20120911 Ver 1_Email_20121126

FW SR 1344 Cashiers Valley Rd, Transylvania (UNCLASSIFIED)
FW SR 1344 Cashiers Valley Rd, Transylvania (UNCLASSIFIED)
Parker, Mike
Sent Monday November 26 2012 8 10 AM
To Carrillo Sonia
Attachments SR 1344 Revised Impact Tab -1 pdf (376 KB) SR1344 Cashiers Valley Ro -1 docx (14 MB)
Sonia please add this to the file for Project 12 -0911 Thanks Mike
Mike Parker - Mike Parker @ncdenr gov
North Carolina Dept of Environment
Asheville Regional Office
Division of Water Quality - Surface
2090 U S 70 Highway
Swannanoa NC 28778
Tel 828 - 296 -4500
Fax 828 - 299 -7043
and Natural Resources
Water Protection
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From Davis Mark S
Sent Wednesday November 21 2012 10 38 AM
To Beckwith Loretta A SAW Chambers Marla J Parker Mike
Cc Cannon Steven L Williams Benjamin T Arrowood William F
Subject RE SR 1344 Cashiers Valley Rd Transylvania (UNCLASSIFIED)
Ladies and Gentlemen
Page 1 of 3
There was a typo in the cover letter Impact table as well as the permit drawings
(see attached) It does not change the total stream impacts for the project (110
linear feet) I have also included color photos of the permit sites No plans
other than a straight -lined diagram was prepared for this project The project
entails widening the road 1 foot on each travel lane improving drainage and
resurfacing Curb and gutter sections were used where there was limited right of
way to avoid impacts to houses that were close to the road and one section was
added to avoid impacts to a small stream in a roadside ditch I am not sure if
trout exists in the project area however small fish were observed at sites 4 & 8
two of the larger streams along the project A trout moratorium should not be a
problem since this project will probably be constructed next spring and summer
There are 79 property owners along this highly developed residential area Hope
this clears up some of you concerns If you have any further questions please
give me a call
Thanks Mark
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From Beckwith Loretta A SAW [mailto Loretta A Beckwith @usace army mil]
Sent Tuesday November 20 2012 4 17 PM
To Davis Mark S
Subject FW SR 1344 Cashiers Valley Rd Transylvania (UNCLASSIFIED)
Classification UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats NONE
FYI
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From Chambers Marla J [mailto marla chambers @ncwildlife org]
Sent Tuesday November 20 2012 2 05 PM
To Beckwith Loretta A SAW
https / /mall nc gov /owa/ ?ae= Item &t =IPM Note &ld= RgAAAADMSzLcd9W2TJHI4 %2b 11/26/2012

FW SR 1344 Cashiers Valley Rd, Transylvania (UNCLASSIFIED) Page 2 of 3
Cc Parker Mike
Subject SR 1344 Cashiers Valley Rd Transylvania
This is a bit late I received early October Sorry'
I noticed there is a typo in the impact table in the cover letter - site 9 - from
42 feet in length to 55 feet is not 10 feet I m not sure if that affects dust the
table or the total There were no plan sheets or permit drawings that show erosion
control or details of the culvert replacements /extensions and curb and gutter
placement Also no justification for the curb and gutter was provided nor an
indication of how much of the project will be affected by it We generally
discourage use of curb and gutter as it reduces stormwater treatment and
potentially degrades downstream water quality The pictures provided even
electronically were poor quality and of little value Perched pipes should be
corrected if practicable The permit application dial not mention trout or if they
had checked into the potential need for a moratorium While trout are nearby I
don t believe a moratorium is necessary for this project however there does not
appear to be much fish sampling in the project area I won t request one at this
time but addressing the issue should be part of the application
Let me know if you have questions
Marla Chambers
Marla J Chambers
Western NCDOT Permit Coordinator
North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
12275 Swift Road
Oakboro NC 28129
Office & Fax 704 - 485 -8291
Work cell 704 - 984 -1070
marla chambers @ncwildlife org
ncwildlife org
Description googleplus3
<https / /plus google com /u /0 /b/ 104061933014720497710 /104061933014720497710/about>
Description fb3 <http / /www facebook com /pages /NC- Wildlife- Resources-
Commission/169986143088699 ?sk= wall &filter =2> Description tweet3
https //mail nc gov /owa/ ?ae= Item &t =IPM Note &id= RgAAAADMSzLcd9W2TJHI4 %2b 11/26/2012

FW SR 1344 Cashiers Valley Rd, Transylvania (UNCLASSIFIED) Page 3 of 3
<https //twitter com / ?lang =en &lopped out= 1 #' /NCWildlife> Description blog3
<http / /www ncwildlife orq /News /Blogs /NCWRCBloq aspx> Description youtube3
<http / /www youtube com/ user /NCWRC ?blend =2 &ob= video- mustangbase>
Get NC Wildlife Update <ht-�p / /www ncwildl_ife__org /Enews /index htm> -- news
including season dates bag limits legislative updates and more -- delivered to
your Inbox from the N C Wildlife Resources Commission
Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N C Public Records
Law and may be disclosed to third parties
Classification UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats NONE
https //mail nc gov /owa/ ?ae= Item &t =IPM Note &id= RgAAAADMSzLcd9W2TJH14 %2b 11/26/2012

SR 1344 -- Cashiers Valley Road
Site 2A
Fiee Flowing Channel
Flow Diversion
70
Site 3
70 x 15' CMP
80'x 18" CMP
10
13 +05
Site 3A
Ftee Flowing Channel
Flow Diversion
105
Site 4
30' x 48" CMP
60' x 48' CMP
30'
20 +00
Site 4A
Fice Flowing Channel
Flow Diversion
85'
Site 5
55 x 18" CMP
55' x 18" CMP
0
20 +70
Site 5A
Free Flowing Channel
Flow Diversion
80
Site 6
50 x 24' CMP
60' x 24 CMP
10
32 +80
flow Diversion
85'
Site 6A
Free Flowing Channel
Site 7
40'x 24" CMP
60' 124" CMP
20'
48 +10
Site 7A
Free Flowing Channel
Flow Diversion
85
Site 8
30' x 60" CMP
40 x 60' CMP
10'
61 +40
Site 8A
Free Flowing Channel
Flow Diversion
65'
Site 9
73 +60
45 124 CMP
)5 \ 24 CMP
110
Site 9A
Fiee Flowing Channel
HwA Dix eision
80
Site 10
40 x 36 CMP
50 x 49 x 33 Atchcd CMP
10
91 +46
Site 10A
Fiee Flowing Channel
Flo« Diversion
80
Site 11
45' x 24 CMP
55' x 24" CMP
10'
100 +80
Site 1 lA
Free Flowing Channel
Flow Diversion
80
Total Pet manent Sti eani Impacts in Linev Feet 110'
Tempotai3 Impacts fat Impervious Dikes Intl Flow Diversion in Ltneat Feet 885'

-5- Ae- i
Transylvania County
Existing & Prop Center Line
2 1
---- -------------- - - - - -- --------- --- -- - - - - --
Oulet Invert Elev Replace Existing Inlet Invert Elev
9944 24 x 45 CMP with 9954
24 x 55 CMP
;gs Approximately 20 from shoulder of existing road
1 9965
2 9939
See plans for erosion control
SR 1344
Cashiers Valley Road
Transylvania County
m
Existing & Prop Center Line
Drawing not to scale
2 -------------------_ _- ..____ __ ___ ____ _ 1
Oulet Invert Elev Replace Existing Inlet Invert Elev
9916 36 x 40 CMP with 9948
49 x 33 x 50 Arched CMP
!gs Approximately 20 from shoulder of existing road
1 9948
2 9909
See plans for erosion control Drawing not to scale

FW Mid- Currrtuck Bridge water quality studies Page 1 of 2
FW Mid- Currituck Bridge -- water quality studies
Chapman, Amy
Sent Friday November 16 2012 9 58 AM
To Carrillo Sonia
Sonia Can you include this email in the laserfiche file for this project please?
Amy Chapman Supervisor
Transportation Permitting Unit
NCDENR / Division of Water Quality
Wetlands and Stormwater Branch
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh NC 27699 -1650
Office (919) 807 -6365 - Fax [phone]
Email correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina
Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From Roberts Tracy
Sent Friday November 16 2012 9 57 AM
To Wainwright David
Cc Harris Jennifer Chad R Wagner Herring Kathy Jeff Harbour
(harbour @ESINC CC) Chapman Amy
Subject RE Mid- Currituck Bridge -- water quality studies
David
I have discussed this with USGS and NCDOT NEU and we will continue the water
quality studies through December 2013
Thanks
Tracy
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From Wainwright David
Sent Wednesday November 14 2012 11 30 AM
To Roberts Tracy
Cc Harris Jennifer Chad R Wagner Herring Kathy Jeff Harbour
(harbour @ESINC CC) Chapman Amy
Subject RE Mid- Currituck Bridge -- water quality studies
Tracy
I appreciate the efforts to collect the data we requested Ideally I would like to
see another year which would expand the baseline and perhaps correct for any
temporal variation from having a dataset that is only one year We had originally
agreed to one year because of the anticipated construction schedule and where we
were in the stormwater treatment discussions at the time (it was pretty much all we
had time for) I also think a larger baseline to compare the runoff to would be
useful for future projects where sweeping might be requested If sweeping works as
anticipated then the larger the dataset used to compare it to the stronger the
argument could be made that it works I think more data would be in the best
interest of the concept of sweeping - would DOT /USGS be willing to collect another
year s worth of data?
David Wainwright
https / /mail nc gov /owa/ ?ae= Item &t =IPM Note &ld= RgAAAADMSzLcd9W2TJHI4 %2b 11/26/2012

FW Mid Currrtuck Bridge - water quality studies Page 2 of 2
NCDENR Division of Water Quality
Transportation Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center Raleigh North Carolina 27699 -1650
Phone [phone] Fax [phone]
David Wainwright @ncdenr gov
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina
Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties unless the content is
exempt by statute or other regulation
P Please consider the environment before printing this email
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From Roberts Tracy
Sent Monday November 12 2012 10 09 AM
To Wainwright David
Cc Harris Jennifer Chad R Wagner Herring Kathy Jeff Harbour
(harbour @ESINC CC)
Subject Mid- Currituck Bridge -- water quality studies
David
As you know NCDWQ requested that the Turnpike Authority collect one year of
baseline water quality data in Currituck Sound The one -year period was to
immediately precede project construction At the time we started collecting data
(in conjunction with USGS and the NCDOT Natural Environment Unit) the schedule
assumed construction would begin in late 2012 However we are now looking at
construction beginning in early 2014
We are nearing the end of data collection for the one -year period based on the
previous schedule My question is whether NCDWQ wants us to continue with the data
collection for another year or whether the data we already have (or will soon have)
will suffice given the approximate one -year delay in construction
Thanks
Tracy
Tracy Roberts AICP
NC Turnpike Authority General Engineering Consultant NCDOT Transportation Building
1 South Wilmington Street
Raleigh, NC 27601
(919) 707 -2728
Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N C Public Records
Law and may be disclosed to third parties
https //mail ric gov /owa/ ?ae= Item &t =IPM Note &id= RgAAAADMSzLcd9W2TJH14 %2b 11/26/2012

Site 1
SR 1344, Cashiers Valley Road, Improvement
Transylvania County
Inlet
'W) Sta. 10 +84
01wr ..�*.,
",`
r
Outlet
ILI
f i
Site 2 Inlet Outlet
35.21755 °N 82.75751 °W Sta. 12 +37

Site 3 Inlet
Site 4 Inlet
(35.218352N 82.761262W) Sta. 20+00
4jr
Outlet
Outlet
or

Site 5 Inlet
(35.218302N 82.761682W)
A
Z,
-:7
!..� x
A
Sta. 20+70
Site 6 Inlet
(35.221012N 82.760539W) Sta. 32+80
Outlet
Outlet
­e,
Outlet

Site 7 Inlet Outlet
(35.22455 9N 82.75878 2W) Sta. 48 +10
Inlet Site 8 Outlet Site 8
(35.22766 °N 82.75817 2W) Sta. 61 +40

Site Inlet
(]5223112N 82J54982VV) Sta.7]+U8
Outlet
Site 10 Inlet Outlet
--- —
*^�

Site 11 Inlet
(35.22866 9N 82.74555 2W) Sta. 100 +80
Outlet
y
� s
r'
-alp(
y^• f
�l� 1