20050054 Ver 3_401 Application_20130107

OS-0054 03
PARKS RECREATION AND CULTURAL RESOURCES DEPARTMENT
January 7, 2013
Subject: Indian Creek Greenway- neighborhood connection
Division of Water Quality
NC Department of Natural Resources
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699 -1650
Dear Karen Higgins,
Attached is a PCN and supporting documents for Riparian Buffer Authorization for impacts to
riparian buffer associated with a proposed greenway trail.
PROJECT LOCATION:
The site is located approximately % miles north of Morrisville Carpenter Drive. The connection is
located off Piper Stream Circle, within Twin Lakes Subdivision, section Seal Harbor and East
Hampton, in Cary, North Carolina. The current site plan is based on the general layout
submitted to you previously by the Nau Company, PLLC for buffer and stream impacts
associated with the first segment of the connector trail constructed by the Twin Lakes
subdivision developer. That segment was approved as part of DWQ Project # 2005- 0054v2;
Twin Lakes SW BMP and Greenway Trail; dated June 28, 2011.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The proposed 125' trail improvement will connect an existing trail connection from Piper Stream
Circle to existing Indian Creek Greenway. The trail is within a 30' wide water and sewer
easement and /or a 70 ft. wide overhead power transmission line easement. The land is
currently owned by Twin Lakes Master Association as common open space. The trail will be
concrete with a proposed boardwalk section to bridge the creek. The trail will connect into the
existing Indian Creek Greenway.
PROJECT SUMMARY
The project will cause the following buffer impacts:
Zone 1: 426 SF (permanent) and 1266 SF (temporary).
Zone 2: 290 SF (permanent) and 626 SF (temporary).
A temporary timber crossing and permanent boardwalk will be used to cross the stream with no
temporary or permanent impact. The trail is located in a cleared utility corridor, minimizing new
impacts to buffer vegetation.
Please feel free to contact me at (919) 460 -4973 or amy.mackintosh(a)-townofcary.org if you
have questions about this application.
Sincerely, �fRk���/
JAN
7 2013
Amy Mackintosh, PLA
Landscape Architect
TOWN Of CARY
316 N. Academy St. -Cary, NC 27513 -PO Box 8005 -Cary, NC 27512 -8005
te1919- 469 -4061 - fax 919 - 469 - 4344 9 www.townofcary.org

\ -ot V�IATl9QG
o
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre - Construction Notification C Form
A. Appheant Information
1. Processing
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
❑Section 404 Permit ❑Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes
❑ No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ® Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
❑ Yes ❑ No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ❑ No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program
El Yes
®No
1 g Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes
® No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2. Project Information
2a Name of project-
Indian Creek Greenway Connector
2b County:
Wake
2c. Nearest municipality / town:
Cary
2d. Subdivision name:
Twin Lakes Subd. -Seal Harbor and East Hampton
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
N/ A
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed.
Twin Lakes Master Association, Inc.
3b Deed Book and Page No.
DB 12893, BK 1001
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d. Street address:
c/o PPM Inc., 6739 Falls of Neuse Rd
3e. City, state, zip:
Raleigh, NC 27615
3f. Telephone no:
919 - 848 -4911
3g Fax no.*
919- 870 -7241
3h. Email address:
TWitliams @ppmral com
Page 1 of 11
PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a Applicant is:
® Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name,
Amy Mackintosh
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
Town of Cary- Parks, Recreation & Cultural Resources
4d. Street address:
316 North Academy Street
4e. City, state, zip,
Cary, NC 27513
4f. Telephone no.:
919 - 460 -4973
4g. Fax no.:
919 - 469 -4344
4h. Email address:
[e-mail]
S. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
5c Street address
5d. City, state, zip:
5e Telephone no.:
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address-
Page 2 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
0745668983 & 0745761566
Latitude: - 78.8414165 deg Longitude: -
1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees).
Long= 35.8295639 deg.
(DD DDDDDD) ( -DD DDDDDD)
1c. Property size:
2.78 Acres &2.24 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
proposed project*
Un -named Tributary to Crabtree Creek
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
030402,27-33-(10), C, NSW
2c. River basin:
Neuse
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application-
Twin Lakes neighborhood connection to Indian Creek Greenway. This is a "gap" within the Town of Cary Greenway
system.The land will be dedicated to the Town of Cary in the future. See Twin Lakes Subdivision Area #4 and Area 9,
Sheet C -1, dated 2012- 10 -15.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property.
Not Applicable (N /A)
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property.
Approx. 440 LF
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
This portion of the Indian Creek Greenway Connector will provide active and passive recreational opportunities to
residents, as well as complete a pedestrian travel route from Airport Blvd to Town Hall Drive. This section will make a
final connection from Piper Stream Circle to existing Indian Creek Greenway.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The proposed 125 LF trail improvement will connect ex. neighborhood section to Indian Creek Greenway.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
®Yes [3 No ❑Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
4b If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
❑preliminary ®Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency /Consultant Company: S &EC
Name (if known): Todd Preuninger
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation
USACE JD issued Feb. 10, 2004 (AID 200420379). NC DWQ Buffer confirmation Sept. 24, 2003.
S. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
DWQ Project # 2005- 0054v2
Page 3 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain
Page 4 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands ❑ Streams - tributaries ® Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2 Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e
2f
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary
W1 ❑ P ❑ T
N/A
N/A
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Corps
❑ DWQ
W2 ❑ POT
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
N/A
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e
3f
3g
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) ) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 ❑P [IT
PER
F1 Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S2 ❑ P FIT
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S5 ❑ P [IT
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
0
31. Comments: Trail will cross stream on boardwalk - no impact
Page 5 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lake §, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a
Open water
impact number —
Permanent (P)
or Temporary
4b
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody type
4e
Area of impact (acres)
01 ❑P ❑T
N/A
02 ❑P ❑T
03 ❑P ❑T
04 ❑P ❑T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
S. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below
5a.
Pond ID
number
5b.
Proposed use or purpose of
pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
N/A
P2
R Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required
❑ Yes No If yes, permit ID no.
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j Size of pond watershed (acres).
5k Method of construction:
Page 6 of 11
PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
® Neuse ❑ Tar - Pamlico ❑ Other:
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f. .
6g.
Buffer impact
number —
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P)
for impact
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
or Temporary
required?
B1 ®P ❑ T
Greenway
Extension
Unnamed Tributary
® Nos
426
290
B2 ❑ P ®T
Grading
Unnamed Tributary
® Nos
1266
626
B3 ❑P ❑T
El Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
1692
916
6i. Comments.
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Trail and grading are located in existing cleared utility line easements (overhead power, water, sewer) to minimize new buffer
disturbance. Boardwalk is used to cross stream without impact.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Timber bridge used for temporary stream crossing for construction - no stream impact. Tree fence and silt fence will be used
to avoid impacts to stream and existing woods in buffer areas adjacent to the disturbed area.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
❑ Yes ® No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project?
❑ Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
Page 7 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f Non- riparian wetland mitigation requested-
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested.
acres
4h. Comments:
S. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h Comments:
Page 8 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
® Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1b If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
® Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
3%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ® No
2c If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why. The disturbed area for the project is less
than 1 acre and the impervious surface is less than 15% so the project is exempt from stormwater management plan
requirements.
2d If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan
® Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
❑ Phase 11
3b. Which of the following locally - implemented stormwater management programs
® NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply)-
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
4a. Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ HQW
❑ ORW
(check all that apply)
❑ Session Law 2006 -246
❑ Other
4b Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 9 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the
® Yes ❑ No
use of public (federal /state) land?
lb If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b Is this an after - the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s)-
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non- discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Not applicable - no wastewater generated
Page 10 of 11
PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

S. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ❑ No
impacts?
5c If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Raleigh
❑ Asheville
5d What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would Impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
N/A
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitats
❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
N/A
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g , National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
N/A
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA- designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? DFIRM Panel 0745; Eff. Date: 5/2/2006
Amy Mackintosh
��
1/4/2013
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
pplicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided
Page 11 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

# \ }�\
\ \ \�\
\ } \ \\
!)[ |s
{ :!9)
` \ ® }\
[El;2
k \\} \\
;t
}
\
m-l-ON

NOW.. Home Wake County Real Estate Data iMaps
Account Summary Tax Bills
P=q Real Estate ID 0378666 PIN # 0745668983
Wfi&E Location Address Property Description Account
0 PIPER STREAM CIR COS SEAL HARBOR & EAST HAMPTON @ TWIN Search
COUNTY LAKES PH1C BM2006 -01516
Pin /Parcel History New Search --
NOILT i CAROLINA Account I Buildings I Land I Deeds I Notes I Sales I Photos I Tax Bill I Map
Property Owner
Owner's Mailing Address
Property Location Address
SANDLER AT TWIN LAKES LLC
448 VIKING DR STE 220
0 PIPER STREAM CIR
(Use the Deeds link to view any additional owners)
VIRGINIA BEACH VA
CARY NC -
VCS 05CA041
23452 -7331
Assessed
Administrative Data
Transfer Information
Assessed Value
Old Map # 427 -
Map /Scale 074511
Deed Date 8/31/2004
Land Value $600
VCS 05CA041
Book & Page 10998 0621
Assessed
City CARY
Revenue Stamps
Bldg. Value
Fire District
Pkg Sale Date
Assessed
Township CEDAR FORK
Pkg Sale Price
Land Class VACANT
Land Sale Date
ETJ CA
Land Sale Price
Tax Relief
Spec Dist(s)
Zoning R/RP
Improvement Summary
Land Use Value
History ID 1
Use Value Deferment
History ID 2 -
Total Units 0
Historic Deferment
Acreage 2.78
Recycle Units 0
Total Deferred Value
Permit Date
Apt/SC Sqft
Permit #
Heated Area
Use /Hist/Tax Relief
Assessed
Total Value $600
Assessed*
*Wake County assessed real estate values reflect the market value as of January 1, 2008, which is the date of the last county-
wide revaluation. Any inflation, deflation or other economic changes occurring after this date do not affect the assessed value
of the property and cannot be lawfully considered when reviewing the value for adjustment. The January 1, 2008 values
remain in effect until the next county -wide revaluation, which is currently performed every eight years. New accounts created
after the 2008 tax year and new construction built after January 1, 2008 are assessed according to the 2008 schedule of
values.
For questions regarding the information displayed on this site, please contact the Revenue Department at
[e-mail] or call 919 -856 -5400.
http: // services. wakegov .com /realestate /Account.asp ?id= 0378666 1/7/2013

Home Wake County Real Estate Data
Account Summary
Real Estate ID 0379308 PIN # 0745761566
WAMLocation Address
0 ROPE WALK CT
COUNTY
NORTH CAIXOLT14A Account I Buildings I Lan
Property Description
COS BEDFORD @ TWIN LAKES PH2 BM2006 -00484
Pin /Parcel History New Search -
Land
Deeds I Notes I Sales I Photos I Tax Bill I Map
imus
Tax Bills
Account
Search
i
Property Owner
TWIN LAKES MASTER ASSN INC
(Use the Deeds link to view any additional owners)
Owner's Mailing Address
3209 GRESHAM LAKE RD
STE 160
RALEIGH NC 27615 -3759
Property Location Address
0 ROPE WALK CT
MORRISVILLE NC -
Administrative Data
Transfer Information
Assessed Value
Old Map # 427- -
Map /Scale 074511
Deed Date 12/2812007
Land Value $720
VCS 05CA042
Book & Page 12893 1001
Assessed
City CARY
Revenue Stamps
Bldg. Value
Fire District
Pkg Sale Date
Assessed
Township CEDAR FORK
Pkg Sale Price
Land Class VACANT
Land Sale Date
ETJ CA
Land Sale Price
Tax Relief
Spec Dist(s)
Zoning R/RP
Improvement Summary
Land Use Value
History ID 1
Use Value Deferment
History ID 2
Total Units 0
Historic Deferment
Acreage 2.24
Recycle Units 0
Total Deferred Value
Permit Date
Apt/SC Sqft
Permit #
Heated Area
Use /Hist/Tax Relief
Assessed
Total Value $720
Assessed*
*Wake County assessed real estate values reflect the market value as of January 1, 2008, which is the date of the last county-
wide revaluation. Any inflation, deflation or other economic changes occurring after this date do not affect the assessed value
of the property and cannot be lawfully considered when reviewing the value for adjustment. The January 1, 2008 values
remain in effect until the next county-wide revaluation, which is currently performed every eight years. New accounts created
after the 2008 tax year and new construction built after January 1, 2008 are assessed according to the 2008 schedule of
values.
For questions regarding the information displayed on this site, please contact the Revenue Department at
RevHelp(cbwakegov.com or call 919 - 856 -5400.
http: // services. wakegov .com /realestate /Account.asp ?id= 0379308 1/7/2013

n t \ \ v v \ \� \� li �• / 34
s
L 1 `
S I
350 ?y_
jr
34 � C'� - { m ' -'� % - -1 1 j' /�`Vl � '� q J / ! ±-� `j � � } •' I `' ,_•/ I f 41 .) j I
v
+ � w
�I
i
i
3051-1
r�
V O
0
Indian Creek Greenway Trail Connection
USGS Cary NC Quadrangle

- �,1 `�` � ;t .. ;` -�'�, 7� ,:fir•
�• t" its; - '� `.,p�,.;, ";, �` >;
ii.., :, :st.. - ._;✓"` .: :Yt .. <1t., si_ a7�._-:.!�ir n...x "�� ��.ata
�7;`l. �". •�'�'�'� \ T'. fir' •.� .h 't :'.`'•7����f y = �.... _l';.'�' t. R �"y�
•-E. \\ F K' �V 4 Y �. ,� �y �' .yam- .•, y' �F .I:' �1,' � �
�M RIO
ki .i3��'�:-i;f��•`.wriSL.'���%.c :ror�.:',.._;'f� ��� ,�f'•,_ - ,.fi h ����..

TOWN OF CARY APPROVAL NOTES:
1. No changes to any aspect of this site plan, including but not limited to,
landscaping, grading, architectural design, (especially colors), lighting:, or utilities
shall be made without the approval of the Development Review Committee of the
Town of Cary.
2. New boardwalks will require building permits from the Town of Cary Inspections
and Permits Department.
SITE NOTES
1. Scope of Work: The work includes three segments of new paved trail to complete connections to existing asphalt trails and
public roads. The new pavement includes asphalt and concrete of widths varying from 6' to 10'. The scope includes selective
tree clearing and grubbing, grading, demolition of existing asphalt paving, storm drainage, erosion control, asphalt and
concrete paving, concrete boardwalk, and permanent seeding.
2. Concrete Boardwalk: See Sheets PT01 -PT04 for concrete boardwalk system for Indian Creek greenway crossing.
3. Site Access: Use the construction access points listed below for all construction access to each site. Provide gravel
construction entrance at edge of pavement. Limit construction staging and parking to the minimum needed to perform the
work. Do not block traffic or driveways.
Downing Village Trail Connection: Access from Downing Glen Blvd. and /or Seymour Place. Provide gravel construction
entrance at access point(s) from these roads.
Indian Creek Trail Connection: Access from Singer Way cul -de -sac via existing Indian Creek Greenway. Do not use
developer built 6' asphalt greenway from Piper Stream Circle. Provide temporary stream crossing to access construction area
on west side of stream channel.
Grace Park Trail Connection: Access from sidewalk along Lake Grove Blvd.
4. Existing Paved Greenway Trail: Provide signage and temporary fencing to close existing greenways adjacent to work areas
during construction activities. Reopen the existing Indian Creek Greenway trail for public use at end of each working day.
5. Trail and Misc Paving: Install asphalt and concrete trail according to details and specifications.
6. Also see General Construction Notes.
GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES:
1. Contractor to locate all utilities prior to construction.
2. Any discrepancies in plans to be brought to Landscape Architect's attention for resolution prior to construction.
3. All materials demolished or removed to be disposed of in a legal manner off site.
4. There are no existing floodplains within this project.
5. All storm drain frames, grates & hoods should be stamped with "Drains to River" in accordance with Town of
Cary Standards.
6. Erosion control review and inspection will be addressed by North Carolina Department of Environment, Health
and Natural Resources not the Town of Cary.
7. The project will meet all of the requirements relative to Best Management Practices and Engineered Stormwater
Control Structures as outlined in the Town of Cary Land Development Ordinance (Chapter 4, Part 4.6, LDO).
8. Unless explicitly specified on this site plan, the development of this project, including any subsequent site plans,
shall comply with the Cary Land Development Ordinance (LDO) and all other applicable regulations and
guidelines. In the event of a discrepancy between this approved site plan and the applicable regulations or
guidelines, and absent clarification or approval of such stated on this site plan or other related approval, the
applicable regulation or guideline shall apply.
9. Contractor shall confine construction activity to within limits of construction.
10. Existing survey points are from field survey by Town of Cary Engineering Department in November /December
2012. Existing contours were manually interpolated and are approximate. No underground utilities were located
as part of the survey.
GREENWAY CONSTRUCTION NOTES:
1. TRAIL SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED PER PLANS AND ACCORDING TO ALL OTHER PERTINENT
DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS.
2. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONFINE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY TO WITHIN LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE.
3. CONTRACTOR SHALL CALL FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.
4. PROPOSED PAVEMENT SHALL MEET EXISTING PAVEMENT FLUSH.
5. TRAIL TO EXHIBIT 2% CROSS SLOPE TOWARDS LOW SIDE UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED ON GRADING PLAN.
6. THE TOWN OF CARY SITE INSPECTOR OR GEO- TECHNICAL ENGINEER SHALL PROOF ROLL
GREENWAY TRAIL PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF FABRIC AND 6" OF CRUSHED STONE. TRAIL SHALL
ALSO BE PROOF ROLLED PRIOR TO PAVING TO A MINIMUM OF 97% COMPACTION.
7. ALL TRAILS, REGARDLESS OF WIDTH SHALL MAINTAIN A 2' WIDE. GRASSED SHOULDER WITH
A 2% CROSS SLOPE.
8. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE SEEDED PER SPECIFICATION.
9. ANY DAMAGE THAT OCCURS TO EXISTING HANDICAP RAMPS OR, DRIVEWAY
APRONS SHALL BE REPAIRED TO EXISTING CONDITIONS AT NO COST TO THE TOWN
OF CARY.
10. CONTRACTOR SHALL FINE GRADE DITCH ON UPHILL SIDE OF TRAIL AS NEEDED TO ENSURE
ADEQUATE DRAINAGE.
11. ENSURE THAT THERE IS NO STANDING WATER ALONG TRAIL.
. .
r f
-
4
.n
y � ,
r.
N I P.
0
-.e®:
P ��
r o
0M to
■
.n
i® /W'1a
Call 1- 800 - 632 -4949
NC ONE CALL CENTER
IT'S THE LAW
LEGEND
1, - ' � ' - EXISTING PROPERTY LINE
�-- TP TP -� TREE PROTECTION FENCE
�-- SF SF SILT FENCE
SWALE
DIRECTION OF SLOPE ON TRAIL
THIS CONTRACTOR.. PROPOSED ITEM
2$0 PROPOSED CONTOUR LINE
EXISTING CONTOUR LINE
250
i
EXISTING EASEMENT
EXISTING VEGETATION
1 REMOVE EX. VEGETATION
=- EX. GRAVEL TRAIL TO REMAIN
REMOVE STRUCTURE
REMOVE PAVEMENT
ss ss EX. SANITARY SEWER LINE
EX. CENTERLINE OF STREAM
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
LIST OF SHEETS
b& oo S q v3
Im OVERALL SITE .
INDIAN CR. GREENWAY CROSSING rc ' r
PLANS - acs
w
Q
z
v
w
o_
AM MT.
-`
DATE:
12-19 -
,,
w
Q`
Q
REVISIONS
SHEET NO.
N
ki
DATE:
12-19 -
SCALE
HOR.1 "= =l
SHEET NO.
N
ki

GRADING & DRAINAGE NOTES
CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE &EROSION CONTROL NOTES
1. Install required erosion control measures prior to construction. See construction sequence and erosion control notes.
1. Install temporary tree protection fencing. o
11. Maintain silt fences and check daily during clearing, grading, and paving operations. 2. All slopes to be consistent and uniform. Cut/Fill slopes not to exceed 3:1 ratio and a minimum of 2% except where 1
2. Call Town of Cary for an inspection of the tree protection fencing. 12. Inspect, clean, and repair all silt fences, swales, inlet protection, and check dams weekly noted on the plan. All slopes to provide positive drainage . Ensure that there is no standing water. W
3. Install temporary gravel construction entry, temporary check dams, temporary diversion and at after each storm event. 4j M
ditches, inlet protection for existing storm drains scheduled to remain during construction, 13. Remove sediment from check dams when approximately one half of storage volume is 3. To minimize damage to existing trees, the Contractor shall ,cut minimum 2' trenches along the limits of disturbance so a �r
and temporary silt fencing as shown on the plans. Clear only as needed to install the pp y n as to cut rather than tear, roots. �
filled. Remove sediment from silt fences when the silt layer becomes 6 thick.
erosion control measures. ,
4. Install temporary timber bridge for construction access across stream per detail. No stream 14. Seed and mulch any disturbed area within 15 days after any phase of grading with 4. Maintain 12" minimum cover over any drainage pipe. Provide flared end sections at both ends of all culvert pipes
p , rY 9 p unless otherwise noted.
impact permitted. temporary or permanent cover.
15. Maintain all soil erosion control measures until permanent ground cover is established 5. Grade trail with 2% max cross slope in direction shown on Ian. Review with owner prior to an Z
5. If material is tracked on to the street, the Town may require the Contractor to install a p p p y paving or placement �
y q for the whole site. When all site work is complete and all areas stabilized, the Contractor of concrete. Q W 4
wash station. shall call for inspection by the Landscape Architect and /or Owner's Representative and o
6. Seed and mulch all disturbed areas associated with the erosion control devices. o o O
obtain approval to remove temporary erosion control measures. 6. Greenway trail grades to be confirmed by Contractor. Slop�a. 2 /o minimum, 5 /o maximum unless otherwise noted or S '�
7. When erosion control devices are completely installed, the Contractor shall call for 16. Remove all temporary erosion control measures after obtaining approval. approved by Owner. 0 Z
inspection by the Landscape Architect and /or Owners Representative. Q w
8. Proceed with clearing, t ree removal, and grading after erosion control measures are 7. Geotechnical engineer shall observe proof- roll for sub -grade and prior to paving. Contractor to coordinate proof -roll Q
approved. with geotechnical engineer hired by Town of Cary. r
9. Construct and immediately stabilize any swales that are indicated. 8. Cut & fill slope that is greater than (2:1) shall be stabilized with permanent slope retention devices or a suitable
10. Stabilize any disturbed swales within Zone 1 of the NRB with erosion combination of plantings and retention devices. Slopes greater than (3:1) shall not be stabilized with turf grass but must t ♦ P
control matting immediately after grading. be stabilized with vegetation that requires minimal maintenance. Weeping Love Grass, Red Fescue or other approved Ali/ M
variety. (Chapter 7, Part 2, Section 4, (G) CDO).
9. Tree Protection Fence (TPF ) line equals Limits of Disturbance where both are shown. Limits of Disturbance line is
shown beyond TPF line on the drawing for graphic clarity. Locate silt fence as close to TPF as possible.
t i
j
t s
5 3 s
OWNER= TWIN LAKES MASTER ASSN INC. }t t STAGING WILL BE ALLOWED WITHIN SINGER WAY
s
REID = 0350496 � � `' CUL DE SAC.
PIN = 0745668578
AREA = 2.45 ACRES s \
TEMP. SILT FENCE WITH TREE PROTECTION
FENCE BEHIND.
REMOVE TREES IN THIS AREA. FIELD VERIFY ( +/- 200 SF)
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE a� s, Sj LOCATE BOARDWALK & FOOTINGS OUTSIDE
6 WIDE X 30' LONG CONCRETE �, ® UTILITY EASEMENT LINE.
BOARDWALK WITH HANDRAILS \ (MIN. 4' CLEAR FROM EX. WATERLINE)
BY PERMATRAK (BASE BID) OR WOODEN a
STRUCTURE (ALTERNATE).SEE SHEETS t Ex .
PT- 01 -PT -04 FOR DETAILS. To Remain 6' WIDE, 6" DEEP CONCRETE WALK.
' . Trees, \ \ (TYPICAL). PLACE CONTROL, JOINT
5 \ \, (C /J) EVERY 6' O /C.
{ \
6' WIDE, 6" DEEP; CONCRETE GREEN�IffAY 3 ® \
i Zone 2 Impacts = 160 SF (Pt --rm.)
342 SF (Tp-mp.)
TEMP. STREAM CROSSING 6 s} bs \ ! !
ONE
• REMOVE EX.
PAVEMENT "`-
\\ (100 SF)
4 �
IX RIP RAP 4' .�•-° is, .�- n• °°'-o-
\ s ADJUST FILL SLOPES IN THIS \
! No Stream Imp \ \
! p AREA TO MINIMIZE \
Use temporary bridge Trees DISTURBANCE TO EXISTING \
To Remain TREES. \ \
! Zone 2 Impacts = 130 SF (Perm.)
284 SF (Temp.
( Zone 1 Impacts = 426 SF (Perm.) F \ \
1,266 SF (Temp.) \
a \�on both sides of creek) • � ` '°° - �•
OWNER= SANDLER AT
_ = TWIN LAKES LLC ?' \
�ti t REID = 0378666
5 PIN = 0745668983 \
AREA = 2.78 ACRES
s � \
•, 5i �j ' q°�
DEMOLITION AND LAYOUT PLAN
t .
TEMP. STREAM CROSSING
` LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE (TYP.)
NEW TREELINE
TEMP. SILT FENCE r8 ` t GRASS ALL
7 g ' DISTU�BED AREAS 5 RESIDENTIAL
� Ex. Tree V
a `} To Rem n WITH`F SCLIE 6 CONSTRUCTION
' 6 \ �� `° e \ ENTRANCE
µ TEMP. STREAM.CRO SING
° TIMBER BRIDGE - NO STREAM I PACT g tP t ��%� \ 7 &8 TEMP. SILT FENCE
as z 4 \ \
7 WITH TREE PROTECTION
• • GRASS ALL t" \�� ` \ \ :s \ \ ° \ FENCE BEHIND
DISTURBED AREAS
s 318.00 \ \ \ 1 9c
°\ \ '°C+�• y LE�317.80° mow\ -
`` ` 9
\' � \ i , ° '£ � ,`�•` ': 4 � +/-321.`4 _.- -- "�`_• ---
. IX RIP RAP
• � � �'• ♦`F_ "'s �14 iy._•'. 1 �5 'lam I F �.
_____319__._1fF , t° '.`,• _- : sF $I` 4 t SF .,
\ - �__•--= '-�°.' 126 } lg` v t ' {� `• ( � �..,
CP
OD
°�\ •_� � f a � 1 cry � t � f � � � `� \ \��
-- r- .... --. -- -."'._. \ inn' � � 1 � i .- .---'� •- � � i \ \ \d`
`0 , Esc. Trees-
0, \ To Remain ._ NEW TREELINE \ \ \\
_ s
\v
` 2
a � \
` - 14 \
l _
�a 1A
3 �
} _ LENGTH = 125 LIN, FT.
EX. IMPERVIOUS = 15,660 SF (0.35 AC.)
NEW IMPERVIOUS = 585 SF (0.01 AC.)
OPEN SPACE = 220, 850 SF (aff 07 AC.)
DISTURBED AREA= 2,908 SF (0.066 ACRES)
6
NORTH
20 10 0 20 40 80
SCALE: 1 " =20'
Z
Q Q
Z 1► Q
ryW
O
n
o
Q4 t n ,' z
W =
U , m > _.I
J _
A, 4r
REVISIONS
A DWQ Permit 1 -07 -2013
PROJ.#
PR1156
DESIGN
BY: CR AM
DRAWN
BY: CR
DATE:
12 -19 -12
SCALE
HOR:1 " =20'
SHEET NO.
4