20130015 Ver 1_401 Application_20130113

201300 1 5
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
S &ME, Inc.
9751 Southern Pine Blvd.
Charlotte, NC 28273
[phone]
(704) 525 -3953 fax
N.C. Division of Water Quality
401 Wetlands Unit
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
DATE: 01.07.12
JOB NO: 1357.12.002
ATTENTION: Ms. Karen Higgins
RE: Greensboro Line 386 Project
5
01.07.12
Attention: Ms. Karen Higgins
WE ARE SENDING YOU: ® Attached ❑ Under separate cover via
❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Draft
❑ Copy of letter ❑ Report
the following items:
❑ Specifications
COPIES
DATE
NO
DESCRIPTION
5
01.07.12
1
Copies of PCN
1
01.07.12
2
CD of PCN
1
12.17.12
3
Check for DWQ processing fee
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED AS CHECKED BELOW:
® For approval
❑ As requested
❑ FOR BIDS DUE:
® For your record
❑ For review and comment ❑
❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
REMARKS: Karen: Please find the attached PCN for the Greensboro Line 386 Project. Please let me know if you need
anything else. Thank you — Joey
SIGN:
S &ME, INC. / 9751 Southern Pine Boulevard / Charlotte, NC 28273 -5560 / p 704.523.4726 f 704.525.3953 / www.smeinc.com

January 7, 2013
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
Attention: Mr. Andrew Williams
N.C. Division of Water Quality
401 Wetlands Unit
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Attention: Ms. Karen Higgins
Reference: Pre - Construction Notification: NWP No. 12/WQC No. 3884
Greensboro Line 386 Project
Greensboro, North Carolina
S &ME Project No. 1357 -12 -002
Dear Mr. Williams and Ms. Higgins:
On behalf of Piedmont Natural Gas (PNG), S &ME, Inc. (S &ME) hereby submits this
application for impacts to waters of the U.S. in accordance with Nationwide Permit
(NWT) No. 12 and the corresponding North Carolina Water Quality Certification (WQC)
No. 3884. Our services were performed for PNG as a subconsultant to Regional Land
Surveyors (S &ME Proposal No. 1357- 25000 -12, dated January 30, 2012). PNG, the
project sponsor, will be considered the applicant. The project entails replacement of an
aging segment of natural gas pipeline with a new 1.6 -mile segment of pipe in
Greensboro, North Carolina, and will involve no loss of waters of the U.S. In support of
this application, please find enclosed the following:
• Figures: Site Vicinity Map (Figure 1), USGS Topographic Map (Figure 2) and 2010
Aerial Photographs (Figure 3A -B)
• Appendix I: Completed Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) and Authorization to
Act as Agent
• Appendix II: Site Photographs
• Appendix III: Jurisdictional Boundary Drawings (Sheets 1 through 8)
• Appendix IV: Wetland, Stream and Riparian Buffer Impact Summary Tables
Appendix V: Agency Scoping Correspondence
• Appendix VI: Restoration Plan and Mitigation Acceptance Letter
S &ME, INC. / 9751 Southern Pine Blvd / Charlotte, NC 28273 / p 704.523.4726 f 704.525.3953 / www.smeinc.com

Pre - Construction Notification SWE Project No. 1357 -12 -002
Greensboro Line 386 Protect January 7, 2013
This PCN is being provided to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) for approval,
and complies with applicable conditions of NWP No. 12. This application is also being
submitted to the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) for approval
because the proposed project is located in an area subject to the Jordan Lake riparian
buffer regulations. A copy of the completed PCN and Agent Authorization Form is
included in Appendix I.
GENERAL PROJECT INFORMATION
PNG is planning to replace an aging section of 10 -inch diameter, steel natural gas
transmission line in Greensboro, North Carolina with a new line of the same size.
The project corridor originates near the southeast quadrant of the intersection of
Yanceyville Street and East Cone Boulevard (36.113194° N,- 79.774647° W), and
extends approximately 7,700 linear feet (If) southeast, crossing U.S. Highway 29 and
terminating near White Street (36.106243° N,- 79.74908° W).
The approximate location of the project corridor is depicted on the Site Vicinity Map
(Figure 1), on a portion of the Greensboro, N.C. (2001) USGS Topographic Quad Sheet
(Figure 2), and in an Aerial Photograph dated 2010 (Figures 3). A majority of the project
corridor adjoins existing utility lines or extends through open field.
The purpose of this project is to replace the aforementioned segment of existing
transmission gas line. The operation and maintenance of PNG's pipeline system is
subject to extensive state and federal regulations and requirements. As a result of current
Federal requirements, all pipeline owners, including PNG, are required to inspect and
assess the safety and integrity of transmission pipelines on an ongoing basis.
The segment of existing pipe proposed for replacement is currently located in the median
of East Cone Boulevard, which is divided into a four -lane road. East Cone Boulevard is a
heavily - trafficked roadway, and the narrow median within which the pipe is located is
considered a liability with respect to PNG's ongoing assessment and maintenance
requirements.
Replacement of the aging segment of pipe by co- locating the new line adjacent to a series
of existing utility corridors south of East Cone Boulevard will help ensure that current
compliance and safety standards are met, and improve the integrity of PNG's existing
system. Safe, reliable operation of their pipeline system, along with the safety of their
customers and employees, are PNG's primary goals, and served as impetus for the
proposed project.
The new pipeline will be installed parallel to existing natural gas pipeline or overhead
electric utility lines within a new 50 -foot wide right -of -way (ROW). Within wetlands
and at stream crossings, the width of the permanently- maintained ROW will be reduced
to 30 feet. In such areas, installation of the pipe will still require an additional 20 feet of
temporary workspace (TWS) for a total ROW width of 50 feet. The TWS will not be
permanently maintained, and will be restored to pre- disturbance contours and allowed to
naturally re- vegetate following construction. Portions of the TWS that are located within
2

Pre - Construction Notification SWE Project No. 1357 -12 -002
Greensboro Line 386 Protect January 7, 2013
Zone 1 of the Jordan Lake riparian buffer will be replanted with native woody vegetation,
as described in the project's restoration plan (Appendix VI).
EXISTING ENVIRONMENT
The proposed pipeline is located in the Piedmont physiographic province in the Cape
Fear River Basin, and crosses North Buffalo Creek. Land use in the vicinity of the
project corridor consists primarily of a mix of woodland, open, maintained land and
scattered residential and urbanized light commercial areas.
In general, observed species occurring within the existing, maintained utility ROW
included dogfennel (Eupatorium capillifolium), broomsedge (Andropogon virginicus),
goldenrod (Solidago sp.), blackberry (Rubus sp.), winged sumac (Rhus copallina), poison
ivy (Toxicodendron radicans), dandelion (Taraxacum officinale), Queen Anne's lace
(Daucus carota), sericea lespedeza (Lespedeza cuneata), big bluestem (A. gerardii),
muscadine grape (Vitis rotundifolia) ), partridge pea (Chamaecrista fasciculata), morning
glory (Ipomoea purpurea), ragweed (Ambrosia artemesiifolia) and various grasses
(Festuca spp.). Woody saplings included sweetgum (Liquidambar styracifZua), black
cherry (Prunus serotina), tulip tree (Liriodendron tulipifera), red maple (Acer rubrum)
and various oaks (Quercus spp).
The canopy of mixed pine and hardwood forests along the project corridor generally
consisted of elm (Ulmus Americana), white oak (Q. alba), ironwood (Carpinus
caroliniana), American beech (Fagus grandifolia), red maple and tulip tree. Subcanopy
species in these areas included flowering dogwood (Cornus florida), black cherry,
American holly (Ilex opaca), Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense), greenbrier (Smilax
rotundifolia), trumpet creeper (Campsis radicans), Virginia creeper (Parthenocissus
quinquefolia), poison ivy, Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica), and groundsel bush
(Baccharis halimifolia).
Species observed within typical wetland areas included sycamore (Platanus occidentalis),
red maple, Chinese privet, tulip tree, giant cane (Arundinaria gigantea), jewelweed
(Impatiens capensis), lizard's tail (Saururus cernuus), soft rush (Juncus effusus), various
sedges (Carex spp.), poison ivy and false nettle (Boehmeria cylindrica).
Other land use areas were observed along the project corridor, but occupy a less
significant portion relative to the habitat types identified above. Such portions of the
project corridor include landscaped or maintained areas, roadway ROWS or lightly -
developed sections.
Photos of the typical project corridor conditions are included in Appendix II.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED WORK
Construction of the new pipeline will first involve identification of the clearing limits,
followed by aboveground removal of woody vegetation from the proposed ROW by
mechanical means or hand - clearing, when appropriate. In wetland areas, efforts will be
3

Pre - Construction Notification SWE Project No. 1357 -12 -002
Greensboro Line 386 Protect January 7, 2013
made to remove surface vegetation in a manner that minimizes disturbance of the forest
floor and prevents exposure of soil. If necessary, a temporary equipment crossing will be
installed along one side of the ROW to facilitate equipment passage and prevent
excessive rutting and ground disturbance in the wetlands. Appropriate sediment and
erosion control measures are proposed to be installed to prevent sedimentation of
jurisdictional features as a result of construction. Streambank vegetation within the
corridor will be hand cleared, and introduction of logging debris into the channel will be
avoided to the extent practicable.
There are no impacts to North Buffalo Creek planned, as the pipeline will be installed via
"trenchless methods" - either bore or horizontal directional drill (HDD). Because the
pipe will be installed via bore beneath North Buffalo Creek, no grubbing or belowground
vegetation removal will be required in this area. Where the pipe will be installed
conventionally, grubbing will be limited to the trenchline. Select portions of the ROW
may require rough grading to facilitate safe passage of equipment, and to prepare a
suitably -level work surface. Appropriate sediment and erosion control measures will be
installed following initial soil disturbance as the project progresses. Within wetland areas
where rutting may occur, timber mats are planned for use to provide work and travel
space for equipment.
During construction, the pipe will be strung and placed on skids (wooden pedestals)
along the ROW. Specialized machines will be used to bend individual segments of pipe
to fit the contours of the trench where necessary. The pipe segments will be welded
together and inspected for structural integrity, and then lowered into the trench. In areas
where segregation of the subsoil and topsoil is required (the segment of wetlands where
the pipe will be installed conventionally), the topsoil is proposed to be replaced last.
Affected areas are proposed to be "cleaned up" by rough - grading and application of
temporary seeding (if necessary), followed by final grading, permanent seeding and
mulching to restore the ROW as closely as possible to pre- disturbance contours and
conditions. Areas within wetlands that are disturbed are scheduled to be seeded with a
customized wetland seed mix.
JURISDICTIONAL AREAS
On January 31, 2012, S &ME conducted a pedestrian review of the proposed project
corridor to delineate jurisdictional surface waters located therein. S &ME followed the
procedures set forth in the 1987 US Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation
Manual and the Eastern Mountain and Piedmont Region Supplemental Guidance. Field
conditions were documented using USACE Routine Wetland Determination Data Forms,
as appropriate. The field review also included identification of tributaries (streams or
ditches) within the project corridor. Drainage features identified during the field review
were assessed to determine the jurisdictional status of the tributary. Drainage features
were classified as either non - jurisdictional or jurisdictional. S &ME used the NCDWQ
Stream Classification Form to document characteristics of identified drainage features on
the day of the assessment.
4

Pre - Construction Notification SWE Project No. 1357 -12 -002
Greensboro Line 386 Protect January 7, 2013
Field review identified multiple regulated surface waters, including North Buffalo Creek
(Stream 1), three other natural stream channels (Streams 2 through 4) and seven wetland
areas (Wetlands A through G). Limits of the jurisdictional features were delineated by
S &ME and subsequently identified with a Trimble global - positioning system (GPS) unit
capable of sub -meter accuracy. The delineated boundaries were surveyed by a registered
land surveyor and mapped on Jurisdictional Boundaries drawings (Sheets 1 -8) in
Appendix III. Results of S &ME's assessment were included in a Request for
Jurisdictional Determination package and submitted to the USACE on December 3, 2013.
PROPOSED PROJECT IMPACTS
Wetland and stream impacts resulting from the proposed project are summarized in the
respective tables located in Appendix IV. Three of the four streams and five of the
seven wetlands areas will be impacted by the project. Project -wide, 0.224 ac. of wetlands
are proposed to be temporarily- impacted during construction, and 0.077 ac. of forested
wetlands are proposed to be converted to herbaceous wetlands. Approximately 155 if
stream channel will be temporarily- impacted by construction of the pipeline.
A majority of wetland impacts associated with the proposed project will result from
aboveground vegetation removal within the construction corridor, excavation of the
trench and temporary placement of the excavated material. Mechanized equipment will
need to access the corridor to remove felled timber, place timber mats where needed,
excavate the trench, install the pipe and restore the affected area. The project is proposed
to result in some conversion of forested wetlands to herbaceous wetlands, but not result
in a loss of waters of the U.S.
Typical wetland crossing details are depicted on Sheet 8 of 8 in Appendix III.
Following construction, disturbed wetlands within the ROW will be restored to their
original grade and contour and seeded with a native wetland seed mix. Similarly,
temporarily affected stream channels will be returned to their pre - construction grade and
contour, seeded and stabilized with coir matting and woody vegetation.
Impacts to Jordan Lake watershed riparian buffers are described in the Additional
Regulatory Considerations section of this letter.
PROTECTED SPECIES
To comply with applicable sections of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973 (16
USC 1531- 1543), S &ME submitted scoping letters to the North Carolina Natural
Heritage Program (NCNHP) and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) on January
31, 2012. The scoping packages included USGS topographic maps and aerial
photographs of the project route, and requested that each agency review records they may
have relating to rare, endangered, or threatened species, or high quality natural
communities within the vicinity of the project corridor, and provide comment.
5

Pre - Construction Notification SWE Project No. 1357 -12 -002
Greensboro Line 386 Protect January 7, 2013
The NCNHP responded with a February 7, 2012 letter stating that they had no records of
rare species, significant natural communities or significant natural heritage areas or
conservation/managed areas within one mile of the project route.
The USFWS responded with a February 24, 2012 letter in which they stated that the
proposed project was unlikely to affect federally - protected species, and that they believed
the requirements of Section 7(a) (2) of the ESA had been satisfied. The USFWS also
stated that they were concerned about potential impacts the project may have on aquatic
species. Accordingly, the USFWS recommended that directional boring be used at
stream crossings, and that stringent measures to control sediment and erosion should be
implemented.
Copies of the February 7, 2012 NCNHP and the February 24, 2012 USFWS
correspondence letters are included in Appendix V.
HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES
In response to a scoping letter and project location maps submitted by S &ME on January
31, 2012, the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) responded with a
February 17, 2012 letter stating that they had conducted a review of the proposed project
area and were aware of no historic resources that would be affected as a result.
Accordingly, the SHPO had no further comment on the project.
A copy of the February 17, 2012 SHPO letter is included in Appendix V.
AVOIDANCE AND MINIMIZATION
To minimize impacts to waters of the U.S. and limit habitat fragmentation, PNG has
proposed to install the new gas pipeline parallel to the existing, maintained ROW.
Impacts to North Buffalo Creek are proposed to be avoided by installing the pipe via
trenchless methods. Wetland impact minimization during construction is proposed
through the use of equipment mats and trench plugs to prevent alterations to wetland
hydrology.
Additionally, construction equipment operating within wetlands are planned to be limited
to that necessary for clearing, excavation, pipe installation and restoration activities.
Wetland vegetation outside of the trench line is proposed to be cut at ground level,
leaving existing root systems in place to promote re- growth. To the extent practicable,
wetland topsoil is proposed to be segregated from the underlying subsoil in areas
disturbed by trenching, except in areas with standing water or saturated soils, or where no
topsoil is evident. Within wetlands, yearly vegetation maintenance is planned to be
limited to a 30 -foot permanent maintenance corridor.
0

Pre - Construction Notification SWE Project No. 1357 -12 -002
Greensboro Line 386 Protect January 7, 2013
ADDITIONAL REGULATORY CONSIDERATIONS
Jordan Lake Riparian Buffer Rules
The project is located in an area subject to the Jordan Lake riparian buffer rules. Streams
within the proposed ROW subject to the riparian buffer rules were evaluated by S &ME
personnel who have successfully completed NCDWQ's Surface Water Identification
Training Certification course utilizing the latest version of the publication Identification
Methods for the Origins of Intermittent and Perennial Streams. S &ME's assessment
determined that all of the streams channels present within the new ROW are subject to
the riparian buffer rules.
As proposed, the project will temporarily impact 18,325 sf of Zone 1 buffer and 8,855 sf
of Zone 2 buffer. A total of 5,463 sf of Zone 1 will be converted from woodland to
permanently - converted to open, grass- covered ROW. A total of 3,417 sf of Zone 2 will
be similarly converted.
Because the proposed gasline will be constructed within a new ROW that parallels
existing, maintained utility easements, Streams 2 and 4 will not be crossed at near -
perpendicular angles. According to the Table of Uses associated with the Jordan Lake
Riparian Buffer Rules, such crosses are allowable so long as compensatory mitigation is
provided.
Sediment and Erosion Control
Appropriate sediment and erosion control practices outlined in the most recent version of
the "North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Planning and Design Manual" and
approved by the local governing authority shall be in compliance with specifications
governing the proper design, installation, operation and maintenance of such BMPs to
comply with the appropriate turbidity water quality standard.
MITIGATION
The project is proposed to result in conversion of 0.077 acre of forested wetlands to
herbaceous wetlands. Mitigation for wetland impacts that do not exceed 0.10 acre is
generally not required by the USACE. Similarly, mitigation for impacts to less than one
acre of wetlands is not required by NCDWQ, and because the project as proposed will
not result in permanent stream impacts, stream mitigation is not required.
With respect to riparian buffer mitigation, PNG is required to purchase 9,876 credits (see
Riparian Buffer Impact Table in Appendix IV). They propose to purchase the necessary
credit from the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program ( NCEEP). A copy of
an acceptance letter from NCEEP is included in Appendix VI.
Mitigation has also been provided by avoidance and minimization procedures
implemented during the design phase of the proposed project. Impacts will be minimized
by: 1) paralleling existing, maintained ROWS where possible; 2) use of trenchless pipe
installation; and 3) reducing the width of the permanent maintenance corridor to 30 feet.
7

Pre - Construction Notification SWE Project No. 1357 -12 -002
Greensboro Line 386 Protect January 7, 2013
As proposed, the project will comply with applicable conditions of NWP No. 12 and
WQC No. 3884. The width of the permanently- maintained ROW will not exceed 30 feet
in wetlands and at stream crossings. The proposed alignment also makes use of existing,
maintained areas to the extent practicable. Following construction, affected jurisdictional
areas are scheduled to be restored to their original grade and contour. As proposed, the
project will not result in permanent changes in pre - construction elevation contours or
affect dimension, pattern or profile of affected streams. Cleared areas are proposed to be
restored in accordance with the attached Restoration Plan (Appendix VI) following
completion of the work.
CLOSING
By copy of this correspondence and completed PCN, we are requesting your written
concurrence with this NWP No. 12 permit application. If you have questions or need
additional information, please feel free to contact us at 704.523.4726.
Sincerely,
S &ME
Joey awler, P.W.S. Darrin M. Peine, Q.E.P.
Senior Project Manager Natural Resources Department Manager
Senior Review by Julie Bennett - Hudel, P.G., LEED AP
Attachments
cc. Jim Kalish - PNG
Andy Clark, PLS — Regional Land Surveyors
Virginia Spillman, P.E. — Guilford County
0

Figures

Appendix I: Completed Pre - Construction Notification (PCN)
and Authorization to Act as Agent

QaeWAr,R7
r
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Page 1 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
Pre - Construction Notification PCN Form
A. Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1 b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 12 or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes
® No
1 d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ® Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
® Yes
❑ No
1 g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 In
below.
❑ Yes
® No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Greensboro Line 386 Project
2b.
County:
Guilford
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Greensboro
2d.
Subdivision name:
N/A
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
N/A
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Piedmont Natural Gas
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d.
Street address:
4720 Piedmont Row Drive
3e.
City, state, zip:
Charlotte N.C. 28210
3f.
Telephone no.:
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
jim.kalish @piedmontng.com
Page 1 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
❑ Agent ® Other, specify: Utility Company
4b.
Name:
Jim Kalish, P.E.
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
Piedmont Natural Gas
4d.
Street address:
4720 Piedmont Row Drive
4e.
City, state, zip:
Charlotte N.C. 28210
4f.
Telephone no.:
704.731.4598
4g.
Fax no.:
704.731.4098
4h.
Email address:
jim.kalish @piedmontng.com
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
Joey Lawler, P.W.S.
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
S &ME, Inc.
5c.
Street address:
9751 Southern Pine Boulevard
5d.
City, state, zip:
Charlotte, N.C. 28723
5e.
Telephone no.:
704.523.4726
5f.
Fax no.:
704.525.3853
5g.
Email address:
jlawler @smeinc.com
Page 2 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
1 a.
Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
Project is a linear utility line replacement
Latitude: origin: 36.11308° N; terminus: 36.10638° N
1 b.
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Longitude: - origin:79.77517° W; term in us: 79.74889° W
(DD.DDDDDD) (- DD.DDDDDD)
1 c.
Property size:
Approximately 9 acres
2.
Surface Waters
2a.
Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
North Buffalo Creek
proposed project:
2b.
Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
WS -IV; NSW
2c.
River basin:
Cape Fear (0303002)
3.
Project Description
3a.
Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Land use in the vicinity of the project corridor consists primarily of a mix of forest, open space and residential /commercial
areas. The proposed right -of -way (ROW) passes through several wetland areas and across multiple stream channels.
The proposed ROW will abut existing, mainatined easements for the most part.
3b.
List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
Approximately 0.5 acre
3c.
List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
Approximately 200 linear feet
3d.
Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the proposed project is to replace an aging segment of existing natural gas transmission line with a new
pipeline that is compatible with current safety and inspection requirements.
3e.
Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Replacement of existing gas line will involve installation of a 10 -inch steel pipe in a new ROW, followed by abandonment
of the old 10 -inch line in the median of East Cone Boulveard . In upland areas, the old pipe will be excavated, and the
new pipeline placed parallel to one of several existing utility easements that it will adjoin. In additon to the new 30 -foot
wide mainatined ROW, and additional 20 feet of temporary work space (TWS) will be necessary to install the pipe. The
total disturbance width will not exceed 50 feet at wetland and stream crossings. The pipe will be installed beneath North
Buffalo Creek via trenchless methods. Following construction, 30 feet of the existing ROW will continue to be maintained
through wetland areas. The TWS located in wetlands shall be restored and allowed to naturally revegetate.
Page 3 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Comments: Request for JD package was submitted to the
USACE on December 3, 2012.
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
®Preliminary El Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency /Consultant Company: S &ME, Inc.
Name (if known):.
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
On January 31, 2012, S &ME conducted a pedestrian review of the proposed project corridor to delineate jurisdictional
surface waters located therein. S &ME followed the procedures set forth in the 1987 US Army Corps of Engineers
Wetlands Delineation Manual and the Eastern Mountain and Piedmont Region Supplemental Guidance. Field conditions
were documented using USACE Routine Wetland Determination Data Forms, as appropriate. The field review also
included identification of tributaries (streams or ditches) within the project corridor. Drainage features identified during the
field review were assessed to determine the jurisdictional status of the tributary. Drainage features were classified as
either non - jurisdictional or jurisdictional. S &ME used the NCDWQ Stream Classification Form to document
characteristics of identified drainage features on the day of the assessment.
Field review identified multiple regulated surface waters, including North Buffalo Creek (Stream 1), three other natural
stream channels (Streams 2 through 4) and seven wetland areas (Wetlands A through G). Limits of the jurisdictional
features were delineated by S &ME and subsequently identified with a Trimble global - positioning system (GPS) unit
capable of sub -meter accuracy. Results of S &ME's assessment were included in a Request for Jurisdictional
Determination package and submitted to the USACE on December 3, 2013.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
❑ Yes ❑ No ® Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
N/A
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
N/A
Page 4 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ® Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary (T)
W1 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
2h. Comments: See Wetland Impact Table in Appendix IV
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
3i. Comments: See Stream Impact Table in Appendix IV.
Page 5 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
4b.
4c.
4d.
4e.
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact number -
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
01 ❑P ❑T
02 ❑P ❑T
03 ❑P ❑T
04 ❑P ❑T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments: No open -water impacts will occur.
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
5b.
5c.
5d.
5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose
(acres)
number
of pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse El Tar-Pamlico ®Other: Jordan
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number -
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary (T)
impact
required?
B1 ❑P ❑T
El Yes
❑ No
B2 ❑P ❑T
El Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑P ❑T
El Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments: See Riparian Buffer Impact Table in Appendix IV.
Page 6 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Instllation of the new pipe adajcent to an existing ROW will reduce habitat fragmentation. Impacts to Buffalo Creek will be
avoided by installing the pipe via HDD methods.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
The width of the permanently- maintained ROW will be reduced to 30 feet within wetlands and at stream crossings.
Construction equipment operating within wetlands will be limited to that necessary for clearing, excavation, pipe installation
and restoration activities. Wetland vegetation outside of the trench line will be cut at ground level, leaving existing root
systems in place to promote re- growth. To the extent practicable, wetland topsoil will be segregated from the underlying
subsoil in areas disturbed by trenching, except in areas with standing water or saturated soils, or where no topsoil is evident.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
® Yes ❑ No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
® DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
®Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: S
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
® Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
0 linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
9,876 square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested:
0 acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
0 acres
4h. Comments: see attached NC EEP acceptance letter
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
N/A
Page 7 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
® Yes ❑ No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c.
6d.
6e.
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
See Riparian Buffer Impact Table in Appendix IV.
6h. Comments: 9,876 sf or riparian buffer mitigation credit will be purchased from NC EEP
Page 8of12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
® Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Comments: Project is a linear utility constructed belowground. The ROW will remain
❑ Yes ® No
grassed with no imperveous surfaces.
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
>1 %
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ® No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: Project will not result in additional
imperveous surface
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
N/A
❑ Certified Local Government
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
❑ Phase II
3b.
Which of the following locally - implemented stormwater management programs
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a.
Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006 -246
❑ Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 9 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the
❑ Yes
® No
use of public (federal /state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes
❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
❑ Yes
❑ No
Comments: N/A
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes
® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after - the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes
® No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
N/A
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes
® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The project is not considered "growth- inducing" in that its purpose to replace an aging segment of existing natural gas
transmission pipleine with a new line of equal size.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a.
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non- discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
The project is a natural gas pipeline and will not generate waste water.
Page 10 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
® Yes ❑ No
impacts?
® Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
To comply with applicable sections of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973 (16 USC 1531 - 1543), S &ME submitted
scoping letters to the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program ( NCNHP) and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service ( USFWS)
on January 31, 2012. The scoping packages included USGS topographic maps and aerial photographs of the project
route, and requested that each agency review records they may have relating to rare, endangered, or threatened species,
or high quality natural communities within the vicinity of the project corridor, and provide comment.
The NCNHP responded with a February 7, 2012 letter stating that they had no records of rare species, significant natural
communities or significant natural heritage areas or conservation /managed areas within one mile of the project route.
The USFWS responded with a February 24, 2012 letter in which they stated that the proposed project was unlikely to
affect federally - protected species, and that they believed the requirements of Section 7(a) (2) of the ESA had been
satisfied. The USFWS also stated that they were concerned about potential impacts the project may have on aquatic
species. Accordingly, the USFWS recommended that directional boring be used at stream crossings, and that stringent
measures to control sediment and erosion should be implemented.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
hftp://ocean.floridamarine.org/efh_coral/ims/viewer.htm
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
In response to a scoping letter and project location maps submitted by S &ME on January 31, 2012, the North Carolina
State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) responded with a February 17, 2012 letter stating that they had conducted a
review of the proposed project area and were aware of no historic resources that would be affected as a result.
Accordingly, the SHPO had no further comment on the project.
Page 11 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA- designated 100 -year floodplain?
® Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: The project will comply with FEMA regulations.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? Available FEMA mapping
Joey Lawler, P.W.S.
Applicant /Agent's Printed Name
01.03.13
Date
Applicant /Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided.)
Page 12 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
Date: 01.02.13
' roject Information
S &ME Project Name: Greensboro Line 386
Type of Project: Natural Gas Transmission Pipeline
Location: Greensboro, N.C.
Property Owner /Representative Information
Business Name:
Mailing Address:
City, State, Zip Code:
Telephone No.
Contact:
Agent Information
Business Name
Street Address:
City, State, Zip Code:
Telephone No.
Contact:
Piedmont Natural Gas
4720 Piedmont Row Drive
Charlotte, N.C. 28210
704.731.4598
Jim Kalish, P.E.
S &ME, Inc.
9751 Southern Pine Boulevard
Charlotte, NC 28273
(704) 523 -4726
Joey Lawler, P.W.S.
Authorization: I
on behalf of
(Contact Signature)
Piedmont Natural Gas hereby authorize
(Name of Landowner or Project Sponsor)
S &ME, Inc. to act as agent in submission of Section 4041401
Permitting information for above- mentioned project.

Appendix II: Site Photographs

IMView of Stream 1 facing east. Note that impacts to
this stream are avoided.
3 View of Stream 2 facing west (upstream).
2 View of Wetland A facing west. Note that impacts to
this wetland are avoided.
4 View of Stream 3 facing north (upstream).
ti[
M Y
c.
6 View of Wetland C facing northeast. Note that
impacts to this wetland are avoided.
SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
PNG Greensboro Project
Greensboro, NC
1
Project No.: 1357 -12 -002 Photo Page 1 of 2

7 View of Wetland D facing northeast.
9 View of Stream 4 facing northwest (upstream).
8 View of Wetland E facing northwest.
r�
r 7
n
SA i
.. � ''+�- � 1 � l� - fir.: � V` : ,�f :3 _' •�`
10 View of Wetland F facing southwest.
11 View of Wetland G facing north.
SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
PNG Greensboro Project
Greensboro, NC
357 -12 -002 Photo Page 2 of 2

Appendix III: Jurisdictional Boundary Drawings
(Sheets 1 through 8)

COV15
N: 860964.00
DO) E: 1771104.35
�E EAST Cam RIw
f j
\ � I
NEW TEMP. 1
WORKSPACE i
PIN: 7876105730
� PS NC I, LP
R.B. 7089 P.G. 914
\E\ + L " , w a i E \ j P.B. 90 PG. 133
•� w 'Vw i •1 w � w 4 T w t L 4i +\ \
EN
3000RR CORRIDOR \
'•�f lw + a a� r e i r•7 a +
r^ � 4i J 'r w iw w L �2r �'•� v v . w •!! \
WETLAND
NIwww a a +J b`!' t \yyi� AREA
Q. �'wwww E r
+ w r 1 t w w l J TEMPORARY \
IMPACT AREAa E\
w w r J + + w E
E-
w
� f
GAS EASEMENT
EXISTING 30' — - -- r
DRAINAGE �'t
EASEMENT L9
ss
ss
i i r a ti w w y ,•a.. w �\s + •^ ,l
SS
LEGEND:
55 SANITARY SEWER LINE
----- - - - - -- SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT
�E E OVERHEAD ELECTRICAL
WOODS LINE
—G —C— PROPOSED GAS LINE
— • — — JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARY
PROPERTY LINE
DUKE POWER EASEMENT
PROPOSED PNG EASEMENT
— — — — — — TEMP WORKSPACE
----- - - - - -- DRAINAGE EASEMENT
- --rr _ w 048 FO
l
PERMANENT
J + w; + -- _CONVERSION AREA \c\�
sl
w`ss'
. � .• w a + w a r a ~+%�yti�4ti i t •Y 1 +� � ~�
ss ss
CONCRETE MONUMENT FOUND ' + r a + w a w �= Ss
• COMPUTED POINT
O SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE
i +
NOTES: w '
r y EXISTING WETLAND
1. DISTURBANCE CORRIDOR IS NOT
TO EXCEED 30' IN WIDTH WITHIN
THE JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES,
CORPS ACTION I.D.
THIS CERTIFIES THAT THIS COPY OF THIS PLAT ACCURATELY DEPICTS THE
BOUNDARY OF THE JURISDICTION OF SECTION 404 OF THE CLEAN WATER
ACT AS OETERMINED BY THE UNDERSIGNED ON THIS DATE. UNLESS THERE
IS A CHANGE IN THE LAW OR OUR PUBLISHED REGULATIONS, THIS
DETERMINATION OF SECTION 404 JURISDICTION MAY BE RELIED UPON FOR A
PERIOD NOT TO EXCEED FIVE YEARS FROM THIS DATE. THIS DETERMINATION
WAS MADE UTILIZING THE 1987 CORP OF ENGINEERS WETLANDS DELINEATION
MANUAL
NAME
TITLE
DATE
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT A SURVEY WAS MADE UNDER MY
SUPERVISION AND THAT THE WETLANDS SHOWN HEREON
REFLECTS THE DELINEATION EVIDENCE PROVIDED BY S &ME
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES ON
DAVID A. CLARK, PLS L -4649
SEAL
L— 46 49
ZZ
S U R`I��ol�����
'A' :GAP Is'
\\\
EXISTING
\E \
\E
\E
\E
\E
`
DUKE NPOWER \E\
EASEMENT f
\E
\f
\E
\E
\E\
EXISTING 20' E\
SANITARY SEWER
EASEMENT
1 �X
S4
ss
j ss
PERMANENT CONVERSION AREA UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. GRAPHIC SCALE
40 0 20 40
2. PIPE INSTALLATION THROUGH
JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARY BY
TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA OPEN CUT.
1 inch 40 !t
WETLAND AREA "G" LINE TABLE
TEMPORARY IMPACTS:
5,871 SF – 0.135 ACRES
LINE
LENGTH
BEARING
L1
17,08'
N76'09'00 "E
L2
13.91'
S83'52'35 "E
L3
136.49'
S05'43'21 "W
L4
66.96'
S64'21'09 "E
L5
17.77'
S51'36'27 "W
L6
4.95'
N67- 21'26 "W
L7
76.81'
N73'30'09 "W
L81
150.25'
N05'43'21 "E
WETLAND AREA "G" LINE TABLE
PERMANENT CONVERSION IMPACTS:
677 SF – 0.016 ACRES
LINE
LENGTH
BEARING
L6
4.95'
S67'21'26 "E
L7
76.81'
S73'30'09 "E
L9
0.61'
S51'36'27 "W
L10
14.30'
S06'01'32 "W
1-111
84.75'
N64'21'09 "W
Ll 21
1.65'
N05'43'21"E
TIE LINE
LINE
I LENGTH
I BEARING
Ll 31
37.51'
N05'52'33 "E
JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES
OF
GREENSB OR 0 LINE 3 8 6
TRANSMISSION GAS LINE
IR# 0230281
PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS
COMPANY, INC.
GUILFORD COUNTY
GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA
SHEET 2 OF 8
Land y N.C. License No. C -1362
Re Zonal d
S urve ors, Inc.
8642 WEST MARKET STREET. SUITE 100
GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA 27409
TELEPHONE [phone]

PIN: 7876105730
PS INC I, LP
D.B. 7089 P.G. 914
P.B. 90 PG, 133
` f \
f
f\
f\
f\
e
WETLAND AREA "F" LINE TABLE
TEMPORARY IMPACTS:
399 SF — 0.009 ACRES
LINE
LENGTH
BEARING
L1
9.91'
N49'15.05 "E
L2
23.32'
N52'25'42 "E
L3
11.44'
S6357'26 "E
L4
11.25'
S42'10'41 "W
L5
21.25'
S51'27'51 "W
L61
13.46'
N63'57'26 "W
LEGEND:
Q IRON PIPE FOUND
• COMPUTED POINT
—E —E— OVERHEAD ELECTRICAL
rr-r- rYrrY-rw,% WOODUNE
- C—G — PROPOSED GAS LINE
— — — — JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARY
—21 — ZI — 30' ZONE 1 BUFFER
— Z2 Z2 — 50' ZONE 2 BUFFER
PROPERTY LINE
DUKE POWER EASEMENT
—PROPOSED PNG EASEMENT
— — — — — — TEMP WORKSPACE
N: 860590,26
E: 1771735.08 \
` \e
\f \f
NO3'27'44 "E \ f
(91.52') TIE \f
\f
WETLAND \f /
AREA "F" \f_
\f
\e
\f
\f
�h
hh
NEW -50'
GAS EASEMENT
BUFFER IMPACT: STREAM "4"
LINE
ZONE 1
ZONE 2
PERMANENT CONVERSION
18 SQ FT
1,049 SQ FT
TEMPORARY IMPACT
5,921 SQ FT
3,542 SQ FT
REPLANT AREA
1,521 SQ FT
0 SQ FT
EXIS71NG WETLAND
PERMANENT CONVERSION AREA
TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA
REPLANT AREA
CORPS ACTION I.D.
THIS CERTIFIES THAT THIS COPY OF THIS PLAT ACCURATELY DEPICTS THE
BOUNDARY OF THE JURISDICTION OF SECTION 404 OF THE CLEAN WATER
ACT AS DETERMINED BY THE UNDERSIGNED ON THIS DATE, UNLESS THERE
IS A CHANGE IN THE LAN! OR OUR PUBLISHED REGULATIONS, THIS
DETERMINATION OF SECTION 404 JURISDICTION MAY BE RELIED UPON FOR A
PERIOD NOT TO EXCEED FIVE YEARS FROM THIS DATE. THIS DETERMINATION
WAS MADE UTILIZING THE 1987 CORP OF ENGINEERS WETLANDS DELINEATION
MANUAL
NAME
TITLE
DATE
��WWWl1I Irl+rrr��
I's N CARD
L ''.
SEAL
* L- -4649: _
SURNFy��`�
\� \ r'r►rII I IIiWW����
e
EXISTING 118' \f \
DUKE POWER \f
EASEMENT \
f \e
PIN: 7875292516
\f STREAM "4" 50' \f\ CONE DENIM LLC
\e\ TO BE OPEN CUT BUFFER \f` ,B. 6049 P.G. 2286
f\ e
� ` �� 1f gyp. f \f
�. 7Q10� 20 ` e f '501
N
PERMANENT
CONVERSION
AREA
NOTES:
1. DISTURBANCE CORRIDOR IS NOT
TO EXCEED 30' IN WDTH WITHIN
THE JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES,
UNLESS OTHERNbSE NOTED.
2. PIPE INSTALLATION THROUGH
JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARY BY
OPEN CUT.
f
47 3. > >:.�� !
GRAPHIC SCALE
40 0 20 40
1 inch a 40 ft,
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT A SURVEY WAS MADE UNDER MY
SUPERVISION AND THAT THE WETLANDS SHOWN HEREON
REFLECTS THE DELINEATION EVIDENCE PROVIDED BY S &ME
ENVIRONMENT L SERVICES ON Z-15-1 -
, I DAVID A. A. CLARK, PLS L -4649
STREAM "4" LINE TABLE
TEMPORARY IMPACTS:
552 SF — 0.013 ACRES
LINE
LENGTH
BEARING
L7
7.58'
N19'33'04 "E
L8
40.33'
N40'53'57 "W
L9
6.86'
N12'27'23 "E
L10
15.42'
S63'57'26 "E
01
40.73'
S33'37'25 "E
L121
9.95'1
S0723'01 "W
Ll 31
14.18'
N63'57'26 "W
Stream "4" Temporary Impacts = 50 LF
JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES
OF
GREENSB OR 0 LINE 3 8 6
TRANSMISSION GAS LINE
IR¢# 0230281
PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS
COMPANY, INC.
GUILFORD COUNTY
GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA
SHEET 3 OF 8
Land N.C. Llca No. C 62
Re lonai Y Surve ors, Inc.
�'
8642 WEST MARKET STREET, SUITE 100
GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA 27409
TELEPHONE [phone]

' x N: 860421.50
\e\ / E: 1772252.99
/ \F
F\
\F / EXISTING 20' \F \
SAN R
EASEMENT
CORPS ACTION I.D.
THIS CERTIFIES THAT THIS COPY OF THIS PLAT ACCURATELY DEPICTS THE
BOUNDARY OF THE JURISDICTION OF SECTION 404 OF THE CLEAN WATER
ACT AS DETERWNEO BY THE UNDERSIGNED ON THIS DATE. UNLESS THERE
IS A CHANGE IN THE LAW OR OUR PUBLISHED REGULATIONS, THIS
PIN: 7876203388 DETERMINATION OF SECTION 404 JURISDICTION MAY BE RELIED UPON FOR A
NIEL RMAH PERIOD NOT TO EXCEED FIVE YEARS FROM THIS DATE. THIS DETERMINATION
D.B. 7358 P.G. 517 WAS MADE UTILIZING THE 1987 CORP OF ENGINEERS WETLANDS DELINEATION
MANUAL
TEMPORARY _ \
�c IMPACT AREA ` _ y w F\ f
PIN: 7875292516 \
CONE DENIM LLC F f
D.B. 6049 P.G. 2286
WETLAND \
AREA "E F \F
NAME
TITLE
DATE
o 1CIAR�0
•.<
zz. • S I OA /2i,
\ = 4e Y
SEAL
*
L-4649 'k -
\f i /O.9,yO SUR,. -' -
\f \ '�� ►I! 11111 I W +� +`\
EXISTING 118' F \F
DUKE POWER
EASEMENT F \E
/ 30' DISTURBED
CORRIDOR \ 41j
WETLAND AREA "E" LINE TABLE
TEMPORARY IMPACTS:
2,717 SF — 0.062 ACRES
LINE
LENGTH
BEARING
L1
133.06'
S6357'26 "E
L2
8.19'
S88'44'49 "W
L3
12.49'
S79'20'56 "W
L4
35.22'
N85'26'34 "W
L5
52.68'
N65'41'07 "W
L61
31.99'
N56'32'01 "W
L71
17.40'
N28'55'20 "E
1_8
4.23'
N32'54'22"E
LEGEND:
SS SANITARY SEWER LINE
----- - - - - -- SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT
—E —E— OVERHEAD ELECTRICAL
WOODLINE
—C —G— PROPOSED GAS LINE
— — — — JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARY
PROPERTY LINE
DUKE POWER EASEMENT
-- --
—PROPOSED PNG EASEMENT
REBAR FOUND
• COMPUTED POINT
EXISTING WETLAND
PERMANENT CONVERSION AREA
TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA
PERMANE
CONVERSION AREA
WETLAND \e\ )
AREA "E" \ F
/ 1
NOTES:
1. DISTURBANCE CORRIDOR IS NOT
TO EXCEED 30' IN WIDTH WITHIN
THE JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES,
UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
2. PIPE INSTALLATION THROUGH
JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARY BY
OPEN CUT.
\NEW 50'
\ GAS EASEMENT
GRAPHIC SCALE
40 0 20 40
1 inch Q 40 it
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT A SURVEY WAS MADE UNDER MY
SUPERVISION AND THAT THE WETLANDS SHOWN HEREON
REFLECTS THE DELINEATION EVIDENCE PROVIDED BY SdcME
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES ON ^13'l�
DAVID A. CLARK, PLS L -4649
WETLAND AREA "E" LINE TABLE
PERMANENT CONVERSION IMPACTS:
647 SF — 0.015 ACRES
LINE
LENGTH
BEARING
L4
35.22'
S85'26'34 "E
L5
52.68'
S65'41'07 "E
L6
31.99'
S56'32'01 "E
L9
24.59'
S79'20'56 "W
L10
1 4.27'
S42'52'49 "W
1_111
96.61'
N63'57'26 "W
Ll 21
8.43'
N28'55'20 "E
JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES
OF
GREENSBORO LINE 386
TRANSMISSION GAS LINE
IR## 0230281
PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS
COMPANY, INC.
GUILFORD COUNTY
GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA
SHEET 4 OF 8
r Surveyors, N.C. License No. C -1362
R e ion ai L an d In c.
g
8642 WEST MARKET STREET, SUITE 100
GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA 27409
TELEPHONE [phone]

�e
\F `\F
\F \F \
�F PIN: 7875292516 F\
\ems CONE DENIM LLC f \e
D B 6049 P G 22$
N: 860352.65
772514.96
\' WETLAND
AREA "E"
c \
are •\ : \ �'
NEW 50'c (� TEMPORARY F
\ `S EASEMENT
6 IMPACT AREA; \F
\y>
\ o Yl
<� 'AI
/ 30' DISTURBED \ '
CORRIDOR r
WETLAND AREA „o„ LINE TABLE
PERMANENT CONVERSION IMPACTS:
1,992 SF — 0.046 ACRES
LINE
LENGTH
BEARING
L4
60.09'
S60'26'21 "E
L5
31.58'
S65'05'26 "E
L8
25.20'
S49'43'38 "W
L9
8.36'
N80'51'43 "W
L10
70.72'
N56'33'26 "W
L111
18.22'
N25'18'55"E
Ll 21
3.32'
N41'54'25 "W
LEGEND:
EE OVERHEAD ELECTRICAL
WODDUNE
—o —c— PROPOSED GAS LINE
— • . • . • — JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARY
PROPERTY LINE
DUKE POWER EASEMENT
PROPOSED PNG EASEMENT
A REBAR FOUND
0 COMPUTED POINT
v EXISTING WETLAND
PERMANENT CONVERSION AREA
TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA
PIN: 7876300121
CITY OF GREENSBORO
D.B. 2064 P.G. 472
CORPS ACTION I.D. S r�
cEns� sr y
J'
THIS CERTIFIES THAT THIS COPY OF THIS PLAT ACCURATELY DEPICTS THE cor;Es�VD.
BOUNDARY OF THE JURISDICTION OF SECTION 404 OF THE CLEAN WATER
ACT AS DETERMINED BY THE UNDERSIGNED ON THIS DATE. UNLESS THERE
IS A CHANGE IN THE LAW OR OUR PUBLISHED REGULATIONS, THIS \
DETERMINATION OF SECTION 404 JURISDICTION MAY BE RELIED UPON FOR A 16TH Sr.
PERIOD NOT TO EXCEED FIVE YEARS FROM THIS DATE. THIS DETERMINATION I
WAS MADE UTILIZING THE 1987 CORP OF ENGINEERS WETLANDS DELINEATION SITE
MANUAL
NAME
TITLE
DATE
\F\F \ \
h \F \F \
\F
\F \
\F
F \ F
F\ \F
�F
\F
``,V►V111111111/����/
\ CARD
SEAL
* L -4649
fAl
F\
F\
F\
F
�QJY \F EXISTING 118' �f
DUKE POWER
F EASEMENT
c
} PERMANENT %--10 F
CONVERSION AREA \F
AR0, G \F\
\ pSeo F
c
\ c\
\ o\
1. DISTURBANCE CORRIDOR IS NOT
TO EXCEED 30' IN WIDTH WITHIN
THE JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES,
UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
2. PIPE INSTALLATION THROUGH
JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARY BY
OPEN CUT.
GRAPHIC SCALE
40 0 20 40
1 inch a 40 !t.
INITY M
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT A SURVEY WAS MADE UNDER MY
SUPERVISION AND THAT THE WETLANDS SHOWN HEREON
REFLECTS THE DELINEATION EVIDEENU PROMDED BY S&ME
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVVIICESS ON
C 1-1-Il 12�[�112-
DAVID A. CLARK, PLS L -4649
WETLAND AREA V- LINE TABLE
TEMPORARY IMPACTS:
753 SF — 0.017 ACRES
LINE
LENGTH
BEARING
L1
2.31'
S63'57'26 "E
L2
121.76'
S56'33'26 "E
L3
2.47'
S49'43'38 "W
L4
60.09'
N60'26'21 "W
L5
31.58'
N65'05'26 "W
L61
26.43'
N41'54'25 "W
L71
7.79'
N24'27156 "W
JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES
OF
GREENSB OR 0 LINE 3 8 6
TRANSMISSION GAS LINE
IR# 0230281
PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS
COMPANY, INC.
GUILFORD COUNTY
GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA
SHEET 5 OF 8
Land N.C. License No. C -1382
ReZonal S Inc,
�
8642 WEST MARKET STREET, SUITE 100
GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA 27409
TELEPHONE [phone]

CORPS ACT10N I.D.
THIS CERTIFIES THAT THIS COPY OF THIS PLAT ACCURATELY DEPICTS THE
N: 858417.56 1 I BOUNDARY OF THE JURISDICTION OF SECTION 404 OF THE CLEAN WATER
E: 1774668.81 ! / ACT AS DETERMINED BY THE UNDERSIGNED ON THIS DATE. UNLESS THERE
If 50' / IS A CHANGE IN THE LAW OR OUR PUBLISHED REGULATIONS, THIS
BUFFER DETERMINATION OF SECTION 4D4 JURISDICTION MAY BE RELIED UPON FOR A
PIN: 7875486429 I '� / PERIOD NOT TO EXCEED FIVE YEARS FROM THIS DATE. THIS DETERMINATION
BELL HOUSE INC. I ff WAS MADE UTILIZING THE 19B7 CORP OF ENGINEERS WETLANDS DELINEATION
EXISTING 68' I l ~� MANUAL
4356 P.G. 1565 DUKE POWER
_E —E P.B. 68, PG. 144 �ASEMENI-
�E�E— I NAME
\� E~E -E-E- I E-E -E -E E [ I ZONE 1 1 ZONE 2`� TITLE
Z2 EXISTING E
�Z2 LFG PIPELINE y� 'IE� e *�` ' DATE
EASEMENT �� �\ I l j Ir a _E—E —ELt-
"r1
l EXISTING
G
~ G ` I �c^ l / N/ SANITARY SEWER
` TEMPORARY
e _ N f EASEMENT
IMPACT AREA
z, -a 72 ~kf
c, WETLAND TYING rf GAS
AREA "B" d� �� , \ i�A r E c -1 G s
n n ~ G 1
tfAl
-30' DISTURBED /A l .STREAM 3 r G
TEMPORARY (TD BE g
^/,�7���_•_ CORRIDOR IMPACT AREA ! OPEN CUT) NEW TEMP,
WORKSPACE
STREAM "2'i
(TO BE
D.B. `OPEN CU
L9 (55.72') TIE
\
REPLANT�t� �- \
a2 AREA PERMANENT \ \ \
CONVERSION AREA \
STREAM "2" LINE TABLE
TEMPORARY IMPACTS:
609 SF - 0.014 ACRES
LINE
I LENGTH
BEARING
L10
25.01'
S61'04'12 "E
L11I
20,49'
S66'33'19 "E
L1 51
1.74'
N78'34'31 "W
L16
3.88'
N85'08'01 "W
L17
4.45'
N61'09'1 7"W
L18
18.96'
N66'38'22 "W
L19
25.50'
N63'58'36 "W
L20
20.42'
N69'56'47 "W
L21
7.87'
N47'08'56 "E
L22
16.24'
S73'22'06 "E
L231
25.97'
S64'08'08 "E
CURVE TABLE
CURVE
BEARING
I CHORD
I RADIUS
C1
I N61'51'16 "W
1 16.59'
145.00'
Stream "2" Temporary Impacts = 64 LF
LEGEND:
ss SANITARY SEWER LINE
___ -_ -- - - SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT
—E—E— OVERHEAD ELECTRICAL
WOODUNE
—G —G— PROPOSED GAS LINE
. • . • -- • -- JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARY
PROPERTY LINE
DUKE POWER EASEMENT
—PROPOSED PNG EASEMENT
- — — — — - TEMP WORKSPACE
~ z1 \ REPLANT
?� AREA
TO" GAS LtN
G G ~G -C
LO
NEW 50'
11 GAS EASEMENT
WETLAND AREA "B" LINE TABLE
PERMANENT CONVERSION IMPACTS:
838 SF - 0,019 ACRES
LINE
LENGTH
BEARING
L9
36,97'
N78'34'31 "W
L10
25,01'
N61'04'12 'W
L11
20,49'
N66'33'19 W
L12
15.33'
N41'03'01 "E
L13
1 45.491
S86'36'26 "W
L1 41
32.05'
556'50'09 "E
© IRON PIPE FOUND
• COMPUTED POINT
0 SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE
EXISTING WETLAND
PERMANENT CONVERSION AREA
TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA
REPLANT AREA
1
i
\' 7'
4
NOTES,
1. DISTURBANCE CORRIDOR IS NOT
TO EXCEED 30' IN WfDTH WITHIN
THE JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES,
UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
2. PIPE INSTALLATION THROUGH
JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARY BY
OPEN CUT,
I
1
1 NEW TEMP.
I WORKSPACE
l 4
�l
� S
y� 1
I � I
1 I
l F, 1
I� I WETLAND \
tI1 (NO
AREA
MPACT)
�:.
� ' -
\`�1�1i1H I Hr1r/r��i
S. 104
4�SEAL `�*
�* �L -4649
�'�rrrrl l l l +� ►����
BUFFER IMPACT: STREAM "2"
LINE
ZONE 1
ZONE 2
PERMANENT CONVERSION
3,274 SQ FT
1,918 SQ FT
TEMPORARY IMPACT
5,588 SQ FT
1,918 SQ FT
REPLANT AREA
2,314 SQ FT
0 SQ FT
BUFFER IMPACT: STREAM "3"
LINE
ZONE 1
ZONE 2
PERMANENT CONVERSION
1,789 SQ FT
233 SQ FT
TEMPORARY IMPACT
3,638 SQ FT
1,275 SQ FT
REPLANT AREA
1,331 SQ FT
0 SQ FT
GRAPHIC SCALE
40 0 20 40
1 inch = 40 it
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT A SURVEY WAS MADE UNDER MY
SUPERVISION AND THAT THE WETLANDS SHOWN HEREON
REFLECTS THE DELINEATION EVIDENCE PRrDED BY S&ME
ENVIRONMENTA SERVICES ON r'
DAVID A. CLARK, PLS L -4649
STREAM "3" LINE TABLE
TEMPORARY IMPACTS:
214 SF - 6.005 ACRES
LINE
LENGTH
BEARING
L1
8.58'
N86'36'26 "E
L2
20.68'
S54'22'38 "W
L3
10.28'
S131 2'34 "W
L4
10.07'
S28'34'24 "E
L5
6.67'
S86'36'26 "W
L6
9.83'
N28'48'07 "W
L7
14.40'
N1 8'20'40 "E
L8
15.24'
N56- 03'14 "E
Stream "3" Temporary Impacts = 41 LF
JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES
OF
GREENSB OR 0 LINE 3 8 6
TRANSMISSION GAS LINE
IR## 0230281
PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS
COMPANY, INC.
GUILFORD COUNTY
GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA
SHEET S OF 8
N.C. License No. C -138
2
Regionai Land Surve y ors, Inc,
8642 WEST MARKET STREET, SUITE 100
GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA 27409
TELEPHONE [phone]

EXISTING 68'
DUKE POWER
EASEMENT
_E- ELE -E -E -E
EXISTING
SANITARY SEWS
EASEMENT
CORPS ACTION I.D.
THIS CERTIFIES THAT THIS COPY OF THIS PLAT ACCURATELY DEPICTS THE
BOUNDARY OF THE JURISDICTION OF SECTION 404 OF THE CLEAN WATER
r 50' ACT AS DETERMINED BY THE UNDERSIGNED ON THIS DATE. UNLESS THERE
BUFFER IS A CHANGE IN THE LAW OR OUR PUBLISHED REGULATIONS, THIS
/ DETERMINATION OF SECTION 404 JURISDICTION MAY BE RELIED UPON FOR A
PERIOD NOT TO EXCEED FIVE YEARS FROM THIS DATE. THIS DETERMINATION
/ WAS MADE UTILIZING THE 1987 CORP OF ENGINEERS WETLANDS DELNEATION
MANUAL
NAME
Ar~ TITLE
ti DATE
zOiy£ r ' 20'
E_Ei' E ZOM£ 2
E~E -E-E-
I I ' E-E_E�
EXISTING
/ LFG PIPELINE
EASEMENT
—7
i' � / G
G G7 rYYY�' - r`rYY -r rr�-r�-r -fY
111 � s G�
tY PROPOSEp 0 " " ~GLI ~G�
E
/ 201 /
i ZOiy£ 2ti !! 3 °'
zp'�� �
I
! ­41 _E'i-E-E
R E~E~E
O
1
BUFFER
LINDER N VENTURES 111,1 LLC. EXISTING METHANE GAS~ c I I :2 c
D.B. 5270 PG. 1784 / n`} ~ G —7 -
P. B. 55 P.G. 41 G
PERMANENT
CONVERSION
AREA t
�G� ! !-
c�
G
TEMPORARY G G G ~G�
IMPACT AREA!! ti° �G
/ Y
I I
STREAM "1"
/ (TO BE BORED)
NO IMPACT +
r! !I R
REPLANT
!!! 1 AREA
I �
!l
! ` Ei I
H �
PIN: 7875676468
GREENSBORO CREDO 11, LLC.
D.B. 4708 PG. 532
I C M
,4r � NEW 50'
� GAS EASEMENT
PIN: 7875679974
DUKE ENERGY
CAROLINAS, LLC.
D.B. 7270 PG. 1048
P.B. 180 P.G. 141
,``1111111 f r rrr!!!��
S
SEAL
*' L --4649 'k
�i <) SURNcl
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT A SURVEY WAS MADE UNDER MY
SUPERVISION AND THAT THE WETLANDS SHOWN HEREON
REFLECTS THE DELINEATION EVIDENCE P&OVIDED BY S &ME
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 9N Z-'13- _
DAVID A. CLARK, PLS L -464
STREAM „1„ LINE TABLE
TEMPORARY IMPACTS:
214 SF - 0.005 ACRES
LINE
LENGTH
BEARING
L1
8.58'
N86'36'26 "E
L2
20.68'
S54'22'38 "W
L3
10.28'
S1312'34 "W
L4
10.07'
S28'34'24 "E
L5
6.67'
56'36'26 "W
L61
9.83'
N28'48'07 "W
L71
14.40'
N18'20'40 "E
L81
15.24'
N56'03'14 "E
Stream "1" Temporary Impacts = 0 LF
Crossing to be Installed via Bore
JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES
OF
GREENSB OR 0 LINE 3 8 6
TRANSMISSION GAS LINE
BUFFER IMPACT:
STREAM „1„
IR# 0230281
PERMANENT CONVERSION
ZONE 1
382 SO FT
1 zo7E 2
217 SO FT
PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS
LEGEND:
TEMPORARY IMPACT 1
3,168 SO FT
1 2,120 SO FT
COMPANY, INC.
© IRON PIPE FOUND
REPLANT AREA
727 SO FTI
0 SQ FT
GUILFORD COUNTY
• COMPUTED POINT
QS SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE
GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA
55 SANITARY SEWER LINE
SHEET 7 OF 8
- - --------- SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT
EXISTING WETLAND
E E OVERHEAD ELECTRICAL
woDDUNE
-
PERMANENT CONVERSION AREA
NOTES:
N.C. Llm se No. C -1362
Regionai S
—G—G— PROPOSED GAS LINE
1. DISTURBANCE CORRIDOR IS NOT
Land urve�Iors Inc.
— • . • . • — JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARY
TO EXCEED 30' IN WIDTH WITHIN
GRAPHIC SCALE
J
—Z1 —Z� — 30' ZONE 1 BUFFER
TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA
UNLE SROTHERWI EL NOTED. IES,
40 D 1 40
8642 WEST MARKET STREET, SUITE 100
— 72 -- z2 --- 50' ZONE 2 BUFFER
GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA 27409
PROPERTY LINE
2. PIPE INSTALLATION THROUGH
JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARY BY
1 inch = 4D &
TELEPHONE (336) 665 --8155
DUKE POWER EASEMENT
REPLANT AREA
OPEN CUT.
^ -- —PROPOSED PNG EASEMENT
JOB : 1227.951 DRAWN BY: JAM DATE: 12/13/2012 1 CREW CHIEF: MW

y.
�> WETLAND
SILT FENCE &
` LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
z
w
s
I°n a SPOIL EXCAVATED
PILE `5' DITCH
y NEW 10" GAS LINE /
LO
G�G
MINIMUM 5 COVER
) DELINEATES
PLUGr\ \ \ \ \yETLpND DISTURBANCE
\ WETLAND`
�.J
TYPICAL WETLAND CROSSING CONSTRUCTION
j_1
r
� 10 SILT FENCE &
e
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
H \ \ A III IIIIIIIII`l. II Illil N 1J
TEMPORARY f "'
w RIDGE OR
SILT ATII��G
p ti PAC I K, I I I I I I EXCAVATED
,5' DITCH
L7 - -c —c G f�• —G `� - -G —� G— G —GNEW GD' GAS LINE
+� �\ X � MINIMUM 5' COVER
HATCHED AREA DELINEATES
� STREAM DI TURBANCE
TYPICAL STREAM /JDD CROSSING CONSTRUCTION
SILT FENCE TO REMAIN UNTIL
GROUND COVER IS REESTABLISHED
z
W
w HATCHED AREA DELINEATES
vo+a COIR MATTING OR ENKAMAT
w ALONG DISTURBED BANKS
y
NEW io' GAS LINE
LO
MINIMUM 5 COVER
.yam \
TYPICAL STREAM /JDD CROSSING REPLACEMENT
LEGEND:
—G —G— PROPOSED GAS LINE
— • — • — . — JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARY
— Z1 — Zt — 30' ZONE 1 BUFFER •
- EXISTING WETLAND
-- z2 -- z2 — 50
' ZONE 2 BUFFER
— — PROPOSED
PNG EASEMENT
W
WETLANDS LIMITS 50' PNG R
\ DISTURBANCE CORRIDOR
.. • W U
SPOIL PILE
PIPELINE
0
a
0
a
%—CORDUROY OR
WETLANDS LIMITS PLAN TIMBER MATS
Ctrs
JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES
50' PNG R Of
DISTURBANCE CORRIDOR GREENSB DR D LINE 3 8 6
TRANSMISSION GAS LINE
IR# 0230281
Zi I la I a PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS
SPOIL PILE 0" f I I COMPANY, INC.
p I GUILFORD COUNTY
GREENSBORO,
N.T.S.
CORDUROY OR
TIMBER MATS
r N.C. License No. C -1362
Region Lal and Surveyors, Inc.
8642 WEST MARKET STREET, SUITE 100
GREENSBORO,
NORTH CAROLINA
SHEET 8 OF 8
PROPOSED-
10'
NORTH CAROLINA 27409
TELEPHONE [phone]
TEMPORARY
BR�DI7a�. 'A I11Na
\ WETLAND`
�.J
TYPICAL WETLAND CROSSING CONSTRUCTION
j_1
r
� 10 SILT FENCE &
e
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
H \ \ A III IIIIIIIII`l. II Illil N 1J
TEMPORARY f "'
w RIDGE OR
SILT ATII��G
p ti PAC I K, I I I I I I EXCAVATED
,5' DITCH
L7 - -c —c G f�• —G `� - -G —� G— G —GNEW GD' GAS LINE
+� �\ X � MINIMUM 5' COVER
HATCHED AREA DELINEATES
� STREAM DI TURBANCE
TYPICAL STREAM /JDD CROSSING CONSTRUCTION
SILT FENCE TO REMAIN UNTIL
GROUND COVER IS REESTABLISHED
z
W
w HATCHED AREA DELINEATES
vo+a COIR MATTING OR ENKAMAT
w ALONG DISTURBED BANKS
y
NEW io' GAS LINE
LO
MINIMUM 5 COVER
.yam \
TYPICAL STREAM /JDD CROSSING REPLACEMENT
LEGEND:
—G —G— PROPOSED GAS LINE
— • — • — . — JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARY
— Z1 — Zt — 30' ZONE 1 BUFFER •
- EXISTING WETLAND
-- z2 -- z2 — 50
' ZONE 2 BUFFER
— — PROPOSED
PNG EASEMENT
W
WETLANDS LIMITS 50' PNG R
\ DISTURBANCE CORRIDOR
.. • W U
SPOIL PILE
PIPELINE
0
a
0
a
%—CORDUROY OR
WETLANDS LIMITS PLAN TIMBER MATS
Ctrs
JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES
50' PNG R Of
DISTURBANCE CORRIDOR GREENSB DR D LINE 3 8 6
TRANSMISSION GAS LINE
IR# 0230281
Zi I la I a PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS
SPOIL PILE 0" f I I COMPANY, INC.
p I GUILFORD COUNTY
GREENSBORO,
N.T.S.
CORDUROY OR
TIMBER MATS
r N.C. License No. C -1362
Region Lal and Surveyors, Inc.
8642 WEST MARKET STREET, SUITE 100
GREENSBORO,
NORTH CAROLINA
SHEET 8 OF 8
PROPOSED-
10'
NORTH CAROLINA 27409
TELEPHONE [phone]
LEGEND:
—G —G— PROPOSED GAS LINE
— • — • — . — JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARY
— Z1 — Zt — 30' ZONE 1 BUFFER •
- EXISTING WETLAND
-- z2 -- z2 — 50
' ZONE 2 BUFFER
— — PROPOSED
PNG EASEMENT
W
WETLANDS LIMITS 50' PNG R
\ DISTURBANCE CORRIDOR
.. • W U
SPOIL PILE
PIPELINE
0
a
0
a
%—CORDUROY OR
WETLANDS LIMITS PLAN TIMBER MATS
Ctrs
JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES
50' PNG R Of
DISTURBANCE CORRIDOR GREENSB DR D LINE 3 8 6
TRANSMISSION GAS LINE
IR# 0230281
Zi I la I a PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS
SPOIL PILE 0" f I I COMPANY, INC.
p I GUILFORD COUNTY
GREENSBORO,
N.T.S.
CORDUROY OR
TIMBER MATS
r N.C. License No. C -1362
Region Lal and Surveyors, Inc.
8642 WEST MARKET STREET, SUITE 100
GREENSBORO,
NORTH CAROLINA
SHEET 8 OF 8
PROPOSED-
10'
NORTH CAROLINA 27409
TELEPHONE [phone]

Appendix IV: Wetland, Stream and Riparian Buffer Impact
Summary Tables

RIPARIAN BUFFER IMPACT TABLE
Greensboro Line 386
Stream
ID
Sheet
No.
Perpendicular
Crossing?
Crossing
Type*
Crossing Notes /Justification
Zone 1 Impacts (sf)
Zone 2 Impacts (sf)
Mitigation
Required?
Area of Zone1 to
be Re- planted
(sf) * **
Net Mitigation
Required **
Temporary
Impact
Permanent
Conversion
Temporary
Impact
Permanent
Conversion
4
3 of 8
No
Conventional
New line parallels an existing ROW
5,921
18
3,542
1,049
Yes
1,521
54
3
6 of 8
Yes
Conventional
New line parallels an existing ROW
3,638
1,789
1,275
233
No
1,331
0
2
6 of 8
No
Conventional
New line parallels an existing ROW
5,588
3,274
1,918
1,918
Yes
2,314
9,822
1
7 of 8
Yes
Trenchless
Buffalo Creek
3,178
382
2,120
217
No
727
0
Totals:
18,325
j 5,463
j 8,855
j 3,417
j 0
j 5,893
9,876
* Trenchless Crossings include boring or use of horizontal directional drill (HDD) that will not impact the jurisdictional feature.
** Net mitigation required for non - perpendicular crossings = (total area of Zone 1 permanent conversion - mitigateable wetland area) x 3. Impacts to Zone 2 do not require mitigation, as the area will consist of a grassed right -of -way with no aboveground
structures or imperveous surface.

STREAM IMPACT TABLE
Greesnboro Line 386
Stream
ID
Sheet
No.
Classification
Average
Width ft
Temp.
Impact If
Perpendicular
Crossing?
Crossing
Type*
Justification
4
3 of 8
Perennial RPW
10
50
No
Conventional
New line parallels existing ROW
3
6 of 8
Perennial RPW
8
41
Yes
Conventional
New line parallels existing ROW
2
6 of 8
Perennial RPW
12
64
No
Conventional
New line parallels existing ROW
1
7 of 8
Perennial RPW
70
0
Yes
Trenchless
N/A
Total:
155
* Trenchless Crossings include boring or use of horizontal directional drill (HDD) that will not impact the stream.

WETLAND IMPACT TABLE
Greensboro Line 386
Wetland
ID
Sheet
No.
Classification
Impacts
Crossing Type*
Vegetative Type
Relation to
Waterbody
Temporary Impacts
Permanent Conversion
sf
ac
sf
ac
G
2 of 8
Forested /Herbaceous
Riparian
5,871
0.135
677
0.016
Conventional
F
3 of 8
Herbaceous
Riparian
399
0.009
0
0.000
Conventional
E
4 of 8
Forested /Herbaceous
Riparian
2,717
0.062
647
0.015
Conventional
D
5 of 8
Forested /Herbaceous
Riparian
753
0.017
1,192
0.027
Conventional
C
-
Herbaceous
Riparian
0
0.000
0
0.000
Avoided
B
6 of 8
Forested /Herbaceous
Riparian
0
0.000
838
0.019
Conventional
A
-
Forested /Herbaceous
Riparian
0
0.000
0
0.000
Avoided
Totals:
9,740
0.224
3,354
0.077

Appendix V: Agency Scoping Correspondence

FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636 -3726
February 24, 2012
Joey Lawler
S &ME, Inc.
9751 Southern Pine Boulevard
Charlotte, NC 28273 -5560
Re: PNG ( =reer chart, pet rofit Project (SR�?!/TF F,c?jPr,tNo.:'357 -12 -002) -- Guildford County,
NC
Dear Mr. Lawler:
This letter is to inform you that a list of all federally- protected endangered and threatened species
with known occurrences in North Carolina is now available on the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service's (Service) web page at http: / /www.fws.gov/i-aleigli. Therefore, if you have projects that
occur within the Raleigh Field Office's area of responsibility (see attached county list), you no
longer need to contact the Raleigh Field Office for a list of federal ly= protected species.
Our web page contains a complete and frequently updated list of all endangered and threatened
species protected by the provisions of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16
U.S.C. 1531 et seq.)(Act), and a list of federal species of concern' that are known to occur in
each county in North Carolina.
Section 7 of the Act requires that all federal agencies (or their designated non- federal
representative), in consultation with the Service, insure that any action federally authorized,
fiunded, or carried out by such agencies is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any
federally- listed endangered or threatened species. A biological assessment or evaluation may be
prepared to fulfill that requirement and in determining whether additional consultation with the
Service is necessary. In addition to the federally- protected species list, information on the
species' life histories and habitats and information on connpleting a biological assessment or
evaluation and can be found on our web page at http: / /www.fws.gov /raleigh. Please check the
web site often for updated information or changes.
The term "federal species of concern" refers to those species which the Service believes might be in need of
concentrated conservation actions. Federal species of concern receive no legal protection and their designation does
not necessarily imply that the species will eventually be proposed for listing as a federally endangered or threatened
species. However, we recommend that all practicable measures be taken to avoid - orminimize adverse impacts to
federal species of concern.

If your project contains suitable habitat for any of the federally- listed species known to be
present within the county where your project occurs, the proposed action has the potential to
adversely affect those species. As such, we recommend that surveys be conducted to determine
the species' presence or absence within the project area. The use of North Carolina Natural
Heritage program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys.
If you determine that the proposed action may affect (i.e., likely to adversely affect or not likely
to adversely affect) a federally - protected species, you should notify this office with your
determination, the results of your surveys, survey methodologies, and an analysis of the effects
of the action on listed species, including consideration of direct, indirect, and cumulative effects,
before conducting any activities that might affect the species. If you determine that the proposed
action will have no effect (i.e., no beneficial or adverse, direct or indirect effect) on federally
listed species, then you are not required to contact our office for concurrence (unless an
Environmental Impact Statement is prepared). However, you should maintain a complete record
of the assessment, including steps leading to your determination of effect, the qualified personnel
conducting the assessment, habitat conditions, site photographs, and any other related articles.
With regard to the above - referenced project, we offer the following remarks. Our comments are
submitted pursuant to, and in accordance with, provisions of the Endangered Species Act.
Based on the information provided and other information available, it appears that the proposed
action is not likely to adversely affect any federally- listed endangered or threatened species, their
formally designated critical habitat, or species currently proposed for listing under the Act at
these sites. We believe that the requirements of section 7(a)(2) of the Act have been satisfied for
your project. Please remember that obligations under section 7 consultation must be
reconsidered if: (1) new information reveals impacts of this identified action that may affect
listed species or critical habitat in a manner not previously considered; (2) this action is
subsequently modified in a manner that was not considered in this review; or, (3) a new species
is listed or critical habitat determined that may be affected by the identified action.
However, the Service is concerned about the potential impacts the proposed action might have
on aquatic species. Aquatic resources are highly susceptible to sedimentation. Therefore, we
recommend that all practicable measures be taken to avoid adverse impacts to aquatic species,
including implementing directional boring methods and stringent sediment and erosion control
measures. An erosion and sedimentation control plan should be submitted to and approved by
the North Carolina Division of Land Resources, Land Quality Section prior to constriction.
Erosion and sedimentation controls should be installed and maintained between the construction
site and any nearby down - gradient surface waters. In addition, we recommend maintaining
natural, vegetated buffers on all streams and creeks adjacent to the project site.
The North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission has developed a Guidance Memorandum (a
copy can be found on our website at (http: / /www.fws.gov /raleigh) to address and mitigate
secondary and cumulative impacts to aquatic and terrestrial wildlife resources and water quality.
We recommend that you consider this document in the development of your projects and in
completing an initiation package for consultation (if necessary).
2

We hope you find our web page useful and informative and that following the process described
above will reduce the time required, and eliminate the need, for general correspondence for
species' lists. If you have any questions or comments, please contact John Ellis of this office at
(919) 856 -4520 ext. 26.
Sincerely,
a
Pet Benjamin
Field Supervisor

List of Counties in the Service's Raleigh Field Office Area of Responsibility
Alamance
Beaufort
Bel-tie
Bladen
Brunswick
Camden
Carteret
Caswell
Chatham
Chowan
Columbus
Craven
Cumberland
Currituck
Dare
Duplin
Durham
Edgecombe
Franklin
Gates
Granville
Greene
Guilford
Halifax
Harnett
Hertford
Hoke
Hyde
Johnston
Jones
Lee
Lenoir
Martin
Montgomery
Moore
Nash
New Hanover
Northampton
Onslow
Orange
Pamlico
Pasquotank
Pender
LI
Perquimans
Person
Pitt
Randolph
Richmond
Robeson
Rockingham
Sampson
Scotland
Tyrrell
Vance
Wake
Warren
Washington
Wayne
Wilson

North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Office of Conservation, Planning, and Community Affairs
Beverly Eaves Perdue Linda Pearsall Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
February 7, 2012
Mr. Joey Lawler
S &ME, Inc.
9751 Southern Pine Boulevard
Charlotte, NC 28273 -5560
Subject: PNG Greensboro Retrofit Project; Greensboro, Guilford County
S &ME Project No. 1357 -12 -002
Dear Mr. Lawler:
The Natural Heritage Program has no record of rare species, sib ificant natural communities, significant natural heritage
areas, or conservation /managed areas at the project site nor within 0.65- mile of the project area. Although our maps do
not show records of such natural heritage elements in the project area, it does not necessarily mean that they are not
present. It may simply mean that the area has not been surveyed. The use of Natural Heritage Program data should not be
substituted for actual field surveys, particularly if the project area contains suitable habitat for rare species, significant
natural communities, or priority natural areas.
You may wish to check the Natural Heritage Program database website at www.ncnhp.org for a listing of rare plants and
animals and significant natural communities in the county and on the quad map. Our Program also has a new website that
allows users to obtain information on element occurrences and significant natural heritage areas within two miles of a
given location: <http: / /nllpweb.enr. state. nc. us / public /virtual_ workroom.phtml >. The user name is "guest" and the
password is your, e -mail address (see instructions on log-in screen). You may want to click "Help" for more information.
Please do not hesitate to contact me at 919-707-860' ) if you have questions or need further information.
Sincerely,
Harry E. LeGrand, Jr., Zoologist
Natural Heritage Program
Mailing address: 1601 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699 -1601
Location: 217 W. Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27604
Phone: 919 - 707 -8600 Webpage: www.oneNCNaturally.org
An Equal opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer
One
NoAhCarohna. IfIr
IVit
a,
Natural Resources Planning and Conservation

STA7p o,
C�
North Carolina (Department of Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M.Bartos, Administrator
Beverly Eaves Perdue, Governor
Linda A. Carlisle, Secretary
Jeffrey). Crow, Deputy Secretary
February 17, 2012
Joey Lawler
S &ME, Inc.
9751 Southern Pine Boulevard
Charlotte, NC 28273 -5560
Office of Archives and I Iistory
Division of I Iistorical Resources
David Brook, Director
Re: Install Natural Gas Pipeline at the Intersection of Yanceyville Street and Cone Boulevard, Greensboro,
S &ME 1357 -12 -002, Guilford County, ER 12 -0175
Dear Mr. Lawler:
Thank you for your letter of January 31, 2012, concerning the above project.
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected by
the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory= Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR
Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
please contact Renee Gledhill- Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919 -807 -6579. In all future
communication concerning this project, please cite the above - referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
I Ramona M. Bartos
Location: 109 Bast Joncs Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 46'17 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 37699 -4617 Telephone /Fax: (9'19) 807 - 6570/807 -6599

Appendix VI: Restoration Plan and
Mitigation Acceptance Letter

RESTORATION PLAN
Greensboro Line 386
Greensboro, North Carolina
The proposed project has been designed to avoid and minimize jurisdictional impacts
where practicable. As part of mitigation for unavoidable impacts, the following plan is
proposed for implementation to restore temporarily- affected wetlands and streams. This
plan entails restoration of temporarily- disturbed areas to their original contours and
conditions to the degree practicable upon project completion. Further, it specifies that
disturbed wetland areas and streambanks will be permanently stabilized with a native
vegetative cover, and affected streambanks planted with woody species. The measures
outlined below will be specified in the contract documents prepared for construction of the
proposed project.
Proposed restoration activities include removal of temporarily- placed fill material and
restoration of original pre- disturbance contours. Excavated material shall be returned to
the trench to the extent possible, and remaining material relocated and retained on an
upland site. Excavated topsoil shall be stockpiled separately and then replaced uniformly
over the area of excavation from which it was removed. The native seed mix identified in
Table 1 below shall be utilized within temporarily- disturbed portions of the corridor
comprised of wetlands.
Table 1: Wetland Seed Mix
Species
Common Name
Percentage of Mix
Elymus ripanus
Riverbank wild rye
20
Agrostis stolonifera
Creeping bentgrass
15
Carex vulpinoidea
Fox sedge
12
Panicum virgatum
Switchgrass
15
Poa palustris
Fowl bluegrass
15
Dichanthelium clandestinum
Deer tongue
08
Bidens aristosa
Bidens
04
Juncus effusus, NC Ecotype
Soft rush
04
Aster lateriflorus
Calico aster
03
Sagittaria latifolia
Duck potato
02
I!t ce rnuus
Lizards tail
02
100
Wetland Seed Mix to be applied to all wetland areas extending five feet landward following construction.
Recommended application rate: 20 -25 lbs. per acre.
The Wetland Seed Mix shall be applied to all wetland areas extending five feet landward
following construction. The Recommended application rate is 20 -25 lbs. per acre.

Restoration Plan S &ME Project No. 1357 -12 -002
Greensboro Line 386 January 2013
At temporarily- affected streambanks and portions of the Zone 1 buffer, the native riparian seed
mix specified in Table 2 below shall be utilized.
Table 2: Riparian Seed Mix*
Species
Common Name
Percentage of Mix
Elymus virginicus
Virginia wild rye
15
Panicum virgatum
Switchgrass
15
Agrostis stolinifera
Creeping bentgrass
10
Rudbeckia hirta, NC ecotype
Black -eyed Susan
10
Coreopsis lanceolata
Lance leaf tickseed
10
Panicum clandestinum
Deer tongue
10
Andropogon gerardii
Big bluestem
05
Juncus effusus
Soft rush
05
Echinochloa muricata
Awned barnyard grass
05
Schizachyrium scoparium
Little bluestem
05
Sorghastrum nutans
Indian grass
05
Tripsacum dactyloides
Gamma grass
05
competitor.
Lolium
100
Riparian Seed Mix to be applied to all disturbed streambanks, extending five feet landward following construction.
Recommended application rate: 20 -25 lbs. per acre
To provide quicker cover, the mixes specified in Tables 1 and 2 should also be augmented with
the appropriate cover /companion species, as identified in Table 3.
Table 3: Cover /Companion Crops
Species
Common
Season
Mix
Notes:
Festuca
3 -5 Ibs /acre;
Weak competitor; does not
brevipila
Hard fescue
Fall, Winter
20%
interfere with native grasses.
Shade tolerant.
Festuca ovina
Sheep
Fall, Winter
3 -5 Ibs /acre;
fescue
20%
Secale cereale
Ceareal or
Early Spring
30 Ibs /acre
Grows 3 -4' tall, but not a strong a
Winter rye
or Fall
competitor.
Lolium
Spring,
Shorter rye; lasts about 2 years,
perenne
Perennial rye
Summer
20 -50%
then dies out.
Foxtail or
Spring,
Good germination; dies off with
Setaria italica
German
o
20-50%
Millet
Summer
frost; does not tolerate mowing.
Use of annual rye ( Lolium multiflorum) is not recommended, as it competes with native
grasses for water and nutrients.
Additionally, affected banks of stream crossings shall be stabilized with coir matting and re-
vegetated using native woody species. In the event that restoration of the temporarily -
impacted streams occurs during the dormant season, woody plantings should consist of a
combination of livestake and bare root species (Table 4). In the event that restoration takes
place during the growing season, plantings identified in Table 4 should also include an
appropriate mix of containerized species (Table 5).

Restoration Plan SWE Project No. 1357 -12 -002
Greensboro Line 386 January 2013
Table 4: Live Stake and Bare Root Species*
Species
Common Name
Plant Spacing
Cornus amomum
Silky dogwood
2 feet on center
Physocarpos opulifolius
Ninebark
3 feet on center
Salix caroliniana
Carolina willow
1 foot on center
Salix nigra
Black willow
1 foot on center
Salix sericea
Silky willow
2 feet on center
Sambucus canadensis
Elderberry
3 feet on center
Symphoricarpos orbiculata
Coral Berry
2 feet on center
'For use when planting during the dormant season. Select at least three of the listed species.
Table 5: Containerized Species Composition*
Species
Common Name
Plant Spacing
Alnus serrulta
Tag alder
5 feet on center
Aronia arbutifolia
Red chokeberry
5 feet on center
Callicarpa Americana
Beautyberry
5 feet on center
Carpinus caroliniana
Ironwood
5 feet on center
Cercis canadensis
Redbud
5 feet on center
Cornus amomum
Silky dogwood
5 feet on center
Fraxinus caroliniana
Carolina ash
5 feet on center
Lindera benzoin
Spicebush
5 feet on center
Ilex verticillata
Winterberry
5 feet on center
Persea borbonia
Redbay
5 feet on center
Sambucus Canadensis
Elderberry
5 feet on center
'For use when planting during the growing season. Select at least two of the listed species.
Temporarily affected portions of the Zone 1 buffer shall also be re- planted with the species
identified in Table 5, or with appropriate substitutions..
Substitutions to the species identified in Tables 3 and 4 may be made based on availability
and approval of S &ME.
North Carolina Suppliers of native seed and plant material:
Mellow Marsh Farm
1312 Woody Store Road
Siler City, N.C. 27344
919.742.1200
919.742.1280 fax
www.mellowmarshfarm.com
Natives
550 East Westinghouse Boulevard
Charlotte, N.C. 28273
688.527.1177
plants(a)- plantnative. net

r�
Ecosystem
PROGRAM
January 2, 2013
Jim Kalish, PE
Piedmont Natural Gas
4720 Piedmont Row Drive
Charlotte, NC 28210
Project: Greensboro Line 386 Project
Expiration of Acceptance: July 2, 2013
County: Guilford
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is willing to accept
payment for compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced project as indicated in the table below. Please
note that this decision does not assure that participation in the NCEEP will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation
for project impacts. It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact these agencies to determine if payment to the NCEEP will be
approved. You must also comply with all other state, federal or local government permits, regulations or authorizations associated
with the proposed activity including SL 2009 -337: An Act to Promote the Use of Compensatory Mitigation Banks as amended by
S.L. 2011 -343.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not received a copy of the
issued 404 Permit /401 Certification /CANIA permit within this time frame, this acceptance will expire. It is the applicant's
responsibility to send copies of the permits to NCEEP. Once NCEEP receives a copy of the permit(s) an invoice will be issued based
on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must be made prior to conducting the authorized work. The amount of the In-
Lieu Fee to be paid to NCEEP by an applicant is calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed at www.nceep.net.
Based on the information supplied by you in your request to use the NCEEP, the impacts that may require compensatory mitigation are
summarized in the following table. The amount of mitigation required for this impact is determined by permitting agencies.
Impact
River
Basin
CU
Location
Stream (feet)
Wetlands (acres)
Buffer I
(Sq. Ft.)
Buffer II
(Sq. Ft.)
Cold
Cool
Warm
Riparian
Non- Riparian
Coastal Marsh
Jordan (Haw)
Cape Fear
03030002
0
0
0
0
0
0
9,876
0
Upon receipt of payment, EEP will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. The mitigation will be performed in
accordance with the N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources' Ecosystem Enhancement Program In -Lieu Fee
Instrument dated July 28, 2010.
Thank you for your interest in the NCEEP. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Kelly Williams at
(919) 707 -8915.
Sincerely,
#AingKlimek
irect or
cc: Karen Higgins, NCDWQ Wetlands /401 Unit
Sue Homewood, NCDWQ - Winston -Salem
Joey Lawler, agent
File
NIKAJ
Rutor�Kg... NCDENR
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699 -1652 / 919 - 919 - 707 -8976 / www.nceep.net