20181442 Ver 1_Dugout Preliminary JD request_20210419

fires
August 1, 2019
Mickey Sugg
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington Field Office
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
Dear Mr. Sugg,
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Raleigh, NC 27605
Corporate Headquarters
5020 Montrose Blvd. Suite 650
Houston, TX 77006
Main: 713.520.5400
Resource Environmental Solutions (RES) is pleased to present this Request for a Preliminary Jurisdictional
Determination for the Dugout Mitigation Site located in Cumberland County, North Carolina (34.9255 °N
and -78.8488 °W). This project will be part of the RES Cape Fear 05 Umbrella Mitigation Bank and will
provide mitigation credits to offset unavoidable impacts to stream resources within the Cape Fear River
Basin (8-digit USGS HUC 03030005). As part of this scope of work, RES is submitting this request to the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) for a confirmation ofthe limits of Waters ofthe U.S. on the subject
site.
The Dugout Mitigation Site (the "Site") is contained in seven parcels totaling 41-acres of proposed
easement in Cumberland County, NC. The Site will involve the restoration, enhancement, and
preservation of Grays Creek, which begins at the western part of the project area and drains in an easterly
direction across the Site, eventually draining to the Cape Fear River. The site is primarily characterized by
agricultural use, forest, and very low -intensity residential areas. Land use at the site is characterized by
pasture, row crop, and disturbed riparian forest.
The proposed site will provide improvements to water quality, hydrologic function, and habitat. The
projects will address stressors identified in the watershed through nutrient removal, sediment removal,
runoff filtration, and improved aquatic and terrestrial habitat.
res.us

We thank you in advance for your timely response and cooperation. Please feel free to contact me at
[phone] if you have any additional question regarding this matter.
Sincerely,
Jeremy Schmid l Senior Ecologist
o
Attachments: Jurisdictional Determination Request Form, Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form,
Landowner Authorization Form, Vicinity Map, USGS Topographc Map, National Wetlands Inventory
Map, Soils Map, Potential Waters of the U.S. Delineation Map, and Wetland Data Sheets
2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
US Army Corps
of Engineers.
Wilmington District
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project
manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by
assigned counties can be found on-line at:
http://www. saw.usace. army.mil/Missions/RegulatoryPermitProgram/Contact/CountyLocator. aspx,
by calling 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your
request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager.
ASHEVILLE & CHARLOTTE REGULATORY
FIELD OFFICES
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
General Number: 910-251-4633
Fax Number: [phone]
INSTRUCTIONS:
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E, F and G.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H.
NOTE ON PART D — PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that
all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to
proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when
necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s)
authorized agent to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for
JD requests associated with North Carolina Depaitiuent of Transportation (NCDOT)
projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD
may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Version: May 2017 Page 1

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: 5235 S NC-87 Highway
City, State: Fayetteville, NC 28306
County: Cumberland
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN):
0442-37-1627.. 0442-37-1967.. 0442-38-2137.. 0442-78-7881.. 0442-46-1787.. 0442-57-8598.. 0442-77-0886
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: Jeremy Schmid
Mailing Address: 302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address:
Select one:
Raleigh, NC 27605
919-345-3034
[e-mail]
I am the current property owner.
I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant'
Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
Other, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION2
Name: Vance U. Tyson Jr.
Mailing Address: 4925 S NC-87 Highway
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address:
Fayetteville, NC 28306
' Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
2 Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
Version: May 2017 Page 2

Landowner Authorization Form
Site: Vance Tvson
Property Legal Description
Deed Book/Page: 10068/811; 10006/306; 10009/887
County: Cumberland
Parcel ID Numbers: 0442-37-1627, 0442-37-1967, 0442-38-2137; 0442-46-1787; 0442-57-8598, 0442-77-0886,
0442-78-7881
Street Address: 5235 S NC-87 Hwy, Fayetteville. NC 28306: 1998 Schreiber Drive, Favetteville, NC 28306; 5029 S
NC-87 Hwy, Fayetteville, NC 28306
Property Owner: Vance U. Tyson. Jr.
The undersigned, registered property owner of the above property, do hereby authorize
Resource Environmental Solutions, the NC Division of Water Resources, and the US Army Corps of Engineers,
their employees, agents or assigns to have reasonable access to the above referenced property for the evaluation of
the property as a potential stream, wetland, and or riparian buffer restoration project, including conducting stream
and or wetland determinations and delineations, as well as issuance and acceptance of any required permit(s) or
certification(s).
Property Owner Address: 4925 S NC 87 Hwy, Fayetteville. NC 28306
I/We hereby certify the above information to be true and accurate to the best of my/our knowledge.
gd4Ate 71/ --/A)
(Property Owner Authorized Signature}) Date
(Property Owner Printed Name
(Property Owner Authorized Signature) Date
(Property Owner Printed Name)

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One)
I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may
be "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United States"on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional "waters of
the United States". PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
"preliminary" in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United
States" are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other "affected
party" (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
n
Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
Size of Property or Review Area 89 acres.
❑ The property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
Version: May 2017
Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
z
Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude: 34.9255
Longitude: -78.8488
A legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than 11x 17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).6
• North Arrow
• Graphical Scale
• Boundary of Review Area
• Date
• Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
• Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
• Jurisdictional non -wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non -Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
• Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non -
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non -Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non jurisdictional (i.e.
"Isolated", "No Significant Nexus", or "Upland Feature"). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
• Wetland and non -wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non -wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
n
Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
6 Please refer to the guidance document titled "Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations" to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards. http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-
Pro gram/Jurisdiction/
Version: May 2017
Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
0
Completed appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
• PJDs, please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form' and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
• AJDs, please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Forma
Vicinity Map
Aerial Photograph
USGS Topographic Map
Soil Survey Map
Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
Landscape Photos (if taken)
NCSAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
Other Assessment Forms
' www.saw.usace.army.mil/Portals/59/docs/regulatory/regdocs/JD/RGL 08-02 App A Prelim JD Form fillable.pdf
s Please see http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-Pro gram/Jurisdiction/
Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to federaljurisdiction under the regulatory
authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local
government agencies, and the public, and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal
law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the
approved jurisdictional determination (AJD), which will be made available to the public on the District's website
and on the Headquarters USAGE website.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the
request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued.
Version: May 2017 Page 6

Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: 07/15/19
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Jeremy Schmid
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: CESAW-RG-W
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: Cumberland City: Hope Mills
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat.: 34.9255
Long.: -78.8488
Universal Transverse Mercator: NAD83
Name of nearest waterbody: Grays Creek
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site
number
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Estimated amount
of aquatic resource
in review area
(acreage and linear
feet, if applicable)
Type of aquatic
resource (i.e., wetland
vs. non -wetland
waters)
Geographic authority
to which the aquatic
resource "may be"
subject (i.e., Section
404 or Section 10/404)
see attached table

Waters_Name State owardin_Codl HGM_Code IMeas_Type
WA NORTH CAROLINA PFO Area
WC NORTH CAROLINA PEM Area
WD NORTH CAROLINA PFO Area
WE NORTH CAROLINA PFO Area
WF NORTH CAROLINA PFO Area
WG NORTH CAROLINA PSS Area
OW1 NORTH CAROLINA POW Area
GC3 NORTH CAROLINA R3 Linear
TV1 NORTH CAROLINA R4 Linear
TV2 NORTH CAROLINA R4 Linear
TV3 NORTH CAROLINA R4 Linear
TV4 NORTH CAROLINA R4 Linear
Amount Units
34.18 ACRE
0.2775 ACRE
4.2853 ACRE
0.1164 ACRE
0.0902 ACRE
0.1851 ACRE
0.33 ACRE
6320 FOOT
580 FOOT
753 FOOT
497 FOOT
264 FOOT
Waters_Type
DELINEATE
DELINEATE
DELINEATE
DELINEATE
DELINEATE
DELINEATE
DELINEATE
DELINEATE
DELINEATE
DELINEATE
DELINEATE
DELINEATE
Latitude
34.925
34.9275
34.9267
34.9259
34.9266
34.9259
34.9251
34.925614
34.92697
34.926107
34.926404
34.927233
Longitude - Local_Waterway
-78.8519
-78.8531
-78.8526
-78.8509
-78.8496
-78.848
-78.8568
-78.84806
-78.853011
-78.85023
-78.84889
-78.848415

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option
to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an
informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their
characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a
Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre -
construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or
other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the
activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has
elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an
official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the
option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit
authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result
in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the
applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can
accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and
conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has
determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject
permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance
of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit
authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the
review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and
waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance
or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7)
whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms
and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively
appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic
jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official
delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds
that there "may be"waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be" navigable waters of
the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review
area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources
below where indicated for all checked items:
• Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map:Vicinity, USGS, NWI, Soil, Existing conditions, WOUS
O Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
n Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
n Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
• U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: 24k Cedar Creek
❑ Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation:
• National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: .(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
❑ Photographs: n Aerial (Name & Date):
or n Other (Name & Date):
n Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
n Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily
been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determinations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory staff member
completing PJD
Jeremy Schmid En,ao;za,oa` zso;oo°
al ,senmid@res us Fua
Signature and date of
person requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)'
1 Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not respond
within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is
necessary prior to finalizing an action.

Legend
Study Area
0 1,000 2,000
Feet
Project Vicinity
Dugout Mitigation Project
Cumberland County, North Carolina
Hope Mill s
Dugout Project
Date: 7/2/2019
Drawn by: MDE
Checked by: JLS
1 inch = 2,000 feet
fires

-.�,~~,,~,,- " j-`~_~~I
r
E
0 1,000 2 000
Feet
USGS Quadrangle
Cedar Creek (1986)
Dugout Mitigation Project
Cumberland County, North Carolina
Date: 7/2/2019
Drawn by: MDE
Checked by: JLS
1 inch = 2,000 feet
Ores

\
A
Legend
Study Area
1111 Hydric (100%)
Predominantly Hydric (66-99%)
1— Partially Hydric (33-65%)
•
Predominantly Nonhydric (1-32%)
Nonhydric (0%)
NRCS - Web Soil Survey 2019
444111141mAllitollii0
,,,Noeikt.farsrdiVietil
stiteraiivrAn.*A 4 44
imilitatto
49,1W
0 400 800
Feet
en
Mapped Soils
Dugout Mitigation Project
Cumberland County, North Carolina
Date: 7/2/2019
Drawn by: MDE
Checked by: JLS
1 inch = 800 feet
pros

C
_
•
Legend
Study Area
NWI Wetland (USFWS 10/15/2018)
0 400 800
Feet
. .t
National Wetland Inventory
Dugout Mitigation Project
Cumberland County, North Carolina
Date: 7/2/2019
Drawn by: MDE
Checked by: JLS
1 inch = 800 feet
pros

J 500 1,000
Feet
Figure 4 - Landowner Map
Dugout Mitigation Site
Cumberland County, North Carolina
Date: 9/7/2018
Drawn by: MDD
Checked by: BPB
1 inch = 1,000 feet
res

Wetland
Wetland
Wetland
Wetland
Wetland
Wetland
0.33 ac
34.18 ac
0.28 ac
4.29 ac
0.12 ac
0.09 ac
0.19 ac
6,320 ft
580 ft
753 ft
Potential
Wetland or Non -Wetland Waters
of the U.S. Map
Cumberland County,
North Carolina
Potential Non-weltand
Waters of the US
REFERENCE
1) Horizontal Datum is NAD83 UTM Zone 17N.
2) Map Projection is NAD_1983_StatePlane_
North Carolina FIPS 3200 Feet

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Dugout
Applicant/Owner: Resource Environmental Solutions
Investigator(s): J. Schmid
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Valley bottom
City/County: Fayetteville/Cumberland
Sampling Date: 11-Apr-19
State: NC Sampling Point: DP-2
Section, Township, Range: S
Local relief (concave, convex, none): flat
T
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 133A in LRR P Lat.: 34.9250 Long.: -78.8461
Soil Map Unit Name: Johnston loam
Slope: 0.0 % /
Datum:
NWI classification: PSS
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes O No 0 (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes 0
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
No ❑
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
0.0 °
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes 0 No 0
Hydric Soil Present? Yes 0 No 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes 0 No 0
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes 0 No
Remarks:
Area logged within last 5 years. Appears that heribicide was applied in powerline easement with possible drift into surrounding areas. Smilax dominant
in many areas
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of 2 required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one required; check all that apply) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
High Water Table (A2) ❑ Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U) ❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑ Water Marks (B1) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Dry Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (B3) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Iron Deposits (B5) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ ShallowAquitard (D3)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) d FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
❑ Water -Stained Leaves (B9) ❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRRT, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes 0 No 0 Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes 0 No 0
Water Table Present? Yes 0 No 0 Depth (inches): 2
Saturation Present?
(includes capillary fringe) Yes ❑ No 0 Depth (inches):
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five/Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Dominant
Species'
Absolute Rel.Strat. Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Cover Status
1. 0 ❑ 0.0%
2 0 ❑ 0.0%
3. o ❑ o.o%
4 0 ❑ o.o%
5. o ❑ o.o%
6. o ❑ o.o%
7. o ❑ o.o%
8 0 ❑ 0.0%
50% of Total Cover: 0 20% of Total Cover: 0 0 = Total Cover
Sapling or Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
1 Quercus nigra 20 V 25.0% FAC
2 Acer rubrum 30 0 37.5% FAC
3. Liquidambar styraciflua 30 • 37.5% FAC
4. 0 ❑ o.o%
5. 0 ❑ o.o%
6. 0 ❑ o.o%
7. 0 ❑ o.o%
8. 0 ❑ 0.0%
50% of Total Cover: 40 20% of Total Cover: 16 80 = Total Cover
Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
1. Rubus argutus 20 • 66.7% FAC
2. Ilex opaca 10 • 33.3% FAC
3. ❑ o.o%
4. 0 ❑ o.o%
5. 0 ❑ o.o%
6. 0 ❑ o.o%
50% of Total Cover: 15 20% of Total Cover: 6 30 = Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
1. 0 ❑ 0.0%
2. 0 ❑ 0.0%
3. o ❑ o.o%
4. 0 ❑ o.o%
5. 0 ❑ o.o%
6. 0 ❑ o.o%
7. 0 ❑ 0.0%
8. 0 ❑ 0.0%
9. 0 ❑ 0.0%
10. 0 ❑ 0.0%
11. 0 ❑ o.o%
12. 0 ❑ 0.0%
50% of Total Cover: 0 20% of Total Cover: 0 0 = Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
1. Smilax laurifolia 30 ❑d 100.0% FACW
2. _ 0 ❑ 0.0%
3. ! o ❑ o.o%
4. 0 ❑ o.o%
5. o ❑ o.o%
50% of Total Cover: 15 20% of Total Cover: 6 30 = Total Cover
Sampling Point: DP-2
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
Percent of dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
6 (A)
6 (B)
100.0% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
FACW species 30 x 2 60
FAC species 110 x 3 330
FACU species 0 x 4 0
UPL species 0 x 5 0
Column Totals: 140 (A) 390
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.786
(B)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
V 2 - Dominance Test is > 50%
O 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0 1
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain)
1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definition of Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?
Yes O No O
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
*Indicator suffix = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP-2
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist)_ % Tvne 1 Locz
Matrix
Redox Features
0-20 10YR 2/1
20-24+ 10YR 5/1
Texture Remarks
Silt Loam
Clay Loam
1 Type: C=Concentration. D=Depletion. RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains 2Location: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:
❑ Histosol (Al)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
❑ Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
❑ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
❑ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
❑ Sandy Muck Mineral (S1) (LRR 0, S)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR 0)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR 0, P, T)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B) wetland hydrology must be present,
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A) unless disturbed or problematic.
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR 0)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 153B)
❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes 0 No 0
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Dugout City/County: Fayetteville/Cumberland Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: Resource Environmental Solutions State: NC Sampling Point: DP-3a
Investigator(s): J. Schmid
11-Apr-19
Section, Township, Range: S T R
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Valley bottom Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 133A in LRR P Lat.: 34.9254
Soil Map Unit Name: Johnston loam
Slope: 0.0 % /
Long.: -78.8551 Datum:
NWI classification: PFO
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes O No 0 (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes 0
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
No ❑
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
0.0 °
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes 0
Yes 0
Yes 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland?
Yes 0 No 0
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of 2 required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one required; check all that apply) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
High Water Table (A2) ❑ Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U) ❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑ Water Marks (B1) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Dry Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (B3) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Iron Deposits (B5) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ ShallowAquitard (D3)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) d FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
❑ Water -Stained Leaves (B9) ❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRRT, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes 0 No 0 Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes 0 No 0
Water Table Present? Yes 0 No 0 Depth (inches): 4
Saturation Present?
(includes capillary fringe) Yes ❑ No 0 Depth (inches):
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five/Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Dominant
Species'
Absolute Rel.Strat. Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Cover Status
1. Acer rubrum 30 ❑d 37.5% FAC
2. Nyssa biflora 20 ❑d 25.0% OBL
3. Taxodium distichum 10 ❑ 12.5% OBL
4 Liquidambar styraciflua 20 ❑d 25.0% FAC
5. o ❑ o.o%
6. o ❑ o.o%
7. o ❑ o.o%
8 0 ❑ 0.0%
50% of Total Cover: 40 20% of Total Cover: 16 80 = Total Cover
Sapling or Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
1 Magnolia virginiana 10 V 33.3% FACW
2 Liquidambar styraciflua 20 0 66.7% FAC
3. o ❑ o.o%
4. o ❑ o.o%
5. 0 ❑ o.o%
6. 0 ❑ o.o%
7. 0 ❑ 0.0%
8. 0 ❑ 0.0%
50% of Total Cover: 15 20% of Total Cover: 6 30 = Total Cover
Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
1. Eubotrys racemosa 30 V 100.0% FACW
2. 0 ❑ 0.0%
3. 0 ❑ o.o%
4. 0 ❑ o.o%
5. 0 ❑ o.o%
6. 0 ❑ o.o%
50% of Total Cover: 15 20% of Total Cover: 6 30 = Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
1 . Juncus effusus 10 0 33.3% OBL
2. Woodwardia areolata 10 0 33.3% OBL
3. Saururus cernuus 10 0 33.3% OBL
4. 0 ❑ o.o%
5. 0 ❑ o.o%
6. 0 ❑ o.o%
7. 0 ❑ 0.0%
8. 0 ❑ 0.0%
9. 0 ❑ 0.0%
10. 0 ❑ 0.0%
11. 0 ❑ o.o%
12. 0 ❑ 0.0%
50% of Total Cover: 15 20% of Total Cover: 6 30 = Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
1. Smilax laurifolia 10 0 100.0% FACW
2. _ 0 ❑ 0.0%
3. ! o ❑ o.o%
4. 0 ❑ o.o%
5. o ❑ o.o%
50% of Total Cover: 5 20% of Total Cover: 2 10 = Total Cover
Sampling Point: DP-3a
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
Percent of dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
10 (A)
10 (B)
100.0% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 60 x 1 = 60
FACW species 50 x 2 = 100
FAC species 70 x 3 = 210
FACU species 0 x 4 0
UPL species 0 x 5 0
Column Totals: 180 (A) 370
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.056
(B)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
V 2 - Dominance Test is > 50%
O 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0 1
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain)
1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definition of Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?
Yes O No O
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
*Indicator suffix = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP-3a
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist)_ % Tvne 1 Locz
Matrix
Redox Features
0-18 10YR 2/1
18-24+ 10YR 4/1
Texture Remarks
Silt Loam
Clay
1 Type: C=Concentration. D=Depletion. RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains 2Location: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:
❑ Histosol (Al)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
❑ Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
❑ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
❑ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
❑ Sandy Muck Mineral (S1) (LRR 0, S)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR 0)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR 0, P, T)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B) wetland hydrology must be present,
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A) unless disturbed or problematic.
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR 0)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 153B)
❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes 0 No 0
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Dugout
Applicant/Owner: Resource Environmental Solutions
Investigator(s): J. Schmid
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Valley bottom
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 133A in LRR P
Soil Map Unit Name: Johnston loam
City/County: Fayetteville/Cumberland
Sampling Date: 11-Apr-19
State: NC Sampling Point: DP-3b
Section, Township, Range: S T R
Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope: 0.0 % /
Lat.: 34.9254 Long.:-78.8551 Datum:
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?
NWI classification:
Yes O No 0 (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes O No 0
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
0.0 °
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes 0
Yes 0
Yes 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland?
Yes 0 No 0
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one required; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of 2 required)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks
(B6)
Concave Surface (B8)
(B10)
(B16)
Table (C2)
(C8)
on Aerial Imagery (C9)
(D2)
(D3)
(D5)
(D8) (LRRT, U)
❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated
❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U) ❑ Drainage Patterns
❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) ❑ Moss Trim Lines
❑ Water Marks (B1) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Dry Season Water
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Crayfish Burrows
❑ Drift Deposits (B3) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Saturation Visible
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ❑ Geomorphic Position
❑ Iron Deposits (B5) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ ShallowAquitard
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test
❑ Water -Stained Leaves (B9) ❑ Sphagnum moss
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes 0 No 0 Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes 0 No 0
Water Table Present? Yes 0 No 0 Depth (inches):
Saturation Present?
(includes capillary fringe) Yes ❑ No 0 Depth (inches):
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five/Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Dominant
Species'
Absolute Rel.Strat. Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: _ ) % Cover Cover Status
1. Liriodendron tulipifera 30 ❑d 37.5% FACU
2. Acer rubrum 20 ❑d 25.0% FAC
3. Quercus nigra 10 ❑ 12.5% FAC
4 Pinus taeda 20 ❑d 25.0% FAC
5. o ❑ o.o%ro
6. o ❑ o.o%
7. o ❑ o.o%ro
8 0 ❑ 0.0%
50% of Total Cover: 40 20% of Total Cover: 16 80 = Total Cover
Sapling or Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
1 Liquidambar styraciflua 10 V 100.0% FAC
2 0 ❑ 0.0%
3. o ❑ o.o%ro
4. o ❑ o.o%ro
5. 0 ❑ o.o%ro
6. 0 ❑ o.o%ro
7. 0 ❑ o.o%ro
8. 0 ❑ 0.0%
50% of Total Cover: 5 20% of Total Cover: 2 10 = Total Cover
Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
1. Rubus argutus 10 V 100.0% FAC
2. 0 ❑ 0.0%
3. 0 ❑ o.o%ro
4. 0 ❑ o.o%ro
5. 0 ❑ o.o%ro
6. 0 ❑ o.o%ro
50% of Total Cover: 5 20% of Total Cover: 2 10 = Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
1 . Microstegium vimineum 20 0 100.0% FAC
2. 0 ❑ 0.0% _
3. o ❑ o.o%ro
4. 0 ❑ o.o%ro
5. 0 ❑ o.o%ro
6. 0 ❑ o.o%ro
7. 0 ❑ 0.0%
8. 0 ❑ 0.0%
9. 0 ❑ 0.0%
10. 0 ❑ 0.0%
11. 0 ❑ o.o%ro
12. 0 ❑ 0.0%
50% of Total Cover: 10 20% of Total Cover: 4 20 = Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
1. Lonicera japonica 10 ❑d 100.0% FACU
2. _ 0 ❑ 0.0%
3. ! o ❑ o.o%ro
4. 0 ❑ o.o%ro
5. o ❑ o.o%ro
50% of Total Cover: 5 20% of Total Cover: 2 10 = Total Cover
Sampling Point: DP-3b
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
Percent of dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
5 (A)
7 (B)
71.4% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
FAC species 90 x 3 = 270
FACU species 40 x 4 = 160
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
Column Totals: 130 (A) 430
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.308
(B)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
V 2 - Dominance Test is > 50%
❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0 1
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain)
1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definition of Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?
Yes O No O
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
*Indicator suffix = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP-3b
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
(inches)
0-6
Matrix
Redox Features
Color (moist) % Color (mois)_ % Tine 1 Locz
7.5YR 3/3
6-14 2.5YR 4/4
Texture Remarks
Sandy Loam
Sandy Loam
1 Type: C=Concentration. D=Depletion. RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains 2Location: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:
❑ Histosol (Al)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
❑ Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
❑ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
❑ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
❑ Sandy Muck Mineral (S1) (LRR 0, S)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR 0)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR 0, P, T)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B) wetland hydrology must be present,
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A) unless disturbed or problematic.
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR 0)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 153B)
❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes 0 No 0
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Dugout City/County: Fayetteville/Cumberland Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: Resource Environmental Solutions State: NC Sampling Point: DP-11
Investigator(s): J. Schmid
11-Apr-19
Section, Township, Range: S T R
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Valley bottom Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope: 0.0 % / 0.0 °
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 133A in LRR P Lat.: 34.9250 Long.:-78.8461 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Deloss loam
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?
NWI classification:
Yes O No 0 (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes O No 0
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes 0 No 0
Hydric Soil Present? Yes 0 No 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes 0 No 0
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes 0 No
Remarks:
Area logged within last 5 years. Appears that heribicide was applied in powerline easement with possible drift into surrounding areas. Smilax dominant
in many areas
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of 2 required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one required; check all that apply) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U) ❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑ Water Marks (B1) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Dry Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (B3) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Iron Deposits (B5) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ ShallowAquitard (D3)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) d FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
❑ Water -Stained Leaves (B9) ❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRRT, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes 0 No 0 Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes 0 No 0
Water Table Present? Yes 0 No 0 Depth (inches):
Saturation Present?
(includes capillary fringe) Yes ❑ No 0 Depth (inches):
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
saturation at 18"
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five/Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Dominant
Species'
Absolute Rel.Strat. Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Cover Status
1. 0 ❑ 0.0%
2 0 ❑ 0.0%
3. o ❑ o.o%
4 0 ❑ o.o%
5. o ❑ o.o%
6. o ❑ o.o%
7. o ❑ o.o%
8 0 ❑ 0.0%
50% of Total Cover: 0 20% of Total Cover: 0 0 = Total Cover
Sapling or Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
1 Acer rubrum 20 • 40.0% FAC
2 Liquidambar styraciflua 20 ❑d 40.0% FAC
3. Quercus nigra 10 • 20.0% FAC
4. 0 ❑ o.o%ro
5. _ 0 ❑ o.o%ro
6. 0 ❑ o.o%
7. 0 ❑ 0.0%
8. 0 ❑ 0.0%
50% of Total Cover: 25 20% of Total Cover: 10 50 = Total Cover
Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
1. Ilex opaca 5 • 33.3% FAC
2. Rubus argutus 10 • 66.7% FAC
3. 0 ❑ o.o%ro
4. 0 ❑ o.o%ro
5. 0 ❑ o.o%ro
6. 0 ❑ o.o%ro
50% of Total Cover: 7.5 20% of Total Cover: 3 15 = Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
1. 0 ❑ 0.0%
2. 0 ❑ 0.0%
3. o ❑ o.o%ro
4. 0 ❑ o.o%ro
5. 0 ❑ o.o%ro
6. 0 ❑ o.o%ro
7. 0 ❑ 0.0%
8. 0 ❑ 0.0%
9. 0 ❑ 0.0%
10. 0 ❑ 0.0%
11. 0 ❑ o.o%ro
12. 0 ❑ 0.0%
50% of Total Cover: 0 20% of Total Cover: 0 0 = Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
1. Smilax laurifolia 50 ❑d 100.0% FACW
2. _ 0 ❑ 0.0%
3. ! o ❑ o.o%ro
4. 0 ❑ o.o%ro
5. o ❑ o.o%ro
50% of Total Cover: 25 20% of Total Cover: 10 50 = Total Cover
Sampling Point: DP-11
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
Percent of dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
6 (A)
6 (B)
100.0% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
FACW species 50 x 2 100
FAC species 65 x 3 195
FACU species 0 x 4 0
UPL species 0 x 5 0
Column Totals: 115 (A) 295
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.565
(B)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
V 2 - Dominance Test is > 50%
O 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0 1
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain)
1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definition of Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?
Yes O No O
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
*Indicator suffix = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP-11
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist)_ % Tvne 1 Locz
Matrix
Redox Features
0-12 10YR 2/1
12-20+ 10YR 4/1
Texture Remarks
Silt Loam
Clay
1 Type: C=Concentration. D=Depletion. RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains 2Location: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:
❑ Histosol (Al)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
❑ Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
❑ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
❑ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
❑ Sandy Muck Mineral (S1) (LRR 0, S)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR 0)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR 0, P, T)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B) wetland hydrology must be present,
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A) unless disturbed or problematic.
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR 0)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 153B)
❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes 0 No 0
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

Soil Borings
Date
Boring
Soil
Saturation depth
Notes
4/11/2019
1
0-20+ 10YR 2/1 silt loam
3
4/11/2019
2
0-20+ 10YR 2/1 silt loam
2
0-12 10YR 2/1 silt loam
12-16 10YR 2/1 sand 16-
4/11/2019
4
24+ 10YR 4/1 loam
>24
0-20 10YR 2/1 silt loam
4/11/2019
5
20-28 10YR 5/1 clay
14
0-20 10YR 2/1 silt loam
4/11/2019
6
20-28 10YR 5/1 clay
14
4/16/2019
7
0-18 10YR 2/1 silt loam
16
4/16/2019
8
0-24 10YR 2/1 silt loam
18
4/16/2019
9
0-24 10YR 2/1 silt loam
18
0-12 10YR 2/1 silt loam
4/16/2019
10
12-20 10YR 4/1 clay
18
0-12 10YR 2/1 silt loam
4/16/2019
11
12-20 10YR 4/1 clay
18
4/16/2019
12
0-20+ 10YR 2/1 silt loam
8
4/16/2019
13
0-20+ 10YR 2/1 silt loam
7
4/16/2019
14
0-20+ 10YR 2/1 silt loam
8
4/16/2019
15
0-20+ 10YR 2/1 silt loam
10
4/16/2019
15a
0-20+ 10YR 2/1 silt loam
8
4/16/2019
16
8
4/16/2019
17
16
4/16/2019
18
>20
4/16/2019
19
>20
4/16/2019
20
>20
rapid assessment to
4/16/2019
21
>20
find any areas having
4/29/2019
22
>20
saturation within 12"
4/29/2019
23
>20
of ground surface. Soil
4/29/2019
24
>20
data not recorded for
4/29/2019
25
>20
each but were similar
4/29/2019
26
>20
to previous borings
4/29/2019
27
>20
(minimum 0-8" of 10YR
4/29/2019
28
>20
2/1)
4/29/2019
29
>20
4/29/2019
30
>20
4/29/2019
31
>20
4/29/2019
32
>20