20201388 Ver 1_ePCN Application_20210419

DWR
Division of Water Resources
Initial Review
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
October 26, 2020 Ver 3.3
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
P Yes
✓ No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
C Yes P No
Change cnly if needed.
BIMS # Assigned*
20201388
Is a payment required for this project?*
✓ No payment required
✓ Fee received
Fee needed - send electronic notification
Reviewing Office*
Winston-Salem Regional Office - (336) 776-
9800
Version#*
1
What amout is owed?*
$240.00
(7 $570.00
Select Project Reviewer*
Sue Homewood:eads \slhomewood
Information for Initial Review
la. Name of project:
Hodges Creek Restoration Project
la. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Charles Anderson
1 b. Primary Contact Email:*
[e-mail]
Date Submitted
4/19/2021
Nearest Body of Water
Fisher River
Basin
Yadkin-PeeDee
Water Classification
WS-II
Site Coordinates
Latitude: Longitude:
36.450847 -80.789882
Pre -Filing Meeting Information
ID#
20201388
Pre -fling Meeting or Request Date*
10/5/2020
lc. Primary Contact Phone:*
[phone]
Version
1
Attach documentation of Pre -Filing Meeting Request here:*
DWR Pre -Filing Meeting Request Form_Submitted.pdf 51.45KB
A. Processing Information
County (or Counties) where the project is located:

Surry
Is this a NCDMS Project
✓ Yes (7 NO
Is this project a public transportation project?*
✓ Yes 6No
la. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
p- Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
r- Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
Has this PCN previously been submitted?*
✓ Yes
6' No
lb. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
[7 Nationwide Permit (NWP)
n Regional General Permit (RGP)
n Standard (IP)
lc. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
✓ Yes 6' No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number: 27 - Restoration
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
ld. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
17 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
n Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
n Individual Permit
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
lf. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
✓ Yes r No
n 401 Water Quality Certification - Express
n Riparian Buffer Authorization
lg. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
✓ Yes (No
lg. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
✓ Yes r No
Acceptance Letter Attachment
lh. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
✓ Yes (No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
✓ Yes 6" No
✓ Yes 6" No
✓ Yes No
B. Applicant Information
ld. Who is applying for the permit?
I— Owner 17 Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?*
6. Yes r No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
Draughon, Alene C (PIN: 4978-00-37-4483)
2b. Deed book and page no.:
00495/0078
2c. Responsible party:
2d. Address

Street Address
778 Casstevens Road
Address Line 2
Mount Airy
Postal / Zip code
27030-8729
2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
Casstevens, Billy R and Billie S (Pin: 4978-00-27-9478)
2b. Deed book and page no.:
00494/1473
2c. Responsible party:
2d. Address
Street Address
835 Casstevens Road
Address Line 2
aly
Mount Airy
Ftstai / Zp Code
27030-9612
2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
Casstevens, Homer D and Shirley (Pin: 4978-00-47-0143)
2b. Deed book and page no.:
00519/0728
2c. Responsible party:
2d. Address
Street Address
734 Casstevens Road
Address Line 2
aly
Mount Airy
Postal / Lp thde
27030-8729
2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
Draughon, Alene C
2b. Deed book and page no.:
00426/0656
2c. Responsible party:
2d. Address
Street Address
778 Casstevens Road
Address Line 2
Mount Airy
Postal / Lp Code
27030
State/ Province/ Region
NC
Country
United States
26. Fax Number:
State/ Rovince/ Region
NC
Country
United States
26. Fax Number:
State/ Province/ Ragion
NC
Country
United States
2f. Fax Number:
State/ Rovince/ Raglan
NC
Country
United States

2e. Telephone Number: 2f. Fax Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
Casstevens, Harold G, Dora M
2b. Deed book and page no.:
00555/0267
2c. Responsible party:
2d. Address
Street Address
902 Casstevens Road
Address Line 2
aty
Mount Airy
Ftistal / Zip code
27030
2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
3. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
3a. Name:
Resource Institute
3b. Business Name:
3c. Address
Street Address
2631 Reynolda Road
Address Line 2
aly
Winston-Salem
Fbstal / Stp Code
27106
3d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
3f. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:
Erin Bennett
4b. Business Name:
Ecosystem Planning and Restoration
State/ Rovince/ Region
NC
Country
United States
26. Fax Number:
State/ Rovince/ Region
NC
Country
United States
3e. Fax Number:
4c. Address
Street Address
1150 SE Maynard Road
Address Line 2
Suite 140
State/ Flovince/ Region
Cary NC
Fbstal / Zip Code Country
27511 United States
4d. Telephone Number: 4e. Fax Number:
[phone]
4f. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
*
Agent Authorization Letter

AgentAuthForms_Signed.pdf
779.97KB
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
Lf.')
1. Project Information
lb. Subdivision name:
()I appropriate)
lc. Nearest municipality / town:
Mt Airy
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
4978-00-37-4483, 4978-00-27-9478, 4978-
00-47-0143, 4978-00-27-0258, 4978-00-47-
8182
2c. Project Address
Street Address
686 Casstevens Road
Address Line 2
2b. Property size:
7.5
aly State / ovince / Region
Mount Airy NC
Postal / Lp Code Country
27030 United States
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:*
Fisher River
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:*
WS-II
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Yadkin-PeeDee
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030401010702
4. Project Description and History
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:*
The project is located on approximately 2,800 linear feet of Hodges Creek which flows into the Fisher River. The proposed project area has been adversely impacted by cattle farming
and anthropogenic alterations causing stream bank erosion stream bed degradation.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
r Yes 0- No r Unknown
4d. Attach an 8 1/2 X11 excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of the project site. (for DWR)
Fig_2_Hodges_Creek_USGS.pdf 1.18MB
4e. Attach an 8 1/2 X11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey map depicting the project site. (for DWR)
Fig_4_Hodges_Creek_Soils.pdf 1.63MB
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0 30
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
2779
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:*
The purpose of this project is to restore approximately 2,800 linear feet of Hodges Creek that has been degraded by bank and stream bed erosion. The project will involve redirecting
the channel to restore proper planform geometry, sloping and stabilizing streambanks using toewood and geolifts, and installing in -stream structures to provide stability and bedform
diversity. Aquatic habitat will be improved by incorporating these structures. Riparian buffers will be replanted in native woody vegetation.
41. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:*
Tracked excavators will be used to shape stream banks, excavate the floodplain, install in -stream structures, and perform general grading. Skid steers and dump trucks will also be used
to move earth and materials.
4j. Please upload project drawings for the proposed project.
HC_ALL_SHEETS_11x17.pdf 21.58MB
5. Jurisdictional Determinations

5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
• Yes r No
r Unknown
Comments:
Not Verified
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
✓ Preliminary r Approved f", Not Verified r Unknown r N/A
Corps AID Number:
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
Amy James
Ecosystem Planning and Restoration
5d1. Jurisdictional determination upload
Fig_3_Hodges_Creek_Aquatic_Resources.pdf 2.19MB
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
T.. Yes No
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
la. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
I— Wetlands
I— Open Waters
3. Stream Impacts
17 Streams -tributaries
r- Pond Construction
r Buffers
3a. Reason for impact (?)
3b.Impact type*
3c. Type of impact*
3d. S. name*
3e. Stream Type*
(?)
3f. Type of
Jurisdiction*
3g. S. width*
3h. Impact
length*
SI
Restoration
Permanent
Bank Stabilization
Hodges Creek
Perennial
Both
19
Average (feet)
2,779
(linear feet)
S2
Restoration
Permanent
Bank Stabilization
UT 1 to Hodges Creek
Perennial
Both
6
Average (feet)
35
(linear feet)
31. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0
3i. Total permanent stream impacts:
2,814
3i. Total stream and ditch impacts:
37
3j. Comments:
3i. Total temporary stream impacts:
0
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
Restoration and bank stabilization techniques WM follow natural channel design principles. Native material and vegetation will be used for construction.
Work will be performed in the dry as a pump around operation will be used.
lb. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
Stream crossings ilI be constructed and maintained to avoid further eroding banks during and after construction. A pump around operation will be
used to ensure that work is performed in the dry.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State

2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
✓ Yes No
2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why:
Compensatory mitigation is not required for stream restoration projects.
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR) Lf_)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
✓ Yes a No
If no, explain why:
Surry County is not located in an area with Riparian Buffer Protection Rules.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?*
✓ Yes a No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
<7 Yes r No
Comments:
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*
( Yes CNo
lb. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State (North Carolina)
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?*
✓ Yes a No
Comments:*
Applicable databases were searched and any results have been included.
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?*
✓ yes(No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
✓ Yes a No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The project vvill not result in additional development after construction is completed.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
✓ Yes No r N/A
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
( Yes r No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
( Yes r No
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Asheville
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
✓ Yes
a No r Unknown

5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
✓ Yes a No
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
(1, Yes r No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
✓ Yes a No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
✓ Yes a No
51 Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
✓ Yes a No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
NC NHP report (accessed August 10, 2020)
USFWS IPaC (accessed August 7, 2020)
Consultation Documentation Upload
NCNHP Report_Hodges Creek 08102020.pdf
Species List_ Asheville Ecological Services Field Office.pdf
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
✓ Yes a No
827.84KB
411.65KB
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
NOAA Essential Fish Habitat Mapper
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
✓ Yes (No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
NC State Historic Preservation Office HPOWEB (attached)
7c. Historic or Prehistoric Information Upload
Hodges Creek_HP0 Map.pdf
Hodges Creek HP0 Resources pdf
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?*
✓ Yes a No
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
National Flood Hazard Layer FIRMette
Miscellaneous
Comments
Miscellaneous attachments not previously requested.
HodgesCreekRiverRestoration_HodgesCreek_Surry_WRCComments.pdf
20-422 Hodges Creek Restoration; Surry Co (KQ-BH).pdf
Fig_1_Hodges_Creek_Vicinity.pdf
Hodges Creek_Property.pdf
Hodges Creek Trib DWR Stream Form.pdf
PhotoLog.pdf
Hodges Creek Wetland Delineation_20200811.pdf
296.88KB
58.08KB
33.28KB
438.52KB
1.04MB
2.63MB
382.75KB
1.1MB
1.04MB
Signature
f7 By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief; and
• The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401 certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• 1 understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND

• I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Erin Bennett
Signature
Sem, OweAz-
Date
4/19/2021

497800279496 /
CASSTEVENS BILLY R
497800270258
CASSTEVENS HAROLD G
misi mak
Legend
Project Area
Existing Stream Centerline
Pa rcels
497800374483
DRAUGHON ALENE CASSTEVENS
497800470143
CA STEVENS HOMER DARR
`1..-Jralit: : •
497800478182
DRAUGHON ALENE CASSTEVENS \
SHELV
200 100
0
200
Feet
PARCEL MAP
HODGES CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT
MULTIPLE PROPERTY OWNERS
PREPARED FOR:
RESOURCE
INSEL1UTE
4 \ RCS
Natural Resources Conservation Service
SURRY COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
PREPARED BY:
ECOSYSTEM
PLANNING 8c
RESTORATION
DATE:
APRIL 2021

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
LOT NO. NA PLAN NO. NA PARCEL ID: 497800374483 and
497800478182
STREET ADDRESS: 778 Casstevens Road
Mount Airy NC, 27030
Please print:
Property Owner:
Alene Draughon Casstevens
-"-Th
Property Owner: _,' — I.A.,"-Li TheZ undersigned, regi ered property owner(s) of the above noted property, do hereby authorize
Erin Bennett , of Ecosystem Planninz and Restoration
(Contractor / Agent) (Name of consulting firm)
to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance of
this permit or certification and any and all standard and special conditions attached.
Property Owner's Address (if different than property above):
Same
Telephone: 3S1— s„14/ 6 .&...s/
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to the
best of our knowledge.
.e 62441) .1-'1LniuIJ
Au horized Signature Authorized Signature
Date: - 0- 1 Date:

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
LOT NO. NA PLAN NO. NA PARCEL ID: 497800279478
STREET ADDRESS: 835 Casstevens Road
Please print:
Property Owner:
Mount Airy NC, 27030
Billy R Casstevens
Property Owner: Billie Sue Casstevens
The undersigned, registered property owner(s) of the above noted property, do hereby authorize
Erin Bennett of Ecosystem Planning,. and Restoration
(Contractor / Agent) (Name of consulting firm)
to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance of
this permit or certification and any and all standard and special conditions attached.
Property Owner's Address (if different than property above):
Same
Telephone:
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to the
best of our knowledge.
do4J-1-,et
Authorized Signature
Date: //2.2/2/
diet, NALitair-9
Authorized Signature
Date:

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
LOT NO. NA PLAN NO. NA PARCEL ID: 497800470143
STREET ADDRESS: 734 Casstevens Road
Please print:
Property Owner:
Mount Airy NC, 27030
Homer Darrell Casstevens
Property Owner: Shirley Casstevens
The undersigned, registered property owner(s) of the above noted property, do hereby authorize
Erin Bennett , of Ecosystem Plannin2 and Restoration
(Contractor / Agent) (Name of consulting firm)
to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance of
this permit or certification and any and all standard and special conditions attached.
Property Owner's Address (if different than property above):
Same
Telephone: [phone]
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to the
best of our knowledge.
110-1)12/1- itotta-L.,"‘
Authorized Signature
Date: ki-is

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
LOT NO. NA PLAN NO. NA PARCEL ID: 497800270258
STREET ADDRESS: 902 Casstevens Road
Mount Airy NC, 27030
Please print:
Property Owner: Harold G Casstevens
Property Owner: Dora May Casstevens
The undersigned, registered property owner(s) of the above noted property, do hereby authorize
Erin Bennett r of Ecosystem Plannin2 and Restoration
(Contractor / Agent) (Name of consulting firm)
to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance of
this permit or certification and any and all standard and special conditions attached.
Property Owner's Address (if different than property above):
Same
Telephone: 034 - w5---
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to the
best of our knowledge.
,
Aut (rized Signature
Date:
Authorized Signature
Date: 17,25/2(2)2 (

HODGES CREEK STREAM RESTORATION
JULY 2020
SURRY COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
HODGES CREEK
BANK EROSION AND DOWNED TREES IN
THE REACH
CATTLE HAVE ACCESS TO THE STREAM
BANK EROSION IN THE REACH
BANK EROSION IN THE REACH
1

HODGES CREEK STREAM RESTORATION
JULY 2020
SURRY COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
TRIBUTARY TO HODGES CREEK - UT 1
PERRENIAL TRIBUTARY TO HODGES CREEK
PERRENIAL TRIBUTARY TO HODGES
CREEK
2

7,7
4/
r‘T.
Woitz hod,‘''s1k6
is.
a,
1 5 t
5, 'i
''
o„c,1
lt-
* Project Location
Stream Centerline
Project Area
NORTH CAROLINA
PROJECT LOCATION
.,-----0:\cAQ-TH.-1 1-11•-! •'-,J,--7<:??.-7.--`,
(21S-172-,---<' -7?; •.-":',.. ( \
'1__ :1:>''''--7-r---r'V%--f'''. j
--'‘).i, 1Y-^:1-"--C.%
'4- '-i
V --'''
Nri,%
Casstevens
Traik
5,
Hystack
44J'0thok Rd
PROJECT LOCATION
SURRY COUNTY, NC
1-77
+1k74
PROJEZ_L:, CATION
irr
tra
witt
•z?
John
USGS, Intermap, increment P Corp., NRCAN,
na (Hong Kong), Esri (Thailand), Mapmylndia,
rs, and the GIS User Community
0
1,000
2,000
4,000
Feet
HODGES CREEK
RESTORATION PROJECT
VICINITY MAP
RESOU KCF
INSTITUTE
ECOSYSTEM
PLANNING a
RESTORATION
1 inch = 2,000 feet
FIGURE 1
SURRY COUNTY, NC
PREPARED BY:
EPR
DATE:
APRIL 2021

* Project Location
Project Area
Stream Centerline
Mt. Airy Quadrangle
North Carolina - Surry County
7.5-Minute Series
0
500
1,000
2,000
Feet
CASSTEVENS RD
USGS The National Map: National Boundaries Dataset, Na ionhal Elevation
Dataset, Geographic Names Information System, National ycirography
Dataset, National Land Cover Database, National Structures yataset, and
National Transportation Dataset; U.S. Census Bureau - TIER/Line; HERE
Road Data. Data Refreshed July, 2017.
HODGES CREEK
RESTORATION PROJECT
USGS MAP
RESOURCE
INSTITUTE
ECOSYSTEM
PLANNING 8c
RESTORATION
1 inch = 1,000 feet
FIGURE 2
SURRY COUNTY, NC
PREPARED BY:
EPR
DATE:
APRIL 2021

Project Area
Existing Stream Centerline
Delineated Wetlands
175
350
1 inch = 350 feet
700
Feet
FIGURE 3
HODGES CREEK
STREAM RESTORATION PROJECT
AQUATIC RESOURCES MAP
SURRY COUNTY, NC
RESOURCE
INSTITUTE
PREPARED BY:
EPR
ECOSYSTEM
PLANNING 8c
RESTORATION
DAT E:
APRIL 2021

Soils
Project Area
ArA-Arkaqua loam, 0 to 2% slopes,
frequently flooded
BbB-Braddock fine sandy loam, 2 to
8% slopes
BbC-Braddock fine sandy loam, 8 to
15% slopes
DeF-Devotion-Rhodiss-Bannertown
complex, 40 to 95% slopes, very
rocky
DrB-Dillard fine sandy loam, 2 to 8%
slopes, rarely flooded
FfD-Fairview cobbly fine sandy loam,
15 to 25% slopes, stony
FnB2-Fairview cobbly sandy clay
loam, 2 to 8% slopes, moderately
eroded, stony
FnB2-Fairview cobbly sandy clay
loam, 8 to 15% slopes, moderately
eroded, stony
FtE-Fairview-Stott Knob complex, 25
to 45% SLOPES, STONY
Water
1
Ilatibited la-thlkig,
0
175
350
700
Feet
HODGES CREEK
STREAM RESTORATION PROJECT
SOILS MAP
RESOURCE
INSTITUTE
ECOSYSTEM
PLANNING 8c
RESTORATION
1 inch = 350 feet
FIGURE 4
SURRY COUNTY, NC
PREPARED
EPR
BY:
DATE:
APRIL 2021

NCHPO HPOWEB
12/21/2020, 10:09:08 AM
= SurveyArea
Local districts & boundaries
Local individual resources & centerpoints
Local Landmark
' Local Landmark, Gone
Local HD Center Point
Surveyed Only individual resources & centerpoints
Surveyed Only
Surveyed in NRHD
Surveyed Only, Gone
Surveyed in NRHD, Gone
Blockface- Multiple properties
Blockface in NRHD
Surveyed Area, No designation
Surveyed Area in NHRD
DOE districts & boundaries
= Determined Eligible Boundary
= Both DOE and Study List Boundary
DOE individual resources & centerpoints
' Determined Eligible
DOE, Gone
SL and DOE
' SL and DOE, Gone
DOEHD Center Point
SLDOEHD Center Point
SL districts & boundaries
= Study List Boundary
= Both SL and Determined Eligible Boundary
SL individual resources & centerpoints
SL Individual Entry
SL and DOE entry
' Study List Entry, Gone
SL and DOE, Gone
SLHD Center Point
SLDOEHD Center Point
NR districts & boundaries
National Register Boundary
1:9,028
0 0.07 0.15
I
i
i
0 0.13 0.25
0.3 nni
. 1
0.5 km
State of North Carolina DOT, Esri, HERE, Garmin, INCREMENT P,
Intermap, NGA, USGS
North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office
State of North Carolina DOT, Esri, HERE, Garmin, INCREMENT P, Intermap, NGA, USGS 1 Esri, HERE 1

OBJECTID Id Site ID Status Local Statu HD status Site Name Descriptior Notes Internal
125504 0 SR0511 SO None None Franklin Pr Church
125505 0 SR0513 SO None None C. W. Snov Log
142443 0 SR0506 SO None None Smith Hou. 1-house
142466 0 SR0512 SD None None William Tu Plain/Trad

Year NR Year SL Year DOE Year Landr Year Surve NR nominz DOE Repor County Quad Nam Township
1981 Surry Bottom Franklin
1981 Surry Bottom Dobson
1981 Surry Bottom Stewarts C
1981 Surry Bottom Franklin

Density Location Photo Link Spatial Acc Latitude Longitude Year Surve x
S side SR 1331, W of jct SR 1404 E 36.45712 -80.7732 -8991629 4363706
E side SR 1405, 0.3 mi SE jct SR 1z 36.44165 -80.7859 -8993046 4361564
S side SR 1403, 0.8 mi W jct SR 12 36.4648 -80.7831 -8992731 4364767
SW side SR 1405, 0.9 mi S of jct S 36.44607 -80.8077 -8995468 4362176

• ENE
In. • NC DEPARTMENT OF
•• •
Num NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
• Now
Amy James
Ecosystem Planning and Restoration
1150 SE Maynard Rd. Suite 140
Cary, NC 27511
RE: Hodges Creek Stream Restoration
Dear Amy James:
Roy Cooper. Governor
Susi Hamilton, Secretary
Walter Clark, Director, Land and Water Stewardship
August 10, 2020
NCNHDE-12646
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
A query of the NCNHP database, based on the project area mapped with your request, indicates
that there are no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, and/or
conservation/managed areas within the proposed project boundary, or within a one -mile radius of
the project boundary.
Please note that although there may be no documentation of natural heritage elements within or
near the project boundary, it does not imply or confirm their absence; the area may not have been
surveyed. The results of this query should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat
exists. In the event that rare species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so
that we may update our records.
Please also note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may also not be redistributed without
permission.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at rodney.butler@ncdchgov or 919.707.8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
DEPARTMENT OF NAT uRAL AND CuLTuRAL RESOvRCES
C) 121 W. JONES STREET. RALEIGH. NC 27603 • 161 rviAIL SERVICE CENTER. RALEIGH. NC 2769g
OFC 'M9.707.91120 • FAX [phone]

NCNHDE-12646: Hodges Creek Stream Restoration
0,0
+E
ed'
.onu Ijigrj
August 10, 2020
▪ Project Boundary
O Buffered Project Boundary
1:21,923
0 0.175 0.35 0.7 mi
0 0.3 0.6 1.2 km
Sources, Esri, HERE, Garmin, Intermap, increment P Corp_, GEBCO, USGS,
FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan,
METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS
User Community
Page 2 of 2

United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Asheville Ecological Services Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, NC 28801-1082
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
http://www.fws.govinc-esies/countyfr.html
In Reply Refer To:
Consultation Code: 04EN1000-2020-SLI-0813
Event Code: 04EN1000-2020-E-01915
Project Name: Hodges Creek Stream Restoration
August 07, 2020
Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project
location, and/or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:
The attached species list identifies threatened, endangered, proposed and candidate species, as
well as proposed and final designated critical habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your
proposed project and/or may be affected by your proposed project. Although not required by
section 7, many agencies request species lists to start the informal consultation process and begin
their fulfillment of the requirements under section 7(c) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) of
1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
This list, along with other helpful resources, is also available on the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service) Asheville Field Office's (AFO) website: https://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/
cntylist/nc counties.html. The AFO website list includes "species of concern" species that could
potentially be placed on the federal list of threatened and endangered species in the future. Also
available are:
Design and Construction Recommendations
https://www.fws.gov/asheville/htmls/project review/Recommendations.html
Optimal Survey Times for Federally Listed Plants
https://www.fws.gov/nc-es/plant/plant survey.html
Northern long-eared bat Guidance
https://www.fws.gov/asheville/htmls/project review/NLEB in WNC.html
Predictive Habitat Model for Aquatic Species
https://www.fws.gov/asheville/htmls/Maxent/Maxent.html

08/07/2020
Event Code: 04EN1000-2020-E-01915 2
New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of
species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could require modifications of these lists.
Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the Act,
the accuracy of the species lists should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be
completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be
completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website or the AFO website (the AFO website dates each
county list with the day of the most recent update/change) at regular intervals during project
planning and implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be
requested through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the
enclosed list or by going to the AFO website.
The purpose of the Act is to provide a means whereby threatened and endangered species and the
ecosystems upon which they depend may be conserved. Under sections 7(a)(1) and 7(a)(2) of the
Act and its implementing regulations (50 CFR 402 et seq.), Federal agencies are required to
utilize their authorities to carry out programs for the conservation of threatened and endangered
species and to determine whether projects may affect threatened and endangered species and/or
designated critical habitat.
A Biological Assessment is required for construction projects (or other undertakings having
similar physical impacts) that are major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the
human environment as defined in the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)
(c)). For projects other than major construction activities, the Service suggests that a Biological
Evaluation similar to a Biological Assessment be prepared to determine whether the project may
affect listed or proposed species and/or designated or proposed critical habitat. Recommended
contents of a Biological Assessment are described at 50 CFR 402.12 and on our office's website
at https://www.fws.gov/asheville/htmls/project review/assessment guidance.html.
If a Federal agency (or their non-federal representative) determines, based on the Biological
Assessment or Biological Evaluation, that listed species and/or designated critical habitat may be
affected by the proposed project, the agency is required to consult with the Service pursuant to
50 CFR 402. In addition, the Service recommends that candidate species, proposed species, and
proposed critical habitat be addressed within the consultation. More information on the
regulations and procedures for section 7 consultation, including the role of permit or license
applicants, can be found in the "Endangered Species Consultation Handbook" at: http://
www.fws.gov/endangered/esa-library/pdf/TOC-GLOS.PDF.
Though the bald eagle is no longer protected under the Endangered Species Act, please be aware
that bald and golden eagles are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (16
U.S.C. 668 et seq.), and projects affecting these species may require additional consultation (see
https://www.fws.gov/southeast/our-services/permits/eagles/). Wind energy projects should follow
the wind energy guidelines (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/) for minimizing impacts to
migratory birds (including bald and golden eagles) and bats.
Guidance for minimizing impacts to migratory birds for projects including communications
towers (e.g., cellular, digital television, radio, and emergency broadcast) can be found at: http://
www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdIssues/Hazards/towers/towers.htm;

08/07/2020
Event Code: 04EN1000-2020-E-01915 3
http://www.towerkill.com; and http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdIssues/Hazards/
towers/comtow.html.
We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages
Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project
planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Tracking Number in
the header of this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project
that you submit to our office.
Attachment(s):
• Official Species List
• Migratory Birds
• Wetlands

08/07/2020
Event Code: 04EN1000-2020-E-01915 1
Official Species List
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the
requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether
any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed
action".
This species list is provided by:
Asheville Ecological Services Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, NC 28801-1082
[phone]

08/07/2020
Event Code: 04EN1000-2020-E-01915 2
Project Summary
Consultation Code: 04EN1000-2020-SLI-0813
Event Code: 04EN1000-2020-E-01915
Project Name: Hodges Creek Stream Restoration
Project Type: AGRICULTURE
Project Description: This project is being implemented through the Western NC Stream
Initiative program. The proposed project area has been adversely
impacted by cattle farming and anthropogenic alterations. The Hodges
Creek Stream Restoration Project will restore approximately 2,800 linear
feet of degraded stream. NRCS practice codes that will be utilized include
584 Structural, 580 Bank Stabilization, 395 Habitat, 578 Crossing, and
612 Riparian Buffer. In -stream structures will be installed to protect
stream bed and banks and to improve aquatic habitat. Riparian buffers
will be replanted in native woody vegetation.
Project Location:
Approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https://
www.google.com/maps/place/36.450731672358216N80.78991773691584W
cogileVe 11Ji
Aro
Counties: Surry, NC

08/07/2020
Event Code: 04EN1000-2020-E-01915 3
Endangered Species Act Species
There is a total of 4 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.
Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include
species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species
list because a project could affect downstream species.
IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA
Fisheriesl, as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the
Department of Commerce.
See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially
within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office
if you have questions.
1. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an
office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
Mammals
NAME STATUS
Gray Bat Myotis grisescens Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6329
Northern Long-eared Bat Myotis septentrionalis Threatened
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9045
Reptiles
NAME STATUS
Bog Turtle Clemmys muhlenbergii
Population: U.S.A. (GA, NC, SC, TN, VA)
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6962
Similarity of
Appearance
(Threatened)

08/07/2020
Event Code: 04EN1000-2020-E-01915 4
Flowering Plants
NAM L._ STATUS
Schweinitz's Sunflower Helianthus schweinitzii Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.goviecp/species/3849
Critical habitats
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICES
JURISDICTION.

08/07/2020
Event Code: 04EN1000-2020-E-01915 1
Migratory Birds
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Actl and the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Act.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to
migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider
implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described below.
1. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
3. 50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)
The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the USFWS
Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your project location.
To learn more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how this list is generated, see
the FAQ below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this location, nor a guarantee that
every bird on this list will be found in your project area. To see exact locations of where birders
and the general public have sighted birds in and around your project area, visit the E-bird data
mapping tool (Tip: enter your location, desired date range and a species on your list). For
projects that occur off the Atlantic Coast, additional maps and models detailing the relative
occurrence and abundance of bird species on your list are available. Links to additional
information about Atlantic Coast birds, and other important information about your migratory
bird list, including how to properly interpret and use your migratory bird report, can be found
below.
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures
to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE
SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be present and
breeding in your project area.
NAME BREEDING SEASON
Eastern Whip -poor -will Antrostomus vociferus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the
continental USA and Alaska.
Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the
continental USA and Alaska.
Breeds May 1 to Aug 20
Breeds May 10 to Aug 31

08/07/2020
Event Code: 04EN1000-2020-E-01915 2
Probability Of Presence Summary
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be
present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project
activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read and understand the
FAQ "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or attempting
to interpret this report.
Probability of Presence (')
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your
project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-week
months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey effort (see
below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One can have higher
confidence in the presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also high.
How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:
1. The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in
the week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events for
that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted Towhee
was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is
0.25.
2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of
presence is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum
probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of presence
in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week 12
(0.25) is the maximum of any week of the year. The relative probability of presence on
week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is 0.05/0.25 = 0.2.
3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical
conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the
probability of presence score.
Breeding Season ( )
Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time -frame inside which the bird breeds across
its entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project
area.
Survey Effort (I)
Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys
performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The number of
surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.
No Data (—)
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
Survey Timeframe

08/07/2020
Event Code: 04EN1000-2020-E-01915 3
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant
information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based on
all years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse.
• probability of presence breeding season 1 survey effort — no data
SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Eastern Whip -poor -
will
BCC Rangewide (CON)
Wood Thrush
BCC Rangewide (CON)
---- ---- ---- -Till 1111 1111 1111 ---- ---- ---- ----
Additional information can be found using the following links:
• Birds of Conservation Concern http://www.fws.gov/birds/management/managed-species/
birds-of-conservation-concern.php
• Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds http://www.fws.gov/birds/
management/project-assessment-tools-and-guidance/
conservation-measures.php
• Nationwide conservation measures for birds http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/pdf/
management/nationwidestandardconservationmeasures.pdf
Migratory Birds FAQ
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts
to migratory birds.
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize
impacts to all birds at any location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly
important when birds are most likely to occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in
the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very
helpful impact minimization measure. To see when birds are most likely to occur and be breeding
in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures and/or
permits may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of
infrastructure or bird species present on your project site.
What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified
location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern
(BCC) and other species that may warrant special attention in your project location.

08/07/2020
Event Code: 04EN1000-2020-E-01915 4
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian
Knowledge Network (AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey, banding,
and citizen science datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as
occurring in the 10km grid cell(s) which your project intersects, and that have been identified as
warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act
requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to offshore activities or
development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your
project area. It is not representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list
of all birds potentially present in your project area, please visit the AKN Phenology Tool.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds
potentially occurring in my specified location?
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data
provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). This data is derived from a growing
collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets .
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information
becomes available. To learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and
how to interpret them, go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me
about these graphs" link.
How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering, migrating or present year-round in my
project area?
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding,
wintering, migrating or year-round), you may refer to the following resources: The Cornell Lab
of Ornithology All About Birds Bird Guide, or (if you are unsuccessful in locating the bird of
interest there), the Cornell Lab of Ornithology Neotropical Birds guide. If a bird on your
migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated with it, if that bird does occur in your
project area, there may be nests present at some point within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds
elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not breed in your project area.
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern
throughout their range anywhere within the USA (including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands,
Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands);
2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation
Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA; and
3. "Non -BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on
your list either because of the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or (for non -eagles)
potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities
(e.g. offshore energy development or longline fishing).

08/07/2020
Event Code: 04EN1000-2020-E-01915 5
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made,
in particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC
species of rangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can
implement to help avoid and minimize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles,
please see the FAQs for these topics.
Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species
and groups of bird species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the
Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal also offers data and information about other taxa besides
birds that may be helpful to you in your project review. Alternately, you may download the bird
model results files underlying the portal maps through the NOAA NCCOS Integrative Statistical
Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic
Outer Continental Shelf project webpage.
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use
throughout the year, including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this
information. For additional information on marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study
and the nanotag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam Loring.
What if I have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid
violating the Eagle Act should such impacts occur.
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of
birds of priority concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for
identifying what other birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC
use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location". Please be
aware this report provides the "probability of presence" of birds within the 10 km grid cell(s) that
overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look
carefully at the survey effort (indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the "no
data" indicator (a red horizontal bar). A high survey effort is the key component. If the survey
effort is high, then the probability of presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In
contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack of data and, therefore, a lack of
certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting point for
identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might
be there, and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you
know what to look for to confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement
conservation measures to avoid or minimize potential impacts from your project activities,
should presence be confirmed. To learn more about conservation measures, visit the FAQ "Tell
me about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory
birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page.

08/07/2020
Event Code: 04EN1000-2020-E-01915 1
Wetlands
Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under Section
404 of the Clean Water Act, or other State/Federal statutes.
For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the local U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers District.
Please note that the NWI data being shown may be out of date. We are currently working to
update our NWI data set. We recommend you verify these results with a site visit to determine
the actual extent of wetlands on site.
RIVERINE
• R4SBC
• R5UBH

North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
Gordon Myers, Executive Director
September 3, 2020
Erin Bennett
Ecosystem Planning and Restoration
1150 S.E. Maynard Road, Suite 140
Cary, NC 27511
SUBJECT: UT Little Fisher River Restoration Project
Dear Ms. Bennett:
Biologists with the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) received your
August 14, 2020 letter regarding plans for a stream restoration project on unnamed tributaries to
the Fisher River in Surry County. You requested review and comment on the project. Our
comments on this project are offered for your consideration under provisions of the Clean Water
Act of 1977 (33 U.S.C. 466 et. seq.) and Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as
amended; 16 U.S.C. 661-667d).
Details were not provided in the letter on design nor the size of the project.
This project should not impact wild trout resources. We recommend that riparian buffers that are
to be reestablished be as wide as possible, given site constraints and landowner needs. NCWRC
generally recommends a woody buffer of 100 feet on perennial streams to maximize the benefits
of buffers, including bank stability, stream shading, treatment of overland runoff, and wildlife
habitat.
Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this project. Please contact me at
[phone] if you have any questions about these comments.
Sincerely,
Andrea Leslie
Mountain Region Coordinator
Habitat Conservation Program
Mailing Address: Habitat Conservation • 1721 Mail Service Center • Raleigh, NC 27699-1721
Telephone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]

United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Asheville Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
September 9, 2020
Erin Bennett
System Planning and Restoration, LLC
1150 S.E. Maynard Road, Suite 140
Cary NC 27511
Dear Erin Bennett:
Subject: Hodges Creek Restoration; Surry County, North Carolina Log No. 4-2-20-422
FISH &WILDLIFE
SERVICE
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) has reviewed the information provided in your
correspondence received on August 18, 2020, dated August 14, 2020, for the project referenced
above wherein you solicit comments regarding potential impacts to federally protected species to
satisfy nationwide permit application requirements. We submit the following comments in
accordance with the provisions of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act, as amended
(16 U.S.C. 661-667e); the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. §4321 et seq.); and
section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531-1543) (Act).
Proj ect Description
According to the information provided, the proposed project involves restoration and
enhancement of an unnamed tributary which connects with Fisher River in Mount Airy, North
Carolina. Design plans and descriptions of proposed impact minimization measures were not
provided in your correspondence. Onsite habitats (instream and riparian) are highly disturbed
due to a legacy of agricultural land use. Surrounding land cover is dominated by forest,
agricultural and residential developments.
Federally Listed Endangered and Threatened Species
Suitable summer roosting habitat may be present in the project area for the northern long-eared
bat (Myotis Septentrionalis). However, the final 4(d) rule (effective as of February 16, 2016),
exempts incidental take of northern long-eared bat associated with activities that occur greater
than 0.25 miles from a known hibernation site, and greater than 150 feet from a known, occupied
maternity roost during the pup season (June 1 — July 31). Based on the information provided, the
project (which may or may not require tree clearing) would occur at a location where any
incidental take that may result from associated activities is exempt under the 4(d) rule.
Although not required, we encourage you to avoid any associated tree clearing activities
during this animal's maternity roosting season from May 15 — August 15.

Based on the information provided, suitable habitat does not occur onsite for any other federally
protected species. Therefore, we would not object to a "no effect" determination from the
appropriate action agency, and we require no further information at this time. Please be aware
that obligations under section 7 of the Endangered Species Act must be reconsidered if: (1) new
information reveals impacts of this identified action that may affect listed species or critical
habitat in a manner not previously considered, (2) this action is subsequently modified in a
manner that was not considered in this review, or (3) a new species is listed or critical habitat is
determined that may be affected by the identified action.
We offer the following comments in the interest of protecting this species and other natural
resources:
Erosion and Sediment Control
Measures to control sediment and erosion should be installed before any ground -disturbing
activities occur. Grading and backfilling should be minimized, and existing native vegetation
should be retained (if possible) to maintain riparian cover for fish and wildlife. Disturbed areas
should be revegetated with native grass and tree species as soon as the project is completed.
Ground disturbance should be limited to what will be stabilized quickly, preferably by the end of
the workday. Natural fiber matting (coir) should be used for erosion confrol as synthetic
netting can trap animals and persist in the environment beyond its intended purpose.
Stream Channel and Bank Restoration
A natural, stable stream system is one that is able to transport a wide range of flows and
associated sediment bed load while maintaining channel features and neither degrading nor
aggrading. Alterations to the dimension, pattern, or profile of the stream channel as well as
changes to streambank vegetation, floodplains, hydrology, or sediment input can significantly
alter this equilibrium.
We offer the following recommendations for the Applicant's consideration:
1. Streambanks with deep-rooted woody vegetation are the most stable, and stream
restoration efforts should incorporate the use of native vegetation adapted to the site
conditions. Live dormant stakes may be used to reestablish root structure in riparian
areas. In areas where banks are severely undercut, high, and steep, whole -tree revetment
or rock may be used as a stabilization treatment (small rock, gravel, sand, and dirt are not
recommended due to their erosive nature), and it should not extend above the bank -full
elevation (the elevation of the channel where the natural floodplain begins).
Deep -rooting woody vegetation should be established along banks where any channel
work is accomplished. Tree and shrub plantings should be spaced at intervals no greater
than 10 feet along banks. Vegetated riparian zone widths should be as wide as practical
but should extend at least 30 feet from the stream channel.
2. Only the absolute minimum amount of work should be done within stream channels to
accomplish necessary reconstruction. Restoration plans should account for the
constraints of the site and the opportunities to improve stream pattern, dimension, and
profile with minimal disturbance.
2

3. Reconstruction work should follow natural channel design methodologies that are based
on the bank -full, or channel -forming, stage of the stream. Bank -full stage maintains the
natural channel dimensions and transports the bulk of sediment over time. Natural
channel conditions should be identified using a reference reach (nearby stream reaches
that exemplify restoration goals). Restoration design should match the pattern,
dimension, and profile of the reference reach to ensure the project's success.
4. All work in or adjacent to stream waters should be conducted in a dry work area to the
extent possible. Sandbags, cofferdams, bladder dams, or other diversion structures
should be used to prevent excavation in flowing water. These diversion structures should
be removed as soon as the work area is stable.
5. Equipment should not be operated in the stream unless absolutely necessary. Machinery
should be operated from the banks in a fashion that minimizes disturbance to woody
vegetation. Equipment should be: (a) washed to remove any contaminant residue prior
to project construction, (b) in good working order, and (c) checked to ensure there are no
leaks of potential contaminants (such as oil or other lubricants) prior to and during
construction.
6. Adequate measures to control sediment and erosion must be implemented prior to any
ground -disturbing activities in order to minimize effects on downstream aquatic
resources. In North Carolina, non -cohesive and erosion -prone soils are most common in
the felsic-crystalline terrains of the mountain and upper piedmont regions. Therefore,
reconstruction work should be staged such that disturbed areas would be stabilized with
seeding, mulch, and/or biodegradable (coir) erosion -control matting prior to the end of
each workday. Matting should be secured in place with staples; stakes; or, wherever
possible, live stakes of native trees. If rain is expected prior to temporary seed
establishment, additional measures should be implemented to protect water quality along
slopes and overburden stockpiles (for example, stockpiles may be covered with plastic or
other geotextile material and surrounded with silt fencing).
The Service appreciates the opportunity to provide these comments. Please contact Mr. Byron
Hamstead of our staff at Byron [e-mail], if you have any questions. In any future
correspondence concerning this project, please reference our Log Number 4-2-20-422.
Sincerely,
Digitally signed by JANET
JANET MIZZI ""'
Date: 2020.09.09 13:57:17
-0400'
Janet Mizzi
Field Supervisor
3

NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
_
Date: 2 li /7_0
Project/Site: „76r-ce H5]..
Latitude:
Evaluator: t.i1-77)1104,- (F-7(2-
County: so ir.
Longitude: - So , 1,64 ;.5
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
*
if 19 or perennial if 30co
Stream Determination (cJiLa..on
Ephemeral Interrnitten Perennia
Other
e.g. Quin:Mame:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1'. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
-3)
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
4. Particle size ofstream substrate
0
1
2
(3-7
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
C--,
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
(6)._
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
s-
1)
2
3
9. Grade control
:0)
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
-'-'- 0.5
'
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No
Yes = 3
-
B. H dmio Subtotal =
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
,-
77-
'3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
(171
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5)
1
. 1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water.table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
C. Biolo Subtotal =
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3 ;
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
'5)
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
T.
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
2
3
22. Fish
0
B
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0-•
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch: _ - . . , ` . r-i-a-i( ep
1 /

DWR Pre -Filing Meeting Request Form
Contact Name*
Contact Email Address*
Project Owner*
Project Name*
Project County*
Owner Address:*
Erin Bennett
[e-mail]
Charles Anderson
Hodges Creek Restoration Project
Surry
Street Address
2631 Reynolda Road
Address Line 2
Suite A
City State / Rovince / Region
Winston-Salen NC
Fbstal / Zip Code Country
27106 Forsyth
Is this a transportation project?* r Yes f' No
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
rJ 401 Water Quality Certification - I— 401 Water Quality Certification -
Reg ula r Express
I— Individual Permit I— Modification
I— Shoreline Stabilization
Does this project have an existing project ID#?*
(' Yes c: No
Do you know the name of the staff member you would like to request a meeting with?
Please give a brief project description below.*
Hodge Creek Restoration Project is being implemented through the
Western NC Stream Initiative program. The Project is located west of 1-77
and accessed via Casstevens Road in Surry County, North Carolina at 36°
27' 01.15" N and 80° 47' 10.95" W. The proposed project aims to address
erosion and sedimentation issues and improve habitat in Hodges Creek.
Stream restoration and enhancement will be conducted and will include
bank sloping, in -stream structure installation, bioengineering, and riparian
buffer planting. NRCS practice codes that will be utilized include 584
Structural, 580 Bank Stabilization, 395 Habitat, 578 Crossing, and 612
Riparian Buffer.
Please give a couple of dates you are available for a meeting.

10/13/2020
10/14/2020
10/15/2020
10/16/2020
10/20/2020
Please attach the documentation you would like to have the meeting about.
Fig_1 _Hodges_Creek_Vicin ity.pdf
Fig_2_Hodges_Creek_USGS.pdf
pdf only
1.03MB
1.18MB
By digitally signing below, I certify that I have read and understood that per the Federal Clean Water Act Section
401 Certification Rule the following statements:
• This form completes the requirement of the Pre -Filing Meeting Request in the Clean Water Act Section 401 Certification
Rule.
• I understand by signing this form that I cannot submit my application until 30 calendar days after this pre -filing
meeting request.
• !also understand that DWR is not required to respond or grant the meeting request.
Your project's thirty -day clock started upon receipt of this application. You will receive notification regarding meeting location
and time if a meeting is necessary. You will receive notification when the thirty -day clock has expired, and you can submit an
application.
Signature *
Submittal Date 10/5/2020