NC0020184_Wasteload Allocation_19840106

NPDES DOCUMENT SCANNING COVER SHEET
NPDES Permit:
NC0020184
Gastonia — Long Creek WWTP
Document Type:
Permit Issuance
Wasteload Allocation
Authorization to Construct (AtC)
Permit Modification
Speculative Limits
201 Facilities Plan
Instream Assessment (67B)
Environmental Assessment (EA)
Permit
History
Document Date:
January 6, 1984
This dacumeat is printed on reuse paper - igaare any
cc• heat on the irelinerse side

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
January 6, 1984
MEMORANDUM
TO: Forrest Westall
Dick Peace, Mooresville Regional Office
FROM:
THROUGH: Randy Williams
Steve Tedder
SUBJECT:
Randy Dodd C b
WLA for Gastonia Long Creek WWTP
RECEIVED
.IN9 1984
WATER UAi.ITY SECTION
O?E 1.T1ONS 3RANCr-;
The Mooresville Regional Office has requested a WLA for several
metals from Technical Services for the Gastonia Long Creek WWTP. Based
on information provided by the region, proposed standards for zinc, copper,
and aluminum, in Class "C" waters, a design flow of 8 mgd, and a 30Q2 of
15 cfs, the effluents limits would be:
WLA (ug/1) Standard (ug/1)
Aluminum 130 50 (proposed)
Chromium (total) 250 100
Copper 40 15 (proposed)
Nickel 250 100
Zinc 130 50 (proposed)
Monitoring information from the ambient station approximately six
miles upstream of the discharge indicated that concentrations of these
metals are generally below detection limits in the water column. Back-
ground concentrations may be elevated below this station because of several
discharges in the basin and urban runoff from Gastonia and Bessemer City.
I have assumed zero background concentrations in developing these limits.
A bioassay screening test indicated no acute toxicity.
An alternative course of action (to placing effluent limits on
Gastonia) is to attach a reopener clause in the permit to establish
effluent limitations if the need arises. This clause could pertain to
all of the above metals, or just to the metals with proposed standards;

Forrest Westall
Dick Peace
January 6, 1984
- page two -
limits could be set for nickel and chromium based on existing standards.
Since these metals have been detected in the discharge, it is recommended
that Gastonia be required to monitor these metals.
I have sent out an approval form with these limits. Please advise
if thi course of action is inappropriate. In particular, please advise
as to the implications of setting effluent limits based on proposed
standards.
RD:cs
cc: Rex Gleason

-
zz
10-4— ly�
z. Z ( ) .
12/1 ,4-83
.0 .thA --tt) e eewta
(
' -Fe,*
C.;-:A&F 14A4s-t,e- 4‘34:C:c 0.4 ,ka-rNAJLZE 1
(/ 4 /1 G• .ram J _ n�%►� -q�
A L L D Q £, a -/m ,�, -44
1-;19 1,171
--ea
aXti, ,
J.
‘01L.1t1--i4e 2;:t7A -A, ea m/A Ve- Owl
V• `.17‘;- ti
644244104 c(pi&, s— 0.)-4,6„
JAiJU'
do - eA �.ue 44L'
4-1>
&LeWv�- 2w�itebAge?,4,0
L.Ne�,� lculx. 5%.�dv: �3 9d
rail a /�e7/)
J"
-41
nu. sue-,
r6/4'
d'1 .:i-A CQe3.O+l- "' 45-i

N
w 39 63___
5 II- 3t.S
—.4
-,als1f5s
•
1z 83
c
5.1.E-�a
6-h (.12. PCs
42-1144 6 0
eo-tb
„.eD
L
\! L 3 5
6 G?
25oc.
. 36
s
S", v So .iD —
go
•
tic
C No p
26
5.7
.z8
V r 3- r P-PS
BoD

1\/Q. kst-v-e (.440J L410,4
t•IPe-
S •
i 0
E____] eZ to L ° .--A .s-t-e,.....0 (.,) 1_, A
-
Tt,-( P
i
tvii t 5 (L1.-P
hi .1.
-3133 6G1 ..Css so
1 61 , L. cO / 26
r
: a ,r
A
I 2. •5-- .1 e' 6 "2- 5 2
1 i
1 ,
-V-41e--
‘ 3.
,....
1
.
• 0;
I'.-..,
I 5 1 6 0 22
1
' .
1
C.6 ....-..
136 et -a_ .4- dt. t....) • ste.......1) e Pc o c6
Cl..L.0 . (.....ss La ,......,..6 0 ,,.„,,,,,..-,,,,•,,u,(0 )
'
!
i D et- 2
..)
..-:- 15. ccs.
‘
i 1 •
-....;.c-- CAS.--,) Ile- P.:, V•QA.
! !
C.
1 1
& i.0 .
--:- f C5 • s' ( 0.44-ix•"."-4HN- k C) ir> c.... ( 6...0 ire vi a )
‘
A ;
• : v...0
-tc: 1 els 2.
1
( c S,',t.e._ , • > i
1
1
i
Al--g
.-- - 9.1 ... 2 7 . "5-- Ut.t ( 4. % .- cle 0 t,,,,,, • , 1,..1a0 ii a Do t,..‘
(it 0
I
+ 'Pk ) s•C 0.. Pe.,. €.0
LO--; 1.1 t•P d4.-kr
;
VI,
g 1
0-1- .....,- r- ( C.,.)t 4 ( , )m et SO-tAl-L- 1: i'. ----
(..) . "....11
-._ . .
.___.--
1 j
I i
4
12. :
e..",.,..- 6-(A 'S I. .!...,
.
6, c...S.k CO e_, • . _
ii
A ,Ats,a__ q.,!,,...t..\
.
1 1
1 i
.
1 !
•

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
December 12, 1983
MEMORANDUM
TO: Steve Tedder
FROM: Randy Dodd Q� ��
THROUGH: Randy Williams 1`u/
SUBJECT: Gastonia Long Creek WWTP
Please find attached a memo from the Mooresville Regional Office
requesting a WLA from Technical Services for the Gastonia WWTP. Based
on monitoring data and the large percentage of industrial flow, the
Mooresville Regional Office has requested an allocation for several
metals. Since standards don't currently exist for zinc, copper, and
aluminum, and it is desirable to address toxicity concerns, a bioassay
screening test appears to be warranted.
It should be noted that Gastonia is considering relocating the
Long Creek plant (Class C receiving waters) to Long Creek at its
confluence with the South Fork of the Catawba (Class A -II), 1.2 miles
downstream. The MRO has also requested an allocation for this site.
RD:cs
Attachment

Ca
r?
0
Facility Name:
Existing
Proposed
1i scrh26 c �•ls
NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION
Engineer
Date Rec.
#
t20
tQ -g
-Ti
CO,U( egc-z�C 1 JCJ Y Date • / 2/'72%P
Permit No.: IvC U O Z.70 t Be Pipe No.: 0 C
Design Capacity (MGD):
County: 6 ;7�
Industrial (% of Flow): Domestic (% of Flow): A>61
Receiving Stream: �.Tk "M L?sz�-�•+(rz- Class:
Reference USGS Quad.
Sub -Basin: 0 ?•08 •_
(Please attach) Requestor• v<<.) Abil- hJ Regional Office I'' IW
(Guideline limitations, if applicable, are to be listed on the back of this form.)
Design Temp.: 26" c- Drainage Area. f �--�
7Q10:. 120 A Winter 7Q10: 220 c c .
Location of D.O.minimum (miles below outfall): '"). mt\es
eta
Velocity (fps):
0
m
a3
. `a57- Kl (base e, per day, 2 tC) :
L-1 S
Avg. Streamflow: 390 c--S
30Q2 • SO 0 ( �;
Slope • - , o
K2 (base e, per day, 2p2C) • ?' 36
,rtCox%r
c e ayvi recQ
may- �-I t- Ol•t s c_hr irq c„.1 --0( iv:, a. - -'•F-1 v Q,1
_
Effluent
Characteristics
-Monthly
Average
Comments
-eo
30
v-.) I .Q
-I-SS
6
ni IX
-Ce (C o "
/dbc,
! �00 ,....Q
_
4 tl
t, -q
sU
e
VI-
2• 3ii
"
(�
\A) �`l
C:�
t-2-7-2-
w•I -1
a.
Original Allocation
Revised Allocation
Confirmation
I
Date(s) of Revision(s)
(Please attach previous allocation)
.J dCew>.$ FL
Effluent
Characteristics
Monthly
Average
Comments
•
alte
4.6
(7 Prepared By: i� . Sc,42 Reviewed By: P(
3Ja �h_i_
Date:

REQUEST NO. : 778
********************* WASTELOAD ALLOCATION APPROVAL FORM *********************
RECEIVED
FACILITY NAME : GASTONIA WWTF'
TYPE OF WASTE : DOMESTIC I AN 3 11984
WATER ! ),.1 'Y S .CTi(N
COUNTY : GASTON or::{'..Y, ,;<<; Nr..;
REGIONAL OFFICE : MOORESVILLE REQUESTOR : LAVE ADKINS
RECEIVING STREAM SOUTH FORK-CATAWBA SUDBASIN : 030836
7010 : 120 CFS
DRAINAGE AREA
W7010 : CFS 3002 : 300 CFS
: 621 SQ.MI. STREAM CLASS :A -II
************************ RECOMMENDED EFFLUENT LIMITS ************************
WASTEFLOW(S) (MGD) : 8 AL' CU, LIMITS ELLIED ia
BOI:'-5 (MG/L) 30 PROPfSED STANDARDS. LIMITS
NH3--N I (MG/L) APPLY TO SUMMER AND WINTER.
D.O. (MG/L)
PH (SU) : 6-9 gio ass ihCOk( cV y Q,c04-v_
FECAL COLIFORM (/ 100ML) : 1000-ioxr6.
TSS (MG/L) : 30
AL (M G / L) : 1 . 2'} I it.ea�t 14%. ; .i5 me. y LA el v i S.CC ba s cd
CR (MG/L) : 1 • a} ers PYt-knvtK Sertel of tla 5XNek
CU (MG ) : .38 �t t G� u1 ri same [g.y.
141 � t`rt G-f 1.� �, . S � a�c
7-rd t rh G-I) : 1. 2-7
********************************************************************************
FACILITY IS : PROPOSED (v') EXISTING ( ) NEW ( )
LIMITS ARE : REVISION ( ) CONFIRMATION ( ) OF THOSE PREVIOUSLY ISSUED
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED BY:
MODELER
SUF'ERVISOR>MODELING GROUP
REGIONAL SUPERVISOR
PERMITS MANAGER
DATE : _ � zl _
ATE :_L
ee(WATE : .3(i-2C5/
DATE : _.¢ _31 ` Y

loc21=- 390 of;
ta.
-
A X. 10CA-2te,--"V\
d,t
yva_cs2.4Aekoe-a
0
6
A =
lako
,54.4_1L-S (_)Q)
it Le)
' zo
LA. A- (iLft)
124.7.5-
32o, Z. _s----
I ocl 25135

I♦4..5✓L« .4 y .4111.! vr7 1 r7wwr-1
THE END U.O. I 6,71 MG/L
********C****************************************************'********
THE END CBOD IS 12.93 MG/L
**********************************************************************
THE END NBOD IS 0.00 MG/L
**********************************************************************
THE U.O. MIN. OF SEGMENT 1 IS 6.71 MG/L
THIS MINIMUM IS LOCATED AT SEGMENT MILEPOINT 2
WHICH IS LOCATED IN REACH NUMBER 1
THE WLA FOR SE MENT 1 REACH 1 IS 129 MG/L OF CBOD
THE WLA FOR SE MEAT 1 REACH 1 IS 0 MG/L OF NBOD
THE REQUIRED EFFLUENT D.O. IS 0 MG/L
THE WASTEFLOW ENTERING SEG 1 REACH 1 IS 8 MGD
**********************************************************************

*** MODEL SUMMARY DATA ***
DISCHARGER
RECEIVING STREAM
7010
DESIGN TEMPERATURE
,
.
.
.
.
.
.
,
GASTONIA LONG CREEK WWTF'
S. FORK-CATAWBA
120 CFS
25 DEGREES C.
SUBBASIN 1 030836
STREAM CLASS: A -II
WINTER 7010 : CFS
WASTEFLOW : 8 MGD
ILENGTHISLOPE 1 VELOCITY (DEPTH 1 K1 1 Kri 1 SOD 1 K2 1 NetPS1
!MILES IFT/MI 1 FPS 1 FT 1 /DAY 1 /DAY IMG/M2D1/DAY IMG/L/DI
SEGMENT 1
REACH 1
1 1 I
1 2.001 4.001
1 I I
1 1 1 I
0.857 1 3.21 1 0.48 1 0.00 1
1 1 1 I
1 1 1
0.01 3.361 0.001
1 1 1
SUMMER MODEL
ALL RATES ARE AT 25 DEGREES C.
*** INPUT DATA SUMMARY ***
FLOW 1 CBOD 1 NBOD 1 D.O.
CFS 1 MG/L 1 MG/L 1 MG/L
SE
MENT
1 REACH 1 1 l
WASTE 1 12.400 1129.000
HEADWATERS1120.000 1 2.000
TRIBUTARY 1 0.000 1 0.000
RUNOFF * 1 0.200 1 2.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0,000
7.560
0.000
7.560
* RUNOFF FLOW IS IN CFS/MILE:

.row A - (0 21 q 4 00 CTg. 19 6
0Q At- .
sc a
Lo a 2s/4. c.3_
Ov" -50 tc, 4,
u,)
.40 v*P
too le.a
so u 1s.9 60
0-‘,,a_ (22 zz4_
ot-OcA.A,-A4,4-;.*
c, SeiLk4‘ .S jg
c,,e 47-‘- 01.1-
4e-61,-12 tet te) ,tA
Ai? 4C-A"t2Z4- c..0.4.12-1449 4.44A e-t()

MEMORANDUM TO:
FROM:
PREPARED BY:
SUBJECT:
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
November 17, 1983
Forrest Westall
D. Rex Gleason
Thurman Horne
City of Gastonia
Long Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant
NPDES Permit No. NC 0020184
Gaston County, North Carolina
RECEIVED
i.J r0 1 81983
1VA, EE c)!JAtilY SECTION
RA
In reviewing the City of Gastonia's application for permit to land apply
sludge from the Long Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant (Permit No. 9146, issued
May 26, 1983), the staff of the Mooresville Regional Office became aware that
the sludge at this facility had unusually high concentrations of metals,
particularly nickel (see Attachment "B").
As a result, the Mooresville Regional Office requested that the City
conduct sampling for metals. These results, plus the results from our own
sampling analysis are displayed in the attached Table "A".
It appears that the effluent concentrations of nickel and chromium may
be of concern since they are approximately twice the water quality standard
for the receiving stream (Long Creek -Class "C" waters) and considering the
volume of discharge is large in proportion to the 7Q10 of the receiving stream
(At present, the facility discharges approximately 4 MGD although the Permit
allows up to 8 MGD. The 7Q10 of the receiving stream is 3.5 cfs or 2.26 MGD.).
It should be noted that the point of discharge into Long Creek is approximately
1.2 miles from the confluence of Long Creek and the South Fork Catawba River,
which is Class A -II waters.
Based on the sampling results and the other pertinent factors, the Moores-
ville Regional Office feels that it is appropriate to request that Technical
Services develop a waste load allocation for the following metals: (1) nickel,
(2) chromium, (3) zinc, (4) copper, and (5) aluminum. When this allocation
has been developed we may consider amending the existing Permit so as to
establish effluent limitations and/or monitoring requirements for these metals.
Attached is a waste load allocation request which should be given to
Technical Services if you agree that metals may be of significant concern.
If you have any questions or need any additional information, please advise.
Attachments

Parameter
TABLE "A"
Gastonia -Long Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant
Metals Sampling Data
*6/26/83 7/14/83 7/20/83 8/9/83
Eff. Inf. Eff.
Inf. Eff. Inf. Eff.
**W. Q.
Standard
Lead, ug/1 <50 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 30
Zinc, ug/1 236 490 100 410 150 180 190
Cadmium, ug/1 <2 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 4.0
Mercury, ug/1 <.2 <.2 <.2 0.4 0.3 <.2 <.2 .05
J Nickel, ug/1 160 200 100 200 200 <100 200 100
"Total Chromium, ug/1 190 520 100 340 210 50 230 100
Sodium, mg/1 800 630 820 7.2 560 600
I Copper, ug/1 350 40 210 50 40 100
Iron, ug/1 5400 900 1400 <100 600 1900
v A1umium, ug/1 1900 <100 1000 200 300 700
*Composite sample by City of Gastonia
**Class "C" receiving waters

�,do ANAir
LAbaRATeis,Qm.
P.O. Co47: toy Shari Straat
ttoraoreettki. Noah Coro ki 27204
Tote,.haw 919/994.204C
P.O. Boa 56C
Clemmxonn, ! C ! 27012
ATTN. Mr_ rrAnk Poet
ZOORnt:113L72
420-811-15-8
DA=
a sr'*
a,wv% s
cc
11!
6/13/03
.,
6/14/03
DAM Oaf ANALANALIT=D 6 16-6/20 83
6/22/03
DATO 07 itco:?
ANAL!C P ,,, .., Gtr Snrings/t3unker/Champion
PAi3AtiIMA
NiUMW
1301
Ammonia
ntrogn
0051,0
mkt/km
6100
,
Tot. Kjeldahl
aeras em
a
00625
ttp/ko
45.000
Nitrate
S.ttrniten._
00620
ms;/ltg
130
Nitrite
Nitrogen
.,
00615
mg/kg .
93
"for.
Phosphorum
00665
mg/kg
11,000
lot.
Residua
00500
I
7.5
Cadmium, Tot.
01027
4
mg/kg
10
CAlciur_ Tot.
0091,6
kA _
11.000
Chromium, Tot.
01034
a �*1R
mg/kg
3800
Copper, Tot.
01042
mg/kg
980
Lead, Tot.
01051
mg/kg
240
Nickel, Tot.
01067
mg/kg
2500
Potassium, Tot.
00937
mg/kg
3400
Zinc, Tot.
01092
mg/kg
1400
Magnesium, Tot
00927
mg/kg
3000
NOTE: SAMPLE
ANALYSE
DONE ON DR
• WT BASIS.
6
.
m
CE1 N$'O
nfil
N/4
j Long Creek
E P,neonin
Treatment
ant

°47'. REVEARdi &Arv-ArgicAl
LabonmoRIEA, bcs,
P.O. E2a 473 106 T...%ort Street
itaracovir«c. MotIt Core:up 27204
T.loploork: 910:T16-224i
AM
P.O. Bo= 5 8
01=z:oar, NC 27012
ATTN: Mr. Frank Ponz
"1.1.0 NILTItia=
29-811-154
DATZCALIME
.1j
=r. .
6/23/CS:
DA=11AtIP1.0 nnicUsiM 611-610i
DA= tlAtTFUL ANALIt=3.....-641LczU2a122----
DAIS C PE..PORT
ANALVEM P
otI
VOA
6/72/g1
Dy....2.2"22101L52.sin.m.a../aker
Pamm=7m
'
TIVIET
MUM=
tmlim
LAU UM'
. 1441-Uilta
•
, n a
Nitrogen
00510
Tot. Kjildahl
Nitr e
1
o
66,700
ra e
Nitrogen
00620
,t
1000
N trite
Nitro,en
44.1
_ ...
ot.
Phos•horus
tiA 4_
Tot.
LI. li
.
—
Cadmium, Tot.
.. .
01027
m k
,P .
• -,
,
......1._
.
Calcium Tot.
00* •
los
h-----
Chromium To.
0I0 4
500
-
Copper, Tot.
01042
-
Lead. Tot.
01051
o
1:
Maznes' A.
Nickel, Tot.
111
to*,
010671
moik-
730
Potassium, Tot.
00937
: :
5300
J..........*Alremam
Zinc To.
'111r11171111,.!''-'11,14...-7
LA
_.
.
. :
--
. . .
. i
q
I NOTE: SAMRLE
MALY _!D0111,
oluimItnw
,
I
Fr. Long Cr,e Treat=
t P ant

North Carolina Department of Natural
Resources &Community Development
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor Joseph W. Grimsley, Secretary
Mr. Cart D. Hicks, City Manager
City of Gastonia
Post Office Box 1748
Gastoni , North Carolina 28052
Dear Mr.
Hicks:
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
May 9, 1983
Subject: Long Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant
NPDES Permit No. NC 0020184
Gastonia, North Carolina
Gaston County
This Office has just recently completed its review of the City's permit
application for land application of sludge generated at the subject facility.
In conducting this review, it was noted that the concentrations of certain
metals in the sludge, as reported in your submittal documents, are considerably
higher than what is normally expected for municipal sludge. This observation
is based on a comparison of the reported concentrations to concentrations for
typical municipal sludge as contained in EPA's "Municipal Sludge Management:
Environmental Factors" EPA 430/9-77-004. Photocopies of the appropriate portions
of this report are enclosed.
Your present NPDES Permit was issued without effluent limitations or
monitoring requirements for these metals based on your original permit application
which inJicated that these metals were not present in the effluent.
In light of the reported concentrations in the sludge we are concerned that
there may be significant concentrations of these metals in the discharge.
7'-refore, in accordance with Part I, C, 6. of the subject Permit, it is
reque 1 that you conduct additional monitoring for the parameters of concern.
It is rc2quested that you collect and analyze a representative 24-hour composite
sample and submit the results to this Office for review. The following parameters
should be analyzed:
Lead, ug/1
Zinc, ug/1
Cadmium, ug/1
Mercury, ug/1
Nickel, ug/1
Copper, ug/1
Total Chromium, ug/1
MO.^.rgc•,
�..,, - 1:f«,,; G. Box 950. P':

i
Mr. Gary D. Hicks
Page Two
May 9, 1983
Although Total Chromium and Mercury were not a part of the sludge analysis,
we include these parameters in this request because we feel that it is advisable
to dete ine if they are present.
The 24-hour composite sample should be collected during the middle of the
week so hat the sample will be representative of normal wastewater character-
istics. The sample results should be submitted to this Office by no later than
June 1, 1983.
When we have reviewed the sample results, you will be contacted if further
action i necessary.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Mr. Thurman
Horne or me (704/663-1699).
Enclosu e
cc: Mr. Forrest Westall
Mr. Lee Fleming
Mr. Dale Crisp
JTH:se
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Engineer

Compailflinme i'
PowersSeafod
Threads: USA
Dixie --Yeast
Freightliner t
Scott Mills'
Firestone Fibers
'7,10,17 .).57).-7 /1.) _S /16145.e. -774- /Ire 7",e'e.P7L^e...r7i -5-14/7/(P C
SIC Code
2077
2280+
2099
3714*
2261*
2296*
Stedman::Corporatton 2261*, 2281*
Taurus Dyeing-&
Finishing
Basco Hand Tools
Sunshine Linen
Service
Cinderella Knitting
(;lobe Nfg.
jlndustPial Blectro-
plating.
2261•
3599*
7218•
2254, 2257*
3089•
3471*
CITY OF GASTONIA
-1 4 DU&TRIM, US BR-D I SCIIAl1G-1-NG-NONAOMIST1C_ WASTESSIIEAM S
Average Pollutants Known
Process. or Suspected Present in
Flow (GPD) Nondomestic Wastestreams
400 High BOD & Solids
1,862,000 Copper, Zinc, Chromium,
Phenol
221,000
65
182,062
43,500
269,518
150,000
122,089
39,109
193,100
1,441
270
Zinc, High BOD, Solids,
COD
Chromium, Copper, Lead,
Nickel, Zinc
Cadium, Chromium,
Copper, Lead, Mercury,
Nickel, Zinc, Phenol
Copper, Benzene,
Naphthalene
Cooper, Benzene
Chromium, Copper, I.eud,
Nickel, Zinc
High PH
Toluene, Methane
Cadmium, Copper,
Nickel, Zinc
* SIC code indicates tnduetry is potentially subject to categorical standards.
Average Pollutant
Concentrations
if Known
Cu-<0.05, Phenol-2880,
Z-0.4?, Chrom-<0.02
BOO - 5,138, TSS-817,
COD - 8,578
CR-.34 Cu-8.10
P11-.85 NI-1.4
CR-.80, Cu-183,
PH-137, NI-249,
ZN-3810
is Pretreatment
of Nondomestic
Wastewater Provided
No
PH Correction
No
PH Correction
No
Grit Removal
PH Correction
Flow Equalization
Sedimentation, Sump
No
Yes
No
No
PH Correction
Flow Equalization
Industrial
Category •
Textile
Mechanical Products
Textile
Textile
Textile
Textile
Metal Finishing
Electroplating
(Coatings)
Textile
Rubber Processing
Electroplating
(Common Metals,
Coatings)

Company Name
Morris Metal
Finishing
Wales Mfg.
SitiIt Independent
Packf,iig ;Company
Armt eia
.�f Johnny's Plating
aft Hard Chronic
Cookeo400o.
Jenkinsi Reneudling
! liudorii' tiluho
+ SIC Code
•
C I-TY-OF-GAST ON-1A
INDUSTRIAL USER DISCHARGING NONDOMESTIC WASTESTREAMS
Average
Process
SIC Code Flow (GPD)
3471* 600
2250* 250,400
2011 200
2261-2282* 957,500
2252*
3471*
3471*
3442*
3541*
2261-2262•
467,735
1,000
500
1,000
1,000
109,190
Pollutants Known
or Suspected Present in
Nondomestic Waatestreams
Cyanide
Cooper, Benzene
High BOD
Arsenic, Cadmium, Chromium,
Copper, Lead, Mercury, Nickel
Silver, Zinc
Chromic Acid
indicated Industry 1s potentially subject
ski 1 TV? Z5
Chromic Acid
Toluene, Naphthalene
Lead
Phenol. Runzune2
Phthalate, Dia( Ethyl/Exyl)
to categorical eLandardu.
Average Pollutant
Concentrations
1f Known
is Pretreatment
of Nondomestic
Wastewater Provided
No
Flow Equalization
Sedimentation
Grease Trap
Flow Equalization
No
Solvent Separation
Sump
Industrial
• Category *
Electroplating
(Common Metals,
Coatings)
Textile
Textile
Textile
Electroplating
Neutralized with Electroplating
Sodium Bisulfate & (Common Metals,
Caustic Soda Coatings)
No
No
No
Metal Finishing
Mechanical Products
Textile

0
0
8
E
0
w
4-0
N
5-
=
1-
Facility Name:
Existing
Proposed
Ix�
/1 NPDES WASTE LOADf�ALL_OCATI\ON j
G r1S'7t� rr 4- L o wG C. JPEf_iC Cesr #U 6 . o ��
Permit No : NC 00a0184
Pipe No • exnt
-rn A
�l- 4
q-30=�'�.�
Date. 41a�jsz
County: 6-*S7eNiA
Design Capacity (MGD): 8.0 W11rD Industrial (% of Flow): 0 Domestic (% of Flow): /a o
Receiving Stream: L.bN45- (REEK
Reference USGS Quad: (Please
Class: � Sub -Basin: C 7 C` 3 - C`Q - 3Co
attach) Requestor • FV&416 3i ' S? Regional Office Per ml't
(Guideline limitations, if applicable, are to be listed on the back of this form.)
3 uw�mer ?SvC w; t r GDraina e Area: -�7 / k" Avg.Streamflow:• �
Design Temp.: ��---- � � ! g !. (.? y1l � �O
7Q10 : -3. S C-4; Winter 7Q10: //I r 30Q2 • /.-� C7-;
Location of D.O.minimum (miles below outfall) : 5(4A'Ptmt-4- /a -173 Slope • .. -
Velocity (fps). i7 t 35 K1 (base e, per day, 200C) : 0, 7 Z K2 (base e, per day, 20°C) •ems: R 6
Effluent
Characteristics
Monthly
Average
f
Mops f i
Comments
et AirLst
1/r g Z a 7
lr
. < ,se--t,„/dZ
i ,7ite�D itr ofroo Q.
30v .3Ok !
Original Allocation
Revised Allocation
Prepared By:
Dat(s) of Revision(s)
(Please attach previous allocation)
tEffluent
Characteristics
Monthly
Average
Comments
11A 7,-„
Reviewed By:
Date: c) / 73
11

REQUEST NO.
446
*********************
FACILITY NAME
TYPE OF WASTE
COUNTY
REGIONAL OFFICE
RECEIVING STREAM
010 : 3.5 CFS
DRAINAGE AREA
WASTELOAD ALLOCATION APPROVAL FORM
GASTONIA
DOMESTIC
GASTON
MOORESVILLE
LONG C R .
W7 01.0 « 1. 1.
51..6 ' O.MI.
CFS
1
*********************
I2
AIR QUA l-1i
SW1
REOUEETO. R : R. BAIRD
SUPBASIN « 03-08--36
3002 . 15
STREAM CLASS
.0
CFS
**********::************** RECOMMENDED EFFLUENT LIMITS *` ********* *****:****"'**
WASTEFLOW(S)
DOD-5
NH3-N
D.O.
I`I•1
FECAL COLIFORM
I J S.
(MGI! ) « 8 8
(MG/L) « 11 22
(MG/l..) ? 14
(MG/L) « 5 5
(SU) «6_ 6-9
(/100ML)«1000 1000
(MG/L) « 30 30
COLUMNt1 REFERS TO SUMMER
LIMITS(AF'RIL 1- OCT.31)
COLUMN t2 REFERS TO WINTER
LIMITS(NOV.1-MARCH 31).
* :************************:**********************************************: ******
FACILITY IS : PROPOSED ( ) EXIST:ENG () NEW ( )
LIMITS ARE « REVISION (....J) 6614F4Pertgaig.30N ( ) OF TEG�F'TA L.Y
_K-
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED BY:
MODELER
SIJF'ERVISOR,MODELING GROUP
REGIONAL SUF'E.RVISOR
PERMITS MANAGER
APPPC)VEI:+ BY «
DIVISION DIRECTOR
ISSUED
5 ._ __DATE «_/_2 e _P,3
__DATE . - 1 �. •...?_..
3
DATE « /42,/ts _..
!ATE