flow ClWAGoaistics eoudstent with intermittent streams.
The diem d had observed flows, sediment deposition, and substrate sorting. See 1D package and North Carolina Stream
Identification form for RPW E and North Carolitm Steam ItImlification f n for RPW F.
Provide estimates for jutiadiaional waters in the mview area (check all that apply):
®Tnbutary waters: 1000 linear fall -8 width (R).
Other non - wetland waters: aces.
Identify type(s) of wads:
3. Ngn -RPWsa that flow direly or iad(reetly into T IMs.
l. t. Watabody that is not a TNW or an RPW, but flaws directly or atdbutly into a TNW, and it has a significant nexus with a
TNW is jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Station III.C.
Provide estimates foriunsdkootal wean within the review area (check all that apply):
®Tributary waters: linear feet widdt (fl).
s Other non- wedand waters saes
Identify type(s) of waters;
0. Wedands directly abutting an RPW Poet flow directly or Indredly Into TNWs.
Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adpoeat wetlands
® Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year-round Provide data and rabo ale
indicating that tributary is paermial it Section Ifl.D2, above. Provide rationale indicating flat wetland is
directly abutting an RPW: Welland D meets the criteria of the 1981 COE Wetb mdr Delineation maaml (See
Routine Wetland Data Farm WILD D. VAdmd d empties directly into mid is not tiles from RPW CAN.
Welland L meets tine erites of the 1987 COE Wdla als Ddinatlaa manual (See Routine Wetland Data Form WILD GM
(Typical} Welland L empties dirreedy Into and is not separated from RPW CAUL
® Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where trtbidaries typically flow "seasonally." Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section III.B aid rationale: in Section W-132, above. Provide muonahe indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW: Wcdwd AIB meets tha w iaia ofthe 1987 COE Wetlands Delineation manual (See Routine Wetland
Data Form WILD A. Wdlaod A1B aa1 " directly ono and is not separated from RPW EIF.
Welland GM meets the aion ofthe 1987 COE Wediads Delineation manual (See Routine Welland Data Form WILD GM. Welland GM
emptns directly into and is ant separated from RPW EIF.
Welland K meets the criteria of the 1987 COE Wetlands Delineation manual (See Routine Welland Data Form WTLD GM (Typican.
Welland K cmptm directly into and is not separated fan RPW J.
Provide acreage estimates Porjmssdidioal wetlands to the review area: WILD AM: +/-1.5 acres, WTLD D : <.Of acres,
VAW OR : <At acres. WILD K : <41. acres, WILD L: < AI acres.
S Wedaeds adjacent to but ad diratly abutting an RPW that fbw dbw* or h diratly into TN Ws.
M Wetlands that do net directly abut an RPW, but when considered in combustion with the tributary to which they are adjacen
and with similarly situated any mat wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW ate jurisi&ctioal. Data supporting this
conclusions is provided at Section III.C.
Provide acreage estimates forimisdidioal wedansds m the review area: acres.
6. Wetlands ad*M to tort -ItM that flow directly ar indirectly into TN Ws.
® Wetlands adlac m to suds waters, and have wham eommle ed in combination wah the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus wnh a TNW are jurisdictional. Data supposing this
comf lion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area, acres
7. Impoundments of jurisdictional waters°
As a general rule. the impoundment of a jurisdictioal tributary retains junsdictio hl.
® Darionstrate that impoundment was created from "waters of the U.S.," or
'See Faanote 4 3
' To axnplete the analysis refer to the key in Section III.D.6 of the hatrmctimml Guidebook.

- ❑ Denanstrate that water..recta the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1-6), or
O Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commas (see E below).
E. ISOLATED (INTERSPATEOR INTRA- STATE1 WATERS, INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS, THE USE,
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE, INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY) ?o
RD which are or could he used by interstate a Eaten travdas far raaeatiaml or other purposes.
from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce.
ce.
which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate eormaem
hexes -- isolated waters. Explain:
© Other Ors. Explain:
Ideaft water body and summarize rationale suupporfiag determination:
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters it the review area (check all that apply):
Tnbuerry waters: lima feet width (R)
Other roes- wetland waters: acres.
Iderdify types) of welds
® Wetlands: acres
F. NON-JURISDICTIONAL WATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
® If poteaaial wetlands were assessed within the review area, t use aroas did not meet the criteria it the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Ddareation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplementer.
® Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nereus to inttsatt (a foreigrt) rnromeroe
❑ Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decsion in "SWAMCC," die review stet would have bode regulated based ad* on the
"Migratory Bird Rule" (MBR).
Waters do not taut the "Significant Nexus" standard, when: such a finding is required thr jurisdiction. Explain:
Other. (explain, if trot covered above):
Provide acreage est n ates for nmtyunsdiaiorel waters in the review area, where tbea k potential busts ofjunsdicbon is the MBR
factors (i.e., prestotoo of migratory bade, pr em of endangaed species, use ofwater for irrigated agriadWre), using beat profissional
udgoart(clock all that apply):
Non - wetland waters (i.e., rivers, stations): li ew feet width (R).
er Ldtes/po ds: saes
Other nm►waland waters: does. List type ofaquatic resource:
Wcda ds: saes.
Provide acreage des for non-jurisdictional OF s m the review area tht do tort rod the "Significara Nexus" standard, when; such
a finding is required for jurisdiction (check all that apply):
® Non - wetland waters (i.e., rivers, stream): linear fat, with (6).
®Lakes/pods: acres
Other non - wetland waters: acres. Lid type ofaquaoc tusounr~
® Wetlands: acres.
SUPPORTING DATA. Dam reviewed for JD (creek all that apply - checked hats shall be included in can file and, where checked
and uecptested, appropriately rafaekkce sources below):
®Maps, plats. plots or p let submitted by or on behalf ofthe applicardowsultam:
Dam sheds prepared/submitted by or on bdialf of the appliaaralco sutitant.
❑ Office concurs with data shectslddoieation report
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets Mireation report
fO Data sheds im Weed by the Caps:
Corps navigable waters' study:
U.S. Gcologml Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
®USGS NHD dam.
USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
" Prior to asserting ordeeadag CWA jodsdktion based sddy on this cstgpry. Corps Districts will devote the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
nwkw coosbtent wtrh the process dewribed io the Corps /EPA Memorradaw &Wnii fg CWA,4tylaP &,Am Fo&nftg sgpmos.

— - -® U.S. Gcologwal Survey map(s). Cite scah: & quad now 124K - Matthews (NC) quad. -- - - -
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Cimtian:
National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite rm w
®StattLocal wetland inventory map(s):
FEMA/FIRM maps:
IQO -year Fkxxklam Elevation is: (Natiwml Gaodxtic Vadcal Datum of 1929)
Photographs: U Aerial (Name & Date):
or ❑Odwr (Name & Date):
® Previous determmetion(s). File on and date of response letter:
ApphcabWsupportmgcase law:
Applica6k/u porting send& beenmaw
Other information (per specify):
IL ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD:

10 f
North Carolina Division of Water Guai' - Stream IdentWication Form: Version M
Ode: April 16, 2009 ProjW: Cthesind Place Laftide: 35.07194 N (NADe3)
fi:valuator: JL, PK, Lit, TW Sibs: RPW CAM Longitude: 80.706 04 W
Total Points: Other Matthews, NC quad
Stem is of uifermAtenr 31 5 Union County e g. o wd Nam:
A. Geotno o logy (SubWW 2 14.5 1
Absent
Weak
Moderate
strong
Ia. Conitrama tied and bank
0
.1
2
3
2. Shjoslty
O
1
2
3
3 lio a el shucture:
0
1
2
3
4. Soo M dire or sbum substrate =11mg
0
1
2
3
5. AdWw'm k floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. bars br bendm
0
1
2
3
7. Braided dhwMI
0
1
2
3
S. Rawd apurlal deposits
0
1
2
3
8 8 Natural kwees
CO3
2
3
10. Headmils
0
1
2
3
11 Grade conhoo
0
CO-19
1
1.5
12. Natural valley or drib
0
. 0.6
L12
1.8
13 Second or greater order Channel on 4
USGS or NRCS mW or other doannembd
evidence.
No ®0
Yes = 3
- amamaoe aaaros we na re¢eo: see amaasiom m mama
R 4lvdrnlnnv MiAtntni = 8
14. GIOMWaterfoWdischarge
0
1
C23
3
15. Water m Memel and > 4B hm aim rain. gr
Water In channel - dry or gvwhW season
O
1
O2
3
16 L.eallmer
1 6
1
0.6
0
17. SedUrwrd on plants or debris
0
0.
1
1.5
18 Organic debris fires or plies (Wrack Mies)
0
0.5
CQ
1.5
19. Hydric sous (recluxtrrugl1ic Ileahires
No = 0
Yes C01 .
IC RinlmV (Suhtetel a 9
Fftm roots In cannel
3
2
1
0
21 . Rooted piwft in dharu>el _
22. C
_ 3
0
2
0.
1
1
0
1.6
23. Bivalves
0
CO-T-
1
2
3
24. Fish
0
1
1.5
26. AnViiibians
0
1.
1
1.5
26. Maembenthos (noto dnrersdy and abundera» )
0
1
1.6
17. FlWnKWA algae: periphytm
0
1
2
3
28 Iron o)ddtdng bacterl
0
1
1.5
29 . Wetland planla in strearnbed
FAC FACW = 0.75. OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0: Other = 0
wens lu am 1 i Focus on um praserrme or upmrro penes. im'm zi muses on ute presenco at aplwec or weusm plants.
Notes. (use beck sde or this form for adi5 WW notes) Sksich.
8'- 12' wide, 2' - 3' deep @ T.O.B.
Sand, gravel, cobble '
Abutting wetlands and impoundment
Fish observed

Date: April 16, 2009 Project ChesbvA Place Laft de: 35.07189 N (NADs3)
Evaluator LR, TW, IL, PIC She: RPW E Longitude: 80.70622 W
Total Points: Other Matthews, NC quad
s(m m rs of east auenrmrent 25 t:ourdy: union County e g Owd mane:
Aa t9ar Aa3/1
A. Geomorphology to SW t W = 12
Absent
Weak
Moderate
3
12 . Cofftuous bed and bank
0
1
2
-Wong
3
2. ShmIty
0
1
2
3
3 in.dtannei stud m: Malmol sequence
0
1
2
3
4. 30 Um We e or sft m subWale
0
1
2
3
5. AdW*ft k tbodpladn
0
f
2
3
6. DePosillomal bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Braided char"
0
1
2
3
S. Recent alluvial deposits
O
1
2
3
9 Natural levees
0
1
2
3
10. Handctts
0
1
2
3
11. Grade oatbnts
0
130.9
1
1.5
12. Natural valley or dndMMM
0
1
1.6
13. Second aR greater order channel an gld�
tSGS or NRCS map or aster wed
evwos.
No f 0®
Yes = 3
war m=m ammm am am rmw, we UNUMM a in mama
13_ Mvdrelanv Muht,"al a 6.5 t
14.E ftwMbftW
0
1
2
3
16. Waiter In Ug-m el and > 48 hm 9W= rain. g
Wrier In Channel - or season
0
0
2
3
16. L editter
1.5
1
0.6
0
17. Sedhwe on pkm or debfls
0
0.
1
1.5
18 Organic debris lines or plies (Wrack Bnes)
0
0.
1
1.5
19. ft sills (reawknoipide features
No = 0
Yes Zi
C- Breleev Is"hfatai a 6.5 1
Fibrous roots in cha n al
3
2
1
0
21 _Rued plants in channel _-
22 CmyflM
3
160 --
2
- - -0.8 --
1
- 1 --
0
- 1.5
23. Bivalves
0
1
2
3
24. Fish
CO3
0.5
1
1.5
25. burs
0
0.
1
1.5
26 MeaebantIm (note dwkuskty and ahretdenoe
CO
0.6
1
1.$
27. Fllantentf= algae; pw"ym
0
1
2
3
28 Ion Wdlzl bacterl
0
-
- 1
1.5 -
29". Weasnd ants in streambed
FAC 5 FACW = 0.75: OBI = 1.5 SAV = 2.0: Osier = 0
nw�u cv wtm c I locus un Uw pr05orce W LWOW FUFv5, IWm zU rOCLw5 on U10 presem Q GgMIC or wcmw pwm.
Notes- (m back 5rde Of aft form for 001" UOte5 ) Sketch,
5'- 8' wide. 2'- 3' deep @ T.O.B.
Sift. sand. gravel, few cobble
Abutting wetlands

d d
North Carolina Division of Water Oust - Strea rn Identification Form; Version 3.1
Dow: April 16,'2009 project: ChestIM Place L.atltlyde: 35.07223 N (NA083)
Evaluator. LR, TV, JL, PK Sft: RPW F Longitude: 80.70577 W
Total Points: Other Matthews, NC quad
stream is at mnsr inrerrrpneud 19.5 � Union County e g. 0ued mane:
da 19or d230
A. Geomo hold Subtalel = 9
Absent
Week
ilAoderate
8"
18. Cadinuous bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Skwostty
0
t
2
3
3 lnn- dharntel *udure: Mialmol
L-O)
1
2
3
4. Sol MMre or stream subsUete
0
1
2
3
5. Agihnlrek ftodpktn
0
1
2
3
6. DoWflond bats or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Braided channel
CO3
1
2
3
S. Recat alluvial deposits
0
Cp
2
3
9 a Naturallavees
CO3
1
2
3
10. Heedcuts
0
1
C2
3
11. a3rade oontrce
0
0.
1
1.5
12. Natural valley or drainagrAW
0
13. Second or greater order channel on e
USGS or NRCS map or other doarrthethied
evidence.
No (D
Yes 3
° alan413e00 arenas are rah knee; see ax as an in mmwm
14. GMWXhWAKf*Wdl3dMW
0
1
2
3
16. Water in dharorel and > 48 his SIM rain, g
Water In channel - or season
O
1O
2
3
16. Le RNW
1.6
1
2
0
17. Sedhw t on plants or debris
O
0
1
1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack Ibres)
0
MCI
1
1.5
19 Hydric sons tedox %sores
No = 0
Yes 1
r- Rinlnav (Suhintml a 4.5 1
Fdw= roots In channel
3
2
1
0
21 :Rooted plans In dhannel
22
-coy- 3
-- 2
015
...__ -- 1 ..- _
1
-0 •_ --
1.6
23. Bivalves
0
1
2
3
24. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
25. Amphibians
0
MCI
1
1.5
26. Maaobendhas (nots dvmskty and abundenoo)
O
0.5
1
1.5
27. Filamentous algae: per"yton
0
1
2
3
28 Iron o)ddWng bactieftningus.
0
1
_
1.5
290. Wetland plants in sbeambed
FAC Q&O FACW = 0.75. OO = 1.5 SAV = 2.0: 00w = 0
-- IICM N era 17 rows 0n m ou5m a 0I upamo pants, Ilan lJ marA5 on me presema OI oW ic 0r Weaarla plants
" $Ketch
4' - 6' wide, 1' - 2' deep @ T.O.B.
Sit, sand
Has abutting wetlands
i
I

North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form: Version 3.1
Date: Apn116, 2009 Project: Chestmd Place Latldide: 35.07206 N (mm)
Evaluabr: LP, TV, ll„ PK She: RPW J Longlbide: 80.70102 W
Total Points: . Otller Matthews, NC quad
rears rs ar east irrternMterx 21.75 1 County: Union County e O
d a 19 orrArvinWif a30
A. Geomorphology Subbotat = 10.5
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Stroh
18. Cortlinuom bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity
O
1
C21
3
3. Inothannel structure:
0
1
2
3
4. So91e or stream substrate Writing
0
C1
2
3
5. Adhre/reNc floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bers or bendnes
0
1
2
3
7. Braided channel
CO3
1
2
3
S. Recent duvlal deposits
0
Q2
2
3
93 Naturallrvees
CO.)
1
2
3
10. Headcuts
0
111
2
3
11. Grade OOnttof8
0
0.5
1
1.5
12. Nabrral valley or drapygrAW
0
13. Second or greater order Channel on edsong
11,SGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence.
No a) O)
Yes = 3
anon mme maw ere not reoeo; see comnsens n manum
a u..a.4....., rc..r.f..ml = 5 -5
14. GroundmelOr 1110WAIISCINOMB
0
L12
2
3
18. Water In channel and > 48 has since rein. ps
Water In charnel - or season
0
1O
2
3
16. Loofaw
1.5
1
2
O
17. Sediment an plants or debts
0
0.
1
1.5
18. Organic debris Ones or piles (Wrm* lures )
0
0.5
C13
1.5
19 Hydft sous redo features !?
No = 0
Yes -.
t^. Ainl%ftu Mashmtat = 5.75 1
Fibrous roots in dtererel
3
2
1
0
21 . tiD01Bd plans rn ttutrunel
22 C -
3 _
0
_ 2
05
1
1
0
1.5
23. Bivalves
0
1
2
3
24. Fish
tol
0.5
1
1.5
25. Amphibians
0
0
1
1.5
26. Macrobert m (note dnWAy and abundarnco)
CO
0.5
1
1.5
27. Fiume algae: perip WW
0
S11
2
3
28 Iran oxidizing
0
1
1.5
29'. Wetland pkwft in streambed
FAC = 0.5: FACW = .7 OBL = 16 SAV = 2.0: Other = 0
- imm zu arm z r rears on mo presence or upuma Morns, non zr accuses on me presence a aq=K or woemro proms.
Notes' Case Oetk side of Oft form for afltldarel notes Sketch.
6' - 8' wide, 2' - 3' deep @ T.O.B.
Silt, sand
Abutting headwater wetland

a s
DATA FORM
(1967 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project / Site: cHF sf Nt rr PLACE
Date: 0411&71119
Applicant / Owner. Reece Gilson
Cosoty: ljda
kwoogator: LR_ 7W. IL PK
State: NC
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes--X— No
Community 0:3W
18 the SRO signifleal ft disturbed (Atypical sihmtion)? Yes_ No_ZL
Transact ID:
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes Nom
Plot ID: WTLD A/B
(explain on reverse N needed)
VEGETATION
l>affiant Phmt seaetas Ili huncamr Pm11 smetds Atmom Iedieater
1. Acerrub"" T FAC 9. Mieroand m v wkwm _H FAQ
I /ix niera T OBI. 10. Lonicera &mica N FAC- "
& LividmbargmadAw T_ FAC+ 11. Boebmeriacvlindrica H FACW+
4. Acerrrtbnan _tS FAC 12.Taacadendranradiaans H FAC
& An it niora SIS -OB __ 13`
&-li {idambarstvMgAm SIS FAC+ 14.
7. AIR=awrniata _/_ FACW+ 1S`
S. Aims se lata H_ FACW+ 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC -). 92y,
Remarks: Wetland Vegetation Present Based Upon Greater than 506 of the Plant Species are Classified as FAG
OBL to the National List of Pima Species that Occur in Wetlands. Sample plot was taken in the center of Wetlmd
AB.
HYDROLOGY
_ Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks):
_ Strom, Lake, or Tide Gauge
— Aerial Photographs
_ Other
_ No Recorded Data Available
Field Observations:
Depth of Smiace Water. n _ s rm)
Depth to Free Water in PR: 0-6 run.)
Depth to Saturated Sol: ,(in)
Remarks:
Wetland Hydrology htdkators
Primary Indicators`
-z- tatrtdated
-A-Saturated In Upper 1T
_ Water Marks
_
Drift Urns
_ SedhnentDeposKs
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators:
-A—CAddind Roots Cher"s in Upper Ir
A Water- Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
FAC - Neutral Test
_ Other (Explain in Rentwks)
=I

i
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Hell — Helena fine g& loan
2-8°/n A=L0rallage Clasp Somewhat Doody drained
Taxonomy ( up): A Ll W -dub
ConPonYMapped Type? Yes No_
X100:
Depth Mdit color Mottle Colors Mottle Tendne. Concretions.
(kwhmt Notion /Mansell Mnistl (Mansell Melatl Stnrdwa_ Ate-
0 _ l2 A_ 25 YR 5/2 5
12-18+ B 2.5 YR 5/2 . NA
YR 5/9 ComtnoWnistinct Sandy On Loam
NA Sandy Loam
Hydric Sol Indicators:
_HMosol
_mm"r EpipedDn
_Concretions
_High Organic Content to Swface layer in Sandy Soils
_SuMldic Odor
Organic: Streaking in Sandy Soils
_Aquk: Mo(stare Regime
--jUsted On local Hydric Soils list
_Reducing Conditions
wed on National Hydric Soils List
x Gleyed or low4hroma Colors
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytle Vegetation Present? Yes X No _ is the Sampling Point
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes _X_ No _ Within a Wetland? Yn_X_ No Hydric Solt Present? Yes X_ No _,
Remarks: Wetland AB is classified as a wetland based upon the criteria set forth m the 1987 Amy Corps of
Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual.

9 40
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wedands Detefndnadon Manual)
Project / Site: CHESTNUT PLACE
Date: 04/16JM
Applicant / Owner. Reece Gibson
County: nio
In esti88to : Lit. TW. JL. PK
State: NC
Do normal circumstances exist on the die? Yes-2L No
Commur ft ID:BWd
Is the sae sigtiFicardly dishabed (Atypical situation)? Yes,_ No X
Transact ID:
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes No-1L
Plot ID: WILD n
(explain on reverse if needed)
15 .
VEGETATION
Dominant want sesetes SMUM &M aanr
1. - SO& af�ora T_ am
DembaM PU M species Z&MOM hmnador
& Candmxine newmtyanica _H_ FAC W+
2 liriodendwn tu&j(ga -,-A- FAC
10, &===0 ramra H ORL
3. Safir alga W OBL
11.
4. 3af x Riau H OBL
12_
5. Mkingaoim dMinauwr H FAC+
— _
13
l
&- ARMS e kas H F +
14.
7. �a! jf g H FACW+
15 .
6._Gd &an aV46M H_ FACU
16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC sxckuding FAC -} 90%
Remarks: Wetland Vegetation Present Based Upon Greater then 50% of the Phmt Species are Classified as FAC-
061, in the National List of Plant Species that Occur in Wd ands. Sample plot was taken in the center of
Wedard D. The canopy is relatively open
HYDROLOGY
_ Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks):
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
_ Stream, Lake, or Tide t knw
_ Aerlal Photographs
Primary Indicators:
_ Other
—rm axleled
8eturated in Upper Ir
No Recorded Data Available
— Wad Marius
— DAR Lines
Field Observations:
.1L Sediment Deposits
�L Dreirmge Paltems in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water, o (in,)
gory Indicators:
�L,Oxkfted Roots Channels in Upper 12°
Depth to Free Water in Pb a _ 6 rid)
— Water-Stained Leaves
_ Local Soll Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soll: o - 4 (id)
FAC44eutral TostRenrarks)
_
Remarks:

� M
Map Unit Name
(SerleS and Phape): Hag — Helena fine sandy loam.
2-8% stoves Dnahtage Class: Som
Taxonomy (SUbgroup): Aq it Hapluduh
Confirm Mapped Type? Yap No
amullamcdaum
00P& Matrk Colors Mottle Colors MGM Texture. Concretions.
gndml Uedwa (Mansell Meistl (Munson Mdets gawk= ere.
0 - 6 _ A 10 YR 5/1 10
6-18+ _0 Glee 2 51100 NA
YR 416 FewAlmmium t Sm Clay Loam
NA Loemv Sand
Hydrlc Soi IndiCabxp:
— Histosol
—H isae Epipedon
_ConaNione
—High Organic Cordent in Swhm Lager In Sandy Sots
—Summ odor
-x—Ongwdc Stn dit in Sandy Solt
—Aquic Moldure Regime
__JJded On Local Hydric Soils Llat
_Reducing CordMonrs
x oared an National Hydnic Soils List
_X-Glsyed or Law.Com on Colors
_OHw (Explain In Remarks)
Remarks
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegan Present? Yes X No _ Is the SampGrg Pohl
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes -IL No _ WMdn a Welland? Yeses No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No _
Renlarkx Wetland D along stream C is classified as a wetland based upon the cnteria set forth in the 1987 Army
Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual

- - - -- - - - -- ----- - - - - -- ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION - -- - -- - -- - -- -- - --
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Pr*d / Site: CHFSTNUT PLACE
Date: 04/1612009
Applicant / Owner: Reece Gibson
County: Union
Investigator: LR TW. JL. PK
Stabs: NC
Do nwmal circumstances exist on tiw eats? Yes -1— No
Community la:Md
Is the site 9%rdkantiy disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yen No X_
Transed m:
Is tits area a potential problem area? Yes Nom
Plat ID: WTLD GM
(explain on reverse N needed)
1s.
VEGETATION
2212111M vaeec se0aes ftj&W hWkator
1. ACPr rubrran T_ FAC
aMftM 1emcato.
9.
2 Uauidambar stvra i m _T FAC+
10.
3, encuc nigm _,$($_ _ FAC
11.
4. LiapidmebarsmmdRaa IS FAC+
12
* Acer rubrian _,-&L_ FAC
13
* Ligttidimbarshradllua H FAC+
14.
7...j - - - H FAC -e
1s.
R Partice rodwar o dusefoka _H FAC
1e.
Perm t of Dominant Spedes that are OEM, FACW, or FAC excluding FAG -) 98%
Remarks: Wetland Vegetation Present Based Upon Greater than 50% of the Plana Species are Classified as FAC -
OBL in the National List of Purr Species that Occur in Wetlands. Sample plot was taken in the center of
Wetland D. Sparse vegetation.
HYDROLOGY
_ Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks).
Welland Hydrology Indicators
— Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
_ Aerial Photographs
OUter
Primary indicators:
Irarudated
_
—
-x-Saturated in Upper Ir
_ No Recorded Data Available
— Water blarks
— Drat urns
Field Obsomations:
— Sediment Deposits
�L Drainage Patterns In Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water. NA (In.)
gory Indicators
- lLOxkNmd Roots Channels In Upper Ir
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 18+ (�)
— WaterStaired Leaves
_ Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soll: 10 - 14 (te.)
— FAC - Noutral Test
— 0tfter (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:

•
Map Unit Name
(Sondes and Phase): Hea - Helen fine sandx loam.
2-8% slonese 0minage Cleew
Taxonomy (Subgroup):Amrie Haniudub
Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
its pth MlatrlsColas NottkCWms Motile Tenor , Concretions,
InfAmd— HaftAft (Munam Melstl (Munsas
0 A 7.5 YR 4/3
Mewl S MSIAM . eta
NA NA Si1jXClav Loam
-4 _
4-19+ AIR 10 YR 7/2 7.5
YR 5/8 Cam anpi*rA S1ty Clay Loam
Hydrlo Sob Indicators:
. on' M Nod
—Concretions
_His"c Epipedon
_High Organic Content in Surface layer to Sandy Sous
_Su1Hdic Odor
Orgmdc Streaidng in Sandy Solis
`Aquic Moisture Regime
misted On local Hydnia Soils Ust
— Reducing Condors
-&-Listed on National Hydrlc Solis List
-a-Gleyed or Low Chrome Colors
_Other (Explain in Re wAW
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydreplgtic Vegetation Present? Yes _2_ No _ Is the Sampling Point
Welland Hydrology Present? Yes _1L -NO _ WOO a Wetland? Yeses No_
Hydric Soils Present? Yes X_ No _
Remarks: Wetland G/H Is classified as a wetland based upon the criteria set forth in the 1987 Arty Corps of
Engineers Wetlands Delineation Ma=L

nwTw FOnru
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project l Site: CHESTNUT PLACE
Date: 04116 61009
Applicant / Owner:_ Reece Gibson
caunwUllm
btvestlgetpr: L2 7w- ]L. PIC -- --
State: NC
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yeses No
Community ID:IJdand
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical siltation)? Yes No_jL_
Transact ID:
IS the area a potential problem area? Yes No_(_
Plot ID: UPLAND 1
(explain on reverse Kneaded)
15
VEGETATION
22MJ0 ja alma t; wMdM Indicator
I. awma Abellas T FACW-
oe I see seadas Ira I
I 7,ou/aria discolor H FAQ
2 lltindod= [u(ioitera _T FAC
10,1°Riaew it MiGa _ H FAQ '
3. LwV danim ipma"M FAC+
11. Clartonia Wrminica H FACU-
4. Pious laeda T FAC
12 Hieratsum smtasran H_ N1
5. l) felrntn T FACI L
18 nme somtina H FAM 1 _
6. Carew tanentosa _T N1
14.
7. Ulmus atata __&L_ FAC.I 1+
15
6. .ltrnioerers vind"hwa _IS FACU-
16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC -� 36%
Remarks` Wetland Vegetation Pmw Based Upon Greater limn M of tbs Picot Species are NOT Classified as
FAC -OBL in the Natiorel List of Plata Species dmt Occur in Wetlards. Sample plot was taken upslope from stream
J.
HYDROLOGY
_ Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks):
Wetland Hydrology indicators
_ Stream, Lake, or Tile Gauge
_ Aerial Photographs
Other
Primary IrtdiCators:
_
_humdated
In Upper Ir
No Recorded Data Available
— water Marks
_
_ Drift Lines
Field Observations`
_ Sediment Deposits
Draina®e Pelterns in Wadands
Depth of Surface Water: NA !ln.)
Secor dery indicators:
Oxidised Roots Channels in Upper 12"
Depth to Free Water In Pit: NA rlel)
— Water-Stained Lomas
— Local Son Survey Date
Depth to Saturated Sol: NA ray)
— FAC - Neutral Test
— 011w (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:

i
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes _ Nog Is the Sampling Point
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes_ No g Within a Weiland? Yes_ Nog
Hydric Soils Present? Yes _ No ,X
Remarits: Upland 1 is NOT classified as a wetland based upon the anteria set forth in the 1987 Anny Corps of
Engineers Wetlands Delineation Maa®L
i
i

,lb

FIGURE 1. Perennial RPW CM.
FIGURE 2. Seasonal RPW E

FIGURE 3. Seasonal RPW F.
FIGURE 4. Seasonal RPW J.

�'L 4 I x
" }
a:'S"' � +4'Z >'�+�' *ry" I, i '{I
i r *' it +'i!.' +�7ro �^i� iM _ e
9 �y r Yx n � ,) +'� ^J .. G ti s Gr2.., -y,' 14 i k''r ij
�,�, .�' ;la .'• �(Y ��e1� � v 'tqA is t'ra� `,7 `� `���`�r'+"!' -P v ♦ �+ �d �^ `a�7'9. � ♦/
e� S �li" ; _� » I i ":� ♦ 1. '.:� . +� +, ��'.
���,��� � c 7�iI ,�rr�y�.C��}�iL?,�i 7/� �l .��1 fi `�'�•�i T'. .{ ^6 � 1. `�+rC
Yf ILI
� � L✓
,ti 41 ..C• � t�.
y- Su� 1 .✓ Z5 7 t 1 :
`, •1 y ?} J .Tic „Y .
� J' "{. �l � �`�'. ` ` � -'S � rat. - ♦ /. r �1 s
—+._; �� t w:�t,�, t tr ,__ 1�h i ; _„'•3'�rn -� �•t� �`- �y�,9 v2
t
if ,} ♦_' J'�'..y; �l'rJ K u(` `'� yµiL .J?a�• 'i`41,' •,t "/
�:tir �jr�'i"C Or-t} � 1 f �'},,�•, v'F� �� /}r ..- .�"4'lyl f' t'llw 7 �':V- „,y.�.Yt' y�4'�,
. r.'I' -h � � J. � � r� � , � �- �.,, r �' ' r`�4>� iti1 r;�r f :�.•'s "s
rtr., I� !�i �Y I+^ ' � .k' yc -4✓' Z vt�kp'i'' -" 1 t , r1 h d,.'� ”` a1.
1 t � 1�; LLL . c frr�'�ti�l`,`•I r. 1 � ?'r �
{ � 5H � � ��i✓�'ca-ll1�k 1rt dcl.; r�1 �� ' t��l'i � \ � �'

ILA
ZR
Jw
4F
3f p
o4,�,vn
4�1
MI
7:7
Z7
ow

v
FIGURE 9. Pond (impoundment).