NC0078955_NPDES Permit Renewal_20160422

Environmental
Quality
State of North Carolina
Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Staff Report
To: ® NPDES Unit ❑ Non -Discharge Unit Application No.: NC0078955
Facility name: A.B. Uzzle WTP
Attn: Bob Sledge
From: (name of Reviewer in Regional Office)
Choose an item. Regional Office
Note: This form has been adapted from the non -discharge facility staff report to document the review of both non -
discharge and NPDES permit applications and/or renewals: Please complete all sections as they are applicable.
I. GENERAL ANI) SITE VISIT INFORMATION
1. Was a site visit conducted? ® Yes or n No
a. Date of site visit: 4/18/2016
b. Site visit conducted by: Chad Turlington
c. Inspection report attached? ® Yes or ❑ No
d. Person contacted: Pamela Gibbons and their contact information: (910) 897 - 5129
e. Driving directions:
2. Discharge Point(s):
Latitude: Longitude:.
Latitude: Longitude:
3. Receiving stream or affected surface waters:
Classification: C
River Basin and Subbasin No.: 18-21
Describe receiving stream features and pertinent downstream uses:
II. PROPOSED FACILITIES: NEW APPLICATIONS
1. Facility Classification: (Please attach completed rating sheet to be attached to issued permit)
Proposed flow:
Current permitted flow:
2. Are the new treatment facilities adequate for the type of waste and disposal system?. n Yes or:n No
If no, explain:
3. Are site conditions (soils, depth to water table, etc) consistent with the submitted reports? ❑ Yes ❑ No n N/A
If no, please explain:
4. Do the plans and site map represent the actual site (property lines, wells, etc.)? ❑ Yes ❑ No,❑ N/A
If no; please explain:
5. Is the proposed residuals management plan adequate? n Yes n No n N/A
If no, please explain:
FORM: WQROSSR 04-14 Page 1 of 5

6. Are the proposed application rates (e.g., hydraulic, nutrient) acceptable? ❑ Yes n No ❑ N/A
If no, please explain:
7. Are there any setback conflicts for proposed treatment, storage and disposal sites? ❑ Yes or n No
If yes, attach a map showing conflict areas.
8. Is the proposed or existing groundwater monitoring program adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A
If no, explain and recommend any changes to the groundwater monitoring program:
9. For residuals, will seasonal or other restrictions be required? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A
- If yes, attach list of sites with restrictions (Certification B)
Describe the residuals handling and utilization scheme:
10. Possible toxic impacts to surface waters:
11. Pretreatment Program (POTWs only):
III. EXISTING FACILITIES: MODIFICATION AND RENEWAL APPLICATIONS
1. Are there appropriately certified Operators in Charge (ORCs) for the facility? ® Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A
ORC: Pamela Gibbons Certificate #: 997968 Backup ORC: Crystal Parrish Certificate #: 997967
2. Are the design, maintenance and operation of the treatment facilities adequate for the type of waste and disposal
system? ® Yes or n No
If no, please explain:
Description of existing facilities: holding lagoon, clarifier, dechlorination,.drying beds
Proposed flow:
Current permitted flow:
Explain anything observed during the site visit that needs to be addressed by the permit, or that may be important
for the permit writer to know (i.e., equipment condition, function, maintenance, a change infacilityownership,
etc.)
3. Are the site conditions (e.g., soils, topography, depth to water table, etc) maintained appropriately and adequately
assimilating the waste? ❑ Yes or ❑ No
If no, please explain:
4. Has the site changed in any way that may affect the permit (e.g., drainage added, new wells inside the compliance
boundary, new development, etc.)? ❑ Yes or n No
If yes, please explain:
5. Is the residuals management plan adequate? n Yes or n No
If no, please explain:
6. Are the existing application rates (e.g., hydraulic, nutrient) still acceptable? n Yes or ❑ No
If no, please explain:
7. Is the existing groundwater monitoring program adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ No n N/A
If no, explain and recommend any changes to the groundwater monitoring program:
8. Are there any setback conflicts for existing treatment, storage and disposal sites? n Yes or No
If yes, attach a map showing conflict areas.
9. Is the description of the facilities as written in the existing permit correct? n Yes or ❑ No
If no, please explain:
10. Were monitoring wells properly constructed and located? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A
If no, please explain:
FORM: WQROSSR 04-14 Page 2 of 5

11. Are the monitoring well coordinates correct in BIMS? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A
If no, please complete the following (expand table if necessary):
Monitoring Well
Latitude
Longitude
O ,
N
0
,
II
0 ,
„
.. 0
O ,
„
0
/
11
0 ,
B
0
,
II
O ,
„
0
,
„ -
12. Has a review of all self -monitoring data been conducted (e.g., DMR, NDMR, NDAR, GW)? ® Yes or ❑ No
Please summarize any findings resulting from this review:
Provide input to help the permit writer evaluate any requests for reduced monitoring, if applicable.
13. Are there any permit changes needed in order to address ongoing BIMS violations? ❑ Yes or n No
If yes, please explain:
14. Check all that apply:
® No compliance issues ❑ Current enforcement action(s) ❑ Currently under JOC
❑ Notice(s) of violation ❑ Currently under SOC ❑ Currently under moratorium
Please explain and attach any documents that may help clarify answer/comments (i.e., NOV, NOD, etc.)
If the facility has had compliance problems during the permit cycle, please explain the status. Has the RO been
working with the Permittee? Is a solution underway or in place?
Have all compliance dates/conditions in the existing permit been satisfied? ® Yes ❑ No n N/A
If no, please explain:
15. Are there any issues related to compliance/enforcement that should be resolved before issuing this permit?
❑Yes ®No❑N/A
If yes, please explain:
16. Possible toxic impacts to surface waters: .
17. Pretreatment Program (POTWs only):
FORM: WQROSSR 04-14 Page 3 of 5

IV. REGIONAL OFFICE RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Do you foresee any problems with issuance/renewal of this permit? ❑ Yes or ❑ No
If yes, please explain:
2. List any items that you would like the NPDES Unit or Non -Discharge Unit Central Office to obtain through an
additional information request:
Item
Reason
3. List specific permit conditions recommended to be removed from the permit when issued:
Condition
Reason
4. List specific special conditions or compliance schedules recommended to be included in the permit when issued:
Condition
Reason
5. Recommendation:
n Hold, pending receipt and review of additional information by regional office
n Hold,pending review of draft permit by regional office
n Issue upon receipt of needed additional information
® Issue
❑ Deny (Please state reasons: )
6. Signature of report preparer: C .
Signature of regional supervisor:
Date: 4/1/2 �_67
FORM: WQROSSR 04-14
Page 4 of 5

V. ADDITIONAL REGIONAL STAFF REVIEW ITEMS
FORM: WQROSSR 04-14 Page 5 of 5

North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Pat McCrory
Governor
April 20, 2016
Ronald D Autry
City of Dunn
PO Box 1065
Dunn, NC 28335
SUBJECT: 4/18/2016 Compliance Evaluation Inspection
City of Dunn
A.B. Uzzle WTP
Permit No: NC0078955
Harnett County
Donald R. van der Vaart
Secretary
Dear Mr. Autry:
Enclosed please find a copy of the Compliance Evaluation Inspection form from the inspection
conducted on 4/18/2016. The Compliance Evaluation Inspectionwas conducted by Chad Turlington of
the Fayetteville Regional Office. The facility was found to be in Compliance with permit NC0078955. As.
a reminder, preservation of the Waters of the State can only be achieved through consistent NPDES
Permit compliance.
Please refer to the enclosed inspection report for additional observations and comments. If you or your
staff have any questions, please call me at 910-433-3320.
Sincerely,
Chad Turlington
Environmental Specialist
Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
cc: Pamela P Gibbons, ORC
Central Files
Fayetteville Files
Fayetteville Regional Office
225 Green Street, Suite 714, Fayetteville, North Carolina 28301-5095
Main Phone: [phone] Internet: http://www.ncdenr.gov
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer — Made in part by Recycled Paper

United States Environmental Protection Agency
E PA Washington, D.C. 20460
Water Compliance Inspection. Report -
Form Approved.
OMB No. 2040-0057
Approval expires 8-31-98
Section A: National Data System Coding (i.e., PCS)
Transaction Code NPDES "yr/mo/day r , Inspection
1 L 2 [ I 3 I NC0078955 - 111 12 I 16/04/18 I17
-Type
18 1.2]
IIIIIII
Inspector FacType
19 [ G i 201 I
21IIIIII IIIIII11I II III IIII I I IIIII
II II r6
Inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating B1 QA--------- —Reserved-----
67I I 70I 171172 LJ1 �, 1 731 I 174 751
1I I
-
180
11I 111
Section B: Facility Data
Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Users discharging to POTW, also include -
POTW name and NPDES permit Number)
A.B. Uzzle WTP
805 W E St
Erwin NC 263391914
Entry Time/Date
09:00AM. 16/04/18
Permit Effective Date
11/12/01
Exit Time/Date
10:30AM 16/04/18
Permit Expiration Date
16/09/30
Name(s) of Onsite Representative(s)/Titles(s)/Phone and Fax Number(s)
///
Pamela P Gibbons/ORC/919-897-5129/
Other Facility Data
'
Name, Address of Responsible Official/Title/Phone and Fax Number
Contacted
Ronald D Autry,PO Box 1065 Dunn NC 28335/City
Manager/910-230-3500/9102303590 No
Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated)
Permit Flow Measurement • Operations & Maintenance Records/Reports
Self -Monitoring Program Facility Site Review Effluent/Receiving Waters Laboratory
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
(See attachment summary)
Name(s) and Signature(s) of Inspector(s) Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
Chad Turlington FRO WQ//910-433-3300 Ext720/ •
Signature of Management Q-A Reviewer Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
t.B In a S Hghson RO WQ//910-433-3300 Ext.72E - 2 a- i i
EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev 9-94) Previous editions are obsolete.
Page# 1

NPDES
NC0078955
111 121
yr/mo/day
16/04/18
17
Inspection Type
18121
1
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
Facility appeared to be neat and well maintained. Records were available and organized. DMR's for
the months of November 2015, and January and February 2016 were reviewed and no reporting
discrepancies were noted.
Page# 2

Permit: NC0078955
Inspection Date: 04/18/2016
Owner - Facility: A.B. Uzzle WTP
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Operations & Maintenance
Is the plant generally clean with acceptable housekeeping?
Does the facility analyze process control parameters, for ex: MLSS, MCRT, Settleable
Solids, pH, DO, Sludge Judge, and other that are applicable?
Comment:
Yes No NA NE
❑ ❑ I ❑
Permit Yes No NA NE
(If the present permit expires in 6 months or less). Has the permittee submitted a new .❑ ❑ ❑
application?
Is the facility as described in the permit? 1 ❑ ❑ 0
# Are there any special conditions for the permit? ❑ FM 0 -❑
Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public? II ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the inspector granted -access to all areas for inspection? El 0 ❑ ❑
Comment:
De -chlorination
Type of system.?
Is the feed ratio proportional to chlorine amount (1 to 1)?
Is storage appropriate for cylinders?
# Is de -chlorination substance stored away from chlorine containers?
Comment:
Are the tablets .the proper size and type?
Are tablet de -chlorinators operational?
Number of tubes in use?
Comment:
Laboratory
Are field parameters performed by certified personnel or laboratory?
Are -all other parameters(excluding field parameters) performed by a certified lab?
# Is the facility using a contract lab?
# Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees
Celsius)?
Incubator (Fecal Coliform) set to 44.5 degrees Celsius+/- 0.2 degrees?
Incubator (BOD) set to 20.0 degrees Celsius +/-1.0 degrees?
Yes No NA NE
Liquid
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
■ ❑❑❑.
• ❑ 0 ❑
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
11 ❑ ❑ ❑
El ❑ ❑ ❑
MI ❑ .❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ MI ❑
❑ ❑ IN ❑
Page#

Permit: NC0078955
Inspection Date: 04/18/2016
Owner -Facility: A.B. Uzzle WTP
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Laboratory Yes No NA NE
Comment:
Record Keeping Yes No NA NE
Are records kept and maintained as required by the permit?
Is all required information readily available, complete and current?
Are all records maintained for 3 years (lab. reg. required 5 years)?
Are analytical results consistent with data reported on DMRs?
Is the chain -of -custody complete?
Dates, times and location of sampling
Name of individual performing the sampling
Results of analysis and calibration
Dates of analysis
Name of person performing analyses
Transported COCs
Are DMRs complete: do they include all permit parameters?
Has the facility submitted its annual compliance report to users and DWQ?
(If the facility is = or > 5 MGD permitted flow) Do they operate 24/7 with a certified operator
on each shift?
Is the ORC visitation log available and current?
Is the ORC certified at grade equal to or higher than the facility classification?
Is the backup operator certified at one grade less or greater than the facility classification?
Is a copy of the current NPDES permit available on site?
Facility has copy of previous year's Annual Report on file for review?
Comment:
® ❑ ❑ ❑
11 ❑ ❑ ❑
11 ❑ ❑ ❑
� . ❑ ❑ ❑
® ❑ ❑ ❑
O
•
e
11
1
® ❑ ❑ ❑
0 El 11 El
11 ❑ ❑ ❑
EN ❑ ❑ ❑
® ❑ ❑ ❑
NI ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ® ❑
Page# 4