NC0004839_Permit (Issuance)_20051018

NPDES DOCUWENT SCANNIM& COVER SHEET
NPDES Permit: NC0004839
Document Type: Permit Issuance
Wasteload Allocation
Authorization to Construct (AtC)
Permit Modification
Speculative Limits
Report
Instream Assessment (67B)
Environmental Assessment (EA)
Permit
History
Document Date: October 18, 2005
Thies document i8 printed on reuMe paper-ignore any
content on the reYeree eeide

r~
A0�W A TFRQG Michael F.Easley,Governor
William G.Ross Jr.,Secretary
coNorth Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
-C Alan W.Klimek,P.E.Director
Division of Water Quality
October 18, 2005
Mr.Robert D. Sullivan
Kinder Morgan Southeast Terminals,LLC
1435 Windward Concourse
Alpharetta,Georgia 30005
Subject:Issuance of NPDES Permit NC0004839
Kinder Morgan Southeast Tertinals-Charlotte
Mecklenburg County
Dear Mr. Sullivan:
Division personnel have reviewed and approved your application for renewal of the subject permit.
Accordingly,we are forwarding the attached NPDES discharge permit. This permit is issued pursuant to the
requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and the Memorandum of Agreement between North
Carolina and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency dated May 9, 1994 (or as subsequently amended).
This final permit includes the following changes from the draft permit sent to you on July 20, 2005:
• Because the Environmental Protection Agency has tagged MTBE as a potential carcinogen and this
discharge is to water-supply waters, MTBE monitoring has been included in this permit. Effluent
data gathered in recent years shows MTBE to be present, so the monitoring frequency required will
be monthly and an action plan for its elimination is also being added.
• The limit for Total Suspended Solids is being changed to 45 mg/L to conform with Division policy
for oil terminal permits.
If any parts,measurement frequencies or sampling requirements contained in this pertnit are unacceptable to
you,you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing upon written request within thirty (30) days following receipt of
this letter. This request must be in the form of a written petition,conforming to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina
General Statutes,and filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings (6714 Mail Service Center,Raleigh,North
Carolina 27699-6714). Unless such demand is made, this decision shall be final and binding.
Please note that this permit is not transferable except after notice to the Division. The Division may require
modification or revocation and reissuance of the permit. This permit does not affect the legal requirements to obtain
other permits which may be required by the Division of Water Quality or permits required by the Division of Land
Resources,the Coastal Area Management Act or any other Federal or Local governmental permit that may be
required. If you have any questions concerning this permit,please contact Dawn Jeffries at telephone number (919)
733-5083,extension 595,
Sincerely,
A V z - ` .
Tur Alan W. Klimek,P.E.
cc: Central Files
Mooresville Regional Office/Surface Water Protection Section
Aquatic Toxicology Unit
Mecklenburg County Department of Environmental Protection N�o�nCarolina
N>�nFs r r,,;r �Na&ra!!y
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh,NC 27699-1617 Phone[phone] Customer Service
Intemet: h2o.emstate.nc.us 512 N.Salisbury St. Raleigh,NC 27604 FAX [phone] 1-877-623-6748
An Equal OpportunilylAffirmative Action Employer—50%Recycled110%Post Consumer Paper

' r
Permit NC0004839
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
PERMIT
TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER UNDER THE
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
(NPDES)
In compliance with the provisions of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1,other lawful standards and regulations
promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission, and the Federal Water Pollution
Control Act,as amended,
Kinder Morgan Southeast Terminals-Charlotte Terminal 2
is hereby authorized to discharge wastewater from outfalls located at the
Kinder Morgan Southeast Terminals-Charlotte Terminal 2
6801 Freedom Drive
Charlotte
Mecklenburg County
to receiving waters designated as an unnamed tributary to Long Creek in the Catawba River basin in
accordance with effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set forth in Parts I,
II, III and N hereof.
This permit shall become effective December 1, 2005.
This permit and authorization to discharge shall expire at midnight on June 30,2010.
Signed this day October 18, 2005.
Y
r Alan W. Klimek, P.E.,Dir ctor
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

Permit NC0004839
SUPPLEMENT TO PERMIT COVER SHEET
All previous MDES Permits issued to this facility,whether for operation or discharge are hereby revoked. As of this
permit issuance,any previously issued permit bearing this number is no longer effective. Therefore,the exclusive
authorityto operate and discharge from this facility arises under the permit conditions,requirements,terms,and
provisions included herein.
Kinder Morgan Southeast Terminals
is hereby authorized to:
1. Continue to discharge stormwater from the diked tank areas via Outfall 001; and
2. Continue to operate a water pollution control system for the stormwater, fire system test water and
wash water from the containment pad and loading racks area consisting of:
• Oil water separator �-
• Retention tank
• GAC unit
and discharge from said water pollution control system via Outfall 001 located at the Charlotte
Terminal 2, 6801 Freedom Drive, Charlotte, Mecklenburg County; and
3. Continue to op te-a5groundwater remediation system and discharge the treated waters consistin
of
• Oil/water separator
• Air stripper
• Carbon polishing unit `� f
and discharge from said treatment system via Outfall 002 located at the Charlotte Terminal 2, 6801
Freedom Drive, Charlotte,Mecklenburg County; and
4. Discharge from said treatment facility at a specified location(see attached map) into an unnamed
tributary to Long Creek, a waterbody classified as WS-IV waters within the Catawba River Basin.

J .
tip ,./"L�ix 'N`4 'YW �Sr i r J����� ��l'M .�+��� L j � •.SIB � �} ,4 '� -7 � _
�- a„�r I+ e,rs� µ'5��.' ,* A, � � ,4'.�t, ..,� 1 / .`� •L a c �l� ' + �
a •:e ' , k,+ 3 0 6.y a "x ''^''. r- y '� .r.r !�'�. -d� .^.t1 S _k Jr"' ,W'N x ,a `
4 r .'t :: �, y• c � � �� �. n�'j"� ,MLA .,�
�F• '- 'r ;cif � � W�
kp=i �►i� �`f. v S. 4b��.,�� ; '� -. -,; •. y_ ,'r Jam, _a •+'�',�' ':\ S a.�Cr�7+ fin'•,
,r -•�.t 5�.+:�St yf �:. y t� i�y;'y t , 11' 4 p., y. �4 `�, ti�J'R,�t
5 Jf/�'�. r .}'�! ' ,rt _r -' �. •r'i. } �_ ^'r ^"'u.: 1 ta ',
'r� d C k.. al,, �r x `� •p.�s' �' y"c+'•� �" � _�=�f trr r� r'r5� 4.yr� �".,� fir, •�Y. '1r A�+. ,S� yJ '� �S�*al.f
.rr .��rn 1 � �� '1►�. i �. :•- r '.wr�'. �,'c�JJ",C'`'�..� �;': +CA;: ? r 1 � '� v
i ra ;� ✓ • �+ #: E
�y . y��i•}..•;� "r`+ �j � �u _�/_ eriiiq_ •.�.� L �,J/:.••,Jr1'rM'�-; 't` • �1� � r7' i
1 f f
�r�.�'��` r �"".rJ �l�s�� �'r• - r'�'.iy:cli4�, � � ..f�'� � ii
,. * ,n ,,�'";' ',� 'fir, � r^�a� /} f � �';,� � �'; r,L�,'s •,`, n ,, �
Outfalls 001 and 002 �` •. � ' � � �" .�
- :�� • • • ��ry'a rRtilr .• � f ,y s� N�� � +. '}'�jtga �x"',
1 •�}F 'k *r a • •
S � �"" 1�".:r•�»�' 1� Jam- �'d, �rS;T,r��e-4-�_i��.,..�,, r*�� ;-`* !' y`` '-t � L; ��"^�.>'
IA
J'aJ'�� , o •° i'�w'' �.�. r}.'i4:,p` j � _ y�' � kd'rg-.- '' y� ��'!}..r i's �� •,.� ,. �1
t� ..sy .. � r ter' '��t •,,,� '�'-� 4 =z .,
5"' t -,,^ ,�.", ��. „" , ". . -k'":i _ ''� � .�'�� 4+ 'R4 '`y'. l �OhA ti !�$_ u ",."_ ♦ �p�+'1"i...,
L.r,S
.fJ.,','.•. �: [�5��:� F �,rq."�i�nrr,:r, ,�i.. Vic. ,�y., S .n NAa . - -I�� 1lE'A-"u„^X�j� 4
yr . '' :G. # _ p yi. ryi• - .R • ff}��•, Q .
.. r� ,t;. !t C'�. r,,w� �r w �r ,x�� ,r` 1 _ ' .,r�a ,� •� +•�
�''{ S'+`" ;�,r ��tY a�i.��+* � .rs�•1`'� J AS 4r � k 1'"� ;� 1 ,s • Y, ,,,4 �VvN.
^:• '�.� i.r# �h,r y.;+ + _ f #'' y-��i ��� � rY• , � .''_ i��,w�A� 4 iR� °i�"'�s�,
F,� ' ;^:,;:*w• ,'4,ry � �� a r,�•, ,- { x•� � 1�.%'•' t .r'� ->�„a� � a. ���ly,�;. "• � ,yEg- ,,¢.ti � � 1,
kJ Y`��';S �,• "1d9, ` ��" na•'! !L�� .� l 'rn�?r �; r f.a r�. ��•�. S.'a ,+• as
Kk
rs � A � .� � �n� `•: rr r. �rx_' r 4 :'� r { r i'-yr� !„ � f � -.,y '� i'
rl }`� �, �.S �' �.d "� - Y_`y r' 1 y f`".'i r♦ -�C N i- 15i Yr�l N'"�i i'i k .-, � ~�a-'.
�4., � '�.�/ �,�� 1f���?t:� ''.J ♦ �.�:t.] �. Y� aYf.� '.L - 1 1T ?:.-•.� '`�5.�ar.+,i ri-?e1'.•.i��.2i�� �• y i ['Y tRJ,
Kinder Morgan Southeast Terminals
Charlotte Terminal 2
Facility Location
State Grid/Quad: F15SW(Mt.Island Lake) not to scale
Latitude: 35°16'40" N
Longitude: W56'27"W NPDES PertnitNo.NC0004839
Receiving Stream: UT to Long Creek Drainage Basin: Catawba River Basin North
Stream Class: WS-Iv Sub-Basin: 30834 Mecklenburg County

,
Permit NC0004839
A. (1) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Beginning on the effective date of the permit and lasting until expiration,the Permittee is authorized to
discharge stormwater and washwater from Outfall 001. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored
by the Permittee as specified below:
EFFLUENT'''" � VELI MITS "� �� 11IUNIM G�AE U,]REIVIENTT—
CHARACTEItISTICS� . y Monthly Ilaily„ Mea u emW Sample` —p �°�n
Sam t'e Location r
�AV Ti DNS., IUIIl` j `Fre U ; T°�€ elk 9 �}
Flow2 Episodic 2 Effluent
Turbidi 3 R> fjTV Quarterly Grab Effluent
Oil and Grease4 Monthly Grab Effluent
Total Suspended Solids 45.0 m Monthly Grab Effluent
Phenol Quarterly Grab Effluent
Benzene '? Quarterly Grab Effluent
Xylene } Quarterly Grab Effluent
Toluene t QuarterlyGrab Effluent
Eth lbenzene ua erly Grab Effluent
Na hthalene5 Monthly Grab Effluent
MTBE6 Monthly Grab Effluent
Acute Toxici 7 Annually Grab Effluent
Footnotes:
1. Samples shall be collected at the effluent discharge pipe.
2. Flow —During periods of no flow, the Permittee shall submit a monthly Discharge Monitoring Report
(DMR) indicating "No discharge." Flow shall be monitored with each discharge event and may be
monitored in one of four ways:
a) measure flow continuously;
b) calculate flow based on total rainfall per area draining to the outfall; (See Special
Condition A. (4.) for rational equation);
c) estimate flow at 20-minute intervals during the entire discharge event; or
d) report flow based on discharge pump logs.
3. Turbidity—Effluent shall not cause receiving stream turbidity to exceed 50 NTU. If receiving
stream background turbidity exceeds 50 NTU, effluent shall not cause this background value to
increase.
4. Oil and Grease — Where possible, sample shall be skimmed from the water surface of a
quiescent zone.
5. Naphthalene — Monitoring requirement applies to facilities that store, or have historically
stored,diesel or other heavy fuels on site.
6. MTBE — Facility shall submit a plan to the Division no later than October 1, 2006 detailing
how MTBE levels will be reduced at this outfall. Permittee may request that monitoring
frequency be reduced to quarterly after a substantial amount of sampling (24 sampling events
over a two year period)indicates that MTBE levels are consistently below detection level.
7. Acute Toxicity (Fatbead Minnow, 24-hour), Annual [see Special Condition A.(3)]. Permit holder
shall sample for acute toxicity and BTEX concurrently.
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or foam visible in other than trace amounts.
There shall be no direct discharge of tank solids,tank bottom water,or the rag layer.
There shall be no direct discharge of tank(or pipe) contents following hydrostatic testing unless benzene
concentration is less than 1.19 fLgll and toluene concentration is less than l I jig/I.

Pem-lit NC0004839
A. (2) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Beginning on the effective date of the permit and lasting until expiration, the Permittee is authorized to
discharge treated groundwater from Outfall 002. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the
Permittee as specified below:
U EFFEM 1g; a IMITS , 1VIONITORING QIItEM ENTS I.iT
cwr rr c ; 5 +s_ 3a.y �ZMea ease rr+a�:•e� sm,unKer-n^' �'� t�7 C' t�
CHARACTERISTICS �MontEily �Dafr�NYly,. Measurement Sample SampleLo�cation1
ti
t1Fa`' ul ( .
e� Maximu�m �Fre uenc . „` Ta , e
Flow2 0.057 MGD Episodic 2 Effluent
Turbidi 3 Quarterly Grab Effluent
Oil and Grease Monthly Grab Effluent
Total Suspended Solids 45.0 m Monthly Grab Effluent
Phenol Quarterly Grab Effluent
Toluene Quarterly Grab Effluent
Benzene Quarterly Grab Effluent
X lene Quarterl Grab Effluent
Eth lbenzene Quarterly Grab Effluent
1,2 Dichloroethane Quarterly Grab Effluent
Chloroform Quarterly I Grab I Effluent
MTBE4 Monthly Grab Effluent
Na hthalenes Monthly Grab Effluent
Footnotes:
1. Samples shall be collected at the effluent discharge pipe.
2. Flow — Flow shall be monitored with each discharge event. The permitee (or designated
representative) shall record the approximate time of flow measurements and calculate the
volume of treated wastewater discharged based on totalizing flow meter records.
3. Turbidity—Effluent shall not cause receiving stream turbidity to exceed 50 NTU. If receiving
stream background turbidity exceeds 50 NTU, effluent shall not cause this background value to
increase.
4. MTBE - Facility shall submit a plan to the Division no later than October 1, 2006 detailing
how MTBE levels will be reduced at this outfall. Permittee may request that monitoring
frequency be reduced to quarterly after a substantial amount of sampling (24 sampling events
over a two year period)indicates that MTBE levels are consistently below detection level.
5. Monitoring requirement applies to facilities that store, or have historically stored, diesel or
other heavy fuels on site.
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or foam visible in other than trace amounts.

Permit NC0004839
EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
SPECIAL CONDITIONS
A. (3) ACUTE TOXICITY MONITORING (ANNUAL)
The Permittee shall conduct annual toxicity tests using protocols defined as definitive in EPA Document
EPA/600/4-90/027 entitled "Methods for Measuring the Acute Toxicity of Effluents to Freshwater and
Marine Organisms." The monitoring shall be performed as a Fathead Minnow (Pimephales promelas)
24-hour static test. Effluent samples for self-monitoring,purposes must be obtained below all waste
treatment. The permittee will conduct one test annually, with the annual period beginning in January of
the calendar year of the effective date of the permit. The annual test requirement must be performed and
reported by June 30. If no discharge occurs by June 30, notification will be made to the Division by this
date. Toxicity testing will be performed on the next discharge event for the annual test requirement.
The parameter code for this test is TAE6C. All toxicity.festing results required as part of this permit
condition will be entered on the Effluent Discharge Form (MR-1) for the month in which it was
performed, using the appropriate parameter code. Additionally, DWQ Form AT-1 (original) is to be sent
to the following address:
Attention: North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Environmental Sciences Branch
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh,North Carolina 27699-1621
Completed Aquatic Toxicity Test Forms shall be filed with the Environmental Sciences Branch no later
than 30 days after the end of the reporting period for which the report is made.
Test data shall be complete and accurate and include all supporting chemical/physical measurements
performed in association with the toxicity tests, as well as all dose/response data. Total residual chlorine
of the effluent toxicity sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for disinfection of
the waste stream.
Should any test data from either these monitoring requirements or tests performed by the North Carolina
Division of Water Quality indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be re-
opened and modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum control
organism survival and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test and will
require immediate follow-up testing to be completed no later than the last day of the month following the
month of the initial monitoring.

Permit NC0004839
A. (4.) RATIONAL EQUATION
The Rational Equation: Q=KuCIA,where:
Q= flow(peak flow rate (cfs or m3/sec)
Ku= units conversation factor= 1.008 for U.S. standard units (usually ignored
because it is so close to'l), or 0.278 for SI units
C= dimensionless runoff coefficient for the watershed, loosely defined as the
ratio of runoff to rainfall
I= intensity of rainfall taken from the intensity-duration-frequency curves
for the specified design return period at the time of concentration,tc
(in/h or numh).tc=time of concentration(time after the beginning of
rainfall excess when all portions of the drainage basin are contributing
simultaneously to flow at the outlet).
A= area of tributary watershed (acres or km2)
The rational equation is used to calculate the runoff from a region,given:
• the runoff coefficient which accounts for infiltration and other potential
losses in the region,
• the rainfall intensity to the region,
• the time it takes for runoff to travel from the region's upper reaches to its
outlet,and the region's drainage area.
i
i
i
I
I

& WAT�C,(� Michael F. Easley,Governor
F�G State of North Carolina O
C/) William G.Ross,Jr.,Secretary
r Department of Environment and Natural Resources
0 Alan W. Klimek,P.E.,Director
Division of Water Quality
July 20, 2005
MEMORANDUM RECEIVED
To: Britt Setzer teer►Nlo � ```"'^"Olfi6e
NC DENR/DEH/ Regional Engineer
Mooresville Regional Office JUL 2 6 2005
From: Dawn Jeffries NCDENR
NPDES Unit PublIC Water Suppi'
Subject: Review of Draft NPDES Permit NC0004839
Kinder Morgan Charlotte Terminal 2
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the draft permit and return this form by August
26, 2005. If you have any questions on the draft permit, please contact me at telephone number(919) 733-
5083,extension 595 or via e-mail at dawn.jeffn'[e-mail].
RESPONSE:(Check one)
© Concur with the issuance of this permit provided the facility is operated and maintained properly, the stated
effluent limits are met prior to discharge, and the discharge does not contravene the designated water quality
standards.
❑ Concurs with issuance of the above permit,provided the following conditions are met:
F-1 Opposes the issuance of the above permit,based on reasons stated below,or attached:
Signed ate: Z s
D --
i
"T �.
i
0UALITY
1617 MAIL SERVICE CENTER, RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 2 7699-161 7 -TELEPHONE 91' - . ;w AX -
VISIT L1S ON THE WEB AT http://h2o.enr.state,nc.us/NPDES

Draft Permit reviews(5)
Subject: Draft Permit reviews (5)
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 15:15:25 -0400
From: John Giorgino <[e-mail]>
To: Dawn Jeffries <[e-mail]>
Hi. Dawn, I have reviewed the following:
NCO003425 Roxboro Steam
NCO004839 Kinder Morgan Southeast
NC0005771 TransMontaigne
NCO021971 Charlotte Paw Creek
NCO046213 Marathon Ashland
I have no comments. Thanks for forwarding them.
John
John Giorgino
Environmental Biologist
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Environmental Sciences Section
Aquatic Toxicology Unit
Mailing Address:
1621 MSC
Raleigh, NC 27699--1621
Office: 919 733-2136
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Web Page: http: //www.esb.enr.state.nc.us
1 of 1 7/29/2005 3:20 PM

The Knight Publishing Co., Inc.
Charlotte, NC
North Carolina ] ss Affidavit of Publication
Mecklenburg County]
THE CHARLOTTE OBSERVER
--------------------------------------------------+---------------------
I PUBLIC NOTICE
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMlSSIONINPDES UNIT
NCDENR/DWQ/NPDES 1817MIG SERVICE CENTER
RAATIGH,NC TENT O I
NOTIFICATION OF INTENT TO ISSUE'
CAROLYN BRYANT I ANPDESWASTEWATEFIPERMIT
J On the basis of thorough staff review and a plicatlon of NC Genarai
1617 MAIL SERVICE CTR I Statute 143,21,Public law 92-500 and other awful standards and rag-
ulations,the North CaroBna Emdronmen al Management Commission
RALE I GH NC 27699-1617 I proposes to Issue a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination 5ystam
(NPDE5)wastewater discharge permit to the person(!)Mated below
effective 45 days from the publish tlate of this notice.
Wrtban comments regarding the pmppend parrot wtli be aocapted
until 30 days after the publish date of this notice..All,comments
received prior to that date are considered In the final detamrinalipns
rogerding the proposed permit.The Director of the INC Dvislon of
Water pu.71 may decide to hold a public meeting for the proposed
Ipamit Should the Divlsluh receive a significant degree of public Inter-
REFERENCE: 30045571 I Copies of the draft and other supporting Information on file used to
detannhe conditions present In the draft pamrft are avallable upon
5489521 Cookson D.O.G. I request and payment of the costs of reproduction.Mao comments
enmor requests tot information to the NC DNIslon of Water Quality at
the above address or call the Point Source Branch at(919)733-
extension 520,Please Include the NPDES permit number(attached)
Before the undersigned, a Notary Public of said in any communication.Interested persons may also visit theDivlsion
g y I of Water Quality at 512 N.Salislwry Street,Raleigh,NC 27604-1140
between this tours of 8:00 a.m.and 5:00 p.m.to review information.
County and State, duly authorized to administer + onIlle. .
Cooksooaths affirmations, etc., personally appeared, (NC008n D.O.G. Ilea gIngappl u for a new D,of,PDES permit
fNC008a061}, dlscharg3n9 up to 0.1 MGD-or'treatad
being dui sworn or affirmed according to law, ¢roundwater to an unnamed tributary to Buffalo Creek In
Y I the 'Yadkin Pao-Dee River Basln, Toluene,, 1,1-
Dlchlon ediene,Trichloroethene,1,1,1-Tdchloroelhane,1,2-
doth depose and say that he/she is a I Dichforoethane, 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroathane and
Naphthalene are water quality limited parameters.This ills.
representative of the Knight Publishing Company a I charge can al future allocatlonstothe receiving a".
corporation organized and doing business under thel 10nder Morgan Southeast TermineB, nin glptraroya
9 Georggia=ha9.appiied for renewal of NPDES permit
NC0004B39 1a its 10nder Mangan Southeast Terminal• .
laws of the State of Delaware, and publishing a I Q v;. Charlotte Temninai2In Mecklenburg Coutdy.TFtls permitted,
ladlity discharges treated storrtrwater.and remedlated
newspaper known as The Charlotte Observer in the I ggrc ree undwatertoanunnamedtributarytoLongCkinthe
Calawbe River Basin.Currently,no parameters are.water• .
city of Charlotte, County of Mecklenburg and Statel quality limited.This dlscharge could aflectfutureallomUom
in this portion of the we ed:' 1.
of North Carolina and that as such he/she is I TraniMonta r,Product Servkxs,Inc.in Noswei,, 6
familiar with the books, records, files and I has applied reek T r final#1 perrr hint urg
� CharblmlPaw Creek Terminal•1 In Medrlenburg Courtly,
This pamitted 13ctlity discharges treated sior mater and
business of said Corporation and by reference to I wastwater to an unnamed tributary to Paw Creek in the
Catawba River Basin.Cur ently,Toluene Is water-quality lim-
the files of said publication I ited.This discharge may afredfuture allocations in this por-
tion of the watershed.
the attached advertisement was inserted. The I TransMomaigne Product Services,Inc.in Roswell.Georgia'
has applied far renewal of NPDES permit NC0021971.f y Its
following is correctly copied from the books and I CharSottelAaw Creek Terminal M2 in Mecklenburg County.
This permltted tactilry dl es treated stormwaler to an
files of the aforesaid Corporation and I unnamed tributary.fa Paw reek In the Catawba River
Basin.Current!y,turbidity Is water-quality limited.This dls-
Pub l i cation. I charge may attach future allocations in ihla podfcn of the
watershed.
I Marathon Ashland'Petroleum, LLC In Findlay,Ohio has '
applied for renewal of NPDES permit NCDD46213 faits
ICharlotte Terminal In Macktanburg County.This pemnitled
1 facility discharges treated stwnrwater to an unnamed tabu•
Into Long Greek In She Catawba River Basin.Currently,
I turbidity is water-quality limited.'This discharge may affect
future allocations in this portion of the watershed. per-
mit ,
Berkley 8 flo has or he Berkleyor Oaks Mobile NPDES
Park.roll N
WWfP In Gaston County.'This permitted facility discharges
treated wastewater to an unnamed tributary to McGill
I Branch in the Catawba River Basta Currently,BOQ.ammo-
nia nitrogen and total realduat chlorine are water quaAty lira-
Iced.This discharge may effect future allocations in this par-
PUBLISHED ON: 07/23 I lion of the watershed.
Union Courtly Public Works, NPDES Permit.Number
NC0085359. 7walve Mlle Creek Wastewater Treatment
I PI K has applied for renewal and expanalon of its it perm
for a facility discharging Mated wastewater to the Twelve
Mlle Creek in the Catawba River Basin.Curenity BOD5,
I NH3,dissolved oxygen,feral coliform,total residual chlo-
rine,and total pho6phorua are water quality limited.This
I discharge may affect future allocations In thls portion of the
racaiving stream.
' LP5489521 —
AD SPACE: 194 LINE
FILED ON: /24/05
---------- - --- ----- ----- �--------------- - -+-- --------
NAME: ��! —✓V TITLE: / �L�.�f✓z +�4�//C-
DATE:
In Testimony Whereof I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my seal, the
day and year aforesaid. -
Nola — A:��_ �Ommss i on Expires: MY` EYE.hS MaY 27, 20(Yo

DENR/DWQ
FACT SHEET FOR NPDES PERMIT DEVELOPMENT
NPDES No.NCO04839
Facility InfohliAtion ;
.v
ApplicanVTacility Name: ExxonMobil Refining& Supply Co./Charlotte Terminal
A licant"Address::: P.O. Box 82, Charlotte,NC 28130
Facility Address: 6801 Freedom Drive, Paw Creek,N.C.
Permitted Flow Outfall 001 is not limited
Outfall 002 is limited to 0.057 MGD per discharge
Type of Waste: Stromwater from diked areas, groundwater remediation and stormwater
from the loading racks areas
Facility/Pen-nit Status.".. Active; Renewal
County: .• Mecklenburg
7. Miscellaneous,.
Receiving Stream: UT to Long •Regional Office: Mooresville
Creek
Stream Classification:' WS-IV State Grid 1 USGS Quad: F15SW (Mt.Island
Lake)
303(d) Listed?.. No Permit Writer: ,- Dawn Jeffries
Subbasin 03-08-34 Date:: `=, May 13, 2005
Drainage Area (mi2):' 0.01
Summer 7 l 0 (cfs)' 0
Winter 7Q10'(cfs): 0
30 2'(cfs) 0" y
Average Flow(cfs): 0
IWC(%) 100%
Lat. 350 16'40"N Long. 800 56' 27"W
BACKGROUND
This facility has two outfalls:
Outfall 001 - discharges stormwater from the storage tanks dikes and treated stormwater and wastewater from
the containment pads and loading racks area.The treatment system consists of an oil water separator, a holding
pond and a GAC unit.
Outfall 002 -discharges treated groundwater. The treatment system consists of an oil water separator,an air
stripper, and a carbon-polishing unit.
FILE REVIEW
Correspondence
The Mecklenburg County Department of Environmental Protection (MCDEP) conducts annual inspections at
this facility as part of a cooperative working agreement between the county and DWQ. Inspection records
indicate satisfactory ratings in all inspected areas. The facility has not received any notices of violation in the
past permit term.
DMR Review:
Outfall 001 - DMRs were reviewed for the period of March 2003 to February 2005. The mean flow
was 0.102 MGD. The highest monthly average flow (used below in the reasonable potential calculations) was
0.3438 MGD. Total suspended solids during this time averaged 6.6 mg/L for all the values above quantitation
level, the maximum daily value was 22 mg/L. Oil and Grease was detected two times, the maximum was 8.7
mg/l. Phenol was not detected above the quantitation level. Quantitation levels for phenol were l0pg/L(before
April 2004) and 5 tiglL (from April 2004 to present). Benzene was not detected above the quantitation level of
I µgll. Xylene was detected once at 2 tLgll. Toluene was not detected above the quantitation level of 1 pg/L.
The facility passed all acute toxicity tests since 2001. Regularly performed EPA Method 625 analysis showed
no additional parameters of concern.
Fact Sheet
NPDES NCO004839
Renewal
Page 1

Outfall 002 - DMRs were reviewed for the period of March 2003 to February 2005. The mean flow
was 0.0069 MGD. The highest monthly average flow (used below in the reasonable potential calculations) was
0.013 MGD. Total suspended solids during this time were all below quantitation level. Oil and Grease was
detected three times, the maximum value was 9.16 mg/L. Phenol was below quantitation level for all samples.
MTBE was detected' in 11 of 24 monthly samples with a maximum of 69 jig/L. Chloroform, 1,2-
Dichloroethane, benzene, ethylbenzene, xylene, and toluene were always below quantitation level. Regularly
performed EPA Method 625 analysis showed no additional parameters of concern.
Reasonable Potential Analysis:
Outfall 001 --Xylene was the only parameter detected for which there is a water quality standard. It
showed no reasonable potential to exceed water quality standards.
Outfall 002 - No parameters monitored at this outfall showed reasonable potential to violate water
quality standards. All samplings for all parameters that have standards were below detection level.
PERMITTING STRATEGY
The permitting strategy for this and all oil terminals in the state is based upon a document entitled,
"NPDES Permitting Requirements for Discharges for Petroleum Bulk Storage, Surface Storage Greater than
One Million Gallons, 2005-Permitting Strategy Addendum." This document is based upon a 2001 SOP and has
been updated after a data review and internal discussions. It delineates monitoring frequencies and permitting
limits for contaminants commonly found at these sites. Below, it is referred to as the -2005 Permitting
Strategy."
Oil Terminal SOP:
For Outfall 001 the flow, toxicity, TSS and oil and grease requirements specified in the previous
permit remain unchanged. Turbidity, benzene, xylene, toluene, phenol, and ethylbenzene showed no potential
to exceed water quality standards. All samples for the past two years were below detection level for phenol and
BTEX except for one detection of xylene at 1.8 µg/L in August 2003. Monitoring requirements will therefore
remain in the permit without limits, and will be decreased from monthly to quarterly due to the lack of
detections. The maximum allowable concentration for phenol was calculated using the maximum flow
discharged for the evaluation period (0.3438 MGD) and the allocation of 0.43 lbs/day for each discharger in
this area. MTBE will be removed from the permit based upon the permitting strategy. As per Parts 8. and 9. of
the 2005 permitting strategy, there can be no direct discharge of tanks solids, tank bottom water or the rag layer,
and no direct discharge of hydrostatic test water if concentrations of benzene and/or toluene exceed the water
quality standard.
The requirements for Outfall 002 in the previous permit were based on the requirements in the general
permit for groundwater remediation systems for petroleum contaminated groundwater and similar wastewaters.
Data was examined for turbidity,benzene, xylene, tuloene, and ethylenzene,phenol, chloroform, and 1,2
Dichlorethane. Turbidity is currently monitored quarterly and showed no reasonable potential, therefore its
requirements will remain unchanged. All other samples for the past two years were below detection levels.
Monitoring requirements will therefore remain in the permit without limits, and will be reduced from monthly
to quarterly due to a lack of detections. MTBE will be removed from the permit based upon the permitting
strategy The maximum allowable concentration for phenol was calculated using the maximum flow discharged
for the evaluation period(0.013 MGD)and the allocation of 0.43 lbs/day for each discharger in this area.
SUMMARY OF PROPOSED CHANGES
Outfall 001
• Reduce monitoring frequency from monthly to quarterly for phenol, benzene, toluene, and
ethylbenzene since these parameters were not detected in the effluent in the past two years.
• Reduce monitoring frequency from monthly to quarterly for xylene since this parameter was
detected only once in the effluent in the past two years, and that detection was 1.8 jig/L. The
maximum predicted concentration was 3.9 AgIL and the allowable concentration based upon water
quality standards is 780 t.g/L.
• Remove requirement for Method 625 scans based upon 2005 permitting strategy.
• Add monthly monitoring requirement for naphthalene based upon 2005 permitting strategy.
Remove MTBE monitoring based upon 2005 permitting strategy.
Fact Sheet
NPDES NCO004839
Renewal
Page 2

Outfall 002
• Reduce monitoring frequency from monthly to quarterly for phenol, benzene, toluene,
ethylbenzene, and xylene since these parameters were not detected in the effluent in the past two
years.
• Remove requirement for Method 625 scans based upon 2005 permitting strategy.
• Add monthly monitoring requirement for naphthalene based upon 2005 permitting strategy.
• Remove MTBE monitoring based upon 2005 permitting strategy.
PROPOSED SCHEDULE FOR PERMIT ISSUANCE
Draft Permit to Public Notice: July 20, 2005
Permit Scheduled to Issue: September 12, 2005
NPDES DIVISION CONTACT
If you have questions regarding any of the above information or on the attached permit, please contact Dawn
Jeffries at [phone] ext. 595.
NAME: DATE:
REGIONAL OFFICE COMMENTS
ell/W
fi
NAME:14ww ZDATE:
SUPERVISOR: - ��ti. Lti DATE:
Fact Sheet
NPDES NCO004839
Renewal
Page 3

REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
Kinder Morgan SE Term. Charlotte #2 Outfall 001
NCO004839 Qw= 0.3438 MGD
Time Period 0
Ow(MGO) 0.3438 WWTP Class 0
701 OS(cis) 0 !WC(%)G 7Q 10S 100
701OW(cls) 0 9 701OW 100
3002(cis) 0 02002 100
Avg.Siream Flow,QA(cfs) 0 ®QA 100
Rec'ving Stream UT to Long Creek Stream Class WS-IV
STANDARDS&
PARAMETER TYPE CRITERIA(2) POL Units REASONABLE POTENTIAL RESULTS RECOMMENDED ACTION
(1) NC was SFAV/
Chrmk Acuff n t OK W.And Crr ACawa6r.CW
Acute: WA
Turbidity NC 50 ntu 12 12 37.13 _ _ ___ __
C L/y (,�� f�.ll�-J•i]Q�1 �+lp
hronic: ^50
Acute: WA
Benzene C 1.2 ugrL 24 0 0.5 _ _ �TZ'L _ew,1014. .2t;"tec'j;60�r
Chronic: 1
Acu10: NIA
l(ylene NC 780 uglL 24 f 3.9 I Chronic: �7a0
— fmIrk mo moue
Acute: NIA +
Toluene NC II ugrL 24 0 0.5
-------•--- I}rf_ L�c.tj_ EfeC� ►o^'- -
Chronic: 11
RP mOn; . Kl
Acute: WA 411 � � J�
Ethyl benzene NC 520 ugrL 24 0 0.5 —jv—,&d de*
Chronic: 520
gdag-
I I Acute: WA
MTBE C 12 uUA- 24 5 29.6 _ (_r;kt—nuki
_ Lf M6Y-4.-_-
iChronic:---12- -
Acute: N/A
Phenols NC 1 ugA 24 -_ _{41b�
y l•l�.if/(�fi�-_- -_-� ,,
Chronic: V 1.
Acuto: NIA
0 0 NIA 11
Chronic::rror 0 Type -----------------------------^
Acute: WA
0 0 WA
------------------------------Chronic:'rror 0 Type
Acute: WA
0 0 WA
---------------------------------
Chronic::nor 0 Type
Acute: WA
0 0 WA
Chronic::r1or 0 Type -- -----------------------------
Acute: N1A
0 0 N/A
[ -
Chronic:-rror f2Typo
_—_—_—__ _
Acule� WA
0 0 WA
Chronic:-rror®-Typo -------------------- - ----- -
Acute: WA
0 0 WA
—'--------------- ------------Chronic:'rror m Type
Acute: WA
0 0 WA _ _ _ _
Chronic::rror Q_Type
'Legend, Freshwater Discharge
C=Carcinogenic
MC=Noncarcoogenic
A=Aestnetw
rpa 001.1
1s,rpo
7/1512005

REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
Kinder Morgan SE Term. Charlotte#2 Outfall 2
NCO004839 Ow= 0.013 MGD
Time Period 0
Ow(MGD) 0,013 WWTP Class 0
70IDS(cfs) 0 IWC(%)®7010S 100
7010W(cts) 0 ®701 O W 100
3002(crs) 0 03002 100
Avg,Stream Flow,OA(ds) 0 ®OA 100
Rec'ving Stream UT to Long Creek Stream Class WS-IV
STANDARDS&
PARAMETER TYPE CRITERIA(2) POL Units REASONABLE POTENTIAL RESULTS RECOMMENDED ACTION
(1) NC was/ 15 FAV7 n I prf. Yea Prod G1r NoweEN C1r
Chrml, Acute
ACule: WA
Turbidity NC 50 nlu 13 9 R.5 _ _ �U �{,�� "�•�K�� r7�+
Chronic: —_�_— -A 1 9-I 1 Mon; .' _—_—___—_
Acute: WA _............ . -- .. ..,.,,.1..
Benzene C 1.2 ugrL 24 0 0.6 _ _ ______ s+LL_�_elow'4&;, i �•. ___
Chronic: 1
man;f= f. QT(2
Acute: WA ,j_,�
%ylene NC 790 ug+L 24 0 0.6 lo
_ _ __ _ _ &-_-----
Chronic: 780
�Pdittk. e i . fy 4TIe I
Acute: NIA
Toluene NC 11 ug4 24 0 0.6
Chronic:---11--
6I7' QTIe lit
Acute: VA L
E1hylhenzene NC 520 uglL 24 0 0.6 ._ _ _
Chronic: 520
Acute: WA
MTBE C 12 ug1L 24 11 371.2 y-
.f`G�'1e1re,
Chronic:---12 — _ y r&,ie —r�—ff
Acute: WA
Phenols NC 1 ug11 24 0 7.9 _
Chronic: 1
Acute: WA
1,2 Dichlorcethane C 0 ug11 12 0 O.R I — 1
--- —
iChronic: -0
Acute: WA
ChlOrol4rm C 5.700 ugf4 12 D 0.7850 —
Chronic: 6 '
Acute: WA
0 0 WA
4 I ------ - ----------------------
Chronic::rror @ Type
Acute: WA
------------ ---Chronic:Error OType -------------
1 Acute: WA t- -
-- ---'---'— -----'--Chronic:Error®Type
Acute: WA
0 0 WA
----Chroni ---:rror O Type
Acute: WA
0 0 WA ......_....
Chronic::rror Q Type _—_�._- _._. _— .......
Acute: WA
0 0 WA
Chronic:Error®Type -------------------------------
'Legend., Freshwater Discharge
C=Carcinogenic
NC:Noncarcincgenic
A=Aesiheric
rpa 002.4s.rpa
7115121305

REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
Ethylbenzene MTBE
Date Data BDL=112DL Results Date Data BDL=112DL Results
1 F Feb 2005- < r 3' 0.5 Std Dev. 0.0000 1 F'Fet>2005 < F.S 2.5 Std Dev. 2.8740
2 Jan 2005 0.5 Mean 0.5000 2 >Jan 2005 < 10+ 5.0 Mean 3.1458
3 D2004 < ,F� '1, 0.5 C.V. 0.0000 3t 'Dec 204 < 10� 5.0 C.V. 0.9138
4 "Nov-2004: < ',�r :11 0.5 n 24 4E "Nov-200 5.0 n 24
5�'''O 2004"1 < 'd F"1 0.5 5" Oct`-2004 < 00 5.0
fiy s52004 < 1 0.5 Mult Factor= 1.0000 6-'Sep 2004.. < .10 5.0 Mult Factor= 2.9600
7 A g 20D4 c � t 0.5 Max.Value 0.5 uglL i .v=Aug 020 4 < .,'10+ 5.0 Max.Value 10.0 ug/L
B� Jul-2004 < 1 0.5 Max.Pred Cw 0.5 ug/L Bk°*Jul 2004 < 10 5.0 Max.Pred Cw 29.6 ug/L
WA
9p Jun-2004 c ty !".1 0.5 9i Jun 2l)04 6 �10 10.000
10+. May 2004 1; 0.5 10: May 220004 5..000 0 6 250011 F 2
1 04 0.50012 Mr 2004 0.5 2 Mar
131 Feti 0.5 130 Feb"2004 < ' 1.5 0.500
14 Jan 2004_ 1 1'� 0.5 14� 'Jan 2004 < <1 D.5
15+, Dec 2003 g < .1 0.5 15 Dec 2003_ < r `,::1',+ 0.5
16� Nov 2003.-; < p 1 ' 0.5 16 Nov=2003 10_; 9.7
17 j FOc�2063 < y�'1` 0.5 17„.,'Oct 2003 `4 4.0
38 Sep 2003 c 1^� 0.5 18 "'Sep 2003 a 4S "1 0.5
39r Aug 2003 c 1 0.5 19 'Aug 20030 1 1.2
20 Jul`-2003 < 1� 0.5 20 Jul 2(103 c y °a.1 0.5
u' M
21 &Junn 2003� < 1- 0.5 21, Jun 2003
22 May 2003 c 1 0.5 22 A+Iay2003 < 1' 0.5
23 1jLwAp 20D3 < ' 1' 0.5 23 Apr 2003 < _t 0.5
244 Mar`2003 < 1. 0.5 24 r:-Mar 2t103 c 3 0.5
25l 25
26 1,1i
FAi Y,
, ^G 26 1
27 "r"r �1 ' 27
291 29
O
spJ 30
32 s rr ir
321: 1.
33
35� 351
37. 37. - r t
v , i
38{ 38 C
3 9 c 39
40 40,:-
41,1 411 a
42 + 42 ti
F
43 ` 43 r
44 447
;'. { d
45,
45
t 46
47 ^ y 47
461 AcYf k3'" ; 46I
49i
npdes rpa 2004031.x1s,data
-3- 4/14/2005

Qc,ct c It vcf
REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
Phenols
Date_ Data BDL=112DL Results
1 Fe6-2005 < 5' 2,5 Std Dev, 1.2724
2 Jan-2005 51 2.5 Mean 3.8542
3 Dec-2004 < 54 2.5 C.V. 0.3301
4 Nov-2004 < 51 2.5 n 24
5 Oct-2004 < 5� 2.5
6 Sep-2004 < 51 2.5 MultFactor= 1,5700
7 Aug-2004 < 5, 2,5 Max,Value 5.0 ugll
8 Jul-2004 < 5 2.5 Max.Pred Cw 7.9 ug11
9 Jun-2004 < 5 2.5
10 May-2004 < 5 2.5
11 Apr-2004 < 5 2.5
12 Mar-2004 < 10 5,0
13 Fed-2004 < 10 5,0 b
14 Jan-2004 < 10 5.0
15 Dec-2003 < 10 5,0
16 Nov-2003 < 10 5.0
17 Oct-2003 < 10 50
18 Sep-2003 < 10 5.0
19 Aug-2003 10 So
20 Jul-2003 < 10 5.0 r �XGDli17r(!Lt
21 Jun-2003 < 10 5,0
22 May-2003 < 10 5.0
23 Apr-2003 < 10 5.0
24 Mar-2003 < 10 5.0 lU Wf'/
25 je V�S AA 5/
26
227 8r✓16,1 f4 rI /1gC��Lf �/4--
29 .. ��L e?o
30
31
32
•33
34
351 36 r"31L
37
38
e a• I T !C� '�SIL
40
442
1 } /�
43 U15 —
44
45
46
47
48 f
npdes rpa 2004031.xis,data
-4- 411412005

REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
Xylene Toluene
Date Data BDL=112DL Results Date Data BDL=112DL Results
1 _Fe1 2005 " < i ;,17 0.5 Std Dev. 0.3751 1 Feb 2005 < 7 1 i 0.5 Std Dev. 0.0000
2 Jan 2005 c 1 0.5 Mean 0.6375 2 `Jan 2005 < 1 0.5 Mean 0.5000
3 Dec 2004 < 1} 0.5 C.V. 0.5884 3 `Deof
2004, < WE, 1� 0.5 G.V. 0.0000
4 t tao200 < h 1 0.5 n 24 4�F Nov 2004� < � ..1 0.5 n 24
5 Oct 2004 < 1 0.5 5 Oct 2004 < 1 0.5
6; S2004 « < As 1! 0.5 Mull Factor 2.1400 file Sep-{20D4� c i� ,,.� 0.5 Mult Factor= 1.0000
7 Aug 2004 < ;.i 0.5 Max.Value 1.8 uglL 7� `Aug 2004 < �� :1 0.5 Max.Value 0,5 ucyL
8� Jul=2004'� < 1( 0.5 Max.Pred Cw 3.9 ug/L 8 :,Jul 2004 c :'-:j 0.5 Max.Pred Cw 0.5 uglL
9 Juri 2004 < c^ii 0,50 9 Jun 2004 ' < r 1� 0.5
10 May2004 c 1k11, 0.50 10 if May2004r < ,. , 1; 0.5
11 Apr 2004 < 1 0.50 1:0, 0.5
12 Mar. 04 < 1 a 0.50 12I:tMar 2004 < 10 0.5
13 Feb 2004 ; < k 1 0.50 13 Feb£2004 R < 1:0j 0.5
14 , J n 00�24 < r 1 1 0-50 14)t^Jan 2004 c '1.0 0.5
15 Duc 2003 < ' 3 1.50 15 DeG 6 3 < 1.0 0.5
16 il�6v,-iobiml < 3 1.50 16 '•,Nov 2003 < 1.Ot 0.5
17 Oct 2D03 s < 1:4 0.50 17 'Oct 2003 < 1i01 0.5
18 Sip 2003 �r_� 0.50 18 Sep�20D3°' < .0� 0,5
19, Aug 03 20 F 2 1.8� 19 ,iAug 10U3ra < 1:0 0.5
20 JuF2003 < ` 1`--�0:50 20 e'Jul-2003' 0,5
21 � Jun'2003�,t c � 1 0.50 21 � Jun 2003 < '.1i0, 0.5
22 May 2003 < J'1 0.50 22 May 2003' c 1.01 0.5
23 Apr 2003 c 1. 0.50 23 S:Apr-2003`. < �` 1.0, 0.5
24 Mar20�03' < 1 + D.50 24 {Mar 003 < fc '*.1;0 0.5
25 25 �f
Nk
26 26 L
p�
28 n 28a "
29 V. c 291
/+ 1 .
30 1 .((C 30
32 431
r]/" 32 _
33r 33p>"_ n K
3a _ { 3a
35 r �' 35�
36 � _ � , k 36�
37 j 371 1
38 l 38w_
39 39I 4 t
40 j 40,
h! 1�, y
41 " , � l,�: 41i
42 43 s � e 42t xs.
_ j 43
m
44� r t 44
r a '✓'
45 ir, V 45
46
46
47- 47 k
48 s .� 48[�- -�
49s _ 491 a ;
npdes rpa 2004031,x15,data
-2- 4M 412005

014t-Ca 11 001
REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
Turbidity Benzene
Date Data BDL=112DL Results Date Data _ BDL=112DL Results
1 Feb-2005 7.6; 7.6 Std Dev. 3.8621 1 t Feb-2005 < 1 0.5 Sid Dev. 0.0000
2 Jan-2005 6.0+ 6.0 Mean 8.3083 2� Jan-2005 < 1 0.5 Mean 0.5000
3 Dec-2004 5.2 5.2 C.V. 0.4648 3� Dec-2004 < 1 0.5 C.V. 0,0000
4 Nov-2004 5,4 5.4 n 12 4} Nov-2004 < 1 0.5 n 24
5 Oct-2004 6.0i 6.0 5 Oct-2004 < 1 0.5
6 Jul-2004 16,6 16.6 Mutt Factor= 2.2800 6 Sep-2004 < 1 0.5 Mult Factor= 1.0000
7 Apr-2004 14.4 14.4 Max.Value 16.6 ntu 7 Aug-2004 < 1 05 Max,Value 0.5 ug/L
8 Mar-2004 . 5.71 5.7 Max.Pred Cw 37.8 ntu 8 Jul-2004 < 1 0.5 Max.Pred Cw 0.5 ug/L
9 Dec-2003 6.4 6.4 91 Jun-2004 < 1 0.5
10 Sep-2003 5.41 5.4 101 May-2004 < 1 0.5
11 Jun-2003 10.2; 10.2 11 Apr-2004 < 1 0.5
12 Mar-2003 10.91 10.9 121 Mar-2004 c 1 0.5
13 13, Feb-2004 < 1 0.5
141I 141 Jan-2004 < 1 0.5
151 151 Dec-2003 < 1 0.5
16 161 Nov-2003 < 1 0.5
17 17. Oct-2003 < 1 0.5
18 18 Sep-2003 1 0.5
19 19 Aug-2003 c 1 0.5
20 20 Jul-2003 1 0.5
21 21 Jun-2003 < 1 0.5
22 22 May-2003 < 1 0.5
23 I 23 Apr-2003 c 1 0.5
24 241 Mar-2003 < 1 0.5
25 25!
26 { 261
27 27�
28 28I LL
29 29
30 30 �e
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 I 34
35 I 35
36 36 IJI
37 37I
38 38
39 391
40 I 401
41 41,
42 421
43 I 43,
44 I 441
45 45 i
46 461
47 471
49 49 L__.___
npdes rpa 2004031.xls,data
1 4/1412005

REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
Turbidity Benzene
Date Data BDL=112DL Results Date Data BDL=112DL Results
1 Jan-2005 3.0 3.0 Std Dev. 0.9543 1' Feb-2005 < 1 0.5 Std Dev. 0.0706
2 Dec-2004 ' .2.6 2.6 Mean 1,5615 2 Jan-2005 .t< 1 0.5 Mean 0.4792
3 ' Oct-2004 "1'1 1.1 C.V. 0.6112 3' Dec-2004 .< 1 0.5 C.V. 0.1473
4 Jul-2004 < 1.0 0.5 n 13 4 Nov-2004 < 1 0.5 n 24
5 Apr-2004 < 1.0 0.5 5 Oct-2004 < 1 0.5
6 Jan-2004 3.1, 3.1 Mult Factor= 2.7500 6 Sep-2004 < 1 0.5 Mult Factor= 1.2300
7 Oct-2003 < 1.0 0.5 Max.Value 3.1 ntu 7 Aug-2004 < 1 0-5 Max,Value 0.5 ucyL
8 Jul-2003 2.3 2-3 Max.Pred Cw 8.5 ntu 8j Jul-2004, < 1 0.5 Max.Pred Cw 0.6 ugrL
9 Apr-2003 1.8 1-8 9 Jun-2004 < 1 0.5
10. Jan-2003 -c 1.0 0.5 10 May 2004 < 1 0.5
11 Oct-2002 :,. .. 1.1 1.1 11 Apr-2004 < 1 0.5
12 Apr-2002 1.6 1.6 12- Mar-2004' < '. 1 0.5
13 Jan-2002 1.7 1.7 13 'Feb-2004 c 1 0.5
14 14 Jan-2004 < 1 0.5
15 15 Dec-2003 < 1 0.5
16 16 Nov-2003 < 1 0.5
17 17 Oct-2003 < 1 0.3
18 18 Sep-2003 < 1 0.3
19° 19 Aug-2003. < 1 0-5
20 20 41.2003 < 1 0.5
21 21 Jun-2003 < 1 0.5
22 22 May-2003 < 1 0.5
23 23 Apr-2003 < 1 0.5
24 24 Mar-2003 < 1 0.5
25 25
26 26
27 27
281 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
44 44 .
45 45
46 46
47 47
48 48
49 49
rpa 002.x1s,data
1 - 7/15/2005

REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
Xylene Toluene
Date Data BDL=112DL Results Date Data BDL=112DL Results
1'' Fek005 <. 1 0.5 Std Dev. 0.0706 1: Feb-2005 ' c 1 0.5 Std Dev. 0.0706
21
Jan-2005 „ < 1 0.5 Mean 0.4792 2z, Jan-2005 < 1 0.5 Mean 0.4792
3' Dec-2004 c i 0.5 C.V. 0.1473 3 Dec-2004 < 1 0.5 C.V. 0.1473
4 Nov-2004 < 1 0.5 n 24 4 Nov-2004 ;< 1 0.5 n 24
5 00-2004 < . 1 0.5 5 Oct-2004 < 1 0.5
6 Sep-2004 < 1 0.5 Mult Factor= 1.2300 6. Sep-2004 1 0.5 Mult Factor= 1.2300
7 Aug-2004 �4 1 0.5 Max.Value 0.5 uglL 7 Aug-2004- < 1 0.5 Max.Value 0.5 uglL
8 „ 'J42004 < 1' 0.5 Max.Pred Cw 0.6 uglL B.' Jul-2004- _rt 1 0.5 Max.Prod Cw 0.6 uglL
9 Jun-2004 c 1 0.50 9' Jun-2004 a 1 0.5
10 May-2004 •< 1 0.50 10 May-2004 < 1 0.5
11 Apr-2004 < 1 0.50 11 Apr-2004 < 1 0.5
12. .Mar-2004 < 1 0.50 12 Mar-2004 .< 1 0.5
13 Feb-2004 < 4 0.50 13j' Feb-2004 < 1, 0.5
14 Jan-2004 < 1 0.50 14" Jan-2004 <� 1 0.5
15 Dec-2003 < 1 0.50 15 Dec-2003 < 1 0.5
16 Nov-2003 < 1 0.50 16 Nov-2003 < 1 0.5
17. Oct-2003 K 1 0.25 17, Oct-2003 '< 0.5 0.3
18 Sep-2003 < 1' 0.25 18 Sep-2003 .< 0.5 0.3
19 A6g-2003 < : 1 0.50 19 Aug-2003 1.0 0.5
20 Jul-2003 < 1 0.50 20 Jul-2003 < 1.0 0.5
21 Jun-2003 < 1 0.50 21 Jun-2003 < 1.0 0.5
22 May-2003 < 1 0.50 22 May-2003 < 1.0 0.5
23. Apr-2003 k. 1 0.50 23 Apr-2003 < 1.0 0.5
24' Mar-2003 < 1 0.50 24 Mar-2003 '< 1.0 0.5
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29' 29
30 30 g,
31 31
32 32
33, 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 t 38
39 39 t
40 40 £
41 41
42 42
43 43
44 44
45 45
46 46
47 47
48 48
49 49 a
rpa 002.xls,data
-2- 7/15/2005

REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
Ethylbenzene MTBE
Date Data BDL=112DL Results Date Data BDL=112DL Results
1 Feb 2005 mc: 1 0.5 Std Qev. 0.0706 1 Feb 2005 9< 10 5.0 Sid Dev. 15.4694
2 Jan2005 '< 1. 0.5 Mean 0.4792 2. Jan-2005 69, 69.0 Mean 8.4958
3 Dec-2004 1.5 1 0.5 C.V. 0.1473 3 Dec-2004 < 10 5.0 C.V. 1.8208
4 Nov-2004 < 1 0.5 n 24 4 Nov-2004 c 10 5.0 n 24
5 Oct-2004 < 1 0.5 5 Oct-2004 15 15.0
6 Sep•2004 < 1 0.5 Mull Factor= 1.2300 6 Sep-2004 c 10 5.0 Mull Factor= 5.3800
7' Aug-2004 a 1 0.5 Max.Value 0.5 uglL 7 Aug-2004 <` • 10, 5.0 Max.Value 69.0 ug/l_
83 'Jul-2004 1 0.5 Max.Pred Cw 0.6 uglL 8 Jul 2004 10 5.0 Max.Prod Cw 371.2 ug/L
9- Jun-2004 < 1 0.5 9 Jun-2004 < 10 5.000
10 May-2004 c 1 0.5 10 -May-2004' < 10 5.000
11 Apr-2004 < 1 0.5 11 Apr-2004 42 42.000
12 Mar-2004 1< 1 0.5 12 Mar-2004 3 3.300
13 Feb-2004 1 0.5 13, Feb-2004 4 3.600
141 Jan-2004: '< 1 0.5 14 Jan-2004 13 13.1
15; Dec-2003 ` 1 0.5 15 Dec-2003 < 1 0.5
16 Nov-2003 1 0.5 16 Nov-2003 3 3.2
17 Oct-2003 < 1 0.3 17 Oct-2003 1 1.0
18 Sep-2003 < 1 0.3 18 Sep-2003 1 0.6
19 Aug-2003 < 1 0.5 19 Aug-2003 < 1 0.5
20 Jul-2003 'Fs 1 0.5 20 Jul-2003 1 0.5
21 Jun-2003 .;< 1 0.5 21 Jun-2003 2 2.0
22 May-2003 "Z 1 0.5 22 May-2003 '<;fir; A 0.5
23 Apr-2003 c 1 0.5 23 Apr-2003 9 8.6
24 Mar-2003 < 1 0.5 24 Mar-2003 < 1 0.5
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 "• 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 11 35
36 a;;;l 36
37 4 37
38 e'I 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 l" 43
44 44 G
45 45
46 46
47 47
48 48
49 L.Lj 49
rpa 002,xis,data
-3- 7/15/2005

REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
Phenols 1,2 Dichloroethane
Date Data BDL=1/2DL Results Date Data BDL=112DL Results
1 Feb2005 •< 5 2.5 Std Dev. 1.2724 1 Jan-2005 7 f 0.5 Std Dev. 0.1131
2 Jan-2005 '< 5 2.5 Mean 3.8542 2,,+..,Oct-2004.;-a< 1. 0.5 Mean 0.4375
3 Dec-2004 c 5 2.5 C.V. 0.3301 3. Jul-2004 < 1 0.5 C.V. 0.2584
4 Nov-2004 < . 5 2.5 n 24 4 Apr-2004 < 1 0.5 n 12
5 Oct-2004 < 5 2.5 S. Jan-2004 < 1 0.5
6. Sep-2004 < 5 2.5 Mu It Factor= 1,5700 6� Oct-2003 < 0.5 0.3 MultFactor= 1.6100
7 Aug-2004 < 5 2.5 Max.Value 5.0 ugn 7 Jul-2003 < 1 0.5 Max.Value 0.5 ugA
8 Jul-2604," < 5 2.5 Max.Pred Cw 7.9 ugll 8 'Apr-2063L 1, 0.5 Max.Pred Cw 0.8 ugll
9 ,tun-2004 < 5 2.5 9 'Jan-2003 1 0.5
10 May-2004 < 5 2.5 10 Sep-2002 < 1 0.5
11 Aprr2004 < 5 2.5 11. Apr-2002 < 1 0.3
12 Mar..=2004 < 10 5.0 121 Jan-2002 < 1 0.3
13 Feb`-2004 e 10' 5.0 13 t.
14 Jan-2004 < : 16' 5.0 14.
15 Dec-2003 < 10 5.0 15
16 Nov-2003 < 10 5.0 16
17 Oct-2003 < 10 5.0 17 4
18 Sep-2003 '< 10 5.0 18
19 Aug-2003 < 10 5.0 19
20 Jul-2003 < 10 5.0 20
21 Jun-2003 < 10 5.0 21
u
22 May-2003 < 10 5.0 22
23 Apr.2003 < 10 5.0 23
24 Mar-2003 < 10 5.0 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34.
35 35 `.
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
44 44
45 45 tN'
46 46
47 47
48 48
49 49 c
rani TmaL ae TAZt 1 Jls aIlDt4rd ✓�16ts5 6).q3 1 /�
u,Uf 3 U i 3 1 b/`-,
rpa 002.x1s,data
-4- 7/15/2005

REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
Chloroform
Date Data BDL=112DL Results
1 Jan-2005 c 1 0.5 Std Dev. 0.1075
2 Oct-2004 c 1 0.5 Mean 0.4408
3 Jul-2004 < 1 0.5 C.V. 0.2438
4 Apr-2004 < 1, 0.5 n 12
5 Jan-2004 <1 11 0.5
6 Oct-2003 < . '0.5 0.3 Mult Factor= 1.5700
7 il61-2003 < 1 0.5 Max.Value 0.5 ugll
8 4r-2003 < 1 0.5 Max.Pred Cw 0.8 ugll
9' Jan-2003 < 1.0 0.5
10 Se p-2002 < . 1.0 0.5
11 Apr-2002 < 0.6 0.3
12 Jan-2002 < 0.5 0.3
13
14
15
16
17'
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
rpa 002.xis,data
-5- 7/15/2005

Whole Effluent Toxicity Testing Self-Monitoring Summary February 15,2005
FACILITY REQUIREMENT YEAR )AN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC -
International Paper Co.-New Hanover chr lim:23% 2001 N — — N — — N — — N — —
NC00 8 1 50 7100 1 Begin71111996 Frequency:0 P1F + tan Apr lul Oct + NonComp:Single 2002 N — -- N --- -- N — -- N — —
COunty:New Hanover Region:W IRO Subbasin:CPF17 2003 N — -- N -- — N — -- N — —
PF: 0.05 Spenal 2004 N _ _- H — — H ---
7Q10:0.13 IWC(%)37 order: 2005
International Paper Roanoke Rapids chr line 3.7% Y 2001 --- -- Pass — --- Pass — — pass — — Pass
NC0000752I001 Begin 2/1/2005 Frequency:Q Mar Jun Sep Due + NonComp:Single 2002 --- Pass --- --- Pass -- •— Pass — — Pass
County:Halifax Region:RRO Subbasin:ROA08 2003 --- — Pass --- -- Pass — — Pass -- --- Pass
PF-28.0 Special 2004 --- — Pass — — Pass — — Pass — — Pass
7QW: 1120 IWC(%)3.7 order: 2005
J.P.Stevens-Wsgram chr Iim:9% Y 2001 — Pass — -- Pass -- --- Pass --- --- Pass ---
NC000 5 7 6210 0 1 Begin I/112001 Frequency:Q Feb May Aug Nov + NonComp,Single 2002 --- Pass -- --- Pass -- --- Pass --- --- Pass ---
County:Scotland Region:FRO Subbasin:LUM51 2003 -- Pass — -- Pass — — Pass --- --- Pass ---
PF:7.0 Special 2004 — pass — -- Pass — --- Pass -» --- Pass --
7Q10: 117 r1VC(%)9.0 Orda: 2005
Jefferson Smurfit Corp. chr Sim:I I% 2001 Pass — — Pass --- --- Pass •» Pass — ---
NC0005061l001 Begin81112004 Frequency:Q Jan Apr Jul Oct + NonComp:Single 2002 Pass -- — Pass --- -- Pass -- — Fail 31.1 >44
County:Cleveland Region:MRO Subbasin:BRD(M 2003 Pass — -- Pass --- --- Fail -44 >44 Pass --- --
PF:0910 Special 2004 Pass — — Pass — --- Pass — --- Pass — —
7Q10:0.12 IWC(%)11.0 Urdu: 2005
Jefferson WWTP chr rim:30%R 0,6 MGD Y 2001 --- Late,Pass NR --- Pass -- -- Pass — -- Pass --
NC0021709l001 Begin6/112001 Frequency:Q FcbMay Aug Nov + NonComp:Single 2002 — Pass — -- Pass -- -- Pass —• -•• Pass ---
County:Ashe Region WSRO Subbasin:NEWOI 2003 --- Pass — -- Pass — — Pass — -- NRJPass —
PF:0.6 Special 2004 --- Pass — — Pass — — Pass — — Pass,-611fl —
7Q€0:2.2 IVJC(%)14.0 Order: 2005
Johnston Co.Regional WH'TF chr lim:4%(aj PF>4.99MGD;6%R, PF 7.0 MGD 2001 -- Pass — — Pass -- --- Pass -- -- Pass ---
NC0030716lODI Begin:2/l/2002 Frequency:0 Feb May Aug Nov + NonComp:Single 2002 -- Pass — --- Pass -- -- Pass --- --- Pass ---
County:Johnston Region:RRO Subbasin:NEU02 2003 -- Pass -- -- Pass Pass — NR Pass --- NR Pass
PF:5 Special 2004 — Pass — — pass — — Pass Pass —
7QI0: 194 IWC(%)3.6 Urdu: 2005
K-T Feldspar chr lim:6.0% Y 2001 — Pass --- --- Pass — — Pass -- -- Pass —
NC0000400100I Begin.8/112004 Frequency:Q Feb May Aug Nov + NonComp:Single 2002 --- Pass --- Pass -- --- Pass --- -- Pass —
County Mitchell Region:ARO Subbasin:FRB06 2003 --- Pass --- --- Pass --- --- Pass --- — Late Pass
PF: 1.73 special 2004 — Pass — — Pass --- -- Pass --- --- Pass —
7QIo:44,0 IWC(%)5.73 Order: 2005
Kenly WWTP chrhrn:22% 2001 --- Pass Pass --- --- Pass — Pass Pass — — Pass
NC0064891/001 Begin 5I111998 Frequency:Q PIF + Mar Jvn Sep Dcc + NonComp:Single 2002 Pass --- --- Pass -- — Pass -- — Pass
County:Johnston Region:RRO Subbasin:NEU06 2003 — --- Pass --- --- Pass — — Pass — — Pass
PF:0.63 special 2004 — — Pass — — Pass — — pass — — Pass
7Q10:4.4 TWC(%)22 Order: 2005
Kinder Morgan Southeast-Selma ftJ 24 hr LC50 ac moni epic fthd 2001
NC00764571001 Begin3/W004 Frequency:A NorComp� 2002
Counry:Johnston Region:RRO Subbasin:NEU02 2003
PF: VAR special 2004
7Q10:0.0 IWC(%)100.0 emu: 2W5
Kinder Alorgan Southeast'Terminals 24hr LC50 ac mono epic Flhd 2001 — -- Invald --- --- -- --- --- >100 --- -- ---
NC00 0 4 83 9100 1 Begin.911/2001 Frequency:A NonComp: 2002 --- --- NRJ>100 --- -- — --- --- --- --- — —
County:Mecklenburg Region:MRO Subbasin:CfB34 2003 --- — �100 -- --- --- -- --- — _- _ _
PF;NA special 2004 --- -- »- -- --- >100 — — --- — — —
7Q10:0.0 IWC(%)NA Order: M05
Kinder Morgan Southeast Terminals LLC 24hr ac merit cpis 0hd 201 H H H H H 97 a li H --- H — H
NC00 3 2 8 7 5100 1 Begin:3/€/2004 Frequency:5OWD/A NonComp: 2(102 — H H H -- H >100 H H H H H
County.Johnston Region:RRO Subbasin:NEU02 2003 H — >100 H H H H -- H H H H
PF:NIA special 2004 — H slut H H H H H — H H —
7Q10:0.0 Iwc(%)100.0 order: 2005
Y Pre 2001 Data Available
LEGEND:
PERM—Permit Requirement LET-Administrative Lettcr-Target Frequency—Monitoring frequency:Q-Quarterly;M-Monthly;13M-Bimonthly;SA-Semiannually:A-Annually;OWD-Only when discharging;D-Discontinued monitoring requirement
Begin—First month required 7Q10=Receiving stream low flaw criterion(cfs) +=quarterly monitoring increases to monthly upon failure or NR Months that testing must occur-ex.Jan,Apr,Jul,Oct NonComp—Current Compliance Requirement
PF=Permitted flow(MGD) IWC%=Instream waste concentration PIF=PasstFail test AC=Acute CHR—Chronic
Data Notation:f-Fathead Minnow;•-Ceriodaphnia sp.;my-Mysid shrimp;ChV-Chronic value;P-Mortality of stated percentage at highest concentration;at-Performed by DWQ Aquatic Tax Unit;bl-Bad rest
Reporting Notation:--Data not required;NR-Not reported Facility Activity Status:I-Inactive,N-Newly Issued(To construct);H-Active bur not discharging;t-More data available for mouth in question; —ORC signature needed
25

SOC PRIORITY PROJECT: Yes No X
r � ...�_...... f To: Permits and Engineering Unit
Water Quality Section
[_Attention:-Carolyn,ByaRt-7
L! 2 5 2005 Date: February 21, 2005
I
��t pUALITY NP S STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
v.ari
POIh1T SOURCE BRANCH
County: Mecklenburg
MRO No.: 04-147
Permit No. NCO004839
PART I - GENERAL INFORMATION
I. Facility and address: Kinder Morgan Southeast Terminals-Charlotte
Terminal 2
Formerly ExxonMobil Refining & Supply Company
801 Freedom Drive
Charlotte, North Carolina 28214
2. Date of investigation: 02-11-05
3. Report prepared by: Samar Bou-Ghazale, Env. Engineer I
4. Persons contacted and telephone number: Mr. Robert Gaston, Terminal Superintendent;
[phone].
5. Directions to Site: Travel northwest from Charlotte on Highway 27 to the Community of
Thrift. Kinder Morgan Southeast Terminal is located on the left side of Highway 27
approximately 100 yards past the junction of Highway 27 and Old Mount Holly Road(S-R.
1619).
6. Discharge Point(s). List for all discharge points:
Latitude: 350 16' 40" Longitude: 800 56' 27"
Attach a U.S.G.S.map extract and indicate treatment facility site and discharge point on map.
USGS Quad No.: F 15 SW USGS Quad Name: Mountain Island Lake
7. Site size and expansion are consistent with application?
Yes X No_ If No, explain:

8. Topography(relationship to flood plain included): Sloping at the rate of 3 to 6%. The site is
not located in a flood plain.
9. Location of nearest dwelling: The nearest dwelling is approximately 250 feet from the site.
10. Receiving stream or affected surface waters: Unnamed tributary to Gum Branch.
a. Classification: WS-IV
b. River Basin and Subbasin No.: Catawba River Basin; 030834
C. Describe receiving stream features and pertinent downstream uses: The receiving
stream appeared to be headwaters of an unnamed tributary to Long Creek. There are
several other discharges from oil terminal facilities into the receiving stream. General
"C " classification uses downstream.
PART II- DESCRIPTION OF DISCHARGE AND TREATMENT WORKS
l. Type of wastewater to be permitted:
0%Domestic
100% Industrial
a. Volume of Wastewater: The wastewater is generated from storm water that falls on
the entire site.
b. What is the current permitted capacity of the wastewater treatment facility?NIA.
C. Actual treatment capacity of the current facility (current design capacity)? 0.057
MGD.
d. Date(s)and construction activities allowed by previous Authorizations to Construct
issued in the previous two years: NIA
e. Please provide a description of existing or substantially constructed wastewater
treatment facilities: The existing wastewater treatment facilities for groundwater
remediation consist of an oil/water separator and an air stripper with a discharge
via outf LU 002. The wastewater treatment facilities for stormwater consist of a
pond and an oil/water separator which discharges at outfall 001. The discharge
from the loading/unloading area is directed to the oil/water separator(outfall 001).
Both outfalls discharges to the creek from the same catch basin.
f. Please provide a description of proposed wastewater treatment facilities: NIA
g. Possible toxic impacts to surface waters: Due to nature of the wastewater there
could be some toxicity concern.

h. Pretreatment Program(POTWs only): NIA.
2. Residuals handling and utilization/disposal scheme: Sludge accumulated in the oil/water
separator is removed by Stat, Inc., tel# [phone]. Waste carbon is regenerated by
US Filter, tel# [phone]I7.
3. Treatment plant classification(attach completed rating sheet): Class 1
4. SIC Code(s): 5171
Primary: 39 Secondary: 73
Main Treatment Unit Code: 53000
PART III - OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION
1. Is this facility being constructed with Construction Grant funds or are any public monies
involved (municipals only)? N/A.
2. Special monitoring or limitations (including toxicity) requests: N/A.
3. Important SOC, JOC or Compliance Schedule elates: (please indicate) N/A.
4. Alternative Analysis Evaluation: Has the facility evaluated all of the non-discharge
options available. Please provide regional perspective for each option evaluated.
Spray irrigation: N/A
Connection to regional Sewer System: N/A
Discharge to an infiltration gallery: NIA
5. Air Quality and/or Groundwater concerns or hazardous material utilized at this facility that
may impact water quality, air quality or groundwater? There are no groundwater
concerns. The facility stores a variety of hazardous materials typically associated with bulk
storage facilities. Air Quality Permit for this facility has been handled by Mecklenburg
County.
Page 3

PART IV- EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Kinder Morgan Southeast Terminals, LLC, is requesting NPDES Permit renewal.
A review of the past year's self-monitoring data, from 02/2003 through 12/2004, revealed no
violations.
It is recommended that the NPDES Permit be renewed as requested.
f
Signature of Report arer
Water Qualit Regional Supervisor
17— l�S
Date
Page 4

Y +
/7
CINDERX,A�S�PAN
ALs L.L.C.
"� .:w':�r-:-.Hama.-r...w^.,Y.•...._.,,cevv:r:..-rrreaynaa.we a i.A
f
Via Federal Express 1'1
Ms. Carolyn Bryant j
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resour [JAEN :6]200]50
Division of Water Quality— Point Source Branch
1617 Mail Service Center '
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 OENR - WATER QUALITY
POINT SOURCE BRANCH
Reference: Response to December 22, 2004 Letter
Regarding Solids handling and Disposal .........
Permit NCO004839
Dear Ms. Bryant:
This letter is in response to your December 22, 2004 letter to Mr. David Hildreth
regarding solids handling and disposal at the referenced facility. Please note that the
Kinder Morgan Southeast Terminals LLC (Kinder Morgan) Charlotte Tenninal 42
removes solids approximately annually. This occurs during the pump out of oil/water
separators) at the facility. Solids removed with residual petroleum product are
transported via licensed contractor to a permitted petroleum reclamation facility. The
solids, once processed, are confirmed "non-hazardous" and are disposed of or are
beneficially used at an appropriate landfill.
Kinder Morgan hopes this letter responds to your needs. If you have any additional needs
or questions, please feel free to contact me at [phone] or Mr. Cliff McCowan at
[phone].
Sincerely,
Kinder rNlorgan Southeast Terminals LLC
Robert D. Sullivan
Senior Environmental Engineer
1435 windward Concourse,Alpharetta,Georgia 30005 770-751-4000 770-324-4424 Fax

November 4, 2004
Accounts Receivable Department
Please accept this letter as notification that Charter-Triad Terminals, LLC has
entered into a definitive agreement to sell its terminal operations to Kinder
Morgan Southeast Terminals, LLC as of Friday, November 5, 2004,
The last day of operations under the control and ownership of Charter-Triad
Terminals, LLC will be Thursday, November 4, 2004. Deliveries made, or
services performed, which are properly ordered, accepted and signed for by an
authorized employee of Charter-Triad Terminals, LLC on or before November 4,
2004 will be the responsibility of Charter-Triad Terminals, LLC. We do not
assume liability for deliveries or services rendered after that date. Invoices are
to be forwarded to our corporate office address. Invoices for services rendered
on or after November 5, 2004 should be sent to Kinder Morgan Southeast
Terminals, LLC 1720 Windward Concourse Suite 325, Alpharetta, GA 30005 to
the attention of Kathy Killebrew.
Should you have questions regarding outstanding invoices, please do not
hesitate to call our corporate accounts payable department at 336-831-8937.
As long as documentation is proper and complete, remittances will be processed
within standard payment terms.
Sincerely,
J"�
F. Charle i
Vice President, CFO
Cc: Cheryl Beard, Kinder Morgan
Kathy Killebrew, Kinder Morgan

l
f •
( t
• K I N DEnAN O RGAN
SOUTHEAST TERMINALS L.L.C.
December 10, 2004
North Carolina Departrnent of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality— NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1 6 1 7
Reference: Application for Renewal of NPDES Permit NCO004839
Kinder Morgan Southeast Terminals —Charlotte Terminal 2
Dear NPDES Pennit Coordinator:
Enclosed please find enclosed NPDES Permit Application — Short For n C —
Manufacturing for the renewal of NPDES Pen-nit NCO004839 for the Kinder Morgan
Southeast Terminals LLC facility located at 6801 Freedom Drive in Charlotte, NC. The
facility should be referred to as the "Kinder Morgan Southeast Terminals — Charlotte
Tenninal 2" on the renewed NPDES pen-nit.
If you have any comments or questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at
[phone]. Thank you in advance for your assistance with this matter.
Sincerely,
Kinder Morgan Southeast Terminals LLC
Robert D. Sullivan
Senior Environmental Engineer
Enclosure
1.435 Windward Concourse Alpharetta,GA 30005 770-751-4000 770-824-4424 Fax

Kinder Morgan Southeast Terminals v
Charlotte Terminal 2
NPDES Pe[nlit No.NCO04839 • �
Mecklenburg County A • •
• ■ p
° ®a
Vym Arp�y/ • •c+wr
Srcroi craw • ���•ltrw Q � Q'
m ui.•ago •� =x-+°4 .
a
° O B 8• Ow
• vA�nQ• iLCCUR m tAW 4 Q• • •
MUMM � •fIC 4 �Armr
s vacQ atr•■n O � • r•■m30 � c •
Uulfall •"r r"•� °
r�rwn rA■r: a �R�
e ° UUI • • �� �►- • c•
� fA� nay wa
i ss+o.rc�
u r� • •w p 3'
n r
ILLL
iiMl aim ..•• � TS
r f Outfall TANG•" ° j')
•• UU2 • n""u rpa 17a ✓" cr •
• A�iM
♦ • • AM[r� • • • ••
•
r f w •• TAM R• •
►AIR a" nwp • •t ro at*
Q
- • ur �
•
rpm w," • '� iraarz
ss °g)c • a�
TAM OVA p
adwA�� aAsnVc '
•
• raw•t
■ ■ • AOMEurM
�r fAR
•
• iMN qdA CAMS tlta
• ,may
TAMI ai lA
V•
• WTrp WALK
• �r�F rALl
• • ■o•Via ftMAM
R rM■rp■•cr
` • lOVa•Ql
• f+bplA Canary
mar[r•• fap • G"VALK
• � f 3
OSa VTj P. CIMM&