HomeMy WebLinkAbout20090858 Ver 2_Year 3 Monitoring Report_20121212I EllEcoEngineering
A division of The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
To Ms Katie Merritt
Date December 12, 2012
NCDENR - DWQ, Wetlands & Stormwater
Branch
512 N Salisbury Street, Archdale Building
Raleigh, NC 27603 REGULAR MAIL
Re Carl Lloyd Bank Parcel Job No
am sending you the following item(s)
MAM -09010
COPIES
DATE
NO.
DESCRIPTION
1
comment response letter
1
Year 3 Monitoring Report
These are transmitted as checked below
❑ As requested
❑ For approval
❑ For review and comment
Remarks
Copy to
❑ For your use
El
�.
Signed �
George Buchholz, REM,
Environmental Scientist
FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY
❑ Copy Letter of Transmittal Only to File
® Copy Entire Document to File
2905 Meridian Parkway, Durham, North Carolina 27713
PO Box 14005, RTP, North Carolina 27709
EcolEngineering
A division of The John R. McAdams Company, Inc. G �---
V
DEC 1 4 2012
w�rE ouA�IrY
December 11, 2012 wetar,ds DEN - R 3 aNtr
Ms. Katie Merritt
Environmental Compliance Specialist & Nutrient Offset Coordinator
Wetlands & Stormwater Branch
NCDENR - DWQ
Archdale Building
512 N. Salisbury Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603
Re: Carl Lloyd Bank Parcel
Year 3 Monitoring Report
Response to Monitoring Year 3 Report Comments
MAM -09010
Following your December 5, 2012 e -mail, please find our responses to your
review comments on the project listed above. Our response comments are in
bold.
1. Comments from DWQ on the Year 2 monitoring report addressed
encroachment of the conservation easement due to mowing in parts of
the restoration area by a landowner. A response from Eco
Engineering stated that replanting was needed and would be done
between March — April 2012. However, there is nothing in the Year 3
monitoring report that states anything about replanting.
Response Needed:
■ please provide an explanation that addresses this
concern.
■ If replanting was not done, please provide dates for
when it is expected to be completed.,
■ Please provide "before" and "after" pictures if you have
them.
JRM Response: A fourth paragraph has been added to Section 2.0
which states the following: During Monitoring Year 2
field investigations, it was determined that the
conservation easement had been encroached upon by
mowing activities associated with the adjacent parcel.
The encroachment area is approximately 2,001 square
feet (0.05 acres) in size and located in the extreme
Remmh Triangle Park, NC northeastern section of the Bank Parcel. The
Post Off" Sm 14M encroachment area is located between Photo Stations 16
Rem KhTrt n* Park, and 17 and can been seen in the pictures for Monitoring
North Cuohna2TM Year 2 (Appendix E, Photo Stations 16 and 17). Re-
m Men` w ftrk"my lantin within the encroachment area occurred within
din
Durham, North Car 27713 planting
e OM05M
919287 -4282
919381 -2268 Fax
wwoomV.wn Design Services Focused On Client Success
EcoEr)gineering
A division of The John R McAdams Company, Inc
Ms Katie Merritt
Response to Monitoring Year 3 Report Comments
December 11, 2012
Carl Lloyd Bank Parcel
Page 2 of 4
May, 2012. A total of 300 species (50 Quercus laurifolia
[laurel oak], 50 Quercus nigra [water oak], 50 Betula
nigra [river birch], 50 Fraxinus pennsylvanica [green
ash], 50 Plantanus occidentalis [sycamore], and 50
Liriodendron tulipifera [tulip poplar]) were re- planted.
During Monitoring Year 3 field investigations, the
previously encroached upon area was visually inspected
and it was determined that the re- planted species are
surviving and the area has not been further encroached
upon. During Monitoring Year 3, Photo Stations 16
and 17 (Appendix E) shows re- growth within the
previously encroached upon area.
/2 Please change the bank sponsor name to "EBX -EM, LLC"
JRM Response: The bank sponsor name has been changed to
Environmental Banc and Exchange — Earth Mark, LLC
(EBX).
Table 2- Please explain why EBX -EM chose not to count the "Not
Listed" volunteer species (red maple and sweetgum) as they have
been included in recent monitoring reports
JRM Response: According to the NC Department of Environment and
Natural Resources — Ecosystem Enhancement Program
Guidelines for Riparian Buffer Restoration (October,
2004) acer rubrum (red maple) and liquidambar
styraciflua (sweet gum) are not listed as preferred
species to be planted within riparian buffers.
Therefore, the quantities were not included within
Table 2 for Monitoring Year although they were
inadvertently in previous years. However, during field
investigations conducted for Monitoring Year 3, red
maple and sweet gum quantities were reported within
each of the Vegetation Monitoring Plot Data Forms
(Appendix D). A fourth note has been added to Table 2
which states the following: "Not Listed" Species Type
are species which are not listed as preferred species to
be planted within riparian buffers according to the NC
Department of Environment and Natural Resources —
Ecosystem Enhancement Program Guidelines for
Riparian Buffer Restoration (October, 2004).
Therefore the values for each of these "Not Listed"
species were not quantified for Table 2 of Monitoring
MAM -09010
EcoEngineering
A division of The John R McAdams Company, Inc
Ms Katie Merritt
Response to Monitoring Year 3 Report Comments
December 11, 2012
Carl Lloyd Bank Parcel
Page 3 of 4
Year 3, although they were inadvertently done so in
previous monitoring years. The values for these "Not
Listed" species were still recorded in the individual
Vegetation Monitoring Data Forms
4 Table 3 shows very low survivability in almost '/2 of the vegetation
plots Please keep an eye on the site and if replanting is considered
/ necessary, notify DWQ prior to replanting
JRM Response: Comment has been noted.
5 Comments provided by DWQ on the Year 2 Monitoring Report
requested that trees <IOcm not be counted since the Level II protocol
for reporting vegetation says that trees <10 cm should be ignored
Eco Engineering's response stated that they would not use 0 -50cm as
a Height Class when recording vegetation and that they would change
the Height Class to 10 -50 cm on all future monitoring reports
Response Needed
• Please provide an explanation as to why this was not
accounted for in the Year 3 report
• Please change the height class from 0 -50cm to 10 -50cm
on this report and all future reports
• Please modify all of the data accordingly (DWQ is
unable to approve of the data without knowing how
many of the trees counted in this height class were <10
cm) Any trees <10 cm shall be removed from the data
and all numbers recalculated and provided to DWQ
JRM Response: Level II protocol was followed for reporting vegetation
in which trees less than 10cm were not counted;
however, it was an oversight in the data sheets and the
parameter of 0 -50cm was not changed to accurately
reflect the monitoring exercises conducted in the field.
Therefore, the 0 -50cm parameter has been changed to
10 -50cm. The data retrieved in the field is still valid. It
is out intent to reflect in future monitoring reports the
10 -50cm parameter.
MAM -09010
EcoEngineering
A division of The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.
Ms. Katie Merritt
Response to Monitoring Year 3 Report Comments
December 11, 2012
Carl Lloyd Bank Parcel
Page 4 of 4
Consideration of this response is greatly appreciated. A revised report is
provided. If you should have any questions or require additional information,
please do not hesitate to contact me at (919) 361 -5000.
Sincerely,
EcoEngineering
a division of The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.
George Buchholz, REM, S
Environmental Scientist
cc: Tommy Cousins, Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC
Enclosures
MAM -09010
CARL LLOYD BANK PARCEL
ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
YEAR 3 MONITORING REPORT
DWQ Project Number: 09- 0858v2
December 11, 2012
112@20WR I
VNR 1 4 2012
A R QUALITY I
Table of Contents
10 Introduction
1 1 Project Location and Description
12 Project Goals and Objectives .
2 0 Vegetation Condition and Comparison
3 0 Methodology . . .
3 1 Vegetation Monitoring Plots .
3 2 Photo Stations
4 0 References
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
5
Appendix A: Site Maps
Figure 1 • Site Location Map
Figure 2 Monitoring Year 2 Exhibit
Appendix B: Vegetation Assessment Data
Table 1 Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary
Table 2 Stem Count Total and Planted Species by Vegetation Plot
Table 3 Planted Species Comparison by Vegetation Plot
Appendix C: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Data Sheets
Appendix E: Photo Stations
1 [JI]EcoEngineering
A division of The John R McAdams Company, Inc
1.0 Introduction
1.1 Project Location and Description
Located at the southwest quadrant of the intersection of Holly Creek Lane and Old Greensboro
Road (SR 1005) in Orange County, North Carolina (Appendix A. Figure 1 — Site Location
Map) is the Carl Lloyd Bank Parcel (Bank Parcel) which is a nutrient mitigation bank The
purpose of this Bank Parcel is to improve water quality within the B Everett Jordan Lake
watershed by providing off -site mitigation for development (both existing and proposed) which
require nutrient offsets This Bank Parcel is not intended to function for mitigation of buffer
impacts It will only be used for nutrient offsets
The Bank Parcel is located within the Upper New Hope Arm of the B. Everett Jordan Lake
watershed, inside of 14 -digit USGS HUC 03030002060070 Stormwater runoff from this site
drains into two unnamed tributaries of Neville Creek (Stream Index #16- 41- 2- 2- 1 -(1)), which
drains into University Lake approximately three (3) miles downstream According to the N C
Division of Water Quality Basmwide Information Management System (BIMS), Neville Creek is
classified as WS -11, HQW, NSW in this location The overall tract, which consists of two (2)
parcels, is approximately 74 acres with a riparian buffer restoration area of 10 84 acres
(Appendix A. Figure 2 — Monitoring Year 1 Exhibit).
This Bank Parcel has been established under the terms and conditions of the Cape Fear Basin
Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Mitigation Umbrella Bank (Bank) made and entered into by
Environmental Banc and Exchange — Earth Mark, LLC (EBX), acting as the Bank Sponsor, and
the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources - Division of Water
Quality (DWQ)
1.2 Project Goals and Objectives
The goals of this nutrient mitigation project are to
To improve the overall water quality and aquatic habitat in and around the unnamed
tributaries of Neville Creek by reducing sediment into the streams caused by
agricultural influences
To improve the richness and diversity of the plant species within the conservation
easement
To provide perpetual protection for the unnamed tributaries of Neville Creek and
associated riparian and upland buffers
These goals will be met through the following objectives
By establishing a native plant community to match the endemic plant species at the
Bank Parcel
By reducing the quantities of exotic invasive species at the Bank Parcel through
mechanical and chemical methods
By establishing a conservation easement to provide long -term protection for the Bank
Parcel
2.0 Vegetation Condition and Comparison
Current stem counts were calculated using vegetation plot monitoring data. Final stem count
criteria are 320 trees per acre at the end of the five (5) year monitoring (Carl Lloyd Bank Parcel -
Bank Parcel Development Package, 2009) As for Monitoring Year 3, the Bank Parcel had 9
2 [JEcoEngineering
A division of The John R McAdams Company, Inc
plots encompassing 0 2224 acres, containing 312 planted and volunteer stems, which yielded a
density of 1,403 trees per acre including planted and volunteer species Vegetation survival
threshold was met for each of the plots except for Vegetation Plot 1 Summary tables of the data
collected are provided in Appendix B
Within the Bank Parcel, Chinese lespedeza (Lespedeza cuneata), which is an exotic /invasive
species was observed at the time of the field investigations Approximately 2 75 acres of the
Bank Parcel contains Chinese lespedeza The extent of exotic /invasive species is depicted in the
Monitoring Year 2 Exhibit (Appendix A, Figure 2)
During Monitoring Year 3 field investigations, it was determined that Vegetation Plot 1 did not
meet the vegetation survival threshold of 320 trees per acre Therefore, re- planting within the
area of Vegetation Plot will occur sometime between the months of November, 2012 and April,
2013
During Monitoring Year 2 field investigations, it was determined that the conservation easement
had been encroached upon by mowing activities associated with the adjacent parcel The
encroachment area is approximately 2,001 square feet (0 05 acres) in size and located in the
extreme northeastern section of the Bank Parcel. The encroachment area is located between
Photo Stations 16 and 17 and can been seen in the pictures for Monitoring Year 2 (Appendix E,
Photo Stations 16 and 17). Re- planting within the encroachment area occurred within May,
2012 A total of 300 species (50 Quercus laurifolia [laurel oak], 50 Quercus nigra [water oak],
50 Betula nigra [river birch], 50 Fraxinus pennsylvanica [green ash], 50 Plantanus occidentalis
[sycamore], and 50 Liriodendron tulipifera [tulip poplar]) were re- planted During Monitoring
Year 3 field investigations, the previously encroached upon area was visually inspected and it
was determined that the re- planted species are surviving and the area has not been further
encroached upon During Monitoring Year 3, Photo Stations 16 and 17 (Appendix E) shows re-
growth within the previously encroached upon area
3.0 Methodolo
3.1 Vegetation Monitoring Plots
All monitoring methodologies follow the most current templates and guidelines provided by EEP
(EEP, 2006; EEP, 2009) All nine (9) vegetation plots installed by EcoEngineering were located
in Monitoring Year 3 Baseline vegetation monitoring was conducted in accordance to CVS-
EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation (CVS -EEP, v4 2) Table 1 (Appendix B) provides a
success summary for each vegetation monitoring plot which the target density is a minimum of
320 trees per acre at the end of the five (5) year monitoring period Table 2 (Appendix B)
provides a stem count total and planted stem total by each individual vegetation plot Table 3
(Appendix B) provides a summary of only planted stem counts as compared to planted stem
counts of the As Built
Vegetation monitoring plots were photographed and are located in Appendix C Vegetation
Monitoring Plot Data Sheets are provided in Appendix D Each Vegetation Monitoring Plot
Data Sheet provides measurements, location, and vigor of each planted species within a
respective vegetation monitoring plot
3.2 Photo Stations
Photo documentation is essential to monitoring the success the Bank Parcel Photos provide a
visual assessment of the vegetation conditions All 19 photo stations installed by
EcoEngineering were located in Monitoring Year 3 Photographs were taken at high resolution
[E—S]EcoEngineering
A division of The John R McAdams Company, Inc
using an Olympus FE -115 5 0 megapixel digital camera The locations of the photo stations are
depicted in the Monitoring Year 3 Exhibit (Appendix A, Figure 2). Photographs for the photo
stations are located in Appendix E
[E—g]EcoEngineering
A dmsmn of The John R McAdams Company, Inc
4.0 References
EcoEngmeermg — A division of The John R McAdams Company, Inc August, 2009 Carl Lloyd
Bank Parcel — Bank Parcel Development Package
Lee Michael T, Peet Robert K, Roberts Steven D, and Wentworth Thomas R, 2008 CVS -EEP
Protocol for Recording Vegetation Level 1 -2 Plot Sampling Only Version 4 2
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) 2004 Guidelines for Riparian
Buffer Restoration Available at internet site
http / /www.nceep net/news /reports/buffers pd f Accessed August 2009
Schafale MP and AS Weakley 1990 Classification of the Natural Communities of North
Carolina Third Approximation North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of
Parks and Recreation, Department of Environment and Natural Resources Raleigh,
North Carolina.
[jEcoEngineering
A division of The John R McAdams Company, Inc
APPENDIX A
Site Maps
[JEcoEngineering
A division of The John R McAdams Company Inc
PROJECT NO. MAM -09010 CARL LLYOD AftoEngineering'
F LENAYE: MAM 09010X. D WG
BANK PARCEL A� ofTLelo}m R ►, .Camp W M
SCAM: A S SHOWN Kmmfnm • PI.ANNm - si1Hmom - SNVU1DNlC$NTAL
FIGURE 1. SITE LOCATION MAP TRPNC��•
GATE: 11 -05 -2012 NO-M -5 a --jv P.A.". ��Lke no:C -QM
ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA � ®- � �
OQ�
o 4 I
G,j- / `
100001-
NOW FORMERLY
WILLIAM J. CALLAHAN &
JUNE POINEAU CALLAHAN
DB 934, PG 498
PIN: 9758428104
— — A — — __�
NOW OR FORMERLY
ALSTON VANESSA
DB 2209, PG 253
PIN: 9758416824
—r___J
- - -�
I
BLESSING DRIVE
50' PRIVATE ACCESS I
EASEMENT
PB 60, PG 117
NOW OR FORMERLY
SHAWN W. GOINS, SR. &
USA A. GOINS
DB 1892, PG 450
PIN: 9758415690
1 pON 67 1M A� /��'�\ ♦\\
E28
7I
CONSERVATION
u EASEMENT 1 I
1 397,187 sq ft I
1 1p 9 12 acres
E21
�C 1� \F," LESPEDEZA CUNEAT�
ENCROACHMENT
512 5 t9�,,n
E59
ssys�OG'"��sJ dy
on.
n. @9
f
s d'�991j su � s f
0^119 `' oy
NOW OR FORMERLY
EDWARD &BACHMANN
DB 4529, PG 429
PIN: 9758512384
NOW OR FORMERLY
CALVIN MELLOTT
08 2329, PG 281
PIN: 9757498340
GENERAL NOTES
1. THIS IS A SURVEY OF AN EXISTING PARCEL(S)
OF LAND. THIS IS A VEG PLOT SURVEY.
2. PROPERTY LINES WERE TAKEN FROM
REFERENCES SHOWN HEREON AND ORIENTATED
TO NC GRID NAD 83 USING GPS METHOD.
3. ALL DISTANCES ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND
DISTANCES.
4. AREA BY COORDINATE GEOMETRY.
S. REFERENCES: DB 3683, PG 299; PB 29, PG
14; PB 32, PG 40; PB 51. PG 162; PB 53,
PG 19; PS 56, PG 153; PB 60. PG 117; PB
74, PG 194; PS 85, PG 17; PB 88, PG 105
OF THE ORANGE COUNTY REGISTRY.
PIN: 9758524286; 9758507824;
9758524286; 9758606891
6. UTILITY STATEMENT
THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN HAVE
BEEN LOCATED FROM FIELD SURVEY
INFORMATION AND EXISTING DRAWINGS. THE
SURVEYOR MAKES NO GUARANTEE THAT THE
UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN COMPRISE ALL
SUCH UTILITIES IN THE AREA, EITHER IN
SERVICE OR ABANDONED. THE SURVEYOR
FURTHER DOES NOT WARRANT THAT THE
UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN ARE IN THE
EXACT LOCATION INDICATED ALTHOUGH HE
DOES CERTIFY THAT THEY ARE LOCATED AS
ACCURATELY AS POSSIBLE FROM INFORMATION
AVAILABLE. THE SURVEYOR HAS NOT
PHYSICALLY LOCATED THE UNDERGROUND
UTILITIES.
7. NO GRID MONUMENTS FOUND WITHIN 2000' OF
SITE.
6_
NOW OR FORMERLY
I CARL BRADY LLOYD, ETAL
TRACT 3
I DB 397, PG 815
PB 51, PG 162
PIN: 9757598564
NOW OR FORMERLY
CHRISTOPHER FRANCIS SMOLLEN &
LESLIE 0. SMOLLEN
DB 2505, PG 278
PB 85, PG 17
PAE 9758627120
DETAIL
CONSE ATION
\EASEM T 3
` 154 ,730 s S ft
\ 3 acre
55 s
\ E116 �
BUFFER VJ
RESTORATION
AREA 5
73,789 sq ft
1 69 acres 1P9R fhb 3„1♦ ` �
E121 —�, ` 130
E1z3�
1 E ;
EXISTING
50' ACCESS 4
EASEMENT
E38 PB 48, PG 60 1� 2
PPXy i,F
2Y r INITIAL ACCESS
EASEMENT TO
�2ti ro y� CONSERVATION
EASEMENT 1 AND 2
NOW OR FORMERLY
LESPEDEZRAA&EWTIZ & SONIA GONZALEZ
ENCROACHMENT DB 3034, PG 430
PIN: 9758710467
BUFFER
RESTORATION
AREA 6
4,290 sq ft
0 10 acres
LESPEDEZA CUNEAT
ENCROACHMENT
=ISFRVA710 EAS MM ARE NCUMW OF IM AREAS N07ED AS BUFFER RW ORA710N AREAS.
CONSERVATION EASEMENT 1
BUFFER RESTICRA7101011 AREA 1
BUFFER RF970RA710N AREA 2
CONSERVATION EASEMENT 1 AEA RE1MAN10
CONSERVATON L400A 11T 2
BUFFER RESTMA110N AREA 3
BUFFER RESTMA71ON AREA 4
CONSFRVATM EASEMENT 2 AREA REMAMM
2.
r "0 MAM -09010
EXISTING IRON PIPE
mm"m MAM09010 -AB
IRON PIPE SET
mu_'
"
EXISTING CONCRETE MONUMENT
1 =250'
CALCULATED POINT
11 -05 -2012
8
0
7
AREA AOIA11141140
397,187 S0. FT. — 0.12 ACRES
107,144 SQ. FT. — 3.84 AGREE
w>0 S0. FT. — 209 ACRES
1406473 SQ. FT. — 3.21 ACRES
1986910 SQ. FT. — 4,82 ARE=
104,184 S4 FT. — 2219 ACRES
236422 SQ, FT. — GM ACRES
89,334 S0. FT. — 1.99 ACRES
181,730 SQ. FT. — 108 ACRES
73,780 SQ. FT. — 1.99 ACRES
4.21110 S96 FT. — 0.10 ACRES
0.464 SQ. FT. — 0.222 ACRES
97,167 9Q6 FT. — 1.84 ACRES
BUFFER /F
RESTORATION
AREA 4 M
23,422 sq ft
0 54 acres
CONSERVATION
EASEMENT 2
196,910 sq ft
4 52 acres PS�79
L178
L176
L175
LEGEND
All
1�
0
EXISTING IRON PIPE
C
IRON PIPE SET
■
EXISTING CONCRETE MONUMENT
A
CALCULATED POINT
ctL
UTILITY POLE
8
PHOTO STATION
VPA
VEG PLOT
EXISTING
7 30 DRAINAGE
um EASEMENT
PSIS PB 48, PBUFFER
+ RESTORATION
VP�fY AREA 7
9,464 sq ft
0 22 acres
t�
♦ U82 �
Psig
:SPEDEZA CUNEATA I 1
- ENCROACHMENT
I I
BUFFER I I
RESTORATION I I
AREA 3
104,154 sq ft
2 39 acres I I
NOW OR FORMERLY I
MARK J. WEHRMAN d�
ERLINDA Z WEHRM
WXY � DB 1624, PG 43 I
POW. PG 153
mmt PIN: 9758808891 I
IJ
EXISTING I I
30' DRAINAGE
♦ � �EASEMENT I I
B 48, PG 60
NOW OR FORMERLY `��♦ ��\
GERALD W. FERNALD &
MARJORIE L FERNALD �
DB 770. PG 204
PB 51, PG 162
PIN: 9758607107
GRAPHIC SCALE
R
250 0 128 500
INVASIVE / EXOTIC
® SPECIES POPULATION
LLOYD PROPERTY
CONSERVATION EASEMENT PHOTO STATION & VW PLAT
CHAPEL HQL TOWNSHIP. ORANGE COUNTY NORTH CARUM
( IN FEET )
1 inch = 000 ft
® THE JOHN R. WADANS
COMPANY, INC.
)�SC97>321Q®i f�� • fS�IDAl�
•16 Mown Dafm 11C wm
eooauaeu....�. m Nu ass
0
APPENDIX B
Vegetation Assessment Data
[jEcoEngineering
A diismn of The John R McAdams Company, Inc
. Table 1. Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary Table
Carl Lloyd Bank Parcel; Orange County, NC
Monitoring Year 3: October 17, 2012
EcoEngineering Project #: MAM -09010
PLANTED & VOLUNTEER STEMS PER ACRE
Buffer Restoration
Area
Vegetation
Plot ID
Vegetation Threshold
Met ?*
Tract Mean
1
1
No
89%
1
2
Yes
3
3
Yes
3
4
Yes
4
5
Yes
2
6
Yes
2
7
Yes
5
8
Yes
7
9
Yes
*Target density is a minimum of 320 trees per acre at the end of the five (5) year monitoring period according
to the "Carl Lloyd Bank Parcel - Bank Parcel Development Package ", August, 2009
0
Table 2 Stem Count Total and Planted Species by Vegation Plot
Carl Lloyd Bank Parcel, Orange County, NC
Monitoring Year 3 October 17, 2012
Bank Parcel 10 84 acres
ecoen meerm
rro ect s MAM -uyu-Iu
CURRENT
PLOT
DATA MY -3 October, 2012
ANNUAL
MEANS
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
VP -1
PLI NT
VP -2
PL NT
VP -3
PL I NT
VP-4
PL NT
VP -5
PL NT
VP -6
PL NT
VP -7
PL NT
VP -8
PL NT
VP -9
PL NT
MY -3
(October, 2012)
MY -2
(October, 2011 )
MY -1
(October, 2010 )
AS BUILT
(May, 2010)
Aroma arbutifolia
red chokecherry
Shrub
0
0
5
18
m
Betula ra
river birch
Tree
1
1
1
4
1
8
10
8
11
Car anus caroliniana
ironwood
Small Tree
2
2
2
1
13
20
14
16
24
Fraxinus Dennsvlvanica
green ash
Tree
1
1
2
1
5
3
3
4
4
2
2
28
23
26
16
Lmodendron tuli ifera
tulip poplar
Tree
1
1
2
2
2
6
M nca cenfera
wax myrtle
Shrub
0
0
10
14
Plantanus occidnetalis
sycamore
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
5
4
4
4
Prunus serotina
cherry
Tree
1
1
2
5
5
11
Quercus alba
white oak
Tree
1
4
1
1
7
8
11
12
Quercus launfolia
laurel oak
Tree
1
1
1
0
2
Quercus I rata
overcup oak
Tree
0
0
0
1
Quercus michauxn
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
0
0
0
1
Quercus m ra
water oak
Tree
1
1
5
1
3
Quercus pagodafolia
cherrybark oak
Tree
2
1
1
4
4
4
6
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
5
6
2
2
1
16
7
10
8
Quercus rubra
red oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
2
2
8
6
11
14
Li uidambar stVraciflua
sweet gum
Not Listed
0
234
223
Juni erus vir miana
red cedar
Small Tree
1
1
2
1
1
Ulmus americans
American elm
Tree
2
11
24
14
23
72
30
12
6
194
57
49
Acer rubrum
red maple
Not Listed
0
64
65
Rhus co allma
winged sumac
Shrub
0
0
64
Ca rya tomentosa
shagbark hickory
Tree
1
2
6
2
11
2
1
N ssa s Ivatica
black gum
Tree
2
2
Quercus stellata
post oak
Tree
1
1
Persea borbonia
I red bay
Small Tree
0
0
3
Planted Stem Count Total
3
11
10
5
16
4
9
9
5
72
91
95
Natural Stem Count Total
3
21
25
14
29
72
31
22
23
240
445
424
Size of Vegetation Plot Acres
0 0247
00247
00247
00247
00247
00247
00247
00247
00247
02224
02224
02224
Number of Different Species
5
10
7
6
10
4
7
7
5
61
79
78
Planted & Volunteer Stems Per Acre
243
1295
1 1416
769
1821
3076
1619
1255
1133
1403
2410
2334
1) The following "Species Types" were not recorded "Shrub" & "Not Listed"
2) PL = Planted Species
3) NT = Natural/Volunteer Species
4) "Not Listed" Species Type are species which are not listed as preferred species to be planted within riparian buffers according to the NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources— Ecosystem Enhancement Program Guidelines for
Riparian Buffer Restoration (October, 2004) Therefore the data for each of these "Not Listed" species were not quantified for Table 2 of Monitoring Year 3, although they were inadvertently done so in previous monitoring years The data for
these "Not Listed" species were still recorded in the individual Vegetation Monitoring Data Forms
J •
Table 3 Planted Species Comparison by Vegation Plot
Carl Lloyd Bank Parcel, Orange County, NC
Monitoring Year 3 October 17, 2012
L,
�
L,
Eco
VP -1 VP -2
naineenna Pro ect # MAM -09010
VP -3
VP-4
VP -5
VP -6
VP -7
VP -8
VP -9
ear 3 Planted Ste m Count Total
3
11
10
5
16
4
9
9
5
MMonitoring
Built Planted Stem Count Total
14
13
22
16
17
20
12
19
18
d Stem Difference from As Bud
-11
-2
-12
-11
-1
-16
-3
-10
-13
it Rate % Monitoring Plot
21%
85%
45%
31%
94%
20%
75%
47%
28%
rvbte i ne umerence between planted stems from the As Bunt and Monitoring Year 3 is due to species which were deemed "missing" or "dead" in previous monitoring years One possible
explanation for "missing" species is due to thick herbaceous growth obscuring the species from identification during previous and current monitoring years Therefore, it is possible
"missing" species could grow larger than the herbaceous growth and allow for their identification and measurement in subsequent monitoring years In addition, species which were
deemed "dead" could survive in subsequent years because the species may have gone dormant at the time of monitoring while the roots of the species are surviving below ground
Therefore, in subsequent years the species could grow under more favorable conditions
•
•
•
APPENDIX C
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
[jEcoEngineering
A donsion of The John R. McAdams Company, Inc
VE6 PLOT It WITHIN AREA I AT Op FAGIN6 2i6 °W.
VE6 PLOT 2: WITHIN AREA I AT Op FAGIN6 266 -K
PEOJECT N°. MAM -09010
CARL LLOYD
lln FIIENAME:MAM09010X.DWG
BANK PARCEL
VEGETATION PLOTS
AftoEngineering'
A divisor of R �Y, Inc.
scAlE:
AS SHOWN
S - UR ORS - EN
SNGINffiiS • PIANN�iS • SORYHYORS • ffiiYIIiDN][�l'PAL
nESEAxcs TRUNGIE PARK • MARLOWE
D.A..
DA7E 11 -05 -2012
ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
scom"s e•- � ft.: c-0m
�
n
C7
v
S
(n
VE6 PLOT 3s WITHIN AREA 3 AT Op FAGIN6 206 05.
VW PLOT 4: WITHIN AREA 3 AT Oro FAGIN6 216 °5W.
PROJECT NO. MAM -09010 CARL L LLOYD
CA
IL E
S LE: ME: BANK PARCEL
cAL AS SHOWN
VEGETATION PLOTS
DATE: 11 -05 -2012 ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
AEcoEngineerin 9 '
A division of 7Le John R McAd®s Cody, Inc.
ENGINEERS • P1ANNEW • SURVEYORS • ENVERONKMAL
RESEARCH TRIANGIE PAR[ • CHARLOTTE
2X05 Nvid= Puksa7, DurhWm NC ZM3
�a
ty
a
VE6 PLOT 9, WITHIN AREA _I AT Op PAGIN6 116 05.
FPROJEC-T M -09010 C � �T LT n� L �1W 1JV ®EcoEngineering
9010X.DWG B� PARCEL A dtvmm of "Ibe John R McAdam Campmy, Ic. %NGII�I& SRS • PLNIiBSB • SOSYEY�3 • ffiiV�O�fiiAL
sHOw►v VEGETATION PLOTS fUMm KU
=FMK-
°"'B 11 -05 -2012 eoo�xis � i:�.mX c-=
ORANGE COUI�TIY. NORTH CAROI�ITA i
•
APPENDIX D
Vegetation Monitoring Data Sheets
g FJO]EcoEngineering
A dnssion of The John R. McAdams Company Inc
Site Carl Lloyd Bank Site
Page 1
Monitoring Year
Date
Area
Veg Plot No
X -axis
MY -3
10/12/2012
1
1
314NW
CURRENT MONITORING YEAR
DATA
MY -2 SEPT, 2011
50-1001
X
Y
ddh
Height
DBH
cm
Vigor
ddh
Height
DBH
Notes
Map ID
Scientific Name
Common Name
Source
meter
meter
millimeter
centimeter
millimeter
centimeter
cm
1
Betula ni ra
river birch
B
03
03
M
789
41
2
Prunus serotma
black cherry
C
32
03
M
missing
3
M rica cerifera
wax myrtle
B
1 57
03
5
85
3
432
73
4
Plantanus occidnetalis
sycamore
C
87
041
1201
154
051
2
1084
163
0 435
stress
51
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
C
86
34
122
12
3
929
67
6
M rica cenfera
wax myrtle
B
61
34
M
missing
7
Quercus rubra
red oak
C
31
31
M
missing
8
Quercus rubra
red oak
B
04
28
M
missm
9
Arorna arbutifolia
red chokeberry
C
04
58
M
1549
86
10
Quercus alba
white oak
B
31
61
M
missing
11
Quercus alba
white oak
C
61
67
11 92
131
3
91
91
12
M nca cenfera
wax myrtle
B
87
67
1795
150
0 225
3
125
102
13
Arorna arbutifolia
red chokeberry
C
75
92
1
M
426
39
14
M nca cenfera
wax myrtle
B
421
89
1
M
Imissing
C = containerized Vigor 3 = good condition, 2 = surviving and likely to survive next year
B = bare root 1 = almost surviving and not likely to survive next year
M = Missmq
CURRENT MONITORING YEAR DATA VOLUNTEER
SPECIES
HEIGHT CLASSES cm
Scientific Name
10 -50
50-1001
> 100
Ulmus americana
2
Li uidambar styraciflua
2
6
Jurn erus vir iniana
1
Pmus taeda
1
Site: Carl Lloyd Bank Site
Page:
2
Date:
10/12/2012
Area:
1
Veg Plot No.:
1
X -axis:
314NW
1
a
E
e
1
0.5
0,0 0.5
i c j
Odenotes missing
ff
4 0 0 / 0 V lu
X -AXIS
MMM
MMMMMMMMMM
i c j
Odenotes missing
ff
4 0 0 / 0 V lu
X -AXIS
Site Carl Lloyd Bank Site
Page 1
Monitoring Year
Date
Area
Veg Plot No
X -axis
MY -3
10/12/2012
1
2
302NW
CURRENT MONITORING YEAR DATA
MY -2 SEPT, 2011
10 -50
X
meter
Y
meter
ddh
millimeter
Height
centimeter
DBH
cm
Vigor
ddh
Hei ht
Notes
Map ID
Scientific Name
Common Name
Source
millimeter
centimeter
1
Quercus rubra
red oak
C
06
03
865
65
1
3
6 15
51
2
Quercus phellos
willow oak
C
35
04
2205
160
0 485
3
1278
103
3
Quercus pagodafolia
cherrybark oak
C
1 63
04
85
62
3
619
62
4
Prunus serotina
black cherry
C
76
051
1821
111
1 3
1591
112
5
Quercus pagodafolia
cherrvbark oak
C
92
29
666
80
2
571
60
stress
6
Quercus hellos
willow oak
B
63
28
2329
150
0 337
3
1635
93
7
Quercus pagodafolia
cherrybark oak
C
27
27
M
missing
8
Car mus caroliniana
ironwood
B
0
26
M
598
59
9
Lmodendron tuli ifera
tulip poplar
C
1 1 3
54
83
52
3
743
31
insect
10
Quercus phellos
willow oak
C
38
541
11 5
142
03351
3
772
74
11
Linodendron tuli ifera
tulip poplar
C
66
54
M
missing
12
Betula rn ra
river birch
C
94
54
1329
121
3
443
31
13
Quercus phellos
willow oak
C
37
98
1638
163
0 451
3
1562
135
14
Quercus phellos
willow oak
C
39
34
131,
165
0 365
3
Ifound this year
C = containerized Vigor 3 = good condition, 2 = surviving and likely to survive next year
B = bare root 1 = almost surviving and not likely to survive next year
M = Missinq
CURRENT MONITORING YEAR DATA VOLUNTEER
SPECIES
HEIGHT CLASSES cm
Scientific Name
10 -50
50-1001
>100
Ulmus americana
1
91
1
Acer rubrum
8
12
1
N ssa s Ivatica
2
Jum erus vir miana
1
Li uidambar st raciflua
2
5
Quercus phellos
1
2
3
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
1
NOTES Lespedeza cuneata within plot
E
4
C
1
05
0,0
' 266W
MMMKJIIOI
Site
Page
Carl Lloyd Bank Site
2
Date
10/12/2012
Area
1
Veg Plot
No
2
X -axis
302NW
1
E
4
C
1
05
0,0
' 266W
MMMKJIIOI
MMMMMM
MMMMMMMMMM
MMMMMMMMMM
MMMMMMMMMM
MMMECOMMMMMM
MMMMMMMMMM
MM
-MMMM
MAI.MM-M
-IMMUOO
MMMMMWMM
MMMMMMMM
UO
MMMMMMMMM
MM
Odenotes missing
X -AXIS
r a a I
Site Carl Lloyd Bank Site
Page 1
Monitoring Year
Date
Area
Veg Plot No
X -axis
MY -3
10/16/2012
3
3
156SE
CURRENT MONITORING YEAR DATA
MY -2 SEPT, 2011
10 -50
X
meter
Y
meter
ddh
millimeter
Height
centimeter
DBH
cm
Vigor
ddh
Height
Notes
Map ID
Scientific Name
Common Namc
Source
millimeter
centimeter
1
Quercus alba
white oak
B
05
04
12
40
3
2088
33
insect
2
Car anus caroliniana
ironwood
C
31
04
1183
90
3
618
47
3
Quercus alba
white oak
B
1 59
04,
37
41
2
288
43
stree
4
Aronia arbutifolia
red chokeberry
C
86
04
1 M
missin
5
Quercus alba
white oak
B
76
12
1365
90
3
888
55
6
Quercus alba
white oak
B
49
1 5
M
missin
7
Quercus alba
white oak
B
22
16
1965
98
3
1261
86
8
Quercus rubra
red oak
B
05
33
M
missing
9
Aroma arbutifolia
red chokeberry
C
351
32
378
28
3
Imissinq
insect/deer
10
Car anus caroliniana
ironwood
C
61
31
M
missing
11
Car anus caroliniana
ironwood
C
10
74
23
51
3
621
62
res rout
12
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
C
8 8
6 2
122
68
3
1098
59
13
Car anus caroliniana
ironwood
C
7 6
7 6
M
591
53
14
Aroma arbutifolia
red chokeberry
B
5 5
6 2
M
631
37
15
Car anus caroliniana
ironwood
C
46
7 6
M
missm
16
Betula ni ra
river birch
B
3
6 2
M
missing
17
Car anus caroliniana
ironwood
C
1 6
7 7
M
missing
18
Aronia arbutifolia
red chokeber
C
0 3
6 2
M
missing
19
Fraxinus p enns Ivamca
areen ash
IC
1 0 7
9 11
11 95
55
3
126
64
deer
20
Betula ni ra
river birch
B
3 5
9
698
68
3
1 589
30
21
Quercus rubra
red oak
B
IC
6 1
1
9
213
42
3
1 945
33
res rout
22
Quercus pagodafolia
cherrybark oak
9 4
9
1 M
Imissino
C = containerized Vigor 3 = good condition, 2 = surviving and likely to survive next year
B = bare root 1 = almost surviving and not likely to survive next year
M = Missing
CURRENT MONITORING YEAR DATA VOLUNTEER
SPECIES
HEIGHT CLASSES cm
Scientific Name
10 -50
50-1001
> 100
Pinus taeda
15
2
Ulmus amencana
11
13
Ca rya tomentosa
1
Li uidambar st raciflua
3
2
NOTES Lespedeza cuneata within plot
Site: Carl Lloyd Bank Site
Page: 2
Date: 10/16/2012
Area: 3
Veg Plot No.: 3
X -axis: 156SE
0 4 3 L 7
X -AXIS
Odenotes missing
10
3
I
I
0.5
0.5 0,0
\(!f)
iiiiiiMiiiiiiiii
a�I
0 4 3 L 7
X -AXIS
Odenotes missing
10
3
I
I
0.5
0.5 0,0
\(!f)
Site Carl Lloyd Bank Site
Page 1
Monitoring Year
Date
Area
Veg Plot No
X -axis
MY -3
10/16/2012
3
4
162SE
CURRENT MONITORING YEAR DATA
MY -2 SEPT, 2011
10 -50
X
meter
Y
meter
ddh
millimeter
Hei ht
centimeter
DBH
cm
Vigor
ddh
Height
Notes
Map ID
Scientific Name
Common Name
Source
millimeter
centimeter
1
M nca cenfera
wax myrtle
B
1 7
06
21 95
160
3
1778
102
2
Linodendron tuli ifera I
tulip poplar
C
45
06
53
25
3
565
43
stress
3
Betula ni ra
river birch
B
73
05
1025
120
3
1 635
76
4
Betula ni ra
river birch
B
99
051
M
269
25
5
M nca cenfera
wax myrtle
B
9
31
M
missing
6
Quercus pagodafolia
cherrybark oak
C
6
34
505
48
3
565
43
7
Fraxinus p enns Ivanica
green ash
C
36
21
55
42
3
556
35
insect
8
M nca cenfera
wax myrtle
B
25
35
1341
121
3
615
57
9
Plantanus occidnetalis
sycamore
C
1 69
41
690
60
3
1 599
49
10
Quercus alba
white oak
B
81
59
M
missing
11
Arorna arbutifolia
red chokeber
C
51
6
496
40
3
missing
12
Quercus alba
white oak
B
25
61
M
597
32
13
M nca cenfera
wax myrtle
B
03
871
84
105
3
279
28
14
Quercus michauxn
swam chestnut oak
C
32
87
M
missin
15
M nca cerifera
wax myrtle
B
621
86
3451
186
0 495
3
1 1561
102
16
Aronia arbutifolia
red chokeberry
IC
1 891
85
1
1
1 M
Imiss,ing
C = containerized Vigor 3 = good condition, 2 = surviving and likely to survive next year
B = bare root 1 = almost surviving and not likely to survive next year
M = Missing
CURRENT MONITORING YEAR DATA VOLUNTEER
SPECIES
HEIGHT CLASSES cm
Scientific Name
10 -50
50 -100
> 100
Ulmus amencana
5
9
Pinus taeda
5
NOTES Lespedeza cuneata within plot
Site Carl Lloyd Bank Site
),Page 2
Date 10/16/2012
Area 3
Veg Plot No 4
X-axis 162SE
MWI
0 denotes missing
X-AXIS
10
3
05
1 05 10,10
M
=
==
Hamm
=1
i
ii�ii��
O
MWI
0 denotes missing
X-AXIS
10
3
05
1 05 10,10
Site Carl Lloyd Bank Site
Page 1
Monitoring Year
Date
Area
Veg Plot No
X -axis
MY -3
10/16/2012
4
5
160S
CURRENT MONITORING YEAR DATA
MY -2 SEPT, 2011
10 -50
X
meter
Y
meter
ddh
millimeter
Height
centimeter
DBH
cm
Vi or
ddh
Height
Notes
Map ID
Scientific Name
Common Name
Source
millimeter
centimeter
1
Car mus caroliniana
ironwood
C
05
06
1019
75
1
3
808
61
2
Betula ni ra
river birch
C
32
06
M
missing
3
Quercus alba
white oak
C
1 61
06
1001
94
3
618
52
4
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
qreen ash
C
89
051
1632
87
3
1575
85
5
Prunus serotma
black cherry
C
99
34
M
missing
6
Quercus rubra
red oak
C
85
—
43
M
missing
7
Quercus launfolia
laurel oak
B
73
35
M
missm
33
8
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
C
51
49
M
missing
62
9
Betula rn ra
river birch
B
45
33
1049
181
3
1769
92
10
Car mus caroliniana
ironwood
C
16
321
11 75
45
3
929
62
11
Arorna arbutifolia
red chokeberry
C
04
461
24
40
2
245
35
stress
12
Fraxinus enns Ivanica
reen ash
C
69
62
119
80
3
756
56
13
Plantanus occidnetalis
sycamore
C
88
88
989
78
3
801
75
14
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
C
71
99
965
51
3
1084
41
15
Betula rn ra
river birch
B
55
85
1345
134
3
1399
117
16
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Inver
green ash
C
28
86
975
62
3
895
54
17
Betula ni ra
birch
B
031
871
992
94
3
931
56
C = containerized Vigor 3 = good condition, 2 = surviving and likely to survive next year
B = bare root 1 = almost surviving and not likely to survive next year
M = Missing
CURRENT MONITORING YEAR DATA VOLUNTEER
SPECIES
HEIGHT CLASSES cm
Scientific Name
10 -50
50 -100
> 100
Ca rya tomentosa
1
1
Li uidambar st racdflua
16
25
15
Acer rubrum
13
3
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
1
2
Ulmus amencana
181
5
Plantanus occidentalis
1
Site: Carl Lloyd Bank Site
Page:
2
Date:
10/16/2012
Area:
4
Veg Plot No.:
5
X -axis: 160S
1
s
E
e
i
MMM_
MMMMIMO"MM
MMMIV�MMMMMMM
MMMMMMMMMIJIM
MMMM
MM
"(90
1 UO
0.5
0,0 0.5 1
f
z s
Odenotes missing
4 5 b / is v lU
X -AXIS
Site Carl Lloyd Bank Site
Page 1
Monitoring Year
Date
Area
Veg Plot No
X -axis
MY -3
10/16/2012
2
6
124SE
CURRENT MONITORING YEAR
DATA
MY -2 OCT, 2011
50-1001
X
Y
ddh
Height
DBH
cm
Vigor
ddh
Height
DBH
Notes
Map ID
Scientific Name
Common Name
Source
meter
meter
millimeter
centimeter
millimeter
centimeter
cm
1
Quercus rubra
red oak
C
07
01
M
441
51
2
Betula ni ra
river birch
C
16
0
7
104
3
885
87
vine
3
Prunus serotina
black cherry
C
1 42
04
M
missing
41
Prunus serotina
black cherry
C
69
091
M
missing
5
Betula ni ra
river birch
C
98
1
M
388
47
6
Quercus phellos
willow oak
C
92
25
M
missing
7
Quercus phellos
willow oak
B
89
38
M
missing
8
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
C
76
29
M
missin
9
Quercus rn ra
water oak
B
49
38
M
missing
10
Prunus serotina
black cherry
C
22
221
M
missing
11
Car anus carolirnana
ironwood
C
02
46
M
1101
92
12
Aronia arbutifolia
red chokeberry
C
56
53
M
missing
13
M nca cenfera
wax myrtle
B
84
59
154
179
3
1075
64
14
Quercus rubra
red oak
C
98
57
679
65
3
555
38
15
Car anus caroliniana
ironwood
C
10
58
M
874
84
16
M nca cenfera
wax myrtle
B
84
841
1495
180
3
889
89
17
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
B
6
84
M
missing
18
M nca cenfera
wax myrtle
B
2 7
78
20251
194
3
911
120
19
Quercus phellos
Iwillow oak
C
1 5
87
1341
162
3
879
109
20
1 Quercus phellos
1willow oak
IB
I 0 4
73
28051
231
3
1745
1801
0581
C = containerized Vigor 3 = good condition, 2 = surviving and likely to survive next year
B = bare root 1 = almost surviving and not likely to survive next year
M = Missing
CURRENT MONITORING YEAR DATA VOLUNTEER
SPECIES
HEIGHT CLASSES cm
Scientific Name
10 -50
50-1001
> 100
Ulmus amencana
28
411
3
Rhus co allina
21
25
12
Li wdambar st raciflua
72
60
40
Acer rubrum
48
40
25
Site: Carl Lloyd Bank Site
Page: 2
Date: 10/16!2012
Area: 2
Veg Plot No.: 6
X -axis: 124SE
1
i
E
1
MMMMMMMMMM
MMM_
==Kb=MMM
,
W,
IMMMMM.-M.MM
MCI
1
Wce-
0.5
0,0
f
L J
Odenotes missing
w o o i a to 1u
X -AXIS
Site Carl Lloyd Bank Site
Page 1
Monitoring Year
Date
Area
Veg Plot No
X -axis
MY -3
10/16/2012
2
7
138SE
CURRENT
MONITORING YEAR
DATA
MY -2 OCT, 2011
> 100
X
Y
ddh
Height
DBH
cm
Vigor
ddh
Height
Notes
Map ID
Scientific Name
Common Name
Source
meter
meter
millimeter
centimeter
millimeter
centimeter
1
Quercus phellos
willow oak
B
08
03
1195
135
3
92
73
2
Aronia arbutifolia
red chokeberry
C
36
06
505
68
3
315
39
3
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
qreen ash
B
1 71
06
11 78
75
2
1109
801
stress
4
Quercus alba
white oak
C
98
06,
445
40
3
445
36
insect
5
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
qreen ash
C
0
351
11 8
82
3
1075
82
6
Car anus carolirnana
ironwood
C
29
36
M
missing
7
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
B
58
36
149
59
2
1303
67
insect
8
Quercus rubra
red oak
C
89
37
555
63
3
687
23
9
Quercus rubra
red oak
C
81
68
351
27
3
missing
10
Quercus phellos
1willow oak
B
49
68
1318
160
037,
3
missing
11
Aronia arbutifolia
ir ed chokeberry
C
19,
67,
722
112
3
10 71
103
insect
12
Quercus a odafolia
cher bark oak
C
421
991
119
100
3
927
68
C = containerized Vigor 3 = good condition, 2 = surviving and likely to survive next year
B = bare root 1 = almost surviving and not likely to survive next year
M = Missinq
CURRENT MONITORING YEAR DATA VOLUNTEER
SPECIES
HEIGHT CLASSES cm
Scientific Name
10 -50
50-1001
> 100
Quercus stellata
1
Li wdambar styraciflua
25
38
Acer rubrum
21
29
Ulmus amencana
9
21
Site Carl Lloyd Bank Site
Page 2
Date 10/16/2012
Area 2
Veg Plot No 7
X -axis 138SE
1
s
f
i
E
1
05I
0,0
e
7 L 3 4 5 6
X -AXIS
Odenotes missing
/ d 9 10
Y�
app
1
05I
0,0
e
7 L 3 4 5 6
X -AXIS
Odenotes missing
/ d 9 10
Site
Page
Monitoring Year
Date
Area
Veg Plot No
X -axis
Carl Lloyd Bank Site
1
MY -3
10/16/2012
5
8
152SE
CURRENT MONITORING YEAR
DATA
MY -2 SEPT, 2011
10 -50
X
Y
ddh
Height
DBH
cm
Vi or
ddh
Height
Notes
Map ID
Scientific Name
Common Name
Source
meter
meter
millimeter
centimeter
millimeter
centimeter
1
Quercus phellos
willow oak
B
04
02
1025
119
3
638
71
2
Betula ni ra
river birch
B
31
03
M
missing
3
Plantanus occidnetalis
sycamore
C
1 59
04
865
78
3
63
66
4
Car anus caroliniana
ironwood
C
87
031
M
missm
5
Car anus caroliniana
ironwood
C
10
271
M
missing
6
M nca cenfera
wax myrtle
B
81
28
M
10
58
7
Linodendron tul ifera
tulip poplar
C
57
1 5
M
missing
8
Quercus ni ra
water oak
C
46
27
1485
115
3
77
58
9
Arorna arbutifolia
red chokeberry
C
1 9
28
1
M
Imissing
10
M nca cenfera
wax myrtle
B
07
98
M
missin
11
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
C
34
58
86
55
3
619
41
12
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
C
52
61
122
95
3
109
60
13
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
B
61
62
10
74
3
943
56
14
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
B
1 8
631
718
73
3
585
34
15
Car anus caroliniana
ironwood
C
93
57
851
50
3
275
33
16
Car anus caroliniana
ironwood
C
81
89
521
52
3
428
54
17
M nca cenfera
wax myrtle
B
53
88
M
missing
18
Car mus caroliniana
ironwood
C
25
87
M
46
61
19
Car anus caroliniana
ironwood
C
021
87
M
missin
C = containerized Vigor 3 = good condition, 2 = surviving and likely to survive next year
B = bare root 1 = almost surviving and not likely to survive next year
M = Missing
CURRENT MONITORING YEAR DATA VOLUNTEER
HEIGHT
CLASSES cm
Scientific Name
10 -50
50 -100
> 100
Ulmus amencana
8
4
Ca rya tomentosa
3
3
Fraxinus pennsylvaniGa
1
3
Li uidambar st raciflua
3
2
Site: Carl Lloyd Bank Site
Page: 2
Date: 10/16/2012
Area: 5
Veg Plot No.: 8
X -axis: 152SE
1
9
i
E
c
4
a
e
�
M
mom==,
MWAM
MMMMMMMMMM
W.P.-n-womm
M-Mrow
!OIN
woum-
UMMMMMMMMO
MMMMMMMMMM
w
1
0.5
0,0 0.5
f
C s 4 0 b
X -AXIS
Odenotes missing
d 9 10
Site Carl Lloyd Bank Site
Page 1
Monitoring Year
Date
Area
Veg Plot No
X -axis
MY -3
10/17/2012
7
9
130SE
CURRENT MONITORING YEAR DATA
MY -2 SEPT, 2011
Scientific Name
X
meter
Y
meter
ddh
millimeter
Height
centimeter
DBH
cm
Vi or
ddh
Height
Notes
Map ID
Scientific Name
Common Name
Source
millimeter
centimeter
1
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
B
04
03
668
45
Car inus carolmiana
3
missing
1
insect
2
Car anus carolimana
ironwood
C
29
05
M
missing
3
Aronia arbutifolia
red chokeberry
C
1 49
09
M
missing
4
Linodendron tuli ifera
tulip poplar
C
62
051
M
missing
5
Quercus phellos
willow oak
B
89
28
M
missing
6
Aroma arbutifolia
red chokeberry
C
7
33
M
missing
7
Quercus laurifolia
laurel oak
B
53
33
M
missing
8
Car anus carolimana
ironwood
C
34
34
M
missing
9
Linodendron tuli ifera
tulip poplar
C
1 5
39
M
missing
10
Quercus I rata
overcup oak
B
03
231
M
missin
11
Quercus rubra
red oak
B
22
5
528
26
3
missing
12
Car anus caroliniana
ironwood
C
31
61
M
missing
13
Quercus m ra
water oak
B
49
64
M
missing
14
Aroma arbutifolia
red chokeberry
C
7
61
M
Imissing
15
Quercus rubra
red oak
C
86
45
555
58
3
312
26
16
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
B
9
831
718
53
3
632
41
17
Quercus m ra
water oak
B
4 3
8 9
M
265
48
18
Car mus carolimana
ironwood
C
1 2
81
695
54
3
631
73
C = containerized Vigor 3 = good condition, 2 = surviving and likely to survive next year
B = bare root 1 = almost surviving and not likely to survive next year
M = Missing
CURRENT MONITORING YEAR DATA VOLUNTEER
HEIGHT
CLASSES cm
Scientific Name
10 -50
50 -100
>100
Ulmus amencana
5
1
Li wdambar st raciflua
7
3
Ca rya tomentoss
2
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
2
Acer rubrum
11
Car inus carolmiana
131
1
NOTES Lespedeza cuneata within plot
Site: Carl Lloyd Bank Site
i Page: 2
Date: 10/17/2012
Area: 7
Veg Plot No.: 9
X -axis: 130SE
IV H 6 /
Odenotes missing
O D 4 J L l
X -AXIS
10
3
;
I
I
0.5
0.5 0,0
1765
we=
ON
MMMMMMMM
MMM
on
MW
W'.M.-ROMMO
MMIGN
MMI
MM
MMMMMMMMMMMEPI.M-I
MMMMMMMMMMK(vj
MM�MMMMMMMMMMMM�
MMM
IV H 6 /
Odenotes missing
O D 4 J L l
X -AXIS
10
3
;
I
I
0.5
0.5 0,0
1765
APPENDIX E
Photo Stations
9 [AEcoEngineering
A dwimm of The John R McAdams Company, Inc
PHOTO STATION I: VIEW WITHIN NORTHWE5TERN SECTION OF BUFFER
RESTORATION AREA I FAGIN& 184 05.
PHOTO STATION 2: VIEW WITHIN CENTRAL_ 5EGTION OF BUFFER RESTORATION
AREA I FAGIN& 16805.
PHoacT No. MAM -09010
C A _ LLOYD
lE:MAM09010X.DWG
t
BANK PARCEL
PHOTO STATIONS
O
S
SCAM
scA�E:
AS SHOWN
C°
DATE: 11 -05 -2012
ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
[4ftoEngineedng
A durum of The John R McAdsm Caopony, Ino.
SN UCERS • PLNNER.S • SURMORS • ENV AL
LARCH TRUNCIE PAM . caARLOM
2M V..b- Pabq, Do*.. IC 27:13
MDIZI-0UU-rrpbzmcm6®.Lie: N-- C—o ,
PHOTO STATION 5: VIEW WITHIN SOUTHEASTERN SECTION OF BLFFER
RESTORATION AREA I FACING 710 0W.
PHOTO STATION 4: VIEW WITHIN NORTHWE5TERN SECTION OF BUFFER
RESTORATION AREA 5 FACING Iq8 05.
FR0 - do. MAM -09010
CAM LLOYD
Fn.ENAnE: M AM 0901 OX. D WG
I
BANK PARCEL
PHOTO STATIONS
AEcoEngineering
A diva m of Tbc John R McAdm Canny, Inc,
scAtE:
AS SHOWN
SNGINffit3 • PLNN�3 • SQSYEl�S • �1V®ONI�[iTAL
�u>ica I�ncls•�nom
DATE: 11-05-201 Z
ORANGE COUNTY. NORTH CAROIlNA
EOp7�}(Na.v," pok- � R �u
^�mm-Umm lb c-m
PHOTO STATION 5: VIEW WITHIN CENTRAL SECTION OF BUFFER RESTORATION
AREA 3 FAGIN6 190 °S.
PHOTO STATION b: VIE^! WITHIN SOUTHEASTERN SECTION OF BUFFER
RESTORATION AREA 3 FACING 32O'NK
PXaECr ND. MAM -09010
CARL LLOYD
FuENAYE: M AM 09 010 X. D WG
9
BANK PARCEL
A diviim of The Jahn R McAdm
WscALE: HNGINffiiS • PIJ1Qi�.9 • SUYYil�S • IIIY�AS
SHOWN
PHOTO STATIONS
Xs�cam�srra•ceAmom
In DATE:
11 -05 -2012
ORANGE COUNTY. NORTH CAROLINA
zm ■vi�l� }�4 �= NC ZM3
OW73 ,a•... s•ti�.�".-
PHOTO STATION 1: VIEW WITHIN NORTHWESTERN SECTION OF BUFFER
RESTORATION AREA 4 FACING 144 05E.
PHOTO STATION 8: VIEW WITHIN CENTRAL SEGTION OF BUFFER RESTORATION
AREA 4 FAGIN& 122 0E.
PROJECT NO. MAM -09010 CARL LLOYD `
AEcoEngineerin9
FILENAME: M AM 09 010 X. D WG BANK PARCEL w divnian of nm Jolo K McAdm Camay, ino-
SCALE: KNGU03M - PIANNM - SUBMCM - ENY®ONWXNTAL
AS SHOWN PH0'I'O STATIONS
BBSRARCH TRIANGLE PAR[ - CRALOAorfs
°A� 11 -05 -2012 000.771%U- -,Ioe� 1— 5-- C-6M
ORANGE COUIITIY. NORTH CAROLINA �
PHOTO STATION q= VIEW WITHIN 5OUTHEA5TERN SECTION OF BUFFER
RESTORATION AREA 4 FACING 352 0N.
PHOTO STATION 10: VIEW WITHIN SOUTHEASTERN SECTION OF BUFFER
RESTORATION AREA 2 FAGIN& 556OR
PROJECT NO. MA901OX. 0 CARL LLOYD [AEcoEngineering'
� F"�"'""E�MAM09010X.DW MC M13
BANK PARCEL
9
A division of 7be John R McAd®s Cony, Inc.
> scA�: SNGINffitS • PIANNSRS • S[JRVBYORS • ffiVVIIiDNl�1TAL
4 AS SHOWN PHOTO STATIONS
� RESEARCH TRUxcus PARK • ceeRw�rrs
�/] DATE: 11 -05 -2012 ORANGE COUNTY. NORTH CAROUNA �
"A
th -7i' v vy f"f
r}
a
r
Pv
o
n
Y
G
a�
uJ
PHOTO 5TATION 13: VIEW WITHIN NORTHWESTERN SECTION OF BUFFER
RE5TORATION AREA 5 FACING 140 °5E.
PHOTO STATION 14: VIEW WITHIN CENTRAL SECTION OF EX#ff99Z
RESTORATION AREA 5 FACING 104 0E.
PROJECT NO. MAM -09010 CAM LLOYD
SCAM: ME: MAM09010X.DWG BANK PARCEL
AS SHOWN
DATE: PHO'T'O STATIONS
11 -05 -2012 ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
kiEcoEngineering
A division of The John R McAdsm Convmy, Inc.
ENGUCOM •PLANNERS • SURVEYORS • E NVERONVINTAL
RESEARCH TRIANGIE PAR[ • CDARI.OWN
ZM Mmdon Pwtk y. Durham NC M13
Re: C- ,
PHOTO STATION 15t VIEW WITHIN 5OUTHEA5TERN SECTION OF BUFFER
RESTORATION AREA 5 FACING 318 6NW.
PHOTO STATION I6J VIEW WITHIN NORTHWESTERN SECTION OF BUFFER
RESTORATION AREA 6 FACING 152.5E.
PROJECT NO. MAM -09010 CARL LLOYD [JEcoEngineering
Fa EN "E:MAM09010X.DW
BANK PARCEL A division of S - Jahn R McAdams NXK Inc,
SCALE: AS SHOWN axcirrffits • PI.ANDiSitS • SOBYSY�s • HNVQdoNI�PiTSL
PHOTO STATIONS ��"*�• CRARLOM
DATE: 11-05-2012 NO- 733M". w�w.�prmi�aaf. Uameme � C-QM
ORANGE COUNTY. NORTH CAROIINA �
PHOTO STATION I'1: VIEW WITHIN SOUTHEASTERN SECTION OF BUFFER
RESTORATION AREA b FAGIN6 330 °NW.
PHOTO STATION I& VIEW WITHIN NORTHWESTERN SEGTION OF BUFFER
RESTORATION AREA 7 FAGINS 138 °SE.
PROJECT N°. MAM -09010
CARL LLOYD
EcoEngineering
0 I'M MEN""E:MAM09010X.DWG
BANK PARCEL
A diviUB of TLc John R Inc.
sc"I.e:
AS SHOWN
BNGINffiiS • PIJIQQSRS • SURVEYORS • SNVIImNI�NTAL
ORS - FM NV
CHARIAYTTE
IM733480.wwyohmoncedo—cm Iii Nu. C-M �
PHOTO STATIONS��•
OANGE COU1Y, NORM CAOINA
DATE: 11 -05 -2012
PHOTO STATION 19, MEW WITHIN SOUTHEASTERN SECTION OF Btu
RESTORATION AREA I FAGIN& 306ONK
PROMCT NO MAM -09010
CARL LLOYD
BANK PARCEL
"$ MAM0901OX DWG
ce�
CAMS
AS SHOWN
PHOTO STATIONS
° "'� 11 -05 -2012
ORANGE COUNTY, NORIH CAMIMA
AEcoEngineedn 9 '
A &vnwn of lbe John R MMd� Ocqz y, b�
ffi�t�B B • -- -- BS • SUEVETM • ffiiym@G80ffAL
BESKABCB ,RUNGLE FAM• CELARIOM
2W5��,.�mc rm
800=4W -ww ®.1� ND- C-�