20121152 Ver 1_Buffer Determination Request_20121228

R. David Crabtree
104 Turk House Lane
Cary, NC 27519 -6854
Phone: [phone]
20121 15 2
Mr. Charles Wakild, Director
NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources — Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699 -1617
December 22, 2012
Subject: Appeal the Town of Cary Denial of No Practical Alternatives/Request for Authorization Certificate.
Dear Mr. Wakild:
Thank you for your consideration in this letter to appeal the denied request by the Town Of Cary to
reverse the steps off a deck at 104 Turk House Lane in Cary, NC within zone 2 of the riparian buffer zone.
Alternatively, my opinion with regards to the best practical alternative is to complete the steps per the plan
submitted to the Town of Cary. Below is a list of reasons in requesting this appeal.
1. The primary reason was to upgrade to a more structurally sound deck and stabilizing deck stairs
that were in a severe state of disrepair while maintaining the same square footage. Implementing a
design that offers a logical flow and includes a landing within the stairs to avoid continuous treads.
2. At this point in the construction process, it would require considerable effort to change the stair
design to match the original configuration. This effort would include removing the deck
approximately 8 feet above grade and removal of piers and footings. By deconstruction and
reconstruction would add to the impact on the stream buffer.
3. The new deck design and layout removes a total of 100 square feet of impervious surfaces.
Achieved by eliminating 80 square feet of hardscape and 20 square feet of impervious decking.
4. The new deck and stair design is located further away from the stream than the original stairs and
will be less intrusive on the stream buffer by implementing a more efficient and logical flow of foot
traffic.
Please contact me anytime for more information and details regarding this appeal. I look forward
to hearing your feedback with regards to this appeal. Thank you again for your time and consideration.
Sincerely,
R. David Crabtree

November 7, 2012
Mr. David Crabtree
104 Turk House Lane
Cary, NC 27519 -6854
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Certified Mail #7012 - 1010 - 0002 - 0792 -6262
Return Receipt Requested
RE: No Practical Alternatives /Request for Authorization Certificate
Jordan Lake Watershed Riparian Buffer
Dear Mr. Crabtree,
The Town has received your No Practical Alternatives /Request for an Authorization Certificate for the
stairs and landings associated with the replacement of your deck/screened porch addition. Upon a
thorough review and careful consideration, this request is denied since it does not meet the no practical
alternatives criteria in the Land Development Ordinance Section 7.2.14 (1)(1)(a) or 7.2.14(I)(1)(b) for
impacts in Zone 2 of the riparian buffer. The basic purpose can be practically accomplished by
replacing the steps in the original layout. Alternately, the layout can be reconfigured or redesigned to
potentially remove the impact from the buffer completely by coming off of one of the two sides of the
screened porch within the built upon area of the existing patio. Either of these options would achieve
the purpose of accessing the backyard from the accessory structure while better minimizing
disturbance, preserving aquatic life and habitat, and protecting water quality.
Any appeal of determinations regarding Authorization Certificates for activities in Zone 1 or Zone 2 of
the riparian buffer shall be referred to the Director of the Division of Water Quality, c/o the 401
Oversight Express Permitting Unit, or its successor. The appeal shall be made in writing to:
NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources -- Division of Water Quality
Mr. Charles (Chuck) Wakild, Director
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699 -1617
Please call me at (919)460 -4930 if I can be of further assistance.
Sincerely,
Jan Patterson
Town of Cary Engineering Department
TOWN OfCARY
318 North Academy Street -Cary, NC 27513 -PO Box 8005 -Cary, NC 27512 -8005
tel [phone] - fax 919 - 460 -4935• www.townofcary.org

Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Form
Town of Cary Jurisdiction within the Jordan Lake Watershed
Riparian Buffer Authorization
Instructions: This form is best completed by using the 'Tab' key to progress through the form fields.
I. Applicant Information
A. Owner and Property Information
1. Name(s) on Recorded Deed R. David Crabtree
2. Deed Book 0 Page No. 1044
3. Property Identification No Tax PIN 743350389 or Parcel ID
4. Property Size (acres) 0.31
5. Site Coordinates (Decimal Degrees) Latitude 35.77 and Longitude 78.85
6. Responsible Party (for LLC if applicable)
7. Contact Information
Street/Mailing Address 104 Turk House E-mail Address rdcrabtree3ftamail.co
M
City Cary Telephone No. 9( 19) 244 -1527
State NC Fax No. (� _-
Zip 27519
S.
C.
Applicant Information (if different from Owner above)
1. Applicant is ❑ Agent ❑ Other, Specify:
2. Applicant Name
3. Business Name (if applicable)
4. Contact Information
Street/Mailing Address
City
State
Zip
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
1. Agent Consultant Name
2. Business Name (if applicable)
3. Contact Information
Street/Mailing Address
City
State
Zip
II. Project Information
A. Project Information
1. Project Name Change direction of stairs off deck
2. County Wake
3. Is the project located in the Town of Cary or ETJ? Town
4. Subdivision Name Tatton Place
E -mail Address
Telephone No. U
Fax No. (_J
E-mail Address
Telephone No. U
Fax No. (___)
B. Surface Waters
1. Name of nearest body of water (river, stream, etc.) to proposed project.
1
EC 2 8 2012
UT White Oak Creek

2. Water Quality Classification of Nearest Receiving Water. WS-IV; NSW
Surface Waters (continued)
3. Subwatershed Lower New
4.12 digit HUC 303000206
5. Distance to Jordan Lake (feet) 33000.00
C. Project Description
1. Describe the existing conditions of the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of
tnis
Current conditions of the site are the structural framing of a 11x7 deck adjacent to a smaller framed 6x4 deck and
a framed 4x4 raised landing for the proposed stairs to make a 90- degree turn. The structural framing of these is
over a gravel bed and established patio. All deck framing is structurally completed with joists, supports and posts
only and no decking boards or railing have been installed. The 11x7 and 6x4 decks are framed together and
properly attached to the rim joist while the 4x4 landing is framed and secured by 4-6x6 king posts set in concrete
footings. The use of this area is to exit down from the deck or the main level and land on the established patio in
the back of the home and yard. See Figure 1 and 4
L List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the
An estimated 60 linear feet of storm water stream is at the back of the property, an estimated 20 feet off the back
property line. The stream enters from the northwest comer approximately 20 feet in from the back comer of the
property line traveling north approximitly 60 feet to the back where it exits the property going due north. See
Figure 5.
3. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of this project was to removal of the original stairs bulit in 1999 that were in a severe state of
disrepair, unsafe, 14 continuous treads that dropped straight down approximately 12 feet to a 4x5 impervious
deck landing at ground level, the stairs also blocked the view from 2 windows in the basement. The steps ran
parallel to the home and pointed away from the main structure onto a impervious landing turning you left 90-
degree back in toward the home then onto hardscape and into the yard. The steps came off a substandard,
unsafe 11x8 stand -alone deck on 4 posts not bolted to the rim joist. (See figure 2)
The goal is building a stronger, safer set of stairs with a break part way down then having them flow in a more
unified direction. To achieve this required they be constructed in the opposite direction landing onto an existing
patio. By doing so maintains the same square footage, removes a 20 square foot impervious surface and opens
up the basement windows. With this concept creates structurally sound steps that are much safer and tied into a
structurally sound deck that is properly constructed while maintaining the same square footage of the original
deck, landing and stairs and eliminating an impervious surface. Changing to this direction puts less of an impact
on the terrain, compacts the steps in a user - friendly logical flow, and opens the view from the basement
windows. This scenario creates the best management practice of this space. Turning the steps makes better
use of the overall property, better minimize disturbance, preserve aquatic life, habitat and protects water quality.
The area of the old steps and old impervious deck landing will then be converted to natural area in a more
environmentally friendly way. (See figure 3 of the old stairs overlay the new) At this point a certified engineer has
approved all structures built to date and a copy of the letter has been recorded.
4. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
This project is focused on the removal of the stairs off a deck built in 1999 that were in a severe state of
disrepair, unsafe and unusable, the elimination of 14 straight continuous stringers/steps and the removal of an
impervious deck landing. This allows for the building of new steps that are much safer and more secure. To
achieve this requires building the new stairs in the opposite direction to flow in a more unified manner, giving way
to an environmentally friendly landscape where the old steps and landing once were and allowing for better use
of the space and surrounding area. The new stairs incorporate additional decking and landing for a 90- degree
turn to eliminate the straight drop. The new steps would then terminate on an existing established patio.
2

The old deck resting on 4 king posts not secured to the house or rim joists (See figure 6) is what contributed to
the unsafe and unusable substandard stairs. The old 14 stair treads each measured 48°x11° terminating on an
impervious landing at the bottom that was 4'x5'. The old deck was 11x8 which is now framed out at 10'9 0x7',
adjacent to this is a new section that is partially out of the zone 2 buffer and is framed out at 6'8 °x4' allowing the
start of the stairs down to a new lower landing that is framed out at 4'3°x4'50 that allows for a 90 degree right
turn. The remaining 9 treads will continue down and terminate on an existing patio, each tread measuring
45 °x11° with a total of 11 treads in all.
With this new proposal the steps will be safe, secure and flow in a logical manner and better on the environment.
This project does set the steps further out than the original deck. The new steps will be a total of 34 -112 °x96°
further beyond the old original outside deck edge, the new lower landing is 36 041 ° further which creates an
overall total of 36 square feet beyond the original deck. All decking and railing will be composite decking with
slots and hidden fasteners. As shown in Figure 3, this reflects a more compact solution that is friendlier on the
environment and gives a logical flow off the deck into the back yard and patio while eliminating an impervious
surface. All work that remains will be completely done by hand with no heavy equipment involved. This design
was put together with the efforts of an architect and myself maintaining the same total square footage as the old
deck and stairs.
In meeting the code variances today, reverting back to the original stairs would lead to soil extraction, heavy
equipment, demolition, de- construction and erosion from footings, also the creation of an impervious surface for
a ground level landing as well as moving even closer to zone 1 buffer line. With this design, I feel is the best
management practice known in creating a strong, safe, secure structure and steps that can be used while
making the best use of the terrain and minimizing the disturbance while protecting the water quality.
D. Jurisdictional Determinations
1. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the US Army Corps of Engineers or NC Division of
Water Quality been requested or obtained for this property/project (including all prior phases) in the past?
No
2. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas ? *:
Individual's Name (if known)
Agency /Consultant Company
Date of delineation (s) (m /d/yyyy)
*Must attach documentation
E. Project History
1. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
No
If yes, explain:
F. Future Project Plans
1. Is this a phased project? No
If yes, explain:
3

III. Proposed Impacts Inventory
A. Buffer Impacts Summary
List all buffer impacts individually below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you must fill out Section IV of this
form.
Buffer
Impact
#
Temporary
or
Permanent
Stream Name
Buffer
Mitigation
Required?
Zone 1
Impact
(ftz)
Zone 2
Impact
(ftz)
Zone 3
Impact
(ftz)
2
Permanent
UT White Oak Creek
No
0
36
0
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Total Buffer
Impacts
0
36
0
The proposed impact is from building a more secure and stable structure of stairs off a deck. The former steps
were unusable, unstable and in disrepair due to poor workmanship built in substandard fashion. By building the
new safer structure, the steps need to be reversed to land on an existing safe solid surface and in a more user-
friendly direction. By doing this requires a portion of the treads to be built 34.5" x 96" further into zone 2. There is
also a landing that gives a 90 degree right turn for the stairs that is also 36" x 51" into zone 2. This change
maintains the same square footage as the old stairs and structure with a portion of new decking now partially out
of zone 2. See figure 3
IV. Impact Justification and Mid adon: Avoidance and Minimization
A. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed Impacts in designing the project.
Avoidance and Minimization - design:
In designing the change of direction to the stairs required they land on a stable structure, constructed properly,
not block any windows and eliminate the unsafe straight drop. The old stairs and deck were built prior to the
Urban Transitions Buffers being in place, the home now sits entirely in Zone 3 with the deck and the comer of the
home in Zone 2 and 3. This gives no options to rebuilding steps outside the buffer. The architect proposed a
solution that minimized the impact of the buffer and not encroach in other easements while maintaining the same
square footage. The deck was reduced from 8 feet to 7 feet to accommodate this change in direction. This
direction gives a break in the stairs for a safe 90 degree turn for the stairs to run parallel to the deck then land on
a solid surface in a safe logical direction. This new design also eliminates a 20 square foot impervious surface
and reduces the overall footprint of the entire stair design by 5 square feet compared to the old design.
In meeting today's code standards, reverting back to the original stairs would lead to soil extraction, heavy
equipment, demolition, de- construction and erosion from footings, also the creation of an impervious surface for
a ground level landing as well as moving even closer to zone 1 buffer line. With this new design and direction, I
feel is the best management practice known in creating a strong, safe, secure structure and steps that can be
used while making the best use of the terrain and minimizing the disturbance while protecting the water quality.
B. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction
techniques.

and Minimization- construction:
The deconstruction and removal of the old stairs in Zone 2 was completed all by manual labor with no heavy
equipment. All new work and new construction are to be completed the same with no heavy equipment involved.
All landscaping will be done by hand in a more environmentally friendly way that will replace the area of the old
stairs and impervious landing. All decking will be slotted composite material over gravel with appropriate
drainage. All work will be done by hand with minimal impact within Zone 2 as the home itself sits in both Zone 2
and 3. Meeting todays code, reverting back to the original stairs would lead to soil extraction and possible
erosion from digging footings with heavy equipment for a ground level landing, creating an impervious surface,
hardscape and spreading the overall footprint wider into the buffer zone and closer to Zone 1. This would create
an unsafe straight drop with14 treads and an impractical flow blocking a double window and a turn off the landing
onto hardscape and straight into the house.
C. Buffer Mitigation
1. Will the project result in an impact within the UTB that will require buffer mitigation? No
2. Identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the UTB that requires mitigation. Calculate the amount of
mitigation required.
a. Zones 1 & 2
Zone
Reason for Impact
Total
Multiplier
Required Mitigation
(ft)
1
0.00
3.0
0.00
2
0.00
Preservation of an existing buffer
1.5
0.00
0.00
Total Zone 1 and 2 Buffer Mitigation
Required:
0.00
b. If buffer mitigation is required in Zones 1 and/or 2, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g.,
payment to private mitigation bank, permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved
in -lieu fee fund).
c. Zone 3
Type of Mitigation
Mitigation Ratio
Proposed Mitigation
Mitigation Credit
Restoration of degraded buffer
1:1
0.00
Protection of ephemeral streams
contiguous to protected streams
1:1
0.00
Preservation of an existing buffer
3:1
0.00
Preservation of open s ce
10:1
0.00
Total
Zone 3 Mitigation Credit
0.00

Figure 1

LV JL.. r. �.� . -• (�'
AS MARKED BY CITY GARY
POST
—A ovlbG
—
N,15
vFF%
Figure 3
00
o4?
}QP.
CAN��EvER r--•
NOTE: SCREEN PORCH
FLOOR 1S 10l
ABOVE PATIO.

Figure 4 above:
Figure 5 below:
N/F PARK /VILLAGE
SETBACKS: coq 5 45'E 61 88'
DB 654 -812
_
FRONT= 20' moo,
2p,
SIDE= 10'
REAR= 20' , �" 15' "B" TYPE BU
PER PLAT
20' SEWER EASEMENT/
/
/
0^lf
�qs MARKEC BY CITY
/
f3 CARY
c2o
/
IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AREA 6 sy
E /
� /
LOT AREA= 13,691.0 SOFT
AP. SURFACE= 3,795.4 SQF -I
.eovc vnrioraa
OR 27.7
OF LOT 26 IS 0.31 AC. +/- (Dtv115),
-
300K MAPS 1997 -1578 AND DEED
FOR OTHER NOTES OF RECORD. \ �2j \
/ '0"
E
( LOT
)44,
DRAWING DOES NOT CONFORM TO G.S. \ \
25
aS AMENDED AND IS NOT INTENDED \
:ORDING.
IS AN EXISTING PARCEL OF LAND. LOT
ADDITION LOCATION \
27
/
MAP
/
FOR \
P
"1 /
BOOK n
I DEED B
DAVID & SUE CRABTRE \
P
PIN# �
PROP
26 PHASE 2 SECTION I TATTON PLACE \
WHITE OAK TWP. WAKE CO. N.C. \
F /
\
/l 104 Tu
FEBRUARY 28, 2012 SCALE: 1" =20'
\
R 5O p0
44.89CHOR0 G.
PREPARED BY:
/
6/18/12: PORCH HEIGHT, BUFFER, CARY COMMENTS.
6/25/12: PROPOSED STEPS, IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AREA. \
P,
21
S7 30'21"W
43.40'
THOMAS L RAMSE
604 YORKTOWN DF
BARSCA-E FOR REDUCTfON LEGEND: \
TURK HOUSE LANE
CI -IAPEL HILL N.C.
• IRON PIPE JOB# 115216
._ �„ �COMFUTED POINT DWG# 115216A
PUBLIC RzW
(919) 967 -5037 -5037
�"

�.20
-.ZIP IZ LS
a � tag
0,%a sow.
3 U ►si-00
tl
J
fl
m

w
i
20 SEWER EASEME
H Tom_. --
AS MARKED BY CITY ; CARY
POSED
--PRO
Co
a
c�
�pNT1�E`rtR
S �
O) NOTE: SCREEN PORCH
lZ/ FLOOR Ago
- uF/ ABOVE
8 � o totes
�9s�� \� STRUCTUR
P AT10

.,,PATS: 6/07/12 PLAN REVIEW CORRECTIONS REPORT PAGE 1
Town of Cary
316 N. ACADEMY ST.
CARY NC 27513
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
APPLICATION NBR . . . 12- 00002924
ADDRESS . . . . . . 104 TURK HOUSE LN
APPLICATION DATE 11/09/11
APPLICATION TYPE BLDG - ADDITION RESIDENTIAL
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OWNER . . . . . . . DAVID & SUE CRABTREE
104 TURK HOUSE LN
CARY NC 27519
CONTRACTOR . . . . . DILLON BUILDERS, INC
216 COLONIA TRAIL CT
PITTSBORO NC 27312
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AGENCY NAME: RES APPLICATION SET
DATE ACTION ACTION BY
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
11/09/11 APPROVED GORNI, BONNIE
-------------------------------------t----------------------------------------
AGENCY NAME: ADMINISTRATION
DATE ACTION ACTION BY
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
11/09/11 APPROVED GORNI, BONNIE
REJECTED PENDING ALL APPROVALS.
THIS PERMIT HAS BEEN REJECTED BY OUR PLAN REVIEW STAFF AND A
RE- REVIEW FEE OF $30.00 WILL BE APPLIED TO THIS PERMIT.
PLEASE SUBMIT A PROJECT MODIFICATION FORM WITH ANY
ADDITIONAL PAPERWORK SUBMITTED. YOU MAY SUBMIT THIS TO US
EITHER IN PERSON OR BY FAX [phone].
THE LINK TO OUR PROJECT MODIFICATION FORM IS BELOW.
http: / /www.townofcary.org /Assets /Inspections +$126 +Permits +De
partment / Forms /projectmodificationapp.pdf
IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS OR NEED
ADDITIONAL ASSISTANCE PLEASE CONTACT ME AT (919)319 -4568 OR
[e-mail]
THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AGENCY NAME: RESIDENTIAL REVIEW
DATE ACTION ACTION BY
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
11/09/11 REJECTED HICKMAN, SUSAN
November 9, 2011 12:55:39 PM shickman.
screen porch and deck, see planning comment.
If you have questions about these comments please contact
Susan Hickman, Plans Examiner, at 919 - 462 -2009, or
susan.hickmanotownofcay.org
5/17/12 RETURNED FOR REVISION GOOD, JEANNE

_D,eATEn 6/07/12 PLAN REVIEW CORRECTIONS REPORT PAGE 2
Town of Cary
316 N. ACADEMY ST.
CARY NC 27513
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
APPLICATION NBR . . . 12- 00002924
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AGENCY NAME: RESIDENTIAL REVIEW
DATE ACTION ACTION BY
------------------------------------------------------------------------ - - - - -- -
5/17/12 RETURNED FOR REVISION GOOD, JEANNE
Closed by revision 001 JGOOD NAVILINE
----------------------------
AGENCY NAME: RESIDENTIAL PZ
DATE ACTION ACTION BY
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
11/09/11 REJECTED HICKMAN, SUSAN
November 9, 2011 12:53:32 PM' shickman.
Screen porch and deck at rear. all construction to remain
out of 201 sewer easement, including cantilever.
The proposed construction is located in a stream buffer.
Provide a written determination from NCDENR DWQ
(919- 791 -4200) stating that, 1) the stream buffer rules do
not apply to this stream or that, 2) DWQ is granting
permission for the construction to encroach into the stream
buffer, OR 3) provide a survey from a PLS (Professional Land
Surveyor) showing that the proposed construction is located
5 feet outside the 50' stream buffer.
If you have questions about these comments please contact
Susan Hickman, Plans Examiner, at 919 - 462 -2009, or
susan.hickmanotownofcay.org
5/17/12 RETURNED FOR REVISION GOOD, JEANNE
Closed by revision 001 JGOOD NAVILINE
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AGENCY NAME: RES APPLICATION SET
DATE ACTION ACTION BY
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5/31/12 APPROVED GOOD, JEANNE
----------------------------
AGENCY NAME: ADMINISTRATION
DATE ACTION ACTION BY
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6/07/12 REJECTED GORNI, BONNIE
REJECTED PENDING ALL APPROVALS.
IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS OR NEED
ADDITIONAL ASSISTANCE PLEASE CONTACT ME AT (919)319 -4568 OR
BONNIE.GORNIOTOWNOFCARY.ORG
THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME.
-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
AGENCY NAME: PLANNING & DEVELOPME
DATE ACTION ACTION BY
------------------------------------------------------------------------ - - - - --

,,RTE': 6/07/12 PLAN REVIEW CORRECTIONS REPORT PAGE 3
Town of Cary
316 N. ACADEMY ST.
CARY NC 27513
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
APPLICATION NBR . . . 12- 00002924
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AGENCY NAME: PLANNING & DEVELOPME
DATE ACTION ACTION BY
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6/05/12 APPROVED ADAMS, TARA
No plan review required.
--------------------------------
AGENCY NAME: RESIDENTIAL REVIEW
DATE ACTION ACTION BY
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5/31/12 REJECTED HICKMAN, SUSAN
May 31, 2012 12:03:40 PM shickman.
1. Waiting for a sealed survey from the PLS, locating the
bilffer and structures.
2. waiting for written approval from TOC Engineering for
encroachment into the buffer.
3. waiting for approval from TOC Planning for buffer setback
per LDO.
If you have questions about these comments please contact
Susan Hickman, Plans Examiner, at 919 - 462 -2009, or
susan.hickman ®townofcary.org
AGENCY NAME: RESIDENTIAL PZ
DATE ACTION ACTION BY
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5/31/12 REJECTED HICKMAN, SUSAN
May 31, 2012 12:06:45 PM shickman.
see building comment.

SETBACKS:
0o FRONT= 20' boo
ul SIDE= 10'
i REAR= 20'
rn PER PLAT
m
i
m
0�0
4�
S89'46'45 "E /(61.88'
15' "B" TYPE BUFFER sop
N/F PARK VILLAGE
DB 6V4 -812 /
20' SEWER EASEMENT/
AS MARKED BY CITY Or CARY
\ 1 g J �R Y seers
\ �pN Fj
A \
IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AREA
LOT AREA= 13,691.0 SQFT \ 'A IL QZy
IMP. SURFACE= 3,795.4 SQFT \ X29 '���soi
OR 27.7% c �°
1. AREA OF LOT 26 IS 0.31 AC. +/- (D MIS)
.
2. SEE BOOK MAPS 1997 -1578 AND DEED
BOOK 1044, FOR OTHER NOTES OF RECORD.
3. THIS DRAWING DOES NOT CONFORM TO G.S. \ \
47 -30 AS AMENDED AND IS NOT INTENDED \
FOR RECORDING.
4. THIS IS AN EXISTING PARCEL OF LAND. LOT \ \
ADDITION LOCATION 27 \
FOR \
DAVID & SUE CRABTRI�E \
LOT 26 PHASE Z SECTION I TATTON PLACE \
WHITE OAK TWP. WAKE CO. N.C. \
DATE: FEBRUARY 28, 2012 SCALE: 1"=20' \
REVISED, 6/18/12: PORCH HEIGHT, BUFFER, CARY COMMENTS.
REVISED, 6/25/12: PROPOSED STEPS, IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AREA. \
BARSCALE FOR REDUCTION LEGEND: \
• IRON -PIPE JOB# 115216
ACOMPUTED POINT DWG# 115216A
C)
.;oo
NOTE SCREEN PORCH
FLOOR IS 10.3'
ABOVE PATIO.
E0511N0 � � —
/ co
cv
/
EX�ST�N�
RUC -SURE
ST
/
/
/
/
/
'.,�_4415y CHORD
S79'30'21 "W
43.40'
TURK HOUSE LANE
PUBLIC R/W
Go
clq
/ LOT
/ 25
/
/ MAP REFERENCES
/ BOOK MAPS 1997 -1578
DEED BOOK 8350 -1044
PIN# 0743 -35 -0389
/ PROPERTY ADDRESS
/ 104 CARY NC HOUSE LANE
/ PREPARED BY:
\THOMAS L. RAMSEY PLS L -2871
604 YORKTOWN DRIVE
CHAPEL HILL N.C.
(919) 967 -5037
i
E0511N0 � � —
/ co
cv
/
EX�ST�N�
RUC -SURE
ST
/
/
/
/
/
'.,�_4415y CHORD
S79'30'21 "W
43.40'
TURK HOUSE LANE
PUBLIC R/W
Go
clq
/ LOT
/ 25
/
/ MAP REFERENCES
/ BOOK MAPS 1997 -1578
DEED BOOK 8350 -1044
PIN# 0743 -35 -0389
/ PROPERTY ADDRESS
/ 104 CARY NC HOUSE LANE
/ PREPARED BY:
\THOMAS L. RAMSEY PLS L -2871
604 YORKTOWN DRIVE
CHAPEL HILL N.C.
(919) 967 -5037

00 FRONT= 20'
SIDE= 10'
i REAR= 20'
rn PER PLAT
rn
m
o�
CORNER JN� o \-`? 15'
R�
SEWER
MANHOLE
M
TYP
S89'46'45 "E 161.88'
"B" TYPE BUFFER
20' SEWER EASEMENT
:NTERED ON SEWER LI
\
-
NOTE: EXISTING DECK
\ STEPS (NOT SH
\ \ BE REMOVED. N .
IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AREA
\
o- \
2��
(AFTER CONSTRUCTION)
'o \
LOT AREA= 13,691.0 SQFT
IMP. SURFACE= 3,751.0 SQFT
OR 27.4%
F \
1. AREA OF LOT 26 IS 0.31 AC. +/- (DMD).
\
2. SEE BOOK MAPS 1997 -1578 AND DEED
BOOK 1044, FOR OTHER NOTES OF RECORD.
�F \
3. THIS DRAWING DOES NOT CONFORM TO G.S.
\
47 -30 AS AMENDED AND IS NOT INTENDED
\
FOR RECORDING.
4. THIS IS AN EXISTING PARCEL OF LAND.
LOT \ \
PLOT PLAN
27 \
FOR
\
DAVID & SUE CRABTREE
\
LOT 26 PHASE 2 SECTION
I \
TATTON PLliCE
\
WHITE OAK TWP. WAKE CO. N.C.C.
\
DATE: OCTOBER 20, 2011 SCALE:
1"=20' \
BARSCALE FOR REDUCTION --I LEGEND: \
• IRON PIPE
A COMPUTED POINT JOB# 115216
i
N/F PARK VILLAGE
D.B. 6514 -812
PCO��
pp�CH
PAnGG
EX�ST\N G
Rv
ST
rI
1
=7 - -
CO
_d
W "
QD
N
/, _ 44 •ts� CHORD BRG\
P� S79'30'21 "W
43.40'
TURK HOUSE LANE
PUBLIC R/W
SLOT
25
/ MAP REFERENCES
BOOK MAPS 1997 -1578
DEED BOOK 8350 -1044
PIN# 0743 -35 -0389
PROPERTY ADDRESS
104 TURK HOUSE LANE
PREPARED BY: CARY NC
\THOMAS L. RAMSEY PLS L -2871
604 YORKTOWN DRIVE
CHAPEL HILL N.C.
(919) 967 -5037

+'
c-
SITE
- - -- --
Q
-�
LINE BEARING DISTANCE LINE DISTANCE
L1 N 4f 18'09' E 8.95 L2 10.15
_
BURGWIN MaIfi41T f4� I
L3 10.12
U 3A
= T ROAO
OZO NKS ROAD
VICINITY MAP Noo
in
NOT TO SCALE NOW OR FORMERLY
PARK VILLAGE P.U.D. HOMEOWNERS ASSOC.
D.B. 6514 -812 $
' N C GRID COORDINATES (NAO 83)
N - 735, 450.508
E - 2.042.991.929
REF: bOM 1997 -1578
� 15' rypE .
B' ewirER
�'�`1 A' pSE�•t�• X36' 20 ,
E 1
16 97,
LOT 26 -_
0.314 ACRE
LOT 2 % \ (BY COORDINATES) �
Z 0, S A N CONCRETE
E Q
\ 997 1578 *= DECK �
�D• \ a
0•
LEGEND �, / � • /
• IRON PIPE FOUND \ 2 STORY BRICK AND FRAME
O IRON PIPE SET ✓siS DWELLING-
WATER METER �• \ / 'hp LOT 2 5
c SEWER CLEAN OUT ao• \ C3 � /
® UTILITY PEDESTAL
CURB INLET PORCH
FLARED END SECTION \ �Z EONCRETE ro
MANHOLE Y�, DRIVE
0.43' o�
• - 4EAL
0 - ; r L-2821
TURK HOUSE LANE ,2q•'•• °..;SU��•.••' c`'.,°
PURL I C R/W ,•,49p,N t S U10 1,4\1,� ��,•
104 TURK HOUSE LANE WAKE COUNTY PIN: 0743.01 -35 -03891
THIS PLAT IS OF A SURVEY OF AN EXISTING PARCEL OR PARCELS OF LAND NOT FOR RECORDATION
BOOK OF MAPS 1997 PAGE 1578 DEED BOOK 8192 PAGE 2023 WAKE COUNTY
LOT 26 PHASE 2 SECTION 1 TATTON PLACE DIVISI N
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP IS CORRECT AND THAT THE BUILDING A LY ON THE LOT AND THAT
THERE ARE NO ENCROACHMENTS ON SAID LOT EXCEPT AS SHOWN.
SURV'D WCM I DRAWN TGP CHK'D.LHS JOB/3622099 OATS: 24 JUNE 1999 SCALE: V ■ 30'
SULLIVAN SURVEYING SURVEY FOR:
LAND SURVEYORS EXE
CARY, ONORTH CTIVE AROLINA CIRCLE
27511 R. DAVID C R A B T R E E
TELEPHONE: [phone] SUE F. C R AB T R E E
WHITE OAK TOWNSHIP, WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
••

\�° \�\��
■
I,-
� � ^//

April 5, 2012
Order Issue Date
Order Issued To:
David Crabtree
CERTIFIED MAIL & REGULAR MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
INSPECTIONS & PERMITS DEPARTMENT
STOP WORK ORDER
12 -2924
Permit Number
Construction Site Address:
104 Turk House Lane Cary, NC 27519
You are hereby ordered to immediately STOP the following construction activity:
Construction Screened Porch and Deck located in Buffer zone and inside the TOC Sewer easement.
This activity must be stopped because of the following reason:
■
■
A permit has not been issued and is required for the work.
The work has exceeded the scope of the permit issued.
The manner of work endangers life or property.
Failure to obtain required building permit and required approvals fro TOC Engineering and PWUT.
This activity may resume under the following conditions:
® A building permit is obtained for the scope of the work being performed.
❑ The permit application is modified to include work not previously permitted.
❑ Eliminate the hazardous condition(s).
® Obtain permit, Post permit & call in for an inspection. Obtain approval for construction from Town of
Cary Engineering and PWUT..
barrels Parnell ,{, A � L p
NAME
Town of Cary — Code Enforcement Official
Phone No: 919 - 469 -4384
NCGS 160- 421(b) The owner or builder may appeal from a stop order involving alleged violation of the State
Building Code or any approved local modification thereof to the North Carolina Commissioner of Insurance or his
designee within a period of five days after the order is issued. The owner or builder may appeal from a stop
order involving alleged violation of a local zoning ordinance by giving notice of appeal in writing to the board of
adjustment. Violation of a stop order shall constitute a Class 1 misdemeanor.
TOWN Of CARY
316 North Academy Street *Cary, NC 27513•PO Box 8005-Cary, NC 27512 -8005
te1919-469-4340 • fax 919 - 460 49359 www.townofcary.org

p • r y
Applications and information for obtaining building permits are available at the Inspections and Permits
Department, 316 N. Academy Street, during office hours (8:00 am to 5:00 pm Monday - Friday) or at the
Town of Cary website http:itwww.townofcary.org
2

February 16, 2012
Mr. Crabtree
104 Turk House Lane
Cary, NC 27519 -6854
Dear Mr.- Crabtree:
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Subject: Jordan Lake Watershed
Urban Transition Buffer Rules
104 Turk House Lane
TCRB 12 -003
In a site visit conducted on February 15, 2012, a determination was made as to whether or not the
referenced site would require compliance with The Town of Cary Urban Transition Buffer Rules. This
stream determination is valid until February 15, 2017. Town of Cary staff determined that the feature
indicated on the most recent version of the Wake County Soil Survey mapping is subject to the Urban
Transition Buffer (Town of Cary Land Development Ordinance (LDO) — Section 7.2.14) and would have
a 50 -ft buffer. This buffer can be broken into two zones: Zone One begins at the top of bank and
extends landward 30 ft while Zone Two begins at the outer edge of Zone One and extends landward 20
ft.
Per Section 7.2.14 of the LDO, exemption can be established only if the use existed in the buffer as of
July 27, 2000 and has continued to exist since that time. Uses designated as prohibited or not
specifically designated in the Table of Uses as Exempt, Allowable, or Allowable with Mitigation may not
proceed within the UTB unless a variance is granted. A minor variance request pertains to activities
that will impact Zone Two of the buffer while a major variance applies to any activity that will impact
Zone One or both Zones One and Two. Please refer to Section 7.2.14 of the LDO for specific
requirements once you've determined the location of impacts within these zones.
Please do not hesitate to contact us if this office can be of any assistance or if you have additional
questions.
Sincerely,
g-6�-
Jan Patterson
Town of Cary Engineering Department
cc: TCRB12003 104TurkHouse.doc
TOWN Of CARY
318 North Academy Street •Cary, NC 27513 -PO Box 8005 -Cary, NC 27512 -8005
te1919- 469-4030 - fax [phone] www.townofcary.org

DATE. '11 /09/11 PLAN REVIEW CORRECTIONS REPORT PAGE 1
�r. Town of Cary
316 N. ACADEMY ST.
CARY NC 27513
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
APPLICATION NBR . . . 12- 00002924
ADDRESS . . . . . . . 104 TURK HOUSE LN
APPLICATION DATE 11/09/11
APPLICATION TYPE BLDG - ADDITION RESIDENTIAL
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OWNER . . . . . . . DAVID & SUE CRABTREE
104 TURK HOUSE LN
CARY NC 27519
CONTRACTOR . . . . . DILLON BUILDERS, INC
216 COLONIA TRAIL CT
PITTSBORO NC 27312
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AGENCY NAME: RES APPLICATION SET
DATE ACTION ACTION BY
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
11/09/11 APPROVED GORNI, BONNIE
----------------------------
AGENCY NAME: ADMINISTRATION
DATE ACTION ACTION BY
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
11/09/11 APPROVED GORNI, BONNIE
REJECTED PENDING ALL APPROVALS.
THIS PERMIT HAS BEEN REJECTED BY OUR PLAN REVIEW STAFF AND A
RE- REVIEW FEE OF $30.00 WILL BE APPLIED TO THIS PERMIT.
PLEASE SUBMIT A PROJECT MODIFICATION FORM WITH ANY
ADDITIONAL PAPERWORK SUBMITTED. YOU MAY SUBMIT THIS TO US
EITHER IN PERSON OR BY FAX [phone].
THE LINK TO OUR PROJECT MODIFICATION FORM IS BELOW.
http: / /www.townofcary.org/ Assets /Inspections +$!26 +Permits +De
partment / Forms /projectmodificationapp.pdf
IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS OR NEED
ADDITIONAL ASSISTANCE PLEASE CONTACT ME AT (919)319 -4568 OR
BONNIE.GORNI @TOWNOFCARY.ORG
THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME.
--------------------------------
AGENCY NAME: RESIDENTIAL REVIEW
DATE ACTION ACTION BY
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
11/09/11 REJECTED HICKMAN, SUSAN
November 9, 2011 12:55:39 PM shickman.
screen porch and deck, see planning comment.
If you have questions about these comments please contact
Susan Hickman, Plans Examiner, at 919 - 462 -2009, or
susan.hickman @townofcay.org
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AGENCY NAME: RESIDENTIAL PZ
DATE ACTION ACTION BY
------------------------------------------------------------------------ - - - - --

DATE: 11/09/11 PLAN REVIEW CORRECTIONS REPORT PAGE 2
Town of Cary
316 N. ACADEMY ST.
CARY NC 27513
------------------------------------------------------------------------ - - - - --
APPLICATION NBR . . . 12- 00002924
----------------------------
AGENCY NAME: RESIDENTIAL PZ
DATE ACTION ACTION BY
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
11/09/11 REJECTED HICKMAN, SUSAN
November 9, 2011 12:53:32 PM shickman.
Screen porch and deck at rear. all construction to remain
out of 20' sewer easement, including cantilever.
The proposed construction is located in a stream buffer.
Provide a written determination from NCDENR DWQ
(919 -791 -4200) stating that, 1) the stream buffer rules do
not apply to this stream or that, 2) DWQ is granting
permission for the construction to encroach into the stream
buffer, OR 3) provide a survey from a PLS (Professional Land
Surveyor) showing that the proposed construction is located
5 feet outside the 50' stream buffer.
If you have questions about these comments please contact
Susan Hickman, Plans Examiner, at 919 - 462 -2009, or
susan.hickman @townofcay.org