NC0071994_Regional Office Historical File Pre 2018 (2)

SOC PRIORITY PROJECT: Yes No X
If Yes, SOC No.
To: Permits and Engineering Unit
Water Quality Section
Attention: Mack Wiggins
Date: April 14, 1993
NPDES STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
County: Union
Permit No. NC0071994
PART I - GENERAL INFORMATION
Facility and Address: John Crosland. Company
145 Scaleybark Road
Charlotte, North Carolina 28209
2. Date of Investigation: August 25, 1987 (last investigation
performed by Thurman Horne)
3. Report Prepared By: G. T. Chen
4. Persons Contacted and Telephone Number: None, 704/522-4528
5. Directions to Site: From the intersection of Stewarts Mill
Road (SR 1525) and Lawyers Road (SR 1004) in northern Union
County, travel southwest on SR 1525 approximately 1.1 miles.
The proposed site is on the right (north) side of SR 1525,
approximately 1,500 feet from the pavement on the west bank of
Goose Creek.
6. Discharge Point(s). List for all discharge points:
Latitude: 359 07' 20" Longitude: 809 37' 10"
Attach a U.S.G.S. map extract and indicate treatment facility
site and discharge point on map.
USGS Quad No.: G 16 SE t7SGS Name: Bakers, NC
7. Site size and expansion are consistent with application?
Yes No If No, explain: N/A
Topography (relationship to flood plain included): The
terrain is relatively flat with slopes less than 5%. The
proposed site appears to be in a flood plain.

9. Location of nearest dwelling: None within 500 feet of the
proposed site.
10. Receiving stream or affected surface waters: Goose Creek
a. Classification: C
b. River Basin and Subbasin No.: Yadkin and 03-07-12
c. Describe receiving stream features and pertinent
downstream uses: The receiving stream is small but
appears to have a continuous flow. There are no known
users for any reasonable distance downstream. However,
there is one (1) permitted dischargers located upstream
(Goose Creek Utility Company - NC0034762).
PART II DESCRIPTION OF DISCHARGE AND TREATMENT WORKS
. a. Volume of wastewater to be permitted: 0.80 MGD (Ultimate
Design Capacity)
b. What is the current permitted capacity of the wastewater
treatment facility? 1.00 MGD
c. Actual treatment capacity of the current facility
(current design capacity)? N/A. Facility has not been
built.
d. Date(s) and construction activities allowed by previous
Authorizations to Construct issued in the previous two
years: N/A
e. Please provide a description of existing or substantially
constructed wastewater treatment facilities: N/A
Please provide a description of proposed wastewater
treatment facilities: The proposed WWTP will be
constructed in four (4) phases. Each phase will be
designed for 0.2 MGD. The proposed facilities will
consist of influent pumping, screening, aeration,
clarification, tertiary filtration, post aeration,
chlorination and aerobic sludge digestion.
g. Possible toxic impacts to surface waters: N/A
h. Pretreatment Program (POTWs only): N/A
in development: approved:
should be required: not needed:
2. Residuals handling and utilization/disposal scheme: Sludge
NPDES Permit Staff Report
Version 10/92
Page 2

11 periodically be removed and disposed at a municipal
wastewater treatment plant.
a. If residuals are being land applied, please specify DEM
Permit No.:
Residuals Contractor:
Telephone No.:
b. Residuals stabilization: PSRP:
RFRP:
Other:
c. Landfill:
d. Other disposal/utilization scheme (specify):
Treatment plant classification (attach completed rating
sheet): Facility has not been built, no rating is given.
4. SIC Code(s): 4952
Wastewater Code(s) of actual wastewater, not particular
facilities, i.e., non -contact cooling water discharge from a
metal plating company would be 14, not 56.
Primary: 05 Secondary:
Main Treatment Unit Code: N/A
PART III OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION
1. Is this facility being constructed with Construction Grant
Funds or are any public monies involved (municipals only)?
N/A
2. Special monitoring or liti.tations (including toxicity)
requests: N/A
Important SOC, JOC or Compliance Schedule dates: (please
indicate) N/A
Date
Submission of Plans and Specifications
Begin Construction
Complete Construction
4. Alternative Analysis Evaluation: Has the faicil
all of the non -discharge options available. P
regional perspective for each option evaluated.
NPDES Permit Staff Report
Versian 1Q/92
ty evaluated
ease provide
N/A
Page 3

PraY igaton:
Connect x to Region e er SYs
Subsurface:
Other Disposal Opt onsµ
Other SPedial Items Mi
. IV - EVALUATION D RECO ENDATIONS
The proposed subdivision haset to be d+ vel aped. Thu n
wastewater treatment facility u.lt.
It is reco ended that the subject request for perm renewal
be proved. Since the proposed site appears to ben a flood
plain, protection of the plant from flooding should be taken into
consideration r to the issuance of the Authorization t
dater Quality Re : r al Supervisor
Date
1
Versi
t StaffReport
/92
Page 4

80° 37'3Q"
35°Q7'3Q'_'., .E
UNITED STATES
EPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
535°°°m E.
('mnsIan ` Coff44
%YC
anIew
35'
4
(M

e / e
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health and Natural R
Division of Environmental Management
512 North Salisbury Street * Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Yandell
John Crosland Company
145 Scaleybark Road
Charlotte, NC 282C9
D0ar Mr. Vanden
April 5, 1993
iU%g1WIT
fita
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Subject: NPDES Permit Application
NPDES Permit No.Nc0071994
idiewild Acres
lianburg County
This is to acknowledge receipt of the following documents on
Application Form
Engineering Proposal (for proposed control facilities),
Request for permit renewal,
Application. Processing Fee of $400.00,
Engineering Economics Alternatives Analysis,
Local Government Signoff,
Source Reduction and Recycling
_Interbasin Transfer,
Other
April 5, 1993:
The items checked below are needed before review can begin:
Application Form
Engineering proposal (see attachment),
Application Processing Fee of
Delegation of Authority (see attached)
Biocide Sheet (see attached)
Engineering Economics Alternatives Analysis,
Local Government ignotf,
Source Reduction and. Recycling,
Interbasin Transfer,
Other
Pollution Prevention Pays
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina '27626-.05.3.5. Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

If the application is not made complete within thirty (30) days, it will be
returned to you and may be resubmitted when complete.
This application has been assigned to Mack Wiggins
(919/733-5083) of our Permits Unit foF review. You wElli be advised of any
comments recommendations, questions or ether information necessary for the
review of the application.
I am, by copy of this letter, requesting that our Regional Office
Supervisor prepare a staff report and recommendations regarding this
discharge. If you have any questions regarding this applications,
please contact the review person listed above,
Sincerely,
CC:
Mooresville Regional Office
CgLeen H. Sullinai

NORTH CAROLINA DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND CO*IUNITY"
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO DISCHARGE - SHORT FORM G
To be filed only by services +tiolesale and retail
and other commercial estib
Do not
h■ents including "elsels
0
FOR
AGENCY
USE
attempt to complete this for* without reading the accoepinying instructions
Pease print or type
1. Name, address, and telephone number of facility producing discharge
A. Mauve _ JO 9N CRGSL11ND COMPANY
2. 51C
(Leave
Al1(1N MeibER
1. Street address 145 S :AL.RYBA RAC ROAD
C. City C, 1ARLO1TE
E. Count
G. Telephone No.
(NBLRG
1'0/1
Area
Code
3. Number of employees
D. State
4. Nature of business ..
S. (a) Check here if discharge occurs all year°, or
(w. r 4C1 the month(ij dlschapie occurs:
1. 0 January 2.0 February 3.0 Mardi 1.0 April S. allay
CO June 7. 0 July 8.0 i4ugust 9.0 September 10. 0 October
11. 0 November 12. ° Decawber
(c) How many days per week;
1.C31 2.0 2-3 3.0 4-S 4,0 6-7
charged to surface raters only (check as applicable)
Flow, gallons per operating dsy
Discharge per
operating day
A. Sanitary. daily
average
g. Cooling water, etc..
4aily average
C. Other dischar9e(I),
daily average;
Specify
lned
ypes
iTg

T, If any of chi types of waste identified in Item 6, elder treated or iw-
ted, are dlsdharger to places other then wrfacs waters, c►eck below
kettle. �.
c
A. MunkIpai tower 'y%leei
D. Evaporation lagoon or pond
9. 0 2-)
0.1-199 1000-4919
C.D4.5 0.©6 or mere
9. Nave of receiving water or waters
.10. does your discharge contain or 1$ it poi
one or more of the following substances
activities, or processes: MOWS, cyanlds,
chromium, copper, lead, mercury, nickel, %glen
grease, and chlorine (residual).
A.0yss 1l.Dno
or your discharge to contain
result of your operations,
beryllium, cadmium,
phenols, s11 and
1 certify that 1 an familiar with the Information contained in the application and
that to the best of my knowledge and belief such information Is true, templets, sad
accurate.
Printed Name of Person
©rt?h Carolina Ceneral Statute 14 —2 .6t"bb) (2 rovidea that Any person who knowingly mars
any fa1se statement represeatat can, or cart cat ort any applicatXon,'reccard, report, plan,
or other document files or required to be tbaintai.ned under Axtitle 21 or regulations of t:�s
Environmental. Management Commission implementing that Arti ls, or who falsifies, tampers with,
r kncwly renders inaccurats any.rscordfo= or nonitoric,g a Ccs or Method required to be
ated or maintained under Axti-c1e 21,For" regulatioes of fi'is 'Environmental Management Catmlisi
implementing that Article, ahalCbe*'gi4 tr of a Misdemeanor punishable by a firs not to exceed
.__ non, or by irsprisonmantAnot to exceed mix months, or by both. (18 U.S.C. Section 100l prow:
punis`m,ent by n fine o ''".tot more than $10,000 or imprisonment not mars than 5 years, or both,
r a °.miler offense.)

DEPART
Permit No. NC0071994
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
ENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH, AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ERMIT
TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER UNDER THE
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYST M
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1,
other lawful standards and regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Envimnanental
Management Commission, and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended,
John Crosland Company
is hereby authorized to discharge wastewater from a facility located at
ldlewild Acres
on NCSR 1525
north of Bakers
nburg County
to receiving waters designated as Goose Creek in the Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basin
in accordance with effluent li
Parts I, II, and III hereof.
ions, monitoring ents, and other conditions set forth
This pernnit shall become effective
This permit .and the authorization to discharge shall expire at midnight on October 31, 1994
Signed this day
A. Preston Howard,' Jr., P.E., Director
Division of Environmental Management
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission
A, G DPPT. OF NATURAL
RESOURCES AND
COMMUNITY DENT t.„OPltr. r
AUG 2 5 1993
N QF FKk','R .NMENT}}A��! II"..,4h}'C MiN1

ts hereby authorized to:
SUPP TO P CO
Jo Crosland Company
No. NC0071994
Enter into a ontrat for cons ction of a wt water , . t facility. a
e
r outlet into Goose Creek, and
After receiving an Authorization to Construct from t.e Division f Enviro ntal
Management, construct and ope a 0.80 MGD wstt aat r tr atn nt facility located t
Idlewild Acres, on NCSR 1525, north of Bakers, g County (See Part I of
this p °t} and
Disch o said tteatment works at the location specified on the attached ap into -
Goose Cr which is classified class C waters in the Yadkin -Pee *,# River Basin.

UNITED STATES
4DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
80 ° 4 7 `30" 535°^ E.
35°07'30'2
6 SE
6
Crosland (©
J/17/0/2 (.1Z/ �'

A. ( ). EFFLUENT LIMETA'TIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS SUMMER (April 1 - October 31) Permit No, NC0071994
During the period beginning on the effective date of the permit and lasting until expansion above 0.2 MGD, the Permittee is authorized to
discharge from outfall(s) serial number 001. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the permittee as specified below:
Effluent Characteristics
Flow
BOD, 5 day, 20°C
Total Suspended Residue
NH3 as N
Dissolved Oxygen**
Fecal Coliform (geometric mean)
Total Residual Chlorine
Temperature
Total Nitrogen (NO2 + NO3 + TKN)
Total Phosphorus
Conductivity
Discharge Limitations
Monthly Avg,
0.2 MGD
17.0 mg/I
30.0 mg/I
1.3 mg/I
200.0 /100 ml
Weekly Avq.
Pally Max
25.5 mg/I
45.0 mg/I
400.0 /100 ml
24.0 14/1
Monitoring
Measurement
Frequency
Continuous
2/Month
2/Month
2/Month
Weekly
2/Month
Daily
Weekly
Quarterly
Quarterly
Weekly
Requitement/5
aample
TyPe
Recording
Composite
Composite
Composite
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Composite
Composite
Grab
*sample
Location
I or E
E
E
E
E. U, D
E,U,D
E
E, U, D
E
E
U, D
* Sample locations: E - Effluent., I - Influent, U - Upstream 100 feet above the discharge point, D - Downstream 4.2 miles below the discharge
point.
The daily average dissolved oxygen effluent concentration shall not be less than 5.0 mg&
The pH shall not be less than 6.0 standard units nor greater than 9.0 standard units and shall be monitored 2/month at the effluent by grab
sample.
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts.

A. ( ). EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS WINTER (November 1 - March 31) Permit No. NC0071994
During the period beginning on the effective date of the permit and lasting until expansion above 0,2 MGD, the Permittee is authorized to
discharge from outfall(s) serial number 001. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the permittee as specified below:
Effluent Characteristics
Flow
BOD, 5 day, 20°C
Total Suspended Residue
NH3 as N
Dissolved Oxygen**
Fecal Coliform (geometric mean)
Total Residual Chlorine
Temperature
Total Nitrogen (NO2 + NO3 + TKN)
Total Phosphorus
Conductivity
Discharge Limitations
0.2 MGD
30.0 mg/I
30.0 mg/I
3.7 mg/I
200.0 /100 ml
45.0 mg/I
45,0 mg/I
400.0 /100 ml
24.0 ggil
Ktoimimen_t_
Frequency
Continuous
2/Month
2/Month
2/Month
Weekly
2/Month
Daily
Weekly
Quarterly
Quarterly
Weekly
* Sample locations: E - Effluent, I - Influent, U - Upstream 100 feet above the discharge point, D - Downstre
point.
** The daily average dissolved oxygen effluent concentration shall not be less than 5.0 mg/I.
The pH shall not be less than 6.0 standard units nor greater than 9.0 standard units and shall be monitored 2/month at the effluent by grab
sample.
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts,
ng Reauirern_ems
LTIle
Recording
Composite
Composite
Composite
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Composite
Composite
Grab
JPPL
Location
I or E
E
E
E
E, U, D
E,U,D
E
E, U, D
E
E
U, D
4.2 miles below the discharge

A. ( ). EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS SUMMER (April 1 - October 31) Permit No. NC0071994
During the period beginning upon expansion to 1.0 MGD and lasting until expiration, the Permittee is authorized to discharge from outfall(s)
serial number 001. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the permittee as specified below:
Effluent Characteristics
Flow
BOD, 5 day, 20°C
Total Suspended Residue
NH3 as N
Dissolved Oxygen**
Fecal Coliform (geometric mean)
Total Residual Chlorine
Temperature
Total Nitrogen (NO2 + NO3 + TKN)
Total Phosphorus
Conductivity
EI9rIthlY AVci,
1 .0 MGD
17.0 mg/I
30.0 mg/I
1.1 mg/I
200.0 /100 ml
Weekly Avg,
Daily Max
25.5 mg/I
45.0 mg/I
400.0 /100 ml
18.0 mg/I
Monitoring
Measurement
Frequency
Continuous
2/Month
2/Month
2/Month
Weekly
2/Month
Daily
Weekly
Monthly
Monthly
Weekly
Requirements
mpie
Tvpe
Recording
Composite
Composite
Composite
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Composite
Composite
Grab
*Sample
Location
I or E
E
E
E
E, U, D
E,U,D
E
E, U, D
E
E
U, D
* Sample locations: E - Effluent, I - Influent, U Upstream 100 feet above the discharge point, D - Downstream 4.2 miles below the discharge
point.
** The daily average dissolved oxygen effluent concentration shall not be less than 5.0 mg/1.
The pH shall not be less than 6.0 standard units nor greater than 9.0 standard units and shall be monitored 2/month at the effluent by grab
sample.
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts.

A.
). EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS WINTER (November I - March 31) Permit No. NC0071994
During the period beginning upon expansion to 1.0 MGD and lasting until expiration, the Perrnittee is authorized to discharge from outfall(s)
serial number 001. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the permittee as specified below:
Effluent Characteristics
Flow
BOD, 5 day, 20°C
Total Suspended Residue
NH3 as N
Dissolved Oxygen**
Fecal Coliform (geometric mean)
Total Residual Chlorine
Temperature
Total Nitrogen (NO2 + NO3 + TKN)
Total Phosphorus
Conductivity
* Sample locations: E E
point.
** The daily average dissolved oxygen effluent concentration shall not be less than 5.0 mg/l.
The pH shall not be less than 6.0 standard units nor greater than 9.0 standard units and shall be monitored 2/month at the effluent by grab
sample.
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts.
pl charge L,Imltatlone
Monthly AvQ.
1.0 MGD
30.0 mg/I
30.0 mg/I
2.2 mg/I
200.0 /100 mi
Weekly Avg,
45.0 mg/I
45.0 mg/I
400.0 /100 ml
18.0 µg/I
plige tering ,
Vie. useawnt
Frequency
Continuous
2/Month
2/Month
2/Month
Weekly
2/Month
Daily
Weekly
Monthly
Monthly
Weekly
vent, I - Influent, U - Upstream 100 feet above the discharge point, D - Downstre
Requirements
Sample itingLe
�.cacatlon
I or E
E
E
E
E, U, D
E,U,D
E
E, U, D
E
E
U, D
Recording
Composite
Composite
Composite
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Composite
Composite
Grab
4.2 miles below the discharge

Permit No, NC 71994
Nutlient Condition for Penults Without Phosphorusl ' its
s rmit may be modified, or revoked and reissued to include e uent limitation on nutrients
for this discharge depending upon the following:
eons
age rnern determine nd `ent
2. Local actions do not su ssfully reduce the nutrient loading on the - i Mg waters.
3. The onset of problem conditions in the % ening waters.
e findings of a study by ivision of Environmentali
tat is necessary.
F. Phased Construction Condition
f this facility is built in phases, plans and specifications for the next phase shall be submitted when
the flow to the existing units reaches 80% of the design capacity of the facilities on line-. At no
may the flow tributary to the facility exceed the design capacity of the existing units.

PERMIT NO.: NC0071994
PERMITTEE NAME: John Crosland Company
FACILITY NAME: Idlewild Acres
Facility Status: Existing
Permit Status:
Major
Pipe No.: 001
Renewal
Design Capacity:
Minor
Domestic (% of Flow): 100 %
Industrial (% of Flow):
NPDE
G.
0Err" °V SA
RtsoLIRC"nEV,1
commUNI1L-V 'e'
9 1993
Comments: L iJ 0.2 614z)4J
PLW5ioeu.L1-1) (14 NA-SC-5 OF 0. 2- A112-
kae Arlo cDR_ evAp v. 2_ oudo,
RECEIVING STREAM:Goose Creek
Class: C
it4ca).kiy
LINA 1-5 piee5Ei\IT-E-D
(4/9 To
Sub -Basin: 03-07-12
Reference USGS Quad: G16 SE
(please attach)
County: DielA1481154% tk) cots --
Regional Office: Mooresville Regional Office
Previous Exp. Date: 9/30/93 Treatment Plant Class: Not built.
Classification changes within three miles:
No change within three miles
Requested, by:
Prepared by.:
Reviewed by:
Tc
"3A
Mack Wiins
Date:
Date:
Date:
6/8/93
ALLOCATION
Modeler
Date Rec.
70 I
2 •
Drainage Area (mi ) (0,ZS
7Q10 (cfs) Winter 7Q 11,0 (cfs) 30Q2 (cfs)
Toxicity Limits: IWC
Instream Monitoring:
Parameters -1.6-111
Upstream
Downstream
Eifiuent
Characteristics
BOD 5 (TIVI)
NH,N(mg/1)
D.O. (mg/0
TSS (mg/1)
F, Co1. (/100 rnl)
pf SU)
T©r 17--6
Comments: ,C4.00,g, 6.2.c,cx
LAPot\I EdicAlim t)e-,
Acute/Chronic
E)
Avg. Streamflow (cfs): (O. 97
2.4-ourogio (orsvorcTivirl
Location AT GLAsT-
LocationA FojAir 426cfc:ovs)
PISti4AC4C-7,
- ,
-30 /
r) fito

Facility Name:
NPDES No.:
Type of Waste:
Facility Status:
Permit Status:
Receiving Stream:
Stream Classification:
Subbasin:
County:
Regional. Office:
Requestor:
Date of Request:
Topo Quad:
FACT SHEET FOR \VAS
Idlewild. Acres
NC0071994
Domestic - 100%v
Existing C/Uot ?
Renewal
Goose Creek
C
030712
MRO
M. Wiggins
6/8/93
G 16SE
OAD ALLOCATION
Request # (A,I3,
R. C. DEPT. DIPI l7f iTit A,J'm
VOMmi .`'rr s$ I'r rr ri
JUL 1 5 1993
Strew_.,. Characteristic::.
U S G S #
Date:
Drainage Area (mi2): 10.28
Summer 7Q10 (cfs): C.).13
Winter 7Q10 (cfs): 0.38
Average Flow (cfs): 10.57
30Q2 (cfs):
I:WC (%): 70(A),83(B),88, C
91(D),92(E)
Wasteload Allocation Summary
(approach taken, correspondence with region, EPA, etc.)
This facility has proposed to build their plant in phases of 0.2MG.D. Per the staff report, 4 phases
are proposed at this time (to total 0.8 MGD). However, the previous permit was issued for 1
MGD, so this WLA presents limits for 5 phases. The region should comment if the facility only
plans to build to 1. MGD,
No A to C has been issued for any flow for Idlewild, so an NH3-N limit and chlorine limit will be
recommended with this renewal,
A model was performed on the Goose Creek area and included all permitted discharges (including
proposed). The Rocky River model requires that the mouth of tributaries to Rocky River meet
BOD5=10 mg/1 and NH3-N=4 mg/l. The Goose Creek model met this requirement. This area will
be looked at again upon basinwid.e renewal.
Special Schedule Requirements and additional comments fro trtt Reviewers:
ecommended by:
Reviewed by
Instrearn Assessment:
Regional Supervisor:
Permits & : Engineering:
RE A. U
0 TECNICAL SERVICES BY:
Date:
AUG 1 0 1993

n
2
CONVENTIONAL PARAME 1'ERS
Monthly Average
Summer Winter
Wasteflow (MGD): 1 1
BOD5 (mg/1) : 17 30
N113N (rng/1): 8 17
DO (mg/1): 5 5
TSS (mg/1): 30 30
Fecal Col. (/100 ml): 1000 1000
pH (SU): 6-9 6-9
Residual Chlorine (µg/1)
Oil & Grease (mg/1):
TP (mg/I):
TN (mg/I):
Recommended Limits:
(A) (B) (C) (D) (E)
sum/win sum/win sunVwin sum/win sum/win
Wasteflow (MGD): 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
BOD5 (mg/1): 17/30 17/30 17/30 17/30 17/30
N113N(mg/1): 1.3/3.7 1.2/2.8 1.1 /2.5 1.1 /2.3 1.1 /2.2
D©(nig/1): 5/5 5/5 5/5 5/5 5/5
TSS (mg/1): 30 / 30 30 / 30 30 / 30 30 / 30 30 / 30
Fecal Col. (/100 rnl): 200 / 200 200 / 200 200 / 200 200 / 200 200 / 200
pH (SU): 6-9 6-9 6-9 6-9 6-9
Residual chlorine (pug/1: 24 / 24 21 / 21 19 / 19 19 / 19 18 / 18
Toxicity testing
TP (mg/1):
TN (mom):
No A to C exists for this facility currently, so the facility will receive chlorine and NH3-N limits.
Limits Changes, Due To:
Change in 7Q10 data
Change in stream classification
Relocation of discharge
Change in wasteflow
Other (onsite toxicity study, interaction, etc.)
lnstream dam
New regulations/standards/procedures
New facility information
Parameter(s) Affected
Fecal coli, NH3-N, CI
X Parameter(s) are water quality limited. For some paracneters, the available load capacity of
the immediate receiving water will be consumed. This may affect future water quality based
effluent limitations for additional dischargers within this portion of the watershed.
OR
No parameters are water quality limited, but this disch
g
y affect future allocations.

Upstream Lacs
Downstreani I.
Parameters:
Special instrea
INSTREAM MONITORING REQUIRE 1EN I S
gin: at least 100 ft upstream
aeon: A point 4.2 miles below the discharge (0.6 miles l elc w SR 1533)
temp., D.O., Fecal colifoznm, conductivity
monitoring locations or monitoring frequencies:
MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION & SPECIAL CONDITIONS
Adequacy of Existing Treatment
Has the facility demonstrated the a
facilities? Yes No
y to meet the proposed new limits
If no, which parameters cannot be met?
th existing treatment
Would a "phasing in" of the new limits be appropriate? Yes No
If yes, please provide a schedule (and basis for that schedule) with tl e regional
office recommendations:
Speciai Instrt
If no, why not?
n
or Conditions
Wasteload sent to EPA? (Major) N (Y or N)
(If yes, then attach schematic, toxies spreadsheet, copy of model, or, if not modeled,
assumptions that were made, and description of how it fits into hasinwide plan)
Additional Information attached? _N (Y or N) If yes, explain with attachments.
e
old

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27611.
B. Hunt, Jr., Governor A. Preston Howard, Jr,P.E,
an B. :Howes, Secretary
March 16, 1993
Shane Carpenter
Land Development Adm. Assistant
145 Scaleybark Road
Charlotte, NC 28209
Subject: NPDES Permit Application
NPDES Permit No. NC0071994
John Crosland Company
Union County
Dear Mr, Carpenter:
tt
Director
On March 8, 1993, the Division of Environmental Management received a NPDES
Permit Application for the subject facility. The renewal submittal is considered incomplete.
Therefore, the Division of Environmental Management is returning your check for $400.00.
The check must be resubmitted with the following:
X A completed short Form D application (See attached).
The Division of Environmental Management will initiate the permit review process
upon receipt of the above requested information. The receipt of the above information does not
preclude this Division from requesting additional information at a future date..
If you have any questions, please contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
/
]Mack Wiggins
lnoresvine Rmini Office
Pollution Preve soon Pays
P.O, Box 9535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626.0535 Telephone [phone]
A E ual Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer