20110720 Ver 0_Year 2 Monitoring Report_20121113

FORREST CREEK UT -2
BANK PARCEL
ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
MONITORING YEAR 2 REPORT
DWQ # 2011 -0720
November 8, 2012
Vlat_)
VV
l.OVt3202
mR - fNATgF� QUALITY
Rranch

Table of Contents
1.0
Introduction ................................................................................................
..............................2
1.1 Project Location and Description ...:.......................................................
..............................2
1.2 Project Goals and Objectives .................................................................
..............................2
2.0
Vegetation Condition and Comparison ......................................................
..............................3
3.0
Methodology ...............................................................................................
..............................3
3.1 Vegetation Monitoring Plots ..................................................................
..............................3
3.2 Photo Stations ........................................................................................
..............................3
4.0
References ..................................................................................................
..............................4
Aouendix A: Site Maps
Figure 1: Site Location Map
Figure 2: Monitoring Year 1 Exhibit
Appendix B: Vegetation Assessment Data
Table 1: Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary
Table 2: Stem Count Total and Planted Species by Vegetation Plot
Table 3: Planted Species Comparison by Vegetation Plot
Appendix C: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
ADDendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Data Sheets
Appendix E: Photo Stations
1 F=4]EcoEngineering
A division of The John R McAdams Company, tnc

1.0 Introduction
L I Project Location and Description
Located off of Edmund Latta Road, just northwest of its intersection with Phelps Road in
Orange County, North Carolina (Figure 1), is the proposed nutrient mitigation bank currently
known as the Forrest Creek UT -2 Bank Parcel (Bank Parcel). This 5.71 acre Bank Parcel
(1.31 acres of nutrient offset restoration area) is currently approved by the North Carolina
Division of Water Quality (DWQ) for use as a nutrient mitigation bank. The Bank Parcel is
located on three (3) tracts of land in Orange County, North Carolina (Orange County Parcel
Identification Numbers 9877207721, 9877520417, and 9876493633). More specifically, the
Bank Parcel is located in the northwestern corner of Parcel Number 9876493633,
southeastern corner of Parcel Number 9877207721, and in the southwestern corner of Parcel
Number 9877520417.
The proposed Bank Parcel is located within the Neuse River Basin, inside of the Upper Falls
Lake Watershed (8 -digit USGS HUC 03020201). Stormwater runoff from this site drains into
an unnamed tributary of Forrest Creek (Stream Index #27- 2- 21 -2 -2). According to the N.C.
Division of Water Quality Basinwide Information Management System (BIMS), Forrest
Creek is classified as WS -11 (Water Supply II), HQW (High Quality Waters), and NSW
(Nutrient Sensitive Waters) in this location. The nutrient offset restoration area within the
Bank Parcel consists of 1.31 acres (Figure 2). The purpose of this Bank Parcel is to improve
water quality within the Neuse River Basin and Falls Lake watersheds by providing off -site
mitigation for both existing and proposed development requiring nutrient offsets. The Bank
Parcel will provide 2,977.63 lbs /acre of nitrogen and 191.78 lbs /acre of phosphorous nutrient
offset credit.
This Bank Parcel has been established under the terms and conditions of the Forrest Creek
Riparian Buffer Mitigation Bank (Bank) made and entered into by Environmental Banc &
Exchange, LLC (EBX), acting as the Bank Sponsor, and DWQ.
1.2 Project Goals and Objectives
The goals of this nutrient offset mitigation project are to:
To improve the overall water quality and aquatic habitat in and around the unnamed
tributary of Forrest Creek by reducing sediment into the streams caused by
agricultural influences.
To improve the richness and diversity of the plant species within the conservation
easement.
To provide perpetual protection for the unnamed tributary of Forrest Creek and
associated Neuse River Riparian Buffer, as well as other riparian areas along Forrest
Creek.
These goals will be met through the following objectives:
- By establishing a native plant community to match the endemic plant species at the
Bank Parcel.
- By reducing the quantities of exotic invasive species at the Bank Parcel through
chemical methods.
- By establishing a conservation easement to provide long -term protection for the Bank
Parcel.
- By donation of the conservation easement and all of its interests, in perpetuity, to an
accredited or approved land trust or stewardship program.
2 ®A division of The John R McAdams Company, Inc

2.0 Vegetation Condition and Comparison
Current stem counts (i.e. stem is defined as single living tree species) were calculated using
vegetation plot monitoring data. Success will be defined as the survival of an average density of
320 trees per acre after five (5) years. As for Monitoring Year 2, the Bank Parcel had four (4)
plots encompassing 0.0988 acres, containing 80 planted stems, which yielded a density of 809
planted stems per acre. When examining both planted and volunteer stems, the four (4) plots
contain 107 planted and volunteer stems, which yielded a density of 1,083 trees per acre
including planted and volunteer species. The planted vegetation survival threshold was met for
all of the vegetation plots. In addition, the planted and volunteer vegetation survival threshold
was met for all of the vegetation plots. Summary tables of the data collected are provided in
Appendix B.
3.0 Methodology
3.1 Vegetation Monitoring Plots
Baseline vegetation monitoring was conducted in accordance to CVS -EEP Protocol for
Recording Vegetation (CVS -EEP, v4.2). All monitoring methodologies follow the most current
templates and guidelines provided by EEP (EEP, 2010; EEP, 2011). All four (4) vegetation plots
installed by EcoEngineering were located in Monitoring Year 2. Table 1 (Appendix B) provides
a success summary for each vegetation monitoring plot. Based on the vegetation monitoring, all
four (4) vegetation monitoring plots were above the five (5) year monitoring period requirement.
Table 2 (Appendix B) provides a stem count total and planted stem total by each individual
vegetation plot. Table 3 (Appendix B) provides a summary of only planted stem counts as
compared to planted stem counts of the As Built.
Vegetation monitoring plots were photographed and are located in Appendix C. Vegetation
Monitoring Plot Data Sheets are provided in Appendix D. Each Vegetation Monitoring Plot
Data Sheet provides measurements, location, and vigor of each planted species within a
respective vegetation monitoring plot.
3.2 Photo Stations
Photo documentation is essential to monitoring the success the Bank Parcel. Photos provide a
visual assessment of the vegetation conditions. All seven (7) photo stations installed by
EcoEngineering were located in Monitoring Year 1. Photographs were taken at high resolution
using an Olympus FE -115 5.0 megapixel digital camera. The locations of the photo stations are
depicted in the Monitoring Year 1 Exhibit (Appendix A, Figure 2). Photographs for the photo
stations are located in Appendix E.
[JEcoEngineering
A division of The John R McAdams Company, Inc

4.0 References
EcoEngineering — A division of The John R. McAdams Company, Inc. May 2011. Forrest Creek
UT -2 Proposed Nutrient Offset Restoration Area — Bank Parcel Development Package.
EcoEngineering — A division of The John R. McAdams Company, Inc. June 2011. Forrest Creek
UT -2 Proposed Nutrient Offset Restoration Area — As -Built Report.
Lee Michael T., Peet Robert K., Roberts Steven D., and Wentworth Thomas R., 2008. CVS -EEP
Protocol for Recording Vegetation Level. Version 4.2
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) October 2004. Guidelines for Riparian
Buffer Restoration.
Available at internet site: http://www.nceqp.net/news/reports/buffers.pd
Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) January 15, 2010. Procedural Guidance
and Content Requirements for EEP Monitorin RgRorts.
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) November 7, 2011. Monitoring
Requirements and Performance Standards for Stream and /or Wetland Mitigation.
Schafale MP and AS Weakley. 1990. Classification of the Natural Communities of North
Carolina: Third Approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of
Parks and Recreation, Department of Environment and Natural Resources. Raleigh,
North Carolina.
[E-I]EcoEngineering
A division of The John R McAdams Company, Inc

APPENDIX A
Site Maps
[JEcoEngineering
A division of The John R McAdams Company, Inc

Z/
0
696
Kati
40
<
FORREST CREEK UT-2
Ua
BANK PARCEL SITE
USGS 7.5 MINUTE "CALDWELL, NC- QUADRANGLE, 1968;
36.1435655•N. 79.0943321 •W
k.- — —
n
PRDIEGT No' EBX— 11020
EBXI 1020X.DWG
FORRFW CREEK UT —2
BANK PARCEL
FIGURE 1. SITE LOCATION MAP
ORANGE COUNW, NORTH CAROLINA
A A division of John R- McAdam Company, Inc.
1" = 2,000'
DATE:
11-06-12
zmmm'"Nm • am"= - mmmmaAL
12MIAM TFMNCJZ PAM - CRAZAM
M MEN[= Pokog • ftrbm PC W13
NO-73HM - wwwjohmsseadmaLwas - Unoss ge. C-M

PROJECT No. EBX -11020
F111RLw71 CREEK
AEcoEngineering
mENARE: EBX11020 -SWX
UT-2
di`
BANK PARCEL
A diviaiao of TLe John R McAdm Oompoy, lnc.
SCAtE:
1 " = 200'
HNGMEM • PUMM S • SURYSYM • BNVDKWM;NTAL
RCOMM MUNGLR PARL. CBARIAPIB
FIGURE 2. MONNORING YEAR 1 EX Mrr
DATE: 11 -06 -2012
ft � �T' °i``° R` rM3
ORANGE COUNTY NORTH CAROIJNA
eoo-TS, Ram
"" '°�°�'�' `i ' R` `-M

APPENDIX B
Vegetation Assessment Data
AEcoEngineering
A division of The John R. McAdams Company, Inc

Table 1. Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary Table
Forrest Creek UT -2; Orange County, NC
Monitoring Year 2: October 17, 2012
EcoEngineering Project #: EBX -11020
PLANTED STEMS PER ACRE
Vegetation Plot ID
Vegetation Threshold
Met ?*
Tract Mean
1
Yes
100%
2
Yes
3
Yes
4
Yes
* Target density is a minimum of 320 trees per acre at the end of the five (5) year monitoring period
according to the "Forrest Creek UT -2 Proposed Nutrient Offset Restoration Area, Bank Parcel
Development Package "; May, 2011.
PLANTED & VOLUNTEER STEMS
PER ACRE
Vegetation Plot ID
Vegetation Threshold
Met ?*
Tract Mean
I
Yes
100%
2
Yes
3
Yes
4
Yes
* Target density is a minimum of 320 trees per acre at the end of the five (5) year monitoring period
according to the "Forrest Creek UT -2 Proposed Nutrient Offset Restoration Area, Bank Parcel
Development Package "; May, 2011.

Table 2. Stem Count Total and Planted Species by Vegation Plot
Forrest Creek UT -2; Orange County, NC
Monitoring Year 2: October 17, 2012
EcoEngineering Project #: EBX -11020
Bank Parcel: 1.31 acres
CURRENT
PLOT DATA (MY -2, OCTOBER,
2012)
ANNUAL MEANS
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
VP -1
VP -2
VP -3
VP -4
MY -2 (October,
2012)
MY -1 (October,
2011)
AS BUILT (June,
2011)
PL
NT
PL
NT
PL
NT
PL
NT
Carya tomentosa
mockernut hickory
Tree
1
1
14
2
Cercis canadensis
eastern redbud
Tree
5
9
2
5
21
27
27
Diospyros virginiana
persimmon
Tree
1
1
2
17
15
Jumperus virginiana
red cedar
Tree
1
1
1
10
Plantanus occzdnetalis
sycamore
Tree
6
6
10
5
27
30
31
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
3
6
14
3
26
24
24
Ulmus americana **
American elm
Tree
1
1
2
2
2
Unknown*
Tree
67
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
1
1
Acer rubrum
red maple
2
2
Liquidambar styraciflua
sweet gum
Tree
10
3
13
12
Ulmus americana
American elm
Tree
6
3
2
11
6
Planted Stem Count Total
15
24
26
15
80
115
178
Natural Stem Count Total
17
3
2
5
27
18
Size of Vegetation Plot (Acres)
0.0247
0.0247
0.0247
0.0247
0.0988
0.0988
0.0988
Number of Different Species
8
8
7
8
31
31
21
Planted Stems Per Acre
607
971
1052
607
809
1163
1801
Planted and Volunteer Stems Per Acre
1295
1093
1
1133
1
1 809 1
1083
Notes:
1) Quantities for "Stems Per Acre" reported for Monitoring Year 1 was for "Planted and Volunter Stems Per Acre" only.
PL= Planted Species
NT = Natural/Volunteer Species
*Applicable only to AS BUILT. Due the lack of leaf out conditions on the majority of the planted stems and on site changes to plant composition associated with local nursery unavailability, the majority of the
planted species within the monitoring plots were identified as "Unknown' and their location and size dimensions were recorded. The intent is to correctly identify the unknown species during the Monitoring Year I
period.
* *An Uhnus amencana was surveyed as part of the As Built even though it is not a species which was planted. Although the Ulmus americana stems are natural/volunteer stems which was already present at the time
of monitoring, it was determined that these specific stems would continued to be monitored during the monitoring years.

Table 3. Planted Species Comparison by Vegation Plot
Forrest Creek UT -2; Orange County, NC
Monitoring Year 2: October 17, 2012
EcoEngineering Project #: EBX -11020
Note: The difference between planted stems from the As Built and Monitoring Year 2 is due to species which were deemed "missing" or
"dead" at the time of monitoring One possible explanation for "missing" species is due to thick herbaceous growth obscurring the species
from identification during Monitoring Year 2. Therefore, it is possibbe "missing" species could grow larger than the herbaceous layer and
allow for their identification and measurment in subsequent monitoring years. In addition, species which were deemed "dead" could
survive in subsequent years because the species may have gone dormant at the time of monitoring while the roots of the species are
surviving below ground. Therefore, in subsequent years the species could grow under more favorable conditions.
VP -1
VP -2
VP -3
VP-4
ear 2 Planted St em Count Total
15
24
26
15
EMonitorin
Built Planted Stem Count Total
42
57
51
28
d Stem Difference from As Buil
-27
-33
-25
-13
li Rate % per Monitoring Plo
36%
42%
51 %
54%
Note: The difference between planted stems from the As Built and Monitoring Year 2 is due to species which were deemed "missing" or
"dead" at the time of monitoring One possible explanation for "missing" species is due to thick herbaceous growth obscurring the species
from identification during Monitoring Year 2. Therefore, it is possibbe "missing" species could grow larger than the herbaceous layer and
allow for their identification and measurment in subsequent monitoring years. In addition, species which were deemed "dead" could
survive in subsequent years because the species may have gone dormant at the time of monitoring while the roots of the species are
surviving below ground. Therefore, in subsequent years the species could grow under more favorable conditions.

APPENDIX C
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
AftoEngineering
A division of The John R McAdams Company, Inc

VE6 PLOT It AT Op FAVN6 328•NW.
VE6 PLOT 2: AT Op FAGIN6 328 °NW.
PROTECT N0. EBX -11020
FORREST CREEK UT -2
®
FILENAME: EBX1102077
BANK PARCEL
division of The John R McAdams Company, Inc.
I
scALe:
AS SHOWN
S ME
ENGINEERS •PLANNERS •SURVEYORS • ENVIi00N1[ENTAL
RESEAR,Hidi- NGLEPAD -h= N M13
2905 Yeridi•n P•rkwry, Durham HC 2T71J
800-733-N46 . n,,,,.iahmmwdsme.com • u� no.: c -oz9J A
VEGETATION PLOTS
ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DATE:
11-06-2012

VE& PLOT 3: AT Op FAGIN& 3040W.
VE6 PLOT 4: Op FAGIN& 326 °NW.
n
C7
PROJECT NO. EBX -11020 FORK ST CREEK UT-2
FILENAME: EBX11020X.DWG BANK PARCEL
SCALE: AS SHOWN
VEGETATION PLO'T'S
DATE: 11 -06 -2012 ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
AftoEngineering
A division of The John R McAdams Company, Inc.
ENGINEERS • PLANNERS • SURVEYORS • ENVIRONMENTAL
RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK • CHARLOTTE
2905 Meridian Porkwq, Durham NC 27713
800 -793 -5840 • w johmncadw�com • li— No.: C -0293

FIN 14 ' 0-11 V-4 4 1]
Vegetation Monitoring Data Sheets
FEJ]EcoEngineering
A division of The John R McAdams Company, Inc

Site Forrest Creek UT -2 (EBX- 11020)
Page 1
ring Year MY -2
Date 10/17/2012
Area
Veg Plot No
X -axis
Plot Location
1
34 N CURRENT MONITORING YEAR DATA
APP 30' east of stream X I Y ddh Height I DBH
1 MY1 (October,
2011
cm
ddh
Height
Notes
Map ID
Scientific Name
Common Name
Source
meter
meter
mm
cm
cm
Vigor
mm
cm
1
Unknown
B
1 9
08
M
missing
missing
2
Cercis canadensis
eastern redbud
B
18
22
921
70
3
738
59
Insect
3
Plantanus occidentalis
sycamore
B
1 2
31
M
missing
missing
4
Querus phellos
willow oak
B
26
39
1090
6800
3
missing
missing
5
Plantanus occidentalis
sycamore
B
23
48
M
1257
49
6
Plantanus occidentalis
sycamore
B
08.
43
9551
75
3
1579
68
7
Unknown
B
16
58
M
missing
missing
8
Plantanus occidentalis
sycamore
B
16
70
M
1084
42
9
Plantanus occidentalis
sycamore
B
04
80
M
865
29
10
Ca rya tomentosa
mockernut hickory
B
10
99
M
575
47
11
Cercis canadensis
eastern redbud
B
27
98
M
621
46
12
Ulmus amencana
American elm
B
1 5
76
950
57
3
899
23
13.Carya
tomentosa
mockernut hickory
B
27.
80
M
1235
58
14
Querus phellos
willow oak
B
1 341
61
900
74
3
598
51
15
Plantanus occidentalis
sycamore
B
44
50
1540
104
3
919
60
16
Plantanus occidentalis
sycamore
B
40
33
2200
105
P05711
3
1504
59
17
Dios ros wr imana
persimmon
B
38
09
M
875
17
18
Dios ros var irnana
persimmon
B
34
23
M
925
17
19
Plantanus occidentals
s camore
B
53
23
21 94
162
3
1252
86
20
Unknown
B
62
28
1 M
Imissing
missing
21
Unknown
B
86.
1 0
1 M
Idead
dead
22
Plantanus occidentalis
sycamore
B
79
31
2232
125
1 3
1 1572
61
23
Unknown
B
93
27
1 M
Imissing
missing
24
Plantanus occidentalis
sycamore
B
99
35
21 58
151
0 385
3
1110
68
25
Diospyros virginiana
persimmon
B
84
43
M
594
61
26
Diospyros vrr miana
persimmon
B
92
47
M
missing
missing
27
Diospyros vir iniana
persimmon
B
71
49
M
missing
missing
28
Querus phellos
willow oak
B
69
64
5951
52
3
556
45
29
Ca a tomentosa
mockernut hickory
B
99
82
M
445
55
30
Cercis canadensis
eastern redbud
B
96
93
618
60
3
591.
53
31
Cercis canadensis
eastern redbud
B
86
81
790
82
3
62
Insect
32
Unknown
B
72
83
M
missin
33
Cercis canadensis
eastern redbud
B
66
93
M
52
34
Cercis canadensis
eastern redbud
B
54.
81
925
53
3
R
61
35
Cercis canadensis
eastern redbud
B
45
97
566.
62
2
57
Deer
36
Querus hellos
willow oak
B
44
83
M
missing
missing
37
Juni erns vir irnana
red cedar
B
45
65
M
missing
38
Juni erns vir imana
red cedar
B
55
65
M
missing
missing
39
Juni erus vir imana
red cedar
B
80
70
M
missing
missing
40
Jum eras virginiana
red cedar
B
95
65
M
dead
dead
o = udic iuui vigor s = g000 conanion, z = surviving ano uKery to survive next year
M = Missing 1 = almost surviving and not likely to survive next year
0 = stem was identified but determined to be dead
CURRENT MONITORING YEAR DATA VOLUNTEER
4EIGHT CLASSES
cm
Scientific Name
0 -50
50 -100
> 100
Li wdambar styraciflua
5
3
2
Ulmus amencana
6
Quercus phellos
1

Site Forrest Creek UT-2 (EBX-1 1020)
Page. 2
Date* MY-2
Area 10/17/2012
Veg Plot No. 1
X-axis 34'N
10
C
W,
MMAJOHMMM
"(6)
==no
N
2
re, 0
w
I
I
1 ra,
WRAt
r"Us
i
on
j,
mm
M
mm_
Irem"MEM
room
I IUD
r(OMMMIMMM
ME
1
05,M
0
0
328'NW
1 4 0 t) I ts V 1U
X-AXIS
Denotes "Missing" Stem may be missing because of thick herbaceous layer and therefore not visible at
the time of monitoring Stem should be searched for at location during subsequent Monitoring Years
because the stem may grow above herbaceous layer.
Denotes "Dead" Stem should still be searched for at location during subsequent Monitoring Years
because the roots of the stem may survive and therefore re-sprout in subsequent Monitoring Years

Site Forrest Creek UT -2 (EBX- 11020)
Page 1
ring Year MY -2
- Date 10/17/2012
Area
Veg Plot No
X -axis
Plot Location
2
34'N CURRENT MONITORING YEAR DATA
App 25' east of stream X Y ddh Height DBH
MY1 (October,
2011
Scientific Name
ddh
Height
Notes
Map ID
Scientific Name
Common Name
Source
meter
meter
mm
cm
cm
Vi o
mm
cm
1
Djospyros vir iniana
persimmon
B
1 6
02
1058
59
3
785
28
2
Querus phellos
willow oak
B
20
1 6
M
419
34
3
Querus phellos
willow oak
B
1 2
24
290
37
3
225
12
4
Unknown
B
26
32
M
dead
dead
5
Plantanus occidentalis
sycamore
B
1 3
34.
2078.
181
3
1274
97
6
Plantanus occidentalis
sycamore
B
02
37
1422
132
3
1091
66
7
Unknown
B
26
42
M
dead
dead
8
Unknown
B
1 2
44
M
missing
missing
9
Ceras canadensis
eastern redbud
B
01
53
610,
74
3
613
51
10
Ceras canadensis
eastern redbud
B
1 5
56
609
70
3
623
66
11
Ceras canadensis
eastern redbud
B
09
66
730
42
3
747
42
12
Ceras canadensis
eastern redbud
B
1 7
81
558
58
3
935
58
13
Ca rya tomentosa
mockernut hickory
B
05
821
M
572
63
14
Querus phellos
willow oak
B
07
96
M
583
63
15
Unknown
B
22
87
M
dead
Idead
16
Ceras canadensis
eastern redbud
B
97
95
725
52
3
885
46
17
Plantanus occidentalis
sycamore
B
93
77
2149
185
056
3
1698
103
18
Querus phellos
willow oak
B
79
78
965
100
3
756
64
19
Unknown
B
7.1
69
M
missin
missing
20
Ca rya tomentosa
mockernut hickory
B
64
76
M
750
69
21
Unknown
B
69
89
M
dead
dead
22
Ceras canadensis
eastern redbud
B
79
99
10001
72
3
915,
73
23
Diospyros virginiana
persimmon
B
57
95
M
10931
35
24
DiosDvros wr miana
persimmon
B
52
81
M
885
15
25
Diospyros vir miana
persimmon
B
55
71
M
1556
22
26
Diospyros wr wana
persimmon
B
42
65
M
435
27
27
Plantanus occidentalis
sycamore
B
32
81
1340
95
3
1278
68
28
Ca rya tomentosa
mockernut hickory
B
46
93
M
1052
62
29
Diospyros wr miana
persimmon
B
28
65,
M
475
55
30
Querus phellos
willow oak
B
97
01
262
24
3
385,
33
Res rout
31
Plantanus occidentalis
sycamore
B
88
01
2548
188
0 996
3
1259
91
Res rout
32
Ca rya tomentosa
mockernut hicko
B
75
00
250
25
2
625
62
Deer
33
Ceras canadensis
eastern redbud
B
61
00
560
46
2
422
49
Insect
34
Querus phellos
willow oak
B
45
00
580
58
3
431
31
35
Ca rya tomentosa
mockernut hickory
B
29
01
M
445
18
36
Unknown
B
37
1 8
M
missinq
missing
37
Querus phellos
willow oak
B
52
1 6
768
73
3
615.
64
381
Diospyros wr miana
persimmon
B
65
1 7
M
879
44
391Carva
tomentosa
mockemut hickory
B
95
29
M
dead
dead
40
Carva tomentosa
mockernut hickory
B
87.
3 0
M
432
12
41
Ceras canadensis
eastern redbud
B
76
30
1039
70
3
1081
75
Insect
42
Ceras canadensis
eastern redbud
B
61
33
M
875
63
43
Ca rya tomentosa
mockernut hickory
B
43
30
M
898
63
44
Ca rya tomentosa
mockernut hickory
B
95
47
M
1090
42
45
Unknown
B
82
47
M
dead
dead
46
Plantanus occidentalis
sycamore
B
65
49
M
dead
dead
47
Unknown
B
60
40
M
missing -missing
48
Plantanus occidentalis
sycamore
B
51
48
1570
141
0 385
3
887
74
49
Unknown
B
44
41
M
missing
missing
50
Querus phellos
willow oak
B
34
51
1025
110
3
637
64
51
Unknown
B
4 9
6 0
M
missm
missing
52
Unknown
B
84
6 0
M
dead
dead
53
Ceras canadensis
eastern redbud
B
71
6 0
1 85
25
2
473
47
Res rout
54
Unknown
B
56
60
M
dead
dead
55
Juni erus var imana I
red cedar
B
15
95
missing
missm
56
J erus w imana
red cedar
B
30
9 5
44 40
148
0 375
_4_1
3
35861
123
57
Jurn erus vir wana I
red cedar
B
40
951
M Imissing
Imissing
We FULA
M = Missing
Vigor j = gooa conartion, z = surviving and likely to survive next year
1 = almost surviving and not likely to survive next year
0 = stem was identified but determined to be dead
CURRENT MONITORING YEAR DATA VOLUNTEER SPECIES
JEIGH T CLASSES cm
Scientific Name
0 -50
150-1001
> 100
Ulmus amencana
3

Site Forrest Creek UT-2 (EBX-1 1020)
Page 2
Date MY-2
Area 10/17/2012
Veg Plot No 2
X-axis 34'N
1 C
9
8
1
051
0,
0
ff 328'NW
U 0 — 1 0 V IU
X-AXIS
Denotes "Missing" Stem may be missing because of thick herbaceous layer and therefore not visible at
the time of monitoring Stem should be searched for at location during subsequent Monitoring Years
because the stem may grow above herbaceous layer
Denotes "Dead" Stem should still be searched for at location during subsequent Monitoring Years
because the roots of the stem may survive and therefore re-sprout in subsequent Monitoring Years
Now
,
Blow
II
1
051
0,
0
ff 328'NW
U 0 — 1 0 V IU
X-AXIS
Denotes "Missing" Stem may be missing because of thick herbaceous layer and therefore not visible at
the time of monitoring Stem should be searched for at location during subsequent Monitoring Years
because the stem may grow above herbaceous layer
Denotes "Dead" Stem should still be searched for at location during subsequent Monitoring Years
because the roots of the stem may survive and therefore re-sprout in subsequent Monitoring Years

Site Forrest Creek UT -2 (EBX- 11020)
Page 1
Ang Year MY -2
Date 10/17/2012
Area
Veg Plot No
X -axis
Plot Location
3
14'N CURRENT MONITORING YEAR DATA
App 25' east of stream X I Y ddh Height DBH
MY1 (October
2011
Scientific Name
ddh
Height
Notes
Map ID
Scientific Name
Common Name
Source
meter
meter
mm
cm
cm
Vi or
mm
cm
1
Ca rya tomentosa
mockernut hickory
B
91
01
M
1062
63
2
Unknown
B
75
01
M
dead
dead
3
Diospyros var iniana
persimmon
B
60
00
M
1051
41
4
Unknown
B
44
00
M
dead
dead
5
Querus phellos
willow oak
B
04
09
1535,
160
0375.
3
637.
64
BlDiospyros
vii imana
persimmon
B
20.
1 0
M
1593
58
7
Unknown
B
341
1 0
M
dead
dead
8
Querus phellos
willow oak
B
51
1 0
1472
105
3
825
59
9
Querus phellos
willow oak
B
66
1 0
1350
105
3
881
71
10
Querus phellos
willow oak
B
81
09
1350
107
3
11 25
81
11
Unknown
B
98
1 0
M
missing
missing
12
Plantanus occidentalis
sycamore
B
93
1 8
15131
102
3
1071.
69
13
Plantanus occidentalis
sycamore
B
80
1 8
1671
98
3
9251
59
14
Unknown
B
61.
21
M
missing
missing
15
Plantanus occidentalis
sycamore
B
43
1 9
1168
75
3
1255
119
16
Diospyros var miana
persimmon
B
24
1 9
M
585
45
17
Plantanus occidentalis
sycamore
B
1 2
1 9
2175
150
0 485
3
920
98
18
Querus hellos
willow oak
B
14
28
1005
95
3
929
55
19
Dios ros vii miana
persimmon
B
29
29
M
5 65
44
20
Plantanus occidentalis
sycamore
B
44
30
19851
146
0 495
3
1265
117
21
Querus hellos
willow oak
B
58
30
359
40
3
missing
missm
Insect/Res rout
22
Cercis canadensis
eastern redbud
B
72
28
510
35
3
576
38
Insect
23
Unknown
B
89
28
M
missing
missm
24
Plantanus occidentalis
sycamore
B
100
36
1675
95
3
1558
71
25
Plantanus occidentalis
sycamore
B
74
38
1545
90
3
1699
75
Insect
26
Plantanus occidentalis
sycamore
B
14
38
2049
156
0491,
3
1557
102
27
Plantanus occidentalis
sycamore
B
03
45
2459.
161
055
3
1245
92
28
Ca rya tomentosa
mockernut hickory
B
21.
45
M
401
28
29
Querus phellos
willow oak
B
38
45
1520
110
3
1385
87
30
Querus phellos
willow oak
B
50
45
1320
126
3
731.
63
31
Plantanus occidentalis
sycamore
B
66
44
M
1569
63
32
Cercis canadensis
eastern redbud
B
82
43
M
421
28
33
Cercis canadensis
eastern redbud
B
48
43
M
missing
missing
34
Unknown
B
43
53
M
missing
missing
35
Querus phellos
willow oak
B
1 8
57
11 66
110
3
755
62
36
Unknown
B
251
69
M
dead
dead
37
Querus phellos
willow oak
B
561
1330
103
3
892
73
38
Querus phellos
willow oak
B
681
.68
68
691
75
3
445
48
39
Querus phellos
willow oak
B
851
66
1175
93
3
missing
missing
40
Cercis canadensis
eastern redbud
B
811
77
1 55
15
3
751
52
Res rout
41
Diospyros vii imana
persimmon
B
58
80
M
missing
missing
42
Querus phellos
willow oak
B
41
84
530
92
3
925
60
43
Diospyros vii imana
persimmon
B
1 5
81
M
580
44
44
Diospyros var imana
persimmon
B
10
90
M
missing
missing.
45
Plantanus occidentalis
sycamore
B
32
89
1840
135
3
1243
96
Insect
46
Unknown
B
53
90
M
missing
missing
47
Unknown
IB
88--
8
8 3
M
missing
missing
48
Querus phellos
willow oak
B
99
88
11 80
115
3
748
64
49 iJuniperus
Juni eras vii imana
red cedar
B
951
65
M
missing
missing
50
Jum erus vii imana
red cedar
B
8 0
9 5
M
missm
missm
51
vii imana
red cedar
B
951
7 0
M
missing_
missing
n = bare roof
M = Missing
vigor 3 = good conaition, 2 = surviving and likely to survive next year
1 = almost surviving and not likely to survive next year
0 = stem was identified but determined to be dead
CURRENT MONITORING YEAR DATA VOLUNTEER
HEIGHT CLASSES cm
Scientific Name
0 -50
Is 0 -100
> 100
Aoer rubrum
2

Site Forrest Creek UT-2 (EBX-1 1020)
Page 2
Date MY-2
Area 10/17/2012
Veg Plot No 3
X-axis 14'N
10
05I
0
O
304 W
U U I u
X-AXIS
Denotes "Missing" Stem may be missing because of thick herbaceous layer and therefore not visible at
the time of monitoring Stem should be searched for at location during subsequent Monitoring Years
because the stem may grow above herbaceous layer
Denotes "Dead" Stem should still be searched for at location during subsequent Monitoring Years
because the roots of the stem may survive and therefore re-sprout in subsequent Monitoring Years
(Q7
05I
0
O
304 W
U U I u
X-AXIS
Denotes "Missing" Stem may be missing because of thick herbaceous layer and therefore not visible at
the time of monitoring Stem should be searched for at location during subsequent Monitoring Years
because the stem may grow above herbaceous layer
Denotes "Dead" Stem should still be searched for at location during subsequent Monitoring Years
because the roots of the stem may survive and therefore re-sprout in subsequent Monitoring Years

Site Forrest Creek UT -2 (EBX- 11020)
Page 1
,nng Year MY -2
Date 10/17/2012
Area
Veg Plot No
X -axis
Plot Location
4
32'N CURRENT MONITORING YEAR DATA
App 25' east of stream X I Y ddh Height DBH
MY1 (October,
2011
Scientific Name
ddh
Height
Notes
Map ID
Scientific Name
Common Name
Source
meter
meter
mm
cm
cm
Vigor
mm
cm
1
Unknown
B
5-8
06
M
missing
missing
2
Ca rya tomentosa
mockernut hickory
B
7 9
04
M
625
60
3
Unknown
B
66
04
M
missing
missing
4
Unknown
B
39
03
M
missm
missm
5
Unknown
B
24
04
M
dead
dead
6
Cercis canadensis
eastern redbud
B
09,
04
847
49
2
8 90
54
Deer
7
Cercis canadensis
eastern redbud
B
03
21
1205
82
2
12 32
89
Insect
8
Unknown
B
1 7
20
M
missm
missing
9
Plantanus occidentalis
sycamore
B
29
22
2622
182
0 719
3
12 55
88
10
Quercus hellos
willow oak
B
41
22
860
72
3
5 68
60
11
Quercus hellos
willow oak
B
59
22
11 90
99
3
7 42
72
12
Quercus hellos
willow oak
B
74
22
705,
64
3
6 18
60
13
Cercis canadensis
eastern redbud
B
39,
39
1024
68
2
15 79
72
Deer
14
Plantanus occidentalis
sycamore
B
221
39
21 55
145
0 352
3
17 35
119
Insect
15
Cercis canadensis
eastern redbud
B
061
36
845
64
3
8 06
62
Insect
16
Cercis canadensis
eastern redbud
B
491
42
865
70
2
10 63
52
Deer
17
Unknown
B
691
44
M
missing
missing
18
Plantanus occidentalis
sycamore
B
96
411
1850
99
3
14 05
44
19
Plantanus occidentalis
sycamore
B
81
38
11 70
94
3
636.
68
Insect
20
Unknown
B
92
57
M
missing
missing
21
Diospyros wr mianana
persimmon
B
53
56
M
593
49
22
Plantanus occidentalis
sycamore
B
20
56
1666
115
3
1078
88
23
Cercis canadensis
eastern redbud
B
0 3
56
M
941
59
24
Diospyros wr inianana
persimmon
B
20,
91
350
22
2
415
32
25
Ulmus amencana
American elm
6 7
96
2009
182
035
3
1410
130
26
Unknown
tB
9 0
99
M
missin
missing
27
Unknown
9 8
85
M
dead
dead
28
Plantanus occidentalis
sycamore
B
9 5
69,
M
missing
missm
o = L)dre FOOL vigor a = gooa conaition, z = surviving and likely to survive next year
M = Missing 1 = almost surviving and not likely to survive next year
0 = stem was identified but determined to be dead
CURRENT MONITORING YEAR DATA VOLUNTEER
4EIGHT CLASSES cm
Scientific Name
0 -50
50 -100
> 100
Li wdambar styraciflua
2
1
Ulmus amencana
2

Site Forrest Creek UT-2 (EBX-1 1020)
Page 2
Date. MY-2
Area 10/17/2012
Veg Plot No 4
X-axis 32'N
Ic
1
05
0,
mmm
�m����Qa
UrN
r(I 70
�M�Oa I,
0
326*NW
�71
lu
X-AXIS
Denotes "Missing" Stem may be missing because of thick herbaceous layer and therefore not visible at
the time of monitoring Stem should be searched for at location during subsequent Monitoring Years
because the stem may grow above herbaceous layer.
Denotes "Dead" Stem should still be searched for at location during subsequent Monitoring Years
because the roots of the stem may survive and therefore re-sprout in subsequent Monitoring Years

APPENDIX E
Photo Stations
F=jjEcoEngineering
A division of The John R. McAdams Company, Inc

r�
A
C7
v
CA
PHOTO STATION I: VIEW FACIN& 240' WEST.
PHOTO STATION 24 VIEW FAGN6 284• WEST.
PROJECT NO. EBX -11020 FORREST CREEK UT -2
FILENAME: EBX11020X.DWG BANK PARCEL
SCALE: AS SHOWN
PHOTO STATIONS
DATE: 11-06-2012
ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
AftoEngineering
A division of The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.
ENGINEERS• PLANNERS a SURVEYORS •ENVIRONMENTAL
RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARE • CHARLOTTE
M Yvidim Parkway, Durham NC 27719
60079 3-5646. www.jolxxmwd� - Haase No.: C -62AT

PHOTO STATION 3: VIEW FAGIN6 240° SOUTHHEST.
PHOTO STATION 4: VIEW FACIN& 222' SOUTHHEST.
PROJECT NO. EBX -11020
FORREST CREEK UT -2
� FILENAME: EBX11020X.DWG
BANK PARCEL
jEcoEngineering
division R. McAdams Company,
d
SCALE: AS SHOWN
S PLANNERS - UR
ENGINEERS •PLANNERS •SURVEYORS • ENVQiONNENTAL
NTT
RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK • CHARLOTTE
PHOTO STATIONS
DATE: 11 -06 -2012
ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
WO-733-5M . wndi- P k •yarn, liNC 2 No.: C-0299

PHOTO STATION 5: VIEW FACING 340 NORTH.
PHOTO STATION 6: VIEW FACING 54a NORTH.
PROJECT NO. EBX -11020 FORREST CREEK UT -2 AftoEngineerind
FILENAME: EBX11020X.DWG
n A division of The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.
d SCALE: LANK PARCEL ENGINEERS, PLANNERS- SURVEYORS •ENVMNMENTAL
AS SHOWN
PHOTOSTATIONS RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK • CHARLOTTE
DATE: 2905 Yeridim Pvkw•7, Durd•m NC 27719
11 -06 -2012 ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA Ma75 &se4e.,.,,.,.�h�ad�aam.Iiceox no: c -oz�

PHOTO STATION 1: VIEW FAGIN6 56° NORTHEA5T.
PROJECT N0. EBX -11020 FORREST CREEK UT -2
[JEcoEngineering'
�Z PILENAmE: EBX11020X.DWG
n A division of The John R McAdams Company, Inc.
SCALE:
A S SHOWN 0 WN BANK PARCEL ENGINEERS • PLANNERS • SURVEYORS • ENVMNMENTAL
3 PHOTO STA RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK •CHARLOTTE
TIONS
C/] DATE: 2x05 Meridian Pvinq, Durham EC 27719
11-06-2012 ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA 500.739 -5646 • .,,.,..;o � • U� No.: C -CM