NC0003549_Wasteload Allocation_19940616

NPDES DOCUMENT SCANNING COVER SHEET
NPDES Permit:
NC0003549
Document Type:
Permit Issuance
Wasteload Allocation
-. .,.
Authorization to Construct (AtC)
Permit Modification
Speculative Limits
Correspondence
Instream Assessment (67B)
Environmental Assessment (EA)
Permit
History
Document Date:
June 16, 1994
Whim document is printed on reuuae paper - ignore any
content on the reszerse side

NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION
PERMIT NO.: NC0076589
PERMI1'1'EE NAME:
FACILITY NAME:
Amerada Hess Corporation
Selma-N Terminal
Facility Status: Existing
Permit Status: Renewal
Major
Pipe No.: 001
Minor
Design Capacity:
Domestic (% of Flow):
Industrial (% of Flow): 100 %
Comments: v' e,2;-1 C yy
RECEIVING STREAM: an unnamed tributary to Mill Creek
Class: WS-IV NSW
Sub -Basin: 03-04-02
Reference USGS Quad: E25SE
County: Johnston
Regional Office: Raleigh Regional Office
(please attach)
Previous Exp. Date: 00/00/00 Treatment Plant Class:
Classification changes within three miles:
Requested by: Charl
Prepared by:
Reviewed by:
T3oD(,1/4.
w04f2
s Alvarez
Date: 5/19/94
Date: t$ f' Jc ►4y�t
Date: /;/ I
Modeler
Date Rec.
#
F1L—
57o I94-
1-8S3
Drainage Area (mi2): < 0.1 Average Streamflow (cfs):
s7010 (cfs): 0.0 w7Q10 (cfs): 3002 (cfs): 0.0
Type of Toxicity Test:
Monitoring Schedule:
Instream Monitoring
Upstream Location
Downstream Location
Flow (MGD)
Oil and Grease (mg/I):
pH (SU):
Settleable Solids (ml/1):
TSS (mg/I):
Tubidity (NTU)
Benzene (µg/l):
Toluene (µg/l):
Xylene (1.1.g/1):
MTBE (µg/I):
Ethylbenzene (µg/I):
Lead * (µg/1):
Naphthalene (µg/l):
Phenols (µg/I):
"limit if leaded fuels are stored
"" The discharge shall cause the turbidity of the receiving water to exceed 50
NTU. If the turbididty exceeds these levels due to natural background
conditions, the discharge level cannot cause any increase in the turbidity of
the receiving water.
Acute / Fathead Minnow 24 hr
Annual
not required
Frequency
Mon. Avg. Daily Max.
variable variable
45
6-9
nr nr
45
50
1.19
2/month
2/month
2/month
2/month
2/month
11.0 2/month
monitor on same schedule as whole effluent toxicity test [annual]
monitor on same schedule as whole effluent toxicity test [annual]
monitor on same schedule as whole effluent toxicity test [annual]
25.0 2/month
monitor on same schedule as whole effluent toxicity test [annual]
1.0 2/month
All volumes of wastewater leaving the facility must be monitored. If continuous
monitoring is not feasible, then the discharger shall record the approximate times
that discharge began and ended, along with the instantaneous flow at the time of
effluent sampling. Monitoring for Benzene, Toluene, Ethyl benzene and Xylene
using an EPA approved method to a detection level of at least 1 ppb. Also
recommend monitoring for methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE), Naphthalene, and
lead, if leaded fuels are stored, using an EPA approved method. This monitoring
should be performed at the same time that the whole effluent toxicity test sample
is taken on an annual basis. A reopener clause should be placed in the permit to
allow limits to be placed on toxicants should the facility fail its whole effluent
toxicity test.
`.. to: J.#.r: i�

Sand and Gravel I'
its %iN1 �JJvq� : \tio
iii ' 1
ravel
Pit
i•••,%.
170, \ / 0 ./
\\ _ / e
N• y.:. �/� �I
s, .
►�/ %!I,F railer Park
.
Substation °�
.
t: Walls
Cem
'moo
4'
•
• Jj
t r j;
y..
Myrtle /
/' /
/ Airport
. /—
' 2305
0

Facility Name:
NPDES No.:
Type of Waste:
Facility Status:
Permit Status:
Receiving Stream:
Stream Classification:
Subbasin:
County:
Regional Office:
Requestor:
Date of Request:
Topo Quad:
FACT SHEET FOR WASTELOAD ALLOCATION
Request # 7853
Amerada Hess Corporation - Selma North Termial
NC0076589
Industrial - 100%
Existing
Renewal
unnamed tributary Mill Creek
WS - IV NSW
03-04-02
Johnston
Raleigh
Alvarez
5/20/94
E25SE
Stream Characteristic:
USGS #
Date:
Drainage Area (mi2):
Summer 7Q10 (cfs):
Winter 7Q10 (cfs):
Average Flow (cfs):
30Q2 (cfs):
IWC (%):
< 0.1
0.0
0.0
100 %
Wasteload Allocation Summary
(approach taken, correspondence with region, EPA, etc.)
Facility not monitoring Lead or Naphthalene per Permit requirments
Phenol limit, (per WS classification) should be given in concentration as flow varies, thus mass
limit would have to fluctuate with flow. 01 k1A 4czai.-t o v14- tea_ Guo-u614iA c lic2"f'vaeo")
Note change in Toxicity Test, per ESB. Facility has no record of a Toxicity Test for 1993,
although previous years portray a good test record.
Special Schedule Requirements and additional comments from Reviewers:
r Q Yelv,kt ..f" Ls. RNn(/ctr1 o Lah R
Oy 60,,,-4 ./1 5" Ye �Zh(fn S' / l/ 5 '5C#t/ isehe;v�•N
cl/ef -Te , (I' ieaie NI 14/3. Jl�l-I1y1i7Qri?-ei)e� fi /t/4 ictene
he I,'rt-,-e( l
Z 9yobo
51 e [ .Ic` 1 o1;)(i
iK
Recommended by: — = Date: Z3 rn, , 314
Farrell Keough
Reviewed by //
Instream Assessment: i1� 5r
Regional Supervisor:
Permits & Engineering:
Date: ' Cl
Date: GI-7l9a-
Date: 2
RETURN TO TECHNICAL SUPPORT BY:JUN
2 9 1994
RECEIVED
JON U 3 199E
OEHNR•RAL RO

Existing Irimits
Flow (MGD)
Oil and (mg/1):
pH (SU):
Settleable Solids (ml/1):
TSS (mg/):
Tubidity ' * (NTU)
Benzene (4/1):
Toluene (14/1):
Xylene (J.g/1):
MTBE (µg/1):
Ethylbeniene (µg/1):
Lead * (µ 1):
Naphthalene (µg/1):
Phenols (/d):
TOXICS/CONVENTIONAL PARAMETERS
Mon. Avg. Daily Max.
variable variable
30 60
6-9
0.1 0.2
nr nr
50 2/month
monitor on same schedule as whole effluent toxicity test
monitor on same schedule as whole effluent toxicity test
monitor on same schedule as whole effluent toxicity test
nr
monitor on same schedule as whole effluent toxicity test
25.0
monitor on same schedule as whole effluent toxicity test
0.01
Frequency
2/month
2/month
2/month
*limit if 1 .-: • • fuels are stored
** The • ' - • • shall cause the turbidity of the receiving water to exceed 50 NTU. If the turbididty exceeds these
levels due to natural background conditions, the discharge level cannot cause any increase in the turbidity of the
receiving water.
Recommended Limits
Mon. Avg. Daily Max. Frequency WQ/EL
Flow (MGD) variable variable
Oil and (mg/1): 45 2/month
pH (SU): 6-9 2/month
Settleabl , Solids (ml/1): nr nr
TSS (mg/1): 45 2/month
Tubidity (NTU) 50 2/month
Benzene (µg/1): 1.19 2/month
Toluene (14/1): II 21A0 2/month
Xylene (14/1): monitor on same schedule as whole effluent toxicity test
MTBE (µg/1): monitor on same schedule as whole effluent toxicity test
Ethylben4ene 44/1): monitor on same schedule as whole effluent toxicity test
Lead * (4/1): a5 2/month Q„„Va1I
Naphthalene (µg/1): monitor on same schedule as whole effluent toxicity test`] r
Phenols (41): 1.0 2/month
*limit if leaded fuels are stored
** Thedischarge shall cause the turbidity of the receiving water to exceed 50 NTIJ. If the turbididty exceeds these
levels due to natural background conditions, the discharge level cannot cause any increase in the turbidity of the
receiving water.
Type of To 'city Test:
Monitoring Schedule:
Instream onitoring
Ups Location
Down Location
Acute / Fathead Minnow 24 hr
Annual
nr
_x_ eter(s) are water quality limited. For some parameters, the available load capacity of the immediate
receiving�ater will be consumed. This may affect future water quality based effluent limitations for additional
dischargers within this portion of the watershed.
OR
No parameters are water quality limited, but this discharge may affect future allocations.

I •
MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION & SPECIAL CONDITIONS
Special Instructions or Conditions
All volum of wastewater leaving the facility must be monitored. If continuous monitoring is not feasible, then the
discharger s record the approximate times that discharge began and ended, along with the instantaneous flow at the
time of effluent sampling. Monitoring for Benzene, Toluene, Ethyl benzene and Xylene using an EPA approved method to
a detection level of at least 1 ppb. Also recommend monitoring for methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE), Naphthalene, and lead, •�
if leaded fuels are stored, using an EPA approved method. ;.: • . .
and annually thereafter. A
reopener clause should be placed in the permit to allow limits to be placed on toxicants should the facility fail its whole - l
J Awn�ml
V" r I €'t
fur
TQ
• i. 1 . 11 . �'• a ' .
effluent toxicity
Explain e,act
test.
pathway of discharge ( i.e. storm sewer to tributary, etc.)
Additional
Information attached? (Y or N) If yes, explain with attachme
ts.

1 ( .
Facility Name Amerada Hess Corp - Selma North Permit # NC0076589 Pipe # 001
ACUTE TOXICITY MONITORING (ANNUAL)
The permi shall conduct annual toxicity tests using protocols defined as definitive in E.P.A.
Document 600/4-85/013 entitled "The Acute Toxicity of Effluents to Freshwater and Marine
Organism ." The monitoring shall be performed as a Fathead Minnow (Pimephales promelas) 24 hour
static test, using effluent collected as a single grab sample. Effluent samples for self -monitoring
purposes must be obtained below all waste treatment. The pennittee will conduct one test annually, with
the annual period beginning in January of the calendar year of the effective date of the permit The
annual test requirement must be performed and reported by June 30. If no discharge occurs by June 30,
notification will be made to the Division by this date. Toxicity testing will be performed on the next
discharge event for the annual test requirement.
The p eter code for this test is TAE6C. All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit
condition be entered on the Effluent Discharge Form (MR-1) for the month in which it was
performed, using the appropriate parameter code. Additionally, DEM Form AT-1 (original) is to be sent
to the following address:
Attention: Environmental Sciences Branch
North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management
4401 Reedy Creek Rd.
Raleigh, N.C. 27607
Test data hall be complete and accurate and include all supporting chemical/physical measurements
performed in association with the toxicity tests, as well as all dose/response data. Total residual chlorine
of the effl ent toxicity sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for disinfection of
the waste tream.
Should an test data from either these monitoring requirements or tests performed by the North Carolina
Division f Environmental Management indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit
may be re pened and modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
NOTE: F ' ure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum control
organism urvival and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test. Failure to
submit s table test results will constitute noncompliance with monitoring requirements.
7Q10
Permitted
IWC
Basin &
0.0 cfs
Flow n/a MGD
100 %
Sub -basin 03-04-02
ReceivingStream ut Mill Creek
County Johnston
AAM Fath7d 24 Version 10/91
Recommended by,
Date '+ 3 MAY a 144

Facility Name:
Permit Number:
Engineer:
Subbasin:
Receiving Stream:
USGS quad #:
Request Number:
Date:
Expiration date:
Amerada Hess Corporation - Selma N Terminal
NC0076589
Alvarez
03-04-02
unnamed tributary to Mill Creek
E25SE
7853
5/20/94
Existing WLA checked:
Staff Report:
Topo checked:
USGS Flows confirmed:
PIRF / APAMS:
IWC Spreadsheet:
Stream Classification:
Nutrient Sensitivity:
Instream Data:
x
x
x
nr
nr
x WS - IV NSW
x
nr
Brief of WLA Analysis
1989: 30 (60) mg/l Oil & Grease, 0.1 (0.2) mUl Settleable Solids, pH, Lead, Phenols, and Turbidity limits along with Acute Daphnid
48hr Toxicity Test
Date Flow Benzene Toluene
mgd KO NA
Dec-93 0.008 <0.8 <1.7
Sep-93 0.03 <1.0 <1.0
Mar-93 0.0435 <0.5 <0.5
Dec-92 0.048 <0.5 <0.5
Jun-92 0.024 <0.5 <0.5
Mar-92 0.006 <0.5 <0.5
Dec-91 0.011 <0.5 <0.5
Aug-91 0.018 <1.0 <1.0
Jun-91 0.016 <2.0 <2.0
Mar-91 0.063 <1.0 <1.0
Staff Report
no additional inform
tion
Ethyl -benzene
PO
<1.0
<1.0
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<1.0
<2.0
<1.0
Xylenes
IA
<2.0
<1.0
<2.0
<1.5
<1.5
<1.5
<0.5
<1.0
<2.0
<1.0
fear., Vol R'
Phenols Phenols
#/d wall
<0.0001 < 1.50
<0.0001 < 0.40
<0.0001 4 0.
0.0006
0.001
<0.0001 < 2.00
n/a
0.00003 0.20
0.0001 0.75
<0.0001 4.0.19

WHOLE EFFLUENT TOXICITY TESTING O[SELF-MONITORING SUMMARY] Mon, May 16, 1994
FA('II.1'1'Y
YEAR 1AN
AMIiRADA IIPSS CORP. PERM:24IIR LC50 AC MONITEPIS 1TI{D (GRAB) 90
NC0066711/001 Bcgin:5/1/93 Ptcquency:5-OWD/A NonCornp: 91 -•-
County:NEWIIANOVIiR Region: WIRO Suhbasin:CPP17 92 —
I'F: Special 93 —
7Q10: IWC(%):NA Older: 94 >1001
REQUIREMENT
FEB MAR API( MAY 111N
>100fSIG
itt),
AI IG Slil'
NOV DT)C
> 1001,> 1001 f
>1001SIG \\\
AMIERAI)A Ill)SS CORP/PAW CRK TERMINAL PIERM:24 IIR FI'IID AC MONIT EMS (GRAB)
N('0005771/001 Begin:4/1/89 l0rgeney: S-OWD/A NonCornp:
Connie htl( 'K1.F.N1111111; Rrgo.'u MRr) Suhlatnin• 1.11114
IT: VARIES Special
7Q 10: 0.0 I\VCI %7 100.0 Order.
90 —
91 NONE
07 ...
0:1 ..-
94 —
PASSI
>100
>100 >100
NONE
>100
>901
AMIiRADA I IF_SS/SIiI,MA PIERM:4811R AC MONIT lil'IS (GRAB)
N(:0076519/001 Begin: 10/1o/89 Ftqucncy: 5 OWD NonComp:
County:JOI INS'TON Region: RRO Subb.asin: NIi002
9F: VAR Special
7010: 0.0 IWC(' .): 100.0 Order:
90 —
91 --•
92 _--
93 --
94 --
—
--
--
--
—
—
NONE
>90'
--
-_
--
-•
--
-»
•--
—
--_
.--
NONE
---
-__
--
---
---
___
--- NONE
>100 ---
..- ._.
-••
-.-
...
NONE
---
,_,
---
>00
-_
AMERICAN AIRLINES GLYCOL (001 / PERM AC MONIT EPIS: 2411R F1710 LC50 (GRAB)
90 —
—
--
—
—
•--
—
_.. ...
_..
—
N00075604/001 Begin:9/1/92 Firquency: 5 OWD/A AFI7ERD1i•ICING NonComp:
91 —
—
--
--
._
—
—
..- ,__
___
-,
County: WAKE Region: RRO Suhhn>in: NE1102
92 -•-
—
--
---
--
__
---
--' ...
...
__.
.-.
PP: NA Special •
93 -- •
>90.01
81',>901
>90.011
>90.011
--
_--
•-- ---
7Q10: NA IWC(%): NA Orden
94 >1001,>1001
--
>1001,>1001
AMERICAN AIRLINES GLYCOL, (002) PERM AC MONIT EPIS: 241LR FflID LC50 (GRAB)
90 --
—
-_
•-
--
--
—
_,_
_._
—
NC0075604/002 Bcgin:9/1/92 Frequency: 5 OWD/A AFTER DE-ICING NonComp:
91 --
—
—
—
__
—
_--
.,. ...
---
County: WAKE Region: RRO Subhosin: NEU02
92 --
—
—
--
—
—
—
__, __
_._
_.
PI:: Special
93 --
—
B11
—
--
—
—
-•- ---
>12.51
--.
...
7010: IWC(%):NA Order.
94 —
>501
--
AMI)RICAN AIRLINES GLYCOI. (003) PERM AC MONIT EPIS: 24IlR Fll ID LC50 (GRAB)
90 --
--
.,
_
-_
--.
—
— _-
_-
-._
NC0075604/003 Begin:9/I/92 Frequency: 5 OWD/A AMER DE-ICING NonCornp:
91 •••
--
--
---
—
—
--
-- ---
__
_._
County:WAKE Region: 1(R() Suhbnsi it: NIi1102
92 --
—
--
.-.
_-
--
__
___ _,.
_._
...
...
I'P:NA Special
03 ...
>00.0'I
811,>90.011
>00.0'1
>90.011
•-•
-.-
---
7010: NA nVC(1•1:NA Omer:
94 >1001,>1001
—
>1001,>1001
AMI)RICAN CYANAMID I'IERM:48 IIR AC MoNfl' 17'IS (GRAB)
90
NC0040690/001 Bcgin:2/1/90 Fnqucncy:5 OWD NonComp:
9t
`
('ouniy: MIICKI J)NBURG Region: MR(O Subhasin: (71134
92
PI':0.I0 special
03
71)10:0.00 IW('(i.):1(8).t)O Onlcr:
04
AMIERICAN'111READ LET: 48 IIR AC DAPl1 OR CGRIO
90 —
--•
--
—
...
—
.„ —
-_
N('0 90108/001 Begin:10/1/93 Frequency: M MONTHLY NonCornp:
91 •••
---
---
—
—
—
—
— -_
__
---
._
County:7RANSYLVANIA Region: ARO Subbasin:l•-1(B01
92 ---
--•
—
—
—
— --
.--
---
PI': 0.015 Special
-..
...
__.
.--
--
—
_,. -_.
_.
72.9'
63.9'
7Q10: 0.43 1WC(%):5.12 Order.
94 >90.0'
>90.0'
>90.0'
40.2'
AMOCO OIL CO. I'ERM:4811R AC MONIT EMS DAP (GRAB)
90 —
---
---
---
--
-_
—
__ ._
--.
NC0003671/001 Begin:2/1/91 Frequency:5.OWU/A NonComp:
91 --
--
3>90
NONE
—
—
—
_- _._
__
--
County:GUILFORD Region:WSRO Subbasin:CPF02
92 NONE
---
---
—
—
—
— _._
—
PF: NA:. Special
93 >90.0
—
---
--
--
—
—
—
7Q10:0:0 IWC(%):100.0 Orden
94 --
—
AMOCO OIL CO.- LONG CRK/006 PERM: 24 lIR LC50 AC MON1T EPIS F itD (GRAB)
90 —
—
---
---
--
—
— ---
—
__.
N00005185/006 Begin:2/1/94 Fioquency:5OWD✓A NonComp:
91 --
•-
••-
---
---
--
—
— _._
.-
_._
---
('ounty:MO('K1.l)NB(lRli Region:MRO Snbbasin:(-11)34
92 __
_-
_..
__
._.
___
—
,_ ._
PIE NA Special
93 --
-_
--
_..
._.
.._
"'
..' --
---
_..
,..
7()10. 0,0 IWC(%): 100.0 Orden
94 —
>1001
>1001
0 2 runsccurive failures = significant noncompliance Y Pre: 1990 Data Avnilnhlc
I.1 iG1%11):
1'Ii.RM = Permit Rtquirentent 1.1if = Administrative Leiter • Target Frequency = Monitoring frequency: Q- Quarterly; M. Monthly: BM- Bimonthly: SA- Semiannually; A- Annually; OWD- Only when discharging; 1)- Discontinued monitoring requirement; 1S- Conducting independent study
Begin = First month required 7Q10 = Receiving stream low flow criterion (cfs) G=qualert), monitoring increases to monthly upon single failure Months that testing must occur - ex. )AN.APRJUL.00I' NonCornp=Current Compliance Requirement
1'P=Pemliucdflow (MGD) IWr%=Instueamwaste concentmtion PH; = Pass/Pall ehmnictest AC=Acute CUR=Chronic
Dam Notation: f • Fathend Minnow: • • ('rriolnnhnia sot.: Inv _ Mvsid shrimp: C11V - Chronic valoc: P - Monnlity of stated percentage nt highest concentrntion: at - Performed by DIEM An Tox Grimm bt - Bad test
Rc1..mnt: N.nat6.m --- = Dana rent NR _ Not reported: ( ) • Brginninr. n(Qunner Facility Activity Status: 1- Inactive. N _ Newly l surd(i'm ronanmetl; II - Active but not discharging: l-More data nvnilnblc for month in question SIG = ORC signature needed

SOC PRIORITY PROJECT: Yes No/
If Yes, SOC No.
To: Permits and Engineering Unit
Water Quality Section
Attention: Charles Alvarez
Date May 6, 1994
NPDES STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION'
County Johnston
Permit No. NC0076589
PART I - GENERAL INFORMATION
4/,
1. Facility and Address: Headquarters '''
Amerada Hess Corporation°
1 Hess Plaza
Woodbridge, NJ 07095
2. Date of Investigation: December 13, 1993
3. Report Prepared by: Ted Cashion, Environmental Chemist
4. Persons Contacted and Telephone Number: Jay Bailey : fr
Terminal Manager
919-965-2956
5. Directions to Site: Highway 70 to Selma, left on SR 1003,
left on Oak St. extension, facility on right.
6. Discharge Point(s), List for all discharge points:
Latitude: 35°33'14" Longitude:78°18'35"
ke.n e tiv�,'
Attach a USGS map extract and indicate treatment facility
site and discharge point on map.
U.S.G.S. Quad No. E25SE U.S.G.S. Quad Name Selma, NC
7. Site size and expansion area consistent with application ?
XXXX Yes No If No, explain:
8. Topography (relationship to flood plain included): Area is
flat and appears to be located out of flood plain.
9. Location of nearest dwelling: Greater than 400 feet.
10. Receiving stream or affected surface waters: UT to Mill
Creek
a. Classification: WS-IV NSW
b. River Basin and Subbasin No.: 03:04:02
c. Describe receiving stream features and pertinent
downstream uses: Small ditch that drains through
other tank farm property.

SOC PRIORITY PROJECT: Yes
If Yes, SOC No.
PART II - DESCRIPTION OF DISCHARGE AND TREATMENT WORKS
1. a. Volume of Wastewater to be permitted: NA MGD (Ul t imat e
Design Capacity)
b. What is the current permitted capacity of the Waste
Water Treatment facility? NA
c. Actual treatment capacity of the current facility
(current design capacity)? NA
d. Date(s) and construction activities allowed by previous
Authorization to Construct issued in the previous two years:
NA
e Please provide a description of existing or
s bstantially constructed wastewater treatment facilities:
oil/water separator
f. Please provide a description of proposed wastewater
treatment facilities: NA
g. Possible toxic impacts to surface waters: Possible
contaminants include BTEX compounds from spills that
may occur.
h. Pretreatment Program (POTWs only): NA
in developmentapproved
should be required not needed
2. Re iduals handling and utilization/disposal scheme: NA
a . If residuals are being land applied, please specify DEM
b.
d.
permit no.
Residual Contractor
Telephone No.
Residuals stabilization: PSRP
PFRP Other
Landfill:
Other disposal/utilization scheme (Specify):
3. Treatment plant classification (attach completed rating
sheet): NA

SOC PRIORITY PROJECT: Yes No/[K
If Yes, SOC No.
4. SIC Code(s): 5171
Wastewater Code(s) of actual wastewater, not particular
facilities i.e.., non -contact cooling water discharge from a
metal plating company would be 14, not 56.
Primary 73 Secondary _
Main Treatment Unit Code: 530-0
PART III - OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION
1. Is this facility being constructed with Construction Grant
Funds or are any public monies involved. (municipals only)? NA
2. Special monitoring or limitations (including toxicity)
requests: none
3. Important SOC, JOC or Compliance Schedule dates: (Please
indicate) NA
4. Alternative Analysis Evaluation: Has the facility evaluated
all of the non -discharge options available. Please provide
regional perspective for each option evaluated.
Spray Irrigation: NA
Connection to Regional Sewer System: NA
Subsurface: NA
Other disposal options: NA
5. Other Special Items: none
PART IV - EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The permit application has been reviewed and a site visit
conducted at this facility. The facility discharges stormwater
through an oil/water separator to UT to Mill Creek, WS-IV NSW.
We recommend that the permit be reissued in accordance with the
basinwide permitting plan, containing appropriate
monitoring/limits as specified by current Division policy.
Signature of report preparer
;2,;;75/e7Z-1-4
Water Quality Regiorial Supervisor
5/-4/7?/
Date
amerada.sr

aver
its
x — o,
\\
1
H 'n
> n �...
n
u i Ss •a Memorial'G
u•n • Cern�l
u
II°
u II al
n ur Seim. ri.=a===
n �.�` :Memorial Gar'
n
� ===o''-(Cemetery)
`u
II O ° tl
5 n •• '.
`_"
JIIit . ; ive-i i
Pao
u - i5E
b US�VKS NE) PR/NCETON 8 MI.
A. •, NE GOLDSB,P,, o� •".
745
' -170 "
i
•O•
•o\
•,.
ATAN7.40
lit. - III TT Ch ''('' k :,--_-:.
,a a / Myrtle /
t. .,--- ' / AirporS
/ ' 2305 )
h
• :•� -- -s"
•
'Bo
/ I
/: /
1`
Lookout,
` �TowerB '
o\�
./75
r3r