20121128 Ver 1_401 Application_20121212

AErT (rF
UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS
MARINE CORPS INSTALLATIONS EAST- MARINE CORPS BASE
PSC BOX 20005
CAMP LEJEUNE NC 28542 -0005
20121 128
IN REPLY REFER M:
5090.11.2
BEMD
DEC��2412
From: Commanding General, Marine Corps Installations East -
Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune
To: Commanding Officer, United States Army Corps of
Engineers, Wilmington District 69 Darlington Avenue,
Wilmington, NC 28403 Attn; Brad Shaver
Subj: APPLICATION FOR
INSTALLATION OF
(SDZ) BOUNDARIES
CORPS BASE, CAMP
0
0
M
me
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT FOR
WARNING'SIGNS ALONG SURFACE DANGER ZONE
ON MARINE CORPS INSTALLATIONS EAST - MARINE
LEJEUNE (MCIEAST -MCB CAMLEJ)
Encl: (1) Pre - Construction Notification Form (NWP 1) for
installation of warning signs along surface danger
zone (SDZ) boundaries on +Marine Corps Installations
East - Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune (MCIEAST -MCB
CAMLEJ)
1. The enclosed application to install warning signs to
identify Surface Danger Zone (SDZ) boundaries of coastal live -
fire ranges along the New River, Stone Bay, and Browns Island on
Marine Corps Installations East - Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune
(MCIEAST -MCB CAMLEJ) is provided for review.
2. Camp Lejeune proposes to install 45 pilings within open
water, and 353 sign posts in areas above mean high water. The
warning signs will notify boaters that access to these areas is
prohibited because of the potential for unexploded ordnance.
3. The point of contact for this project
Environmental Conservation Branch, G -F at
7235 or email martin.korenek @usmc.mil.
is Mr. Martin Korenek,
telephone
Sincerely,
10• r02'v�
OHN R. TOWNSON
Director, Environmental
By direction of the
Commanding General
DEC 1 9 2012
Management

Copy to:
NCDENRI DWQ, 401 Section, attn: I. McMillan
NCDENR, DWQ, WRO, attn: J. Steenhuis

O�o��G
o<
20121 128
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
❑Section 404 Permit ®Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number. 1 or General Permit (GP) number.
1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
®Yes
❑ No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
® Yes ❑ No
For the record only for Corps Permit
❑ Yes ® No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
❑ Yes
® No
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
® Yes
❑ No
1h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
® Yes
❑ No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project.
Sign/Piling Installation along New River and Browns Island
2b. County:
Onslow County
2c. Nearest municipality / town:
Camp Lejeune
2d. Subdivision name:
N/A
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
N/A
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
US Government
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
UCLI I
I
3d. Street address:
DENR - WA
H QUALITY
3e. City, state, zip:
3f. Telephone no.:
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address:
Pagel of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner):
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name:
Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
c/o Mr. Neal Paul; Deputy Public Works Officer, Public Works Division
4d. Street address:
1005 Michael Road
4e. City, state, zip:
Camp Lejeune, NC 28542
4f. Telephone no.:
(910) 451 -2213
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
5c. Street address:
5d. City, state, zip:
5e. Telephone no.:
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
Page 2 of 11

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1 a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
Project site located within Camp Lejeune
Latitude 34.597441 °N Longitude - 77.224189 °W
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
(DD.DDDDDD) (- DD.DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size:
Project area consists of beachfront and waterways
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
New River, Stones Bay, Browns Inlet
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water.
SC; SA HOW; SA HQW
2c. River basin:
White Oak 03030001
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The project area consists of wetlands or open water along waterways. Land use in the vicinity is undeveloped.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
Entire project area is wetlands, open water, or beach front
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property.
Project area is within or adjacent to several waterways.
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The USMC proposes to install warning signs along New River, Stones Bay, and Browns Inlet that will clearly notify
travelers that access to the area is prohibited because of potential unexploded ordnances.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The USMC will install 45 pilings and 353 warning/information signs within Surface Danger Zone (SDZ) perimeters along
the New River, Stones Bay, and Browns Inlet that will notify travelers that access to the area is prohibited because of the
potential for unexploded ordnances in the area. The pilings to be installed in open water will have a 10 inch diameter and
will be installed a minimum depth of six feet. 353 additional warning signs will be installed at higher elevations along the
beach and wetland fringe. These signs will be on 6" x 6" square posts and will be installed ten feet above the high water
mark and the bottom edge of the sign will be six feet about ground level. Finally, nine existing pilings in the Stones Bay
section will be removed. The contractor will use a mini excavator on a barge to access areas where signs will be installed.
The piles located in open water will be driven into place. A combination of driving, jetting and augering will be used to
install the other signposts depending upon the soil conditions.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
❑Yes ®No ❑Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
❑ Preliminary ❑ Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency /Consultant Company:
Name (if known):
Other.
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
Page 3 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
S. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Yes ® No ❑ unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 4 of 11

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
la. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply): NIA
❑ Wetlands ❑ Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts NIA
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary
W1 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
E] No
❑DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
2h. Comments: Water line to be installed in existing maintained corridor.
3. Stream Impacts NIA
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 ❑ P [IT
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
3i. Comments:
Page 5 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Open Water Impacts: NIA
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of the
U.S. then individu ly list all open water im acts below.
4a.
4b.
4c.
4d.
4e.
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact number —
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
01 ❑P ❑T
02 ❑ PC] T
03 ❑P ❑T
04 ❑ P ❑T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction: WA
If Pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
5b.
5c.
5d.
5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose of
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
number
pond
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ): NIA
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse El Tar-Pamlico ❑Other.
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number —
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary
impact
required?
131 ❑P ❑T
❑Yes
❑ No
62 ❑P ❑T
El Yes
❑ No
133 ❑P ❑T
❑Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments:
Page 6 of 11

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The MCB has worked extensively to minimize impacts to jurisdictional areas. Pilings will be driven, jetted, or augered into the
ground (dependent on soil type) and the contractor will work from a barge so as not to disturb adjacent wetlands during
construction.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
The contractor will work from a barge so as not to disturb adjacent wetlands during construction.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ® No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
❑ Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank: N/A
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type Non - riparian
Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program: N/A
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
N/A
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
N/A square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
N/A acres
4f. Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested:
N/A acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
N/A acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan: N/A
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 7 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
❑ Yes ® No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required. NIA
6c.
6d.
6e.
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
NIA
6h. Comments: NIA
Page 8 of 11

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
❑ Yes ® No
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
None
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ® No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
No impervious cover
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
❑ Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review: NIA
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
❑ Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally- implemented stormwater management programs
apply (check all that apply):
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other.
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review: NIA
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HOW
4a. Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply
(check all that apply):
❑ ORW
❑ Session Law 2006 -246
❑ Other.
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes No
❑
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review: NIA
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 9 of 11
PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state/local) funds or the
® Yes ❑ No
use of public (federal /state) land?
1b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetiand Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after - the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
Project will not provide access or utilities to adjacent areas.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Proposed project will not generate wastewater.
Page 10 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
® Yes ❑ No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ® No
impacts?
❑ Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Feld Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
The Base has an endangered species program that focuses on conservation and protection of species and their
management. The West Indian manatee, Atlantic sturgeon, and shortnose sturgeon and known to occur within open waters of
the project area. Because the project would occur during winter months and each piling /post will have a minimal footprint, no
impacts to federally-protected species are anticipated.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
® Yes ❑ No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
The NOAA Fisheries Essential Fish Habitat Mapper GIS program was used to determine the presence of Essential Fish
Habitat. This section of the New River is considered EFH and HAPC for several fish species. Additionally, New River is
designated as a coastal estuarine water and a special secondary nursery area. Waters/wetlands northwest of the AIWW
in the project area are classified as a primary nursery area.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
The site has been investigated for cultural resources and contains no known archeological or historic sites.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA- designated 100 -year floodplain?
To Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? The NC Floodplain Mapping Information System
website was used to determine the boundaries of the 100 -year floodplain.
Ne a pot..
I Z. IZ• e'Z
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Applicant/A is Signabre
Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if ak a0thorization letter from the applicant
is r ed.
Page 11 of 11

Coastal Consistency Determination
FEDERAL COASTAL CONSISTENCY DETERMINATION FOR PROPOSED
PILING /SIGN INSTALLATION AT NEW RIVER AND BROWNS ISLAND
AT MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP LEJEUNE, NORTH CAROLINA
December 2012
The United States Marine Corps (USMC) has determined that implementing the proposed action is
consistent to the maximum extent practicable with the enforceable policies of North Carolina's
approved Coastal Management Program.
1.0 FEDERAL AGENCY ACTION
The United States Marine Corps (USMC) proposes to install warning signs within Surface Danger
Zone (SDZ) perimeters along the New River, Stones Bay, Verona, and Brown's Island training areas
located on the Marine Corps Base (MCB) Camp Lejeune in Jacksonville, NC (Onslow County
(Figures 1 - 3). The warning signs will notify boaters that access to these areas is prohibited because of
the potential for unexploded ordnances. The project includes the installation of 45 pilings within open
water and 353 sign posts in areas above mean high water (Figures 5 & 6). The open water pilings
would have a 10 -inch diameter and would be installed a minimum of six feet deep. The 353 additional
warning signs would be on 6" x 6" square posts and would be installed a minimum of ten feet above
the high water line (Figure 7). Additionally, nine pilings currently in open water at Stones Bay will be
removed. The contractor will use a mini excavator on a barge to access areas where signs would be
installed. The piles located in open water will be driven into place. A combination of driving, jetting
and augering would be used to install the sign posts, depending upon the soil conditions.
All components of the proposed action would occur within coastal waters. The proposed action would
also occur in the vicinity of waters that are classified as primary nursery areas and special secondary
nursery areas.
2.0 NORTH CAROLINA COASTAL AREA MANAGEMENT ACT
In 1972, Congress passed the Coastal Zone Management Act, which encouraged states to keep the
coasts healthy by establishing programs to manage, protect, and promote the country's fragile coastal
resources. Two years later, the North Carolina General Assembly passed the landmark Coastal Area
Management Act (CAMA). CAMA established the Coastal Resources Commission, required local
land use planning in 20 coastal counties, and provided for a program for regulating development. The
North Carolina Coastal Management Program was federally approved in 1978 by the National Oceanic
and Atmospheric Administration.
Demands placed on lands and waters of the coastal zone from existing economic development and
population growth require that new projects or actions be carefully planned in order to avoid stress on
the coastal zone. This planning involves a review of state enforceable policies, which are designed to
provide effective protection and use of land and water resources of the coastal zone.

Coastal Consistency Determination
2.1 AREAS OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN
North Carolina's coastal zone includes the 20 counties that are adjacent to, adjoining, intersected by or
bounded by the Atlantic Ocean or any coastal sound, including Onslow County. There are two tiers
within this boundary. The first tier is comprised of Areas of Environmental Concern (AECs)
designated by the state. AECs have more thorough regulatory controls and include coastal wetlands,
coastal estuarine waters, public trust areas, coastal estuarine shorelines, ocean beaches, frontal dunes,
ocean erosion areas, inlet lands, small surface water supply watersheds, public water supply well
fields, and fragile natural resource areas. The second tier includes land uses with the potential to affect
coastal waters, even though they are not defined as AECs. The coastal zone extends seaward to the
three nautical mile territorial sea.
An AEC is an area of natural importance and its classification protects the area from uncontrolled
development. AECs include almost all coastal waters and about three percent of the land in the 20
coastal counties. The four categories of AECs are:
• The Estuarine and Ocean System, which includes public trust areas, estuarine coastal waters,
coastal shorelines, and coastal wetlands;
• The Ocean Hazard System, which includes components of barrier island systems;
• Public Water Supplies, which include certain small surface water supply watersheds and public
water supply well fields; and
• Natural and Cultural Resource Areas, which include coastal complex natural areas; areas
providing habitat for federal or state designated rare, threatened or endangered species; unique
coastal geologic formations; or significant coastal archaeological or historic resources.
MCB Camp Lejeune includes coastal resources designated as AECs, including estuarine coastal
waters, coastal shorelines, and coastal wetlands of the Estuarine and Ocean System AEC, as well as
habitat for federal or state designated species and archaeological or historic resources of the Natural
and Cultural Resource Area AEC. The project area is designated as coastal estuarine waters.
Furthermore, all land located within 75 feet of the normal high water level of coastal waters is also
considered to be coastal shoreline within the Estuarine and Ocean System AEC. All sign and piling
installation would take place within the coastal shoreline AEC. Coastal wetlands are located along
much of the MCB Camp Lejeune's estuarine waters including the proposed project areas. Several
wetland system types are located near the proposed action areas, including estuarine and riverine.
Habitat that supports threatened and endangered species is considered a coastal resource under the
Natural and Cultural Resource Area AEC. The West Indian manatee (Trichechus manatus) is a
federally- listed endangered aquatic mammal. The manatee is an occasional summer resident off the
North Carolina coast and is known to occur within the New River and the Atlantic Intracoastal
Waterway. The manatee is considered a year -round resident of the region with a maximum population
in the summer months. Additionally, the Atlantic sturgeon (Acipenser oxyrinchus oxyrinchus) and the
shortnose sturgeon (A. brevirostrum) are federally- listed endangered fish species. Both sturgeon
species are found along the Atlantic seaboard from southern Canada to northeastern Florida. The
Atlantic sturgeon is anadromous; adults spawn in freshwater in the spring and early summer and
migrate into estuarine and marine waters where they spend most of their lives. The shortnose sturgeon
migrates seasonally between upstream freshwater spawning habitat and downstream foraging

Coastal Consistency Determination
mesohaline areas within a river. The species is freshwater amphidromous because it rarely leaves its
natal river. Both sturgeon species could be found within waters of the project area.
Other coastal resources not designated as AECs in the vicinity of the project area include primary
nursery areas and secondary nursery areas.
Following is an analysis of the applicability of policies designed to protect AECs and the project's
consistency with those policies, when applicable.
2.1.1 15A NCAC 07H.0200 (Estuarine and Ocean Systems)
15A NCAC 07H .0205 defines and establishes management objectives for coastal wetlands "to
conserve and manage coastal wetlands so as to safeguard and perpetuate their biological, social,
economic, and aesthetic values; to coordinate and establish a management system capable of
conserving and utilizing coastal wetlands as a natural resource essential to the functioning of the entire
estuarine system." While installing the signs, wetlands would be avoided to the maximum extent
practicable. Pilings will be installed from a barge in the water to minimize impacts from heavy
equipment.
15A NCAC 07H .0206 defines and establishes management objectives for estuarine waters "to
conserve and manage the important features of estuarine waters so as to safeguard and perpetuate their
biological, social, economic, and aesthetic values; to coordinate and establish a management system
capable of conserving and utilizing estuarine waters so as to maximize their benefits to man and the
estuarine and ocean system." All of the proposed signs /pilings is located within an estuarine system.
The project would install 45 pilings along the New River, which is considered a special secondary
nursery area for estuarine habitats. In addition, 353 signs would be installed a minimum of ten feet
above the high water line along the New River and in areas near Brown's Inlet and the Atlantic Ocean.
Sections of the project area (northwest of the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway) are classified as a
primary nursery area (Figures 4A & 4B). The proposed action would not significantly impact coastal
water quality. Minimal soil disturbance and no impervious cover would be associated with the project.
Therefore, the proposed action is not expected to cause any adverse runoff that might enter estuarine
waters.
15A NCAC 07H .0207 defines and establishes management objectives for public trust areas, in order
"to protect public rights for navigation, recreation, and to conserve and manage public trust areas in a
manner that safeguards and perpetuates their biological, economic, and aesthetic values." The project
area is currently designated as a military danger zone and restricted area for the Base and access is
prohibited. Therefore, the proposed action would not cause a change in the public's current ability to
access coastal resources in Onslow County.
15A NCAC 07H .0209 defines and establishes management objectives to ensure that "shoreline
development is compatible with the dynamic nature of coastal shorelines as well as the values and the
management objectives of the estuarine and ocean system. Other objectives are to conserve and
manage the important natural features of the estuarine and ocean system so as to safeguard and
perpetuate their biological, social, economic, and aesthetic values; to coordinate and establish a
3

Coastal Consistency Determination
management system capable of conserving and utilizing these shorelines so as to maximize their
benefits to the estuarine and ocean system and the people of North Carolina."
The proposed installation of signs will not affect the public trust rights or the biological and physical
functions of the estuarine and ocean system. Every reasonable effort has been made to avoid, mitigate,
or reduce adverse impacts of development to estuarine and coastal systems through the planning and
design of the project. The proposed action would not directly or indirectly impair water quality
standards, increase shoreline erosion, alter coastal wetlands or submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV),
deposit spoils waterward of normal water level or normal high water, or cause degradation of shellfish
beds, or interfere with existing public rights of access to, or use of, navigable waters or public
resources in Onslow County.
2.1.2 15A NCAC 07H.0300 (Ocean Hazard Areas)
15A NCAC 07H .0303 defines and establishes management objectives for ocean hazard areas "to
eliminate unreasonable danger to life and property and achieve a balance between the financial, safety,
and social factors that are involved in hazard area development." Ocean hazard areas include beaches,
frontal dunes, inlet lands, and other areas in which geologic, vegetative and soil conditions indicate a
substantial possibility of excessive erosion or flood damage. Part of the proposed project area near
Brown's Inlet is located within an Ocean Hazard Area. The areas near Brown's Inlet and Bear Inlet are
located within an Ocean Erodible Area, an Inlet Hazard Area, and a High Hazard Area. No
development or impervious cover is proposed in these areas. Only pilings /posts that have a minimal
footprint yet are large enough to withstand storm surges (10" diameter for open water pilings and 6" x
6' square posts for other signs) would be installed. All hardware used would be designed to withstand a
corrosive environment.
The proposed project will have no effect on Ocean Hazard Areas and it is consistent with the
management objectives of 15A NCAC 07H .0303.
2.1.3 15A NCAC 07H.0400 (Public Water Supplies)
15A NCAC 07H .0403 defines and establishes management objectives for public water supplies. The
objective in regulating development within critical water supply areas is the "protection and
preservation of public water supply well fields and A -II streams and to coordinate and establish a
management system capable of maintaining public water supplies so as to perpetuate their values to the
public health, safety, and welfare." There are no public water supply wells, well fields or small surface
water supply watersheds within the project areas; therefore policies designed to protect public water
supplies are not applicable.
2.1.4 15A NCAC 07H.0500 (Natural and Cultural Resource Areas)
15A NCAC 07H .0501 defines fragile coastal natural and cultural resource areas as "areas containing
environmental, natural, or cultural resources of more than local significance in which uncontrolled or
incompatible development could result in major or irreversible damage to natural systems or cultural
resources, scientific, educational, or associative values, or aesthetic qualities." The AECs within this
category are coastal complex natural areas, coastal areas that sustain remnant species, unique coastal
4

Coastal Consistency Determination
geologic formations, significant coastal architectural resources, and significant coastal historic
architectural resources.
15A NCAC 07H .0505 defines and establishes management objectives "to protect unique habitat
conditions that are necessary to the continued survival of threatened and endangered native plants and
animals and to minimize land use impacts that might jeopardize these conditions." Camp Lejeune has
four known, active bald eagle nests. Bald eagles on Camp Lejeune are managed and monitored in
accordance with the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (16 U.S.C. 668- 668c). There are no known
eagle nests within the project area. Bald eagles would not be affected by the proposed project.
The West Indian manatee (Trichechus manatus) is an occasional summer resident off the North
Carolina coast and is known to occur within the New River. The manatee is considered a year -round
resident of the region with a maximum population in the summer months. Additionally, the Atlantic
sturgeon (Acipenser oxyrinchus oxyrinchus) and the shortnose sturgeon (A. brevirostrum) are
federally- listed endangered fish species. Both sturgeon species are found along the Atlantic seaboard
from southern Canada to northeastern Florida. Both species may be found within waters of the project
area. The sign installation project will occur during winter months, when populations of these
federally- protected water - dependent species will be at their lowest. Additionally, the footprint of each
piling would be minimal (10" diameter for open water pilings and 6" x 6" square posts for other signs).
However, if there is to be loud noise in the water (e.g. driving piles, etc.), then observers would be
posted while that activity is taking place. If any marine mammal (including bottlenose dolphin) comes
within 100 meters of the project, the activity should be stopped until the animal has left the area. If
there is no loud noise anticipated in the water, this 100 meter rule is not necessary. Because of the
minimal disturbance associated with the project and because of the precautionary measures to be taken,
federally- protected species would not be affected by the proposed action.
15A NCAC 07H .0506 defines and establishes management objectives "to protect the features of a
designated coastal complex natural area in order to safeguard its biological relationships, educational
and scientific values, and aesthetic qualities." MCB Camp Lejeune has two designated natural areas
that have been registered by the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program: the CF Russell Longleaf
Pine Natural Area and the Wallace Creek Natural Area. The project area is not located near either of
these sites; therefore, no impacts are anticipated.
15A NCAC 07H .0507, establishes management objectives to protect unique coastal geologic
formations for the purpose of preserving formations' physical components that serve as important
scientific and educational sites, or as valuable scenic resources. Currently, the only designated unique
coastal geologic formation in North Carolina is Jockey's Ridge [15A NCAC 07H .0507(c)(3)], located
in the Town of Nags Head in Dare County, North Carolina. Therefore, the proposed project will have
no effect on this unique geologic formation and it is consistent with the management objectives of 15A
NCAC 07H.0507.
15A NCAC 07H .0508 defines and established use standards for development in designated fragile
coastal natural or cultural areas." The proposed project area is not within a designated fragile coastal
natural or cultural resource area. Implementing the proposed action would not cause irreversible
damage to natural systems or cultural resources, scientific, educational, or associative values, or
aesthetic qualities; therefore, this policy is not applicable.

Coastal Consistency Determination
15A NCAC 07H .0509 defines and establishes management objectives "to conserve coastal
archaeological resources of more than local significance to history or prehistory that constitute
important scientific sites, or are valuable educational, associative, or aesthetic resources." Currently,
the only designated significant coastal archaeological resource in North Carolina is Permuda Island
[15A NCAC 07H .0509(e)]. Permuda Island is a former barrier island located within Stump Sound in
Southwestern Onslow County, North Carolina. There are no significant coastal archaeological
resources that would be affected by the proposed project. In addition, no archaeological sites that are
eligible or potentially eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places have been
identified in the project area. Therefore, the proposed project is consistent with the management
objectives of 15A NCAC 07H .0509.
2.2 General Policy Guidelines
The North Carolina CAMA sets forth 11 General Policy Guidelines, addressing:
• Shoreline erosion policies;
• Shorefront access policies;
• Coastal energy policies;
• Post - disaster policies;
• Floating structure policies;
• Mitigation policies;
• Coastal water quality policies;
• Policies on use of coastal airspace;
• Policies on water- and wetland -based target areas for military training areas;
• Policies on beneficial use and availability of materials resulting from the excavation or
maintenance of navigational channels; and
• Policies on ocean mining.
The purpose of these rules is to establish generally applicable objectives and policies to be followed in
the public and private use of land and water areas within the coastal area of North Carolina. The
following is an analysis of the applicability of the General Policy Guidelines to the proposed project
and the project's consistency with those policies, when applicable.
2.2.1 15A NCAC 07M.0200 (Shoreline Erosion Policies)
The proposed action would involve the installation of sign posts along the shoreline near Brown's Inlet
and Bear Inlet. No development or impervious cover is proposed in these areas. Only pilings /posts that
have a minimal footprint yet are large enough to withstand storm surges (10" diameter for open water
pilings and 6" x 6" square posts for other signs) would be installed. All hardware used would be
designed to withstand a corrosive environment. The contractor would use a mini excavator on a barge
to access areas where signs would be installed. The piles located in open water would be driven into
place. A combination of driving, jetting and augering would be used to install the sign posts,
depending upon the soil conditions. The proposed action is consistent with the policy that directs
development in the vicinity of coastal shorelines to be conducted in a manner that avoids loss of life,
property, and amenities.
6

Coastal Consistency Determination
2.2.2 15A NCAC 07M .0300 (Shorefront Access Policies)
MCB Camp Lejeune is a military base where the public has not historically had beach access or
uncontrolled water access (boat launches). Additionally the proposed action does not involve any
activities which would change the public's ability to access the beach or water; therefore, these policies
are not applicable.
2.2.3 15A NCAC 07M.0400 (Coastal Energy Policies)
The proposed action does not involve the development of any major energy facilities; therefore, these
policies are not applicable.
2.2.415A NCAC 07M.0500 (Post- disaster Policies)
These policies require that all state agencies prepare for disasters and coordinate their activities in the
event of a coastal disaster. MCB Camp Lejeune Base Order P3440.6E Destructive Weather Manual
addresses how MCB Camp Lejeune would prepare for and respond to a potential disaster which
includes: assigning responsibilities, and providing guidance by which the Department of Defense
responds to all hazards in accordance with 42 United States Code (U.S.C.) 5121, the Civil Defense Act
of 1950 50 U.S.C., National civil defense policy, and federal and state civil defense programs in
cooperation with the Federal Emergency Management Agency; prescribing the basic warnings and
conditions of readiness for destructive weather, and providing the capstone doctrine for United States
Army and USMC domestic support operations, and provides general information for planning and
conducting such operations, and identifies relationships between federal, state, and local organizations,
and military services. However, these policies are not applicable as no pre - disaster planning or post -
disaster recovery would be needed for the proposed action.
2.2.515A NCAC 07M .0600 (Floating Structure Policies)
No floating structures are included in the proposed action; therefore, these policies are not applicable.
2.2.615A NCAC 07M .0700 (Mitigation Policy)
North Carolina's mitigation policy states that, "Coastal ecosystems shall be protected and maintained
as complete and functional systems by mitigating the adverse impacts of development as much as
feasible, by enhancing, creating, or restoring areas with the goal of improving or maintaining
ecosystem function and areal proportion." Impacts would also be minimized through 1) proper site
planning, 2) site selection and 3) compliance with development standards.
In an ecosystem context, MCB Camp Lejeune is actively working to maintain complete and functional
ecosystems within the state's coastal zone. MCB Camp Lejeune's participation with the state of North
Carolina and other conservation partners in a long -term encroachment partnering strategy has resulted
in preservation of 3,820 acres of coastal lands identified by state, federal, and non - governmental
partners as having significant or unique natural resources. The USMC has contributed over $10
7

Coastal Consistency Determination
million dollars to restrict development and conserve wildlife habitat on large land tracts adjacent to and
in the vicinity of MCB Camp Lejeune in support of regional conservation initiatives.
The adverse impacts to wildlife would not be expected to affect the stability of wildlife populations on
Base or migratory bird populations. Sign installation would take place along the New River, which is
considered a special secondary nursery area. These waters are essential to North Carolina's
commercial and recreational fishing industries. Since the footprint of each piling would be minimal
(10" diameter for open water pilings and 6" x 6" square posts for other signs), estuarine species or
habitats occurring in the river or creek substrate or water column would not be affected. In addition, all
work will occur from a barge. Therefore, no staging area on land is needed. Installation of the warning
signs would not significantly affect any federally- protected species.
The proposed action would install 45 pilings in open water and 353 additional sign posts ten feet above
the high water line. Because the footprint of each piling is minimal (10" diameter for open water
pilings and 6" x 6" square posts for other signs), no impacts to wetlands would occur.
Other wetlands and streams in the vicinity of the proposed project area would be protected from direct
and indirect impacts. These areas would remain undeveloped and be managed in accordance with the
installation's state and federal agency - approved Integrated Natural Resources Management Plan. No
impervious cover and very little soil disturbance would occur. Therefore, a Stormwater Plan and
Sedimentation and Erosion Control Plan are not required.
Permits and approvals for the proposed action include:
• Private Aids to Navigation Permit (GC 2554) from the U.S. Department of Homeland Security,
U.S. Coast Guard.
If, during construction, any site of potential historical or archaeological significance is encountered, the
installation commander would be notified. The unit commander would order actions in the vicinity
halted and the area marked. The unit commander would immediately notify the Base archaeologist.
Because of minimal soil disturbance and the lack of impervious cover, an Erosion and Sedimentation
Control Plan and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan are not required for this project.
With the above mitigation and minimization measures in place, the proposed action would be
consistent with this policy.
2.2.7 15A NCAC 07M.0800 (Coastal Water Quality Policies)
This policy guideline states that no land or water use shall cause the degradation of water quality so as
to impair the traditional uses of coastal waters. All aspects of the project would be conducted in
accordance with standard procedures governing hazardous materials and petroleum, oils, and
lubricants. Implementation of the proposed action would be consistent with coastal water quality
policies.

Coastal Consistency Determination
The proposed construction activities would not result in significant impacts to coastal water quality.
Therefore, implementation of the proposed action would be consistent with coastal water quality
policies.
2.2.815A NCAC 07M.0900 (Policies on Use of Coastal Airspace)
No use of coastal airspace would be part of the proposed action; therefore, these policies are not
applicable.
2.2.915A NCAC 07M.1000 (Policies on Water- and Wetland -Based Target Areas for Military
Training Areas)
No water- or wetland -based target areas or military training areas would be part of the proposed action;
therefore, these policies are not applicable.
2.2.10 15A NCAC 07M .1100 (Policies on Beneficial Use and Availability of Materials Resulting
From the Excavation or Maintenance of Navigational Channels)
Excavation or maintenance of navigational channels would not be taking place; however, the new
signs would be placed along creeks, inlets, and rivers.
The proposed project would install 45 pilings and remove nine existing pilings located within open
water in the New River, which is considered a special secondary nursery area for estuarine habitats. In
addition, 353 posts would be installed a minimum of ten feet above mean high water along Browns
Inlet, the AIWW, Banks Channel, and Shackelford Channel. Areas along the northern edge of the
AIWW are classified as primary nursery area.
The contractor would use a mini excavator on a barge to access areas where signs will be installed. The
piles located in open water will be driven into place. A combination of driving, jetting and augering
will be used to install the sign posts, depending upon the soil conditions. Implementation of the
proposed action would be consistent with excavation policies.
2.2.11 15A NCAC 07M .1200 (Policies on Ocean Mining)
No ocean mining would be part of the proposed action; therefore, these policies are not applicable.
3.0 ONSLOW COUNTY COASTAL MANAGEMENT POLICIES
CAMA requires local governments in each of the 20 coastal counties in the state to prepare and
implement a land use plan and ordinances for its enforcement consistent with established federal and
state policies. Specifically, policy statements are required on resource protection; resource production
and management; economic and community development; continuing public participation; and storm
hazard mitigation, post - disaster recovery, and evacuation plans. Upon approval by the North Carolina
Coastal Resources Commission, the plan becomes part of the North Carolina Coastal Management
Program.
9

Coastal Consistency Determination
The Onslow County Comprehensive Plan (CAMA Core Land Use Plan), adopted by the Onslow
County Board of Commissioners on October 19, 2009 and certified by the Coastal Resource
Commission on January 13, 2010, addresses land use planning in relation to CAMA. According to this
Comprehensive Land Use Plan, Camp Lejeune is zoned as a Military Reservation (MR) and is limited
to activities determined to be appropriate by the military. As the proposed activity has been requested
by authorities at Camp Lejeune, the Proposed Action on Base will be consistent with the operation of
the Camp Lejeune Military Reservation, the applicable policies of the North Carolina Coastal
Management Program, and Onslow County's comprehensive plan policies, for the reasons described
throughout this Coastal Consistency Determination.
4.0 CONCLUSION
In conclusion, because the proposed action would not affect areas outside of the installation and
impacts within the installation would be minimized by mitigation measures, it has been determined
that implementing the proposed action would be fully consistent with the applicable policies of the
North Carolina Coastal Management Program.
10

LIST OF FIGURES
PILING /SIGN INSTALLATION AT NEW RIVER AND BROWNS ISLAND
AT MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP LEJEUNE, NORTH CAROLINA
Onslow County, NC
Figure 1 Vicinity Map
Figures 2 Topographic Map of Project Area
Figures 3A & 3B SCS Soils Maps of Project Area
Figure 4 Fishery Nursery Areas of Project Area
Figure 5 Aerial Photograph Depicting Piling/Post Locations at New River
Figure 6 Aerial Photograph Depicting Post Locations at Browns Inlet
Figure 7 Typical Cross Sections of Pilings & Posts

i25
LAPERMITS\2012 PERMIT FILES \40 -12 -242 MapSet
*Boundaries are approximate and are
not meant to be absolute.
Map Source: ArcGIS World Street Map
i�
i, gr
1470
E�
JACKSONVILLE
NEIN RIVER STATION
dERG11�
�Z
a
u
0
3
m
c
Q
1 eleune et,,d
24
A
:n
5.
I
104 1�
e`
lqtc�
MIDWAY PARK
HUEERT -6 24
ctrlui" YJay,
IV
i4✓N SWANSSORO
l
•
•
•
•
•
r
•
•
,••0.•..• •
•
• 6 ••....
:r
olxoa
G
x
o 7;n
v
f
r,
�f.
f}
SNEA.DS FERRY
i•
,••
�•� •J• • -• 60 •�
.
• •.
•,.
;r:••' :
s•
•;.,r .•r
•
DEC: 1 9 2012
DENT
leband s
SCALE 1" = 2 Miles
t

w
s
r
c T L' >ft P 9t.# v 'fir .v t� •• - .tom "- -. _ .. " 'i� .♦
ale
.. •Fry
7
t .7
_ - ... R '" >. ! , w.•r «v.0 ..a -•,mss
j.
as
4f 61� ...._ • � ° . • _ _ iC A _ V 3 , !i !> . X � r /� !• � ! ran � 1 - ,
._ .
L1 I A U N 6:L 1: SF t .Crr; •� is ♦ •
r
FFF
I ri'
-
r'
ea' h Da—PD
a
ENR - WptTEF' Ova €T'
r — tvf
'
wetlands S Stc�rs\va �ancxr
L:\PERMITS\2012 PERMIT FILES \40 -12 -242 MapSet
*Boundaries are approximate and are
not meant to be absolute.
Map Source: Browns Inlet, Camp Lejeune, Hubert,
Jacksonville South, New River Inlet, Sneads Ferry
Quadrangles 7.5 minute (topographic)
SCALE 1" = 1 Mile

94
271'
V..
'3 A
17t�g i
T
\_
n.
L.
x.
o
,� _
, ,
"_ , _
40
Ln
-40*
ry
Q4
7
4�- 4-... f+in,t� d �Ra'Nb�!� LJj t, r ^ ^� ., y,.i. . - _4
Ca
'Ln
_N
may- E
on
Mac A
Ln
r.
KA,
W -
BmB: Baymeade-Urban land complex
Bo: Bohicket silty clay loam na
fit: Croatan muck
FoA: Foreston loamy fine sand
1Y
GoA� Goldsboro fine sandy loam
KuB- Kureb fine sand
Lm Leon fine sand • V, Oi
Ly: L ynchburg fine sandy loam
MaC- Marvyn loamy sand' MA
Mk- Muckalee ioarn
Mu: MurviHe muck
NoB Norfolk. loamy fine sand
J Onslow loamy fine sand
n�
VVaB: Wando fine sand
\ � Woodingtor do2,my fine sand 11
)VO
e7
(r
LAPERMITS\2012 PERMITFILESWO-`12-242 MapSet
E
Sign Installation Project
lw
A
L
DEC 192012,
-Boundaries are approximate and are
MG Camp Lejeune
,11 On to County, KIC
Mqure M2,
11
q —
DENR
not meant to be absolute.
November 2012
FIVIV: 910.45ZO001 -1.8W1MGAG76
9011W Map
V_A_TKR_
V dij;ZI—Ty
atV Branc
Map 8(r)urce. NR Soil Survey
Fax 910.452MW
4 for New River Area
40-12-242
to
WRwingn, W. 29403
SCALE V 2500'
L - -

-'r
L-41
AnB: Alpin fine sand
BaB: Baymeade fine sand
Bo: Bohicket silty clay loam
Ca: Carteret fine sand
Co: Corolla fine sand
Ct: Croatan muck
Dc: Duckston fine sand
KuB: Kureb fine sand
Ln: Leon fine sand
MaC: Marvyn loamy sand
Mk: Muckalee loam
Mu: Murville muck
NeE: Newhan fine sand
NfC: Newhan fine sand, dredged
NnE: Newhan - Corolla -Urban land complex
Pa: Pactolus fine sand
To: Torhunta fine sandy loam
WaB: Wando fine sand
YaA: Yaupon fine sandy loam
LAPERMITS \2012 PERMIT FILES \40 -12 -242 MapSet
*Boundaries are approximate and are
not meant to be absolute.
Map Source: NRCS Soil Survey
Sign Installation Project
MCB Camp Lejeune
Onslow County, NC
November 2012
40 -12 -242
LMG
wvvw.LMGroup.net
Phone: [phone] - 1.866.LMG.1078
Fax 910,452.0060
3805 Wrightsville Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
Figure 3B
Soils Map
for Browns Island Area
' IVY7.
' w
•
f
,&
SCALE 1" = 2500'

•
i !
r
'Zj 4 1
y 9C
#1� � °�� • T I II
_,i.
' LIV .t
r N711
,yy+fr
1�• VIII` " _ +�_ � � .-
1 J
I
�► �II1111111p, ,;� 1„1�ai, :•: �,I:!IIII � III��!�i,�lll, i��lDl �• .-
-�
❖
�i♦•i °ice _ r
-, !y, 4, �♦♦ ♦.a.�♦ ?♦ +C • _ I Ili
fit li mkgm— C:
Sa
1 "gilgli'. ► +•i +iii +O• � � _ � �•i I ��III�I' / ..
�� Ifl .iiq +iu+ �►i +: +i4i +i +i +a�i +ii +s � ` ° •in,u,: .
1 � �i11 +i1, �i +i <i+ :•iii + : +i +i +� +:� �� � s�.
of , i •h '. 4' ���. +•►�._• +.� +.�• �'' 1 � E i � 1 1 K
4 � +••"� Vii_ +_� -i ♦��` y • ',•1 I�I
►a �� ♦_..• ♦__ � _ i IK III.
- + +: sue► i•♦•ii -iii �'
.yam♦♦ ♦ ♦� ♦ -� A.I. ♦. -. v.•
�i'°♦ai � +•ice
nnm m
Em Ush"Dow
Zanwad
All ... w RnVwWAam
.• • - : NC Division of - Fisheries (Maps 19 : 1
�ib•�b�
leap wq•eimC MC Obb plow 011•c Mwoh 2011
1000 0 1000 2000 Yon*
0.7 0 0.7 1.4 IYw
MCB Camp Lejeune
Onslow County, NC
November 2012
40 -12 -242
LMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP
En•wonm+rntat C .... ltoars
= www. LMG rou p. net
Phone: [phone] •1.866.LMG.1078
Fax [phone]
3805 Wrightsville Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
Figure 4
Fishery Nursery Areas
of Project Area
n
r<<r
O -1
N
a
W
Z

r�z
z
L� I IN
a J 'IS
III J [
r
J ( JJ
s ��,•J��, 110 ;-a 0, -
u
L -�
I
C C Ci
ul
1330
g
a
0
C
O N
CNN
44 m
oCoB�
U �
3�
ui
0
�1
I
I�
<> O
U
a")
I It, -
Z a
ZL
s
�
l
5
«
�
�
NO M,
� �
a
J
c
s
t
�
�
)
-R
1
ul
1330
g
a
0
C
O N
CNN
44 m
oCoB�
U �
3�
ui
0
�1
I
I�
<> O
U
a")
I It, -
Z a

:, ..,.ti= ^« ^ - •:'�+y'.� - .- .«�+*,.,..�... - . a .fl-T'++— ,,.: n „Krim +" ' ;. _ 7 XR1&" 6 '.
,
1 �? 1
e t
^ ,
,. "* •
' r
Ago, m
m ■" a ❑
I
U p_ turl c U LRI12 4
r�SUNC�
A 7
i
-p)
■ �II %L� M
o Typ)(p b
r,r, , R
NO
■ �' � , ,
31 2N
�r
tea. ,��, ■ � - r■ ■ — -- —
a
■f �`.: P r/ -RA
.. r
, >: S P G�Jfl
��. m s Ir" �� ■r a romp rFrgr,Vm,Lj d,rgFru� �narif
�, . � �w ». ; � ■ � ��� � Mot f limn, i rU� M —
'A � wr'. �ym; ,., ■ 5 1 -. ;. All. ...� 14
i . t�(rM irl�r� � CL P. ma, m2hl
fi ) f J`J r�r <, 7
i> ( ✓I L L) a p r
Dir _
a _
■ ■
■ --
_ � �� Mcrr4G�Cr� V
C M)b " 7U pp w Bkro.
Num"Olk VA 235K& 21
ir&f Qpbi�22--,Y,uS0
w tai
I
w • �.�� ��
ill
D.E. Walker Construction Col 704.597.8920 Phone
ZAPATA Incorporated JV 704.597.8477 Fax
�. m 0 � 5�r � ��° � � � � APR tii J Charlotte, NC 28210 www.dewalkermnstruction.comJ

Typical Cross Section Typical Cross Section
Open Water Piling Post Above MHW
Sign (Typ.) Sign (Typ.)
14 Piling 14 Piling
(10" diameter) (6" x 6 ")
10 10
4
a 10' min distance
6 6 I
Approx. MHW Approx. MHW
2 APProx Existing Grade 1st1n( j Grade
_2 _2
S
_6 _6
�c� l �
fin)
NOTE: Final Depth of Pilings Per Contractor Vvy
or Engineer. DENR " WP,T�R fir. Branch
y��tands 3
NOTE: THIS DRAWING IS NOT SURVEY
OR ENGINEERED DRAWING.
FOR ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITTING ONLY.
0 5 10 20
1! iiiiiii
2012 PERMIT FILES \40 -12 -242 - -- MCB Camp Lejeune
PRELIMINARY
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION