Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20080229 Ver 2_Year 5 Monitoring Report_20121204Forrest Creek Mitigation Bank Forrest Creek Stream Restoration Site Annual Monitoring Report Year 5 (2012) Orange County, North Carolina USGS HUC: 03020201 Prepared for Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC 909 Capability Drive Raleigh, North Carolina 27606 -3870 Submitted November 2012 09 -oaaq r=@ww R L_ DE 44 CU1 2 WATER (QUALITY Forrest Creek — MY5 (2012) mley -Han COMM a Associates, Inc TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY /PROJECT ABSTRACT ................................... ..............................1 2.0 PROJECT BACKGROUND ............................................................................. ..............................3 2.1 LOCATION AND SETTING .............................................................. ..............................3 2.2 STRUCTURE AND OBJECTIVES ...................................................... ..............................3 3.0 PROJECT CONDITION AND MONITORING RESULTS ................................ ..............................4 3.1 VEGETATION ASSESSMENT .......................................................... ..............................4 3.1.1 Soil Data ............................................................................ ..............................4 3.1.2 Vegetative Problem Areas .............................................. ..............................4 3.1.3 Stem Counts ..................................................................... ..............................5 3.1.4 Vegetation Assessment Summary ................................. ..............................6 3.2 CHANNEL STABILITY ASSESSMENT .............................................. ..............................6 3.2.1 Cross Sections ........................................................... ..............................6 3.2.2 Bank Full Events ........................................................ ..............................7 3.2.3 Longitudinal Profiles ....................................................... ..............................7 3.2.4 Channel Stability Assessment Summary ...................... ..............................8 3.3 SITE SUMMARY ............................................................................. ..............................8 FIGURES Figure 1: Project Location Map Figure 2: Monitoring Plan View Table VII. Stem Counts by Plot Table VIII. Bankfull Events TABLES Table I. Project Mitigation Structure and Objectives Table II. Project Activity and Reporting History Table III. Project Contacts Table IV. Preliminary Soil Data Table V Installed Plantings Table VI. Stem Counts by Species Table VII. Stem Counts by Plot Table VIII. Bankfull Events Forrest Creek — MY5 (2012) � ter, Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. APPENDICES Appendix A. Vegetation Raw Data Appendix B. Cross Sections Appendix C. Profile Survey Appendix D. Pebble Counts Appendix E. Photo Logs Appendix F. Bankfull Event Photo Log Appendix G. Repairs Forrest Creek — MY5 (2012) � ter, Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY /PROJECT ABSTRACT The Forrest Creek Stream Restoration Site (Site) of the Forrest Creek Mitigation Bank (Bank) is located in Orange County North Carolina within land owned by Milton'A. Latta and Sons Dairy Farms, Inc. A permanent conservation easement covers the restored stream and surrounding riparian buffer. This easement defines the Site's boundaries. The Site is located on an active dairy farm approximately seven miles northeast of Hillsborough and six miles northwest of Durham in northeastern Orange County, North Carolina. The streams lie within USGS hydrologic unit 03020201020020 in the Neuse River Basin. The North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) classifies the main reach, Forrest Creek, as a WS -II (water supply II), HQW (high quality water), and NSW (nutrient sensitive water). Prior to restoration, pastureland surrounded most of the length of the project reaches and the stream banks lacked strong rooted vegetation (e.g. woody or deep- rooted herbaceous vegetation). Due to the unlimited livestock access, lack of bank protection and partially cleared watershed, the stream channels became entrenched within the floodplain and showed signs of high shear stress. In this condition and with regular impacts due to cattle traffic, bank erosion had accelerated and the variety of bed features diminished. Two types of vegetative communities surrounded the stream reaches prior to restoration. The first zone consisted of a mix of woody vegetation that included significant populations of invasive species including privet (Ligustrum sinense), multiflora rose (Rosa multiflora), Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica), Japanese Stilt Grass (Mircostegium vimineum), Tree -of- Heaven (Ailanthus oltissima), and Princess Tree (Paulownia tomentosa). This zone covered the lower section of the tributary to Forrest Creek and the upper section of Forrest Creek. The second zone consisted primarily of herbaceous vegetation with scattered woody vegetation. The ' woody vegetation included a mix of natural, invasive, and succession species. This zone covered the remaining areas. ' The altered conditions of the stream and the riparian buffer reduced water quality and impaired habitat. Pasture derived nutrients flowing untreated through the riparian zone and fine silts sloughing from the incised banks raised biochemical oxygen demand. This, with the lack of sufficient re- oxygenating riffle features, reduced dissolved oxygen within the water column. Water quality had also diminished due to raised turbidity and siltation from bank erosion as well as elevated water temperatures caused by the lack of tree shading. Habitat potential had been reduced by the diminished water quality and loss of physical habitat such as bed features, undercut banks, and a well - developed vegetative community. The Forrest Creek reach was restored within the existing floodplain using a Priority II approach and the tributary to the Forrest Creek reach bed was raised to the abandoned floodplain using a Priority I approach. A portion of Forrest Creek immediately above the Forrest Creek restoration reach was enhanced by modifying a downstream crossing that had caused partially impounded it. The crossing modification reestablished natural flow and creating a natural channel profile. Above the ' enhancement area, a section of Forrest Creek has been placed under a conversation easement to preserve the stream channel and riparian buffer. ' The stream restoration work is regulated under the Forrest Creek Mitigation Bank Mitigation Banking Instrument (MBI) signed by the Sponsor and the US Army Corp of Engineers (USACE), the US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), the NC Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ), ' Forrest Creek — MYS (2012) 1 Kimley -Han Ca11 and Associates. Inc. and the NC Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC). These agencies comprise the Interagency Review Team (IRT), formerly the MBRT, in accordance with Federal guidelines and regulations including the Compensatory Mitigation losses of Aquatic Resources Final Rule, 33 CFR Parts 325 and 332 and 40 CFR Part 230. Restoration work resulted in the restoration of 6,825 linear feet, enhancement (Level 1) of 325 linear feet, and preservation of 3,005 linear feet of stream. With the restoration, water quality has been improved due to a decrease in nutrients, turbidity, and moderation in water temperature. Biochemical oxygen demand has been reduced through filtering in the riparian buffer and riverine wetlands. Potential habitats have been added through the creation of bed features and the reestablishment of riparian vegetative community. The annual monitoring work assesses the Site's streams, the Forrest Creek main channel and the Unnamed Tributary to Forrest Creek, to determine restoration success. The monitoring plan has been set up based on guidance provided by The Stream Mitigation Guidelines developed by the United States Corps of Engineers — Wilmington District (McLendon, et al. 2003), version 1.2 (11/16/2006) of the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) document entitled "Content, Format, and Data Requirements for EEP Monitoring Reports ", version 2.0 (3/27/2008) of the EEP document entitled "Mitigation Plan Document Format, Data Requirements, and Content Guidance ", and the Forrest Creek Mitigation Bank Mitigation Plan (May 2008). The monitoring has occurred annually for five years. The monitoring period should include two separate years with bankfull events. Five events have been recorded as of monitoring year 5. Bankfull events were verified using an installed crest stage gauge that was inspected during each monitoring visit. Monitoring reports have been submitted for years 1 -4. Annual monitoring work has included reference photographs, vegetative stem counts, materials sampling, site survey, bankfull event documentation, and visual assessment and mapping of significant features. Environmental Banc and Exchange, LLC (EBX) and the IRT in coordination with the appropriate regulatory agencies will determine when stream and riparian restoration have met success criteria. The sections below provide a framework for determining and assessing success criteria. Stream restoration is considered successful through achievement of stable channel geometry, 1 appropriate channel materials, and lack of significant erosion. The riparian buffer has been monitored for survivability and specific densities of planted vegetation and exclusion of invasive species. The site has been maintained during the monitoring period to allow it to continue on a ' trajectory that meets project goals and success criteria. Repairs were completed as necessary to reestablish channel stability and the site was replanted when the vegetation showed signs of significant failure or if vegetative density goals contained in the MBI are not achieved. Year 5, 2012 monitoring was completed on September 18 -19 and October 16, 2012. Strategies and methodologies laid out in the Monitoring Plan have been followed for a minimum of five years of monitoring. The stream has been monitored for stability of dimension, pattern, and ' profile using standard practices including permanent cross sections, longitudinal profile, and pebble counts. Vegetative success of associated plantings has been monitored for species diversity and survival with standardized, permanent (10m by 10m) vegetation plots that were monitored annually for 5 years. Monitoring data was then analyzed to determine what remedial actions, if any, are required. Any remedial actions proposed have been detailed in the following monitoring report. Forrest Creek — MY5 (2012) 2 �^ Kimley -Horn Ci•I 1 and Associates. Inc. 2.0 PROJECT BACKGROUND 2.1 LOCATION AND SETTING The Forrest Creek Stream Restoration Site (Site) of the Forrest Creek Mitigation Bank (Bank) is located in Orange County North Carolina within land owned by Milton A. Latta and Sons Dairy Farms, Inc. A permanent conservation easement covers the restored stream and surrounding riparian buffer. This easement defines the Site's boundaries. The Site is located approximately seven miles northeast of Hillsborough and six miles northwest of Durham in northeastern Orange County, North Carolina (see Figure 1). The streams lie within USGS hydrologic unit 03020201020020 in the Neuse River Basin. The Site includes two streams. The larger reach (Forrest Creek) flows through the property from north to south and drains a 3.6 square mile area consisting of predominantly forest and pasture land. The smaller tributary (UT 1) flows from west to east before joining with Forrest Creek and drains a 0.1 square mile area consisting of predominantly pasture land. 2.2 STRUCTURE AND OBJECTIVES The goals of the project relate to providing ecological improvements to the Site's streams and riparian buffers through beneficial modifications of hydrology, water quality, and habitat. Goals related to hydrology include: • Re- establishing floodplain connection by raising bed elevations (UT1) or lowering adjacent floodplain (Forrest Creek) • Increasing flood storage by re- establishing floodplain connection Goals related to water quality include: • Reducing turbidity and pollution by reducing sediment and nutrient inputs (cattle exclusion) • Reducing water temperatures by providing shading • Increasing / stabilizing oxygen levels by reducing BOD /COD and increasing re- oxygenating turbulence Goals related to habitat include: • Improving in stream bed habitat by increasing riffle — pool diversity, reducing sediment deposition, and improving low flow water depths • Improving bank habitat by increasing stability and woody biomass • Improving floodplain habitat by establishing microtopography and hydrology, removing invasive vegetation, and increasing habitat diversity • Improving food web dynamics by adding biomass (such as detritus, coarse woody debris, and leaf matter) and re- establishing floodplain connection The restoration achieves these goals through the following objectives: • Stabilizing channel bed and banks through modifying dimension, pattern, and profile using natural channel design • Installing in- stream structures such as rock vanes, log vanes, and constructed riffles Forrest Creek — MY5 (2012) 3 C On Kimley -Han and Associates, Inc. • Raising stream bed elevations or lowering floodplains • Restoring soils in riparian buffer by excluding cattle and adding organic components • Removing invasive vegetation • Planting native vegetation in riparian buffer • Fencing out livestock Together, these improvements have provided functional uplift for the watershed as a whole. The dimension, pattern, and profile were restored using Rosgen Priority I and II restoration approaches ( Rosgen, David L. 1997). The Priority I approach was used on the UT to Forrest ' Creek to raise bed elevations and reconnect the stream to the abandoned floodplain. The Priority II approach was used on Forrest Creek to reestablish an active floodplain at the existing bed elevation. These methods have decreased stream bank erosion, establish an active floodplain, reduce channel stress during floods, improve aquatic habitat, and reduce fine sediments. A portion of Forrest Creek immediately above the restoration reach was enhanced by modifying a downstream crossing that had created ponding upstream of it. The crossing 1 modification reestablished natural flow and will create a natural channel profile. Above the enhancement area, a section of Forrest Creek has been placed under conservation easement to preserve a functional stream channel and riparian buffer. The remaining impaired riparian buffer was planted as four (4) zones. Zones 1 and 2 are the stream channel and bank zones consisting of tree and shrub species and native herbaceous seeding typically found along stream banks in the region. Live stakes comprised the bulk of installed species within these zones. Zone 3 is the riparian zone consisting of selected tree and shrub species with a range of tolerances to inundation and saturation. Zone 4 is the transitional zone that includes the buffer areas (subject of a separate report prepared for NCDWQ). See Tables 1 -III for more information regarding project structure, activity, history, and contacts. 3.0 PROJECT CONDITION AND MONITORING RESULTS 3.1 VEGETATION ASSESSMENT 3.1.1 Soil Data Preliminary soil data was gathered from the USDA Soil Survey for Orange County, NC (1977). The site consists primarily of the Chewacla Series, a somewhat poorly drained, moderately permeable soil that formed in recent alluvium. More information on the soil series can be found in Table IV. 3.1.2 Vegetative Problem Areas The site is stabilized and vegetated with native woody and herbaceous species. Approximately 1,600 linear feet of the stream project along the main channel (27% of the stream project as a whole) required remedial work due to poor soil, harsh winter conditions of 2010 (freeze /thaw loosening of the banks immediately followed by large rain events) combined with problem areas lacking vegetation. These areas were repaired according to the approved Remedial Repair Plan and seeded and stabilized. This work has resulted in a minor disturbance to the riparian buffer Forrest Creek — MY5 (2012) 4 Kimley -Han C EI \ and Associates, Inc. in these areas. Every effort was made to save planted trees and volunteers of significant size in this area. For the most part, invasive species listed in the executive summary and in the Mitigation Report have not reestablished themselves and will continue to be monitored and noted in future reports. Several individuals of Princess Tree (Paulownia tomentoso) were spotted at the crossing below the confluence of the main channel and the UT during the Year 5 assessment ' (2012). Kudzu, which was previously kept at bay by grazing cattle, has begun to establish along UT1 between Stations 119 +00 and 129 +00, approximately. This population was treated twice in 2010 and annual treatments have been scheduled for this area. An additional, small population emerged on stream bank right above London Lane. This area was treated once in 2010 and was not noticed during the Year 5 assessment. Through treatments, these invasive populations seem to be under control. An unidentified species of Commelina (Dayflower) tends to colonize the riffle areas and shallow areas during low flow and dry periods. These plants die back over - winter each year. Herbicide treatments were applied in the summer of 2010 in attempt to prepare the stream bed for pebble counts and survey activities. This population was still present during the 2011 and 2012 monitoring process. A more detailed discussion of the effects of these populations can be found with the Pebble Count analysis in the Forrest Creek Mitigation Bank Stream Monitoring report. As documented in the previously submitted Supplemental Planting Report a supplemental planting of 600, gallon size trees was completed on February 10th, 2010 by Carolina Wetland Services (see Table V). Findings of the 2012 monitoring activities and stems counts are discussed in the following section. 3.1.3 Stem Counts The Mitigation Plan specifies four planting zones to be established as follows: Zone 1— Stream channel; Zone 2- Stream Bank; Zone 3 — Riparian; and Zone 4 — Transitional (including buffer areas). Live stakes were installed along the newly constructed channel within Zones 1 and 2. Zones 2 — 4 consist of tublings, gallon and 3 gallon size plants. Native vegetation is considered to be established when nuisance species are less than 10 %. Study plots show that the composition and density of vegetation in the restoration areas compares closely to the reference areas, indicating restoration success for vegetation. Success is gauged by stem counts of planted species. Stem counts of over 320 woody stems per acre after 5 years will be considered successful. Presence, numbers and health of desirable volunteers were considered before a replant was deemed necessary. Photos taken at established photo points should indicate maturation of riparian vegetation community. Photographs have helped document the health of the planted vegetation and the severity of any invasive or exotic species infestations. 1 Permanent vegetative plots have been established at 14 locations. The success of vegetation plantings have been measured through stems counts. These plots were used to sample primarily Zones 2, 3 and 4. Each plot covers 100 square meters for tree counts. Within each plot, a 1 meter plot was sampled to measure herbaceous coverage. During the counts, the health of the vegetation was noted. In addition to stem counts, the samples inventoried species diversity to allow for comparison between the reference and restoration wetlands and track the 1 percent cover of nuisance species. The vegetation survey occurred during the growing season in each monitoring year. On September 18 -19, 2012, the fifth year vegetative monitoring was performed on the established vegetative plots. Forrest Creek — MY5 (2012) 5 COMM mley -Horn e Associates. Inc. 3.1.4 Vegetation Assessment Summary The success of riparian vegetation planting was gauged by stem counts . of planted species and an assessment of community composition including (desirable) volunteers. Stem counts of over 320 trees and shrubs per acre after 5 years is considered successful. The composition of the vegetation community should trend toward a predominance of target species. A majority (80 %) of the target species should be present in the reforestation area in numbers and condition conducive to continuing the species through the maturation of the community. The population of invasive species will be kept below 10% of the total population. Photos taken at established photo points should indicate maturation of riparian vegetation community. The Year 5 monitoring numbers indicate approximately 77% survival and 856 stems per acre overall. The Tributary reach maintained an overall stems per acre count of 543 not counting volunteer species. This number was improved by supplemental plantings done prior to the 2010 growing season. The main channel reach maintained an overall stem per acre count of 463 not including volunteer species. See Tables VI and VII for more detailed vegetation data. Along the main channel, no plots indicated a stems per acre count of below 320. Plot 3 is marginal at 324, considering the success criteria goal is 320 after Year 5 for a buffer site, as opposed to the goal of 260 for many other restoration sites; however inclusion of volunteer stems of green ash which is a target species on the planting plan increases the count to 769 stems per acre, therefore no additional supplemental planting is proposed. The 2010 supplemental planting covered the unnamed tributary only. Desirable volunteers are beginning to contribute more significantly along UT1. Stem counts for both the main channel and the UT in 2012 do not indicate the need for any additional replants at this time. Along the main channel of Forrest Creek, herbaceous cover is well established. Sample plots indicated a 100% cover for the entire reach. Cattle grasses and grasses used for stabilization are beginning to be out competed by natural herbaceous cover such as soft rush and polygonum in the wet areas; and narrow leaved sunflower, dog fennel and cockle burr in the drier areas. Along the unnamed tributary, herbaceous cover is well established and more mature than on the main channel, with the exception of some minor areas on the left bank around station 104 +00. Sample plots indicated 100% cover throughout with similar composition to the main channel. Detailed vegetation survey information is located in Appendix A; including herbaceous cover, stressed individuals, and volunteers. Forrest Creek — MY5 (2012) ( Kimley -Horn Con and Associates, Inc. 32 CHANNEL STABILITY ASSESSMENT 3 2 1 Cross Sections ' The stream geometry is considered to be successful if the cross - section geometry, profile, and sinuosity are stable or reach a dynamic equilibrium It was expected that there would be minimal changes in the designed cross sections, profile, and /or substrate composition Changes that may occur during the monitoring period were evaluated to determine if they represent a movement toward a more unstable condition (e g down cutting, erosion, mid- channel bars, etc ) or are minor changes that represent an increase in stability (e g settling, vegetative changes, coarsening of bed material, etc ) Deviation from the design ratios will not necessarily denote failure as it is possible to maintain stability and not stay within the design geometry Additionally, determination of true bankfull will be difficult until the stream has had adequate flooding events to create strong bankfull indicators Morphological data used for this report was collected in September and October, 2012 and is shown in Appendix B Commehna is present in several riffles and throughout the tributary, this vegetation in the channel at time of survey creates a slight artificial rise in bed elevation on some cross sections Overall the cross - section graphs for Year 5 compare well to previous years and show stable dimension with normal, minor fluctuations 3 2 2 Bank Full Events 1 Crest Stage Gages (CSG) are located on Forrest Creek and on the Tributary Photo documentation is shown in the Bank Full Event Photo Log in Appendix E A total of five bankfull events have been documented since the submittal of the Year 1 Monitoring Report Indicators of overbank flow were found on both reaches during the Year 5 field assessment (see Table VIII) No rain events were recorded by the on -site rain gage due to an equipment malfunction, but the CSG's were triggered Repairs were made to the swale area above the confluence of the main channel and UT1 in February 2011 This repair was a hold over from Year 1 storm damage due to Hurricane Hanna Before and after photos of this repair are located in Appendix E 3 2 3 Longitudinal Profiles Profiles 1, 2, and 3 are'along portions of the UT and Profiles 4 and 5 cover larger sections of ' Forrest Creek Commehna is present in almost every riffle and throughout the tributary, this vegetation in the channel at time of survey creates a slight artificial rise in bed elevation in some areas, particularly riffles Overall the profile graphs for Year 5 compare well to previous years ' and show a stable profile with normal, minor fluctuations Bed material was also sampled at five riffles throughout the project Cross Sections T1, T3 and ' T6 on the UT are located in LP 1, LP 2, and LP 3, respectively Cross Sections 2 and 4 on Forrest Creek are located in LP 4 and LP 5, respectively Forrest Creek — MY5 (2012) ] Kimley Horn Cam/ 1 and Associates, Inc Morphological data used for the profiles in this report was collected in September and October, 2012 and is shown in Appendix C. Pebble count data was collected in September and October, 2012 and is also included in Appendix C. ' 3.2.4 Channel Stability Assessment Summary Approximately 1,600 linear feet of the stream project along the main channel (27% of the stream project as a whole) required remedial work due to poor soil and harsh winter conditions combined with problem areas lacking vegetation. These areas were repaired in February 2011 according to the approved Remedial Repair Plan and seeded and stabilized. This work has resulted in a minor disturbance to the riparian buffer in these areas. Every effort was made to 1 save planted trees and volunteers of significant size in this area. For more information on the repair work, please refer to the attached Remedial Repair Plan and project photos. Kudzu along UT1 near VQT2 was treated twice in 2010 with herbicide and annual treatments will be scheduled for this area. This invasive species appears to be under control, and this area will be continually monitored. Minor beaver activity was noted in late 2010 and the dams were removed. During the Year 5 field assessment, a beaver dam was noted on the main channel downstream of the confluence at approximately station 225 +75. The beaver dam was removed from the stream during the ' week of November 26th — November 30th. On -going beaver management will be maintained as part of the monitoring requirements as discussed in the Mitigation Plan. Other than the areas mentioned above, the remainder of the site is functioning as planned. The pattern and profile appear to be making minor adjustments, but the overall trend is towards long term stability. The repair areas will continue to be monitored to ensure the repairs are 1 successful. The addition of the soil lifts has allowed the vegetation to establish itself in these areas, and no new erosion has presented itself. 3.3 SITE SUMMARY The monitoring results for 2012 document that the Site is on track to achieve all of the vegetative and stream stability success criteria specified in the MBI for the Site. Forrest Creek — MY5 (2012) g �^ Kimley -Han C aI 1 and Associates, Inc. FIGURES KWnlay Horn Forrest Creek Monitoring — MY4 (2011) Cmrl andA latesjna Title I Vicinity Map Project Forrest Creek Mitigation Site Fmpmd For Orange County, North Carolina �HarthMark _ companies Date KHA Project Number Figure 8/24/06 012857004 1 P"Amd by Jason Diaz G ■n °w°,L"va. �umcwunw ,ru,aRmYnuTnioiurNluauwnw+wmert' ""`^^• "• ru�i Nw. i�wwwa MwervLL envulmwTMl�nmM MeannYw 6 T 1_O.t'ILtOIW'OOBNIMA MiTWHN{ONANO C ONTROLDA1 M— kTtM70NT \AYNYROI.1'JU0.t'!N wRr AA mM ttMNW weWauu+. nwawb®MifNAir 4NNay.l.a�Nwn+ul R rC. CtiGAEAll1L0.,S By UL QuJ nN NL ISM Swo� tl].NLN it"A,01YNON.WLC kt)LN 111gy9r XA01 GAROIJNANT \Tµti)ANDNA 0WA11 aYN'NM, 4 A NM IMRt00'111gAYANTALI ANONAVDI9 (VCRTICALA GIQS5 U t MOG Wd1M, NU � e � mrIRY Mfr IN[ N G OGa CgROlNiLS AND OOV W6 grow aI a6 qAr lR DOaVRWr Npr OCIptlNNm m AM AC11L1L os SuR\er NTArneND m c MAT S1/LSMCO \L Y pm ID C NN A1 1 -R n M M ..0 Q1XM CaamNArLS NO1E aCaMwm m Ia aGaANG4 A0.NSxorr IINY M6 Saner Yll9 NLR/aN11m vane arc A7 loco as Nwrn NCL>TA locro wro NCB YM NCridAl ALL �Ai6 ANC � aN wW N]pmYJ AMP AIL ocwnoc ANC Sw� a+ ww Sn PPS w_� \ \ BNMOaN, m CFO" LACAM" 1 11OM ♦ �4Ya1m t ♦ CIOS9IC taswS mRAV nar tw�wr - nncAt. i5 . ov wm ur -wuaar iovr 1� � RM(14 � MI MANLY aOwNr NFOSIat a' affDi RWIL it ` 1 PROW j ♦ y ♦ \ PP2 7\v/ �P yQ- AR[ tr ��a�ua�vOSw/sPatl aoarnAnCV wm e<N.d/A NV rnel Aio aro ��om.1°`e� m�.n"w•�ivr°0ne�°imr ANA[AfAq un ma[ ���� w¢�afMVm mAOrAwser+w m�ismil�r w'Y / aA SoR.m m 4. DUO RA 216Y1) - - / � `♦ ♦ C3G • �hpa PRELUVE NARY PLAT Not for Recordation. Conveyance or Sales L.owa Salt r - AO' CONSERVAftGW f•4SFMENi AS BMT AO a N m Al CALLEMYN FORREST CREEK RESTORA77ON "11°"'�°1O°' 0 ° „� ...r..y.a..... CEOAR GROW 7NP CRANX C0. NORM CAROLINA _ FIELD �fOWC PERFOR1ffA .NNE 2008 .m.... NAME OF CUENT EARINMARK W71GAn / alY SUMCM LLC ARAww ouwlwwwro LMaOCwmna R..<MTOYTNAtnO RnUNj nM1VNIwIDI.M NQI% Wt�i'molINWVUTA TI.U. �IRVN'u{Ot IRw�taa+n4Tn0 6'0WM0 IATk W1ItlCLLIV101UMT1R0NfH1 Tn�u�wrt�xON Ip,{%rypiiµply�p,Nytl%p p�yyym CONT0.0L1AT\ON +OPl1ATN)NTS107J p0.011 NSiRVCT �w %Wmumw,m cwllny' Iw ,�uu�wom.mTgonlrmnuuLgaN�nllut �, IWttiDLC hm MV{ISDy [ IN "no a IIWImIATaN Mn.OGANp MwL nXO TlNeLrOI�gW. bi. � ALLY DI,CLNNL�l100T OY U.OIN C.VYL�,f1'N lL4 --"L- WVNYI NU i�t V.LNYN 0. {T \ %NON'�O:�Iifl %VRVNT HT1970 NO0.TI1 CANOILlA NTATII P4\NNCOONDMATk AMLSII.I 4 NAD IYILS.t00')11tORf/ONTALI ANDNAVD39 (VISitTICWI d { \ \ t T t \ t \ CULw ...m w enmm \ s I \ 4 1 \ 1 t \ ouK ev or. \\ 20 IML y ATA aa� TO TRIBUTARY PRELIMINARY PLAT Not for Recordation, Conveyance or Sales \ x \ b n PPI \\ PP4 tmeNO -z 01': =4 C r -.c CCNSFRYAVXW EASfMFMr AS amr IL-0 b EO j CLM� FORREST CREEK RESTORA77ON "'""'°� 0 G •��•,••¢ �%` ,�.R ,m, �„�q etnAR GROW 711PE FORMW 40 N20M cAn+oLtNA aFen uowc rFxFawL�s IAAVE zaoe NAME or a� im EM?WARK MmCAACN SEWCES LLC m'�°� LAHYnCAIAITAN 1'41 aa1TTTUT M. MTwAn ONAwfvIIDl4 AfY Nat' NnWWrr uv WAON IMOUAn�aNAL AIInYIA nV.a uKya Nr n1!'nWW✓n TNrTMO K 'rV LD%T%NVM1A' ON MIATMN MrvN UUWYOwatcvMNCn srruna nT�ouOnorrurnlnwxLnnn GO>'N. OLD \1'rTA- DnMtA OAT= �0.01J NDN!1 r W4 rwpitmTMOIC UO vwt�TUmiwralMnF Urm®IUauunnluK AA YDL +tl.AI b%IM7LBYA WGUi.I nKPL yqD{{ .u� ...rx lau uvwnw wsl. �� N00.7H CMOlMA4TATEPLIro[COMWYATTtsyiRn4 NAD IPIC4]DoT(IIOIIVA�'rIJ.IAHD NAVbb(VI.ItTIGLL) O or CW. PPc Frnz .d �a MR � tDNCIN[NK A D/= i su aHa TO RA ]JIW PREI.MNARY PLAT Not for Recordation, Conveyance or Sales I yo` vcc Dow caysmvAnc rA m As sour 40 o .D a ALOIS CALLEMYN �-[ FORREST CREEK RESTORATION D °°'—• �� ('DAR GROti£ rxP. oav+ce CaR. xoans CAROlfNA FW WOW PEWORMW AM; 2W8 MnWAR�TlFAMN�WXA uc to A..rlr..11r..,o m ru�aawrnuvnmruvw.vouw�wormw Lxw Mr«nv sir MVBINRfXL RIaMwM�CN.LLYIX�M'>MM VMiIYItTNwWYIW.wMTn� C2MOTAT%W KMATOVTIhATW♦ATSD w6T.wmwAtn wwNa YTmvRe rtNaMpepwuc+lOi wtunp XNMULD1TrI LAINIl97 �AYNIRtOA1MURW1' YIIITFI'wOw WkIRCAMGADKMNe�D ®wRNYA �nolmn+AI. YON�nn�y ��14 VMittJO)'UTT.1.I.�tkTIIAIARA D \TCD �wIrtWVW+NYmMAM IOM.nueTRi DAV Or11DUCL� ` � ' AO.Y -0Y.tlG\IIId1A I0o]DV AIAW GUL.AIYR.I'L b9dN VORTIICARA AI IVOI`' ARIL VLC W\tiVWAIt VRMOA is w AAD A I9Kb2WM WD TALI AND NAV "(vt ncnw l NM GWdwA N.CI12/2f14 mOlry 1141T M uF DIIO D]amowla .Vm GOVYR sww aR wt rUr a DORVD/r ,D¢ URIY.w oY W ADn4u, as swlcr w�sDRI®m rG MAr n LZW a YAS FlD"— p Gn4 Co= ^ Rd0 Mb —11 GCO A M1R .T r;xO PRD CODYwMRII SCI[ ADft=M U3 C OIC (I)N ­R O WOr R WKR IWOO A NDST RRf MRRdR •U. t00mMF1R] ARZ YA'YD O4 RAO eNaaoi A,D wu ncv,nawl AM wsm a, +ww an 514 lv�m To ovslru m�w\mv warn - rrsR.,A rar nmm�u wrw4RUC sz mrsrnwm� wear nw,uA ODK' or K ,um afro aAV -wcm moT Rps snncv n Rmu'om w ac�ACr �axr Rtcaru cF oau �Q ti Q' -� /- - -- PrAvu 1 a.urniwe0`am10 „J -- � � TIDIOp PPS r Ppr PP10 ' ry /UYIOIROIIAL FCAA TIIIS'1 10 9Rt nhJb AO.CIITIIR/L FIRM Otm9a Not for RecordabmL Convoyaice or Sales n, I � w sold r -,w .� Rmwwr ®a�wumm.wu �-} ra.wwm.wa CONSINVATh; EASE T AS BUILT 40 D b AO ALM CALLEM FORREST CREEK RESTORA77ON Y �� - CM4R QWW TWF. ORANGE Ca M NO 04ROUNA R¢o Kew PD?F Rm Am& 2008 EM"ARKAw GAn�SOMC= LLC I KdIGLNaIYN RganTlvrTUTTtmrtAT wAaoMwNVxaNtW NMYI \TpaN YYgYANAMN. IUNN4l YNOY WAY4 W MvivUlaY TIATINID IMt WAl rA[YANm MAnoxOAwtT YRHTWIRANtlAiDiavNNtYt%wi Lug x mNi Np �wY�aiwtMiw rn 'wv Innl Ion anW.mWnnu 1r7eLL sour r -o o NOR _ IWATINOTWMUPIRQ1 ZNf0R1 MONMD CO OAT\ N xW P OUM MU D IHAP MVJLAN AILY DUto g 2W7 ay Dp G .%LJ.0 1TL N04T CAAOI 1n0kV\Nn0NM COOAODURMYYIYM MAD Iv�(10W)AWALIMDNAVO (N'ATICAU •Y el r1 41 li Mmm'uW m CEDAR CROVE TW., aWJW Ca NMM CAROLWA PRFtIMNARY PLAT NwfnavavrdeLLVgCWnyeea�« . RE1D 1VW PERFORMED JUNG 2008 OWN RgilL a�� MD NAME OF aMVT 30, aa+ UNONOMK �� \ S amt aoulrs�reneer _ ZIA Tom° PPG TRIBUTARY pe �' C3o PRE DENARY PLAT Not for Recordation. Conveyance or Sales OREM COMMAI MCN EA� AS ABLY FORREST CREEK RESTOR47TON sour r -o o %O W CN "°'m"""""'°' m CEDAR CROVE TW., aWJW Ca NMM CAROLWA PRFtIMNARY PLAT NwfnavavrdeLLVgCWnyeea�« . RE1D 1VW PERFORMED JUNG 2008 NAME OF aMVT CAR "W MRICA'M N SERWCM 4C amt aoulrs�reneer TABLES ' ^ Klmisy -Horn Forrest Creek Monitoring — MY4 (2011) C0I \ ° dAsswiafB%I- and As Forrest Creek - MY4 (2011) r- on Horn � and Associates, Inc Table I Project Mitigation Structure and Objectives Forrest Creek Stream Restoration -- Monitoring Year 5 (2012) Feature Mitigation Type Pre Construction Length/Area As Built Length/ Area Mitigation Credit Ratio Mitigation Credits Forrest Creek Restoration 3,405 feet 3,484 feet 1 1 3,484 UT to Forrest Creek Restoration 2,436 feet 3,371 feet 1 1 3,371 Forrest Creek Enhancement 325 feet 325 feet 15 1 217 Forrest Creek Preservation 3,005 feet 3,005 feet 5 1 601 Total Stream Credits SMU 7,673 and As Forrest Creek - MY4 (2011) r- on Horn � and Associates, Inc Table II Project Activity and Reporting History Forrest Creek Stream Restoration -- Monitoring Year 5 (2012) Activity or Report Calendar Year of Completion or Planned Completion MBI Signed March 2007 Buffer Agreement Signed A nl 2008 Construction March to June 2008 Temporary /Permanent seeding March to July 2008 Containerized Plantings March to July 2008 Mitigation Plan November 2008 Year 1 Monitoring December 2008 Year 2 Monitoring October 2009 Year 3 Monitoring November 2010 Year 4 Monitoring August 2011 Year 5 Monitoring September/October 2012 Forrest Creek - MY4 (2011) [on and Horn � and Assouates, Inc Table III Project Contacts Forrest Creek Stream Restoration -- Monitoring Year 5 (2012) Project Manager 909 Capability Drive Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC Raleigh, NC 27606 Tommy Cousins 919 522 -9253 Designer 3001 Weston Parkway Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc Cary, NC 27513 Todd St John (919) 653 -2950 Daren Part 757 335 -6677 Construction Contractor P 0 Box 14987 Shamrock Environmental Browns Summit, NC 27214 Corporation Mike Granson 336 708 -5930 Planting Contractor 550 E Westinghouse Blvd Carolina Wetland Services Charlotte, North Carolina 28273 Joshua Frost 704 527 -1177, ext 102 Monitoring Performers 1960 Derita Road Mid- Atlantic Mitigation, LLC Concord, North Carolina 28027 (MY1 -MY3) Christine Cook (704) 782 -4133 Tommy Cousins 704 782 -4133 Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc 3001 Weston Parkway (MY4 -MY5) Cary, NC 27513 Josh Allen (919) 677 -2165 Todd St John 919 653 -2950 ' Forrest Creek - MY4 (2011) GEFl and nd A Horn � a Associates Inc Table IV Preliminary Sod Data Forrest Creek Stream Restoration -- Monitoring Year 5 (2012) Series Max Depth (in) % Clay on Surface K T OM Chewacla 60 1 10 -27 028 5 1 -4 and as Horn Forrest Creek - MY4 (2011) r, On d A � Associates Inc Table V Installed Plantings Forrest Creek Stream Restoration -- Monitoring Year 5 (2012) Scientific Name C Common Name t Bare roots and L Lwesta es L Livestalms G Gallons G Gallons Asimina tnloba P Paw Paw 6 600 Betulo mgra R River Burch 6 600 2 200 1 120 Cephalonthus ocadentahs B Buttonbush 6 600 Cornus amomum S Silky Dogwood 6 600 3 3775 5 500 Frawnus penns Ivamca G Green Ash 2 226 2 200 Ilex opaca A Amencan Holly 6 600 Jugulans mgra B Black Walnut 6 600 1 120 Plotanus ocndentahs S Sycamore 6 600 2 200 Quercus mrchauxn S Swamp Chestnut Oak 6 600 2 200 1 120 Quercus olustns P Pin Oak 6 600 1 120 Quercus phellos W Willow Oak 6 600 2 200 1 120 Solix mgra B Black Willow 1 11,325 1 1,000 Total 6 6600 1 15,100 1 1,500 1 1,000 6 600 Kim ley Horn Forrest Creek - MY4 (2011) CoFl � I ,and Associates, Inc Table VI Total Stem Count by Species Forrest Creek Stream Restoration -- Monitoring Year 5 (2012) Scientific Name Common Name As -built Year 1 2008 Year 2 2009 Year 3 2010 Year 4 2011 Year 5 2012 Current percent survival from As -built Acer rubrum Red Maple 1 2 Asimina triloba Paw Paw 10 9 7 15 6 5 50% Betula nigra* ** River Birch* ** 7 5 12 22 18 18 100% Ce halanthus occidentalis Buttonbush 4 4 8 9 9 11 100% Cercis canadensis Eastern Redbud 226 2 1 2 2 2 88% Cornus amomum Silky Dogwood 12 9 8 7 6 6 50% Dios yros virginiana Persimmon 1 1 Fraxinus pennsylvanica* Green Ash 14 it 21 45 80 < 93 * ** 100% Ilex o aca American Holly 1 1 0 0% Jugulans nigra** Black Walnut ** 15 11 5 13 5 6 40% Li uidambar st raciflua Sweet um 10 30 Lincidendron tulipifera Tulip Poplar 1 0 0 4 4 5 100% Morus rubra Red Mulberry 1 1 1 1 2 1 100% Pinus sp Pine 9 Platanus occidentalis Sycamore 3 2 Po ulus deltoides Cottonwood 1 1 Quercus michauxii* ** Swamp Chesnut Oak* ** 3 2 11 15 9 9 100% Quercus palustris ** Pin Oak ** 64 45 43 60 53 50 78% Quercus hellos* Willow Oak 1 1 11 11 8 <6*** 100% Robinia pseucloacacia Black Locust 1 Salix m ra Black Willow 20 7 22 31 32 24 100% Salix sencea Silky Willow - 1 1 Ulmus alata Winged Elm 7 12 _ Total Total 155 264 108 150 235 258 <295 * ** 79% *Species Included In 2009 supplemental Planting * *Species Included In 2010 supplemental Planting Forrest Creek - MY4 (2011) CE" and As Horn � ,and Associates, Inc Table VII. Stems per Acre by Plot and Year Forrest Creek Stream Restoration -- Monitoring Year 5 (2012) Replant - Replant MY3 W/ MY4 MY5 Baseline MYl MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 Year 1 Year 2 Vol. W/ Vol. W/ Vol. VQ1 283 202 324 445 445 445 728 445 931 445 931 VQ2 364 243 486 445 445 405 486 405 448 405 809 VQ3 486 364 364 364 526 324 486 324 567 324 769 VQ4 486 364 364 324 567 486 1174 486 890 486 < 1052* VQ5 364 2 445 405 405 364 728 364 809 364 850 VQ6 324 81 647 688 688 647 931 647 809 647 1012 VQ7 405 81 607 607 607 567 688 567 1174 567 1174 Average stems /acre 387 191 463 468 526 463 746 463 804 463 < 942* (Main Channel) VQT1 647 283 688 647 647 607 850 607 971 607 < 971* VQT2 688 607 607 283 769 445 809 445 728 445 688 VQT3 647 486 486 324 688 526 728 526 728 526 850 VQT4 526 445 445 202 607 486 607 486 445 486 < 567* VQT5 486 324 324 324 769 688 850 688 769 688 890 VQT6 607 526 526 607 607 526 647 526 607 526 728 VQT7 486 405 405 121 526 526 567 526 526 526 688 Average stems /acre 584 439 497 358 659 543 723 543 682 F 43 < 769* (Tributary) Average stems /acre 486 316 480 413 593 503 734 503 743 503 < 856* Total -- Decrease from previous MY -- Increase from previous MY Forrest Creek - MY4 (2011) and As ocia ' � and Aesociaraa Inc. Table VIII Bankfull Events Forrest Creek Stream Restoration -- Monitoring Year 5 (2012) Site Visit Date Associated Rainfall Event Date Rainfall Amount (Inches) Method Documented 12/15/2008 Nov 30th -Dec 1st 125 CSG /Photos 4/15/2009 March 27th - 29th 199 CSG /Photos 6/16/2010 CSG /Photos 6/29/2011 June 28th 117 Photos 9/20/2012 September 19th 226 CGS /Photos ' Forrest Creek - MY4 (2011) Kimley Horn r, E , and Associates Inc APPENDIX A Raw Vegetation Data ' Forrest Creek Monitoring — MY4 (2011) Kim ley Horn end Av late%Inc. Baseline Project Forrest Creek stems = 7 Date 6/1/2008 plot size (m "2) = 100 Name VQ1 stems /acre = 283 Size 10m x 10m Cover 25% water, 75% grass x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition 43 05 Unknown sp Unknown sp 9 21 _ Quercus sp Oak Sp 69 39 Quercus sp Oak Sp 31 3 Quercus sp Oak Sp 22 68 Quercus sp Oak Sp 64 69 Quercus sp Oak Sp 10 76 Quercus sp Oak Sp Comments ddh (mm) Height (cm) 6 47 4 48 3 26 3 38 3 30 3 25 3 36 Forrest Creek -- MY5 (2012) Cc" a crass Cates Inc MY1 Project Forrest Creek Unknown sp Stressed Date 12/4/2008 Name VQ1 Pin Oak Size 10m x 10m Cover 25% water, 75% grass x (m) y (m) Scientific Name 43 05 Unknown sp 9 21 Quercus palustns 31 3 Quercus palustns 22 68 Quercus palustns 10 76 Quercus palustns 1 5 51 Liquidambar styraciflua 2 51 Liquidambar styraciflua 24 85 Liquidambar styraciflua stems = 5 plot size (m ^2) = 100 stems /acre = 202 Common Name Condition Comments Unknown sp Stressed Pin Oak Pin Oak Pin Oak Pin Oak Sweet Gum Invasive native Sweet Gum Invasive native Sweet Gum Invasive native Forrest Creek -- MY5 (2012) Cnn a a�ns Associates Inc Replant - Year 2 Project Forrest Creek stems = 8 Date 5/29/2009 plot size (m ^2) = 100 Name VQ1 stems /acre = 324 Size 10m x 10m Cover 25% water, 75% grass x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name 9 21 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 31 3 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 22 68 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 10 76 Quercus palustrs Pin Oak 1 5 51 Liquidambar styracflua Sweet Gum 2 51 Liquidambar styracflua Sweet Gum 24 85 Liquidambar styraaflua Sweet Gum 1 7 35 Betula nigra River Birch 66 88 Betula nigra River Birch 49 0 Quercus phellos Willow Oak 68 26 Juglans nigra Black Walnut 1 51 Liquidambar styraaflua Sweet Gum 23 51 Liquidambar styracflua Sweet Gum 69 39 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 0 52 Liquidambar styracflua Sweet Gum 42 62 Liquidambar styraaflua Sweet Gum 2 68 Liquidambar styraaflua Sweet Gum 12 95 Liquidambar styraaflua Sweet Gum Condition stems= Vol = 9 plot size (m ^2) = 100 stems /acre = 364 Comments Invasive native Invasive native Invasive native 1/29/09 Replant 1/29/09 Replant 1/29/09 Replant Vol Invasive native Invasive native Invasive native Invasive native Invasive native Invasive native Forrest Creek -- MY5 (2012) Can a dAs Associates Inc MY2 Project Forrest Creek stems= Vol = Date 9/1/2009 100 Name VQ1 stems /acre = Size 10m x 10m 486 Cover Dog fennel, mixed cattle grasses = 85% X (m) y (m) Scientific Name 9 21 Quercus palustrs 31 3 Quercus palustns 22 68 Quercus palustns 10 76 Quercus palustns 1 5 51 Liquidambar styraciflua 2 51 Liquidambar styraciflua 24 85 Fraxmus pennsylvanicus 66 88 Betula nigra 49 0 Quercus phellos 68 26 Robinia pseudoacacia 1 51 Quercus phellos 23 51 Quercus michauxii 69 39 Quercus palustrs 0 52 Liquidambar styraciflua 42 62 Liquidambar styraciflua 2 68 Liquidambar styraciflua 12 95 Salix Nigra stems = 11 stems= Vol = 12 plot size (m 12) = 100 plot size (m ^2) = 100 stems /acre = 445 stems /acre = 486 Common Name Condition Comments Pin Oak Pin Oak Pin Oak Pin Oak Sweet Gum Invasive native Sweet Gum Invasive native Green Ash Replaced Sweet gum River Birch Willow Oak Black Locust Vol Willow Oak Replaced Sweet gum Swamp chestnut Oak Replaced Sweet gum Pin Oak Sweet Gum Invasive native Sweet Gum Invasive native Sweet Gum Invasive native Black Willow Replaced Sweet gum Forrest Creek -- MY5 (2012) Cc" a dAs Associates Inc MY3 Project Forrest Creek Date 9/10/2010 Name VQ1 Size 10m x 10m Cover X (m) 9 31 22 10 69 24 6 8 8 66 17 1 49 1 59 68 15 2 0 42 2 4 62 12 29 stems = 11 stems= Vol = 18 plot size (mA2) = 100 plot size (mA2) = 100 stems /acre = 445 stems /acre = 728 Forrest Creek -- MY5 (2012) Cc" a and orates Inc Percent survivial Dog fennel, mixed cattle grasses, 100% cover y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition Comments 21 Quercus palustrs Pin Oak 3 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 68 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 76 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 39 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 85 Fraxinus pennsylvanicus Green Ash Replaced Sweet gum 25 Fraxinus pennsylvanicus Green Ash Vol 35 Fraxinus pennsylvanicus Green Ash Vol 42 Fraxinus pennsylvanicus Green Ash Vol 88 Betula nigra River Birch 35 Betula nigra River Birch 75 Betula nigra River Birch Vol 0 Quercus phellos Willow Oak 51 Quercus phellos Willow Oak Replaced Sweet gum 4 Quercus phellos Willow Oak Vol 26 Robinia pseudoacacia Black Locust Vol 51 Liquidambar styraciflua Sweet Gum Invasive native 51 Liquidambar styraciflua Sweet Gum Invasive native 52 Liquidambar styraciflua Sweet Gum Invasive native 62 Liquidambar styraciflua Sweet Gum Invasive native 68 Liquidambar styraciflua Sweet Gum Invasive native 10 Liquidambar styraciflua Sweet Gum Invasive native, on the line 10 Liquidambar styraciflua Sweet Gum Invasive native, on the line 95 Salix Nigra Black Willow Replaced Sweet gum 10 Quercus michauxii Swamp chestnut Oak on the line Forrest Creek -- MY5 (2012) Cc" a and orates Inc MY4 Project Forrest Creek Date 6/28/2011 Name Size Cover X (m) 17 1 24 6 8 15 2 0 42 2 4 62 97 95 29 9 31 22 10 69 1 12 5 VQ1 10m x 10m Dog fennel, mixed cattle grasses, 100% cover stems = plot size (m ^2) _ stems /acre = 11 (w /vols) stems = 100 plot size (m ^2) _ 445 stems /acre = y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition 35 Betula nigra River Birch 75 _ Betula nigra River Birch 85 Fraxinus pennsylvanicus Green Ash 25 Fraxinus pennsylvanicus Green Ash 35 Fraxinus pennsylvanicus Green Ash 51 Liquidambar styraciflua Sweet Gum 51 Liquidambar styraciflua Sweet Gum 52 Liquidambar styraciflua Sweet Gum 62 Liquidambar styraciflua Sweet Gum 68 Liquidambar styraciflua Sweet Gum 10 Liquidambar styraciflua Sweet Gum 10 Liquidambar styraciflua Sweet Gum 68 Liquidambar styraciflua Sweet Gum 72 Liquidambar styraciflua Sweet Gum 10 Quercus michauxii Swamp chestnut Oak 21 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 3 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 68 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 76 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 39 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 51 Quercus phellos Willow Oak 95 Salix Nigra Black Willow 98 Salix Nigra Black Willow Comments Vol Replaced Sweet gum Vol Vol Invasive native Invasive native Invasive native Invasive native Invasive native Invasive native, on the line Invasive native, on the line Vol Vol on the line Replaced Sweet gum Replaced Sweet gum Vol 23 100 931 Forrest Creek -- MY5 (2012) CnFl a alns Associates Inc MY5 Project Forrest Creek stems = 11 (w /vols) stems = Date 9/20/2012 plot size (mA2) = 100 plot size (mA2) _ Name VQ1 stems /acre = 445 stems /acre = Size 10m x 10m Cover Dog fennel, mixed cattle grasses, 100% cover X (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition Comments 1 7 35 Betula nigra River Birch 1 75 Betula nigra River Birch Vol 6 25 Fraxinus pennsylvanicus Green Ash Vol 8 35 Fraxinus pennsylvanicus Green Ash Vol 1 5 51 Liquidambar styraciflua Sweet Gum Invasive native 2 51 Liquidambar styraciflua Sweet Gum Invasive native 0 52 Liquidambar styraciflua Sweet Gum Invasive native 42 62 Liquidambar styraciflua Sweet Gum Invasive native 2 68 Liquidambar styraciflua Sweet Gum Invasive native 4 10 Liquidambar styraciflua Sweet Gum Invasive native, on the line 62 10 Liquidambar styraciflua Sweet Gum Invasive native, on the line 97 68 Liquidambar styraciflua Sweet Gum Vol 95 72 Liquidambar styraciflua Sweet Gum Vol 29 10 Quercus michauxii Swamp chestnut Oak on the line 9 21 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 31 3 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 22 68 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 10 76 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 7 85 Betula nigra River Birch Vol 73 85 Pinus sp Pine Vol 75 2 Robinia pseudoacacia Black Locust Vol 8 4 Fraxinus pennsylvanicus Green Ash Vol 7 0 Fraxinus pennsylvanicus Green Ash Vol 23 100 931 Forrest Creek -- MY5 (2012) Gu/ 1 enGIAssociates Inc 10 9 8 7 6 Swee -- 5 E 4 3 2 1 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 X (m) ■ Baseline ■ MY1 ■ Replant (Year 1) ■ MY2 ■ MY3 ■ MY4 + MY5 VQ1 Swamp chestnut Oak Sweet Gum Black Willow ■ Sweet Gum River Birch Green Ash ■ ■ River Birch Pill ■ Sweet Gum 0 ■ ■ Pin Oak Sweet Gum ■ Gum Willow Oak Sweet Gum ■ Sweet Gum Green Ash Willow Oak Pin Oak ■ River Birch ■ Green Ash ■ Pin Oak Green Ash ■ ® Black Locust Pin Oak ■ Willow Oak yak I 6 7 8 9 10 Baseline Project Forrest Creek stems = 9 Date 611/2008 plot size (MA 2) = 100 Name VQ2 stems /acre = 364 Size 10m x 10m Cover 25% water, 75% grass x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition Comments ddh (mm) Height (cm) 28 04 Quercus sp Oak sp 2 22 37 3 - Quercus sp Oak sp 2 30 47 7 Quercus sp Oak sp 3 35 1 9 9 Quercus sp Oak sp 3 34 1 5 56 Quercus sp Oak sp 3 39 69 1 3 Quercus sp Oak sp 2 28 98 41 Quercus sp Oak sp 3 36 72 43 Unknown sp Unknown sp 3 12 83 83 Quercus sp Oak sp 3 32 Forrest Creek -- MY5 (2012) Cc" and As Horn ,and Associates Inc MY1 Project Forrest Creek Date 12/4/2008 Name VQ2 Size 10m x 10m Cover 25% water, 75% grass x (m) y (m) Scientific Name 28 04 Quercus palustns 47 7 - Quercus palustns 1 9 9 Quercus palustns 1 5 56 Quercus palustrs 69 1 3 Quercus palustns 83 83 Quercus palustns stems = plot size (m ^2) _ stems /acre = Common Name Pin Oak Pin Oak Pin Oak Pin Oak Pin Oak Pin Oak 6 100 243 Condition Comments Forrest Creek -- MY5 (2012) G�� a d As ociates Inc Replant - Year 2 Project Forrest Creek stems = 12 Date 5/29/2009 plot size (m ^2) = 100 Name VQ2 stems /acre = 486 Size 10m x 10m Cover 25% water, 75% grass x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition Comments 28 04 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 47 7 _ Quercus palustns Pin Oak 1 9 9 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 1 5 56 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 69 1 3 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 83 83 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 26 1 9 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 1/29/09 Replant 1 3 59 Betula nigra River Birch 1/29/09 Replant 46 75 Betula nigra River Birch 1/29/09 Replant 68 51 Betula nigra River Birch 1/29/09 Replant 94 32 Quercus phellos Willow Oak 1/29/09 Replant 37 3 Quercus palustns Pin Oak l Forrest Creek -- MY5 (2012) Gam/ \ and Associates ociates Inc, MY2 Project Forrest Creek stems = Date 9/1/2009 plot size (MA 2) _ Name VQ2 stems /acre = Size 10m x 10m Cover mixed cattle grasses, porcupine sedge, cokleburr = 90% X (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name 47 7 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 1 9 9 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 1 5 56 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 69 1 3 Quercus michauxii Swamp Chestnut Oak 83 83 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 26 1 9 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 1 3 59 Betula nigra River Birch 46 75 Betula nigra River Birch 68 51 Betula nigra River Birch 94 32 Quercus phellos Willow Oak 98 41 Quercus michauxii Swamp Chestnut Oak 11 100 445 Condition Comments ' Forrest Creek -- MY5 (2012) CEI1 andAS orates Inc MY3 Project Forrest Creek stems = Date 9/10/2010 plot size (mA2) _ Name VQ2 stems /acre = Size 10m x 10m Cover narrow leaf sunflower, porcupine sedge, cokleburr, 100% cover x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name 47 7 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 1 9 9 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 1 5 56 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 69 1 3 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 26 1 9 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 09 45 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 9 8 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 1 3 59 Betula nigra River Birch 46 75 Betula nigra River Birch 68 51 Betula nigra River Birch 94 32 Quercus phellos Willow Oak 98 41 Quercus michauxii Swamp Chestnut Oak 10 stems= Vol = 12 100 plot size (mA2) = 100 405 stems /acre = 486 Condition Comments Vol Vol l Forrest Creek -- MY5 (2012) Cam/ 1 and Associates orates Inc MY4 Project Forrest Creek stems = Date 6/28/2011 plot size (m ^2) _ Name VQ2 stems /acre = Size 10m x 10m Cover narrow leaf sunflower, porcupine sedge, cokleburr, 100% cover x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name 1 3 59 Betula nigra River Birch 46 75 _ Betula nigra River Birch 68 51 Betula nigra River Birch 26 19 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 09 45 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 9 8 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 98 05 Morus rubra Red Mulberry 98 41 Quercus michauxii Swamp Chestnut Oak 1 9 9 Quercus palustrs Pin Oak 69 1 3 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 89 5 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 10 stems= Vol = 11 100 plot size (m ^2) = 100 405 stems /acre = 445 Condition Comments Vol Vol Vol Vol Forrest Creek -- MY5 (2012) ��� andlAS Associates Inc MY5 Project Forrest Creek stems = Date 9/20/2012 plot size (m ^2) _ Name VQ2 stems /acre = Size 10m x 10m Cover narrow leaf sunflower, porcupine sedge, cokleburr, 100% cover x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name 1 3 59 Betula nigra River Birch 46 75 _ Betula nigra River Birch 26 1 9 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 09 45 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 9 8 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 98 05 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 98 41 Quercus michauxii Swamp Chestnut Oak 1 9 9 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 69 1 3 Quercus michauxii Swamp Chestnut Oak 89 5 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 68 32 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 08 32 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 66 31 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 95 99 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 99 68 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 9 67 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 74 3 Liquidambar styraciflua Sweet Gum 51 34 briodenron tulipifera Tulip Poplar 05 3 Liquidambar styraciflua Sweet Gum 1 3 32 Liquidambar styraciflua Sweet Gum 10 stems= Vol = 20 100 plot size (m ^2) = 100 405 stems /acre = 809 Condition Comments Vol Vol Vol Vol Vol Vol Vol Vol Vol Vol Vol Vol Vol Vol l Forrest Creek -- MY5 (2012) ��� and Associates orates Inc 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 X (m) ■ Baseline ■ MY1 ■ Replant - Year 1 ■ MY2 ■ MY3 ■ MY4 + MY5 VQ2 6 7 8 9 10 Oak Baseline Project Forrest Creek Date 6/1/2008 Name VQ3 Size 10m x 10m Cover 60% grass x (m) y (m) Scientific Name 3 03 Asimina tnloba 64 01 - Asimina tnloba 92 16 Asimina tnloba 74 43 Cornus amomum 45 28 Asimina tnloba 09 48 Cornus amomum 3 73 Cornus amomum 58 66 Asimina tnloba 97 65 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 82 87 Asimina tnloba 51 93 Asimina tnloba 23 99 Cornus amomum stems = plot size (m ^2) = stems /acre = Common Name Common Pawpaw Common Pawpaw Common Pawpaw Silky Dogwood Common Pawpaw Silky Dogwood Silky Dogwood Common Pawpaw Green Ash Common Pawpaw Common Pawpaw Silky Dogwood 12 100 486 Condition Comments ddh (mm) Height (cm) 9 89 11 114 10 120 7 84 15 124 5 42 6 65 9 107 4 23 11 106 11 100 4 65 Forrest Creek -- MY5 (2012) ��n a d Associates Inc MY1 Project Forrest Creek stems = 9 Date 12/4/2008 plot size (m ^2) = 100 Name VQ3 stems /acre = 364 Size 10m x 10m Cover 60% grass x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition Comments 3 03 Asimina tnloba Common pawpaw 64 01 - Asimina trdoba Common pawpaw 92 16 Asimina tnloba Common pawpaw 74 53 Corpus amomum Silky Dogwood 45 28 Asimina tnloba Common pawpaw 09 48 Corpus amomum Silky Dogwood 58 66 Asimina triloba Common pawpaw 97 65 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 51 93 Asimina tnloba Common pawpaw Forrest Creek -- MY5 (2012) l ��/ \ and Associates Inc MY2 Project Forrest Creek stems = Date 9/1/2009 plot size (m ^2) _ Name VQ3 stems /acre = Size 10m x 10m Cover mixed cattle grasses, narrow leaved sunflower, soft rush = 100% cover X (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name 3 03 Asimina tnloba Common pawpaw 64 01 Asimina trdoba Common pawpaw 92 16 Asimina tnloba Common pawpaw 74 53 Corpus amomum Silky Dogwood 45 28 Asimina tnloba Common pawpaw 09 48 Corpus amomum Silky Dogwood 97 65 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 51 93 Asimina tnloba Common pawpaw 0 7 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 9 100 364 Condition Comments stressed stressed not on previous counts but now touching the line Forrest Creek -- MY5 (2012) Enn �d As Associates Inc Supplemental Planting Feb 2010 Project Forrest Creek stems = 13 Date 2/17/2010 plot size (m ^2) = 100 Name VQ3 stems /acre = 526 Size 10m x 10m Cover mixed cattle grasses, narrow leaved sunflower, soft rush, 100% cover X (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name 3 03 Asimina tnloba Common pawpaw 64 01 _ Asimina tnloba Common pawpaw 92 16 Asimina tnloba Common pawpaw 74 53 Corpus amomum Silky Dogwood 45 28 Asimina tnloba Common pawpaw 09 48 Corpus amomum Silky Dogwood 97 65 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 51 93 Asimina triloba Common pawpaw 0 7 Quercus palustrns Pin Oak 1 7 91 Betula nigra River Birch 45 55 Unidentified at time of planting Replant 8 73 Unidentified at time of planting Replant 63 34 Asimina tnloba Common pawpaw Condition Comments stressed stressed on the line Replant Replant Replant Replant Forrest Creek -- MYS (2012) c_" andlAssociates Inc MY3 Project Forrest Creek stems = Date 9/10/2010 plot size (MA 2) _ Name VQ3 stems /acre = Size 10m x 10m Cover mixed cattle grasses, narrow leaved sunflower, soft rush = 100% cover X (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name 74 53 Corpus amomum Silky Dogwood 09 48 _ Corpus amomum Silky Dogwood 97 65 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 92 16 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 45 28 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 51 93 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 74 43 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 17 99 0 7 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 3 03 Asimina triloba Common pawpaw 64 01 Asimina triloba Common pawpaw 63 34 Asimina triloba Common pawpaw 8 sterns= Vol = 12 100 plot size (mA2) = 100 324 stems /acre = 486 Condition Comments Vol Vol Vol Vol replant on the line Stressed Stressed Healthy Replant I stomped on trying to find it l Forrest Creek -- MY5 (2012) CnFl andAssociates Inc MY4 Project: Forrest Creek stems = Date: 6/28/2011 plot size (MA 2) _ Name: VQ3 stems /acre = Size: 10m x 10m Cover: mixed cattle grasses, narrow leaved sunflower, soft rush = 100% cover X (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name 3 0.3 Asimina triloba Common pawpaw 6.3 3.4 Asimina triloba Common pawpaw 4.9 9 Asimina triloba Common pawpaw 1.7 9.9 Betula nigra River Birch 7.4 5.3 Corpus amomum Silky Dogwood 0.9 4.8 Corpus amomum Silky Dogwood 9.7 6.5 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 9.2 1.6 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 4.5 2.8 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 5.1 9.3 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 7.4 4.3 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 7.5 9 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 0.7 10 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 0 0 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 0 7 Quercus palustris Pin Oak 8 stems = Vol. = 14 100 plot size (mA2) = 100 324 stems /acre = 567 Condition Comments Stressed Good replant Vol replant Vol Vol Vol Vol Vol Vol Vol on the line Forrest Creek -- MYS (2012) Cc" a l dAssocates,Inc. MY5 Project Forrest Creek stems = Date 9/20/2012 plot size (MA 2) _ Name VQ3 stems /acre = Size 10m x 10m Cover mixed cattle grasses, narrow leaved sunflower, soft rush = 100% cover X (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name 3 03 Asimina tnloba Common pawpaw 63 34 Asimina tnloba Common pawpaw 49 9 Asimina tnloba Common pawpaw 1 7 99 Betula nigra River Birch 74 53 Corpus amomum Silky Dogwood 09 48 Corpus amomum Silky Dogwood 97 65 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 92 16 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 45 28 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 51 93 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 74 43 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 75 9 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 07 10 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 0 0 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 0 7 Quercus palustris Pin Oak 10 9 Liquidambar styraciflua Sweet Gum 7 7 Liquidambar styraciflua Sweet Gum 75 7 Liquidambar styraciflua Sweet Gum 5 35 Juglans nigra Black Walnut 8 stems= Vol = 19 100 plot size (MA 2) = 100 324 stems /acre = 769 Condition Comments Stressed Good replant Vol replant Vol Vol Vol Vol Vol Vol Vol Vol Vol Vol Vol on the line l Forrest Creek -- MY5 (2012) CE/ \ land Associates orates Inc VQ3 River Birch 10 9 8 Pin 7 6 E 5 4 3 2 1 0 ■ Oak Green Ash ■ ■ ■ ■ Silky Dogwood Silky Dogwood IE Green Ash ■ Common pawpaw FR Green Ash PR Common pawpaw ■ Common pawpaw ■ reen A3h ■ 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 X (m) ■ Baseline ■ MY1 ■ MY2 ■ Replant ■ MY3 ■ MY4 + MY5 Baseline Project Forrest Creek stems = 12 Date 6/1/2008 plot size (MA 2) = 100 Name VQ4 stems /acre = 486 Size 10m x 10m Cover 50% Herbaceous Dicots x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition Comments ddh (mm) Height (cm) 66 08 Juglans nigra Black Walnut 8 68 81 32 - Quercus sp Oak sp 3 40 35 27 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 9 55 1 54 Unknown sp Unknown sp 4 28 62 46 Quercus sp Oak sp 2 27 35 63 Quercus sp Oak sp 4 36 1 8 Quercus sp Oak sp 3 36 57 79 Quercus sp Oak sp 3 36 95 87 Juglans nigra Black Walnut 7 62 0 98 Salix nigra Black Willow Livestake 40 15 06 97 Salix nigra Black Willow Livestake 38 16 12 95 Salix nigra Black Willow Livestake 17 19 l Forrest Creek -- MYS (2012) GuFl andAS orates Inc MY2 Project Forrest Creek Date 9/1/2009 (w /vols) stems = Name VQ4 100 Size 10m x 10m stems /acre = Cover Dog fennel, mixed cattle grasses = 100% X (m) y (m) Scientific Name 66 08 Juglans nigra 1 54 Populus deltoides 62 46 Quercus phellos 35 63 Quercus michauxii 1 8 Quercus phellos 57 79 Quercus phellos 06 97 Salix nigra 12 95 Salix nigra 64 02 Rhus glabra stems = 7 (w /vols) stems = 9 plot size (mA2) = 100 plot size (MA 2) = 100 stems /acre = 283 stems /acre = 364 Common Name Black Walnut Cottonwood Willow Oak Swamp Chestnut Oak Willow Oak Willow Oak Black Willow Black Willow Smooth Sumac Condition Comments Vol Livestake Livestake Vol Forrest Creek -- MYS (2012) CEI1 a dlAS Associates Inc MY1 Project Forrest Creek stems = 9 Date 12/4/2008 plot size (MA 2) = 100 Name VQ4 stems /acre = 364 Size 10m x 10m Cover 50% Herbaceous Dicots x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition Comments 66 08 Juglans nigra Black Walnut 81 32 - Quercus palustrs Pin Oak 35 27 Fraxinus Pennsylvanica Green Ash Stressed 1 54 Unknown sp Unknown sp 62 46 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 35 63 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 1 8 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 57 79 Quercus palustrs Pin Oak 95 87 Juglans nigra Black Walnut Forrest Creek -- MY5 (2012) G =Fl a i dns Associates Inc Supplemental Planting Feb 2010 Project Forrest Creek stems = 14 (w /vols) stems = 16 Date 2/10/2010 plot size (MA 2) = 100 plot size (MA 2) = 100 Name VQ4 stems /acre = 567 stems /acre = 647 Size 10m x 10m Cover Dog fennel, mixed cattle grasses = 100% X (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition Comments 66 08 Juglans nigra Black Walnut 62 46 Quercus phellos Willow Oak Couldn't see any oaks 35 63 Quercus michauxii Swamp Chestnut Oak Couldn't see any oaks 1 8 Quercus phellos Willow Oak Couldn't see any oaks 57 79 Quercus phellos Willow Oak Couldn't see any oaks 06 97 Salix nigra Black Willow LS Livestake 12 95 Salix nigra Black Willow LS Livestake 0 98 Salix nigra Black Willow LS Livestake 64 02 Rhus glabra Smooth Sumac Vol Vol 1 54 Populus deltoides Cottonwood Vol Vol 3 45 Betula nigra River Birch Replant Replant 5 5 Quercus phellos Willow Oak Replant Replant 9 78 Quercus phellos Willow Oak Replant Replant 9 55 Quercus palustns Pin Oak Replant Replant 95 55 Quercus phellos Willow Oak Replant Replant 25 1 5 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Replant 55 3 Betula nigra River Birch Replant Replant 65 2 Betula nigra River Birch Replant Replant 81 32 Quercus palustrs Pin Oak ~ 1 2 1 Quercus palustns Pin Oak Replant Replant Forrest Creek -- MYS (2012) CE Fl ndlAS orates Inc MY3 Project Forrest Creek stems = 12 (w /vols) stems = 29 Date 9/10/2010 plot size (m ^2) = 100 plot size (m ^2) = 100 Name VQ4 stems /acre = 486 stems /acre = 1174 Size 10m x 10m Cover Dog fennel, mixed cattle grasses, 100% cover X (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition Comments 66 08 Juglans nigra Black Walnut Stressed 1 5 85 _ Juglans nigra Black Walnut Stressed Replant 62 46 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Vol 35 63 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Vol 1 8 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Vol 95 87 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Vol 57 79 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Vol 35 27 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 25 1 5 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Replant 02 08 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Replant 1 22 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Replant 45 1 5 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Replant 55 2 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Replant 06 97 Salix nigra Black Willow LS Stressed Livestake 12 95 Salix nigra Black Willow LS Stressed Livestake 64 02 Rhus glabra Smooth Sumac Vol Stressed Vol 1 54 Populus deltoides Cottonwood Vol Vol 55 3 Betula nigra River Birch 3 45 Betula nigra River Birch 81 32 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 12 1 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 6 66 Quercus palustns Pin Oak Replant 95 55 Quercus phellos Willow Oak 9 78 Quercus phellos Willow Oak 5 5 Quercus phellos Willow Oak 73 37 Quercus michauxii Swamp Chestnut Oak Replant 48 75 Quercus michauxii Swamp Chestnut Oak Replant 0 22 Asimina triloba Common pawpaw on the line never counted 8 55 Platanus occidentalis Sycamore Replant Forrest Creek -- MY5 (2012) CEI1 a d As ociates Inc MY4 Project Forrest Creek Date 6/28/2011 Name VQ4 Size 10m x 10m Cover X (m) 0 62 35 1 95 57 35 25 02 1 45 55 66 15 8 1 73 6 95 9 5 06 Dog fennel, mixed cattle grasses, 100% cover stems = 12 (w /vols) stems = 22 plot size (m 12) = 100 plot size (m ^2) = 100 stems /acre = 486 stems /acre = 890 Y (m) Scientific Name Common Name 22 Asimina trnloba Common pawpaw 46 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 63 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 8 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 87 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 79 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 27 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 1 5 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 08 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 22 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 1 5 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 2 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 08 Juglans nigra Black Walnut 85 Juglans nigra Black Walnut 55 Platanus occidentalis Sycamore 54 Populus deltoides Cottonwood Vol 37 Quercus michauxii Swamp Chestnut Oak 66 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 55 Quercus phellos Willow Oak 78 Quercus phellos Willow Oak 5 Quercus phellos Willow Oak 97 Salix nigra Black Willow LS Condition Comments on the line never counted Vol Vol Vol Vol Vol Replant Replant Replant Replant Replant Stressed Stressed Replant Replant Vol Replant Replant Stressed Livestake Forrest Creek -- MY5 (2012) Gnn a dlAs Associates Inc MY5 Project Forrest Creek Date 9/20/2012 Name VQ4 Size 10m x 10m Cover X (m) 0 62 35 1 95 57 35 25 02 1 45 55 1 73 6 95 9 5' 1 15 6 2 8 75 3 95 stems = 12 (w /vols) stems = 26 plot size (MA 2) = 100 plot size (MA 2) = 100 stems /acre = 486 stems /acre = < 1052* Dog fennel, mixed cattle grasses, 100% cover Vegetation Quad is overwhelmed by Green Ash volunteers* Y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition Comments 22 Asimina tnloba Common pawpaw on the line never counted 46 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Vol 63 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Vol 8 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Vol 87 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Vol 79 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Vol 27 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 1 5 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Replant 08 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Replant 22 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Replant 1 5 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Replant 2 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Replant 54 Populus deltoides Cottonwood Vol 37 Quercus michauxii Swamp Chestnut Oak Replant 66 Quercus palustns Pin Oak Replant 55 Quercus phellos Willow Oak 78 Quercus phellos Willow Oak 5 Quercus phellos Willow Oak 1 Quercus palustns Pin Oak Vol 05 Liquidambar styraciflua Sweet Gum Vol 2 Betula nigra River Birch Vol 3 Betula nigra River Birch Vol 54 Betula nigra River Birch Vol 9 Quercus palustns Pin Oak Vol 65 Quercus palustns Pin Oak Vol 7 Quercus palustns Pin Oak Vol Forrest Creek -- MY5 (2012) Can and l Assocates Inc �- E E. 7 E 5 .r 4 3 Commor 21 �r VQ4 ac illow LS IN Black Walnut Green Ash■ ■ Green Ash Willow Oak Swamp Chestnut Oa ■ PlrrOak +- Green Ash + ■ Cottonwood Vol Sycamore Willow Oak ■ Willow Oak River Birch Gieen Ash ■ Swamp Chestnut 0- ak ■ River Birch Green Ash ■ Pin Oak pawpaw ■ Green Ash Green Ash Green Ash Green Ash Pin Oak en Ash Black Walnut ■ + Smooth Sumac Vol ■ 1 2 3 4 5 X (m) ■ Baseline ■ MY1 ■ MY2 ■ Replant- Year 2 ■ MY3 • MY4 + MY5 6 7 8 9 10 Baseline Project Forrest Creek stems = 9 Date 6/1/2008 plot size (MA 2) = 100 Name VQ5 stems /acre = 364 Size 10m x 10m Cover 80% Broomsedge x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition 03 02 Quercus sp Oak sp 59 09 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 85 03 Quercus sp Oak sp 44 94 Unknown sp Unknown sp 55 37 Quercus sp Oak sp 26 31 Salix nigra Black Willow 1 3 59 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 26 85 Quercus sp Oak sp 75 87 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Comments ddh (mm) Height (cm) 3 41 4 34 2 35 8 28 3 37 4 19 5 33 3 44 2 20 -Horn Forrest Creek -- MY5 (2012) EnFl and As � , entl associates inc MY1 Project Forrest Creek stems = 5 stems+ Vol = 7 Date 12/4/2008 plot size (MA 2) = 100 plot size (MA 2) = 100 Name VQ5 stems /acre = 202 stems /acre = 283 Size 10m x 10m Cover 80% Broomsedge x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition Comments 59 09 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 85 03 Quercus palustris Pin Oak 1 3 59 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 26 85 Quercus palustris Pin Oak 75 87 Quercus palustris Pin Oak 12 63 Unknown sp Unknown sp Vol 23 68 Unknown sp Unknown sp Vol Forrest Creek -- MY5 (2012) CMn a l dAssociates Inc Replant - Year 2 Project Forrest Creek stems = 11 stems+ Vol = 16 Date 5/29/2009 plot size (m ^2) = 100 plot size (m ^2) = 100 Name VQ5 stems /acre = 445 stems /acre = 647 Size 10m x 10m Cover 80% Broomsedge x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition 59 09 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 85 03 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 1 3 59 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 26 85 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 1 2 63 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush 23 68 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush 77 21 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 24 94 Quercus phellos Willow Oak 03 02 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 55 37 Quercus palustrs Pin Oak 07 54 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush 14 54 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush 05 78 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush 7 5 87 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 4 4 94 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 6 3 98 Quercus palustrs Pin Oak Comments Vol Vol 1/29/09 Replant 1/29/09 Replant Vol Vol Vol 1/29/09 Replant mis- identified @ nursery? Forrest Creek -- MYS (2012) Cvn o mass cates Ina MY2 Project Forrest Creek stems = 10 stems+ Vol = 16 Date 9/1/2009 plot size (m ^2) = 100 plot size (m ^2) = 100 Name VQ5 stems /acre = 405 stems /acre = 647 Size 10m x 10m Cover dog fennel, narrow leaved sun flower = 100% x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition Comments 59 09 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 85 03 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 1 3 59 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 26 85 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 12 63 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush Vol 23 68 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush Vol 24 94 Quercus phellos Willow Oak 03 02 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 55 37 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 07 54 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush Vol 1 4 54 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush Vol 0 5 78 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush Vol 75 87 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 44 94 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 6 3 98 Quercus palustrs Pin Oak 2 6 31 Diospyros virgirnana Persimmon Vol � Forrest Creek -- MY5 (2012) Cc" and/ssocates Inc MY3 Project: Forrest Creek stems = 9 stems+ Vol. _ Date: 9/10/2010 plot size (m ^2) = 100 plot size (m 12) _ Name: VQ5 stems /acre = 364 stems /acre = Size: 10m x 10m Cover: dog fennel, narrow leaved sun flower; 100% cover x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition Comments 5.9 0.9 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Actually an Asmina triloba? 1.3 5.9 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 7.5 8.7 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 2.3 6.8 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Vol. 2.6 3.1 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Vol. 4 2.5 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Vol. 7.5 4 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Vol. 8.5 0.3 Quercus palustris Pin Oak Dead? Too close to fence, got hit w /herbicide 0.3 0.2 Quercus palustris Pin Oak 2.6 8.5 Quercus palustris Pin Oak 5.5 3.7 Quercus palustris Pin Oak 4.4 9.4 Quercus palustris Pin Oak 6.3 9.8 Quercus phellos Willow Oak 2.4 9.4 Quercus phellos Willow Oak 1.2 6.3 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush Vol. 0.7 5.4 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush Vol. 1.4 5.4 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush Vol. 0.5 7.8 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush Vol. 1.9 7.9 Ulmus alata Winged Elm Vol. 18 100 728 Forrest Creek -- MYS (2012) Con a dAssociates,Inc. MY4 Project Forrest Creek stems = 9 stems+ Vol = 20 Date 6/29/2011 plot size (m ^2) = 100 plot size (m ^2) = 100 Name VQ5 stems /acre = 364 stems /acre = 809 Size 10m x 10m Cover dog fennel, narrow leaved sun flower, 100% cover x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition Comments 1 3 59 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush 12 63 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush Vol 0 7 54 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush Vol 1 4 54 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush Vol 5 9 0 9 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 75 87 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 2 3 6 8 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Vol 2 6 31 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Vol 4 2 5 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Vol 7 5 4 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Vol 75 2 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Vol 74 1 5 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Vol 6 1 0 5 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Vol 7 8 Liquidambar styraciflua Sweet Gum Vol 0 3 02 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 2 6 85 Quercus palustrs Pin Oak 5 5 37 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 4 4 94 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 6 3 98 Quercus phellos Willow Oak 24 94 Quercus phellos Willow Oak Forrest Creek -- MY5 (2012) Gz/ \and As ociates Inc MY5 Project Forrest Creek stems = 9 stems+ Vol = 21 Date 9/20/2012 plot size (m ^2) = 100 plot size (m ^2) = 100 Name VQ5 stems /acre = 364 stems /acre = 850 Size 10m x 10m Cover dog fennel, narrow leaved sun flower, 100% cover x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition Comments 1 3 59 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush 1 2 6 3 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush Vol 0 7 54 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush Vol 1 4 54 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush Vol 59 0 9 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 7 5 87 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 2 3 68 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Vol 26 31 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Vol 4 2 5 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Vol 7 5 4 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Vol 75 2 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Vol 74 1 5 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Vol 61 0 5 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Vol 7 8 Liquidambar styraciflua Sweet Gum Vol 0 3 02 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 26 8 5 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 55 37 Quercus palustrs Pin Oak 24 94 Quercus phellos Willow Oak 97 78 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Vol 8 1 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Vol 65 0 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Vol Forrest Creek -- MY5 (2012) CZn a d Asociates Inc MY1 Project: Forrest Creek Date: 12/4/2008 Name: VQT1 Size: 10m x 10m Cover: 90% cattle grass x (m) y (m) Scientific Name 3 0.7 Quercus palustris 7.9 1 Quercus palustris 1.4 3.3 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 8.8 6.3 Quercus palustris 6.2 7.5 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 0.5 7.3 Quercus palustris 2.3 9.5 Fraxinus pennsylvanica stems = 7 plot size (MA 2) = 100 stems /acre = 283 Common Name Condition Comments Pin Oak Pin Oak Green Ash Pin Oak Green Ash Pin Oak Green Ash Forrest Creek -- MY5 (2012) Cc" and As Horn � ,and Associates, Inc. Replant - Year 2 Project: Forrest Creek stems = 17 stems + Vol = 22 Date: 5/29/2009 plot size (m12) = 100 plot size (m12) = 100 Name: VQT1 stems /acre = 688 stems /acre = 890 Size: Cover: x(m) 3 79 14 88 62 05 23 71 75 01 02 03 05 04 04 04 08 28 38 42 52 62 10m x 10m 90% cattle grass Y (m) Scientific Name 07 Quercus palustns 1 Quercus palustns 33 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 63 Quercus palustrs 75 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 73 Quercus palustns 95 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 38 Quercus michauxii 78 Quercus michauxii 08 Salix nigra 16 Salix nigra 22 Salix nigra 58 Salix nigra 67 Salix nigra 72 Salix nigra 85 Salix nigra 88 Platanus occidentalis 56 Cephalanthus occidentalis 56 Cephalanthus occidentalis 72 Cephalanthus occidentalis 47 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 1 1 Cephalanthus occidentalis Common Name Pin Oak Pin Oak Green Ash Pin Oak Green Ash Pin Oak Green Ash Swamp Chestnut Oak Swamp Chestnut Oak Black Willow Black Willow Black Willow Black Willow Black Willow Black Willow Black Willow Sycamore Buttonbush Buttonbush Buttonbush Green Ash Buttonbush Condition Comments 1/29/09 Replant 1/29/09 Replant livestake - Replant livestake livestake livestake livestake livestake - Replant livestake - Replant Vol Vol Vol Vol 1/29/09 Replant Vol Forrest Creek -- MY5 (2012) GEFl andAssocates Inc MY2 Project: Forrest Creek stems + Vol. = Date: 9/1/2009 100 Name: VQT1 stems /acre = Size: 10m x 10m 728 Cover: dog fennel, mixed cattle grasses = 100% X (m) y (m) Scientific Name 3 0.7 Quercus palustris 7.9 1 Quercus palustris 1.4 3.3 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 8.8 6.3 Quercus palustris 6.2 7.5 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 2.3 9.5 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 7.1 3.8 Quercus michauxii 7.5 7.8 Quercus michauxii 0.1 0.8 Salix nigra 0.2 1.6 Salix nigra 0.3 2.2 Salix nigra 0.5 5.8 Salix nigra 0.4 6.7 Salix nigra 0.4 7.2 Salix nigra 0.4 8.5 Salix nigra 2.8 5.6 Cephalanthus occidentalis 5.2 4.7 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 6.2 1.1 Cephalanthus occidentalis stems = 16 stems + Vol. = 18 plot size (m ^2) = 100 plot size (MA 2) = 100 stems /acre = 647 stems /acre = 728 Common Name Pin Oak Pin Oak Green Ash Pin Oak Green Ash Green Ash Swamp Chestnut Oak Swamp Chestnut Oak Black Willow Black Willow Black Willow Black Willow Black Willow Black Willow Black Willow Buttonbush Green Ash Buttonbush Condition Comments livestake livestake livestake livestake livestake livestake livestake Vol. fel Forrest Creek -- MY5 (2012) ��n a l d Associates, Inc. MY3 Project: Forrest Creek stems = 15 stems + Vol = 21 Date: 9/10/2010 plot size (m ^2) = 100 plot size (m ^2) = 100 Name: VQT1 stems /acre = 607 stems /acre = 850 Size: 10m x 10m Cover dog fennel, mixed cattle grasses, 100% cover X (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition Comments 3 07 Quercus palustris Pin Oak 79 1 _Quercus palustns Pin Oak 14 33 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 52 47 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 62 75 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 23 95 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 88 63 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Vol 38 56 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Vol 42 72 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Vol 71 38 Quercus michauxii Swamp Chestnut Oak 75 78 Quercus michauxii Swamp Chestnut Oak 01 08 Salix nigra Black Willow livestake 02 16 Salix nigra Black Willow livestake 03 22 Salix nigra Black Willow livestake 05 58 Salix nigra Black Willow livestake 04 67 Salix nigra Black Willow livestake 04 72 Salix nigra Black Willow livestake 04 85 Salix nigra Black Willow livestake 69 69 Salix nigra Black Willow Vol 28 56 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush Vol 62 1 1 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush Vol Forrest Creek -- MY5 (2012) CzFl andlAS Associates Inc MY4 Project: Forrest Creek stems = Date: 6/29/2011 plot size (m ^2) _ Name. VQT1 stems /acre = Size: 10m x 10m Cover: dog fennel, mixed cattle grasses, 100% cover X (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name 28 56 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush 62 1 1 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush 1 4 33 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 52 4 7 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 6 2 7 5 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 2 3 9 5 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 8 8 6 3 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 3 8 56 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 4 2 72 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 6 5 5 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 8 3 9 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 74 8 7 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 71 38 Quercus michauxii Swamp Chestnut Oak 7 5 7 8 Quercus michauxii Swamp Chestnut Oak 3 0 7 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 7 9 1 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 0 1 0 8 Salix nigra Black Willow 0 2 1 6 Salix nigra Black Willow 0 3 22 Salix nigra Black Willow 0 5 58 Salix nigra Black Willow 04 6 7 Salix nigra Black Willow 0 4 72 Salix nigra Black Willow 04 85 Salix nigra Black Willow 6 9 6 9 Salix nigra Black Willow 15 stems + Vol = 24 100 plot size (m ^2) = 100 607 stems /acre = 971 Condition Comments Vol Vol Vol Vol Vol Vol Vol Vol livestake livestake livestake livestake livestake livestake livestake Vol Forrest Creek -- MY5 (2012) CMn �alns Associates Inc MY5 Project: Forrest Creek stems = 15 stems + Vol = Date. 9/20/2012 plot size (m ^2) = 100 plot size (m ^2) _ Name: VQT1 stems /acre = 607 stems /acre = Size: 10m x 10m Cover: dog fennel, mixed cattle grasses, 100% cover Vegetation Quad is overwhelmed by Green Ash volunteers* X (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition Comments 28 56 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush Vol 62 1 1 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush Vol 1 4 33 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 52 4 7 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 62 75 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 2 3 9 5 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 88 6 3 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Vol 38 56 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Vol 42 72 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Vol 6 5 5 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Vol 8 3 9 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Vol 74 87 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Vol 71 38 Quercus michauxii Swamp Chestnut Oak 75 78 Quercus michauxii Swamp Chestnut Oak 3 0 7 Quercus palustris Pin Oak 79 1 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 01 0 8 Salix nigra Black Willow livestake 02 1 6 Salix nigra Black Willow livestake 0 5 58 Salix nigra Black Willow livestake 04 6 7 Salix nigra Black Willow livestake 04 72 Salix nigra Black Willow livestake 04 85 Salix nigra Black Willow livestake 24 100 < 971* Forrest Creek -- MY5 (2012) C =I1 and Associates Inc VQ5 1 Willow Oak 0 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 - Green -Ash - Green Ash Pin Oak - - r ■ Green Ash ■ Pin Oak ■ 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 X (m) ■ Baseline ■ MY1 ■ Replant - Year 1 ■ MY2 ■ MY3 ■ MY4 + MY5 Baseline Project- Forrest Creek stems = 8 Date: 6/1/2008 plot size (m12) = 100 Name: VQ6 stems /acre = 324 Size: 10m x 10m Cover: 90% Annual Rye x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition Comments ddh (mm) Height (cm) 1 1 1 Juglans nigra Black Walnut 8 55 87 03 _ Quercus alba White Oak 2 19 1 5 45 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 3 33 38 3 Quercus alba White Oak 4 20 77 31 Juglans nigra Black Walnut 8 51 58 71 Unknown sp Unknown sp 3 32 38 96 Quercus sp Oak sp 2 17 92 7 Quercus sp Oak sp 4 38 l Forrest Creek -- MY5 (2012) G =Fl andAssociates Inc MY1 Project: Forrest Creek Date- 12/4/2008 Name: VQ6 Size: 10m x 10m Cover: 90% Annual Rye x (m) y (m) 11 1 38 3 22 16 5 31 Scientific Name Juglans nigra Quercus michauxn Unknown sp Unknown sp stems = 2 stems + Vol = 4 plot size (m ^2) = 100 plot size (m 12) = 100 stems /acre = 81 stems /acre = 162 Common Name Black Walnut Swamp Chestnut Oak Unknown sp Unknown sp Condition Comments Vol Vol Forrest Creek -- MY5 (2012) C =n a d Associates Inc Replant - Year 2 Project: Forrest Creek stems = 16 stems +Vol = 19 Date: 5/29/2009 plot size (MA 2) = 100 plot size (MA 2) = 100 Name: VQ6 stems /acre = 647 stems /acre = 769 Size: 10m x 10m Cover: 90% Annual Rye x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name 1 1 1 Juglans nigra Black Walnut 38 3 _Quercus palustns Pin Oak 22 16 Juglans nigra Black Walnut 63 25 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 41 5 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 1 5 45 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 75 64 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 36 82 Betula nigra River Birch 34 1 9 Betula nigra River Birch 49 05 Sailx nigra Black Willow 56 03 Sailx nigra Black Willow 67 03 Sailx nigra Black Willow 87 03 Sailx nigra Black Willow 42 32 Diospyros virginiana Persimmon 05 38 Platanus occidentalis Sycamore 58 71 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 64 77 Quercus phellos Willow Oak 32 10 Diospyros virginiana Persimmon 38 96 Quercus palustns Pin Oak Condition Comments 1/29/09 Replant 1/29/09 Replant 1/29/09 Replant 1/29/09 Replant 1/29/09 Replant livestake - Replant livestake - Replant livestake - Replant livestake - Replant Vol Vol 1/29/09 Replant Vol l Forrest Creek -- MY5 (2012) Col 1 and Associates Inc i`tl ' Project: Forrest Creek Date: 9/1/2009 Name: VQ6 Size- 10m x 10m Cover• x (m) 11 38 22 63 41 15 75 36 34 49 56 67 87 1 42 05 58 64 32 38 92 stems = plot size (m ^2) _ stems /acre = 17 stems +Vol = 100 plot size (m ^2) _ 688 stems /acre = narrow leaved sunflower, bare spots where annual rye is gone and not grown over yet = 80% cover Y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition Comments 1 Juglans nigra Black Walnut Stressed 3 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 16 Juglans nigra Black Walnut Stressed 25 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 5 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 45 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 64 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 82 Betula nigra River Birch Stressed 19 Betula nigra River Birch Stressed 05 Sailx nigra Black Willow livestake 03 Sailx nigra Black Willow livestake 03 Sailx nigra Black Willow livestake 03 Sailx nigra Black Willow livestake 0 Sailx nigra Black Willow livestake 32 Diospyros virginiana Persimmon Vol 38 Platanus occidentalis Sycamore Vol 71 Quercus michauxii Swamp Chestnut Oak 77 Quercus phellos Willow Oak 10 Diospyros virginiana Persimmon Vol 96 Quercus palustris Pin Oak 7 Platanus occidentalis Sycamore Vol 21 100 850 previously not counted Forrest Creek -- MY5 (2012) Enn a dAss sates Inc MY3 Project: Forrest Creek Date 9/10/2010 Name: Size: Cover: X (m) 11 63 41 15 75 78 99 36 34 49 56 67 87 1 58 64 38 38 92 05 42 32 05 VQ6 10m x 10m stems = plot size (m ^2) _ stems /acre = narrow leaved sunflower, Dog fennel, mixed grasses, 100% cover Y (m) Scientific Name Common Name 1 Juglans nigra Black Walnut 25 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 5 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 45 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 64 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 31 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 25 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 82 Betula nigra River Birch 1 9 Betula nigra River Birch 05 Sailx nigra Black Willow 03 Sailx nigra Black Willow 03 Sailx nigra Black Willow 03 Sailx nigra Black Willow 0 Sailx nigra Black Willow 71 Quercus michauxii Swamp Chestnut Oak 77 Quercus phellos Willow Oak 96 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 3 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 7 Platanus occidentalis Sycamore 38 Platanus occidentalis Sycamore 1 5 Diospyros virginiana Persimmon 10 Diospyros virginiana Persimmon 65 Diospyros virginiana Persimmon 16 stems +Vol = 23 100 plot size (m ^2) = 100 647 stems /acre = 931 Condition Comments Stressed Vol Vol livestake livestake livestake livestake Stressed LS on the line Stressed Vol Vol Vol Vol Vol Forrest Creek -- MY5 (2012) c=" a dins orates Inc r MM �= r M r r ■s r �r rc r� MY4 Project• Forrest Creek stems = Date: 6/28/2011 plot size (m ^2) _ Name: VQ6 stems /acre = Size- 10m x 10m Cover: narrow leaved sunflower, Dog fennel, mixed grasses, 100% cover X (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name 36 82 Betula nigra River Birch 34 1 9 Betula nigra River Birch 05 65 Diospyros virginiana Persimmon 63 25 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 41 5 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 75 64 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 78 52 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 6 51 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 1 1 1 Juglans nigra Black Walnut 92 7 Platanus occidentalis Sycamore 05 38 Platanus occidentalis Sycamore 38 96 Quercus palustris Pin Oak 38 3 Quercus palustris Pin Oak 34 9 Quercus palustris Pin Oak 64 77 Quercus phellos Willow Oak 49 05 Sailx nigra Black Willow 56 03 Sailx nigra Black Willow 67 03 Sailx nigra Black Willow 87 03 Sailx nigra Black Willow 1 0 Sailx nigra Black Willow 16 stems +Vol = 20 100 plot size (m ^2) = 100 647 stems /acre = 809 Condition Comments Vol Vol Vol Stressed Vol Vol Vol livestake livestake livestake livestake Stressed LS on the line Forrest Creek -- MY5 (2012) CCI1 a dAss Cates Inc MY5 Project: Forrest Creek stems = Date- 9/20/2012 plot size (m ^2) = Name: VQ6 stems /acre = Size. 10m x 10m Cover: narrow leaved sunflower, Dog fennel, mixed grasses, 100% cover X (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name 36 82 Betula nigra River Birch 34 1 9 - Betula nigra River Birch 05 65 Diospyros virginiana Persimmon 63 25 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 41 5 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 75 64 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 78 52 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 6 51 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 92 7 Platanus occidentalis Sycamore 05 38 Platanus occidentalis Sycamore 38 96 Quercus palustris Pin Oak 38 3 Quercus palustris Pin Oak 34 9 Quercus palustris Pin Oak 64 77 Quercus phellos Willow Oak 56 03 Sailx nigra Black Willow 67 03 Sailx nigra Black Willow 87 03 Sailx nigra Black Willow 1 0 Sailx nigra Black Willow 59 72 Liquidambar styraciflua Sweet Gum 59 47 Liquidambar styraciflua Sweet Gum 79 47 Liquidambar styraciflua Sweet Gum 10 65 Liquidambar styraciflua Sweet Gum 10 3 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 85 4 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 95 64 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 16 stems +Vol = 25 100 plot size (m ^2) = 100 647 stems /acre = 1012 Condition Comments Stressed Vol Vol Vol Vol Vol Vol I ivestake I ivestake I ivestake LS on the line Forrest Creek -- MY5 (2012) con a d Associates Inc 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 VQ6 Persimmon 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 X (m) ■ Baseline ■ MY1 ■ Replant - Year 1 ■ MY2 ■ MY3 ■ MY4 + MY5 Baseline Project: Forrest Creek 5 stems = 10 Date: 6/1/2008 4 plot size (MA 2) = 100 Name: VQ7 3 stems /acre = 405 Size: 10m x 10m 3 42 Cover: 100% polygonum and cocklebur 4 x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition Comments 07 07 Quercus sp Oak sp 39 21 Quercus sp Oak sp 67 23 Quercus sp Oak sp 98 25 Quercus sp Oak sp 39 21 Quercus sp Oak sp 75 46 Quercus sp Oak sp 45 45 Quercus sp Oak sp 1 8 72 Quercus sp Oak sp 75 9 Quercus sp Oak sp 98 25 Quercus sp Oak sp Forrest Creek -- MYS (2012) ddh (mm) Height (cm) 3 31 5 50 4 31 4 45 3 40 3 34 3 42 3 42 3 31 4 27 C ^ Kimley -Horn and Associates Inc MY1 Project: Forrest Creek Date. 12/4/2008 Name: VQ7 Size: 10m x 10m Cover: 100% polygonum and cocklebur x (m) y (m) Scientific Name 39 21 Quercus palustris 75 46 Quercus palustns stems = plot size (m ^2) _ stems /acre = Common Name Pin Oak Pin Oak 2 100 81 Condition Comments Forrest Creek -- MY5 (2012) con andA -Horn � and associates inc Replant - Year 2 Project: Forrest Creek stems = 15 Date: 5/29/2009 plot size (m ^2) = 100 Name: VQ7 stems /acre = 607 Size: 10m x 10m Cover: 100% polygonum and cocklebur x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition 75 46 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 1 5 82 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 1 7 16 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 65 02 Betula nigra River Birch 95 88 Quercus phellos Willow Oak 67 23 Quercus phellos Willow Oak 98 08 Quercus michauxii Swamp Chestnut Oak 98 25 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 67 2 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 29 92 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 1 8 72 Quercus palustrs Pin Oak 07 07 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 75 9 Quercus michauxii Swamp Chestnut Oak 75 67 Quercus michauxii Swamp Chestnut Oak 51 1 7 Quercus michauxii Swamp Chestnut Oak Comments 1/29/09 Replant 1/29/09 Replant 1/29/09 Replant 1/29/09 Replant 1/29/09 Replant 1/29/09 Replant 1/29/09 Replant mis- identified @ nursery? 1/29/09 Replant 1/29/09 Replant Forrest Creek -- MY5 (2012) rmn and ls Associates Inc MY2 Project: Forrest Creek stems = 15 Date: 9/1/2009 plot size (m ^2) = 100 Name- VQ7 stems /acre = 607 Size: 10m x 10m Cover: polygonum, narrow leaved sunflower, cocklebur = 100% x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition Comments 75 46 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 1 5 82 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 1 7 16 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 65 02 Betula nigra River Birch 95 88 Quercus phellos Willow Oak 67 23 Quercus phellos Willow Oak 98 08 Quercus michauxii Swamp Chestnut Oak 98 25 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 67 2 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 29 92 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 1 8 72 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 07 07 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 75 9 Quercus michauxii Swamp Chestnut Oak 75 67 Quercus michauxii Swamp Chestnut Oak 51 1 7 Quercus michauxii Swamp Chestnut Oak Forrest Creek -- MY5 (2012) run a d Associates Inc MY3 Project: Forrest Creek stems = Date: 9/10/2010 plot size (m ^2) _ Name: VQ7 stems /acre = Size: 10m x 10m Cover: polygonum, narrow leaved sunflower, cocklebur; 100% cover x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name 1.5 8.2 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 1.7 1.6 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 6.5 0.2 Betula nigra River Birch 9.8 4.5 Betula nigra River Birch 9.5 8.8 Quercus phellos Willow Oak 6.7 2.3 Quercus phellos Willow Oak 3.5 3.5 Quercus phellos Willow Oak 7.5 4.6 Quercus palustris Pin Oak 9.8 2.5 Quercus palustris Pin Oak 6.7 2 Quercus palustris Pin Oak 2.9 9.2 Quercus palustris Pin Oak 1.8 7.2 Quercus palustris Pin Oak 3.9 2.1 Quercus palustris Pin Oak 4.5 4.5 Quercus michauxii Swamp Chestnut Oak 7.5 6.7 Quercus michauxii Swamp Chestnut Oak 3.7 0.3 Quercus michauxii Swamp Chestnut Oak 9.8 0.8 Quercus michauxii Swamp Chestnut Oak 1.7 5.3 Quercus michauxii Swamp Chestnut Oak 14 stems = Vol. = 17 100 plot size (m ^2) = 100 567 stems /acre = 688 Condition Comments Vol? no notation made Vol. Vol. Forrest Creek -- MY5 (2012) CE" a d Associates, Inc. MY4 Project: Forrest Creek stems = Date: 6/28/2011 plot size (m ^2) _ Name: VQ7 stems /acre = Size: 10m x 10m Cover: polygonum, narrow leaved sunflower, cocklebur, 100% cover x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name 98 45 Betula nigra River Birch 1 5 82 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 1 7 16 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 65 02 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 9 75 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 66 9 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 6 93 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 54 9 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 52 75 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 41 75 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 39 7 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 37 7 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 28 96 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 1 8 96 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 01 7 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 01 62 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 1 7 62 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 26 62 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 27 61 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 02 54 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 1 43 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 2 43 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 09 01 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 98 08 Quercus michauxii Swamp Chestnut Oak 75 46 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 98 25 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 67 2 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 29 92 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 1 8 72 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 14 stems= Vol = 29 100 plot size (m ^2) = 100 567 stems /acre = 1174 Condition Comments Vol? Vol Vol Vol Vol Vol Vol Vol Stressed Vol Vol Vol Vol Vol Vol Vol Vol Vol Vol Stressed Vol Vol Forrest Creek -- MY5 (2012) Cc" and As Associates Inc MY5 Project: Forrest Creek stems = 14 stems= Vol = 29 Date: 9/20/2012 plot size (mA2) = 100 plot size (m12) = 100 Name: VQ7 stems /acre = 567 stems /acre = 1174 Size: 10m x 10m Cover: polygonum, narrow leaved sunflower, cocklebur, multiflora rose, honeysuckle, 100% cover x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition Comments 98 45 Betula nigra River Birch Vol? 1 5 82 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 1 7 16 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 65 02 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 9 75 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Vol 66 9 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Vol 6 93 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Vol 54 9 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Vol 52 75 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Vol 41 75 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Vol 39 7 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Vol 37 7 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Stressed Vol 28 96 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Vol 1 8 96 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Vol 01 7 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Vol 01 62 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Vol 1 7 62 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Vol 26 62 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Vol 27 61 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Vol 02 54 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Vol 1 43 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Vol 2 43 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Stressed Vol 09 01 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Vol 98 08 Quercus michauxii Swamp Chestnut Oak 75 46 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 98 25 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 67 2 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 29 92 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 1 8 72 Quercus palustns Pin Oak Forrest Creek -- MY5 (2012) GEn a dlAs Associates Inc 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 VQ7 - -_f_ -— Willow Oak Swamp Chestnut0ak — - ■ ■ ■ Willow Oak Pin O k ■ Pin Oak Swamp Chestnu River Birch 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 X (m) ■ Baseline ■ MY1 ■ Replant - Year 1 ■ MY2 ■ MY3 ■ MY4 + MY5 t Oak Baseline Project- Forrest Creek stems = 16 Date: 6/1/2008 plot size (m ^2) = 100 Name: VQT1 stems /acre = 647 Size: 10m x 10m Cover: 90% cattle grass x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition Comments ddh (mm) Height (cm) 3 07 Quercus sp Oak sp 5 32 79 1 _ Quercus sp Oak sp 4 46 14 33 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 4 28 02 16 Salix nigra Black Willow 23 14 03 22 Salix nigra Black Willow 26 17 01 31 Salix nigra Black Willow 21 17 06 37 Salix nigra Black Willow 16 17 01 39 Salix nigra Black Willow 31 19 06 46 Salix nigra Black Willow 23 21 01 49 Salix nigra Black Willow 15 18 05 58 Salix nigra Black Willow 29 21 04 67 Salix nigra Black Willow 30 14 88 63 Quercus sp Oak sp 2 18 62 75 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 4 33 05 73 Quercus sp Oak sp 4 47 23 95 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 6 52 ' Forrest Creek -- MY5 (2012) GPI \ and Associates, nc 10 M. M � 5 4 Bloc VQT1 Green Ash ■ lack WillqMv ■ Swamp Chestnut Oak Green Ash lack Willow Green Ash ® Black Willow ■ Green Ash Black Willow Green Ash ■ ■ Swamp Chestnut Oak ■ ■ Green Ash ■ ck Willow .k Willow ■ Buttonbush Pin Oak Willow Pon Oak- 0 ■ 1 2 3 4 5 X (m) ■ Baseline ■ MY1 ■ Replant - Year 1 ■ MY2 ■ MY3 ■ MY4 �- MY5 6 7 8 9 10 Baseline Project: Forrest Creek stems = 17 Date: 6/1/2008 plot size (MA 2) = 100 Name VQT2 stems /acre = 688 Size. 10m x 10m Cover: 80% Eupatonum and grass x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition Comments ddh (mm) Height (cm) 1 2 1 3 Quercus sp Oak sp 3 37 78 02 Quercus sp Oak sp 2 36 84 24 Juglans nigra Black Walnut 6 53 55 21 Unknown sp Unknown sp 3 28 1 9 33 Quercus sp Oak sp 8 41 1 5 38 Quercus sp Oak sp 4 40 39 41 Betula nigra River Birch 5 62 62 42 Ilex opaca American Holly 3 34 8 49 Corpus amomum Silky Dogwood 7 32 1 9 62 Quercus sp Oak sp 4 43 44 63 Juglans nigra Black Walnut 9 20 67 68 Quercus phellos Willow Oak 7 94 92 69 Unknown sp Unknown sp 5 40 73 91 Corpus amomum Silky Dogwood 6 53 47 89 Corpus amomum Silky Dogwood 10 53 27 85 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush 6 73 0 2 8 Betula nigra River Birch 5 49 Forrest Creek -- MY5 (2012) Cc" and Associates � ,and Associates Inc MY1 Project: Forrest Creek stems = 15 Date: 12/4/2008 plot size (m "2) = 100 Name: VQT2 stems /acre = 607 Size: 10m x 10m Cover: 80% Eupatonum and grass x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition Comments 1 2 1 3 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 78 02 - Quercus palustrs Pin Oak 84 24 Juglans nigra Black Walnut 55 21 Unknown sp Unknown sp 1 9 33 Quercus palustrs Pin Oak 1 5 38 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 39 41 Betula nigra River Birch 62 42 Ilex opaca American Holly 8 49 Corpus amomum Silky Dogwood 19 62 Quercus palustrs Pin Oak 44 63 Juglans nigra Black Walnut 67 68 Quercus phellos Willow Oak 92 69 Unknown sp Unknown sp 73 91 Cornus amomum Silky Dogwood 27 85 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush Forrest Creek -- MYS (2012) and'Asociates Inc MY2 Project: Forrest Creek Date 9/1/2009 Name: VQT2 Size: 10m x 10m Cover: Dog fennel = 100% x (m) y (m) Scientific Name 12 1 3 Quercus palustns 1 9 33 _ Quercus palustns 1 5 38 Quercus palustns 39 41 Betula nigra 67 68 Quercus phellos 73 91 Corpus amomum 49 08 Betula nigra 19 62 Quercus palustns stems = plot size (m ^2) _ stems /acre = Kudzu in plot Common Name Pin Oak Pin Oak Pin Oak River Birch Willow Oak Silky Dogwood River Birch Pin Oak 7 100 283 Condition Comments Forrest Creek -- MY5 (2012) Gin �d�As o�i tes Inc Supplemental Planting Feb 2010 Project: Forrest Creek stems = 19 Date: 2/10/2010 plot size (m ^2) = 100 Name- VQT2 stems /acre = 769 Size: 10m x 10m Cover: Dog fennel = 100% Kudzu in plot x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition Comments 1 2 1 3 Quercus palustrs Pin Oak 1 9 33 Quercus palustrs Pin Oak 1 5 38 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 39 41 Betula nigra River Birch 67 68 Quercus phellos Willow Oak 73 91 Corpus amomum Silky Dogwood 49 08 Betula nigra River Birch 02 8 Betula nigra River Birch 55 21 Juglans nigra Black Walnut 8 49 Cornus amomum Silky Dogwood 1 10 Quercus palustns Pin Oak Replant Replant 0 9 Juglans nigra Black Walnut Replant Replant 0 4 Quercus palustns Pin Oak Replant Replant 0 1 Juglans nigra Black Walnut Replant Replant 4 85 Quercus palustns Pin Oak Replant Replant 35 5 Juglans nigra Black Walnut Replant Replant 45 5 Juglans nigra Black Walnut Replant Replant 8 3 Juglans nigra Black Walnut Replant Replant 9 65 Juglans nigra Black Walnut Replant Replant -Ho Forrest Creek -- MY5 (2012) Can and i antl Associates Inc MY3 Project: Forrest Creek stems + Vol = 20 Date: 9/10/2010 plot size (m ^2) = 100 Name: VQT2 stems /acre = 809 Size: 10m x 10m Comments Cover: Dog fenne, 100% cover x (m) y (m) Scientific Name 1 2 1 3 Quercus palustrs 1 9 62 - Quercus palustns 49 4 Quercus palustns 0 4 Quercus palustns 1 10 Corpus amomum 73 91 Corpus amomum 8 49 Corpus amomum 39 41 Betula nigra 49 08 Betula nigra 02 8 Betula nigra 67 68 Quercus phellos 9 65 Juglans nigra 0 9 Salix nigra 69 2 Salix nigra 78 02 Quercus nigra 10 4 Ulmus alata 25 05 Ulmus alata 25 1 Ulmus alata 0 5 Ulmus alata 6 9 Unknown stems = 11 stems + Vol = 20 plot size (m ^2) = 100 plot size (m ^2) = 100 stems /acre = 445 stems /acre = 809 Common Name Condition Comments Pin Oak Pin Oak Stressed Pin Oak Vol? Pin Oak Replant Replant Silky Dogwood Vol Silky Dogwood Silky Dogwood River Birch River Birch River Birch Willow Oak Black Walnut Replant Replant Black Willow Vol Black Willow Vol water Oak Winged Elm Vol Winged Elm Vol Winged Elm Vol Winged Elm Vol Unknown Vol Forrest Creek -- MY5 (2012) ��� and Kimley-Ho Associates e ,and Pssociates Inc MY4 Project: Forrest Creek stems + Vol = Date: 6/29/2011 100 Name VQT2 stems /acre = Size: 10m x 10m 728 Cover: Dog fenne, 100% cover x (m) Y(M) Scientific Name 6 9 Asimina tnloba 39 41 Betula nigra 49 08 Betula nigra 02 8 Betula nigra 1 10 Corpus amomum 8 49 Corpus amomum 9 65 Juglans nigra 1 2 1 3 Quercus palustns 1 9 62 Quercus palustns 49 4 Quercus palustns 9 5 Quercus palustns 67 68 Quercus phellos 0 9 Salix nigra 69 2 Salix nigra 10 4 Ulmus alata 25 05 Ulmus alata 25 1 Ulmus alata 0 5 Ulmus alata stems = 11 stems + Vol = 18 plot size (m ^2) = 100 plot size (m ^2) = 100 stems /acre = 445 stems /acre = 728 Common Name Condition Comments Common Paw Paw Vol River Birch River Birch River Birch Silky Dogwood Vol Silky Dogwood Black Walnut Replant Replant Pin Oak Pin Oak Stressed Pin Oak Vol? Pin Oak Vol Willow Oak Black Willow Vol Black Willow Vol Winged Elm Vol Winged Elm Vol Winged Elm Vol Winged Elm Vol Forrest Creek -- MY5 (2012) CE" a d Associates Inc MY5 Project: Forrest Creek stems = 11 stems + Vol = 17 Date: 9/20/2012 plot size (m ^2) = 100 plot size (m ^2) = 100 Name- VQT2 stems /acre = 445 stems /acre = 688 Size: 10m x 10m Cover: Dog fenne, 100% cover x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition Comments 6 9 Asimina tnloba Common Paw Paw Vol 39 41 _ Betula nigra River Birch 02 8 Betula nigra River Birch 8 49 Corpus amomum Silky Dogwood 9 65 Juglans nigra Black Walnut Replant Replant 12 1 3 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 49 4 Quercus palustrs Pin Oak Vol? 9 5 Quercus palustns Pin Oak Vol 67 68 Quercus phellos Willow Oak 10 4 Ulmus alata Winged Elm Vol 25 05 Ulmus alata Winged Elm Vol 25 1 Ulmus alata Winged Elm Vol 07 02 Ulmus alata Winged Elm Vol 94 4 Liquidambar styraciflua Sweet Gum Vol 6 5 Juglans nigra Black Walnut Vol 52 48 Acer rubrum Red Maple Vol 6 47 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Vol Forrest Creek -- MY5 (2012) -Horn C�� and As � ,and Associates Inc 10 Black 9 Ri 8 7 6 _Wing( E 51 Pin Oak 41 3 2 1i VQT2 Silky Dogwood illow Unknown Silky Dogwood er Birch ■ M Willow Oak ■ Black WalnuIPReplant Pin Oak ■ d Elm Silky Dogwood + + Replant River Birch Pin Oak Wing ■ ■ ■ Black Willow ■ Pin Oak ■ Winged Elm River Birch Wing Elm IN ■ water Oak + ■ J Elm I 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 X (m) ■ Baseline ■ MY1 ■ MY2 ■ Replant- Year 2 ■ MY3 ■ MY4 + MY5 Baseline Project: Forrest Creek stems = 16 Date: 6/1/2008 plot size (mA2) = 100 Name. VQT3 stems /acre = 647 Size: 10m x 10m Cover: 95% Solidego sp and cattle grass x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition Comments ddh (mm) Height (cm) 25 03 Asimina tnloba Common Pawpaw 10 108 64 09 Quercus sp Oak sp 6 45 94 06 Corpus amomum Silky Dogwood 5 84 26 25 Juglans nigra Black Walnut 9 74 0 31 Unknown sp Unknown sp 12 116 5 32 Unknown sp Unknown sp 7 52 95 35 Cercis canadensis Eastern Redbud 8 84 2 48 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush 6 89 37 55 Asimina tnloba Common Pawpaw 6 82 58 54 Quercus sp Oak sp 6 65 83 55 Unknown sp Unknown sp 5 61 64 8 Cercis canadensis Eastern Redbud 8 107 4 7 6 Linodendron tulipifera Tulip Poplar 7 54 2 73 Unknown sp Unknown sp 9 177 1 8 99 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush 7 93 33 9 9 Quercus sp Oak sp 4 55 Kimley -Horn Forrest Creek -- MY5 (2012) CuFland Associates Inc MY1 Project: Forrest Creek stems = 12 Date: 12/4/2008 plot size (m 12) = 100 Name: VQT3 stems /acre = 486 Size: 10m x 10m Cover: 95% Solidego sp and cattle grass x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition Comments 25 03 Asimina trdoba Common Pawpaw 64 09 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 94 06 Cornus amomum Silky Dogwood 26 25 Juglans nigra Black Walnut 0 31 Unknown sp Unknown sp Nyssa? Corpus? 5 32 Unknown sp Unknown sp Morus rubra? 2 48 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush 37 55 Asimina triloba Common Pawpaw 64 8 Cercis canadensis Eastern Redbud 2 73 Unknown sp Unknown sp River Birch? 1 8 9 9 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush 33 99 Quercus palustns Pin Oak Forrest Creek -- MY5 (2012) G�� a alas Associates Inc MY2 Project: Forrest Creek Date: 9/1/2009 Name: VQT3 Size: 10m x 10m Cover Dog Fennel, narrow leaved sunflower = 100% x (m) y (m) Scientific Name 25 03 Asimina tnloba 64 09 Quercus palustns 94 06 Corpus amomum 26 25 Juglans nigra 5 32 Unknown sp 64 8 Cercis canadensis 33 99 Quercus palustrs 35 4 Quercus palustns stems = 8 plot size (m12) = 100 stems /acre = 324 Common Name Condition Comments Common Pawpaw Pin Oak Silky Dogwood Black Walnut Unknown sp Morus rubra? Eastern Redbud Pin Oak Pin Oak Forrest Creek -- MY5 (2012) GOB MAssociates Inc Supplemental Planting Feb 2010 Project: Forrest Creek stems = 17 stems + Vol = 19 Date: 2/10/2010 plot size (m ^2) = 100 plot size (m ^2) = 100 Name- VQT3 stems /acre = 688 Size 10m x 10m stems /acre = 769 Cover: Dog Fennel, narrow leaved sunflower = 100% x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition Comments 25 03 Asimina tnloba Common Pawpaw 64 09 Quercus palustris Pin Oak 94 06 Corpus amomum Silky Dogwood 26 25 Juglans nigra Black Walnut 5 32 Morus rubra? Red Mulberry 64 8 Cercis canadensis Eastern Redbud 33 99 Quercus palustris Pin Oak 35 4 Quercus palustris Pin Oak 0 31 Juglans nigra Black Walnut 2 73 Juglans nigra Black Walnut 95 35 Cercis canadensis Eastern Redbud 02 93 Salix nigra Black Willow LS LS 0 82 Salix nigra Black Willow LS LS 0 4 Corpus amomum Silky Dogwood LS LS 35 8 Juglans nigra Black Walnut Replant Replant 75 6 Juglans nigra Black Walnut Replant Replant 6 4 Juglans nigra Black Walnut Replant Replant 1 5 25 Salix nigra Black Willow Vol Vol 1 3 2 Salix nigra Black Willow Vol Vol Forrest Creek -- MY5 (2012) c:" and lAs Associates Inc MY3 Project: Forrest Creek stems = 13 stems + Vol. = 18 Date: 9/10/2010 plot size (m12) = 100 plot size (MA 2) = 100 Name: VQT3 Size: 10m x 10m stems /acre = 526 stems /acre = 728 Cover: Dog Fennel, narrow leaved sunflower; 100% cover x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition Comments 2.5 0.3 Asimina triloba Common Pawpaw 9.4 0.6 Corpus amomum Silky Dogwood 2.6 2.5 Juglans nigra Black Walnut 7.5 6 Liriodenron tulipifera Tulip Poplar Replant 5 3.2 Morus rubra Red Mulberry 5.8 5.4 Quercus palustris Pin Oak 4 7.6 Quercus palustris Pin Oak Vol? 3.3 9.9 Quercus palustris Pin Oak 6.4 0.9 Quercus palustris Pin Oak 6.4 8 Cercis canadensis Eastern Redbud 9.5 3.5 Cercis canadensis Eastern Redbud 0.2 9.3 Salix nigra Black Willow LS LS 0 8.2 Salix nigra Black Willow LS LS 1.5 2.5 Salix nigra Black Willow Vol Vol 1.3 2 Salix nigra Black Willow Vol Vol 0 4 Salix sericea Silky Willow LS 0.9 2 Ulmus alata Winged Elm Vol. 0.1 4 Ulmus alata Winged Elm Vol. Forrest Creek -- MY5 (2012) cc� \ and Assocates,Inc. MY4 Project: Forrest Creek stems = Date: 6/29/2011 plot size (MA 2) _ Name: VQT3 Size: 10m x 10m stems /acre = Cover Dog Fennel, narrow leaved sunflower, 100% cover x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name 25 03 Asimina tnloba Common Pawpaw 64 8 Cercis canadensis Eastern Redbud 95 35 _ Cercis canadensis Eastern Redbud 94 06 Corpus amomum Silky Dogwood 26 25 Juglans nigra Black Walnut 75 6 Linodenron tulipifera Tulip Poplar 5 32 Morus rubra Red Mulberry 58 54 Quercus palustrs Pin Oak 4 76 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 33 99 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 64 09 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 02 93 Salix nigra Black Willow LS 0 82 Salix nigra Black Willow LS 1 5 25 Salix nigra Black Willow Vol 1 3 2 Salix nigra Black Willow Vol 0 4 Salix sencea Silky Willow 09 2 Ulmus alata Winged Elm 01 4 Ulmus alata Winged Elm 13 stems + Vol = 18 100 plot size (mA2) = 100 526 stems /acre = 728 Condition Comments Stressed Stressed Replant Vol? LS LS Vol Vol LS Vol Vol Forrest Creek -- MY5 (2012) CU/1 andlAssociates Inc MY5 Project: Forrest Creek stems = Date: 9/20/2012 plot size (MA 2) _ Name: VQT3 Size: 10m x 10m stems /acre = Cover: Dog Fennel, narrow leaved sunflower, 100% cover x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name 25 03 Juglans nigra Black Walnut 64 8 Cercis canadensis Eastern Redbud 95 35 Cercis canadensis Eastern Redbud 94 06 Corpus amomum Silky Dogwood 26 25 Juglans nigra Black Walnut 75 6 Linodenron tulipifera Tulip Poplar 5 32 Morus rubra Red Mulberry 58 54 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 4 76 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 33 99 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 64 09 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 02 93 Salix nigra Black Willow LS 0 82 Salix nigra Black Willow LS 1 5 25 Salix nigra Black Willow Vol 1 3 2 Salix nigra Black Willow Vol 0 4 Salix sencea Silky Willow 09 2 Ulmus alata Winged Elm 01 4 Ulmus alata Winged Elm 7 7 Pinus sp Pine 83 47 Ulmus alata Winged Elm 65 4 Ulmus alata Winged Elm 13 stems + Vol = 21 100 plot size (MA 2) = 100 526 stems /acre = 850 Condition Comments Stressed Stressed Replant Vol? LS LS Vol Vol LS Vol Vol Vol Vol Vol l Forrest Creek -- MY5 (2012) ��� and Associates oc ates Inc 10 Blacl 9 Black V 8I 7 N. E 5 Silk 41 3 2 1- VQT3 Pin Oak Willow LS ■ illow LS Eastern Redbud - - �- Pi Oak - ■ ■ Tulip Poplar Pin Oak Willow Eastern Redb Winged Elm Red Mulberry ■ Black Willow Vol Winged Elmo ■ Black Walnut Black Willow Vol Pin Oak Common Pawpaw ■ 0 0 CJ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 X (m) ■ Baseline ■ MY1 ■ MY2 ■ Replant- Year 2 ■ MY3 ■ MY4 + MY5 Baseline Project: Forrest Creek stems = 13 Date: 6/1/2008 plot size (MA 2) = 100 Name: VQT4 stems /acre = 526 Size: 10m x 10m Cover: 95% Solidego sp and cockleburs x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition Comments ddh (mm) Height (cm) 06 06 Cercis canadensis Eastern Redbud 6 85 28 03 - Quercus sp Oak sp 3 35 74 05 Quercus sp Oak sp 3 39 91 24 Quercus sp Oak sp 2 35 63 23 Quercus sp Oak sp 4 24 34 25 Quercus sp Oak sp 3 36 72 51 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush 7 75 47 52 Quercus sp Oak sp 4 24 21 55 Unknown sp Unknown sp 4 57 02 61 Quercus sp Oak sp 3 30 27 77 Corpus amomum Silky Dogwood 5 54 52 76 Asimina tnloba Common Pawpaw 7 72 03 85 Asimina tnloba Common Pawpaw 4 48 Forrest Creek -- MY5 (2012) Cc" and A -Horn and Associates Inc MY1 Project: Forrest Creek Date: 12/4/2008 Name: VQT4 Size: 10m x 10m Cover- 95% Solidego sp and cockleburs x (m) y (m) Scientific Name 06 06 Cercis canadensis 28 03 Quercus palustrs 74 05 Quercus palustns 63 23 Quercus palustrs 34 25 Quercus palustns 72 51 Cephalanthus occidentalis 47 52 Quercus palustrs 02 61 Quercus palustrs 27 77 Cornus amomum 52 76 Asimina tnloba 03 85 Quercus sp stems = plot size (m ^2) _ stems /acre = Common Name Eastern Redbud Pin Oak Pin Oak Pin Oak Pin Oak Buttonbush Pin Oak Pin Oak Silky Dogwood Common Pawpaw Oak sp 11 100 445 Condition Comments Forrest Creek -- MY5 (2012) CMFl andlAssocates Inc MY2 Project: Forrest Creek stems = Date: 9/1/2009 plot size (MA 2) _ Name: VQT4 stems /acre = Size: 10m x 10m Cover. cocleburr, dog fennel = 100% x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name 74 05 Quercus palustris Pin Oak 72 51 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush 4 7 52 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 27 77 Cornus amomum Silky Dogwood 52 76 Asimina triloba Common Pawpaw 5 100 202 Condition Comments l Forrest Creek -- MY5 (2012) CC" andAssociates Inc Supplemental Planting Feb 2010 Project: Forrest Creek stems = 15 Date: 2/10/2010 plot size (MA 2) = 100 Name: VQT4 stems /acre = 607 Size: 10m x 10m Cover: cocleburr, dog fennel = 100% x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition Comments 74 05 Quercus palustrs Pin Oak 72 51 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush 47 52 Quercus palustris Pin Oak 27 77 Corpus amomum Silky Dogwood 52 76 Asimina tnloba Common Pawpaw 1 35 Linodenron tulipifera Tulip Poplar Replant 5 7 Linodenron tulipifera Tulip Poplar Replant 9 8 Juglans nigra Black Walnut Replant 4 5 Asimina tnloba Common Pawpaw Replant 5 25 Quercus palustns Pin Oak Replant 52 1 Unidentified at time of planting Replant Replant 65 35 Unidentified at time of planting Replant Replant 7 3 Quercus palustns Pin Oak Replant 1 85 Unidentified at time of planting Replant Replant 85 05 Unidentified at time of planting Replant Replant l Forrest Creek -- MY5 (2012) CuFl andAssociates Inc MY3 Project: Forrest Creek stems + Vol = Date: 9/10/2010 100 Name: VQT4 stems /acre = Size: 10m x 10m 607 Cover: cocleburr, dog fennel, 100% cover x (m) y (m) Scientific Name 74 05 Quercus palustrs 7 3 Quercus palustrs 5 25 Quercus palustns 28 03 Quercus palustns 72 51 Linodenron tulipifera 5 7 Linodenron tulipifera 1 35 Linodenron tulipifera 27 77 Corpus amomum 52 76 Asimina tnloba 03 85 Asimina tnloba 4 5 Asimina tnloba 9 8 Juglans nigra 06 06 Salix nigra 1 2 Salix nigra 01 4 Salix nigra stems = 12 stems + Vol = 15 plot size (m "2) = 100 plot size (m ^2) = 100 stems /acre = 486 stems /acre = 607 Common Name Pin Oak Pin Oak Pin Oak Pin Oak Tulip Poplar Tulip Poplar Tulip Poplar Silky Dogwood Common Pawpaw Common Pawpaw Common Pawpaw Black Walnut black willow black willow black willow Condition Comments Replant Replant Stressed Replant Replant Replant Replant Vol Vol Vol Forrest Creek -- MY5 (2012) Cn/ \ and1 Associates Inc MY4 Project: Forrest Creek stems = 12 stems + Vol = 11 Date: 6/29/2011 plot size (m ^2) = 100 plot size (m ^2) = 100 Name: VQT4 stems /acre = 486 stems /acre = 445 Size: 10m x 10m Cover: cocleburr, dog fennel, 100% cover x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition Comments 27 77 Corpus amomum Silky Dogwood 72 51 Linodenron tulipifera Tulip Poplar 5 7 Linodenron tulipifera Tulip Poplar Replant 1 35 Linodenron tulipifera Tulip Poplar Replant 74 05 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 7 3 Quercus palustns Pin Oak Replant 5 25 Quercus palustns Pin Oak Replant 28 03 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 06 06 Salix nigra black willow Vol 1 2 Salix nigra black willow Vol 01 4 Salix nigra black willow Vol Forrest Creek -- MYS (2012) l ��I \ and Associates ocates Inc MY5 Project: Forrest Creek stems = 12 stems + Vol = 14 Date: 9/20/2012 plot size (m "2) = 100 plot size (m ^2) = 100 Name: VQT4 stems /acre = 486 stems /acre = < 567" Size- 10m x 10m Cover cocleburr, dog fennel, 100% cover Vegetation Quad is overwhelmed by Willow Oak volunteers" x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition Comments 27 77 Cornus amomum Silky Dogwood 72 51 _Linodenron tulipifera Tulip Poplar 5 7 Linodenron tulipifera Tulip Poplar Replant 1 35 Linodenron tulipifera Tulip Poplar Replant 74 05 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 7 3 Quercus palustns Pin Oak Replant 5 25 Quercus palustrs Pin Oak Replant 28 03 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 06 06 Salix nigra black willow Vol 1 2 Salix nigra black willow Vol 01 4 Salix nigra black willow Vol 1 87 Liquidambar styraciflua Sweet Gum Vol 73 6 Ulmus alata Winged Elm Vol 95 3 Ulmus alata Winged Elm Vol Forrest Creek -- MY5 (2012) Csn a dAss Cates Inc VQT4 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 X (M) ■ Baseline ■ MY1 ■ MY2 ■ Replant- Year 2 ■ MY3 ■ MY4 + MY5 MY1 Project: Forrest Creek Date: 12/4/2008 Name: VQT5 Size: 10m x 10m Cover: 95% Solidego sp and cockleburs x (m) y (m) Scientific Name 04 1 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 79 01 - Juglans nigra 66 26 Betula nigra 31 23 Quercus alba 16 46 Betula nigra 31 76 Quercus palustris 89 85 Betula nigra 16 10 Betula nigra stems = 8 plot size (MA 2) = 100 stems /acre = 324 Common Name Condition Green Ash Black Walnut Stressed River Birch White Oak River Birch Pin Oak River Birch River Birch Stressed Comments Forrest Creek -- MY5 (2012) rMn andA -Horn � and Associates Inc Baseline Project: Forrest Creek stems = 12 Date: 6/1/2008 plot size (MA 2) = 100 Name: VQT5 stems /acre = 486 Size: 10m x 10m Cover: 95% Solidego sp and cockleburs x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition Comments ddh (mm) Height (cm) 04 1 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 6 42 79 01 - Juglans nigra Black Walnut 8 42 66 26 Betula nigra River Birch 6 59 31 23 Quercus alba White Oak 3 35 16 46 Betula nigra River Birch 6 66 48 51 Juglans nigra Black Walnut 8 40 76 56 Quercus sp Oak sp 4 54 08 32 Juglans nigra Black Walnut 8 58 31 76 Quercus sp Oak sp 2 24 6 79 Betula nigra River Birch 6 53 89 85 Betula nigra River Birch 7 71 16 10 Betula nigra River Birch 5 55 Forrest Creek -- MY5 (2012) Can and l Associates Inc Supplemental Planting Feb 2010 Project: Forrest Creek stems = 19 Date: 2/10/2010 plot size (MA 2) = 100 Name: VQT5 stems /acre = 769 Size: 10m x 10m Cover: narrow leaved sunflower, mixed grasses= 100% X (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name 04 1 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 66 26 Betula nigra River Birch 31 23 Quercus palustris Pin Oak 16 46 Betula nigra River Birch 31 76 Quercus palustris Pin Oak 89 85 Betula nigra River Birch 38 05 Fraxinus pennsylvanicus Green Ash 95 65 Quercus palustris Pin Oak 25 8 Unidentified at time of planting Replant 24 6 Quercus palustris Pin Oak 2 26 Quercus palustris Pin Oak 5 7 Quercus palustris Pin Oak 5 5 Quercus palustris Pin Oak 5 45 Unidentified at time of planting Replant 5 25 Betula nigra River Birch 75 05 Quercus palustris Pin Oak 73 27 Unidentified at time of planting Replant 9 8 Quercus mlchauxii Swamp Chestnut Oak 35 1 5 Quercus michauxii Swamp Chestnut Oak Condition Comments not previously counted not previously counted Replant Replant Replant Replant Replant Replant Replant Replant Replant Replant Replant Forrest Creek -- MYS (2012) CWl ndlAssociates Inc MY2 Project: Forrest Creek Date: 9/1/2009 Name: VQT5 Size: 10m x 10m Cover- x (m) 04 66 31 16 31 89 38 95 narrow leaved sunflower, mixed grasses = 100% stems = plot size (MA 2) _ stems /acre = Y (m) Scientific Name Common Name 1 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 26 Betula nigra River Birch 23 Quercus palustris White Oak 46 Betula nigra River Birch 76 Quercus palustris Pin Oak 85 Betula nigra River Birch 05 Fraxinus pennsylvanicus Green Ash 65 Quercus palustris Pin Oak 8 100 324 Condition Comments not previously counted not previously counted Forrest Creek -- MY5 (2012) Csn a dAssocates Inc MY3 Project: Forrest Creek stems = Date: 9/10/2010 plot size (MA 2) _ Name: VQT5 stems /acre = Size: 10m x 10m Cover: narrow leaved sunflower, mixed grasses, dog fennel, 100% cover X (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name 04 1 Fraxinus pennsylvanicus Green Ash 38 05 Fraxinus pennsylvanicus Green Ash 01 7 Fraxinus pennsylvanicus Green Ash 66 26 Betula nigra River Birch 89 85 Betula nigra River Birch 16 46 Betula nigra River Birch 5 25 Betula nigra River Birch 6 79 Betula nigra River Birch 69 99 Betula nigra River Birch 31 76 Quercus palustrs Pin Oak 73 27 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 2 26 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 24 6 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 5 5 Quercus palustrs Pin Oak 5 7 Quercus palustrs Pin Oak 75 05 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 76 56 Quercus michauxii Swamp Chestnut Oak 9 8 Quercus michauxii Swamp Chestnut Oak 35 1 5 Quercus michauxii Swamp Chestnut Oak 1 5 1 Acer rubrum Red Maple 67 12 Ulmus alata Winged Elm 17 stems + Vol = 21 100 plot size (MA 2) = 100 688 stems /acre = 850 Condition Comments not in base line Vol Replant Vol Replant Replant Replant Replant Replant Replant Replant Vol Vol Horn Forrest Creek -- MY5 (2012) Can and As and Associates Inc MY4 Project: Forrest Creek stems = Date- 6/29/2011 plot size (MA 2) _ Name: VQT5 stems /acre = Size: 10m x 10m Cover: narrow leaved sunflower, mixed grasses, dog fennel, 100% cover X (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name 1 5 1 Acer rubrum Red Maple 66 26 - Betula nigra River Birch 89 85 Betula nigra River Birch 16 46 Betula nigra River Birch 6 79 Betula nigra River Birch 04 1 Fraxinus pennsylvanicus Green Ash 38 05 Fraxinus pennsylvanicus Green Ash 01 7 Fraxinus pennsylvanicus Green Ash 5 05 Fraxinus pennsylvanicus Green Ash 76 56 Quercus michauxii Swamp Chestnut Oak 35 1 5 Quercus michauxii Swamp Chestnut Oak 31 76 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 73 27 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 2 26 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 24 6 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 5 5 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 5 7 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 75 05 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 67 12 Ulmus alata Winged Elm 17 stems + Vol = 19 100 plot size (mA2) = 100 688 stems /acre = 769 Condition Comments Vol not in base line Vol Vol Replant Replant Replant Replant Replant Replant Vol l Forrest Creek -- MY5 (2012) Gs► \ and Associates Inc MY5 Project: Forrest Creek Date: 9/20/2012 Name: Size: Cover: X (m) 15 66 89 16 04 38 01 5 76 31 73 24 5 5 75 67 65 87 15 6 79 31 VQT5 10m x 10m stems = 17 stems + Vol = 22 plot size (m "2) = 100 plot size (m ^2) = 100 stems /acre = 688 stems /acre = 890 narrow leaved sunflower, mixed grasses, dog fennel, 100% cover y (m) Scientific Name Common Name 1 Acer rubrum Red Maple 26 _ Betula nigra River Birch 85 Betula nigra River Birch 46 Betula nigra River Birch 1 Fraxinus pennsylvanicus Green Ash 05 Fraxinus pennsylvanicus Green Ash 7 Fraxinus pennsylvanicus Green Ash 05 Fraxinus pennsylvanicus Green Ash 56 Quercus michauxii Swamp Chestnut Oak 76 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 27 Quercus palustrs Pin Oak 6 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 5 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 7 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 05 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 12 Ulmus alata Winged Elm 2 Ulmus alata Winged Elm 1 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush 1 Liquidambar styraciflua Sweet Gum 6 5 Liquidambar styraciflua Sweet Gum 42 Liquidambar styraciflua Sweet Gum 03 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush Condition Comments Vol not in base line Vol Vol Replant Replant Replant Replant Vol Vol Vol Vol Vol Vol Vol Forrest Creek -- MY5 (2012) cc \ and Associates ocates Inc 10 9 8 Gre Ash n 7 - VQT5 Pin Oak Pin Oak Pin Oak Pin Oak ■ River Birch River Birch River Birch Swamp (Restnut Oak — SwamprGhestrrutfla E ■ 3 Prn Oates River Birch -Rivei Bimpin Oak ■ 2 Swamp Chestnut Oak Green Ash Red Maple [] Winged Elm 1 ■ Green Ash Pin Oak ■ 0 ■ + 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 X (m) ■ Baseline ■ MY1 ■ MY2 ■ Replant- Year 2 ■ MY3 ■ MY4 + MY5 Baseline Project: Forrest Creek stems = 15 Date: 6/1/2008 plot size (MA 2) = 100 Name: VQT6 stems /acre = 607 Size: 10m x 10m Cover: 97% Solidego sp and cockleburs x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition Comments ddh (mm) Height (cm) 86 29 Quercus sp Oak sp 3 41 56 21 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 4 20 3 1 9 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 4 29 04 27 Juglans nigra Black Walnut 7 58 45 45 Quercus sp Oak sp 4 35 69 53 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 3 33 0 54 Salix nigra Black Willow Livestakes 36 25 0 6 Salix nigra Black Willow Livestakes 18 22 0 67 Salix nigra Black Willow Livestakes 13 30 0 73 Salix nigra Black Willow Livestakes 20 27 0 78 Salix nigra Black Willow Livestakes 29 24 0 84 Salix nigra Black Willow Livestakes 20 25 3 66 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 4 29 93 76 Quercus sp Oak sp 3 35 1 9 95 Quercus sp Oak sp 3 40 Forrest Creek -- MY5 (2012) Cc" and AS -Horn � end Associates Inc MY1 Project: Forrest Creek stems = 13 Date: 12/4/2008 plot size (MA 2) = 100 Name: VQT6 stems /acre = 526 Size: 10m x 10m Cover: 97% Solidego sp and cockleburs x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition Comments 8.6 2.9 Quercus palustris Pin Oak 5.6 2.1 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 3 1.9 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 0.4 2.7 Juglans nigra Black Walnut 4.5 4.5 Quercus palustris Pin Oak 0 5.4 Salix nigra Black Willow Livestakes 0 6 Salix nigra Black Willow Livestakes 0 6.7 Salix nigra Black Willow Livestakes 0 7.3 Salix nigra Black Willow Livestakes 0 7.8 Salix nigra Black Willow Livestakes 0 8.4 Salix nigra Black Willow Livestakes 3 6.6 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 9.3 7.6 Quercus palustris Pin Oak Forrest Creek -- MY5 (2012) Gnn a d�Assocates,Inc. MY2 Project: Forrest Creek stems = Date: 9/1/2009 plot size (MA 2) _ Name: VQT6 stems /acre = Size: 10m x 10m Cover: cokleburr, dog fennel, narrow leaved sunflower = 100% x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name 8.6 2.9 Quercus palustris Pin Oak 5.6 2.1 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 3 1.9 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 0.4 2.7 Juglans nigra Black Walnut 4.5 4.5 Quercus palustris Pin Oak 0 5.4 Salix nigra Black Willow 0 6 Salix nigra Black Willow 0 6.7 Salix nigra Black Willow 0 7.3 Salix nigra Black Willow 0 7.8 Salix nigra Black Willow 0 8.4 Salix nigra Black Willow 3 6.6 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 9.3 7.6 Quercus palustris Pin Oak 1.9 9.5 Quercus palustris Pin Oak 5.1 7 Quercus palustris Pin Oak 15 100 607 Condition Comments Livestakes Livestakes Livestakes Livestakes Livestakes Livestakes not previously counted Forrest Creek -- MY5 (2012) cc" a dens Associates, Inc. Lye? Project: Forrest Creek stems = 13 stems + Vol = 16 Date: 9/10/2009 plot size (MA 2) = 100 plot size (MA 2) = 100 Name: VQT6 stems /acre = 526 stems /acre = 647 Size: 10m x 10m Cover cokleburr, dog fennel, narrow leaved sunflower, 100% cover x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition Comments 86 29 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 93 76 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 56 21 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 3 1 9 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 3 66 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 69 53 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 41 9 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Vol 04 27 Juglans nigra Black Walnut 0 54 Salix nigra Black Willow Livestakes 0 6 Salix nigra Black Willow Livestakes 0 67 Salix nigra Black Willow Livestakes 0 73 Salix nigra Black Willow Livestakes 0 78 Salix nigra Black Willow Livestakes 0 84 Salix nigra Black Willow Livestakes 24 9 Salix nigra Black Willow Vol 08 7 Betula nigra River Birch Vol Forrest Creek -- MY5 (2012) ��� and As -Horn � ,and Associates Inc MY4 Project: Forrest Creek stems = 13 stems + Vol = 15 Date- 6/29/2011 plot size (m ^2) = 100 plot size (m ^2) = 100 Name: VQT6 stems /acre = 526 stems /acre = 607 Size: 10m x 10m Cover. cokleburr, dog fennel, narrow leaved sunflower, 100% cover x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition Comments 08 7 Betula nigra River Birch Vol 03 32 Betula nigra River Birch Vol 56 21 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 3 1 9 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 3 66 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 69 53 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 41 9 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Vol 86 29 Quercus palustris Pin Oak 93 76 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 0 54 Salix nigra Black Willow Livestakes 0 6 Salix nigra Black Willow Livestakes 0 67 Salix nigra Black Willow Livestakes 0 73 Salix nigra Black Willow Livestakes 0 78 Salix nigra Black Willow Livestakes 0 84 Salix nigra Black Willow Livestakes Forrest Creek -- MYS (2012) Csn and Is Associates Inc MY5 Project: Forrest Creek stems = Date: 9/20/2012 plot size (m ^2) _ Name: VQT6 stems /acre = Size: 10m x 10m Cover cokleburr, dog fennel, narrow leaved sunflower, 100% cover x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name 08 7 Betula nigra River Birch 03 32 Juglans nigra Black Walnut 3 19 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 69 53 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 41 9 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 86 29 Quercus palustris Pin Oak 93 76 Quercus palustns Pin Oak 0 54 Salix nigra Black Willow 0 6 Salix nigra Black Willow 0 67 Salix nigra Black Willow 0 73 Salix nigra Black Willow 0 78 Salix nigra Black Willow 0 84 Salix nigra Black Willow 5 05 Pinus sp Pine 5 5 Pinus sp Pine 91 8 Liquidambar styraciflua Sweet Gum 4 4 Pinus sp Pine 4 10 Liquidambar styraciflua Sweet Gum 13 stems + Vol = 18 100 plot size (m ^2) = 100 526 stems /acre = 728 Condition Comments Vol Vol Vol Livestakes Livestakes Livestakes Livestakes Livestakes Livestakes Vol Vol Vol Vol Vol Forrest Creek -- MY5 (2012) Cc , and Associates Inc. 10 9 Black I Black Black) I Black I Black 6� Black E 5 } 4 3E E 1 VQT6 %lack Willow Green Ash illow illow illow River Birch w -■ - _ illow illow Green Ash acFWalnut ■ Pin Oak ■ Green Ash Green Ash 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 X (m) ■ Baseline ■ MY1 ■ MY2 ■ MY3 O MY4 ®MY5 Baseline Project: Forrest Creek 7 stems = 12 Date: 6/1/2008 175 plot size (m ^2) = 100 Name: VQT7 9 stems /acre = 486 Size: 10m x 10m 32 3 32 Cover: 95% Solidego sp 3 26 x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition 1 1 07 Corpus amomum Silky Dogwood 68 1 - Juglans nigra Black Walnut 83 35 Quercus sp Oak sp 51 32 Corpus amomum Silky Dogwood 0 32 Quercus sp Oak sp 98 61 Juglans nigra Black Walnut 54 62 Corpus amomum Silky Dogwood 09 64 Juglans nigra Black Walnut 0 7 Salix nigra Black Willow 27 87 Quercus sp Oak sp 8 75 Juglans nigra Black Walnut 01 93 Quercus sp Oak sp Comments ddh (mm) Height (cm) dbh = 0 5 cm 21 155 7 41 3 27 dbh = 0 6 cm 26 175 4 36 7 42 9 132 5 47 30 32 3 32 5 62 3 26 ' Forrest Creek -- MY5 (2012) Cam/ \ and Associates Inc MY1 Project: Forrest Creek Date: 12/4/2008 Name: VQT7 Size: 10m x 10m Cover: 95% Solidego sp x (m) y (m) 11 07 68 1 51 32 0 32 54 62 09 64 0 7 27 87 8 75 01 93 Scientific Name Corpus amomum Juglans nigra Corpus amomum Quercus palustris Cornus amomum Juglans nigra Salix nigra Quercus palustris Juglans nigra Quercus palustris stems = plot size (mA2) _ stems /acre = Common Name Silky Dogwood Black Walnut Silky Dogwood Pin Oak Silky Dogwood Black Walnut Black Willow Pin Oak Black Walnut Pin Oak 10 100 405 Condition Comments Forrest Creek -- MY5 (2012) Con and Horn � ,end Associates Inc MY2 Project: Forrest Creek (w/ vols ) stems = Date: 9/1/2009 100 Name: VQT7 stems /acre = Size- 10m x 10m 162 Cover: dog fennel, soft rush = 100% x (m) y (m) Scientific Name 1 1 07 Corpus amomum 51 32 - Corpus amomum 54 62 Corpus amomum 34 87 Salix nigra stems = 3 (w/ vols ) stems = 4 plot size (m12) = 100 plot size (mA2) = 100 stems /acre = 121 stems /acre = 162 Common Name Silky Dogwood Silky Dogwood Silky Dogwood Black Willow Condition Comments Vol Forrest Creek -- MY5 (2012) `c" and Associates S ,and Associates Inc Supplemental Planting Feb 2010 Project: Forrest Creek stems = 13 (w/ Viols ) stems = 14 Date: 2/10/2010 plot size (MA 2) = 100 plot size (MA 2) = 100 Name: VQT7 stems /acre = 526 stems /acre = 567 Size: 10m x 10m Cover: dog fennel, soft rush = 100% x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition Comments 1 1 07 Cornus amomum Silky Dogwood 51 32 Corpus amomum Silky Dogwood 54 62 Cornus amomum Silky Dogwood 34 87 Salix nigra Black Willow Vol Vol 1 8 Quercus palustns Pin Oak Replant 2 35 Quercus palustns Pin Oak Replant 3 35 Quercus palustns Pin Oak Replant 35 85 Quercus palustns Pin Oak Replant 5 7 Quercus palustrs Pin Oak Replant 55 5 Quercus palustns Pin Oak Replant 75 7 Quercus palustns Pin Oak Replant 8 4 Quercus palustns Pin Oak Replant 9 55 Quercus michauxii Swamp Chestnut Oak Replant 8 2 Quercus palustns Pin Oak Replant Forrest Creek -- MY5 (2012) rLn a dlAs Associates Inc MY3 Project: Forrest Creek stems = 13 (w/ vols ) stems = 14 Date: 9/10/2010 plot size (m ^2) = 100 plot size (m ^2) = 100 Name VQT7 stems /acre = 526 stems /acre = 567 Size: 10m x 10m Cover: dog fennel Dominant, 100% cover x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition Comments 1 1 07 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush 51 32 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush 54 62 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush 9 55 Quercus michauxii Swamp Chestnut Oak Replant 1 8 Quercus palustns Pin Oak Replant 2 3 5 Quercus palustrs Pin Oak Replant 3 35 Quercus palustns Pin Oak Replant 3 5 85 Quercus palustns Pin Oak Replant 5 7 Quercus palustrs Pin Oak Replant 55 5 Quercus palustns Pin Oak Replant 75 7 Quercus palustns Pin Oak Replant 8 4 Quercus palustrs Pin Oak Replant 8 2 Quercus palustrs Pin Oak Replant 34 87 Salix nigra Black Willow Vol Vol Forrest Creek -- MY5 (2012) GZF1 a dAs Associates Inc MY4 Project: Forrest Creek stems = 13 (w/ vols ) stems = 13 Date: 6/29/2011 plot size (MA 2) = 100 plot size (m12) = 100 Name: VQT7 stems /acre = 526 stems /acre = 526 Size: 10m x 10m Cover: dog fennel Dominant, 100% cover x (m) y (m) Scientific Name Common Name Condition Comments 1 1 07 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush 51 32 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush 54 6 2 Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush 9 5 5 Quercus michauxii Swamp Chestnut Oak Replant 1 8 Quercus palustns Pin Oak Replant 2 3 5 Quercus palustns Pin Oak Replant 3 3 5 Quercus palustns Pin Oak Replant 3 5 8 5 Quercus palustns Pin Oak Replant 5 5 5 Quercus palustns Pin Oak Replant 7 5 7 Quercus palustns Pin Oak Replant 8 4 Quercus palustns Pin Oak Replant 8 2 Quercus palustns Pin Oak Replant 34 8 7 Salix nigra Black Willow Vol Vol Forrest Creek -- MY5 (2012) l Cam/ 1 and Associates Inc MY5 Project: Forrest Creek (w/ vols ) stems = Date: 9/20/2012 100 Name: VQT7 stems /acre = Size: 10m x 10m 688 Cover: dog fennel Dominant, 100% cover x (m) y (m) Scientific Name 1 1 07 Cephalanthus occidentalis 51 32 Cephalanthus occidentalis 54 62 Cephalanthus occidentalis 9 55 Quercus michauxii 1 8 Quercus palustns 2 35 Quercus palustns 3 35 Quercus palustns 35 85 Quercus palustns 8 4 Quercus palustns 8 2 Quercus palustns 34 87 Salix nigra 82 9 Liquidambar styraciflua 51 2 Liquidambar styraciflua 75 05 Pinus sp 9 1 5 Pinus sp 9 25 Pinus sp 9 29 Pinus sp stems = 13 (w/ vols ) stems = 17 plot size (m ^2) = 100 plot size (m ^2) = 100 stems /acre = 526 stems /acre = 688 Common Name Buttonbush Buttonbush Buttonbush Swamp Chestnut Oak Pin Oak Pin Oak Pin Oak Pin Oak Pin Oak Pin Oak Black Willow Vol Sweet Gum Sweet Gum Pine Pine Pine Pine Condition Comments Replant Replant Replant Replant Replant Replant Replant Vol Forrest Creek -- MY5 (2012) Cc" and nd As -Horn Cc" and Inc 10 9 8 7 6 5 v 4 I 3 2 1 0 0 VQT7 ■ Black Willow vol ■ % Pin Oak Pin Oak Pin Oak Pin Oak ■ ■ Buttonbush ■ AIL- Swamp Chestnut Oak Pin Oak Pin Oak Pin Oak Pin Oak ■ ® Buttonbush ■ Pin Oak + -I- ■ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 X (m) FEBasefine ■ MY1 ■ MY2 ■ Replant- Year 2 ■ MY3 ■ MY4 + MY5 APPENDIX B Cross Sections ' Forrest Creek Monitoring — MY4 (2011) rl on Kdnley Horn and Also iatm Inc XSP1 - 2012 ' 592 -- - - -- -T - -- 591 - -- - - - - -- - --- - -- - -- 590 -- - -- -- -- -= _S589 - -_- -__- -- -- - -- -- - -- -- - 0 Y a 588 ----------------- - -- - -- - -- - - Year 1- 2008 w - -- Year 2 - 2009 587 -- -- - -- --- - - -- I - - -- -- - - -- -- - -- - -- -- Year 3 - 2010 i Year 4 - 2011 586 - - -- - -- -- - -- - -- - - -- -- -- -- - - -- - -- -- - -- - - --0- Year 5 - 2012 585 - Bankfull I 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 105 Station (ft) 1j -- Summary Data Table As -built MY 1 2008 MY2 2009 MY3 2010 MY4 2011 As -built 2008* Yew 1 - 2008 Year 2 - 2009 Year 3 - 2010 Year 4 - 2011 Year 5 - 2012 Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature 0.00 591.08 BM 0.0 591.08 BM 0.00 591.08 0.00 591.08 LPIN -1,99 590.832 13.09 590.35 FP 13.09 590.63 FP 2,89 590.92 4.08 590.85 8.12 590.526 17.41 589.73 FP 17.41 589.78 FP 10.64 590.51 13.07 590.39 18.01 589.752 29.50 589.34 FP 29.50 589.16 FP 19.43 589.81 23.87 589.71 26.55 589.515 35.70 588.53 35.70 588.32 28.22 589.47 28.39 589.16 BKF 27.40 589.36 43.60 586.38 LTOE 43.60 586.33 LTOE 34.25 588.47 33.22 588.56 28.50 589.16 BKF 45.80 586.19 LEW 45.80 586.13 LEW 37.62 58829 36.28 588.43 30.46 588.804 48.74 585.89 TW 48.74 586.01 TW 40.62 587.59 43.89 586.25 33,42 588.355 52.24 586.25 RTOE 52.24 585.76 RTOE 42.69 586.79 46.28 586.11 37.1 588.077 62.27 589.16 BKF 62.27 588.93 BKF 44,47 58629 50.26 586.13 40.19 587.188 78.47 588.85 FP 78.47 589.09 FP 46.34 586.28 51.05 58602 LEW 40.98 587.172 88.59 590.12 FP 88.59 590.18 FP 48.46 586.08 LEW 51.24 585.68 41.84 586.674 LEW 103.41 590.21 BM 103.41 590.31 BM 49.78 586.21 51.88 585.48 42.68 586.258 51.41 586.08 52.52 585.57 45.62 586.167 52.26 585.64 52.63 586.06 REW 47.41 586.316 53.00 585.73 5103 586.56 47.83 586.043 53.33 586.09 REW 55.08 587.38 48.54 585.953 53.74 586.66 56.69 587.55 49.64 586.216 54.45 58722 59.35 588.49 50.61 585.99 56.78 587.58 63.10 589.16 BKF 51.19 585.668 58.98 588.43 78.18 589.00 51.71 585.576 62.74 589.16 BKF 82.82 589.66 52.62 586.043 69.15 588.99 87.46 590.019 53.56 586.899 77.16 588.94 103.30 590.275 RPIN 55.3 587.471 82.10 589.51 53.36 586.87 REW 85.28 589.91 57.48 588.044 88.43 1 590.15 61.54 589.16 BKF 96.58 590.04 69.45 588.937 103.30 590.23 78.56 588.997 81.16 589.36 83.08 589.627 93.25 590.024 103.62 590.099 Bbl XSP1 - 2012 ' 592 -- - - -- -T - -- 591 - -- - - - - -- - --- - -- - -- 590 -- - -- -- -- -= _S589 - -_- -__- -- -- - -- -- - -- -- - 0 Y a 588 ----------------- - -- - -- - -- - - Year 1- 2008 w - -- Year 2 - 2009 587 -- -- - -- --- - - -- I - - -- -- - - -- -- - -- - -- -- Year 3 - 2010 i Year 4 - 2011 586 - - -- - -- -- - -- - -- - - -- -- -- -- - - -- - -- -- - -- - - --0- Year 5 - 2012 585 - Bankfull I 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 105 Station (ft) 1j -- Summary Data Table As -built MY 1 2008 MY2 2009 MY3 2010 MY4 2011 MY5 2012 Bankfull Cross Sectional Area 58.8 64.8 56.6 5861 58.0 Bankfull Width: 50.1 49.6 49.0 50.9 51.2 Bankfull Max Depth: 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.71 3.6 BKF ELEV: 589.16 - NO as -ouut tiara Was collected tdr tms project -the data taken during Year 1 monitoring is assumed to be the as -built data for this project. ` CKimidy -HOm �„ and Associates, Inc. XSR2 - 2012 593 - -- - -- 592 -- - -- -- - - -- - -- 591 - --------- -- - -- - - -- - -- - -- - -- Year 1- 2008 C 590 _ Year 2- 2009 --- - -- O Year 3- 2010 ro v 589 - -- - -- -- - -- _ -- - - -_ - - - __ Year 4 - 2011 -b -Year 5 - 2012 588 - -- - -- - - -- - -- -- -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- -- - -= Bankfull - - -- - 587 -- - -- -- - -- - -- �- - -- -- - -- -- - - - -- 586 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 105 110 115 120 Statio (ft) Summary Data Table As -built MY1 2008 MY2 2009 1 MY3 2010 1 MY4 2011 1 MY5 2012 As -built 2008• Year 1 - 2008 Year 2 - 2009 Year 3 - 2010 Year 4 - 2011 Year 5 - 2012 Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature BKF ELEV: 590.09 0.00 592.06 BM 0.0 -592.06 BM 0.00 592.06 0.0 592.06 LPIN 0 591.752 BM 13.24 591.71 FP 13.2 591.56 FP 8.64 591.77 2.3 591.96 13.32 591.499 34.89 590.70 FP 34.9 590.46 FP 19.87 591.19 29.0 590.77 26.26 590.802 42.91 589.96 40.7 590.09 BKF 26.33 590.36 37.1 590.36 37.34 590.262 49.50 587.64 LTOE 42.9 589.96 31.31 589.59 39.4 590.09 BKF 39.53 590.09 BKF 50.83 587.43 LEW 49.5 587.76 LTOE 37.39 588.92 45.8 589.36 44.34 589.713 56.08 587.44 TW 50.8 587.46 LEW 45.44 588.38 47.8 588.57 47.34 589.148 61.03 587.36 REW 56.1 587.46 TW 48.52 587.92 49.6 588.28 48.41 588.495 62.18 587.56 RTOE 61.0 587.36 REW 50.44 587.51 LEW 51.2 587.65 50.67 588.185 LEW 69.14 590.09 BKF 62.2 587.56 RTOE 51.90 587.42 52.0 587.48 LEW 53.37 587.569 77.97 590.13 FP 69.1 589.86 53.14 587.40 54.1 587.31 57.80 587.409 90.05 591.67 FP 78.0 590.66 FP 53.66 587.35 55.0 587.55 61.11 587.352 115.70 591.80 BM 90.1 591.36 FP 55.43 587.50 REW 56.4 587.48 63.40 588.012 REW 115.7 591.86 BM 59.72 587.73 57.5 587.33 65.88 588.741 61.91 588.22 60.6 587.29 67.26 589.307 63.91 589.01 61.3 587.51 REW 69.87 589.823 65.05 589.53 62.6 587.77 77 590.09 BKF 65.78 590.09 BKF 64.6 588.45 79.17 590.171 67.64 590.23 67.6 589.56 86.84 591.127 70.85 591.14 71.6 590.09 BKF 93.41 591.521 79.40 591.64 82.6 590.82 99.47 1 591.643 93.53 591.79 91.1 591.63 105.98 591.559 107.39 591.72 9749 591.567 116.99 591.52 BM 115.65 591.81 115.7 591.609 RPIN XSR2 - 2012 593 - -- - -- 592 -- - -- -- - - -- - -- 591 - --------- -- - -- - - -- - -- - -- - -- Year 1- 2008 C 590 _ Year 2- 2009 --- - -- O Year 3- 2010 ro v 589 - -- - -- -- - -- _ -- - - -_ - - - __ Year 4 - 2011 -b -Year 5 - 2012 588 - -- - -- - - -- - -- -- -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- -- - -= Bankfull - - -- - 587 -- - -- -- - -- - -- �- - -- -- - -- -- - - - -- 586 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 105 110 115 120 Statio (ft) Summary Data Table As -built MY1 2008 MY2 2009 1 MY3 2010 1 MY4 2011 1 MY5 2012 Bankfull Cross Sectional Area: 51.1 51.5 60.61 49.61 48.2 Bankfull Width: 27.6 31.0 37.7 32.21 37.5 Bankfull Max Depth: 27 2.7 2.71 2.81 2.7 BKF ELEV: 590.09 - r4o as -oum aata was couected for this project "late data taken during Year 1 monitoring is assumed to be the as -built data for this project. Forrest Creek Monitoring -- MY4 (2011) GEF, andA -Horn � and Associates, Inc. Summary Data Table As -built MY1 2008 MY2 2009 MY3 2010 MY4 2011 MY5 2012 As -built 2008* Year 1 - 2008 Year 2 - 2009 Year 3 - 2010 Year 4 - 2011 Year 5 - 2012 Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature BKF ELEV: 591.69 0.00 592.56 BM 0.0 592.56 BM 0.00 592.56 0.00 592.56 LPIN 0 592.137 BM 26.22 591.69 BKF 26.22 591.76 5.66 592.12 14.97 592.01 3.93 591.804 40.88 590.83 LB 27.33 591.69 BKF 1797 592.11 28.21 591.69 BKF 15.52 591.765 52.18 589.36 LEW 40.88 59776 LB 22.33 591.84 34.13 591.54 17.63 591.69 BKF 61.56 588.14 TW 52.18 589.46 LEW 29.65 591.58 38.79 591.08 24.16 591.458 67.76 589.26 REW 61.56 588.16 TW 37.42 590.94 45.14 590.11 31.82 591.228 75.16 591.94 LB 67.76 589.26 REW 46.67 590.17 52.44 589.64 35.91 590.957 106.73 592.65 BM 75.16 591.76 LB 49.49 589.91 53.58 589.39 40.29 590.449 106.7 592.66 BM 51.50 589.67 54.37 589.07 LEW 43.41 590.311 52.83 589.58 54.63 588.50 44.41 590.206 53.57 589.07 LEW 58.71 588.23 44.83 589.917 LEW 54.80 588.39 63.66 588.00 45.53 589.637 57.69 588.29 65.88 588.39 49.02 589.804 60.51 588.23 66.00 589.11 REW 51.39 589.579 63.41 588.06 66.61 589.59 53.34 589.231 65.22 588.45 67.08 589.69 54.7 588.606 65.91 589.12 REW 67.60 590.18 55.86 588.098 66.06 589.63 69.65 591.46 57.68 587.987 66.70 589.64 73.48 591.69 BKF 61.79 588.152 66.96 590.30 78.52 591.96 66.21 588.067 68.51 591.16 90.7 592.55 66.9 588.505 74.74 591.69 BKF 107.12 592.71 RPIN 1 67.53 589.363 85.19 592.16 67.91 589.949 REW 97.28 592.46 69.22 590.819 104.23 592.46 71.27 591.101 106.70 592.65 80.5 591.69 BKF 81.63 591.762 93.72 592.295 103.92 592.157 108.85 592.377 BM Summary Data Table As -built MY1 2008 MY2 2009 MY3 2010 MY4 2011 MY5 2012 Bankfull Cross Sectional Area: 78.6 78.4 73.7 72.5 89.6 Bankfiill Width: 48.3 47.6 48.2 45.3 62.9 Banldull Max Depth: 3.6 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.7 BKF ELEV: 591.69 - ­1L uaut was cVUa;lCa ror cros pro3ecc. 1 ne aaur raKen aunng Year t tnonnonng is assumed to be the as -built data for this project. Forrest Creek Monitoring -- MY4 (2011) Gin antlley ociates, Inc. c 0 a v w As -built MY1 2008 MY2 2009 1 MY3 2010-1 MY4 2011 MY5 2012 As -built 2008' Year 1 - 2008 Year 2 - 2009 Year 3 - 2010 Year 4 _-2011 Year 5 - 2012 Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature BKF ELEV: 594.57 0.00 595.92 BM 0.00 595.92 BM -9.32 596.26 0.00 595.92 LPIN 0 595.843 BM 6.31 595.64 FP 6.31 595.82 FP 0.75 596.07 5.61 596.12 8.64 595.397 13.34 594.67 FP 1334 594.92 FP 9.46 594.91 BKF 14.46 594.98 13.49 594.586 24.61 594.57 BKF 21.03 594.57 BKF 10.01 594.84 24.98 594.71 13.73 59454 BKF 31.17 592.74 LTOE 24.61 594.42 24.98 594.71 25.38 594.57 BKF 21.18 594.072 32.66 592.58 LEW 31.17 593.02 LTOE 31.04 593.91 29.96 593.17 LEW 26.13 594.196 34.64 592.50 TW 32.66 592.92 LEW 34.14 593.35 33.14 592.91 28.74 593.4 42.92 592.21 TW 34.64 592.82 TW 36.67 593.09 38.67 592.84 31.16 592.96 45.39 592.59 REW 42.92 592.82 TW 37.75 592.91 LEW 42.75 592.97 30.54 593.042 LEW 46.13 592.67 RTOE 45.39 592.72 REW 40.01 592.92 593.10 REW 33.62 592.576 53.15 594.23 46.13 592.82 RTOE 43.37 592.71 593.39 34.38 592.35 64.31 594.94 53.15 594.42 47.12 592.73 M517 593.93 35.77 592.372 74.00 594.87 64.31 595.12 FP 48.80 592.83 REW 594.57 BKF 39.68 592.457 76.95 595.53 PBM 74.00 595.12 FP 50.41 593.18 594.73 42.02 592.239 91.94 595.55 76.95 595.42 FP 52.73 593.76 71.64 595.19 45.75 592.592 91.9 595.72 BM 54.85 594.35 80.82 595.81 46.79 593.17 RFW 59.47 594.75 99.0 595.29 48.66 593.379 67.89 595.12 50.67 593.876 76.41 595.80 60.71 594.519 83.3 595.81 62.44 594.54 BKF 71.69 594.842 78.41 595.432 88.03 595.403 94.16 595.149 BM c 0 a v w -10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 Summary Data Table As -built MY1 2008 MY2 2009 1 MY3 2010-1 MY4 2011 MY5 2012 Bankfull Cross Sectional Area 46.8 - -- --- -- - -- 395- 394- 393 - 392- -- -- -- - -- - - -- - - - -- - -- --- - -------------- - -- - -- - -- -- . _ - -- - - -- Banldull Max Depth: 2.4 1.91 2.2 1.7 2.3 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 Summary Data Table As -built MY1 2008 MY2 2009 1 MY3 2010-1 MY4 2011 MY5 2012 Bankfull Cross Sectional Area 46.8 38-71 49.5 17.2 50 Bankftdl Width: 33.9 34.51 53.7 26.3 48.7 Banldull Max Depth: 2.4 1.91 2.2 1.7 2.3 BKF ELEV: 594.57 - rvo as -ouul data was collected for this project. The data taken during Year 1 monitoring is assumed to be the as -built data for this project. Forrest Creek Monitoring -- MY4 (2011) L� andA Associates, �„ ana Associates, inc. Summary Data Table As -built MYl 2008 MY2 2009 MY3 2010 MY4 2011 MY5 2012 Bankfldl Cross Sectional Area: As -built 2008* Year 1 - 2008 Year 2 - 2009 Year 3 - 2010 Year 4 - 2011 Year 5 - 2012 Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature 0.00 598.01 0.00 -598.01 0.00 598.01 0.00 598.01 LPIN 0 597.965 BM 14.50 597.01 FP 14.50 597.01 FP 14.41 596.98 9.02 597.42 10.17 597.37 23.06 595.58 FP 23.06 595.81 FP 20.19 596.24 16.00 596.93 20.76 596.14 BKF 31.85 595.43 31.85 595.11 20.89 596.14 BKF 22.15 596.14 BKF 21.15 596.095 31.96 595.39 LTOB 31.96 595.11 LTOB 27.21 595.37 1 25.73 595.70 27.81 595.343 43.68 593.70 LEW 43.68 594.11 LEW 36.18 594.69 38.30 595.16 34.06 595.444 45.54 592.96 LTOE 45.54 593.21 LTOE 39.59 594.93 41.42 594.81 36.55 595.079 50.72 591.72 TW 50.72 592.11 TW 42.24 594.59 43.09 594.54 39.06 595.179 50.74 592.10 TW 50.74 592.11 TW 43.48 594.17 44.37 593.98 LEW 43.38 594.685 52.77 592.02 TW 52.77 592.11 TW 44.49 593.75 LEW 44.76 593.28 44.23 594.744 LEW 54.96 592.57 RTOE 54.96 592.81 RTOE 46.32 592.81 47.49 592.64 44.75 594.328 56.07 593.90 REW 56.07 594.01 REW 48.34 592.39 49.73 592.00 45.61 593.484 62.41 596.14 BKF 62.41 596.14 BKF 51.06 592.14 52.70 592.07 47.40 592.941 88.18 596.59 FP 88.18 596.51 FP 53.79 592.01 55.94 593.27 49.13 592.598 95.75 597.31 FP 95.75 597.01 FP 55.98 593.84 REW 56.06 593.84 REW 50.79 592.198 99.32 597.50 FP 99.32 597.11 FP 57.23 594.45 56.52 594.51 1 52.25 592.205 106.66 597.60 BM 106.66 597.61 BM 61.38 595.91 58.80 595.05 53.54 592.304 65.25 596.06 62.84 596.03 54.04 592.245 71.88 596.00 80.50 5967 55.81 592.169 80.38 596.15 84.18 596.14 BKF 56.91 593.1 88.26 596.44 85.30 596.19 57.43 594.495 106.6 597.56 93.7 596.88 58.28 594.806 REW 125.4 596.95 60.8 595.4 63.1 596.1 BKF 66.4 596.1 74.5 596.0 78.1 596.3 89.1 596.5 96.4 597.1 112.9 597.1 126.8 596.9 BM XSPS - 2012 598 - -- - - -- - -- - - 597 - - -- - - ----------------------- -- - -- 596 _ -------------- 595 - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- -- -- - -- - -- ------------ -- -- - -- -- -- -- - -- - -- - - -- - -- - o Year 1 - 2008 v 594 U.) 593 592 - -- -- - -- - -- -- - -- - -- - - -- - -- -- - - -- ------------ - -- -- ----------- - - -- -- - - - -- - -- - - -- - - - -- Year 2 - 2009 Year 3 - 2010 Year 4 -2011 -0- Year 5 - 2012 _ - 591 - -- - -- - -- -- - -- - - -- Bankfull IT - -- 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 105 110 115 120 125 130 Station (ft) Summary Data Table As -built MYl 2008 MY2 2009 MY3 2010 MY4 2011 MY5 2012 Bankfldl Cross Sectional Area: 77.3 732 744 68.4 67.3 Banldlrll Width: 42.7 41.7 54.9 62.0 42.2 Banld'all Max Depth: 4.4 40 -1.1 4.1 4.0 BKF ELEV: 596.14 ' No as -built data was collected for this project. The data taken during Year I monitoring is assumed to be the as -built data for this project. 1 Forrest Creek Monitoring -- MY4 (2011) r_=F, andA sH is � and P,asxiates, Inc. j 602 601 600 c 599 0 i > 598 NJ 597 596 595 XSR6 - 2012 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 5 Static Summary Data Table As -built MYl 2008 MY2 2009 MY3 2010 MY4 2011 MY5 2012 As -built 2008 • Year I - 2008 Year 2 - 2009 Year 3 - 2010 Year 4 - 2011 Year 5 - 2012 Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature BKF ELEV: 598.1 0.00 598.74 BM 0.00 598.74 BM 0.00 598.74 0.00 598.74 LPIN 3 598.7 2.85 598.41 FP 2.85 598.24 FP 4.18 598.10 BKF 8.03 598.10 BKF 11 598.1 BKF 7.10 597.60 FP 4.09 598.10 BKF 4.77 598.00 14.05 597.61 12.5 597.207 19.52 597.47 7.10 597.74 FP 11.01 597.47 18.72 597.54 18.60 597.293 24.91 595.71 LEW 19.52 597.34 1 16.42 597.27 21.62 597.20 19.96 597.034 31.42 595.57 TW 24.91 595.84 LEW 19.80 597.45 24.64 596.50 20.88 596.77 LEW 36.94 595.67 REW 31.42 595.62 TW 21.98 597.01 26.21 596.02 LEW 23.73 596.26 45.45 598.10 BKF 36.94 595.88 REW 23.37 596.46 27.09 595.83 25.17 595.549 73.93 598.89 BM 45.45 597.78 24.86 595.98 30.78 595.50 28.59 595.497 73.93 598.91 BM 26.47 596.09 LEW 32.66 595.57 30.43 595.398 29.10 595.51 36.88 595.69 33.76 595.565 31.24 595.54 37.57 596.09 REW 36.70 595.565 34.14 595.60 39.11 596.36 37.86 595.979 37.19 595.55 40.95 596.86 40.89 596.887 REW 38.96 596.11 REW 43.63 597.64 42.45 597.413 40.12 596.25 45.93 598.10 BKF 45.64 598.046 42.46 596.73 47.56 598.39 47.29 598.1 BKF 44.14 597.16 68.06 598.91 50.83 598.216 46.18 597.83 81.15 599.12 61.28 598.569 50.59 598.15 95.60 598.96 67.65 598.655 59.71 598.48 102.79 600.18 75.51 599.016 74.9 598.89 108.0 601.74 85.34 598.824 89.11 598.72 93.77 598.828 97.04 599.313 101.39 600.293 107.15 601.574 BM j 602 601 600 c 599 0 i > 598 NJ 597 596 595 XSR6 - 2012 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 5 Static Summary Data Table As -built MYl 2008 MY2 2009 MY3 2010 MY4 2011 MY5 2012 Bankfull Cross Sectional Area: 55.9 56.1 59.0 48.8 56.2 Bankfull Width: 11.0 49.4 45.7 37.9 36.3 Bankfull Max Depth, 2.5 2.5 2.6 2.6 2.7 BKF ELEV: 598.1 - no as -ouut aata Was couected Tor trus prQlect. I he data taken during Year I monitoring is assumed to be the as -built data for this project. I Forrest Creek Monitoring - MY4 (2011) C =Fl a dIA9 Pates. Inc. 0 Y in 1. CU CU W XSRT1 - 2012 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 Station (ft) I� Forrest Creek Monitoring -- MY4 (2011) 1 Summary Data Table As -built MY 12008 MY2 2009 MY3 2010 MY4 2011 MY5 2012 Bankfull Cross Sectional Area As -built 2008* Year 1 - 2008 Year 2 - 2009 Year 3 - 2010 Year 4 - 2011 Year 5 - 2012 Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature 0.00 619.82 BM 0.00 619.82 BM 0.00 619.60 -0.62 620.21 RPIN -0.62 620.21 BM 0.00 619.73 FP 0.00 619.82 FP 0.00 619.60 -0.71 619.78 -0.71 619.78 9.63 619.52 FP 9.63 619.62 FP 9.63 619.39 5.66 619.68 5.37 619.677 14.46 619.56 BKF 14.46 619.56 BKF 14.46 619.32 BKF 11.52 619.54 12.46 619.566 18.44 618.71 LTOE 18.44 618.72 LTOE 18.44 618.40 1 14.46 619.56 BKF 14.80 619.56 BKF 20.17 618.65 TW 20.17 618.72 TW 20.17 618.33 16.53 619.00 15.89 619.355 23.05 619.07 RTOE 23.05 618.96 RTOE 23.05 618.97 17.94 618.74 LEW 16.71 618.981 26.48 619.69 26.48 619.63 26.48 619.39 18.37 618.79 17.74 618.857 40.54 619.88 FP 40.54 620.02 FP 40.54 619.90 19.15 618.78 REW 18.69 618.684 53.14 620.28 FP 53.14 620.45 FP 53.14 620.20 20.96 618.86 19.20 618.635 53.14 620.43 BM 53.14 620.45 BM 53.14 620.20 1 24.67 619.56 BKF 20.70 618.712 37.34 619.94 22.56 618.985 44.44 620.12 24.76 619.348 46.55 620.21 25.99 619.56 BKF 52.48 620.47 LPIN 26.94 619.724 33.06 619.877 41.17 619.932 47.04 620.06 52.18 620.172 63.32 620.367 69.98 620.881 76.92 621.466 87.01 621.992 90.54 622.177 Bbt 0 Y in 1. CU CU W XSRT1 - 2012 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 Station (ft) I� Forrest Creek Monitoring -- MY4 (2011) 1 Summary Data Table As -built MY 12008 MY2 2009 MY3 2010 MY4 2011 MY5 2012 Bankfull Cross Sectional Area 6.0 6.1 8.31 25.9 6.0 Bankf ill Width: 18.0 11.7 15.71 47.3 11.2 Bankfttll Max Depth 0.9 0.8 1.01 1.5 0.9 BKF ELEV: 619.56 r.0 as -uuui uaw Was correctea ror mts project. t ne aata taxen outing Year 1 monitoring r is assumed to be the as -built data for this project. =Fl and and Associates, Inc. 621 620 619 c 0 Y w 618 617 616 XSPT2 - 2012 As -built MYl 2008 MY2 2009 MY3 2010 MY4 2011 MY5 2012 As -built 2008* Year 1 - 2008 Year 2 - 2009 Year 3 - 2010 Year 4 - 2011 Year 5 - 2012 Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature Year 3- 2010 Year 4 - 2011 0.00 619.63 BM 0.00 619.63 BM 0.00 620.10 - -- 0.00 619.63 LPIN -1.5 619.127 BM 9.86 619.51 FP 9.86 619.23 FP 7.50 619.42 10.07 619.46 8.98 619.08 33.21 618.88 25.80 618.76 BKF 19.46 619.00 27.68 619.11 25.71 618.76 BKF 33.47 618.81 LTOB 33.21 618.55 30.92 618.84 34.40 618.83 26.55 618.744 35.84 618.76 bkf 33.47 618.54 LTOB 38.67 618.98 35.66 618.76 BKF 32.20 618.559 42.36 617.71 LTOE 35.84 618.40 41.09 618.57 39.76 618.46 32.83 618.536 44.87 617.32 TW 42.36 617.56 LTOE 42.88 618.24 41.42 618.11 LEW 37.81 618.354 44.91 617.34 TW 44.87 617.26 TW 44.12 617.89 LEW 42.56 617.74 39.96 618.096 46.72 617.74 RTOE 44.91 617.28 TW 45.03 617.76 44.35 617.56 41.52 617.789 LEW 46.80 617.78 RTOE 46.72 617.65 RTOE 46.12 617.51 45.61 617.58 42.34 617.451 50.14 618.80 RTOB 46.80 617.57 RTOE 46.76 617.52 REW 46.86 618.15 REW 43.28 617.383 50.25 618.85 50.14 618.78 RTOB 47.30 617.72 47.13 618.28 44.54 617.228 61.17 618.98 FP 50.25 618.80 48.31 618.11 48.90 618.76 BKF 45.43 617.272 72.34 620.06 FP 61.17 618.89 FP 49.56 618.43 50.09 619.05 46.06 617.557 72.34 620.07 BM 72.34 619.84 FP 51.69 618.76 BKF 50.25 619.05 46.36 617.691 REW 72.34 619.84 BM 53.65 619.02 55.60 619.07 46.73 617.987 62.03 619.11 65.77 619.35 48.76 618.536 65.91 619.29 68.34 619.70 49.59 618.76 BKF 72.36 619.63 72.4 620.16 RPIN 58.95 618.783 65.67 619.207 73.7 619.719 BM 621 620 619 c 0 Y w 618 617 616 XSPT2 - 2012 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 Station (ft) Summary Data Table As -built MYl 2008 MY2 2009 MY3 2010 MY4 2011 MY5 2012 Bankfull Cross Sectional Area. 10.5 14.5 6.9 7.5 12.8 Bankfull Width: 14.2 24.3 11.7 13.2 23.9 Bankfull Max Depth: Year 1- 2008 Year 2- 2009 1 4 1.5 -- - -- BKF ELEV: 618.76 Year 3- 2010 Year 4 - 2011 = --- - -- - - -- - -0- Year 5 - 2012 - - -- Bankfull 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 Station (ft) Summary Data Table As -built MYl 2008 MY2 2009 MY3 2010 MY4 2011 MY5 2012 Bankfull Cross Sectional Area. 10.5 14.5 6.9 7.5 12.8 Bankfull Width: 14.2 24.3 11.7 13.2 23.9 Bankfull Max Depth: 1 4 1.5 1.3 1.2 1.5 BKF ELEV: 618.76 - rvu as -uuu : uata was couectea ror tuts project. 1 -he data taken during Year 1 tttomtonng is assumed to be the as -built data for this project. Forrest Creek Monitoring -- MY4 (2011) CuFl andA Socia � and Associates, Inc. 611 610 F w 0 Y i _v W 609 608 0 XSRT3 - 2012 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 Station (ft) Summary Data Table As -built MYl 2008 MY2 2009 MY3 2010 MY4 2011 As -built 2008' Year 1 - 2008 Year 2 - 2009 Year 3 - 2010 Year 4 - 2011 Year 5 - 2012 Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature 0.00 609.93 BM 0.00 609.93 BM 0.00 609.93 0.00 609.93 LPIN -2 609.505 BM 8.97 609.51 BKF 8.97 609.51 BKF 5.70 609.68 1.69 609.61 3.4 609.517 14.42 609.48 14.42 60936 9.23 609.51 BKF 6.28 609.80 BF 10.76 609.295 16.15 608.90 LEW 16.15 608.98 LEW 10.69 609.44 10.45 609.55 14.32 609.51 BKF 17.16 608.58 TW 17.16 608.67 TW 14.08 609.48 1 14.71 609.56 15.24 609.038 LEW 18.49 608.92 REW 18.49 608.93 REW 15.47 609.24 15.11 609.51 BKF 16.04 608.858 22.39 609.66 22.39 609.63 16.04 608.95 15.86 609.41 16.98 608.679 29.60 609.38 FP 29.60 609.43 FP 16.42 609.02 LEW 16.08 609.18 LEW 17.43 608.693 37.90 610.10 BM 37.90 610.09 BM 16.54 608.78 16.52 609.07 18.19 609.062 REW 17.57 608.77 17.29 608.71 20.47 609.51 BKF 18.24 609.00 REW 18.13 608.88 24.28 609.547 19.77 609.00 18.74 609.20 REW 28.80 609.277 21.32 609.67 19.23 609.28 1 37.99 609.852 BM 23.32 609.58 21.53 609.62 28.58 609.33 23.61 609.51 BKF 34.75 609.72 1 30.11 609.34 37.92 610.00 37.94 610.09 RPIN 611 610 F w 0 Y i _v W 609 608 0 XSRT3 - 2012 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 Station (ft) Summary Data Table As -built MYl 2008 MY2 2009 MY3 2010 MY4 2011 MY5 2012 Bankfull Cross Sectional Area 17 17 3.8 2.6 2.8 Banldull Width: 17.5 16.6 18.4 14.0 6.0 Bankfutl Max Depth: 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.8 0.9 BKF ELEV: 609.51 - rio as -oum aam was collected for this protect The data taken during Year 1 monitoring is assumed to be the as -built data for this project. C c„ and A -Horn Forrest reek Monitoring -- MY4 (2011) and ey-Ho rtes Inc. 609 608 607 ° 606 av w 605 604 603 XSPT4 - 2012 As -built MY1 2008 MY2 2009 MY3 2010 MY4 2011 1 MY5 2012 As -built 2008• Year 1 - 2008 Year 2 - 2009 Year 3 - 2010 Year 4 - 2011 Year 5 - 2012 Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature BKF ELEV: 605.61 0.00 608.76 BM 0.00 608.76 BM 0.00 608.76 Year 2008 Year 2 - 2009 -- Year 3 - 2010 Year 4 - 2011 0.00 608.76 LPIN 0 608.178 BM - -- -- . - 3.45 607.30 FP 3.45 607.82 FP 1.55 607.94 0.02 608.40 6.44 606.955 - -- - -- - 15.04 606.59 FP 15.04 606.68 FP 9.59 606.85 3.72 607.25 12.8 606.603 20.54 606.18 20.54 606.02 17.41 606.41 9.69 606.91 18.23 606.337 22.91 605.42 LEW 22.45 605.61 BKF 19.43 606.32 19.80 606.47 21.64 606.092 25.68 604.24 TW 22.91 605.53 LEW 20.80 606.17 21.64 606.05 22.57 605.9 32.76 605.43 REW 25.68 603.99 TW 21.66 605.79 23.97 605.91 LEW 23.98 605.71 39.73 605.61 BKF 32.76 605.51 REW 22.47 605.64 LEW 24.02 605.61 BKF 24.31 605.666 40.38 605.34 FP 39.73 605.41 24.53 604.03 24.10 604.57 24.34 605.61 BKF 1 46.80 605.44 FP 40.38 605.41 FP 27.44 603.69 26.37 604.29 24.95 604.343 LEW 52.36 605.50 FP 46.80 605.54 FP 29.95 604.56 28.53 604.15 26.54 604.058 62.62 606.02 FP 52.36 605.71 FP 31.33 604.77 29.88 604.56 29.61 604.3 66.65 606.22 FP 62.62 606.15 FP 32.07 605.62 REW 31.62 605.25 31.92 604.788 REW 73.54 606.78 BM 66.65 606.38 FP 36.14 605.61 BKF 31.67 605.61 BKF 33.92 605.61 BKF 73.54 606.74 BM 43.92 605.55 31.93 606.00 REW 40.34 605.38 54.50 605.59 1 32.81 605.79 44.21 605.566 66.92 606.21 36.61 605.63 48.34 605.345 73.53 606.76 41.86 605.63 53.26 605.475 56.5 605.86 54.17 605.392 73.6 606.84 RPIN 58.57 605.687 59.11 605.71 65.78 605.995 75.65 606.409 BM 609 608 607 ° 606 av w 605 604 603 XSPT4 - 2012 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 Station (ft) Forrest Creek Monitoring -- MY4 (2011) Summary Data Table As -built MY1 2008 MY2 2009 MY3 2010 MY4 2011 1 MY5 2012 Bankfall Cross Sectional Area: 10.7 10.6 12.7 8.7 10.3 Banldull Width: 32.2 26 6 28.3 7.7 9.6 Banldull Max Depth: 1.4 1 6 1.9 1.5 1.6 BKF ELEV: 605.61 Year 2008 Year 2 - 2009 -- Year 3 - 2010 Year 4 - 2011 - -- - - -- -- . - - - -- - -- - -- - -- -- �� Year 5 - 2012 - - -- Bankfull 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 Station (ft) Forrest Creek Monitoring -- MY4 (2011) Summary Data Table As -built MY1 2008 MY2 2009 MY3 2010 MY4 2011 1 MY5 2012 Bankfall Cross Sectional Area: 10.7 10.6 12.7 8.7 10.3 Banldull Width: 32.2 26 6 28.3 7.7 9.6 Banldull Max Depth: 1.4 1 6 1.9 1.5 1.6 BKF ELEV: 605.61 - NO as -Dula data was collected for this project. The data taken during Year 1 monitoring is assumed to be the as -built data for this project. „ Kimley -Horn Gam and Associates, inc. XSRTS - 2012 As -built MYl 2008 1 MY2 2009 1 MY3 2010 1 MY4 2011 1 MY5 2012 As -built 2008 * Year 1 - 2008 Year 2 - 2009 Year 3 - 2010 Year 4 - 2011 Year 5 - 2012 Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature BKF ELEV: 601.7 0.00 602.21 BM 0.00 602.21 BM -0.91 602.05 0.00 602.21 LPIN 0 602.135 BM 0.86 601.56 FP 0.86 601.90 FP 7.62 601.50 BKF 0.01 601.66 0.14 601.794 11.30 601.64 FP 11.30 601.86 FP 16.63 601.66 8.58 601.82 0.21 601.63 Year 1- 2008 20.76 601.79 20.76 601.86 20.47 601.54 13.64 601.70 BKF 11.42 601.626 240.15 600.65 LTOE 24.15 601.37 LTOE 22.53 601.38 20.47 601054 19.24 601.7 BKF Year 2 - 2009 25.81 600.53 TW 25.81 600.93 TW 23.60 600.69 - - - -- 21.93 600.85 LEW 21.86 601.267 27.67 600.87 RTOE 27.67 601.26 RTOE 24.75 600.36 24.01 600.52 22.92 601.12 Year 3 - 2010 31.88 601.70 BKF 31.88 601.70 BKF 25.52 600.37 24.57 600.53 23.95 600.633 LEW Year 4 - 2011 47.49 601.84 FP 47.49 601.85 FP 26.91 600.39 25.47 600.55 25.44 600.431 -0- Year 5 - 2012 60.60 601.24 FP 60.60 601.41 FP 28.01 600.54 26.07 600.70 26.80 600.48 - - -- 8ankfull 74.71 601.87 FP 74.71 602.51 FP 28.94 600.74 26.86 600.90 27.18 600.809 REW 74.93 602.52 BM 74.93 602.51 BM 34.33 601.33 27.79 601.49 28.73 601.295 44.84 601.32 30.26 601.48 30.02 601.7 BKF 60.54 600.95 39.05 601.11 30.32 601.794 61.94 601.54 56.55 601.70 BKF 30.43 601.83 73.98 601.61 58.61 601.77 32.65 601.785 74.58 602.46 RPIN 42.04 601.691 56.04 601.301 68.79 601.75 71 601.794 74.57 601.865 74.8 602.431 BM XSRTS - 2012 As -built MYl 2008 1 MY2 2009 1 MY3 2010 1 MY4 2011 1 MY5 2012 Bankfull Cross Sectional Area: 1 12.91 5.11 10.61 16.21 7.1 Bankfull Width: 45.61 22.41 51.41 45.11 10.8 Bankfull Max Depth: I 0-81 1.21 1.21 1.3 BKF ELEV: 601.7 > > Year 1- 2008 LU Year 2 - 2009 -- - - - -- - -- Year 3 - 2010 Year 4 - 2011 -0- Year 5 - 2012 - - -- 8ankfull -5 0 _ 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 Station (ft) Summary Data Table As -built MYl 2008 1 MY2 2009 1 MY3 2010 1 MY4 2011 1 MY5 2012 Bankfull Cross Sectional Area: 1 12.91 5.11 10.61 16.21 7.1 Bankfull Width: 45.61 22.41 51.41 45.11 10.8 Bankfull Max Depth: 1.2 0-81 1.21 1.21 1.3 BKF ELEV: 601.7 • NO as -nutlt data Was collected for this project. The data taken during Year I monitorigg is assumed to be the as -built data for this project. K Forrest Creek Monitoring -- MY4 (2011) w" ad Associates, Inc I Forrest Creek Monitoring Y4 9 -- ( 2011 ) Summary Data Table As -built MYl 2008 MY2 2009 MY3 2010 MY4 2011 MY5 2012 Bankfidl Cross Sectional Area 9.4 11.1 89 16.5 9.31 Bankfull Width: 26.1 2T2 25 1 48.4 16.6 Bankfull Max De the 1.2 1.4 14 As -built 2008* 1.8 Year 1 - 2008 Year 2 - 2009 Year 3 - 2010 Year 4 - 2011 Year 5 - 2012 Station Elevation- Feature Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature Station Elevation Feature 0.00 595.81 BM 0.00 '595.81 BM 0.00 595.81 1.38 596.11 RPIN -0.8 595.3 BM 0.09 595.33 FP 0.09 595.80 FP 10.48 595.50 1.38 595.87 7.0 595.4 14.85 595.57 FP 10.18 595.57 BKF 17.82 595.57 BKF 1.40 595.40 16.0 595.6 22.22 595.57 BKF 14.85 595.46 FP 24.23 595.19 8.62 595.74 16.4 595.6 BKF 25.92 594.60 LTOE 22.22 595.34 24.63 1 595.04 22.22 595.57 BKF 18.7 595.3 27.91 594.41 TW 25.92 594.54 LTOE 26.98 594.21 25.02 594.86 21.4 595.3 29.88 594.65 RTOE 27.91 594.14 TW 28.92 594.38 2660 594.61 LEW 22.9 595.2 34.31 595.77 29.88 594.71 RTOE 31.06 595.02 27.37 594.00 25.0 594.8 40.31 595.68 FP 34.31 595.39 33.64 595.67 28.02 594.51 REW 26.0 594.6 53.93 595.68 FP 40.31 595.74 FP 41.21 595.91 29.37 594.78 26.9 593.8 LEW 53.93 596.22 BM 53.93 595.73 FP 49.20 595.68 32.21 595.57 BKF 27.2 593.8 53.93 596.14 BM 53.93 596.16 40.55 595.79 27.6 593.9 RE W 49.73 595.87 28.3 594.5 55.18 595.92 LPIN 29.7 595.0 31.8 595.5 33.0 595.6 BKF 35.7 595.8 43.2 595.7 53.3 595.5 60.8 595.5 63.7 596.1 Y W O Y v "' 597 - 596 595 - -- - ---- -- - -- - I - -- - - - -- - - -� XSRT6 - - - - 2011 -- - - - - i - -- Year 1- 2008 Year 2 - 2009 594 Year 3 - 2010 Year 4 - 2011 --0- Year 5 - 2012 - - -• Bankfull 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 _,_ _-� 30.0 Station (ft) 35.0 40.0 45.0 50.0 55.0 60.0 I Forrest Creek Monitoring Y4 9 -- ( 2011 ) Summary Data Table As -built MYl 2008 MY2 2009 MY3 2010 MY4 2011 MY5 2012 Bankfidl Cross Sectional Area 9.4 11.1 89 16.5 9.31 Bankfull Width: 26.1 2T2 25 1 48.4 16.6 Bankfull Max De the 1.2 1.4 14 1.9 1.8 BKF ELEV: 595.57 * No as -built data was collected for this project. The data taken during Year I monitoring is assumed to be the as -built data for this project. Gam„ Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. APPENDIX C Profile Survey ' Forrest Creek Monitoring — MY4 (2011) 62' 620.1 62( 619.1 61� 618.`, 61E 617.E 617 616.5 PrnfilP 1 l Forrest Creek -- MY5 (2012) CcI \ ndAS o�ates,Inc. Profile 2 611 610 - - 609 - 608 - 607 - At A 606 - 605 604 603 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 12008 -m --2009 (2010 ♦ BKF 12011 12012 Forrest Creek -- MY5 (2012) ��� nd Ag Associates, Inc. Profile 3 596.5 596 ♦ 595.5 595 - ♦ 594.5 - - - - 594 i 593.5 i 593 -- 592.5 - - - 592 2650 2700 2750 2800 2850 2900 2950 (2008 12009 - 0-2010 ♦ BKF -m-2011 X2012 Forrest Creek -- MY5 (2012) c_" a and o� ates, Inc. Profile 4 597 596 595 ♦ 594 ♦ _ - A ♦ 593 ♦ A. 592 - - 591 - 590 589 588 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 O- 2008 - •-2009 x-2010 --m-2011 12012 ♦ BKF Forrest Creek -- MY5 (2012) Enn a dAssociates, Inc. Profile 5 592 -- i 591 - 590 589 588 587 - - - 586 585 584 350 450 550 650 750 850 950 1050 1150 12008 x-2009 -0-2010 12011 -2012 ♦ BKF Forrest Creek -- MY5 (2012) C=I1 andA-Hom ti and Associates, Inc. APPENDIX D Pebble Counts Kim Hann Forrest Creek Monitoring — MY4 (2011) and Ase late %1 CrossSection4(XS4) MaterialsSurvey ForrestCreek - -MYS Particle Size (mm) Pebble Count 2008 MY2 2009 MY3 2010 MY4 2011 MYS 2012 0.062 16 17 15 18 18 0.13 0.25 0.5 6 1 1 2 2 1 4 7 5 6 6 3 10 6 1 4 8 7 10 8 2 11 4 3 17 3 1 16 4 4 11 3 3 22 7 7 9 3 1 32 13 8 5 5 2 45 15 10 13 3 9 64 15 14 4 5 13 90 19 12 1 23 22 128 8 5 1 24 13 180 5 6 9 256 1 3 2 362 512 1024 2048 4096 CrossSection2 (XS2) MaterialsSurvey ForrestCreek - -MY5 Particle Size (mm) Pebble Count 2008 MY2 2009 MY3 2010 MY4 2011 MYS 2012 0.13 10 25 30 7 31 0.25 0.5 1 6 2 1 4 it 5 6 2 15 5 8 3 11 2 4 11 7 5 7 3 16 4 9 3 3 1 22 10 8 4 10 3 32 10 10 3 4 1 45 3 4 5 3 64 15 5 24 1 15 7 90 12 6 19 9 13 128 13 10 7 6 16 180 10 6 1 6 7 256 2 1 362 2 3 4 512 1024 2048 4096 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 6ry by O � ^ a �° yL ba ^tig ryye ^ti op0 ti ■MY1 ■MY2 aMY3 ■MY4 ■MYS 35 30 20 15 5 I i 0 ■MY1 ■MY2 ,MY3 ■MY4 ■MY5 �imiev -HOm Forrest Creek - -MY5 2012 Can cn..o�mrec.mc. CrossSectionTI (XST 1)MaterialsSurvey ForrestCreek - -MY5 Particle Size (mm) Pebble Count 2008 MY2 2009 MY3 2010 MY4 2011 MY5 2012 0.13 1 20 18 30 33 0.25 - 0MY3 3 2 0.5 2 1 2 1 6 2 3 4 2 6 2 1 3 3 8 3 3 8 4 11 13 8 20 3 3 16 19 10 32 4 10 22 22 9 8 1 11 32 18 16 11 4 8 45 12 12 5 64 5 4 1 1 2 8 90 6 3 2 13 128 2 6 1 4 180 1 1 3 256 2 362 8 2 512 1 2 1024 1 2048 4096 CrossSectionT3 (XST3) MaterialsSurvey ForrestCreek - -MYS Particle Size (mm) Pebble Count 2008 MY2 2009 MY3 2010 MV4 2011 MY5 2012 0.13 36 63 ■MY5 1 30 36 0.25 - 0MY3 0 MY4 ■MY5 0.5 1 6 2 3 4 6 2 1 3 8 3 5 4 11 1 3 9 16 3 6 4 22 4 3 4 32 4 5 1 45 12 2 3 64 13 4 1 1 3 90 14 3 5 4 128 11 5 3 7 180 1 8 256 3 362 8 2 512 2 1024 1 2048 4096 35 30 i 25 20 15 10 5 0 A 6( 5C 4( 3C 2C 1c C oryh N b 0 16 gry 0b ^ry0 ryy0 y�ry oa0 ry O�0 ry ■MY1 0 MY2 0 MY3 •MY4 ■MY5 1 ■MY2 - 0MY3 0 MY4 ■MY5 Forrest Creek -- MYS (2012) Cmn cnu. rw a�oaaew, lnc. O�0 ry ■MY1 ■MY2 - 0MY3 0 MY4 ■MY5 Forrest Creek -- MYS (2012) Cmn cnu. rw a�oaaew, lnc. CrossSectionT6 (XST6)MaterialsSurvey ForrestCreek - -MYS Particle Size (mm) Pebble Count 2008 MY2 2009 MY3 2010 MY4 2011 MY5 2012 0.13 40 53 60 9 0.25 2 0.5 1 2 4 6 2 8 3 2 11 1 5 4 16 4 3 8 4 22 6 2 9 2 32 4 5 7 6 45 8 6 6 10 64 16 11 7 1 90 18 12 2 7 128 15 5 2 180 1 256 3 362 512 1024 2048 4096 70 - - - - -- 60 50 40 I 30 20 10 0 o �h d 0 No 5L ��0 ry�0 y �op0 ■MY1 ■MY2 i3W3 •MY4 ■MYS Forrest Creek -- MYS (2012) [gin K a W- z APPENDIX E Photo Logs ' Forrest Creek Monitoring — MY4 (2011) anKimley Horn and Associates, Im r - ,r. p.e '� .�:{ ._ J �r Rol i7 A MR �,. •fie e 7i:! K • . :7 t �r. 7i:! K • . :7 At i Photo Point 9 — Looking downstream (UT) from Edmund Latta Road (STA 110 +50). Photo Point 10 - Looking upstream (UT) from Edmund Latta Road (STA 110 +00). �' Forrest Creek — MY5 (2012) ��� Kimley -Han and Associates, Inc. downstream WUN XS1 facing t t „5 i' ' .f j Iva yy i ' .f XS3 facing downstream XS3 from stream right XS3 from stream left XS3 facing upstream Forrest Creek — MY5 (2012) [zFl andlAssocates. Inc. �° � . � ti� . ?? , - �. ;ate,.: �, , _.� �. �.� .� k1 � I I yy� w �1 � � r r XS6 from stream lef� .7 401 A OrA '4' t Q0.. °•. � �M, t. 11 w :'�. O"N .F �_ , _ I \ w . * N-- 4... v 4 ` ' } 1 / // / F ; / i 1,� Jam/ ' �/� 4 ioe- 4... v •/ I / // / F ; / i 1,� Jam/ ' �/� ell ♦' �,_ � �"• � ,' '�\ z. a .1. t.' i 1, 3 '1 IL Al J XST4 from stream left a � . t s . I � R. 4t, is or Liz 46— v. M M M M M M r M M M= M M ■rte M= M M M XST6 facing downstream XST6 from stream right XST6 from stream left XST6 facing upstream Forrest Creek — MY5 (2012) G�� Kirnle -Ho rates, Inc. Tli k -7 � it 4 � -• ..._ ..- -:!lam: � 1 - •y h n to gmtomiiL ` • � '"'� 4 � -• ..._ ..- -:!lam: � 1 - •y h i_ PAL.- E 6 w AF w 3 APPENDIX F Bankfull Event Photo Log lum ey Hwn Forrest Creek Monitoring — MY4 (2011) Carl enanesocatealnc BANKFULL EVENT LOG Crest Stage Gauge located on the Forrest Creek main channel. Bankfull event occurred on September 18th, and read a depth of 1.7 feet. Over bank flow observed on September 191h (event occurred on September 18th) in main channel. Forrest Creek - MYS 2012 r, on and A smia � and Associates, Inc. Over bank flow observed on September 191h (event occurred on September 18t) in main Ichannel. Over bank flow observed on September 191h (event occurred on September 18t) in main Ichannel. Forrest Creek — MY5 (2012) ��n and A -Horn � ,and Psvociates, Inc. APPENDIX G Repairs ' Kh H nley an Forrest Creek Monitoring — MY4 (2011) G�� and A" la`es''- � Forrest Creek Mitigation Bank Year 3 Remedial Repair Plan Orange County, North Carolina USGS HUC: 03020201020020 September 2010 Executive Summary On April 9th, 2010 members of the Inter - agency Review Team (IRT), t accompanied by EarthMark staff, walked the existing Forrest Creek Mitigation Bank (FCMB) site EarthMark staff had not walked the main channel of Forrest Creek below the confluence of the unnamed tributary (UT) since monitoring work was completed in September 2009 It is theorized that a particularly brutal winter combined with poor soils below the confluence of the UT and the main channel lead to significant damage and instability The engineers /designers opinion of the cause of these failures along with the proposed repair plan is presented in more detail in the attached memorandum (Exhibit A) Observations during the site visit indicated gravel had washed off of the first cattle crossing (Station 200) into the easement This was removed by our on -site maintenance contractor in early July Below Cross Section 4, approximately Station 214, a large Swale feeds ' into the main channel from the adjacent pasture and has been a reoccurring problem area The Swale itself is stable, however, upstream of this confluence the channel has cut into the right bank and created a center bar /island This area ' also needs to be stabilized with vegetation, the soil has a low nutrient, high clay content, rocky composition where live stakes will not take and lack of ground ' cover is troublesome The attached detail for the proposed rock vane was taken from the original FCMB approved construction plans Small bare areas where live stakes have not taken and where no ground cover has established exist all over the site Remedial activities will address the worst of these areas with top soil amendments and sod Between the last culvert crossing (Station 223) and London Lane (Station 232) many outside bends experienced some degree of stress this winter Areas where live stakes did not take and where no ground cover established in previous seasons became loose and weak, sloughed off and deposited bank sediment into the stream bed Much of this sediment stayed in place at the toe of the bank This sediment can be reclaimed from the stream bed and used to rebuild the banks, however, this soil is low - nutrient with high clay content and will require top soil amendments Some areas may require more top soil for fill and soil amendments than can be borrowed from adjacent pasture areas Additional soil may be taken from areas within the easement where vegetative growth is successful and indicates acceptable soils Within the easement these borrow areas will be left as potential vernal pools no larger than 30 feet in diameter, as represented on the ' Repair Plan map, and according to the attached detail also taken from the original approved FCMB construction plans Existing planted trees will be salvaged and moved Species that tolerate wetter conditions (i a river birch) will be replanted and additional supplemental plantings will be`done this winter if necessary in all areas potentially impacted by repair work Exhibit A: Engineers Opinion Remedial Plan Details ' Kr*4iorn C and Amwtes, kx. Memorandum ' To_ Cl nIme Cook PWS From: Todd St_ John PE Date: June 7_ 2010 Subject: Forrest Creek Repairs Situation: ' This mater was particularly wet and cold There were several strong freezes followed by large runoff events. When ground freezes and subsequently thaws, it tends to loosen the soil stnirtire (water expands when it freezes, forcing soil ' particles apart)_ If there is not a strong, dense root system in the soil, it becomes vulnerable to erosion This is phenomenon is often observed along stream banks during the winter. It is my opinion that this phenomenon also contributed to the recent erosion in certain sections of Forrest Creek, particularly along the north/south facing sections of the stream between the farm road and London Lan_ The strongest evidence for this hes in the timing of the erosion as well as the fact that it occurred equally along both banks and not Just in meander bends_ Recommendations: As such, it is recommended that the primary focus of the repairs be to replace the ' eroded banks and establish vigorous, woody vegetation in the banks_ Figures 1 and indicate the areas and the various proposed treatments_ Kimley -Hom recommends the use of soil lifts to repair the eroded areas_ There are also some scoured areas where we have recommended soil replacement with coir matting_ The soil should be ' imported or amended to include a higher organic content_ The area labeled as soil lift bench in Figure 1 proposes a more substantial treatment with a more eidensne soil lift area, possibly supported by rock or boulders along the upstream edge_ The ' soil lifts and soil replacements areas should also be vegetated, preferably with some interspersed brush mattresses, fascines, harvested sod, or live stakes to provide roughness_ ' It is recommended that a contractor be engaged to review the proposed repair schemes. The contractor may be able to provide a better sense of the cost as well sonw approaches to further reduce costs_ ' Preliminan opinion of cost: The following costs were developed from estimated and measured distances (as opposed to survey)_ All of the estimates assume obtaining top soil from of Fute and a combination of dense plantings, including brush mattresses, fascines, sod, and live stakes.. The type of planting treatments used can affect the cost significantly_ The soil lift bench includes cost for rock or boulders as well_ Treatment Linear feet Soil lifts 370 Soil lift -bench 100 Brush mattress/sod 610 Soil replacement 350 Total ■ 1$ 919 677 2M FAX 919 677 2M ■ P-0 Box 33M Raiei NWIh Gamin 27636 -3M N 2008 Aerials Forrest Creek 2010 Repair Plan EarthMark Mitigation (Pre - Construction) o llo zzo aao feet ' 1 ' Services, LLC inch = 111 feet m m m m m= i = == m m m m m m a i a.N OR ANE LK OA DEAD JEmt X0IUIFD FORE RDPE MATIINC al MpCX N AFNW wnreNC 'WO Y WODEX' (SWE) sfXC ON A!re ROPE sT cueao ro srv¢s amsN BATr� (xN xA. ANOO rc R ANWDR OrpLV aN i anrens Tl 11 71 INGIQIS ON S IFRS Z{ ]DLR / 6 irp —a ANaoRs ra -rd AREA a rYe� mrr[RS c a wAV g�cna I e -y (X.{, I WaWr uNDM n oEr BAdL`�!! WT.IxG� BAtlO1LL .—D A„ NC r+s ON D TBiS Os R E.— XArnNG ro NW¢L N uN xoN e' -10 DFI:P 1ApfH BASIL pD 6 BI.TM65 m B: NSErrrep BF1a BASE iLOa C1A55 DA RIPyrN E. 11�R5 idrs, µ0 ACA ALL SED� SOIL [OYPlPreO N ALCOIOANQUWM MF PIOIECr 1 sP61FlOATN]NS PWCA m CDEXT OF CM IN 11RNUr F1Bp YATIING = mXC SNALL BE �. ro WCEO N 1RENON aAawuEo eMUX eEO IYPK.4L am SECTION COIR FIBER MATTING DETAIL Xor m scuE PUNTxOS $HALL OMSO:T OR APPHDKO —1 OEICI ®N II.WAN6 RN6 COiAC1E0 FlLL N rZ Urls eAr«NNi W M -ne Tn) li sXMD tE ro — DzsTNC mP or eANx MANTAN EASING M N' NMLL eOrfN COR TFE t W MPs (ly DI qA. WN) o�w � fro I I 2A (TYP) CASANG —NM BAM(J \ ti i — =— �1N111L1 W11PACifD iA1 lIf A pN.RRI. Cif a.1A.FbdWl. . SOIL LIFT SECTION „TYPICAL NUTD10 SCAT£ PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION cupr � M111GATpN BANG M I d- A t I a n t l c N I 1 I ¢ A . r n n 1 I C � IGmiay Hy(n and Assoaates Inc - .� PR8IQWN mar CAN oeM]/rD • an,[cr FOR�3T C �� nD� Mx NsanRe. aNA. Au w mesa .A n.vx . W n.uW.A .r..wN vNr a w adN P.X.N w el:n"� .nxn n .. ..IW r a xwy -IWn ae Awsxgw .e DwYMM� REPAR DETAILS o.e D12m]aW 1 v 1 �HEADE ROCK FOOTER ROCK B KEY IN VANE TO BANK MINIMUM OF 3' AT AN ELEVATION EQUAL TO BANKFULL OR SLIGHTLY LOWER A POOL HEADER ROCK TYP SEE PR4ON FLOW ELEVATI 0 75' -1 0' BACKFILL, TYP Y CLASS A, B, a AND #57 STONE m EXCAVATED TRENCH FOR ROCK VANE CONSTRUCTION SECTION A -A / -POOL EXCAVATED PER DIRECTION OF ENGINEER PLAN VIEW STRUCTURE DATA TABLE REACH 1/3 2/3 BANKFULL BANKFULL WIDTH WIDTH 20 TO FOREST CREEK 36" 30 B UT1 � Y A m 'r FLOW CLASS A, B, AND #57 STONE fit, iLy ILTE FABRIC~ �HEADE ROCK FOOTER ROCK B KEY IN VANE TO BANK MINIMUM OF 3' AT AN ELEVATION EQUAL TO BANKFULL OR SLIGHTLY LOWER A POOL HEADER ROCK TYP SEE PR4ON FLOW ELEVATI 0 75' -1 0' BACKFILL, TYP Y CLASS A, B, a AND #57 STONE m EXCAVATED TRENCH FOR ROCK VANE CONSTRUCTION SECTION A -A / -POOL EXCAVATED PER DIRECTION OF ENGINEER PLAN VIEW STRUCTURE DATA TABLE REACH MINIMUM MEAN ROCK DIAMETER VANE ARM SLOPE FOREST CREEK 36" 4 -10% UT1 30" 4 -7% BANKFULL 0 75' -1 0' BACKFILL, TYP - CLASS A, B, - AND #57 STONE ROCK VANE DETAIL NOT TO SCALE SET HEADER ROCK BACK A MINIMUM OF 1/3 WIDTH OF THE FOOTER ROCK ABED XCAVATED POOL FOOTER ROCK, TYP ROCKS IN VANE ARM SHOULD NOT BE GAPPED OR HAVE ANY SIGNIFICANT SPACES FILTER FABRIC, TYP SEE TABLE FOR SLC 3e� FABRIC MIN SECTION B -B TIE VANE ARM INTO - BANKFULL ELEVATION - HEADER ROCK ROCK -ocu ROCKS IN VANE ARM SHOULD NOT•BE GAPPED OR HAVE ANY SIGNIFICANT SPACES NOTES 1 DEEPEST PART OF POOL TO BE IN LINE WITH WHERE VANE ARM TIES INTO BANKFULL 2 DO NOT EXCAVATE POOL TOO CLOSE TO FOOTER ROCK 3 CLASS "A" STONE CAN BE USED TO REDUCE VOIDS BETWEEN HEADERS AND FOOTERS 4 COMPACT BANKFULL TO EXTENT POSSIBLE OR AT THE DIRECTION OF THE ENGINEER 5 POOL DEPTH SHOULD BE 2 TO 3 TIMES BANKFULL DEPTH FLOOD PLAIN ELEVATION row s�o F� �0 �x� � do 'pJ = 11141, DEEP POOL ;,— ,,, —,,, DEPTH VARIES 6 " -2 0' -I I I- CROSS SEC'nON A -A VIEW TYPICAL PLAN VIEW TYPICAL TYPICAL VERNAL POOL NTS PRIMARY OUTLET LOCATION AT FLOOD PLAIN ELEVATION (LOCATION VARIES) ��OA wjsr �t 1 v- ory aRA F�f o ym � n ti Exhibit B: As -built Plans Pages 1 through 3 1 AL061 n111AM rLi fAIITYYTIMTJN6 uAT AAS WnM♦ I�G.r Ml All I L vRlsm. M,P G rIRYIxu ♦rMIM A♦ ARI nL 411Ma MnalI�DARMYM MVIMD \TNnTJNIt LAIl.IIAL IIA'IN NIL"ALCIN IAMAII1k0Mh I KWY snuu ♦nIT[AAAMI iASxin ♦DnMY1 rrn[�IIsN,lI UN.I]LLDUAII X1LNLMAUUA IA NLAINUMALNVLY o AMNJ♦n nx AAN�DIA MmISA MTIIANU♦N. Mlnnnu�I�\ R� fff JLLY LLU MHLiL2 ANIHMANIa UAILU Nus]snnU♦v MU,n♦DaF.0 tHDirnl wTaA ♦i me, ' *K \ 1L LY ULLLMBLN,SdI]BYAUNA L.ALLLMYA YLA R L -DN Ii CAllAMn rLS Lln♦ss Nl LiaM fRf' AWALW UAIIAHUWA UN INtS NI RVLY II, IILU III AUN INLANULIAA NI AILYL.AALLIN>NDIQ IV AYA AL Ap RI AAU IVN3 SUIIJIHUNIGIA IAL)AAUA ♦VU WIVLNIILALl EID W MN RNE r K fTlftREST (A ®L 1 ALPS CALLEMYN N C P L 5 R— 6ARFY THAI NIC N C GPO A, NO,F 9 VP°T11EAY (T CDDItdN. TES w0 BEARVlCS SHDw W RYS PLA, OR DOCUMC�L «ERE r — —.sap — c(NI ,Nuum SEIERNINED BY AN ACNAL CPS SURVEY PERFCNUEO DY uF Ml; 1 «IS PERFOAMEO ro Q.— C ECCC SDEG%icATWS AND M.i IN= (ROSS USLD WS -- SURVEY FIELD PROCEpURES COOK M TS M— ror VINE, lVP OERRMINED By LEAS/ SOIJARES ADJU I-YT 5 AIRYEY NAS _ PERFORMED U51«0 WE (I) IOPCM CPS WPER AE-- [ IN NCZ RM NEIAOM 4L ­—S .R BASED 43N NAD a3(200i) . nqE v.a u.r DA1asC �a w mws a mnox[xr �.r az rtvlVn ANp Al ELEVARONS ARE BASE- DN NAVO 8A / r �� mn[_roc Mw pr w+FSrt.rtD 2 ) ru vay.vu .ec.wwc euec Vru,rz ururr wr.xTS nar mu w .... .4 IA TYP AS -WILT \ CtNISTRUCTED RIFLER C t IbrLgnanoH ♦ LOCAn A(N°WLTLP WL AL t EAgLIU1T TYP ♦ VLTITED (FENCE ON) ♦ LISSINO FOR RNC COrvSEFVAUON EAN XE - 1191CAL O WAO / a ADOIrpvAl in 011E DN N E C DA-I nON fAUGUST OONSiNUC1ED ] SURVEYFIS RECD: -W M ORANGE —.11 111 rEry Q`COEEBS �J M15 RIFLE, !YP L LLL - MON L LLNNNNONAL MOME 4 M Z11.13 lot PP2 // / 0 WAD / / / / \,�^ _mom ♦ Ili � —a,� EV , O / '�P EzsnNc vIN co PRELB41NARY PLAT Not for Recordation, Conveyance or Sales o N _ IAOaw �... oA..,, /'_� CONSERVATION EASEMENT AS BUILT srwle J• _ a a a V m ALOIS CA DAYN '°m° "''"°" n A ,., FORREST CREEK RESTORATION CEDAR CI70VE TWP ORANGE CO NORTH CAROLINA FIELD WORK PERFORMED JUNE 2008 NAME OF CLIENT -- •""' /-- EARTHMARK MITIGA710N SERVICES LLC "I Vm - -- .upRr.w, New RoMIRIS/tT I nLUIII nLLlMYI PLn tTRT1ITTIUTTNtt MAT HAFDRAw11 Ip.R MY RYIFAA MtH.1 I AITIKAtVAY —1— IN Vp \TNATTMR MAT wnFnis.FRNp IN nc fDRpnITF wrtN THA FTnIp�Vlpt nP PRnfnl NHRI LA \D 0UI L LAIR1X01,I AI A N IPHILALOK IA U IIIA IAU LU01 %UL DA I A IAI UNMA I IUA I AOLA 1 K 01 RV LY a VILI`YRITH RnMO tiAF nNi�DlawmAS<M \IIRNIIVLLVIIVnTM F <InTRnit Iqi nV Fnt tNU inH pnrwn119nF ��,� RK L01tILL0 LAI IA LANIHMAR UAIW JL LY ULLLMOLN,'_IMIT BY ALIAS LALWA \APL =� R 1 L -2!N PPI i nLDtt CN.4MYV RR µAVRNVIRLw NIILU 111 A1101N Un11AISIAIL1LA- LIRVIV AURIH( ANULIOAFIAXLPLAAKD .p KAVU1011LnYNILL A AU IlM1 't)1U 1HIJNILIIA 1 ALl AAU A AV U'+V IV LIII ILILI lk� ' 4 PA �� Y t \ (vLFalrm AGPoWLiIFAI CR059HG \ \ Q \ e I \ 1 I L�G(iLE NAL \ \STA za.IL3 TG RO STA 11 pt13 T PP3 \ 2� F> TRIBUTARY PRELUMNARY PLAT Not for Recordation, Conveyance or Sales SBEETZI>FS CONSERVATION EASEMENT AS BUILT FORREST CREEK RESTORATION CEDAR GROVE TWP ORANGE GO NORTH CAROLINA FIELD WORK PERFORMED JUNE, 2008 NAME OF CLIENT EARTHMARK MITIGATION SERVICES LLC 7 OEN WALL (YEfEIATm) PPI i IxlLVmim\ waLnJIeAL (AV59HG sr LEr -a V 0 v m ALOIS 01111 Lr LAW =1IgYrt I4W 11010 N!L�f�O/ MC tR1� AOr/dM/ARYIRRT 1 N.oalnuaAlr\ rLZl LknrrrxnTTxa ruT ana cknw\1 \qR MY AUIL RRnakl \rtl(M1A\AITI nL4lNVNADr 1 '\DLRMY411JIYIM(1 \TNnTTXII L \IA IIN( IIM(H NAPIIILAL IXi —11 I'll I'D YOWYIMP TDnn�tnRDn\(AwmI TXX aTn\D.vDEwrRnrncLMIRLn\D ,ay. LJ/RITLULDAIAIRIUNMAIUa IAKLAIN UM\Ik \LY 1 rI tMY�IV'n \N>RnM11J\n nYXn RED �Y1TASt M \1)RNInN,Wnnn Rl MR ^' 01r 41Y6 nTl[ n DaNnl tvX \I Mm f LN YI)LU LAIIALAKIHMAXR BY AL =P� L �) JL LY ULLLMPLIL ?pU dY ALIN\LALLLM \a YL\ R WafKLN1Y \!L 1JI E\FF\D lau A. RLW UAI A\HUWR- I HIXM RVIY P 11LU 10 Hl)kIH LA X114NA8IAILPLARLL0IJ — AILXYXILM R AU 141J'Mldl IHUkIL11H I AL) AAU A AVIT W IY LXI I[J�L) DUAL 00 CRP. OWIDR WALL (YEGFTAlEO) Lma LDN°TIpNAL RI0EILE ] aTA IIMAI ro SrA 1]I+AD END Ld°IUWJAL sr�A° aiE +a ro PP4 srA Im.a y� G W I�� RiQ�.s 13D.OD / / Oi°59HG F� q \11Z oo YEG ° Ao PPS I 2 CULKPIID NIwLLJUPAL d X � I 2 ) \ O2 P o2�yr T PRELINUNARY PLAT Not for Recordation, Conveyance or Sales LD�I.D SRS 3oFs SGVL r a e e CONSERVAT pJ EASEMENT AS BUILT ALOIS CALLEMYN e We FORREST CREEK RESTORATION• CEDAR GROVE TWP ORANGE CO NORTH CAROLINA RELD WORK PERFORMED JUNE 2008 NAME OF CUENT EARlHMARK NLTLGARON SERVICES UC 1C AGYd�MWiKf TIM t -- � �- - "44-- - I RIT ';r►. FV ` ff - -�A ; #��•�r .,�� - - �- ate,.•,, . - - 06 09/2010 - y -I »oi,. FN - y -I »oi,. Before Photo 3 — View of Forrest Creek and tributary confluence IAfter Photo 3 — View of Forrest Creek and tributary confluence h5 _ �tl fi Photo 4 — During repair construction Photo 5 —Newly installed soils lifts and live stakes Photo 6 — Log vane installation Photo 7 —Newly installed live stakes, matting, and soil amendments at tributary confluence Photo 8 —Newly installed brush mattress Photo 9 — Bank repairs using soil lifts and live stakes Jt x eta • Y �L L y FT77 3Y Or Forrest Creek — MY5 (2012) ��I \ nd1eAssociates, Inc