Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
SW3201201_Report (SW)_20210317
ENGINEERING CALCULATIONS FOR UNION COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE Prepared by: LandDesign, Inc. 223 North Graham St. Calculations by: GR, AR, MO, SK Checked by: MDM 55151111f111 � CAR f�''�% ` �� • F Es s i'o' �lI' ': SEAL = 033804 = q ENcira Ey D. ����I11111151555� March 15t", 2020 LandDesign PN: 1019314 TABLE OF CONTENTS PROJECT NARRATIVE EROSION CONTROL CALCULATIONS SEDIMENT TRAP AND SKIMMER SEDIMENT BASIN DESIGN ABOVE GROUND SAND FILTER CALCULATIONS DESIGN CALCULATIONS HYDROCAD WATER QUALITY ANALYSIS DETENTION ANALYSIS STORMWATER CALCULATIONS 10-YR STORM SEWER REPORT - STORM SEWER PLAN - PIPE CAPACITY CALCULATIONS RUNOFF TO PRESSON ROAD RUNOFF TO EX. BMP RIP -RAP OUTFALL SIZING CALCULATIONS APPENDIX EXISTING CONDITIONS - WEB SOIL SURVEY - SITE LOCATION MAP - USGS TOPO MAP - PROPERTY DATA PRE -DEVELOPMENT HYDROLOGY EXHIBIT POST -DEVELOPMENT HYDROLOGY EXHIBIT NCDEQ - EROSION & SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PRELIMINARY REVIEW CHECKLIST - STORMWATER CHECKLIST - FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY FORM PROJECT NARRATIVE Erosion Control Narrative Union County Sheriff's Office 3344 Presson Road, Wingate, NC, Union County INTRODUCTION LandDesign, Inc (LDI) has prepared an Erosion Control package for the Union County Sheriff's Office located in Wingate, North Carolina. Existing conditions of the project site include asphalt pavement, gravel, dense woodland, and fallow wooded soils. The proposed project is located within Wingate city limits on property owned by Union County, Tax ID #090-05-7010. Current zoning of the parcels is HC (highway corridor mixed -use). Planned facilities associated with the Sheriffs Office include offices, storage rooms, a fitness area, and lab rooms. CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE 1. Verify approved erosion control plan is on site. 2. Flag the construction limits and mark any trees, wetlands, or existing structures noted to remain. 3. Set up an on -site pre -construction conference with erosion control inspector to discuss erosion control measures. Failure to schedule such conference 48 hours prior to any land -disturbing activity is a violation and is subject to fine. 4. Contractor to coordinate perimeter construction fencing with owner and submit fencing plan to owner for approval. 5. Install temporary construction entrance(s). 6. Install silt fence and any other measures required by the erosion control inspector. 7. Install skimmer sediment basin, temporary sediment traps, check dams and diversion ditches. (Phase 1) 8. Notify NCDEQ inspector that erosion control measures are in place. 9. Obtain grading permit and/or perform any field revisions as required by inspector. 10. Remove existing utilities as shown on sheet C1-00 - Demolition Plan a. Power b. Gas line — coordinate with Piedmont Natural Gas c. Telecom Line d. Storm Drainage e. Light poles and underground electric. Contractor to coordinate with construction manager. 11. Upon removal of all utilities in conflict with proposed grading, the grading contractor will verify that erosion control measures are in place and functioning prior to grubbing and mass grading operations. 12. Upon stabilization of all upstream area, muck out skimmer sediment basin and convert to an above ground sand filter. Remove temporary sediment trap and all unstable sediment, and smooth area to blend with adjoining areas. Stabilize properly. SITE UTILITIES All site utilities to serve the building are controlled by Union County with the exception of natural gas which is owned by Piedmont Natural Gas and power which is owned by Duke Energy. Water, sewer, electric and telecom service are all available to the site. WATER SERVICE Water service to the building will be provided from one 8" domestic tap and one 6" fire line tap into the existing water line serving the existing office and jail, which connects to a water main on Presson Road. Separate backflow devices and meters will be used. All domestic water will be metered for internal tracking. SANITARY SEWER SERVICE The Sheriff's Office waste will discharge into a proposed 8" gravity sewer main line. The sanitary main will connect to larger lines which eventually connects to the John Glenn Water treatment Plant. STORMWATER SYSTEM Proposed drainage intends to maintain the existing runoff by utilizing an above ground sand filter to mitigate storm water impacts and detain the 1 ", and 2-yr /10-yr, 24-hr storms. SITE GEOLOGY The project site contains asphalt, gravel, and dense woodland. Preliminary geotechnical analysis of the site encountered fat clays, silty sand and sandy silt. The soil is classified as Badin channery siltu clay loam, from 2 to 15 percent slopes. Residual soil was found below the surficial materials at each test location. The site is located in the Yadkin-PeeDee River Basin. SITE PREPARATION AND GRADING The placement of the building and the establishment of a finished floor elevation are based on Presson Road. Minor adjustments to the final FIFE considered ADA accessibility, pedestrian movements and delivery truck access. SEDIMENT TRAP AND SEDIMENT BASIN DESIGN Sediment Trap and Skimmer Sediment Basin Design (To Emergency Spillway Elevation) Project: UCSO Computed By: AR Date: 11/6/2020 Location: Wingate, NC Checked By: MDM Revised: 11/18/2020 Developer: Turner Design Criteria: Settling Efficiency Criteria: Design Storm 10 yr Design Storm 10 yr Rational Runoff Coeff. 0.6 Rational Runoff Coeff. 0.6 Intensity 7.03 in/hr (Tc= 5 min.) Intensity 7.03 in/hr (Tc= 5 min.) Weir Coefficient 3.13 Height Over Weir 1 ft Basin Number Drainage Area (Acres) Denuded Area (Acres) Sediment Basin Volume Required Provided Bottom Area Sq ft Depth ft. Top Area Sq ft Side- slope Weir Length ft. Sediment Basin Factor Skimmer Size (inches) Orifice Diameter (inches) Dewatering Time (days) 10-yr Flow cfs SSB 1 1.08 1.08 1,944 6,529 2,569 3 3,989 3 20 2,310 2.5 2.50 0.99 4.56 SSB 2 2.65 2.65 4,770 11,381 4,702 3 6,708 3 20 2,310 2.5 3.00 1.20 11.18 SSB 3 4.64 4.64 8,352 16,344 6,166 3 10,220 3 20 2,310 2.5 3.00 1.72 19.57 SSB 4 6.13 6.13 22,068 40,416 11,535 51 15,485 51 201 2,310 1 2.5 1 5.00 1 1.53 25.86 Surface Area Requirements: Sediment Trap 435 sf X Peak Flow (10 yr) Skimmer Basin 325 sf X Peak Flow 110 -1 Basin Number Drainage Area (Ac) 10-year Peak Inflow (cfs) Surface Area (Sq. ft.) Required Provided SSB 1 1.08 4.56 1,481 3,989 SSB 2 2.65 11.18 3,633 6,708 SSB 3 4.64 19.57 6,361 10,220 SSB 4 6.13 25.861 11,248 15,485 Verify Good Good Good Good Volume Requirements: Sediment Trap 3600 cf X Denuded Acres Skimmer Basin 1900 cf X Denuded Acres Basin Number Drainage Area (Acres) Denuded Area (Acres) Sediment Basin Volume Required Provided SSB 1 1.08 1.08 1,944 6,529 SSB 2 2.65 2.65 4,770 11,381 SSB 3 4.64 4.64 8,352 16,344 SSB 4 6.13 6.13 22,068 40,416 Verify Good Good Good Good Verify Good Good Good Good 10-yr Flow cfs 1.46 3.57 6.25 8.26 Skimmer Sediment Basin 1 Contour Cumulative Elevation Area I Volume I Volume I Volume ft) (sq ft cut I (cu ft) I (ac-ft) 543.00 2,569 2,910 2,910 0.07 544.00 3,250 3,620 6,529 0.15 545.00 3,989 DETENTION VOLUME REQUIRED = DETENTION VOLUME PROVIDED = 1,944 CU-FT 6,529 CU-FT Skimmer Sediment Basin 3 Contour Cumulative Elevation Area Volume Volume Volume ft) (sq ft cut cu ft ac-ft 531.00 6,166 7,159 7,159 0.16 532.00 8,151 9,186 16,344 0.38 533.00 10,220 DETENTION VOLUME REQUIRED = DETENTION VOLUME PROVIDED = 8,352 CU-FT 16,344 CU-FT Skimmer Sediment Basin 2 Contour Cumulative Elevation Area Volume Volume Volume ft) (sq ft cut (cu it) (ac-ft) 538.00 4,702 5,189 5,189 0.12 539.00 5,676 6,192 11,381 0.26 540.00 6,708 DETENTION VOLUME REQUIRED = DETENTION VOLUME PROVIDED = 4,770 CU-FT 11,381 CU-FT Skimmer Sediment Basin 4 Contour Cumulative Elevation Area Volume Volume Volume ft) (sq 11 cut cu ft ac-ft 534.00 11,535 12,165 12,165 0.28 535.00 12,795 13,453 25,618 0.59 536.00 14,111 14,798 40,416 0.93 537.00 15,485 DETENTION VOLUME REQUIRED = DETENTION VOLUME PROVIDED = 22,068 CU-FT 40,416 CU-FT SAND FILTER CALCULATIONS Project Name: UNION COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE Project Number: 1019314 Design Requirements: NCDEQ Storm Water Manual Given Information: Land Use: Commercial Drainage Area to Facility (Acres): 6.86 Impervious Area (Acres): Percent Impervious: Soil Type: BdB2 & BdC2 Soil Group: C Curve Number (CN) Pre: Curve Number (CN) Post: Time of Concentration Pre (hour): Time of Concentration Post (hour): Design Storm Rainfall Depth (in): Detention Time (Day): 4.157 60.6% 73 92 0.300 0.0833 1.0 1.66 NCDENR (Maximum 5 Acres) Meck. County (Maximum 10 Ac for a Surface Filter) Meck. County (Maximum 2 Ac for a Perimeter Filter) Meck. County (Maximum 5 Ac for an Underground Filter) (Typically 1 ") Meck. County: 2 days - 85% TSS & 70% TP (Optimal Efficiency) 1 day - 70% TSS & 35% TP (Standard Efficiency) 2 days - 85% TSS & 0% TP (TSS - Only Efficiency) NCDENR 1.66 days Coefficient of Permeability for the Sand Filter Bed: 2 inches/hour Watershed: N/A Efficiency: NCDENR Sand Filter Design (NCDENR) Project Name: UNION COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE Job Number: 1019314 Step 1: Compute the water quality volume (WQV). WQV (Ft) _ (Rv/ 1) X (A, / 1) X (43,560 Ft' / 1 Acre) X (RD / 1) X (1 Ft / 12 in) WQVAdj (Ft3) _ (0.75) WQV Where: WQV = Water Quality Volume (Ft) WQVAdi = Adjusted Water Quality Volume (Ft) AD = Drainage Area to Sand Filter (acres). Max. 5 acres for underground. 10 acres for above ground Rv= Volumetric Runoff Coefficient = 0.05 + 0.9 (% Impervious) Rp = Design Storm Rainfall Depth (in). Typically 1.0". Percent Impervious = 61% AD = 6.86 acres Rp = 1.0 in RV = 0.60 WQV = 14,826 Ft3 WQVAdj = 11,120 Ft' Sand filters allowed to reduce in volume by 25% Step 2: Determine the maximum head on the sand filter and sedimentation basin. ha (ft) = hMaxFilter / 2 hMaxFilter (Ft) _ (WQVAdj) / (As + Af) As (Ft2) _ -(Q0 / w) x (In (1 - E)) Af (Ft2) _ (WQV x dF) / (k x t x (hA + dF)) Q (Ft3/Sec) = k x (1 Day / 86,400 Sec) x (Af) x ((ha + dF) / dF) Where: ha = Average Head (Ft) hMaxFilter = Maximum Head on the Sand Filter (Ft) As = Surface Area of the Sedimentation Basin (Ft2) Af = Surface Area of the Sand Filter Bed (Ft2) Qo = Average Rate of Outflow From Sedimentation Chamber (Ft3 / sec.) = WQV / 86,400 E = Trap Efficiency of the Chamber = 0.9 w = Settling Velocity of Particle (Ft/sec) (Assume Particle Diameter of 20 microns = 0.0004 Ft/sec) dF = Depth of Sand Filter Bed (Ft) (Minimum of 1 Ft) k = Coefficient of Permeability for the Sand Filter Bed NCDEQ = 2 in / hr = 4 Ft / day, CI- t = Time Required to Drain the WQV through the Sand Filter Bed (day). Q = Sand Filter Infiltration Rate at hMaxFilter (Ft3/Sec). (Darcy's Law) For maximum heads between 2 and 6 feet, the following combinations of variables will work: (Ideal situation As = Af) hMaxFilter Ft WQVAdj (Ft3) As + Af (Ft2) 2 11,120 5,560 3 11,120 3,707 4 11,120 2,780 5 11,120 2,224 6 11,120 1,853 Area available for sand filter = 11,535 Ft2 hMaxFilter - Ft ha = 1 Ft Minimum As = 988 Ft` dF = Ft k = 4.0 Ft/day t = 1.66 day Minimum Af= 1,340 Ft` Min. required area for sand filter = 2,328 Ft2 Provided Af = 2,550 Ft` Provided As = 8,985 Ft' hMaxFilter - 2.0 Ft ha = 1.0 Ft Q = 0.197 Ft3/Sec Surface area of entire BMP As allowed by stormwater standards Min 1' NCDEQ = 2 in / hr = 4 Ft / day, Charlotte = 3.5 Ft / Day TRUE = surface area of entire BMP - provided sand fil Step 3: Ensure that the Water Quality Volume is Contained. (Af + As) x hMaxFilter WQVAdj 23,070 Ft3 >_ 11,120 Ft3 TRUE Step 4: Additional Design Requirements. For underground sand filters, provide at least 5 feet of clearance between the surface of the sand filter and the bottom of the roof of the underground structure to facilitate cleaning and maintenance. Step 5: Calculate Surface Area and Underdrain Requirements Q (Ft3/Sec) = k x (1 Day / 86,400 Sec) x (Af) x ((ha + dF) / dF) Where: ha = Average Head (Ft) hMaxFiiter = Maximum Head on the Sand Filter (Ft) (Maximum of 2.0 Ft) Af = Surface Area of the Sand Filter Bed (Ft2) As = Surface Area of the Sedimentation Basin (Ft2) Cd = Sediment Chamber Depth (Ft) dF = Depth of Sand Filter Bed (Ft) (Minimum of 2.0 Ft) k = Coefficient of Permeability for the Sand Filter Bed = 3.5 Ft/day QM -Filter = Sand Filter Infiltration Rate at hM-Filter (Ft3/Sec). (Darcy's Law) Qo = Sand Filter Infiltration Rate at Top of Sand (Ft 3/Sec). (Darcy's Law) Required Af= 1,340 Ft2 Provided Af = 2550 Ft` Required As= 988 Ft' Provided As = 8985 Ft` Required Cd = 0.4 Ft Provided Cd = Ft QMaxFliter = 0.197 Ft3/Sec Qo = 0.000 Ft3/Sec Number of Underdrain Rows Required=0(Maximum Spacing = 10 Ft) Total Length of Underdrain = 78 Ft Number of Underdrain Perforations = 616 Holes 50% of Perforations = 308 Holes Area of One Perforation = 0.00077 Ft2 Capacity of One Hole = 0.0052 Ft3/Sec Total Capacity of Perforations = 1.6 Ft3/Sec Check: 1.6 Ft3/Sec > 0.197 Ft3/Sec :. GOOD Capacity of 6" PVC Underdrain at 0.50% Slope = 0.39 Ft3/Sec Assume 50% Clogging = 0.20 Ft3/Sec Check: 0.20 Ft3/Sec > 0.197 Ft3/Sec :. GOOD 9314-BMP Sand Filter Volumes Type 1124-hr 1000-yr Rainfall=11.40" Prepared by LandDesign - MRO Printed 1/25/2021 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 09780 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 2 Summary for Pond 3P: SAND FILTER OVERALL VOLUME Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 534.00' 74,272 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic)Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 534.00 11,535 0 0 535.00 12,795 12,165 12,165 536.00 14,111 13,453 25,618 537.00 15,484 14,798 40,416 538.00 16,914 16,199 56,615 539.00 18,400 17,657 74,272 9314-BMP Sand Filter Volumes Type 1124-hr 1000-yr Rainfall=11.40" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/9/2021 HydroCAD® 10.10-4a s/n 09780 © 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 1 Summary for Pond 4P: SED. CHAMBER VOLUME Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 534.00' 55,908 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 534.00 8,985 0 0 535.00 9,832 9,409 9,409 536.00 10,708 10,270 19,679 537.00 11,605 11,157 30,835 538.00 12,528 12,067 42,902 539.00 13,484 13,006 55,908 9314-BMP Sand Filter Volumes Type 1124-hr 1000-yr Rainfall=11.40" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/9/2021 HydroCAD® 10.10-4a s/n 09780 © 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 1 Summary for Pond 5P: SAND CHAMBER VOLUME Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 534.00' 18,366 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 534.00 2,550 0 0 535.00 2,963 2,757 2,757 536.00 3,404 3,184 5,940 537.00 3,880 3,642 9,582 538.00 4,386 4,133 13,715 539.00 4,916 4,651 18,366 WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS WQ -Adjusted CN 3P SAND FILTER Subcat Reach on Link 9314-BMP Sand Filter - WQ Type 11 6-hr 1-in Rainfall=1.00" Prepared by LandDesign - MRO Printed 1/25/2021 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 09780 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 2 Time span=0.00-72.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs, 1441 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Pond 3P: SAND FILTER Peak Elev=534.88' Storage=10,700 cf Inflow=8.82 cfs 0.288 of Outflow=0.17 cfs 0.283 of 9314-BMP Sand Filter - WQ Type 11 6-hr 1-in Rainfall=1.00" Prepared by LandDesign - MRO Printed 1/25/2021 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 09780 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 3 Summary for Pond 3P: SAND FILTER Inflow Area = 6.130 ac, 0.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 0.56" for 1-in event Inflow = 8.82 cfs @ 2.96 hrs, Volume= 0.288 of Outflow = 0.17 cfs @ 6.04 hrs, Volume= 0.283 af, Atten= 98%, Lag= 184.9 min Primary = 0.17 cfs @ 6.04 hrs, Volume= 0.283 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 534.88' @ 6.04 hrs Surf.Area= 12,650 sf Storage= 10,700 cf Plug -Flow detention time= 938.3 min calculated for 0.283 of (98% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 937.9 min ( 1,141.0 - 203.1 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 534.00' 74,272 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic)Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 534.00 11,535 0 0 535.00 12,795 12,165 12,165 536.00 14,111 13,453 25,618 537.00 15,484 14,798 40,416 538.00 16,914 16,199 56,615 539.00 18,400 17,657 74,272 Device Routinq Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 530.85' 24.0" Round Culvert L= 132.9' RCP, groove end w/headwall, Ke= 0.200 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 530.85' / 530.19' S= 0.0050 T Cc= 0.900 n= 0.011 Concrete pipe, straight & clean, Flow Area= 3.14 sf #2 Device 1 534.00' Sand Infiltration Rate Elev. (feet) 534.00 535.00 536.00 537.00 538.00 539.00 Disch. (cfs) 0.000 0.197 0.276 0.354 0.433 0.512 Primary OutFlow Max=0.17 cfs @ 6.04 hrs HW=534.88' (Free Discharge) L1=Culvert (Passes 0.17 cfs of 26.79 cfs potential flow) L2=Sand Infiltration Rate (Custom Controls 0.17 cfs) 9314-BMP Sand Filter - WQ Type 11 6-hr 1-in Rainfall=1.00" Prepared by LandDesign - MRO Printed 1/25/2021 HydroCADO 10.00-19 s/n 09780 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 4 Pond 3P: SAND FILTER Hydrograph ■ Inflow i 8.82ds /�I .,I Imo+ I,� I!� I� Primary 9 1 1 1 111 T 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I �I q fl ow I-�'"'� 1 e am-6 i 1-i7 V I 8 1�s il/ .-8 V 1 I- I -I _I � � � � 1 � � I_ I_ I _I _I _I � � 1Peak /�I 7 -'I -1 -1 -4 -44- 4-'� 1- 1-'1 -'1 -1 -1 +Storag 00I, Ma C11r� I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i 5 3 I -III �� rt rt fi fi� IIIII I� rt rt fi fi� IIIII �� rt rt fi fi 0 LL 4 1 1 7 7 7 T T 7 7 F 1 1 1 7 7 T T T 7 1 1-1-1 7 T T T 31 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72 Time (hours) Pond 3P: SAND FILTER Stage -Discharge ■ Primary 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 0.5 Discharge (cfs) DETENTION CALCULATIONS PREDEVEILOPMENT 4P PRE OUT S4 Reach on L ink i S POSTDEVELOPMENT 43P SAND FILTER 9314-BMP Sand Filter - Storms Type 1124-hr 2-yr Rainfall=3.64" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/11/2021 HydroCAD® 10.10-4a s/n 09780 © 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 2 Summary for Pond 3P: SAND FILTER Inflow Area = 6.860 ac, 60.60% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.49" for 2-yr event Inflow = 29.64 cfs @ 11.95 hrs, Volume= 1.422 of Outflow = 5.37 cfs @ 12.13 hrs, Volume= 1.405 af, Atten= 82%, Lag= 10.7 min Primary = 5.37 cfs @ 12.13 hrs, Volume= 1.405 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 536.32' @ 12.13 hrs Surf.Area= 14,550 sf Storage= 30,196 cf Plug -Flow detention time= 360.7 min calculated for 1.405 of (99% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 353.6 min ( 1,155.6 - 802.0 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 534.00' 74,272 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 534.00 11,535 0 0 535.00 12,795 12,165 12,165 536.00 14,111 13,453 25,618 537.00 15,484 14,798 40,416 538.00 16,914 16,199 56,615 539.00 18,400 17,657 74,272 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 530.85' 24.0" Round Culvert L= 132.9' RCP, groove end w/headwall, Ke= 0.200 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 530.85' / 530.19' S= 0.0050 T Cc= 0.900 n= 0.011 Concrete pipe, straight & clean, Flow Area= 3.14 sf #2 Device 1 534.00' Sand Infiltration Elev. (feet) 534.00 535.00 536.00 537.00 538.00 539.00 Disch. (cfs) 0.000 0.197 0.276 0.354 0.433 0.512 #3 Device 1 535.00' 2 yr Weir, Cv= 2.62 (C= 3.28) Head (feet) 0.00 0.50 Width (feet) 2.00 2.00 #4 Device 1 537.35' 48.0" x 48.0" Horiz. Top of Riser C= 0.600 Limited to weir flow at low heads #5 Primary 538.35' 20.0' long Emergency Spillway 2 End Contraction(s) Primary OutFlow Max=5.36 cfs @ 12.13 hrs HW=536.32' (Free Discharge) 1=Culvert (Passes 5.36 cfs of 33.16 cfs potential flow) 2=Sand Infiltration (Custom Controls 0.30 cfs) 3=2 yr Weir (Orifice Controls 5.06 cfs @ 5.06 fps) 4=Top of Riser ( Controls 0.00 cfs) 5=Emergency Spillway ( Controls 0.00 cfs) 9314-BMP Sand Filter - Storms Type 11 24-hr 2-yr Rainfall=3.64" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/11/2021 HydroCAD® 10.10-4a s/n 09780 © 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 3 N w G 3 0 LL Pond 3P: SAND FILTER Hydrograph Time (hours) Pond 3P: SAND FILTER Stage -Discharge 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 Discharge (cfs) e Inflow ❑ Primary ❑ Primary 9314-BMP Sand Filter - Storms Type 1124-hr 2-yr Rainfall=3.64" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/11/2021 HydroCAD® 10.10-4a s/n 09780 © 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 4 Summary for Pond 4P: PRE OUT Inflow Area = 6.860 ac, 1.90% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.54" for 2-yr event Inflow = 12.24 cfs @ 12.11 hrs, Volume= 0.878 of Primary = 12.24 cfs @ 12.11 hrs, Volume= 0.878 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs 1 1 1 1 N U 3 0 LL Pond 4P: PRE OUT Hydrograph 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72 Time (hours) ❑ Inflow ❑ Primary 9314-BMP Sand Filter - Storms Type 11 24-hr 10-yr Rainfall=5.33" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/11/2021 HydroCAD® 10.10-4a s/n 09780 © 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 5 Summary for Pond 3P: SAND FILTER Inflow Area = 6.860 ac, 60.60% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 4.09" for 10-yr event Inflow = 47.31 cfs @ 11.95 hrs, Volume= 2.337 of Outflow = 11.97 cfs @ 12.11 hrs, Volume= 2.321 af, Atten= 75%, Lag= 9.2 min Primary = 11.97 cfs @ 12.11 hrs, Volume= 2.321 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 537.53' @ 12.11 hrs Surf.Area= 16,248 sf Storage= 48,888 cf Plug -Flow detention time= 256.2 min calculated for 2.321 of (99% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 251.6 min ( 1,039.6 - 788.0 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 534.00' 74,272 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 534.00 11,535 0 0 535.00 12,795 12,165 12,165 536.00 14,111 13,453 25,618 537.00 15,484 14,798 40,416 538.00 16,914 16,199 56,615 539.00 18,400 17,657 74,272 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 530.85' 24.0" Round Culvert L= 132.9' RCP, groove end w/headwall, Ke= 0.200 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 530.85' / 530.19' S= 0.0050 T Cc= 0.900 n= 0.011 Concrete pipe, straight & clean, Flow Area= 3.14 sf #2 Device 1 534.00' Sand Infiltration Elev. (feet) 534.00 535.00 536.00 537.00 538.00 539.00 Disch. (cfs) 0.000 0.197 0.276 0.354 0.433 0.512 #3 Device 1 535.00' 2 yr Weir, Cv= 2.62 (C= 3.28) Head (feet) 0.00 0.50 Width (feet) 2.00 2.00 #4 Device 1 537.35' 48.0" x 48.0" Horiz. Top of Riser C= 0.600 Limited to weir flow at low heads #5 Primary 538.35' 20.0' long Emergency Spillway 2 End Contraction(s) Primary OutFlow Max=11.78 cfs @ 12.11 hrs HW=537.53' (Free Discharge) 1=Culvert (Passes 11.78 cfs of 37.71 cfs potential flow) 2=Sand Infiltration (Custom Controls 0.40 cfs) 3=2 yr Weir (Orifice Controls 7.41 cfs @ 7.41 fps) 4=Top of Riser (Weir Controls 3.97 cfs @ 1.38 fps) 5=Emergency Spillway ( Controls 0.00 cfs) 9314-BMP Sand Filter - Storms Type/1 24-hr 10-yr Rainfall=5.33" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/11/2021 HydroCAD® 10.10-4a s/n 09780 © 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 6 N C1 3 0 LL Pond 3P: SAND FILTER Hydrograph Time (hours) Pond 3P: SAND FILTER Stage -Discharge 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 Discharge (cfs) e Inflow ❑ Primary ❑ Primary 9314-BMP Sand Filter - Storms Type 11 24-hr 10-yr Rainfall=5.33" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/11/2021 HydroCAD® 10.10-4a s/n 09780 © 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 7 Summary for Pond 4P: PRE OUT Inflow Area = 6.860 ac, 1.90% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.90" for 10-yr event Inflow = 23.42 cfs @ 12.10 hrs, Volume= 1.659 of Primary = 23.42 cfs @ 12.10 hrs, Volume= 1.659 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs N U 3 0 LL Pond 4P: PRE OUT Hydrograph 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72 Time (hours) ❑ Inflow ❑ Primary 9314-BMP Sand Filter - Storms Type 11 24-hr 25-yr Rainfall=6.37" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/11/2021 HydroCAD® 10.10-4a s/n 09780 © 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 8 Summary for Pond 3P: SAND FILTER Inflow Area = 6.860 ac, 60.60% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 5.09" for 25-yr event Inflow = 58.11 cfs @ 11.95 hrs, Volume= 2.912 of Outflow = 29.57 cfs @ 12.05 hrs, Volume= 2.895 af, Atten= 49%, Lag= 6.2 min Primary = 29.57 cfs @ 12.05 hrs, Volume= 2.895 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 537.90' @ 12.05 hrs Surf.Area= 16,766 sf Storage= 54,877 cf Plug -Flow detention time= 215.6 min calculated for 2.893 of (99% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 213.7 min ( 995.7 - 782.0 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 534.00' 74,272 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 534.00 11,535 0 0 535.00 12,795 12,165 12,165 536.00 14,111 13,453 25,618 537.00 15,484 14,798 40,416 538.00 16,914 16,199 56,615 539.00 18,400 17,657 74,272 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 530.85' 24.0" Round Culvert L= 132.9' RCP, groove end w/headwall, Ke= 0.200 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 530.85' / 530.19' S= 0.0050 T Cc= 0.900 n= 0.011 Concrete pipe, straight & clean, Flow Area= 3.14 sf #2 Device 1 534.00' Sand Infiltration Elev. (feet) 534.00 535.00 536.00 537.00 538.00 539.00 Disch. (cfs) 0.000 0.197 0.276 0.354 0.433 0.512 #3 Device 1 535.00' 2 yr Weir, Cv= 2.62 (C= 3.28) Head (feet) 0.00 0.50 Width (feet) 2.00 2.00 #4 Device 1 537.35' 48.0" x 48.0" Horiz. Top of Riser C= 0.600 Limited to weir flow at low heads #5 Primary 538.35' 20.0' long Emergency Spillway 2 End Contraction(s) Primary OutFlow Max=29.04 cfs @ 12.05 hrs HW=537.89' (Free Discharge) 1=Culvert (Passes 29.04 cfs of 38.96 cfs potential flow) 2=Sand Infiltration (Custom Controls 0.42 cfs) 3=2 yr Weir (Orifice Controls 7.98 cfs @ 7.98 fps) 4=Top of Riser (Weir Controls 20.64 cfs @ 2.40 fps) 5=Emergency Spillway ( Controls 0.00 cfs) 9314-BMP Sand Filter - Storms Type/1 24-hr 25-yr Rainfall=6.37" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/11/2021 HydroCAD® 10.10-4a s/n 09780 © 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 9 N C1 3 0 LL Pond 3P: SAND FILTER Hydrograph Time (hours) Pond 3P: SAND FILTER Stage -Discharge 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 Discharge (cfs) e Inflow ❑ Primary ❑ Primary 9314-BMP Sand Filter - Storms Type/1 24-hr 25-yr Rainfall=6.37" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/11/2021 HydroCAD® 10.10-4a s/n 09780 © 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 10 Summary for Pond 4P: PRE OUT Inflow Area = 6.860 ac, 1.90% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 3.80" for 25-yr event Inflow = 30.66 cfs @ 12.10 hrs, Volume= 2.175 of Primary = 30.66 cfs @ 12.10 hrs, Volume= 2.175 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs N V 3 0 LL Pond 4P: PRE OUT Hydrograph 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72 Time (hours) ❑ Inflow ❑ Primary 10-YR STORM SEWER REPORT Hydraflow Storm Sewers Extension for Autodeak@ Civil 3D@ Plan 19 16 Outfall 18 17 1 15 5 4 14 20 3 21 6 13 23 22 24 27 2 2625 Outfall 28 12 33 11 31 29 10 9 35 36 37 38 8 39 7 Outfall Project File: 9314_STORM SEWERS —UPDATE 01.20.21.stm Number of lines: 39 Date: 1/20/2021 Storm Sewers v2020.00 Storm Sewer Tabulation Page 1 Station Len Drng Area Rnoff Area x C Tc Rain Total Cap Vel Pipe Invert Elev HGL Elev Grnd / Rim Elev Line ID coeff (I) flow full Line To Incr Total Incr Total Inlet Syst Size Slope Dn Up Dn Up Dn Up Line (ft) (ac) (ac) (C) (min) (min) (in/hr) (cfs) (cfs) (ft/s) (in) M (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) 1 End 20.775 0.04 0.04 0.85 0.03 0.03 5.0 5.0 7.2 0.25 3.58 2.38 12 1.01 544.67 544.88 544.85 545.08 546.34 548.87 Pipe - (323) 2 End 91.616 0.07 0.56 0.85 0.06 0.48 5.0 7.1 6.7 3.17 7.44 4.04 18 0.50 542.00 542.46 542.68 543.15 543.42 547.00 Pipe - (13) 3 2 119.183 0.09 0.38 0.85 0.08 0.32 5.0 6.1 6.9 2.24 4.54 2.81 15 0.50 542.46 543.05 543.48 543.69 547.00 547.62 Pipe - (320) 4 3 66.685 0.15 0.29 0.85 0.13 0.25 5.0 5.6 7.1 1.74 2.54 3.32 12 0.51 543.30 543.64 543.98 544.23 547.62 547.80 Pipe - (16) 5 4 37.317 0.14 0.14 0.85 0.12 0.12 5.0 5.0 7.2 0.86 2.47 1.11 12 0.48 543.39 543.57 544.48 544.50 547.80 548.18 Pipe - (321) 6 2 66.578 0.11 0.11 0.85 0.09 0.09 5.0 5.0 7.2 0.68 2.76 1.94 12 0.60 542.71 543.11 543.48 543.45 547.00 547.00 Pipe - (26) 7 End 43.233 0.36 5.80 0.85 0.31 4.93 5.0 12.7 5.6 27.44 33.64 5.30 36 0.25 534.00 534.11 536.06 536.17 537.47 538.38 Pipe - (1) 8 7 18.409 0.04 5.44 0.85 0.03 4.62 5.0 12.6 5.6 25.80 46.64 5.51 36 0.49 534.11 534.20 536.39 535.84 538.38 538.38 Pipe - (2) 9 8 77.854 0.00 3.81 0.85 0.00 3.24 5.0 12.4 5.6 18.18 22.35 6.82 24 0.98 534.20 534.96 535.84 536.49 538.38 539.50 Pipe - (3) 10 9 186.237 0.00 3.81 0.85 0.00 3.24 5.0 11.9 5.7 18.46 18.90 6.86 24 0.70 534.96 536.26 536.56 537.86 539.50 545.12 Pipe - (4) 11 10 222.368 0.00 3.57 0.85 0.00 3.03 5.0 10.4 6.0 18.09 18.95 5.76 24 0.70 536.26 537.82 538.49 539.92 545.12 547.33 Pipe - (6) 12 11 99.990 0.30 3.57 0.85 0.26 3.03 5.0 10.1 6.0 18.25 25.95 5.91 24 1.32 537.82 539.14 540.42 540.99 547.33 546.00 Pipe - (7) 13 12 150.000 0.09 2.65 0.85 0.08 2.25 5.0 9.6 6.1 13.78 17.52 4.39 24 0.60 539.15 540.05 541.83 542.39 546.00 546.70 Pipe - (9) 14 13 94.234 1.09 1.85 0.85 0.93 1.57 5.0 9.1 6.2 9.78 16.80 3.11 24 0.55 540.05 540.57 542.81 542.98 546.70 546.00 Pipe - (18) 15 14 130.955 0.09 0.76 0.85 0.08 0.65 5.0 8.3 6.4 4.14 8.75 2.48 18 0.69 541.07 541.98 543.06 543.24 546.00 546.80 Pipe - (25) 16 15 58.023 0.13 0.67 0.85 0.11 0.57 5.0 7.8 6.5 3.70 7.80 3.24 18 0.55 541.98 542.30 543.37 543.03 546.80 548.00 Pipe - (22) 17 16 132.309 0.39 0.49 0.85 0.33 0.42 5.0 6.4 6.8 2.85 4.80 3.99 15 0.55 542.30 543.03 543.03 543.71 548.00 547.90 Pipe - (325) 18 17 67.111 0.10 0.10 0.85 0.09 0.09 5.0 5.0 7.2 0.62 2.64 0.89 12 0.55 543.03 543.40 544.12 544.13 547.90 547.90 Pipe - (326) 19 16 66.534 0.05 0.05 0.85 0.04 0.04 5.0 5.0 7.2 0.31 3.33 2.46 12 0.87 543.12 543.70 543.33 543.93 548.00 547.74 Pipe - (23) 20 13 58.200 0.19 0.71 0.85 0.16 0.60 5.0 7.3 6.6 4.01 8.14 2.27 18 0.60 540.55 540.90 542.81 542.89 546.70 547.00 Pipe - (10) 21 20 159.000 0.00 0.52 0.85 0.00 0.44 5.0 6.2 6.9 3.05 5.02 2.52 15 0.60 541.14 542.10 542.95 543.27 547.00 548.06 Pipe - (11) 22 21 92.165 0.11 0.42 0.85 0.09 0.36 5.0 5.5 7.1 2.54 4.99 2.31 15 0.60 542.05 542.60 543.42 543.54 548.06 547.50 Pipe - (12) Project File: 9314_STORM SEWERS -UPDATE 01.20.21.stm Number of lines: 39 Run Date: 1/21/2021 NOTES:Intensity = 88.24 / (Inlet time + 15.50) ^ 0.83; Return period =Yrs. 10 c = cir e = ellip b = box Storm Sewers v2020.00 Storm Sewer Tabulation Page 2 Station Len Drng Area Rnoff Area x C Tc Rain Total Cap Vel Pipe Invert Elev HGL Elev Grnd / Rim Elev Line ID coeff (I) flow full Line To Incr Total Incr Total Inlet Syst Size Slope Dn Up Dn Up Dn Up Line (ft) (ac) (ac) (C) (min) (min) (in/hr) (cfs) (cfs) (ft/s) (in) M (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) 23 22 66.729 0.31 0.31 0.85 0.26 0.26 5.0 5.0 7.2 1.91 2.76 2.54 12 0.60 542.60 543.00 543.70 543.86 547.50 547.40 Pipe - (322) 24 21 54.105 0.10 0.10 0.85 0.09 0.09 5.0 5.0 7.2 0.62 4.45 0.95 12 1.33 542.05 542.77 543.42 543.43 548.06 548.90 Pipe - (44) 25 12 61.051 0.00 0.62 0.85 0.00 0.53 5.0 5.5 7.1 3.74 4.42 4.76 12 1.31 539.14 539.94 541.83 542.41 546.00 542.44 Pipe - (40) 26 25 44.387 0.16 0.46 0.85 0.14 0.39 5.0 5.3 7.2 2.80 3.88 3.56 12 1.01 539.94 540.39 542.76 542.99 542.44 548.62 Pipe - (42) 27 26 39.588 0.30 0.30 0.85 0.26 0.26 5.0 5.0 7.2 1.85 3.83 2.35 12 0.99 540.39 540.78 543.09 543.18 548.62 542.66 Pipe - (43) 28 25 22.141 0.16 0.16 0.85 0.14 0.14 5.0 5.0 7.2 0.98 8.44 1.25 12 4.79 539.94 541.00 542.76 542.77 542.44 548.65 Pipe - (41) 29 10 21.963 0.00 0.24 0.85 0.00 0.20 5.0 11.7 5.7 1.17 5.46 2.84 12 2.00 537.88 538.32 538.49 538.78 545.12 550.05 Pipe - (327) 30 29 21.204 0.00 0.01 0.85 0.00 0.01 5.0 7.1 6.7 0.06 5.43 0.78 12 1.98 538.11 538.53 538.78 538.63 550.05 544.90 Pipe - (30) 31 30 22.435 0.01 0.01 0.85 0.01 0.01 5.0 5.0 7.2 0.06 2.61 1.77 8 3.97 538.53 539.42 538.63 539.53 544.90 545.51 Pipe - (31) 32 29 23.057 0.08 0.23 0.85 0.07 0.20 5.0 6.0 6.9 1.36 3.85 2.91 12 1.00 538.07 538.30 538.78 538.79 550.05 547.25 Pipe - (32) 33 32 73.523 0.15 0.15 0.85 0.13 0.13 5.0 5.0 7.2 0.92 3.84 2.76 12 0.99 538.30 539.03 538.79 539.43 547.25 548.70 Pipe - (33) 34 8 14.567 0.30 1.59 0.85 0.26 1.35 5.0 6.5 6.8 9.23 67.67 3.54 36 1.03 534.20 534.35 535.84 535.31 538.38 539.41 Pipe - (35) 35 34 70.987 0.35 1.29 0.85 0.30 1.10 5.0 6.0 7.0 7.63 15.88 4.99 24 0.49 534.35 534.70 535.33 535.68 539.41 537.45 Pipe - (36) 36 35 52.886 0.37 0.78 0.85 0.31 0.66 5.0 5.7 7.0 4.67 7.50 4.17 18 0.51 534.70 534.97 535.68 535.82 537.45 537.60 Pipe - (37) 37 36 18.010 0.25 0.41 0.85 0.21 0.35 5.0 5.5 7.1 2.47 4.57 2.31 15 0.50 534.97 535.06 536.03 536.04 537.60 538.15 Pipe - (38) 38 37 25.331 0.16 0.16 0.85 0.14 0.14 5.0 5.0 7.2 0.98 4.63 0.93 15 0.51 535.06 535.19 536.13 536.14 538.15 538.18 Pipe - (39) 39 35 34.802 0.16 0.16 0.85 0.14 0.14 5.0 5.0 7.2 0.98 2.56 1.34 12 0.52 534.70 534.88 535.68 535.70 537.45 537.50 Pipe - (328) Project File: 9314_STORM SEWERS -UPDATE 01.20.21.stm Number of lines: 39 Run Date: 1/21/2021 NOTES:Intensity = 88.24 / (Inlet time + 15.50) ^ 0.83; Return period =Yrs. 10 c = cir e = ellip b = box Storm Sewers v2020.00 RUNOFF TO PRESSON ROAD 9314- Presson Road Runoff Type 1124-hr 10-yr Rainfall=5.33" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 1/25/2021 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 09780 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 1 Summary for Subcatchment 1S: PRE -IMPERVIOUS Runoff = 14.23 cfs @ 12.02 hrs, Volume= 0.729 af, Depth> 2.77" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type II 24-hr 10-yr Rainfall=5.33" Area (ac) CN Description 2.460 72 Woods/grass comb., Good, HSG C 0.700 98 Paved parking, HSG C 3.160 78 Weighted Average 2.460 77.85% Pervious Area 0.700 22.15% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.1 Direct Entry, User Entry 9314- Presson Road Runoff Type 1124-hr 10-yr Rainfall=5.33" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 1/25/2021 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 09780 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 3 Summary for Subcatchment 2S: POST -IMPERVIOUS Runoff = 10.58 cfs @ 11.95 hrs, Volume= 0.475 af, Depth> 3.43" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type II 24-hr 10-yr Rainfall=5.33" Area (ac) CN Description 0.750 98 Paved parking, HSG C 0.910 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C 1.660 85 Weighted Average 0.910 54.82% Pervious Area 0.750 45.18% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, User Entry RUNOFF TO EX. BMP 9314- Ex BMP Runoffs Type 1124-hr 10-yr Rainfall=5.33" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 1/25/2021 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 09780 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 1 Summary for Subcatchment 3A: EX. BMP (AREA E) - PRE Runoff = 8.19 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume= 0.547 af, Depth> 2.49" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type II 24-hr 10-yr Rainfall=5.33" Area (ac) CN Description 0.100 98 Paved parking, HSG C 2.530 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C 2.630 75 Weighted Average 2.530 96.20% Pervious Area 0.100 3.80% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 16.2 100 0.0350 0.10 Sheet Flow, Woods: Light underbrush n= 0.400 P2= 3.60" 2.6 400 0.0250 2.55 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps 18.8 500 Total 9314- Ex BMP Runoffs Type 1124-hr 10-yr Rainfall=5.33" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 1/25/2021 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 09780 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 3 Summary for Subcatchment 3B: EX. BMP (AREA E) - POST Runoff = 7.99 cfs @ 12.00 hrs, Volume= 0.378 af, Depth> 2.50" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type II 24-hr 10-yr Rainfall=5.33" Area (ac) CN Description 0.090 98 Paved parking, HSG C 1.720 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C 1.810 75 Weighted Average 1.720 95.03% Pervious Area 0.090 4.97% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 7.4 100 0.0350 0.23 Sheet Flow, Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 3.60" 0.8 160 0.0469 3.49 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fps 8.2 260 Total 9314- Ex BMP Runoffs Type 1124-hr 10-yr Rainfall=5.33" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 1/25/2021 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 09780 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 5 Summary for Subcatchment 4A: EX. BMP (AREA A) - PRE Runoff = 18.40 cfs @ 11.97 hrs, Volume= 0.931 af, Depth> 4.23" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type II 24-hr 10-yr Rainfall=5.33" Area (ac) CN Description 0.650 79 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG C 1.990 98 Paved roads w/curbs & sewers, HSG C 2.640 93 Weighted Average 0.650 24.62% Pervious Area 1.990 75.38% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 75 0.0533 0.25 Sheet Flow, Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 3.60" 1.3 300 0.0600 3.94 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fos 6.3 375 Total 9314- Ex BMP Runoffs Type 1124-hr 10-yr Rainfall=5.33" Prepared by {enter your company name here) Printed 1/25/2021 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 09780 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 7 Summary for Subcatchment 4B: EX. BMP (AREA A) - POST Runoff = 14.48 cfs @ 11.96 hrs, Volume= 0.657 af, Depth> 3.14" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type II 24-hr 10-yr Rainfall=5.33" Area (ac) CN Description 0.820 98 Paved roads w/curbs & sewers, HSG C 1.690 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C 2.510 82 Weighted Average 1.690 67.33% Pervious Area 0.820 32.67% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, USER ENTERED THROUGH PIPE ASSUMPTION 0.7 200 0.0775 4.48 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Unpaved Kv= 16.1 fos 5.7 200 Total OUTFALL RIP -RAP SIZING CALCULATIONS User Input Data Calculated Value Reference Data INLET INTO BMP Designed By: Alexander Rhode Date: 3/10/2021 Checked By: Marc Momsen Date: 3/11/021 Company: LandDesign, Inc. Project Name: Union County Sheriff's Office Project No.: 1019314 Site Location (City/Town) Monroe, NC Culvert Id. Total Drainage Area (acres) 5.8 Step 1. Determine the tadwater depth from channel characteristics below- the pipe outlet for the design capacity of the pipe. If the tailwater depth is less than half the outlet pipe diameter, it is classified minimum taihcater condition. If it is greater than half the pipe diameter, it is classified maximum condition_ Pipes that outlet onto Wide flat areas with no defined channel are assumed to have a minimum tailwater condition unless reliable flood stage elevations show otherwise_ Outlet pipe diameter, Do (in.) Tailwater depth (in.) Minimum/Maximum tailwater? Discharge (cfs) Velocity (ft./s) 36 18 Max TW (Fig. 8.06b) 27.44 5.3 Step 2. Based on the tailwater conditions determined in step 1, enter Figure 8.06a or Figure 8.06b. and determine d50 riprap size and minimum apron length (L). The d5o size is the median stone size in a well -graded nprap apron. Step 3. Determure apron width at the pipe outlet, the apron shape, and the apron width at the outlet end from the same figure used in Step 2_ Riprap d50, A) Minimum apron length, La (ft.) Apron width at pipe outlet (ft.) Apron shape Minimum TW Figure 8.06a E Maximum TW Figure 8.06b 0.2 13.75 9 Rectangle Apron width at outlet end (ft.) 3 8.5 Step 4. D: terms-ne the tna"anium stone diameter d�3s = I.5 x cl',o Minimum TW Max Stone Diameter, dmax (ft.) 0 Step 5. Deternune the apron thickness: Apron thickness = 1.5 x dr,. Apron Thickness(ft.) Maximum TW 0.3 Minimum TW Maximum TW 0 0.45 Step 6. Fit the nprap apron to the site by making it level for the nunimiLun length, La. from Figure 8.06a or Figure 8.06b. Extend the apron farther downstream and along channel banks until stability is assured_ Keep the apron as straight as possible and align it Krith the flow of the receiving stream. Make any necessary alignment bends near the pipe outlet so that the entrance into the receiving stream is straight. Some locations may require lining of the entire charnel cross section to assure stability. It may be necessary to increase the size of riprap where protection of the channel side slopes is necessary (Appendix 8.05). Where overfalls exist at pipe outlets or flows are excessive, a plunge pool should be considered, see page 8.06.8_ Figure 8.06b: Design of outlet protection from a round pipe flowing full, maximum tailwater condition (Tw>=0.5 diameter) 3DO Outlet N . Do + 0.4L8 pipe diameter Mo) L La 5Do �'u iw Discharge (tt3/sec) Curves may not be extrapolated. Figure 8.06b Design of outlet protection from a round pipe (:owing full, maximum tailwater condition (T„ i 0.5 3ameter). 3 .0 000 8.06.4 Rev, 12 93 User Input Data Calculated Value Reference Data BMP OUTFALL Designed By: Alexander Rhode Date: 3/12/2021 Checked By: Marc Momsen Date: 3/12/2021 Company: LandDesign, Inc. Project Name: Union County Sheriff's Office Project No.: 1019314 Site Location (City/Town) Monroe, NC Culvert Id. Total Drainage Area (acres) 6.86 Step 1. Determine the tailwater depth from channel characteristics below the pipe outlet for the design capacity of the pipe_ If the tailwater depth is less than half the outlet pipe diameter, it is classified tailwater condition. If it is greater than half the pipe diameter, it is classified maximum condition. Pipes that outlet onto wide flat areas with no defined channel are assumed to have a minimum tailwater condition unless reliable flood stage elevations show otherwise_ Outlet pipe diameter, Do (in.) Tailwater depth (in.) Minimum/Maximum tailwater? Discharge (cfs) Velocity (ft./s) 24 24 Max TW (Fig. 8.06b) 11.97 3.81 Step 2. Based on the tailwater conditions determined in step 1_ enter Figure 8.06a or Figure 8.06b, and determine dso riprap size and muiimum apron length (L). The d,, size is the median stone size in a well -graded nprap apron. Step 3. Determine apron width at the pipe outlet, the apron shape_ and the apron width at the outlet end from the same figure used in Step 2. Minimum TW Figure 8.06a Riprap d50, A) Minimum apron length, La (ft.) Apron width at pipe outlet (ft.) 6 Apron shape Maximum TW Figure 8.06b 0.1 9.5 6 Rectangle Apron width at outlet end (ft.) 2 5.8 Step 4. Determine the maximum stone diameter- d.=1.5xd5, Minimum TW Max Stone Diameter, dmax (ft.) 0 Step 3. Determne the apron thickness - Apron thickness = 1.5 x d,_,„ Apron Thickness(ft.) Maximum TW 0.15 Minimum TW Maximum TW 0 0.225 Step 6. Fit the riprap apron to the site by making it level for the mininituu length. L,,_ from Figure 8.06a or Figure 8.06b. Extend the apron farther doxvristream and along channel banks until stability is assured_ Keep the apron as straight as possible and align it with the flow of the receiving stream. :Make any necessary alignment bends near the pipe outlet so that the entrance into the receiving stream is straight_ Some locations may require lining of the entire channel cross section to assure stability. It may be necessary to increase the size of riprap where protection of the channel side slopes is necessary (Appendix 8.05). VG'here overfalls exist at pipe outlets or flows are excessive, a plunge pool should be considered, see page 8.06.8. Figure 8.06b: Design of outlet protection from a round pipe flowing full, maximum tailwater condition (Tw>=0.5 diameter) 3Do { I Outlet W = Do + 0.4La pipet�l diameter (Dol i La 5Do 80 - �PQ�o 70 60 50 20 r--:... - 10 0 120 - I ' Discharge (Olsec) Curves may not be extrapolated - Figure 6.06b Dosign of outlet protection from a round pipe flowing full. maximum tailwater conddion (Tw > 0,5 ciameter)- 8.SC4 Rew IM APPENDIX WEB SOIL SURVEY USDA United States Department of Agriculture N RCS Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local participants Custom Soil Resource Report for Union County, North Carolina May 26, 2020 Preface Soil surveys contain information that affects land use planning in survey areas. They highlight soil limitations that affect various land uses and provide information about the properties of the soils in the survey areas. Soil surveys are designed for many different users, including farmers, ranchers, foresters, agronomists, urban planners, community officials, engineers, developers, builders, and home buyers. Also, conservationists, teachers, students, and specialists in recreation, waste disposal, and pollution control can use the surveys to help them understand, protect, or enhance the environment. Various land use regulations of Federal, State, and local governments may impose special restrictions on land use or land treatment. Soil surveys identify soil properties that are used in making various land use or land treatment decisions. The information is intended to help the land users identify and reduce the effects of soil limitations on various land uses. The landowner or user is responsible for identifying and complying with existing laws and regulations. Although soil survey information can be used for general farm, local, and wider area planning, onsite investigation is needed to supplement this information in some cases. Examples include soil quality assessments (http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/ portal/nres/main/soils/health/) and certain conservation and engineering applications. For more detailed information, contact your local USDA Service Center (https://offices.sc.egov.usda.gov/locator/app?agency=nres) or your NRCS State Soil Scientist (http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/soils/contactus/? cid=nres142p2_053951). Great differences in soil properties can occur within short distances. Some soils are seasonally wet or subject to flooding. Some are too unstable to be used as a foundation for buildings or roads. Clayey or wet soils are poorly suited to use as septic tank absorption fields. A high water table makes a soil poorly suited to basements or underground installations. The National Cooperative Soil Survey is a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) has leadership for the Federal part of the National Cooperative Soil Survey. Information about soils is updated periodically. Updated information is available through the NRCS Web Soil Survey, the site for official soil survey information. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require 2 alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. 3 Contents Preface.................................................................................................................... 2 How Soil Surveys Are Made..................................................................................5 SoilMap.................................................................................................................. 8 SoilMap................................................................................................................9 Legend................................................................................................................10 MapUnit Legend................................................................................................ 11 MapUnit Descriptions.........................................................................................11 Union County, North Carolina......................................................................... 13 BdB2—Badin channery silty clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, moderately eroded................................................................................13 BdC2—Badin channery silty clay loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes, moderately eroded................................................................................14 BuB—Badin-Urban land complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes ............................ 15 ChA—Chewacla silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded .......... 16 References............................................................................................................18 2 How Soil Surveys Are Made Soil surveys are made to provide information about the soils and miscellaneous areas in a specific area. They include a description of the soils and miscellaneous areas and their location on the landscape and tables that show soil properties and limitations affecting various uses. Soil scientists observed the steepness, length, and shape of the slopes; the general pattern of drainage; the kinds of crops and native plants; and the kinds of bedrock. They observed and described many soil profiles. A soil profile is the sequence of natural layers, or horizons, in a soil. The profile extends from the surface down into the unconsolidated material in which the soil formed or from the surface down to bedrock. The unconsolidated material is devoid of roots and other living organisms and has not been changed by other biological activity. Currently, soils are mapped according to the boundaries of major land resource areas (MLRAs). MLRAs are geographically associated land resource units that share common characteristics related to physiography, geology, climate, water resources, soils, biological resources, and land uses (USDA, 2006). Soil survey areas typically consist of parts of one or more MLRA. The soils and miscellaneous areas in a survey area occur in an orderly pattern that is related to the geology, landforms, relief, climate, and natural vegetation of the area. Each kind of soil and miscellaneous area is associated with a particular kind of landform or with a segment of the landform. By observing the soils and miscellaneous areas in the survey area and relating their position to specific segments of the landform, a soil scientist develops a concept, or model, of how they were formed. Thus, during mapping, this model enables the soil scientist to predict with a considerable degree of accuracy the kind of soil or miscellaneous area at a specific location on the landscape. Commonly, individual soils on the landscape merge into one another as their characteristics gradually change. To construct an accurate soil map, however, soil scientists must determine the boundaries between the soils. They can observe only a limited number of soil profiles. Nevertheless, these observations, supplemented by an understanding of the soil -vegetation -landscape relationship, are sufficient to verify predictions of the kinds of soil in an area and to determine the boundaries. Soil scientists recorded the characteristics of the soil profiles that they studied. They noted soil color, texture, size and shape of soil aggregates, kind and amount of rock fragments, distribution of plant roots, reaction, and other features that enable them to identify soils. After describing the soils in the survey area and determining their properties, the soil scientists assigned the soils to taxonomic classes (units). Taxonomic classes are concepts. Each taxonomic class has a set of soil characteristics with precisely defined limits. The classes are used as a basis for comparison to classify soils systematically. Soil taxonomy, the system of taxonomic classification used in the United States, is based mainly on the kind and character of soil properties and the arrangement of horizons within the profile. After the soil 5 Custom Soil Resource Report scientists classified and named the soils in the survey area, they compared the individual soils with similar soils in the same taxonomic class in other areas so that they could confirm data and assemble additional data based on experience and research. The objective of soil mapping is not to delineate pure map unit components; the objective is to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. Each map unit is defined by a unique combination of soil components and/or miscellaneous areas in predictable proportions. Some components may be highly contrasting to the other components of the map unit. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The delineation of such landforms and landform segments on the map provides sufficient information for the development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas. Soil scientists make many field observations in the process of producing a soil map. The frequency of observation is dependent upon several factors, including scale of mapping, intensity of mapping, design of map units, complexity of the landscape, and experience of the soil scientist. Observations are made to test and refine the soil -landscape model and predictions and to verify the classification of the soils at specific locations. Once the soil -landscape model is refined, a significantly smaller number of measurements of individual soil properties are made and recorded. These measurements may include field measurements, such as those for color, depth to bedrock, and texture, and laboratory measurements, such as those for content of sand, silt, clay, salt, and other components. Properties of each soil typically vary from one point to another across the landscape. Observations for map unit components are aggregated to develop ranges of characteristics for the components. The aggregated values are presented. Direct measurements do not exist for every property presented for every map unit component. Values for some properties are estimated from combinations of other properties. While a soil survey is in progress, samples of some of the soils in the area generally are collected for laboratory analyses and for engineering tests. Soil scientists interpret the data from these analyses and tests as well as the field -observed characteristics and the soil properties to determine the expected behavior of the soils under different uses. Interpretations for all of the soils are field tested through observation of the soils in different uses and under different levels of management. Some interpretations are modified to fit local conditions, and some new interpretations are developed to meet local needs. Data are assembled from other sources, such as research information, production records, and field experience of specialists. For example, data on crop yields under defined levels of management are assembled from farm records and from field or plot experiments on the same kinds of soil. Predictions about soil behavior are based not only on soil properties but also on such variables as climate and biological activity. Soil conditions are predictable over long periods of time, but they are not predictable from year to year. For example, soil scientists can predict with a fairly high degree of accuracy that a given soil will have a high water table within certain depths in most years, but they cannot predict that a high water table will always be at a specific level in the soil on a specific date. After soil scientists located and identified the significant natural bodies of soil in the survey area, they drew the boundaries of these bodies on aerial photographs and 0 Custom Soil Resource Report identified each as a specific map unit. Aerial photographs show trees, buildings, fields, roads, and rivers, all of which help in locating boundaries accurately. 7 Soil Map The soil map section includes the soil map for the defined area of interest, a list of soil map units on the map and extent of each map unit, and cartographic symbols displayed on the map. Also presented are various metadata about data used to produce the map, and a description of each soil map unit. 0 3 fn W 548550 34° 58 54 N IN 0 93 34° 58' 33" N 548550 548630 549710 548790 548870 3 fn Map Scale: 1:3,180 W printed on A portrait (8.5" x 11") sheet N Meters 0 45 90 181 270 Feet 0 150 300 600 900 Map projection: Web Mercator Comeraoordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 17N WGS84 9 Custom Soil Resource Report Soil Map 548630 548710 548790 548870 548950 3 a $N W 549030 6—8 34° 56 54 N 34° 58' 33" N 549030 3 fn v N MAP LEGEND Area of Interest (AOI) 0 Area of Interest (AOI) Soils 0 Soil Map Unit Polygons im 0 Soil Map Unit Lines ■ Soil Map Unit Points Special Point Features Blowout Borrow Pit Clay Spot Closed Depression Gravel Pit .4 Gravelly Spot 0 Landfill Lava Flow Marsh or swamp + Mine or Quarry Miscellaneous Water Perennial Water Rock Outcrop Saline Spot Sandy Spot Severely Eroded Spot Sinkhole Slide or Slip oa Sodic Spot Custom Soil Resource Report MAP INFORMATION A Spoil Area The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:24,000. Stony Spot Very Stony Spot Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. Wet Spot Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause Other misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil .- Special Line Features line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed Water Features scale. - Streams and Canals Transportation Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map �}} Rails measurements. Interstate Highways Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service US Routes Web Soil Survey URL: Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857) Major Roads Local Roads Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts Background distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the Aerial Photography Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate calculations of distance or area are required. This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below. Soil Survey Area: Union County, North Carolina Survey Area Data: Version 19, Sep 16, 2019 Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000 or larger. Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Jul 18, 2011—Nov 25, 2017 The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. 10 Custom Soil Resource Report Map Unit Legend Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI BdB2 Badin channery silty clay loam, 18.1 74.2% 2 to 8 percent slopes, moderately eroded Badin channery silty clay loam, BdC2 6.3 25.8% 8 to 15 percent slopes, moderately eroded BuB Badin-Urban land complex, 2 to 0.0 0.0% 8 percent slopes ChA Chewacla silt loam, 0 to 2 0.0 0.0% percent slopes, frequently flooded Totals for Area of Interest 24.4 100.0% Map Unit Descriptions The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit. A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class. Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils. Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They generally are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the scale used. Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas are identified by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a given area, the contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit descriptions along with some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor components may not have been observed, and consequently they are not mentioned in the descriptions, especially where the pattern was so complex that it 11 Custom Soil Resource Report was impractical to make enough observations to identify all the soils and miscellaneous areas on the landscape. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate pure taxonomic classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. The delineation of such segments on the map provides sufficient information for the development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, however, onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas. An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions. Each description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil properties and qualities. Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have major horizons that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement. Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness, salinity, degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the basis of such differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas shown on the detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase commonly indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series. Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas. These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups. A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps. The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar in all areas. Alpha -Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example. An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present or anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered practical or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The pattern and relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar. Alpha -Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example. An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas that could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can be made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made up of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example. Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil material and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example. 12 Custom Soil Resource Report Union County, North Carolina BdB2—Badin channery silty clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, moderately eroded Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 2mx85 Elevation: 200 to 650 feet Mean annual precipitation: 37 to 60 inches Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 66 degrees F Frost -free period: 200 to 240 days Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance Map Unit Composition Badin, moderately eroded, and similar soils: 85 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Badin, Moderately Eroded Setting Landform: Interfluves Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve Down -slope shape: Convex Across -slope shape: Convex Parent material: Residuum weathered from metavolcanics and/or argillite Typical profile Ap - 0 to 6 inches: silty clay loam Bt - 6 to 20 inches: silty clay BC - 20 to 28 inches: channery silty clay loam Cr- 28 to 42 inches: weathered bedrock R - 42 to 80 inches: unweathered bedrock Properties and qualities Slope: 2 to 8 percent Depth to restrictive feature: 20 to 40 inches to paralithic bedrock; 40 to 80 inches to lithic bedrock Natural drainage class: Well drained Runoff class: Medium Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Very low to high (0.00 to 1.98 in/hr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Available water storage in profile: Low (about 4.8 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2e Hydrologic Soil Group: C Hydric soil rating: No 13 Custom Soil Resource Report BdC2—Badin channery silty clay loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes, moderately eroded Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 2mx86 Elevation: 200 to 650 feet Mean annual precipitation: 37 to 60 inches Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 66 degrees F Frost -free period: 200 to 240 days Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance Map Unit Composition Badin, moderately eroded, and similar soils: 85 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Badin, Moderately Eroded Setting Landform: Hillslopes on ridges Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope, shoulder Landform position (three-dimensional): Side slope Down -slope shape: Linear Across -slope shape: Convex Parent material: Residuum weathered from metavolcanics and/or argillite Typical profile Ap - 0 to 6 inches: silty clay loam Bt - 6 to 20 inches: silty clay BC - 20 to 28 inches: channery silty clay loam Cr - 28 to 42 inches: weathered bedrock R - 42 to 80 inches: unweathered bedrock Properties and qualities Slope: 8 to 15 percent Depth to restrictive feature: 20 to 40 inches to paralithic bedrock; 40 to 80 inches to lithic bedrock Natural drainage class: Well drained Runoff class: Medium Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Very low to high (0.00 to 1.98 in/hr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Available water storage in profile: Low (about 4.8 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3e Hydrologic Soil Group: C Hydric soil rating: No 14 Custom Soil Resource Report BuB—Badin-Urban land complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 3wOk Elevation: 200 to 650 feet Mean annual precipitation: 37 to 60 inches Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 66 degrees F Frost -free period: 200 to 240 days Farmland classification: Not prime farmland Map Unit Composition Badin and similar soils: 60 percent Urban land: 25 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Badin Setting Landform: I nterfluves Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve Down -slope shape: Convex Across -slope shape: Convex Parent material: Residuum weathered from metavolcanics and/or argillite Typical profile Ap - 0 to 6 inches: channery silt loam Bt - 6 to 35 inches: silty clay Cr - 35 to 43 inches: weathered bedrock R - 43 to 80 inches: unweathered bedrock Properties and qualities Slope: 2 to 8 percent Depth to restrictive feature: 20 to 40 inches to paralithic bedrock; 40 to 80 inches to lithic bedrock Natural drainage class: Well drained Runoff class: Medium Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Very low to high (0.00 to 1.98 in/hr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Available water storage in profile: Low (about 6.0 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2e Hydrologic Soil Group: C Hydric soil rating: No 15 Custom Soil Resource Report Description of Urban Land Setting Landform: Interfluves Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve Down -slope shape: Convex Across -slope shape: Convex Parent material: Impervious layers over human transported material Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 8 Hydric soil rating: No ChA—Chewacla silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 3wOp Elevation: 200 to 1,400 feet Mean annual precipitation: 37 to 60 inches Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 66 degrees F Frost -free period: 200 to 240 days Farmland classification: Prime farmland if drained and either protected from flooding or not frequently flooded during the growing season Map Unit Composition Chewacla and similar soils: 87 percent Minor components: 13 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Chewacla Setting Landform: Flood plains Down -slope shape: Concave Across -slope shape: Linear Parent material: Loamy alluvium derived from igneous and metamorphic rock Typical profile A - 0 to 4 inches: silt loam Bwl - 4 to 26 inches: silty clay loam Bw2 - 26 to 38 inches: loam Bw3 - 38 to 60 inches: clay loam C - 60 to 80 inches: loam Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 2 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Somewhat poorly drained 16 Custom Soil Resource Report Runoff class: Low Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr) Depth to water table: About 6 to 24 inches Frequency of flooding: Frequent Frequency of ponding: None Available water storage in profile: High (about 11.5 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4w Hydrologic Soil Group: B/D Hydric soil rating: No Minor Components Congaree Percent of map unit: 8 percent Landform: Flood plains Down -slope shape: Linear Across -slope shape: Linear Hydric soil rating: No Wehadkee, undrained Percent of map unit: 5 percent Landform: Depressions on flood plains Down -slope shape: Concave Across -slope shape: Linear Hydric soil rating: Yes 17 References American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). 2004. Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling and testing. 24th edition. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2005. Standard classification of soils for engineering purposes. ASTM Standard D2487-00. Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of wetlands and deep -water habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service FWS/OBS-79/31. Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States. Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States. Hurt, G.W., and L.M. Vasilas, editors. Version 6.0, 2006. Field indicators of hydric soils in the United States. National Research Council. 1995. Wetlands: Characteristics and boundaries. Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/ nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres 142p2_054262 Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. http:// www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres142p2_053577 Soil Survey Staff. 2010. Keys to soil taxonomy. 11th edition. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. http:// www. nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres142p2_053580 Tiner, R.W., Jr. 1985. Wetlands of Delaware. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Wetlands Section. United States Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Waterways Experiment Station Technical Report Y-87-1. United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. National forestry manual. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/soils/ home/?cid=nres142p2_053374 United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. National range and pasture handbook. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/ detail/national/landuse/rangepasture/?cid=stelprdb1043084 18 Custom Soil Resource Report United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. National soil survey handbook, title 430-VI. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/ nres/detail/soils/scientists/?cid=nres142p2_054242 United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2006. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States, the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 296. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/? cid=nres142p2_053624 United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1961. Land capability classification. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 210. http:// www.nrcs.usda.gov/lnternet/FSE—DOCUMENTS/nrcsl 42p2_052290.pdf 19 SITE AND USGS TOPO MAP ............ or PROJECT LOCATION t ®2020Goag€e �- •• Voogle Earth +• knagery Date: 9/29j2019 34°58'46.52" N B0°27'59.55" W eley W ft eye at 7045 ft 0 PROPERTY DATA 7/16/2020 Parcel Report Parcel Number 09057010 Owner UNION COUNTY Mailing Address %SHERIFF'S OFFICE 3344 PRESSON RD MONROE NC , 28112 Account Information Land Value $1,093,200.00 Building Value $14,592,800.00 Total Value $15,686,000.00 Acreage 33.4400 Sales Information Sale Date Sale Amount Location Information Municipal Union County Administration County Zoning Code CITY Zoning Administration Wingate ETJ Wingate Fire District Wingate Soils ChA,BdC2,BuB,BdB2 Building Information Description WINGATE-PRESSON RD-JAIL 3344 PRESSON RD Situs Address 3344 PRESSON RD Property Class GOVERMENT/SCHOOL/CHURCH Book & Page Grantor 12 Mile Service Area No School School Assignment Information Census Tract Number 207.02 FEMA Panel 5465,5464 FEMA Zone AE Total Living Area 0 Improvement Type Year Build 0 District Voting Assignments (Jurisdictions) Polling Place Wingate Community School District 1 Center Precinct District #8 State House 69 Congressional 8 District Senate 35 District gis-web.unioncountync.gov//gomaps/Reports/UserDefined/parcelReport.cfm?objectids=16242412&bbox=-8957852.236709736,4160210.338999955,-... 1 /1 PRE AND POST HYDROLOGY EXHIBITS 410 4F \ SITE INFORMATION: SITE: 33.44 AC PARCEL: 09057010 EXISTING IMPERVIOUS: ASPHALT = 131,249 SF = 3.013 AC CONCRETE = 41,061 SF = 0.943 AC GRAVEL = 10,209 SF = 0.234 AC 92,561 SF = 2.125 AC L = 275,080 SF = 6.315 AC L PERCENT IMPERVIOUS = 18.88% SCALE: 1 "=120' 0 60' 120' 180' 300' UNION COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE • MONROE, NC • PRE -DEVELOPMENT IMPERVIOUS EXHIBIT PN1019314 1 07.16.2020 1 UNION COUNTY LandDesign. 7/16/20202:08PM GRUAN N:\2019\1019314\CAD\CIVIL\CALCS\9314-PRE-IMPERVIOUS.DWG ooe N STREAM AREA = 0.331 AC SITE IMPERVIOUS INFORMATION: SITE: 33.44 AC PARCEL: 09057010 PER SECTION IV 7 OF THE NCDEQ STORMWATER MANAGEMENT APPLICATION THE TOTAL PROJECT AREA = PROPERTY AREA - WETLANDS - STREAM WATER SURFACE AREA - ANY OTHER WATER SURFACE AREAS. TOTAL PROJECT AREA = 33.44 AC - 0.331 AC (EX. STREAM) TOTAL PROJECT AREA= 33.109 AC EXISTING IMPERVIOUS: ASPHALT = 131,249 SF = 3.013 AC CONCRETE = 41,061 SF = 0.943 AC GRAVEL = 10,209 SF = 0.234 AC BUILDINGS = 92,561 SF = 2.125 AC TOTAL = 275,080 SF = 6.315 AC EXISTING IMPERVIOUS TO BE REMOVED: TOTAL = 0.714 AC PROPOSED NEW IMPERVIOUS: ASPHALT = 152,910 SF = 3.510 AC CONCRETE = 22,780 SF = 0.523 AC BUILDINGS = 36, 513 SF = 0.838 AC TOTAL = 212,094 SF = 4.871 AC TOTAL SITE BUA = 6.315 - 0.714 + 4. 871 = 10.472 AC TOTAL SITE % IMPERVIOUS = (TOTAL SITE IMPERVIOUS / TOTAL PROJECT AREA) * 100 = (10.472 AC / 33.109)* 100 = 31.63 INCREASED BUA FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT =4.871 AC-0.714AC = 4.157 AC ** IF THIS TABLE CHANGES, UPDATE ON SHEET C3-00 AND C3-05 AS WELL ** OFFICE _ X TIMOTHY CHARLES HUGGINS PID: 09057010C \ PIE: 1172 PG 647 PROPERTY BOUNDARY- I �- v _ _ - — — — — 11000 4000 loe O��QPP Y ' A� cP 0-p 09O � x C. EXISTING \ \� ANIMAL CONTROL PROPOSEDOFFICE 100000 0000, 00000, OP J� 00 Q110� HELMS JAMED o so o Rio Leo aoo PID: 09057011A57011A UNION COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE • MONROE, NC • POST —DEVELOPED IMPERVIOUS AREAS PN1019314 1 01.25.2021 1 UNION COUNTY LandDesign. 1/25/2021 2:20 PM SKAUFMAN NA 2019\1019314\CAD\CIVIL\CALCS\9314-POST-IMPERVIOUS.DWG Xx DRAINAGE AREA TOTAL SITE AREA: t 33.44 AC EX. IMP: t 6.315 AC IMPERVIOUS: 18.88% <0��i��/ M—S nuamrs H—INS =111.1% \ PIE I=7 oh h / 2 DRAINAGE BOUNDARY (TYP.) q R sopUl 046 ° �� ����/� N — — \�\ . 5 525\\\ ,ems �• 1 EXISTING DA C �\ 530�A \s DRAINAGE AREA: 1.50 AC \ \��o�• 515 ��� �`�� �� EXISTING DA B 90 EXISTING DA A I �� Os3s = 535 \� ��� ��� DRAINAGE AREA: 2.10 AC DRAINAGE AREA: 18.31 AC _� o 77 / 5 �� �Ll S —1 — — — — — _ �j DRAINAGE AREA: 34,167 SF AS 0.78 AC 535 �1 542' p / DA: 4 DRAINAGE AREA: 115,490 SIF I 2.65 AC / / �\s Sao DRAINAGE0 68 AC 29,837 SF 540' OFF -SITE DA ,o / / DA: 3 DRAINAGE AREA: 1.40 AC /� / / �\ DRAINAGE AREA: 225,914 SIF \\\ \ \ — lob � / � 5.19 AC S3 540 'Qy / San DA: 5 DRAINAGE AREA: 36,371 SF 0.83 AC 175 150' 0 75 150 300 UNION COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE • MONROE, NC • PRE -DEVELOPED DRAINAGE AREAS FOR EROSION CONTROL USE PN1019314 1 07.17.2020 1 UNION COUNTY LandDesign. 11/17/2020 4 07 PM ARHODE N:\-2019\1019314\CAD\CIVIL\CALCSk9314-PRE-IMPERVIOUS.DVVG 11 PI�H — 7 — \ \ \ PIE. 5�.]PGsze — — P,Eo:1� 00 S\\ S DA TO PRESSON ROAD, 1.66 AC REMAINING SITE DA \em53s = j DA TO EX. BMP � \A9� 33.44 AC - 6.86 - 1.81 - 2.51 - 1.66 AC 2.51 AC 20.30 AC 530� / y 0 \ \ y J �/ j��All 535 = �_ 54p � �(((/G�� 542 i DA TO EX. ma 54 o PROP. BMP DA TO PROP. BMP E]s 6.86 AC yy° 63.6 s \\ - - 535 HELMS JHMESDONALO D UNION COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE • MONROE, NC • POST -DEVELOPED DRAINAGE AREAS PN1019314 1 01.25.2021 1 UNION COUNTY 1/25/2021 2:20 PM SKAUFMAN NA 2019\1019314\CAD\CIVIL\CALCS\9314-POST-IM PERVIOUS. DWG 1= 150' 7 0 5 150 300 s CB - (16) DA: 0.05 A () _ _ A DA: 0.15 AC ��S DA: 0.07 AC �o CB - (15) 0 CB - (26) s a DA: 0.04 AC �O DA: 0.11 AC DA: 0.14 AC CB (13) CB - (491) 5_ 540 53 DA: 0.10 AC CB - (490) CB - (12) DA: 0.31 AC \` a \ ' DA: 0.39 AC DA: 0.11 AC � DA: 0.10 AC ` ` CB - (11) DA: 0.13 AC i s SDCO - (44) �� A CB - (22) p DA: 0.0 AC DA: 0.09 AC CB - (25) mo TD- (31) � / — TD - (30) / 540 SDMH - (3) 1 SDCO - (492) _ � DA: 0.37 AC \ 45 545 - SDCO - (32) ��_ CB - (10) v DA:1.09 AC 535 � c _ III DA: 0.04 AC �� ��. CB - (24) 4 /PROP. B M P c6 (2)30 AC SDCO - (33) SDCO - (43) �`v I CB - (35) \ _ SDCO - (42) CB - (1) DA: 0.16 AC CB - (27) s \ \ \ spc0000 SDCO - (40) DA: 0.09 AC \ \ / / DA: 0.35AC SDCO-(41) �V CB - (493) CB - (36) n DA: 0.30 AC _ / - - / I CB- DA: 0.37 AC s3s i CB - (37) I SDMH - (6) CB (38) \ _ DA: 0.16 AC �o o DA: 0.25 AC \ 535 o CB - (39) �O Q� \ \ 542 545 5A0 Q 539 540 535 HELMS JA ALD � PID: 09059057011011A 7 — , ��� �� 535 UNION COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE • MONROE, NC • SITE POST -DEVELOPED DRAINAGE AREAS PN1019314 101.21.2021 1 UNION COUNTY 1/25/2021 2:20 PM SKAUFMAN N:\ 2019\1019314\CAD\CIVIL\CALCS\9314-POST-IM PERVIOUS. DWG I W. rore I- s NCDEQ CHECKLISTS, FRO, & APPROVAL LETTER EROSION and SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLAN PRELIMINARY REVIEW CHECKLIST The following items shall be incorporated with respect to specific site conditions, in an erosion & sedimentation control plan: NPDES Construction Stormwater General Permit NCGO10000 X Designation on the plans where the 7 or 14 day ground stabilization requirements apply per Part II.E.1 of the permit. X Design of basins with one acre or more of drainage area for surface withdrawal as per Part II.B.8 of the permit. LOCATION INFORMATION X Project location & labeled vicinity map (roads, streets, landmarks) X North arrow and scale X Identify River Basin. X Provide a copy of site located on applicable USGS quadrangle and NRCS Soils maps if it is in a River Basin with Riparian Buffer requirements. GENERAL SITE FEATURES (Plan elements) X Property lines & ownership ID for adjoining properties X Existing contours (topographic lines) X Proposed contours X Limits of disturbed area (provide acreage total, delineate limits, and label). Be sure to include all access to measures, lots that will be disturbed, and utilities that may extend offsite. X Planned and existing building locations and elevations X Planned & existing road locations & elevations, including temporary access roads X Lot and/or building numbers X Hydrogeologic features: rock outcrops, seeps, springs, wetland and their limits, streams, lakes, ponds, dams, etc. (include all required local or state buffer zones and any DWQ Riparian Buffer determinations) X Easements and drainageways, particularly required for offsite affected areas. Include copies of any recorded easements and/or agreements with adjoining property owners. X Profiles of streets, utilities, ditch lines, etc. X Stockpiled topsoil or subsoil locations If the same person conducts the land -disturbing activity & any related borrow or waste activity, the related borrow or waste activity shall constitute part of the land -disturbing activity unless the borrow or waste activity is regulated under the Mining Act of 1971, or is a landfill regulated by the Division of Waste Management. If the land -disturbing activity and any related borrow or waste activity are not conducted by the same person, they shall be considered separate land -disturbing activities and must be permitted either through the Sedimentation Pollution Control Act as a one -use borrow site or through the Mining Act. Location and details associated with any onsite stone crushing or other processing of material excavated. If the affected area associated with excavation, processing, stockpiles and transport of such materials will comprise 1 or more acres, and materials will be leaving the development tract, a mining permit will be required. Required Army Corps 404 permit and Water Quality 401 certification (e.g. stream disturbances over 150 linear feet) EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES (on plan) X Legend (provide appropriate symbols for all measures and reference them to the construction details) X Location of temporary measures X Location of permanent measures X Construction drawings and details for temporary and permanent measures. Show measures to scale on plan and include proposed contours where necessary. Ensure design storage requirements are maintained through all phases of construction. X Maintenance requirements for measures X Contact person responsible for maintenance SITE DRAINAGE FEATURES X Existing and planned drainage patterns (include off -site areas that drain through project and address temporary and permanent conveyance of stormwater over graded slopes) X Method used to determine acreage of land being disturbed and drainage areas to all proposed measures (e.g. delineation map) X Size, pipe material and location of culverts and sewers X Soil information: type, special characteristics X Soil information below culvert storm outlets X Name and classification of receiving water course or name of municipal operator (only where stormwater discharges are to occur) STORMWATER CALCULATIONS X Pre -construction runoff calculations for each outlet from the site (at peak discharge points). Be sure to provide all supporting data for the computation methods used (rainfall data for required storm events, time of concentration/storm duration, and runoff coefficients). X Design calculations for peak discharges of runoff (including the construction phase & the final runoff coefficients for the site) X Design calcs for culverts and storm sewers (include HW, TW and outlet velocities) X Discharge and velocity calculations for open channel and ditch X flows (easement & rights -of -way) Design calcs for cross sections and method of stabilization for existing and planned channels (include temporary linings). Include appropriate permissible velocity and/or shear stress data. X Design calcs and construction details for energy dissipaters below culvert and storm sewer outlets (include stone/material specs & X apron dimensions). Avoid discharges on fill slopes. Design calcs and dimension of sediment basins (note current surface area and dewatering standards as well as diversion of runoff to the basins). Be sure that all surface drains, including ditches and berms, will have positive drainage to the basins. VEGETATIVE STABILIZATION X Area & acreage to be stabilized with vegetation X Method of soil preparation X Seed type & rates (temporary & permanent) X Fertilizer type and rates X Mulch type and rates (include mulch anchoring methods) NOTE: Plan should include provisions for groundcover in accordance with NPDES Construction Stormwater General Permit NCG010000. FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY/OWNERSHIP FORM X Completed, signed & notarized FR/O Form X Accurate application fee payable to NCDEQ ($65.00 per acre rounded up the next acre with no ceiling amount) X Certificate of assumed name, if the owner is a partnership Name of Registered Agent (if applicable) Copy of the most current Deed for the site. Please make sure the deed(s) and ownership information are consistent between the plan sheets, local records and this form. X Provide latitude & longitude (in decimal degrees) at the project entrance. X Two hard -copies of the plans (some regional offices require additional plans or multiple sizes; please contact the regional coordinator prior to such submittal.) NOTE: For the Express Permitting Option, inquire at the local Regional Office for availability. Express Reviews are performed by appointment only. NARRATIVE AND CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE X Narrative describing the nature & purpose of the construction X activity. Construction sequence related to erosion and sediment control (including installation of critical measures prior to the initiation of the land -disturbing activity & removal of measures after areas they serve are permanently stabilized). Address all phases of construction and necessary practices associated with temporary stream bypasses and/or crossings. Bid specifications related only to erosion control rev. 05142019 NC DEQ Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources STATE STORMWATER FAST TRACK "AUTHORIZATION TO CONSTRUCT" PERMIT APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS A. ELIGIBILITY FOR FAST -TRACK PERMITTING Before applying for a Fast Track ATC permit, be sure to verify that your project is eligible for permitting under the Fast Track Permitting Process. Read each item on the application form under "A. ELIGIBILITY FOR FAST -TRACK PERMITTING" carefully and check only those items that apply to your project. If any item does not apply, the project is not eligible for Fast Track Permitting and must apply under the Standard Permitting Process. B. GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Project Name — Provide the actual name of the project consistent with the project name that was used on the CAMA application and/or on the SEC application. 2. Previous Project Name — If the project was previously submitted and/or returned under another name, please report the previous project name. 3. Location of Project — Provide the street address of the facility. Most local governments require a street address for the 911 emergency system. Please provide the 911 street address for the project and the ZIP code with 4-digit extension. Reporting the ZIP code is necessary in order for the Division's database to accurately reflect the project location. 4. Directions to Project — The directions provided must originate from the nearest intersection of 2 major roads (should be the same roads referenced on the vicinity map on the plans). A major road is any 1, 2 or 3 digit NC, US or Interstate highway. The 4-digit NC State Road numbers are helpful, but referencing only NCSR numbers in the directions will not suffice. 5. Latitude and Longitude — These must be taken and recorded at the Main Entrance to the project. If there is more than 1 main entrance, please specify which entrance was chosen, i.e., north, south, east, west, and/or identify by the road name. Please be careful when entering the numbers on the application. C. PERMIT INFORMATION New Projects If the project has never received a stormwater permit before, then it is NEW (no previous application). If the project has previously received a Fast Track ATC permit, the project is considered NEW (replacing a previous ATC Permit) if: • the previous Fast Track ATC permit has NOT expired; • construction on the project has NOT begun; • the proposed project has been modified such that project area has changed; • the project can begin and end construction within the term of its original ATC permit (the new ATC permit will be issued with the same expiration date); and • the applicant agrees to rescind the previous Fast Track ATC permit (the new ATC permit will be issued with a different permit number). If the project has previously received a Fast Track ATC permit, the project can be renewed one time using Form SWU-102 (the renewed permit will be issued with the same permit number and a new expiration date), if: • the previous Fast Track ATC permit has NOT expired; • the project has NOT been modified such that the project area has changed; Stormwater Fast Track ATC Application Instructions Page 1 of 7 Feb. 11, 2018 • construction has either NOT begun or has begun, but due to unforeseen circumstances, CANNOT be completed in the original 5-year permit term; and • construction on the project can be completed within the renewed 5-year permit term. Major ModificationF A project is a MODIFICATION of an EXISTING STORMWA TER PERMIT if a project previously permitted under the Standard Permitting Process is being modified, and the applicant wishes to permit it under the Fast Track Permitting Process going forward. If a project was previously permitted under the Standard Permitting Process, and a major modification is requested, the project may be eligible for the Fast Track Permitting Process if: • the modification being requested is NOT considered a minor modification, as that term is defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1002(25). Minor modifications must use the Standard Permitting Process; • the major modification is submitted by the original permittee; • the previous SW permit has NOT expired; • the entire project and all SCMs (including existing SCMs associated with the project) will meet all applicable requirements of 15A NCAC 02H .1000 - .1062, including the MDC, upon project completion; and • the applicant agrees to rescind the previous SW permit upon issuance of the new Fast Track ATC permit. Modifications of existing Fast Track ATC permits are not allowed. If a project for which a Fast Track ATC permit was issued has been modified such that the project area has changed, that project may be eligible to replace its Fast Track ATC permit with a new Fast Track ATC permit (see criteria above under "New Projects.") Please list the existing SW permit number and the status of construction: Check ❑Not Started if the project that was previously permitted was not built. Check Partially Completed if, during the course of construction, something about the project has changed that requires a modification. Check ❑Completed if the project is complete and is being modified for some other reason. For both Partially Complete and Completed projects, a Designer's Certification must accompany the modified application. A partial Designer's Certification is needed for Partially Complete projects, and would cover the SCM(s) and any drainage features constructed to date. The Designer's Certification for a Complete project would encompass the SCM, the drainage area and the built -upon area. Transfers A transfer of an existing Fast Track ATC Permit to a new project owner (other than an HOA) may be requested using the Stormwater Fast Track ATC Application Form under the following conditions: • the existing Fast Track ATC Permit is NOT expired; • the project area has NOT been modified; • the proposed permittee fills out a new ATC form with a new Design Professionals notarized certification AND the current permittee notarized certification form approving the transfer; • the Fast Track ATC Permit is NOT being transferred to a Homeowner's Association (a project must be issued a Final Permit before transferring to an HOA); • the Applicant acknowledges that the expiration date for the transferred Fast Track ATC permit will remain the same as the existing Fast Track ATC permit; Stormwater Fast Track ATC Application Instructions Page 2 of 7 Feb. 11, 2018 If the project has NOT started construction, the current permittee has provided a copy of the Fast Track ATC Permit and any associated records (e.g., design information) to DEMLR and the proposed permittee/Applicant; If the project has started construction, the design professional of record must certify what has been built to date and the design professional must provide all records (e.g., plans, calculations, SCM specifications, recorded documents, etc) to DEMLR and the proposed permittee/Applicant. If any of the above conditions cannot be met, the Fast Track ATC Permit is not eligible for Transfer and may be rescinded upon issuance of a new permit or allowed to expire. If construction has NOT started, the new permittee/Applicant may choose to apply for a new Fast Track ATC Permit or apply under the Standard Permitting Process. In those cases, the renewal term will be reset. If construction has started, the new permittee/Applicant may request that the Fast Track ATC Permit be converted to a state stormwater permit under the Standard Permitting Process. 2. Applicable State Stormwater Programs — Check each stormwater program that applies to the project. Applicability is generally based on location of the project site within a subject area, draining to a subject waterbody, and/or cumulative disturbed area. Consult the Stormwater Permitting Interactive Map as the starting reference determining applicability, and contact the DWR Regional Office for confirmation. You should also consult the stormwater rules (effective 1/1/2017) that apply to your project for specific requirements. If a project has portions that are located within two or more coastal stormwater program areas, the project shall meet the applicable requirements of 15A NCAC 02H .1019(6) inside each of the project's portions. (15A NCAC 02H .1019(5)(d) & G.S. 143-214.7 (b2)(3)] If there are any questions, please contact the appropriate Regional Office for guidance. 3. Other Permits — Please let us know what other permits the project has already applied for or received or that are required. You will need to contact the Division of Coastal Management to determine if a CAMA Major permit is needed. You will need a Sedimentation Erosion Control Plan if the project will cumulatively disturb more than one acre. You will need an NPDES Industrial Stormwater permit if the project proposes an activity wherein the stormwater will come in contact with any process water or chemicals. You will need a 401/404 wetlands permit if there are any wetlands impacts proposed. If you need help with determining what other permits may be needed, please contact the Customer Service Center at 1-877-623-6748. DEMLR routinely sends out letters requesting stormwater applications for those projects that have submitted for a CAMA Major permit or for a Sedimentation Erosion Control Plan approval or for the proposed construction of more than 10,000 square feet of built -upon area. The applications for CAMA and SEC projects are assigned an application number, which is referenced on the letter. Please refer to this application number when applying for the stormwater permit. 4. Local Government Contact — Provide information on the local government contact that will be issuing the building permit. This will assist us in getting a copy of the permit to the correct Building Inspection Office. D. CONTACT INFORMATION 1. Applicant (also known as Financially Responsible Party) — Who will own the project? This can be a developer, the property owner, the person leasing the property (lessee), the purchaser of the property, a designated government official, a "person" such as a corporation, LLC, general partnership, municipality, individual, etc., Stormwater Fast Track ATC Application Instructions Page 3 of 7 Feb. 11, 2018 2. If the Applicant/Financially Responsible Party is a corporation or LLC, list the name of the Registered Agent and contact information. The mailing address must match the address on file with the NC Dept of the Secretary of State https://www.sosnc.gov/search/index/corp. 3. Check all that apply to indicate whether the Applicant is the property owner, the lessee, purchaser, developer, or some combination thereof. The property owner is the person who owns the property, is legally responsible for the property, and who has the authority sell it and place deed restrictions on it. If the Applicant is not the property owner, attach a copy of the associated agreement and complete Item 4. 4. Complete this item if the Applicant is not the property owner. Otherwise, skip to Item 5. 5. List the contact information for the consultant who is acting as the licensed Design Professional for the duration of the project. The Design Professional for permits issued under the Fast Track Permitting Process must be licensed pursuant to either Chapter 89A or Chapter 89C of the NC General Statutes. f15A NCAC 02H .1043(2)] 6. [Optional] This is the place to provide any other contact information for the project, such as the construction supervisor. E. PROJECT INFORMATION Specify whether the project is Low Density or High Density. Note that projects which drain to an off -site SCM are not eligible for Fast -Track Permitting and must apply under the Standard Permitting Process. (15A NCAC 02H.1003(3)(c)] 2. A brief explanation on how the stormwater will be treated/conveyed. This can be as simple as "Low density with grassed roadside swales" or "Wet Detention Pond" to something more complex, such as "Overall low density with infiltration trench systems to treat areas of the project with a density higher than the overall project." 3. What River Basin(s) will the project drain to? In North Carolina, there 17 identified river basins. In the 20 coastal counties, the following river basins can apply: Lumber, Cape Fear, White Oak, Neuse, Tar -Pamlico, Pasquotank, or Chowan. 4. List the Receiving Stream Name, Stream Classification, and Stream Index Number for each waterbody receiving flow from the project. This information can be found in the NC Surface Water Classifications interactive map. Search for the receiving waters by stream name or location. Streams may be broken up into several segments, each with different classifications. If you need assistance, you can submit the Water Quality Classification Request form and topo map to the Regional Office. 5. Project Area and Density Information (report in square feet, unless otherwise stated) Total Property Area = The entire property area (or permit area for campus -style development) on which the project will be located. Total Surface Water Area = Area of waters shown as blue lines on the USGS maps, hydrologically connected waters, and waters that are listed in the Division's Schedule of Stream Classifications, whether they appear on the USGS map or not. This includes the normal pool of impounded structures, the area between the banks of streams and rivers, and the area below the Normal High Water (NHW) line or Mean High Water (MHW) line. Total Coastal Wetlands Area = Area of coastal wetlands landward from the NHW (or MHW) line. Coastal wetlands are defined in Rule 15A NCAC 07H .0205, and can only be identified and flagged by personnel of the Division of Coastal Management, or an Stormwater Fast Track ATC Application Instructions Page 4 of 7 Feb. 11, 2018 appropriately trained person acceptable to DCM. Total Project Area = Project Area minus (Coastal Wetlands Area + Surface Water Area) Total Project Area may or may not be the same as Total Property Area. "Project" is defined as the proposed development activity for which an applicant is seeking a stormwater permit. "Project" excludes any land adjacent to the area disturbed by the project that has been counted as pervious by any other development regulated under a federal, State, or local stormwater regulation. [15A NCAC 02H .1002(38)] If the proposed project has more than one phase of development, the Applicant must consider whether multiple phases can be completed within the 5-year permit term and be able to provide the required information for each phase with the initial ATC permit application. If not, the Applicant must consider each phase as its own project for purposes of Fast Track ATC permitting. Alternatively, the phased project may be permitted under the Standard Permitting Process. Built -Upon Area (BUA) associated with Existing Development = BUA associated with Existing Development within the Total Project Area • "Existing Development" means those projects that are built or those projects that have established a vested right under NC law as of the effective date of the state stormwater program or applicable local government ordinance to which the project is subject. (15A NCAC 02H. 1002(17] • "Built -upon area" or "BUA" means impervious surface and partially impervious surface to the extent that the partially impervious surface does not allow water to infiltrate through the surface and into the subsoil. "BUA" does not include a slatted deck; the water area of a swimming pool; a surface of number 57 stone, as designated by the American Society for Testing and Materials, laid at least four inches thick over a geotextile fabric; or a trail as defined in G.S. 113A-85 that is either unpaved or paved as long as the pavement is porous with a hydraulic conductivity greater than 0.001 centimeters per second (1.41 inches per hour). (NCGS 143-214.7(b2] Proposed New BUA = BUA that is not associated with existing development. • "Built -upon area" or "BUA" means impervious surface and partially impervious surface to the extent that the partially impervious surface does not allow water to infiltrate through the surface and into the subsoil. "BUA" does not include a slatted deck; the water area of a swimming pool; a surface of number 57 stone, as designated by the American Society for Testing and Materials, laid at least four inches thick over a geotextile fabric; or a trail as defined in G.S. 113A-85 that is either unpaved or paved as long as the pavement is porous with a hydraulic conductivity greater than 0.001 centimeters per second (1.41 inches per hour). (NCGS 143-214.7(b2] • The design volume of SCMs must take into account the runoff from build out from all surfaces draining to the SCM. [15A NCAC 02H .1050(1)]. Project Density - Perform one of the following Project Density calculations, depending on whether or not the project has existing development: Project Density with Existing Development = [New BUA] divided by [Total Project Area minus Existing BUA] x 100 or Project Density without Existing Development = [New BUA] divided by [Total Project Area] x 100 6. Identify the Anticipated construction start date. Stormwater Fast Track ATC Application Instructions Page 5 of 7 Feb. 11, 2018 7. Please check the appropriate box as to whether the project is located within 5 miles of a public airport that supports commercial air carriers or general aviation services. See Session Law 2012-200, Part VI for more information regarding SCM types used. 8. FOR PROJECTS IN UNION COUNTY ONLY: Contact the DEMLR Central Office Stormwater staff at 919-707-9200 to determine if the project is located within a Threatened & Endangered Species watershed that may be subject to more stringent stormwater requirements per 15A NCAC 02B .0600. F. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS This section provides a list of all the items that make up a complete State Stormwater Fast Track Process: Authorization to Construct Permit Application. Only application packages that include all these items will be accepted and reviewed: 1. Two original signed hard copies and one electronic copy of the State Stormwater Fast Track Process: ATC application form. Original signatures only. (15A NCAC 02H .1043(3)(a)] 2. The appropriate permit application processing fee currently set at $505.00. (N.C.G.S. 143- 215.3D)] 3. Two hard copies and one electronic copy of a USGS map identifying the project location and GPS coordinates for the project. For those projects draining to a receiving stream that is classified as SA, the project location must be shown to scale and the'/2 mile radius from the project must be drawn on the map. If the project is within 575 feet of Class SA-ORW waters, the map must include the 575-foot radius. (15A NCAC 02H .1043(3)(e)] 4. Two original signed hard copies and one electronic copy of a site plan depicting the boundary of the project or project phase currently being permitted, including the locations of SCMs, streams, wetlands, and buffers. (15A NCAC 02H .1043(3)(j)] 5. Two hard copies and one electronic copy of a construction sequence that discusses how any future development on the project may be phased. [15A NCAC 02H .1043(3)(g)] 6. One copy of the most current property deed, along with the Deed Book and Page No. 7. Corporations and Limited Liability Corporations must be registered with the NC Secretary of State, active and in good standing, in order to receive a permit. The person signing the application for a corporation must be at least the level of vice president. The person signing the application for an LLC must be either the Manager, if the LLC is manager -managed, or a Member, if the LLC is member -managed. Additionally, the person signing the application must be either listed in the Articles of Incorporation and identified with their title, or listed on the latest annual report with their title. These documents can be downloaded from the Secretary of State website at https://www.sosnc.gov/search/index/corp, and must be submitted with the application. (15A NCAC 02H .1043(3)(b)] 8. When the applicant is a Partnership or other person engaging in business under an assumed name, attach a copy of the Certificate of Assumed Name. 9. When the applicant is not the property owner, provide two hard copies and one electronic copy of lease agreements, affidavits, or other documents showing that the applicant has obtained legal rights to submit a stormwater permit application within the proposed project area. (15A NCAC 02H .1043(3)(c)] 10. If modifying an existing permit for completed or partially completed projects, one copy of the designer's certification. Stormwater Fast Track ATC Application Instructions Page 6 of 7 Feb. 11, 2018 G. CERTIFICATION OF APPLICANT/FINANCIALLY RESPONSIBLE PARTY The applicant signs and dates the application in the presence of a notary public. Don't forget to have the notary public fill in, stamp, sign and date the notary public area. Either inked stamps or raised impression stamps are allowed. Please make sure the Notary Public signs the application containing the original signature of the applicant and not a photocopied signature. 15A NCAC 02H .1043(3)(a)(vii); 15A NCAC 02H .1043(3)(d) H. DESIGN PROFESSIONAL'S CERTIFICATION The Design Professional identified in Section D.5 completes this Section, including affixing their professional seal. I. PROPERTY OWNER'S AUTHORIZATION To be completed by the Property Owner if the Applicant is NOT the Property Owner. The Property Owner signs and dates the application in the presence of a notary public. If a developer or lessee is involved, the property owner's signature also authorizes the developer or lessee to construct the project as approved. Don't forget to have the notary public fill in, stamp, sign and date the notary public area. Either inked stamps or raised impression stamps are allowed. Please make sure the Notary Public signs the application containing the original signature of the property owner and not a photocopied signature. J. CERTIFICATION OF CURRENT PERMITTEE To be completed by the current permittee ONLY if a permit transfer is being requested. The current permittee signs and dates the application in the presence of a notary public. Don't forget to have the notary public fill in, stamp, sign and date the notary public area. Either inked stamps or raised impression stamps are allowed. Please make sure the Notary Public signs the application containing the original signature of the applicant and not a photocopied signature. Stormwater Fast Track ATC Application Instructions Page 7 of 7 Feb. 11, 2018 FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY/OWNERSHIP FORM SEDIMENTATION POLLUTION CONTROL ACT No person may initiate any land -disturbing activity on one or more acres as covered by the Act before this form and an acceptable erosion and sedimentation control plan have been completed and approved by the Land Quality Section, N.C. Department of Environmental Quality. Submit the completed form to the appropriate Regional Office. (Please type or print and, if the question is not applicable or the e-mail and/ or fax information unavailable, place N/A in the blank.) Part A. Union County Sheriff's Office 1. Project Name 2. Location of land -disturbing activity: County Union City or Township Wingate Highway/Street Presson Latitude 34.980999 Longitude-80.465823 3. Approximate date land -disturbing activity will commence: October 2020 4. Purpose of development (residential, commercial, industrial, institutional, etc.): Commercial 5. Total acreage disturbed or uncovered (including off -site borrow and waste areas): 11.71 6. Amount of fee enclosed: $ 780.00 . The application fee of $65.00 per acre (rounded up to the next acre) is assessed without a ceiling amount (Example: a 9-acre application fee is $585). 7. Has an erosion and sediment control plan been filed? Yes No Enclosed X 8. Person to contact should erosion and sediment control issues arise during land -disturbing activity: Name Gordon Vincent E-mail Address gordon.vincent@unioncountync.gov Telephone 704-296-4252 Cell # Fax # 9. Landowner(s) of Record (attach accompanied page to list additional owners): Union County 704-296-4252 N/A Name 500 N Main St Telephone N/A Current Mailing Address Current Street Address Monroe NC 28112 N/A City State 10. Deed Book No. N/A Zip City Page No. N/A Fax Number State 01 Provide a copy of the most current deed. Part B. 1. Company(ies) or firm(s) who are financially responsible for the land -disturbing activity (Provide a comprehensive list of all responsible parties on an attached sheet.) If the company or firm is a sole proprietorship, the name of the owner or manager may be listed as the financially responsible party. Union County gordon.vincent@unioncountync.gov Name 500 N Main St E-mail Address N/A Current Mailing Address Current Street Address Monroe NC 28112 n/a City State Telephone 704-296-4252 Zip City State Zip Fax Number ROY COOPER Governor MICHAEL S. REGAN Secretary BRIAN WRENN Director NORTH CAROLINA Environmental Quality November 10, 2020 LETTER OF APPROVAL WITH MODIFICATIONS Union County Attention: Gordon Vincent, Facilities Project Manager 500 North Main Street Monroe, North Carolina 28112 RE: Project Name: Union County Sheriff's Office Acres Approved: 11.71 Project ID: UNION-2021-013 County: Union, City: Wingate Address: Presson Rd. River Basin: Yadkin-PeeDee Stream Classification: Other Submitted By: Marc Momsen, PE, LandDesign Date Received by LQS: October 27, 2020 Plan Type: Revised Dear Mr. Vincent: This office has reviewed the subject erosion and sedimentation control plan. We find the plan to be acceptable with modifications and hereby issue this letter of Approval with Modifications. The Modifications Required for Approval are listed on the attached page. This plan approval shall expire three (3) years following the date of approval, if no land -disturbing activity has been undertaken, as is required by Title 15A NCAC 4B .0129. As of April 1, 2019, all new construction activities are required to complete and submit an electronic Notice of Intent (NOI) form requesting a Certificate of Coverage (COC) under the NCG010000 Construction Stormwater General Permit. This form MUST be submitted prior to the commencement of any land disturbing activity on the above named project. The NOI form may be accessed at deq.nc.gov/NCGOI. Please direct questions about the NOI form to Annette Lucas at Annette.lucas@ncdenr.gov or Paul Clark at Paul.clark@nedenr.gov. After you submit a complete and correct NOI Form, a COC will be emailed to you within three business days. Initially, DEMLR will not charge a fee for coverage under the NCGO1 permit. However, on or after May 1, 2019, a $100 fee will be charged annually. This fee is to be, sent to the DEMLR Stormwater Central Office staff in Raleigh. Title 15A NCAC 4B .0118(a) and the NCGO1 permit require that the following documentation be kept on file at the job site: goat �Rlolt,tl� 9Epa1Mealt 6f EPvitOmM1enial l7uaEtty North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality i Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources Mooresville Regional Office 1 610 East Center Avenue. Suite 301 1 Mooresville, North Carolina 28115 704.663.1699 Letter of Approval with Modification November 10, 2020 Page 2 of 3 1. The approved E&SC plan as well as any approved deviation. 2. The NCGO1 permit and the COC, once it is received. 3. Records of inspections made during the previous 30 days. Also, this letter gives the notice required by G.S. 113A-61.1(a) of our right of periodic inspection to insure compliance with the approved plan. North Carolina's Sedimentation Pollution Control Act is performance -oriented, requiring protection of existing natural resources and adjoining. properties. If, following the commencement of this project, the erosion and sedimentation control plan is inadequate to meet the requirements of the Sedimentation Pollution Control Act of 1973 (North Carolina General Statute I I3A-51 through 66), this office may require revisions to the plan and implementation of the revisions to insure compliance with the Act. Acceptance and approval of this plan is conditioned upon your compliance with Federal and State water quality laws, regulations, and rules. In addition, local city or county ordinances or rules may also apply to this land -disturbing activity. This approval does not supersede any other permit or approval. Please note that this approval is based in part on the accuracy of the information provided in the Financial Responsibility Form, which you provided. You are requested to file an amended form if there is any change in the information included on the form. In addition, it would be helpful if you notify this office of the proposed starting date for this project. Your cooperation is appreciated. Sincerely, { Shannon Leonard Assistant Regional Engineer Land Quality Section Enclosures: Certificate of Approval Modifications Required for Approval NCGO1 Fact Sheet c: Inspection Department ec: Marc Momsen, PE Letter of Approval with Modification November 10, 2020 Page 3 of 3 MODIFICATIONS REQUIRED FOR APPROVAL Project Name: Union County Sheriffs Office Project ID: UNION-2021-013 County: Union 1. Adequately sized slope drains shall be provided into SSB-3. A minimum of five (5) 18" slope drains shall be provided. Slope drains shall be provided to convey the run-off from the temporary diversion berms into the basin. The slope drains shall outlet into the bottom of the basin. 2. The permanent storm drainage into SSB-4 shall be installed from Outfall-1 thru CB-36 before SSB-3 can be removed. This will allow the relocation of the temporary diversion berm in inset on Sheet C2-02 to be followed. The diversion berm to CB-36 (to isolate SSB-3 area), shall remain intact and functional during fill placement into SSB-3 area. Approval from DEMLR is required prior to the removal of SSB-3. 3. Upon placing fill during SSB-3 removal, a diversion berm shall be placed at the top of the fill slope at the end of each working day. Slope drains shall be provided to convey any run-off to toe of fill slope. Adequate excavated storage area (e.g. 4' W x 8' L x 2' D minimum) shall be provided in front of the stone outlets at the toe of the fill slope. 2. (a) If the Financially Responsible Party is not a resident of North Carolina, give name and street address of the designated North Carolina Agent: N/A Name E-mail Address Current Mailing Address City Telephone. Current Street Address State Zip City Fax Number State Zip (b) If the Financially Responsible Party is a Partnership or other person engaging in business under an assumed name, attach a copy of the Certificate of Assumed Name. If the Financially Responsible Party is a Corporation, give name and street address of the Registered Agent: N/A Name of Registered Agent Current Mailing Address City Telephone E-mail Address Current Street Address State Zip City State Zip Fax Number The above information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief and was provided by me under oath (This form must be signed by the Financially Responsible Person if an individual or his attorney -in -fact, or if not an individual, by an officer, director, partner, or registered agent with the authority to execute instruments for the Financially Responsible Person). I agree to provide corrected information should there be any change in the information provided herein. Gordon Vincent Type or print name Title or Authority Signature Date , a Notary Public of the County of State of North Carolina, hereby certify that appeared personally before me this day and being duly sworn acknowledged that the above form was executed by him. Witness my hand and notarial seal, this day of 120 Seal Notary My commission expires