20121123 Ver 1_Application_20121217

M STATL n
7 fin,., /9
STATE OF NORTH CAROL1N , NR Wq�R p� v c
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTA�Wq ER R4y�
BEVERLY EAVES PERDUE EUGENE A CO1dTI, JR
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
December 17, 2012
U S Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
ATTENTION Mr Brad Shaver
NCDOT Coordinator
2p 1 21 1 23
SUBJECT Nationwide 14 Permit Application for Secondary Road Improvement on SR 1401
(Stone House Road), Pender County WBS# 3C 071088 (DWQ Permit Fee $240)
Dear Mr Shaver
Please find enclosed a PCN application from the North Carolina Department of Transportation ( NCDOT)
for a Nationwide 14 permit for the secondary road improvement project on SR 1401 (Stone House Rd) in
Pender County
The scope of the project will be to widen, grade, drain, base and pave the 1 75 miles of existing unpaved
road to current NCDOT secondary road standards to improve the roadway safety and stability These
standards include 20 feet of travel lanes and 6 feet of grassed shoulders on both sides within 60 feet of
right of way Some sections of the road will be built within "maintenance limits" R/W and will not have a
defined ditch section Also enclosed are maps for the issuance of a jurisdictional determination based on
our field review on November 6, 2012 The jurisdictional determination form will be supplied to you
electronically
By copy of this letter and enclosures, NCDOT is also requesting issuance of 401 Water Quality
Certification (WQC) #3886 from the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) A method of debiting $240 to
process the WQC permit request has been provided as noted in the subject line of this application
If you have any questions or need any additional information, please contact me at (910) 341 -2037
Sincerely,
Anneliese Westphal
Division 3 Environmental Specialist
Enclosures
cc
Ms Sonia Carillo, DWQ, Fayetteville (electronic copy)
Mr Mason Herndon, DWQ, Fayetteville (electronic copy)
5501 BARBADOS BLVD CASTLE HAYNE, NC 28429
PHONE [phone] FAx [phone]

>ia�!s+v�s�+F:tN:fe:Ma�
Office Use Only
Corps action ID no
DWQ project no
Form Version 1 3 Dec 10 2008
Page 1 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version
Pre - Construction Notification PCN ]Form
A Applicant Information
1
Processing
la
Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps
®Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1b Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number 14 or General Permit (GP) number
1c
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corpse
® Yes
❑ No
ld
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply)
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification -- Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
le
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit
❑ Yes ® No
if
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? if so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program
Li
®No
1g
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties If yes, answer lh
below
® Yes
❑ No
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
_1h
2
Project Information
2a
Name of project
SR 1401 - Stone House Road
2b
County
Pender
2c
Nearest municipality / town
Long Creek, NC
2d
Subdivision name
N/A
2e
NCDOT only, T I P or state
project no
3C 071088
3
Owner Information
3a
Name(s) on Recorded Deed
North Carolina Department of Transportation
3b
Deed Book and Page No
N/A
3c
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable)
N/A
3d
Street address
N/A
3e
City, state, zip
N/A
3f
Telephone no
N/A
3g
Fax no
NIA
3h
Email address
NIA
Page 1 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

4
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a
Applicant is
❑ Agent ® Other, specify NCDOT Division 3 Engineer
4b
Name
Karen E Fussell, P E
4c
Business name
(if applicable)
North Carolina Department of Transportation
4d
Street address
5501 Barbados Boulevard
4e
City, state, zip
Castle Hayne, NC 28429
4f
Telephone no
910 341 2000
4g
Fax no
910 675 0143
4h
Email address
N/A
5
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a
Name
Anneliese Westphal
5b
Business name
(if applicable)
North Carolina Department of Transportation
5c
Street address
5501 Barbados Boulevard
5d
City, state, zip
Castle Hayne, NC 28429
5e
Telephone no
910 341 2037
5f
Fax no
910 675 0143
5g
Email address
aestphal@ncdot gov
Page 2 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

B Project Information and Prior Project History
1 Property Identification
la Property identification no (tax PIN or parcel ID)
N/A
lb Site coordinates (in decimal degrees)
Latitude 34 49869 Longitude - 77 983916
(DD DDDDDD) ( -DD DDDDDD)
1 c Property size
N/A acres
2 Surface Waters
2a Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc ) to
UT Mill Creek (C Sw)
proposed project
2b Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water
SA HQW
2c River basin
Cape Fear
3 Project Description
3a Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application
The site is currently an unpaved sod and rock secondary road General land use is agricultural, forestry (adjacent land
was being logged during a recent site visit) and hog /poultry production
3b List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property
None within the RAN
3c List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property
There are approximately 60 'of intermittent and 60' of perennial stream which cross the RIW and Pipes B and A
respectively
3d Explain the purpose of the proposed project
To improve the existing roadway by bringing it up to NCDOT standards to inlcude paving to provide a better and safer
roadway for all that utilize this facility
3e Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used
This project will widen, grade, drain, add base, pave and stabilize the existing road to NCDOT secondary road standards
to 20 feet of travel lanes and 6 feet of grassed shoulders using standard road construction equipment including a motor
grader, excavators, and dump trucks
4 Jurisdictional Determinations
4a Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments Field visit on November 6, 2012
4b If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
❑ preliminary ® Final
of determination was made?
4c If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency /Consultant Company
Name (if known) Anneliese Westphal
Other NCDOT
4d If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation
Field verification 11/06/2012
5 Project History
5a Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions
Pipe B (Sta 32 +72 23) was upgraded a few years ago, likely under a NWP3 and corresponding WQC Its current length
is not sufficient for the proposed road typical and therefore will be lengthened
Page 3 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

6 Future Project Plans
6a Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes ® No
6b If yes, explain
Page 4 of 11
PCN Form —Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

C Proposed Impacts Inventory
1 Impacts Summary
la Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply)
❑ Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2 Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted
2a
2b
2c
2d
2e
2f
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary
W1 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g Total wetland impacts
2h Comments
3 Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted
3a
3b
3c
3d
3e
3f
3g
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 ®P ®T
Pipe (Pipe A)
UT Mill Creek
® PER
❑ INT
® Corps
® DWQ
6
114(+10
temp)
S2 ®P ®T
Pipe (Pipe B)
UT Mill Creek
❑ PER
® INT
® Corps
® DWQ
6
17(+10
temp)
S3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
3h Total stream and tributary impacts
31(+20
temp)
31 Comments Pipe A is located at Sta 20 +72 96 and Pipe B at Sta 32 +72 23 The permanent impacts are for additional pipe
length and the temporary impacts are for dewatenng during construction
Page 5 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

4 Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U S then individually list all open water impacts below
4a
4b
4c
4d
4e
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact number—
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
01 ❑P ❑T
02 ❑P ❑T
03 ❑P ❑T
04 ❑P ❑T
4f Total open water impacts
4g Comments
5 Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below
5a
5b
5c
5d
5e
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose
(acres)
number
of pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5f Total
5g Comments
5h Is a dam high hazard permit required
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no
51 Expected pond surface area (acres)
51 Size of pond watershed (acres)
5k Method of construction
6 Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form
6a
❑ Neuse El Tar-Pamlico El Other
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b
6c
6d
6e
6f
6g
Buffer impact
number—
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary T
impact
required?
B1 ❑P ❑T
❑Yes
❑ No
B2 ❑P ❑T
❑Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ No
6h Total buffer impacts
61 Comments
Page 6of11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

D Impact Justification and Mitigation
1 Avoidance and Minimization
1 a Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project
Side slopes in fill sections have been designed at 3 1 or less Headwalls have been included on the new pipe to reduce pipe
length and stream impacts The legth of Pipe B was kept to 48' instead of 50' Therefore, impacts to the streams are the
minimum needed to accommodate the road design Ditch depth sections near wetlands will be minimized to reduce the
potential for wetland impacts
1 b Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques
Strict implementation of sediment and erosion control BMPs will be utilized to protect waters of the US Orange safety fence
will be utilized at the streams to delineate them as jurisdictional and flagging or fencing will be used in the vicinity of wetlands
off of the R/W as a reminder to avoid these areas during construction
2 Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U S or Waters of the State
2a Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U S or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ® No
2b If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply)
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
F-1 Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3 Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a Name of Mitigation Bank
3b Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
3c Comments
4 Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached
❑ Yes
4b Stream mitigation requested
linear feet
4c If using stream mitigation, stream temperature
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only)
square feet
4e Riparian wetland mitigation requested
acres
4f Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested
acres
4g Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested
acres
4h Comments
5 Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan
Page 7of11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

6 Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ® No
6b If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation Calculate the
amount of mitigation required
Zone
6c
Reason for impact
6d
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
15
6f Total buffer mitigation required
6g if buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e g , payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund)
6h Comments
Page 8of11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

E
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1
Diffuse Flow Plan
1a
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments
2
Stormwater Management Plan
2a
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
33% (this is a width of 20' of
pavement in a 60' RAN)
2b
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
® Yes ❑ No
2c
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why
2d
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan
NCDOT's BMPs for Construction and Maintenance Activities will be utilized to manage stormwater runoff during
construction Grass swales will be used to the maximum extent possible in compliance with NCDOT's NP DES Permit No
NCS000250 Post Construction Stormwater Program Specifically, no ditch section will
be utilized from Sta 10 +00 -L-
(begin of project) to Sta 19 +20 —L- and from Sta 10 +00 -R- (begin of project) to 20 +73
-R- These areas will be allowed
to sheet flow as they do now due to the fact that NCDOT has only maintenance limits
R/W throughout these sections
Also, a grassed swale will be utilized from Sta 21 +15 -L- to Sta 22 +00 -L- and from Sta
20 +73 -R- to Sta 32 +72 -R- Also,
from Sta 32 +72 —L- to Sta 33 +82 -L- will be left vegetated and undisturbed
2e
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? Due
❑ Certified Local Government
to the existing width of the soil and rock road bed (24'), this project is not adding
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
impervious (typical will be 20' width of pavement) and therefore a DWQ Stormwater
® DWQ 401 Unit
Program review is not triggered
3
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a
In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
N/A
❑ Phase II
3b
Which of the following locally - implemented stormwater management programs
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply)
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other
3c Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
® Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a
Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply)
❑ Session Law 2006 -246
❑ Other
4b Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached? NOTE The plan is described above, but is being submitted for the first
❑ Yes ® No
time with this application
5
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
Page 9of11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

5a Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
F Supplementary Information
1 Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
la Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the
® Yes ❑ No
use of public (federallstate) land?
lb If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ❑ No
letter )
Comments
2 Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B 0200)?
2b Is this an after - the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s)
3 Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b If you answered "yes' to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description
This project is one which qualifies as a minimum criteria (category 121) under 19A NCAC 2F 0102 As such, the project
1s in a category of projects that add either no or a minor amount of new impervious surface directly, indirectly, or
cumulatively Consequently, the project will not result in cumulative impacts that cause or will cause a violation of
downstream water quality standards
4 Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non - discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project or available capacity of the subject facility
N/A
Page 10 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

5 Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ® No
impacts?
❑ Raleigh
5c If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted
❑ Asheville
5d What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would Impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
Natural Heritage GIS Database and preliminary ground survey
6 Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would Impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NC GIS data
7 Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a WIII this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e g , National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
This project has been reviewed and cleared by NCDOT Human Environment Unit for historic architecture and
archaeology in coordination with the State Hisotric Preservation Office (see attached forms)
8 Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a Will this project occur in a FEMA - designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes ® No
8b if yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements
8c What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA GIS data
Anneliese Westphal
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
Applicant/Agent's Sign ure
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided
Page 11 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

I ci v- �4 S 1Z 140\ Si 11 4,,, Pad C,o
I 1 RI 'J 'I ml
' NI t
tD
9g
/ L
IS
e
r ^ n
LL�
,o N
ti . 7 d vl el 4ft
�I
i C {
t
e �
12 C e
o
Tj r /: I ��
N of /1 NI ,� ° ^I � v.� ^'I •1 t '� ` l a �� �`.N.I � �,� 8� °J

NO SURVEY REQUIRED FORM
PROJECT INFORMATION
Piofect No
WBS No
FA No
3C 071049
NIA
Federal (USAGE) Permit Required?
Project Tracking No (Internal Use)
12 -04 -0008
County Pendei
Document MCD Checklist
Funding ® State ❑ Federal
® Yes ❑ No Permit Type NWP 14 and DWQ
Py o_/ect Description Grade, Drain, Base and Pave SR 1401 Stone House Road Al I work will be within
the existing NCDOT Right of Way
SUMMARY OF CULTURAL RESOURCES REVIEW
Brief description of review activities, results of review, and conclusions
Review of HPO quad maps, HPO GIS information, historic designations roster, and indexes was
undertaken on April 10, 2012 Based on this review, there are no existing NR, SL, LD, DE, or SS
properties in the Area of Potential Effects, which is 75' from the centerline each way The Quad Map
recording HPO sites, created in 1970, shows there are no structures along the road under fifty years of
age Google Maps aerial imagery and NC OneMap Aerial Imagery indicate that there are what appear to
be modern metal chicken sheds or farming sheds on the north side of the road There are no historic
properties present and no survey is required If design plans change, additional review will be required
Brief Explanation of why the available information provides a reliable basis for reasonably predicting
that there are no unidentified historic pt opei ties in the APE
HPO quad maps and GIS information recording NR, SL, LD, DE, and SS properties for the Pender
County survey and Google Maps are considered valid for the purposes of deteimimng the likelihood of
historic resources being present There are no historic resources present and no survey is required
SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
See attached Maps
FINDING BY NCDOT CULTURAL RESOHRG go - ESSIONAL NO SURVEY REQUIRED
ARCHAEOLOGY HISTORIC ARCHITECTURE (CIRCLE ONE)
- U
NCDOT Cultural Resources Speciali
No Sru -vey Regnn ed' farm for Muror Transportation Projects as Qnal f ed hi Ilia 1007 Pi ogramuranc Agreement
NCDOT Archaeology dr Historic Archnectare Groups
Date

Project Tracking No (taretnalUse)
12 -04 -0008
NO PREHISTORIC OR HISTORIC PROPERTIES
PRESENT/AFFECTED FORM
PROJECT INFORMATION
PiojectNo 3C 071049
WBS No
FA No
3C 071049
na
Feder al (USACE) Permit Requo ed
Project Desct iption
County Pender
Document Minimum Criteria Sheet
Funding ® State ❑ Federal
® Yes ❑ No Pet mit Type NWP 14 & DWQ cert
The project calls for the imps ovement (grade, drain, base, and pave) of the existing SR 1401 (Stone
House Road) in Pendet County The archaeological Area of Potential Effects (APE) for the project is
defined as a 1 75 -mile (2,816 35 in) long corridor starting at the junction of SR 1401 with SR 1402
(Fennell Town Road) in the west and running east till it Joins with SR 1400 (Highsmith Road) The
core idol includes the existing? fight -of -way and measures approximately 60 feet (18 29 in) wide extending
30 feet (9 14 m) on either side front the new proposed center of SR 1401
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
The North Carolina Department of Ti anspot tation (NCDOT) i eviewed the subject project and determined
Archaeology
® There are no National Register- listed of Study Listed properties within the project's area of potential
effects
❑ No subsurface archaeological investigations are required for this project
® Subsurface investigations did not reveal the presence of any archaeological resources
❑ Subsurface investigations did not reveal the presence of any archaeological resources considered eligible
for the National Register
❑ All identified Aichaeological sites located within the APE have been considered and all compliance for
archaeological resources with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and GS 121 -12(a) has
been completed for this project
® There are no historic properties present or affected by this project (Attach any notes or documents as
needed)
No historic Propernes Present fonn for Armor Transporranon Projects as Qual fed m die 2O7 Progronrmortc Agreement
NCDOT Archaeology & Ilatonc Archuccnoe Groups

12 -04 -0008
SUMMARY OF CULTURAL RESOURCES REVIEW
B1:ef description of i eview activities, n esults of; evnew, and conclusions
SR 1401 is southwest of Burgaw, east of Long Creek, and northwest of the Rocky Point near the center of
Pender County, North Carolina The project area is plotted in the northwestern coiner of the Rocky Point
USGS 7 5' topographic quadrangle (Figure 1)
A map review and site file search was conducted at the Office of State Archaeology (OSA) on April 10,
2012 No previously recorded archaeological sites have been identified within the APE, adjacent to the
APE, or within a mile radius of the project area In addition, no existing National Register of Historic
Places (NRHP), State Study Listed (SL), Locally Designated (LD), Determined Eligible (DE), or
Surveyed Site (SS) properties are within or adjacent to the APE Topographic maps, USDA soil survey
maps, aerial photographs (Google and NCDOT), and historic maps (North Carolina maps website) were
utilized to gage environmental factors that may contribute to the presence of historic or prehistoric
settlement within the project limits and to assess the level of various types of disturbances An
archaeological reconnaissance and field survey was carried out on April 16, 2012, to help assess the
project area
SR 1401 generally runs east -west between SR 1400 and SR 1402 (Figure 2) The road crosses two small
unnamed drainages in the west and man -made open drainage ditch in the east The two drainages flow
south and join to form Mill Creek, which is part of the Cape Fear drainage basin The man -made ditch
also appears to flow south, but no outlet into a waterway could be determined This ditch was dug to help
in draining excess water that collects on the landform The majority of the APE is situated along upland
flats, which consists primarily of pine plantations with a cultivated field at its eastern end Terraces and
very narrow floodplains are located along the two unnamed drainages in the west These areas are made -
up of a hardwood forest and livestock farms The only residential lawns within the APE are found at
either ends of the project area Overall, ground disturbance appears minimal
A review of the USDA soil survey map indicates that the APE is composed of five soil types (Figure 3)
The largest is the Rains fine sandy loam (Ra) This covers the upland flats This series is nearly level and
poorly drained Water collects at the surface for brief periods in the depressed areas The seasonal high
water table is within 30 cm (1 foot) of the surface Due to wetness and poor drainage, the Rains soil
series is not suited to yield significant archaeological sites Found adjacent to the Rains series are Exum
loam (En-LA) and Goldsboro fine sandy loam (GoA) These soils are also present on the upland flats but
nearer to natural drainages Exum loam only encompasses a small area at either end of the APE, while
the Goldsboro fine sandy loam is found surrounding the drainages in the west Both soil types are fairly
sirrular with moderately well drained soils and slope of 0 to 2 percent However, seasonal wetness can be
a hindrance as excess water can pool in depressions along the landform In general, these two series can
yield archaeological sites, if water can drain away quickly and naturally The Norfolk loamy fine sand
(NoB) is located on the terraces neighboring the floodplains in the west This soil is well drained with a
slope of 2 to 6 percent It is ideal for prehistoric and historic settlement due to being fairly level, its close
proximity to water, and it ability to rapidly drain Lastly, Muckalee loam (Mk) composes the narrow
floodplains This soil is level, poorly drained, and frequently flooded The seasonal high water table is
typically 15 cm (6 in) below the surface This series is not going to produce any significant or important
archaeological deposits due to persistent wetness
Early maps from the 18th and 19th centuries show only general features of the region with few if any
details near the project area Although roads are depicted near the project area on these maps, none have
a similar alignment as SR 1401 It is not until the early 20th century that more accurate maps of the
region are published in which SR 1401 can be identified The circa 1910 U S Postal map of Pender
County and the 1912 soil map for the county are two of the first to show the road (Figures 4 and 5) No
historic structures appear alongside SR 1401 on either map, but a tram line (short gage railroad) crossed
No Historic Properties Present form for Minor Transponatron Projects as Quo! fed to the 2007 Programmatic Agreement
NCDOT Archaeology d 11tstancArclutecttue Groups

12 -04 -0008
SR 1401 at its eastern end No evidence for this line could be found along the surface within the project
area From this review, it appears no significant historic deposits associated with former structuies should
be encountered during the road improvements
The lack of no site being identified near the project area is due to no previous investigations being carried
out in this portion of Pender County Additional work is needed in the area before any conclusion can be
drawn on the predictability of archaeological sites based upon known sites
The current archaeological investigations at SR 1401 consisted of a surface inspection and shovel test
placements (STPs) (Figure 6) Surface visibility was near 100 percent within the cultivated fields, along
the farm properties, and in areas that had been recently clear cut Observations along the surface within
the APE revealed no cultural material, but the reconnaissance survey did identify a dilapidated wooden
frame shack at the western end of the road on its south side Associated structures on the property include
an outhouse The buildings seem to date to the early to mid -20th century, but do not appear on any
historic maps Regardless, these structures are outside the APE and will not be affected by the proposed
road improvements Thus, no further investigations are needed for this resource, and it was not recorded
as an archaeological site A total of 16 STPs were excavated at 30 -m intervals along the terraces next to
the floodplains and drainages in the western portion of the APE These areas were chosen due to the high
probability soils within the permit areas STPs were not excavated next to the man -made open ditch due
to poorly drained Rains soils All STPs were negative for prehistoric and historic artifacts The soil
stratigraphy consists of two to three strata The surface layer is very dark grayish brown (10YR 3/2)
loamy sand or sand that is between 15 and 40 cm (6 to 16 in) thick The second layer, if present, is a
yellowish brown (10YR 5/4) loamy sand or sand that is less than 15 cm (6 in) thick Subsoil is yellowish
brown (10YR 5/3) sandy clay loam, but it is occasionally mottled with brown (10YR 413) clay Subsoil
extends at least 50 cm (20 in) below the surface
The archaeological investigations for the proposed improvements to SR 1401 suggest no significant
archaeological sites within the APE The investigations consisted of a surface inspection and shovel test
excavations, which failed to identify any cultural materials within the project limits Soils along the
upland flats demonstrated undesirable qualities for significant archaeological sites by being poorly
drained Although soils along the terraces were suitable for intact archaeological deposit, no cultural
resources were identified within the APE As long as impacts to the subsurface occur within the defined
APE, no further archaeological work is recommended for road improvements to SR 1401m Pender
County However, further archaeological consultation will be necessary if construction should affect
subsurface areas beyond the defined APE
SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
See attached Map(s), Previous Survey Info, Photos, Correspondence, Photocopy of notes from survey
Signed
4/I8/12
C Damon Jones
Cultural Resources Specialist, NCDOT Date
No Hrsione Properties Present form forMrnorTransportation Projects osQualified or the 2007 ProgranrnratreAgrecnrenr
NCDOTArchaeologi B Historic Architecture Gronps

12 -04 -0008
It
One Mile Radius (Shaded)
Around Project Area
X
4z 1
/ •- r.l `.; x ^� _ { '(' . pp
t J e'�+�1.;:,..ri'! 1wi "�'"Jf i SR 1401 -� 1 ?'- �^�'�� J'' ��•S; ^� , ` ,
`� °J
Project Area (Red) rA
r';w;`.ri F f� 1 '.A lac , �'hs�4.Sr a £�k,. rG� YL + vj� ��
-x ✓Ka x,AY c rte" r =.-: '=.+_� r=,Y ,.�� .,. +y4 r _f, .y`^A.,,- r~�_�.
;-r j•x ��y yf1hY F Y �r Z 1
r'Iu3 >.N "` ✓�f`ri^ ' �'�'� -�-+ ^Y't+`'fr..' e ~�., �',- " K� »�i y�?x � ,C i`?.r' /' ° ltwj) � � J
t
),4 {,YI ,• r ?r r e3 u
�t
1 > > ��— r.�.i.• ' ` -r �'�. .c�:i'�`s ; S r � +i ti c ""r�- � }-t •s� �, ' r' , ' Fy s�, � sA Jpr _ jr I d,�l� ,
�e_ l^>�� n•z- G- x-.irU - 1'-' - .,sue -`i7s �f f�•�•,�- re- -,.-.� �,y��`"'rL w^^ >i? l },��r;.� `.'
.°
�� eR 's r'3'
! r ,. •+'�"'�'4` :�� � �� t t ti. l�- "•'r ; l" z ,1 `` 0 ,
G s _ yi °�'� %: -,^a, � � �,',a r a.. � ^.r`;= � x �c sc rM`s x��f " iJ'•.
- '�" M-�'",-!'i2� � .,_,,: r'h...`r.,�> f Ti.•`= �G'r'♦ � Jc4�:�'' -9.' f,'r,�..,:ix�e'�.b "r `ss��:: _ ��.1(r ��' _ .. _ fi a
tf �r �'A''"L`t•<.�Jti:�Ks� -� `��� � �� > ° + =_w,��. .. �6�`�I+w hr�r�a.� 4 � �.-'c� �; - -a - � .,t j - � /P`i�
{ � r � �._� >- �..f�;�^ �s � � . , `�"�m iA l �...% +y 5��, fi rF. /)'� ��� � , A• :,✓ iC',r'r''`a.�.� qr„+�.J �.ra �`� , �,*�'}�
a3 ��� o � y>'F' � �p �.tr».vc•,� � r�� �-' x .iC .�L+'r ..r '� �-" a .°'{T� ay, ,�' s ¢ tr /+ �=
y,
a
.."J.a.�a..�~t �qt �. =�� � u ���'r��. �$ iS f T'J w4, ;1 �s'*'i4 �,�,jr �r� ' _ ', 1 YI (� � �,[ "'w Y. !r'✓ 4F' .+
�'L� K '`� �- �,� 4"•r t C7MC � - 1G' �- �°, � '1 -�''i. tK .w T,' , t -
,
drl J,t �,'' � �r S1- ^`�Y }�
�7" `��
7' -' •- �' 't• ` {��,� { �_ rY7 G �r+` ;�1,(, tnra err{ 'r'� a° r {
5/
1 (
+,
r. r1r �� d17.i j= S.if� r.r r "1,r .. ♦ 4 r<_
ty
't '
4- s'. ' r�r, rt4 1 f�-. �. t aifF> i 4; 4•'" ° err
sr* J �' \ 1 w� Y f t
f.o r r ti }� � T }pit _ -51 I 1{ �? l
1:rr�y�t c``� - }�J', ai ,'ly)f {r c�•- -.f iy`rr��,c
s .+
,it 3? '�1id,;`�i��Y���F}a,��..� -edY"ri
..A +"f .'_ ~�r^x�y,�"J <rlt4i6r,'�r'' =rM.,A ''y °✓;} rJr •r. t r
USGS 7 5 tWtmte Qr adrangk AW 0 1
RocAy Powt Burgdw Cult» N
and Ctane NC
Miles
,1 0 5 �0
W E
Feel
0 2000
Pendsr County Meters S
Figure 1 Topographic Setting of Project Area, Rocky Point (1970, photomspected 1988), Burgaw (1981), Costm
(1984), and Currie (1983, photoinspected 1988), NC, USGS 7 5' Topographic Quadrangle
No lrtstortc Properlres Present form for ALnor Transportation Projects as Qmal fed mt the 2007 Progrommamc Agreement
NCDOT Archaeology d Historic Architecture Groups
4

as a�i;AK r

12 -04 -0008
f t rS
f ✓�
Jg Project Area
1 ♦� r
y
'N i if f
c
m� rr � grf
� F�F t it t � 'r
a �
r � yri
4 -t e I
Figure 4 The circa 1910 U S Post Office map for Pender County showing the project area
U 11J
I
It V
lx �Tr Boa F a
"`ry?.T Y1 e-+i r:.vx!- S•)�'r F-r!n ,.' vr�'1.: •"., d" �. J ki ..i"1` S iLT yrlr ?�lM�Tf >� .5,«- lR�+. �'�`i`^l"^
*li
>s ,s tin h f�,� ty�...
��.1��wf �r A""f��
_n
(
`
F{
QY _�"r�N i AZ�CI ••���k, �i
�'lN
s +rfr�
t7 a'Yft�Y
7i a i J : z ^t r z,,:,,
- , -� ,�N
ti"'r
?rojectAea ;, �� is
d r -,K ; a� 3,3f .
_�u
Cf waf 2„r h6 ti4.1�
>c w i
�
� <.f i' i, 3.+tt
+y �
i tom' �+,.1 3
J
z°4
} j z ,v t h -
ysi'a e•
� gypj
' ps ''
„ e cv
r)l�+ _ " 44
;
a^ ,\O�L
'fis C r
�7 rS ` a
r
,r
' .� . T fii r
� Y I
„
J ^ .
Li�te
- � � rrZ�
°n .
»C �
-
r.{i�"j ,
K _�
` ” °
� tir
�
•
f
'- i
A" w ✓
5 H. { .. C
Gyf
wk�"W
i`r'e e
�t > n,r �.`n nzy. ,. .. 3m +,, nu .�,..r r ^— �''c,? ,Sr.r+ ^ ,FLl �"`•
rr�sr'r7
i nrr� �`w`{ �'1 �,�:� y t �r" �p< _ 13_ � � � >1 asi `�` � y� � ' °Y i a i j a � r i* 1. �e 3r +a � np� a"' `✓
wrk
� y Jh -� F ^1 � j` t r� r y �.� Th � r d r'a r i. }r,� ��; r ✓F�) ✓ 1 :> Mt �>'yl�+v . aT Hk?�a sr. r
_€ rr'. rt
y,�..=y.�x � <. r� ✓rr:5 X 3y 'L "-: r n r k '� r nr`^'' •;�-v1�x " _�� `4 J ��i �i
fl_xll��¢�
�` ` =Yri -✓ Y'_ C i`�`5+ I .} i +,.� x.s. +��sr� �"sr y`4 1 r fr t '° �'" .f"i'^3 E._ s.+ -._.. �, " .: ' � .; rs � t+o
41-
r ., 3 '}✓fir t k,,.. F [ it.�t z�ja ¢,�, -, '>i, -rr
i t �
f'`,,t,'
{r
Figure 5 The 1912 soil survey map for Pender County showing the project area
-No Historic Proper a Present faun for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified m dhe 2007 Progrananatre Agreement
NCDOT Archacology & 11morrc Ardwecture Groups
i

12 -04 -0008
v =
a '� rOr +n t° ua arPD00D8BuryaryDe�tl
fop' or°
i 1
< o
d 75
,iA631 �'' 33 r�G
O
I37 �
' St Hele
l �
faro s 1 t
1
o ' 1
V
1 SI°I911uwt °iti
II y.t..77 111i
HPO Web GIS
Z bi
ti
V t
I r _ ei rr
kti I A�'F�
is �- t '" Yrt � fay
L
5� _y r, =v
, v3,,s P ,s
3�z�' rr C
� �
A V,'- ;
HPO Quad Map Published 1970
Aerial View of Road, NC One Map Aerial Modern Metal Structures not th of road
No San cy Ruprned form for Almor Trorrsportanwr Projects as Ooahfrcd In the 2007 P igrmmnallc Agreement
NC'DO7 Archaeology d Historic Architecture Groups

t � %
//k
o
@
E \7/
g§ m E
G_
G
G
/\ E/
^
�
�2\
CM s
$ \
-
� §
/
2
m O
RI
�E�
<
EI
\\ /�
=
L)
L<^
g
0 7)
8
L§\CLs
/
o
0 L eu
z /If
�®
/
92LU\
U)
�� 7
\
E
o
\ E/
Of
co
I E
=2 ��
% §
2C)
�
k E
E
E
co
§\
°
«
r-4
v
&
2
—
>
o = 3 v
o
s
Z2
\ \
wLL
��cQ7
0
\
E %
_
/ 4
/
[ ƒ %
k §
ƒ 4
//
�E
< 3
k%
2
/\
0 c e
\gR-
a S
ac
d\�
m -0 m
E
m/
8b d)co5
E
P
/\
m r +_#
g o=
G
/
E
m
/
/r-
\
§
+
%
®
t
CN
n
/
/
k
_ %
E
)
/�
U)
(95
e l m

0
N
I
J
r'
J
J
L�
a
U
C7
C/)
Z
O
J
c
_
a�
w
z
wY
cy')
a°
m
L
aC
w
QQ
�>
�-
Q
�m
UO
W
W
O Q
I
w
o�
¢ j
�o
U-
a�
U
Q
a_=
Q
I
co
w Z
v
C(
U)
I
F=
cn O
a
J
W"
d J
Z m
W
I n
V�
I
�Z
r0
w
W�
a�
wQw
i
o°
o-
z
W
I
cr-
z
--
- - --
- --
-
FLOW
o-
a
r-
n
W
z
n-
co
* L) W
W
X=W
-
w
(D Zw
0
W
o
m
0 z
0 0
a
CL
vUN
L6
W
N
J
J �
OW
U m
0
QU
00

OI rnl ml ml mI ml m m ml m ml OD l co
O O
m
o0
�D
M
N
O
m
co
m
m
0-)
m
m
0-)
m
m
m
00
co
O
Ln
X N
Q Q
N
W
XD
N
LLJ
p
M
N
J
Q
0
0i
m
N
F-U
o
0
0
o o
LLJ
W
n
Oo
�
``
/�
ow
OVm
j=
CL U
�G
V1
�—
0-
Q O
��
J N N 00
D O
C0
o
Q
=
W
L)
a-
�
N 1
1_.L .J
I
U
i
0')
U/
J
In
i
N
W
co
rr-�
0
Q
�
Ln
w
W
a
o
Ln
0
LL
n
2
0 U
LLI
m
M
6 '
L J
n
L L
ED
H M
Q
O z
(n X
w Ln
N t-
O
W�
� v
pw IX
�nrn
�>
�Z
OI rnl ml ml mI ml m m ml m ml OD l co

O
N
I I
J
�
W
m
``
Q
J_
U
U)
n
LL
m
J
W m
a
C
z ¢
°" E
o
Z
U)
w
O
Q °?
w
<
r w
ch =
W
U) b
U —
m
oQ
z
° `_
N 2.
X
Q
of w
I
I
a
¢
U
Q�
� 0
�'0
CD
w
<L
¢v~i
OD U)
cc
�Q
F- v
_.
I
af
w�-
3 aXi
Z�LUd
�J
�w
--
o
�
U) >
_
�Z
N w
I
O
w 2"�
�r 0
Q�
J w
fl 0
o
—
z
>
Oz
o�
o�
—w
w
�
w
x
�
_ _1__
I
FLOW
o
�-
Q-
J
CD
CD Q
00
r
I
Q
00
w
;ow
x
I
n
Z
co
N
X 2 60
w co
w m
cn Z)
O I-
I
Ln
O
z
°' (n
o
0-0
CD
F- N
to
w
N
J
J
O
m
O
00

Za
v 0:m
~r
V Ow y N� N
J O� WN F
1 I W v
a a O s m
" � r,
II� a�H U 99"
WNY-V
` N Lc)
'L W� Q Q =gc
ill aa-' o
S W Z a
Ili Z %
p y W ¢
�o A tl o EAaN
t O O N O i
tn. NNY
p 3: U w
LLI qG�� 2 14 �� N • • " � o� m -u
ga �
'0.0 c NJ
�
V Q� \\\,
°
Q �
\�1 1
,
oc
1 1
1 111 j1 �o -
\ =o
Is
C8, OVN
KD
I ►� 11,1 3
a
a
III
' I I�IIo
sr+ o .raw
t y

w 2
B
U Wm
£8 GVN ° q Q. N
_ n win f
t: ono Tmni
h w J
7 J n V a
p'+ Q
aq Wm u°
o Z m
> am
Q tl O Nac w
a� Z Z U' a
O B"¢ a
p bD w vm0 S
2 V O NQO N r
IIC 1 ►I u :z
IC 11 p ° c:,
Za: E. l° u
0 0�n0
MCL IiE ail
I IC a�l
1 1111 �
Ila o
U
I It a I
I � h
1� �I
I ;g it
it
a U 1► i
b�l 11 1► I �
I 1► I
I i� it 9
W �I II
II& ►I
I►� II
1� 1 a
� a
Old!
� aeaa'-
� I I'Ill
jell
I�II�

CS adN
Z -
V1M Cia =u�i
o� $� W oo-
n
LUO% C O � w }f
�� v Y
2QQ W10� LK y0°OOAD p A Q= W � m a` o
ti� {It Il � wz
� ill A �, Q cnaN Z
uIIt 1 1 1 o°
It III Ux N =z m o
PL IIt II o CC Nm�
' It II tt NU New
llt II o3 C,W•
z a BOO m -u
It III LL s oZ
o A ON�
I It II I
p III II I
v l I III a�
I It II I
o II II o
=1t III
it it
It II 8
alt Ilo �
I It III a,
ptn It I I ao
I It III �
Ilt II
i It I I
Ilt l
It II
116 tt I �
Ili 81l �
Ilt all
_aq
Iit X11
$s
I �
r� II ij1 I
I
1 III
j�lll
I�IIie

I
£8 OVN � d
F-
A,M
y
W—
es..
2 Ul O O
W Z- U
grIII ° 01' } O c7 m W
OP
t3 zur
BBLL
a:mz m o
No
N~ NSW
ex
i4 LL O «oz
moll
LOW
CIL
e„
C" o
I {;II
{ 'I
I '
I
W IC I a
0
IC jI
o alk �Ia �
g ilg ill
I►� �I�I
I It 1 I I _ as
1 I I S � aa ias
N

m
ps
Cq WN �
aM w 07.. uw
O W
/ / O� Q WWv UIOO
/ zm
a N z
t3N Z
U na o Z0;
Z
BNK a
/If /H9 p MAO V V O O i�
I JC Ci W N 'E LL a s
w ,,o °m
NV NNW
oW.
LL O m o l]
ON00
/LL
I I
I
I
/
A/,7
/`
VOW
LJCi
JI
,1 /Q
4F
Cy //
9 i
ier
W W
�S
// ✓® L 8d
bag
E8 (IVN I
jell
_ I Ellie

£8 CIVN Z
U WO
w cn s
ds ~\ Opp �mv
6v p,M W¢
rn' O O .. f u n
w ►1 O w Z N u
z w a m
O178 w
4s ms
8yea Z z
n _
O m O a
N�z NO~
ti 0E m�U
"C3
\ J 0Z
ou°
1
LO
cv �e
Mal sp�� \\
a��$ a \��; h�
AK
N[ LL.
\ \ \\\
Lu
``
OQp, ly /rrlj `\ `\
ri y' /a � \ \
1O, \ \\ \\ b
/ err W s
a�
w'�'
MCI

Z"
U W B
r�
C N W(n r
d Q
U) O O N p �\ -x *z) T.
cl) Co (1) 0) O f
LO m CU C) (06 U N y C a tl y Vwl J ll"1 o c i
in µ- O } 0,2
J r- f_n i+ p N 6� U "- p p 2� �- fn o v
X 4 c
t5 o co ^ _° 0) =V O) �? Q w z NN o
cn
CD =1 Q w
w OO+ O 00'O N N c`-p O s v~ia z° tf
C E i C p a O }6 p 0) C U r O m?¢ w
M ca 3�w �= J� E c $ oe°W v_NO a
W 3 C) c°) m a) U$ NmZ m
SON �10 N O� U m CL _ _ ¢�NO�
C (D JfV c9 C CO p —O M -p Q p `� �U Nc'x
O N 0) — (6 O C (4 fl) O o m^ s
U 'p d' N V` N(D (/� O C Q m U Z a LL Ch u °o
N f6 cn
T+ a N a w C � .L.. O cu E O. CU c6 Q
z .0 LO
co m H o` u H ii cn w o. 3 Q n
L` a�
L _ c
r 0 D M N
o u
o N
V
M
o w
u o
¢ W -
a 4 u U 2
W o \
L Z u ¢ U
N } x¢ w
T � 4- O m W N W m
D W � a J ¢¢ Ln
ai E Df / p �¢ W
,F > D. W c Q w
D O \ N O W uP V
Q- = ?LL
L o ------- ----- L) U N
O Q a �aa a
O N r, + Z �FN W CL a
10 D d l a. 3 W owl IxJ J
�NW r ¢
LL � O W a�a ¢
¢ ocn 1O �
o + Q pu CD c3 ¢
4- O_ WWJ W E
w
s _ a (n o a w
++ N O OO
L 0
+ D N
o H
3
a
�
a
a
N
�
f
W
O
v
y
O
U
N
°
O
0
Q.
a
a
D
O
O
L
L
a
L
a
a
2
w
r
a
v
�
�
W
a
w
�
J
o
J
W
d
w
v
O
N
X
aD
m
U
nom.
�
�
W
=
Z
(h
M
ll'1
d.
a
w
ch
J
CD
Z
r
a
a
a
N
W
N
�
U
U
D:
U
2
W
07
m
p
Q7
c
v
-^
Z
c0
(")
O'
O
Q
n
n
n
r
B
N
N
N
N
(•1
I�
W
D'
Q
m
U
a

' r
i�
s
>li
�..1
Ar
rL