Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNC0020052_Wasteload Allocation_19910219NPDES DOCUMENT SCANNINO COVER SHEET NC0020052 McAdenville WWTP NPDES Permit: Document Type: Permit Issuance \ Wasteload Allocation Authorization to Construct (AtC) Permit Modification Speculative Limits Compliance Instream Assessment (67B) Environmental Assessment (EA) Permit History Document Date: February 19, 1991 This document is printed on rewae paper - ignore any content on the reYerise aside NPDES WAS lb LOAD ALLOCATION PERMIT NO.: NC0020052 PERMITTEE NAME: Town of McAdenville / McAdenville WWTP Facility Status: Existing Permit Status: Renewal Major Minor Pipe No.: 001 Design Capacity: 0.130 MGD Domestic (% of Flow): -3-%-- /oo Industrial (% of Flow): .J.7-% Comments: Industrial flow from Stowe Mills. RECEIVING STREAM: South Fork Catawba River Class: WS-III Sub -Basin: 03-08-36 Reference USGS Quad: F14SE, Mount Holly (please attach) County: Gaston Regional Office: Mooresville Regional Office Previous Exp. Date: 5/31/91 Treatment Plant Class: II Classification changes within three miles: No change within 3 miles. Requested by: Prepared by: Reviewed b Jeffrey A. Curka Date: 1/2/91 Date: 2//2 Date: Modeler Date Rec. # z-KA_,3 (1z-kt e' Drainage Area (miy ) 6 3 Avg. Streamflow (cfs): jot, 7Q10 (cfs) 42 Y Winter 7Q10 (cfs) 2 24 30Q2 (cfs) Toxicity Limits: IWC % Acute/Chronic Instream Monitoring: Parameters Upstream itl Location Downstream n) Location Effluent Characteristics Summer Winter BOD5 (mg/1) 30 NH3-N (mg/1) Nr D.O. (mg/1) ,./y TSS (mg/1) 3 v F. Col. (/100 me 2 a 0 pH (SU) 6 —9 - Refer : Basinwide / Streamline WLA File Completed By Permits & Engineering _ At Front Of Subbasin OLOTTFP, Comments: /3S UskA 2— Facility Name NPDES No. Type of Waste Facility Status Permit Status Receiving Stream Stream Classification: Subbasin County Regional Requester Date of Request Topo Quad Office -1- FACT SHEET FOR WASTELOAD ALLOCATIONS : '.uEir(ENT Request # 5986 QFFlCE. MCADENVILLE WWTP NC0020052 100%s DOMESTIC EXISTING RENEWAL SOUTH FORK WSIII 030836 GASTO MRO CURKA 1/2/91 F14SE CATAWBA RIVER Stream Characteristics: USGS # 02.1451.1200 Date:'85 Drainage Area: 632 sq. mi. Summer 7Q10: 124 cfs Winter 7Q10: 226 cfs Average Flow: 800 cfs 30Q2: cfs Wasteload Allocation Summary (approach taken, correspondence with region, EPA, etc.) Recommend renewal of existing limits, revising fecal coliform limit to reflect new 200/100m1 limit. Special Scheduled Requirements and additional comments from Reviewers: Recommended by: Reviewed by Instream Assessment: ar'r autih-5-eifvuQ,tcAA4)-, Regional Supervisor:/9 cff' Permits & Engineering: RETURN TO TECHNICAL SERVICES BY: Date:_1/30/91_ Date: 3 [ Date: Date: ZAl 7e( Exis in Limits W stef low (MGD) : BOD5 (mg/1) : NH3N (mg/1) : DO (mg/1): TSS (mg/1) : Fecal Colif rm (/100 ml) : pH (SU) : Oil & rease (mg/1) : TP (mg/1) : TN (mg/1) : Toxicity: Recommended Limits Wasteflow (MGD) : BOD5 (mg/1) : NH3N (mg/1) : DO (mg/1) : TSS (mg/1) : Fecal Colif rm (/100 mi) : pH (SU) : Oil & Grease (mg/1): TP (mg/1) : TN (mg/1) : Toxicity: -2- CONVENTIONAL PARAMETERS Monthly Average Summer/Winter 0.130 30 nr nr 30 1000 6-9 Monthly Average Summer/Winter 0.130 30 nr nr 30 200 6-9 INSTREAM MONITORING REQUIRMENTS: Upstream: N Location: Donwstream: N Location: Limi s Chan • es Du To • Instream Da Ammonia To Chlorine Nutrient Se HOW New 7Q10 flow data Special Modeling Studies New facility information Other a city sitive Waters Daily Maximum Daily Maximum Parameter (s) Affected (explanation of any modifications to past modeling analysis includidng new flows, rates, field data, interacting discharges, etc.) 3,t �"_ a ) eC;71 �� L (:1174 -1, 4 l /f%5-4/ D99730 4). /J /» ' fir � r � /J, / /LyJn/Q1 /+' [ f-.-'� �''i1 � �i,�y�+ Arc,. r yrcr .vc /h f Gr."crirr.1r.J /�/,JiN'•sJi?£ Fi vJ /. Ss` /am &/JLv;,// Awl? 5 54"' /f/(--?'P'e 4'?.-5 ee,4,-177,0L-12,,e_ 6_4-ea ( )9' 76 6^ta4C / �?',h• C�-� �/x e� rit. �I�'c- �,s+ J , LCs /30 /.5S-y) (6, /30x- i. ) /-2Y 4z,09. tifo,"/112-'i Z° Z.41/2v,6 mcadenvi l l e wwt C AL IJpstr Predicted C p CHLORINE ANALYSIS 7Q10: 124.0000 cfs L2 Effl. Conc: .0.9000 mg/1 (17/19 ug/1): 17.0000 ug/1 eam.CL2 Conc.: 0.0000 uq/1 Design Flow: • 0.1300 MGD L2 Downstream: . 1.46 ug/1 0.001460 mg/1 CL2 Limit: 10478.53 ug/1 10.47853 mg/1 To: Permits and Engineering Unit Water Quality Section Datr: January 24, 1991 1' $ NPDES STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIOK;:TWED County: Gaston NPDES Permit No.: NC0020052 MRO No. 91-5 JQN 2 9 1991 PART I - GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Faci ity and Address: McAdenville WWT? Post Office BoxU 129 McAdenville, North Carolina 28101 2. Date !:-:_lsittiZTSR CH of Investigation: January 17, 1991 3. Report Prepared By: Michael L. Parker, Environmental Engineer II 4. Person Contacted and Telephone Number: Mr. Mike Church, operator; 704/824-3551 5. Dire tions to Site: From the junction of Highway 7 (Main Stre t) and S. R. 2209 (Wesleyan Drive), travel south on S. R. 2 09 approximately 0.3 mile and turn left onto Church Stre t (no S. R. number). The wastewater treatment plant is located at the end of Church Street. 6. Discharge Point(s), List for all discharge Points: - Latitude: 35° 15' 20" Longitude: 81° 04' 22" Atta h a USGS Map Extract and indicate treatment plant site and ischarge point on map. USGS Quad No.: F 14 SE 7. Size (land available for expansion and upgrading): There is ample area available for expansion if necessary. 8. Topography (relationship to flood plain included): Relatively flat, 1-3% slopes. The site appears to be within the 100 year flood plain, however, facilities are located above this point. 9. Loca the ion of Nearest Dwelling: Several within 500 feet of acility. 10. Receiving Stream or Affected Surface Waters: South Fork Catawba River Page Two a. Classification: WS-III b. River Basin and Subbasin No.: Catawba c. Describe receiving stream features and pertinent downstream uses: Discharge enters receiving stream, which has substantial flow. Other wastewater dischargers are located above and below the subject point of discharge. PART II - DESCRIPTION OF DISCHARGE AND TREATMENT WORKS 1. Type of Wastewater: 100% Domestic 0% Industrial a. Volume of Wastewater: 0.13 MGD (Design Capacity) b. Types and quantities of industrial wastewater: This facility does not actually receive any industrial process water, however, an adjacent textile mill is connected and may have small amounts of industrial strength contaminants present in the waste stream. These contaminants potentially could originate from sinks/drains located throughout the mill. c. Prevalent toxic constituents in wastewater: With the exception of chlorine, no toxic constituents are known to exist in the waste stream. d. Pretreatment Program (POTWs only): N/A 2. Production Rates (industrial discharges only) in Pounds: N/A 3. Description of Industrial Process (for industries only) and Applicable CFR Part and Subpart: N/A 4. Type of Treatment (specify whether proposed or existing): The existing facility is a contact stabilization wastewater treatment plant containing an influent pump station, bar screen, grit chamber, flow measuring device, contact aeration basin, reaeration basin, aerobic digestor, clarifier, a polishing pond and effluent disinfection. 5. Sludge Handling and Disposal Scheme: Sludge is removed periodically and is used to seed the Stowe -Pharr Mills Wastewater Treatment Plant (NC0004812). 6. Treatment Plant Classification: Less than 5 points; no rating (include rating sheet). Class II 7. SIC Code(s): 4952 Wastewater Code(s): Primary: 01 Secondary: Page Three PART III - OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION 1. Is this facility being constructed with Construction Grants Funds (municipals only)? No 2. Special monitoring requests: None at this time 3. Additional effluent limits requests: None at this time 4. Air Quality and/or Groundwater concerns or hazardous waste utilized at this facility that may impact water quality, air quality or groundwater? No air quality concerns nor is hazardous waste utilized. Groundwater should be advised of the existence of the polishing lagoon which appears to only have a clay liner. 5. Other: N/A PART IV - EVALUATION ND RECOMMENDATIONS The wastewater treatment facilities serving the Town of McAdenville appeared -o be well operated and maintained at the time of the site inspection. The Town anticipates abandonment of the existing polishing lagoon in the near future as a result of deteriorating effluent quality. Effluent analyses from the final clarifier have generally been much better than those from the polishing pond, therefore, elimination of this unit is planned in the next few months. The polishing pond will be left intact should a need for this unit ever arise in the future. This facility does not have a stand-by power supply. Electrical power is supplied from two (2) sources (Duke Power Company and a nearby mill). According to the operator, electrical power failures result only in a minor disruption to the wastewater treatment plant. DHS-Water Supply Branch should be advised of this discrepancy. Pending receipt and approval of the waste load allocation and concurrence by DHS-Water Supply Branch, it is recommended that the Permit be renewed. � (-274-e • 2�/ /? / Signature of Report PreparerD"ate Yeet4--e1-1,_ i/ N%>/ Water Quality- regional Supervisor Date