HomeMy WebLinkAbout310555_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20210212O1Division of Water Resources elms ' -y
Facility Number - �j �j 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation �1
0 Other Agency
of Visit: Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
n for Visit: G/Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: _ j;2- Arrival Time: 00 Departure Time: County: 12,jeLitJ Region:
Farm Name: 0}, 1� d e �%J p_%Aoc x
Owner Name: Mai' e o ✓% S�
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative: CA�RIS )i E S
Certified Operator: /V\&,c< oyn S 4 1<15
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Other
Owner Email:
Phone:
Title:
Latitude:
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number: P q 3 Sy
Certification Number:
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
I :::::] Layer I I —d
Non -Layer
Design Current
Dry Panitry Canacitv Pon.
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Longitude:
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Dischar1jes and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
El No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
ErNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
To
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
o
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
To
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued
Facility Number: S I - 555 jDate of inspection: 3-a
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
Spillway?: _
Designed Freeboard (in):� _
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
M-f-4o ❑ NA ❑ NE
[k10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 6
❑ Yes / No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [g-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes �No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes E2/No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures
require ❑ Yes []el�o
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or comp, nce alternatives that need
❑ Yes [2Io
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes E2*<o
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground
❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift
❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): 1�) kk , U P S
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ff No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? [—]Yes F!rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes eNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
[No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
YNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
FZ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Weather
Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rainfall
Inspections
Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
N
❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
[ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued
Facility Number: 1 -5S5 I jDate of Inspection: —QL-
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ff No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes EZ'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
❑ Yes EvrNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yesg&o
[2NA
❑ NE
-3 a•ak; at
❑ Yes D4
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes dNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes2/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes
[] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments. 1
Use drawings of facilitv to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary). I I
II o = 3 ?=a.� �_-- 95,TO
Plans -f a 11L
Reviewer/Inspector Name: ;Ko"o PEP-4
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Phone: (a ! U
Date:
Page 3 of 3 V 21412015