20210678 Ver 1_CheekSwanBurt_PJD_Package_June2019_20210416

From: Evan Morgan
To: Nancy Oberle
Subject: FW: SAW-2019-00741 Cheek Swan&Burt Track
Date: Wednesday,January 27,2021 1:31:14 PM
Evan T.Morgan,LSS
Three Oaks Engineering
324 Blackwell Street,Suite 1200
Durham,NC 27701
0:919.732.1300 1 M:919.417.0509
Original Message
From:Dailey,Samantha J CIV USARMY CESAW(USA)<[e-mail]>
Sent: Thursday,July 11,2019 9:26 AM
To: Evan Morgan<[e-mail]>
Subject:RE: SAW-2019-00741 Cheek Swan&Burt Track
Hi Evan,
I apologize for the delay-I've been out of the office.This office concurs with the revised JD information submitted
on June 18,2019.Considering there will be a permit application submitted for the project,the approved JD will be
completed in conjunction with the permit verification.Please let me know if you have any additional questions.
Sincerely,
Sam
Samantha Dailey
Regulatory Project Manager
U.S.Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Division
3331 Heritage Trade Drive,Suite 105
Wake Forest,NC 27587
[phone],Ext.22
[e-mail]
Original Message
From:Evan Morgan[mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday,July 03,2019 9:04 AM
To: Dailey,Samantha J CIV USARMY CESAW(USA)<[e-mail]>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source]Re: SAW-2019-00741 Cheek Swan&Burt Track
Sam,
Has what I've provided you been enough for me to go ahead and tell the client that they can go ahead and finalize
the site design?
I wasn't sure if you'd be sending back something formal or if that wasn't going to be until a permit application is
submitted for the eventual roadway crossing.
Have a nice holiday weekend!

Thanks,
-Evan
>On Jun 18,2019,at 12:08 PM,Dailey, Samantha J CIV USARMY CESAW(USA)
<[e-mail]>wrote:
>Thank you!
>Samantha Dailey
>Regulatory Project Manager
>U.S.Army Corps of Engineers
>Regulatory Division
>3331 Heritage Trade Drive,Suite 105
>Wake Forest,NC 27587
>[phone],Ext.22
>[e-mail]
> Original Message
>From: Evan Morgan[mailto:[e-mail]]
>Sent: Tuesday,June 18,2019 10:23 AM
>To: Dailey,Samantha J CIV USARMY CESAW(USA)<[e-mail]_mil>
>Cc: Deal,Joshua A CIV USARMY CESAW(USA)<[e-mail]>
>Subject: [Non-DoD Source]RE: SAW-2019-00741 Cheek Swan&Burt Track
>Sam,
>I did not directly abut the wetland to the stream SD to account for the actual width of the channel;as the line on
the map is not accurate of the width. However,I understand the beaver dam is artificially manipulating the width
and thus wetlands are directly adjacent to the channel center.
>I've created new Figures 2 and 3 showing this with an updated aquatic resources table for the new acreage of WD.
>Let me know if you have any additional questions.
>Thanks,
>Evan T.Morgan,LSS
>Three Oaks Engineering
>0:919.732.1300 1 M:919.417.0509
> Original Message
>From: Dailey,Samantha J CIV USARMY CESAW(USA)<[e-mail]>
>Sent: Tuesday,June 18,2019 9:48 AM
>To: Evan Morgan<[e-mail]>
>Cc: Deal,Joshua A CIV USARMY CESAW(USA)<[e-mail]>
>Subject:RE: SAW-2019-00741 Cheek Swan&Burt Track
>Hey Evan,
>Can you provide an explanation as to why Wetland WD isn't shown as directly abutting Stream SD towards the
center of that reach?It looks like there's some upland areas shown;however,I'm confident that both sides of the
channel exhibited wetland characteristics.Please advise.
>Thank you,

>Sam
>Samantha Dailey
>Regulatory Project Manager
>U.S.Army Corps of Engineers
>Regulatory Division
>3331 Heritage Trade Drive,Suite 105
>Wake Forest,NC 27587
>[phone],Ext.22
>[e-mail]
> Original Message
>From: Evan Morgan[mailto:[e-mail]]
>Sent:Friday,June 07,2019 3:11 PM
>To: Dailey,Samantha J CIV USARMY CESAW(USA)<[e-mail]>
>Cc: Deal,Joshua A CIV USARMY CESAW(USA)<[e-mail]>
>Subject: [Non-DoD Source]RE: SAW-2019-00741 Cheek Swan&Burt Track
>Sam,
>Attached is an updated figure 2 and 3.Sorry for the poor quality on the Topo map,we've been having issues for
weeks with the USGS Topo maps not loading in ArcGIS. I've also included the updated table. You'll note the
length of SD slightly changed as I moved it more central to the channel.
>The non jurisdictional open water is approximately 1.25-acres in size.
>Please let me know if you need anything else or additional information.
>Thanks,
>Evan T.Morgan,LSS
>Three Oaks Engineering
>0:919.732.1300 1 M:919.417.0509
>Please note my mobile number has changed
> Original Message
>From: Dailey,Samantha J CIV USARMY CESAW(USA)<[e-mail]>
>Sent:Friday,June 7,2019 2:06 PM
>To: Evan Morgan<[e-mail]>
>Subject:RE: SAW-2019-00741 Cheek Swan&Burt Track
>Updated figures/tables is perfectly fine.I don't need the whole package again!
>Samantha Dailey
>Regulatory Project Manager
>U.S.Army Corps of Engineers
>Regulatory Division
>3331 Heritage Trade Drive,Suite 105
>Wake Forest,NC 27587
>[phone],Ext.22
>[e-mail]
> Original Message

>From: Evan Morgan[mailto:[e-mail]]
>Sent:Friday,June 07,2019 1:47 PM
>To: Dailey,Samantha J CIV USARMY CESAW(USA)<[e-mail]>
>Cc: Deal,Joshua A CIV USARMY CESAW(USA)<[e-mail]>
>Subject: [Non-DoD Source]RE: SAW-2019-00741 Cheek Swan&Burt Track
>Sam,
>Do you need the entire package resubmitted or do I just need to send new figure 2 and 3 and an updated table?
>Thanks,
>Evan T.Morgan,LSS
>Three Oaks Engineering
>0:919.732.1300 1 M:919.417.0509
>Please note my mobile number has changed
> Original Message
>From: Dailey,Samantha J CIV USARMY CESAW(USA)<[e-mail]>
>Sent: Wednesday,June 5,2019 2:45 PM
>To: Evan Morgan<[e-mail]>
>Cc: Deal,Joshua A CIV USARMY CESAW(USA)<[e-mail]>
>Subject: SAW-2019-00741 Cheek Swan&Burt Track
>Evan,
>It was a pleasure meeting with you.As discussed during the on-site field verification,please make the following
changes to the map/tables,including any linear footage and/or acreages:
> 1)The open water/pond feature was constructed in uplands,outside of waters of the United States,and is therefore
considered non jurisdictional.Please identify this feature on the map as a non jurisdictional open water(and provide
the acreage-email body is fine);
>2)The slender portion of Wetland WA below the pond should be removed;and the portion on the southeast side
of Wetland WA should be removed,as discussed;
>3)Wetlands WB and WE are both isolated,non jurisdictional wetlands situation in depressional areas,with no
inlet or outlet.In addition,these features are located along the ridge of the watershed.Please show them as isolated,
non jurisdictional wetlands in the map legend;and
>4)Stream SD is located inside of a beaver swamp with wetlands on either side of it.The actual stream channel
appeared to be approximately 10-15 feet wide,with adjacent wetlands.The wetlands extended along Stream SD past
the confluence with Stream SC.Please re-draw the center line of Stream SD and show the adjacent wetlands on
either side.Please also include the acreage of this wetland complex.
>I have included notes on the enclosed map to further demonstrate the revisions requested.Please let me know if
you have any additional questions.
>Sincerely,
>Sam
>Samantha Dailey
>Regulatory Project Manager
>U.S.Army Corps of Engineers
>Regulatory Division
>3331 Heritage Trade Drive,Suite 105
>Wake Forest,NC 27587

>[phone],Ext.22
>[e-mail]

cf\IAEER/y/,,
•041*---
\-11844330''
Three Oaks Engineering,Inc.
324 Blackwell Street,Suite 1200
Durham,NC 27701
[phone]
April 29, 2019
ATTN: Samantha Dailey
919-554-4884. Ext. 22
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest,NC 27587
Subject: Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD)Package: Cheek-Swan and Burt Parcels—
Orange County,NC
Ms. Dailey,
Three Oaks Engineering(Three Oaks)was retained by Stephen Burt to assess potential jurisdictional waters at
the Cheek-Swan and Burt Project Site in Orange County,NC. The study area is approximately 61.1 acres and
is comprised of two parcels (PINS: 9840339815 and 9840439598). The study area is accessible from near
7900 Orange Grove Road.
A site investigation was conducted on April 22, 2019 to identify potential jurisdictional features within the
study area. A PJD field verification meeting is to be scheduled. This PJD Package is to be approved by the
US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)and NC Division of Water Resources(NCDWR). Nine potential
jurisdictional features, four streams and five wetlands,were identified. NCDWR Stream Identification forms
are included for each potential stream; except Collins Creek, and USACE Wetland Determination forms are
included for each potential wetland(Appendix B). Please see the following PJD Package.
This is a request for concurrence with our assessment. If you have any questions,require additional
information,please contact me at 919-732-1300 (office) or by email at
[e-mail]. We appreciate your assistance on this project.
Sincerely,
Evan Morgan
Three Oaks Engineering
324 Blackwell Street, Suite 1200
Durham,NC 27701
Cc: Stephanie Goss,NCDWR
Three Oaks Engineering threeoaksengineerinq.com

Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Package
Cheek-Swan & Burt Project Site
Orange County, North Carolina
Prepared for:
Stephen Burt
Prepared by:
0)1HEERbro,.
v • .
PA
8443 31,
324 Blackwell Street, Suite 1200
Durham, NC 27701
[phone]
June 2019

1.0 INTRODUCTION
Three Oaks Engineering (Three Oaks)was retained by Stephen Burt to assess potential jurisdictional
waters at the Cheek-Swan and Burt Project Site in Orange County,NC. The study area is
approximately 61.1 acres and is comprised of two parcels (PINS: 9840339815 and 9840439598).
The study area is accessible from near 7900 Orange Grove Road. The purpose of this investigation
was to identify, and map potential jurisdictional waters located within the study area (Figure 1).
2.0 RESULTS
A site investigation was conducted by Three Oaks staff on April 22, 2019. Nine potential
jurisdictional features, four streams and five wetlands,were identified(Tables 1-3; Figure 3).
Table 1. Potential jurisdictional streams in the study area
Stream Name Map ID NCDWQ Index Best Usage
Number Classification
Unnamed Tributary(UT)to Collins Creek SA 16-30-(0.5) C;NSW
Unnamed Tributary(UT)to Collins Creek SB 16-30-(0.5) C;NSW
Unnamed Tributary(UT)to Collins Creek SC 16-30-(0.5) C;NSW
Collins Creek SD 16-30-(0.5) C;NSW
Table 2. Characteristics of potential jurisdictional streams in the study area
Length River Basin Appears on Appears on
Map ID (ft) Classification Buffer NRCS Soil USGS Topo
Survey? Mapping?
SA 1,070 Perennial Subject Yes Yes
SB 223 Perennial Subject Yes No
SC 167 Intermittent Subject No No
SD 1,708 Perennial Subject Yes Yes
Total 3,168
Table 3. Characteristics of potential jurisdictional wetlands in the study area
Map ID NCWAM Wetland Type Hydrologic Acreage
Classification
WA Bottomland Hardwood Forest Riparian 2.20
WB Headwater Forest Riparian 0.99
WC Headwater Forest Riparian 0.01
WD Headwater Forest Riparian 1.63
WE Headwater Forest Riparian 0.43
Total 5.26
Cheek-Swan&Burt Project Site June 2019
PJD Package Page 1

Appendix A
Figures

_ y L. -;"x•T - + y P'�•'�i � ,O9.r•---• • •A/ *.4.r 4:�rr''- Svw10.-:0r '• '.. 14c'D,, �- - mil.:.•.:F'r'�nr•Si.-114f�:rJ'.!E,}Fr'✓:-...fir•-.,�!`7r"C,:1rI F•.,-..•
... ,�:.> �.� .. ��,ItIEE'Rjyif
S.
•
•
Parcel Boundary A •Pa
r. 'I t i, .,�.t =•1 • ..#f* „� _ `�3"_ ±. .•f%; ->«� .�L++r. ,� a"� f
+ . *M1• .4 .a: a• .z 'S :'r�n.• r. �-L.' .":.. ,r! + r�' •- �✓ ,firitx •,Lti 1.:
Road �' * ,_ �,, ',„.... .b +. ��. , ^ � • vorore.-.4
-
41
4...
,_„:,,,,,,,,...,, .,..,...„...t.„,-,.....,
•
'�'. '4 ' �t'�+�Y�r.Ts - T - - �'P}. 4 A 4.,? �}'4'� '�• '' .' ,�77��i 'cy � +•. •L -� F /... , r .1'S.�w b L l� •.W'.,- • }�� 'h' .rit"W• `�1'� rt ..y`• �*'i6s • «4 ♦ Y.� +�
5.
+ti ,� _- y G ,
ii,* 3Aiii,'-' 1.:• .1 < A $i : 1:2 +Li'i ti-1.4 y ?A. e 7� • ?1y...
yY I'" a�"'x,� u . , w.� , ,;r"_. • `. • 4P ; k *
Prepared For:
....p" .w.. -•!..4r7rVe?%•." =•._."Le7-• . ‘1',.. rip.' .",'7' - 41 •,'46.1 .".c-41',*1,-*111.4CLW. "V"Iir'-' .irr‘iie:ii-•'..Z"' - .6.
:�� ,: { . �. �': wS�.-^ - a u■r'Y„�y'sq :• ,,Y;'y �";;,lt; ' • Chapel Hii! Stephen Burt
-SOS•.
!11. .w*a•yLirst- j •yyI: : r • r • "
r{R 3' ry+i k �' : ..�'y'w :5 H _ 14-. r P -.♦ 1AA .0rf M1A •?'..+e- ...,...-i- ,µr 4.
r.
•
r, •.,:'' �p ,r !' r'`: �'=x ' • ,c:.,•.. ©OpenStreetMap(and)
r. • 'u r,� ,� J', ,d•;, `•' •c v.. t. y:y • contributors, CC-BY-SA
- y�� .�� `sr �_ ,- �rVf .T--ty -+�•��i �� s ,�> •' "fir -` •r 1
E:S '1- 1i. .e-! * S'"i: '� '� . V. • ._ tip'!$' -'.ti .v,,E d'a_ �:#a.' ' spa •r, -V+City ..'i,. •►. :t i ,
i •,G a:r #xl" •; - •f- y .7,�. i'7'- e' ..{ `i M - - a"' ?riA: y.- , '.� Y' ,' -� - 'iT r•' - 'a. •p 3,y ''., r`- i•:�•'yri'; L '_.- _ i
' T,, . 'Js,x ti .4"„ ,o{ ' •ya 'R` z{l,,. ;Or:!1 •1.•. k S r. .V.,-i •,•H .L.`""'•-:,--..
' s- M1`f •1r } 'i,�,�+11' .v "x 1 #• • Y 4
i yRlj:•� ▪ V.::
: a `-x. +� SI1,: ,r •.' - tit' ,V i :`s +ry r�'t ,� k I
,14,, ,�r' '• 4y` .' 0. y , ,- 1_ � ,. .- ..':l �N.. . - _ ,�_,; � . '� ', 4• Preliminary
rr�I :t.- , ,Gf� y*: e. ., `` ` -ti n Syr �w ,�.�!- y' r ,; � " .• ;�;��. �• ,� ` Jurisdictional
- Mi 7.,• :?'la- _ 4i+-' a s• .RfW r�,•'� aYL, ;a • �. ,y` '�•:-�e�s,•,:y - Y ;tali
r ` �^•�,�. - I� Y i-`Y t.
4 y` ._ 1 Y ',, r, • .. � ':' . . ��, {;(;,- � :�� '�. ;;' : : r '� r ' Determination
J}} '7 • - 4y.'1 , '•J •.[ , . kh ' S • •1•i.d.-it- •i� • • -'ft.
N .'I _ .. I v _!� jF
1.' �?. i•, .- 7 r:-''.? • - � i t F,{, ' i+�/C• >- ." W °"- r aT,'{ 7 r •i• ,St*' z. rr r' > d.4 'f- .t f ri .r
- r ' a a[ y �' .. k • --:� - r' - yq.'yf�''0w.v .y, f:f. vit:.- r '
.[ 1� �,�+� iT
ilk
•
•
;' ;' � .. Cheek Swan
• tir • .,., .��.. ,y• -r.4,• �� y. _ •"�*S!t. •,` +1y-.� �[�r� - - .yc_ +�G"�+M • +fir. '.• ',� I ti._ _ & Burt Tracts
_ 'fir- Fes'# L f .• ', • e. • .� ..-� f�F J' 5 � ' ` >�:`s' oM "i' -
r. r,i� . 1.1Ar�i.• i 4 . .• _
r,c �:�yPP err w�. y;. � • _ y IE a �'� F� " �(,�e,w � .� :'� R. .*� .
*.:: _Y. it :l• . .. • ' i•• .M_,,, . ,i ./. .rr,,. Pi"Ake, •- y- .r 4.,r ` .•M s1i a-r-+ „if,,......-ri1• .• - •1■ - .S. .
bit
054-
i-'f• 'i- '•; ` r lie "- 4. ,, .. �: „... r Vicinity Map
•
ll• x1 h * �,� � • ,r _< '.�r _ *��� •r - .^. k... - '� it d�.r%;y w�''• i_y)„`s••+ . :'+�• ,7y, ..- f}-
•
.i ' • , i.4y•�, r :,'...- L..l+ 4-▪N • It• • ..,".. .k- ••-yt +y x '� 47.i" �} ,_y V=yy�r• • :" • .f {E .fr.`1 rer , . - - -
•
•
1,�{ l�. ^�, +'•"•�J a• � 7 .. .F •yl .•y4, -�L�� 'l t Y a.t y h� y� �
> � !} � ,r•'. ar '+F•' r' 1 '�� i-. -f. .- ,� 3r:�(i! R �+ fit+-•;;'V9 "' ". r� r'y yr. tAwl1 rJ>
• •...y � _ � Y� gor '�' w ,,,•} --y�•y �+� G �{k�.. c.��y �7.1j. J a rq-y .,, •it r -�,Jt - L *Ill rr' '•+,1.�•. .
• f e �[ ti a,E"'r Y.40, - .... .r"•.,•"s �v* �1.. :• 4 �" vim* vy 1 _ � ;•�4 •j G.7 r:
d •
y , V .i. r_ •` .!y. V' L.�r.��,,°,�[�k va) + fe�L •.i�,r� -.y 's{ ,Ly :`"L' X•'. r t1 w.:. ,,,�r y'* '-'r fir•• ti 1.
}:�L yr� p Y.. i—* s-0, - , e"• 4 .d[,, x -, wer :�:"'-. =_.Y .. L.$ ,� E 'i '' Kam• ' 'y�;�3••yY�F t: r �
- �•L it.. •.[•� .- " - -- . - '1'• •`•'. ',.",��� y.;-1�.. ir,.�r r..e'+1•R' - 4w' - • , r -t.'"- 'S[ .T',;.sp.. rl•..' ". .., � 2 "� ,, .-.10�•,-,.�`,.,:�•
2 *,• y 's . • ', r: ' ; .t.7• . ; ,: ' ,,! = f'r;• ,-5..*'% v t • a 7 • J ' 5 •10 ry ,,-,: Orange County, North Carolina
-� •t. •�•• � �t�� ?�� ti, ME 'y r ����. tin/ '•�f�r •.e.•, .t�_y,. f'fi wE. � �' • I• � '
- .- y,. :. ., 4 ,�. r44' y0C. - • } - - F ,y ti� {+.- '-t i4S .•
•
A'. VAL- y.y.Y+.s.'1 . i� .l ' ..s „b 4.. A - - 'K F' . j � y:. . .r �,_ ,gfrr�' �y' • _ ti . ••� 4,14ti4.1. , .%,.. _ . .? ', �. �.�•�,. f'. ► .�'£' 5i- ,t. �,. [ ,. Date:r . . �.. :-, _ �•,�; �• ,' ,v,�,ti ' ' April 2019
-706
- •leiii, •
+ yp-.Y1kkw. .. 7+�` `).7g'. -i Lti„-" �r Fr, I, • ' r � _ 1'. „�^,.i- - - i;$i y3. ~ n #•' Scale:
i. t•;*yt ;, <41 ti ti z �r ‘�, ,� ,A 0 110 220 Feet
434
1-1(-i •: - '; 'S �r •, _ .:r i � { 1 , i 4 1,' .OK.m - ,i• .� d+-4-. 4 Job No.:
�` ' ' -r-"S' �' 1. ti like,• ..' :4'.-y�,1 - �• i`}4{c a.i.. +n K z i ry - r•1`; :r �4V-. �; , .''0•• .- 19-717
•• te a_ •.,. s • .-f - - L .-_T �' ],, e•7 _. - ,- .," `1.1 1,,, _ f •'r �
�. .�. !' ^:�qq -��.•; '",':"� Drawn Checked
':�5� - -:'fir ; } t• •�'• `� • - r - A• .
. •',. .*..•,"tP� '•# .v. r ,�,•. .rf .. ra i!+'r f• nY
R;"` s r { r ,�H ETM MGW
,, ` .ii y� !+ . } •NQ► .t. .1 , '+ '5,.2 L. .f .^L -. . '1', '.'..M1,+ .I-..›.y,,,y�
•
.- 1• . , r lot { .�C 4 y y : _a. a may, . 'r . -r s. ' id s ' ill � tf•; iiTit �. , ,;�"� e; ,�
' •' er •f: • • ••.LLL .?' ^ .'i S•[ .- .{ ^'" p a.
.l�Vv ,%►'�.+•: Rai f;� :� •� - ' ..,_- ., -.v- .• +lr�r ' .� ,.;_ s `' -7'hk*N.„ - a
- µ :. s -• Figure
- -•;�,� w'v ._ .s .t �; -4r,} mow., -• -'w - ,G•�y • _ - 1 -1 :JCS a ! G ti f�• �,f ��..'':i�,f y,4, it ,�� ',7:,?5,• 't.,... , - w
� i _ I 'yfw6 i' ,• .'. ggp ist °1 ',{F 1�'. •,.I•• 1.
S '• _ •�_- .•.-' • li• i' i- .aid+' .:.C'C ' ;fir'• �• -• Id.'
ui....r 1 ,, .r' •- �+5 .} , . 'y�,'.•'!r ,. ,� ;• - k ta�'Sc.,{'+- .��-f b.act' .7', ,� ▪ 4. -1�' .r-• �4 .t �'; +'!.,' ,r •+G ( :. ,,}}'.,�: �t•ter=.
•,! -y :+ - - .- '. ` 3 r' t*t d', � r i�'• .:+�, _ _ s'v",^' �".}i'+.• '�•^ y y �:4•i: '•1,n• 4^ ,i. _ • Y r! �r, ^S 'n )u.. +yey[� ; i{• 44 f bj - r4*'4•,Y rv4i� �+i • • M
Or •.} • J;,^ ;1 p;�k R•. :S.; , - ''r ,- `:.:.,t iw 4i�' _ Je .,ter'. .. 6. rl ,: ,' 4-1 oi- -,,J �•'�
Ir
•
Pt 1
� • .; �` �-. ••
1 ji.` rs ,w *R ':'•' �. �4 *�. ▪ rJ1 . 1x *i: J1 $ . �f mo�Of PPG'egr �� e - e g'�fl ''

N
Parcel Boundary 12 A �_
Potential Jurisdictional Wetland 1,1 ,„,ti 'M
• Isolated, Non-Jurisdictional Wetland A.
Potential Perennial Stream 414.
+'9'1f4'33t11#
• Potential Intermittent Stream
1 Pipe Prepared For:
Non-Jurisdictional Open Water
0 i
t
• . .+ Stephen Burt
4 _+
I
SB N'
' / Preliminary
f 4 Jurisdictional
Determination
WB f -
44
We
N Cheek_Swan
& Burt Tracts
9
WA + 1 USGS Topo Map
t
1
, / t
co
Orange County, North Carolina
WE WD
1 ti Date:
1 ..11 June 2019
/ % Scale:0 110 220 Feet
i
I I I
ri Job No.:
". 19-717
��
I
Drawn By: Checked By:
4 ETM MGW
I1
,' Figure
1
/ et,.... 2
...
•_
/0"
• / C pyright:©2013 National Geographic Society,i-cubed

.- _ - . .mww ,. - ti "iAy. K 4r _ _ _ ...r.. - ...t•i',,. Yam' 4'1� +'. .^}}Y.�h- .y.*. I^�it\'v .i �'t�-
, � 1..,.K _ :. wr" .a4��`«'+rK '"4' ' ' �,� may. y ." g"�'.VW' rd• �, -7#� a�+ Yi, ."}' 'r1- _. '`#H'9'_3. ,._ 4-..erty.:*tics..,._. ...6:A r
1 iatf-- 4
x } ' � ..I - e w-1: •s °b r n� •''"k '..:... r ,Y ;-.„:11WRW»,^.aM*,r$ ,''' ! .yr'� ,�i'• - - _ ,i.� � j
,,
v.: .'t4yS �r *'t- '4 ..`5..�'+t '`.; * + � ;,. .rs; -.+: Parcel Boundary
•7`+y•
:; ` -+Al.. 4 '...••AL,.` +� '�+• A. ' IjiZ 7 f „e - .. :} 1 '+L•. '#y..,' A"r.,gt " fi ...."�` l a..• k r {;Si W !'r'�
; z .. ,. k �' Potential Jurisdictional Wetland
.:. ,.�,. ' ,.-' '4i i•`yl';' V 4._i�'•yy,.- ri�+7Ky` el '[:+ ' � + +y=` f*" `--j51: 4.F.a'R+•�ilz+,.Y �`^�,a'' e '' „ , ?;�j•y�'s
401. cC. a
4 \ f �*' ++f �.- f• :. ,y:t+ ; w;`• 34
� ; ,�s .� ` Isolated, Non-Jurisdictional Wetland '10
-- _: r ..'-. 44 ..-r. �Y.� �� 'Ma w, ry . aa�y� h *
L'; 1 ' • l''F"a !fr, ? _ ,:',. , .�"�r -Fy ,,y..• .+ {ti,, t-�S k:..4, '' f yF
it rr' ' �� .IA,. k ' « ,„}� °y • �w LLB L
• _ z , ry _ ' Potential Perennial Stream 41141311,� '
'� S�+' >d�) ti !�,gyp'•_ `' 3'ri' 'i+' ?"_*,. " 'x.: sin at""�"`, w
' « +, R.. } } + '`a•y. .*,b t r i yY, ..it' y'. '�r�' •.*fZe'(1
•Pit ►� ;, „� ,: rk . — Pot:hlta1
i Intermittent Stream tt
�� dt'' ��,. _ '�"'.�,, 'Y.'s'1. R - A. `.� ` `.:¢�`+�fkG' pr.�',s�'`'r',c,�;,� -7+1te s, -' *ewro4"r�4r�•-y,:' '�,ui. 'y' M�
,w, �"v ,, a: '"� ,"`t,,, :•:lr ,, Aw .yew;, "< 4 1;. Prepared For:
f E .�`g`+,_•
_ i.."."" �" � T. t`, .`�+'v.�'. 4•T " 3 t_ _ . `�a4t y ,y .'S w� `'r'L, kLw:•i-�'^„r "'L• ' ', -w«Mn' ".r 1
�": '' ru `', "+ . ` � : Non-Jurisdictional Open Water
0 v it,:
-=- :;.. •
�._ ,rm ^s ..r K.tg h �t,-i ,_ b,; ,ssw +w *'1 iyi"i•
T y, 1 '4, 1. , + A� '"3 - yr ' • i ",'4,' ^. '� 8' + kC
x}'��.V, ��`. tin J
d �y ,.ar' .► y� 'W" Mt r f1 ' l s S'k! tit f--"<Y , C. i S y.n. -—,, 1;.- ,,,,
i �* ; 4r5. � ,i; r .� .r ' �, - . . Stephen Burt
.Y'•` Y'i •,1 -- 4°7 +', ' il'' y!• "...''�'� Yee s �'• �fq�,a.L'" '"r ,�•r • - .' e. Y - - .- - `' '$ •• 4' ,.,.*4. r4-.
_ �', ,y ,r9"�` N >Y' _ a, ��€.:f �` t�'ly'y,,- '�' • ri.•1•/'T .'..+s +b' '�,'�r� iy, .,;ir '�!;+' 1. • 'rj.
•
. t • • • • 'y,. • .�. �F�� :�'�. '�»' .. - - ��" ow..'�•'- .�' r '.1c c�,- �. '�?4�;i '!i�; �� ='h�� [
„ �ti� •;,r: ':��' .r 'L." a+� _ ,W h. .y` y,; '�'7#' al, vi's'F,. ' • $�j
,
•
i^
•
_u ,A'- � ; �' ,A "' .tis .,y,Y�zh!". ,iT!, ..•'#a� .J, � =4" 'r;r t''���rCFM�#. -r� q•r ..y �-.�+' s1r y
•il- _ - .} a.. Y, tit L • _ • '-•_.,4,-.. t' v, • . :.'it'' !kr
{ 1 . '�- - '', tcf±. _ .ar^. yyo i„ "A�FnI' ,+.,. ik f a'
,
^
: . ; ��/��*[ fides+ ,�qq y ��ytQ q ^j,� a�
�� RF _� i��_9� � ,Y. ���iky^MW �'X'�Y��"K�'. ." y,^., �'t{' ''V*.. ^tY ` �'.�' ��r• � ,R` 'a '� r" I�.�'.,
-i - �s t_.t, I,, .y�16' ',10 ^ y r J i•+rc* ,aM -fvgw i,.�'-="a,, .,� .,. t," i'
:'. ti r .j *.: .`,y' "" �r� �y, -'4"xR' _A r.�, ryr-L:., .,w�., r .r, .: .,- ;':?fie, '1 •�. .., 'rr ' T4'• -'� , ..x,.
,. ,. .��•M +" '� Y "i`"ib .�° •iF7"r� c � 'W+-�''�`, 'L" k_''�": a` e;. ' y i`w is
T. tir y 1 ��k' •-4.. 14.1.,4 .., 'T✓+�, �aiZ r. . fr -"vr4 ./�,,«�+, :^ - .s ` t #.y':1' .G.,
,F. -5 ' +Tt l;srs'• ^'. .�,p'�.,t - ` `�' :5:'k�' M1✓.+�T` 1J- ,.:`"",..�•'. '":' ,�,,�B,Yr^ "•T':.^Kra.• Sx y,,�," ,, •• ,,�r'@ 1...".7
rr""k- "',�.n'+e .--, Sp.„,. Y" ; �. _{ ti_I�`' �, °.-,; * c Y�'ti 'C a^'` a t'� L
' .
4 r i�C iY I x e � F y ,
R 74 _ 'a."!F •�'. :L Y. 4„ "�, rw s ';$ K.' gw_^" ;y, .k+ ` ,t"` 'N B' Ar •mow r '^
�' a'
_. _ 1:i• rt•14_ ,I :s a� 'i4 b• .*.. � 47. ~ '" ��,t�M'.. '''. E: .' ,w' .` "�'kS '" "�'r*' if c 4.y. 4
i f- ."?•. • _ ty.,X +iFp. '{�#;,:��F: .�: '� ' .�a` � v � Y t.i '`F y - z., 1,ri.3 •:' ;" �7 5, .�T"}�' ,,�g',1ias�'�.-' # s�'f_ �"4,-. • ?N•: �" "9� i. 4.! �R`.
ri. .>d .r i► ,i t•.' sG "'°M, at ',+:h ,A`q. : ''"�'�: f� ti-. n� fi 3
'• �.•. axi H,k �' -�' - `'x'4 ,l' , -,+r>,k0'�`'p,:+i .t-:1"�.�.�t±''irq„S y,P Y,:
__--_ i "my d-, ���� ...low �.' •`t' :>;e � .a , ' �.5 :r•• .:#' � "SAS
•
r<.
�y ' . . ,E w���,Y:a' - 'r ��,�`' 41 � :`� .r';x '�y�l: e`. xs' ,.:..
4 _ h' :"'. - � ,jp .T `?k+Y �,` 'S �,F .�a-yf'r"1/' IK., y�':1F;.. AJurisdictional
�`�,�y .+. - �;iF' k '�. may `"� ������.'�r� +4 ,rS';•:Rr` n: "x`�p ��-� '^:* /17" •fie . ,
' �'f Q".' ^ I� r. ...3,,:a., �. .�: "4{.. ""'�` t, ''`�Y* �' :.a d t. �'` s"•n� -r'.� "M.t:'
�; • Determination
.�..�a S ak ''tom f •*�• �'• '
,. •�~ •�`� '�i:; r� lip,
Pwt' _ •t4 `.v't 4 2-.' k`:' � �t !, � °i�i��f '�i1'.`A', �� ."99�t 7jly
' , a
, M
..:. • ' . y�y �` ., Jo-. A.ie
7-
t• ; i• -4. + 'br I, f ;.Y.,, .�,y�,:.a .f K,k,y#tg;t yr.,1y * ,�
"` _ a, `^ :tr•.q+- „ B ,�i.', .}; ,A y-•,' e .n e., _k '` ' , WB :col%.`.'loll �F'' • ,:'1«k " + ' Lt #lq.
re' : f'^ -fin,•'#= -'^X : .i i 'fit , +rr.YV } f�.-;, �T� t', y ,1' , kte.. •"�''' L is� .',y( .l'�• i
_ r N :%' � ;:; ,:.�°, -:..: rl ' ,, ."his .. y.; il:� ,,.. .A,+,�. �• ,.��:it.' '�, A. - � 2, f.a.? �'f, I,
_ X ,. - +�` '¢ � ' .: � ' ' `. _ Cheek_Swan
,t '�. f +q!.Y„ `>,♦ ,. 5, ,.1. Jy [. _� „« _.. ,�+r, -Y.. r• „ '.. 4r a ,vr1'. 11-" f •rf I
.: , ,� ~,. � .,r « & Burt Tracts
•'n ill fi,!• l a . - ,x t; r -zi.
E
•
•
v ��sp,;+
.
t- . ^ - *4r . .. :' a �;, r--. - d ` `4 ice- .^Fvd 1{{+''f -�•.� t�• "�il�, : ."r
. '�... •r .. ..Y''' 7l gyy '� •+TV .!4k �r �, +i. ,�"st >i !! .'t� a•. ,'1 t .� �M`i i j ,
•
•
��-- ^ y � Nil
, . +!�►" , ': r 1, . -"" _
'r'r .'. .ir id__ cif } ,T. - +�.'
' " t r1 Orthoima er Ma
��.� _ ! � dayy� P, i ,� y. ,� , i•kirs � , ,�,.. �. '« iM �d'� v 4.,��. ;�� �''�� ,." .r t�
'fX`.F -..%'. 9L: wt.. n` ,t -. ,V 'ii J rj - yl:. 4:. rs_ M, -'
. t
_ -a` .�..'. 1 •,",mot' $::€ :.'a� .a• ' r°n y' ' - W
I.�,` y. ' ),. v,01+.! 4:.,.. iN h+ :'r`' , i}r „it -
•
1.
< ` s:' ,' M �- `• 'y,!a �'`,. S• IIt'tfs � - • ° _ .,.�-.
iket.i.
.w .,$ I! rY' •P - ter --_-
�4+� ., IL,f', V- {� •• /
r.
1
_„pt .:^". v, ,.. .� ; i ;elk:'•. r v'-` q [J+R 41.'1, 4' 7Y, 2 `t' rl` I,.`.
`t: j ._.4-: :^ ri - •:a -v , ,''r�,;,,pp,� -yy,�� ..Y.• P7 .. ,,} �%I. ".4` `b'r',lk ' i:t v ..ky[p ..-!'- tl
: "'S), , L.� 2�. .Yt �^��� .+ ... _'x1►, s - • 1. �' •
. �!'- f �'1 `}.'` .t, q h.r.�l'. �r. P,° 1
♦. :3i,. '. ,.t - 'r ,r. rlm ;may '^7�[: 14 tti ^+ .. ,, s. •4 -.a. 2-
•;%r iy- '�., .4! .' �� ':a #. � �" • • ,S ( �y 'LAB"`-.^.. � }. u,,4 7i�
• 1
•.� � b' � ��.� s Orange County, North Carolina
^•"+. • ,._ a€` `r fi •'.,, • •+z �r,,� - '. •..L" 5: -.� -><r - w ' y ;_ ' '',' -Y -.t =i' A' „ ,«'-•.xis.+�r�?''4•' ;i�riai' w- "g„k Y'
14
'' ..f'.fy .'4_' t R � ,. 3 a_� .E', •,. :'c b'• F $,Y • a! I'+T' 4.A. ,.c 'lr. tlL' s�ryi,. "5.,
i - '._ *. >,+^ +'} al.,, `t -�-- _ ^ • ""�i F '� .. :' .4* Syr. m!' s", .� nr.•Y' Vim';
,+ eu'+ zz .€ v y+ fr + r:y„ `�.<. r:: t.. "' .�' r a 3! f..,.,p ''� ';,,+, A.T. :.,. ':Y'
rr�96i�.���...ttt .aW yq. ' '!�0 ,+Is r ti. - �.y '. , MI t':' r +` "yS.:y; 44,41.
,r, i.i y/.-'rY .,y ` wJ:�• ,f{` `' "t"".� 5 '!�. ar X ,' l^
«' , u �` " y k, :''a , 4. y' _ r, 1 .. ,- .* R` :ti , Date:
,
,ct
1, r <..7� 3v1� `, r y..::, ,. \ k;, +,,7h.♦ i R ., "E :A. .i ''''+t1? }9hfy 'iC-V"' dt>•r:. :� . ..,'.� - ''T.«, .{ C »�, , we �!"� ; June 2019
.d .!.' >,,y, �, - `. .� • *$ •t• . . : " pen �,
.x � -�' .� ..'3 .. _,,, .�• ♦^ �,'. ae ',, -�' " '4 } •• Lea,: ,,
e. '`
•
+ �}p� - PrtA tta.- Yi .A'P"' ,:i •4 i7t Y$,, ,^t Scale:
v
,
�' � :, . ` 2. � . - .. r �!;,;p��` �+� ,�, �' •�+ 0 110 220 Feet
Iv
F.
- +. .3`i+� j• 1 { *fit y ,i,4; �.`k +Jf•" a: .,,, it. .4# r �;;' r ,' i 4• +h-� ;+ C'
19-717
::^ ,r.." ,. ---., '•erti -: ''. ti,`. � '$'� • ,+ze aa H ' :':. �' 1 ',i,r '' Job No.:
- _ • • _.. 14, .. iii ° Ica .,
yr. s w �,`
A _ 461, 4: 'r `r -
• ' wry 1
" ,. ,:. , ta + • rr ,,4, -,; Drawn By: Checked By:
ill'• i+
`y ' 4 ». :' .- '' ,' = _eI.. t t: i ,t, x$,�,, ,.r: ,r r4 s, ETM MGW
,� ' >, , S'; • ,. '3r'r +=•>`, A x :v�• ; -, '" ` ;. !'-Mir ., < �r' .�,
y.,ti - #' ;'b; i<11��c $'' ��, .ter_ 4,_. '_ i' , .. ,�!1 ,, "� '` R •-y<,
r.'' .'.„..4:7174142
'' '" ►'.. a, w: ,ip� �.., e !� 4�`,:,` n _ r' ;+,ems' "�
!�-` -}- iy T _ Nirs. -' i. 'ry k ` :ar. r. ' z',,,,p04` '`�;;k +�q '�fA- ,L„'
‘, 'A.' ,--r ' '' '4, •,7 i •
4. . = M`' z �k • � , Figure
3
it, !�` 4 , n !a' .,' ak 5 'F' ' l�. 1, '' '. 1 i` ., �- i.. *,♦�•r�..} .sY f+b-,'z•' „4.
417,
‘ ..
•
.1 k "ve `. ., •rt .r a 1 r y,r i ""` r.`'` r�' '�'' 37V''#• "s1.-.
rd
!.. '#. �". -.s' k - ,, r,..:.' v«5c a. ..# "..„., ,y, rh, ,.,•ya,
41 ,., yr� .3'. o-, - na 'a nL^�.•' •`�4ti.'9',S' ,.�. '�"7',
•
., E n ;,k, p ., . K vim',
': "' V:1.-'!l# „ '�. !#. � 1 qr*J' t AS "�1 ' 'f,- r'`a'..'r*` ,• r „_
x.` .-.. ` .fm a,-1 'k-: 1 t,._ #.i-','
v r _ _ _ ' , t:,_ , ,„e, �wy�,4 :s.t;` "n"'- r •¢, ."
- t
�f'�. , '-�`� :.r ?f-. k �, I F 1 yT } fp ,ci. R`�'V ,� '�'.. %, Lh
,r •. --"t' • Ki . ,^. , 'RF' ! . Yi ! a •:9 �`,�.Vsh r., sq' k.!!p ,,s „

Appendix B
NCDWR Stream Identification Forms
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetland Determination Data Forms

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: L- _U. 19 Project/Site: O 5 e RUB}- Latitude: ci)._cizist
Evaluator: I41,tr°;,, 14. vacs County:Dom-
_ Longitude:'?. 1c6G5-00
Total Points: Stream Determination(cir - •.- Other
Stream is least intermittent
if 19 orperennierennialifz 30* _34 Ephemeral Intermittent r ) e.g.Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 2 i ) Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1-
1a.Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 S
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2' 1 -
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, 0 1 n 3
ripple-pool sequence
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 0 2 3
5. Active/relict floodplain 0 1 2 *V
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 %_ 1 3
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 3
8. Headcuts C6.)
_ 1 2 3
9. Grade control 0 ED 1 1.5
10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5
11. Second or greater order channel No=0 Qe-rlb
a artificial ditches are not rated;see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal= qe c )
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria l 1 2 3
14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 i) 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1.5
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No=0 -Yes=3
C. Biology (Subtotal= (b,S )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 2 1 0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 y 1 0
20. Macrobenthos(note diversity and abundance) 1 2 3
21.Aquatic Mollusks 1 2 3
22. Fish 0 0.5 1.5
23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
24.Amphibians J0] 0.5 1 1.5
25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5
26.Wetland plants in streambed FACW=0.75; OBL= 1.5 Other=_0)
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods.See p.35 of manual.
Notes: Lc,r - -FidrAlclr,`n} eff..4 c.,llex
�-
r- Bank Height(ft):1-y
Sketch:
iii
r Bankfull width(ft): 4v
Crafil Water depth(in):Li-l%
Channel substrate-Clay,Silt,Sand Gravel,Cobble,
77 Bedrock
Pt_ -------\ Velocity-fast,i oderate low
Clarity-clear,.lightlyturbi. turbid
1

56
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: ZZ-( Project/Site: Gl eett- riwi-_ Latitude: 3s- q iry��
Evaluator: rtiry f`' ti4 County: Q( Longitude: -7cf, ��(0�(O_
µ Total Points: Stream Determination(cir e o Other
Stream is at least intermittent 36 Ephemeral Intermittent erenmal e.g.Quad Name:
if 219 or perennial if 2 30*
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal= (VC ) Absent Weak - Moderate Strong
la•Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 (3''
2.Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 3
3. In-channel structure:ex riffle-pool,step-pool, 0 1 2 3
ripplecool sequence
4. Particle size of stream substrate _ 0 1 2 3
5.Active/relict floodplain 0 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7.Recent alluvial deposits 0 8 - 2 3
8. Headcuts ( ) L 2 3
9.Grade control 0 0.� 1 1.5
10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1. 1.5 -
11.Second or greater order channel No=� Yes=3
a artificial ditches are not rated;see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal_= `1.5- L
12.Presence of Baseflow ~ 0 1 2 Q
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0' 0 2 3
14.Leaf litter _ CO 1 0.5 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 (L 1 1.5
16.Organic debris lines or piles 0 t9 1 1.5
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No=0 Yes=3
C. Biology (Subtotal=, 9 )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed ( ) r 2 1 0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 2 1 0
20. Macrobenthos(note diversity and abundance) 0 1 0 3
21.Aquatic Mollusks 1 2 3
22. Fish S 0.5 1 1.5
23.Crayfish 0 .0 1 1.5
24.Amphibians0 0.5 1 1.5
25.Algae 0 0.0 1 } 1.5
26.Wetland plants in streambed FACW=0.75: OBL=1.5 Other= )
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods.See p.35 of manual.
Notes: c4 td.M L/ elnci rv.,ciye .
Sketch: See .
SR 5 he e-1' Bank Height(ft):l-2.
Bankfull width(ft):l-3
Water depth(in):2_1 f)
Channel substrate- la t,Sand ravel,Cobble,Bedrock
Velocity-fast,;oderate slow
Clarity-clear, tly turbid turbid

5C
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: t-I„Z7-"I01 ProjectJSite:Cleek-5,,,,,,,, g,,,r f- Latitude:35,ct5--7q-y7
Evaluator: E,lvly i-4. wood County: ©/ov.1 Longitude: -7GI,l235-2,y
Total Points: I I Stream Deter i'. circle one) Other
Stream is at least intermittent
Z"1 Ephemeral Perennial e.g.Quad Name:
if 2 19 or oerenniai if 2 30*
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal= 9 ) Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1C.Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 _ 1 ( 3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg - 0 �1) - 2 3
3. In-channel structure: ex.riffle-pool,step-pool, 0 2 3
ripple-pool sequence .
4. Particle size of stream substrate - 0 s?' .$) 2 3
5.Active/relict floodplain 0 ( 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches _ W 1 2 _ 3
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 2 3
8. Headcuts 0 2 2 3
9.Grade control (0) 0.5 �1 1.5
10. Natural valley 0 0.5 'l 1.5
11.Second or greater order channel No=0 -
Yes=3
artificial ditches are not rated;see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal=, $.5- )
12.Presence of Baseflow 0 1 O 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 (I] 2 3
14. Leaf litter 0.5 0
. _qe
15. Sediment on plants or debris 1 1.5 f
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No=0 es
C. Biology [Subtotal= ('.5 )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 2 1 0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed S 2 1 0
20. Macrobenthos(note diversity and abundance) ( 1 2 3
21.Aquatic Mollusks Q 1 2 3
22. Fish Q 0.5 1 1.5
r 23.Crayfish Q 0.5 1 1.5
24.Amphibians OP 0.5 1 1.5
25.Algae 0 (0.g} 1 1.5
26.Wetland plants in streambed FACW=0.75; OBL=1.5 Other=0
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods.See p.35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch: ,��
Bank Height(ft):1-'7-
iv SC. Bankfull width(ft):1-2-
Water depth(in):t-Qi
_u Channel substrate-Cla ilt,Sand,Gravel Cobble,Bedrock
d i c.fe Velocity-fast oderate, low
rLO`�l{1 7 Clarity ap ig t y turbid,turbid

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET—Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Cheek-Swan&Burt City/County: Chapel Hill, Orange Sampling Date: 4-22-19
Applicant/Owner: Evan Morgan State: NC Sampling Point: WA-10
Investigator(s): Evan Morgan, Hayley Wood Section,Township, Range:
Landform (hillside,terrace,etc.): Floodplain Local relief(concave,convex, none): concave Slope(%): 2
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.957975 Long:-79.189509 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: HrC-Herndon silt loam NWI classification: N/A
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation No , Soil No ,or Hydrology No significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation No , Soil No ,or Hydrology No naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Large bottomland hardwood forest,floodplain of SA and SB. Lots of remnant oxbow depressions.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required;check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks(B6)
_Surface Water(A1) _True Aquatic Plants(B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8)
X High Water Table(A2) _Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) X Drainage Patterns(B10)
x Saturation(A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) _Moss Trim Lines(B16)
_Water Marks(B1) _Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
_Sediment Deposits(B2) _Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) X Crayfish Burrows(C8)
Drift Deposits(B3) _Thin Muck Surface(C7) _Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
Algal Mat or Crust(B4) Other(Explain in Remarks) _Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)
Iron Deposits(B5) X Geomorphic Position(D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) _Shallow Aquitard(D3)
X Water-Stained Leaves(B9) _Microtopographic Relief(D4)
Aquatic Fauna(B13) X FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No x Depth(inches):
Water Table Present? Yes x No Depth(inches): 0
Saturation Present? Yes x No Depth(inches): 0 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge, monitoring well,aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Floodplain on SA
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont—Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata)-Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: WA-10
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 10x10m ) % Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet:
1. Acerrubrum 30 Yes FAC Number of Dominant Species
2. Carpinus caroliniana 20 Yes FAC That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 7 (A)
3. Total Number of Dominant
4. Species Across All Strata: 9 (B)
5. Percent of Dominant Species
6. That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 77.8% (A/B)
7. Prevalence Index worksheet:
50 =Total Cover Total% Cover of: Multiply by:
50%of total cover: 25 20%of total cover: 10 OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 10x10m ) FACW species 30 x 2= 60
1. Acer rubrum 15 Yes FAC FAC species 90 x 3= 270
2. Carpinus caroliniana 10 Yes FAC FACU species 10 x 4= 40
3. Fagus grandifolia 10 Yes FACU UPL species 0 x 5= 0
4. Fraxinus pennsylvanica 10 Yes FACW Column Totals: 130 (A) 370 (B)
5. Prevalence Index = B/A= 2.85
6. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7. 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8. X 2-Dominance Test is>50%
9. X 3-Prevalence Index is<_3.01
45 =Total Cover 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting
50%of total cover: 23 20%of total cover: 9 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 10x10m ) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. Juncus effusus 20 Yes FACW 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2. Carex spp. 15 be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
3. Microstegium vimineum 15 Yes FAC Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4. Tree-Woody plants,excluding vines,3 in. (7.6 cm)or
5. more in diameter at breast height(DBH), regardless of
6. height.
7. Sapling/Shrub-Woody plants,excluding vines,less
8. than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9 (1 m)tall.
10. Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants, regardless
11. of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
50 =Total Cover Woody Vine-All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50%of total cover: 25 20%of total cover: 10 height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 10x10m )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover Vegetation
50%of total cover: 20%of total cover: Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: WA-10
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-4 10YR 5/2 80 7.5YR 4/6 20 C PL/M Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
4-12 10YR 6/2 95 10YR 6/6 5 C PL Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol(A1) Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(MLRA 147, 148) _2 cm Muck(A10)(MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon(A2) _Thin Dark Surface(S9)(MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox(A16)
Black Histic(A3) _Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(MLRA 136) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)
Stratified Layers(A5) X Depleted Matrix(F3) (MLRA 136, 147)
_2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR N) _Redox Dark Surface(F6) _Red Parent Material(F21)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _Depleted Dark Surface(F7) (outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _Redox Depressions(F8) _Very Shallow Dark Surface(F22)
Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR N, Other(Explain in Remarks)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) MLRA 136)
_Sandy Redox(S5) _Umbric Surface(F13)(MLRA 122, 136) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Stripped Matrix(S6) _Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface(S7) Red Parent Material(F21)(MLRA 127, 147, 148) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils,Version 8.0,2016.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont—Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET—Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Cheek-Swan&Burt City/County: Chapel Hill, Orange Sampling Date: 4-22-19
Applicant/Owner: Evan Morgan State: NC Sampling Point: WB-3
Investigator(s): Evan Morgan, Hayley Wood Section,Township, Range:
Landform (hillside,terrace,etc.): Hilltop Depression Local relief(concave,convex, none): concave Slope(%): 0
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.957975 Long:-79.189509 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Lg-Lignum NWI classification: WB PFO1C-Freshwater Shrub Wetland
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation No , Soil No ,or Hydrology No significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation No , Soil No ,or Hydrology No naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
This form is for wetland WB and WE as they are similar depression pools at the top of landform
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required;check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks(B6)
X Surface Water(A1) _True Aquatic Plants(B14) X Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8)
X High Water Table(A2) _Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) _Drainage Patterns(B10)
x Saturation(A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) _Moss Trim Lines(B16)
_Water Marks(B1) _Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
_Sediment Deposits(B2) _Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) Crayfish Burrows(C8)
Drift Deposits(B3) _Thin Muck Surface(C7) X Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
Algal Mat or Crust(B4) Other(Explain in Remarks) _Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)
Iron Deposits(B5) _Geomorphic Position(D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) _Shallow Aquitard(D3)
_Water-Stained Leaves(B9) _Microtopographic Relief(D4)
Aquatic Fauna(B13) FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes x No Depth(inches): 12
Water Table Present? Yes x No Depth(inches): 0
Saturation Present? Yes x No Depth(inches): 0 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge, monitoring well,aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont—Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata)-Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: WB-3
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 10x10m ) % Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet:
1 Number of Dominant Species
2. That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 8 (A)
3. Total Number of Dominant
4. Species Across All Strata: 9 (B)
5. Percent of Dominant Species
6. That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 88.9% (A/B)
7. Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover Total% Cover of: Multiply by:
50%of total cover: 20%of total cover: OBL species 15 x 1 = 15
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 10x10m ) FACW species 30 x 2= 60
1. Acer rubrum 15 Yes FAC FAC species 90 x 3= 270
2. Carpinus caroliniana 10 Yes FAC FACU species 10 x 4= 40
3. Fagus grandifolia 10 Yes FACU UPL species 0 x 5= 0
4. Fraxinus pennsylvanica 10 Yes FACW Column Totals: 145 (A) 385 (B)
5. Pinus taeda 10 Yes FAC Prevalence Index = B/A= 2.66
6. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7. 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8. X 2-Dominance Test is>50%
9. X 3-Prevalence Index is<_3.01
55 =Total Cover 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting
50%of total cover: 28 20%of total cover: 11 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 10x10m ) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. Juncus effusus 20 Yes FACW 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2. Typha latifolia 15 Yes OBL be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
3. Microstegium vimineum 15 Yes FAC Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4. Tree-Woody plants,excluding vines,3 in. (7.6 cm)or
5. more in diameter at breast height(DBH), regardless of
6. height.
7. Sapling/Shrub-Woody plants,excluding vines,less
8. than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9 (1 m)tall.
10. Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants, regardless
11. of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
50 =Total Cover Woody Vine-All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50%of total cover: 25 20%of total cover: 10 height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 10x10m )
1. Smilax rotundifolia 40 Yes FAC
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
40 =Total Cover Vegetation
50%of total cover: 20 20%of total cover: 8 Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Very little vegetation growing within ponded depression area. Thick sapling and vines around water edge
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: WB-3
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-3 2.5Y 5/2 90 10YR 5/6 10 C M Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
3-12 2.5Y 6/2 95 10YR 6/6 5 C PL Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol(A1) Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(MLRA 147, 148) _2 cm Muck(A10)(MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon(A2) _Thin Dark Surface(S9)(MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox(A16)
Black Histic(A3) _Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(MLRA 136) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)
Stratified Layers(A5) X Depleted Matrix(F3) (MLRA 136, 147)
_2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR N) _Redox Dark Surface(F6) _Red Parent Material(F21)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _Depleted Dark Surface(F7) (outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _Redox Depressions(F8) _Very Shallow Dark Surface(F22)
Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR N, Other(Explain in Remarks)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) MLRA 136)
_Sandy Redox(S5) _Umbric Surface(F13)(MLRA 122, 136) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Stripped Matrix(S6) _Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface(S7) Red Parent Material(F21)(MLRA 127, 147, 148) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils,Version 8.0,2016.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont—Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET—Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Cheek-Swan&Burt City/County: Chapel Hill, Orange Sampling Date: 4-22-19
Applicant/Owner: Evan Morgan State: NC Sampling Point: WC-3
Investigator(s): Evan Morgan, Hayley Wood Section,Township, Range:
Landform (hillside,terrace,etc.): hillside drainageway Local relief(concave,convex, none): concave Slope(%): 4
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.958084 Long:-79.183636 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: HrB-Herndon silt loam NWI classification: N/A
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation No , Soil No ,or Hydrology No significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation No , Soil No ,or Hydrology No naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Small drainageway that leads to headwater of SC. Cuts through easement
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required;check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks(B6)
X Surface Water(A1) _True Aquatic Plants(B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8)
X High Water Table(A2) _Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) X Drainage Patterns(B10)
x Saturation(A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) _Moss Trim Lines(B16)
_Water Marks(B1) _Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
_Sediment Deposits(B2) _Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) Crayfish Burrows(C8)
Drift Deposits(B3) _Thin Muck Surface(C7) _Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
Algal Mat or Crust(B4) Other(Explain in Remarks) _Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)
Iron Deposits(B5) X Geomorphic Position(D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) _Shallow Aquitard(D3)
_Water-Stained Leaves(B9) _Microtopographic Relief(D4)
Aquatic Fauna(B13) X FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes x No Depth(inches): 2
Water Table Present? Yes x No Depth(inches): 0
Saturation Present? Yes x No Depth(inches): 0 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge, monitoring well,aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
small pool areas with standing water
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont—Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata)-Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: WC-3
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 10x10m ) % Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet:
1. Number of Dominant Species
2. That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 4 (A)
3. Total Number of Dominant
4. Species Across All Strata: 4 (B)
5. Percent of Dominant Species
6. That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
7. Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover Total% Cover of: Multiply by:
50%of total cover: 20%of total cover: OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 10x10m ) FACW species 65 x 2= 130
1. Acerrubrum 5 Yes FAC FAC species 25 x 3= 75
2. Carpinus caroliniana 5 Yes FAC FACU species 0 x 4= 0
3. Fraxinus pennsylvanica 5 Yes FACW UPL species 0 x 5= 0
4. Column Totals: 90 (A) 205 (B)
5. Prevalence Index = B/A= 2.28
6. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7. 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8. X 2-Dominance Test is>50%
9. X 3-Prevalence Index is<_3.01
15 =Total Cover 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting
50%of total cover: 8 20%of total cover: 3 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 10x10m ) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. Juncus effusus 60 Yes FACW 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2. Carex spp. 15 No be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
3. Microstegium vimineum 15 No FAC Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4. Tree-Woody plants,excluding vines,3 in. (7.6 cm)or
5. more in diameter at breast height(DBH), regardless of
6. height.
7. Sapling/Shrub-Woody plants,excluding vines,less
8. than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9 (1 m)tall.
10. Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants, regardless
11. of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
90 =Total Cover Woody Vine-All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50%of total cover: 45 20%of total cover: 18 height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 10x10m )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover Vegetation
50%of total cover: 20%of total cover: Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: WC-3
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-6 2.5Y 7/2 95 10YR 4/6 5 C PL/M Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
6-12 10YR 6/2 95 10YR 6/6 5 C PL Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol(A1) Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(MLRA 147, 148) _2 cm Muck(A10)(MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon(A2) _Thin Dark Surface(S9)(MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox(A16)
Black Histic(A3) _Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(MLRA 136) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)
_Stratified Layers(A5) X Depleted Matrix(F3) (MLRA 136, 147)
_2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR N) _Redox Dark Surface(F6) _Red Parent Material(F21)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _Depleted Dark Surface(F7) (outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _Redox Depressions(F8) _Very Shallow Dark Surface(F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR N, Other(Explain in Remarks)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) MLRA 136)
_Sandy Redox(S5) _Umbric Surface(F13)(MLRA 122, 136) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix(S6) Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface(S7) Red Parent Material(F21)(MLRA 127, 147, 148) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils,Version 8.0,2016.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont—Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET—Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Cheek-Swan&Burt City/County: Chapel Hill, Orange Sampling Date: 4-22-19
Applicant/Owner: Evan Morgan State: NC Sampling Point: WD-6
Investigator(s): Evan Morgan, Hayley Wood Section,Township, Range:
Landform (hillside,terrace,etc.): linear drainage/seep/spring Local relief(concave,convex, none): concave Slope(%): 4
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.957904 Long:-79.182656 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: HrB-Herndon silt loam NWI classification: N/A
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation No , Soil No ,or Hydrology No significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation No , Soil No ,or Hydrology No naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Two depressed drainageways that have direct nexus with Collins Creek. They both appear to originate at a spring/seep.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required;check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks(B6)
_Surface Water(A1) _True Aquatic Plants(B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8)
X High Water Table(A2) _Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) X Drainage Patterns(B10)
x Saturation(A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) _Moss Trim Lines(B16)
_Water Marks(B1) _Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
_Sediment Deposits(B2) _Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) x Crayfish Burrows(C8)
Drift Deposits(B3) _Thin Muck Surface(C7) _Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
Algal Mat or Crust(B4) Other(Explain in Remarks) _Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)
Iron Deposits(B5) X Geomorphic Position(D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) _Shallow Aquitard(D3)
_Water-Stained Leaves(B9) _Microtopographic Relief(D4)
Aquatic Fauna(B13) X FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No x Depth(inches): 0
Water Table Present? Yes x No Depth(inches): 0
Saturation Present? Yes x No Depth(inches): 0 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge, monitoring well,aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont—Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata)-Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: WD-6
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 10x10m ) % Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet:
1 Number of Dominant Species
2. That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 4 (A)
3. Total Number of Dominant
4. Species Across All Strata: 5 (B)
5. Percent of Dominant Species
6. That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 80.0% (A/B)
7. Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover Total% Cover of: Multiply by:
50%of total cover: 20%of total cover: OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 10x10m ) FACW species 40 x 2= 80
1. Acer rubrum 15 Yes FAC FAC species 35 x 3= 105
2. Carpinus caroliniana 10 Yes FAC FACU species 0 x 4= 0
3. Fraxinus pennsylvanica 10 Yes FACW UPL species 0 x 5= 0
4. Column Totals: 75 (A) 185 (B)
5. Prevalence Index = B/A= 2.47
6. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7. 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8. X 2-Dominance Test is>50%
9. X 3-Prevalence Index is<_3.01
35 =Total Cover 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting
50%of total cover: 18 20%of total cover: 7 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 10x10m ) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. Juncus effusus 30 Yes FACW 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2. Carex spp. 30 Yes be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
3. Microstegium vimineum 10 No FAC Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4. Tree-Woody plants,excluding vines,3 in. (7.6 cm)or
5. more in diameter at breast height(DBH), regardless of
6. height.
7. Sapling/Shrub-Woody plants,excluding vines,less
8. than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9 (1 m)tall.
10. Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants, regardless
11. of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
70 =Total Cover Woody Vine-All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50%of total cover: 35 20%of total cover: 14 height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 10x10m )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover Vegetation
50%of total cover: 20%of total cover: Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: WD-6
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-4 10YR 4/2 80 10YR 6/6 20 C PL/M Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
4-12 10YR 5/2 90 10YR 6/4 10 C PL Loamy/Clayey Distinct redox concentrations
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol(A1) Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(MLRA 147, 148) _2 cm Muck(A10)(MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon(A2) _Thin Dark Surface(S9)(MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox(A16)
Black Histic(A3) _Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(MLRA 136) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)
_Stratified Layers(A5) X Depleted Matrix(F3) (MLRA 136, 147)
_2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR N) _Redox Dark Surface(F6) _Red Parent Material(F21)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _Depleted Dark Surface(F7) (outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _Redox Depressions(F8) _Very Shallow Dark Surface(F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR N, Other(Explain in Remarks)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) MLRA 136)
_Sandy Redox(S5) _Umbric Surface(F13)(MLRA 122, 136) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix(S6) Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface(S7) Red Parent Material(F21)(MLRA 127, 147, 148) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils,Version 8.0,2016.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont—Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET—Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Cheek-Swan& Burt City/County: Chapel Hill, Orange Sampling Date: 4-22-19
Applicant/Owner: Evan Morgan State: NC Sampling Point: WE-10
Investigator(s): Evan Morgan, Hayley Wood Section,Township, Range:
Landform (hillside,terrace,etc.): Hillslope Local relief(concave,convex, none): concave Slope(%): 6
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.957439 Long:-79.187745 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Lg-Lignum NWI classification: N/A
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation No , Soil No ,or Hydrology No significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation No , Soil No ,or Hydrology No naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
This upland form serves for WA,WB,WC,WD,and WE as the soil and vegetation was consistent throughout the upland areas of the project site.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required;check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks(B6)
Surface Water(A1) _True Aquatic Plants(B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8)
_High Water Table(A2) _Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) _Drainage Patterns(B10)
_Saturation(A3) _Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) _Moss Trim Lines(B16)
_Water Marks(B1) _Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
Sediment Deposits(B2) _Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) _Crayfish Burrows(C8)
_Drift Deposits(B3) _Thin Muck Surface(C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
Algal Mat or Crust(B4) Other(Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)
Iron Deposits(B5) _Geomorphic Position(D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) _Shallow Aquitard(D3)
Water-Stained Leaves(B9) Microtopographic Relief(D4)
Aquatic Fauna(B13) FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No x Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No x Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No x Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge, monitoring well,aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont—Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata)-Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: WE-10
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 10x10m ) % Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet:
1. Pinus taeda 30 Yes FAC Number of Dominant Species
2. Pinus echinata 20 Yes UPL That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 5 (A)
3. Juniperus virginiana 10 No FACU Total Number of Dominant
4. Acerrubrum 10 No FAC Species Across All Strata: 8 (B)
5. Percent of Dominant Species
6. That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 62.5% (A/B)
7. Prevalence Index worksheet:
70 =Total Cover Total% Cover of: Multiply by:
50%of total cover: 35 20%of total cover: 14 OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 10x10m ) FACW species 0 x 2= 0
1. Pinus taeda 25 Yes FAC FAC species 90 x 3= 270
2. Carpinus caroliniana 10 Yes FAC FACU species 30 x 4= 120
3. Fagus grandifolia 10 Yes FACU UPL species 20 x 5= 100
4. Juniperus virginiana 10 Yes FACU Column Totals: 140 (A) 490 (B)
5. Prevalence Index = B/A= 3.50
6. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7. 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8. X 2-Dominance Test is>50%
9. 3-Prevalence Index is<_3.01
55 =Total Cover 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting
50%of total cover: 28 20%of total cover: 11 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 10x10m ) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. Microstegium vimineum 10 Yes FAC 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2. be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
3. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4. Tree-Woody plants,excluding vines,3 in. (7.6 cm)or
5. more in diameter at breast height(DBH), regardless of
6. height.
7. Sapling/Shrub-Woody plants,excluding vines,less
8. than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9 (1 m)tall.
10. Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants, regardless
11. of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10 =Total Cover Woody Vine-All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50%of total cover: 5 20%of total cover: 2 height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 10x10m )
1. Smilax rotundifolia 5 Yes FAC
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
5 =Total Cover Vegetation
50%of total cover: 3 20%of total cover: 1 Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: WE-10
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-3 10YR 5/6 80 7.5YR 4/6 20 C M Loamy/Clayey Faint redox concentrations
3-16 7.5YR 6/6 90 10YR 5/4 10 C PL Loamy/Clayey Distinct redox concentrations
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol(A1) Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(MLRA 147, 148) _2 cm Muck(A10)(MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon(A2) _Thin Dark Surface(S9)(MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox(A16)
Black Histic(A3) _Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(MLRA 136) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)
_Stratified Layers(A5) Depleted Matrix(F3) (MLRA 136, 147)
_2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR N) _Redox Dark Surface(F6) _Red Parent Material(F21)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _Depleted Dark Surface(F7) (outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _Redox Depressions(F8) _Very Shallow Dark Surface(F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR N, Other(Explain in Remarks)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) MLRA 136)
_Sandy Redox(S5) _Umbric Surface(F13)(MLRA 122, 136) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix(S6) Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface(S7) Red Parent Material(F21)(MLRA 127, 147, 148) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils,Version 8.0,2016.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont—Version 2.0

Appendix C
Agent Authorization Form
JD Request Form
PJD Form

DocuSign Envelope ID:8D56181F-9B27-4722-8871-0D557D1C4793
SAMPLE AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 9840439598
LOT NO. PLAN NO. PARCEL ID: 9840339815
STREET ADDRESS: Near 7900 Orange Grove Road
Chapel Hill, NC 27516
Please print: Stephen �61
Property Owner:
Property Owner.
Lisa Cheek and Sama ha Swan � �
The undersigned, registered property owners of the above noted property, do hereby authorize
Evan Morgan of Three Oaks Engineering
(Contractor/Agent) (Name of consulting firm)
to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance of
this permit or certification and any and all standard and special conditions attached.
Property Owner's Address (if different than property above):
Telephone:
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to the
best of our knowledge.
DocuSigned by:
Authorized Signature e7 i'`0 nature
4/24/19 April 24, 2019
Date: Date:

Jurisdictional Determination Request
iri
US Army Corps
of Engineers
Wilminglan District
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD)from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District(Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project
manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by
assigned counties can be found on-line at:
http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regul atoryPermitProgram/Contact/CountyLocator.aspx,
by calling 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your
request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager.
ASHEVILLE&CHARLOITE REGULATORY WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
FIELD OFFICES US Army Corps of Engineers
US Army Corps of Engineers 2407 West Fifth Street
151 Patton Avenue,Room 208 Washington,North Carolina 27889
Asheville,North Carolina 28801-5006 General Number:[phone]
General Number:[phone] Fax Number:[phone]
Fax Number:[phone]
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE US Army Corps of Engineers
US Army Corps of Engineers 69 Darlington Avenue
3331 Heritage Trade Drive,Suite 105 Wilmington,North Carolina 28403
Wake Forest,North Carolina 27587 General Number:910-251-4633
General Number:[phone] Fax Number:[phone]
Fax Number:[phone]
INSTRUCTIONS:
All requestors must complete Parts A,B, C,D, E, F and G.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H.
NOTE ON PART D—PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that
all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to
proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when
necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s)
authorized agent to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D -NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for
JD requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD
may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Version:May 2017 Page 1

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: Near 7900 Orange Grove Road
City, State: Chapel Hill, NC 27516
County: Orange
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 9840339815 and 9840439598
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: Evan Morgan
Mailing Address: 324 Blackwell Street, Suite 1200
Durham, NC 27701
Telephone Number: 919-732-1300
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
Select one:
u I am the current property owner.
✓ I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant'
Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
riOther, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION2
Name: Stephen Burt
Mailing Address: 7951 Lake Ross Lane
Sandford, FL 32771
Telephone Number: 407-580-7189
Electronic Mail Address: steveburtl @me.com
I Must provide completed Agent Authorization Foiui/Letter.
2 Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request(copy of Deed,County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
Version:May 2017 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION3,4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
Evan Morgan
Print Name
Capacity: fl Owner fl Authorized Agents
04/29/2019
Date
Signature
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
ri I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
1-1 I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
fl I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
111 I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
1-1 A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
fl I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
n I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
Other:
3 For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
4 If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties,please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
5 Must provide agent authorization foim/letter signed by owner(s).
Version:May 2017 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION(JD)TYPE (Select One)
nI am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD)provides an indication that there may
be "waters of the United States" or"navigable waters of the United States"on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional"waters of
the United States". PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
"preliminary" in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD)is a determination that
jurisdictional "waters of the United States" or"navigable waters of the United
States" are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other"affected
party" (33 C.F.R. 331.2)who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
nSize of Property or Review Area 61 .1 acres.
The property boundary (or review area boundary)is clearly physically marked on the site.
Version:May 2017 Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
riProject Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude: 35.959068
Longitude: -79.192917
riA legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than l 1x17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).6
• North Arrow
• Graphical Scale
• Boundary of Review Area
• Date
• Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
• Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
• Jurisdictional non-wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non-Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
• Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non-
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non-Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non jurisdictional (i.e.
"Isolated", "No Significant Nexus", or"Upland Feature"). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
• Wetland and non-wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non-wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
riCompleted Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
6 Please refer to the guidance document titled"Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Deteuninations"to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards. http://www.saw.usace.ainiy.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Peimit-
P ro gram/Juri sdi ction/
Version:May 2017 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
Completed appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
• PJDs,please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form'and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
• AJDs,please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form'
✓ Vicinity Map
IAerial Photograph
I USGS Topographic Map
n Soil Survey Map
Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
riLandscape Photos (if taken)
flNCSAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
riNC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
Other Assessment Forms
' www.saw.usace.auuy.mil/Portals/59/docs/regulatory/regdocs/JD/RGL 08-02AppAPrelim JD Foul' fillable.pdf
' Please see http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-Pro gram/Jurisdiction!
Principal Purpose:The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to federal jurisdiction under the regulatory
authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses:This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal,state,and local
government agencies,and the public,and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal
law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the
approved jurisdictional determination(AJD),which will be made available to the public on the District's web site
and on the Headquarters USAGE web site.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary;however,if information is not provided,the
request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued.
Version:May 2017 Page 6

Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: 4/26/2019
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Evan Morgan
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Wilmington
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: Orange City: Chapel Hill
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat.: 35.959068 Long.: -79.192917
Universal Transverse Mercator: 17
Name of nearest waterbody: Collins Creek
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date: 04/29/2019
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE"SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site Latitude Longitude Estimated amount Type of aquatic Geographic authority
number (decimal (decimal of aquatic resource resource (i.e.,wetland to which the aquatic
degrees) degrees) in review area vs. non-wetland resource "may be"
(acreage and linear waters) subject(i.e., Section
feet, if applicable) 404 or Section 10/404)
See Attached List

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option
to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an
informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their
characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a
Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre-
construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non-reporting NWP or
other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the
activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has
elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an
official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the
option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit
authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result
in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the
applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can
accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and
conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has
determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject
permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance
of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit
authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the
review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and
waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance
or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7)
whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms
and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively
appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic
jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official
delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds
that there "may be"waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be"navigable waters of
the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review
area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources
below where indicated for all checked items:
n Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map:Aerial Vicinity Map, USGS Topo Map, Orthoimagery Map
n Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
n Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
n Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
n D• ata sheets prepared by the Corps:
n Corps navigable waters' study:
n U• .S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
n USGS NHD data.
n USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
n U• .S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: 1:24000 White Cross
n Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation:
n N• ational wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
n State/local wetland inventory map(s):
n F• EMA/FIRM maps:
n 1• 00-year Floodplain Elevation is: .(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
n P• hotographs: n Aerial (Name & Date):
or n Other (Name & Date):
n Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
n Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily
been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determinations.
Digitally signed by Evan Morgan
DN:cn=Evan Morgan,o=Three Oaks
ngineering,au,
fJU+f"l emailevanmorgan@threeoak engineers
ng.com,c=US
_ Date:2019.04.29 15:47:52-04'00'
Signature and date of Signature and date of
Regulatory staff member person requesting PJD
completing PJD (REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)'
1 Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not respond
within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is
necessary prior to finalizing an action.

Aquatic resources in the review area which "may be" subject to regulatory jurisdiction.
Estimated amount of Geographic
Site Latitude Longitude aquatic resource in Type of aquatic authority to which
Number resource the aquatic resource
review area (lf& ac)
"may be" subject
SA 35.959282 -79.1895 1,070 linear feet Non-wetland Section 404
SB 35.959147 -79.188686 223 linear feet Non-wetland Section 404
SC 35.957937 -79.183524 167 linear feet Non-wetland Section 404
SD 35.958235 -79.181445 1,708 linear feet Non-wetland Section 404
WA 35.957975 -79.189509 2.20 acres Wetland Section 404
WB 35.958192 -79.185583 0.99 acres Isolated Non- Section 404
Jurisdictional Wetland
WC 35.958084 -79.183636 0.01 acres Wetland Section 404
WD 35.957904 -79.182656 1.63 acres Wetland Section 404
WE 35.956456 -79.186300 0.43 acres Isolated Non- Section 404
Jurisdictional Wetland