20121081 Ver 1_401 Application_20121112

20121081
November 26, 2012
Ms Tasha McCormick
USACE
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
151 Paton Ave, Rm 208
Asheville, NC 28801 -5006
RE. Middle Fork Greenway, Section 1, Phase 2
Watauga County, NC
Dear Ms McCormick.
tt Pk 7 T
3784 Rommger Rd
Banner Elk, NC 28804
Ph 828 - 2978948
Fax [phone]
e-mail wccjvQskybest com
Enclosed is an application for NWP 42 and WQC #3884 for the referenced project The property owner
is Middle Fork, LLC represented by William H Hall, chairman Watauga County Pathways, Inc. and the
Applicant is Watauga County Pathways, Inc, William H Hall is the contact John Vilas with ENV Inc is
the agent, (authorization letter included with PCN) and has prepared this application Copies of this
PCN have been mailed to both DWQ (5 with a check for $240 to cover 401 fee) and NCWRC
If you need to schedule a site visit please contact me Please include ENV Inc on the copy list of all
correspondence for this project If you have any questions regarding this information please can me at
828 - 297 -6946, thank you
Sincerely,
J hn C. Villas
President, ENV Environmental Consulting Services Inc
Cc Mr Dave McHenry, NCWRC
Mr William H Hall, Watauga County Pathways
Mr Jason Gaston, Valor Engineering
NCDWQ, central office (5 copies with check)
E Cua>
DE NR - V
etlantin R VAL1T,
i

O�0F W A tF9 pG
`i
O ^�
20 12 108 1
Office Use Only
Corps action ID no
DWQ project no
Form Version 13 Dec 10 2008
etlan�, $ �� QUALI
•- ��wate�8ra��
Page 1 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version
Pre - Construction Notification PCN Form
A. Applicant Information
`
_ ''
1
Processing
la
Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps
z
® Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10- Permit
1 b
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number 42 or General Permit (GP) number
1c
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes
® No
Id
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply)
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification
❑ Yes N No
For the record only for Corps Permit
❑ Yes N No
1f
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program
❑ Yes
® No
1g
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties If yes, answer 1 h
below
❑ Yes
® No
1h
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
N No
2
Project Information
2a
Name of project
Middle Fork Greenway Section 1, Phase 2
2b
County
Watauga
2c
Nearest municipality / town
Boone
2d
Subdivision name
NA
2e
NCDOT only, T I P or state
project no
NA
3.
Owner Information
3a
Name(s) on Recorded Deed
Middle Fork, LLC
3b
Deed Book and Page No
BOR 1412 page 576
3c
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable)
William H Hall, Chairman Watauga County Pathways, Inc
3d
Street address
815 West King St
Boone, NC 28607
3e City, state, zip
3f
Telephone no
828 - 265 -7444
lull
3g
Fax no
V c/ L Q i
TV
3h
Email address
Q�tio
etlan�, $ �� QUALI
•- ��wate�8ra��
Page 1 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a
Applicant is
❑ Agent ® Other, specify Developer and managing entity
4b
Name
William H Hall, Chairman
4c
Business name
(if applicable)
Watauga County Pathways, Inc
4d
Street address
815 West King Street
4e
City, state, zip
Boone, NC 28607
4f
Telephone no
828- 265 -7444
4g
Fax no
4h
Email address
5
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a
Name
John Vilas
5b
Business name
(if applicable)
ENV -ECS, Inc
5c
Street address
3764 Rominger Rd
5d
City, state, zip
Banner Elk, NC 28604
5e
Telephone no
828 - 297 -6946
5f
Fax no
828 - 297 -1982
5g
Email address
john @env -ecs com
Page 2 of 14
PCN Form —Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
1a
Property identification no (tax PIN or parcel ID)
2819802374000 (Watauga County) Easement
1 b
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees)
Latitude 36 163N Longitude 81 644W -
(DD DDDDDD) ( -DD DDDDDD)
The proposed Middle Fork Greenway trail will be
constructed within a 20' wide easement along the entire
1c
Property size
length of the trail Currently the length of this easement
within Section One, Phase 2 is approximately 1200 feet -
long (this excludes the portion through the box culvert) for
a total project area of roughly 0 55 acres
2
Surface Waters
2a
Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc) to
Middle Fork Creek
proposed project
2b
Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water
WS -IV, Trout, +
2c
River basin
New River
Page 3 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

3 Project Description
3a Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application
Theproject site from station 0 +00 (upstream end) to station 9 +25 (upstream end of box culvert) can
be described as a narrow wooded corridor running_ generally north/south and flanked by US Hwy 321
to the east and Middle Fork Creek to the west The project comdor bends to a more east/west
onentation as it passes through the northern barrel of an existing tnple -11'x1 1'x240' long box culvert
under US Hwy 321 The project site extends about 270 feet below the downstream end of the box
culvert (station 11 +75) through a narrow grassed corridor between Middle Fork Creek (east) and the
Mystery Hill attraction parking lot (west). Section 1 -Phase II ends at station 14 +45 This entire portion
of the project site lies within the 100 year floodplain and much of the site lies at least partially within
the 25 foot -wide trout buffer
3b List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the propert y There are no wetlands within the project
corridor.
3c List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property
The project site contains or occurs immediately adjacent to approximately 1200 linear feet of perennial
stream
3d Explain the purpose of the proposed project
The project purpose is to construct a greenway trail that will ultimately connect the towns of Boone and
Blowing Rock.
Page 4 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

3e
Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used
The current project is to construct the first section of a red enway trail that will eventually connect the
towns of Boone and Blowing, Rock This initial phase is critical in order to generate rg eater
enthusiasm for the project The first section of the trail consists of two phases totaling about a mile
This PCN applies to Section 1- Phase 2 of the trail and will involve impacts to Middle Fork Creek at
both ends of an existing triple cell 11'x1 1'x240 foot-long box culvert that cames Middle Fork Creek
under US Hwy 321 Proposed impacts will occur as a result of activities necessary to align the trail
with the box culvert openings and activities necessary to remove accumulated sediment from within
and around one of the cells of the box culvert Proposed impacts will involve both permanent and
temporary alterations to the stream channel.
Permanent impacts will primarily consist of fill impacts associated with constructing the trail
foundation as it transitions from stream bank to the opening of both ends of the box culvert under US
Hwy 321. The trail foundation will be composed existing earth in cut sections or, in fill sections of
large boulders with smaller rock in between to fill the voids. The finished trail surface will be paved
with asphalt over a compacted gravel base except for within the box culvert where the trail surface
will consist of 6 -inches of concrete The trail surface through the box culvert will be approximately
2 5 feet above the bottom of the concrete floor of the culvert (streambed) This is below the bankfull
level of the stream by roughly one -foot which will result in periodic flooding of this portion of the
trail. This design was necessary to maintain sufficient flood carrying pacity of the box culvert and to
allow sufficient height for pedestrian and bicycle traffic
Temporary impacts will occur in association with sediment removal from within and around both ends
of the northernmost cell of the box culvert Temporary impacts will also occur from construction of a
rock vane extending out from the edge of the greenway trail on the upstream end of the box culvert
The rock vane is needed to direct stream flow toward the north side of the box culvert and to protect
the rem. trail
4.
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments The entire length of Section 1 of the Middle Fork
Greenway was evaluated for wetlands by ENV -ECS Inc no
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
wetlands were identified USACE agents Tasha McCormick
and Amanda Jones visited the site on 5 -22 -2012 and
confirmed that no wetlands exist within the project corridor
4b
If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
® Preliminary ❑ Final
4c
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known) John Vilas /Sean Martin
Agency /Consultant Company ENV -ECS, Inc
Other
4d
If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation
USACE site visit 5 -22 -12
5.
Project History
5a
Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past
❑ Yes ®No Unknown
5b
If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions
Page 5 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

6 Future Project Plans
6a Is this a phased project? ® Yes ❑ No
6b If yes, explain The Middle Fork Greenwav project is linear in nature and will be constructed in numerous phases over
several years Specific timing and design of future phases in unknown at this time and will depend on land acquisition and
funding among other factors
Page 6 of 14
PCN Form —Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

C Proposed Impacts Inventory
1 Impacts Summary
la Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply)
❑ Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2 Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted
2a
2b
2c
2d
2e
2f
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
W1 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
0
2h Comments
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted
3a
3b
3c
3d
3e
3f
3g
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ —non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
( )
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 ®P ®T
Fill and Sediment
Middle Fork Creek
® PER
® Corps
45
60
Removal
❑ INT
® DWQ
S2 ®P ®T
Fill and Sediment
Middle Fork Creek
® PER
® Corps
45
80
Removal
❑ INT
® DWQ
S3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
3h Total stream and tributary impacts
140 lin ft
31 Comments (S1- upstream site) Impacts at this site will occur in an area no more than 60 feet upstream of the box culvert
Permanent Impact Large boulder fill will be placed along the left side of channel to support the proposed greenwav trail
Temporary Impact A rock vane will be constructed out from the trail to direct flow toward the two culvert barrels that will not
contain the trail Excess sediment will be removed from the approach and within the right (northern) barrel of the box culvert
(S -2- downstream site) Impacts at this site will occur in an area no more than 80 linear feet downstream of the box culvert
Page 7 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

Permanent Impact Large boulder fill will be placed along the left side of channel to support the proposed greenway trail
Temporary Impact Excess sediment will be removed from the approach and within the right (northern) barrel of the box
culvert
4 Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U S then individually list all open water impacts below
4a
Open water
impact number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
4b
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c
Type of impact
4d
Waterbody type
4e
Area of impact (acres)
01 ❑P ❑T
02 ❑P ❑T
03 ❑P ❑T
04 ❑P ❑T
4L Total open water impacts
4g Comments
5 Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below
5a
Pond ID
number
5b
Proposed use or purpose
of pond
5c
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
K Total
5g Comments
5h Is a dam high hazard permit required
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no
51 Expected pond surface area (acres)
51 Size of pond watershed (acres)
5k Method of construction
Page 8 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

6 Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form
6a.
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar - Pamlico ❑ Other
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b
Buffer impact
number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
6c
Reason
for
impact
6d
Stream name
6e
Buffer
mitigation
required
6f
Zone 1 impact
(square feet)
6g
Zone 2 impact
(square feet)
131 ❑PEI
El Yes
❑ No
B2 ❑ PEI T
El Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑P ❑T
El Yes
❑ No
6h Total buffer impacts
61 Comments
D Impact Justification and Mitigation
1 Avoidance and Minimization
1a Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project
The proposed project has been planned from the beginning to avoid and minimize impacts to jurisdictional
waters to the maximum extent practicable The Applicant initiated an environmental consultant near the
beginning of the planning stage for the project to perform a wetland delineation and advise regarding potential
permit issues. Consequently, the project has been designed so that the vast majonty of the land disturbing
activities will be located in upland areas outside the trout buffer (where practically feasible) along Middle
Fork Creek. The only impacts are associated with utilization of one cell of an existing triple cell box culvert
that conveys Middle Fork Creek under US Hwy 321 Impacts will occur in conjunction with construction of
transition sections of the trail on either end of the box culvert Impacts will also occur from the necessary
clean-out of the northern barrel of the box culvert and removal of accumulated sediment from the entrance
and exit areas of this barrel.
Impact Site 1 (S1): This site is located on the upstream end of the existing box culvert The reg enway trail will
approach the box culvert along the left bank of Middle Fork Creek. Greenway trail standards require
maximum trail surface slopes not to exceed 5% Grading for the trail encroaches into the bankfull boundary at
about trail station 8 +75 or about 55 feet upstream of the box culvert It is not practically feasible to reduce the
length of trail that will encroach within the channel because of the 5% slope requirement The edge of the trail
facing the channel will be protected from scour and erosion by large boulder np -rap There will also be a rock
vane constructed out from the edge of the trail The rock vane will deflect stream energy away from the trail
and direct flow toward the two northern barrels of the box culvert These design features are considered
necessary to protect the trail and prevent the necessity for recurring re air projects in this area The northern-
most barrel of the box culvert is currently blocked by sediment deposits almost to the bankfull elevation
Sediment deposits adjacent to the wing wall and upstream for about 20 feet will be removed or partially
removed to allow flows to access this barrel. Impacts at this location associated with trail construction are
considered permanent impacts. Impacts associated with rock vane construction and sediment removal are
considered temporary impacts
Impact Site 2 (S2) This site is located on the downstream end of the box culvert The greenway trail
Page 9 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

approaches the box culvert from the left bank, maximum slope of the trail must not exceed 5 %. Grading for
the trail will encroach into the stream channel at about trail station 12 +40, the trail enters the box culvert at
station 11 +60 The trail has been located so that the minimum amount of grading will be required but also so
that pre- and post - grading cross sectional area will be similar This cross section matching is necessary to
minimize the effect of the project on mapped FEMA floodplain areas. The edge of the trail facing the channel
will be protected from scour and erosion by large boulder rip -rap. The northern -most barrel of the box culvert
is currently blocked by sediment deposits almost to the bankfull elevation Sediment deposits adjacent to the
wing wall and upstream for about 20 feet will be removed or partiahy removed to allow flows to access this
barrel. Impacts at this location associated with trail construction are considered permanent impacts Impacts
associated with rock vane construction and sediment removal are considered temporary impacts
1b Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques
Permit conditions require that work be performed in the dry to the maximum extent practicable Efforts will be made throughout
the project construction phase to shift stream flow away from active work areas This will be accomplished by placing clean
boulders or sand bags as support for a plywood barrier to isolate the work area Work will be coordinated so that each
mstream activity will be completed in one day This barrier will be reinforced and with sandbags and plastic during the period
when concrete is poured in the box culvert The contractor will be required to monitor weather to insure no rain is forecast
within 48 hours of pouring concrete
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S or Waters of the State
2a Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U S or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ® No
2b If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply)
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
El Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a Name of Mitigation Bank
3b Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
3c Comments
I
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached
❑ Yes
4b Stream mitigation requested
4c If using stream mitigation, stream temperature
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only)
square feet
4e Riparian wetland mitigation requested
4f Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested
4g Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested
acres
4h Comments
i
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan
l
I
Page 10 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

6 Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a Will the protect result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ® No
6b If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation Calculate
amount of mitigation required
the
Zone
6c
Reason for impact
6d
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
15
6f Total buffer mitigation required
6g If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e g, payment to private mitigation
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund)
bank,
6h Comments
Page I 1 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1a
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
lb
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why
❑ Yes El No
Comments
2
Stormwater Management Plan
2a
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
25%
2b
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ® No
2c
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why The Middle Fork Greenway Trail
Section -1 involves the construction of about 4530 linear feet of paved trail 10 feet -wide This will create roughly 45300 sg
ftl of impervious area within a 42 acre easement post construction imperviousness will be about 2 5% There will be no
stormwater collection system and runoff will be distributed nearly evenly along a 4500 foot -long corridor The trail has
been located in uplands outside of the immediate riparian area and trout buffer to the extent practicable
2d
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative
description of the plan
❑ Certified Local Government
2e
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a
In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
❑ Phase II
3b
Which of the following locally - implemented stormwater management programs
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply)
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other
3c
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
4a
Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ HQW
❑ ORW
(check all that apply)
❑ Session Law 2006 -246
❑ Other
4b
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ❑ No
6
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 12 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

F. Supplementary Information
1 Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
la Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the
® Yes ❑ No
use of public (federal /state) land?
lb If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter )
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments
2 Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B 0200)?
2b Is this an after - the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s)
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
El Yes No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality
3b If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description
Although there will likely be future impacts to streams and /or wetlands associated with construction of future phases of
the MFG trail, these impacts will be minimal and will have negligible effec, on water quality In the case of agreenway trail
there is general consensus that the benefits to the greater Dublic good out -weigh any reasonably unavoidable impacts
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non - discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility
This project will not generate any wastewater
Page 13 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

=
5a. Wil this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b Have you checked with the USFUUS concerning Eked Species Ad
T
❑Yes ®No
impacts?
❑ Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
1
I
❑ Asheville
Ii
5d. What data soarces did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Spices or Designated
Cntical
Habitat?
{ USFWS database for T&E species in NCNVat mm 2RUM
a
i
S. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requite
6a. Wdl this project occur in or near an area did as essential fie habitat?
Oyes ® No
i 6b What data sources dal you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
South Attantic: Habitat and Ec ouyotem IMS fie- ocemi flame
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corp RequheirvnM
7a Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
{.
governments have desOuded as having historic or cultural preservation
Yes '
❑ ® No
status (e.g., National Histork Truce deskjnation or properties m th
North Carolina Mst wy and ardiaeology)?
i
Ij
7b What data sources dud you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
National Register of Historic Places- www- W_ncdcr govld NCHPO OWN Start Pacie
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirements
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA designated 100 -year Win? [ Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, expbvi how project meets FEMA requirements. A No- mpact Gee will be obtained
Sc. What source(s) did you use to make the fbodptain determination? An indent flood shift was Performed
by Sunnate
Design Groom. PA and the findrnm have been submitted to the Watauga County Floodaiain Coordinator. The flood
study Les in a MCAM Of o Inwed far activities assocaded with the coffin of the weenway
trail
William gi Hall
3
i"t�.
i
AppllcantlAgerit's Printed Name
Date
AppiicantlAgerifs Sgnature
(Agent's ssgniitwe is vafid only if an ma wnnuan Ww from the appitcarrt
g
Page 14 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

Agent Authorization Form
Project. Middle Fork Greenway
Date 11 -19 -2012
Property. Middle Fork Greenway Section I project corridor, Phase 2. consisting of a 20'
wide easement corridor
Parcel ID Watauga County # 2818988488000 2818981665000 NCDOT
BOR/Page 1412/576, 1029 /129, DOT easement pending
Street Address US Hwy 321 near Tweetsie RR
Owner Watau ag CgM Pathways, Inc.
Address 815 West King Street. Boone, NC 28607
Phone [phone]
The undersigned, registered property owners of the above noted property, do hereby
authorize Mr. John C. Vilas of ENV Environmental Consulting Services, Inc to act on
my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance of
this permit or certification and any and all standard and special conditions attached
I hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to
the best of my Knowledge
Aut orized Signature
W kt✓L%A
Printed Name
Date

Map Name: Unknown Scale: 1 inch = 2,000 ft. Horizontal Datum: NAD27
Print Date: 11/26/12 Map Center: 036.1646244° N OF
('
t--,/Yarnall Knob-
M
(,
_ -� - •�'
,.J. � ma=r' ��,
_ .. - _
Z
°o
C �,f ll _ -) rr ` s
Z
67
r
C.
Vol
E�od cam
Middle Fork Greenway kburn
7 _ \ Section 1 downstream limit b
Z
e',ForkCh
Z
°
`I' — 01i 120 ReSe1
•
CD
impact Area: Site 1 is upstream of
r
==' existing box culvert under Hwy 321 and
co
Site 2 is downstream
<>
.• V�_ Section 1: Phase 1 v __
rA
o
Section 1: Phase 2
o
-
o
(D
, _ Middle Fork Greenway
Section 1 upstream limit,_
J)
o
_ ;
3412 t } • �U
�- +�
o
U)
o
M
� � i � _��,� I• Ja 1, -
�
Middle Fork Greenway
Section 1, Phase 1 & 2
Z
Location Map `}
Z
AL ' C C arth ' ' ris;,tnc
0
081.660
000° W 081.650
000° W 081.640
000° W 081630
000°

!"u
%.
Izi
\ ``�� .•s�, \\�` \ \ \ \ -- . -/ / / / / / 41�ste r I �iI1 7`
J
i t)e
Pr_oos M
jidd I -Fork
\\
Green- r 1 -t act Abea
ro
LX
Impact Area 1 QHE ONE
ONE OHE ome OHE 1 ONE ONE _ `_ /
Ca
To p d 8br66
A ti"�r_ _'Whitener
' \ Middle Fork Greenwa
Y
Section 1 Phase 2
Site Plan
/
2T Trout er / / / Base Map by Valor Engineering, notes added by ENV -ECS, Inc.
�., Not To Scale
11 -8 -2012

...........
US Hwy 321
-------------- - ------- ------------
Ex DOT BQx--Cu,lvert -------
'triple 11'x11'x240'(approx)
Permanent
Impact Area I-A
915 sq.ft. Fill
6
fogged)
19
:Po.
...........
.........
DISCLAIMER: Basernap produced by Valor Engineering, Notes and edits by ENV-ECS, Inc., For planning purposes
only, Not intended for construction purposes
........
rn
Teporory
tem r nd permanent,
....... ...
I J
mf t
ac
......... .. .....
Area 1
culvert. /Total stream
706 sq ft.
,Q)
b
linea
Sedim nt
Remo al. Rip rap
0
Fork Greenway
to b placed
Site 1 (S1)
11-8-2012
airo nd exposed
n of wingwall
ii
DISCLAIMER: Basernap produced by Valor Engineering, Notes and edits by ENV-ECS, Inc., For planning purposes
only, Not intended for construction purposes
NOTE: 11 1 pacts, both
tem r nd permanent,
t ur w' hin 60 linear
t upsty6am of box
culvert. /Total stream
impact/at this site is 601.
,Q)
b
linea
Middle
Fork Greenway
Impact
Site 1 (S1)
11-8-2012
Not To Scale
DISCLAIMER: Basernap produced by Valor Engineering, Notes and edits by ENV-ECS, Inc., For planning purposes
only, Not intended for construction purposes

---- --- -- - -- - ---- -----
- - - -- -- - - - - - - - --
R
P
Middle Fork Greenway
3
r°
Impact Site 2 (S2) Ex. Septic
ti A
drain � ''d,�, 19 011*
111-8-2012 field
area
Not To Scale
x�
Rip ra to be p ced
NOTE: All i p s, both temporar alon toe of trai ' I
and perma a t, to occur within�80 slo a and a and of
linear fe do nstream of box r2 S e osed g w,
culvert,, Tot stream impaot'at this oy
site i 80 H ear feet.
Ex. Septic �
Tanks
a �
a`Q
' r
aL i2 empora
Impact
Qa Are -
o f di ent al
x DOT B vert
Triple 1'x240'
1 a P r-man (a r
m
O
e -A J5
–_— -
DISCLAIMER: Basemap produced by Valor Engineering, Notes and edits by ENV -ECS, Inc., For planning purposes only, Not intended for construction
purposes

F,
I
M
0/rA
Fic
Sti
ck a prox. 30 -35
ft. -long from e of GW
trail
I 1 VVICI RVt.RJ
Notes:
1. Exact location, elevation, angle and slope of rock vane to be
field determined during construction by Engineer or
Environmental Consultant
2. Inside face of rock vane to be overlapped with non -woven
filter cloth and backfilled with streambed material to prevent
gravel from washing through structure
3. Rock vane to be constructed of large boulders (4'x2'x2' typical)
4. Footer rocks to be installed at least 2' below streambed
Plan View
Greenway Trail
Profile View
Middle Fork Creek
Greenway PCN
Rock Vane Detail
Typical

Middle Fork Greenway PCN
Photo Sheet
11 -8 -2012
Site S1, looking from left side of channel at
upstream end of box culvert. Greenway trail is in
barrel #1. Barrel #3 is partially filled and blocked
by sediment that will be removed.
Site S1, looking downstream at upstream end of
box culvert (barrels numbered). Major design
features shown.
Site S2, Looking upstream, sediment blocking Site S2, Looking from right bank at downstream
barrel #3 is to be removed, rip rap will be placed end of box culvert.
to protect end of wingwall. Large boulder rip rap
will also be used to armor the greenway trail
slope.

PROJECT DIRECTORY SITE /CIVIL DEVELOPMENT PLANS FOR: SHEET INDEX
DEVELOPER /OWNER G -1 COVER SHEET
WATAUGA COUNTY PATHWAYS, INC. C -1 NOTES & DETAILS
C -1.1 NOTES & DETAILS
815 WEST KING STREET
C -2 STA. 00 +00.00 TO STA. 07 +75.00
BOONE, NC 28607 C -2.1 STA. 07 +75.00 TO STA. 14 +45.00
(828) 265 -7444
CONTACT: MR. WILLIAM H. HALL
CIVIL ENGINEER
VALOR ENGINEERING, PLLC
Fork Greenwa
215 BOONE HEIGHTS DR., SUITE 107
BOONE, NC 28607
(828) 262 -9807 NEAR MIDDLE FORK ROAD IN BLOWING ROCK, NC
CONTACT: MR. JASON GASTON, P.E.
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER •
L SQUARED ENGINEERING, PLLC
PO BOX 174
is I&
LAKE LURE, NC 28746
(828) 335 -2878 WATAUGA COUNTY
CONTACT: MR. LAURENCE LINDSEY, P.E.
PATHWAYS
SURVEYOR
APPALACHIAN PROFESSIONAL LAND
SURVEYORS AND CONSULTANTS
1480 U.S. HIGHWAY 421 SOUTH
BOONE, NC 28607
(828) 264 -0290 -
CONTACT: MR. DONALD MCNEIL "
c SITE
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANT �
ENV -ECS, INC.
3764 ROMINGER RD. y
BANNER ELK, NC 28604_
(828) 297 -6946
0
CONTACT: MR. JOHN VILAS
FLOODPLAIN CONSULTANT N
SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A. ° A o
915 JONES FRANKLIN ROAD
RALEIGH, NC 27606 � D
(919) 859 -2243
CONTACT: MR. HENRY WELLS, JR., P.E. VICINITY MAP mOXJ L�S�
NOT TO SCALE
24 HR CONTACT: MR. JASON GASTON, P.E. pENR - WAMR QUALITY
Branch
Wetlands Ovate?
(828) 262 -9807
PREPARED BY:
ALORREVISIONS:
NO. DESCRIPTION: BY: DATE:
ENGINEERING
215 Boone Heights Drive Suite 107
Boone, NC 28607 03 z33
828 - 262 -9807
November 9, 2012
024 -001

EROSION CONTROL NOTES:
1.) IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO OBTAIN QUALIFIED PROFESSIONAL ADVICE WHEN QUESTIONS ARISE CONCERNING DESIGN AND EFFECTIVENESS OF EROSION CONTROL DEVICES. 24 HR CONTACT: JASON GASTON, P.E. TJO- 722.9178.
2.) THE INSTALLATION OF EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AND PRACTICES SHALL TAKE PLACE PRIOR TO OR CONCURRENT WITH ALL LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE PROJECT
3.) EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES WILL BE MAINTAINED AT ALL TIMES. IF FULL IMPLEMENTATION OF THE APPROVED PUN DOES NOT PROVIDE FOR EFFECTIVE EROSION CONTROL, ADDITIONAL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED TO CONTROL OR TREAT THE
SEDIMENT SOURCE.
4.1 THE ESCAPE OF SEDIMENT FROM THE SITE SHALL BE PREVENTED BY THE INSTALLATION OF EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AND PRACTICES PRIOR TO, OR CONCURRENT WITH, ALL LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE PROJECT.
S.) THIS PROJECT REQUIRES COMPLIANCE WTIH ALL CONDITIONS OF THE GENERAL NPDES STORMWATER PERMIT TO DISCHARGE STOWWATER UNDER THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (PERMIT WNCWI0000). ANY PERMIT NONCOMPLIANCE 15 A VIOLATION OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT
AND MAY REQUIRE ENFORCEMENT ACTION BY NCDENR
6.) THIS PROJECT REQUIRES COMPLIANCE WITH SEDIMENTATION AND POLLUTION CONTROL ACTS SELF - INSPECTION PROGRAM FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO SUPPLY ALL NECESSARY INSPECTION REPORTS AND ANY OTHER INFORMATION REQUIRED
FOR COMPLIANCE.
7.) SEDIMENT STORAGE INDICATORS MUST BE INSTALLED IN SEDIMENT STORAGE STRUCTURES, INDICATING THE 113 FULL VOLUME. WHEN SILT FENCES BECOME 1/3 FULL OF SEDIMENT, THE SEDIMENT MUST BE REMOVED.
e.) MAINTENANCE OF ALL SOIL EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURES AND PRACTICES, WHETHER TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT, SHALL BE AT ALL TIMES THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PROPERTY OWNER
9.) AUK LL SLOPES SHALL HAVE SILT FENCE PLACED AT THE SLOPE'S TOE.
10.3 EROS ION CONTROL DEVICES THAT ARE INSTALLED AS DIRECTED BY THE LAND DEVELOPMENT INSPECTOR BUT NOT SHOWN W THE APPROVED PLAN AND WHICH ALSO SUBSEQUENTLY FAIL, ARE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR
11.3 ALL TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT SEEDING MUST BE PERFORMED AT THE APPROPRIATE SEASON. ADDITIONAL PLANTINGS WILL SE NECESSARY IF A SUFFICIENT STAND OF GRASS FAILS TO GROW.
12.) TOPSOIL SHALL BE STOCKPILED AND USED TO DRESS FINAL GRADES.
13.) STANDARDS a SPECIFICATIONS: ALL DESIGNS WILL CONFIRM TO AND ALL WORK WILL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS DETAILED IN THE CURRENT DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS OF WATAUGA COUNTY AND TINE PUBLICATION 'EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL
PLANNING AND DESIGN MANUAL".
14.) THE CONTRACTOR WILL CLEAN OUT ACCUMULATED SILT IN THE STORM DRAINAGE PIPES AT END OF CONSTRUCTION WHEN DISTURBED AREAS HAVE BEEN STABILIZED.
15.) APPROVAL Of THESE PLANS DOES NOT CONSTITUTE APPROVAL BY WATAUGA COUNTY O0. EM OF ANY LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES WITHIN WETLAND AREAS. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PROPERTY OWNER TO CONTACT THE APPROPRIATE REGULARITY AGENCY FOR APPROVAL OF ANY WETLAND THAT 15
DISTURBED.
16.) APPROVAL OF THESE PLANS DOES NOT CONSTITUTE APPROVAL BY WATAUGA COUNTY OR END OF ANY LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES WHICH MAY IMPACT AND ENDANGERED SPECIES. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PROPERTY OWNER TO CONTACT THE APPROPRIATE REGULATORY AGENCY FOR APPROVAL OF
MY DISTURBANCE WHICH MAY HAVE THIS EFFECT.
NPDES STORM WATER DISCHARGE PERMIT NOTES
MONITORING B INSPECTIONS
1) CONTRACTOR MUST KEEP A MIN GAUGE ON SITE.
2) DEDICATED DEMOLITION AND OTHER WASTE AREAS AND EARTHEN MATERIAL STOCKPILES MUST BE LOCATED AT LEAST SO' FROM STORM DRAINS OR STREAMS UNLESS NO ALTERNATIVE IS FEASIBLE.
3) CONTRACTOR MUST INSPECT ALL ENSC MEASURES AT LEAST ONCE A WEEK AND WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER ANY STORM EVENT GREATER THAN A HALF INCH (WRING A 24-HOUR PERIOD). CONTRACTOR MUST TAKE IMMEDIATE CORRECTIVE ACTION FOR ANY DEVICE FAILURE.
4) CONTRACTOR MUST INSPECT ALL OUTLETS WHERE STORM WATER RUNOFF LEAVES THE SITE AND EVALUATE THE EFFECT ON NEARBY STREAMS OR WETLANDS. CORRECTIVE ACTION MUST BE TAKEN If SEDIMENT IS DEPOSITED OFF SITE OR INTO A STREAM OR WETLAND, OR CAUSES A VISIBLE INCREASE IN
TU RBIDITY (CLOUDINESS) OF ANY WATERBODY
5) CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP RECORDS OF THESE INSPECTIONS AND ANY CORRECTIVE ACTIONS TAKEN.
OPERATION S. MAINTENANCE
CONTRACTOR MUST PROVIDE THE OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN OPTIMAL PERFORMANCE OF STOWWATER CONTROLS. THIS MEANS TAKE CORRECTIVE ACTION IF EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL FACILITIES ARE NOT OPERATING PROPERLY. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE INCLUDES,
BUT I54 NOT LIMITED TO:
REGULA RLY CLEANING OUT SEDIMENTATION BASINS.
b) STAIRU ING ERODED BANKS OR SPILLWAY STRUCTURES.
C) REPAIRING /CLEARING OUT INLETS AND OUTLETS.
d) REPAIRING PIPING, SEEPAGE AND MECHANICAL DAMAGE.
e) REPAIRING SILT FENCE DAMAGE.
REPORTING
REGULAR INSPECTIONS ARE A CHANCE TO CHECK IMPACTS TO NEARBY WATERS. IF CONTRACTOR OBSERVES SEDIMENT THAT HAS DEPOSIT IN A STREAM OR WETLAND, CONTRACTOR MUST NOTIFY THE DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY REGIONAL OFFICE WITHIN 24 HOURS AND PROVIDE WRITTEN NOTICE WITHIN 5
DAYS (SEE Y 3 ON PAGE 6 OF THE GENERAL PERMIT). CONTRACTOR SHALL SEND A COPY OF THIS CORRESPONDENCE TO THE DIVISION OF LAND RESOURCES (DUR).
INONCQMPLIANCE R FINES
PROJECTS THAT VIOLATE STORM WATER PERMIT CONDITIONS AND /OR HAVE UNAUTHORIZED WATER QUALITY IMPACTS APE SUBJECT TO FINES, CIVIL PENALTIES OF UP TO $25,000.00 PER DAY FOR EACH VIOLATION MAY BE ASSESSED.
RN WA A LWTI VEIRI RE UIRE E IlTHE FN PERMIT
THE FOLLOWING ACTIVITIES, ANp OTHERS ON A SITE•SPECIFlC BASIS, REQUIRE OVERSIGHT THROUGHOUT THE
CONSTRUCTION AND DEVEl OPMENT PROCESS TO ASSURE THAT ALL WATER QUALITY STANDARDS ARE PROTECTED:
A) EQUIPMENT OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE - EQUIPMENT UTILIZED DURING THE CONSTR(K M ALTJVITY ON A SITE MUST BE OPEMTEO AND MANTAIED IN SUCH A TANNER AS TO PREVENT THE POTENTIAL M ACTUAL POLLUTION OF THE SURFACE OR GROUND WATERS OF ME STATE. FUELS, LUBIUCANTS,
COOLANTS, AND HYDRAULIC FLUIDS, OR ANY OTHER PETROLEUM PRODUCTS, SHALL NOT BE DISCHARGED ONTO THE GROUND OR INTO SURFACE WATERS. SPENT FLUNK SHALL BE CLEANED UP AND DISPOSED Of IN A MANNER 50 AS NOT TO ENTER THE WATERS, SURFACE OR GROUND, OF THE STATE AND IN
ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE STATE AND FEDERAL REGULAT IONS.
a; MATERIAL HANDLING BE - HERBICIDE, PESTICIDE, AND FERTILIZER USAGE DURING THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH THE FEDERAL INSECTICIDE, FUNGICIDE, AND RODENTICIDE ACT AND SHA BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH LABEL RESTRICTIONS.
C) BUILDING MATERIAL WASTE HANDLING
i) ALL WASTES COMPOSED Of BUILDING MATERIALS SMALL BE DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE WITH NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL STATUTES, CHAPTER 130A, ARTICLE 9 - SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT, AND RULES GOVERNING THE
DISPOSAL OF SOLID WASTE (NORTH CAROLINA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE SECTION ISA NCAC 13B).
ILA LOCATE AREAS DEDICATED FOR MANAGEMENT OF LAND CLEARING AND DEMOLITION DEBRIS, CONSTRUCTION AND DOMESTIC WASTE, AND HAZARDOUS OR TOXIC WASTE. THIS LOCATION SHALL SE AT LEAST 50 FEET AWAY FROM
STORM ORAIN INLETS AND SURFACE WATERS UNLESS IT CAN BE SHOWN THAT NO OTHER ALTERNATIVES APE REASONABLY AVAILABLE.
IN) DUMPING OF PAINT AND OTHER LIQUID BUILDING MATERIAL WASTES IN STORM DRAINS IS PROHIBITED.
Iv) LITTER AND SANITARY WASTE - THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTROL THE MANAGEMENT AND DISPOSAL OF LITTER AND SANITARY WASTE FROM THE SITE.
D) LOCATION OF STOCK PILES - LOCATE EARTHEN- MATERIAL STOCK PILE AREAS AT LEAST 50 FEET AWAY MOM STORM DRAIN INLETS AND SURFACE WATERS UNLESS IT CAN BE SHOWN THAT NO OTHER ALTERNATIVES ARE REASONABLY AVAILABLE.
E) HANDINGOFCONCRETE
U CONCRETE MATERIALS ONSITE, INCLUDING EXCESS CONCRETE, MUST BE CONTROLLED AND MANAGED TO AVOID CONTACT WITH SURFACE WATERS, WETLANDS OR BUFFERS. NO CONCRETE OR CEMENT SLURRY SHALL BE
DISCHARGED MOM THE SITE. (NOTE THAT DISCHARGES MOM ONSITE CONCRETE PLANTS REQUIRE COVERAGE UNDER A SEPARATE NPDES PERMIT - NCG140000.)
II) ANY HARDENED CONCRETE RESIDUE WILL BE DISPOSED OF, OR RECYCLED ON SITE, IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL AND STATE SOLID WASTE REGULATIONS.
BlLF INSPECTION AND REPORTING R60UIRlMlNTS
MINIMUM SELF INSPECTION AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS A. AS FOLLOWS UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY.
A) A MIN GAUGE SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN GOOD WORKING ORDER ON THE SIR UNLESS ANOTHER MIN- MONTTORING DEVICE HAS BEEN APPROVED BY THE DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY.
B) A W RRTEN RECORD OF THE DAILY RAINFALL AMOUNTS SHALL BE RETAINED AND ALL RECORDS SHALL U MADE AVAILABLE TO DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY OR AIITHORIZED AGENT UPON REQUEST. IF NO DAILY RAIN GAUGE OBSERVATIONS APE MADE WRING WEEKEND OR HOLIDAY PERIODS, AND NO
INDIVIWAL -DAY RAINFALL INFORMATION 1S AVAILABLE, THE CUMULATIVE MIN MEASUREMENT FOR THOSE UNATTENDED DAYS WILL DETERMINE IF A SITE INSPECTION IS NEEDED. (NOTE: IF NO RAINFALL OCCURRED, THE PERMUTES MUST RECORD -ZERO').
C) EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL SE INSPECTED TO ENSURE THAT THEY ARE OPERATING CORRECTLY. INSPECTION RECORDS MUST SE MAINTAINED FOR EACH INSPECTION EVENT AND FOR EACH MEASURE. AT A MINIMUM, INSPECTION OF MEASURES MUST OCCUR AT THE FREQUENCY
INDICATED BELOW:
1) ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURES MUST BE INSPECTED BY OR UNDER THE DIRECTION OF THE PERMrrrU AT LEAST ONCE EVERY SEVEN CALENDAR DAYS, AND
N) ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES MUST BE INSPECTED BY OR UNDER THE DIRECTION OF THE PERMITTEE WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER ANY STORM EVENT OF GREATER THAN 0.50 INCHES OF MIN PER 24 HOUR PERIOD.
D) ONCE LAND DISTURBANCE HAS BEGUN ON THE SITE, STORMWATER RUNOFF DISCHARGE OIRFALLS SHALL BE INSPECTED BY OBSERVATION FOR EROSION, SEDIMENTATION AND OTHER STORM WATER DISCHARGE CHARACTERISTICS SUCH AS CLARITY, FLOATING SOLIDS, AND OR SHEENS. INSPECTIONS OF THE
OIRFALLS SHALL BE MADE AT LEAST ONCE EVERY SEVEN CALENDAR DAYS AND WITHIN 24 HOURS RATER ANY STORM EVENT OF GREATER THAN 0.50 INCHES OF RAIN PER 24 HOUR PERIOD,
E) INSPECTIONS ME ONLY REQUIRED TO BE MADE WRING NORMAL BUSINESS HOURS. WHEN ADVERSE WEATHER CONDITIONS WOULD CAUSE THE SAFETY OF THE INSPECTION PERSONNEL TO BE IN JEOPARDY, THE INSPECTION CAN BE DELAYED UNTIL IT IS DEEMED SAE TO PERFORM THESE DUKES. (TIMES
WHEN INSPECTIONS WERE DELAYED BECAUSE OF SAFETY ISSUES SHOULD BE NOTED IN THE INSPECTION RECORD.) IF THE INSPECTION CANNOT BE DONE ON THAT DAY, IT MUST BE COMPLETED ON THE FOLLOWING BUSINESS DAY.
F) TW ENTY -FOUR HOUR REPORTING FOR VISIBLE SEDIMENT DEPOSITION
ILA THE PERMITTEE SHALL REPORT TO THE DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY CENTRAL OFFICE OR THE APPROPRIATE REGIONAL OFFICE ANY VISIBLE SEDIMENT BEING DEPOSITED IN ANY STREAM OR WETLAND OR ANY NONCOMPLIANCE WHICH MAY ENDANGER HEALTH OR THE ENVIRONMENT. (SEE SECTION VID
OF THIS PERMIT FOR CONTACT INFORMATION.) ANY INFORMATION SHALL BE PROVIDED ORALLY OR ELECTRONICALLY WITHIN 24 HOURS MOM THE TIME THE PERMITTEE BECAME AWARE OF THE CIRCUMSTANCES.
H) A WRITTEN SUBMISSION SHALL BE PROVIDED TO THE APPROPRIATE REGIONAL OFFICE OF THE DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY WITHIN 5 DAYS OF THE TIME THE PERMITTEE BECOMES AWARE OF THE CIRCUMSTANCES. THE WRITTEN SUBMISSION SHALL CONTAIN A DESCRIPTION OF THE SEDIMENT
DEPOSITION AND ACTIONS TAKEN TO ADDRESS THE CAUSE OF THE DEPOSITION. THE DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY STAFF MAY WAIVE THE REQUIREMENT FOR A WRITTEN REPORT ON A CASE-BY -CASE BASIS.
G) RECORDS OF INSPECTIONS MADE DURING THE PREVIOUS 30 DAYS SHALL REMAIN ON THE SITE AND AVAILABLE MR AGENCY INSPECTORS AT ALL TIMES DURING NORMAL WORKING HOURS. UNLESS THE DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY PROVIDES A SITE - SPECIFIC EXEMPTION BASED ON UNIQUE SITE CONDITIONS
THAT MAKE THIS REQUIREMENT NOT PRACTICAL OLDER RECORDS MUST BE MAINTAINED FOR A PERIOD OF THREE YEARS AFTER PROJECT COMPLETION AND MADE AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST THE RECORDS MUST PROVIDE THE DETAILS OF EACH INSPECTION INCLUDING OBSERVATIONS, AND ACTIONS TAKEN IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THIS PERMIT. THE PERMITTEE SHALL RECORD THE REQUIRED RAINFALL AND MONITORING OBSERVATIONS ON THE INSPECTION RECORD FORM PROVIDED BY THE DIVISION OR A SIMILAR INSPECTION FORM THAT IS INCLUSIVE OF ALL OF THE ELEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE DMSION'S FORM.
USE OF ELECTRONICALLY- AVAILABLE RECORDS, IN LIEU OF THE REQUIRED PAPER COPIES FOR INSPECTION WILL BE ALLOWED IF SHOWN TO PROVIDE EQUAL ACCESS AND UTILITY AS THE HARD -COPY RECORDS.
H) INSPECTION RECORDS MUST INCLUDE, AT A MINIMUM, THE FOLLOWING:
1) CONTROL MEASURE INSPECTIONS: INSPECTION RECORDS MUST INCLUDE AT A MINIMUM: 1) IDENTIFICATION OF THE MEASURES INSPECTED, 2) DATE AND TIME OF THE INSPECTION, 3) NAME OF THE PERSON PERFORMING THE INSPECTION, 4) INDICATION OF WHETHER THE MEASURES WERE OPERATING
PROPERLY, 5) DESCRIPTION OF MAINTENANCE NEEDS FOR THE MEASURE, 6) CORRECTIVE ACTIONS TAKEN (7) DATE Of ACTIONS TAKEN, AS WELL AS THE DATE AND AMOUNTS OF RAINFALL RECEIVED.
113 ETORMWATM DISCHARGE INSPECTIONS: INSPECTION RECORDS MUST INCLUDE AT A MINIMUM: 1) IDENTFICATON OF THE DISCHARGE OUTFALL INSPECTED, 2) DATE AND TIME OF THE INSPECTION, 3) NAME OF THE PERSON PERFORMING THE INSPECTION, 4) EVIDENCE OF INDICATORS OF
STORMWATER POLLUTION SUCH AS OIL SHEEN, FLOATING OR SUSPENDED SOLIDS OR DISCOLORATION, 5) INDICATION OF VISIBLE SEDIMENT LEAVING THE SITE, 6) ACTIONS TAKEN TO OORRECT/PREVENT SEDIMENTATION AND 7) DATE OF ACTIONS TAKEN.
III) VISIBLE SEDIMENTATION FOUND OUTSIDE THE SITE LIMITS: INSPECTION RECORDS MUST INCLUDE: 1) AN EXPLANATION AS TO THE ACTIONS TAKEN TO CONTROL FUTURE RELEASES, 2) ACTIONS TAKEN TO CLEAN UP OR STABILIZE THE SEDIMENT THAT HAS LEPT THE SITE LIMITS AND 3) THE DATE OF
ACTIONS TAKEN.
IV) VI SIBLE SEDIMENTATION FOUND IN STREAMS OR WETLANDS: ALL INSPECTIONS SHOULD INCLUDE
EVALUATION OF STREAMS OR WETLANDS ONSITE OR OFFSTTE ( WHERE ACCESSIBLE) TO DETERMINE IF VISIBLE SEDIMENTATION HAS OCCURRED.
1) VISIBLE STREAM TURBIDITY - IF THE DISCHARGE FROM A SITE RESULTS IN AM INCREASE IN VISIBLE STREAM TURBIDITY, INSPECTION RECORDS MUST RECORD THAT EVIDENCE AND ACTIONS TAKEN TO REDUCE SEDIMENT CONTRIBUTIONS. SITES DISCHARGING TO STREAMS NAMED ON THE STATE'S 303(D) UST
AS IMPAIRED FOR SEDIMENT- RELATED CAUSES MAY BE REQUIRED TO PERFORM ADDITIONAL MONITORING, INSPECTIONS OR APLICATION OF MORE - STRINGENT MANAGEMENT PRACTICES IF IT IS DETERMINED THAT THE ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS ARE NEEDED TO ASSURE COMPLIANCE WITH THE FEDEML OR
STATE IMPAIRED- WATERS CONDITIONS. IF A DISCHMGE COVERED BY THIS PERMIT ENTERS A STREAM SEGMENT THAT IS LISTED ON THE IMPAIRED STREAM LIST FOR SEDIMENT- RELATED CAUSES, AND A TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOAD (TMDL) HAS BEEN PREPARED FOR THOSE POLLUTANTS, THE PERNUIEE MUST
IMPLEMENT MEASURES TO ENSURE THAT THE DISCHARGE OF POLLUTANTS FROM THE SITE IS CONSISTENT WITH THE ASSUMPTIONS AND MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE APPROVED TMDL.
FLOODWAY NOTES
1) A PORTION OF THIS PROJECT LIES WITHIN A FEMA REGULATED FLOODWAY AND FLOODPWN PER NCDFIRM 37102819001 DATED DECEMBER 3, 2009. SEE 'NO IMPACT" CERTIFICATION.
TOTAL DISTURBED AREA - 0.74 ACRES
LOCATION MAP
ANTICIPATED ACTIVITY
I— CONSTRUCTION FlBNUA0.Y
SCHEDULE
2013
MAtW
PNirH, ACTH.
' ,a W,. Aal,s
Nm
°
'
•
eMO CONSTAURION -
15,
SHEET TITLE:
NOTES & DETAILS
THU.,
ow
1.q,
.:, -:•� "• «.,,R
ACTIVITY
2.B
3.0
4.a
RM,
MTI MTN
MrM
MTH
•NpNlr.:l.
IN irA
f O
3
N CONTROL BMP
iF•4vde b�A4
FILTER FABRIC
1
LATION
"•. "•
WIRE FENCE
Zaow
SITE
2 G AND GRABBING
r
TION /GRADING OF
3 AY
REVISIONS DATE
•L
4
�A1 SILT FENCE DETAIL
,
5 ARY COVER )
E LEAN UP
NANCE OF ENSC
ES
" C
NPDES STABILIZATION TABLE:
ERTALIIE SHOULDER TO
OF DISTURBANCE
1.) CROSS SLOPE DIRECTION SHOULD VARY ACCORDING TO NATURAL DRAINAGE '"' '"'
PATTERNS. IN GENERAL, SLOPE TOWARD STREW.
AGGREGATE BASE
AM
ONPACTED SUBGMDE
10' ASPHALT GREENWAY CROSS SECTION ONTRACTO0.TO
NOT TO SCALE EXCAVATE GREENWAY SO
THAT STONE WE AND
PAVEMENT DO NOT
CAUSE A CHANGE IN
EXISTING GRADE.
-, r •r •r •r gr tr,•r it -L. .r.- I •
Y�Y C I rY LY L! _•Y- LYti�T,_
OLD ✓i`� ✓ ✓`��� �✓
© / , • 1 caloum
FERTAILIZE
OF DISTURBANCE
DOUBU ROW OF SILT FENCE
OUTSIDE 2' SHOULDER ADJACENT
TO STREW BUFFER
I' j \ TYPICAL EROSION CONTROL �APLYDST CONTROL
NOT TO SCALE APPLY DUST CONTROL TO
GREENWAY (AS NEEDED)
r_B' MAX STANDARD STRENGTH FABRIC WITH WIRE FENCE
6' MAX. EXTRA STRENGTH FABRIC WITHOUT WIRE FENCE
S(Eg POST ' I-- TIESSRC OR LURE
PROJECT:
Phase of the
Middle Fork
GADDRESS: reenway
Near Middle Fork Road in
Blowing Rock NC
DEVELOPER:
&1014"A
WATAUGA COUNTY
PATHWAYS
815 West King Street
Boone, NC 28607
CONTACT: Mr. William H. Hall
ENGINEER:
ALOFT
Elvcl
215 50ONE HEIGHTS DRIVE, STE. 107
BOONE, NC 28607
828- 262 -9807
www.ve43rcnglneeAnq.com
SEAL:
WIRE FENCE —�
_
Sir
MAtW
PNirH, ACTH.
' ,a W,. Aal,s
Nm
TkoL
ropi,r
11/09/12
SHEET TITLE:
NOTES & DETAILS
THU.,
ow
1.q,
N,mr
FILE NUMBER:
- -
• e19�*rM
RM,
.Nyn tee.•
dr J.1
t O3 23 _
•NpNlr.:l.
IN irA
• � l'.Ia
uAw,
iF•4vde b�A4
FILTER FABRIC
"•. "•
WIRE FENCE
Zaow
ERTALIIE SHOULDER TO
OF DISTURBANCE
1.) CROSS SLOPE DIRECTION SHOULD VARY ACCORDING TO NATURAL DRAINAGE '"' '"'
PATTERNS. IN GENERAL, SLOPE TOWARD STREW.
AGGREGATE BASE
AM
ONPACTED SUBGMDE
10' ASPHALT GREENWAY CROSS SECTION ONTRACTO0.TO
NOT TO SCALE EXCAVATE GREENWAY SO
THAT STONE WE AND
PAVEMENT DO NOT
CAUSE A CHANGE IN
EXISTING GRADE.
-, r •r •r •r gr tr,•r it -L. .r.- I •
Y�Y C I rY LY L! _•Y- LYti�T,_
OLD ✓i`� ✓ ✓`��� �✓
© / , • 1 caloum
FERTAILIZE
OF DISTURBANCE
DOUBU ROW OF SILT FENCE
OUTSIDE 2' SHOULDER ADJACENT
TO STREW BUFFER
I' j \ TYPICAL EROSION CONTROL �APLYDST CONTROL
NOT TO SCALE APPLY DUST CONTROL TO
GREENWAY (AS NEEDED)
r_B' MAX STANDARD STRENGTH FABRIC WITH WIRE FENCE
6' MAX. EXTRA STRENGTH FABRIC WITHOUT WIRE FENCE
S(Eg POST ' I-- TIESSRC OR LURE
PROJECT:
Phase of the
Middle Fork
GADDRESS: reenway
Near Middle Fork Road in
Blowing Rock NC
DEVELOPER:
&1014"A
WATAUGA COUNTY
PATHWAYS
815 West King Street
Boone, NC 28607
CONTACT: Mr. William H. Hall
ENGINEER:
ALOFT
Elvcl
215 50ONE HEIGHTS DRIVE, STE. 107
BOONE, NC 28607
828- 262 -9807
www.ve43rcnglneeAnq.com
SEAL:
WIRE FENCE —�
_
NATURAL GROUND
DRAWING BY:
JEG
JURISDICTION:
c ."
.�, >
11/09/12
SHEET TITLE:
NOTES & DETAILS
,: •ORS CAq "'•,,
8. DORM a,
4" FORWARD
FILE NUMBER:
- -
ALONG
E TRENCH ` FILTER FABRIC
t O3 23 _
•• %1 TF!, Nf, {.
FILTER FABRIC
"•. "•
WIRE FENCE
GAS ,.
BACKFILL TRENCH AND COMPACT THOROUGHLY
STEEL POST FLQW—
r
E NATURAL GROUND
REVISIONS DATE
•L
�A1 SILT FENCE DETAIL
NOT TO SCALE
POST
END Fff=�
HO•
RAIL
V It
PERSPECTIVE VIEW
MONT VIEW
NOTES:
I) ALL WOOD FOR FENCE TO BE PRESSURE TREATED.
2) END POST SHALL BE TERMINL POST.
STANDARD SPLIT -RAIL FENCE
NOT TO SCALE
Know what% IOW
0811 before you di9
PROJECT MANAGER:
JEG
DRAWING BY:
JEG
JURISDICTION:
WATAUGA COUNTY
DATE:
11/09/12
SHEET TITLE:
NOTES & DETAILS
SHEET NUMBER:
C_1
SCALE: NTS
FILE NUMBER:
024 -001

PROJECT:
1/8 " RADIUS TVP.
t /8' WIDE % 1' DEEP
a a Pa 4
Oofthe
CONSTRUCTION JOINT
3338
COLD POUR SINGLE COMPONENT SEALANT MATERIAL,
HEALPROO1 WRH SHORE A HARDNESS OF 3S OR GREATER.
1 SEALANT IS TO BE FLUSH WITH PAVING SURFACE.
1/4" R.TYP. Ir
Dial /�,.�
East Dial Headwall Cross— section (Up Stream)
(Left t0 Right)
Elev.= JJ.T6.68'
l '
ev.- 3JJ6.2J
Phase
Middle Fork
'
JJ36
(3 5 /8- BACKER ROD
8'-0
Greenway
' AIR GAP
ADDRESS:
D BITUMINOUS, NON - EXTRUDING, RESILIENT PRE FORMED
MILER MATERIAL (COMPLY WITH ASTM D1751) INSTALLED
JJ34
Near Middle Fork Road in
Blowing Rock NC
CONTROL JOINT TO HILL DEPTH OF CONCRETE SLAB.
DEVELOPER:
�6� CONTROL AND EXPANSION JOINTS FOR SIDEWALK I
NOT TO SCALE 3332
TIE-IN PROPOSED ASPHALT TO PROPOSED
CRIB WALL
TO
REBAR TOCO.C.) CRIB WALL TO
WALKWAY O.C.)
W
I
WATAUGA COUNTY
a4 REBAR TO CONNECT WALKWAY TO
`:. CULVERT (24• D.C.)
3mo
-
PATH WAYS
_d, _ -_. � _ _ - _ _ �� 6' 4,000 PSI CONCRETE WITH
CONSTRUCTION JOINTS EVERY 10' O.C.
CONTROL JOINTS SHALL BE PLACED AT 40'
INTERVALS.
.4
�. 616 4 GAUGE WELDED WIRE FABRIC OR
k4 REBAR UL CONNECT CRIB EQUIVALENT
WALL TO CULVERT (12" D.C.)
STONE FILL (.67 EACH AJBM). PLACE STONE
PROPOSED "CRIB WALL" TO CONTAIN IN 1' LIFTS WITH EACH LIFT SUBJECTED TO
3328
PROPOSED 1" DEEP x 4"
WIDE SWALF FOR WEEP
HOLE SEEPAGE
Es Ground level
815 West King Street
Boone, NC 28607
CONTACT: Mr. William H. Hall
STONE CULVERT WITH *4 RE A BOTTOM WITH LEAST II BUT NO MORE THAN 6 PASSES
OF CULVERT W RH SPACED '4 WITH A VIBPATORY PLATE COMPACTOR.
SLOPE 1L = 32 LPL TO WA E S WALE
PR TRAJI = 3326.3
ENGINEER:
S. A,RAR
ON 12" CENTERS. BA0.5 SHALL BE REMOVE SILT /CLEAN TO BOTTOM OF E %. 3326 6' OIKRETE'
BY CORING INTO THE EXISTING CULVERT SILT TO BE
CONNECTED TO THE CULVERT BOTTOM I F
CONCRETE AND SETTING REBAR INTO EX. CONCRETE CULVERT BOTTOM REMOVED
EPDXY PER MANUFACTURE'S �—
RECOMMENDATIONS. ALLOW
STONE
FILL --
CONCRETE C(OB WALLS TO CURE FOR
AT LEAST 4 GAYS PRIOR TO FILLING
WITH STONE.
JJ2,t
ve Pq BOTTOM. J324A
B°llgR' le
Ex Riva Bottpm Level ,wr
A L O R
ENGINEERING
7 CONCRETE GREENWAY THROUGH CULVERT
NOT TO SCALE
J522
215 BOONE HEIGHTS DRIVE, STE. 107
BOONE, NC 28607
US � xs _
_ -
JJ20
CONTRACTOR TO REMOVE 5I1 To
PROPOSED ARMOR/FILL AT CULVERT P
ENTRANCE ROPOSED BOTTOM ELEVATION OF
3324.4
828- 262 -9807
www.valoren Ineerin
9 g.mm
0.00 5.00 1000 15.00 200 25.00 J0.00 35.00
4000
SEAL:
%
t R,,3
Rock z. 30 -35
ft. -long hoa. of GW
trail'.95'1i7/NE
I
JJJB
.
@ rA' .
'•'�' GA9�dt;o'':
l
JJJ6
e9
Nast End Headwall Cross — section (Down Stream)
I (Left to Right) FJez= J334.54'
1
Ele— JJJ4.29'
2
Plan View
Filter lh
ot
3314
REVISIONS DATE
1.90' i -0*
Bankfull�__�,_ 1
� GreMway Trail
Flow - - -'
33J1
Steam Brd
J
Footer ",,,.L.' PrVffle VIEW
3330
Notes: - - - -- _— _
1. Exact location, elevation, angle and slope of rock vane to be
field determined during construction by Engineer or
Environmental Consultant
2. Inside fate of rock vane to be overlapped with non -woven
Filter cloth and backfilled with streambed material to prevent
3326
PROJECT MANAGER' JeG
gravel from washing through structure
3. Rock vane to be constructed of large boulders (4'x:'x -' typical)
PROPOSED 1" DEEP x 4'
DRAWING BY: JEG
4. Footer rocks to be installed at least below etneambed WIDE SWALE FOR WEEP
HOLE SEEPAGE
%Q� ] -HOOK
NOT TO SCALE
JJ26
s
PR TRAJL - 3325.5
JURISDICTION: WATAUGA COUNTY
DATE: 11/09/12
concgere
SHEET TITLE:
SILT TO BE STONE
3324
REMOVED FILL
) Wp(er revel
Ev River B°ttomtewV
NOTES & DETAILS
Pq BOTTOM = JJI3.0
SHEET NUMBER: C -1.1
JJ22
SCALE:
CONTRACTOR TO REMOVE SILT TO
PROPOSED BOTTOM ELEVATION OF
3323.0 PROPOSED ARMOR/FILL
ig 15 0 30 60
3320 AT CULVERT ENTRANCE
0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 2000 . 25.00 30.00
35.00 40.00
Know What's BLOW
0311 before you dig
SGLE IN FEET
FILE NUMBER: 024-001

3350
0 +00.00 TO 7 +75.00
3350
PROJECT:
3345
EXISTING GRADE. CONTRACTOR TO
EXCAVATE GREENWAY 50 THAT
STONE BASE AND PAVEMENT DO NOT
3345
Ooithle
3340
CAUSE A CHANGE IN EXISTING ".
GRADE
3340
3335
- - _ --
- - - --
_ . -- g.sssu -- — -r. -4.7s%
-- 3335
Phase
3330
PROPOSED GREENWAY SHALL NOT SLOPE MORE THAN 5 %.
Middle Fork
n R
3330
3325
3325
Greenway
i
C m
ADDRESS:
3320
O
�
� �
3320
Near Middle Fork Road in
�
Blowing Rock, NC
3315
3315
DEVELOPER:
3310
3310
0 +00 0 +50 1 +00 1 +50 2 +00
2 +50 3 +00
3 +50 4 +00 4 +50 5 +00
5 +50 6 +00 6 +50 7 +00 7 +50
7 +75
M
30 15 0 30 60 10 5 0
10 20
WATAUGA COUNTY
HORIZONTAL SCALE IN FEET VERTICAL SCALE IN FEET
PATHWAYS
j
815 West King et
Boone,
NC 2 607
CONTACT: Mr. Wllllam H. Hall
ENGINEER:
/ cF
i
- -- --
- --
_- ._, _
R.walaeuaeer.aoe
a/ Rllw 669 at page 2z1 i / j ./
- —__ PIN: 18/8981665000
-
/
215 BOONBOONE, NC DRIVE, 2 607 S7E. 107
828- 262 -9807
J
ww—alo engl....1,9.co
r /
SEAL:
• __ -_
-.
/
03 233 i
"• 1 '1{INE � { ^
�•'
/
EXISTING W W LINE ��
PROPOSED 10' ASPHALT GREENWAY TRAIL EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT
\\ Blue RWge Rural Land T—t -
Back o{ Rec. 1019 at poge r79 30' VEGETATIVE SETBACK
PIN 1BIM.1B8000
i���
�— ��' —`
/ / f
/ j — J APPROXIMATE aagV�.
Lounon OF �. ���� /
EXISTING GRAVEL TRAIL
DRIVE
REVISIONS DATE
—
— o
15' UNDISTURBED BUFFER
0.EGUlAT00.Y TOP OF BANK
/
FI..d
_
W
�
3340
--_— ______ ____'^_��� � u g �
� • /
\ \
4
I RAT ° SIG
J RDAD2R09SING AT STA 5+86
iROAD CROSSING AT STA. 5 +67.
APPROXIMATE
OF
PROJECT MANAGER: ]EG
APPROXIMATE
LOCATION OF EX.
TRAIL
PROPOSED LIMITS OF CLEARING.
CONTRACTOR TO BENS E
0.1.1' 'SIGN -�
DRAWING BY: JEG
TRIi TI AS NECESSARY
FOR PROPOSED TRAIL. ALL \
DISTURBED AREA INSIDE LIMITS OF
TO BE SEEDED. \
-
/ /
JURISDICTION: WATAUGA COUNTY
DATE. 11/09/12
CLEARING
/
SHEET TITLE:
STA. 0 +00 TO
+ 5.00
SWI,g H. IBdt—
O Rea. 97 at page +za
wN za1697eaTZOao
- - --AE � Y ��
SHEET NUMBER:
C_2
� - 16.1 Acres
�
� j
� ---- ,;
— — - -�
•
SCALE: 1° - 30•
30 15 0 30 60
\
/
J
Knowwhat'e @SOW
SCAIE IN FEET
�
/"
Cali before you dig
FILE NUMBER: 024 -001

PROJECT:
3350
7+75.00 TO 14 +45.00
3350
3345
3345
"Phase
3340
�- \
-
the
3335 __
..
,. _ _ __.
3335
-4. --
Middle Fork
3330
Z5%
�\ -
_
Ex CULVERT _. _. _—
� -.. _ ➢.58%. -_ -. . - - - -. ___.._ ___..
__ --
3330
PROPOSED GREEN WAY SHALL MOTS
3325
•�
-- -
Greenway
_
_i'_
_
v .t
3325
ADDRESS:
3320
3320
Near Middle Fork Road in
$
m
B
Blowing Rock NC
15
^��'- �•3
O
3315
DEVELOPER:
3310
3310
7 +75 8 +00
8 +50 9 +00 9 +50 10 +00
10 +50 11 +00 11 +50 12 +00
12 +50 13 +00 13 +50 14 +00 14 +45
NIANVE
30 15 0 30
60 10 5 0 10 20
WATAUGA COUNTY
HORIZONTAL SCALE IN FEET
VERTICAL SCALE IN FEET
PATHWAYS
815 West King et
Boone, NC 2 607
CONTACT: Mr. William H. Hall
a
ENGINEER:
\
�� /
\\
\ `
✓ E)GSTING u" acv NPE
CONTRACTOR TO SAWCUT PORTION OF
PROPOSED SPLIT RAIL FENCE TO
215 BOONE HEIGHTS DRIVE, STE. 107
80 NC 28607
\
/
EXISTING CONCRETE FLU E EXISTING RCP AND TIE -IN TO PROPOSED
JUNCTION BOX.
SEPARATE GREEN WAY FROM EXISTING
GRAVEL PARKING AREA- SET FENCE 2'
826- 262 -9807
28-2
U \
\
PROPOSED CONC APRON AND GATE INLET TOP - 3333.00
(NCDOT STD ) \ INV. IM 3_ 3331.00
FOG APR EVAT ON - 3330.00
FROM EDGE OF PAVEMENT.
PROPOSED TIE-IN TO PHASE 1
w.vabrenglneerin
�• ➢•wm
\
INV. OUT - 3327.50
3RR TE T
TE TOP -3329.W
\
/
INV. OIfT 3324.50
24.5
SEAL:
EXISTING STONES TO BE REMOVED NEEDED) FOR\ 20 LF. O T 12" RCP ®2.5%
INV. OUT- 332].00
\ �✓p\\
'
=-
CT .
GREENWAY INSTALLATION. AS
RECYCIF STONES AND USE AS ARMOR/PROTECTON.
\
.
•'•.
R. Rh UnEer -ood
^e -
42 L.F. OF 15" HOPE 0 1.19%
INV. OUT - 3324.00
r' pPt . �q-
't
\
Book of Recd 689 aM page 224
\
.
PIN T8I8981665000
- 2019 Ames
EKISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT wP
30' VCi'.EfArnrnFF GGEIBACK s•
�• UNDISTURBED BUFFER- \ +
_
= 03 233
� - ..�..\ \
.,
PROPOSED IV ASPHALT GREENW AY TRA
(ASPHALT OUTSIDE OF CULVERT) ___ -_ -_
••'7s "NrNF��L�• ••
'•' "
__
GAB "o"
REVISIONS DATE
12�F_ \
�\ v
.dam.
EX CULVERT
-,•y
CONCRETE GREEN WAY INSIDE CULVERT
SILT /DEBRIS TO BE REMOVED FROM
MIDDLE AND NORTM BARREL- SEE
CULVERT CRO55•SECTI
-
.
DETAILS
PROJECT MANAGER: JEG
DRAWING BY: JEG
POLE MOUNTED WB-18
'ROAD MAY FLOOD" SIGN
_ EAST END OF CULVERT (UPSTREAM)
FLO
Y UNE
—
JURISDICTION: WATAUGA COUNTY
_ _ --��
EXISTING UK
i
<
DATE: 11 /09 /12
SHEET TITLE.
PI�OPBSE U60EWSMINE
-_
- PLYWOOD MRRRRIER TO VAUSED'�5 r --,C
- —� -/ ///���,,,
A CULVERT MOUNTED "s
STREAM DIVERSION. O BE bIVERIED TO ,,-
-
ARP0.0PRIATE BARREL ATCO\ M,
-
�;' ��� \
_J/
�. - _ _ \\
— — —
l.0'N HEADROOM SIGN
J
STA. 7 +75.00 TO
\
/ _j
\ _
— \
_-
STA. 14 +45.00
SHEET NUMBER:
\
CLASS II RIPRAP PRDTECr1011 ON _ -� -` "..
CULVERT MOUNTED W12 -2
C-2.1
CULVERT MOUNTED "CAUTION
"'... MAW MEADROON "SIGN
GRADED AREA UPSTREAM OF l
CULVERT. CONTRACTOR MAY \
\\ 2' -0" LO CE�51BN
- -__ -__ ,
I" 30'
/ RECYCLE EXISTING STREAM BED
- CLASS IIHIAIA PROTECTION ON
\_., i � i - _-
- - - - -"
SCALE: -
_ , Ya
S V
f STONES IF THEY ARE 8.12' IN SIZE. \
\ GRADED AREA DOWNSTREAM OF
\ MAY CULVERT. CONTRACTOR MAY
L _ / / \
\, J
30 15 0 30 60
,..- RECYCLE EXISTING STREAM BED
R•O �' - -- - --
.-
CULVERT
\.
STONES IF THEY ARE B-IY IT SIZE -
\ , -' --
- -' -�
_
\
SCALE IN FEET
FILE NUMBER: 024 -001
CLEARANCE SIG KNOW WI1BI�3 IOW
\B' -0" LOW CIEARANCF SIGN LLD HMOUNTER) LOOD" MGN
9A \
Call before you dg