20110855 Ver 4_Individual_20121218

LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
SBME, Inc.
9751 Southern Pine Blvd.
Charlotte, NC 28273
704.523.4726
704.525 -3953 fax
To: NC Division of Water Quality
401 Wetlands Unit
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC- 27699 =1601
We Are Sending You: ® Attached
following items:
It •Dess vy
Date: December 17, 2012
Job No. 1357 -11 -034
Re: PNG Sutton Project
Attn: Ms. Karen Higgins
❑ Under separate cover via the
❑
Shop drawings
❑
Contract ❑ Plans
❑ Samples ❑ Spe(ifications
i F TD
❑
Copy of letter
❑
Report
12/5/12
Copies
Date
No
Description
2
12/14/12
1
Request for Additional Permit Revision
1
12/5/12
2
Check for NCDWQ for $570.00
These Are Transmitted As Checked Below: ENR �u V
• For approval ❑ For your use 1 8 2012
• As requested ❑ For Review
A
❑ For Bids Due: / / ❑ Prints Returned After Loan To Us
Remarks: Enclosed are two copies of above - mentioned request and a check.
If you have any questions, feel free to call Joey Lawler at 704 - 523 -4726
Signed:
Joey Lawler,

�► - () 1&s s 14
December 14, 2012 u
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
Attention: Mr. David Bailey
N.C. Division of Water Quality
401 Wetlands Unit
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699 -1601 ZAX�PD
Attention: Ms. Karen Higgins `.
Reference: Request for Additional Permit Revision p ���u��
PNG Sutton Project
Multiple North Carolina Counties utc 1 g LU12
S &ME Project No. 1357 -10 -022
USACE Action ID No. SAW- 2010 -01309 t) ENR - WAS Qu��
NCDWQ Project No. 20110855e,�
Dear Mr. Bailey and Ms. Higgins:
This Request for Permit Revision is being submitted on behalf of Piedmont Natural Gas
(PNG) for additional stream and wetland impacts in connection with: 1) a proposed
extension of the Sutton Pipeline Project at the existing Progress Sutton Energy Site; 2)
placement of a culvert within a jurisdictional drainage ditch (JDD37.3A) associated with
construction of a permanent access road to a permanent laydown yard at the Lumberton
Compressor Station site, and; 3) Changes to the Approved Restoration Profile of JDD
42.1 in order to accommodate the landowner.
The Sutton project originally received authorization under a Department of the Army
Section 404 Individual Permit (IP) and North Carolina Division of Water Quality
( NCDWQ) Individual Water Quality Certification (IC) in April 2012. Subsequent
revisions that entailed inclusion of additional temporary work space (TWS), changes in
construction methods at multiple wetland areas and a re- routed segment of the pipeline
were subsequently authorized by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and
NCDWQ from June 2012 through October 2012.
S &ME, INC / 9751 Southern Pine Blvd / Charlotte, NC 28273 1 p 704 523 4726 f 704 525 3953 / www smemc corn

Request for Additional Permit Revision SWE Project No. 1357 -10 -022
PNG Sutton Project December 14, 2012
SITE CONDITIONS
Locations of the work subject to this revision are depicted on the Site Vicinity Map
(Figure 1), portions of the appropriate USGS Topographic Maps and 2010 Aerial
Photographs (Figures 2 -3A and 2 -313).
A majority of this revision is to authorize an extension of the 20 -inch Sutton pipeline.
Most of the extension will be constructed within a portion of Progress Energy's Sutton
Plant property, located in New Hanover County, North Carolina (See Figures 2A and
3A). The corridor originates at the terminus of the original Sutton line (34.279693,-
77.984363), and extends south through a wooded area, to avoid a large retention pond,
then turns east, crossing a rail spur (Rail Spur 1). After crossing the rail spur, the pipeline
then turns north, crossing Sutton Steam Plant Road and another rail spur (Rail Spur 2)
before terminating at a proposed receiver station (34.286782,- 77.978122). A small
segment of the new pipeline and the proposed station, which is designed to accommodate
an in -line inspection device (ILID), will be located on an adjoining parcel (PID R03200-
002- 001 -011) owned by New Hanover County, who have given their approval for the
project as proposed. Representative photographs of conditions within the extension
corridor are included in Appendix I.
A majority of the extension route traverses portions of the Progress Energy property that
have been logged. Portions of the 421 Sand Ridge Natural Area, located west of the Rail
Spur 1, have been logged within the past year, and contain no overstory vegetation. Prior
to logging activities, the area was vegetated with longleaf pine (Pinus palustris) and
various oak species (Quercus spp.), as evidenced by downed vegetation observed during
field review. Remaining herbaceous vegetation was sparse, and included bluestem
(Andropogon capillipes), wiregrass (Aristida stricta), giant cane (Arundinaria gigantea),
pine barren goldenrod (Solidago fistulosa) and dog fennel (Eupatorium capillifolium).
Understory vegetation was more dense in areas transitioning to Wetland WJC, and
included saplings of wax myrtle (Myrica cerifera), gallberry (Ilex glabra), sweetgum
(Liquidambar styraciva), water oak (Q. nigra) and sweetbay (Magnolia virginica).
A majority of Wetland WJC had not been logged, and was vegetated with red maple
(Acer rubrum), blackgum (Nyssa sylvatica), gallberry, Chinese privet (Ligustrum
sinense), laurel - leaved catbriar (Smilax laurifolia), pond pine (Pinus serotina), redbay
(Persea borbonia), titi (Cyrilla racemiflora), wax myrtle, giant cane, fetterbush (Lyonia
lucida) and cinnamon fern (Osmunda cinnamomea).
The area located between the two rail spurs appeared to have been logged within the last
ten years, and is vegetated with a sparse assemblage of younger trees, saplings and
shrubs. Species observed in this area included longleaf and loblolly pine (P. taeda),
black cherry (Prunus serotina), turkey oak (Q. laevis), water oak, wax myrtle, wiregrass,
pine barren goldenrod, dog fennel, and greenbrier (S. rotundifolia).
The property north of the second rail spur was vegetated with young and mid -age
longleaf and loblolly pine and turkey oak. Understory vegetation was sparse, and
2

Request for Additional Permit Revision S &ME Project No. 1357 -10 -022
PNG Sutton Project December 14. 2012
consisted primarily of wiregrass. The property just west of the route through this portion
of the site consisted of open area previously mined for sand.
Jurisdictional areas within the extension route were delineated by S &ME on November 7,
2012. A request for Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination was submitted to the
USACE on November 16, 2012. The extension corridor was reviewed in the field by the
USACE on December 12, 2012.
Existing site conditions at the Lumberton Compressor Station property where the
permanent laydown yard will be constructed, and at the location of JDD 42.1, were
documented in connection with the original IP submittal, and consist of open field and
actively- cultivated farmland, respectively.
REVISED PROJECT IMAPCTS
The currently- authorized, project -wide wetland and stream impacts are identified in
Table 1 below.
Table 1: Summary of Currently Authorized Impact Totals
Jurisdictional Drainage Ditch
The proposed extension will impact one wetland located on the Progress Energy property
(WJC). Portions of the wetland (WJC) will be impacted for construction of the pipeline
(WJC. 1), and to provide a temporary stringing area (WJC.2) for pipe associated with a
horizontal directional drill (HDD) beneath an existing railroad line along the route. The
extension will affect 64,069 square feet (sf) (1.57 acre) of Wetland WJC. Of these
impacts, 14,620 sf (0.34 acre) will be converted from forested wetland to herbaceous
wetland, while the remaining 49,449 sf (1.23 acre) will be temporarily affected and
allowed to return to a forested state following construction.
Construction of the access road to the pipe storage area on the Lumberton Compressor
Station property will permanently impact and additional 63 linear feet (If) of an existing
non - stream tributary (jurisdictional drainage ditch — JDD37.3A) located in a farm field.
3
Wetland Impacts
Total Disturbance (Combined
Clearing, Fill, Ground
Disturbance and Permanent
Conversion
Total Permanent Impacts (Fill
Placement)
Permanent Conversion
(Forested Wetlands to
Emergent Wetlands)
216.03 acres
0.41 acres
68.74 acres
Tributary Impacts
Pipeline Construction Activities /Crossings
Culvert Relocation for Access Road
Stream
Non - Stream Tributary"
Stream
Non - Stream Tributary*
Temp.
Perm.
Temp.
Perm.
Temp.
Perm.
Temp.
Perm.
5,051
0
7,773
2,155
0
0
65
42
Jurisdictional Drainage Ditch
The proposed extension will impact one wetland located on the Progress Energy property
(WJC). Portions of the wetland (WJC) will be impacted for construction of the pipeline
(WJC. 1), and to provide a temporary stringing area (WJC.2) for pipe associated with a
horizontal directional drill (HDD) beneath an existing railroad line along the route. The
extension will affect 64,069 square feet (sf) (1.57 acre) of Wetland WJC. Of these
impacts, 14,620 sf (0.34 acre) will be converted from forested wetland to herbaceous
wetland, while the remaining 49,449 sf (1.23 acre) will be temporarily affected and
allowed to return to a forested state following construction.
Construction of the access road to the pipe storage area on the Lumberton Compressor
Station property will permanently impact and additional 63 linear feet (If) of an existing
non - stream tributary (jurisdictional drainage ditch — JDD37.3A) located in a farm field.
3

Request for Additional Permit Revision S &ME Project No. 1357 -10 -022
PNG Sutton Project December 14, 2012
The adjusted, project -wide wetland impacts that will occur as a result of this additional
revision are identified in Table 2.
Table 2: Summary of Proposed Impact Totals
* Jurisdictional Drainage Ditch
The revised relevant plan sheets depicting impacts that will occur as a result of the
proposed modifications are included in Appendix II, and a revised project -wide wetland
impact table is included in Appendix III.
NEED FOR PROPOSED REVISION
Sutton Extension
The operation and maintenance of PNG's pipeline system is subject to extensive state and
federal regulations and requirements. As a result of current Federal requirements, all
pipeline owners, including PNG, are required to inspect and assess the safety and
integrity of transmission pipelines on an ongoing basis through the use of specific
pipeline assessment tools. One of the required assessment tools is use of an ILID. Such
devices physically travel through the pipeline, continuously taking measurements and
recording data that allow the pipeline to be assessed in terms of its structural integrity and
to identify areas that require further inspection, assessment, and potential repair or
remediation. Use of an ILID typically requires construction of multiple new facilities
along the pipeline route for the ILID's insertion into and removal from the pipeline being
assessed. These are referred often to as "launchers" and "receivers."
Several months ago, PNG and Progress Energy began conversations stemming from
concern expressed by the construction team regarding operating activities associated with
the ILID receiver at the Sutton metering and regulating (M &R) site. During normal ILID
inspection operations, gas is released from the receiving equipment. Progress Energy
expressed concern regarding these potentially combustible gas releases in relation to the
original location of the ILID site and that of new high voltage transmission power line
and the turbines at the power plant facilities.
4
Wetland Impacts
Total Disturbance (Combined
Clearing, Fill, Ground
Disturbance and Permanent
Conversion
Total Permanent Impacts (Fill
Placement)
Permanent Conversion
(Forested Wetlands to
Emergent Wetlands)
217.61 acres
0.41 acres
69.08 acres
Tributary Impacts
Pipeline Construction Activities /Crossings
Culvert Relocation for Access Roads
Stream
Non - Stream Tributary*
Stream
Non - Stream Tributary*
Temp.
Perm.
Temp.
Perm.
Temp.
Perm.
Temp.
Perm.
5,051
0
7,773
2,155
0
0
65
105
* Jurisdictional Drainage Ditch
The revised relevant plan sheets depicting impacts that will occur as a result of the
proposed modifications are included in Appendix II, and a revised project -wide wetland
impact table is included in Appendix III.
NEED FOR PROPOSED REVISION
Sutton Extension
The operation and maintenance of PNG's pipeline system is subject to extensive state and
federal regulations and requirements. As a result of current Federal requirements, all
pipeline owners, including PNG, are required to inspect and assess the safety and
integrity of transmission pipelines on an ongoing basis through the use of specific
pipeline assessment tools. One of the required assessment tools is use of an ILID. Such
devices physically travel through the pipeline, continuously taking measurements and
recording data that allow the pipeline to be assessed in terms of its structural integrity and
to identify areas that require further inspection, assessment, and potential repair or
remediation. Use of an ILID typically requires construction of multiple new facilities
along the pipeline route for the ILID's insertion into and removal from the pipeline being
assessed. These are referred often to as "launchers" and "receivers."
Several months ago, PNG and Progress Energy began conversations stemming from
concern expressed by the construction team regarding operating activities associated with
the ILID receiver at the Sutton metering and regulating (M &R) site. During normal ILID
inspection operations, gas is released from the receiving equipment. Progress Energy
expressed concern regarding these potentially combustible gas releases in relation to the
original location of the ILID site and that of new high voltage transmission power line
and the turbines at the power plant facilities.
4

Request for Additional Permit Revision S &ME Project No. 1357 - 10-022
PNG Sutton Project December 14, 2012
As a result, PNG and Progress Energy have agreed to relocate both the proposed ILID
receiver for the new Sutton Pipeline and the existing launchers and receivers at PNG's
Wilmington interconnect site on Sutton Power Plant property to an adjacent property
northeast of the power plant. Co- locating the launchers, receivers, and associated
equipment that vent gas during these operations assures power plant operating personnel
that the gas released during normal operations is vented away from the power generating
equipment at the plant, and that PNG personnel would not have to enter the new Sutton
Power Plant secure area to access these facilities.
A small portion of the extension has been routed through the wetland area (WJC) in order
to avoid adjacent high ground that was used for construction of a large retention pond by
Progress Energy. The remainder of the route is located in high ground (See attached
Revised Impact Maps, Appendix II, and Figures 2A and 213).
Access Road
Construction of a permanent road on the Lumberton Compressor Station property is
necessary in order to provide access to a proposed pipe and equipment storage area that
will be constructed at the site. The property upon which the Compressor Station is
located is owned by PNG, and consists of approximately 122 acres. Accordingly, PNG
determined that a large high ground portion of the site that previously consisted of
agricultural field would serve as a good location for the establishment of a pipe storage
and laydown area. The central location of the property also makes it accessible to many
of PNG's operating areas within the region.
The proposed storage area is segregated from the remainder of the site by a jurisdictional
drainage ditch (JDD 37.3A). Although a separate access road was constructed to the
compressor station site in connection with the original permit application, the road does
not cross the subject ditch to the proposed pipe yard. Several areas were evaluated for
the location of the storage yard; however, these areas were either not large enough to
accommodate planned storage capacity, would increase impacts to wetlands, or will
require extensive clearing and grading to make site conditions suitable for development.
Accordingly, a spur road will be constructed from the existing access road and cross
JDD37.3A. A 30 -inch corrugated metal pipe (CMP) will be installed within the ditch.
The pipe will be 51 feet long in order to accommodate the width of the road and
associated fill slope. A 12 -foot long riprap apron will be placed at the downstream end of
the pipe. The total length of impact to JDD37.3A will be 63 if (See attached Revised
Impact Map, Appendix II, and Figures 3A and 313).
Changes to the Approved Restoration Profile of JDD 42.1
Several agencies have conducted periodic inspections of the project during construction
to review conditions for permit compliance. During such an inspection on August 22,
2012, it was noted that conditions at a jurisdictional drainage ditch (JDD 42.1) on the
Storms Farm Property in Bladen County, North Carolina (See Figure 1, Inset) did not
appear to match the Ditch Remediation Cross Sections submitted with the original permit
application. Specifically, the banks did not appear to meet the 2:1 slope criteria depicted
on the cross section detail, and lacked adequate stabilization. As a result of this meeting,
5

Request for Additional Permit Revision S &ME Project No. 1357 -10 -022
PNG Sutton Project December 14, 2012
the USACE requested that the banks be hydro- seeded for stabilization. The hydro -
seeding occurred in September 2012, and the relocated ditch segment continues to be
monitored during weekly stormwater inspections. At the time the banks were hydro -
seeded, the contractor, Troy Construction, was able to restore the ditch banks to a more
gradual slope, although not 2:1.
The relocated ditch segment was not constructed entirely in accordance with the
restoration plan due to a request PNG received from the landowner. The landowner
expressed concern that the ditch, if restored in accordance with the approved plan, would
impact drainage of the surrounding farm fields through drain tiles that he had previously
installed. The landowner specifically indicated that the banks should be installed such
that bank elevation is higher than the agricultural fields, thereby maintaining positive
drainage. A letter from the landowner expressing his concerns was received by PNG and
forwarded to the USACE on September 5, 2012 (Appendix IV). In response to the
landowner request, PNG authorized the contractor to perform additional work on the
ditch to accommodate the landowner's concerns. Following construction of the banks,
additional stabilization measures were implemented. These measures included
application of coir matting packed with native soil material for additional reinforcement,
seeding with the restoration mix, and the application of curlex matting on top to seal the
bank. Photos of the ditch are also included in Appendix IV. The modified measures
should provide sufficient stabilization for the relocated segment of ditch and
accommodate the landowner's concerns.
AVOIDANCE AND MINIMIZATION
The project avoids and minimizes wetland impacts to the extent practicable. PNG's first
option was to route the extension entirely through high ground. However, this is not
possible as Progress Energy had developed adjacent high ground east of the route's
origin, requiring the new line to extend south through Wetland W JC before turning
northeast and back to high ground. Use of trenchless crossing methods for installation of
the pipe in this location is not practicable given the bend in the route that is necessary to
avoid impacts to an existing sediment basin and align the route back to high ground.
Impacts to WJC. 1 and WJC.2 will be minimized during construction through the use of
equipment mats in the wetland areas, and trench plugs will be employed to prevent
alterations to wetland hydrology, as appropriate. Additionally, construction equipment
operating within the wetland will be limited to that equipment necessary for clearing,
excavation, pipe installation and restoration activities. Wetland vegetation will be cut at
ground level, leaving existing root systems in place, where possible, to promote re-
growth. To the extent practicable, wetland topsoil will be segregated from the underlying
subsoil in areas disturbed by trenching, except in areas with standing water or saturated
soils, or where no topsoil is evident. Within wetlands, yearly vegetation maintenance
will only be conducted within a 30 -foot corridor centered on the new pipe. Remaining
portions of the proposed temporary workspace wetlands will be seeded with a wetland
seed mix and allowed to re- vegetate naturally.
2

Request for Additional Permit Revision SWE Project No. 1357 -10 -022
PNG Sutton Project December 14, 2012
PNG will limit the width of the permanent ROW through WJC.1 to 30 feet. This is the
minimum width required to support PNG's operational requirements, such as leakage
surveys, accurate identification of possible repairs and maintenance and minimization of
potential canopy encroachment. The combined width of the TWS and the permanent
ROW will not exceed 70 feet through the wetland. Portions of WJC.2 temporarily
impacted by the HDD stringing area will be seeded with the wetland mix and will be
allowed to re- vegetate naturally.
Following construction, the affected wetland crossings will be restored to original grade
and contour. The proposed project will not result in permanent changes in pre -
construction elevation contours. Excess material will be removed to a high ground
disposal area. Cleared areas will be restored in accordance with the project's approved
Restoration Plan following completion of the work.
ADDITIONAL REGULATORY CONSIDERATIONS
Coastal Area Management Act
Although the proposed extension route is located in New Hanover County, impacts that
will occur as a result of this revision will not affect additional Coastal Area Management
Act (CAMA) Areas of Environmental Concern (AECs). Similarly, the permanent access
crossing and JDD42.1 are not located in AECs, and as such, further revision of the
project's CAMA Major Permit (No. 23 -12) from the North Carolina Division of Coastal
Management (NCDCM) should not be required.
Protected Species
To comply with applicable sections of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973 (16
USC 1531- 1543), S &ME conducted a pedestrian assessment of the proposed extension
for potential federally protected terrestrial plant and animal species habitat. Endangered
species are defined as those plants and animals whose prospects of survival are in
immediate danger. Threatened species are those species that may become endangered if
conditions related to their existence continue to deteriorate (e.g., loss of suitable habitat).
The assessment was conducted on November 7, 2012. The assessment was conducted
within a 300 -foot wide survey corridor centered on the proposed centerline of the route.
The purpose of this assessment was to determine whether current site conditions within
the Extension corridor are suitable for those federally protected terrestrial species whose
presence may be currently or historically documented in the counties referenced above,
and if those species known to occur in the vicinity of the Extension corridor were present
at the time of field review.
S &ME's review of potential protected species habitat and vegetative communities in the
Extension corridor consisted of a literature review of existing records obtained from
federal and state sources, and also included field review of the Extension corridor to
identify potential habitat for the federally protected terrestrial species identified during
review of existing records. Topography, drainage features, soil types, level of
disturbance, and plant community types were considered during the literature and field
7

Request for Additional Permit Revision S &ME Project No. 1357 -10 -022
PNG Sutton Project December 14. 2012
reviews. A summary of existing conditions within the Extension corridor was provided
in the Site Conditions section of this letter report.
In support of our efforts, S &ME reviewed the USFWS list of federally protected species
with documented populations in New Hanover County, within which the proposed
Extension is located. In addition, S &ME also consulted the North Carolina Natural
Heritage Program ( NCNHP) Geographic Information Systems (GIS) database Virtual
Workroom and Element Occurrence (EO) Database, and reviewed the appropriate USGS
topographic maps and aerial photographs of the Extension corridor. The purpose of
reviewing this supporting information was to aid in identification of existing conditions,
areas of vegetative disturbance and coverage in the Extension corridor. During field
reconnaissance, S &ME personnel integrated information obtained from this supporting
documentation with field evaluation for the presence of protected species habitat.
The NCNHP database and USFWS list of protected species identified three federally
protected species with documented populations within a two -mile radius of the route, as
identified in Table 3 below. An explanation of the federal ranking is included at the end
of the table.
Table 3: Federally Protected Species Summary
Scientific Name
Common Name
Federal
Status
County Status
Documented
within 2 Miles of
Site?
Acipenser brevirostrum
Shortnose Sturgeon
E
Current
Yes
Alligator mississippiensis
American Alligator
T(S /A)
Current
Yes
Amaranthus pumilus
Seabeach Amaranth
T
Current
No
Caretta caretta
Loggerhead Sea Turtle
T
Current
No
Charadrius melodus
Piping Plover
T
Current
No
Chelonia mydas
Green Sea Turtle
T
Current
No
Dermochelys coriacea
Leatherback Sea
Turtle
E
Current
No
Lysimachia asperulifolia
Rough -leaf Loosestrife
E
Current
No
Mycteria americana
Wood Stork
E
Current
No
Picoides borealis
Red - cockaded
Woodpecker
E
Current
No
Thalictrum cooleyi
Cooley's Meadowrue
E
Current
No
Trichechus manatus
West Indian Manatee
E
Current
Yes
E = Endangered, T = Threatened; T(S /A) = Threatened due to Similarity of Appearance
Information obtained from USFWS or NCNHP Species Descriptions regarding the
protected species with documented occurrences within two miles of the subject site, is
provided below. Note that of the animal species, two are considered exclusively aquatic.
Sampling for the aquatic species was not conducted, as impacts to streams that could
potentially provide habitat for these species are not proposed. It should be further noted
11

Request for Additional Permit Revision SWE Project No. 1357 -10 -022
PNG Sutton Project December 14. 2012
that red - cockaded woodpecker was included in the assessment due to reports of historic
occurrences in the broader vicinity.
Red - cockaded Woodpecker
Status: Federally Listed Endangered
Biological Determination: May Affect, Not Likely to Adversely Affect
Red - cockaded woodpecker measure approximately seven inches long and has black and
have white horizontal stripes on its back. The cheeks and under -parts are white and the
sides are streaked in black. The cap and stripe on the throat and neck of the bird are
black. Male individuals of the species have a small red spot on each side of the black cap
and display a red crown patch after the first post - fledgling molt. The woodpecker's diet
consists primarily of insects.
Red - cockaded woodpecker's range is closely linked to the distribution of mature stands
of southern pines. Longleaf and loblolly pines that are 60 years old or greater are most
commonly selected for nesting and roosting trees. The woodpecker excavates nest and
roost cavities in trees that are stressed, and often are infected with red -heart rot fungus.
Preferred nesting sites generally include relatively open, park -like, mature pine stands
with a suppressed mid -story layer. Suppression of the mid -story by fire or mechanical
means in mature pine stands promotes colonization by the red - cockaded woodpecker.
Foraging habitat is frequently limited to pine or pine- hardwood stands that are 30 years
old or greater with a preference for pine trees with a diameter of 10 inches or larger.
Dense hardwood mid -story hampers foraging by red - cockaded woodpecker and increases
the occurrence of cavity competitors. The USFWS indicates that the maximum foraging
radius from a colony site of the red - cockaded woodpecker is typically one -half mile or
less.
S &ME performed a pedestrian survey of forested portions of the project corridor on
November 7, 2012. No suitable nesting habitat was observed. The survey identified
potentially - suitable foraging habitat between Sutton Steam Plant Road and the terminus
of the project. Trees in this area appeared to be less than 30 years old, and no discernible
nesting cavities or pitch marks were observed. Furthermore, recent logging within the
project area has eliminated over -story trees and altered vegetative cover to an extent
which may be unsuitable for this species and, as such, no impacts to red - cockaded
woodpecker or its habitat are anticipated as a result of this project.
It should also be noted that at the request of Progress, ecologists with Golder Associates
NC, Inc. performed a systematic pedestrian survey of adjacent portions of the Progress
Energy property for the red - cockaded woodpecker in 2010. Golder's site reconnaissance
was performed to identify potential nesting and foraging habitat. During the survey,
Golder did not observe nesting cavities or prime foraging habitat on the property or in the
immediate vicinity.
Based on the nature and limited extent of potential foraging habitat within and adjacent to
the propped extension corridor, it is unlikely that the proposed project will affect red
cockaded woodpecker.

Request for Additional Permit Revision SWE Project No. 1357 -10 -022
PNG Sutton Project December 14, 2012
Reference: 2010. Golder Associates NC Inc. Environmental Assessment for Sutton
Steam Electric Plant. (pp 1 -5, Appendices 1 -4).
Shortnose Sturgeon
Status: Federally Listed Endangered
Biological Determination: No Effect
The shortnose sturgeon is a large fish that is generally around three feet in length at
maturity with five rows of spines extending its length from head to tail. Coloring is dark
on the back and spines, and lighter on the belly. The shortnose sturgeon has a short,
pointed snout and a downward - facing mouth.
Shortnose sturgeon are generally found in the ocean and brackish waters along the
Atlantic Coast and upstream into the lower ends of larger rivers where water moves
slowly, sometimes moving into faster moving freshwaters upstream to spawn. This
species is currently known from the Cape Fear and Pee Dee River Basins in North
Carolina. Construction of dams and pollution are the main threats, along with dredging
or disposal of dredge material into habitat. The Extension corridor does not contain
aquatic habitats suitable for shortnose sturgeon inhabitance. Accordingly, adverse effects
to shortnose sturgeon or its habitat are not anticipated.
Reference: NOAA Fisheries Office of Protected Resources. Shortnose Sturgeon
(Acipenser brevirostrum)" (On- line). Accessed at
http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/si2ecies/fish/shortnosesturgeon.htm
American Alligator
Status: Federally Listed Threatened (due to similarity of appearance)
Biological Determination: May Affect, Not Likely to Adversely Affect
The American alligator is listed as Threatened by the federal government because of its
similarity in appearance to the American crocodile (Crocodylus acutus), which is
currently limited to between 500 and 1,200 individuals in the United States, limited in
range to the southern tip of Florida. American crocodiles are more common elsewhere in
Mexico and South America.
Because the American alligator resembles the American crocodile, it is legally protected
in the United States. American alligators vary in length from up to 9 to 15 feet. The
body of the alligator is armored and is generally greenish -brown in color. Alligators have
a muscular tail and a long snout with nostrils on top for breathing while otherwise
submerged. Juvenile alligators have yellow- striped tails.
Alligators breed in shallow waters, generally at night during the month of May, with egg -
laying occurring in June and July. Eggs are laid near the shore in nests of vegetation and
generally hatch in late August. Young are susceptible to predation by birds, raccoons,
bobcats, otters, snakes, large bass, and larger alligators. Habitat includes ponds, swamps,
rivers, freshwater and brackish marshes, and canals. Habitat for American alligator was
not observed within the Extension corridor, although plant personnel have indicated that
alligators have been sited on the property in the past. Based on the distance of the project
10

Request for Additional Permit Revision S &ME Project No. 1357 -10 -022
PNG Sutton Project December 14, 2012
corridor from open water and the lack of suitable habitat therein, it is unlikely that
American alligator will be affected.
Reference: Pajerski, L., B. Schechter and R. Street. 2000. Alligator mississippiensis (On-
line), Animal Diversity Web. Accessed April 14, 2008 at
httl2:Hanimaldiversity .ummz.umich.edu /site /accounts /information/Alligator mississippie
nsis.html
West Indian Manatee
Status: Federally Listed Endangered
Biological Determination: No Effect
The West Indian manatee is a large marine mammal reaching approximately 10 feet in
length. The front limbs are flipper -like, there are no rear limbs, and the tail is rounded,
flat, and paddle -like. Manatees are gray or brown in color with a rounded head and
whiskers around the mouth.
Manatees are marine mammals found in marine, estuarine, and freshwater environments.
Manatees are generally seen in North Carolina passing through only during the summer
months for feeding. They are most common on the Florida Gulf Coast, where year -round
warm water temperatures provide more suitable habitat. The Cape Fear River is the
portion of the project area closest to the Intracoastal Waterway and Atlantic Ocean. The
extension will not affect the Cape Fear River. Consequently, no affects to the West
Indian manatee are anticipated to result from the proposed project.
In summary, the Extension corridor was reviewed for the presence of protected species
with known current or historic populations within New Hanover County. In addition to
the species identified above, S &ME did not observe suitable habitat conditions within the
Extension corridor for any of the remaining plant or animal species identified for New
Hanover County. As such, the proposed project is unlikely to affect populations of
federally - protected flora or fauna, or their critical habitat.
Assessment of the Lumberton Compressor site, where the permanent pipe yard will be
located, and the Storms Farm property, where JDD42.1 is located, was conducted
previously in connection with the original permit application.
Historic and Archaeological Resources
S &ME completed cultural resource investigations of the proposed pipeline extension
corridor. The work was conducted on November 7, 2012, and entailed completion of a
comprehensive archaeological survey within a 200 -foot wide corridor centered on the
alignment. Results of the investigation were detailed in a November 9, 2012 report,
which subsequently received approval from the N.C. Historic Preservation Office
(SHPO) on December 3, 2012 (Appendix V). S &ME concluded that no historic
properties will be affected by the proposed undertaking, and that no further cultural
resource investigations should be necessary. Assessment of the Lumberton Compressor
site, where the permanent pipe yard will be located, and the Stone Farm property, where
11

Request for Additional Permit Revision S &ME Project No. 1357 -10 -022
PNG Sutton Project December 14, 2012
JDD42.1 is located, was conducted previously in connection with the original permit
application.
Mitigation
The additional impacts that will occur as a result of this revision will result in 0.34 acre of
permanent wetland conversion. To offset this unavoidable loss, PNG plans to purchase
0.5 acre of riparian wetland credit in Lower Cape Fear River Basin (03030005) from the
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program ( NCEEP). An acceptance letter from
the NCEEP is attached as Appendix VI.
Temporarily- affected areas will be restored in accordance with the project's approved
Restoration Plan. Wetland areas will be restored to their original grade and contour,
seeded with a native wetland seed mix, and allowed to naturally re- vegetate.
Project wide permanent impacts to non - stream tributaries do not exceed 150 If. As such,
mitigation for those impacts should not be required.
Sediment and Erosion Control
The current Erosion and Sediment Control Plans for the project will be modified as
appropriate to account for the proposed revisions and changes in the amount of disturbed
area, and approved by the NCDENR Land Quality Section prior to work within the
affected areas. Grading activities will not commence within jurisdictional portions of the
proposed extension until such time as approval of this permit revision request is received
from the USACE and NCDWQ.
CLOSING
We hope that this Request for an Additional Permit Revision provides the information
you need to appropriately revise the subject permit authorizations. Again, please note that
aside from 63 if of fill material with an existing JDD, the proposed revision will not
involve additional loss of Waters of the U.S. If you have questions, please feel free to
contact us at 704.523.4726.
Sincerely,
S &ME, Inc.
Joey wler, PWS Cryst Fox
Senior Project Manager Natural Resources Staff Professional
Senior Review by Julie Bennett- Hudel, PG, LEED AP
• Figures
• Appendix I: Site Photographs
• Appendix II: Relevant Revised Plan Sheets
• Appendix III: Revised Stream and Wetland Impact Tables
12

Request for Additional Permit Revision SWE Project No. 1357 -10 -022
PNG Sutton Project December 14, 2012
Appendix IV: Information Related to Change in Restoration of JJD 42.1
Appendix V: Cultural Resources Investigation Information
Appendix VI: EEP Acceptance Letter
CC. Adam Long, PNG
Robb Mairs, NCDCM
Chad Coburn, NCDWQ
13

FIGURES

•
O
00P- AL
.�i r ,a ti
:
1 ;
• N
,
v�
• Vr
W" 1
}
,
��..
yy a
16% afia;d-ig
r y
r.
^
:
4
• sr d ' : .t _._ l/ X T a c O 4 h t` ""�+ ..w i' * ❑ o U
I y fiyi�
t
�� � -. , - r. . "�`.- ,#'mss °r�,,,"i"Y ,� "��` � � °•"'+;� � f
e
s z
N
•
yy
Rail S ur,2 .
t ,
_
yd •
,
t 1 •1
_
1 J:
-! w w , A
-. _• ;, ; .: . ^• � �,* _° is _ Q O
d
• -a
r
• 4
• i
rr - T
,
-6
„ .fir .. -•i ,. .,. `.. � .. `,.,• ,, �„ �i� �. �• � '�. h +�� 9, ._yr.. V
tL
03 . w
. .
j J ,., .,.. 'x ,.. 4•' ,.• -ter_. _.. .,_. i ir -
-
Y.
�-
z
_ .., _ • .
WJC^ ;,, x O
Z
Rail Spur 1 O
WJC.1 -_• t' g „_ , vim) -
' a z
E,d
_
. ) w
EL
u
Y
-s
•
-..' Vv .,;, *• *�4 {rx�..*h� aY-. WJC.1 _ .j O O
r
,
� /•!�� �� J. �„{a�. 7 �,,,�ry7, fir` .
' tt":,� "l•'*` ,C•. t-f' '\�jh - �� �it r 4y�� �.. m _ r4 Y/ � �
Z
J A V
zl
♦ A > e f
•
,
0 Wetlands
500 'I',000 1,500 FOR ADDITIONAL MAPPING OF JURISDICTIONAL FEATURES PLEASE SEE: —Sutton Extension
Feet MCKIM AND CREED, JURISDICTIONAL WATERS OF THE US IMPACT PLANS Sutton Alignment
501, 501A, AND 501 B.
Proposed Permanent Easement, Sutton Extension FIGURE No.
REFERENCE: 77p. Temporary Workspace
THE WETLANDS LAYER IS DERIVED FROM SURVEY DATA PROVIDED BY MCKIM AND CREEDAND DEINEATED BY S &ME PERSONNEL BETWEEN JULY 2010 AND NOVEMBER 2012. THE SUTTON ALIGNMENT,
SUTTON EXTENSION, PROPOSED PERMANENT EASEMENTAND TEMPORARY WORKSPACE LAYERS WERE PROVIDED BY URS. THE RAIL SPUR LAYER IS DERIVED FROM DATA PROVIDED BY ENCOMPASS., HT Rail Spur 1 zA
THE ABOVE BACKGROUND GIS DATA WAS OBTAINED FROM THE NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETYTOPO! (2010) AND NCDOT GIS DATA LAYERS. PLEASE NOTE THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES d�.
ONLY. IT IS NOT MEANT FOR DESIGN, LEGAL, OR ANY OTHER USES. THERE ARE NO GUARANTEES ABOUT ITS ACCURACY. S &ME, INC. ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FORANY DECISION MADE OR ANY �" ' u±s,.±.• +' Rail Spur 2
ACTIONS TAKEN BY THE USER BASED UPON THIS INFORMATION.
.. , , .. .. "._ • �: - �' ` .• «ait")' .; rt

Singletary Church Road
JDD 37.3A
44�
e
Robeson Compressor
loft*
Proposed Pipe Yard
Footprint of Impact, JDD 37.3A
Robeson Compressor
Existing Compressor Access Road
Sutton Alignment
Construction Temporary Workspace
N�
A
REFERENCE:
THE SUTTON ALIGNMENT, AND TEMPORARY WORKSPACE LAYERS WERE PROVIDED BY URS. THE PROPOSED
PIPEYARD, ROBESON COMPRESSOR, AND THE EXISTING COMPRESSOR ACCESS ROAD LAYERS WERE
DERIVED FROM DATA PROVIDED BY MCKIM &CREED. THE ABOVE BACKGROUND GIS DATA WAS OBTAINED 0 100 200 300
FROM THENATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC TOPOI DATASET (2010) PLEASE NOTE THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL
PURPOSES ONLY. IT IS NOT MEANT FOR DESIGN, LEGAL, OR ANY OTHER USES. THERE ARE NO GUARANTEES Feet
ABOUT ITS ACCURACY S &ME, INC. ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY DECISION MADE OR ANY
ACTIONS TAKEN BY THE USER BASED UPON THIS INFORMATION. Q1ONailOnaiGe,OgraphMC'SOC Ity
SCALE: AS SHOWN USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP FIGURE
DATE: 12.13.12 S&ME
PNG SUTTON PROJECT,
DRAWN BY CJF - - ROBESON COMPRESSOR SITE
CHECKED BY: ��
WWW.SMEINC.COM Robeson Count North Carolina
JOI- PROJECT NO:
� 1357 -10 -022

APPENDIX 1
Site Photographs

Photo 1: View of origin of extension project near existing
Progress Energy plant.
Photo 3: Typical view of route through 421 Sand Ridge
Natural Area, which has been recently logged.
Photo 5: Typical view of route north of the second rail spur.
Photo 2: Typical view of Wetland WJC through which the
extension will pass.
Photo 4: Typical view of portion of the route located between
the two rail spurs.
station is proposed.
Taken by: JoL
Checked by: JBH
Date Taken: 11.07.2012 ME
SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
PNG Sutton Project Revision
New Hanover County
North Carolina

APPENDIX 11
Relevant Revised Plan Sheets

\ \ J
J V i V
1 WES 07+
J
WESWESi /�Y
08 V i
WES �\
y�
\ ` ES.1 O J i i J i J J+ J J
9 J V J
y� V\ V Y i J J V i i J
\\ ACS 11 4�,{'\ i i V V i i V
/ •'• •��V.' �' .p• \ \N,]A� T i i i i i+ 'Y i i i V' W 'Y i°
\ \ WES 1� •',N: .',w b'1 i� i i i i i + i i
\ HIES 13 i �•.u.:•:.: tj��«:... <.;� :a.` i J J
WETLAND FLAG TABLE
FLAG
LENGTH
BEARING
NORTHING
EASTING
WES 01
19.92'
S20'12'12 "W
N 193713.76
E 2306951.49
WES 02
20.68'
S07146'25 "W
N 193695.07
E 2306944.61
WES 03
32.57'
S15'05'10 "E
N 193674.58
E 2306941.81
WES 04
29.35'
S24'05'1 3"E
N 193643.13
E 2306950.29
WES 05
19.08'
S71 *47'09 "E
N 193616.34
E 2306962.27
WES 06
-
-
N 193610.38
E 2306980.39
WES 07
16.03'
S441 2'05 "W
N 194124.14
E 2306883.10
WES 08
14.63'
N50'38'1 7 "W
N 194112.65
E 2306871.92
WES 09
36.61'
S01 *45'23"W
N 194121.93
E 2306860.61
WES 10
9.53'
552'53'38 "W
N 194085.34
E 2306859.49
WES 11
25.75'
S82'1 2'50"W
N 194079.59
E 2306851.89
WES 12
26.40'
S72'30'39 "W
N 194076.10
E 2306826.38
WES 13
28.21'
N88'1 3 "57 "W
N 194068.17
E 2306801.20
WES 14
-
-
N 194069.04
E 2306773.00
J
ti
2 N ��
<-','GAS LINE SITE
<
DAMS
po ROYSTER RD , CAPE FEgR
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
♦ y a.7%v
`Y•� V V V` v \` :''''V,'6. :w'M•,•: ;4.�1N�
V i W. w V. M h, \• �. :'• •' F• ' 4•'.': •,6. ;i Vl i i i J i J i i V
h �'•':' /(•f�j •�
� V Y V M. h11� V,'. :.',fn ; \'� `•� V V i V i J J W W.06
WES 14 W V V �4 ` V V w V� { .''•'a a'.'::0� V+ i V i i J i J i V W
C i
J J Y J �y w o w i�'• «•:'•.'' a.•,.•, //' ,�W.02 ,�.W01
V i J i \ ♦ �'�'{:•h''V' ••'h'`.',O k J i i V i i i J {'
W.OS
i + J Y Y J w `:.w Vl`:M. •..{. :;, w.., •'.V ` V� J V i J + i V i V W.07 _'fW.{/7- - i i i+ J i i` V i i `•
i i J i
yr
V i i Y V i J µ w h y V`1'1+..,.: (,4!g:.,,•.,h`. •,` V� V i J J V i V Y i V J V J� �W ,••Y `Y •� .i w 'Y ,/ •W.03
N�' ' ••, V• \vN J V J W V V V V W V V V V �' •y V w• V' W •Y /Y V i V V i V i V i V J
V J V Y V Y + i i � y V V ,b. :,4 ',•:a ,•.,V •,\ V\ Y J J V V V J Y J i V V i w w W V' V V i/ i J i Y Y i V i J V i V
V i J V i V i V + J h V" w'V• A 4', •,w, V• \ \, Y J i J J i Y i // / '
�..'•.,•. �� {' ♦ V i W V V'Z y .'♦W /w
V V J V V V J J V J V �• 'V ♦ ♦. �'b,'V.,y,'�h'•'•V.'. \: \`J i J J J i V i V ♦ W.OB V V V J �'�%r �' ',�v v r, VJ/ Y V i W J Y J Y Y J V V
V i J V W V J W i V Y V y V v �+ V` w,• ,V��j(��'N' ?, {>\� J V V J V i J J W ♦ i W V J/ W��Y ' -� W w, w �'Y i i i V L i Y i V i V i`
�(•. h V V `•M '•. V',•• ••''. V.,�V� J i i Y J i J J J .. i V /.Y1 ; w, - W, W /.' w v', W J w W i J i i J w J J Y J
V i J i + Y J V i V i .,- V i w( V V" V V 1•`, •.',6 \`V1. l� i J V i i i V i .v � �I' J (/ w •w, w W I i Y i i i i i J Y i V i V
� i ♦ i J J i i Y i Y v i J W( h V h V \•1w', .�'h:`: •,6 •, \V�t� i i i i i i i Y i r
.O (V J Y ., J V Y Y V i J J Y Y J r J W i J V i V V J J Y i `vi . (J • � ,w • w v ♦ V Vw • V• w h \V' V " � •E•..•' '', 'a••:'. • ''�' h � ' g ' . a.. ;',e•n•:4. •:� \ T V �• Vi ' i •a i -i Y J i .i y V i .i v J V vi , i J .r v V i .V v i J V V i V W V i Y Y W.09
W1/ 0
sc V i i i i L r V V J . V+WV . 1_• 1 V� w •w 'Y W Y' •. w�Y • wY � w /• i i /
i V i Y i 1i • + Y i Y -i V V V i i Y
V i i i i -Y + V
V
TEMPORARY WORK SPACE p� i
/O Ci w w•/ J i J J i i i i i J Y` i J i` i J i
} Y V i i i i J i V J i� V V� 'w' h •'•'w- ••" V� V+ i .Y i .v v W i V v
c O m -ti - - :G A �� : . - - --- • - Y ` V V i y 1 v V Yi J i J J i Y i J Y J Y J i r v W V J Y Y i V V y W V i J i {i , i i J V J Y i Y J V i (J `• l V J V J w J � Y V 'Y h 'i h h J V V h ` �h y`( \ ,,b h ,V •. :±V\ il . y'1 V V�aii . j'•:' w a a•. • . "'•, , h ;: '.h V ,' . : :V V\�� •� : wV�:•.1 ' '•, ,,l VM'•.' '•, .
•y1 . \ . 1A
` 1 h� i • i i V :+ V ` i `1 i J V i i v J i J V J .W y i ` i V i i V i i J i V i i i V V ♦ i V i J i i J W W i J i 'y Q Q �p o
. (:j
!�
TEMPORARY IMPACT LIMIT �O
w � {• �J i J i W V Y i V Y V + V Y i y V r Y Y i i i i V J V i i ii V i i V ii i i i
��/PERMANENT CONVERSION UMIT/EASEMENT . . V i Y Y V i i i Y V i Y i i i i i Y Y i i V Y V i V i + i i i J i i i J i •V J Y i y
. V i
V
Q Q_�V
WES 01 W.12Y
GAS PROPOSED GAS LINE p
ig t
WES 02 p PERMANENT CONVERSION LIMIT
` i
Q
- -- V i i i i r W i i V i i i Y i W `a ` v w• v� ' wY�p 4� + J i i Y L i J V J p �W 13 -
-- . J i J W + i + i W i ` i
- - -- TEMPORARY IMPACT LIMIT
•L S 03 i i i i i i i i i i i i
EASEMENT i 2
W i i 'w« i ♦ w �'` y �� «`; \ ' •6 . v. ,,6•t ; �w:�' ::'•.'.1: �«� : , � i J vi* J*+iT iYJW.�i: ` .�V// `Q�' :o�• /
` i i i i J i Y i i i J
J J i i i i J i J i i
i i i J J V Y i J J
J
TEMPORARY WORK SPACE WETLAND WJC.1 4 p.. -J i-J� WES 0 {
0 +
+ J J � J �J , h ` V Y w h` w V i •' •� b �.4' .' ,` • •�' V ' ,'"• :,''h'•'' •, ' , �'.�.; .�•: + •�«.' f , .�•.�h. '. , t�•'•'.,V:, %�;. ''., y••; , : �'•" ^. � •w •,V�,h•'•,~y`;.•. ',,rM •.:,.:"',.w • . ''O
.••,•µ •',i' t ' .:%: .t ' :'' M :, :' .'J ' V v
iWES oi i s . NOT TO SCALE 30 f PERMANENT CONVERSION AREA .
14,620 sq. ft. WES 05. J
V V i
J
V L1 EGV Ei N D
0.34 acres i
TEMPORARY CHANNEL IMPACT
• J i i Y � V 4 ♦ V �'- rw,'Vy w •••' ''.:•{+'•'• '•'♦'.'••. h'• :• V• :. :M''•': in'�. •V ♦. V i J -y i i
/� 111YI��1.1e� �. ••.-- .tr.'r•.4. 5... µ .`.'p ter. T. �•.Sr.
• .���Y., IT �+' h...
70' TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA + J J + i h w w` w `, ` h V. ` M,•.'V.,•. « N :` , V V. w i Y J J J J TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA
NOT FOR RE C + J i J
CONVEYANCES, OR SALES 40,903 sq. ft. ` J+ i` i J J Y i J J V ` h w " w v «' V h V« w w V« w v w w„ w.v : w w 1/J W i J i V i J J
NOTES: 0.94 acres + J J Y PERMANENT CONVERSION AREA
Y i �( , .w Y w w. .y • w: ♦.:...: «; :. h h' 7 1 i i i
Y -�yr- ..� - - ♦. �:�'- : �:.+ -'�y� t:- J i W J J i J i WETLAND AREA
- ALL DISTANCES SHOWN ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND DISTANCES AND ARE IN FEET UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. J+ i +Jii + i J Y J V J i J i J
J
- THIS MAP DOES NOT CONFORM TO GS 47 -30, AS AMENDED. NOT INTENDED FOR RECORDATION.
S1.001 STREAM DELINEATION FLAG
- WETLANDS SURVEYED BY TRIMBLE "PATHFINDER" METHODS. i 1 CPS1.001 COMPUTED POINT
V i J i J V J V i J
- THE SOLE PURPOSE OF THIS PLAT IS TO SHOW JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES AS DELINEATED BY S &ME, INC. W1.001 WETLAND DELINEATION FLAG
J J i J i
- BASIS OF BEARING IS NORTH CAROLINA STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM (NAD 83 /NSRS2007). J J i J J J J J i J i J i i` J i+ J J J J J+ J J J+ J J J+ J J J+ Y i i i J+ WETLAND/STREAM BOUNDARY
EXISTING WOODS LINE
JOB NUMBER: 03139 -0110 JUFNSMTMAL WATEW OF THE U.& GAS PROPOSED GAS LINE
4gW$p */li �M&� DWG. NUMBER: WJC.1 WACT PLAN GRAPHIC SCALE -GAS _�5- EXISTING GAS LINE
li�r ii SHEET NUMBER: 501A OF 501 OF 0 25 50 100 PROPOSED EASEMENT
8020 TOWER POINT DRIVE PROJ. SURVEYOR: JLS - EXISTING EASEMENT
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA 28227 P E MOW NAT�L QA$ LUVE, SUTTON - IMPACT LIMIT
TALE (704) 841 -2678 DRAWN LE: DGS , BCCT�. AM. ROBE ( IN FEET) - - - - - - - PROPERTY LINE
FAX: [phone] COMPUTER FILE: WJC.t.dwg �.��y��~� -"���' 1 inch 60 it
F -1222 DATE: 11/27/12 CM AND B� K coo n!M � C TEMPORARY WORK SPACE

WETLAND FLAG TABLE
FLAG
LENGTH
BEARING
NORTHING
EASTING
WES 15
41.94'
S44'43'1 0 "W
N 193457.04
E 2307284.67
WES 16
37.88'
S09'23'24 "W
N 193427.24
E 2307255.16
WES 17
45.39'
S0845'21 "W
N 193389.87
E 2307248.98
WES 18
35.12'
S17'17'17 "E
N 193345.01
E 2307242.07
WES 19
26.79'
S36'1 1.06 "E
N 193311.48
E 2307252.51
WES 20
62.26'
S48'30'40 "E
N 193289.85
E 2307268.33
WES 21
WES 22
37.81'
60.5
S09'00'1 WE
N 193248 61
E 2307314 97
WES 23
60.5
— TEMPORARY WORK SPACE
Z
m • ' �Q •
s TEMPORARY WORK SPACE
NOT TO SCALE
PF93JMNARY PLAT
NOT FOR RECORDATION.
CONVEYANCES, OR SALIES
GAS LINE
1 ��o
DAMS WAYO`
�a ROYSTER RD
SITE
x
WES 17
y t y t t r r x x t k r y t t t r t x 50 ' TEMPORARY WORKSPACE
Y Y x t t t t t _
t r t 4 r r t t t x Y LL r' y t t x r r t t r t r r t r x Y r r y x r t r x t r x r x k' k —�. IC c ,i Y• r k. as 18
x x � � r r t x r t r t k Y t � t x t r r k t r x r Y Y Y -� �� �� � -r .�. 1L�•. �� �.� -r 1, • a t +4. 4. }` Y y' � Y t r Y, 4 y t
t Y T�'rTc -� �. -'�. �T nr•'•t �_ k x t r x 't` r' is r k x y Y Y, " = t " t „ �• " "
t r t r Y r �-� :Y :k L. •'t •. Y,•t': JC' t -� Y; •y t.. x kb t Y 4'. y: t t' Y k ILA Y• •Y K.'L: r Y y. K y 4
` tt 4' ti 4 r y, K • }. Y' t Y r a y. Y• r k t x '° t r ,�: '` x t k k t. t' WES is -- WORKSPACE
50' TEMPORARY
4•.;t Y ♦ t4 ` r x t r y y i
t 6 't ' x °- Y k t y. t Y' .r r v, , K• h. v t .4 µ L Y x Y ¢ y r r q `• `` x. .��* �� �`i� 4 x ��x. . Y. � y— � t Y k � k
t k .t r, t. r. K.. r,.•} .k-. r r r -y y. t r r 't r.�- x u ti ��n Y k r t k Y t r WES 20
k 1'+ t i . t X R k• t r t: � i� �x r �- t y Y k r t r Y k r k x k
� .r.: .IC,.Y i•- �� -Y -tom Y r r t k Y y Y y
y r r r y t t r t x t k r y k t r y x
`•'
t x t k ^OODEDy
WES 21
k
WETLAND WJC.2
t x t r r x t t k r y x r r x r
r r t x t t y 4 4 4 r r r WES 22
50' TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA
27,781 sq. ft. r t t r r y t LEGEND
0.64 acres ��a Y t
t t Y x r r y x
TEMPORARY CHANNEL IMPACT
WES 23 TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA
ate' x
NOTES: o�
— ALL DISTANCES SHOWN ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND DISTANCES AND ARE IN FEET UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
— THIS MAP DOES NOT CONFORM TO GS 47 -30, AS AMENDED. NOT INTENDED FOR RECORDATION.
— WETLANDS SURVEYED BY TRIMBLE "PATHFINDER" METHODS. 175 —BR -803
— THE SOLE PURPOSE OF THIS PLAT IS TO SHOW JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES AS DELINEATED BY S &ME, INC.
— BASIS OF BEARING IS NORTH CAROLINA STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM (NAD 83 /NSRS2007).
JOB NUMBER: 03139 -0110 JLFd8=TKXAL WATM OF THE U.&
DWG. NUMBER: WJC.2 WACT PLAN GRAPHIC SCALE
SHEET NUMBER: 501B OF 501 OF 30 60 120
8020 TOWER POINT DRIVE PROJ. SURVEYOR: JLS
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA 28227 PEDMOW NATURAL CHAS LM S f ON
TELL- (704) 841 -2588 DRAWN BY: DGS RI>0IAOND, MOTLAND, ( IN FEET )
FAX: [phone] COMPUTER FILE: WJC.2.dwg 1 inch - 60 ff.
F -1222 DATE: 11/27/12 COUAMM AM BFAR NOM CARCLM
PERMANENT CONVERSION AREA
WETLAND AREA
F'Ckip-sooloololl
5' S03'S7'S0 "E
N
193211.26
E 2307320.88
WETLAND DELINEATION FLAG
5' S03'S7'S0 "E
N
193150.86
E 2307325.07
VICINITY MAP
PROPOSED GAS LINE
— GAS — GAS—
EXISTING GAS LINE
x r x Y •- y x r
NOT TO SCALE
t
y t r y
r
y
Y
t
r r t x t
t
t x t t t r t r r
- Y t Y r t r r r y
k Y t x t x t r r r
r y r r t x r r y k r x x Y x t �- r �`• r t t t r
x t t• r t Y r r y Y t t t t r t Y t r r Y r t t r r x Y r t t t t
WOODED t
Y x t t r
k t Y x r r r
r k Y r t r r
x t t r �` t Y Y
WES 18 WES 15
r k x t
x t x r r r k x t t
x t t r r x
SITE
x
WES 17
y t y t t r r x x t k r y t t t r t x 50 ' TEMPORARY WORKSPACE
Y Y x t t t t t _
t r t 4 r r t t t x Y LL r' y t t x r r t t r t r r t r x Y r r y x r t r x t r x r x k' k —�. IC c ,i Y• r k. as 18
x x � � r r t x r t r t k Y t � t x t r r k t r x r Y Y Y -� �� �� � -r .�. 1L�•. �� �.� -r 1, • a t +4. 4. }` Y y' � Y t r Y, 4 y t
t Y T�'rTc -� �. -'�. �T nr•'•t �_ k x t r x 't` r' is r k x y Y Y, " = t " t „ �• " "
t r t r Y r �-� :Y :k L. •'t •. Y,•t': JC' t -� Y; •y t.. x kb t Y 4'. y: t t' Y k ILA Y• •Y K.'L: r Y y. K y 4
` tt 4' ti 4 r y, K • }. Y' t Y r a y. Y• r k t x '° t r ,�: '` x t k k t. t' WES is -- WORKSPACE
50' TEMPORARY
4•.;t Y ♦ t4 ` r x t r y y i
t 6 't ' x °- Y k t y. t Y' .r r v, , K• h. v t .4 µ L Y x Y ¢ y r r q `• `` x. .��* �� �`i� 4 x ��x. . Y. � y— � t Y k � k
t k .t r, t. r. K.. r,.•} .k-. r r r -y y. t r r 't r.�- x u ti ��n Y k r t k Y t r WES 20
k 1'+ t i . t X R k• t r t: � i� �x r �- t y Y k r t r Y k r k x k
� .r.: .IC,.Y i•- �� -Y -tom Y r r t k Y y Y y
y r r r y t t r t x t k r y k t r y x
`•'
t x t k ^OODEDy
WES 21
k
WETLAND WJC.2
t x t r r x t t k r y x r r x r
r r t x t t y 4 4 4 r r r WES 22
50' TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA
27,781 sq. ft. r t t r r y t LEGEND
0.64 acres ��a Y t
t t Y x r r y x
TEMPORARY CHANNEL IMPACT
WES 23 TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA
ate' x
NOTES: o�
— ALL DISTANCES SHOWN ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND DISTANCES AND ARE IN FEET UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
— THIS MAP DOES NOT CONFORM TO GS 47 -30, AS AMENDED. NOT INTENDED FOR RECORDATION.
— WETLANDS SURVEYED BY TRIMBLE "PATHFINDER" METHODS. 175 —BR -803
— THE SOLE PURPOSE OF THIS PLAT IS TO SHOW JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES AS DELINEATED BY S &ME, INC.
— BASIS OF BEARING IS NORTH CAROLINA STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM (NAD 83 /NSRS2007).
JOB NUMBER: 03139 -0110 JLFd8=TKXAL WATM OF THE U.&
DWG. NUMBER: WJC.2 WACT PLAN GRAPHIC SCALE
SHEET NUMBER: 501B OF 501 OF 30 60 120
8020 TOWER POINT DRIVE PROJ. SURVEYOR: JLS
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA 28227 PEDMOW NATURAL CHAS LM S f ON
TELL- (704) 841 -2588 DRAWN BY: DGS RI>0IAOND, MOTLAND, ( IN FEET )
FAX: [phone] COMPUTER FILE: WJC.2.dwg 1 inch - 60 ff.
F -1222 DATE: 11/27/12 COUAMM AM BFAR NOM CARCLM
PERMANENT CONVERSION AREA
WETLAND AREA
F'Ckip-sooloololl
STREAM DELINEATION FLAG
1
COMPUTED POINT
WETLAND DELINEATION FLAG
WETLAND /STREAM BOUNDARY
EXISTING WOODS LINE
GAS
PROPOSED GAS LINE
— GAS — GAS—
EXISTING GAS LINE
— —
PROPOSED EASEMENT
—
EXISTING EASEMENT
- — — — — — —
- IMPACT LIMIT
PROPERTY LINE
—
TEMPORARY WORK SPACE

' JDD 37 r-7r t
JDD 37.3A.05 - - - -=�
NOTES:
71
_ -•102
is 5r
01 100g�
98
lo ■
-es-- — — _10—
_ A
JDD 37.3A
PERENNIAL RPW
63 LF PERMANENT IMPACT
(STREAM BED IMPACTS IN LINEAR
FEET%
BOTTOM 20% 1
TO BE BURIED BENEATH
7p
Lail �
i
BOTTOM 20R OF 30' PIPE
TO BE BURIED BENEATH DITCH BED
::,g-_.JDD 37 A15
RIP RAP APRON 12 LF
JDD 37.3A.04
FLARED END SECTION
30' RCP
PROPOSED GRADE
EXISTING GRADE
SECTION A -A
HORZ/VERT SCALE 1' =10'
'BIG SWAMP"
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
WETLAND
FLAG TABLE
FLAG
LENGTH
BEARING
NORTHING
EASTING
JDD 37.3A.13
70.19'
N80'58'3WE
N 309224.11
E 2038795.32
JDD 37.3A.14
39.74'
N82'29'43'E
N 309235.12
E 2038864.64
JDD 37.3A.15
39.74'
N82'29'43YE
N 309240.31
E 2038904.05
JDD 37.3A.05
67.65'
N81*03'36"E
N 309212.14
E 2038797.12
JDD 37.3A.04
41.64'
N81'28'46"
N 309222.65
E 2038863.94
JDD 37.3A.03
41.64'
N81.28.46;,
81 28'46'
N 309228.82
E 2038905.12
- ALL DISTANCES SHOWN ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND DISTANCES AND ARE IN FEET UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
- THIS MAP DOES NOT CONFORM TO GS 47 -30, AS AMENDED. NOT INTENDED FOR RECORDATION.
- WETLANDS SURVEYED BY TRIMBLE "PATHFINDER" METHODS.
- THE SOLE PURPOSE OF THIS PLAT IS TO SHOW JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES AS DELINEATED BY S &ME, INC.
- BASIS OF BEARING IS NORTH CAROLINA STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM (NAD 83 /NSRS2007).
�umm &clzEm
8020 TOWER POINT DRIVE
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA 28227
TELE. (704) 841 -2588
FAX: [phone]
F -1222
JOB NUMBER:
03139 -0110
DWG. NUMBER:
JDD37.3A
SHEET NUMBER:
1 OF 1
PROJ. SURVEYOR:
JLS
DRAWN BY.
DGS
COMPUTER FILE:
37.3A Eng
DATE:
12/03/12
WATERS OF 7HE UDR
WACT PLAN
OF
PIEDMONT NATURAL C1pA�8pLM �SUpTT�O�Np�
RK*&40NID. SOOTLAND, ROBESON, BLADEN,
COLUMBUS AND BRUNSWICK COIAN713% NOFUH CAROLINA
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 5 10 20
( IN FEET )
1 inch - 10 It
LEGEND
TEMPORARY CHANNEL IMPACT
W1.001
WETLAND DELINEATION FLAG
WETLAND/STREAM BOUNDARY
- - -100- - -
CONTOUR MAJOR
- - - -99 - - - -
CONTOUR MINOR
---- re- - - -ie—
TOP OF BANK
---- ee- - - -ee—
BOTTOM OF BANK
PROPOSED EDGE OF PAVEMENT
m4
PROPOSED STORM PIPE

APPENDIX 111
Revised Stream and Wetland Impact Tables

REVISED WETLAND IMPACT TABLE
Wetland ID
Sheet No.
(# of 501)`
Classification
Impacts
Crossing Type"
Primary Vegetative
Type(s)
Relation to
Waterbody
Permanent
Conversion
Temporary Impacts
ac
ac
WA
25
Emergent/Forested
Riparian
0.440
0.660
Frenchiess
WB
26
Emergent/Forested
Non-riparian
0.230
0.510
onventional
WC
27
Forested
Riparian
0.040
0.100
onventional
WD
28
Forested
Non-riparian
0.270
0.580
onventional
WE
29
Forested
Riparian
0.226
0.521
onventional
WF
30
Emergent/Forested
Riparian
0.140
0.220
renchless
WG
31 -34
Emergent/Forested
Non-riparian/Riparian
0.323
0.614
onventional/ Trenchless
WH
35
Emergent/Forested
Riparian
0.170
0.362
onventional
WI
36
Forested
Riparian
0.060
0.080
renchless
W1.1
36.1
Forested
Non -ri anan
0.000
0.000
voided
WJ
37
Forested
Riparian
0.370
0.480
renchless
WK
38
Emergent/Forested
Riparian
0.020
0.070
renchless
WL
39
Emergent
Non -n arian
0.000
0.010
onventional
WM
40-43
Emergent/Forested
Non-riparian
0.830
3.570
onventional
WN
44
Emergent/Forested
Riparian
0.010
0.030
onventional
WO
45
Emer ent/Forested
Riparian
0.060
0.230
renchless
WP
46
Emergent/Forested
Non-riparian
0.020
0.130
renchless
WD
47
Emergent
Non-riparian
0.000
0.620
onventional
W0.1
48
Forested
Riparian
0.000
0.050
onventional
WR
49
Emergent/Forested
Non-riparian
0.128
0.403
onventional
WS
50
Eme ent/Forested
Non-riparian
0.140
0.660
onventional
WT
52
Forested
Riparian
0.025
0.038
renchless
WU
53
Forested
Riparian
0.132
0.527
renchless
WV
54
Emergent/Forested
Riparian
0.001
0.043
renchless
WW
55
Emerge nt/Forested
Riparian
0.156
0.330
onventional
WX
56
Forested
Non-riparian
0.090
0.190
onventional
WY
57
Forested
Non-riparian
0.399
1.110
onventional
WZ
66
Forested
Non-riparian
0.005
0.017
onventional
WAA
67
Emergent/Forested
Riparian
0.060
0.290
onventional
WAB
68-73
Emergent/Forested-
Riparian
2.550
3.730
renchless
WAC
74
Eme ent/Forested
Non-riparian
0.040
0.080
onventional
WAD
75
Emergent/Forested
Non-riparian
0.020
0.060
onventional
WAE
76
Emerge nt/Forested
Non-riparian
0.110
0.300
onventional
WAF
77 -79
Forested
Riparian
1.070
1.880
renchless
WAG
80-83
Forested
Non-riparian
1.220
3.260
onventional
WAH
86 -89
Emergent/Forested
Non-riparian
0.640
1.900
onventional
Ponventional
WAI
90
Emergent
Non-riparian
0.000
0.890
Page 1 of 8

REVISED WETLAND IMPACT TABLE
Wetland ID
Sheet No.
(# of 501)'
Classification
Impacts
Crossing Type"
Primary Vegetative
Type(s)
Relation to
Waterbody
Permanent
Conversion
Temporary Impacts
ac
ac
WAJ
93 -97
Emergent/Forested
Riparian
0.850
3.300
onventional
WAK
98 -99
Emerge nt/Forested
Non-riparian
0.133
1.647
onventional
WAL
103
Emerge nt/Forested
Riparian
0.090
0.350
renchless
WAM
110
Emergent/Forested
Non-riparian
0.010
0.496
onventional
WAN
111
Emergent/Forested
Non -ri anan
0.001
0.001
onventional
WAO
112
Emerge nt/Forested
Riparian
0.240
1.340
onventional
WAP
115
Forested
Non-riparian
0.070
0.110
onventional
WAQ
119
Forested
Non-riparian
0.210
0.360
onventional
WAR
119
Forested
Non-riparian
0.070
0.120
onventional
WARA
124
Emergent/Forested
Non-riparian
0.002
0.021
onventional
WAT
127
Forested
Non-riparian
0.000
0.004
onventional
WAV
133
Forested
Non-riparian
0.080
0.220
onventional
WAW
134
Forested
Non-riparian
0.190
0.430
onventional
WAX
135 -138
Forested
Riparian
2.400
6.070
onventional
WAX.1
139
Forested
Riparian
0.090
0.200
onventional
WAX.2
140 141 8144
Forested
Riparian
0.050
0.060
renchless
WAX.3
140 -142 8 144
Forested
Riparian
1.060
1.420
renchiess
WAY
145
Emergent/Forested
Non-riparian
0.580
1.790
onventional
WAZ
146
Forested
Non -ri anan
0.460
1.160
onventional
WBA
147
Forested
Non-riparian
0.070
0.130
onventional
WBB
148
Forested
Non -n arian
0.060
0.070
onventional
WBC
149
Forested
Non-riparian
0.320
0.750
onventional
WBE
150
Emergent/Forested
Non-riparian
0.040
0.890
onventional
WBF
151
Forested
Riparian
0.800
1.390
onventional
WBG
152
Forested
Non-riparian
0.230
0.580
onventional
WBH
154
Forested
Non -ri arian
0.220
0.500
onventional
WBI
156
Forested
Non-riparian
0.280
0.640
onventional
WBJ
157
Forested
Non-riparian
0.010
0.020
onventional
WBK
158
Forested
Non-riparian
0.400
0.920
onventional
WBL
159
Forested
Non-riparian
0.070
0.110
onventional
WBM
160
Forested
Non-riparian
0.070
0.120
onventional
WBN
162
Forested
Non-riparian
0.300
0.720
onventional
WBO
163
Forested
Non-riparian
0.100
0.210
onventional
WBP
164
Forested
Non-riparian
0.330
0.800
onventional
WBQ
165
Forested
Non-riparian
0.240
0.490
onventional
WBR
166
Forested
Non-riparian
0.120
0.310
onventional
WBS
167
Emergent/Forested
Non-riparian
0.000
0.040
onventional
Page 2 of 8

REVISED WETLAND IMPACT TABLE
Wetland ID
Sheet No.
(# of Sol)'
Classification
Impacts
Crossing Type**
Primary Vegetative
Type(s)
Relation to
Waterbody
Permanent
Conversion
Temporary Impacts
ac
ac
WBT
169
Forested
Non-riparian
0.550
1.280
onventional
WBU
170
Forested
Non-riparian
0.180
0.430
onventional
WBV
171
Forested
Non-riparian
0.230
0.540
onventional
WBV.1
172
Forested
Non-riparian
0.070
0.390
onventional
WBW
173
Forested
Non-riparian
0.070
0.110
onventional
WBW.1
174
Forested
Non-riparian
0.100
0.220
onventional
WBX
175
Forested
Non-riparian
0.050
0.060
onventional
WBY
176 -177.1
Emergent
Non-riparian
0.000
1.794
onventional
WCA
178
Forested
Non-riparian
0.030
0.050
onventional
WCB
179
Forested
Non -ri anan
0.000
0.000
voided
WCC
180
Forested
Non-riparian
0.170
0.380
onventional
WCF
182
Forested
Non -n arian
0.080
0.120
onventional
WCG
183
Forested
Non -n anan
0.200
0.440
onventional
WCN
198
Emergent/Forested
Non -n arian
0.095
0.320
onventional
WCO
200
Emergent/Forested
Non -n anan
0.100
0.560
onventional
WCP
201 -204
Emer enVForested
Non-riparian
0.409
1.770
onventional
WCO
205
Emergent/Forested
Non-riparian
0.040
0.370
onventional
WCR
206
Emergent/Forested
Non-riparian
0.023
0.098
onventional
WCR.1
209.1
Forested
Non-ri anan
0.410
0.410
ermanent Fill Impacts
WCS
210
Emergent/Forested
Non-riparian
0.231
0.521
onventional
WCT
212 -225
Emergent/Forested
Riparian
0.884
8.018
renchless
WCU
226
Forested
Riparian
0.560
1.400
oventional
WCV
228
Emer enVForested
Non-riparian
0.190
1.119
onventional
WCW
229
Emergent/Forested
Non-riparian
0.396
1.696
onventional
WCX
230
Emergent/Forested
Non-riparian
0.126
0.579
onventional
WCY
232
Forested
Riparian
0.281
0.710
onventional
WCZ
233
Forested
Non-riparian
0.356
0.834
onventional
WDA
234
Emergent/Forested
Non-riparian
0.060
0.530
onventional
WDB
235
Emergent/Forested
Non-riparian
0.070
0.910
onventional
WDG
242 -243
Emer entForested
Riparian
0.397
1.116
onventional
WDH
244
Eme enVForested
Riparian
0.281
0.643
onventional
WDI
251
Emer entForested
Non-riparian
0.330
1.360
onventional
WDI.1
252
Emergent/Forested
Non-riparian
0.060
0.220
onventional
WDJ
253
Emergent/Forested
Non-riparian
0.360
1.980
onventional
WDK
254
Emergent/Forested
Non-riparian
0.170
0.990
onventional
WDL 1
255
Emer entForested
Riparian
0.290
1.020
onventional
WDM 1
256
Emer entForested
Non-riparian
0.170
0.560
onventional
Page 3 of 8

REVISED WETLAND IMPACT TABLE
Wetland ID
Sheet No.
(# of 501)'
Classification
Impacts
Crossing Type"
Primary Vegetative
Type(s)
Relation to
Waterbody
Permanent
Conversion
Temporary Impacts
ac
ac
WDN
257
Eme enUForested
Non -ri anan
0.070
0.580
onventional
WDO
262
Forested
Riparian
0.151
0.342
onventional
WDP
263
Emergent/Forested
Non-riparian
0.012
0.044
onventional
WDQ
264
Emergent/Forested
Riparian
0.400
1.027
renchless
WDR
265
Emergent/Forested
Non-riparian
0.010
0.360
onventional
WDS
266
Forested
Non -n arian
0.040
0.070
onventional
WDT
269
Emergent/Forested
Non-riparian
0.190
0.800
onventional
WDU
270
Emergent/Forested
Non-riparian
0.030
0.350
onventional
WDV
271
Emergent/Forested
Non-riparian
0.050
0.290
onventional
WDW
272
EmergentlForested
Riparian
0.120
0.320
onventional
WDW.1
272.1
Forested
Non -ri arian
0.050
0.060
onventional
WDX
273
Forested
Non-riparian
0.010
0.020
onventional
WDY
274
Emergent/Forested
Riparian
0.050
0.190
renchless
WDZ
275
Emergent/Forested
Non-riparian
0.029
0.040
onventional
WDZ.1
276
Emergent/Forested
Non-riparian
0.070
0.180
onventional
WEA
277 -279
Emergent/Forested
Riparian
0.275
1.791
onventional /Trenchless
WEB
280 -285
Forested
Riparian
1.580
11.020
onventional
WEC
286
Emergent/Forested
Non-riparian
0.000
0.290
onventional
WED
287
Emergent/Forested
Non-riparian
0.020
0.100
onventional
WEE
289
Eme enUForested
Non-riparian
0.000
0.000
voided
WEF
290
Emergent/Forested
Non-riparian
0.130
0.740
onventional
WEG
291
Emergent/Forested
Non-riparian
0.050
0.410
onventional
WEH
292
Emergent/Forested
Riparian
0.244
0.891
onventional
WEI
293
Emer enUForested
Riparian
0.529
0.888
renchless
WEJ
294
Emergent/Forested
Riparian
0.079
0.511
onventional
WEK
295
Forested
Riparian
0.330
0.820
onventional
WEL
296
Forested
Non -n arian
0.300
0.717
onventional
WEM
297
Forested
Non-riparian
0.133
0.298
onventional
WEN
298
Emergent/Forested
Non-riparian
0.021
0.113
onventional
WEO
299
Emer enUForested
Riparian
0.150
0.570
onventional
WEP
300
Forested
Riparian
0.530
1.520
onventional
WEQ
301
Emer enUForested
Non-riparian
0.020
0.070
onventional
WER
302 -303
Forested
Riparian
0.050
0.400
onventional
WER.1
302 & 304
Forested
Riparian
0.120
0.670
onventional
WES
302 304, & 305
Forested
Ri arian
0.000
0.050
onventional
WET
305
Forested
Non-riparian
0.180
0.670
onventional
WEU
306
Forested
Non-riparian
0.002 1
0.005
renchless
Page 4 of 8

REVISED WETLAND IMPACT TABLE
Wetland ID
Sheet No.
(# of 501)•
Classification
Impacts
Crossing Type"'
Primary Vegetative
Type(s)
Relation to
Waterbody
Permanent
Conversion
Temporary Impacts
ac
ac
WEV
307
Forested
Riparian
0.190
0.480
onventional
WEW
308
Forested
Non-riparian
0.290
0.500
nventional
WEW.1
309
Forested
Non-riparian
0.105
0.368
nventional
WEX
310 -313
Emergent/Forested
Non -ri arian
1.250
5.310
nventional
WEY
314
Emergent/Forested
Non -n arian
0.160
1.230
nventional
WEZ
315
Forested
Riparian
0.310
1.020
nventional
WFA
316
Emergent/Forested
Ri arian
0.280
1.470
nventional
[renRTle-ss
WFB
317
Emergent/Forested
Ri arian
0.090
0.220
WFC
318
Emer enUForested
Non-ri arian
0.030
0.900
nventional
WFE
320
Emer enUForested
Non -ri arian
0.220
1.200
nventional
WFF
321
Emer enUForested
Non -ri arian
0.060
0.210
nventional
WFG
322
Emer ent
Non -n arian
0.000
0.270
nventional
WFH
323
Emergent/Forested
Non -n arian
0.090
0.290
onventional
WFI
324
Emergent/Forested
Non-riparian
0.150
0.560
onventional
WFJ
325
Emergent/Forested
Non-riparian
0.100
0.480
onventional
WFK
326
Emergent/Forested
Riparian
0.560
2.530
onventional
WFL
327
Emergent/Forested
Non -n anan
0.250
1.480
onventional
WFM
328
Emergent/Forested
Non-riparian
0.000
0.005
onventional
WFN
329
Emergent
Non -ri arian
0.000
0.390
onventional
WFO
331 -333
Forested
Non-riparian
1.270
3.740
onventional
WFP
334339
Emergent/Forested
Non-riparian
0.009
5.020
onventional
WFO
340
Emergent/Forested
Non-riparian
0.350
0.960
onventional
WFR
341
Emergent/Forested
Non -ri anan
0.150
0.570
onventional
WFS
342 -345
Emergent/Forested
Non-riparian
2.710
6.990
onventional
WFT
349
Emerge nt/Forested
Non-riparian
0.320
1.530
onventional
WFU
358
Forested
Non-riparian
0.609
1.830
onventional
WFV
359
Emergent/Forested
Non -n arian
0.002
0.344
onventional
WFV.1
362
Emergent/Forested
Non-riparian
0.001
0.009
onventional
WFW
363 -365.1
Emergent/Forested
Riparian
0.360
1.160
onventional
WFX
366
Forested
Non-riparian
0.000
0.016
onventional
WFY
367
Forested
Non -n arian
0.059
0.106
onventional
WFZ
368
Forested
Non-riparian
0.081
0.128
onventional
WGA
369
Forested
Non-riparian
0.020
0.051
onventional
WGB
369
Forested
Non-riparian
0.023
0.036
onventional
WGD
371 -373
Emergent/Forested-
Riparian
0.390
0.690
renchless
WGE
374
Forested
Non-riparian
0.000
0.000
voided
WGF
375
Forested
Riparian
0.010
0.020
renchless
Page 5 of 8

REVISED WETLAND IMPACT TABLE
Wetland ID
Sheet No.
(# of 501)`
Classification
Impacts
Crossing Type**
Primary Vegetative
Type(s)
Relation to
Waterbody
Permanent
Conversion
Temporary Impacts
ac
ac
WGG
376 -379
Forested
Non-riparian
2.090
4.867
onventional
WGH
380
Forested
Non-riparian
0.118
0.279
onventional
WGI
381
Forested
Non-riparian
0.020
0.025
onventional
WGJ
382
Emergent/Forested
Non-riparian
0.252
0.689
onventional
WGK
383
Forested
Non-riparian
0.018
0.029
onventional
WGL
384
Emer enUForested
Non -n arian
0.052
0.091
onventional
WGM
386 -388
Emergent/Forested
Non-riparian
0.812
2.610
onventional
WGN
391
'Emergent/Forested
Non-riparian
0.500
1.580
onventional
WGO
392
Forested
Non-riparian
0.180
0.360
onventional
WGP
393 -395
Forested
Non-riparian
0.997
2.270
onventional
WGQ
396
Forested
Non-riparian
0.106
0.236
onventional
WGR
397
Emer enUForested
Non-riparian
0.027
0.048
renchless
WGS
398
Forested
Riparian
0.036
0.063
onventional
WGT
399
Forested
Riparian
0.023
0.030
renchless
WGT.1
399.1
Forested
Riparian
0.000
0.050
DD Stringing Area
WGU
400
Forested
Non-riparian
0.012
0.019
onventional
WGV
401
Forested
Riparian
0.070
0.090
renchless
WGW
402
Forested
Riparian
0.087
0.128
renchless
WGX
402
Forested
Riparian
0.000
0.000
voided
WGY
402
Forested
Riparian
0.121
0.162
renchless
WGY.1
403
Forested
Non-riparian
0.000
0.040
DD Stringing Area
WGZ
404
Forested
Non-riparian
0.010
0.020
renchless
WGZ.1
404
Forested
Non-riparian
0.030
0.040
renchless
WHA
405
Forested
Non-riparian
0.002
0.003
renchless
WH13
406
Forested
Non -ri anan
0.039
0.052
renchless
WHC
407
Forested
Non-riparian
0.000
0.000
voided
WHD
407
Forested
Non -ri anan
0.000
0.000
voided
WHC.1
407.1
Forested
Non - riparian
0.000
0.310
DD Stringing Area
WHC.2
407.2
Forested
Non - riparian
0.000
0.190
DD Stringing Area
WHC.3
407.3
Forested
Non- npanan
0.000
0.360
DD Stringing Area
WHCA
407.4
Forested
Non - riparian
0.000
0.170
DD Stringing Area
WHC.5
407.5
Forested
Riparian
0.000
0.850
DD Stringing Area
WHF
408
Forested
Non - riparian
0.320
0.430
renchless
WHH
411
Forested
Non - riparian
0.160
0.210
renchless
WHJ
413 -415
Forested
Riparian
0.190
0.260
renchless
WHJ.1
415 lForested
Non- riparian 1
0.060
0.080
renchless
Page 6 of 8

REVISED WETLAND IMPACT TABLE
Wetland ID
Sheet No.
(# of b01)•
Classification
Impacts
Crossing Type"'*
Primary Vegetative
e(
Types)
Relation to
Waterbody
Permanent
Temporary Impacts
ac
ac
WHK
416
Forested
Riparian
0.085
0.121
Frenchless
WHK.1
417
Forested
Riparian
0.000
0.010
onventional
WHL
419
Emergent/Forested
Riparian
0.022
0.214
onventional
WHM
420
Forested
Non- riparian
0.474
1.059
onventional
WHN
421
Forested
Non - riparian
0.001
0.001
onventional
WHP
423
Emergent
Non - riparian
0.000
0.939
onventional
WHP.1
423A
Forested
Non- riparian
0.124
0.367
onventional
WHP.2
423B
Forested
Riparian
0.044
0.075
onventional
WHQ
425
Forested
Non - ripanan
0.049
0.079
onventional
WHR
426
Emergent/Forested
Non - riparian
0.000
0.000
voided
WHS
427 -429
Emergent/Forested
Riparian
0.000
0.000
voided
WHT
430
Emergent/Forested
Riparian
0.070
0.100
onventional
WHU
431
Emer enUForested
Riparian
0.000
0.000
voided
WHV
432
Emerge nt/Forested
Riparian
0.000
0.000
voided
WHW
435 -437
EmergenUForested
Non- nparian
0.000
0.000
voided
WHX
438
Forested
Non - riparian
1.055
2.622
onventional
WHY
440
Forested
Non- ripanan
0.000
0.000
voided
WHZ
441
Emergent
Non - ripanan
0.000
0.001
onventional
WIA
442
Emergent/Forested
Non - riparian
0.001
0.001
onventional
WIB
443
Forested
Non- riparian
0.000
0.000
voided
WI13.1
443.1
Forested
Non - riparian
0.010
0.100
onventional
WIC
444
Forested
Riparian
0.430
0.570
renchless
WID
445
Emer entForested
Non-riparian
0.010
0.070
renchless
WIE
446
Forested
Non-riparian
0.196
0.448
onventional
WIF
447
Forested
Non - riparian
0.340
0.970
onventional
WIF.1
448
Emergent/Forested
Riparian
0.520
1.321
onventional
WIG
449
Emergent/Forested
Non - riparian
0.099
0.422
onventional
WIH
450
Forested
Non - riparian
0.270
0.593
onventional
WII
451
Forested
Non - riparian
0.690
1.620
onventional
WIJ
452
EmergenUForested
Non- riparian
0.067
0.122
onventional
WIK
453
EmergenUForested
Non - riparian
0.521
1.697
onventional
WIL
454
Forested
Non - riparian 1
0.180
0.290
onventional
WIN!
455
Forested
Non - riparian
0.100
0.230
onventional
WIN
456 -458
Forested
Non - riparian
2.254
5.780
onventional
Page 7 of 8

REVISED WETLAND IMPACT TABLE
Wetland ID
Sheet No.
(# of 601)'
Classification
Impacts
Crossing Type"
Primary Vegetative
Type(s)
Relation to
Waterbody
Permanent
Conversion
Temporary Impacts
ac
ac
WIO
459
Emergent/Forested
Non - ripanan
0.020
0.304
Frenchless
WIP
460
Emergent/Forested
Non - riparian
0.101
0.261
onventional
WIQ
461 -475
Emergent/Forested
Non - riparian
3.500
11.930
onventional
WIR
476 & 477.1
Forested
Riparian
0.170
0.405
onventional
WIS
477 -477.1
Forested
Riparian
0.047
0.098
onventional
WIS.1
477 -477.1
Forested
Riparian
0.000
0.036
onventional
WIT
478
Emergent/Forested
Non-riparian
0.370
1.010
onventional
WIU
479
Forested
Non - riparian
0.140
0.660
onventional
WIV
480 -482
Forested
Non - riparian
1.260
2.330
onventional
WIW
483
Emer enUForested
Riparian
0.221
0.396
enchless
WIX
484
Forested
Non-riparian
0.001
0.041
onventional
WIY
485
Emergent/Forested
Non -ri arian
0.001
0.290
onventional
111renchless;
WIZ
485
Emergent/Forested
Non - riparian
0.080
0.420
onventional
WJA
486
Emergent/Forested
Non - riparian
0.001
0.129
onventional
WJB
487
Forested
Non- riparian
0.060
0.330
onventional
WJC
488 -499
Forested
Riparian
4.040
4.050
WJC.1
501A
Forested
Riparian
0.340
0.940
onventional
WJC.2
501B
Forested
Riparian
0.000
0.640
ADD Stringing Area
WJD
500
Forested
Non- nparian
0.000
1.500
ADD Stringing Area
WJE
501
Forested
Non - riparian
0.000
0.160
ADD Stringing Area
Totals:
69.08
217.61
• Pages not represented in these drawings reflect re- routed segemnts where wetlands /streams are located a significant distance from the pipeline, and would not be
meaningful to include.
•' Trenchless Crossings include boring or use of horizontal directional drill (HDD)
= Denotes new impact
Page 8 of 8

REVISED STREAM AND NON - STREAM TRIBUTARY (JDD1 IMPACT TABLE
Stream ID
Sheet No.
(# of 501)*
Classification
Impacts
Crossing Type **
Temporary Impacts
Permanent Impacts
If
If
S1
25
Perennial RPW
170
0
Trenchless
S1.1
27
Perennial RPW
79
0
Conventional
S1.2
29
Perennial RPW
83
0
Conventional
S2
30
Perennial RPW
25
0
Trenchless
S2.1
31 & 33
Perennial RPW
114
0
Trenchless
S3
35
Perennial RPW
85
0
Conventional
S4
36
Seasonal RPW
23
0
Trenchless
S5
37
Perennial RPW
20
0
Trenchless
S6
38
Perennial RPW
20
0
Trenchless
S7
44
Seasonal RPW
51
0
Conventional
S8
45
Perennial RPW
20
0
Trenchless
S8.1
48
Perennial RPW
61
0
NA
S9
51
Seasonal RPW
80
0
Conventional
S10
52
Perennial RPW
22
0
Trenchless
S11
53
Perennial RPW
21
0
Trenchless
S12
54
Perennial RPW
21
0
Trenchless
JDD1A
54A
Perennial RPW
124
0
Conventional
S12.1
55
Seasonal RPW
81
0
Conventional
S13
58
Perennial RPW
54
0
Conventional
JDD1
59
Seasonal RPW
53
0
Conventional
JDD2
60
Seasonal RPW
53
0
Conventional
JDD3
61
Seasonal RPW
52
0
Conventional
JDD4
62
Seasonal RPW
54
0
Conventional
JDD5
63
Seasonal RPW
53
0
Conventional
JDD6
64
Perennial RPW
51
0
Conventional
JDD7
65
Perennial RPW
88
0
Conventional
S14
68 & 70
Perennial RPW
21
0
Trenchless
S15
68 & 73
Perennial RPW
0
0
NA
S16 1
77 -79 ITNW
1
0
0
Trenchless
Page 1 of 7

REVISED STREAM AND NON - STREAM TRIBUTARY (JDDI IMPACT TABLE
Stream ID
Sheet No.
�# of 501)*
Classification
Impacts
Crossing Type **
Temporary Impacts
Permanent Impacts
If
If
JDD8
84
Seasonal RPW
50
0
Conventional
JDD9
85
Seasonal RPW
51
0
Conventional
JDD9.1
86 -89
Seasonal RPW
110
0
Conventional
S17
91
Perennial RPW
56
0
Conventional
S18
92
Seasonal RPW
51
0
Conventional
S19.1
93 & 95
Perennial RPW
96
0
Conventional
S19
93 & 96
Perennial RPW
96
0
Conventional
S20
100
Seasonal RPW
61
0
Conventional
S21
101
Seasonal RPW
59
0
Conventional
S22
101.1
Perennial RPW
0
0
Conventional
S23
102
Seasonal RPW
50
0
Conventional
S24
103
Perennial RPW
23
0
Trenchless
JDD9.2
104
Perennial RPW
66
0
Conventional
JDD9.3
105
Perennial RPW
59
0
Conventional
JDD9.4
106
Seasonal RPW
61
0
Conventional
JDD9.5
107
Perennial RPW
52
0
Conventional
S29
108
Perennial RPW
99
0
Conventional
S30
109
Perennial RPW
54
0
Conventional
JDD9.6
111.1
Perennial RPW
103
0
NA
S31
112
Perennial RPW
84
0
Conventional
JDD10
113 -114
Perennial RPW
159
0
Conventional
JDD11
113 -114
Perennial RPW
71
0
Conventional
JDD12
116
Seasonal RPW
75
0
Conventional
JDD13
117
Seasonal RPW
59
0
Conventional
JDD14
118
Seasonal RPW
50
0
Conventional
JDD15
119
Perennial RPW
63
0
Conventional
S32
120
Perennial RPW
61
0
Conventional
JDD16
121
Seasonal RPW
50
0
Conventional
JDD17
122
Perennial RPW
51
0
Conventional
Page 2 of 7

REVISED STREAM AND NON - STREAM TRIBUTARY (JDD) IMPACT TABLE
Stream ID
Sheet No.
(# of 501)*
Classification
Impacts
Crossing Type **
Impacts
Permanent Impacts
—Temporary
If
If
JDD18
123
Perennial RPW
58
0
Conventional
JDD18.1
125
Perennial RPW
60
0
Conventional
S33
126
Perennial RPW
54
0
Conventional
JDD19
127
Seasonal RPW
50
0
Conventional
JDD20
128
Seasonal RPW
53
0
Conventional
S34
129
Perennial RPW
68
0
Conventional
S35
130
Perennial RPW
57
0
Conventional
JDD21
131
Seasonal RPW
68
0
Conventional
JDD21.1
132
Seasonal RPW
143
0
Conventional
S36
140, 141, & 144
Perennial RPW
66
0
Trenchless
S36.1A
151
Perennial RPW
75
0
Conventional
JDD22
152
Seasonal RPW
71
0
Conventional
JDD23
153
Perennial RPW
50
0
Conventional
S36.1 B
153
Perennial RPW
56
0
Conventional
JDD23.1
154
Seasonal RPW
71
0
Conventional
S37
155
Perennial RPW
53
0
Conventional
JDD24
158
Seasonal RPW
50
0
Conventional
JDD25
161
Perennial RPW
68
0
Conventional
JDD26
168
Perennial RPW
62
0
Conventional
JDD26.1
181
Perennial RPW
52
0
Conventional
JDD27
184
Perennial RPW
56
0
Conventional
JDD27.1
185
Seasonal RPW
66
0
Conventional
JDD28
186
Seasonal RPW
52
0
Conventional
S39
187
Perennial RPW
51
0
Conventional
JDD29
188
Perennial RPW
54
0
Conventional
JDD30
189
Seasonal RPW
63
0
Conventional
JDD31
190
Seasonal RPW
59
0
Conventional
JDD32
191
Seasonal RPW
50
0
Conventional
S40
192
Perennial RPW 1
115
0
Conventional
Page 3of7

REVISED STREAM AND NON - STREAM TRIBUTARY (JDD) IMPACT TABLE
Stream ID
Sheet No.
�# of 501)'
Classification
Impacts
Crossing Type "*
Impacts
Permanent Impacts
—Temporary
If
If
S41
193
Perennial RPW
52
0
Conventional
S42
194
Perennial RPW
84
0
Conventional
JDD32.1
195
Seasonal RPW
57
0
Conventional
JDD34
196
Perennial RPW
52
0
Conventional
JDD34.1
197
Seasonal RPW
51
0
Conventional
JDD34.2
199
Seasonal RPW
156
0
Conventional
JDD37
201 & 204
Perennial RPW
91
0
Conventional
JDD37.1
207
Seasonal RPW
53
0
Conventional
JDD37.2
208
Seasonal RPW
58
0
Conventional
S45
209
Perennial RPW
51
0
Conventional
JDD37.3A
209.2
Perennial RPW
0
42
Culvert
JDD37.3A
1 of 1
Perennial RPW
0
63
Culvert
JDD37.3
211
Perennial RPW
70
0
Conventional
S46
212, 213, & 222
Perennial RPW
23
0
Trenchless
S46.1
226
Perennial RPW
91
0
Conventional
JDD37.4
227
Perennial RPW
63
0
Conventional
S47
231
Seasonal RPW
55
0
Conventional
J131338.1
232
Perennial RPW
54
0
Conventional
S47.1
232
Perennial RPW
82
0
NA
JDD38.2
235
Perennial RPW
75
0
Conventional
JDD38.3
236
Perennial RPW
54
0
Conventional
JDD39
237
Perennial RPW
52
0
Conventional
JDD40
238
Perennial RPW
52
0
Conventional
J131340.1
239
Perennial RPW
55
0
Conventional
JDD41
240
Seasonal RPW
91
0
Conventional
S55
241
Perennial RPW
74
0
Conventional
JDD42
242
Perennial RPW
173
0
Conventional
S56
244
Perennial RPW
180
0
Conventional
JDD42.1
245 -249
Perennial RPW 1
0
1,967 INA
Page 4 of 7

REVISED STREAM AND NON - STREAM TRIBUTARY (JDDI IMPACT TABLE
Stream ID
Sheet No.
(# of 501)*
Classification
Impacts
Crossing Type'*
Temporary Impacts
Permanent Impacts
If
If
JDD42.2
250
Perennial RPW
0
188
NA
JDD42.4
258
Seasonal RPW
79
0
Conventional
JDD42.5
261
Perennial RPW
139
0
Conventional
S62
262
Perennial RPW
81
0
Conventional
S62.1
262
Perennial RPW
72
0
Conventional
S64
267
Perennial RPW
50
0
Conventional
JDD43
268
Perennial RPW
136
0
Conventional
JDD44
271
Seasonal RPW
53
0
Conventional
S65
274
Perennial RPW
21
0
Trenchless
S66
280 & 284
Perennial RPW
73
0
Conventional
S67
288
Seasonal RPW
59
0
Conventional
S68
293
Perennial RPW
26
0
Trenchless
S68.1
302 -305
Perennial RPW
84
0
Conventional
JDD45
306
Perennial RPW
138
0
Trenchless
S68.2
307
Perennial RPW
74
0
Conventional
JDD48
309
Perennial RPW
149
0
Conventional
S68.3
317
Perennial RPW
43
0
Trenchless
JDD50
325
Seasonal RPW
70
0
Conventional
S68.4
326
Perennial RPW
21
0
Trenchless
JDD51
328
Seasonal RPW
57
0
Conventional
JDD52
330
Perennial RPW
52
0
Conventional
JDD53
346
Perennial RPW
56
0
Conventional
JDD54
347
Perennial RPW
54
0
Conventional
JDD55
347
Perennial RPW
56
0
Conventional
JDD56
348
Perennial RPW
61
0
Conventional
JDD56.1
349.1
Seasonal RPW
51
0
Conventional
JDD56.2
349.1
Seasonal RPW
51
0
Conventional
JDD57
350
Perennial RPW
51
0
Conventional
JDD58
351
Perennial RPW
27
0
Conventional
Page 5 of 7

REVISED STREAM AND NON - STREAM TRIBUTARY (JDDI IMPACT TABLE
Stream ID
Sheet No,
(# of 501)*
Classification
Impacts
Crossing Type **
Temporary Impacts
Permanent Impacts
If
If
JDD59
352
Perennial RPW
52
0
Conventional
JDD60
353
Perennial RPW
52
0
Conventional
JDD61
354 -357
Perennial RPW
1,050
0
Conventional
JDD62
360
Perennial RPW
89
0
Conventional
.1131362.1
360 -A
Seasonal RPW
50
0
Conventional
JDD63
362
Seasonal RPW
50
0
Conventional
JDD64
361
Seasonal RPW
64
0
Conventional
S70
365
Perennial RPW
76
0
Conventional
S71
365
Perennial RPW
164
0
Conventional
S72
371 -372
Perennial RPW
23
0
Trenchless
S72.1
375
Seasonal RPW
22
0
Trenchless
JDD65
385
Seasonal RPW
50
0
Conventional
JDD66
390
Seasonal RPW
53
0
Conventional
S73
398
Perennial RPW
54
0
Conventional
S74
399
Perennial RPW
20
0
Trenchless
S74.1
399.1
Perennial RPW
53
0
HDD Stringing Area
S75
402
TNW
20
0
Trenchless
S75.1
407.5
TNW
161
0
HDD Stringing Area
S78
413 -414
Perennial RPW
23
0
Trenchless
S80
416
Perennial RPW
98
0
Trenchless
S81
417
Perennial RPW
164
0
Conventional
S81.1
419
Perennial RPW
75
0
Conventional
JDD67
422
Perennial RPW
50
0
Conventional
S81.2
423B
Seasonal RPW
80
0
Conventional
JDD67.1
424
Perennial RPW
93
0
Conventional
S82
427 & 429
Perennial RPW
0
0
Avoided
S83
431
Perennial RPW
0
0
Avoided
S84
432
Perennial RPW
0
0
Avoided
JDD68
433
Perennial RPW
0
0
Avoided
Page 6 of 7

REVISED STREAM AND NON - STREAM TRIBUTARY (JDD) IMPACT TABLE
Stream ID
Sheet No.
(# of 501)*
Classification
Impacts
Crossing Type*'
Temporary Impacts
Permanent Impacts
If
If
JDD69
434
Perennial RPW
0
0
Avoided
JDD70
435 & 437
Perennial RPW
0
0
Avoided
JDD71
439
Perennial RPW
52
0
Avoided
JDD72.1 * **
N/A
Perennial RPW
95
0
TWS
S85
444
Perennial RPW
20
0
Avoided
S92
448
Perennial RPW
169
0
Conventional
JDD72
476 -477.1
Perennial RPW
336
0
Conventional
JDD73
477 -477.1
Perennial RPW
121
0
NA
S93
483
Perennial RPW
97
0
Trenchless
S94
488 & 496 -497
TNW
0
0
Trenchless
Totals:
12,759
2,260
* Pages not represented in these drawings reflect re- routed segemnts where wetlands /streams are located a significant distance from
the pipeline, and would not be meaningful to include.
** Trenchless Crossings include boring or use of horizontal directional drill (HDD)
* ** Impacts to this JDD are associated with need for additional TWS, and were authorized by USACE on 10.29.12.
= Denotes new impact
Page 7 of 7

APPENDIX IV
Information Related to Change in
Restoration of JJD 42.1

William R. Storms
257 Storms Road
Bladenboro, NC 28320
RE: Drainage Ditch Relocation and Restoration (BL -553) September 4, 2012
To Whom It May Concern:
Piedmont Natural Gas recently requested to relocate an agricultural drainage ditch on my farm
to facilitate installation of anew natural gas transmission pipeline. Piedmont agreed to restore
it in the same condition that they found it, just in a different location, away from the new
natural gas pipeline. I reluctantly agreed to their request, for fear that it wouldn't be put back
exactly the way it was originally.
Now I am informed that the Army Corps of Engineers wants Piedmont to put it back differently,
with sloped ditch banks and no grassy water -way. I want it put back the way it was originally,
with a grassy water -way and with vertical ditch banks which are higher than the field elevation,
so the water from the field doesn't run directly into the ditch, but runs through drainage tiles at
specified locations where the water will pool near the outside of the ditch banks. The original
ditch construction maximizes the usable agricultural space on my farm and has been working
fine for many years. I am requesting that it be constructed the same as it was originally, with
vertical banks, not sloped banks.
%!% llow
William R. Storms

Photo 1: View of JDD 42.1 facing west in September 2012,
photo taken posthydro- hydroseeding.
}
Photo 3: View of JDD 42.1 facing east, November 2012
Taken by: BB /CJF
•
Checked by: JBH
Date Taken: September
and November 2012
Photo 2: View of JDD 42.1 facing west in November 2012, note
more gentle slope of bank, growth from previous hydro -seed,
and new curlex.
Photo 4: View of JDD 42. 1, note plastic drainage pipe.
SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
PNG Sutton Project Revision
Storms Farm, JDD 42.1,
Bladen County
North Carolina
Project No.: 1357 -10 -022 I Photo Page 1 of 1

APPENDIX V
Cultural Resources Investigation Information

i -
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M. Banos, Administrator
Beverly Eaves Perdue, Governor
Linda A. Carlisle, Secretary
Jeffrcy J. Crow, Deputy Secretary
December 3, 2012
William Green
S&ME, Inc.
134 Suber Road
Columbia, SC 29210
Office of Archives and History
Division of Historical Resources
David Brook, Director
Re: Addendum 3, Phase I Cultural Resource Investigations for the Proposed PNG Sutton Pipeline Project,
Multi County, ER 10 -1103
Thank you for your letter of November 9, 2012, transmitting the above referenced Addendum. We found the
document to be extremely informative and concise. The document states that no archaeological resources were
recorded during the field investigations and that further archaeological investigations are not necessary or
warranted, we concur with this assessment.
We have determined that the project addendum as proposed will not have an effect on any historic structures.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR
Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
please contact Renee Gledhill- Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919- 807 -6579. In all future
communication concerning this project, please cite the above - referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
Ldn(Ramona M. Bartos
Location 109 East Jones Strect, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address- 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699 -4617 Telephone /Fax. [phone] -6599

S&ME
November 9, 2012
Ms. Renee Gledhill - Earley
4617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh North Carolina 27699 -4617
Reference: Addendum # 3 to a Phase I Cultural Resource Investigations for
the Proposed PNG Sutton Pipeline Project, Anson, Bladen,
Brunswick, Columbus, New Hanover, Richmond, Robeson, and
Scotland Counties, North Carolina (Nagle et al. 2011).
S &ME Project No.: 1356 -11 -034 Ph. 7
SHPO Project Review No.: ER 10 -1103
Dear Ms. Gledhill - Earley:
S &ME, Inc. (S &ME), on behalf of the Piedmont Natural Gas Company, Inc. (PNG), has completed a
Phase I cultural resource survey on the Progress Energy Extension Pipeline, an approximately 1.25 mile
extension of the Sutton Pipeline in New Hanover County, North Carolina (Figure 1). This report is an
addendum to the report entitled Cultural Resource Investigations for the Proposed PNG Sutton Pipeline
Project (Nagle et al. 2011) that was previously reviewed by your office (ER No. 10 -1 103). The following
work was conducted in general accordance with the agreed -upon scope, terms, and conditions presented
in S &ME Proposal No. 1357- 22936 -10, dated May 13, 2010.
The proposed extension is approximately 1.25 miles long and begins approximately 400 in (0.25 mile)
north of Sutton Steam Plant Road. From there the proposed pipeline generally travels south and
southwest, crossing Sutton Steam Plant Road, an existing transmission line, and an existing railway. It
then turns north and terminates at the Sutton Steam Plant (Figure 1). Vegetation along the proposed re-
route consisted primarily of planted pines and there are areas that are currently used as staging areas for
an unrelated project (Figures 2 and 3). Topography was generally level across the entire project area.
BACKGROUND RESEARCH
On November 6, 2012, a background literature review and records search was conducted at the North
Carolina Office of State Archaeology (OSA) and at the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office
(SHPO) in Raleigh. The records examined at SHPO included a review of National Register and survey
files for properties listed in or eligible for inclusion in the National Register. Records examined at OSA
included master archaeological site maps, state archaeological site files, and associated archaeological
reports. The area examined was a 0.25 -mile radius around the project tract.
A review of the files and records at OSA and SHPO indicated there was one previously recorded
archaeological site, 31NH39 * *, and no previously recorded historic resources located within a 0.25 -mile
SWE, INC / 134 Suber Road / Columbia, SC 29210 / p 803.561.9024 / 803.561.9177 / www.smeinc.com

Addendum Report No. 3 for Cultural Resource Investigations S &ME Project No. 1356 -11 -034 Ph. 7
PNG Sutton Pipeline, Brunswick Co., NC November 9, 2012
radius of the project area (Figure 1). Site 31NH39 ** is a nineteenth century residence and farmstead that
was initially identified in 1976 (Phelps 1976). In 2003, site 31NH39 ** was re- located during a survey for
the Wilmington Bypass and determined eligible for listing in the NRHP (Cassedy et al. 2003).
FIELD METHODS
Fieldwork for the project was conducted on November 7, 2012, by Senior Archaeologist Kimberly Nagle,
M.S. During the survey, 36 shovel tests, ranging from 55-80 cm below surface (curbs), were excavated at
30- and 60 -m intervals (in hydric soils) along the proposed re-route. Site boundaries were determined by
excavating shovel test pits at 15 -m intervals radiating from an initial positive shovel test pit until two
negative shovel test pits were excavated. Shovel tests were at least 30 cm in diameter and excavated to at
least 80 cm below surface or until subsoil or hydric soil was encountered. Soil was screened through 0.25 -
inch hardware mesh, and artifacts, if recovered, were bagged according to provenience. Notes were kept
in a field journal and on S &ME site forms.
A typical soil profile in hydric soils consisted of very dark gray (10YR 3/1) sand. A typical soil profile
for shovel tests not containing hydric soil consisted of approximately 25 cm of mottled dark grayish
brown (10YR 6/2) and white (2.5Y 8/1) sand (Ap horizon), overlying 50+ cm (25 -80+ cmbs) of white
(2.5Y 8 /1) sand. No artifacts were found in the shovel tests and none were noted on the ground surface.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS
S &ME has completed a Phase I cultural resource survey on the Progress Energy Extension Pipeline. No
archaeological sites or isolated finds were found and there were no structures more than 50 years old
within the Area of Potential Effects (APE). Based on these results, it is S &ME's opinion that no historic
properties will be affected by the proposed extension. If you have any questions about the investigations
or this report, please do not hesitate to contact Kimberly Nagle at (803) 561 -9024 or at
knagle @smeinc.com.
Sincerely,
S &ME, Inc.
li11(A- l
Kimberly Nagle, M.S., RPA
Senior Archaeologist
Senior Reviewed by: William Green
cc: Joey Lawler, S &ME — Charlotte Branch
2

Addendum Report No. 3 for Cultural Resource Investigations S &ME Project No. 1356 -11 -034 Ph. 7
PNG Sutton Pipeline, Brunswick Co., NC November 9, 2012
REFERENCES
Cassedy, Daniel, Matthew Jorgenson, and Marvin Brown
2003 Archaeological Survey and Evaluation for the Western Portion of the Wilmington Bypass, New
Hanover and Brunswick Counties, North Carolina. Report prepared for North Carolina Department of
Transportation, Raleigh. Report prepared by URS Corporation, Morrisville, North Carolina.
Phelps, David Sutton
1976 An Archaeological Survey of the Lower Cape Fear Regional Water Supply System Project Area.
Archaeological Impact Studies No. 9, Archaeological Research Laboratory, East Carolina University,
Greenville, North Carolina.

{,,:. � b i s1 r L3� � 3 'r r �. _ r• ��, �,�f •t w��'1' f it:� . ;`, ` ss,�(� � S �I : ;�a- �yvi.` a v,
. t ,�� ' -` r"r �.v tiJ� ' �. f• 't Z�r 7`}'�, ~�" +� �f� C ��ab :r .,'`�s:,S�', `.
,
io
..' ,t1 '`i.,...`a�tr• J.. '^ i.� Y f ., � 7 � r.) t '.'fit r ff itt {; i7 � .•
A" •� r f • -r } r - ) ,r, . ..r I it
y 77
t
�7i �, a � _ •� ��� kp Ki..r t l 't �, •1•`i t1. �,.
� -y. `.,; ..,�j q ..� r „�'�• ,.,,� f�,r�i✓r a r � . ll - 't t2'tii2• �,� ,r",%�' :''ti
�t� t .- . Y�-• t1 d • y.. !�,.� 1 •�.'
ra* tr Y V�tw r '•t,. t i 7".
r• 'iii t
A -.Jr�,r�`� � r � �,t•� � la. t6. y,'�1f,u%� t�.
X.
j 4P
t r ZI \ {
�r�yrC'd • ?.(t 7 a I �C
Ta Y. Jt S ''• �_{..^ , F.
•� 1 1 J� -� r �.f ���;` ' - t t `~!ifS M
r t SSSW , . I ' `f3 t � ` � Y s �. Il. t �• - � } ; , ` f
/ Fa N,t''S'. . +'`6,`� •,✓:.! ;•lr;; 7 r r r ,'a ^�+-. `7 �y
1
_ d
K °,r'4 trsi r'i 1 ,.. >:t `j �.� ,� +r a � r ,. �I,mt� �•' � '~' t 'i +�� �:
rf. l k.
i tR*��f td l:r SF yS•�) t p5 f r i -j,3 �t Zt ��t`3 � Cam:
��t'ji a C<' � ��ty�- �1`'Ihi�tL�a ��.'�, `. s.:� �a'rt; t Yt�. f�ti� F �d��lr�`) nt�G�'' 4,'tt ,d•+�+' a ..�' t� ', .
.rt s4... `- �,'r,,�t • f t +,,.i'J `r' G't 4r'ct. -r:� , 7�. �,•t f1 �' �i.. 1'
r � 4 �1 =L A t y °�,•Y�' °�� '_�'���r•�.'t�,•\ � ." Y�j^ eft '°' 3< t` •S. � � � �1� rtr 7 ��,y'� "j. e � i . r"
�'slw.`,`w -r�r
C '`y `«• , +. rt 3 v v7 `� 31 NFI39 "` wr +t• 1J 1 tFy�.
'rr•`R.,•j`.y\ti� ;Y+r'usrryr
���{{t11♦ 1 e} !i S �9 , ,� ti as. ..� -t •. j im. ��A. ��.rl �r�M'� •�Vt
w7 sir. L• .1" \��'� n' � {� .y_ _ 1• j lr� .! �f }s \ �'x r �>rt ^i �F l -'.
- �1��'jy` •�. �.. ! & 4���>iiiYYii a1. �ti• 1 r{t� L � FrS �' 1�lp,• i ' r`�•y t � �� I t }t t f mss.
' " y{.v \•} \ <t a rR> T� aar' v f 4 )r l } L.f. t
v
y'0..•,^N ait � ' t ,�r1 .e 5 a••sr tIa )(��^ L •t './ St a.9 ` .w� ''".L� ,t� i'
S .r's- .Ity�.C't C1�.tS4LS.•J'Sf )4 L1 ,f�F -� �y6 r -7 ;� T�tti .. t1. 7 tr 9 �'`y,•/j •sr.. '� J1
! r s �;M1` �� • � .f2�t,�,k ��';.<ro:i h t '� ; '.':tf � 3 c{t.; l�t j ; � t � y�j � >y : r,} ,ti � . e •;� ,
t'�� t v.: Ft• 7 cti 'fir f� �r r�4.:•d h• ts'['t • it �y/jy, - .. t 1, t • - .i___ 5l .
t ,-''.t�4\
,wW`ri'�•k •h.,,,� i�F�i•'R. J t�r.. r:ti �.n,},..'{ S r��, t,.T't t� !'a�%t•' ��.'" �� r � � ; i� ` L � �
«s•} � doe, >, u ..s,t , t � r - 1 t' r 'j` � ' t ,.•
yii r � W,r'ir t r r '•j �'�r w 4� �t , L �t l 'rj y' 4 Y � � � � {'.:.. .�
�Co a, ` + 3 �..,� at r 5'+ /� F' ,�+ n w 111 L-q•.. t,
i ?l'i4e • -w s T i : gtO rj... f� � r, (' i �IrJA r ; ar ..-.,- 1' ,: )'.
Z 4•�. f�yg�.i" " 'ky �'v*� �,, fir'.! .. _ , �k. � � � u..�'4 {-4 1 i Z,� �t X
,�>t:n,.,:f,"$r. • SZ. r.. o..,id.k'�;'.>r >= .t+f_v;.;... ,' +•..'s'� , - .......r:;•'
Figure 1, Sutton Steam Station Extension. 0 0.25 0.5
Base Map: Castle Hayne 7.5' USGS topographic quadrangle. Miles
A Archaeological Site
- ter'-'— Previously Surveyed Corridor
Project Corridor
Q 0.25 -mile Search Radius
'• is
_F-
N
W +E
S
►= a 1 � rti ► . � i � r s � � � � �i 1 rte" ���
r„�

Addendum Report No. 3 for Cultural Resource Investigations S &ME Project No. 1356 -11 -034 Ph. 7
PNG Sutton Pipeline, Brunswick Co., NC November 9, 2012
Figure 2. Vegetation near the beginning of the proposed corridor, facing north.
Figure 3. Staging area near the middle of the project area, facing west.

APPENDIX VI
Acceptance Letter from NCEEP

r, Y
,,F o x,.111
PROGRAM
December 4, 2012
Adam Long, PE
Piedmont Natural Gas
4720 Piedmont Row Drive
Charlotte, NC 28210
Project: PNG Sutton Extension
Expiration of Acceptance: June 4, 2013
County: New Hanover
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is willing to accept
payment for compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced project as indicated in the table below. Please
note that this decision does not assure that participation in the NCEEP will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation
for project impacts. It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact these agencies to determine if payment to the NCEEP will be
approved. You must also comply with all other state, federal or local government permits, regulations or authorizations associated
with the proposed activity including SL 2009 -337: An Act to Promote the Use of Compensatory Mitigation Banks as amended by
S.L. 2011 -343.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not received a copy of the
issued 404 Permit/401 Certification/CAMA permit within this time frame, this acceptance will expire. It is the applicant's
responsibility to send copies of the permits to NCEEP. Once NCEEP receives a copy of the permits) an invoice will be issued based
on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must be made prior to conducting the authorized work. The amount of the In-
Lieu Fee to be paid to NCEEP by an applicant is calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed at www.nceep.net.
Based on the information supplied by you in your request to use the NCEEP, the impacts that may require compensatory mitigation are
summarized in the following table. The amount of mitigation required for this impact is determined by permitting agencies.
Impact
River
Basin
CU
Location
Stream (feet)
Wetlands (acres)
Buffer I
(Sq. Ft.)
Buffer H
(Sq. Ft.)
Cold
Cool
Warm
Ri arian
Non-Riparian
Coastal Marsh
Cape Fear
03030005
0
0
0
0.50
0
0
0
0
Upon receipt of payment, EEP will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. The mitigation will be performed in
accordance with the N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources' Ecosystem Enhancement Program In -Lieu Fee
Instrument dated July 28, 2010.
Thank you for your interest in the NCEEP. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Kelly Williams at
(919) 716 -1921.
Sincerely,
S Klimek
Ac ' Director
cc: Karen Higgins, NCDWQ Wetlands /401 Unit
David Bailey, USACE- Wilmington
Chad Coburn, NCDWQ- Wilmington
Doug Huggett, NCDCM- Morehead City
Joey Lawler, agent
File
Pro" Our Jt &
S�ww fflk-
AAYA
RUM
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699 -1652 / 919- 715 -0476 1 www.nceep.net