Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNC0021661_Wasteload Allocation_19940902NPDES DOCUMENT !;CANNING COVER !SHEET NC0021661 Libbey-Owens-Ford WWTP NPDES Permit: Document Type: Permit Issuance Wasteload Allocation` Authorization to Construct (AtC) Permit Modification Complete File - Historical Engineering Alternatives (EAA) Correspondence Instream Assessment (67b) Speculative Limits Environmental Assessment (EA) Document Date: , 1994 5;pk.1„ 2_ This document is printed on reuse paper - ignore any content on the resrerse side Request # 7893 Facility Name: Libby - Owen Ford WWTP - City of Laurinburg NPDES No.: NC0021661 Type of Waste: 100 % Domestic Facility Status: Existing Permit Status: Renewal Receiving Stream: Big Shoe Heel Creek Stream Classification: C - Swamp S ubbas in: 03-07-55 County: Scotland Stream Characteristic; Regional Office: Fayetteville USGS # Requestor: Wilson Date: 1991 Date of Request: 6/22/94 Drainage Area (mi2): 83.9 Topo Quad: 121 NW Summer 7Q10 (cfs): 13 Winter 7Q10 (cfs): 23 Average Flow (cfs): 96.5 3002 (cfs): 35 IWC (%): Existing WLA checked: x Staff Report: x Topo checked: x USGS Flows confirmed: IWC Spreadsheet: Stream Classification: x Nutrient Sensitivity: x Instream Data: x Brief of WLA Analysis 1976: modeled w/ Secondary Limits; C classification and 17.8 cfs s7Q10 1981: renewed w/ Secondary Limits; note on WLA, "now, 'City of Laurinburg'" 1986: reissued w/ Secondary Limits and fecal coliform limit; copies of chemical analysis, (looks like petroleum products) but no explaination as to need or use) 1991: reissued w/ same limits This discharge is officially Permitted to the City of Laurinburg; Libbey - Owen Ford has a seperate Permit [NC0049514] for their Industrial discharge. Discharge is averaging approximately 1/3 of Permitted quantity and is displaying treatment levels better than Advanced Secondary to almost Advanced Tertiary on a regular, consistent basis. Mapping from the 1991 WLA notes indicates that many dischargers exist in this area. Per Staff Report; "[t]he discharge from this package treatment plant goes into Libby - Owen - Ford's process discharge line which goes into their cooling water pond, which discharges only occasionally to Big Shoe Heel Creek." Instream Data Temperature range Upstream: 7 - 25 ° C Downstream: 7 - 25 ° C ranges are from monthly averages dissolved oxygen range 8.2 - 9.0 mg/I 7.9 - 9.0 mg/I refer instream monitoring note on that WLA; NC0020656 Existinq_Limits: Monthly Averages Summer Winter Wasteflow (MGD): 0.030 BOD5 (mg/I): 30 30 NH3N (mg/I): nr nr DO (mg/I): 5.0 5.0 TSS (mg/I): 30 30 Fecal Col. (/100 ml): 200 200 pH (SU): 6 - 9 6 - 9 Residual Chlorine (µ.g/I): monitor monitor Oil & Grease (mg/I): TP (mg/I): TN (mg/I): WQ or EL Upstream Location: Hwy 74 Downstream Location: SR 1612 near Maxton Parameters: Temperature, dissolved oxygen, fecal coliform, conductivity Libby - Owens Ford [Laurinbury Permit' NC0021061 Upstream: US 74 east Month Temp DO Saturation Fecal Conductivity Jun-94 May-94 API-94 Mar-94 Feb-94 Jan-94 Dec-93 Nov-93 Oct 93 Sep-93 Aug-93 Jul-93 23 18 19 13 10 7 8 12 16 22 24 25 8.2 8.4 8.2 8.4 8.9 8.9 8.9 8.9 9.0 8.2 8.3 8.3 96% 89% 88% 80% 79% 73% 75% 83% 91% 94% 99% 100% 65 220 100 170 51 95 97 40 126 173 126 190 32 34 35 38 36 45 39 43 31 33 32 29 • Downstream: SR 1612 near Maxton Temp DO Saturation Fecal Conductivity 24 19 19 13 10 7 8 12 17 22 24 25 8.1 8.2 8.2 8.5 8.9 9.0 8.8 8.7 8.9 7.9 8.2 8.0 96% 88% 88% 81% 79% 74% 74% 81% 92% 90% 97% 97% 29 60 45 15 84 28 31 69 63 179 141 126 50 44 42 42 44- 45 44 47 48 50 52 52 Ammonia [2 / 4 mg/Ij - Residual Chlorine - Fecal Collform Instream Waste Concentrations Residual Chlorine 7010 (cfs) 13.0 Design Flow (mgd) 0.03 Design Flow (cfs) 0.046 Stream Std (µg/I) 17 Upstream bkgrd level (µg/l) 0 IWC (%) .-0:4%_ Allowable Concentration (µg/i) < 4821.3 �> Allowable Concentration (myl) Fecal Limit Ratio of 280.1 :1 200/100m1 Ammonia as NH3 (summer) 13.0 j 7010 (cfs) Design Flow (mgd) 0.046 Design Flow (cfs) 1 Stream Std (mg/l) 0.22 Upstream bkgrd level (mg/1) 0.4% IWC (%) 221.4 ? Allowable Concentration (mg/I) 0.03 0.046 1.8 0.22 100.0% 1.8 Ammonia a8 NH3 (winter) 7010 (cfs) Design Flow (mgd) Design Flow (cfs) Stream Std (mg/I) Upstream bkgrd level (mg/i) IWC (%) Allowable Concentration (mgf) 8/10/94 SOC PRIORITY PROJECT: Yes _ No x If yes, SOC No. To: Attention: Permits and Engineering Unit Water Quality Section July 21, 1994 NPDES STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS County Scotland Permit No. NC0021661 PART I. GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Facility and Address: City of Laurinburg P.O. Box 249 Laurinburg, NC 28352 2. Date of Investigation: July 6, 1994 3. Report Prepared By: Grady Dobson, Environmental Engineer, FRO 4. Persons Contacted and Telephone Number: Robert Ellis, (910) 277-0215 5. Directions to Site: Libby -Owen -Ford is located on the south side of US 74 at the junction of SR 1611 in Scotland County. The wastewater treatment plant is at the rear of the property. 6. Discharge Point(s), List for all discharge points: Latitude: 34° 44' 30" Longitude: 79° 27' 45" Attach a USGS map extract and indicate treatment facility site and discharge point on map. USGS Quad No.: I-21 NW USGS Quad Name: Johns, NC & SC 7. Site size and expansion area consistent with application? x Yes No (If no, explain) 8. Topography (relationship to flood plain included): Relatively flat (0- 4% slope). 9. Location of nearest dwelling: None within 1,000 feet. 10. Receiving stream or affected surface waters: a. Classification: Class "C" Swamp b. River Basin and Subbasin No.: 03-07-55 c. Describe receiving stream features and pertinent downstream uses: Fresh waters protected for secondary recreation, fishing, aquatic life, including propagation and survival, and wildlife. Shoe Heel Creek Staff Report and Recommendations Page 2 PART II - DESCRIPTION OF DISCHARGE AND TREATMENT WORKS 1. a. Volume of Wastewater to be permitted: .03 MGD (Ultimate Design Capacity) b. What is the current permitted capacity of the Wastewater Treatment facility? .03 MGD c. Actual treatment capacity of the current facility (current design capacity). .03 MGD d. pate(s) and construction activities allowed by previous Authorizations to Construct issued in the previous two (2) years. N/A e. Please provide a description of existing or substantially constructed wastewater treatment facilities. The existing system includes grit removal, extended aeration, clarification, chlorination, and sludge digestion (aerated). f. Please provide a description of proposed wastewater treatment facilities: N/A g. Possible toxic impacts to surface waters: N/A h. Pretreatment Program (POTWs only): In development Approved Should be requir-ia-- Not needed x 2. Residuals handling and utilization/disposal scheme: a. If residuals are being land applied, please specify DEM Permit No. Residual Contractor Telephone No. b. Residuals stabilization: PSRP PFRP Other c. Landfill: d. Other disposal/utilization scheme (Specify): In the past, a local septic tank pumper had been disposing sludge in the manner in which septage was disposed. The company has been advised that this was unacceptable. The company is now pursuing disposal by land ;application at the City of Laurinburg's sludge site (Permit No. WQ0002526). 3. Treatment plant classification (attach completed rating sheet): Class II 4. SIC Code(s): 4952 Primary 02 Secondary Main Treatment Unit Code: • Staff Report and Recommendations Page 3 PART III - OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION 1. Is this facility being constructed with Construction Grants Funds or are any public monies involved (municipals only)? N/A 2. Special monitoring or limitations (including toxicity) requests: N/A 3. Important SOC, JOC, or Compliance Schedule dates (please indicate): Date Submissionlof Plans and Specifications N/A Begin Construction N/A Complete Construction N/A 4. Alternative Analysis Evaluation: Has the facility evaluated all of the nondiScharge options available. Please provide regional perspective for each option evaluated. N/A (an existing facility) Spray Irrigation: N/A Connection to Regional Sewer System: N/A Subsurface: N/A Other disposal options: N/A 5. Other, Special Items: The discharge from this package treatment plant goes into Libby-Owen-Ford's process discharge line which goes into their cooling water pond, which discharges only occasionally to Big Shoe Heel Creek. PART IV - EVALUATION AND RECO/OU3NRATION It is the recommendation of this office that NPDES Permit No. NC0021661 issued to the City of Laurinburg for Libby-Owen-Ford's wastewater treatment plant be reissued. f Signature' of R=••r'E Preparer Wa er Q ity Regional Supervisor Date