NC0005274_Permit Modification_20050615

NPDES DOCUMENT SCANNING COVER SHEET
NC0005274
NPDES Permit:
Document Type:
Permit Issuance
Wasteload Allocation
Authorization to Construct (AtC)
,,-
Permit Modification`
Speculative Limits
Report
Instream Assessment (67B)
Environmental Assessment (EA)
Permit
History
Document Date:
June 15, 2005
This document in printed on reuse paper - ignore any
content on the reYerne side

Michael F. Easley, Governor
State of North Carolina
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
June 15, 2005
Mr. William J. Shortreed
Advanced Resource Technologies, Inc.
42 Running Fox Road
Columbia, SC 223
Subject: NPDES Permit Modification
Yorkshire Americas, Inc.
NPDES Permit NC0005274
Gaston County
Dear Mr. Shortreed:
The Division o Water Quality (Division) has reviewed your request to divert stormwater runoff
from the wastewater treatment system. Due to the bankruptcy of the Yorkshire Americas, Inc. there
is no funding to operate and maintain WWTP. In addition, production has been discontinued at the
plant, and stormwater is not exposed to the chemicals on site. Sampling conducted by the court
appointed site coordinator indicated that stormwater discharge is unlikely to cause contamination of
the receiving water. l
Therefore, the Division is in favor of granting your request. However, it is necessary to establish a
separate storm ter outfall and incorporate quarterly sampling at the point of discharge for the
following pollu nts: Total Phenols, Sulfates, Chlorides, Conductivity, Total Chromium, Total
Copper, Total Cyanide, Total Lead, Total Nickel, Total Zinc, and pollutants subject to an EPA
method 625 sc . Establishment of a new outfall is considered a Major Modification to the existing
NPDES permi and can be processed only if requested by Yorkshire Americas or their legal
representative. This request has to be accompanied by a permit application and the map that clearly
identifies location of the new outfall along with its longitude and latitude. Since the new outfall will
be established for stormwater discharges you would also need to submit the stormwater forms EPA
1 and EPA 2F. The Division feels that this is the most appropriate way to incorporate the required
changes.
If you have any questions concerning this permit, please contact Sergei Chemikov at telephone
number [phone], extension 594.
Sincerely,
P
cc: Central Files
Mooresville Regional Office/Water Quality Section
NPDES Files
Mr. Roosevelt Childress, EPA Region IV
Sergei Chemikov, Ph.D.
NPDES-West
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
[phone]
FAX [phone]
On the Internet at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/

March 2, 2005
MEMORANDUM
TO: Susan Wilson
Western NPDES Program
iL
FROM: Rex Gleason p
PREPARED BY: Richard Bridgeman 1�
SUBJECT: Yorkshire Americas, Inc.
NPDES Permit No. NC0005274
Gaston County
By memorandum dated January 3, 2005, you were advised of the bankruptcy of
the subject company and of the request of the Site Coordinator, William Shortreed, to
preclude discharges from the NPDES-permitted wastewater treatment facility by
rerouting storm water runoff to prevent its entry into the idle treatment plant.
A letter to Mr. Shortreed dated January 13, 2005 approved temporary emergency
rerouting of the storm water. Mr. Shortreed was asked to analytically characterize the
storm water runoff that would normally be routed to one of the facility's EQ basins, and
has done so during two separate rainfall events. Attached, you will fmd correspondence
from Mr. Shortreed, which summarizes the current on -site conditions and the data from
the two sampling events. The first sampling event was conducted on January 13, 2005.
One sample (Lab Sample #62225) was of rainfall collected directly into buckets; as one
might expect, the pollutants analyzed for were not detected. Of course, since the affected
surface water, the South Fork Catawba River, is classified a Class WS-V stream, the total
phenols detection level should have been 1.0 µg/L; this fact is true for all of the
subsequent phenols analyses I will discuss. Also during the first event, a sample (Lab
Sample #62226) was collected at the front gate of the site outside of the fence line;
although there were detectable concentrations of chlorides, chromium, copper, and zinc,
only copper and zinc were higher than the stream action levels. Also during the first
event, a sample (Lab Sample #62227) was collected of the runoff flow that would
normally be routed to an EQ basin; although there were detectable concentrations of
chlorides, phenols, copper, and zinc, only phenols, copper, and zinc were higher than the
relevant stream standard or action level. A second sampling event was conducted on
February 3, 2005. The sample (Lab Sample #62570) was collected of the runoff flow
that would normally be routed to an EQ basin; there were detectable concentrations of
copper and zinc, but both were at or below the relevant stream action level.

Mr. Shortreed would like to have permanent approval to reroute the storm water
runoff to prevent its entry into the treatment plant. There is no funding source to provide
for operation and maintenance of the treatment works. To the writer, the only detected
pollutant of concern is phenols. The use of a sump pump to collect Lab Sample #62227
may have contributed to the high value of 15 µg/L, since the manually collected Lab
Sample #62570 had a result of <10 µg/L. This could be verified by pumping distilled
water through the system and collecting a sample for phenol analysis.
This office has no objection to allowing a permanent rerouting of the storm water
runoff. It is recommended, however, that quarterly sampling of relevant pollutants be
required.
Contact Richard or me should you have questions.
Attachments
RMB

Yorkshire Americas, Inc.
1602 North Main St.
Lowell, NC 28098
February 23, 2005
Mr. Richard Bridgeman
NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Surface Neater Protection
610 East center Ave.
Suite 301
Mooresville, NC 28115
Subject: NPDES Permit # NCOOO5274
Dear Mr. ridgeman:
Backgrou d:
FEB 282005
Yorkshire Americas, Inc. in Lowell, NC ceased operations on September 24, 2004 and
formally obtained Chapter 7 bankruptcy status on November 4, 2004. The NPDES
permit requires all precipitation that fell onto the approximately eight (8) acre active area
of the plant to be directed to the on -site waste water treatment plant. The logic for this
action, apprently, was that Yorkshire operations transferred a certain amount of
chemical contamination to the plant roadways and roofs in the course of doing business.
Upon shutting down the operation, the facility also ceased operation of the waste water
treatment plant. Further, no other continuing operations are being maintained. Thus, the
potential of contaminating roadways and roofs with chemicals no longer exists.
The routing of roadway and roof drains to the waste water treatment plant contributes
over 2OO,O0O gallons of water to the system for each inch of rain.

Request:
We request that NCDENR provide us with authority to divert these surface waters from
the waste water treatment system, which will enable us to maintain it in an idled mode.
Data:
At the request of the NCDENR, we obtained samples of water from a major rain event on
January 13, 2005. Appendix A contains a summary report from PAR Labs, of which you
have the original report.
Sample 6 25 - Rainwater collected directly in buckets, with no plant surface contact.
Sample 6 26 - Runoff water collected at the front gate of the plant outside of the fence
Sample 6227 - Runoff water collected at the base of the plant, which represented the
runoff from the majority of the facility.
All three f the samples were tested for Chlorides; Cyanide, total; Phenols, total;
Conducti ty; Sulfate; Chromium, total; Nickel, total; Lead, total; and Zink, total.
Samples 61226 and 6227 also received EPA 625 testing for specific compounds. Sample
6225 was excluded from this test because there was an inadequate volume of sample.
Further, since a large volume of sample was necessary, and we collected water from
shallow accumulation areas, an electric "sump" pump was used to collect Samples 6226
and 6227.
Upon evaluation of these data, the NCDENR requested that we analyze the runoff from a
second rain event for Chlorides, total Phenols, Conductivity, total Copper and total Zinc.
These samples were taken during a February 5, 2005 rain event and the analyses are
attached Par Report dated 02/09/05 (Appendix B). We were unable to obtain samples
from the front gate area because there, simply, wasn't enough water accumulation to
allow any sampling technique.
Conclusions:
We strongly believe that the methodology of collecting the first samples with a "sump"
pump resuited in a highly agitated zone in the sampling area. The outcome of this
approach was a scrubbing effect in that zone, which would have created false high
readings.
The samples taken during the February 5, 2005 event much more accurately represent the
actual concentrations in the runoff water.
If the runoff water can not be diverted, then we would be forced to start up the waste
water treatment plant to manage that water. This would not enhance the environment
since nutrients would be required to maintain the bacteria in the treatment tanks. Thus,

instead of discharging acceptably clean water to the environment, we would discharge
that same water fortified with the residuals of those required nutrients.
Mr. Bridgeman, we look forward to an early decision from the Department allowing us to
divert the surface water runoff from the waste water treatment plant.
Sincerely,
W. am J. Shortreed
e Coordinator
Columbia Office:
42 Running Fox Road
Columbia, SC 29223
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
cc: P. Wayne Sigmon, Trustee

Appendix A
Summary data for 1/13/05 rain event

REPORT OF ANALYSES
Attn: BILL SHORTREED
YORKSHIRE AMERICA
C/O ADV. RESOURCE TECH.
42 RUNNING FOX ROAD
COLUMBIA, SC 29223-
PROJECT NAME: JAN 05
DATE: 02/08/05
SAMPLE NUMBER- 62225 SAMPLE ID- ART BACKGROUND
DATE SAMPLED- 01/13/05
DATE RECEIVED- 01/14/05 SAMPLER- RUSS EVERETT
TIME RECEIVED- 0930 DELIVERED BY- RUSS EVERETT
Page 1 of 7
ANALYSIS
SAMPLE MATRIX- WW
TIME SAMPLED- 2320
RECEIVED BY- MJ
TYPE SAMPLE- Grab
ANALYSIS
METHOD DATE TIME BY RESULT UNITS
CHLORIDES SM 4500-CL 01/19/05 1400 RE < 0.1 mg/L
CYANIDE,TOTAL EPA 335.3 01/18/05 1236 CT < 0.002 mg/L
TOTAL PHENOLS 420.1,.2 01/18/05 1513 CT < 0.010 mg/L
CONDUCTIVITY EPA 120.1 01/18/05 1215 CT 16.3 um/cm
SULFATE EPA 375.4 01/18/05 1330 CT < 10 mg/L
CHROMIUM, TOTAL EPA 200.7 01/17/05 1557 CT < 0.005 mg/L
COPPER, TOTAL EPA 200.7 01/17/05 1557 CT < 0.002 mg/L
NICKEL, TOTAL EPA 200.7 01/17/05 1557 CT < 0.01 mg/L
LEAD, TOTAL EPA 200.7 01/17/05 1557 CT < 0.01 mg/L
ZINC, TOTAL EPA 200.7 01/17/05 1557 CT < 0.005 mg/L
LABORATORY DIRECTOR

REPORT OF ANALYSES
Attn: BILL SHORTREED
YORUCSHIRE AMERICA
C/O ADV. RESOURCE TECH.
42 RUNNING FOX ROAD
COLUMBIA, SC 29223-
PROJECT NAME: JAN 05
DATE: 02/08/05
SAMPLE NUMBER- 62226 SAMPLE ID- ART FRONT GATE
DATE SAMPLED- 01/13/05
DATE RECEIVED- 01/14/05 SAMPLER- RUSS EVERETT
TIME RECEIVED- 0930 DELIVERED BY- RUSS EVERETT
Page 2 of 7
YSIS
SAMPLE MATRIX- MW
TIME SAMPLED- 2300
RECEIVED BY- MJ
TYPE SAMPLE- Grab
ANALYSIS
METHOD DATE TIME BY RESULT UNITS
CHIARIDES SM 4500-CL 01/19/05 1400 RE 4.38 tag/L
CYANIDE,TOTAL EPA 335.3 01/18/05 1236 CT < 0.002 mg/L
TOTAL PHENOLS 420.1,.2 01/18/05 1513 CT < 0.010 mg/L
CONDUCTIVITY EPA 120.1 01/18/05 1215 CT 90.3 um/cm
SULFATE EPA 375.4 01/18/05 1330 CT < 10 mq/L
CHROMIUM, TOTAL EPA 200.7 01/17/05 1557 CT 0.010 mg/L
COPPER, TOTAL EPA 200.7 01/17/05 1557 CT 0.043 mg/L
NICCEL, TOTAL EPA 200.7 01/17/05 1557 CT < 0.01 mg/L
LEAD, TOTAL EPA 200.7 01/17/05 1557 CT < 0.01 mg/L
ZINC, TOTAL EPA 200.7 01/17/05 1557 CT 0.211 mg/L
EPA 625, SEMI-VOLITILES EPA 625 01/19/05 MS
4-N TROPHENOL EPA 625 01/19/05 MS < 10 ppb
PENTACHLOROPHENOL EPA 625 01/19/05 MS < 10 ppb
2,4-DINITROPHENOL EPA 625 01/19/05 MS < 10 ppb
4-C$LORO-3-METHYPHENOL EPA 625 01/19/05 MS < 10 ppb
2,4 6-TRICHLOROPHENOL EPA 625 01/19/05 MS < 10 ppb
2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL EPA 625 01/19/05 MS < 10 ppb
2, 4.-DIMETHYLPHENOL EPA 625 01/19/05 MS < 10 ppb
PHEWOL EPA 625 01/19/05 MS < 10 ppb
2-NITROPHENOL EPA 625 01/19/05 MS < 10 ppb
2-C7LOROPHENOL EPA 625 01/19/05 MS < 10 ppb

Page 3 of 7
CO TINUATION OF DATA FOR SAMPLE NUMBER 62226
ANALYSIS
N-NITROSODIMETHYLAMINE
BIB(2-CHLOROETHYL)ETHER
N-NITROSODI-n-PROPYLAMINE
NI -•BENZENE
HLOROBUTADIENE
1,2,4-TRICHLORABENZENE
ISOPHORONE
NAPTHALENE
BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXY)METHANE
HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE
2-CLORONAPTHALENE
ACENAPHTHYLENE
ACEiIAPTHENE
AZOHENZENE
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
2,6-DINITROTOLUENE
FLUORENE
4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
2,4-DINITROTOLUENE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
N-N TROSODIPHENYLAMINE
HEXACHLOROBENZENE
4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
PHENATHRENE
ANTHRACENE
DI -II -BUTYL -PHTHALATE
FLU4»UINTHENE
P NE
BENZIDINE
BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE
BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL)PHTHALATE
METHOD
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
ANALYSIS
DATE TIME BY RESULT UNITS
01/19/05 MS < 10 ppb
01/19/05 MS < 10 ppb
01/19/05 MS < 10 ppb
01/19/05 MS < 10 ppb
01/19/05 MS < 10 ppb
01/19/05 MS < 10 ppb
01/19/05 MS < 10 ppb
01/19/05 MS < 10 ppb
01/19/05 MS < 10 ppb
01/19/05 MS < 10 ppb
01/19/05 MS < 10 ppb
01/19/05 M3 < 10 ppb
01/19/05 MS < 10 ppb
01/19/05 M3 < 10 ppb
01/19/05 MS < 10 ppb
01/19/05 MS < 10 ppb
01/19/05 M3 < 10 ppb
01/19/05 M3 < 10 ppb
01/19/05 MS < 10 ppb
01/19/05 MS < 10 ppb
01/19/05 MS < 10 ppb
01/19/05 MS < 10 ppb
01/19/05 MS < 10 ppb
01/19/05 MS < 10 ppb
01/19/05 MS < 10 ppb
01/19/05 MS < 10 ppb
01/19/05 MS < 10 ppb
01/19/05 MS < 10 ppb
01/19/05 M3 < 10 ppb
01/19/05 MS < 10 ppb
01/19/05 M3 < 10 ppb

Pails 4 of 7
co INUATION OF DATA FOR SAMPLE
ANALYSIS
BENZO (A)ANTHRACENE
CHRYSENE
3,3-DICHLOROBENZIDINE
DI-n-OCTYLPHTHALATE
BENZO (B)FLUORANTHENE
BENZO (K)FLUORANTHENE
BENZO (A)PYRENE
INDENO (1,2,3, -cd)PYRENE
DI$ENZO (a,h)ANTHRACENE
BE ZO (g,h,i)PERYLENE
BIS (2CHLOROISOPROPYL)ETHER
HEKACHLOROETHANE
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,4 DICHLOROSENZENE
2-METHYL-4, 6-DINITROPHENOL
NUMBER 62226
ANALYSIS
METHOD DATE TIME BY RESULT UNITS
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
01/19/05
01/19/05
01/19/05
01/19/05
01/19/05
01/19/05
01/19/05
01/19/05
01/19/05
01/19/05
01/19/05
01/19/05
01/19/05
01/19/05
01/19/05
01/19/05
LABORATORY DIRECTOR
< 10 ppb
< 10 ppb
< 10 ppb
< 10 ppb
< 10 ppb
< 10 ppb
< 10 ppb
< 10 ppb
< 10 ppb
< 10 ppb
< 10 ppb
< 10 ppb
< 10 ppb
< 10 ppb
< 10 ppb
< 10 ppb

REPORT OF ANALYSES
Attn: BILL SHORTREED
YO HIRE AMERICA PROJECT NAME: JAN 05
C/ ADV. RESOURCE TECH. DATE: 02/08/05
42 RUNNING FOX ROAD
COLIA, SC 29223-
SAMPLE NUMBER- 62227 SAMPLE ID- ART WASTE TREATMENT SAMPLE MATRIX- WW
DATE SAMPLED- 01/13/05 TIME SAMPLED- 2310
DATE RECEIVED- 01/14/05 SAMPLER- RUSS EVERETT RECEIVED BY- MJ
TIME RECEIVED- 0930 DELIVERED BY- RUSS EVERETT TYPE SAMPLE- Grab
Page 5 of 7
ANALYSIS
ANALYSIS
METHOD DATE TIME BY RESULT UNITS
CHLORIDES SM 4500-CL 01/19/05 1400 RE 1.75 mg/L
CYANIDE,TOTAL EPA 335.3 01/18/05 1236 CT < 0.002 mg/L
TOTAL PHENOLS 420.1,.2 01/18/05 1513 CT 0.015 mg/L
CONDUCTIVITY EPA 120.1 01/18/05 1215 CT 49.4 um/cm
SULFATE EPA 375.4 01/18/05 1330 CT < 10 mg/L
CHROMIUM, TOTAL EPA 200.7 01/17/05 1557 CT < 0.005 mg/L
COPPER, TOTAL EPA 200.7 01/17/05 1557 CT 0.016 mg/L
NICKEL, TOTAL EPA 200.7 01/17/05 1557 CT < 0.01 mg/L
LEAD, TOTAL EPA 200.7 01/17/05 1557 CT < 0.01 mg/L
ZIN, TOTAL EPA 200.7 01/17/05 1557 CT 0.066 mg/L
EPA 625, SEMI-VOLITILES EPA 625 01/19/05 M3
4-N TROPHENOL EPA 625 01/19/05 MS < 10 ppb
PENTACHLOROPHENOL EPA 625 01/19/05 MS < 10 ppb
2,4»DINITROPHENOL EPA 625 01/19/05 MS < 10 ppb
4 -CHLORO-3 -METHYPHENOL EPA 625 01/19/05 MS < 10 ppb
2,46-TRICHLOROPHENOL EPA 625 01/19/05 MS < 10 ppb
2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL EPA 625 01/19/05 MS < 10 ppb
2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL EPA 625 01/19/05 M3 < 10 ppb
PHENOL EPA 625 01/19/05 MS < 10 ppb
2-NITROPHENOL EPA 625 01/19/05 MS < 10 ppb
2-CHLOROPHENOL EPA 625 01/19/05 MS < 10 ppb

Palle 6 of 7
CONTINUATION OF DATA FOR SAMPLE
ANALYSIS
N-NITROSODIMETHYLAMINE
BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL)ETHER
N-NITROSODI-n-PROPYLAMINE
N�BENZENE
H HLOROBUTADIENE
1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
ISOPHORONE
NAPTHALENE
BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXY)METHANE
HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE
2-CBLORONAPTHALENE
ACENAPHTHYLENE
ACENAPTHENE
AZOBENZENE
OIMETHYL PHTHALATE
2,6-DINITROTOLUENE
FLUORENE
4- LOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
2,4-DINITROTOLUENE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE
HEX CHLOROBENZENE
4-8 PHENYL PHENYL ETHER
PHENATHRENE
ANT1RACENE
DI-N-BUTYL-PHTHALATE
FLUORANTRENE
PYRBNE
BENZIDINE
BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE
8IS(2-ETHYLHEXYL)PHTHALATE
NUMBER 62227
METHOD
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
ANALYSIS
DATE TIME BY RESULT UNITS
01/19/05 MS < 10 ppb
01/19/05 MS < 10 ppb
01/19/05 M3 < 10 ppb
01/19/05 MS < 10 ppb
01/19/05 M3 < 10 ppb
01/19/05 M3 < 10 ppb
01/19/05 MS < 10 ppb
01/19/05 MS < 10 ppb
01/19/05 M3 < 10 ppb
01/19/05 M3 < 10 ppb
01/19/05 M3 < 10 ppb
01/19/05 M3 < 10 ppb
01/19/05 M3 < 10 ppb
01/19/05 MS < 10 ppb
01/19/05 MS < 10 ppb
01/19/05 M3 < 10 ppb
01/19/05 148 < 10 ppb
01/19/05 M3 < 10 ppb
01/19/05 MS < 10 ppb
01/19/05 MS < 10 ppb
01/19/05 MS < 10 ppb
01/19/05 M3 < 10 ppb
01/19/05 MS < 10 ppb
01/19/05 MS < 10 ppb
01/19/05 MS < 10 ppb
01/19/05 M3 < 10 ppb
01/19/05 MS < 10 ppb
01/19/05 M3 < 10 ppb
01/19/05 M3 < 10 ppb
01/19/05 MS < 10 ppb
01/19/05 MS < 10 ppb

Pae 7 of 7
CO�INUATION
ANALYSIS
OF DATA FOR SAMPLE NUMBER 62227
ANALYSIS
METHOD DATE TIME BY RESULT UNITS
BENZO (A)ANTHRACENE EPA 625 01/19/05 MS < 10 ppb
CHRTSENE EPA 625 01/19/05 MS < 10 ppb
3,3-DICHLOROBENZIDINE EPA 625 01/19/05 MS < 10 ppb
DI-}a-OCTYLPHTHALATE EPA 625 01/19/05 MS < 10 ppb
BENZO (B)FLUORANTHENE EPA 625 01/19/05 MS < 10 ppb
BEN O (K)FLUORANTHENE EPA 625 01/19/05 MS < 10 ppb
BENZO (A)PYRENE EPA 625 01/19/05 MS < 10 ppb
IND (1,2,3,-cd)PYRE$E EPA 625 01/19/05 MS < 10 ppb
DIBENZO (a,h)ANTHRACENE EPA 625 01/19/05 MS < 10 ppb
BENZO (Q,h,i)PERYLENE EPA 625 01/19/05 MS < 10 ppb
BIS (2CHLOROISOPROPYL)ETHER EPA 625 01/19/05 MS < 10 ppb
HEX4CHLOROETHANE EPA 625 01/19/05 MS < 10 ppb
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE EPA 625 01/19/05 MS < 10 ppb
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE EPA 625 01/19/05 MS < 10 ppb
1,4 DICHLOROBENZENE EPA 625 01/19/05 MS < 10 ppb
2-METHYL-4, 6-DINITROPHENOL EPA 625 01/19/05 MS < 10 ppb
LABORATORY DIRECTOR

Appendix B
PAR Analytical Report for 2/5/05 rain event

PAR Laboratori.s, Inc.
2217 Graham Paris Drive
PO8ox411483
Chariot$o. NC 28241-1483
Phone: [phone]; Fax: [phone]
NCCott '20;SCCart •wow
REPORT OF ANALYSES
Attn: SILL SHORTREED
YORRSHIRS AMERICA PROJECT NAME: FEB 05
C/O ADV. RESOURCE TECH. DATE: 02/09/05
42 RUNNING FOX ROAD
COLUMBIA, SC 29223-
SAMPLE NUMBER. 62570 .SAMPLE ID- ART WASTE TREAT STORMWATER '', SAMPLE MATRIX- ww
DATE SAMPLED- 02/03/0S TIME SAMPLED- 1045
DATE RECEIVED- 02/03/05 SAMPLER- R. EVERETT RECEIVED BY- CT
TIME RECEIVED- 1316 DELIVERED BY- R. EVERETT TYPE SAMPLE- Grab
Page
1 of 1
ANALYSIS
CHLORIDES
TOTAL PHEKOLS
CONDUCTIVITY
COMM, TOTAL
ZINC, TOTAL
ANALYSIS
METHOD DATE TIME BY RESULT UNITS
SA 4500-CL 02/08/05 0853 RS < 0.1 mg/L
420.1,-2 02/08/05 1356 CT < 0.010 mg/L
SPA 120.1 02/08/05 1445 CT 26.6 um/cm
EPA 200.7 02/07/05 1442 CT 0.007 mg/L
EPA 200.7 02/07/05 1442 CT 0.040 mg/L

CHAIN OF CUSTODY
PAR Laboratories, Inc
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
conspei=
Advanced Resource Technologies
Sppt
2217 Graham Park Drive
Charlotte, NC 28273
it Is NNNC *U the d hlarnda+ be molded on wt Chub rift** document for aoaplance by PAR tgborib d.s, tro. end s+S Note
ct EavAri nmtna Ana MOW itaourott.
Muffing:
PO Box 411483
Charlotte, NC 28241-1483
Comments/ Special Instructions
Addriel 42 Runntng Fox Road •
city, $rat & sip cods
Cotum�28223
Point Contact it T Number
s� 8hortreed [phone]
Sample Taken
By:
1 4-}Q. -DSAAA
at
35 /ate
IS THIS FOR STATE or EPA REPORTING'. YES�C NO
'Sample type: DW _,,,_ W W OVAAV SoU =other
8emple Temp at time of sampling: °C Sample Temp upon noel : °C
Preserved: Yes No Teflon Urnd Zero Heave: Yes _ No _ NWA.
41 •.•... .y,.{`•y. r q Yw -. i'
k S.SrS iJ ,1165 .t� • .M {�+r
.Y. �1. ..``i.. .''7.
S '.1 Nr.Vi' . rfi✓ ��, .�H.
Sl
r !
Y
rt�:.
_ .. .1
.••.ttl.,:.
i'
,r 1 • .
�j" kY
. p,
. e M
1•pi=•..-�
x'S?.+...��
.-, _`.+` '•
•%y/t l
rr i•14'1= ' .*.
Y .�. _ {.
c �gry,.:i
g a. .'^ - OW:. t+ 17-,
�'i.../�M t 4M`,a.l
••3...1 ( L r ^' i S
.Yrl:+.w,,. ^r..
�+
x
g
,�
cecA,
-&
C...-, .,
i
_
_
1
,,
•
Rdmished ttp a b
DeefrIme
• C•c«eoeeb COGrab tiWutkkddng Water WW.Weste waax CMMII.Groundoster Motoring Well PIW.Hassoloos Wade .. See
Other Side