NC0020401_Wasteload Allocation_19950420

NPDES DOCPJHENT SCANNING COVER SHEET
NPDES
Permit:
NC0020401
Hickory - Northeast WWTP
Document Type:
Permit Issuance
..Wasteload
Allocation
Authorization to Construct (AtC)
Permit Modification
Speculative Limits
201 Facilities Plan
Instream Assessment (67B)
Environmental Assessment (EA)
Permit
History
Document Date:
April 20, 1995
This document is printed on reuse paper - ignore airy
content on the reverse side

NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION
PERMIT NO.: NC0020401
PERMI FI'EE NAME:
FACILITY NAME:
Facility Status: Existing
City of Hickory
Northeast WWTP
Permit Status: Renewal
Major Minor
Pipe No.: 001
Design Capacity: 6.0 MGD
Domestic (% of Flow): 97 %
Industrial (% of Flow): 3 %
Comments:
see staff report, region suggests BPJ limits for this facility and thinks
they can meet them (15 SOD and 4 ammonia)
RECEIV NG STREAM: the Catawba River
\AS -IL
Class: WS-W and B
Sub -Basin: 03-08-32
Ftt.);4.C.6 E
Reference USGS Quad: D13SE (please attach)
County: Catawba
Regional Office: Mooresville Regional Office
Previous Exp. Date: 6/30/94 Treatment Plant Class: class IV
Classification changes within three miles:
no change
Requested by:
Ra%dy Kepler
Date:
Prepared b: n/ Date:
Reviewed by: /t,L c. ?')o /1'L -0n-- Date:
12/21/93
Modeler
Date Rec.
#
1 MA)
t 2I Za-1et
1'10 3
Drainage Area (mi2): 1,225 Average Streamflow (cfs): n/a
s7Q10 (cfs): 60 Minimum Instantaneous Release
Toxicity Limits:
Chronic (Ceriodaphnia) P / F 13
January, April, July, and October
Upstream Location: near Hiahwav 27 bridge
Downstream Location: -. 1 mile below outfall (by boat)
Parameters: temperature, dissolvea oxygen, fecal coliform,
conductivity
Special instream monitoring locations or monitoring frequencies:
Wasteflow (MGD):
BOD5 (mg/I):
NH3N (mg/I):
DO (mg/I):
TSS (mg/I):
Fecal Col. (/100 mi):
pH (SU):
Residual Chlorine (µg/I):
TP (mg/I):
TN (mg/I):
Cadmium (µg/I):
Copper (µg/1):
Mercury (µg/I):
Silver (µg/I):
Zinc (µg/I):
Phenols (4/1):
Monthly Average
15
monitor
0.09
monitor
monitor
7.5
6.0
30
monitor
monitor
30
200
6-9
monitor
monitor
monitor
Daily Maximum
Daily Maximum
Daily Maximum
Daily Maximum
Daily Maximum
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other
than trace amounts.
Purarn

Facility Name:
NPDES No.:
Type of Waste:
Facility Status:
Permit Status:
FACT SHEET FOR WASTELOAD ALLOCATION
City of Hickory -
NC0020401
97 % Domestic
Existing
Renewal
Receiving Stream: Catawba River
Stream Classifications and B
Subbasin:
County:
Regional Office:
Requestor:
Date of Request:
Topo Quad:
03-08-32
Catawba
Mooresville t ,
Lucas
12/22/93
D13SE
Request # 7703
Northeast WWTP
3 % Industial
Wasteload Allocation Summary
(approach taken, correspondence with region, EPA, etc.)
Stream Characteristic:
USGS #
Date:
Drainage Area (nu2):
Summer 7Q10 (cfs):
Winter 7Q10 (cfs):
Average Flow (cfs):
30Q2 (cfs):
IWC (%):
1,225
60
Minimum
Instantaneous Release
13 %
BOD5 and TSS violations in January and February 1994.
TSS violations in March and April 1993 and December 1992.
High total phosphorus and total nitrogen effluent levels.
There are no other dischargers known between the discharge point and a hydroelectric dam (Oxford Dam)
located —8.0 miles below the point of discharge. Recommendation of 15.0 mg/1 BOD5 and 4.0 mg/1 NH3-N
limits per Mooresville Regional Office recommendation for dischargers to lakes, (whether facility is
expanding or just renewing). Currently, Instream Asses§mentilk has no justification for implementing these
limits changes during a renewal. (i.t.)i4k-ocA. QaS i o
SECOND FACT SHEET SENT OUT
This facility has a tape manufacturer as an SIU, (Sanford Tape Mills). The manufacturer uses
toluene in its process and recycles its solvents; Hickory receives the bottom sludge from the
recycling basin. Therefore, Pretreatment and IAU recommends continuation of an APAM
requirement and toluene monitoring per LTMP.
Special Schedule Requirements attior7Jal comments from Reviewers:
r.� e. ,k,u,. s' po '+¢oa() 114A-Yl- r,1ox Q1. a-ct,oelp-1,,, 4 Ai
eitx
.057,4 *- 04,t-)•r -L. -L.._.. �Voo'n-J 07- A
�,f- .��o-to hdo�iz
Z f - ,C' ' I '($C o.J 4Z7z 4 ,Pi"/ro,e/,x po/AJT.
I L.:
cD
Recommended
Reviewed by
Instream Assessment:
Regional Supervisor:
Permits & Engineering:
Farrell Keough --
Date: ZD mom) �945
Date:
Date: //`7/ F-C--
Date:
N.G. DEPT. OF
aENVIRONMENT. HEALTH,
171'/S & NATURAL RESOURCES
RETURN TO TECHNICAL SUPPORT BY: APR 1 9 1995
MAR 30 1995
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEME;i1
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE

CONVENTIONAL PARAMETERS
Existing Limits:
Monthly Average
Monthly Weekly Daily
Wasteflow (MGD): 6.0
BOD5 (mg/1): 30 45
NH3N (mg/1): monitor
DO (mg/1): monitor
TSS (mg/1): 30 45
Fecal Coliform (/1100 ml): 200 * 400 *
pH (SU): I 6 - 9
Residual Chlori0 (14/1): monitor
Oil & Grease (mg/1): not required
Total Phosphorus (mg/1): monitor
Total Nitrogen (mg/1): monitor
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts.
* These limitations apply only during the period of May 1 to September 30.
During all Wier months, the limitations shall be: Monthly Average: 1,000 / 100 ml
and Weekly Average: 2,000 / 100 ml
Recommended Limits:
Monthly Average
Monthly Weekly Daily
Wasteflow (MGD): 6.0
BOD5 (mg/1): 30 45
NH3N (mg/1): monitor
DO (mg/1): monitor
TSS (mg/1): 30 45
Fecal Coliform (/ 00 ml): 200 400
pH (SU): 6 - 9
Residual Chlorine (µg/1): monitor
Oil & Grease (m ): not required
Total Phosphorus (mg/1): monitor
Total Nitrogen (mg/1): monitor
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts.
Parameters) affected: Limits Changes Due To:
Fecal Coliform
current regulations
(explanation of any modifications to past modeling analysis including new flows, rates, field data,
interacting discharges)
(See page 4 for miscellaneous and special conditions, if applicable)

Rxisting Limits
Arsenic (µg/1):
Cadmium (4/1):
Chromium (µg/1):
Copper (1):
Cyanide (pg/1):
Lead (pg/1):
Mercury (µg/1):
Nickel (µg/1):
Silver (14/1):
Zinc (µg/1):
Phenols (4/1):
Toluene (pg/1):
TOXICS/METALS
Daily Maximum
monitor per LTMP *
monitor
monitor
monitor
37
monitor
monitor
186
monitor
monitor
monitor
monitor per LTMP *
Recommended Limits Daily Maximum
Arsenic (µg/1): monitor per LTMP *
Cadmium (µg/i): 15
Chromium (4/1): monitor per LIMP *
Copper 4ig/1): monitor per NPDES *
Cyanide (pg/1): '---- _ monitor per LIMP *
Lead (pg/1): - - - - - ---- monitor per LIMP *
Mercury (µg/1): 0.09
Nickel (4/1): monitor per LTMP *
Silver (1tg/1): -- monitor per NPDES *
Zinc (4/1): _ _ _ monitor per NPDES *
Phenols (µg/1): 7.5
Toluene (µg/1): monitor per LTMP *
* Long Term Monitori•ng Plan (LTMP) through Pretreatment or monitor through NPDES Permit
Arsenic:
Cadmium:
Chromium:
Copper:
Cyanide:
Lead:
Mercury:
Nickel:
Silver:
Zinc:
Phenols:
Toluene:
Max. Cw
Allow le Cw
Max. Cw
Allow le Cw
Max. Pired Cw
Allowable Cw
Max. Pined Cw
Allowable Cw
Max. Pred Cw
Allowable Cw
Max. Pred Cw
Allowable Cw
Max. Pred Cw
Allowable Cw
Max. Pred Cw
Allowable Cw
Max. Pred Cw
Allowable Cw
Max. Pred Cw
Allowable Cw
Max. Pred Cw
Allowable Cw
Max. Pred Cw
Allowable Cw
0.0 18 out of 18 data point less than 5.0 µg/1
372.6 monitor through Pretreatment LTMP
40 28 out of 29 data point less than 5.0 µg/l [more than half the data less than 0.5 µg/1]
14.9 positive value of 10 µg/1 in January, 1994 reason for limit
67.5 16 data point less than 5.0 14/1 and 11 data point less than 50.0 mil (29 total data pts)
372.5 monitor through Pretreatment LTMP
380.7 many values above detection level
52.2 monitor through NPDES Permit
12.6 66 out of 69 data point less than 5.0 µg/1
37.3 monitor through Pretreatment LTMP
67.5 11 data point less than 5.0 µg/1 and 10 data point less than 50.0 µg/1(29 total data pts)
186.3 monitor through Pretreatment LTMP
0.84 25 out of 28 data point less than 0.2 µg/1 [3 values above detection level per LIMP]
0.09 Limit through NPDES Permit
75.2 22 data point less than 5.0 µg/1 and 47 data point less than 50.0 µg/1(70 total data pts)
655.7 monitor through Pretreatment LTMP
16.2 many values above detection level
0.4 Monitor through NPDES Permit
3,322 many values above detection level
372.6 monitor through NPDES Permit
165 28 out of 30 data point less than 5.0 µg/1
7.5 Limit through NPDES Permit
74.3 about 50/50 between less than and above the detection level
82 monitor through Pretreatment LTMP

MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION & SPECIAL CONDITIONS I bc,4+16� ,N t, ,c-}5 �tx,
Adequacy of Existing Treatment t N wrdci tr'�
kE
Has the facility demonstrated the ability to meet the proposed new limits with existing treatment facilities? -- d„ .
Yes No
If no, which parameters cannot be met?
Would a "phasing in" of the new limits be appropriate? Yes No
bmii G' P go v �c(,;.
jda•,�,
If yes, please provide a schedule (and basis for that schedule) with the regional office d' ar A�
recommendations: eft{ r-
OZ
F'N/al d,bloN w„,
pPirk4
t) J kl i lc
oW .1,
(116 rN�(vcf€
clgk, `Vtt;v
If no, why not?
Type of Toxicity Test
Existing Limit:
Recommended Limit
Monitoring Schedule:
TOXICS
Chronic (Ceriodaphnia) P / F Toxicity Test
13 %
13 %
January, April, July, and October
Parameter(s) are water quality limited. For some parameters, the available load capacity of the immediate
receiving water will be consumed. This may affect future water quality based effluent limitations for additional
dischargers within this portion of the watershed.
OR
No parameters are water quality limited, but this discharge may affect future allocations.
INSTREAM MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Upstream Location: nebrequired Meta fiW invV
Downstream Location: N DU' tze.�9u) tl-r)44J1 —
Parameters: pp, Te v>ti Co Cre cal Coafoi n^
Special instream monitoring locations or monitoring frequencies:
Q t/toU5 tN3tQeAap‘ cxtstA wA .�
tMtM Ntr r befog along Q bp
bind-. wt ll 2 ut 2c -r L pt� egg _s
Q1 ao,,,,e, lactottu,'.►
< t• Man) cok.ntedJr on)
1n - -s PiaeG.
ut2tcc� !Tit,* f
Special Instructions or Conditions
Wasteload sent to EPA? (Major) (Y or N)
(If yes, then attach updated evaluation of facility, including toxics spreadsheet, modeling analysisif modeled at
renewal, and description of how it fits into basinwide plan)
Additional Information attached? (Y or N) If yes, explain with attachments.
ct 4I tt,,

Facility Name Hickory - Northeast Waste Water Treatment Plant Permit # NC0020401-001
CHRONIC TOXICITY PASS/FAIL PERMIT LIMIT (QRTRLY)
1
The effluent discharge shall at no time exhibit chronic toxicity using test procedures outlined in:
1.) The North Carolina Ceriodaphnia chronic effluent bioassay procedure (North Carolina Chronic
Bioassay Proced ' - Revised *September 1989) or subsequent versions.
The effluent con ntration at which there may be no observable inhibition of reproduction or significant
mortality is 13 % (defined as treatment two in the North Carolina procedure document). The permit
holder shall perform Quarterly monitoring using this procedure to establish compliance with the permit
condition. The first test will be performed after thirty days from the effective date of this permit during
the months of 4an., Apr., Jul., and Oct. Effluent sampling for this testing shall be performed at
the NPDES permitted final effluent discharge below all treatment processes.
All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent
Discharge Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the month in which it was performed, using the parameter code
TGP3B. Additionally, DEM Form AT-1 (original) is to be sent to the following address:
Attention: Environmental Sciences Branch
North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, N.C. 27607
Test data shall be complete and accurate and include all supporting chemical/physical measurements
performed in association with the toxicity tests, as well as all dose/response data. Total residual chlorine
of the effluent toxicity sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for disinfection of
the waste stream.
Should any single quarterly monitoring indicate a failure to meet specified limits, then monthly
monitoring will begin immediately until such time that a single test is passed. Upon passing, this
monthly test requirement will revert to quarterly in the months specified above.
Should any test data from this monitoring requirement or tests performed by the North Carolina Division
of Environmental Management indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be re-
opened and modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
NOTE: Failure tol achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum control
organism survival and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test and will require
immediate retesting(within 30 days of initial monitoring event). Failure to submit suitable test results will
constitute noncompliance with monitoring requirements.
7Q10 0.0 cfs
Permitted Flow 0.675 MGD
IWC 100 %
Basin & Sub -basin 03-03-04
Receiving Stream Canal Creek
County Halifax
QCL PIF Version 9/91
Recommende y:
Date v NtQt,�
Farrell

Facility Name:
NPDES No.:
Type of Waste:
Facility Status:
Permit Status:
Receiving Stream:
Stream Classification:
Subbasin:
County:
Regional Office:
Requestor:
Date of Request:
Topo Quad:
City of Hickory - Northeast WWTP
NC0020401
97 % Domestic
Existing
Renewal
Catawba River
WS IV and B
03-08-32
Catawba
Mooresville
Kepler
12/22/93
D 13 SE
3 % Industial
Request # 7703
Stream Characteristic:
USGS #
Date:
Drainage Area (mi2):
Summer 7Q10 (cfs):
Winter 7Q10 (cfs):
Average Flow (cfs):
30Q2 (cfs):
IWC (%):
1988
1,225
60 Minimum Instantaneous
60 Minimum Instantaneous
60 Minimum Instantaneous
60 Minimum Instantaneous
13
Existing WLA checked:
Staff Report:
Topo checked:
USGS Flows confirmed:
IWC Spreadsheet:
Stream Classification:
Nutrient Sensitivity:
Instream Data:
1976 - 1979: proposed to discharge in many locations with a final discharge point established to be in Falling Creek, w/ a 7Q10 of
0.8 cfs. Note on final WLA indicates that pipe is extended such that discharge is to Lake Hickory, but return note indicates that
location of pipe is such that the 7Q10 would still remain the same. This discharge was modeled using what looks to be field
data and reaches ran up to about the lake itself. The recommended limits were: 5.0 mg/I BOD5, 2.0 mg/1 NH3-N, 5.0 mg/l
dissolved oxygen, 30 mg/I TSS, 200 / 100 ml fecal coliform, and 6 - 9 SU pH.
1983: The discharge location was 0'd to Lake Hickory and a lake model run was completed with recommended limits of:
18.0 mg/I BOD5, 5.0 mg/I NH3-N, 5.0 mg/I dissolved oxygen, 30 mg/I TSS, 200 / 100 ml fecal coliform, and 6 - 9 SU pH.
1985: remodeled with lake model for summer and winter limits; a bioassay indicated no toxicity. A field study was proposed and
noted on Fact Sheet that this study could change future limits. The recommended limits were: 22.0 [30] mg/I BOD5, 18.0 [no
limit] mg/I NH3-N, 5.0 mg/I dissolved oxygen, 30 mg/I TSS, 200 / 100 ml fecal coliform, and 6 - 9 SU pH, [summer / winter]
1986: expansion to 6.4 mgd was permitted with limits for extended pipe with diffuser into Lake Hickory. The recommended limits
were: 30.0 mg/l BOD5, no limit NH3-N, no limit dissolved oxygen, 30 mg/l TSS, 1,000 / 100 ml fecal coliform, and 6 - 9 SU pH.
1988: numerous industrial facilities were connected to facility. Expansion was about 50% complete. Continuation of Secondary
Limits were recommended along with limits on nickel and cyanide, and effluent monitoring for phenols, copper, zinc, mercury,
cadmium, chromium, lead, and silver. Extensive Instream Monitoring was required.
DMR's
BODs and TSS violations in January and February 1994.
TSS violations in March and April 1993 and December 1992,
High total phosphorus and total nitrogen effluent levels.
Staff Report Put itallA-�E i <Y,,.�- `thnt I4JON � I�r:^: 5s7n� bl&4, 61aC., .
"There are no other dischargersknownbetween the discharge point and a hydroelectric dam (Oxford Dam) located -8.0 miles below
the point of discharge." Recommendation of 15.0 and 4.0 limits; this is a consistent Mooresville recommendation for all dischargers to
lakes, (whether facility is expanding or just renewing). There is currently no justification for implementing these recommended limits
changes.
This facility has a tape manufacturer as an SIU, (Sanford Tape Mills). The manufacturer uses toluene in its process and recycles its
solvents; Hickory receives the bottom sludge from the recycling basin. Therefore, Pretreatment recommends continuation of an APAM
requirement and toluene monitoring per LTMP and I will recommend TSB concurrence. Pretreatment concurs with the toxics
recommendations we have made, (19 September, 1994)
SI U's
North Hickory Dyeing & Processing
Ellis Hosiery Mill, Inc
Frye Regional Medical Center
Hickory Dyeing & Winding Company
Colorific Dyeing & Finishing
Shuford Mills, Inc - Tape Division
Hyalyn, Ltd
Hickory Printing Company
H K Research
Efflerint Considerations
yarn dyeing
hosiery mfg
health care
dyed yarn in various forms
hosiery mfg
mfg pressure sensative tape - refer above in notes -
Pottery
printed products
polyester gel coat

Existing Limits:
Monthly Averages
Monthly Weekly Daily
Wasteflow (MGD): 6.0
BOD5 (mg/I): 30 45
NH3N (mg/I): monitor
DO (mg/1): monitor
TSS (mg/1): 30 45
Fecal Col. (/100 ml): 200 ' 400 *
pH (SU): 6 - 9
Residual Chlorine (µg/I): monitor
Oil & Grease (mg/1): nr
TP (mg/I): monitor
TN (mg/1): monitor
Nickel (µg/I): 186.0
Cyanide (µg/I): 37.0
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts.
" These limitations apply only during the period of May 1 to September 30. During all other months,
the limitations shall be: Monthly Average: 1,000 / 100 ml and Weekly Average: 2,000 / 100 ml
Upstream Location: upstream (2EcomrrirJd : E{w tz}) i t t�A1N
Downstream Location: downstream( ,rnmr,c�r►a b
: t.5 ,,lealou.) Hukw., tz1.1 Ikdtvsttd
Parameters: Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen, Fecal Colllorm, Conductivity, ae vr0igtt040 pp
[ TKN, NO2 + NO3, Total Phosphorus, NH3-N, and chlorophyll - a ] " stAa0
Stream samples shall be collected three times per week during June, July, August, and September BAfts.
and once per week during the remaining months of the year. u5ys = 5�1- 404?) 1%5 as
" Instream monitoring for these parameters is to be taken weekly in June, July, August, and September only. 14�� d,tho cotlLktp/a
`t km Af c- /a ( A[5_1) TIC
LTM P
Arsenic: , Max. Pred Cw 0.0 x .18 data points less than 5.0 µg/I NO tltfjib-1raw5 R_ct,.
Allowable Cw 372.6 . ✓delete NPDES requirement .5tq., gtLd
C7.8 0JT 0-5- Z-g1
Cadmium:' Max. Pred Cw 40.0 x /28 data points less than at most 5.0 µg/I [ more than half of the less than 1-I,A,„ Lit?
Allowable Cw 14.9 values were less than 0.5 µg/l : Pretreatment monitoring ] AniJ dr7G_ (
Positive value of 10.0 µg/I in January, 1994 dA N"cg
Limit in NPDES Permit
-r1,.-
Chromium: Max. Pred Cw 67.5 x ✓16 data points less than 5.0 µg/I and 11 data points less than 50.0 µg/I t4,'�/ 5 04CE- a c,
Allowable Cw 372.5 delete NPDES requirement Wttt ,...0. bt
Copper:,, Max. Pred Cw 380.7 x many hits IN fl l+a� zitkPo
Allowable Cw 52.2 ,./ monitor in NPDES Permit rtkis AR-G'A t `(
itc
Cyanide: Max. Pred Cw 12.6 x ✓66 data points less than 5.0 µg/1 3 hits from 1993 - 1994 1k16-1e..4,1M,. 14
0
124±7" t'''1A-tc,,,r6 14t?'
Allowable Cw 37.3 delete NPDES requirement
Lead: Max. Pred Cw 67.5`' x ✓11 data points less than 5.0 µg/I and 10 data points less than 50.0 µg/1 UM
Allowable Cw 186.3` numerous hits c,d
delete NPDES requirement
Mercury: Max. Pred Cw 0,84' x ✓ 25 data points less than 0.2 µg/I 3 hits in attached LTMP data
Allowable Cw 0.09-- ✓Limit in NPDES Permit
Nickel: Max. Pred Cw 75.2/ x 22 data points less than 5.0 µg/I and 47 data points less than 50.0 µg/I
Allowable Cw 655.7- v delete NPDES requirement
Silver: Max. Pred Cw 16.2 " x numerous positive values above the allowable action level
Allowable Cw 0.4 -'monitor in NPDES Permit
Zinc:. Max. Pred Cw 3,322 x numerous positive values above the allowable action level
Allowable Cw 372.6 monitor in NPDES Permit
Phenols:: Max. Pred Cw 165 x 28 data points less than 5.0 µg/I the two hits were:
Allowable Cw 7.5 50 µg/I in February, 1994 and 10 µg/I in September, 1993
Limit in NPDES Permit
Toluene: Max. Pred Cw 74.3 x . about 50 /50 for positive values to less than 1.0 µg/I
Allowable Cw 82.0 monitor per LTMP
Hickory - Northeast Waste Water Treatment Plant NC0020401

WIIOLE EFFLUENT TOXICITY TESTING O]SELF-MONITORING SUMMARY] Mon, Dec 19, 1994
FACILITY JLEOUIHI11MI}'NI' YEAR JAN Pm MAR APR
IIAI.II'AX WWII' I'1111M CIIR I.IM:1,1% 00 „- _
NC0066192AJ01 Begin: I/12/93 1'nxrycncy: Q I'/P A JAN AI'R JUL OCT NuiCump:SINUII! 111 - -
Counly:lL&LIFAX kcgion: RRO Subbuin: ROA08 92 - - - _ -
PF:0.075 Special- - - -- - - -
7Q10:0.70 1WC(%):14.0 Onkr: 93 - PASS - NMPASS - - PASS
D4 PASS PASS
- PASS - - PASS
11AMllil' WW1 'I' PERM CIIR LIM:38% B0 - - - - -
FAIL
NC0047562/001 Dcgin:12/1/93 Frequency: Q P/F A JAN APR JUL OCI' NonComp:SINGI Ji 01 - - - - - - PASS -,- -
County:RICUIMOND Region: FRO Subbasin: YADI6 - PA- SS - FAIL PASS - >100 02 B8.8 - .100 .100- -
PF: Lo Special - - - - -
7Q10:2.5 IWC(%):38.27 Omer: 93 PASS - - PASS - - PASS PASS - -
94 PASS - - - - PASS - -
PASS - - PASS - -
PASS
IIAVE.00K WW'I'I' I'I(ItM (AIR LIM:90% III 41 1.5 OR 1.9MQD 00 PAIL PASS bt
NC0021253/001 Begin:5/1/94 Frequency: P/F A JAN APR JUL OCTNoncom SINGIJ3 01 PASS FAIL FAIL PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS
Q F•PASS bt,PASS
County:CItAVEN Region:WARO Subbasin:NEU10 92 PASS -- -- - PASS
PF:1.50 Special 03 FALL - FAIL - - PASS - - PASS
7QI0:0.00 1WC(%):I00.00 Order: 94 PASS - - PASS - - PASS - - PASS
- PASS - - FAIL FAIL PASS PASS
IIAYISVILE WWIP PERM C11R LIM:18%; 23% 41 EXP TO .097 90 NR PASS
NC0026697/001 Begin:I/1/93 Ftalucncy: Q P/F A FEB MAY AUG NOV NotiComp:SINGI.E 91 PASS - bl - - bl
Comity:CLAY ItrOh�w AI(O Suld,.alu: IIIW01 u1 PAS:tl - PASS,PASS - - PASS
PE: 0.072 Special PAiln 1•AI:!:
03 PASS
7Q10: 0.50 IWC(%): 18.9 Order: 94 - PA- SS - - NI FAIL PASS- PASS
PASS - - PASS
MAY JIIN 1111. AIIG SIP OCT NOV
I IINDIhISON CO. SCIIOQI S PERM CIIR LIM:13%(GRAB)
NC(K1 0ll(N01 •llcgiu:9/I19I Victim -my: Q 1'/I' A JAN AI'I( 1111. (X71'
County: IIIiNDI RSON Region: ARO Subbasin: l•7RU02
PE: 0.0099 Special
7Q10: 0.1 IWC(%):13 On1er:
90 - -
Nou('oi„P: UI --- -.- _
92 Ni Nl
- NI Nil PASS FAIL PASS - -
93 FAIL NR NR FAIL FAIL PASSSIG II
- - - PASS PASSIL- -
94 PASS
PASS - - H FAIL
IIENDIJ(SUN NW BUSH CRK WWII' PERM CIIR LIM :90% 90 FAIL FAIL
NC0020559/001 Begin:4/1/92 Frequency: +, , + - FAIL FAIL FAIL - FAIL, F PASS FAIL FAIL FAIL
I 7 0 WI' A MAR 1lIN SLI DEC Nuu('unycSlN[iIJ. 01 FAIL FAIL FAIL PASS FA11.,4.0 PASS,P PAII. FAIL
County; VANCI1 Region: kkO Subbasin: ROAU6 92 FAIL PASS FAIL FAIT. PASS FAIT.
PP:4.14 Special PASS FAIL PASS FAILASS,FAIL 1 AIL 1-AIL FAIL FAIL FAIL FAIL,FAIL
(x JOC:6/88-3/1/96 CIIK P/F MONIT Q 9096 W!A 03 FAIL PASS FAIL FAIL PASS FAIL FAIL
7Q10: 0.20 [WC(%):96.97 Order:94 PASS LATE.PASS FAILat FAIL PASS PASS FAIL
PASS FAIL <12.5 94.86,PASS PASS PASS FAIL FAIL
IIENDERSONVILI1i WWFP PERM CIIR LIM:22%; 35% 11; 41 6MGD y 90 FAIL NR
NC0025534I001 Begin:9/I/93 F )+ bl PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS - - LATE bt
Frequency: Q '/I• A NOV FEBIL'D MAY AUG Noncom SINGl1. 91 PASS FAIL PASS PASS _
County:lIFNOFI2SON Region: ARO Subbasin: FRB02 92 - PASS - - PASS
PF:3.2 Special - - PASS - - PASS - PASS
7QI0:40.0 IWC(%):11.01 Order: 93 - PASS - PASS PASS - - PASS -
94 - PASS - - - PASS -
PASS - - PASS
I IER7"L R[N'1-Al. CAR FACII,ffY 1'EKM CIIR LIM:90% B0
NC0084000/O01 Ilogiu:9/1/94 Frequency: Q 1'/II A JAN AI'R JUL OCT NonCon,p:SIN(;IJi 91
County:MECKLENBURG Region: MR0 Subbasin:CfB34 92
PI': 0.0144 Special 93
7Q10: 0.0 IWC(%): 100 Order:
PASS
- bt FAIL PASS
I'AUI(
PASS
94
IIICKORY•111iNRY FORK WW11' PERM CIIR LIM:26%; IF I'P 9MGD CIIR LIM 34% Y 90 - PASS FAIL PASS PASS(a) PASS PASS PASS FAIL FAIL PASS PASS
NC0040797/001 Begin:1/1/94 Frequency: Q P/F A NOV FEB MAyAUG NonComp:S1NGlii 91 PASS PASS
- PASS - - PASS -
County:CATAWBA Region:MRO Subhasin:CID35 FAIL PASS
92 - PASS - PASS FAIL - -
PI'. 6 on •yt'•.1•1 RI w'. IV UU9.1 0/1(9 r. I. J ('1114 MI 'NUM. 19,Ja,19.1, u:1 - FAH l'All I All I All I All l'AI:I( I All ,1'All I'Alltt(.( PASS I ASSll 'AI:I1 •.-
7Q10' 24.90 IWC(%):27.19 (("lef: 13XJAJ0) ._,
U4 --• FAIL PASS LAIL- <13.0 22.5 02 Itl
IIICKORY•N.E.WWIP ,: -•• 15.0
1 ERM CIIR LIM:I3% V 90 PASS PASS PASS -
NC0020101/001 Dcgin:8VI/89 Frequency: Q PA' A JAN APR JUL OCI' NonComp: 01 PASS - - - - - PASS
County:('ATAWBA keg' :MHO 5ohIaaia: C11132 - - PASS - - PASS - - PASS - U2 - PASS PASS PAIL PASS PASS
P1+:6.00 Special 93 PASS - -
7Q10:60.00 IWC(%):13.4 Order:- - P[R/ASS - - PASS - PASS - -
94 PASS - - PASS - - NPASS -- - PASS
0 2 consecutive failures = significant nonconipliantx Y 1're 1990 Data Available
LEGEND:
PERM = Permit Requirement LLF= Administrative Letter - Target Frequency = Monitoring frequency: Q- Quarterly; M- Monthly; DM- Bimonthly; SA- Semiannually; A- Annually; OWD- Only when discharging; D. Discontinued monitoring requirement; IS• Conducting independent study
Begin = First month inquired 7Q10 = Receiving stream low Dow criterion (eft) A = quarterly monitoring increases to monthly upon single failure Months that testing must occur • ex. JAN,AI'R JUL,OCF NonComp = Current Compliance Requirement
I'F= Permitted flow (MGD) IWC%= Insucwn waste concentration P/F = Pd gAC = Acute CI R
= Chronic
Data Notation: f • Fathead Minnow; • - Ceriodaphnia sp.: my - Mvsid ahtimo; ChV - Chronic value; P - Mortalitychronic
tof staled percentage at highest concentration: at - Performed by DL'M Tot Eva! Group: bt - Dad test
Rcponing Notation: - = Data not required; NR - Not reposed; ( ) - Beginning of Quarter Facility Activity Status: 1 - Inactive, N - Newly Issucd(I'o construct); II • Active but not discharging; t•Morc data available for month in question SIG = ORC signature needed
26

Hickory - Northeast Waste Water Treatment Plant NC0020401
5�t-
Upstream:
location unknown-
Al : t;e... li W h t t.-i- tr.td c._
Date
Temp
DO
Saturation
pH BOD Fecal
Conduct
NH3
TKN
NO2 + 3
T - phos
chlr - a
phenols
NI
CN
Cu
Zn
Hp
Cd
Cr
Pb
5-Jul-94
28
8.6
110%
6.5 < 2 31
75
0.8
6-Jul-94
28
6.5
839'
6.5 3.6 6
73
7-Jul-94
28
5.0
64%
6.3 < 2 16
75
< 1
< 0.1
0.02
11-Jul-94
27
5.0
63%
7.0 <2 91
75
0.14
12-JuI-94
27
4.5
56%
6.2 < 2 9
75
< 0.5
< 0.1
0.03
5.14
14-Jul-94
27
4.5
56%
6.5 < 2 17
75
18-Ju1-94
27
3.5
44%
6.9 < 2 58
75
0.15
19-JuI-94
27
4.1
51 %
7.0 < 2 9
75
< 0.5
< 0.1
0.03
6.54
21-Jul-94
24
6.5
77%
6.5 < 2 7
75
0.24
< 0.01
< 0.005
< 0.005
0.002
0.01
< 0.0002
0.001
< 0.005
< 0.005
25-JuI-94
27
4.5
56%
6.4 < 2 13
75
0.18
0.7
< 0.1
0.04
12.4
26-Jul-94
28
7.2
92%
6.5 < 2 15
50
28Jul-94
26
6.8
84%
6.2 < 2 18
85
1-Jun-94
23
6.5
76%
7.5 < 2 10
55
0.13
2-Jun-94
23
6.5
76%
7.0 < 2 5
55
3-Jun-94
24
7.5
89%
7.0 2.3 89
50
<1.0
<0.1
0.25
�1 9.1
6-Jun-94
24
6.5
77%
6.2 < 2 < 1
55
< 0.1
( `----
7-Jun-94
24
9.2
109%
6.6 < 2 28
50
9-Jun-94
24
8.0
95%
6.2 < 2 8
55
< 1.0
< 0.1
0.03
13.72
13-Jun-94
24
9.5
113%
6.5 <2 3
55
<0.15
14-Jun-94
24
8.5
101%
6.5 <2 17
55
<0.5
<0.1
0.02
12.78
16-Jun-94
27
6.5
82%
6.4 <2 56
55
20-Jun-94
27
9.0
113%
7.6 < 2 < 1
55
0.19
< 1.0
< 0.1
0.03
15.96
21-Jun-94
27
8.9
112%
7.6 <2 8
55
23-Jun-94
29
8.0
104%
7.5 <2 <1
65
27-Jun-94
25
6.0
73%
6.2 7.1 122
75
0.44
28-Jun-94
24
7.1
84%
6.3 <2 23
72
30-Jun-94
27
7.3
92%
6.2 <2 60
77
2-Sep-93
28
6.6
84%
7.0 2 7
68
< 0.11
< 1.0
< 0.1
0.01
12.95
< 0.01
< 0.05
< 0.005
0.24
1.693
< 0.0002
0.008
< 0.05
< 0.05
7-Sep-93
27
6.0
75%
6.9 < 2 22
70
< 0.12
<1.0
<0.1
<0.01
17.54
8-Sep-93
27
5.8
73%
7.4 < 2 9
75
9-Sep-93
27
6.8
85%
6.3 < 2 3
73
13-Sep-93
26
6.6
81%
6.5 < 2 1
71
0.11
<1.0
0.1
0.03
12.27
14-Sep-93
26
6.5
80%
6.4 < 2 2
74
16-Sep-93
26
6.9
85%
6.6 < 2 1
85
20-Sep-93
26
7.0
86%
6.1 < 2 2
75
<0.1
<1.0
<0.1
0.01
17.74
21-Sep-93
26
6.8
84%
6.4 <2 3
78
23-Sep-93
25
6.1
74%
6.7 < 2 3
83
27-Sep-93
25
5.9
71%
6.7 <2 3
78
<0.1
<1.0
<0.1
0.02
14.78
28-Sep-93
24
6.0
71%
6.9 < 2 < 1
75
30-Sep-93
24
6.1
72%
6.7 < 2 4
74
2-Aug-93
30
7.2
95%
6.5 2.9 1
70
< 0.1
3-Aug-93
29
7.0
91 %
6.5 < 2 < 1
68
< 1.0
< 0.1
0.03
15.3
< 0.01
< 0.05
< 0.005
< 0.05
< 0.1
< 0.0002
0.005
< 0.05
< 0.05
5-Aug-93
27
40%
5.8 < 2 4
79
9-Aug-93
26
7.0
86%
6.0 < 2 1
75
< 0.13
< 1.0
< 0.1
0.03
10.77
10-Sep-93
26
6.5
80%
6.4 < 2 2
69
12-Aug-93
26
6.2
76%
6.2 < 2 5
71
16-Aug-93
29
7.2
94%
6.4 < 2 1
75
<0.14
<1.0
<0.1
0.02
8.02
17-Aug-93
26
6.3
78%
6.1 < 2 40
72
19-Aug-93
27
7.2
90%
6.0 < 2 46
72
23-Aug-93
27
6.8
85%
6.1 < 2 13
74
< 0.11
< 1.0
< 0.1
0.03
14.81
24-Aug-93
28
7.2
92%
6.2 < 2 3
73
26-Aug-93
28
7.8
100%
6.3 < 2 3
72
30-Aug-94
28
7.5
96%
7.4 < 2 1
70
< 0.11
HARD DRIVE -> STARTUP FOLDER -> TINY -> COMPLETED CHECKLIST--> CATAWBA -> 03.08-32 --> HICKORY INSTREAM DATA

Hickory - Northeast Waste Water Treatment Plant NC0020401
Upstream: location unknown
Date Temp DO Saturat on pH BOD Fecal Conduct NH3 TKN NO2 T - phos chlr a phenols NI CN Cu Zn Hg Cd Cr Pb
1-Jul-93 27 4.6 58% 6.7 <2 1 57 <1.0 <0.1 0.02 8.48
6-Jul-93 28 5.3 68% 5.7 < 2 1 58 < 0.098 < 1.0 < 0.1 < 0.1 12,31
7Jul-93 29 3.7 48% 6.5 <2 1 59
8-Jul-93 30 2.9 38% 7.8 < 2 c 1 60
12-Jul-93 29 .0 39% 6.5 < 2 2 58 < 0.075
13-Jul-93 29 7. 1 % 6.9 < 2 4 60 < 1.0 < 0.1 0.02 11.58
15-JuI-93 28 4.3 55% 5.9 < 2 1 59
19-Jul-93 28 6.% 6.4 < 2 3 58 0.2 < 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.002 < 0.005 < 0.0002 < 0.0005 < 0.005 < 0.01
20-Jul-93 28 7.4 95% 6.1 < 2 7 61 < 1.0 < 0.1 0.03 4.26
22-Jul-93 28 7.2 92% 6.3 < 2 < 1 62
26-Jut-93 26 7.0 86% 6.4 < 2 3 63 < 0.13
27-Jul-93 27 7.1 89% 6.4 < 2 5 60 < 1.0 0.36 0,02 14.65
29-Jul-93 30 6.3 83% 7.8 < 2 10 72
1-Jun-93 22 7.8 89% 6.3 < 2 < 1 40
2-Jun-93 22 10.4 119% 6.3 < 2 < 1 38
3-Jun-93 23 7.5 87% 6.6 < 2 10 45 < 0.11
7-Jun-93 23 7.7 90% 6.6 < 2 < 1 46 < 0.11
8-Jun-93 25 6.6 80% 8.0 < 2 1 50
10-Jun-93 26 8.7 107% 7.4 < 2 7 50
14-Jun-93 25 5.2 63% 6.0 < 2 20 48 < 0.11
15Jun-93 24 7.4 88% 6.1 < 2 310 49
17-Jun-93 26 7.1 88% 6.1 <2 3 50
21-Jun-93 27 6.0 75% 6.7 < 2 1 51 < 0.1 data not included in June, 1993 DMR's
22Jun-93 26 6.6 81% 7.0 <2 <1 52
24Jun-93 26 5.8 72% 6.2 < 2 < 1 52
28-Jun-93 26 5.9 73% 5.7 < 2 9 52 < 0.11
29-Jun-93 26 (2.2 277 ' 5.9 <2 6 58
WPD DP.V6 9TAPTU2 4 DGP TINY COMo1CTGD r'Mfd 'U3T "ATAIMIL 09C9.54 _ ^1i1^W, iv Id9TPG 4 D!TA

Hickory - Northeast Waste Water Treatment Plant NC0020401
Downstream:
location unknown
I^ - 1 --:
, i . V
t,-, ;'.'-
Date Temp
DO
Saturation
pH
BOD
Fecal
Conduct
NH3 TKN
NO2 + 3
T - phos
chlr - a
phenols NI CN Cu
Zn
Hg
Cd
Cr
Pb
5-Jul-94 28
8.5
109%
6.2
< 2
18
75
< 0.12
6-Jul-94 28
7.0
89%
6.0
< 2
2
72
7-Jul-94 28
6.0
77%
6.3
< 2
5
75
< 1.0
< 0.1
0.03
16.5
11-Jul-94 27
6.0
5%
6.7
< 2
70
75
0.12
12-Jul-94 27
5,0
63%
6.3
< 2
16
75
< 0.5
< 0.1
0.04
32.3
14-Jul-94 27
4.5
56%
6.5
< 2
25
75
not being taken downstream
18-Jul-94 27
4.0
50%
7.0
< 2
67
75
<0.11
19-Jul-94 27
4.3
54%
6.8
< 2
3
75
< 0.5
< 0.1
0.03
13.8
21-Jul-94 24
6.0
71%
6.8
< 2
22
75
25-Jul-94 27
4.0
6.4
< 2
16
75
0.12 0.7
0.11
0.04
11.2
26-Jul-94 28
7.2
92%
6.5
< 2
17
50
28-Jul-94 26
6.5
80%
6.1
< 2
3
85
1-Jun-94 23
7.5
87%
7.5
<2
<1
55
<0.1
2-Jun-94 23
6.5
76%
7.0
< 2
< 1
55
3-Jun-94 24
7.5
89%
7.5
3.3
1
50
< 0.5
< 0.1
0.01
9.97
6-Jun-94 24
7.5
89%
6.0
< 2
12
55
< 0.1
7-Jun-94 23
9.4
110%
6.5
< 2
3
50
9-Jun-94 24
7.8
93%
6.5
< 2
7
55
< 1.0
< 0.1
0.02
10.77
not being taken downstream
13Jun-94 25
9.0
109%
6.3
< 2
4
55
< 0.15
14-Jun-94 24
8.5
101%
6.2
< 2
4
55
< 0.5
< 0.1
0.05
15.93
16-Jun-94 27
7.5
94%
7.0
< 2
1
55
20-Jun-94 27
9.1
114%
7.5
< 2
< 1
55
0.82 < 1.0
< 0.1
0.04
15.21
21Jun-94 27
9.1
114%
7.6
<2
5
55
23-Jun-94 27
8.0
100%
7.5
< 2
< 1
65
27-Jun-94 24
6.0
71%
6.2
<2
20
75
0.85
28-Jun-94 24
7.1
84%
6.3
< 2
7
72
30-Jun-94 27
7.2
90 %
6.2
2.4
4
77
2-Sep-93 28
6.8
87%
6.8
< 2
< 1
69
<0.11 < 1.0
<0.1
0.03
12.97
7-Sep-93 28
6.0
77%
7.0
< 2
43
70
<0.12 < 1.0
< 0.1
0.01
17.88
8-Sep-93 26
5.8
72%
7.4
< 2
5
75
9-Sep-93 27
6.3
79%
6.5
< 2
1
76
13-Sep-93 26
6.4
79%
6.9
< 2
3
71
0.99 < 1.0
< 0.1
< 0.01
10.23
not being taken downstream
14-Sep-93 26
6.3
78%
6.7
< 2
7
74
16-Sep-93 25
6.7
81%
6.8
< 2
3
81
20-Sep-93 26
6.8
84%
6.2
< 2
24
77
< 0.1 < 1.0
< 0.1
0.03
14.22
21-Sep-93 26
6.6
81%
6.5
<2
2
79
23-Sep-93 25
5.8
70%
6.8
< 2
4
80
27-Sep-93 25
5.6
68%
6.7
< 2
5
79
< 0.1 < 1.0
0.11
0.02
14.44
28-Sep-93 24
5.8
69%
7.0
2
1
78
30-Sep-93 24
6.0
71%
6.8
< 2
2
75
2-Aug-93 30
7.4
98%
6.6
< 2
2
69
< 0.1
3-Aug-93 29
7.2
94%
6.5
< 2
2
68
< 1.0
< 0.1
0.03
15.56
5-Aug-93 27
3.1
39 %
5.9
< 2
2
78
9-Aug-93 26
7.2
89%
6.2
< 2
1
74
<0.13 < 1.0
< 0.1
0.03
11.83
10-Sep-93 26
6.9
85%
6.6
< 2
1
70
12-Aug-93 25
6.6
80 %
6.3
< 2
6
72
16-Aug-93 29
7.2
94%
6.6
< 2
2
76
< 0.14 < 1.0
< 0.1
0.02
8.37
17-Aug-93 26
7.1
88%
6.2
< 2
31
73
not being taken downstream
19-Aug-93 27
7.7
97%
6.1
< 2
5
73
23-Aug-93 27
7.2
90 %
6.2
< 2
4
74
< 0.11 < 1.0
< 0.1
0.04
12.51
24-Aug-93 28
7.2
92%
6.3
< 2
2
73
26-Aug-93 28
7.2
92%
6.5
< 2
2
73
30-Aug-94 28
7.5
96%
7.6
< 2
2
71
<0.11
HARD DRIVE --> STARTUP FOLDER -> TINY --> COMPLETED CHECKLIST--> CATAWBA --> 03-08-32 --> HICKORY INSTREAM DATA

Hickory - Northeast Waste Water Treatment Plant NC0020401
Downstream: location unknown
Data Temp
1-Jul-93 27
6-Jul-93 28
7-Jul-93 29
8-Jul-93 30
12Jul-93 29
13Jul-93 29
15-Jul-93 28
19Jul-93 28
20-Jul-93 28
22-Jul-93 28
26Jul-93 27
27-Jul-93 27
29-Jul-93 30
1-Jun-93 22
2-Jun-93 22
3-Jun-93 23
7-Jun-93 23
8-Jun-93 25
10-Jun-93 26
14-Jun-93 25
15-Jun-93 24
17-Jun-93 26
21-Jun-93 26
22-Jun-93 26
24-Jun-93 26
28-Jun-93 26
29-Jun-93 26
DO
5.0
5.2
3.8
2.6
3.2
Saturation
6.7 86%
7.1 91%
7.5 96%
7.3 93%
7.2 90%
7.4 93%
3.7 49%
7.6 87%
10.1 116%
7.2 84%
8.8 103%
6.8 82%
4.7 57%
7.0 83%
6.8 84%
5.4 67%
6.5 80%
5.7 70%
6.4 79%
CC0 49%�
pH BOD Fecal Conduct NH3 TKN NO2 T - phos chlr - a phenols NI CN Cu Zn Hg Cd Cr Pb
63% 6.4 < 2 3 56 < 1.0 < 0.1 0.02 8.71
66% 6.3 < 2 3 58 < 0.098 <1.0 <0.1 0.02 14.8
49% 7.0 < 2 2 60
34% 8.2 < 2 2 60
42% 6.8 < 2 3 58 < 0.075
5% 5.8 < 2 1 60 < 1.0 < 0.1 0.02 14.8 not being taken downstream
6.1 < 2 2 60
6.3 < 2 11 58 < 0.075
6.5 <2 2 61 <1.0 <0.1 0.02 6.62
6.8 < 2 < 1 62
6.5 <2 2 63 <0.13
6.9 <2 430 60 <1.0 <0.1 0.07 14.4
8.0 < 2 1 71
6.2 < 2 4 42
5.9 2.4 5 41
6.1 <2 3 46 <0.11
6.7 < 2 4 45 <0.11
7.6 < 2 1 49
7.7 < 2 5 50
5.9 < 2 2 49 < 0.11 data not included in June, 1993 DMR's
6.0 < 2 1 49
5.8 < 2 20 50
5.7 <2 20 51 <0.1
6.9 < 2 10 52
5.7 < 2 2 52
5.8 < 2 < 1 52 <0.11
6.2 < 2 <1 58
YARD DRIn 9T+PTUR FOt.DGa TW V O^'PICTGO ^M°CaLl9T O+T W J - 2 HQI1J f Y 1d91PC+14 ^0•TA

August, 1993 through July, 1994 [ Including LTMP+ ]
Facility Name sir
NPDES0 a
Qw (UGD) a
7010s (cfs)s
!WC(%)=
Hickory - Northeast WWTP
NC0020401
6.00 mgd
60.00 cfs
13.42 %
FINAL RESULTS
Arsenic Maximum Value 2.5
Max. Pred Cw 0.0
Allowable Cw 372.6
Cadmium Maximum Value 10.0
Max. Pred Cw 40.0
Allowable Cw 14.9
Chromium Maximum Value 25.0
Max. Pred Cw 67.5
Allowable Cw 372.6
Copper [Al] Maximum Value 141.0
Max. Pred Cw 380.7
Allowable Cw 52.2
Cyanide Maximum Value 9.0
Max. Pred Cw 12.6
Allowable Cw 37.3
Lead Maximum Value 25.0
Max. Pred Cw 67.5
Allowable Cw 186.3
Mercury Maximum Value 0.4
Max. Pred Cw 0.84
Allowable Cw 0.09
Nickel Maximum Value 47.0
Max. Pred Cw 75.2
Allowable Cw 655.7
Silver [AL] Maximum Value 9.0
Max. Pred Cw 16.20
Allowable Cw 0.45
Zinc [AL] Maximum Value 949.0
Max. Pred Cw 3321.5
Allowable Cw 372.6
Phenols Maximum Value 50.0
Max. Pred Cw 165.0
Allowable Cw 7.5
Toluene Maximum Value 12.6
Max. Pred Cw 74.3
Allowable Cw 82.0
9/19/94

...w •oaf w......f.
Pawnor Arsenio • Pr eatetwadam - Cadmium • P t uru ne
6tatda0- 50 NI Mg • Datasb"1993 6r+raaet- 2 pel dW' Deotat si.1993
n BDL-112DL 1112 DL RISULI$ n 8OL.120L Mt 12 DL RESULTS
1 2.5 Sid Date. 0A 1 0.25 • Std Div. 2.0
2 25 Own 2.5 2 0.25 • Moan 1.4
3 2.5 C.V. 0.0 3 0.25 • C.V. 1.5
4 2.5 4 0.25 •
6 2.5 6 0.25 •
e 2.5 • Ah4tFedor - 0A 6 0.25 • MONFactor - 4.0
7 2.5 • Max. Valve 2.3 pp4 7 0.23 • Max. Value 10.0 apt
6 2.5 • + Max. Prod Cw 0.0 ppil a 0.25 • + Max. Prod Ow 40.0 p94
9 2.5 • NbwaMM6Cw 372.5_ 01 9 2.5 • Afaeahl+Oa l49_pyl
10 2.5 10 0.25 •
11 2.5 11 2.5 • vallbnhOLbeam
12 2.5 12 0.25 • Pneaattrn04 DV HMS
13 2.5 13 2.5 •
14 2.5 14 0.25 •
16 2.5 s 2.5 •
16 2.5 16 0.25 •
17 2.5 17 2.5 •
16 2.5 is 0.25 •
19 19 2.5 •
20 20 0.25 •
21 21 10 Jan-94
22 22 0.25 •
23 23 0.25 •
24 24 2.5 •
26 26 0.25 •
2e 26 2.5 •
27 2V 0.25
2s 26 2.5 •
29 29 2.5 '
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
36 36
a 39
40 40
41 41
a a
a a
44 44
46 46
46 46
47 47
4e 46
N s
60 60
51 51
62 62
63 63
54 64
ea es
6e 66
67 87
24 6e
60 69
e0 60
61 61
e2 es
40 03
64 64
e6 e6
eb e6
e7 a
es ea
e0 es
70 70
b..J,.i.... Tft1,1
- ChrOtldllm ♦ Praeo4lafaxdala 1+Psan ter- Copper pig . Pt6rwrtenldam
50 pp9 .tfj • 0e0wttest.1993
Saes* - 7 pp! Jtlp • Deameer.1993
n BDLr122L 1112 DL RESULTS n BDL-12DL 9t 12 DL RESULTS
1 2.5 • 8e1 Daly. 10.9 1 5 81d Day. 24.2
2 25 Man 11.0 2 20 Mein 26.7
3 2.5 • C.V. 0.9 3 30 C.V. 0A
4 2.5 4 20
6 9 Jul•93 LIMP 6 7
e 2.5 • Mull Factor - 2.7 a 20 MtlaFair . 2.7
7 2.5 • Max. Vades 23.0 pp/ 7 20 Max. Value 141A pp1
e 2.5 • + Max. Prod 0w 615 ape a 20 + Max. Prod Ow 380.7 poi
9 25 • Aflowxbla Cgs 372.6 pp4 9 141-141kmabls 044-62.2-pp4
10 2.5 10 30
11 25 • vanalbn In DL bNwaan 11 25 '
12 2.5 • P omman n4 and NPO63 12 10 '
13 25 13 25
14 2.5 • 14 10 •
13 25 • 16 25
10 2.5 • 16 20
17 25 17 25 •
IS 2.5 1e 30
19 25 19 25
20 2.5 20 20
21 25 21 51
22 13 Jan-94 22 50
23 2.5 23 20
24 25 24 10
26 2.5 26 20
26 25 26 25
27 2.5 27 20
IN 25 26 25
29 25 29 25
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
36 36
3e se
37 37
36 33
39 39
40 % 40
41 41
42 a
43 43
44 44
4a 46
46 46
a a
46 46
49 49
60 60
61 81
62 62
63 63
64 64
66 66
6e 3 66
67 57
ea a es
60 69
60 e0
61 61
a 02
03 03
04 64
46 OS
ea 06
a e7
es es
co a9
70 70

Pawn* 0)ra11ld0 +PISIM07.mdata ; Paara0w. Load +P se:nodaa
12- 5 p01 Jute • Deo.mb.r.1993
n 801.1120L 'i 1/2 DL RESULTS
1 2.5 823 Div. 1.2
2 2.5 Man 27
3 2.5 C.V. 0.4
4 2.5
6 2.5
6 2.5 • Mdt Factor- 1.4
7 2.5 • Max. Value 9.0 p94
a 2.5 • + Max. Prod Ow 12.6 poi
9 2.5 • Meagan, Cw 37.3 poi
10 2.5
tt 2.5
12 2.5
13 2.5
14 2.5
15 2.5
16 2.5
17 2.5
1a 2.5
19 2.5
20 2.5
21 2.5
22 2.5
23 2.5
24 2.5
25 2.5
26 2.5
27 2.5
u 2.5
29 2.5
30 9 Mr-94
31 2.5
32 2.5
33 2.5
34 2.5
35 2.5
30 2.5
37 2.5
311 2.5
39 25
40 2.5
41 25
42 25
43 25
44 2.5
48 25
a 2.5
A 2.5
44 2.5
49 2.5
50 9 Deo•93
51 2.5
52 2.5
53 25
54 2.5
55 25
56 2.5
67 25
5a 25
69 2.5
60 2.5
61 25
m 2.5 •
m 2.5 •
64 2.5
e5 2.5
6e 2.5 •
e7 2.5
e6 25
e9 8 Au2-93
70
Blander!- 25 pan .My-Dac.irbr.1953
n B1)L.1/2DL 'it 1/2 It RESULTS
1 0.5 • Sad 0ev. 10.7
2 2 Merl 11.3
3 1 • C.V. 0.9
4 16
5 10
6 2.5 AAdtFactor- 17
7 2.5 Max. V8219 2S0 poi
a 2.5 • + Max. Prod Ow 67.5 pp4
9 25 • eaysb191:14_180.3 1
10 8
11 25 • val.pbn 8101. butw..n
12 2.5 • Pramatmax and NPOE5
13 25
14 25
15 25
1e 25
17 25
1a 12
19 25
20 2.5
21 25
22 2
23 2.5
24 25 •
26 2.5
28 25
27 2.5
26 25
29 25
30
31
32
33
34
35
30
37
3a
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
A
46
49
50
51
52
63
54
5a
56
57
66
69
CO
61
62
m
64
65
66
57
611
ea
70
paaallaN►. Mercury + Prousamini data
Sandal. 0.012 pp4 July • D.o.mbr.1993
n 80Lt1/201. 9t 1/2 0L RESULTS
1 0.1 Sad Dsv. 0.1
i 0.2 Jul-43 Morn 0.1
3 0.3 Jul-43 C.V. 0.6
4 0.1
5 0.4 Ju1•93 LIMA
6 0.1 • Mgt Foam - 2.1
7 0.1 Max. Value 0.4 py1
a 0.1 • + Max. Prod Oww 0.54 poi
9 0.1 • Aflame* Cw OA9-pp5
to 0.1
11 0.1
12 0.1
13 0.1
14 0.1
to 0.1
16 0.1
17 0.1
15 0.1
19 0.1 •
20 0.1
21 0.1
22 0.1 •
2S 0.1
24 0.1 •
25 0.1
26 0.1 •
27 0.1
u 0.1 •
20
30
31
32
33
34
35
38
37
31
19
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
A
48
49
60
51
52
63
54
55
56
57
66
69
40
61
62
m
64
66
66
57
66
eo
70
Ammar - Nickel • Pt.sanam daa - Saver [AL] • Pramam.m data
Sndal- 88 poi July - Doaerbr.1993 r Saodal- 0.08 p91 .My • O.oambr.1993
n BOL.121:11. '4112 OL RESULTS n B0L .1/2DL • 11/2 0L RESULTS
1 2.5 • 8ad Dov. 10.7 1 1 Sad Own. 1.8
2 2.5 Man 17.5 2 2 Moan 3.6
3 2.5 C.V. 0.6 3 2 C.V. 0.5
4 2.5 4 2
5 2.5 5 3
6 2.5 • Mutt Factor. 1.6 6 3 MA Fader 1.11
7 25 • Max. Val. 47.0 pp4 7 5 • Max. Vduo 9.0
a 2.5 ' + Max. Peed ON 752 so : $ 4 + Max. Prod Ow 18.2
9 -----25------' Afowab1e0w-658.7 pp4 9 -5 •-AlavabbCw OA
t0 25 10 0.5 •
11 25 • Wham In oL nohow 11 5 ' vata5on h 01. Wawa
12 2.5 • Poem:mini and NAD58 12 0.5 • Pmasaaanl and NPOEE
13 25 13 5 •
14 25 14 1 •
15 25 15 5 •
16 25 to 4
17 25 17 5 •
14 2.5 1a 3
19 25 19 5
20 25 20 4
21 25 21 5
22 25 22 9
23 25 23 4
24 25 24 5
25 25 25 5 '
26 25 26 5
27 25 27 3
u 25 26 5 .
29 2.5 29 5 •
30 25 30
31 25 31
32 25 32
33 25 • 33
34 25 34
33 2.5 35
36 25 36
37 25 37
3a 2.5 34
39 25 39
40 25 40
41 20 41
42 25 42
43 25 43
44 2.5 44
45 47 Jan•94 45
46 2.5 ' 46
47 25 • 47
4s 20 • 411
49 20 49
50 20 5o
at 20 a1
52 2.5 ' 52
53 20 23
54 20 54
56 20 • 65
56 20 56
57 2.5 ' 57
55 25 as
59 20 69
60 20 60
et 2.5 61
e2 25 e2
m 25 m
64 25 • 64
ea 25 e5
66 25 e6
67 25 • 67
61 25 63
e9 25 ' ea
7o 25 7o

�..�w 411al 1.ew..d. ..L. 4 W U I. ..�-- 1 TIME. 1
- 39sO [Ala .Pr ooaamarldata
tar. 50 pp .yi.Oscsatr.1993
w
1
2
3
4
5
6
PO 7
POI •
BDL.1/20L 9112 0L RESULTS
28 81d Ow. 175.7
21 Mown 149r4
38 C.V. 1.2
80
81
151 ARdt Factor- 3.5
70 Mws. Wu* 919.0 pal
95 + Ma%. Prod Cw 2921.E poi
949 #aowwbloCw--772.0 pet
50
10
11 197
12 100
13 138
14 130
16 144
16 78
17 152
19 182
19 237
20 277
21 95
22 74
23 70
24 101
25 151
26 50
27 320
2•
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
3•
39
40
41
42
43
44
46
46
47
4•
4•
60
51
52
53
54
55
56
a
5•
5
CO
61
62
03
64
6S
66
67
66
69
70
paramour. Pt•nols +riw.aramtaifa
&R M. 1 poi J ,.0aonrbr.1993
1 t30Lr1/2DL 'it 112 0L RESULTS
1 5 • SW Dw. 82
2 5 • Mown 6.7
3 5 • C.V. 1.2
4 5 •
5 5
6 5 • Malt Factor - 3.3
7 5 • Max. Vitus 50.0 pyl
• 5 • + Ma. Prod Cw 16E0 Poe
v 6-- ---- 5 • AlloNaLbQr- 7.6 pia
10 5 '
11 5 •
12 5 •
13 5
14 5 •
13 5
16 5 •
17 5 •
t• 5 •
19 5
20 50 Feb•94
21 5 •
22 5
23 5 '
24 5 •
26 5
26 5
27 5
23 5
29 10 Sep-93
30 5 •
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
3•
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
40
50
51
52
53
64
55
56
57
6•
59
00
61
62
CO
64
&
06
a
6•
69
70
Paramour. Wows • Praoalrtad data
fUndind. 11 peg Ju17-Doo5ater.1993
n 80L -120L 1112 0L RESULTS
t 0.5 • SW Dw. 3.0
2 0.5 • M. 1.9
3 3.8 C.V. 1.6
4 3.8
a 4.8
6 1.9 ARARector- SA
7 0.5 Mu. Vwiu9 1Z6 ppe
• 0.5 • + Mwx. Prod Ow 74.3 pet
--9 0.5 • AUowabis Cw_810 ppe
t0 0.5
11 0.5
12 0.5
13 0.5 •
is 0.5 •
13 12.E Jon-94
tb 0.5 •
17 0.5
u 1.8 Aug•93
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
2•
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
3•
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
46
40
50
51
52
53
54
55
66
57
6•
59
60
61
62
63
64
66
66
a
6•
&
70

Is
:DEC.1 5 1993
•
Tc • frerrnits and
Engr neeri ng.
nitr'
Water Quality Section 0
Attention: Randy Kepler
PART I
SOC PRIORITY PROJECT: No
Date:December 10, 1993
NPDES STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
County:. Cat aw.. a
NPDES Permit No. : NC002040 ;
MRO No.: - 93-271
GENERAL INFOR`•tATION
Facility and Address: City of Hickory Northeast WWTP
Post Office Sox 19R
Hi nko v! N.C. 78 60 3
— J
Date of Investigation: December 9, 199
3 Report Prepared By: Michael L. Parker, Environ. Engr. I
4 . Perason Contacted and Telephone Number: James Kirby, ORr
(7d4) 324-6512,
5. Directions to Site: The WWTP site is located on the right
(west) side of SR 1400 (Cloninger Mill Rd , N H ) tin_, mile
L L ii i—. t L I i ! V i i
soiitheast of the jct. of SR 1400 and Hwy. 127 in northern
Catawba County.
6. Dis
At
an
charge Point(s), List for all discharge Pointe:
Latitude: 35° 48' 00"
Longitude: 81° 18' 05"
ach a USGS Map Extract and indicate treatment plant site
discharge point on map.
USGS Quad No.: D 13 SE
7. Site size and expansion area consistent with aprlication:
Yes. There is very limited area available for expansion, if
necessary,
8. Topography (relationship to flood plain included): Hilly,
5-12% slopes. The WWTP site does not appear to he located�in
L' does i-- appear L L i L
a flood plain area.
9. Location of Nearest Dwelling: There is one dwelling =100
feet from the WWTP site. Several dwellings are located with
50d feet of the site.

10. R
b
n
PART II
1. a,
b.
n.
d,
P,
f.
g•
h.
ce±ving Stream or AfffecttV-Ie_•d; Surfar.e Waters:
Class± f _catj on; Ns^ IIV, R
River Basin and Subbasin No.. Catawba 03n8.12
Describe receiving stream features and pPrtinPnt
downstream uses: Primary and sennndary recreation_
(with f err ,ent nrli 1 contact) andas a _ r•--L.• h.:• _fir _, �nL1r�P of
public water cup l y Thera ;re . nth
77,.,
_t--�-1 r _> •_ .. no her (;j �c�larger.
;•te mown betwPPn he d scharopni rat and a - - - - - _ ._= hydroelectric
dam (Oxford Dam) locatedd z8,0 miles below the point of
discharge.
f`at artha Ri ? er
- DESCRIPTION OF DISCHARGE AND TREATMENT WORKS
Volume Of Wastewater: 6,0 Mcm (Design Capacity)
What i s the current permitteri cai aci ty: 6,0 0 MGD
- 1
Actual treatment capacity of current faci l i tv (rjrrPnt
design capacity): 6.0 MGD
Date(s) and construction activities allowed by nrevi!Ills
i sued in the previous two years : N/A
Descri tinn of existin or substantially r rated
- -]:' _ _g__constructed
_
WWT facilities: The existing WWT facilities consist of
a parshall flume fo1 1 Diked b. dual i fluent - j _ nLL•_ bar snrAPng
(one mechanical and one manual), dual aerated grit
chambers, two rectangular anri one circular primary
clarifiers, eight aeration basins twn circular j
secondary clarifiers, a sludge pumping station, gaseous
chlorine disinfection, dechlorination, diffused past
aeration, twn gravity sludge thickens a
, and one
primary and one secondary aerobic digester. A stand-by
power enerator is available,necessary.
�• g- ]. �
Description of proposed '1WT facilities: N/A
Possible toxin impacts to surface waters: This
facility has a consistent record (last five quarters)
of passing it's toxicity tests,
Pretreatment Program (POTWs only):
Approved.
2 • Residual handling and utilization/disposal scheme:
0
Tf residual 4 are being land apt li Pd specfy iDEM Permit
No, WQ0001 669. _3
Residuals Contractor: Bionorniv Inc.
Telephone No, [phone].
b. Residuals stabilization: PSRP
3. Treatment Plant Classificat±on: iess than C'• points; no
rating (include rating sheet). Class IV

Page Fol.
r
4 SIC Codes): 4052
Wa-tewater rode(s). Primary: *01
Second? r 1 . 55, 09
MTU Codes): 04003
PART III
- OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION
1 Tc thisfacility bPi nr constructed with Cn strt r` inn (-It-ant
3 � _L• .:: � _ _ __ _._ _ 71 h I'_�• 1•_ t
Funds or are any public monies irlvnl ved? : Nn
7
Special monitoring or limitations (including toxicity)
reuests: See Part IV.
Important cnr/JOC or rpm liance
DRAT TV
The
for the
complete
current
Mr4D , Nn
at this
Schedule dates:
- EVALUAT I nN A Nn R ECnMMENDAT I QN S
Ai / n
f s
City o f Hi cknry requests renewal of the subject Permit
continued operation of the subject facility. The City
d an expansion at this facility during the term of the
Permit that increased the design flow from 5.0 to 6.0
changes and/or modifications to the Permit are proposed
time.
Al hough significant changes to the WLA are not anticipated,
this of ice feels that consideration • should be given to assigning
BPJ lim tations to this facility. The rational for this decision
can be traced to previous MRO recommendations for other WWT
facilities discharging into water supply reservoirs that receive
L �i t Si J t • v V ..1 Y
frequent) bodily contact, This recommendation typically applied to
new or expanding facilities, however, for consistencies sake we
feel that all facilities meeting the above criteria should be
considered. The current facility is certainly capable of
complying with the suggested limitations ;RODS-1 5.0 mg/I, NH2 as
N-4 .0 m(j/ 1) , which could be phased in after the upcoming Permit
„eri od . Therefore, this Office recommends that the Permit
include BPJ limitations that will be effective after the next
Permit renewal period.
Pending receipt and approval of the WLA, it is recommended
that the Permit be renewed as requested.
e Quality
l'Z//3�f 7
Date
Water gi oral Supervisor

ti
RATING SCALE FOR CLASSIFICATION OF FACILITIES
Name of Plant: C 41 )a,2/G;edi ,--- 'Y.t)4,-)'*
Owner or Contact Person: \/e zizy /w 'q ffs
Mailing Address: A0,0or. 3?6
/>/c40,t., Ai- e-,Z1�03
County: C -/4- im- Telephone: .[phone]
N P ES Permit No. NCOO 20170/ Ncndisc. Per. No.
IsstieDate: Expiration Date:
Exi ting Facility�e s New Facility
Rat d By: /17/b/'.7c� P/A/?/e "/ Date: 9?/Z/0
Reviewed (Train. & Cert.) Reg. Office
Reviewed (Train. & Cert.) Central Office
ORC
]TEM
(1) Industrial Pretreatment Units and/or
Industrial Pretreatment Program
(see definition No. 33)
(2) DESIGN FLOW OF PLAN' IN GPD
(not applicable to non
waters, sludge handlii
-,:,,ilication plants, to
:ems (del. No. 11),
consisting only of Item
and (11) (d))
0 •- 20,000 .
20.001 -- 50,000
50.001 -- 100.000
100,001 — 250,000
250.001 -- 500,000
500.001 --1,000,000
1,000,001 -- 2,000,000
2,000.001 (and up) -
Design Flow (gpd) :
contaminated cooling
�g facilities for water
ally closed cycle
and facilities
(4) (d) or Items (4) (d)
Grade
POINTS ITEM
rate 1 point additional for each
200,000 gpd capacity up to a
maximum of 30
to, ow/ Oov
(3) PRELIMINARY UNITS ( ee definition no. 32)
(a) Bar Screens
or
(b) Mechanical Screens, Static Screens or
Comminuting Devices
(c) Grit Removal
Or
(d) Mechanical or Aerated Grit Removal
(e) Flow Measuring Device
or
(1) Instrumented Flow Measurement
(g) Preaeration
(h) Influent Flow Equaliialion
(i) Grease or Oil Separelors - Gravity
Mechanical
Dissolved Air Flotation.
G) Prechiorinalion
0
POIN
(4) PRIMARY TREATMENT UNITS
(a) Septic Tank (see definition no. 43)
(b) Imhoff Tank
(c) Primary Clarifiers
(d) Settling Ponds at Settling Tanks for Inorganic
Non -toxic Materials (sludge handling facilities
for water purification plants, sand, gravel,
stone,' and other mining operations except
recreational activities such as gem or gold
mining) 2
1 (5) SECONDARY TREATMENT UNITS
2 (a) Carbonaceous Stage
3 (i)Aeration - High Purity Oxygen System • 2
4 Diffused Air System
5 Mechanical Air System (fixed.
8 floating or rotor)
10 Separate Sludge Reaeration 2
(ii) Trickling Filter
High Rate 7
Standard Rale
Packed Tower 5
(lii) Biological Aerated Filter or Aerated
Biological Filler
(iv) Aerated Lagoons
(v) Rotating Biological Contactors
(vi) Sand Fillers -
intermittent biological 2
recirculating biological 3
(vii) Stabilization Lagoons
(viii)Clarifier
(ix) Single stage system for combined
carbonaceous removal of BOD and
nitrogenous removal by nitrification
(see def. No. 12) (Points for this item
have to be in addition to items (5) (a)
©(i) through (5) (a) (viii) 8
2 (x) Nutrient additions to enhance BOD
removal 5
(xi) Biological Culture ('Super Bugs') addition
to enhance organic compound removal 5
1
4)1
2
2
3
8
5
sr
1(
1t
1t

(1;.)
bfyrt�c,roaS CAm%ej
i (i) Aeration - High Purity Oxygen System 20
Diffused Air System 10
Mechanical Air System (fixed,
floating. or rotor) 8
Separate. Sludge Reaeration 3
(ii) Trickling Filter -
High Rale 7
Standard Rate 5
Packed Tower 5
(i i i) Biological Aerated Fitter or Aerated
Biological Filter
Rotating Biological Contactors
Sand Filter -
intermittent biological 2
recirculating biological 3
(vi) Clarifier 5
6) TERTIARY OR ADVANCED TREATMENT UNiT
(a) Activated Carbons Beds -
without carbon regeneration
with carbon regeneration
(b) Powdered or Granular Activated Carbon Feed -
without carbon regeneration
with carbon regeneration
(c) Air Stripping
(d) Denitritication Process (separate process)
(e) Electrodialysis
(i) Foam Separation
(g) ton Exchange
(h) Land Application of Treated Effluent
(see definition no. 22b) (not applicable for
sand. gravel. stone and other similar mining
operations)
1(i) on agriculturally managed sites (See def.
No. 4) 1 0
(ii) by high rate infiltration on non -agriculturally
managed sites (includes rotary distributors
and siaeilar fixed nozzle systems)
(iii) by subsurface disposal (includes .low pressure
pipe systems and gravity systems except at
plants consisting of septic tank and nitrifica-
tion lines only) 4
Microscreens
Phosphorus Removal by Biological Processes
(See def. No. 26)
Polishing Ponds -
(iv)
(v)
(i)
G)
(k) without aeration
with aeration
(1) Post Aeration - cascade
diffused or mechanical .. .
(m) Reverse Osmosis
(n) Sand or Mixed -Media Fillers - low rate
high rate 5
(o) Treatment processes for removal of metal or
cyanide 1 5
(p) Treatment processes for removal of toxic
materials other than metal or cyanide 15
t7) SLUDGE TREATMENT
(a) Sludge Digestion Tank - Healed 1
Aerobic ..... 5
Unhealed
(b) Sludge Stabilization (chemical or thermal) 5
(c) Sludge Drying Beds - Gravity 2
Vacuum Assisted 5
(d) Sludge Elutriation 5
(e) Sludge Conditioner (chemical or thermal) 5
(f) Sludge Thickener (gravity) 5
(g) Dissolved Air Flotation Unit
(not applicable to a unit rates as (3) (i) 8
(h) Sludge Gas Utilization (including gas storage) . 2
10
10
5
15
5
15
5
10
5
5
5
4
5
20
2
5
2
(i) . Sludge Holding Tank - Aerated 5
% Non•aera led ... . 2,_
(j) Sludge Incinerator - (not including activated
carbon regeneration) 10
(k) Vacuum Filter. Centrifuge or Filter Press or other
similar dewatering devices 110)
(8) SLUDGE DISPOSAL (including incinerated ash)
(a) Lagoons
(b) Land Application (surface and subsurface)
(see definition 22a)
-where the facility holds the land app. permit . . . 10
-by contracting to a land application operator who
holds the land application permit 2
•land application of sludge by a contractor who does
not hold the permit for the wastewater treatment
facility where the sludge is generated 10
(c) Landfilled (burial) - 5.
DISINFECTION
(a) Chlorination
(b) Dechlorination
(c) Ozone 5
(d) Radiation 5
(10) CHEMICAL ADDITION SYSTEM (S) (See definition No. 9)
(not applicable to chemical additions rated as item
(3) (j), (5) (a) (xi), (6) (a), (6) (b). (7) (b), (7) (e),
(9) (a). (9) (b), or (9) (c) 5 points each: List:
(9)
.2
5
5
5
(11) MISCELLANEOUS UNITS
(a) Holding Ponds. Holding Tanks or Settling Ponds
for Organic or Toxic Materials including wastes
from mining operations containing nitrogen and/or
phosphorous compounds in amounts significantly
greater than is common for domestic wastewater 4
(b) Effluent Flow Equalization (not applicable to storage
basins which are inherent in land application systems)2
(c) Stage Discharge (not applicable to storage basins
inherent in land application systems )
(d) Pumps............_._..._._.............................................__
(e) Stand -By Power Supply
(1) Thermal Pollution Control Device
TOTAL POINTS ! 664.
CLASSIFICATION
Class 1 5 - 25 Points
Class II 26- 50 Points
Class III �................».... 51- 65 Points
Class IV .„........ 66- Up Points
Facilities having a rating of one through four points. inclusive.
do not require a certified operator. Classification bf all other
facilities requires a comparable grade operator in responsible
charge.
Facilities having an activated sludge process will be assigned
a minimum classification of Class II.
'Facilities having treatment processes for the removal of metal
or cyanide will be assigned a minimum classification of Class II.
Facilities having treatment processes for the biological removal
of phosphorus will be assigned a minimum classification of Class`
1
xx

'L.
SAMPLE Location =>
POTW Name =>
NPDES, IUP # =>
1ue_r\-'
1ijr,r-Ylegst
N oyot
Data Summary Sheets MSS)
File: Blank_DSS
Date rev: 5/6/93
Page: 1
Good Detection Limits =>
Laboratory performing Analysis =>
BOD
Good MDL = 1.00 mg/1
Q = Flow
Sample
ID, or
Count
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
Date
Sample
Collected
77 Is/ r3
7//1 /Y 3
/i 3
Time
Sample
Collected
/go den
1,0hQ Tr"
/6o5Pm
T{ egi
!,o f"
Iw IS p i
41.00
tx. op Or,
111,0D /
PLLp�,
wee
Person
Collecting
Sample
Xi/490
4-1/
Notes about Sample ie.
LTMP, NPDES, DMR
IDMR, Sludge, other
M = Metered
E = Estimated
mgd gal/day
Actual
Results
Reported
Laboratory
Method
Detection
Limit
mg/I
G.
<?
mg/l
a"R9�asa r IT. {:7G}Yaft.": "•+. : {Y"�'�i'
ape •�•�y l
w•H[LLi:. \\. S2L�3.. Z'•8•{]tti. }X}:titiK•.
.r�r.; - ,..-\\'raw{45c;;}s;{{z; s{}.;•a':
}�•�+, .•:+��•• +,:•.fir
121,s /sue
.cam if
IS 'vo
tk•co phi
PY 11)5
•
ff
ikr
}
ti
TNS =
NumBDL =
MAX =
Avg.ignor.BDL =
Avg.incl.BDL =
Avg.half.BDL =
Avg.zero.BDL =
Total number of samples =
Total number below MDL =
Maximum data value (mg/1) =>
Average data value, Ignore all BDL values =>
Average data value, Include BDL values as detection
Average data value, Include BDL values as 1/2 detection =>
Average data value, Include BDL values as zero =>
.L'
{•S'.2Q.+y}a'.hx••..'•CS;aJS}, fit:

' SAMPLE Location =>
POTW Name =>
NPDES, IUP # =>
Sample
• ID, or
Count
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
Date
�
�p1I r
Collected
'1 In
93
(30
22
TNS
NumBDL
MAX
Avg.ignor.BDL
Avg.incl.BDL
Avg.half.BDL
Avg.zero.BDL
t\ r4hec +
NCr_oao,w) i
Data Summary Sheets (DSS) •
Idle: Blank_DSS
Date rev: 5/6/93
Page: 2
Reported Reported Reported
Laboratory Laboratory Laboratory
Actual Method Actual Method Actual Method
Results Detection Results Detection Results Detection
Limit Limit Limit
mg/1 <? mg/1
icp
7, c/
gskia
NNW
e:C
`: 1
ti
Y1Y
N
• \1Y:h +it
vie{ h•
.ti•.::jyy.1•
•
mg/1 <? mg/1
kmf
I `
A
;1titi
t3
:tit
A►
S .
,y.
�Y•
114Nti.:{'.
•
11
•� Kit. `• }}1}�'.. 1
mg/1
5o"?,I
C3(0
<?
.41,1..... •............... •�1\1.
Wiz , '...W.M.':

' SAMPLE Location =>
POTW Name =>
NPDES, IUP # _>
Sample Date
ID, or Sample
Count Collected
1Icq33
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
Arsenic
E cc 1uenr
('Jo rTeasi-
nicO-o Ru4t)
Data Summary Sheets (DSS) 4
File: Blank_DSS
Date rev: 5/6/93
Page: 3
Cadmium Chromium
, Reported Reps Reported
Laboratory Laboratory Labonatay
Actual Method Actual Method Actual Method
Results Detection Results Detection Results Detection
Limit Limit Limit
G.005'
C. Y Sv
G,00S✓
_rtti.
}
F ?' '+'ti••• 0 000
to3 0 00S
\ 1-6 o
1A`t to tCj3(0t005
TNS =
NumBDL =
MAX =
Avg.ignor.BDL =
Avg.incl.BDI,. =
Avg.half.BDL =
Avg.zero.BDL =
3.
Sks
0.4x'
•
--::X ..:.1 D • oa55
•
{
••
l�1
•
y?'ti1
•
11
±re
�\S
3
0.00
D,005'
©r 005✓
y•
•
;W:t..,}yyf
•
•?...vhtti•WMiyY•y��A�hY;
\ •hti n •. •'•• V.
•
ti

• SAMPLE Location =>
POTW Name =>
NPDES, IUP # =>
Ecuenk
(\or T-heast
NCOodo4or
Data Summary Sheets (DSS)
File: Blauk_DSS
Date rev: 5/6/93
Page: 4
COD
Good MDL =1.00 mg/1
Copper
Cyanide
Good MDL = .002 mg/1 Good MDL = .010 mg/1
G = GRAB Sample?
Sample
ID, or
Count
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
Date
Sample
Collected
V\
Icl�,i N3,
tq 146 \
\pkd13
TN-SI =
NumBDU =
MAX=
Avg.ignor.BDL =
Avg.incl.BDL =
Avg.half.BDL =
Avg.zero.BDL =
Actual
Results
Reps
Laboratory
Method
Detection
Limit
AcpPl
Results
Reported
Laboratory
Method
Detection
Limit
mg/1 <?
mg/1
mg/1
•
tiff•:; *;
+Y•� i
t �•
.Y�
•h •
ti
O e cc '
O.i� ✓
o•o�v
•
A•
r••
<? mg/1 G
.A�
,J
•
Actual
Results
Reported
Laboratory
Method
Detection
Limit
mg/1 <? mg/1
O,
O oo
V
o, oo 5
'*yti •
a•
J
•
h•,
••:,•T.V W!�
•
,nn4.-r;,•r.. -ti
•

Nif
• SAMPLE Location =>
POTW Name
NPDES, IUP #
Fccl ukerk
AJ,r4hecs -V
NICC.V");.Ott 0 I
Lead
Mercury
Data Summary Sheets (DSS)
File: Blank DSS
Date rev: 5/6/93
Page: 5
Nickel
Good MD1:. = .010 mg/1
Good BDL = .0002 mg/1
Good MDL = .010 mg/1
Sample
ID, or
Count
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
Date
Sample
Collected
at
f 1 \Ct
k ViS GIS
TN =
NumBDL
Avg.ignor.BD =
Avg.incl.BDL =
Avg.half.BDL=
Avg.zero.BDL =
Actual
Results
Reported
Laboratory
Method
Detection
Limit
Actual
Results
Reported
Laboratory
Method
Detection
Limit
Actual
Results
Reported
Laboratory
Method
Detection
Limit
mg/1 <? mg/I
,
0.007
0.01
. Ov
C. 00 5`f
D 0 0
o .005-
:4444'44.
...... . . ....
•••••+
• ::::::::::::::
.41.-VOM\
gEK:WW:1%.**:•;:i,
:x4•.•
tr.:ZOO:
afSti&Vraa
"444.•
•%,;.%Dr%%, • .*•%:••44,4,:-
mg/1 <? mg/I
.00r
0 ,
. COO
O. 003
0.000
WO: ........
...
. .... ............. .
1:AV•k;::••Y4i:t.
0
mg/I <? mg/1
% •
•
. (3C)
..... .................... 0
0 .00
• ••.••,•::!..fti (!) Oc,5
•s-
"" %Y.: 4 •
........
....
••••
It*
•Xt.•SM•:•%,
•
O. 00 5
•k%
• ••• .. ...........
• ••••
•*1
.................... ..
:.•••
A

• SAMPLE Location =>
POTW Name =>
NPDES, IUP # =>
Eff
Nor4-he ra s4
nlcOC c 6
Data Summary Sheets (DSS) 4
File: Blank DSS
Date rev: 5/6/93
Page: 6
Phosphorus
Silver
Zinc
Good MDL = .500 mg1
Good MDL = .005 mg/1
Good MDL = .010 mg/I
Sample
ID, or
Count
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
Dat4
Sample
Collected
c3
=
NumBDL =
MAX =
Avg.ignor.BDL =
Avg.incl.BDL =
Avg.half.BDL =
Avg.zero.BDL =
Actual
Results
mg/I
Reported
Laboratory
Method
Detection
Limit
<? mg/1
4
Actual
Results
mg/I <?
0 (CO
Reported
Laboratory
Method
Detection
Limit
mg/1
0 co?(
owov
0 004-
Actual
Results
mg/I <?
15
o07
}
Reported
Laboratory
Method
Detection
Limit
mg/1
0,410(
ti•Vikv ON;
•
ate.....
\tip 4•{}:ems;?:}
...m...—m.
istli
• •.
1
}

v
• SAMPLE Location =>
POTW Name
NPDES, IUP #
Sample
ID, or
Count
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
7uent
Nor 4-hqa5
NCOccio4o►
Data Summary Sheets (DSS)
File: Blank_DSS
Date rev: 5/6d93
Page: 7
Other
PY\eno\s
Actual
Results
Iwo>
_>
Date;
Sample
Collected
•
�rrr•.}��\Vx•.\y.
:'♦SiVT.
///ag/9.3
p, 0 It/
o, 01
•
Reported
Laboratory
Method
Detection
Limit
r
S\r. J• �
%•:‘:‘:••
r� �iy{{{hS\�S1K{{vtiy
ut'
•
•
Other
Other
Actual
Results
mg/1 <
�I0
7,
7,
7, D
7, a
s.
•
oer,e.
Laboratory
Method
Detection
Limit
mg/1
es
1 :l'J._
.v vv.
:{A.V
$M
•
•
•
•
.1
•
r•
't4
Actual
o
•
Reported
Laboratory
Detection
Limit
mg/1
a
,g✓
PI ✓
0
a
ti}tiff r}.1\:�•• vk.
•\•,•1,�,
TNS
NumBDL �=
MAXI
Avg.ignor.BDL
Avg.incl.BDL
Avg.half.BDL
Avg.zero.BDL
♦ •
s. .
•
. ♦ •fit,,♦}' ,,} ;.,♦J}

C )\41i CrF 6/141° 11
eev• 1$‘464i0
)1-x/girdih
ff.-CO n� m� G� 0 M �� ✓1 I M � dY\
�01WO tn_o-)11\-\--Dv-61 he cq (4-se_ crf
S 44,, k 1- ,sy-e i M-16

NPDES PRETREATMENT INFORMA
PERMIT CONDITIONS COVERING .PRETREAIMENT
\
This facility has no Sills and should not have pretreat menu language.
This facility should and/or is developinga pretreatment prd ram.
Please include the following conditions:
Program Development
Phase I due / /
Phase II due —/—/
Additional Conditions
/ (attached)
V This facilityis currently
y implementing a pretreatment program.
Please include the following conditions: /
V Program Implementation
Additional Conditions
(attached)
IGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USERS' ' (S IUs) ODNTRIBUTION
SIU FLOW - TOTAL:.
- COMPOSITION :.
?Egli 41776--
„Z%2 rGD
TOCTELE:
METAL FINISHING:
OTHER: j Cej'
•Or,er
Ppv M4,
•
O I (4 7 MGD
'MOS
f)b (s
MGD
MGD
MD
MD
MGD
FIEF,DWORKS REVIEW
PARAMETER
cd
Cr
Cu
Ni
Pb
Zn
CN
Phenol
Other
3)20wA
PASS l
:THROUGH
• Ockt
gos
DAILY LOAD IN LBS/PAY ACTUAL 'P O1
DOMESTIC PERMI` rJ u) INDUSTRIAL %. REMOVAL
.oe .
IA , 8 9
55_ 3.v
I AI a OOtJ5��57 (,06
1(01
I0�
,l3
cZ
i0 39 `Ty
RECEIVED: I / 5/40V. REVIEWED BY: