20210579 Ver 1_401 Application_20210419

Strickland, Bev
From: Goss, Stephanie
Sent: Monday, April 19, 2021 7:51 AM
To: Montalvo, Sheri A
Cc: Strickland, Bev
Subject: FW: [External] Fwd: Pine Reserve Apartments
Attachments: Wetland Exhibit - Pine Reserve.pdf; 47048-EX6.0 STREAM CROSSING PROFILE.pdf;
2017NWP29.pdf; Center Church Form_JD Request Signed.pdf; Center
Church_Upland_Datasheets_Atlantic_and_Gulf_Coastal_Plain_Fillable.pdf; Center
Church_Wetland_Datasheets_Atlantic_and_Gulf_Coastal_Plain_Fillable.pdf;
Center_Church Fig 2 - Wetlands.pdf; Center_Church Fig 2a - Wetlands_20210106.pdf;
Center_Church Fig 2b - Wetlands Impact_20210106.pdf; Center_Church Fig 4 -
Soils.pdf; Center_Church Fig 3 - Topo.pdf; Center_Church Fig 6 - Flood.pdf;
Center_Church Fig 5-NWI.pdf; Center_Church Flags off site with Topo.pdf; Grading
Prelim - Pine Reserve.pdf; ILF-Request-Fillable-Form-June2019.pdf; Parcel 1 info.pdf;
Parcel 2 info.pdf; Parcel 3 info.pdf; Pine Reserve Apartments DMS Acceptance
Letter.pdf; Signed Center Church_Agent Authorization Letter.pdf; Signed Center
Church_Pre-Construction Notification PCN_20201130 (1).pdf; SAW-2020-02152
signed NWP verification_PJD.pdf
Sheri,
Adam stated he submitted this application electronically, but I am not seeing it in BIMS. BIMS states it is still on hold.
Stephanie Z. Goss
Environmental Program Consultant
Division of Water Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
380o Barrett Drive
Raleigh, NC 27609
919-791-4256
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Adam Carter [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Friday, April 16, 2021 4:43 PM
To: Goss, Stephanie <[e-mail]>
Subject: [External] Fwd: Pine Reserve Apartments
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to
Report Spam.
Regards,
1

Adam Carter
Owner
Weiland Solutions, LLC
P.O. Box 244
Bunnlevel, NC 28323
[phone]
[e-mail]
www.WetlandNC.com
www.linkedin.com/in/adam-carter-wetland
Forwarded message
From: Adam Carter <[e-mail]>
Date: Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 11:39 AM
Subject: Fwd: Pine Reserve Apartments
To: Goss, Stephanie <[e-mail]>
This email below was sent months ago. I understand the process now with all the pre meeting
submissions. Please don't shoot me.
Regards,
Adam Carter
Owner
Wetland Solutions, LLC
P.O. Box 244
Bunnlevel, NC 28323
[phone]
[e-mail]

www.WedandNC.com
www.linkedin.com/in/adam-carter-wetland
Forwarded message
From: Adam Carter <[e-mail]>
Date: Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 12:10 PM
Subject: Pine Reserve Apartments
To: Goss, Stephanie <[e-mail]>
Hi Stephanie,
I hope all is well. Attached is the PJD and NW permit issued by James Lastinger with the Corps a couple of
weeks ago. I have attached the 404/401 packet request and done the online submissions as well. The project
consists of one road crossing .017ac wetland impact and 60ft of stream impact. Wew are mitigating through
NCDMS for credits. Let me know if you have any questions or need additional information. The sediment and
erosion control for this project is being submitted today Thank you for your time and consideration.
Regards,
Adam Carter
Owner
Weiland Solutions, LLC
P.O. Box 244
Bunnlevel, NC 28323
[phone]
[e-mail]
www.WetlandNC.com
www.linkedin.com/in/adam-carter-wetland
3

Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
la. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
❑ Section 10 Permit
X Section 404 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: NW29 or General Permit (GP) number:
lc. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes X No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification
the DWQ (check all that apply):
— Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
— Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
X 401 Water Quality Certification
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes X No
❑ Yes X No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
X Yes ❑ No
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes X No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes X No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project:
Center Church Rd
2b. County:
Lee
2c. Nearest municipality / town:
Sanford
2d. Subdivision name:
Pine Reserve Apartments
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
ML Consulting of Sanford
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
BK 01394 pg0822
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
ML Consulting of Sanford
3d. Street address:
20 Birkdale Way
3e. City, state, zip:
Pinehurst, NC 28374
3f. Telephone no.:
910 601 1217
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
X Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Samuel Adam Carter
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
Wetland Solutions, LLC
5c. Street address:
P.O. Box 244
5d. City, state, zip:
Bunnlevel, NC 28323
5e. Telephone no.:
910 890-2779
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 10

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
la. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
9631-34-9072-00, 9631-44-1034-00, 9631-44-0754-00
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 35.437756 Longitude: -79.221365
lc. Property size:
16.44 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Raccoon Creek
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C
2c. River basin:
Cape Fear
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The land use in the abutting tracts are commercial and residential and forested areas.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 1.91
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 870
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the project is to supply a rd crossing to high ground in order to develop and apartment complex.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The project will consist of building a road crossing with fill and 42in culvert install. A trackhoe bulldozer will be utilized con -construct and install the roa
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
X Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
X Preliminary Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Adam Carter
Agency/Consultant Company: Wetland Solutions,LLC
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Yes X No Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes X No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections
were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Streams — tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
X Wetlands
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f.
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1 P
Culvert
Headwater Wetland
Yes
Corps
0.17
W2 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W3 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W4 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W5 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W6 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
17
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1 P
Culvert
UT to Coons Creek
PER
DWQ
2
60
S2 -
Choose one
-
-
S3 -
Choose one
-
-
S4 -
Choose one
-
-
S5 -
Choose one
-
-
S6 -
Choose one
-
-
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
60
3i. Comments:
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01 -
Choose one
Choose
O2 -
Choose one
Choose
03 -
Choose one
Choose
04 -
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet)
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet)
B1 -
Yes/No
B2 -
Yes/No
B3 -
Yes/No
B4 -
Yes/No
B5 -
Yes/No
B6 -
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
6i. Comments:
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The wetlands were delineated; wetland data was process and the narrowest area of the wetland drain was located in oder to construct the Wetland/
Stream crossing to minimize and to avoid a larger impact.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
A silt fence with outlets will be constructed in order to manage all sedimentation during construction. Winter rye, celcer matting will be installed on
slopes and a maintenance management plan developed. These BMPs will help keep residual sedimentation from wetland and stream impacts before
& after road construction and culvert install.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
No
X Yes ❑
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ X Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
fee program
Mitigation
X Payment to in -lieu
❑ Permittee Responsible
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
X Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
60 linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose one
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
0 acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
0.34 acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments: Actual impact for wetland is .17 with 2/1 ratio making it .34acs
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ❑ No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
❑ Yes X No
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
X Yes ❑ No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
Wetponds will be developed inorder to manage surface hydrology.
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
City of Sanford
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
municipality
3b. Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Phase II
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
X Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes X No
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
4a. Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
(check all that apply):
❑Coastal counties
X HQW
❑ORW
❑Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes X No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
X Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes X No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
use of public (federal/state) land?
❑ Yes X No
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
❑ Yes X No
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
Comments:
❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
❑Yes X No
2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑Yes X No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
Yes X No
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Local sewer will be utilized for this project.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
habitat?
❑ Yes
X No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
impacts?
❑ Yes
X No
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Raleigh
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
Information for Planning and Consultation (https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/)
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes
X No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/resource/map/essential-fish-habitat-mapper
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
❑ Yes
X No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
http://www.hpo.ncdcr.gov/
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?
❑ Yes
X No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
NC Flood Risk Information System f(http://fris.nc.gov/fris/Home.aspx?ST=NC)
Samuel Adam Carter
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
c d-1 7, ILLe/ ` ea 2, 4A,,
11 30 2020
Date
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 10 of 10

DMS ILF Mitigation Request Statement of Compliance with §143-214.11 & 143-214.20
(link to G.S. 143-214.11)
Prior to accessing the Division of Mitigation Services (DMS), state law requires applicants to
demonstrate compliance with G.S. § 143-214.11 and 143-214.20. All requests MUST include this form
signed and dated by the permit applicant or an authorized agent.
Compliance Statement:
I have read and understand G.S. § 143-214.11 and 214.20 and have, to the best of my
knowledge, complied with the requirements. I understand that participation in the DMS is
voluntary and subject to approval by permitting agencies.
Please check all that apply:
Applicant is a Federal or State Government Entity or a unit of local government
meeting the requirements set forth in G.S. 143-214.11 and is not required to
purchase credits from a mitigation bank.
There are no listed mitigation banks with the credit type I need located in the
hydrologic unit where this impact will take place (link to DWR list)
Mitigation bank(s) in the hydrologic unit where the impacts will occur have been
contacted and credits are not currently available.
The DWR or the Corps of Engineers did not approve of the use of a mitigation
bank for the required compensatory mitigation for this project.
This is a renewal request and the permit application is under review. Bank
credits were not available at the time the application was submitted.
Enter date permit application was submitted for review:
Note: It is the applicant's responsibility to document any inquiries made to private mitigation
banks regarding credit availability.
SAC
initial here
I have read and understand the DMS refund policies (attached)
,-,,,,n.ad 4 d„,,,,., c?„,/_,A,
Signature of Applicant or Agent
11-30-2020
Date
Pine Reserve Apartments
Project Name
Samuel Adam Carter
Printed Name
Tramway, Lee County
Location
Clear Form

DIVISION OF MITIGATION SERVICES (DMS)
IN -LIEU FEE REQUEST FORM Revised 6/30/2019
Complete requested information, sign and date, email to kelly.williamstncdenr.gov . Attachments are acceptable for clarification
purposes (location map, address or lat long is required). Information submitted is subject to NC Public Records Law and may
be requested by third parties.
Save Form
CONTACT INFORMATION
1. Business/Company Name
2. Contact Person
APPLICANT'S AGENT
APPLICANT
Wetland Solutions, LLC
Riley & Walker Companies
Adam Carter
Braden Riley
3. Mailing address
P.O. Box 244
20 Birkdale Way
4. City, State, Zip
Bunnlevel, NC 28334
Pinehurst, NC 28374
5. Telephone Number
910 890 2779
910 601 1217
6. E-Mail Address
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
PROJECT INFORMATION
7. Project Name
Pine Reserve Apartments
8. Project Location (nearest town, city)
Tramway, Sanford
9. Lat-Long Coordinates or attach a map
35.437991 -79.221350
10. County
Lee
11. River Basin & 8-digit HUC (link to Map)
03030003
12. Project Type
nGovernment
pi Private
Project Type: other
13. Riparian Wetland Impact (ac.) (e.g., 0.13)
.34ac
14. Non -Riparian Wetland Impact (ac.)
15. Coastal Marsh Impact (ac.)
16. Stream Impact (ft.) (e.g. 1,234)
Warm
Cool
Cold
60ft
17. Riparian Buffer Impact (sq. ft.)
n/a basin/huc above in #11
Zone 1:
Zone 2:
18. Regulatory Agency Staff Contacts
USACE: James Lastinger
NCDW R:
Other:
Check (..) below if this request is for a:
I I
revision to a current acceptance
renewal of an expired acceptance
extension of unexpired acceptance
By signing below, the applicant is confirming they have
read and understand the DMS refund policy posted at
nceep.net and attached to this form.
Signature of Applicant or Authorized Agent:
�a.kn G:a.C'i
Date: 11/30/2020
Direct questions to Kelly Williams at 919-707-8915 or kelly.williams(c�ncdenr.gov or to the front desk at 919-707-8976

Refund Policy for Fees Paid to DMS In -Lieu Fee Programs (9/21/2009)
Purpose: The purpose of this policy is to make clear the circumstances and process under which a
permittee can obtain a refund while simultaneously balancing customer service and responsible
business practices. This policy applies to all refund requests made on or after the publication date of
this policy.
Policy Statement: The policy of DMS is to allow for refunds under certain conditions.
1. All refund requests must be made in writing to the DMS In -Lieu Fee Program Coordinator at
[e-mail].
2. All refund requests are subject to fund availability. DMS does not guarantee fund availability for
any request.
3. The request must either come from the entity that made the payment or from an authorized agent.
Third parties requesting refunds must provide written authorization from the entity that made the
payment specifying the name and address of the authorized refund recipient.
4. Refund requests related to unintended overpayments, typographical errors or incorrect invoices
should be brought the attention of the In -Lieu Fee Program Coordinator as soon as possible. Such
requests are typically approved without delay.
5. Payments made under an incremental payment arrangement are not eligible for refunds.
6. Refund requests made within nine months of payment to DMS will only be considered for requests
associated with projects that have been terminated or modified where the permittee's mitigation
requirements have been reduced. Such requests must be accompanied by written verification from the
permitting agency that the project has been canceled, the permits have been rescinded or have been
modified, or the mitigation requirements have been reduced.
7. Refund requests made more than nine months from the payment date will only be considered for
permits that were terminated or modified to not require any mitigation. Such requests must be
accompanied by written verification from the permitting agency that the project has been canceled, the
permits have been rescinded and/or mitigation is no longer required.
8. Refund requests not meeting the criteria specified above are not eligible for a refund.
9. Refund requests that meet the criteria above will be elevated to DMS Senior Management for
review. The following considerations apply to all refund requests:
a. availability of funds after consideration of all existing project and regulatory obligations
b. the date the payment was made
c. the likelihood DMS can use the mitigation procured using the payment to meet other
mitigation requirements
10. Once a refund has been approved, the refund recipient must provide a completed W-9 form to the
DMS In -Lieu fee Program Coordinator within two weeks in order to process the refund though the
State Controller's Office.
11. All decisions shall be final.

ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
TIM BAUMGARTNER
Director
Braden Riley
Riley and Walker Companies
20 Birkdale Way
Pinehurst, NC 28374
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
December 1, 2020
Expiration of Acceptance: 6/1/2021
Project: Pine Reserve Apartments County: Lee
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) is willing to
accept payment for compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced project as
indicated in the table below. Please note that this decision does not assure that participation in the DMS in -
lieu fee mitigation program will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts.
It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact permitting agencies to determine if payment to the DMS will
be approved. You must also comply with all other state, federal or local government permits, regulations or
authorizations associated with the proposed activity including G.S. § 143-214.11.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not
received a copy of the issued 404 Permit/401 Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will
expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send copies of the permits to DMS. Once DMS receives a copy
of the permit(s) an invoice will be issued based on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must
be made prior to conducting the authorized work. The amount of the in -lieu fee to be paid by an applicant is
calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed on the DMS website.
Based on the information supplied by you in your request to use the DMS, the impacts for which you are
requesting compensatory mitigation credit are summarized in the following table. The amount of mitigation
required and assigned to DMS for this impact is determined by permitting agencies and may exceed the
impact amounts shown below.
River Basin
Impact Location
(8-digit HUC)
Impact Type
Impact Quantity
Cape Fear
03030003
Riparian Wetland
0.34
Cape Fear
03030003
Warm Stream
60
Upon receipt of payment, DMS will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. The
mitigation will be performed in accordance with the In -Lieu Fee Program instrument dated July 28, 2010 and
15A NCAC 02B .0295 as applicable. Thank you for your interest in the DMS in -lieu fee mitigation program.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact [e-mail].
cc: Adam Carter, agent
Sincerely,
FOR James. B Stanfill
Asset Management Supervisor
NORTH CAROLINA f
Department of Environmental Quality /—
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Mitigation Services
217 W. Jones Street 11652 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1652
919.707.8976

OLUTIONS LL
Agent Authorization Letter
November 6, 2020
Owner Information
Owner Name : Braden Riley
Riley & Walker Companies
Mailing Address: 20 Birkdale Way
City, State, Zip: Pinehurst, NC 28374
Phone#: [phone]
Property Description
PIN: 9631-44-0754-00
Project: Pine Reserve Apartments
Address: 0 Jefferson Davis HWY
County: Lee
I, Braden Riley , as owner/agent of the above referenced
property, authorize the US Army Corps of Engineers and NCDWR to enter the subject property
for the purpose of a jurisdictional determination.
I also authorize Mr. Adam Carter of Wetland Solutions, LLC to act in my behalf as my agent in
processing applications for wetland certification and/or permits.
gtaidadi Age3
Signature
Managing Member
11/6/2020
Title Date
Wetland Solutions, LLC PO Box 244 Bunnlevel, NC 28323
[phone]
[e-mail]
www.WetlandNC.com

11/30/2020
ConnectGlS Feature Report
ecoNNE2-9g
Lee2
Printed November 30, 2020
See Below for Disclaimer
Parcels
Struts
Railroad
Lee County
Sanford City Limits
Broadway Town Limits
https://lee2.connectgis.com/DownloadFile.ashx?i=_ags_map626259295c1 a49fb88e99e770695a3ecx.htm&t=printid 1/2

11/30/2020
ConnectGlS Feature Report
PIN
9631-34-9072-00
PARID
963134907200
Book
1511
Subdivision
Legal 3
69/252, 394/434, 406/395
Mail Address
Mail Street
PO BOX 766
Mail State
NC
Out BLDG YRBLT
0
Dwelling DESCR
Appraised Total
240900
OBJECTID 1
28249
Acres
0.73748332
Appraised Land
240900
Page
39
Legal 1
TRACT 2
Owner
LAKETREE INC
Mail Suffix
MaiIADRSUF
Mail Zip
28390
Sale Date
9/10/1987 12:00:00 AM
Dwelling YRBLT
0
Out BLDG Area
0
TaxCard
http://taxaccess.leecountync.gov/PT/
Datalets/Datalet.aspx?
mode=&UseSearch=no&pin=963134
907200&j u r=000&taxyr=2021
Parcel Address
156 CENTER CHURCH RD
Appraised Building
0
Tax District
FTW
Legal 2
PLAT 2018/128
Owner2
Mail Street Dir
Mail City
SPRING LAKE
Out BLDG Description
Dwelling Style
Shape Length
827.695153223247
Dwelling SFLA
0
This site is prepared for the inventory of real property found within this jurisdiction and is compiled from recorded deeds, plats and other public records and data. Users
of this site are hereby notified that the aforementioned public primary information sources should be consulted for verification of the information contained on this site.
The County of Lee and Dude Solutions, Inc. assume no legal responsibility for the information contained on this site. Please be advised that you must contact the Lee
County Tax Office for accurate tax values. Please contact the Lee County Appraisal Department if any building information is incorrect. The map, layer, data and website
(collectively known as a€cethe layers€0) are for graphical and illustration purposes only. The Lee County Strategic Services Department (hereinafter a€cethe
Department6€0) provides the layer and the information contained within to the general public and has not customized the information for any specific or general
purpose. Such information was generated from data maintained by different sources and agencies and as such, some limitations may apply based upon restrictions
imposed by other sources or agencies supplying data to Lee County (hereinafter a€cethe Countya€0). While the Department strives to make the information on the GIS
website as timely, reliable and accurate as possible, neither the Department nor the County local governments make any claims, promises, or guarantees about the
accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the contents of the layer. Areas depicted are approximate and are not necessarily accurate to mapping, surveying or engineering
standards. The County expressly disclaims liability for errors and omissions in the contents of this site and layer. No warranty of any type, implied, expressed, statutory,
UCC or otherwise, including, but not limited to, the warranties of non -infringement of third party rights, title, accuracy of data, merchantability, or fitness for a particular
purpose, is given with respect to the substantive content of this layer or its use in private or commercial financial transactions. The fact of distribution of the layer does
not constitute any warranty, express, implied or otherwise. The user assumes the entire risk related to the use of this data. If the user intends to make any legal or
financial decision based on this data, the user should independently verify the accuracy of the same. The Strategic Services Department and the Lee County local
governments are providing this data "as is.6€0 In no event will any of the foregoing local governments or their officers and employees be liable to you or to any third
party for any direct, indirect, incidental, consequential, special or exemplary damages or lost profit resulting from any use or misuse of this data. Unless otherwise noted
on an individual document, files, documents, and information contained in this layer may be copied and distributed for non-commercial use, provided they are copied
and distributed without alteration.
https://lee2.connectgis.com/DownloadFile.ashx?i=_ags_map626259295c1 a49fb88e99e770695a3ecx.htm&t=printid 2/2

11/30/2020
ConnectGlS Feature Report
ecoNNE2-9g
Lee2
Printed November 30, 2020
See Below for Disclaimer
Parcels
Struts
Railroad
Lee County
Sanford City Limits
',roadway Town Limits
https://lee2.connectgis.com/Download File.ashx?i=_ags_ma pf654d ec814744817ad69fc3a8c2f7098x. htm&t=pri ntid 1/2

11/30/2020
ConnectGlS Feature Report
PIN
9631-44-1034-00
PARID
963144103400
Book
1511
Subdivision
Legal 3
37/570, 68/262, 120/721
Mail Address
Mail Street
PO BOX 766
Mail State
NC
Out BLDG YRBLT
0
Dwelling DESCR
Appraised Total
365900
OBJECTID 1
28250
Acres
1.19162056
Appraised Land
365900
Page
39
Legal 1
TRACT 1
Owner
LAKETREE INC
Mail Suffix
MaiIADRSUF
Mail Zip
28390
Sale Date
11/8/1971 12:00:00 AM
Dwelling YRBLT
0
Out BLDG Area
0
TaxCard
http://taxaccess.leecountync.gov/PT/
Datalets/Datalet.aspx?
mode=&UseSearch=no&pin=963144
103400&j u r=000&taxyr=2021
Parcel Address
124 CENTER CHURCH RD
Appraised Building
0
Tax District
FTW
Legal 2
PLAT 2018/128
Owner2
Mail Street Dir
Mail City
SPRING LAKE
Out BLDG Description
Dwelling Style
Shape Length
930.613019008076
Dwelling SFLA
0
This site is prepared for the inventory of real property found within this jurisdiction and is compiled from recorded deeds, plats and other public records and data. Users
of this site are hereby notified that the aforementioned public primary information sources should be consulted for verification of the information contained on this site.
The County of Lee and Dude Solutions, Inc. assume no legal responsibility for the information contained on this site. Please be advised that you must contact the Lee
County Tax Office for accurate tax values. Please contact the Lee County Appraisal Department if any building information is incorrect. The map, layer, data and website
(collectively known as a€cethe layers€0) are for graphical and illustration purposes only. The Lee County Strategic Services Department (hereinafter a€cethe
Department6€0) provides the layer and the information contained within to the general public and has not customized the information for any specific or general
purpose. Such information was generated from data maintained by different sources and agencies and as such, some limitations may apply based upon restrictions
imposed by other sources or agencies supplying data to Lee County (hereinafter a€cethe Countya€0). While the Department strives to make the information on the GIS
website as timely, reliable and accurate as possible, neither the Department nor the County local governments make any claims, promises, or guarantees about the
accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the contents of the layer. Areas depicted are approximate and are not necessarily accurate to mapping, surveying or engineering
standards. The County expressly disclaims liability for errors and omissions in the contents of this site and layer. No warranty of any type, implied, expressed, statutory,
UCC or otherwise, including, but not limited to, the warranties of non -infringement of third party rights, title, accuracy of data, merchantability, or fitness for a particular
purpose, is given with respect to the substantive content of this layer or its use in private or commercial financial transactions. The fact of distribution of the layer does
not constitute any warranty, express, implied or otherwise. The user assumes the entire risk related to the use of this data. If the user intends to make any legal or
financial decision based on this data, the user should independently verify the accuracy of the same. The Strategic Services Department and the Lee County local
governments are providing this data "as is.6€0 In no event will any of the foregoing local governments or their officers and employees be liable to you or to any third
party for any direct, indirect, incidental, consequential, special or exemplary damages or lost profit resulting from any use or misuse of this data. Unless otherwise noted
on an individual document, files, documents, and information contained in this layer may be copied and distributed for non-commercial use, provided they are copied
and distributed without alteration.
https://lee2.connectgis.com/DownloadFile.ashx?i=_ags_mapf654dec814744817ad69fc3a8c2f7098x.htm&t=printid 2/2

11/30/2020
ConnectGlS Feature Report
ecoNNE2-9g
Lee2
Printed November 30, 2020
See Below for Disclaimer
Parcels
Streets
Railroad
Lee County
Sanford City Limits
Broadway Town Limits
https://lee2.connectgis.com/Download File.ashx?i=_ags_ma p24a0974fa41 d44ada27f39c95edbb732x.htm&t=printid 1/2

11/30/2020
ConnectGlS Feature Report
PIN
9631-44-0754-00
PARID
963144075400
Book
1394
Subdivision
Legal 3
1272/574, 1272/583, 1272/586,
1461/673
Mail Street Dir
Mail City
SANFORD
Out BLDG Description
Acres Parcel Address
14.50823666 0 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWY
Appraised Land Appraised Building
794200 0
Page Tax District
822 CSF
Legal 1 Legal 2
TRACT 4 PC 8/93C
Owner Owner2
ML CONSULTING OF SANFORD LLC
Mail Address Mail Suffix
Mail Street
PO BOX 487
Mail State
NC
Out BLDG YRBLT
0
Dwelling Style Dwelling DESCR
Shape Length
3361.50346208612
Dwelling SFLA
0
Appraised Total
794200
OBJECTID 1
19759
MaiIADRSUF
Mail Zip
27331
Sale Date
7/31/1996 12:00:00 AM
Dwelling YRBLT
0
Out BLDG Area
0
TaxCard
http://taxaccess.leecou ntync.gov/PT/
Datalets/Datalet.aspx?
mode=&UseSearch=no&pin =963144
075400&jur=000&taxyr= 2021
This site is prepared for the inventory of real property found within this jurisdiction and is compiled from recorded deeds, plats and other public records and data. Users
of this site are hereby notified that the aforementioned public primary information sources should be consulted for verification of the information contained on this site.
The County of Lee and Dude Solutions, Inc. assume no legal responsibility for the information contained on this site. Please be advised that you must contact the Lee
County Tax Office for accurate tax values. Please contact the Lee County Appraisal Department if any building information is incorrect. The map, layer, data and website
(collectively known as a€cethe layers€0) are for graphical and illustration purposes only. The Lee County Strategic Services Department (hereinafter a€cethe
Department6€0) provides the layer and the information contained within to the general public and has not customized the information for any specific or general
purpose. Such information was generated from data maintained by different sources and agencies and as such, some limitations may apply based upon restrictions
imposed by other sources or agencies supplying data to Lee County (hereinafter a€cethe Countya€0). While the Department strives to make the information on the GIS
website as timely, reliable and accurate as possible, neither the Department nor the County local governments make any claims, promises, or guarantees about the
accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the contents of the layer. Areas depicted are approximate and are not necessarily accurate to mapping, surveying or engineering
standards. The County expressly disclaims liability for errors and omissions in the contents of this site and layer. No warranty of any type, implied, expressed, statutory,
UCC or otherwise, including, but not limited to, the warranties of non -infringement of third party rights, title, accuracy of data, merchantability, or fitness for a particular
purpose, is given with respect to the substantive content of this layer or its use in private or commercial financial transactions. The fact of distribution of the layer does
not constitute any warranty, express, implied or otherwise. The user assumes the entire risk related to the use of this data. If the user intends to make any legal or
financial decision based on this data, the user should independently verify the accuracy of the same. The Strategic Services Department and the Lee County local
governments are providing this data "as is.6€0 In no event will any of the foregoing local governments or their officers and employees be liable to you or to any third
party for any direct, indirect, incidental, consequential, special or exemplary damages or lost profit resulting from any use or misuse of this data. Unless otherwise noted
on an individual document, files, documents, and information contained in this layer may be copied and distributed for non-commercial use, provided they are copied
and distributed without alteration.
https://lee2.connectgis.com/DownloadFile.ashx?i=_ags_map24a0974fa41 d44ada27f39c95edbb732x.htm&t=printid 2/2

Preliminary Sec. 404 Wetlands — 1.91 acres
' 1SO UTIONS LLO
P.O. Box 244
Bunnlevel, NC 28323
Project Name: Riley & Walker Development, LLC
Location: 124 Center Church Rd, Sanford, NC
Property ID: 963144103400, 963134907200, 963144075400
0 100 200 300 400 500 Feet
I I I I I
Figure: 2
1 inch = 200 feet
23 Nov 2019

O Stream Centerline Pts
Stream Type
Intermittent — 110 ft
i."\,f Perennial — 1.156 ft
Center_Church_Parcels
Delineation Flags
O A1-A49
• B15-B52
�-..Co Preliminary Sec. 404 Wetlands — 1.91
acres
SOLUTIONS LLO
P.O. Box 244
Bunnlevel, NC 28323
Project Name: Riley & Walker Development, LLC
Location: 124 Center Church Rd, Sanford, NC
Property ID: 963144103400, 963134907200, 963144075400
Wetland Delineation Map; Aerial: Maxar 11/21/2018
Figure: 2a
1 inch = 150 feet
6 Jan 2021

O Stream Centerline Pts
Stream Type
Intermittent - 110 ft
i."\,f Perennial - 1,156 ft
Center_Church_Parcels
Delineation Flags
O A1-A49
• B15-B52
- Preliminary Sec. 404 Wetlands - 1.91 acres
18O' UTIONB LLC
P.O. Box 244
Bunnlevel, NC 28323
EXISTING
A! AREA
s15
0
100
200
300
400
V JIJJ, /iCI WIJ Ra PJp Il7IVp duIW UIIC' I IPJCI l4UIIIIIIGIIIUy
Project Name: Riley & Walker Development, LLC
Location: 124 Center Church Rd, Sanford, NC
Property ID: 963144103400, 963134907200, 963144075400
Wetland Delineation Map w/Georeferenced Site Plan Impact
500 Feet
Figure: 2b
1 inch = 100 feet
6 Jan 2021

' G11144*
0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 Feet T
•
• •
. ••
r
r-'
/i-_�l
771
Center_Church_Parcels
Copyright:© 2013.National Geographic Society-i)cGbed
18C' UTICNB LLC
P.O. Box 244
Bunnlevel, NC 28323
Project Name: Riley & Walker Development, LLC
Location: 124 Center Church Rd, Sanford, NC
Property ID: 963144103400, 963134907200, 963144075400
USGS 7.5-Minute Topographic Map; Sanford Quad
Figure: 3
1 inch = 1,000 feet
23 Nov 2019

AE)
X
-3710962200
-u;
AE
x
r
X
S-AE.�
3710962100
x
x 3710962000
•
•
x
3710963200 3710964
200
x ��1110963100
0 1,000 2,000 3,000
I I I I
4,000
5,000 Feet
3710963000
ouGi Esri, Digital@
USDA. USGS,Arero@RID
3710964100
x
Center_Church_Parcels
C FIRM Panel
Flood Zone
AE (100-Year)
1 X (Low Risk)
er Community
_SO' UTIONS LLC
P.O. Box 244
Bunnlevel, NC 28323
Project Name: Riley & Walker Development, LLC
Location: 124 Center Church Rd, Sanford, NC
Property ID: 963144103400, 963134907200, 963144075400
NC Flood Risk Information System
Figure: 6
1 inch = 1,500 feet
23 Nov 2019

Center_Church_Parcels
Wetland Type (Cowardin)
Freshwater Emergent Wetland
Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland
Freshwater Pond
18O' UTIONB LLC
P.O. Box 244
Bunnlevel, NC 28323
Project Name: Riley & Walker Development, LLC
Location: 124 Center Church Rd, Sanford, NC
Property ID: 963144103400, 963134907200, 963144075400
USFWS National Wetland Inventory (May 2019)
Figure: 5
1 inch = 500 feet
23 Nov 2019

' 1SO UTIONS LLO
P.O. Box 244
Bunnlevel, NC 28323
bjb4•b3 b2 1
•
•a47 b17
• •
a46 b18
a4s+a45 •
a44 b19
�a43 • b20
a42 •%20
'41 b21
• •
a40 b22
a39 •
• b23
a38 •
• b24
a37 •
• a36 eb25
� a35 b26
•
a34 •a33b7 •b28
• • b29
• i3.b3yb32
•a32
a31 b%b35�3:b7• ,38 �9b40
• a30 a16 b4T
�a29 ate• •ay5 a11a12 �42b43
• a1R • • •
••
a28 •a19 a10 •a9 44
• a27 lt1 ta7 b4 45
• a26 a22 •a5 b4, ,48
24 5 •a4
• a23 •a33
• Center_Church_Flags
Project Name: Center Church
Location: Sanford, NC
Property ID:
0 100 200 300 400 500 Feet
I I I I I
lcS7ii o,NaUonai Geographic
N
Figure: 2
1 inch = 182.09 feet
23 Nov 2019

N x
_ _ _ _ _ ,
--472-\
,_
- i_
,
, /
\
. /.i (Th/rTh
0
n / /
1, C /
L/ /
* / L
THIS DRAWING PREPARED AT THE
RALEIGH OFFICE
5410 Trinity Road, Suite 102 I Raleigh, NC 27607
TEL [phone] FAX [phone] www.timmons.com
REVISION DESCRIPTION
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.
470
IC
W
\ \/
`
V/
\
\A
AI'
l
I
\
W
/
\I/
/
VAC
W
I
W
\/
�/
WETLAND
V /
*
EXISTING
V
�/
V
\I
V
\/
�/
V (
CI
AREA
V
��\
^
V/ ^p�
o,
0.17 AC OF
WETLAND
DISTURBANCE
W ♦°
/�
��
t
/ \�1�
7
\
\ \
\ \V
/
`
I
_ -
V
- -
-/-'
V
- -
\',
V
\I/
W ��
\`
\v
I
W
\I/
I ,
-
I
`
-
;
W \
\
I //
„
v\
'1'
I
W
c
4
\\
I
DATE
10/29/2020
DRAWN BY
TIMMONS GROUP :':'•.
DESIGNED BY
CHECKED 8Y
SCALE
AS SHOWN
PINE RESERVE APARTMENTS
SANFORD, LEE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
WETLAND DISTURBANCE EXHIBIT
y_Ali
_ 472---
\
\
_/
-
V
^h
a•
•
a I�
'
1
�'
V
V
/ /
/
/ �\
/ \ — _
(k \ \I/
?
/ /
/ \
/
/ \ \I
\ _\
/
I
•
•
/ \
_ 476---- - /
' • a I / \
•
I —
a ° ° I
a I SCALE
$ \ /
M
o
z
1 "=30'
JOB NO.
47048
. Q� \ i ° /
/ \ /
Aa
-- _ 4/6 0 30' 60'
SHEET ND.

� _ 1
1
1
/
/
/
/
/
\
\
/
/
/
/
/
/
N.
N.
\
N.
\
\
\
—1-
1
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
- •••••\l,
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
Vi \l, \!r
1 \I' \ /
\
\
\
GND
\l/\\14--
\\i/ \-1>\
\fr 11Sii\fr\fr \fr\ W\i/ET\v/LAIN\i/DA.:IE:A\fr
GND
CLO▪ MI
/2
GND
•
mmrmon
GND
•
cgs
PA▪ D
ILO
. grow
/
/
/
cni
/
/
/ /
/ /
/ / / ,
/ ,
,,
be, ,
/
/
/
/ / / /
/
/
/
/
/
\ / \
\ /
/
/
zz

S:\331\47048-Pine_Reserve_Apts\DWG\Sheet\Exhibit\47048-EX4.0-WETL-PROF.dwg I Plotted on 1/4/2021 2:57 PM I by Alex May
\
KNOW WHAT'S BELOW.
CALL 811 BEFORE YOU DIG.
485
480
475
470
465
460
o
•
FINISHED
GRADE
O
M
O
0.,..---8
inch PVC
EW300
TOP 470
INV IN 4(
J
69.84
JT 46
EXISTING
GRADE
—
/
301-300
105.00' OF
36" RCP
@ 0.10%
—8
inch PVC
r
(0
c
470.74
468.6
co
co,—
r- m-cc;
co
co
475.57
466.6
10+00 10+50 11+00
\ co
INVERT 465.90'
(BURIED 20%)
\, GROUND ELEV 466.46
— 467 — — 46 ` 10+00
EW300
\I
PROFILE VIEW - STREAM CROSSING
\l/
•._ 1
//
/
475 / / U) 37/
c-v
—� o� -o
-n 73 0 op_ -\
/ mrnzcy
rn
485
480
475
470
465
460
11+50
/-
470 /
\ I
INVERT 466.00'
(BURIED 20%)
GROUND ELEV 466.56,
PLAN VIEW - STREAM CROSSING
3-
0
0 30
PROFILE SCALE
\�
\\
ALL CONSTRUCTION TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL CITY OF SANFORD,
NCDEQ AND NCDOT STANDARDS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND DETAILS
0
M
co
0
Z
SCALE 1 "=30'
30'
60'
E
0
U
O �
O 0
n E
rV
U .E
O
0'
X
ri
>-•
•
LL VD
I—VD
O •
Lr1 0'
J
W
1-
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.
• •
•
•
•
•
•
0.
0
Z
0
REVISION DESCRIPTION
w
0
J
DATE
01/04/2021
DRAWN BY
331
DESIGNED BY
331
CHECKED BY
J. CHANDLER
SCALE
AS SHOWN
SANFORD - LEE COUNTY - NORTH CAROLINA
LIJ
J
11
LL
0
CL
STREAM CROSSING
JOB NO.
47048
SHEET NO.
EX6.0
0
>
N
U
0
w
m
3
0
0_
a
>
0
0
0
ID
0
0
m
C6
(6
0
0
3
0
8
� 0
2 O
2
2, 0
o g
T �_
U
a=
co
00
3
ZN
0
2 Q
g 0x
O w
• o
a• 3
0=
7) c6
U
2,
• 0
N U
C L• O
E 0
0 03
a • 0)
0
m • 0
N o_
� • U
-02
ON
� �
• a
C
m 0
aw
� .
L

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site. Center Church Rd
Applicant/owner: Riley & Walker Companies
Investigator(s): Adam Carter
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Hillslope
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) LRRP
City/County: Lee
Sampling Date: 11/10/2020
State: NC _ Sampling Point: A7
Section, Township, Range: Sanford
Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave
Lat: 35.437423 Long: -79.221252
Slope (%): 4%
Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Ch Chewacla silt loam ,0 to 2 percert slopes, frequently flooded NW] classification: Upland Forest
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ Na (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Soil or Hydrology J significantly disturbed' Are "Normal Circumstances' present? Yes
Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation
Are Vegetation
No
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transacts, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland?
Yes I No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
naurface Water (Al )
[]High Water Table (A2)
[]Saturation (A3)
[]Water Marks (B1)
[]Sediment Deposits (B2)
[]Drift Deposits (B3)
[]Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
[] Iron Deposits (B5)
[] Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
[]Aquatic Fauna (B13)
[]Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
[]Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
[]Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living
[]Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
[] Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
[] Thin Muck Surface (C7)
[]Other (Explain in Remarks)
Roots (C3)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
n Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
[]Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
[]Drainage Patterns (B10)
[]Moss Trim Lines (B16)
[]Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
[]Crayfish Burrows (C8)
[]Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
[]Geomorphic Position (D2)
[]Shallow Aquitard (D3)
[]FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes n No I=1 Depth (inches):
�I
Water Table Present? Yes
� No I I Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes [1 No I —I Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: A7
Absdute Dominant Indicator
kee Stratum (Plrf sire 30ft x 30ft % Cover _Specie2 Status
1. -
2
3
4. -
5. -
6. -
0 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 0 20% of total cover: 0
.Saolina Stratum (Plot size: 30ft x 30ft
1.
2. -
3
4.
5. -
6.-
50% of total cover: 0
Shrub Stratiim (Plot size: 30ft x 30ft
1 Chinese Privet (Ligustrum sinese)
2
3.-
4-
5.-
0 — Total Cover
20% of total cover: 0
40% Yes FAC
6.-
40 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20 20% of total cover: 8
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30ft x 30ft
1. -
2. -
10. -
0 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 0 20% of total cover: 0
Woody. Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30ft x 30ft
1. Pueraria montana
2. Grape (Vitis spp.)
3 Cat Greenbrier (Smilax glauca)
58% Yes Puerar
1 % No FACW
1% No FAC
4.-
5.-
60 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 30 20% of total cover 12
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 2 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 100 (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of-
OBL species x 1 = 0
FACW species x 2 = 0
FAC species x 3 = 0
FACU species x 4 = 0
UPL species x 5 = 0
Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 (B)
Prevalence Index
B/A= NaN
jdrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
✓ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine — All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?
Yes
No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Regien — Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: A7
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
(inches) Color (moist)
Matrix
Redox Features
0/0 Color (moist) 0/0
0-3 10YR 5/3 100
3-13 10YR 5/4 100
13-214 10YR 6/4 100
Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
SiL
SiL
SCL
Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (A1) ❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) El cm Muck (A9) (LRR 0)
Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) []2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR 0) Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
RHydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5) E Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑ Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) ❑ Marl (F10) (LRR U)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) ❑ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
I I Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR 0, P, T)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) ❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR 0, S) ❑ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
0 Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
H
[] Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
(MLRA 153B)
n Red Parent Material (TF2)
n Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
n Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes
No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site. Center Church Rd
Applicant/owner: Riley & Walker Companies
Investigator(s): Adam Carter
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Hilisope
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) LRRP
City/County: Lee
Sampling Date: 11/10/2020
State: NC _ Sampling Point: A7
Section, Township, Range: Sanford
Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave
Lat: 35.437756 Long: -79.221365
Soil Map Unit Name: Gh B—Gilead loamy sand, 2 to 8 percent slopes
Slope (%): 3%
Datum: NAD 83
NW] classification: Headwater Wetland
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Soil or Hydrology J significantly disturbed' Are "Normal Circumstances' present? Yes
Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation
Are Vegetation
No
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transacts, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland?
Yes
No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
nSurface Water (Al)
nHigh Water Table (A2)
[]Saturation (A3)
[]Water Marks (B1)
[]Sediment Deposits (B2)
[]Llnft Deposits (B3)
[]Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
[] Iron Deposits (B5)
[] Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
nAquatic Fauna (B13)
[]Mad Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
[]Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
nOxidized Rhizospheres along Living
[]Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
[] Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
[] Thin Muck Surface (C7)
[]Other (Explain in Remarks)
Roots (C3)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
n Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
nSparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
[]Drainage Patterns (B10)
nMass Trim Lines (B16)
[]Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
[]Crayfish Burrows (C8)
[]Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
[]Geomorphic Position (D2)
[]Shallow Aquitard (D3)
[]FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes D No I=1 Depth (inches):
�I
Water Table Present? Yes
� No I I Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes D No I —I Depth (inches): 16incheS
(includes capillary fringe)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No =
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: A7
aee Stratum (Plrf si,e• 30ft x 30ft
Absdute Dominant Indicator
% Cover _Specie 2 Status
1 Tulip Poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera) 60% Yes FACU/I
2
3. -
4
5
6. -
60 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 30 20% of total cover: 12
.Saolina Stratum (Plot size: 30ft X 30ft
1 Tulip Poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera) 20 % Yes FACU/F
2 Red Maple (Acer rubrum) FAC/FF
3.
4.
5. -
6.-
50% of total cover: 10
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30ft x 30ft
1 Chinese Privet (Ligustrum sinese)
2
3.-
4-
5.-
6.-
1 = Total Cover
50% of total cover 7 5 20% of total cover: 3
�0 — Total Cover
20% of total cover: 4
15% Yes FAC
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30ft x 30ft
1 Sensitive Fern (Onoclea sensibilis) 2% Yes FACW
2. Barnyard grass (Echinochloa crusgalli) 2% Yes FACW
3. _ Carex, Sedge (Carex spp.) 2% Yes FAC-0
4.. Ebony spleenwort (Asplenium platyneuron) 2% Yes FACU
5. -
7. -
8. -
10. -
8 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 4 20% of total cover: 1.6
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30ft x 30ft
1. Grape (Vitis spp.) 2% Yes FACW.
2. Poison Ivy (Toxicodendron radicans) 2°/0 Yes FAC
3 Laurel -leaved Greenbrier, Bamboo Vine (Smilax lauirfolia) 1 % No FACW
4 Honey suckle (Lonicera japonica) 2% Yes FACU
5.-
7 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 3.5 20% of total cover 1.4
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 10 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 10 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 100 (%VB)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of-
OBL species x 1 = 0
FACW species x 2 = 0
FAC species x 3 = 0
FACU species x 4 = 0
UPL species x 5 = 0
Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 (B)
Prevalence Index
B/A= NaN
jdrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
✓ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine — All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?
Yes
No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: A7
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) 0/0
0-10 10YR 3/2 30% 10YR 4/1 70%
10-24 10YR 4/1 90% 10YR 3/2
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduc
Type' Loc2
C M
10% C M
ed Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Texture Remarks
LS
LS
Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
Histosol (A1) ❑
Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑
Black Histic (A3) ❑
HHydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5) ❑
❑ Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) ❑
❑ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) ❑
❑ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) ❑
❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) ❑
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) ❑
I I Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) ❑
Mucky Mineral (Si) (LRR 0, S) ❑
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑
Sandy Redox (S5) ❑
Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑
!Sandy
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
unless otherwise noted.)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR 0)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR 0, P, T)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
M1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR 0)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
nAnomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
(MLRA 153B)
HRed Parent Material (TF2)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
n Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes
No
Remarks. Data point is abutting wetlands to stream. Layered sedimentation that has slowly converted to hydric soils,
but is becoming relic because of incised stream not supplying hydrolgy to abutting wetlands consistently.
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0