20201105 Ver 2_ePCN Application_20210415

%. WithersRavenel
II.Our People. Your Success.
April 15, 2021
US Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Mr. Dave Bailey
3331 Heritage Trade Drive
Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
NC -Division of Water Resources
401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
Mr. Paul Wojoski
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699
Re: Reidsville Rural Ready Site - Access & Utilities - NWP 39 PCN Submittal
Reidsville, Rockingham County
USACE AID: SAW-2020-01543
NCDWR Project #20201105
WR Project #06180244.01
Dear Mr. Bailey and Mr. Wojoski,
On behalf of Rockingham County, we are requesting authorization from the USACE to use NWP
39 for 0.066 acres of permanent wetland impacts, 0.009 acres of temporary wetland impacts,
0.052 ac (139 If) of permanent stream impacts and 0.017 ac (52 If) of temporary stream impacts
for construction of an access road (Diesel Drive) and utilities (water & sewer) for the Reidsville
Rural Ready Site.
Proposed Impact Table
Feature
Type of Impact
Impact Area
LF
SF
AC
Stream
Permanent (Functional Loss)
139 If
2,248 sf
0.052 ac
Stream
Temporary
52 If
709 sf
0.017 ac
Wetland
Permanent
2,885 sf
0.066 ac
Wetland
Temporary
385 sf
0.009 ac
The proposed total permanent impact to jurisdictional wetland and streams is 0.118 acres and
total permanent stream impacts are less than 0.05 acres (see table below), and therefore the
proposed project is eligible for authorization under an NWP 39.
Type of Impact
Impact Area
LF
SF
AC
Stream - Permanent (Functional Loss)
139 If
2,248 sf
0.052 ac
Wetland - Permanent
2,885 sf
0.066 ac
Total
139 If
5,133 sf
0.118 ac
The project area is ±9.0 acres in size and is within the larger 127-acre Reidsville Rural Ready Site
which is bound to the north by Drum Road, to the west by US 29 and south by Holiday Drive in
Reidsville, Rockingham County (Latitude: 36.332295°N; Longitude:-79.637327°W). The
219 Station Road, Suite 101 I Wilmington, NC 28405
t: 910.256.9277 I www.withersravenel.com I License No. C-0832
Asheville I Cary I Greensboro I Pittsboro I Raleigh I Wilmington

Reidsville Rural Ready Site - Access & Utilities
Reidsville, Rockingham County
%� WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
Reidsville Rural Ready Site consist of three parcels owned by Rockingham County. The proposed
project is specifically located on the following four parcels:
• 891300291534 - Owned by Rockingham County
• 891403104118 - Owned by Rockingham County
• 891403203865 - Owned by Rockingham County
• 891306287774 - Owned by Patricia Bradsher
The project is in the Roanoke River basin and onsite waters drain to Jones Creek (Lake Wade).
The Water Quality Classification for Jones Creek is C, and the Stream Index Number is: 22-50-3.
The cataloging unit for the site is 03010104.
Proposed Project
The purpose of the proposed project is to construct an extension of Diesel Drive, which will
provide access and water/sewer infrastructure to the 127-acre Reidsville Rural Ready Site to
facilitate economic development within Reidsville and Rockingham County. Reidsville and
Rockingham County have high unemployment and have a need to make as much
industrial/commercial land available as possible to attract investors who could bring jobs to the
area. While this site is located within a prime area for industrial/commercial development, the site
has been passed up by companies looking to expand or build in Reidsville area due to a lack of
utilities and road infrastructure. The proposed project will allow the Reidsville and Rockingham
County to proactively market the site for industrial development. The Reidsville Rural Ready Site
could potentially attract employers that would invest an estimated $50 million in private capital
investment and possibly create upwards of 250 local jobs. There are numerous opportunities for
potential employers who are interested in this site to become engaged in the workforce initiatives
and provide opportunities to local students and those being retrained to fulfill recruited positions
in the community. These jobs and economic development are desperately needed in
Reidsville/Rockingham County.
The construction of Diesel Drive and water and sewer infrastructure are the first steps in allowing
the site to be proactively marketed to attract potential businesses to relocate or expand within the
area. Diesel Drive will provide direct access to the US 29 interchange without having to go through
residential communities. The proposed construction of Diesel Drive and the water/sewer
infrastructure is being funded through a "Rural Ready Site" grant through the NC Department of
Commerce. A "Rural Ready Site" grant can only go to Cities/Counties which own a 50-acre or
greater tract of land that could be used for industrial development. The funds are available to
make the site ready for development by providing utilities and roads for the site. Without the
grant, Rockingham County would not be able to pay for the proposed infrastructure, making it
extremely difficult to market the site and bring needed economic development to the area.
Please note that the lots shown adjacent to the proposed Diesel Drive are conceptual only, as the
actual lot sizes and configurations will be dependent on the ultimate investors who purchase and
develop the lots for their specific needs. The project area for the proposed project has been limited
to only the ±9.0 area needed for construction of Diesel Drive and the water/sewer infrastructure,
as this is an economic development project, intended to attract businesses to the 127-acre
Reidsville Rural Ready Site. Due to funding constraints and the inability to anticipate the ultimate
needs for potential businesses, no additional impacts are proposed as part of this application. Any
Page 2 of 5

Reidsville Rural Ready Site - Access & Utilities
Reidsville, Rockingham County
%� WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
impacts for specific businesses building within the Reidsville Rural Ready Site will be permitted in
the future as the need arises.
The proposed project consists of the construction of ±2,700 If of road (Diesel Drive), 2,930 If of
12" water line, 1,530 If of 8" waterline, 3,120 If of 8" gravity sewer, 3,144 If of 4" force main and
one sewer lift station. Diesel Drive will be extended north to the proposed sewer lift station,
stubbing short of Stream 3 and will not result in impacts to Stream 3. Diesel Drive is not proposed
to connect to Drum Road for several reasons, including lack of grant funding to pay for
construction, as well as there being no need to provide access to Drum Road as all traffic for the
site will be funneled to US 29 and not Drum Road.
The project will be constructed using traditional commercial construction equipment and
techniques.
Project History
WithersRavenel delineated the wetlands within the project area in May 2019. Please note that
we are not requesting issuance of a Jurisdictional Determination in conjunction with issuance of
the NWP 39. An exhibit depicting the delineation completed for the project area and
wetland/upland data forms have been provided as an attachment to this application.
WithersRavenel previously submitted a NWP 39 application on 8/27/2020 for the proposed
project. Dave Bailey (USACE) issued a request for additional information in an email dated
9/21/2020. In the email, Mr. Bailey specified that due to the reasonably foreseeable cumulative
impacts for future development within the industrial park exceeding the typical compensatory
mitigation threshold under a NWP 39, compensatory mitigation would be required for the
proposed 139 If of permanent stream impacts for the construction of the Diesel Drive stream
crossing. The proposed project is being fully funded by the Rural Ready Grant, and at the time of
submittal of the previous application there was not sufficient funding in the approved grant to
cover the cost of the stream and wetland mitigation. Therefore, the proposed project was revised
to eliminate the road crossing entirely, install the sewer force main at the stream crossing via bore
and jack to avoid stream impacts and to provide construction access from Pickrel Road entirely
within uplands. In an email dated 11/25/2020, WR notified the USACE and NCDWR of the
modifications of the project design which would eliminate the need for 404/401 permits and
formally withdrew the application. A copy of the 11/25/2020 email withdrawing the application
has been provided as an attachment to this application. In an email dated 11/27/2020, Mr. Bailey
(USACE) confirmed withdrawal of the NWP 39 application which has been provided as an
attachment to this application. Additionally, Ms. Homewood (NCDWR) issued a letter of
acknowledgement of withdrawal of the 401 WQC application dated 11/30/2020 which has been
provided as an attachment to this application.
The applicant has successfully secured additional "Rural Ready Site" funding from the NC
Department of Commerce to cover the cost of the stream mitigation. Therefore, we are
resubmitting the NWP 39 application for the impacts associated with the Diesel Drive stream
crossing and installation of the sewer force main.
Please note that WithersRavenel coordinated with Sue Homewood (NCDWR) via phone calls and
email correspondence during the review of the previously submitted 401 WQC application. A
copy of the email correspondence with the Ms. Homewood dated 9/21/2020 in response to the
USACE email requesting additional information and the NCDWR letter acknowledging withdrawal
Page 3 of 5

Reidsville Rural Ready Site - Access & Utilities
Reidsville, Rockingham County
%� WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
of the previous 401 WQC application has been attached as documentation that coordination with
NCDWR was conducted more than 30-days prior to submittal of this application. Therefore, the
requirement for requesting a pre -filing meeting under 40 CFR Part 121 for 401 Certifications in
accordance with the federal Clean Water Act have been satisfied.
Proposed Impacts
The proposed impacts consist of 0.066 acres of permanent wetland impacts, 0.009 acres of
temporary wetland impacts, 0.052 ac (139 If) of permanent stream impacts and 0.017 ac (52 If) of
temporary stream impacts.
All proposed impacts are associated with the construction of access road (Diesel Drive), which has
been designed as a perpendicular crossing across Stream 1 and Wetland A. Due to the low velocity
of flow within Stream 1, a riprap dissipator is not proposed. The crossing has been designed with
a 48-inch RCP culvert, which will be buried 10-inches (20%) below the stream bed to allow for
aquatic life passage during periods of low flow.
Please note that the northern end of the access road (Diesel Drive) has been designed to stub
short of Stream 2, as a connection to Drum Road is not needed at this time and may never be
constructed. All traffic from future development will be directed to the US 29 interchange to the
southeast and not onto Drum Road.
There may be additional impacts needed for future development within the Reidsville Rural Ready
Site. However, it is impossible to anticipate and determine these impacts, as they will be
dependent on the specific users and configuration of the buildings and infrastructure specific to
their operations. Therefore, future impacts will be permitted as the need arises.
Avoidance and Minimization
Prior to site plan design, the applicant requested that a detailed wetland delineation be conducted
so that impacts to wetlands and "waters" could be minimized.
The project has been designed to minimize impacts to wetlands and streams by crossing the
stream/wetland perpendicularly. Retaining walls have been designed at the stream crossing to
stabilize road fill and minimize stream and wetland impacts. Additionally, the crossing has been
designed without a riprap dissipator as flows were determined to be at non -erosive rates, which
further minimized stream impacts.
During construction, work will be conducted "in the dry" through installation of temporary coffer
dams upstream and downstream of the work area, and flow will be pumped around the project
area during installation of the culvert. Additionally, installation of the culvert will be planned during
a period with no forecasted rain for 4-days.
After construction of the culvert and retaining walls are complete, the stream channel temporarily
impacted will be restored to pre -construction contours and the banks will be temporarily stabilized
with biodegradable matting and seeded with a riparian seed mix until natural recruitment of native
vegetation permanently stabilizes the banks. Temporary wetland impact areas will be restored to
natural grades and seeded with a wetland seed mix to provide temporary stabilization until natural
recruitment of native vegetation permanently stabilizes these areas.
Access during construction will occur from uplands. Silt fencing will be installed around all
disturbed areas to prevent Toss of sediment into adjacent waters.
Page 4 of 5

Reidsville Rural Ready Site - Access & Utilities
Reidsville, Rockingham County
%� WithersRavenel
Our Petrie. Your Success.
Mitigation
The applicant proposes to mitigate for the 0.066 acres of permanent wetland impacts at a 2:1
mitigation ratio, resulting in provision of 0.14 acres of riparian wetland mitigation. Additionally,
the applicant proposes to mitigate for the proposed 139 If of permanent stream impacts at a 2:1
mitigation ratio, resulting in provision of 278 If of stream mitigation. There are no private
mitigation banks servicing the Roanoke 03010104 basin. Therefore, the applicant proposes to
provide the 0.14 acres of riparian wetland mitigation and 278 If of stream mitigation through the
purchase of credits from the NCDMS ILF program. A copy of the NCDMS letter of acceptance
has been provided as an attachment to this application.
Please feel free to call if you have questions or require additional information.
Sincerely,
WithersRavenel
Troy Beasley
Senior Environmental Scientist
Attachments:
• Agent Authorization
• Pre -Filing Meeting Documentation
• WithersRavenel Email Withdrawing 11/25/2020 Application
• USACE Email Acknowledging Withdrawal of 8/27/2020 Application
• NCDWR Letter Acknowledging Withdrawal of 8/27/2020 Application
• Parcel/Owner Information
• Aerial Photo
• Wetland/Stream Delineation Exhibit and Wetland/Upland Data Forms
• USGS Quads
• Rockingham County Soil Survey
• NCNHP Project Review Letter
• USFWS T&E List for Rockingham County
• NCDMS ILF Letter of Acceptance
• Impact Exhibits
Page 5 of 5

DWR
Division of Water Resources
Initial Review
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
April 4, 2021 Ver 4
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
6 Yes
✓ No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
CYes f: No
Change only if needed.
BIMS # Assigned*
20201105
Is a payment required for this project?*
✓ No payment required
✓ Fee received
6 Fee needed - send electronic notification
Reviewing Office *
Winston-Salem Regional Office - (336) 776-
9800
Version#*
2
What amout is owed?*
F $240.00
r $570.00
Select Project Reviewer*
Sue Homewood:eads\slhomewood
Information for Initial Review
la. Name of project:
Reidsville Rural Ready Site - Access & Utilities
la. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Troy Beasley
1b. Primary Contact Email:*
[e-mail]
Date Submitted
4/15/2021
Nearest Body of Water
Jones Creek (Lake Wade) (Stream Index 22-50-3)
Basin
Roanoke
Water Classification
C
Site Coordinates
Latitude:
36.332295
Longitude:
-79.637327
lc. Primary Contact Phone:*
[phone]
A. Processing Information
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Rockingham
Is this a NCDMS Project
✓ Yes r' No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
✓ Yes r' No
Pre -Filing Meeting Information
Is this a courtesy copy notification?*
✓ Yes f No

ID# Version
20201105
Pre -fling Meeting or Request Date
9/21/2020
Attach documentation of Pre -Filing Meeting Request here:
Click the upbad button or drag and drop files here to attach document
EMAIL_NCDWR response to USAGE Request for Additional Information_2020-09-21.pdf
NCDWR 20201105 Ver 1_Withdrawal Acknowiedgement_20201130.pdf
Retype must be FCF
la. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
I7 Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
r Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
Has this PCN previously been submitted?*
0' Yes
✓ No
Please provide the date of the previous submission.*
8/7/2020
1b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
f7 Nationwide Permit (NWP)
I- Regional General Permit (RGP)
r Standard (IP)
lc. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
6 Yes r No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number: 39 - Commercial/Institutional Developments
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
Id. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
r 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
r Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
r7 Individual 401 Water Quality Certification
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
If. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
✓ Yes ( No
161 46KB
936.42KB
✓ 401 Water Quality Certification - Express
✓ Riparian Buffer Authorization
lg. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
6 Yes rNo
lg. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
✓ Yes r No
Acceptance Letter Attachment
Reidsville Rural Ready Site - Access + Utilities DMS Acceptance_2021-04-01.pdf 437.59KB
1 h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
✓ Yes f No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
4Yes0' No
B. Applicant Information
Id. Who is applying for the permit?
17 Owner r Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?*
✓ Yes r No
✓ Yes S No
✓ Yes 6 No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:

Rockingham County
2b. Deed book and page no.:
Book: 1286, Page: 0418; Book: 1285, Page: 0021; Book: 1281, Page: 2165
2c. Contact Person:
Lance Metzler- County Manager
2d.Address
Street Address
371 NC 65
Address Line 2
city State / Bovine / Region
Reidsville NC
Postal / Zip Cale Country
27320 USA
2e. Telephone Number: 2f. Fax Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
Patricia Bradsher
2b. Deed book and page no.:
Book: 1029; Page: 2026
2c. Contact Person:
2d. Address
Street Address
13231 US Highway 158
Address Line 2
at),
Reidsville
Postal / Zip Code
27320
2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:
Troy Beasley
4b. Business Name:
WithersRavenel
4c.Address
Street Address
219 Station Road
Address Line 2
Suite 101
aty
Wilmington
Postal / Zip Code
28405
4d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
4f. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
State / Bovine / Region
NC
Country
USA
2f. Fax Number:
State / Bovine / Region
NC
Country
USA
4e. Fax Number:
Agent Authorization Letter*
SIGNED_Agent Authorization Form_Rockingham County.pdf 27.31 KB
C. Project Information and Prior Project History v
1. Project Information

1b. Subdivision name:
(if appropriate)
lc. Nearest municipality/ town:
Reidsville
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
PINs: 891403203865; 891403104118;
891300291534; 891306287774
2c. Project Address
Street Address
Diesel Drive
Address Line 2
2b. Property size:
Project Area: ±9 acres
Oty State / Province / legion
Reidsville NC
Postal / ZZp ode Country
27320 USA
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:*
Jones Creek (Lake Wade) (Stream Index 22-50-3)
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:*
C
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Roanoke
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030101040104
4. Project Description and History
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:*
The project site currently consists of undeveloped woodlands. The land use in the vicinity consists of a mixture of undeveloped woodlands, residential and commercial land use.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
r Yes f No r Unknown
4d. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of the project site. (for DWR)
USGS Quads. pdf 509.97KB
4e. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey map depicting the project site. (for DWR)
Rockingham Co Soil Survey.pdf 1.65MB
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0.075 acres (Impact Area Only)
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
139 If (Impact Area Only)
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:*
The purpose of the proposed project is to construct an extension of Diesel Drive, which ell provide access and water/sewer infrastructure to the 127-acre Reidsville Rural Ready Site to
facilitate economic development within Reidsville and Rockingham County. Reidsville and Rockingham County have high unemployment and have a need to make as much
industrial/commercial land available as possible to attract investors who could bring jobs to the area. While this site is located within a prime area for industrial/commercial development,
the site has been passed up by companies looking to expand or build in Reidsville area due to a lack of utilities and road infrastructure. The proposed project will allow the Reidsville
and Rockingham County to proactively market the site for industrial development. The Reidsville Rural Ready Site could potentially attract employers that would invest an estimated $50
million in private capital investment and possibly create upwards of 250 local jobs. There are numerous opportunities for potential employers who are interested in this site to become
engaged in the workforce initiatives and provide opportunities to local students and those being retrained to fulfill recruited positions in the community. These jobs and economic
development are desperately needed in Reidsville/Rockingham County.
The construction of Diesel Drive and water and sewer infrastructure are the first steps in allowing the site to be proactively marketed to attract potential businesses to relocate or
expand within the area. Diesel Drive will provide direct access to the US 29 interchange without having to go through residential communities. The proposed construction of Diesel Drive
and the water/sewer infrastructure is being funded through a "Rural Ready site grant through the NC Department of Commerce. A "Rural Ready Site" grant can only go to
Cities/Counties which own a 50-acre or greater tract of land that could be used for industrial development. The funds are available to make the site ready for development by providing
utilities and roads for the site. Without the grant, Rockingham County would not be able to pay for the proposed infrastructure, making it extremely difficult to market the site and bring
needed economic development to the area.
Please note that the lots shown adjacent to the proposed Diesel Drive are conceptual only, as the actual lot sizes and configurations will be dependent on the ultimate investors wfio
purchase and develop the lots for their specific needs. The project area for the proposed project has been limited to only the ±9.0 area needed for construction of Diesel Drive and the
water/sewer infrastructure, as this is an economic development project, intended to attract businesses to the 127-acre Reidsville Rural Ready Site. Due to funding constraints and the
inability to anticipate the ultimate needs for potential businesses, no additional impacts are proposed as part of this application. Any impacts for specific businesses building within the
Reidsville Rural Ready Site will be permitted in the future as the need arises.
4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:*

The proposed project consists of the construction of ±2,700 If of road (Diesel Drive), 2,930 If of 12" water line, 1,530 If of 8" waterline, 3,120 If of 8" gravity sewer, 3,144 If of 4" force
main and one sewer lift station. Diesel Drive will be extended north to the proposed sewer lift station, stubbing short of Stream 3 and will not result in impacts to Stream 3. Diesel Drive is
not proposed to connect to Drum Road for several reasons, including lack of grant funding to pay for construction, as well as there being no need to provide access to Drum Road as all
traffic for the site will be funneled to US 29 and not Drum Road.
The project will be constructed using traditional commercial construction equipment and techniques.
4j. Please upload project drawings for the proposed project.
Reidsville Rural Ready Site Impact Plans_FINAL.pdf 794.86KB
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
( Yes r No
Comments:
WithersRavenel delineated the wetlands within the project area in May 2019. Please note that we
are not requesting issuance of a Jurisdictional Determination in conjunction with issuance of the
NWP 39. An exhibit depicting the delineation completed for the project area and wetland/upland
data forms have been provided as an attachment to this application.
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
C' Preliminary C' Approved 6' Not Verified C' Unknown r N/A
Corps AID Number:
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
5d1. Jurisdictional determination upload
Wetland Delineation Exhibit.pdf
Wetland -Upland Dataforms.pdf
6. Future Project Plans
Alyssa Ricci
WithersRavenel
6a. Is this a phased project?*
(c Yes CNo
421.08KB
105.32KB
Unknown
6b. If yes, explain.
The proposed construction of Diesel Drive and water/sewer infrastructure is intended to be a catalyst for future development of the 127-acre Reidsville Rural Ready Site. Therefore, the
proposed project will have future phases associated with the intended development of the property as portions of the property are subdivided as lots and sold for construction of various
businesses.
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
No
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
la. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
17 Wetlands
I— Open Waters
2. Wetland Impacts
17 Streams -tributaries
r' Pond Construction
r Buffers
2a. Site #* (7)
2a1 Reason (?)
2b. Impact type * (?)
2c. Type of W.*
2d. W. name *
2e. Forested *
2f. Type of
Jurisdicition*(?)
2g. Impact
area*
Impact 2
Road Crossing
P
Headwater Forest
Wetland A
Yes
Both
0.066
(acres)
Impact 3
Road Crossing
T
Headwater Forest
Wetland A
Yes
Both
0.009
(acres)
2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact
0.009
2g. Total Wetland Impact
0.075
2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0.066
2i. Comments:

Proposed wetland impacts are for the perpendicular crossing of Wetland A. Temporary wetland impact areas wll be restored to natural grades and
seeded with a wetland seed mix to provide temporary stabilization until natural recruitment of native vegetation permanently stabilizes these areas.
3. Stream Impacts
3a. Reason for impact (?)
3b.Impact type*
3c. Type of impact*
3d. S. name *
3e. Stream Type*
(?)
3f. Type of
Jurisdiction*
3g. S. width *
3h. Impact
length*
S1
Impact 1 - Road Crossing
Permanent
Culvert
Stream 1
Perennial
Both
8
Average (feet)
139
(linear feet)
S2
Impact 4 - Road Crossing
Temporary
Culvert
Stream 1
Perennial
Both
8
Average (feet)
27
(linear feet)
S3
Impact 5 - Road Crossing
Temporary
Culvert
Stream 1
Perennial
Both
8
Average (feet)
25
(linear feet)
31. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0
31. Total permanent stream impacts:
139
3i. Total stream and ditch impacts:
191
3i. Total temporary stream impacts:
52
3j. Comments:
All proposed impacts are associated with the construction of access road (Diesel Drive), which has been designed as a perpendicular crossing across
Stream 1. Due to the low velocity of flowwithin Stream 1, a riprap dissipator is not proposed.After construction of the culvert and retaining walls are
complete, the stream channel temporarily impacted will be restored to pre -construction contours and the banks will be temporarily stabilized with
biodegradable matting and seeded with a riparian seed mix until natural recruitment of native vegetation permanently stabilizes the banks.
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
Prior to site plan design, the applicant requested that a detailed wetland delineation be conducted so that impacts to wetlands and "waters" could be
minimized.
The project has been designed to minimize impacts to wetlands and streams by crossing the stream/wetland perpendicularly. Retaining walls have
been designed at the stream crossing to stabilize road fill and minimize stream and wetland impacts. Additionally, the crossing has been designed
without a riprap dissipator as flows were determined to be at non -erosive rates, which further minimized stream impacts.
During construction, work will be conducted "in the dry" through installation of temporary coffer dams upstream and downstream of the work area, and
flowwtll be pumped around the project area during installation of the culvert. Additionally, installation of the culvert will be planned during a period with
no forecasted rain for 4-days.
After construction of the culvert and retaining walls are complete, the stream channel temporarily impacted will be restored to pre -construction
contours and the banks will be temporarily stabilized with biodegradable matting and seeded with a riparian seed mix until natural recruitment of native
vegetation permanently stabilizes the banks. Temporary wetland impact areas will be restored to natural grades and seeded with a wetland seed mix
to provide temporary stabilization until natural recruitment of native vegetation permanently stabilizes these areas.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
Access during construction will occur from uplands. Silt fencing will be installed around all disturbed areas to prevent loss of sediment into adjacent
waters.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
( Yes r No
2c. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
r DWR fJ Corps
2d. If yes, which mitigation option(s) will be used for this project?
n Mitigation bank II Payment to in -lieu fee r Permittee Responsible
program Mitigation
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
6 Yes r No
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
(linear feet)
278
4c. If using stream mitigation, what is the stream temperature:
warm

4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWR only):
(square feet)
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
(acres)
0.14
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested: 4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
(acres) (acres)
4h. Comments
The applicant proposes to mitigate for the 0.066 acres of permanent wetland impacts at a 2:1 mitigation ratio, resulting in provision of 0.14 acres of
riparian wetland mitigation. Additionally, the applicant proposes to mitigate for the proposed 139 If of permanent stream impacts at a 2:1 mitigation
ratio, resulting in provision of 278 If of stream mitigation. There are no private mitigation banks servicing the Roanoke 03010104 basin. Therefore, the
applicant proposes to provide the 0.14 acres of riparian wetland mitigation and 278 If of stream mitigation through the purchase of credits from the
NCDMS ILF program. A copy of the NCDMS letter of acceptance has been provided as an attachment to this application.
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
✓ Yes ( No
If no, explain why:
The project is located within the Roanoke River Basin, which is not a state buffered basin.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?*
✓ Yes ( No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
( Yes r No
Comments:
The proposed project is not located within a regulated watershed, and therefore a stormwater management plan is not required for infrastructure only projects.
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*
(c Yes r No
1b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State (North Carolina)
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?*
✓ Yes f No
Comments:*
The environmental impacts for the proposed project does not meet thresholds requiring formal NEPA/SEPA review. However, a Preliminary
Engineering Report (PER) was prepared as part of the Rural Ready Sites grant application packet, which included a preliminary review of potential
environmental impacts, which was approved by the NC Department of Commerce.
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?*
✓ Yes ( No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
('Yes rNo
3c. Upload a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis.
Cumulative Impacts Summary.pdf 76.51KB
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
( Yes r No r N/A
4b. Describe, in detail, the treatment methods and dispositions (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project. If the wastewater will be treated
at a treatment plant, list the capacity available at that plant.
Reidsville Sanitary Sewer

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
✓ Yes f• No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
✓ yes ( No
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
✓ Yes
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
✓ Yes G No
r No r Unknown
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
✓ Yes r No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
✓ Yes r No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
✓ Yes r No
5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
✓ Yes G No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
WR reviewed the NC Natural Heritage Program database, located at http://www.ncnhp.org/web/nhp/home, as well as NCNHP GIS data to identify if
there were any known occurrences of endangered species on or near the proposed project. The review of the NHP data did not identify any recent
occurrences of federally listed threatened or endangered species or critical habitat on the subject property or within 1.0 miles of the project, see
attached NCNHP project review letter. Furthermore, site reviews did not identify any potential habitat for any federally protected species known to
occur in Rockingham County. While Stream 1 is a perennial stream, it is not large enough to be considered potential habitat for Roanoke logperch or
green floater. Additionally, there is no potential habitat for smooth coneflower. Therefore, the proposed project will not adversely affect federally
protected species or their designated critical habitat.
Consultation Documentation Upload
NCNHP Project Review Letter_2021-04-01.pdf
USFWS T&E List for Rockingham Co_2020-07-17.pdf
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
✓ Yes f• No
208.98KB
133.63KB
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
WR reviewed the NOAA Essential Fish Habitat online mapper, located at: http://w,vw.habitat.noaa.gov/protection/efh/efhmapper/index.html. There are
no waters classified as EFH in Rockingham County.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
✓ Yes f• No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
WR reviewed the NC State Historic Preservation Office's online database, located at: http://gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb/, to determine if there were any
known historic or cultural resources within or in the vicinity of the proposed project. The database review did not identify any known resources within or
in the vicinity of the proposed project.
7c. Historic or Prehistoric Information Upload
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?*
✓ Yes (7 No
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
vmw.ncfloodmaps.com
Miscellaneous
Comments
Miscellaneous attachments not previously requested.

EMAIL_WR Application Withdrawal_2020-11-25.pdf
EMAIL_USACE Acknowledgement of Application Withdrawal_2020-11-27.pdf
Parcel -Owner Info.pdf
PCN Cover Letter.pdf
896.64KB
201.42KB
244.46KB
128.41 KB
Signature
By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief; and
• The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401 certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Troy Beasley
Signature
Date
4/15/2021

ROY COOPER
Governor
DIONNE DELLI-GATTI
Secretary
TIM BAUMGARTNER
Director
Lance Metzler
Rockingham County
371 NC Hwy 65, Suite 200
Wentworth, NC 27375
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
April 1, 2021
Expiration of Acceptance: 10/1/2021
Project: Reidsville Rural Ready Site - Access & Utilities County: Rockingham
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) is willing to
accept payment for compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced project as
indicated in the table below. Please note that this decision does not assure that participation in the DMS in -
lieu fee mitigation program will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts.
It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact permitting agencies to determine if payment to the DMS will
be approved. You must also comply with all other state, federal or local government permits, regulations or
authorizations associated with the proposed activity including G.S. § 143-214.11.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not
received a copy of the issued 404 Permit/401 Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will
expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send copies of the permits to DMS. Once DMS receives a copy
of the permit(s) an invoice will be issued based on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must
be made prior to conducting the authorized work. The amount of the in -lieu fee to be paid by an applicant is
calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed on the DMS website.
Based on the information supplied by you in your request to use the DMS, the impacts for which you are
requesting compensatory mitigation credit are summarized in the following table. The amount of mitigation
required and assigned to DMS for this impact is determined by permitting agencies and may exceed the
impact amounts shown below.
River Basin
Impact Location
(8-digit HUC)
Impact Type
Impact Quantity
Roanoke
03010104
Warm Stream
139
Roanoke
03010104
Riparian Wetland
0.066
Upon receipt of payment, DMS will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. The
mitigation will be performed in accordance with the In -Lieu Fee Program instrument dated July 28, 2010.
Thank you for your interest in the DMS in -lieu fee mitigation program. If you have any questions or need
additional information, please contact [e-mail].
cc: Troy Beasley, agent
Sincerely,
FOR James. B Stanfill
Asset Management Supervisor
NORTH CAROLINA
Departmental Environmental Quality
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Mitigation Services
217 West Jones Street 11652 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1652
919.707.8976

011101 Our People. Your Success.
WithersRavenei
AUTHORITY FOR APPOINTM ENT OF AGENT
The undersigned Owner Rockingham County (Client) does hereby appoint WithersRavenel,
Inc. as his, her, or it's agent for the purpose of petitioning the appropriate local, state and
federal environmental regulatory agencies (US Army Corps of Engineers, NC Division of
Water Quality, NC Division of Coastal Management, local municipalities, etc.) for: a) review
and approval of the jurisdictional boundaries of onsite jurisdictional areas (wetlands, surface
waters, riparian buffers, etc.) and/or; b) preparation and submittal of appropriate
environmental permit applications/requests for the Reidsville Rural Ready Site project,
located on three parcels (Parcel #s: 180882; 180094; 171127) north of Diesel Drive in
Reidsville, Rockingham County, North Carolina.
The Client does hereby authorize that said agent has the authority to do the following acts
on behalf of the owner:
(1) To submit appropriate requests/applications and the required
supplemental materials;
(2) To attend meetings to give representation on behalf of the Client.
(3) To authorize access to subject property for the purpose of
environmental review by appropriate regulatory agencies.
This authorization shall continue in effect until completion of the contracted task or
termination by the Client.
Agent's Name, Address & Telephone:
WithersRavenel, Inc.
115 MacKenan Drive
Cary, NC 27511
Tel. [phone]
Date: Q e /o? 7/ e20 b
Signature of Client: A
L. Mehl e,. u,r`I Pta• Pv.ue.4,
(Name - Print) (Title) ��}l
(Signature)
Mailing Address
1Zet�SlAtlej N.0 "7 3
City State Zip
Phone:(334) 34 . — E j® /
Email: I lAr,4-7.J ,C,, tw $b
115 MacKenan Drive j Cary, NC 27511
t: 919.469.3340 I f: 919.467.6008 I www.withersravenel.com I License No. C-0832
Asheville I Cary I Greensboro I Pittsboro I Raleigh I Wilmington

GRAPHIC SCALE
0 250 500
N:\18\18-0240\180244.01
a>
N
co
ROCKINGHAM CO. PIN:891403104118
ROCKINGHAM COUNTY
PO BOX 206
WENTWORTH NC 27375
DB1288 PG 21
23.03 ACRES
ROCKINGHAM CO. PIN:891300291534
ROCKINGHAM COUNTY
PO BOX 206
WENTWORTH NC 27375
DB1286 PG 418
23.43 ACRES
PROJECT AREA
O
J
4/
co
DRUM ROAD
L
1 inch = 500 ft.
ROCKINGHAM CO. PIN:891403203865
ROCKINGHAM COUNTY
PO BOX 206
WENTWORTH NC 27375
DB1281 PG 2165
79.59 ACRES
AVLOOP
ROCKINGHAM CO. PIN:891306287774
PATRICIA BRADSHER
13231 US HIGHWAY 158
RIEDSVILLE NC 27320
DB1029 PG 2026
22.71 ACRES
REIDSVILLE RURAL READY SITE
REIDSVILLE ROCKINGHAM COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
PARCEUOWNER EXHIBIT
�i WithersRavenel
1/ Engineers I Planners I Surveyors

DATE 7/13/20 ROCKINGHAM COUNTY PAGE 1
TIME 17:10:00 PROPERTY CARD PROG# A52006
USER RKKWALLACE FOR YEAR 2020
ROCKINGHAM COUNTY PARCEL ID.. 180882 PIN... 8913 00 29 1534 00
LOCATION... DIESEL DR
DEED YEAR/BOOK/PAGE.. 2019 1286 0418 ASSESSMENT NONE
PO BOX 206 PLAT BOOK/PAGE.. 82 57 OWNER ID.. 1193776
LEGAL DESC:21.43 AC ROCKINGHAM COUNT DISTRICT.. 101 REIDSVILLE
Y/ CITY REIDSVILLE SURVEY Area/Fire: 901 REIDSVILLE
TOWNSHIP... 7 REIDSVILLE
WENTWORTH NC 27375-0206 ROCKINGHAM COUNTY SRVY NBRHOOD... C300A HOLIDAY INN
DESCRIPTION GOVERNMENT PROPERTY/278.1 NH CLASS..
DESCRIPTION FULLY EXEMPT PROPERTY HWY BUS REIDSVILLE
MAINTAINED.. 5/01/2019 BY LSTANLEY VALUED.. 5/01/2019 BY LSTANLEY EXEMPT.... 06 FED,STATE,LOCAL GOV 278.1
VISITED BY PREV PARCEL 180096 ROUTING#.. 7600
PARCEL STATUS... ACTIVE CATEGORY.. REAL & PERSONAL
DISCLAIMER -OWNERSHIP, ZONING AND OTHER INFORMATION SHOULD BE VERIFIED. INFORMATION AND VALUE SUBJECT TO CHANGE.
*****
* LAND VALUED BY NEIGHBORHOOD BASE RATE METHOD *
SALES HISTORY
DEED BK/PAGE SALE DATE SALES INSTRUMENT DISQUALIFIED SALE AMOUNT STAMP AMOUNT DEED NAME
1286 0418 2/04/2019 SPLIT
OTHER ROCKINGHAM COUNTY
LAND SEGMENTS
LND STRAT LAND AVERAGE TOT CURRENT
# ZONE CODE TYPE/CODE LAND QTY LAND RATE DPT% SHP% LOC% SIZ% OTH% TOP% ADJ FMV
1 HB/RD 100 AC CR 21.430 20,933.27 .00 .00 .00 .00 100.00 75.00 75.00 336,450
TOTAL ACRES.. 21.430 TOTAL LAND FMV.. 336,450
TOTAL PARCEL VALUES---- LAND / OVR IMPROVEMENTS / OVR TOTAL LAND/IMPROVE 2019 VALUE
FMV 336,450 0 336,450 0
APV 336,450 0 336,450 0

DATE 7/13/20 ROCKINGHAM COUNTY PAGE 1
TIME 17:10:00 PROPERTY CARD PROG# AS2006
USER RKKWALLACE FOR YEAR 2020
BRADSHER PATRICIA R PARCEL ID.. 157430 PIN... 8913 06 28 7774 00
LOCATION... 2231 HOLIDAY LP
DEED YEAR/BOOK/PAGE.. 2000 1029 2026 ASSESSMENT NONE
13231 US HIGHWAY 158 PLAT BOOK/PAGE.. 34 53 OWNER ID.. 148008
LEGAL DESC:22.71 AC PATRICIA R BRADS DISTRICT.. 101 REIDSVILLE
HER SURVEY Area/Fire: 901 REIDSVILLE
TOWNSHIP... 7 REIDSVILLE
REIDSVILLE NC 27320-9569 BRADSHER PATRICIA R SRVY NBRHOOD... C300A HOLIDAY INN
DESCRIPTION RES/COMM USE MIXED NH CLASS..
DESCRIPTION LAND USE AGRICULTURE COMMERCIAL HWY BUS REIDSVILLE
MAINTAINED.. 7/11/2019 BY RKMARKMC VALUED.. 1/16/2019 BY DIWILSON
VISITED 12/14/2009 BY SP ROUTING#.. 7800
PARCEL STATUS... ACTIVE CATEGORY.. REAL & PERSONAL
DISCLAIMER -OWNERSHIP, ZONING AND OTHER INFORMATION SHOULD BE VERIFIED. INFORMATION AND VALUE SUBJECT TO CHANGE.
*****
* LAND VALUED BY NEIGHBORHOOD BASE RATE METHOD *
SALES HISTORY
DEED BK/PAGE SALE DATE SALES INSTRUMENT DISQUALIFIED SALE AMOUNT STAMP AMOUNT DEED NAME
1029 2026 1/13/2000 REF ONLY OTHER 20,500 BRADSHER PATRICIA R
0001 0001 7/01/1986 DEED CONVERTED BRADSHER PATRICIA R
LAND SEGMENTS
LND STRAT LAND AVERAGE TOT CURRENT
# ZONE CODE TYPE/CODE LAND QTY LAND RATE DPT% SHP% LOC% SIZ% OTH% TOP% ADJ FMV
2 HB/RD 100 AC CR 8.530 22,344.67 .00 .00 50.00 .00 100.00 .00 45.00 85,770
OTHER ADJ... 90.00 .00 .00 .00
LUV.. LU A4 8.530 420.00 LU ADJ & VALUE.. .00 3,582
3 HB/RD 100 AC CR 2.620 27,633.59 .00 .00 50.00 .00 100.00 .00 45.00 32,580
OTHER ADJ... 90.00 .00 .00 .00
LUV.. LU A4 2.620 420.00 LU ADJ & VALUE.. .00 1,100
4 HB/RD 100 AC CS 1.000 135,000.00 .00 .00 50.00 .00 100.00 .00 50.00 67,500
5 HB/RD 100 AC CR .670 40,000.00 .00 .00 50.00 .00 100.00 .00 25.00 6,700
OTHER ADJ... 50.00 .00 .00 .00
LUV.. LU A6 .670 40.00 LU ADJ & VALUE.. .00 26
6 HB/RD 100 AC CR 9.890 22,022.24 .00 .00 50.00 .00 100.00 .00 45.00 98,010
OTHER ADJ... 90.00 .00 .00 .00
LUV.. LU F2 9.890 255.00 LU ADJ & VALUE.. .00 2,521
TOTAL ACRES.. 22.710 TOTAL LAND FMV.. 290,560
TOTAL IN LU.. 21.710 TOTAL LAND LUV.. 74,729
IMPROVEMENT # 1 MAJOR IMPR-M
MAIN FIN AREA.. 1,550.00 ACT/EFF YR/AGE.. 1935 1935 84 VISITED.. 5/27/2003 BY BN
STRAT 100 DESCRIPT.... SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING MAINTAINED.. 7/11/2019 BY RKMARKMC
MAIN GROUND SF.... 1,550.000
BUILT USE 01 SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING CURRENT USE.... CR CURRENT USE RESIDENTIAL
LOCATION # 2231 HOLIDAY LP
COMPONENT TYPE/CODE/DESC PCT UNITS RATE STR# STR% SIZ% HGT% PER% CDS% COST %CMPL
AC EPU ENCLOSED PORCH UNFIN 100 42.00 25.60 1.00 1,075
AC OPR OPEN PORCH RAISED 100 400.00 12.80 1.00 5,120
MA R01 SFR MAIN AREA FRAME 100 1550.00 64.50 1.00 96.00 95,976
EW 03 ALUMINUM SIDING 100 180.00 .00 0
- AR 004 FORCED HOT AIR & CEN100 1550.00 5.50 8,525
- PD EL03 AVERAGE ELECTRIC 100 1.00 .00 0
- PD EX03 ALUMINUM SIDING 100 1.00 .00 0
- PD FL06 ASPHALT TILE OR LIN0100 1.00 .00 0
- PD FN34 CONTINUOUS WALL BRIC100 1.00 .00 0
- PD IF02 INT FINISH PLASTER 100 1.00 .00 0
- PD PL03 PLUMBING AVERAGE 100 1.00 .00 0
- PD RF01 GABLE ROOF 100 1.00 .00 0
- PD RM01 RF MATERIAL ASPHALT 100 1.00 .00 0
RCN... PCT COMPLETE 100 x 110,696
RCN... COUNTY RCN ADJ 100.00 x 110,696
QUAL.. QG E+ CONSTRUCTION GRADE E 85.00 x 94,091

DATE 7/13/20 ROCKINGHAM COUNTY PAGE 2
TIME 17:10:00 PROPERTY CARD PROG# AS2006
USER RKKWALLACE FOR YEAR 2020
BRADSHER PATRICIA R
PARCEL ID.. 157430 PIN... 8913 06 28 7774 00
IMPROVEMENT # 1 MAJOR IMPR-M
COMPONENT TYPE/CODE/DESC PCT UNITS RATE STR# STR% SIZ% HGT% PER% CDS% COST %CMPL
DEPR.. RPR POOR CONDITION
75.00 - 70,568 70,568 T
--FMV... 23,523

DATE 7/13/20 ROCKINGHAM COUNTY PAGE 3
TIME 17:10:00 PROPERTY CARD PROG# AS2006
USER RKKWALLACE FOR YEAR 2020
BRADSHER PATRICIA R
PARCEL ID.. 157430 PIN... 8913 06 28 7774 00
+-11--+-7+-14--+
• 67-+
2 2
O 0
+ +2
1
1 4
4
1 2+
4 1-8-+
4
+ 32 + 1
8
8 .
+ 40 +
IMPROVEMENT # 1 MAJOR IMPR-M
AC EPU ENCLOSED PORCH UNFIN TRAVERSE
M U 14.00 M L 2.00 M U 14.00 M R 2.00 M U 20.00 M R 11.00
D D 6.00 D R 7.00 D U 6.00 D L 7.00
AC OPR OPEN PORCH RAISED TRAVERSE
D D 8.00 D R 40.00 D U 18.00 D L 8.00 D D 10.00 D L 32.00
MA R01 SFR MAIN AREA FRAME FLOOR: 1.00 TRAVERSE
D U 14.00 D L 2.00 D U 14.00 D R 2.00 D U 20.00 D R 11.00
D D 6.00 D R 7.00 D U 6.00 D R 14.00 D D 20.00 D R 2.00
D D 14.00 D L 2.00 D D 14.00 D L 32.00
TOTAL PARCEL VALUES---- LAND / OVR IMPROVEMENTS / OVR TOTAL LAND/IMPROVE 2019 VALUE
FMV 290,560 23,523 314,083 314,083
APV 74,729 23,523 98,252 98,252
DEFERRED215,831 0 215,831 215,831

DATE 7/13/20
TIME 17:10:00
USER RKKWALLACE
ROCKINGHAM COUNTY
PO BOX 206
WENTWORTH
DESCRIPTION GOVERNMENT
DESCRIPTION
ROCKINGHAM COUNTY
PROPERTY CARD
FOR YEAR 2020
PARCEL ID.. 180094
LOCATION... US 29 HW
DEED YEAR/BOOK/PAGE.. 2018
PLAT BOOK/PAGE..
LEGAL DESC:23.03 AC US 29
TOWNSHIP... 7 REIDSVILLE
NC 27375-0206
PROPERTY/278.1
PAGE 1
PROG# A52006
PIN... 8914 03 10 4118 00
1285 0021 ASSESSMENT NONE
OWNER ID.. 1193776
DISTRICT.. 101 REIDSVILLE
Area/Fire: 901 REIDSVILLE
NBRHOOD... C300A HOLIDAY INN
NH CLASS..
FULLY EXEMPT PROPERTY HWY BUS REIDSVILLE
MAINTAINED.. 7/11/2019 BY RKMARKMC VALUED.. 2/05/2019 BY PGRIGGS
VISITED BY PREV PARCEL 157394
PARCEL STATUS... ACTIVE
DISCLAIMER -OWNERSHIP, ZONING AND OTHER INFORMATION SHOULD BE VERIFIED.
*****
* LAND VALUED BY NEIGHBORHOOD BASE RATE METHOD *
SALES HISTORY
EXEMPT.... 06 FED,STATE,LOCAL GOV 278.1
ROUTING#.. 12700
CATEGORY.. REAL & PERSONAL
INFORMATION AND VALUE SUBJECT TO CHANGE.
DEED BK/PAGE SALE DATE SALES INSTRUMENT DISQUALIFIED SALE AMOUNT
1285 0021 1/01/2018 REVAL(2 YRS OPE OTHER
1285 0021 11/30/2017 SPLIT OTHER
LAND SEGMENTS
LND LAND
# ZONE TYPE/CODE LAND QTY
1 HB/RD 100 AC CR
TOTAL ACRES..
STRAT
CODE
AVERAGE
LAND RATE
23.030 20,868.43
23.030
STAMP AMOUNT DEED NAME
ROCKINGHAM COUNTY
ROCKINGHAM COUNTY
TOT
DPT% SHP% LOC% SIZ% OTH% TOP% ADJ
.00 .00 .00 .00 50.00 75.00 37.50
TOTAL LAND FMV..
TOTAL PARCEL VALUES---- LAND / OVR IMPROVEMENTS / OVR
FMV 180,225 0
APV 180,225 0
TOTAL LAND/IMPROVE
180,225
180,225
CURRENT
FMV
180,225
180,225
2019 VALUE
180,225
180,225

DATE 7/13/20 ROCKINGHAM COUNTY PAGE 1
TIME 17:10:00 PROPERTY CARD PROG# A52006
USER RKKWALLACE FOR YEAR 2020
ROCKINGHAM COUNTY
PO BOX 206
PARCEL ID.. 171127 PIN... 8914 03 20 3865 00
LOCATION... DRUM RD
DEED YEAR/BOOK/PAGE.. 2006 1281 2165 ASSESSMENT NONE
PLAT BOOK/PAGE.. DB1281 P2171 OWNER ID.. 1193776
LEGAL DESC:79.59 AC DRUM RD/PICKRELL DISTRICT.. 101 REIDSVILLE
Area/Fire: 901 REIDSVILLE
TOWNSHIP... 7 REIDSVILLE
WENTWORTH NC 27375-0206 DEATON JEWELL 5 ESTATE NBRHOOD... C300A HOLIDAY INN
DESCRIPTION GOVERNMENT PROPERTY/278.1 NH CLASS..
DESCRIPTION FULLY EXEMPT PROPERTY HWY BUS REIDSVILLE
MAINTAINED.. 2/28/2020 BY RKPGRIGGS VALUED.. 2/28/2020 BY RKPGRIGGS EXEMPT.... 06 FED,STATE,LOCAL GOV 278.1
VISITED BY MM PREV PARCEL 169201 ROUTING#.. 100
PARCEL STATUS... ACTIVE CATEGORY.. REAL & PERSONAL
DISCLAIMER -OWNERSHIP, ZONING AND OTHER INFORMATION SHOULD BE VERIFIED. INFORMATION AND VALUE SUBJECT TO CHANGE.
*****
* LAND VALUED BY NEIGHBORHOOD BASE RATE METHOD *
SALES HISTORY
DEED BK/PAGE SALE DATE SALES INSTRUMENT DISQUALIFIED SALE AMOUNT STAMP AMOUNT DEED NAME
1281 2165 5/02/2006 DEED
EXEMPT PROPERTY 199,000 ROCKINGHAM COUNTY
LAND SEGMENTS
LND STRAT LAND AVERAGE TOT CURRENT
# ZONE CODE TYPE/CODE LAND QTY LAND RATE DPT% SHP% LOC% SIZ% OTH% TOP% ADJ FMV
2 HB/RD 100 AC CR 79.590 20,251.29 .00 .00 .00 .00 100.00 75.00 67.50 1,087,965
OTHER ADJ... 90.00 .00 .00 .00
TOTAL ACRES.. 79.590 TOTAL LAND FMV.. 1,087,965
TOTAL PARCEL VALUES---- LAND / OVR IMPROVEMENTS / OVR TOTAL LAND/IMPROVE 2019 VALUE
FMV 1,087,965 0 1,087,965 1,087,965
APV 1,087,965 0 1,087,965 1,087,965

N:\18\18-0240\180244.01
Ili' r
z
F
ki‘c‘ '
+��sr
rJI' ORpyyS
-Ka
,,-
., .
i
N ,-,
w 3 �� ai
, -
•
Greenvfe ` Cem�
PeJ AL��T ST
� W._
r� w ReidEawn Cem REIDSVILLE
RURAL READY
s SITE BOUNDARY
490
OLD'
EAST ST•
REIDSVILLE RURAL READY SITE
REIDSVILLE ROCKINGHAM COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
DRUM RD
GROOMS RD
USGS QUAD (2019) - REIDSVILLE
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 1000 2000
1 inch = 2000 ft.
REIDSVILLE
WithersRavenel
1/ Engineers Planners Surveyors

N:\18\18-0240\180244.01
I{
REIDSVILLE RURAL
READY SITE BOUNDARY
_0 Ip GRAPHIC SCALE
0 200 400
-�--....,„
1 'ti _ ' �. tip. 1
—.... —
r, I
1' �~-.
• n.
▪ bN't el
1 Iii
i
1 inch = 400 ft.
REIDSVILLE RURAL READY SITE
REIDSVILLE ROCKINGHAM COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
I
%
•
USGS QUAD (2019) - REIDSVILLE
0
WithersRavenel
1/ Engineers Planners Surveyors

N:\18\18-0240\180244.01
PROJECT AREA
REIDSVILLE RURAL READY SITE
REIDSVILLE ROCKINGHAM COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
REIDSVILLE READY
SITE BOUNDARY
ROCKINGHAM CO. SOIL SURVEY (1992)
SHEET 10
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 200 400
1 inch = 400 ft.
Ai WithersRavenel
1/ Engineers I Planners I Surveyors

SEWER
LIFT STATION
PROJECT
LIMITS
PERENNAL
STREAM #1
LOT 10
RECREATIONAL
18 AC.
IMPACT
AREA A
LOT 1
COMMERCIAL
HOTEL OR RETAIL
15 AC. /
\ LOT 2
COMMERCIAL
HOTEL OR RETAIL
9.5 A .
LOT 9
C aMMERCIAL
2.5 AC.
LOT 8
COMMERCIAL
2.0 AC.
ROAD TO BE
STUBBED SHORT OF
STREAM AT TOP OF
SLOPE. NO STREAM
IMPACTS
LOT 7
COMMERCIAL
2.0AC.
LOT 4
COMMERCIAL
3 AC.
LOT 3
RETAIL
6.0 AC.
LOT 6
INDUSTRIAL
42 AC.
LOT 5
INDUSTRIAL
8.0 AC.
it
VICINITY MAP
SCALE: 1 "=2,000'
SITE
US 29 & BARN
ST. EXIT
GRAPHIC SCALE
400 0 200 400
1 inch = 400 ft.
800
I M PACT
IMPACT SPECIFICATION
OVERALL STREAM AND WETLAND IMPACT SUMMARY
TEMPORARY
PERMANENT
(NO FUNCTIONAL LOSS)
PERMANENT
(FUNCTIONAL LOSS)
STREAM
WETLANDS
STREAM
WETLANDS
STREAM
WETLANDS
(LF)
(SF)
(AC)
(SF)
(AC)
(LF)
(SF)
(AC)
(SF)
(AC)
(LF)
(SF)
(AC)
(SF)
(AC)
1
ROAD CROSSING
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
139
2,248
0.052
-
-
2
ROAD CROSSING
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2,885
0.066
3
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
-
-
-
385
0.009
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
27
244
0.006
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
25
465
0.011
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
TOTAL
52
709
0.017
385
0.009
-
-
-
-
-
139
2,248
0.052
2,885
0.066
No.
Revision
Date
By
Designer
Drawn By
Scale
JA AS NOTED
Date
JA 8/25/2020
RURAL READY SITE
OVERALL IMPACT MAP
WithersRavenel
1/ Engineers I Planners I Surveyors
Sheet No.
1
Checked By Job
No.
TB 06180244.01
REIDSVILLE
ROCKINGHAM
NORTH CAROLINA
115 MacKenan Drive 1 Cary, NC 27511
t: 919.469.3340 1 license #: C-0832 www.withersravenel.com

IMPACT LEGEND
A
PERMANENT WETLANDS
TEMPORARY WETLANDS
TEMPORAY STREAM (NO FUNCTIONAL LOSS)
PERMANENT STREAM (FUNCTIONAL LOSS)
7
STREAM 1 \
PERENNAL --------
\\ \ \
\ \\
N \ N \ N
\ \\\ �\\\\ \
\ \\
\ rL
\\\ \ \\`\\\
\S \ II..<'.�\ \\\\\\ \\l \
1\\\\I\ 1, ( /0 1 1 L
I\ I I\) \ V A/ETJL)
v il
V �\ V ' - '70/
���
if /1/1
It I
\ \o \ \ \ \ \ \, \ I
1
\J/ I I1\\\\ t )
\. 1 \\ (Y\\
f ) I WALL A
)� II
I `I`
\\
�\\\\\,, I\\\ 1\I\\Il
\ \\\\\\ lam
\\\ \\
\\\\�\\
\\,
\\ \\\ \ \�
\ \ \ \ \IMPACT #4\
\ \\\ \\\\\ \\ \\I\t
\ \ \ \ \ TEMPORARY STREAM'
\ \ \ \ \ CONSTRUCTION ACCESS'
\ \ \ \� NO FUNCTIONAL LOSS-
27LF. \\
244SF, \ \
0.006 AC �) \
N
\
-780
\
IMPACT#1_
\ PERMANENT STREAM
FUNCTIONAL LOSS • ---
ROAD CROSSING —
139LF-
2,248 SF'
0.052AC.1 \ \\\
783
40
IMPACT #2--_
PERMANENT WETLANDS- _—
DISTURBANCE _
(ROAD CROSSING)
0.066 AC.
7,�
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 20 40
I Iv
\ \
\ \ \
IMPACT #5 y.
TEMPORARY STREAM N
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS'
-NO FUNCTIONAL LOSS
—25LF
465 SF
— -. 0.011 AC.
I II ,I \ .
I
\ \ \
\ \ \ •
\� \\\
\
\ \ \ \
N \ \ \\\
\\\
\\ 1\L
\\\\\ \\
WALL B`
\\\\\
\\\\\\�.
' > IMPACT#3
— TEMPORARY WETLANDS DISTURBANCE
(CONSTRUCTION ACCESS) .009 AC.
\\ \ \ Ll `WETLANDA
\\s N 0
\ \\
�l\
\ \ \
55
j � _760
\\\\ \.
80 \\ \\\\
80
1 inch = 40 ft.
\
WALL A
770
770
765
760
755
750
EXISTING GRADE
745
740
PROPOSED GRADE BEHIND WALL
765
\
J
1
— STREAM BED
735
SCALE: -0+50 0+00
765
1" = 80' HORIZ.
1"=8'VERT.
760
755
750
745
740
735
PROPOSED 48" RCP
EMBEDDED 20% (10")
INTO STREAM BED
0+50 1+00 1+50
WALL B
760
755
750
745
740
73�
2+00 2+50
765
PROPOSED GRADE
760
EXISTING GRADE
STREAM BED
PROPOSED 48" RCP —
EMBEDDED 20% (10") —
INTO STREAM BED
I I I I I
I
755
750
745
740
— 735
-0+50 0+00 0+50 1+00 1+50 2+00
No.
Revision
Correct Stream Embedment Note
Date
9/22/20
By
JFA
Designer
Drawn By
Checked By
JA
JA
TB
ScaleDate AS NOTED
8/12/2020
Job No.
06180244.01
REIDSVILLE
RURAL READY SITE
ROCKINGHAM
NORTH CAROLINA
STREAM CROSSING
IMPACT AREA A
WithersRavenel
1/ Engineers I Planners I Surveyors
115 MacKenan Drive 1 Cary, NC 27511
t: 919.469.3340 1 license #: C-0832 www.withersravenel.com
2

N:\18\18-0240\180244.01
PROJECT BOUNDARY
WETLAND B
OUTSIDE OF PROJECT AREA
NOTES:
1) DELINEATION PERFORMED BY WR ON 05/07/2019.
2) STREAM AND WETLAND LOCATIONS WITHIN PROJECT AREA ARE
BASED ON FIELD SURVEY BY PLS.
REIDSVILLE RURAL READY SITE
REIDSVILLE ROCKINGHAM COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
STREAM 2
OUTSIDE OF PROJECT AREA
WETLAND A
POTENTIAL WETLAND
WATERS OF THE US
STREAM 1
PERENNIAL
POTENTIAL NON -WETLAND
WATERS OF THE US
WETLAND DELINEATION EXHIBIT
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 150 300
1 inch = 300 ft.
WithersRavenel
1/ Engineers Planners Surveyors

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R
OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
(Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Reidsville Rural Ready Site
Applicant/Owner: Rockingham County
City/County: Reidsville/Rockingham Co Sampling Date: 05/07/2021
Investigator(s): Alyssa Ricci - WithersRavenel
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.):
Section, Township, Range:
State: NC Sampling Point: DP-1
Local relief (concave, convex, none):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 36.330652681
Slope (%): 1
Long: -79.639929802 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: MbE2 - Madison sandy clay loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes, eroded NWI classification: Riverine Swamp Forest
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?
Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes X No
Yes X No
Yes X No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes X No
Remarks:
This sampling point was located within Wetland A, at Flag H-2, near the lat/long specified above.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface (B8)
(C2)
Imagery (C9)
(D1)
(D4)
_
X Surface Water (Al) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave
_ _
X High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) X Drainage Patterns (B10)
_
X Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ _
Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry -Season Water Table
_ _ _
Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ _ _
Drift Deposits (B3) Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial
_ _Thin _
Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants
_Algal _ _
Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ _
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ _
X Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief
_
Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 0
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes
X
No
Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 4
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 0
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology was present at this sampling point.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point:
DP-1
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' Radius ) % Cover Species? Status
1. Betula nigra 5 Yes FACW
2. Liriodendron tulipifera 5 Yes FACU
3. Water Hickory 5 Yes OBL
4.
5.
6.
15 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 8 20% of total cover: 3
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 15' Radius )
1. Carya glabra 5 Yes FACU
2. Carpinus caroliniana 5 Yes FAC
3.
4.
5.
6.
10 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 5 20% of total cover: 2
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' Radius )
1. Carya glabra 5 Yes FACU
2. Liquidambar styraciflua 5 Yes FAC
3.
4.
5.
6.
10 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 5 20% of total cover: 2
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' Radius )
1. Arisaema triphyllum 5 Yes FACW
2. Carex spp
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
5
Yes
10 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 5 20% of total cover: 2
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' Radius )
1. Smilax rotundifolia 5 Yes FAC
2. Lonicera japonica 5 Yes FACU
3.
4.
5.
10 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 5 20% of total cover: 2
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 11 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 54.5% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 5 x 1 = 5
FACW species 10 x 2 = 20
FAC species 15 x 3 = 45
FACU species 20 x 4 = 80
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
Column Totals: 50 (A) 150 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.00
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
X 3 - Prevalence Index is S3.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody Plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height.
Woody Vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrolphytic vegetation was present at this sampling point.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP-1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
(inches)
Matrix
Color (moist)
Ok
Redox Features
Color (moist)
0-14 10YR 3/1 95 7.5YR 4/6
Ok
Type Loc2
Texture Remarks
5 C M Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (A1)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
X
X
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present?
Yes X No
Remarks:
Hydric soils were present at this sampling point.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R
OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
(Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Reidsville Rural Ready Site
Applicant/Owner: Rockingham County
City/County: Reidsville/Rockingham Co Sampling Date: 05/07/2021
Investigator(s): Alyssa Ricci - WithersRavenel
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.):
Section, Township, Range:
State: NC Sampling Point: DP-2
Local relief (concave, convex, none):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 36.330652681
Slope (%): 1
Long: -79.639929802 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: MbE2 - Madison sandy clay loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes, eroded NWI classification: Upland
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?
Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland?
Yes No X
Remarks:
This sampling point was located within uplands adjacent to Wetland A, at Flag H-2, near the lat/long specified above.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface (B8)
(C2)
Imagery (C9)
(D1)
(D4)
_
Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave
_ _ _
High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10)
_ _ _
Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ _ _
Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry -Season Water Table
_ _ _
Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ _ _
Drift Deposits (B3) Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial
_ _Thin _
Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants
_Algal _ _
Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ _
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ _
Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief
_ _
Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes
No
X
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology was not present at this sampling point.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point:
DP-2
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' Radius ) % Cover Species? Status
1. Acer rubrum 15 Yes FAC
2. Pinus taeda 10 Yes FAC
3. Fagus grandifolia 10 Yes FACU
4.
5.
6.
35 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 18 20% of total cover: 7
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 15' Radius )
1. Liquidambar styraciflua
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
10 Yes FAC
10 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 5 20% of total cover: 2
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' Radius )
1. None
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
=Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' Radius )
1. None
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
=Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' Radius )
1. None
2.
3.
4.
5.
=Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 4 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 75.0% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
FAC species 35 x 3 = 105
FACU species 10 x 4 = 40
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
Column Totals: 45 (A) 145 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.22
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is S3.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody Plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height.
Woody Vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrolphytic vegetation was not present at this sampling point.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP-2
Depth
(inches)
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Matrix Redox Features
Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Typel Loc2 Texture
0-4 10YR 3/3 100
4-14 10YR 5/4 100
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Loamy/Clayey
Loamy/Clayey
Remarks
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (A1)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
T
L
L
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
hin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
oamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
oamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
ron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present?
Yes No X
Remarks:
Hydric soils were not present at this sampling point.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

%. WithersRavenel
II.Our People. Your Success.
Cumulative Impacts
The proposed construction of Diesel Drive and water/sewer infrastructure for the 127-acre
Reidsville Rural Ready Site is intended to be a catalyst for future development for economic
development within the area. Therefore, the proposed project will have future phases associated
with the intended development of the property as portions of the property are subdivided as lots
and sold for construction of various businesses. The ultimate lot configurations, access alignments
and utility alignments cannot be determined as these design items will depend on what businesses
ultimate build within the Reidsville Rural Ready Site and what configuration is needed to support
their business operations. Therefore, the currently proposed impacts are those impacts necessary
to support economic development.
There may be future impacts to wetlands and streams needed for the future development of the
Reidsville Rural Ready Site. Future impacts will be permitted as the need arises as businesses buy
and construct within the Reidsville Rural Ready Site. Any future development will be required to
meet all local, state, and federal requirements for development and permitting, which will provide
assurance that potential impacts to nearby downstream water quality will be addressed at that
time.
219 Station Road, Suite 101 I Wilmington, NC 28405
t: 910.256.9277 I www.withersravenel.com I License No. C-0832
Asheville I Cary I Greensboro I Pittsboro I Raleigh I Wilmington

■■■
■■ NC DEPARTMENT OF
■■. ■a NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
• •D•
April 1, 2021
Troy Beasley
Withers & Ravenel
115 MacKenan Drive
Cary, NC 27511
RE: Reidsville Rural Ready Site - Access & Utilities; 06180244.01
Dear Troy Beasley:
Roy Cooper, Governor
D. Reid Wilson, Secretary
Walter Clark
Director, Division of land and Water Stewardship
NCNHDE-14361
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
Based on the project area mapped with your request, a query of the NCNHP database indicates that
there are no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, and/or
conservation/managed areas within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there
may be no documentation of natural heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not
imply or confirm their absence; the area may not have been surveyed. The results of this query
should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists. In the event that rare
species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may update our
records.
The attached `Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is found within the project area or is indicated within a one -mile radius of
the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for
guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
https://www.fws.gov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a
Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Land and Water Fund easement, or Federally -
listed species are documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at [e-mail] or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
4) 121 W. JONES STREET, RALEIGh 1_ NC 27603 • 16S1 MAIL SERVICE CENTER. RALEIGH. NC 27699
OFC V19 707.9120 • FAX [phone]

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Reidsville Rural Ready Site - Access & Utilities
Project No. 06180244.01
April 1, 2021
NCNHDE-14361
Element Occurrences Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Taxonomic EO ID cientific Name Common Name Element Accuracy Federal State Global State
Group Observation Occurrence Status Status Rank Rank
Date i Rank
Dragonfly or 33770 Somatochlora Coppery Emerald 2004-Pre H? 5-Very
Damselfly georgiana Low
No Natural Areas are Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Med Area Name ner Type
NC Division of Mitigation Services Easement NC DEQ, Division of Mitigation Services State
Significantly G3G4 S1?
Rare
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at https://ncnhde.natureserve.ora/help. Data query generated on April 1, 2021; source: NCNHP, Q4 January 2021. Please
resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 2 of 3

NCNHDE-14361: Reidsville Rural Ready Site - Access & Utilities
s
April 1, 2021
111 Project Boundary
Lf Buffered Project Boundary
Managed Area (MAREA)
1:25,076
0 0.2 0.4
0.8 mi
0 0.325 0.65
113 km
Sources: Esn. HERE. Garmn. Irnermap. in men[ P Corp., GESCO. USGS.
FAO. NPS. NRCAN. GoSase. IGN. Hadaster NI_ Ordnance Survey. Esri Japan.
MET.. Esn China (Hong Kong)_ to] OpenSlreetMap contributors, and the GIS
user Community
Page 3 of 3

Endangered Species, Threatened Species, and Candidate Species,
Rockingham County, North Carolina
Updated: 07-17-2020
Common Name
Vertebrate:
Roanoke logperch Range by basin
Invertebrate:
Green floater
James (=Virginia) spinymussel
Vascular Plant:
Smooth coneflower
Nonvascular Plant:
Lichen:
Scientific name
Percina rex
Lasmigona subviridis
Parvaspina collina
Echinacea laevigata
Federal Record Status
Status
E Current
ARS Current
E Current
E Historical
Definitions of Federal Status Codes:
E = endangered. A taxon "in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range."
T = threatened. A taxon "likely to become endangered within the foreseeable future throughout all or a
significant portion of its range."
C = candidate. A taxon under consideration for official listing for which there is sufficient information to support
listing. (Formerly "Cl" candidate species.)
BGPA =Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act. See below.
ARS = At Risk Species. Species that are Petitioned, Candidates or Proposed for Listing under the Endangered
Species Act. Consultation under Section 7(a)(2) of the ESA is not required for Candidate or Proposed species;
although a Conference, as described under Section 7(a)(4) of the ESA is recommended for actions affecting
species proposed for listing.
T(S/A) = threatened due to similarity of appearance. A taxon that is threatened due to similarity of appearance
with another listed species and is listed for its protection. Taxa listed as T(S/A) are not biologically endangered
or threatened and are not subject to Section 7 consultation. See below.
EXP = experimental population. A taxon listed as experimental (either essential or nonessential). Experimental,
nonessential populations of endangered species (e.g., red wolf) are treated as threatened species on public land,
for consultation purposes, and as species proposed for listing on private land.
P = proposed. Taxa proposed for official listing as endangered or threatened will be noted as "PE" or "PT",
respectively.

Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGPA):
In the July 9, 2007 Federal Register( 72:37346-37372), the bald eagle was declared recovered, and removed (de-
listed) from the Federal List of Threatened and Endangered wildlife. This delisting took effect August 8,2007.
After delisting, the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (Eagle Act) (16 U.S.C. 668-668d) becomes the
primary law protecting bald eagles. The Eagle Act prohibits take of bald and golden eagles and provides a
statutory definition of "take" that includes "disturb". The USFWS has developed National Bald Eagle
Management Guidelines to provide guidance to land managers, landowners, and others as to how to avoid
disturbing bald eagles. For mor information, visit http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/baldeagle.htm
Threatened due to similarity of appearance(T(S/A)):
In the November 4, 1997 Federal Register (55822-55825), the northern population of the bog turtle (from New
York south to Maryland) was listed as T (threatened), and the southern population (from Virginia south to
Georgia) was listed as T(S/A) (threatened due to similarity of appearance). The T(S/A) designation bans the
collection and interstate and international commercial trade of bog turtles from the southern population. The
T(S/A) designation has no effect on land management activities by private landowners in North Carolina, part of
the southern population of the species. In addition to its official status as T(S/A), the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service considers the southern population of the bog turtle as a Federal species of concern due to habitat loss.
Definitions of Record Status:
Current - Based on NC Natural Heritage Program information, this taxon is considered to be extant in the
county.
Historical - Based on NC Natural Heritage Program information, this taxon is considered to be historical in the
county, meaning that all recorded occurrences are either extirpated, have not been found in recent surveys, or
have not been surveyed recently enough to be confident they are still present.
Obscure - the date and/or location of observation is uncertain.
Incidental/migrant - the species was observed outside of its normal range or habitat.
Probable/potential - the species is considered likely to occur in this county based on the proximity of known
records (in adjacent counties), the presence of potentially suitable habitat, or both.

Beasley, Troy
From: Beasley, Troy
Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2020 10:06 AM
To: Bailey, David E CIV USARMY CESAW (USA); Sue Homewood
Cc: Fleming, Glynn; Lance Metzler
Subject: RE: Request for Additional Information - Reidsville Rural Ready site, Diesel Drive, Reidsville,
Rockingham County; SAW-2020-01543
Attachments: Reidsville Rural Ready Site_Revised Plan_scanned.pdf; Reidsville Rural Ready Site_Impact Plans
Complete_.pdf
Dave/Sue,
I wanted to let you know that the project has been revised to eliminate all previously proposed impacts. The revisions
noted below are also noted in the attached plan. I have also attached the previously submitted impact plans for
reference only:
• The previously proposed culverted stream crossing for the extension of Diesel Road (Impacts 1, 2 & 3) will no
longer be constructed. The grading for the road bed will stop near the 750' contour on both sides of the stream
(see attached .
• The force main crossing of the stream will be constructed via jack and bore beneath the stream and wetlands,
completely avoiding impacts.
• The construction of the pump station and road grading in the northern portion of the site will occur only in
uplands, and no crossing of the stream is proposed.
Based on the revisions to the project, there will not be any impacts to jurisdictional wetlands or streams and the project
does not require authorization from the USACE or NCDWR. Therefore, we are formally withdrawing our application as it
is no longer needed. Please respond to this email confirming receipt of our withdrawal for our files.
When the applicant is able to secure the necessary funding to complete the stream crossing for Diesel Road, we will
submit 404/401 PCN for authorization of those impacts at that time.
Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Have a happy Thanksgiving!
Troy Beasley
As, WithersRaveriel
mu pp Oa Nage. ski 'Wens.
219 Station Road, Suite 101 I Wilmington, NC 28405
Office: 910.256.9277 I Direct: 910.509.6512
Mobile: [phone]
[e-mail]
IUD
n
CONFIDENTIALITY AND NONDISCLOSURE
1

From: Bailey, David E CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
Sent: Friday, October 23, 2020 12:08 PM
To: Beasley, Troy <[e-mail]>; Lance Metzler <[e-mail]>
Cc: Homewood, Sue <[e-mail]>; Fleming, Glynn <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Request for Additional Information - Reidsville Rural Ready site, Diesel Drive, Reidsville, Rockingham
County; SAW-2020-01543
Hi Troy. The Corps grants your 30-day extension per your request.
-Dave Bailey
David E. Bailey, PWS
Regulatory Project Manager
US Army Corps of Engineers
CE-SAW-RG-R
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
Phone: [phone], Ext. 30.
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
We would appreciate your feedback on how we are performing our duties. Our automated Customer Service Survey is
located at: http://corpsmapu.usace.army.mil/cm apex/f?p=136:4:0
Thank you for taking the time to visit this site and complete the survey.
From: Beasley, Troy <[e-mail]>
Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2020 8:34 PM
To: Bailey, David E CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>; Lance Metzler
<[e-mail]>
Cc: Homewood, Sue <[e-mail]>; Fleming, Glynn <gfleming@v hersravenel.com>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] RE: Request for Additional Information - Reidsville Rural Ready site, Diesel Drive, Reidsville,
Rockingham County; SAW-2020-01543
Dave/Sue,
Rockingham County and the City of Reidsville are exploring options for addressing the items noted in your email
below. Therefore, we are requesting an additional 30-days to provide a formal response to your email below, and
request that the application be placed on administrative hold during that time.
Thanks for your help with this project.
Troy Beasley
219 Station Road, Suite 101 I Wilmington, NC 28405
Office: 910.256.9277 I Direct: 910.509.6512
Mobile: [phone]
[e-mail]
2

CONFIDENTIALITY AND NONDISCLOSURE
From: Bailey, David E CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, September 21, 2020 3:53 PM
To: Beasley, Troy <[e-mail]>; Lance Metzler <[e-mail]>
Cc: Homewood, Sue <[e-mail]>
Subject: Request for Additional Information - Reidsville Rural Ready site, Diesel Drive, Reidsville, Rockingham County;
SAW-2020-01543
All,
Thank you for your PCN and attached information, dated 8/28/2020, for the above referenced project. I have reviewed
the information and need clarification before proceeding with verifying the use of Nationwide Permit (NWP) 39
(Blockedhttp://saw-reg.usace.army.mil/NWP2017/2017NWP39.pdf). Please submit the requested information below
(via e-mail is fine) within 30 days of receipt of this Notification, otherwise we may deny verification of the use of the
Nationwide Permit or consider your application withdrawn and close the file:
1) Thank you for your detailed information regarding the conceptual nature of the project. Based on our review of
the information provided and remotely sensed resources, it is likely that all current and future phases of this
overall commercial/industrial project could be constructed with cumulative impacts staying below the maximum
threshold allowed by the NWPs. Due to the preceding, and because it is our intention to be flexible with
permitting, it appears that the proposed crossing could potentially be permitted ahead of future phases.
However, a second stream/wetland crossing is reasonably foreseeable for future phases of the development
based on the Vicinity Map (which shows a "Future Road" crossing to connect to Drum Road), discussions with
local officials, and our experience with other commercial/industrial park developments and phased projects in
general. Based on the plans, no indication is given that the road would stub out prior to crossing the stream.
Given that reasonably foreseeable cumulative stream impacts would exceed the typical compensatory
mitigation threshold (NWP Regional Condition 3.2) for road crossings alone, uncertainty regarding future
proposed impacts for conceptual Lot end users, and to ensure that the overall development does not result in
more than minimal adverse effects on the aquatic environment, we are using our discretion (NWP District
Engineer's Decision) to require compensatory mitigation for currently proposed stream impacts. Please update
Section D.2 of the PCN accordingly, including any relevant compensatory mitigation acceptance letters;
2) Based on the PCN and plans it is unclear whether or not the culvert pipe is proposed to be buried. Please clarify
the project description and relevant project plans accordingly. We recommend providing a profile view along the
culvert showing the existing stream bed as a reference;
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Dave Bailey
David E. Bailey, PWS
Regulatory Project Manager
US Army Corps of Engineers
CE-SAW-RG-R
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
3

Phone: [phone], Ext. 30.
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
We would appreciate your feedback on how we are performing our duties. Our automated Customer Service Survey is
located at: Blockedhttp://corpsmapu.usace.army.mil/cm apex/f?p=136:4:0
Thank you for taking the time to visit this site and complete the survey.
4

Rural Ready Site
Utilities Award Option 1
Remove Stream Crossing
:: WithersRavenel
Engineers I Planners I Surveyors
115 MacKenan Dr I Cary NC, 27511
t: 919.469.3340
license #: C-0832
www.withersravenel.com
0 150 300
600
Feet
Sewer
Pump Station
ROAD CONSTRUCTION TO STOP SHORT OF
STREAM. PREVIOUSLY PROPOSED
CULVERTED STREAM CROSSING WILL NOT
BE CONSTRUCTED AT THIS TIME.
FORCEMAIN WILL BE INSTALLED VIA JACK
AND BORE AND WILL NOT RESULT IN
STREAM IMPACTS.
PARCEL # 180094
ROCKINGHAM COUNTY
DB 1288 PG 21
23.03 AC..
W
co
W
a
Q@o
PARCEL # 180096
ROCKINGHAM COUNTY
DB 1286 PG 418
23.43 AC..
ROAD CONSTRUCTION
TO STOP SHORT OF
STREAM AND WILL NOT
RESULT IN IMPACTS.
PARCEL # 171127
ROCKINGHAM COUNTY
DB 1281 PG 2165
79.59 AC.
GRAVEL ROAD TO BE CONSTRUCTED TO
PROVIDE ACCESS FROM PICKREL ROAD
GRAVEL ROAD WILL BE
ALONG RIDGE, ENTIREL
AND WILL NOT RESULT IN WETLAND OR
STREAM IMPACTS.
5OLF 8-Inch water line
Jbbed into property
CONSTRUCTED
Y WITHIN UPLANDS
%k s ft
rilert
■
■
■
Legend
Site
Existing Buffer
Existing Stream
Existing Water
Future Road
Proposed ROW
— — — • P-FORCEMAIN
— — — • P-SEWER
— — — • P-WATER
Parcels
1 inch = 300 feet
/ /
/ \
w
I
Path: N:\18\18-0240\180244-Reidsville - Rural Ready Site\Geomatics\GIS\Reidsville Rural Ready Site 55_Optionl.mxd
Aerial Date: 2014
Printed Date: 11/19/2020
Created By: TLPH

Beasley, Troy
From: Bailey, David E CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
Sent: Friday, November 27, 2020 7:01 AM
To: Beasley, Troy; Sue Homewood
Cc: Fleming, Glynn; Lance Metzler
Subject: RE: Request for Additional Information - Reidsville Rural Ready site, Diesel Drive, Reidsville,
Rockingham County; SAW-2020-01543
Troy,
Thank you for the update, details, and PCN withdrawal notification. The Corps is in receipt of your notification and
confirms the withdrawal of the PCN. We appreciate your coordination efforts as always. I hope you had a Happy
Thanksgiving as well.
Sincerely,
Dave Bailey
David E. Bailey, PWS
Regulatory Project Manager
US Army Corps of Engineers
CE-SAW-RG-R
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
Phone: [phone], Ext. 30.
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
We would appreciate your feedback on how we are performing our duties. Our automated Customer Service Survey is
located at: http://corpsmapu.usace.army.mil/cm_apex/f?p=136:4:0
Thank you for taking the time to visit this site and complete the survey.
From: Beasley, Troy <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2020 10:06 AM
To: Bailey, David E CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>; Sue Homewood
<[e-mail]>
Cc: Fleming, Glynn <[e-mail]>; Lance Metzler <[e-mail]>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] RE: Request for Additional Information - Reidsville Rural Ready site, Diesel Drive, Reidsville,
Rockingham County; SAW-2020-01543
Dave/Sue,
I wanted to let you know that the project has been revised to eliminate all previously proposed impacts. The revisions
noted below are also noted in the attached plan. I have also attached the previously submitted impact plans for
reference only:
• The previously proposed culverted stream crossing for the extension of Diesel Road (Impacts 1, 2 & 3) will no
longer be constructed. The grading for the road bed will stop near the 750' contour on both sides of the stream
(see attached .
1

• The force main crossing of the stream will be constructed via jack and bore beneath the stream and wetlands,
completely avoiding impacts.
• The construction of the pump station and road grading in the northern portion of the site will occur only in
uplands, and no crossing of the stream is proposed.
Based on the revisions to the project, there will not be any impacts to jurisdictional wetlands or streams and the project
does not require authorization from the USACE or NCDWR. Therefore, we are formally withdrawing our application as it
is no longer needed. Please respond to this email confirming receipt of our withdrawal for our files.
When the applicant is able to secure the necessary funding to complete the stream crossing for Diesel Road, we will
submit 404/401 PCN for authorization of those impacts at that time.
Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Have a happy Thanksgiving!
Troy Beasley
219 Station Road, Suite 101 I Wilmington, NC 28405
Office: 910.256.9277 I Direct: 910.509.6512
Mobile: [phone]
[e-mail]
CONFIDENTIALITY AND NONDISCLOSURE
From: Bailey, David E CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
Sent: Friday, October 23, 2020 12:08 PM
To: Beasley, Troy <[e-mail]>; Lance Metzler <[e-mail]>
Cc: Homewood, Sue <[e-mail]>; Fleming, Glynn <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Request for Additional Information - Reidsville Rural Ready site, Diesel Drive, Reidsville, Rockingham
County; SAW-2020-01543
Hi Troy. The Corps grants your 30-day extension per your request.
-Dave Bailey
David E. Bailey, PWS
Regulatory Project Manager
US Army Corps of Engineers
CE-SAW-RG-R
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
Phone: [phone], Ext. 30.
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
2

We would appreciate your feedback on how we are performing our duties. Our automated Customer Service Survey is
located at: http://corpsmapu.usace.army.mil/cm apex/f?p=136:4:0
Thank you for taking the time to visit this site and complete the survey.
From: Beasley, Troy <[e-mail]>
Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2020 8:34 PM
To: Bailey, David E CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>; Lance Metzler
<[e-mail]>
Cc: Homewood, Sue <[e-mail]>; Fleming, Glynn <[e-mail]>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] RE: Request for Additional Information - Reidsville Rural Ready site, Diesel Drive, Reidsville,
Rockingham County; SAW-2020-01543
Dave/Sue,
Rockingham County and the City of Reidsville are exploring options for addressing the items noted in your email
below. Therefore, we are requesting an additional 30-days to provide a formal response to your email below, and
request that the application be placed on administrative hold during that time.
Thanks for your help with this project.
Troy Beasley
219 Station Road, Suite 101 I Wilmington, NC 28405
Office: 910.256.9277 I Direct: 910.509.6512
Mobile: [phone]
[e-mail]
CONFIDENTIALITY AND NONDISCLOSURE
From: Bailey, David E CIV USARMY CESAW (USA)<[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, September 21, 2020 3:53 PM
To: Beasley, Troy <[e-mail]>; Lance Metzler <[e-mail]>
Cc: Homewood, Sue <[e-mail]>
Subject: Request for Additional Information - Reidsville Rural Ready site, Diesel Drive, Reidsville, Rockingham County;
SAW-2020-01543
All,
Thank you for your PCN and attached information, dated 8/28/2020, for the above referenced project. I have reviewed
the information and need clarification before proceeding with verifying the use of Nationwide Permit (NWP) 39
(Blockedhttp://saw-reg.usace.army.mil/NWP2017/2017NWP39.pdf). Please submit the requested information below
(via e-mail is fine) within 30 days of receipt of this Notification, otherwise we may deny verification of the use of the
Nationwide Permit or consider your application withdrawn and close the file:
3

1) Thank you for your detailed information regarding the conceptual nature of the project. Based on our review of
the information provided and remotely sensed resources, it is likely that all current and future phases of this
overall commercial/industrial project could be constructed with cumulative impacts staying below the maximum
threshold allowed by the NWPs. Due to the preceding, and because it is our intention to be flexible with
permitting, it appears that the proposed crossing could potentially be permitted ahead of future phases.
However, a second stream/wetland crossing is reasonably foreseeable for future phases of the development
based on the Vicinity Map (which shows a "Future Road" crossing to connect to Drum Road), discussions with
local officials, and our experience with other commercial/industrial park developments and phased projects in
general. Based on the plans, no indication is given that the road would stub out prior to crossing the stream.
Given that reasonably foreseeable cumulative stream impacts would exceed the typical compensatory
mitigation threshold (NWP Regional Condition 3.2) for road crossings alone, uncertainty regarding future
proposed impacts for conceptual Lot end users, and to ensure that the overall development does not result in
more than minimal adverse effects on the aquatic environment, we are using our discretion (NWP District
Engineer's Decision) to require compensatory mitigation for currently proposed stream impacts. Please update
Section D.2 of the PCN accordingly, including any relevant compensatory mitigation acceptance letters;
2) Based on the PCN and plans it is unclear whether or not the culvert pipe is proposed to be buried. Please clarify
the project description and relevant project plans accordingly. We recommend providing a profile view along the
culvert showing the existing stream bed as a reference;
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Dave Bailey
David E. Bailey, PWS
Regulatory Project Manager
US Army Corps of Engineers
CE-SAW-RG-R
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
Phone: [phone], Ext. 30.
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
We would appreciate your feedback on how we are performing our duties. Our automated Customer Service Survey is
located at: Blockedhttp://corpsmapu.usace.army.mil/cm apex/f?p=136:4:0
Thank you for taking the time to visit this site and complete the survey.
4

Beasley, Troy
From: Homewood, Sue <[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, September 21, 2020 8:17 PM
To: Beasley, Troy; Lance Metzler
Cc: [e-mail]
Subject: RE: [External] Request for Additional Information - Reidsville Rural Ready site, Diesel Drive, Reidsville,
Rockingham County; SAW-2020-01543
Please copy me on the response. Thank you.
Sue Homewood
Division of Water Resources, Winston Salem Regional Office
Department of Environmental Quality
336 776 9693 office
336 813 1863 mobile
[e-mail]
450 W. Hanes Mill Rd, Suite 300
Winston Salem NC 27105
• .■'.I
•. .
From: Bailey, David E CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, September 21, 2020 3:53 PM
To: Beasley, Troy <[e-mail]>; Lance Metzler <[e-mail]>
Cc: Homewood, Sue <[e-mail]>
Subject: [External] Request for Additional Information - Reidsville Rural Ready site, Diesel Drive, Reidsville, Rockingham
County; SAW-2020-01543
CAUTION:
ternal email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to
r
All,
Thank you for your PCN and attached information, dated 8/28/2020, for the above referenced project. I have reviewed
the information and need clarification before proceeding with verifying the use of Nationwide Permit (NWP) 39
(http://saw-reg.usace.army.mil/NWP2017/2017NWP39.pdf). Please submit the requested information below (via e-mail
is fine) within 30 days of receipt of this Notification, otherwise we may deny verification of the use of the Nationwide
Permit or consider your application withdrawn and close the file:
1) Thank you for your detailed information regarding the conceptual nature of the project. Based on our review of
the information provided and remotely sensed resources, it is likely that all current and future phases of this
overall commercial/industrial project could be constructed with cumulative impacts staying below the maximum
threshold allowed by the NWPs. Due to the preceding, and because it is our intention to be flexible with
permitting, it appears that the proposed crossing could potentially be permitted ahead of future phases.
However, a second stream/wetland crossing is reasonably foreseeable for future phases of the development
1

based on the Vicinity Map (which shows a "Future Road" crossing to connect to Drum Road), discussions with
local officials, and our experience with other commercial/industrial park developments and phased projects in
general. Based on the plans, no indication is given that the road would stub out prior to crossing the stream.
Given that reasonably foreseeable cumulative stream impacts would exceed the typical compensatory
mitigation threshold (NWP Regional Condition 3.2) for road crossings alone, uncertainty regarding future
proposed impacts for conceptual Lot end users, and to ensure that the overall development does not result in
more than minimal adverse effects on the aquatic environment, we are using our discretion (NWP District
Engineer's Decision) to require compensatory mitigation for currently proposed stream impacts. Please update
Section D.2 of the PCN accordingly, including any relevant compensatory mitigation acceptance letters;
2) Based on the PCN and plans it is unclear whether or not the culvert pipe is proposed to be buried. Please clarify
the project description and relevant project plans accordingly. We recommend providing a profile view along the
culvert showing the existing stream bed as a reference;
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Dave Bailey
David E. Bailey, PWS
Regulatory Project Manager
US Army Corps of Engineers
CE-SAW-RG-R
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
Phone: [phone], Ext. 30.
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
We would appreciate your feedback on how we are performing our duties. Our automated Customer Service Survey is
located at: http://corpsmapu.usace.army.mil/cm apex/f?p=136:4:0
Thank you for taking the time to visit this site and complete the survey.
2

DocuSign Envelope ID: 7B251 B8A-C22A-44BC-A854-B251 E5380FE9
ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
S. DANIEL SMITH
Director
NORTH CAROL.INA
Environmental Quality
November 30, 2020
DWR # 20201105
Rockingham County
Rockingham County
Attn: Mr. Lance Metzler
371 Nc 65
Reidsville NC 27320
Subject: ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF APPLICATION WITHDRAWAL
Riedsivlle
Dear Mr. Metzler:
On September 8, 2020, the Division of Water Resources (Division) received your application
requesting a 401 Water Quality Certification from the Division for the subject project. On
November 25, 2020, the Division received a request to withdraw the application from
WithersRavenel on your behalf. This letter acknowledges your request; your application is
withdrawn.
Please be aware that you have no authorization under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act for
this activity and any work done within waters of the state may be a violation of North Carolina
General Statutes and Administrative Code.
Please contact Sue Homewood at 336-776-9693 or [e-mail] if you have
any questions or concerns.
Sincerely,
DocuSigned by:<
�ti l . J,.IACr
145B49E225C94EA...
Lon T. Snider
Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ— WSRO
D_E
NCIrU CAROLINn
Department of Environmental Quality
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
Winston-Salem Regional Office 1450 West Hanes Mill Road, Suite 300 I Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27105
336.776.9800

DocuSign Envelope ID: 7B251 B8A-C22A-44BC-A854-B251 E5380FE9
Rockingham County
DWR# 20201105
Withdrawal
Page 2 of 2
cc: Troy Beasley, WithersRavenel (via email)
David Bailey, USACE Raleigh Regulatory Field Office (via email)
Olivia Munzer, NCWRC (via email)
DWR WSRO 401 file
DWR 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit file