20040712 Ver 4_Individual_20121109

LP" U4
_A74 �AWA
NCDNR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
Beverly Eaves Perdue Braxton C. Davis
Governor Director Dee Freeman
Secretary
November 2, 2012
MEMORANDUM:
TO: Karen Higgins
401 Oversight
Division of Water Quality- Surface Water Protection
FROM: Doug Huggett, NC DENR -DCM Major Permits Coordinator
400 Commerce Ave., Morehead City, NC 28557 (Courier 11- 12 -09)
SUBJECT: CAMA / D &F Major Permit Application Review
Applicant: Paul & Susan Magnabosco for Stanwick Shores S/D
Project Location: far northern end of Bridgers Ave., adjacent to Banks Channel and Topsail Sound,
in Topsail Beach, Pender County.
Proposed Project: reconfigure docking facility and incorporate new dredging
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and return this
form to Doug Hug_gett at the address above by November 26, 2012. If you have any questions
regarding the proposed project, contact Jason Dail at (910) 796 =7215, when appropriate, in -depth
comments with supporting data is requested.
REPLY: This agency has no objection to the project as proposed.
SIGNED
This agency has no comment on the proposed project.
This agency approves of the project only if the recommended changes are
incorporated. See attached.
This agency objects to the project for reasons described in the attached
comments.
DATE
127 Cardinal Drive Ext., Wilmington, NC 28405
Phone. [phone] \ FAX: 910 - 395 -3964 Internet: www.nccoastalmana_qement.net
An Equal Opportunity \ Affirmative Action Employer
A1
DENR - NVjsTEP 00ALBT'Y
NorthCarolina
Natatd,ff

DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT
APPLICANT'S NAME: Paul and Susan Magnabosco, for Stanwick Shores Subdivision
2. LOCATION OF PROJECT SITE: Located at the far northern end of Bridgers Ave., adjacent to Banks Channel
and Topsail Sound, in Topsail Beach, Pender County.
Photo Index — 2006:25 -2567, L -M, 15 -16 2000: 25 -325, L, M, N -10 1995:25 -307, K, L, M -2
State Plane Coordinates - X: 2416467 Y: 230280 GPS File: 0- 042117B
3. INVESTIGATION TYPE: CAMA/Dredge and Fill
4. INVESTIGATIVE PROCEDURE: Dates of Site Visit -- Most recent: 3/7/12, 6/12/12, 7/31/12
Was Applicant Present — No
5. PROCESSING PROCEDURE: Application Received — modified and completed 1 1/01/12
Office - Wilmington
6. SITE DESCRIPTION:
(A) Local Land Use Plan - Pender County
Land Classification From LUP — Conservation in the AEC and Limited Transition for uplands
(B) AEC(s) Involved: ES, EW, PT
(C) Water Dependent: Yes
(D) Intended Use: Commercial
(E) Wastewater Treatment: Existing — None Planned - None
(F) Type of Structures: Existing — One single family residence, bulkhead and docking facility
Planned - reconfigure docks and dredge around six -slip docking facility
(G) Estimated Annual Rate of Erosion: N/A
Source - N/A
7. HABITAT DESCRIPTION: [AREA]
DREDGED FILLED OTHER
(A) Shallow bottom — SAV Habitat
3,024 sq ft.
(168 yds')
(B) Non- Vegetated Wetlands
410 sq. ft.
(open wafter)
Same as above
incorporated
(C) Other
36,000 sq. ft.
High ground
(0.82 acres)
graded
(D) Total Area Disturbed: 39,434 sq ft (0.90 acres)
(E) Primary Nursery Area: No
(F) Water Classification: SA Open: Yes
PROJECT SUMMARY: The applicant is proposing to re- configure the existing docking facility and incorporate
new dredging.

Paul and Susan Magnabosco
Page Two
9. PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
The Stanwick Shores Subdivision is located at the far northern end of Bridgers Ave., adjacent to Topsail Sound and Banks
Channel, in the Town of Topsail Beach, Pender County. To get to the project site from Wilmington, head north on US
Hwy 17 toward Jacksonville. At the intersection of US Hwy 17 and NC Hwy 210, turn right onto NC Hwy 210 towards
Surf City. Cross the AIWW (swing bridge) leading into Surf City and turn right at the stoplight onto NC Hwy 50. Travel
approximately 3.5 miles south and turn right onto Rocky Mount Lane. Once on Rocky Mount Lane, take the first right
onto Bridges Ave. The property will be located at the terminal end of Bridgers Ave, on the western side. The property is
approximately 200' wide x 310' long (as measured from Bridgers Ave.). Please refer to the field investigation report dated
3/22/3005, for a brief description of the project as it existed prior to development.
The Stanwick Shores Subdivision was originally permitted under CAMA Major Permit #60 -05, on April 28, 2005. The
permit was scheduled to expire on December 31, 2008; however, it was renewed on January 27, 2009, and later extended
due to Session Law 2009 -406, and as amended by Session Law 2010 -077. The current expiration date for the permitted
project is December 31, 2014.
To date, the applicant has completed the vast majority of the work approved by the original CAMA Major permit. Two
individual docks have been constructed, as well as a community docking system (consisting of 6- slips), bulkhead and
subdivision infrastructure. Additionally, one home has been erected on the property and the remaining lots have been
cleared of vegetation. The applicant has openly stated that this project is essential, as he is marketing two of the slips
within the community docking facility for two properties that are located outside of the Stanwick Shores subdivision.
The waters of Topsail Sound and Banks Channel, adjacent to the proposed project area, are classified as "SA" by the
Division of Water Quality. This section of Topsail Sound is NOT designated as a Primary Nursery Area by the Division
of Marine Fisheries. According to maps provided by Shellfish Sanitation, the area is OPEN to the harvesting of shellfish.
Additionally, the entire area surrounding the project site has been confirmed (by the NC Division of Marine Fisheries) as
Submerged Aquatic Vegetation (SAV) habitat area, and either contains, or has previously contained beds of SAV.
PROPOSED PROJECT:
The applicant is proposing to re- configure the existing docking facility by relocating the fixed finger piers associated with
the community docking system. In addition, the applicant is planning to incorporate new dredging around the footprint of
the community dock (i.e. new boat basin).
It should be noted the applicant has requested authorization for dredging activities around the community docking facility
in the past; however, negative comments from several resource agencies prompted the applicant to voluntarily withdraw
the dredging portion of the project from the previous CAMA permit application. Specifically, Fritz Rhode (formerly with
NCDMF) responded to the initial dredging request with the following comments in a Memorandum to the Division of
Coastal Management on May 23, 2004. The comments of that memorandum read as follows: "Per General Statute 113-
131, the Division of Marine Fisheries recommends denial of the above permit During a site visit, numerous (more than
24) patches of submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV) were observed in the footprint of the proposed dredging. These
patches ranged in size from less than Ift in diameter to over 6 ft. in diameter..... i31ithout dredging, the water depths are
too shallow to permit docking without causing negative impacts to the SA Vs..... At the time oj'the site visit (low water),
depths throughout much of the project were 12 " or less...... It is the position of the Division of Marine Fisheries that the
dredging andlor the doers without dredging would have significant adverse impacts to this important coastal fish habitat
and to coastal fisheries resources using this habitat. "
In addition to the negative comments received from the Division of Marine Fisheries, the NC Division of Water Quality
also recommended denial of the dredging of SAVs in the project area and the NC Wildlife Resources Commission
requested that the "dredging footprint shall be modified to avoid disturbance to all SAV".

Paul and Susan Magnaboseo
Page Three
The applicant's voluntary withdrawal of the dredging portion of the project is documented in a letter to Jason Dail, dated
February 24, 2005. Specifically, the letter from the applicant's agent states "This revision approach was discussed
between the applicant and the two most relevant commenting agency contacts, following the February 2, 2005 meeting; to
solicit feedback There were no objections to this proposal with three piers if the proposed dredging was eliminated.
Additionally, as a further improvement, the walkway for the northeastern pier has been shifted overt to the shown location
to avoid passing directly over a relatively dense area of SAV ".
With respect to the current proposal, the applicant is requesting approval to re- configure the community docking system
by adding two additional 10' x 10' platforms at the terminal end of the existing platform (one on either side) and
repositioning the two finger piers located landward of the platform. As constructed, the two existing finger piers are
oriented perpendicular to the existing access walkway and measure 4' x 20' each. The new design would angle the finger
piers toward the sound (approximately 30 °) to allow flexibility while docking at the facility, rather than docking
perpendicular. Similarly, the platform additions at the terminal end would also be angled to prevent vessel operators from
having to dock perpendicular in tight quarters. The realignment of the finger piers would result in a slight extension on
either side of the facility (approximately 2') due to the angle at which they are proposed. The applicant is also requesting
approval to install six (6) boatlifts, one in each of the existing slips. As proposed, the boatlifts would measure
approximately 12' x 12'.
The dredging portion of this project would include removing approximately 3,024 sq. ft. of shallow bottom SAV habitat
area. The dimension of the proposed project area measures 42' (L) x 72' (W) x -1.5' (D), giving a total dredged volume of
168 cubic yards. Current water depths in the vicinity of the proposed dredge footprint range from +0.6" at Normal Low
Water (NLW) to -2.5' NLW. As proposed, the projected depth would measure -4.0', NLW. The application states that the
dredge footprint would have a 45° taper around the perimeter of the cut, to a depth of -2.0', Mean Low Water (MLW).
The applicant states the project has been designed to avoid impacts to SAV; however, the footprint of the dredge cut
borders a 15' x 20' established SAV bed. Short of installing vinyl sheet piles around the perimeter of the dredge cut, it
would be virtually impossible to "avoid" any impacts to SAV beds.
The application states that a barge mounted excavator would be used to dredge around the docking facility and material
generated from the project would be transported off -site (via barge) to a designated disposal site at Queen's Grant, which
is located approximately 0.60 miles north of the project site. The applicant has received approval from Queen's Grant,
allowing deposition of material along the peninsula bordering the center canal. Dimensions of the proposed spoil
deposition area measure approximately 60'(w) x 600'(1), providing a total footprint of approximately 36,000 sq. ft. As
proposed, all spoil material would be deposited outside of the 30' Coastal Shoreline Buffer. There are no "404" type of
Coastal Wetlands on/at the proposed spoil disposal site.
10. ANTICIPATED IMPACTS
Multiple SAV surveys have been conducted at Stanwick Shores (visual and documented) by both the resource agencies as
well as the applicant. The results of the surveys, in addition to DMF's site visits, clearly define the presence of SAV in the
immediate vicinity of the proposed project. Similarly, the entire area within the project boundary has been defined as SAV
habitat area by the NC Division of Marine Fisheries. Dredging within this area would impact approximately 3.024 sq. ft.
of shallow bottom SAV habitat (at a minimum) and deposition of dredge spoil material could impact up to 36,000 sq. ft.
of previously disturbed high ground. No Coastal or "404" type Wetlands would be impacted or affected as a result of the
project. The repositioning of the finger piers and platforms would incorporate an additional 410 sq. ft. of open water area.
The proposed pier /platform expansion would be located within the applicant's area of riparian access, but would encroach
into the 15' riparian setback; however, the applicant has obtained a waiver from both neighbors allowing the
/4
encroachment. The proposal would be located within' of the width of the waterbody and outside of the federally
maintained channel along Banks Channel.
Submitted by: J. Dail Date: November 2, 2012 Office: Wilmington

WALTONEN(wNEERiiNT
July 31, 2012
Mr. Jason Dail
NCDENR Division of Coastal Management
117 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405
, ; €1
re: Modification of LAMA Permit No. 60 -05. Stanwick Shores Subdivision
Dear Jason.
Attached is an application for modification of the referenced LAMA Permit. The proposed
modification consists solely of reconfiguring the boat slips of the common area pier;
eliminating wet slips and using only boat lifts; and minor dredging in the area of the
reconfigured boat slips. No other changes are proposed. The pier and docks are currently
constructed according to the approved plans. The attached plans show the as -built pier /dock
and proposed changes.
The changes are being proposed for the common area (middle pier) to increase the usefulness,
safety and convenience of the boat slips. Wet slips are no longer needed because modern
boatlifts are remote controlled. At the time of the original application, this was not the case.
The boat slips are being reconfigured from the original perpendicular alignment to the pier to
a 30- degree alignment to facilitate docking and to avoid impacts to SAV habitat. The new
alignment was the result of multiple iterations to arrive at the best solution to avoid SAV
impacts within the constraints of the boatlift dimensional requirements. The new alignment
will require modification of the finger piers as shown on the plan. With the angle docking, the
boats do not extend as far from the pier as before. Also, less room is needed for maneuvering.
Both of these enhancements will reduce the potential for SAV impacts by scouring.
The proposed dredge area as shown on the plan, is only 2723.5 square feet, at a maximum
depth of 2' and an average depth of F for a total volume of 100.8 cubic yards. This volume is
approximately half of what could be permitted under a General Permit if this site did not
already have an Individual Permit.
The proposed dredge and boat slip layout have been designed and adjusted to avoid impacts to
SAV habitat in accordance with input from NCDENR officials in Scoping Meetings held on
2/13/12 and 5/21/12 and an on -site meeting held 6/12/12. The existing beds of SAV shown on
the plan are according to a survey that has been verified and approved by Jessie Baker of
Narrative
Tel: 910 - 2594800 Po Box 895, Burgaw. North Carolina, 28425 Fax: [phone]
-

WA L TO lV C 1�'��.�I1V G
a
NCDENR Division of Marine Fisheries. None of the proposed work encroaches on the
existing SAV beds. The perimeter of the dredge area will be sloped at 45 degrees to avoid
sloughing to further avoid impacts to the SAV. Boat slips have been moved as far waterward
as possible to avoid impacts to SAV habitat. Also, the pilings for the boat lifts for slips C5
and C6 will prevent boats from encroaching into SAV habitat areas landward of the slips.
Dredging will be done by a shovel mounted on a barge. The anticipated spoil disposal area is
at nearby Queens Grant, which has an existing dredge spoil permit. It is understood that the
spoil from Stanwick Shores' dredging will have to be added to the Queens Grant permit.
If you have any questions, please call me at 910- 2594800
Sincerely,
�K 1'4�
Mark Walton
N.C. Professional Engineer
Registration No. 16879
1!!- (12 11611°
Narrative
Tel: [phone] PO Box 895, Burgaw. North Carolina, 28425 Fax: [phone]

qT
APPUCATIONfer
M8,.1' Development Permit rn
(last revised 12127/06)
North Carolina DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
3. Primary Applicantl Landowner Information
Business Name
Paul And Susan Magnabosco
Project Name (if applicable)
Stanwick Shores Common Area Pier Modification
Applicant 1 • First Name
Paul Magnabosco
MI
W
Last Name
Magnabosco
Applicant 2: First Name
MI
Last Name
If additional applicants, please attach an additional page(s) with names listed.
Mailing Address
3306 Tipton Ct.
PO Box
City
Wilmington
State
NC
ZIP
28409
Country
USA
Phone No.
910 -619 - 8888 ext.
FAX No
- -
Street Address (if different from above)
City
State
ZIP
Email
[e-mail]
2. Agent/Contractor Information
Business Name
Walton Engineering
Agent/ Contractor 1: First Name
MI
Last Name
Raymond
M
Walton
Agent/ Contractor 2 First Name
Ml
Last Name
Mailing Address
PO Box
City
State
PO Box 895
895
Burgaw
INC
ZIP
Phone No. 1
Phone No 2
28425
910 - 259 - 4800 ext.
- -
ext
FAX No.
Contractor #
910 259 1779
Street Address (if different from above)
City
State
ZIP
109 East Fremont St
Burgaw
NC
28425-
Email
mark @waltonengineedng.net alien @waitonengineedng.net
<Form continues on back>

Form DCM MP -1 (Page 2 of 4)
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
3. Project Location
County (can be multiple)
Street Address
State Rd. #
Pender
Bridgers Ave. (between 116 Bridgers & 120 Bridgers) -
d Approximate elevation of tract above NHW (normal high water) or
Subdivision Name
City
State
Zip
Stanwick Shores
Topsail Beach
NC
28445-
Phone No.
Lot No (s) (if many, attach additional page with list)
910 - 619 - 8888 ext.
i Is the proposed project consistent with the applicable zoning?
a. In which NC river basin is the project located?
b Name of body of water nearest to proposed project
N/A Banks Channel
Banks Channel
c. Is the water body identified in (b) above, natural or manmade?
d Name the closest major water body to the proposed project site.
®Natural ❑Manmade ❑Unknown
Atlantic Ocean
e Is proposed work within city limits or planning jurisdiction?
f. If applicable, list the planning jurisdiction or city limit the proposed
®Yes ❑No
work falls within.
Town of Topsail Beach
4. Site Description
a. Total length of shoreline on the tract (ft)
b Size of entire tract (sq ft )
10$,
4791.6 sq, ft,
c. Size of individual lot(s)
d Approximate elevation of tract above NHW (normal high water) or
NWL (normal water level)
(if many lot sizes, please attach additional page with a list)
❑NHW or ❑NWL
e. Vegetation on tract
Native Shrubs
f. Man -made features and uses now on tract
Pier & Bulkhead
g. Identify and describe the existing land uses adiacent to the proposed project site.
Residences
h. How does local government zone the tract?
i Is the proposed project consistent with the applicable zoning?
Residential R2 & R4
(Attach zoning compliance certificate, if applicable)
®Yes ❑No ❑NA
j. Is the proposed activity part of an urban waterfront redevelopment proposal? ❑Yes ®No
k. Has a professional archaeological assessment been done for the tract? If yes, attach a copy ❑Yes ®No ❑NA
If yes, by whom?
1. Is the proposed project located in a National Registered Historic District or does it involve a ❑Yes ®No ❑NA
National Register listed or eligible property?
<Form continues on next page> q

Form DCM MP -1 (Page 3 of 4)
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
m (i) Are there wetlands on the site? ®Yes []No
(ii) Are there coastal wetlands on the site? ®Yes ❑No
(iii) If yes to either (i) or (ii) above, has a delineation been conducted? ®Yes []No
(Attach documentation, if available)
n. Describe existing wastewater treatment facilities.
N/A
o. Describe existing drinking water supply source
N/A
p. Describe existing storm water management or treatment systems.
N/A
5. Activities and Impacts
a. Will the project be for commercial, public, or private use?
❑Commercial ❑Public/Govemment
®Private /Community
b. Give a brief description of purpose, use, and daily operations of the project when complete
Purpose: to increase the usefulness, safety, and convenience of the boat slips through new boat lifts and reconfigured finger
piers.
c. Describe the proposed construction methodology, types of construction equipment to be used during construction, the number of each type
of equipment and where it is to be stored.
- Manual construction equipment
-Barge mounted shovel for dredging
-Pile driver
d. List all development activities you propose
- Change existingfinger piers and boat lifts on existing pier
- Dredge 100.8 c.y.
e Are the proposed activities maintenance of an existing project, new work, or both?
The pier is existing. The existing finger
piers will be changed to a design that
better accommodates
f What is the approximate total disturbed land area resulting from the proposed project?
2723.5 ®Sq Ft or []Acres
g. Will the proposed project encroach on any public easement, public accessway or other area
❑Yes ®No ❑NA
that the public has established use of?
h. Describe location and type of existing and proposed discharges to waters of the state.
N/A
I. Will wastewater or stormwater be discharged into a wetland?
❑Yes ®No ❑NA
If yes, will this discharged water be of the same salinity as the receiving water?
❑Yes ❑No ®NA
j. Is there any mitigation proposed?
[]Yes ®No 1 NA B
<_
If yes, attach a mitigation proposal.
9.e '
,� Q
<Form continues on back>

Form DCM MP -1 (Page 4 of 4)
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
6. Addidonallnformadon
In addition to this completed application form, (MP -1) the following items below, if applicable, must be submitted in order for the application
package to be complete. Items (a) — (t) are always applicable to any major development application. Please consult the application
instruction booldet on how to property prepare the required items below.
a A project narrative.
b. An accurate, dated work plat (including plan view and cross - sectional drawings) drawn to scale. Please give the present status of the
proposed project. Is any portion already complete? If previously authorized work, clearly indicate on maps, plats, drawings to distinguish
between work completed and proposed.
c. A site or location map that is sufficiently detailed to guide agency personnel unfamiliar with the area to the site.
d. A copy of the deed (with state application only) or other instrument under which the applicant claims title to the affected properties.
e. The appropriate application fee. Check or money order made payable to DENR
f A list of the names and complete addresses of the adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners and signed return receipts as proof that such
owners have received a copy of the application and plats by certified mail. Such landowners must be advised that they have 30 days in
which to submit comments on the proposed project to the Division of Coastal Management.
Name Nick & Linda Palczuk Phone No.
Address 318 Twin Pond Drive, West Chester PA 19382
Name Mark & Stacy Yusko Phone No.
Address 2121 N Lakeshore Dr, Chapel Hill NC 27514
Name Phone No.
Address
g. A list of previous state or federal permits issued for work on the project tract Include permit numbers, permittee, and issuing dates
CAMA Permit No. 60-05, Stormwater Management Permit
#SW8 040423
h. Signed consultant or agent authorization form, if applicable.
i. Welland delineation, if necessary.
j. A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in oceanfront and inlet areas (Must be signed by property owner)
k A statement of compliance with the N.0 Environmental Policy Act (N C.G S. 113A 1 -10), if necessary. If the project involves expenditure
of public funds or use of public lands, attach a statement documenting compliance with the North Carolina Environmental Policy Act
7. Ceram cation and Permission to Enter on Land
I understand that any permit issued in response to this application will allow only the development described in the application.
The project will be subject to the conditions and restrictions contained in the permit.
I certify that I am authorised to grant, and do in fact grant permission to representatives of state and federal review agencies to
enter on the aforementioned lands in connection with evaluating information related to this permit application and follow -up
monitoring of the project.
I further certify that the information provided in this application is truthful to the best of my knowledge.
Date rV LY 310 2012- Print Name r, *UL MA epm6 osc�;
If
Signature ")3 e''
IF
Please indicate application attachments pertaining to your proposed project.
®DCM MP -2 Excavation and Fill Information ❑DCM MP -5 Bridges and Culverts
❑DCM MP -3 Upland Development qq aa
®DCM MP-4 Structures Information '
253 -80I -2803 . 1- 888- 41RCOAS7'

Form ®CM MP-4
� l ■ :11 oil
(Construction within Public Trust Areas)
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major Permit, Form DCM MP -1. Be sure to complete all other sections of the Joint
Application that relate to this proposed project. Please include all supplemental information.
1. DOCKING FACIUMMARINA CHARACTERISTICS
a. (i) Is the docking facility/marina:
❑Commercial ❑PubliclGovemment ®Pnvate /Community
c. (i) Dock(s) and/or pier(s)
(ii) Number 1 Existing
(iii) Length
(m) Width
(v) Floating ❑Yes []No
e (i) Are Platforms included? ❑Yes []No
If yes:
(ii) Number 2
(iii) Length 10'10"
(iv) Width 10'10" (Note: Both platforms at the
pier head are not square shaped (see drawing Fig. 1)
(v) Floating []Yes ®No
Note: Roofed areas are calculated from dnpline dimensions.
❑This section not applicable
b. (i) Will the facility be open to the general public?
❑Yes ®No
d. (i) Are Finger Piers included? ®Yes []No
If yes:
(ii) Number 2
(iii) Length 20'9" out from pier (Note: finger pier
extend 10' then bend 30° then extend 12'6" more.
therefore 22'6" linear feet
(iv) Width 4
(v) Floating ❑Yes ®No
f. (i) Are Boatlifts included? ®Yes []No
If yes.
(ii) Number 6
(iii) Length 11,101,
(iv) Width 12' 6"
g. (Q Number of slips proposed h
N/A
(ii) Number of slips existing
N/A Existinq_ slips _hold 6 boats. New proposed slips will
hold 6 boats.
i. Check the proposed type of siting:
❑ Land cut and access channel
®Open water, dredging for basin and /or channel
[]Open water, no dredging required
❑Other; please describe,
k. Typical boat length; 20'
Check all the types of services to be provided.
❑ Full service, including travel lift and /or rail, repair or
maintenance service
❑ Dockage, fuel, and marine supplies
❑ Dockage ("wet slips”) only, number of slips:
❑ Dry storage, number of boats-
0 Boat ramp(s), number of boat ramps-
0 Other, please describe -
Dockage, private boat lifts -6 slips
j Describe the typical boats to be served (e.g , open runabout,
charter boats, sad boats, mixed types)
open runabout
I (i) Will the facility be open to the general public?
.,_" 3�•�tii� �a,a�?i� ,., 2- �a�?d; -fir ��a���'' _ it6'u�V6i.9'��°..��€��.`S�c'&. �$i?�z'ax�„°*'x'fl�'3"ea „dec;.w

Form DCM MP-4 (Structurr•es, Page i, of 4Y
m. (i) Will the facility have be pilings? ❑Yes ®No
❑Yes ®No
(ii) If yes number of tie pilings?
2. DOCKING FACIL►TYAWARINA OPERATIONS ®This section not applicable
a. Check each of the following sanitary facilities that will be included in the proposed project.
❑ Office Toilets
❑ Toilets for patrons, Number , Location:
❑ Showers
❑ Boatholding tank pumpout; Give type and location:
b Describe treatment type and disposal location for all sanitary wastewater
c Describe the disposal of solid waste, fish offal and trash
d How will overboard discharge of sewage from boats be controlled?
e (i) Give the location and number of "No Sewage Discharge" signs proposed.
(ii) Give the location and number of ° Pumpout Available" signs proposed.
f. Describe the special design, if applicable, for containing industrial type pollutants, such as paint, sandblasting waste and petroleum products.
g Where will residue from vessel maintenance be disposed of7
h• Give the number of channel markers and 'No Wake" signs proposed
i. Give the location of fuel - handling facilities, and describe the safety measures planned to protect area water quality
j. What will be the marina policy on overnight and live- aboard dockage'
k. Describe design measures that promote boat basin flushing?
.E 7%-sil ,� TP00 9 -M-4RCt AST _ a a °:r,as Wa =.�t tPrr ;arm. =Ncar. :€ �.r a. a:',, ;�..�� ? Cs•;�

Form C t MP-4 ( iVvet ,ares, Page 3 of )
If this project is an expansion of an existing marina, what types of services are currently provided?
m. Is the marina/docking facility proposed within a primary or secondary nursery area?
❑Yes ❑No
n. Is the marinaldocking facility proposed within or adjacent to any shellfish harvesting area?
❑Yes ❑No
o. Is the marina/docking facility proposed within or adjacent to coastal wetlands/marsh (CW), submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom
(SB), or other wetlands (WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the number of square feet affected.
❑CW ❑SAV ❑SB
OWL ❑None
p. Is the proposed marina/docking facility located within or within close proximity to any shellfish leases? ❑Yes ❑No
If yes, give the name and address of the leaseholder(s), and give the proximity to the lease
3. BOATHOUSE (including covered lifts) ®This section not applicable
a. (i) Is the boathouse structure(s):
❑Commercial ❑PubliclGovemment ❑Private /Community
(ii) Number
(iii) Length
(iv) Width
Note. Roofed areas are calculated from dnpline dimensions.
4. GROIN (e.g., wood, sheetpile, etc. If a rock groin, use MP -2, Excavation and Fill.) ®This section not applicable
a. (i) Number
(ii) Length
(in) Width
5. BREAKWATER (e.g., wood, sheetpile, etc.) ®This section not applicable
a Length b. Average distance from NHW, NWL, or wetlands
c Maximum distance beyond NHW, NWL or wetlands
6. MOORING PILINGS and BUOYS ®This section not applicable
a. Is the structure(s):
❑Commercial ❑PubliclGovernment ❑Pnvate/Community
c Distance to be placed beyond shoreline
Note: This should be measured from marsh edge, if present
b Number
d Description of buoy (color, inscription, size, anchor, etc)
pilings

Form 0CM MP-4 (Structures, Page 4 of 4)
e. Arc of the swing
7. GENERAL
a. Proximity of structure(s) to adjacent riparian property lines b. Proximity of structure(s) to adjacent docking facilities.
finger piers 66" and 57 pier head platforms 8'6" and 9'6" finger piers 33'& 34' pierhead platforms 27' (both sides)
Note: For buoy or mooring piling, use arc of swing including length
of vessel.
c Width of water body
Banks Channel is approx. 1200' at this location
e. (i) Will navigational aids be required as a result of the project?
❑Yes MNo ❑NA
(ii) If yes, explain what type and how they will be implemented.
d Water depth at waterward end of structure at NLW or NWIL
81
18. OTHER E] This section not applicable
a. Give complete description:
7/31/2012
Date
StanvAck Shores common Area Pier & Boat Slip Modification
Project Name
Paul Magnabosco
Applicant Name
Applicant Signature
1 8834 COAST :! wWw- qcC O-)'tal mc r-19L' t -net revisc-4. 41a, 27 06

Form DCM MP -2
(Except for bridges and culverts)
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major Permit, Form DCM MP -1. Be sure to complete all other sections of the Joint
Application that relate to this proposed project. Please include all supplemental information.
Describe below the purpose of proposed excavation and /or fill activities. All values should be given in feet.
1. EXCAVATION ❑This section not applicable
a. Amount of material to be excavated from below NHW or NWL in b. Type of material to be excavated.
cubic yards.
S r1d
c. (i) Does the area to be excavated include coastal wetlands /marsh
(CW), submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB),
or other wetlands (WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the
number of square feet affected.
❑CW ❑SAV ❑SB
OWL [NNone
(ii) Describe the purpose of the excavation in these areas:
SPIV
d. High -ground excavation in cubic yards.
2. DISPOSAL OF EXCAVATED MATERIAL ❑This section not applicable
a. Location of disposal area. b. Dimensions of disposal area.
uu is C� of �,n}�✓ awn
c. (i) Do you claim title to disposal area? d. (Q Will a disposal area be available for future maintenance?
❑Yes [oNo ❑NA []Yes ❑No (PNA
u If no, attach a letter granting (i) If yes, where?
( ") g g permission from the owner.
e. (Q Does the disposal area include any coastal wetlands/marsh
(CW), submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB),
or other wetlands (WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the
number of square feet affected.
❑CW ❑SAV ❑SB
OWL [%None
(ii) Describe the purpose of disposal in these areas:
P-Ait1G trpd a5 t,ndu an U4"nc\
f. (i) Does the disposal include any area in the water?
❑Yes VNo ❑NA
(ii) If yes, how much water area is affected?
J
:5241 018 -2808 .. 4- S&R -4RCOA 06
Access
Other
Channel
(NLW or
Canal
Boat Basin
Boat Ramp
Rock Groin
Rock
Breakwater
(excluding
shoreline
NWL )
stabilization
Length
Width
7,2 '
Avg. Existing
Depth
,
NA
NA
Final Project
Depth
y r
NA
NA
1. EXCAVATION ❑This section not applicable
a. Amount of material to be excavated from below NHW or NWL in b. Type of material to be excavated.
cubic yards.
S r1d
c. (i) Does the area to be excavated include coastal wetlands /marsh
(CW), submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB),
or other wetlands (WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the
number of square feet affected.
❑CW ❑SAV ❑SB
OWL [NNone
(ii) Describe the purpose of the excavation in these areas:
SPIV
d. High -ground excavation in cubic yards.
2. DISPOSAL OF EXCAVATED MATERIAL ❑This section not applicable
a. Location of disposal area. b. Dimensions of disposal area.
uu is C� of �,n}�✓ awn
c. (i) Do you claim title to disposal area? d. (Q Will a disposal area be available for future maintenance?
❑Yes [oNo ❑NA []Yes ❑No (PNA
u If no, attach a letter granting (i) If yes, where?
( ") g g permission from the owner.
e. (Q Does the disposal area include any coastal wetlands/marsh
(CW), submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB),
or other wetlands (WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the
number of square feet affected.
❑CW ❑SAV ❑SB
OWL [%None
(ii) Describe the purpose of disposal in these areas:
P-Ait1G trpd a5 t,ndu an U4"nc\
f. (i) Does the disposal include any area in the water?
❑Yes VNo ❑NA
(ii) If yes, how much water area is affected?
J
:5241 018 -2808 .. 4- S&R -4RCOA 06

For 4 ( rcavation ;and Fill, P,1 a, 2 of )
3. SHORELINE STABILIZATION [This section not applicable
(lf development is a wood groin, use MP-4 — Structures)
a. Type of shoreline stabilization:
❑Bulkhead ❑ Riprap ❑Breakwater /Sill ❑Other.
c. Average distance waterward of NHW or NWL:
e. Type of stabilization material:
g. Number of square feet of fill to be placed below water level.
Bulkhead backfill Riprap
Breakwater /Sill Other
i. Source of fill material.
b. Length:
Width:
d. Maximum distance waterward of NHW or NWL:
f. (i) Has there been shoreline erosion during preceding 12
months?
❑Yes ❑No ❑NA
(ii) If yes, state amount of erosion and source of erosion amount
information.
h. Type of fill material.
4. OTHER FILL ACTIVITIES OThis section not applicable
(Excluding Shoreline Stabilization)
a. (i) Will fill material be brouqht to the site? ❑Yes ❑No ❑NA b. (i) Will fill material be placed in coastal wetlands/marsh (CW),
If yes,
(ii) Amount of material to be placed in the water
(iii) Dimensions of fill area
(iv) Purpose of fill
submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB), or
other wetlands (WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the
number of square feet affected.
❑CW ❑SAV ❑SB
OWL ❑None
(d) Describe the purpose of the fill in these areas.
5. GENERAL
a. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site and erosion b. What type of construction equipment will be used (e.g., dragline,
controlled? backhoe, or hydraulic dredge)?
X� C J. J
c. (i) Will navigational aids be required as a result of the project?
❑Yes �No ❑NA
(h) If yes, explain what type and how they will be implemented.
d. (i) Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment to project
site? ❑Yes Wo ❑NA
(ii) If yes, explain steps that will be taken to avoid or minimize
environmental impacts.
vaul
Date Applicant Name
2 -112
Project Name Applicant Signature
S IkOW1c(" 5760AfS CbfA O AAF*-
flex M061FIcknotJ
252-808-280.8 :m 1- 88£- 4RCOAS :. wt�ra >nt. c a:as�a9ava rsesr�r ss .e �t s i ed. `' r?ki 06

m
;o
(D
in CL
CL
Co a.
z (D
ig
10
=r
CO)
Lit
CA
0 1 co
�q OC
0 o
12.3 0
3 • jOw
0 ;r
3 r*
cn
?1 > = 0
@ 0
Z
0 !C
0
13
\1
11 0
cj
01
OJ
OV-o
Wo Wo-j f� 0,0_01
I 0r
CP�j Ci
V, I-Pol'o t- ol
Oil^
Jl 01
1% k

SURVEY REFERENCE.
• FINAL PLAT OF STANWICK SHORES
MAP BOOK 36 AT PAGE 128
SECTION 1, LOTS 1 -6, AND COMMON AREA
DEED BOOK 2279 AT PAGE 113
PENDER COUNTY REGISTRY
NOTES:
1. CORNERS ARE MARKED AS NOTED ON MAP.
2. ALL DISTANCES ARE HORIZONTAL FIELD MEASUREMENTS.
3. ALL ELECTRIC UNDER GROUND BOTH PRIMARY AND SERVICE DROPS.
4. 150 t LINEAL FEET OF PAVED STREET.
5. PAVEMENT WIDTH TO BE 19.6' TO MATCH EXISTING PAVEMENT
AT END OF BRIDGERS AVENUE.
6. HOUSE LOCATION FOR LOTS 1 -6, AND PIER DESIGN TO BE
FINALIZED PRIOR TO SUBMISSION OF APPLICATION FOR C.A. M.A. PERMIT,
7. IRON STAKES IN LINE WITH OR AT EACH CORNER,
8. NO KNOWN HORIZONTAL CONTROL WITHIN 2,000' OF PROJECT.
LEGEND:
WL
RIGHT —OF —WAY
WATER LINE (WL)
NAIL
Q PP (POWER POLE) DO °K
CENTER LINE
❑
R
ZA
PROPERTY LINE
--------------------- NON— SURVEYED LINE
— — — — — — — — EASEMENT LINE
EOP EDGE OF PAVEMENT
ASPHALT
MBL MINIMUM BUILDING LINE
SPOT r1EVk710ti/
EXISTING
DOCK
—11.2
NEt —7.9 EXISTING
Sol." DOCK
DOCK
-10.34
qq
MAP OF IMPROVEMENT LOCATION
OF
SECTION 1
STANWICK SHORES
TOWN OF TOPSAIL BEACH
TOPSAIL TOWNSHIP — PENDER COUNTY — NORTH CAROLINA
SCALE: 1" = 50' AUGUST 16, 2007
50 0 50 100 150
GRAPHIC SCALE — FEET
-2.7
-3.2'
POINT ON END \ 422
CORNER OF CONCRETE
OULK14EAD tih
,.1'
COa�� �J� 12 N 5 ,
N °
o
\��,ill�llI///
ROa A •
.,,`�`
tip.
�;' j a 13 i i +1'• Awe HOUSE
e DEVELOPED BY:
PAUL W. MAGNABOSCO
3308 TIPTON CT., WILMINGTON, NC 18409 (910) 799 -8748
DOCK
WATER LINE
Course Bearing Distance
L21 N 53'4514 E 32.65
L22 N 67'10'32" E 32.07
L23 N 70'38 26 E 41.42
L24 N 45'27'30 E 32.52
L25 N 87'41'38" E 1 25.30
L26 N 65'37'38*' E 1. 12.88
^�
POINT ®EDGE OF wATE —
L25 X20
N 48'27'3,1 Q\ . /
14.39' O
vr\ EIS /N, &4VS
'�k 0 �/
ado 9r'S�- `
4
N 24'33'4p
l S SS 17.68i
An y A
2 13 0�
000,
l °M
l
1 1
1 1
f�
/
t DIONY
•'/ '� F*Mr HOUSE
?0 T am ftmw
Qo'.�
(/ // 2 5 —
?o OF 6�
—M wfiER LINE L 'a•
P p ��
,.68 1 I1' o•'
' 10
Itikr
r,
T
J
046,SCHMIDT
D8 889 19
/ ISR
ii')
t�at._e•
1W,
jA4;V 2 .5 2008
I � _
Thompson & Jones
Surveying Company
P.O. Box 1471
111 East Fremont Street
Burgow, NC 28425
Ph; (910) 259 -2954
Fx: (910) 259 -9040
Em: jonessurveying®bellsouth.neil
File: STANWICK SHORES
Owg. No_ TOPSAIL B &M STANWICK
.1
EIS (EXISTING IRON STAKE)
ISS (IRON STAKE SET)
EIP (EXISTING IRON PIPE)
ECM (EXISTING CONCRETE MONUMENT)
/W
❑
R
ZA
PROPERTY LINE
--------------------- NON— SURVEYED LINE
— — — — — — — — EASEMENT LINE
EOP EDGE OF PAVEMENT
ASPHALT
MBL MINIMUM BUILDING LINE
SPOT r1EVk710ti/
EXISTING
DOCK
—11.2
NEt —7.9 EXISTING
Sol." DOCK
DOCK
-10.34
qq
MAP OF IMPROVEMENT LOCATION
OF
SECTION 1
STANWICK SHORES
TOWN OF TOPSAIL BEACH
TOPSAIL TOWNSHIP — PENDER COUNTY — NORTH CAROLINA
SCALE: 1" = 50' AUGUST 16, 2007
50 0 50 100 150
GRAPHIC SCALE — FEET
-2.7
-3.2'
POINT ON END \ 422
CORNER OF CONCRETE
OULK14EAD tih
,.1'
COa�� �J� 12 N 5 ,
N °
o
\��,ill�llI///
ROa A •
.,,`�`
tip.
�;' j a 13 i i +1'• Awe HOUSE
e DEVELOPED BY:
PAUL W. MAGNABOSCO
3308 TIPTON CT., WILMINGTON, NC 18409 (910) 799 -8748
DOCK
WATER LINE
Course Bearing Distance
L21 N 53'4514 E 32.65
L22 N 67'10'32" E 32.07
L23 N 70'38 26 E 41.42
L24 N 45'27'30 E 32.52
L25 N 87'41'38" E 1 25.30
L26 N 65'37'38*' E 1. 12.88
^�
POINT ®EDGE OF wATE —
L25 X20
N 48'27'3,1 Q\ . /
14.39' O
vr\ EIS /N, &4VS
'�k 0 �/
ado 9r'S�- `
4
N 24'33'4p
l S SS 17.68i
An y A
2 13 0�
000,
l °M
l
1 1
1 1
f�
/
t DIONY
•'/ '� F*Mr HOUSE
?0 T am ftmw
Qo'.�
(/ // 2 5 —
?o OF 6�
—M wfiER LINE L 'a•
P p ��
,.68 1 I1' o•'
' 10
Itikr
r,
T
J
046,SCHMIDT
D8 889 19
/ ISR
ii')
t�at._e•
1W,
jA4;V 2 .5 2008
I � _
Thompson & Jones
Surveying Company
P.O. Box 1471
111 East Fremont Street
Burgow, NC 28425
Ph; (910) 259 -2954
Fx: (910) 259 -9040
Em: jonessurveying®bellsouth.neil
File: STANWICK SHORES
Owg. No_ TOPSAIL B &M STANWICK
.1
POINT ®EDGE OF wATE —
L25 X20
N 48'27'3,1 Q\ . /
14.39' O
vr\ EIS /N, &4VS
'�k 0 �/
ado 9r'S�- `
4
N 24'33'4p
l S SS 17.68i
An y A
2 13 0�
000,
l °M
l
1 1
1 1
f�
/
t DIONY
•'/ '� F*Mr HOUSE
?0 T am ftmw
Qo'.�
(/ // 2 5 —
?o OF 6�
—M wfiER LINE L 'a•
P p ��
,.68 1 I1' o•'
' 10
Itikr
r,
T
J
046,SCHMIDT
D8 889 19
/ ISR
ii')
t�at._e•
1W,
jA4;V 2 .5 2008
I � _
Thompson & Jones
Surveying Company
P.O. Box 1471
111 East Fremont Street
Burgow, NC 28425
Ph; (910) 259 -2954
Fx: (910) 259 -9040
Em: jonessurveying®bellsouth.neil
File: STANWICK SHORES
Owg. No_ TOPSAIL B &M STANWICK
.1

x4,
x 4
X sso
CLOSURE LIMIT eoo x X x
X X
x . As x �4a xt sr
APPro Dept
X2m X x X-2,10 , taken at TWO (10
X X 30' BUFFER epfember 8,11:00
X'47, X,79 •�.4 :''ti `'7� •f!
"v
x X -2.1&
x
X
x
X
SHELLFISH XT x
SAMPLINOP&OTS X ar
X X-Is X XX t fA
es x X sr �
X X.0,
X-1.70 �•.
X-4
X X .00 • V . . �' : q'� Y
x x{ �+:. ~.�. `.g.0 •. ?. t -7.17
75 AEC LIMITS
X X ♦ ?' ♦ ti
X X
X •;•X•',' ::.•.• ..... :�. �•'• ?f``. ., .tom.: +r., -1.71
X 5 AEC LIMITS = .,,• HELLFISH
�.,• �:;; ` CLOSURE LIMIT
X-8.40
SAV LOCAnoNs
90m4
.....
EXISTING HISTORIC TOWER TO ;:
REMAIN
LEGEND
PROPOED DREDGING
r • t•
SPOIL DISPOSAL AREA
GRAPHIC SCALE
100 0 50 100 zoo
( IN FEET )
1 inch = 100 &
Scale is approximate.
:..... ` •• • -1.46
................ v i r• :.:.,
••,:::ii:•. ••�t jiA
_ :° t • • = Al
T
: ::•X
':t....:: a'...... {?4z:
0111 .
b
Note: Walton Engineering utilized a reproduction of Figure: Project:
a plan prepared for Queens Grant by Land
Management Group Inc that was obtained from 2
public file at NCDENR. Date: 9127112
)Q43
X•7.12
Queens Grant, Topsail Beach NC
CAMA Permit # 129 -10
Stanwick Shores I Title: Dredge Spoil Disposal Area
Scale: 1" =100' 1 Drawn by: DAT
SPOIL
r
SITE
VICINITY MAP (N.T.S)
WALTONENGINEERING
PO Box 895. Burgaw, NC 28425 [phone]

PIER CROSS — SECTION
CROSS SECTION A —A
Not to Scale
Bottom (Rails Not Shown)
Area to be
Removed
MLW by Dredge BO
mad
i�
r
Co Co a0 00
�t N -
NAVD 88 WATER DEPTH CROSS REFERENCE
68 ELEVATION
- -
-1.00
—1.20
01
-2.00
+0.8'
-3.00
+ 1.8'
,
-4.0eR-
+2.8'
-5.00
+3.8'
-6.00
+4.8'
Note: Contour Lines Below the MLW Line are 'Water Depth at Mean Low
Tide' and are Topographic Contour Lines Relative to NAVD88. Changed
per the Request by the DCM. Magenta contour lines are from an
updated survey of December 2011. Countour lines are NAVD88 /
Water Depth (Below Mean Low Water).
,_ i

Area of Proposed
Modification
i
Proposed fingers and dock end do not exceed the allowable amount
(as outlined in 15A NCAC 071-1_1205 (e)
527.9 Square Feet of shaded impact does not exceed the allowable
800 Square Foot Max or the 884 Square Feet as calculated from 1
the 110.5 Linear feet of Shoreline
Existing Pier Line Existing dock alignment is perpendicular to pier and
Approximate Edge from Aerial Photo proposed is 30' to the pier.
Of Federally
Maintained Channel
i
Minimum 37' Setback 90 Proposed Dredge Area = 2723.5 S.F.
From Federally 'r 1\ 0 to 2'deep MLW = 100.8 C.Y.
Maintained Channe� sawn C°nidor9 ae `` ' Average Dredge Depth = V
The dredge area cut will have a 45' taper along the sides
from the existing bottom
`(solid blue line) down to – 2' MLW, the depth limit of the
dredge area (dashed blue line)
/ r
j Riparian Corridor \—, • • of
1.27'
1.15' . ¢�" 'L .�? \ Q@
10.65' +! per/ "06 '� %�
` 2 �Existin pilings within Area of Proposed
\\ ,«r ca 1 , '� Modiaction to be removed (8 ea.)
�4 t6 0
ILI& 0ww 0ammon Nio s.oe �� ? �/ / Property of Gregory P.
& Donna L. Schmidt
DB 869 PG 19
177x / %' , i 5 100' Offset
g L cb /� 15 From MHW Line
/ . r Qto
0 0 5, 40 , \
Lower Limits of Coastal li •, ti� I( y �0� \ 10'
Vegetation /MLW x.• % �� j i ��
CAMA MHW Line 0
1 / �7 ` Y ' �. 17 yet
Upper Limits of oG f _ \ �� 10
Coastal Vegetation - t l`�y 5 /' t7 0 "'
– – 1 Re o \o `LO �/ ' \ \ 6 fro
R'DO�s 10 /� h
30' Setback \ \ ` 117 35
From MHW Line 5' �. \
AEC Line 9jsp \ \ '%• 1s 30
(75' Offset From MHW Line) 'r, �A 0�.., / MHW LINE
V J
100' Offset ° s17 t0 ,v�� Course Bearing Distance
From MHW Line L27 S 59:13:15:: W 16.06'
1z7 � L3 S 76 2831" W 19.38'
Property of Paul W. & \� L4 N 49.54'49" W 14.59'
Susan K. Ma Paul W. o L5 N 19.23'18 W 28.37'
g 0 L6 N 85'02'12" W 11.10'
L7 S 64.03'26" W 41.11'
i L8 S 44.25'36 W 21.23'
L9 S 19 50'39" E 26.98'
L 1 0 S 57.25'40" E 15.34'
L11 S 46'21'15" W 19.26'
L12 S 49.36'47" W 22.20'
L13 S 80'36'50" W 32.25'
LEGEND 404 LINE TABLE/
'0011 "e �i CAMA WETLANDS
Course Bearing Distance 6- rijPE R i Y LHN
Property Line 4Wt L1 S 55'39'58" W 19.90'
Lot Line - - -- fl se Bearing D
Io a"�'?' L2 S 74'34'37" W 7.45
L14 S 65'39'28" W 3742 L21 N 53145'14" E 32.6"
Building Setback – – – -- -- – S L15 S 68 11'30" W 32.47' L22 N 67 10'32" E 32.0
s 1687'9 L16 S 54'39'33" W 58.82' L23 N 70.38'26" E 41
��$ %
Septic Setback — — — — — — — J'l]/ L17 S 86.12'50" W 23.74' L24 N 45.27'3C" E
T — 1� L20 N 25 00'57" W 68.32' L25 N 87141'30" E
Silt Fence V L28 S 38' 10'00" E 23.93' L26 N 65'37'38" E
Boat Slip ���-1 td •� ' • • • i
(Wet Slip or Lift) Lam%' J� V0 �:4����s
0 25' 50' 100'
SAV