SW8080313_HISTORICAL FILE_20080429

STORMWATER DIVISION CODING SHEET
POST -CONSTRUCTION PERMITS
PERMIT NO.
SW8 0803 I
DOC TYPE
❑ CURRENT PERMIT
❑ APPROVED PLANS
HISTORICAL FILE
❑ COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION
DOC DATE
Zoo S 04 79
YYYYMMDD

_.14.
a O� F W ATFRQG
wa
>6
April 29, 2008
Carl Baker, Deputy Public Works Officer
U.S. Government - MCB Camp Lejeune
1005 Michael Road
Camp Lejeune, NC 28542
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Nalural Resources
Subject; NPDES Phase II Stormwater Permit No. SW8 080313
P-1184 Dining Facility at Stone Bay
High Density Commercial infiltration Basin Project
Onslow County
Dear Mr. Baker:
Coleen H. Sullins Director
Division of Water Quality
The Wilmington Regional Office received a complete NPDES Phase II Stormwater
Management Permit Application for P-1184 Dining Facility at Stone Bay on April 22, 2008.
Staff review of the plans and specifications has determined that the project, as proposed, will
comply with the Stormwater Regulations set forth in Session Law 2006-246 and Title 1'5A
NCAC 2H.1000. We are forwarding Permit No. SW8 080313 dated April 29, 2008, for the
construction of the subject project.
This permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until April 29, 2018, and shall be
subject to the conditions and limitations as specified therein. Please pay special attention to
the Operation and Maintenance requirements in this permit. Failure to establish an adequate
system for operation and maintenance of the stormwater management system will result in
future compliance problems.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this permit are unacceptable, you have
the right to request an adjudicatory hearing upon written request within sixty (60) days
following receipt of this permit. This request must be in the form of a written petition,
conforming to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes, and filed with the Office of
Administrative Hearings, P.O. Drawer 27447, Raleigh, NC 27611-7447, Unless such demands
are made this permit shall be final and binding.
..If you have any questions, or need additional information concerning this matter, please
contact Christine Nelson, or me at [phone].
Sinc ly,
Edward Beck
Regional Supervisor
Surface Water Protection Section
ENBlcan: S:1WQSISTORMWATERIPERMIT1080313.apr08
CC" K. Joshua Hurst, PE, Clark Nexsen
Onslow County Building Inspections
Christine Nelson
Wilmington Regional Office
Central Files o,;e'
NorthCarolina
�/�7lli!llY7��f
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 127 Cardinal Dri�c Extension Wilmington, NC 28405 Phone [phone] Customer Service
Wilmington Regional Office Internet: sv%vw.ncwa1crcualitv.orP_ Fae [phone] 1.877-623-6748
An Equal OpportunitylAffirmalive Action Employer — 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper

State Stormwater Management Systems
Permit No. SW8 08031:3
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
NPDES PHASE II STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT
HIGH DENSITY DEVELOPMENT
In accordance with the provisions of Article 21 of Chapter 143, General Statutes of
North Carolina as amended, and other applicable Laws, Rules, and Regulations
PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO
Carl Baker & U.S. Government - MCB Camp Lejeune
P-9 184 Dining Facility at Stone Bay
Range' Road, Camp Lejeune, Onslow County
FOR THE
construction, operation and maintenance of five infiltration basin(s) in compliance with
the provisions of Session Law 2006-246 and 15A NCAC 2H .1000 (hereafter referred to
as the "stormwater rules') and the approved stormwater management plans and
specifications and other supporting data as attached and on file with and approved by
the Division of Water Quality and considered a part of this permit.
This permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until April 29, 2018, and shall be
subject to the following specified conditions and limitations:
I. DESIGN STANDARDS
This permit is effective only with respect to the nature and volume of stormwater
described in the application and other supporting data.
2. This stormwater system has been approved for the management of stormwater
runoff as described in Section 1.8 on page 3 of this permit. The five stormwater
controls have been designed to handle the runoff from a total of 109,389 square
feet of impervious area. Infiltration basins 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 have been designed
to handle 23,958, 23,705, 24,264, 20,909, and 16,553 square feet of impervious
area, respectively.
3. These basins must be operated with a 50' vegetated filter.
4. The tract will be limited to the amount of built -upon area indicated in Section 1.8
on page 3 of this permit, and as shown on the approved plans. The built -upon
area for the future development is limited to 3,160 square feet within drainage
area 5.
5. All stormwater collection and treatment systems must be located in either e
dedicated common areas or recorded easements. The final plats for the project
will be recorded showing all such required easements, in accordance with the
approved plans.
Page 2 of 8

State Stormwater Management Systems
Permit No. SW8 080313
6. The runoff from all built -upon areas within the permitted drainage area of this
project must be directed into the permitted stormwater control system.
7. The built -upon areas associated with this project shall be located at least 30 feet
landward of all perennial and intermittent surface waters.
8. The following design criteria have been permitted for the infiltration basins and
must be provided and maintained at design condition:
Design Criteria
Infiltration
Basin #1
Infiltration
Basin #2
Infiltration
Basin #3
Infiltration
Basin #4
Infiltration
Basin #5
a. Drainage Area: acres
-Onsite, ft2:
-Offsite, ft2:
0.98
42,689
none
1.16
50,530
none
1.74
75,795
none
1.22
53,143
none
0.78
33,812
none
b.Total Impervious Surfaces, ft :
-Buildings, ft2:
-Parking/Streets, ft2:
-Sidewalks, ft2:
-Future, ft2:
23,958
0
23,958
0
0
23,705
860
21,715
1,130
0
24,264
0
23,432
832
0
20,909
13,235
3,060
4,614
0
16,553
7,575
4,480
1,338
3,160
c. Design Storm, in.
3.58
3.58
3.58
3.58
3.58
d. Difference in the pre- and post-
development 1-yr, 24-hr runoff, ft3:
-Pre-development 1-yr, 24-hr runoff, ft3:
-Post-development 1- r, 24-hr runoff, ft3:
6,433
637
7069
6,316
754
7,069
6,549
1,131
7,680
5,613
793
6,406
4,444
500
4,944
e. Basin Depth, ft:
1.67
1.63
2.00
1.42
1.37
f. Bottom Elev., FMSL:
48.83
47.87
48.50
49.08
50.13
g. Bottom Surface Area, ft :
5,315
3,941
6,802
4.840
2,946
h. Bypass Weir Elevation, FMSL:
50.00
49.17
49.40
50.10
51.40
i. Permitted Storage Volume, ft :
6,750
6,400
6,600
5,650
4,500
'. Pre -development 1- r 24-hr discharge, ft Is:
0.035
0.04
0.06
0.04
0,027
k. Type of Soil:
Sand
Sand
Sand
Sand
Sand
I. Expected Infiltration Rate, inlhr:
10.0
7.7
10.0
10.0
5.0
m.Seasonal High Water Table, FMSL:
46.83
45.87
46.2
47.08
48.13
n. Draw Down Time, hrs:
1.5
2.5
1.2
1.4
3.6
o. Receiving Stream 1 River Basin:
Stones Creek 1 New
p. Stream Index Number:
19-30-3
q. Water Body Classification:
"SA, HQW"
II. SCHEDULE OF COMPLIANCE
1. The stormwater management system shall be constructed in its entirety,
vegetated and operational for its intended use prior to the construction of any
built -upon surface.
2. During construction, erosion shall be kept to a minimum and any eroded areas of
the system will be repaired immediately.
Page 3 of 8

State Stormwater Management Systems
Permit No. SW8 080313
3. The permittee shall at all times provide the operation and maintenance
necessary to assure the permitted stormwater system functions at optimum
efficiency. The approved Operation and Maintenance Plan must be followed in
its entirety and maintenance must occur at the scheduled intervals including, but
not limited to:
a. Semiannual scheduled inspections (every 6 months).
b. Sediment removal.
C. Mowing and revegetation of slopes and the vegetated filter.
d. Immediate repair of eroded areas.
e. Maintenance of all slopes in accordance with approved plans and
specifications.
f. Debris removal and unclogging of bypass structure, infiltration media, flow
spreader, catch basins, piping and vegetated filter.
g. A clear access path to the bypass structure must be available at all times.
4. Records of maintenance activities must be kept for each permitted BMP. The
reports will indicate the date, activity, name of person performing the work and
what actions were taken.
5. The permittee shall submit to the Division of Water Quality an annual summary
report of the maintenance and inspection records for each BMP. The report
shall summarize the inspection dates, results of the inspections, and the
maintenance work performed at each inspection.
6. The facilities shall be constructed as shown on the approved plans. This permit
shall become voidable unless the facilities are constructed in accordance with
the conditions of this permit, the approved plans and specifications, and other
supporting data.
7. If the stormwater system was used as an Erosion Control device, it must be
restored to design condition prior to operation as a stormwater treatment device,
and prior to occupancy of the facility.
8. Upon completion of construction, prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy,
and prior to operation of this permitted facility, a certification must be received
from an appropriate designer for the system installed certifying that the permitted
facility has been installed in accordance with this permit, the approved plans and
specifications, and other supporting documentation. Any deviations from the
approved plans and specifications must be noted on the Certification. A
modification may be required for those deviations.
9. Access to the stormwater facilities shall be maintained via appropriate
easements at all times.
Page 4of8

State Stormwater Management Systems
Permit No. SW8 080313
10. The permittee shall submit to the Director and shall have received approval for
revised plans, specifications, and calculations prior to construction, for any
modification to the approved plans, including, but not limited to, those listed
below:
a. Any revision to any item shown on the approved plans, including the
stormwater management measures, built -upon area, details, etc.
b. Project name change.
C. Transfer of ownership.
d. Redesign or addition to the approved amount of built -upon area or to the
drainage area.
e. Further subdivision, acquisition, lease or sale of all or part of the project
area. The project area is defined as all property owned by the permittee,
for which Sedimentation and Erosion Control Plan approval or a CAMA
Major permit was sought.
f. Filling in, altering, or piping of any vegetative conveyance shown on the
approved plan.
11. The permittee shall submit final site layout and grading plans for any permitted
future areas shown on the approved plans, prior to construction.
12. A copy of the approved plans and specifications shall be maintained on file by
the Permittee for a minimum of ten years from the date of the completion of
construction.
13. The Director may notify the permittee when the permitted site does not meet one
or more of the minimum requirements of the permit. Within the time frame
specified in the notice, the permittee shall submit a written time schedule to the
Director for modifying the site to meet minimum requirements. The permittee
shall provide copies of revised plans and certification in writing to the Director
that the changes have been made.
III. GENERAL CONDITIONS
1. This permit is not transferable to any person or entity except after notice to and
approval by the Director. In the event of a change of ownership, or a name
change, the permittee must submit a completed Name/Ownership Change form
to the Division of Water Quality, signed by both parties, and accompanied by the
appropriate documentation as listed on page 2 of the form. The approval of this
request will be considered on its merits and may or may not be approved.
2. The permittee is responsible for compliance with all permit conditions until such
time as the Division approves the transfer request.
3. Failure to abide by the conditions and limitations contained in this permit may
subject the Permittee to enforcement action by the Division of Water Quality, in
accordance with North Carolina General Statute 143-215.6A to 143-215.6C.
4. The issuance of this permit does not preclude the Permittee from complying with
any and all statutes, rules, regulations, or ordinances, which may be imposed by
other government agencies (local, state, and federal) having jurisdiction.
5. In the event that the facilities fail to perform satisfactorily, including the creation
of nuisance conditions, the Permittee shall take immediate corrective action,
including those as may be required by this Division, such as the construction of
additional or replacement stormwater management systems.
6. The permittee grants DENR Staff permission to enter the property during normal
business hours for the purpose of inspecting all components of the permitted
stormwater management facility.
Page 5 of 8

State Stormwater Management Systems
Permit No. SW8 080313
7. The permit issued shall continue in force and effect until revoked or terminated.
The permit may be modified, revoked and reissued or terminated for cause. The
filing of a request for a permit modification, revocation and reissuance or
termination does not stay any permit condition.
8. Unless specified elsewhere, permanent seeding requirements for the stormwater
controls must follow the guidelines established in the North Carolina Erosion and
Sediment Control Planning and Design Manual.
9. Approved plans and specifications for this project are incorporated by reference
and are enforceable parts of the permit.
10. The issuance of this permit does not prohibit the Director from reopening and
modifying the permit, revoking and reissuing the permit, or terminating the permit
as allowed by the laws, rules and regulations contained in Session Law 2006-
246, Title 15A NCAC 21-1.1000, and NCGS 143-215.1 et. al.
11. The permittee shall notify the Division in writing of any name, ownership or
mailing address changes at least 30 days prior to making such changes.
Permit issued this the 29th day of April 2008.
NORT AROLINA ENVI NME L MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
for Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission
Page 6 of 8

State Stormwater Management Systems
Permit No. SW8 080313
Camp Lejeune - P-1184 Dining Facility at Stone Bay
Stormwater Permit No. SW8 080313
Onslow County
Designer's Certification
I, , as a duly registered in the
State of North Carolina, having been authorized to observe (periodically/ weekly/ full
time) the construction of the project,
(Project)
for (Project Owner) hereby state that, to the
best of my abilities, due care and diligence was used in the observation of the project
construction such that the construction was observed to be guilt within substantial
compliance and intent of the approved plans and specifications.
The checklist of items on page 2 of this form is included in the Certification.
Noted deviations from approved plans and specification:
Signature
Registration Number
Date
SEAL
Page 7 of 8

State Stormwater Management Systems
Permit No. SW8 080313
Certification Requirements:
1. The drainage area to the system contains approximately the permitted
acreage.
2. The drainage area to the system contains no more than the permitted
amount of built -upon area.
3. All the built -upon area associated with the project is graded such that the
runoff drains to the system.
4. All roof drains are located such that the runoff is directed into the system.
5. The bypass structure weir elevation is per the approved plan.
6. The bypass structure is located per the approved plans.
7. A Trash Rack is provided on the bypass structure.
8. All slopes are grassed with permanent vegetation.
9. Vegetated slopes are no steeper than 3:1.
10. The inlets are located per the approved plans and do not cause short-
circuiting of the system.
11. The permitted amounts of surface area and/or volume have been
provided.
12. All required design depths are provided.
13. , All required parts of the system are provided.
14. The required system dimensions are provided per the approved plans.
cc: NCDENR-DWQ Regional Office
Onslow County Building Inspections
Page 8 of 8

INFILTRATION BASIN ANALYSIS
FILENAME: s:lwgslslormwaterlpermits & projects120081080313 HD12012 06 excel_IB 080313
PROJECT NUMBER: SW8 080313
First Run Date:
3/271200B
PROJECT NAME: Camp Lejeune Dining
Fac & BEO Rifle Range
Last Modified:
28-Jun-12
REVIEWER:
L. Lewis
Basin 1
I_ _Basin 2
Basin 3
Basin 5
Basin 6
Basin7
Basin 9
P-1286
P-1184
P-1286
P-1164
P-1286
P-1286
P-1286
Receiving Stream
Stones Creek
Stones Creek
Stones Creek
Stones Creek
Stones Creek
Stones Creek
Stones Creek
River Basin
WOK02
WOK02
WOK02
WOK02
WOK02
WOK02
WOK02
Index Number
19-30-3
19-30-3
19-30-3
19-30-3
19-30-3
19-30-3
I
19-30-3
Classification
SA; HOW
SA; HOW
SA; HOW
SA; HOW
SA; HOW
SA; HOW
SA HOW
IMPERVIOUS AREA CALCULATION
Onsite DA,sf 149975
50530
140526
33812
312827
287276
78292
OHsite DA, sf 0
0
0
0
1067
0
0
Drainage Area, sq ft = 149975
50530
140526
33812
313894
287276
78292
Drainage Area, ac = 3.44
1.16
3.23
0.78
7.21
6.59
1,80
Buildings 25961
860
280
7575
31670
1992
14358
_Streets
4480
11056
Parking 54619
21715
63139
Sidewalk 8545
1130
12226
1338
13477
14229
1935
Other
7349
Future
3160
Offsite
1067
Exis_ ting 10425
40923
23552
149193-�
TOTAL 99550
23705
53429
16553
151310
165414
16293
0,544
1.227
0.380
3.474
3.797
0,374
2.285
% Impervious, I, sq ft= 66.38%
46.91%
38.02%
48.96%
48.20%
57.58%
20.81%
Cc= 0.65
0.57
0.21
0.36
0.47
0.14
0.18
VOLUME CALCULATION
Design Storm = 3.6
3.6
3.6
Rv, pre (0%)= 0.05
0.05
0.05
Rv, post= 0.65
0.47
0.39
SHWT Elev.= 46.83
45.87
46.20
Infiltration Rate, Inlhr = 10.0
7.7
10.0
Bottom Elevation= 47.6
47.87
45.5
Bottom Surface Area = 10552
3941
6233
Storage Elevation = 49.73
49,17
47.51
Storage SA = 13655
6011
8187
Pre -development volume 2249.6
758.0
2107.9
Post -development volume 29120.1
7158.3
16533.7
6400
14426
Design Volume = 26879
6469
14492
Total Volume Provided= 26991
as acre -in 7.44
1.78
3.99
Is the Vol Provided? OK
OK
OK
Storage met at elevation= 49.72
49.16
47.50
Bypass Weir Elov. 49.73
4RX7
47.51
Time to Draw Down = 3.06
2.53
2,78
f
is
1.00
0.98
0.98
0.95
0.95
0,98
0.98
0.95
d
rc
3.6
3.6
3.6
3.6 in
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.49
0.48
0.57
0.24
48.13
44.50
43.5
45.5 frnst
5.0
10.0
10.0
5 in/lu
50.13
46.5
45.5
47.5 fmsi
2946
17671
17283
2856 sf
51.4
48.6
47.79
49.78 fmsi
4362
21286
21788
4953 sf
507.2
4708.4
4309A
1174.4 1 yr 2
4976.5
45562.1
48970.9
5573.5 1 yr 2
4469
40854
44662
4399 1,f
4641
40905
44736
8902 cf
1.28
11,27
12,32
2.45 ac-in
OK
OK
OK
OK
51.35
48.60
47.79
48.63 fmsl
.51.4"
48.60
47,79
49.78 fmsl
3.64
2.77
3.10
3.70 hrs
COMMENTS
Volume and drawdown are (not) within Design Requirements.
Basins 2 and 5 are unchanged from the April 29, 2008 permit.

DWQ USE 0NLY
Date Received
Fee Paid
Permit Number
000.� -tom9
Sw31a�d313
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT APPLICATION FORM
This form may be photocopied for use as an original
1. GENERAL INFORMATION
1. Applicants name (specify the name of the corporation, individual, etc. who owns the project):
U.S. Government - MCB Camp Lejeune
2. Print Owner/Signing Official's name and title (person legally responsible for facility and compliance):
Carl Baker - Deputy Public Works Officer_____
3. Mailing Address for person listed in item 2 above:
1005 Micheal Road
City:Camp Lejeune State:NC Zip:28542
Phone: (910 ) 451-2213 Fax: (910 ) 451-2927
Email:[e-mail]
4. Project Name (subdivision, facility, or establishment name - should be consistent with project name on plans,
specifications, letters, operation and maintenance agreements, etc.):
P-1184 Dining Faciltiy at Stone BaY MCB Camp Lejeune
5. Location of Project (street address):
�L}flAE' �Odc� � Llr� ICICE'✓1� � �, ' �ai�ta �+�.�
UI
City: Ca nnLejeune County:Onslow Zip:28542
6. Directions to project (from nearest major intersection):
Site is located within Stone Bay Rifle Range Road accessed off Henry 210 between Hwy 17 to the North and
Hwy 172 to the south.
7. Latitude:34° 34' 48" N Longitude:77° 2700" W of project
8. Contact person who can answer questions about the project:
Name:K. Toshua Hurst, P.E. _ Telephone Number: (919 ) 828-1876
Email:[e-mail]
1L PERMIT INFORMATION:
1. Specify whether project is (check one):
❑Renewal . ❑Modification
Form SWU-101 Version 02.19.08
Page l of 4

2. If this application is being submitted as the result of a renewal or modification to an existing permit, list the
existing permit numberNZA and its issue date (if known)N/A
3. Specify the type of project (check one):
❑Low Density ®High Density ❑Redevelop ❑General Permit ❑Universal SMP ❑Other
4. Additional Project Requirements (check applicable blanks; information on required state permits can be
obtained by contacting the Customer Service Center at 1-877-623-6748):
❑CAMA Major ®Sedimentation/Erosion Control 0404/401 Permit ZNPDES Stormwater
III. PROJECT INFORMATION
1. In the space provided below, summarize how stormwater will be treated. Also attach a detailed narrative
(one to two pages) describing stormwater management for the project .
see attached narrative and calculations S I F I LTk'AT tale SAS INS
2. Stormwater runoff from this project drains to the New River basin.
3. Total Property Area: 6.96 acres 4. Total Wetlands Area: 0 acres
5. 100' Wide Strip of Wetland Area: n/a acres (not applicable if no wetlands exist on site)
6. Total Project Area**:6.96 acres
S. How many -drainage areas does the project have?6
7. Project Built Upon Area
9. Complete the following information for each drainage area. If there are more than two drainage areas in the
project, attach an additional sheet with the information for each area provided in the same format as below.
For high density projects, complete the table with one drainage area for each engineered stormwater device.
Basin Information
_,.Drainage Area I
Drainage Area 2—
Receiving Stream Name
Stream Class & Index No.
Total Drainage Area (sf)
See attached
see attached
On -site Drainage Area (sf)
Off -site Drainage Area (sf)
Existing Impervious* Area (sf)
Proposed Impervious*Area (sf)
`% Impervious* Area (total)
Impervious* Surface Area
Drainage Areal, .... .. ..... .
Drainage Area 2
On -site Buildings (sf)
On -site Streets (sf)
On -site Parking (sf)
On -site Sidewalks (sf)
Other on -site (sf)
Off -site (so
Total (so:
* Impervious area is defined as the built upon area including, but not limited to, buildings, roads, parking areas,
sidewalks, gravel areas, etc.
**Total project area shall be calculated based on the current policy regarding inclusion of wetlands in the built upon area
percentage calculation. This is the area used to calculate percent project built upon area (BUA).
Form SWU-101 Version 02.19.08 Page 2 of 4

Basin Information
DA-1
DA-2
DA-3
DA-4
DA-5
I DA-6
Receiving Stream Name
Stones Creek
Stones Creek
Stones Creek
Stones Creek
Stones Creek
Stones Creek
Stream Class & Index No.
SA; HQW 19-30-3
SA; HQW 19-30-3
SA; HQW 19-30-3
SA; HQW 19-30-3
SA; HQW 19-30-3
SA; HQW 19-30-3
Drainage Area (sD
42689
50530
75795
53143
33812
45739
Existing Impervious Area (so
0
0
0
0
0
0
Proposed Impervious Area (sq
23958
23705
24264
20909
16553
7040
% Impervious Area (total)
56%
47%
32%
39%
49%
15%
,Impervious Surface Area
On -site Building s
0
860
0
13235
7575
0
On -site Streets (so
0
0
0
0
4480
5540
On -site Parking (so
23958
21715
23432
3060
0
On -site Sidewalks (so
1130
832
4614
1338
1500
Future Building s
0
01
01
01
31601
0
Off -site sf
01
01
01
01
01
0
Total (s91
239581
237051
242641
209091
165531
7040

A 10. How was the off -site impervious area listed above derived? N r A
IV. DEED RESTRICTIONS AND PROTECTIVE COVENANTS
One of the following deed restrictions and protective covenants are required to be recorded for all subdivisions,
outparcels and future development prior to the sale of any lot. If lot sizes vary significantly, a table listing each lot
number, size and the allowable built -upon area for each lot must be provided as an attachment. Forms can be
downloaded from http://l12o.enr.state.ilc.us/su/bmp forms.htm - deed restrictions.
Form DRPC-1
High Density Commercial Subdivisions
Form DRPC-2
High Density Developments with Outparcels
Form DRPC-3
High Density Residential Subdivisions
Form DRPC-4
Low Density Commercial Subdivisions
Form DRPC-5
Low Density Residential Subdivisions
Form DRPC-b
Low Density Residential Subdivisions with Curb Outlets
By your signature below, you certify that the recorded deed restrictions and protective covenants for this
project shall include all the applicable items required in the above form, that the covenants will be binding on
all parties and persons claiming under them, that they will run with the land, that the required covenants
cannot be changed or deleted without concurrence from the State, and that they will be recorded prior to the
sale of any lot.
V. SUPPLEMENT FORMS
The applicable state stormwater management permit supplement form(s) listed below must be submitted for each
BMP specified for this project. Contact the Stormwater and General Permits Unit at [phone] for the status
and availability of these forms. Forms can be downloaded from littp://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/su/bmp forms.htm.
Form SW401-Low Density
Form SW401-Curb Outlet System
Form SW401-Off-Site System
Form SW401-Wet Detention Basin
Form SW401-infiltration Basin
Form SW401-Infiltration Trench
Form SW401-Bioretention Cell
Form SW401-Level Spreader
Form SW401-Wetland
Form SW401-Grassed Swale
Form SW401-Sand Filter
Form SW401-Permeable Pavement
Low Density Supplement
Curb Outlet System Supplement
Off -Site System Supplement
Wet Detention Basin Supplement
Infiltration Basin Supplement
Underground Infiltration Trench Supplement
Bioretention Cell Supplement
Level Spreader/Filter Strip/Restored Riparian Buffer Supplement
Constructed Wetland Supplement
Grassed Swale Supplement.
Sand Filter Supplement
Permeable Pavement Supplement
Form SWU-101 Version 02.19.08 Page 3 of

Ir
VI. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
f Only complete application packages will be accepted and reviewed by the Division of Water Quality (DWQ).
A complete package includes all of the items listed below. The complete application package should be
submitted to the appropriate DWQ Office. (Appropriate office may be found by locating project on the
interactive online map at http://h2o,enr.state.nc.us/su/insi maps.htm)
Please indicate that you have provided the following required information by initialing in the space provided
next to each item.
Initials
• Original and one copy of the Stormwater Management Permit Application Form
• Original and one copy of the Deed Restrictions & Protective Covenants Form (if
required as per Part IV above)
• Original of the applicable Supplement Form(s) and O&M agreement(s) for each BMP
• Permit application processing fee of $505 ($4,000 for Express) payable to NCDENR C
• Calculations & detailed narrative description of stormwater treatment/management
• Copy of any applicable soils report %
• Two copies of plans and specifications (sealed, signed & dated), including:
- Development/Project name
- Engineer and firm
-Legend
- North arrow
- Scale
- Revision number & date
- Mean high water line
- Dimensioned property/project boundary
- Location map with named streets or NCSR numbers
- Original contours, proposed contours, spot elevations, finished floor elevations
- Details of roads, drainage features, collection systems, and stormwater control measures
- Wetlands delineated, or a note on plans that none exist
- Existing drainage (including off -site), drainage easements, pipe sizes, runoff calculations
- Drainage areas delineated
- Vegetated buffers (where required)
VII. AGENT AUTHORIZATION
If you wish to designate authority to another individual or firm so that they may provide information on your
behalf, please complete this section. (ex. designing engineer or firm)
Designated agent (individual or firm): K , 3 d56 io l� Uf 5�� Q F , ck Cl ai^ l< .1VeiC A
Mailing Address: 400o W'05- Cc6z 131 Vey, SUi i P Zg o
City: n A, State: iJL Zip: Z-7f 07
Phone: ( I ) _. US
` t g-7 Fax: f `� f cf ) US' 1 9 - 7
Email:7hU(y�
VIII. APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION j
I, (print or type name of person listed in General Information, item 2)
certify that the information included on this permit application form is, to the best of my knowledge, correct and
that the project will be constructed in conformance with the approved plans, that the required deed restrictions
and protective covenf ec is will be red, and that the proposed project complies with the requirements of 15A
NCAC 2H .1000. / J n
Signature:
Date: 3 3 - b e
Form SWU-101 Version 02.19.08 Page 4 of 4

Permit No. 54.i G 7) '� 13
(to be provided by DWQ)
h o�
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT APPLICATION FORM CIa
O Y
NCDENR 401 CERTIFICATION APPLICATION FORM
INFILTRATION BASIN SUPPLEMENT
This form must be filled out, printed and submitted.
The Required Items Checklist (Part III) must be printed, filled out and submitted along with all of the required information.
I. PROJECT INFORMATION
Project Name DINING FACILITY AT STONE BAY, MCB CAMP LEJEUNE
Contact Person Jeffrey J. Bass
Phone Number 757-961-7805
Date 21712008
Drainage Area Number DRAINAGE AREAS 1
II. DESIGN INFORMATION
Site Characteristics
Drainage area 42,689.00 ft2
Impervious area 23,958.00 ft2
Percent impervious 0.56
Design rainfall depth 3.6 in
Peak Flow Calculations
Is prelpost control of the 1-yr 24-hr peak flow required?
Y
(Y or N)
1-yr, 24-hr runoff depth
3.58
in
1-yr, 24-hr intensity
0.18
inlhr
Pre -development 1-yr, 24-hr runoff volume
0.035
ft`/sec
Post -development 1-yr, 24-hr runoff volume
0.11.
ft3lsec
Pre/Post 1-yr, 24-hr peak Flow control
0.1
ft/sec
Storage Volume: Non -SR Waters
Minimum design volume required
NIA
ft3
Design volume provided
NIA
ft3 OK for non -SR waters
Storage Volume: SR Waters
1-yr. 24-hr rainfall depth
3.6 in
Pre -development 1-yr, 24-hr runoff
637 ft3
Post -development l-yr, 24-hr runoff
7069 ft3
Minimum volume required
6433 ft3
Volume provided
6,750 ft'
Soils Report Summary
Soil type
Sand
Infiltration rate
18,40
inlhr
SHWT elevation
46,83
fmsl
Basin Design Parameters
Drawdown time
0.04
days OK
Basin side slopes
3
:1 OK
Basin bottom elevation
48.83
fmsl OK
Storage elevation
50.00 .
fmsl
Top elevation
50.50
fmsl
Basin Bottom Dimensions
Basin length
71
ft
Basin width
74
ft
Bottom SA
5,315
ft'
Form SW401-Infiltration Basin-Rev.1 Parts I. & II. Design Summary, Page 1 of 2

Permit No. 5W iU D-3 C)
(to be provided by OWQ)
Additional Information
Total runoff volume captured by basin
Length of vegetative filter for overflow
Distance to structure
Distance from surface waters
Distance from water supply well(s)
Separation from impervious soil layer
Naturally occuring soil above shwt
Bottom covered with 4-in of clean sand?
Recorded drainage easement provided?
Capures all runoff at ultimate build -out?
Bypass provided for larger storms?
Pretreatment device provided
1'.88
ac-in
OK
50
ft
OK
410
ft
OK
50
ft
OK
n!a
ft
OK
2
ft
OK
.1.67
ft
OK
Y
(Y or N)
OK
nla
(Y or N)
OK
Y .
(Y or N)
OK
Y
(Y or N)
OK
Swale
Form SW401-Infiltration Basin-Rev.1 Parts I. & It. Design Summary, Page 2 of 2

Permit No.
(to be provided by DWQ)
III..FREQIl1&9%ITEMSr'.0 KL13T* � r,., � r� .�� �� _--'�,o � -� ��u�s= "'� ti �+;,r
1 --1-- o_ �.r �,__... w__,5 may,
Please indicate the page or plan sheet numbers where the supporting documentation can be found. An incomplete submittal package will
result in a request for additional information. This will delay final review and approval of the project. Initial in the space provided to
indicate the following design requirements have been met. If the applicant has designated an agent, the agent may initial below. if a
requirement has not been met, attach justification.
Pagel Plan
Initi Is
Sheet No.
0119/
1. Plans (1" 50' or larger) of the entire site showing:
C(a5a/
Design at ultimate build -out,
C4
Off -site drainage (if applicable),
- Delineated drainage basins (include Rational C coefficient per basin),
Basin dimensions,
Pretreatment system,
High flow bypass system,
Maintenance access,
- Recorded drainage easement and public right of way (ROW),
- Overflow device, and
Boundaries of drainage easement.
-y
/
01
2. Partial plan (1" = 30' or larger) and details for the infiltration basin showing:
- Bypass structure,
- Maintenance access,
- Basin bottom dimensions,
- Basin cross-section with benchmark for sediment cleanout,
- Flow distribution detail for inflow,
- Vegetated filter, and
- Pretreatment device,
3. Section view of the infiltration basin 0" = 20' or larger) showing:
C6601
- Pretreatment and treatment areas, and
_
- Inlet and outlet structures.
4. A table of elevations, areas, incremental volumes & accumulated volumes to verify the volume provided.
5. A soils report that is based upon an actual field investigation, soil borings, and infiltration tests. The
results of the soils report must be verified in the field by DWQ, by completing & submitting the soils
investigation request form. County soil maps are not an acceptable source of soils information.
l
6. An assurance that the installed system will meet design specifications upon initial operation once the
project is complete and the entire drainage area is stabilized.
C61O2
7. A construction sequence that shows how the infitlration basin will be protected from sediment until the
entire drainage area is stabilized.
G ICS
8. The supporting calculations.
9. A copy of the signed and notarized inspection and maintenance (I&M) agreement.
N
10. A copy of the deed restriction.
Form 5W401-Infiltration Basin-Rev.1 Page 1 of i Part III. Required Items Checklist, Page 1 of 1

Permit No. 2�'M�O'N3
(to be provided by DWQ)
1 �p�oF
w A TFgaa
NNA STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT APPLICATION FORM - g
P <
NCDENR 401 CERTIFICATION APPLICATION FORM
INFILTRATION BASIN SUPPLEMENT
This form must be filled out, printed and submitted.
The Required Items Checklist (Part 111) must be printed, filled out and submitted along with all of the required information.
I. PROJECT INFORMATION
Project Name DINING FACILITY AT STONE BAY, MCB CAMP LEJEUNE
Contact Person Jeffrey J. Bass
Phone Number 757-961-7805
Date 2/7/2008
Drainage Area Number DRAINAGE AREAS 3
II. DESIGN INFORMATION
Site Characteristics
Drainage area
75,795.00 ftZ
Impervious area
24,264,00 fie
Percent impervious
0,32
Design rainfall depth
3.6 in
Peak Flow Calculations
Is prelpost control of the 1-yr 24-hr peak flow required?
Y
(Y or N)
1-yr, 24-hr runoff depth
3.58
in
1-yr, 24-hr intensity
0.18
inlhr
Pre -development 1-yr, 24-hr runoff volume
0.06
ft3lsec
Post -development 1-yr, 24-hr runoff volume
0.138
f0lsec
Pre/Post 1-yr, 24-hr peals flow control
0.1
ft3lsec
Storage Volume: Non -SR Waters
Minimum design volume required
nla
ft3
Design volume provided
n1a
ft3
OK for non -SR waters
Storage Volume: SR Waters
1-yr, 24-hr rainfall depth
3.6
in
Pre -development 1-yr, 24-hr runoff
1131
ft3
Post -development 1-yr, 24-hr runoff
7680
ft3
Minimum volume required
6549
ft3
Volume provided
6,600
ft3
Soils Report Summary
Soil type
Sand
Infiltration rate
14.70
inlhr
SHWT elevation
46,20
fmsl
Basin Design Parameters
Drawdown time
0,03
days
OK
Basin side slopes
3
:1
OK
Basin bottom elevation
48.50
fmsl
OK
Storage elevation
49.40
fmsl
Top elevation
50.50
fmsl
Basin Bottom Dimensions
Basin length
146
ft
Basin width
45
ft
Bottom SA
6,802
ftZ
Form SW401-Infiltration Basin-Rev.1 Parts I, & 11, Design Summary, Page 1 of 2

Permit No. 15\AM )
fto be provided by DWQJ
additional Information
Total runoff volume captured by basin
1.88
ac-in
OK
Length of vegetative filter for overflow
50
ft
OK
Distance to structure
345
ft
OK
Distance from surface waters
50
ft
OK
Distance from water supply well(s)
nla
ft
OK
Separation from impervious soil layer
2
ft
OK
Naturally accuring soil above shwt
1'V
ft
OK
Bottom covered with 4-in of clean sand?
Y
(Y or N)
OK
Recorded drainage easement provided?
nla
(Y or N)
OK
Capures all runoff at ultimate build -out?
Y
(Y or N)
OK
Bypass provided for larger storms?
Y
(Y or N)
OK
Pretreatment device provided
Swale
Form SW401-Infiltration Basin-Rev.1 Parts I. & 11. Design Summary, Pago 2 of 2

Permit No.
(to be provided by DWQ)
Ill: %REQUIREDs-_-`ITEM
_S�`CCK1flST�Y s ."r� "t b'
.. -HI: - `�,� _;
Please indicate the page or plan sheet numbers where the supporting documentation can be found. An incomplete submittal package will
result in a request for additional information. This will delay final review and approval of the project. Initial in the space provided to
indicate the following design requirements have been met. If the applicant has designated an agent, the agent may initial below. If a
requirement has not been met, attach justification.
Page! Plan
In' gals
Sheet No.
101
1. Plans (1" 50' or larger) of the entire site showing:
C(7,CV f
- Design at ultimate build -out,
Mks.
- Off -site drainage (if applicable),
- Delineated drainage basins (include Rational C coefficient per basin),
Basin dimensions,
Pretreatment system,
- High flow bypass system,
Maintenance access,
Recorded drainage easement and public right of way (ROW),
Overflow device, and
Boundaries of drainage easement.
j
2. Partial plan (1" = 30' or larger) and details for the infiltration basin showing:
- Bypass structure,
Maintenance access,
- Basin bottom dimensions,
Basin cross-section with benchmark for sediment cleanout,
- Flow distribution detail for inflow,
- Vegetated filter, and
t7�
- Pretreatment device.
3. Section view of the infiltration basin (1" = 20' or larger) showing:
CGS/
- Pretreatment and treatment areas, and
62r0.
- Inlet and outlet structures.
4. A table incremental &
�
of elevations, areas, volumes accumulated volumes to verify the volume provided.
CS,
5. A soils report that is based upon an actual field investigation, soil borings, and infiltration tests. The
results of the soils report must be verified in the field by DWQ, by completing & submitting the soils
investigation request form. County soil maps are not an acceptable source of soils information.
J�
6. An assurance that the installed system will meet design specifications upon initial operation once the
project is complete and the entire drainage area is stabilized.
OK 1V
7. A construction sequence that shows how the inftiration basin will be protected from sediment until the
entire drainage area is stabilized.
CS —
& The supporting calculations.
9. A the inspection
copy of signed and notarized and maintenance (I&M) agreement.
Al >t}
10. A copy of the deed restriction.
Form 5W401-Infiltration Basin-Rev.1 Page 1 of 1 Part III. Required Items Checklist, Page 1 of 1

. • 41 � r -�7 -�-7� 2,
Z Permit No. ✓ "�1 JO J
(to be provided by DWQ)
• �aF war�R a
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT APPLICATION FORM
P ^f
NCDENR 401 CERTIFICATION APPLICATION FORM
INFILTRATION BASIN SUPPLEMENT
This form must be filled out, printed and submitted.
The Required Items Checklist (Part 111) must be printed, filled out and submitted along with all of the required information.
I. PROJECT INFORMATION
Project Name DINING FACILITY AT STONE BAY, MCB CAMP LEJELINE
Contact Person Jeffrey J. Bass
Phone Number 757-961.7805
Date 2t712008
Drainage Area Number DRAINAGE AREAS 4
IL DESIGN INFORMATION
Site Characteristics
Drainage area
53,143.00 tt2
Impervious area,
20.909,00 ft'
Percent impervious
0,39
Design rainfall depth
.3.6, - in
Peak Flow Calculations
Is pretpost control of the 1-yr 24-hr peak Flow required?
1-yr, 24-hr runoff depth
1-yr, 24-hr intensity
Pre -development 1-yr, 24-hr runoff volume
Post -development 1-yr, 24-hr runoff volume
PrelPost 1-yr, 24-hr peak Flow control
Storage Volume: Non -SR Waters
Minimum design volume required
Design volume provided
Storage Volume: SR Waters
1-yr, 24-hr rainfall depth
Pre -development 1-yr, 24-hr runoff
Post -development 1-yr, 24-hr runoff
Minimum volume required
Volume provided
Soils Report Summary
Soil type
Infiltration rate
SHWT elevation
Basin Design Parameters
Drowdown time
Basin side slopes
Basin bottom elevation
Storage elevation
Top elevation
Basin Bottom Dimensions
Basin length
Basin width
Bottom SA
Y
(Y or N)
3.58
in
0.18
inmr
0,044
ft3lsec
0.1:1
R3isec
0.1
ft3lsec
N/A ft,
NIA' tt3 OK for non -SR waters
3.6 - in
793 ff3
6406 tt3
5613 ft3
5,650 ff3
Sand
11.80 inlhr
47.08 fmsl
0,05
days OK
3
:1 OK
49.08
fmsl OK
50.10
fmsl
50.50
fmsl
6$ ft
75 ft
4,840 ft2
Form SW401-Infiltration Basin-Rev.1 Parts 1. & It. Design Summary, Page 1 of 2

Permit No. 4q 'R 0-3 1 J
110 be provided by DWQJ
Additional Information
Total runoff volume captured by basin
1.55
ac-in
OK
Length of vegetative filter for overflow
50
ft
OK
Distance to structure
410
ft
OK
Distance from surface waters
50
ft
OK
Distance from water supply well(s)
nla
ft
OK
Separation from impervious soil layer
2
ft
OK
Naturally occuring soil above shwt
1.67
ft
OK
Bottom covered with 4-in of clean sand?
Y
(Y or N)
OK
Recorded drainage easement provided?
n/a
(Y or N)
OK
Capures all runoff at ultimate build -out?
Y
(Y or N)
OK
Bypass provided for larger storms?
Y '
(Y or N)
OK
Pretreatment device provided
Swale
Form SW401-Infiltration Basin-Rev.1 Parts I. & IL Design Summary, Page 2 of 2

Permit No.
(to be provided by DWQ)
I QREQU1RED1ITEMS,CHQCKLIST'
Please indicate the page or plan sheet numbers where the supporting documentation can be found. An incomplete submittal package will
result in a request for additional information. This will delay final review and approval of the project. Initial in the space provided to
indicate the following design requirements have been met. If the applicant has designated an agent, the agent may initial below. If a
requirement has not been met, attach justification.
Pagel Plan
I ' ials
Sheet No.
1. Plans (1" 50' or larger) of the entire site showing:
CUP
Design at ultimate build-out,
Off-site drainage (if applicable),
- Delineated drainage basins (include Rational C coefficient per basin),
- Basin dimensions,
Pretreatment system,
High flow bypass system,
Maintenance access,
- Recorded drainage easement and public right of way (ROW),
Overflow device, and
Boundaries of drainage easement.
�l
2. Partial plan 0" = 30' or larger) and details for the infiltration basin showing:
Bypass structure,
- Maintenance access,
Basin bottom dimensions,
Basin cross-section with benchmark for sediment cleanout,
- Flow distribution detail for inflow,
Vegetated filter, and
Pretreatment device.
3. Section view of the infiltration basin (1" = 20' or larger) showing:
c6 ffll
- Pretreatment and treatment areas, and
Ccs.
- Inlet and outlet structures.
4. A table incremental &
of elevations, areas, volumes accumulated volumes to verify the volume provided.
62 Ia.
5. A soils report that is based upon an actual field investigation, soil borings, and infiltration tests. The
results of the soils report must be verified in the field by DWQ, by completing & submitting the soils
investigation request form. County soil maps are not an acceptable source of soils information.
6. An assurance that the installed system will meet design specifications upon initial operation once the
project is complete and the entire drainage area is stabilized.
7. A construction sequence that shows how the infllration basin will be protected from sediment until the
entire drainage area is stabilized.
UCS
& The supporting calculations.
nP�
9.
A copy of the signed and notarized inspection and maintenance (I&M) agreement.
N
10. A the
copy of deed restriction.
Form SVV401-Infiltration Basin-Rev.I Page 1 of 1 Part III. Required items Checklist, Page 1 of 1

ARA y
a
NCDENR p
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT APPLICATION FORM
401 CERTIFICATION APPLICATION FORM
LEVEL SPREADER, FILTER STRIP AND RESTORED RIPARIAN BUFFER SUPPLEMENT
This form must be completely filled out, printed and submitted.
DO NOT FORGET TO ATTACH THE REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST AND ALL REQUIRED ITEMS (NEXT WORKSHEET)I
I. PROJECT INFORMATION
Project name Dining facility at Stone Bay, MCB Camp Lejeune.
Contact name Jeffrey J. Bass
Phone number 757-961-7805
Date April21, 2008
Drainage area number 1, 3, 4
11. DESIGN INFORMATION
For Level Spreaders Receiving Flow From a BMP
Type of BMP Infiltration Basin
Drawdown flow from the BMP 4,25 cfs
For Level Spreaders Receiving Flow from the Drainage Area
Do not complete this section of the worksheet.
Drainage area
171,626.40
f?
Do not complete this section of the worksheet.
Impervious surface area
69,131.00
ft�
Do not complete this section of the worksheet.
Percent impervious
40.28
%
Do not complete this section of the worksheet.
Rational C Coefficient
0.50
Do not complete this section of the worksheet.
Peak flow from the 1 inlhr storm
1,97
cfs
Do not complete this section of the worksheet.
Time of concentration
47.00
min
Rainfall intensity, 10-yr storm
2.7 inhlr
Do not complete this section of the worksheet.
Peak flow from the 10-yr storm
5.32
cfs
Do not complete this section of the worksheet.
Where Does the Level Spreader Discharge?
To a grassed bioretention cell? N (Y or N)
To a mulched bioretention cell? N (Y or N)
To a wetland? Y (Y or N) Please complete filter strip characterization below.
To a filter strip or riparian buffer? Y (Y or N) Please complete filter strip characterization below.
Other (specify) -
Fitter Strip or Riparian Buffer Characterization (if applicable)
Width of grass
50,00
ft
Width of dense ground cover
ft
Width of wooded vegetation
ft
Total width
50.00
ft
Elevation at downslope base of level lip
49.00
fmsl
Elevation at top of bank of the receiving water
46.00
fmsl
Slope (from level lip to to top of bank)
6.00
% OK
Are any draws present?
N
(Y or N) OK
Level Spreader Design
Forebay surface area
NA
sq ft No forebay is needed.
Feet of level lip needed per cfs
13
fucfs
Answer 'Y' to one of the following:
Length based on the 1 inlhr storm?
N
(Y or N)
Length based on the 10-yr storm?
Y
(Y or N)
Length based on the BMP discharge rate?
Y
(Y or N)
Design flow
5.32
cfs
Is a bypass device provided?
N
(Y or N) A bypass device is not needed.
Form SW401-Level Spreader, Fitter Strip, Restored Riparian Buffer-Rev.S Parts I. and II. Design Summary, page 1 of 2

Length of the level lip
Are Ipvel spreaders in series?
Bypass Channel Design (if applicable)
Does the bypass discharge through a wetland?
Does the channel enter the stream at an angle?
Dimensions of the channel (see diagram below):
M
B
W
y
Peak velocity in the channel during the 10-yr storm
Channel lining material
70.00 ft
Level spreader length OK
N (Y or N)
(Y or N)
Do not complete this section of the worksheet.
(Y or N)
Do not ccmpMe this section of the worksheel.
Do not complete this section of the worksheet.
ft
Do not complete this section of the worksheet.
ft
Do not complete this section of the worksheet.
ft
Do not complete this section of the worksheet.
ft
Do not complete this section of the worksheet.
cfs Do not complete this section of the worksheet.
Do not complete this section of the worksheet.
'
w
'
l
•-------------
Y
l
1
M
M
i
B
i
Form SW401-Level Spreader, Filler Strip, Restored Riparian Buffer-Rev.S Parts I. and 11. Design Summary, page 2 of 2

S\4�� 31`j
fll. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Please indicate the page or plan sheet numbers where the supporting documentation can be found. An incomplete submittal package will
result in a request for additional information. This will delay final review and approval of the project. Initial in the space provided to
indicate the following design requirements have been met. If the applicant has designated an agent, the agent may initial below. If a
requirement has not been met, attach justification.
Pagel Plan
Initials
Sheet No.
C61
1. Plans (V - 50' or larger) of the entire site showing:
DV
Design at ultimate build -out,
CaiCS
Off -site drainage (if applicable),
Delineated drainage basins (include Rational C coefficient per basin),
Forebay (if applicable),
High flow bypass system,
Maintenance access,
Proposed drainage easement and public right of way (ROW), and
Boundaries of drainage easement.
�1
2. Plan details (1" = 30' or larger) for the level spreader showing:
LP -A►_ 3 ;�
77
Forebay (if applicable),
High flow bypass system,
One foot topo lines between the level lip and top of stream bank,
Proposed drainage easement, and
Design at ultimate build -out.
�G✓� i
3. Section view of the level spreader (1" = 20' or larger) showing:
j/
Underdrain system (if applicable),
Level lip,
Upslope channel, and
Downslope filter fabric.
4. A date the filter that the type is
-stamped photograph of strip clearly shows of vegetation that present.
5. A construction sequence that shows how the level spreader will be protected from sediment until the entire
drainage area is stabilized.
�ait5
6. The supporting calculations,
7. A copy of the signed and notarized operation and maintenance (0&M) agreement.
8, A copy of the deed restrictions (if required).
Form SW401-Level Spreader, Filter Strip, Restored Riparian Buffer-Rev.5 Part III, page 1 of 1

Permit Nuniber: -� ell? 4 6 O'3/
(to be provided by Dll'Q)
braillage Area Number: 1
Infiltration Basin Inspection and Maintenance Agreement
I will keep a maintenance record on this BMP. This maintenance record %vill be kept in a
log iYl a known set Iocation. Any deficient 131V1P elelnenLs noted in the inspection will be
corrected, repaired or replaced inanediately. These deficiencies can affect the integrity
of structures, safety of the public, and the removat efficiency of the BTV1P.
Important maintenance procedures:
The drainage area will be carefully managed to reduce the sediment load to the
infiltration basin.
— lnunediately after the infiltration basin is established, the vegetation will be
watered twice weekly if needed until the plants become established (cornmonl.y
six weeks).
— Na portion of the infiltration basin will be fertilized after the hi.itial fertilization
that is required to establish the vegetation.
The vegetation to and around the basin will be maintained at a height of
approximately six. inches.
After the infiltration basin is established, it will. be inspected once a quarter and within
24 hours after every storm event greater than 1.0 inches (or 1.5 inches if in a Coastal
County). Records of inspection and maintenance will be kept in a known set location
and will be available upon request.
Inspection activities. shall be performed as follows. Any problems plat are found shall.
be repaired immediately.
I3MP clement:
Potential roblent:
How 1 will renlediate the probleln:
The entire BMP
Trash/debris is present.
Remove the trash/debris.
The perimeter of the
Areas of bare soil and/or
Regrade the sail if necessary to
infiltration basin
erosive gullies (lave formed.
remove the gully, and theft plant a
ground cover and water until it is
established. Provide lime atul a
one-tillle fertilizer application,
The inlet device: pipe or
The pipe is.clogged (if
Unclog the pipe. Dispose of the
Swale
applicable).
sediment off -site.
The pipe:is cracked or
Replace the pipe..
ofllerwise dainaged (if
applicable).
Erosion iS OCCLtrl'lllg in the
Regrade the s'wale if necessary to
swine (if applicable).
slllootll it over and provide croslon
control devices such as reinforced
turf 111attirlg or riprap to avoid
fuhlre Probicnis with erosion.
form SW401-hlliltration EDasiil lzC M-Rev.2 Page 1 0173

.I
I3MP element
The forebay
The main treatment area
The embankment
The outlet device
The receiving water
Potential problem:
Sediment has accumulated
and reduced the depth to 75%
of the original design depth.
Erosion has occurred or
riprap is displaced.
Weeds are present.
A visible layer- of sediment
has ICCUMrrlated.
1,1Tater is standing More than-
5 clays after a storm event.
Needs and noxious plants are
growing in (lie main
trcahrtenL area.
Shrubs or trees have started
to row on the embankment.
An annual inspection by an
appropriate professional
shows that the embankment
needs re Lair.
Clogging has occurred.
The outlet device is damaged
Erosion or other signs of
damage have occurred at the
outlet.
Dorm SW401-hifiltration Basin I&VH- cv.2
I -low t will remediate the problem:
Search for the som-ce of the
sect imenL and remedy the problem if
possible. Removethesedimentand
dispose of it in a location w1wre it
will not cause imoacLS to streams or
the MAP.
Provide additional erosion
protection such as reinfmced turf
matting"or riprap if needed to
prevent future erosion problems.
Remove the weeds,.preferably by
hand: If pesticides are used, wife
them on the plants rather than
Search for the source of the
sediment and remedy the problem if
possible. Remove the sedimentancl
ilisposepf it in a location where it
will not cause impacts to streams or
the BNIP. Replace any media that
was removed in the process.
Revegetate disturbed areas
immediate.
Replace. the top fe%v inclies of filter
meci.ia and see if this corrects the
standing water problem. If so,
revegetate immediately. If not,
consult an appropriate professional
for a more extensive repair.
Remove the plants'by hand or by
wiping, thew with pesticide {clo not
Remove shrubs or trees
immediately.
Make all needed'repairs.
Clean out the outlet device. Dispose
of the sediment off -site.
Re nr}L •r or r e[ace the outlet device.
Contact the NC Division of Water
Quality 401 Oversight: Unit at 919-
733-1786.
1'age2of3

I
l�.ermlt Nnlnl)el'; " 3/ 3
(to be provided by DIVA)
I acknoNvIcdge and agree by my signature below that l am responsible for the
performance of the maintenance procedures listed above. I agree to notify ❑` Q of any
problems. with the system or prior to any changes to the system or responsible party.
A-gjecl name: P 1194 b,IJI NG FAC, t.t7`Y AT 5—ONE SAY MGS CAAP LC NNU
RA41' diwinuge civea number: �
Print name: CAak. 5A,-15-1Z
Title: DrPozY Post.tc oditK 5 D FF tC;R
Address: tCoS_ IA ial 4eAx. - Inc)1 CA"tP C 2-6 Sq2
Phone: & i4
Signature:
Date: — �Q
Note: "llre, legally responsible party should not be a homeowners association unless more than 50% of
the lots have been sold and a resident ofthe suhctivisioii has been named tile president.
�Ieff , a Notary Public for the State of
County Of �� , do hereby certify that
personally appeared'before the this
day of SZ%, r),V,� -, and acknowledge tile (ILIC eXCCLltloll of the
forgoing infiltration basin maintenance requirements. Witness my hand and ofFicial seal,
ALIC I A RG"TM
Notary Publlo
Onstow County
Sk" of North Carolina
Commi"10n ExPirm Oct 23, 20
SEAL,
My commission expires "V
Form SW401-InCllration Basin E&M-Rev.?
Page 3 of 3

Gawn�lwiawia�p�A b�fspets1UCi
i 32' 300I�jjiVC40 of AMU) c6u4
bPP0.
WIC& v Wiaout

1'
PermitNtimber:
Oo be prm,ided 1)), 1)J119)
prailiage Area Number:
fnfiliTation Basin Inspection and Maintenance Agreement
I will keep a maintenance record on this 13MP. This•nlaijltenance record will be kept in a
log in a known set- location. Any deficient BIVIP elements noted in the inspection Will be
corrected, repaired or replaced iinmediately. These deficiencies can affect the integrity
of structures, safety of the public, and the.removal efficiency of the € IMP.
Important maintenance procedures
— The drainage area will be carefully managed to reduce the, sediment load to the
infiltration Basin.
— Immediately after the infiltration basin is established, the vegetation will be
watered twice weekly if needed until the plants become. established (conunonly
six weeks).
No portion of the infiltration basin will be fertilized after the initial fertilization
ChM is required to establish the vegetation.
The vegetation.in and around the basin will be maintained at a height of
approximately six inches..
After the infiltration basin is established, it will be inspected. once,a quarter and within
24 hours after every starm event greater than 1.0 inches (or 1.5 inches if in a Coastal
County). Records of inspection and maintenance will be kept in a known set location
and will be available upon request.
Inspection activities shall be performed as follows. Any problems that are found shall
be repaired immediately.
BMP element:
PotentialProblem:
How I will remediate theproblem:
The entire BMP
Trash/debris is preseiit.
Remove the trash/debris.
The perimeter of the
Areas of Mare soil grid/or
Regrade (lie soil if necessary to
iirfiltratiori basin
erosive gullies have formed.
remove the gully, aiid then plant a
ground cover and water until it is
established. Provide line and a
one-time fertilizer aulicatimi.
Tlie.inlet device: pipe or
The pipe is clogged (if
Unclog the pipe. Dispose.of the
Swale
'a livable .
.sedimeittoff--site.
The pipe is cracked or.
Replace the pipe.
otherwise damaged (if
a p2 Iicable).
Erosion is occurrhig in the
Regracle the swale if necessary to
s%vale (if applicable).
smooth it over ain'I Provide erosion
control devices such as reinforced
ttirf niattriig or rlprap to avoicl
fulore `roblems-kvitli erosion.
Form SW401-hililtratim Basin l&vl-Rev.2
Page I of-3

BMP element:
Potential problem:
Hoiv I will reinediate the roblem:
The forebay
Sediment has accumulated
Search for the source of the
and reducted the depth to 75°%n
sedinient'and remedy the problem if
of the original design depth.
possible. Remove the.sedinient and
CI Ispose of it ill a location Ivllere it
Will not cause impactsto'streanis or,
the BIVill.
Erosion has occurred or
Provide additional erosion
riprap is displaced.
protection SL1CIl as reinforced [Liff
matting or riprap if needed to
revent future erosion problems.
Weeds om present.
Remove the %needs; preferably by
hand. If pesticides are used, wipt:
them on the plaints rather than
s ra +in .
The main treifinent area
A visiblelayer of sccliment
Search for the sourceOf the
has accumulated.
sediment and remedy the problem if
possible. Remove the sediment Find
dispose of it in a location where it
will not cause impacts to streams or
the BMP. Replace any media that
was removed in the process.
Revegetate disturbed areas
immediately.
Water is standing more than
Replace the top few inches of filter
5 clays after a storm event.
media and see if this corrects the
standing water problem. if so,
revegetate immediately. If not,
consult an appropriate professional
for a more exterisiVe repair.
Weeds and.noxious plants are
Remove the plants by hand of by
growing in the main
lvip.ing them With pesticide (do not
treatment area-
S ra
The embankment
Shrubs or trees have started
Remove shrubs or trees
to arow on the embankment.
ininiediitely.
An annual inspection by in
Intake all needed repairs.
appropriate professional
shows that the einbanknient
needs repair.
The outlet device
Clogging has occurred.
Clean otat the outlet device. Dispose
of the sedin'Lent off -site.
'Che outletdevice is damaged
Repair or replace the outlet device.
The receiving water
Erosion or other signs of
Cont"Ict [lie NC Division of Wetter
daniage have occurred at the
Quality 901 Oversight Unit:at 91.9-
outlet.
733-1786.
Forni SW401-Infiltration Busin WM-Rev.2 Page 2 o f 3 -

`Y Permit Number:
(to be provided by DIVQ)
I acknowledge and agree by Illy Signattn•e below that 1 1111 rCSponSlble for thc•
performance of (lie maintenance procedures listed above. I agree to notify DWQ ofany
problems with the system or prior to any changes to the system or responsible party.
PI-QjeCt 17,111he: P1 V D l tJ t NG PAGI L I TY AT STON E 8AY Mc13 GA-F i�3rrt1/UE
13j1V11' ch-crinage cu-e(r number: 3
Print name: CARS 8.4W.F)Z
Title: DEPy7Y 'Poet![ W'Sic cs Orr /C,re
Address: 1005 Nt 1 C tiML RD., Cep Lejg N� •, NC _ 296Y2
Phone: 000 YYl - Z Z l3 ,-i, _
r •`
Note: The legally responsible parry slaosald not be a homeowners association unless more than -0% of
the lots have been sold and -resident of the subdivision has been named the president.
1 Q a Notary Public for the State of
IVC' , County of OA.5 , do hereby certify that
►- personally appeared before the this I I
day of a b,cR&OR , and ackno,,Vledge the due execution of the
Forgoing hililtration basin maititenartce requirepients. Witness my Build and official seal,
AME A •OMWM
MOM PubMC
Oralaw COW"
po of North COMW O
Commlulen 6nplr06 Oof 3J.
SEAL
My commission expires "v 61-;wo
Form SW40I-Infiiltratiori Basin WM-(tcv.2 i,agc 3 of 3

1
=nOj&tjMMO:)
31A
la
rst!o OtotzOlOt .la:lmMO:) yM

I
Permit Number; 5G11��e)] 13
(to be provided by DWQ)
Drainage Area Number:��
Infiltration Basin Operation and Maintenance Agreement
I will keep a maintenance record on this BMP. This maintenance record will be kept in a
log in a known set location. Any deficient BMP elements noted in the inspection will be
corrected, repaired or replaced immediately. These deficiencies can affect the integrity
of structures, safety of the public, and the removal efficiency of the BMP.
Important maintenance procedures:
— The drainage area will be carefully managed to reduce the sediment load to the
infiltration basin.
— Immediately after the infiltration basin is established, the vegetation will be
watered twice weekly if needed until the plants become established (commonly
six weeks).
No portion of the infiltration basin will be fertilized after the initial fertilization
that is required to establish the vegetation.
— The vegetation in and around the basin will be maintained at a height of
approximately six inches.
After the infiltration basin is established, it will be inspected once a quarter and within
24 hours after every storm event greater than 1.0 inches (or 1.5 inches if in a Coastal
County). Records of operation and maintenance will be kept in a known set location
and will be available upon request.
Inspection activities shall be performed as follows. Any problems that are found shall
be repaired immediately.
BMP element:
Potentialproblem:
How 1 will remediate theproblem:
The entire BMP
Trash/debris is present.
Remove the trash/debris.
The perimeter of the
Areas of bare soil and/or
Regrade the soil if necessary to
infiltration basin
erosive gullies have formed.
remove the gully, and then plant a
ground cover and water until it is
established. Provide lime and a
one-time fertilizer application,
The inlet device: pipe or
The pipe is clogged (if
Unclog the pipe. Dispose of the
swale
applicable),
sediment off -site.
The pipe is cracked or
Replace the pipe.
otherwise damaged (if
a licable).
Erosion is occurring in the
Regrade the swale if necessary to
swale (if applicable).
smooth it over and provide erosion
control devices such as reinforced
turf matting or riprap to avoid
future problems with erosion.
Form SW401-infiltration Basin O&M-Rev.3
Page 1 of 3

i'
BMP element:
The forebay
The main treatment area
The embankment
The outlet device
The receiving water
Potential problem: _
Sediment has accumulated
and reduced the depth to 75%
of the original design depth.
Erosion has occurred or
riprap is displaced.
Weeds are present
A visible layer of sediment
has accumulated.
Water is standing more than
5 days after a storm event.
Weeds and noxious plants are
growing in the main
treatment area.
Shrubs or trees have started
to grow on the embankment.
An annual inspection by an
appropriate professional
shows that the embankment
needs repair.
Clogging has occurred.
The outlet device is damage
Erosion or other signs of
damage have occurred at the
outlet.
How I will remediate the problem:
Search for the source of the
sediment and remedy the problem if
possible. Remove the sediment and
dispose of it in a location where it
will not cause impacts to streams or
the BMP.
Provide additional erosion
protection such as reinforced turf
matting or riprap if needed to
prevent future erosion problems.
Remove the weeds, preferably by
hand. If pesticides are used, wipe
them on the plants rather than
spraying.
Search for the source of the
sediment and remedy the problem if
possible. Remove the sediment and
dispose of it in a location where it
will not cause impacts to streams or
the BMP. Replace any media that
was removed in the process.
Revegetate disturbed areas
immediately.
Replace the top few inches of filter
media and see if this corrects the
standing water problem. If so,
revegetate immediately. If not,
consult an appropriate professional
for a more extensive repair. _
Remove the plants by hand or by
wiping them with pesticide (do not
Remove shrubs or trees
immediately.
Make all needed repairs.
Clean out the outlet device. Dispose
of the sediment off -site.
Repair or replace the outlet device.
Contact the NC Division of Water
Quality 401 Oversight Unit at 919-
733-1786.
Form SW401-infiltration Basin O&M-Rev.3
Page 2 of 3

Permit Humber: SGJ�Q�� j/3
(to be provided by DVVQ)
I acknowledge and agree by my signature below that 1 am responsible for the
performance of the maintenance procedures listed above. I agree to notify DWQ of any
problems with the system or prior to any changes to the system or responsible party..
Project dame: P-1184 MARSOC Dining, Facility at Stone Bay
BMP drainage area number:_ II
Print name:Carl Baker
Title:Deputy Public Works Officer
Address: Bldg. 1005 Michael Rd., Camp Lejeune NC 28547-2521
Phon
Sign;
Date
Note: The legally responsible party should not be a homeowners association unless more than 50% of
the lots have been sold and a resident of the subdivision has been named the president.
/M2 / , a Notary Public For the State of
County of , do hereby certify that
�!
personally appeared before me this
day of �7� ,2yv� , and acknowledge the due execution of the
forgoing infiltration basin maintenance requirements. Witness my hand and official seal,
AUCE A IONNETU
Notary PUbllc
Ornlow COW*
StOtt of Nolih Carolina
My Commlislon Explras Oct 23, ]2010
SEAL
My commission expires_ -�
Form SW40I-infiltration Basin O&M-Rev.3
Page 3 of 3

Permit Name: `5L U kO 313
(lo be, providad by DJVQ)
Drai.66ge Area Ntmibgr: Ll.xt415, %
Grassed Swale Inspection and Maintenance Agreement
l will keep i, maintenance record on this BMP. This, maintenance record will be kept in a
log in a known set location. Any deficient BMP elements noted in the inspection will be
corrected, repaired or replaced inin-tediately. These deficiencies can affect the integrity
of strtictiEres, safety of the pLrblic, and the removal efficiency of the BiVIR
important mauitenance, procedures:
The drainage area of the grassed swale will be carefully managed to reduce the
sediment load to the grassed Swale.
— After [lie first-time fertilization to establish the grass in the swale, fertilizer will
not be applied to the grassed Swale.
The grassed.swale will be inspected once a.quarter. Records of inspection and
maintenance will be kept in a known set location and will be available upon request.
Inspection activities sliall be perfaa'med as follows: Any problems that are found shall
be repaired immediately.
BMP element:
Potential roblem:
I -low I will remediate the robleni:
['he entire lerigth of the
Trasli/debris is Present.
Ren►ove.tlie trash/debris.
swale
Areas of bare soil anti/or
Regrade the soil if tiecessary to
erosive gullies have formed.
remove the gully, and then re -sod
(or plant with other appropriate
species) and water midi established.
Provide lisle and a one-time
fel'tiIi7er a licatio11.
Sediment covers [lie grass at
Remove sedrlll(',lit and dispose mall
the bottom of the swale.
area that will not- impact streams or
WIN. Re -sod if necessary.
Vegetation is too short orJoo
Maintain vegetation at a height of
lots
a i roxill ately six inches.
The receiving water
Erosion or other signs of
Contact the.NC Division of Water
damage have occurred at the.
Quality 401 Oversight Unit at 919-
o u tl t.
7334786.
Form SW401-Grassed Swale l&M-Rev.2
Paige 1 of 2

Penuit NunilUer:�sw $6�o --SI3
(it) he provider! by U11rQ)
1 acknowledge and agree by my signature below that I ain responsible for the
perlormance of the maintenance procedures listed above. I agree to notify DWQ of any
problems with -the system or prior to any changes to the system oi• responsible tarty.
1'1:ojeci muse: Q 111$ti DINING FAC t t.t-ry A7 STor l�- 9A1 ► N C 0 Ga.rw. P L.ga vrwF
BIII'dwim-ige area number: 3
Paint name: GAML SAVMIZ
Title: DtPVTY Punt. �Aa S brFlce
Address:_ 100S to CAL-- l-D. Les Ec}me N C- � 2,8 sy 2,.
Phone: 110 - ` .; [ ," Z Z I
NOWMWIF-71
Dote: The legally responsible psirty should not be a hanteowners association unless more than 50% of
the lots have been sold and a resident of the subdivision has been nained the president.
I,
day of 1
forgoing
� , a Notary Ptthlic For the State of
County of Cl/?✓�� , do hereby certify that
personally appeared before me this
and acknowledge the clue execution of the
swale maintenance requirements. Witness my hand and official. seal,
AUCE A ICOGOM
moo V wblta
Obbw County
Suit of Norm cmotha
MY Comntl"I" fx M Oct 23, 2010
SLAL
My commission expires
corm SW4Ut-Grassed Swale 1&M-Rev.2
Page 2 of 2

05
V C
H
4

Permit Number:
(to be provided by DWQ)
Drainage Area Number: 3;
Filter Strip, Restored Riparian Buffer and Level Spreader
Operation and Maintenance Agreement
I will keep a maintenance record on this BMP. This maintenance record will be kept in a
log in a known set location. Any deficient BMP elements noted in the inspection will be
corrected, repaired or replaced immediately. These deficiencies can affect the integrity
of structures, safety of the public, and the removal efficiency of the BMP.
Important maintenance procedures:
— Immediately after the filter strip is established, any newly planted vegetation
will be watered twice weekly if needed until the plants become established
(commonly six weeks).
— Once a year, the filter strip will be reseeded -to maintain a dense growth of
vegetation
— Stable groundcover will be maintained in the drainage area to reduce the
sediment Ioad to the vegetation.
— Two to three times a year, grass filter strips will be mowed and the clippings
harvested to promote the growth of thick vegetation with optimum pollutant
removal efficiency. Turf grass should not be cut shorter than 3 to 5 inches and
may be allowed to grow as tall as 12 inches depending on aesthetic requirements
(NIPC, 1993). Forested filter strips do not require this type of maintenance.
— Once a year, the soil will be aerated if necessary.
— Once a year, soil pH will be tested and Iime will be added if necessary.
After the filter strip is established, it will be inspected quarterly and within 24 hours
after every storm event greater than 1.0 inch (or 1.5 inches if in a Coastal County).
Records of operation and maintenance will be kept in a known set location and will be
available upon request.
Inspection activities shall be performed as follows. Any problems that are found shall
be repaired immediately.
BMP element:
Potentialproblem:
How I will remediate theproblem:
The entire filter strip
Trash/de:bris is present.
Remove the trash/debris.
system
The flow splitter device
The flow splitter device is
Unclog the conveyance and dispose
(if applicable)
clogged.
of any sediment off -site.
The flow splitter device is
Make any necessary repairs or
damaged.
replace if damage is too large for
repair.
�E9VE:
JUN 19 2012
BY:
Form SWU401-Level Spreader, Filter Strip, Restored Riparian Buffer O&M-Rev.3 Page I of 3

BMP element:
Potentialproblem:
How I will remediate theproblem:
The swale and the level
The swale is clogged with
Remove the sediment and dispose
lip
sediment.
of it off -site.
The level lip is cracked,
Repair or replace lip.
settled, undercut, eroded or
otherwise damaged.
There is erosion around the
Regrade the soil to create a berm
end of the level spreader that
that is higher than the level lip, and
shows stormwater has
then plant a ground cover and
bypassed it.
water until it is established. Provide
lime and a one-time fertilizer
application.
Trees or shrubs have begun
Remove them.
to grow on the swale or just
downslo e of the level lip.
The bypass channel
Areas of bare soil and/or
Regrade the soil if necessary to
erosive gullies have formed.
remove the gully, and then
reestablish proper erosion control.
Turf reinforcement is
Study the site to see if a larger
damaged or ripap is rolling
bypass channel is needed (enlarge if
downhill.
necessary). After this, reestablish
the erosion control material.
The filter strip
Grass is too short or too long
Maintain grass at a height of
if applicable).
approximately three to six inches.
Areas of bare soil and/or
Regrade the soil if necessary to
erosive gullies have formed.
remove the gully, and then plant a
ground cover and water until it is
established. Provide lime and a
one-time fertilizer application.
Sediment is building up on
Remove the sediment and
the fitter strip.
restabilize the soil with vegetation if
necessary. Provide lime and a one-
time fertilizer application.
Plants are desiccated.
Provide additional irrigation and
fertilizer as needed.
Plants are dead, diseased or
Determine the source of the
dying.
problem: soils, hydrology, disease,
etc. Remedy the problem and
replace plants. Provide a one-time
fertilizer application.
Nuisance vegetation is
Remove vegetation by hand if
choking out desirable species.
possible. If pesticide is used, do not
allow it to get into the receiving
water.
The receiving water
Erosion or other signs of
Contact the NC Division of Water
damage have occurred at the
Quality local Regional Office, or the
outlet.
401 Oversight Unit at 919-733-1786.
Form SWU401-Level Spreader, Filter Strip, Restored Riparian Buffer O&Ni-Rev.3
T= TL_0'*E0E#.
J U N 19 2012
Pge20f3

Permit Number:
(to be provided by DWQ)
I acknowledge and agree by my signature below that I am responsible for the
performance of the maintenance procedures listed above. I agree to notify DWQ of any
problems with the system or prior to any changes to the system or responsible party.
Project name:P1286 BACHELOR'S ENLISTED QUARTERS RIFLE RANGE
BiVP drainage area number:
Print name:Carl Baker
`fitle:Deputy Public Works Officer
Address:Building 1005 Michael Road MCB Camp Le'eune NC 28542
Phon+
S igna
Date:
Note: The legally responsible party should not be a homeowners association unless more than 50% of
the lots have been sold and a resident of the subdivision has been named the president.
a Notary Public for the State of
C County of Olod . do hereby certify that _4h
personally appeared before me this
day of .% , c,. and acknowledge the due execution of the
forgoing filter strip, riparian buffer, and/or level spreader maintenance requirements.
Witness my hand and official seal, ��
ALICE A. 130NNE7TE
Notary public
State of ifVo h �a�pii a
Commisslon Ex kes`
SEAL
My commission expires C;;t /�� � ��
VI_ x r5
JUN 19 2012 ` I�
Form SWU401-Level Spreader, Filter Strip, Restored Riparian Buffer O&M-Rev.3_-

Permit Number:
(to be provided by DWQ)
Drainage Area Number:_____
Filter Strip, Restored Riparian Buffer and Level Spreader
Operation and Maintenance Agreement
I will keep a maintenance record on this BMP. This maintenance record will be kept in a
log in a known set location. Any deficient BMP elements noted in the inspection will be
corrected, repaired or replaced immediately.' These deficiencies can affect the integrity
of structures, safety of the public, and the removal efficiency of the BMP.
Important maintenance procedures:
— Immediately after the filter strip is established, any newly planted vegetation
will be watered twice weekly if needed until the plants become established
(commonly six weeks).
-- Once a year, the filter strip will be reseeded to maintain a dense growth of
vegetation
— Stable groundcover will be maintained in the drainage area to reduce the
sediment load to the vegetation.
— Two to three times a year, grass filter strips will be mowed and the clippings
harvested to promote the growth of thick vegetation with optimum pollutant
removal efficiency. Turf grass should not be cut shorter than 3 to 5 inches and
may be allowed to grow as tall as 12 inches depending on aesthetic requirements
(NIPC, 1993). Forested filter strips do not require this type of maintenance.
— Once a year, the soil will be aerated if necessary.
— Once a year, soil pH will be tested and lime will be added if necessary.
After the filter strip is established, it will be inspected quarterly and within 24 hours
after every storm event greater than 1.0 inch (or 1.5 inches if in a Coastal County).
Records of operation and maintenance will be kept in a known set location and will be
available upon request.
Inspection activities shall be performed as follows. Any problems that are found shall
be repaired immediately.
BMP element:
Potentialproblem:
How I will remediate the roblem:
The entire filter strip
Trash/debris is present.
Remove the trash/debris.
sy stem
The flow splitter device
The flow splitter device is
Unclog the conveyance and dispose
(if applicable)
-clog d.
of any sediment off -site.
The flow splitter device is
Make any necessary repairs or
damaged.
replace if damage is too large for
repair.
i JUN 192012, a
f
Form SWU401-Level Spreader, Filter Strip, Restored Riparian Buffer O&M-Rev.3 Page I of 3

BMP element:
Potentialproblem:
How I will remediate theproblem:
The swale and the level
The swale is clogged with
Remove the sediment and dispose
lip
sed iment.
of it off -site.
The level lip is cracked,
Repair or replace lip.
settled, undercut, eroded or
otherwise damaged.
There is erosion around the
Regrade the soil to create a berm
end of the level spreader that
that is higher than the level lip, and
shows stormwater has
then plant a ground cover and
bypassed it.
water until it is established. Provide
lime and a one-time fertilizer
application.
Trees or shrubs have begun
Remove them.
to grow on the swale or just
downslo e of the level lip.
The bypass channel
Areas of bare soil and/or
Regrade the soil if necessary to
erosive gullies have formed.
remove the gully, and then
reestablish proper erosion control.
Turf reinforcement is
Study the site to see if a larger
damaged or ripap is rolling
bypass channel is needed (enlarge if
downhill.
necessary). After this, reestablish
the erosion control material.
The filter strip
Grass is too short or too long
Maintain grass at a height of
if applicable), '
approximately three to six inches.
Areas of bare soil and/or
Regrade the sod'if necessary to
erosive gullies have formed.
remove the gully, and then plant a
ground cover and water until it is
established. Provide lime and a
one-time fertilizer application.
Sediment is building up on
Remove the sediment and
the filter strip.
restabilize the soil with vegetation if
necessary. Provide lime and a one-
time fertilizer application.
Plants are desiccated.
Provide additional irrigation and
fertilizer as needed.
Plants are dead, diseased or
Determine the source of the
dying.
problem: soils, hydrology, disease,
etc. Remedy the problem and
replace plants. Provide a one-time
fertilizer application,
Nuisance vegetation is
Remove vegetation by hand if
choking out desirable species.
possible. If pesticide is used, do not
allow it to get into the receiving
water.
The receiving water
Erosion or other signs of
Contact the NC Division of Water
damage have occurred at the
duality local Regional Office, or the
outlet.
401 Oversight Unit at 919-733-1786.
Form SWU401-Level Spreader, Filter Strip, Restored Riparian Suffer O&M-Rev.3
j U N i 9 2012
BY: ___J?age_2-o f-3-----

Permit Number:
(to be provided by DWQ)
I acknowledge and agree by my signature below that I am responsible for the
performance of the maintenance procedures listed above. I agree to notify DWQ of any
problems with the system or prior to any changes to the system or responsible party.
Project name:P1286 BACHELOR'S ENLISTED QUARTERS RIFLE RANGE
BMP drainage area number
Print name:Carl Baker
Title:Deputy Public Works Officer
Address: Building* 1005 Michael Road, MCB Camp_Lejeune, NC,_28542
Phon
Sign,
Date
Note: The legally responsible parry should not be a homeowners association unless more than 50% of
the lots have been sold and a resident of the subdivision has been named the president.
a Notary Public for the State of
G , County ofdo hereby certify that
personally appeared before me this
day of and acknowledge the due execution of the
forgoing filter strip, riparian buffer, and/or level spreader maintenance requirements.
Witness my hand and official seal,
ALICE A. BONNETTE
Notary Public
Onslow County
State of North Caro ina
Commission Ex fro
SEAL
My commission expires
Norm SWU401-Level Spreader, Filter Strip, Restored Riparian Buffer O&M-Rev.3
JUN 19 2012
Page 3 of 3

I
:.
d

f
Permit Number: :511" 9aS 3 /-7
(to be provided by DWQ)
Drainage Area Number:
Filter Strip, Restored Riparian Buffer and Level Spreader
Operation and Maintenance Agreement
I will keep a maintenance record on this BMP. This maintenance record will be kept in a
log in a known set location. Any deficient BMP elements noted in the inspection will be
corrected, repaired or replaced immediately. These deficiencies can affect the integrity
of structures, safety of the public, and the removal efficiency of the BMP.
Important maintenance procedures:
Immediately after the filter strip is established, any newly planted vegetation
will be watered twice weekly if needed until the plants become established
(commonly six weeks).
— Once a year, the filter strip will be reseeded to maintain a dense growth of
vegetation
— Stable groundcover will be maintained in the drainage area to reduce the
sediment load -to the vegetation.
— Two to three times a year, grass filter strips will be mowed and the clippings
harvested to promote the growth of thick vegetation with optimum pollutant
removal efficiency. Turf grass should not be cut shorter than 3 to 5 inches and
may be allowed to grow as tall as 12 inches depending on aesthetic requirements
(NIPC, 1993). Forested filter strips do not require this type of maintenance.
— Once a year, the soil will be aerated if necessary.
— Once a year, soil pH will be tested and lime will be added if necessary.
After the filter strip is established, it will be inspected quarterly and within 24 hours
after every storm event greater than 1.0 inch (or 1.5 inches if in a Coastal County).
Records of operation and maintenance will be kept in a known set location and will be
available upon request.
Inspection activities shall be performed as follows. Any problems that are found shall
be repaired immediately.
BMP element:
Potentialproblem:
How I will remediate theproblem:
The entire filter strip
Trash/debris is present.
Remove the trash/debris.
system
The flow splitter device
The flow splitter device is
Unclog the conveyance and dispose
(if applicable)
clogged.
of any sediment off -site.
The flow splitter device is
Make any necessary repairs or
damaged.
replace if damage is too large for
repair.
JUN 19 2012
BY:
Form SWU401-Level Spreader, Filter Strip, Restored Riparian Buffer O&M-Rev.3 Page 1 of 3

BMP element:
Potentialproblem:
How I will remediate theproblem:
The swale and the level
The swale is clogged with
Remove the sediment and dispose
lip
sediment.
of it off -site.
The level lip is cracked,
Repair or replace lip.
settled, undercut, eroded or
otherwise damaged,
There is erosion around the
Regrade the soil to create a berm
end of the level spreader that
that is higher than the level lip, and
shows stormwater has
then plant a ground cover and
bypassed it.
water until it is established. Provide
lime and a one-time fertilizer
application.
Trees or shrubs have begun
Remove them.
to grow on the swale or just
downslo e of the Ievel lip.
The bypass channel
Areas of bare soil and/or
Regrade the soil if necessary to
erosive gullies have formed.
remove the gully, and then
reestablish proper erosion control.
Turf reinforcement is
Study the site to see if a larger
damaged or ripap is rolling
bypass channel is needed (enlarge if
downhill.
necessary). After this, reestablish
the erosion control material.
The filter strip
Grass is too short or too long
Maintain grass at a height of
if applicable).
approximately three to six inches.
Areas of bare soil and/or
Regrade the soil if necessary to
erosive gullies have formed.
remove the gully, and then plant a
ground cover and water until it is
established. Provide lime and a
one-time fertilizer application.
Sediment is building up on
Remove the sediment and
the filter strip.
restabilize the soil with vegetation if
necessary. Provide lime and a one-
time fertilizer apl2lication.
Plants are desiccated.
Provide additional irrigation and
fertilizer as needed.
Plants are dead, diseased or
Determine the source of the
dying.
problem: soils, hydrology, disease,
etc. Remedy the problem and
replace plants. Provide a one-time
fertilizer application.
Nuisance vegetation is
Remove vegetation by hand if
choking out desirable species.
possible. If pesticide is used, do not
allow it to get into the receiving
water.
The receiving water
Erosion or other signs of
Contact the NC Division of Water
damage have occurred at the
Quality local Regional Office, or the
outlet.
401 Oversight Unit at 91.9-733-1786.
Form SWU401-Level Spreader, Filter Strip, Restored Riparian Buffer O&M-Rev-3
k 3 % f4 ;
,iUN 19
2012
Page-2_o.f_3_--

t� -�
Permit Number:
(to be provided 6v DWQ)
I acknowledge and agree by my signature below that [ am responsible for the
performance of the maintenance procedures listed above. [ agree to notify DWQ of any
problems with the system or prior to any changes to the system or responsible party.
Project name:P1286 BACHELOR'S ENLISTED QUARTERS RIFLE RANGE
BMP drainage area number:
Print name:Carl Baker
Title:Deputy Public Works Officer
Address: BuiIdin 1005 Michael Road, MCB Camp Le'eune. NC. 28542
Phon
S ign�
Date
Note: The legally responsible party should not be a homeowners association unless more than 50% of
the lots have been sold and a resident of the subdivision has been named the president.
I, �; � /'�,C"
i1iZ/ , a Notary Public for the State of
AL , County of do hereby certify that
1
personally appeared before me this
day of ,�/� , and acknowledge the due execution of the
01
forgoing filter strip, riparian buffer, and/or level-spreader_rnaintenance requirements.
Witness my hand and official sea[. C!
=BONNET:TENETTElicuntyaroiinares ,
SEAL,
My commission expires iEUVLEE
r, JUN 19 20V
;__fir
Form SWU401-Level Spreader, Filter Strip, Restored Riparian Buffer O&M-Rev.3 6Y'--—Page3`of'3

3

x
Central Files: APS . SWP
04/29/08
Pernut Number SW8680313
Permit Tracking Slip
Program Category
Status Project Type
State SW
Active New Project
Permit Type
Version Permit Classification
State Stormwater
1.00 Individual
Primary Reviewer
christine. nelson
Permitted Flow
Facilit
Permit Contact Affiliation
Facility Name Major/Minor Region
P1184 Dining Facility at Stone Bay MCB Camp Minor Wilmington
Lejeune
Location Address County
Range Rd Adajacent To Bldg Rr8 Onslow,
Camp Lejeune NC 28542 Facility Contact Affiliation
Owner Name Owner Type
US Marine Corps - Camp Lejeune Government - Federal
Owner Affiliation
John Townson
Psc Box 20004
Camp Lejeune NC 285420004
DateslEvents
Scheduled
Orig Issue App Received Draft Initiated Issuance Public Notice Issue Effective Expiration
04/29/08 03/26/08 04/29/08 04/29/08 04/29/18
egulated Activities
State Stormwater - HD - Infiltration
Outfall NULL
ReauestedlReceived Events
Deed restriction requested
Deed restriction received
Additional information requested
04/02108
Additional information received
04/14/08
Additional information requested
04/18/08
Additional information received
04/22108
Waterbody Name Stream Index Number Current Class Subbasin

P,OI
TRANSACTION REPORT
:K
APR-30-2008 WED
09:18 AM
:K
:K FOR: NCDENR
9103502004
SEND
DATE START RECEIVER
TX TIME PAGES'TYPE
NOTE
M# DP
:K
>K APR-30 09:16 AM 919198281877
1'31" 9 FAX TX
OK
315
�c
TOTAL :
1M 31S PAGES: 9
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Wilmington Regional Office
Michael F. Easley, Governor
FAX COVER SHEET
Date: A ri130 2008
To: K_ Joshua Hurst, RE,
Co: Clark-Nexsen
Fax: [phone]
William G. Russ, Jr., Secretary
No. Pages (excl. cover)
Express Permitting
From: Sandra Exum
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Re: Exmess pqmit Dining ra ility at Stone Bay MCB Camp Lej eune
Hard copy to follow
127 Cardinal Drive Extension, Wilmington, NC 28405 + [phone] • An Eaual Omortunity Affirniariva Ar6nn Fmnlnv.r

FW: P1 184 Stone Bay Dining (NC481.4)
Subject: FW: Pl 184 Stone Bay Dining (NC481.4)
From: "Joshua Hurst" <[e-mail]>
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 08:40:09 -0400
To: "Christine Nelson" <[e-mail]>
Christine,
I got your voicemail from yesterday afternoon. It appears that there was a typographical error in the
email address that was sent yesterday. Here is the email showing the change that we are making to the
plans. Please let me know if you need anything else.
Thank you,
Josh
From: Christopher H. Small
Sent: Monday, April 28, 2008 12:11 PM
To: '[e-mail]'
Cc: Joshua Hurst
Subject: P1184 Stone Bay Dining (NC481.4)
Christine,
Per our conversation this morning we have reviewed the elevations on Bypass Structure #5. After
confirming with Josh; on sheet CG501- Bypass Structure (#5), we authorize to change the elevation of
the weir from 51.10 to 51.40. Also on section B-B the height changes to 1'-3". We will make these
changes prior to issuing these documents for construction. Thanks for all your help and feel free to
contact us if you have any questions.
Christopher H. Small El
Civil Engineer
CLARK+NEXSEN
Architecture & Engineering
4000 Westchase Boulevard Suite 280
Raleigh, NC 27607
919.828.1876 Tel.
919.828.1877 Fax
[e-mail]
www.clarknexsen.com
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE: This e-mail and any files transmitted with it contain privileged and
confidential information and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which they are
addressed. If you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering the e-mail to the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination or copying of this e-mail or any of its
attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the
sending individual or entity by e-mail and permanently delete the original e-mail and attachments from
your computer system.
1 of 1 4/29/2008 9:26 AM

Architecture 6 Engineering
Project: P-1184 Dining 1 aaczlily at Stone Bay MCB Camp
Le" jeune
NCDENR Slormwater Project 1\a. SW8 080313
Submittal: StormwalerF..%press Review
Date of Submittal: April22, 2008
4000 Westehase Bbd, Suite 280 Location: Camp 1—geune, N C
Raleigh, AIC 27607 CN Ref. No.: !\TC481.4
9191828-1876 APR.. 2 2 Z008
Fax [phone]
http://www.clarknexsen.caw BY
Below are NCDENR's comments and Clark Nexsen's responses to the stormwater review of P-1184 Dining Facility
at Stone Bay MCB Camp Lejeunc. NCDLNR's comments are listed first, followed by our response in italics.
1. Provide calculations for the drawdown rate specific to each infiltration basin using the bottom
surface area of the infiltration basins. The drawdown time for infiltration system may be less than 2 days.
Response.- The drawdown time for infiltration basins, provided in appendix C, is based on the clean .rand area shown on
CG101 that is hatched within the limits of each basin.
2. All runoff in excess of the design storm is required to bypass to a vegetated Filter strip prior to
entering the infiltration basin. A 50-foot wide filter strip and level spreader device must be provided for the
excess runoff that is bypassing infiltration basin 2. Please refer to the major design elements required for
infiltration devices on page 16-1 and 2 of the 13MP manual.
A bypass channel for the level spreader / filter strip is not required if the level spreader and filter strip are
designed to handle the peals flow from the 10-year storm event.
Response: An additional Ater strip and level spreader has been added to the pass stmaure for basin 2. In addition, the level
spreader/filter strip has been designed to handle the 10 year storm event.
3. Please verify the flow rates used in the level spreader/vegetated Filter strip supplements. '111e flow
rates used to design the level spreader do not appear to match the provided calculations and hydrograph
reports. Please complete the Section II: "For bevel Spreaders Receiving Flow from the Drainage Area" on
the level spreader and filter strip supplement.
Response: All design flows for the level spreaders receiving flow from the Drainage Arias have been updated, and the calculations
for length of the level spreader have been verified.
4. Please ensure that all elevations are presented consistently. The elevations on plan sheet CG501 are
inconsistent with the information in the supplements. For instance, the SFt%Vf for infiltration basin 3 and
the storage elevations for infiltration basins 1 and 2 are inconsistent between the infiltration basin table
presented on CG501 and the supplements. The bypass elevations presented in the structure details for basins
2, 3, and 4 are also inconsistent with the supplements.
\\cn-ralnc\data\JOBS\NC481.4 Stonel3ay 11IARSOC Dining Hall\Faxes and' Transmittals\Sulsmittal Transmittals\2008-04-21
NCDENR Stormwater Comments Response Nfemo.doc Page 1 of 2

1+ ,

�,Irchiteclure 6 Engineering
Project: P-11 84 Dining Facility at Stone Bay MC8 Camp
1-- jeune
-NrCD1—:7A7R Stormwater Pr feet Alo. Sld%8 080313
Submittal: Stormwater Express Review
Date of Submittal: Apri122, 2008
Response.- The elevations shown on plan sheet CG501 have been updated to match the supplements, and the output information
for the hydmgrapbr.
Please submit a $1,000 fee for the additional review required for this application.
Response: Additional review fee is attached
G. I'lease be aware that only two requests for additional information are permitted within the Ilxpress
Stormwater Permitting Program. If these outstanding issues are not satisfactorily addressed, the project may
be returned.
Response: Comment noted
\\cn-ra1nc\data\JOBS\NC481.4 Stonel3ay-MARSOC Dicing Hall\Faxes and Transmittals\Submittal "Transmittals\2008-04-21
NCDIsNR Stormwater Comments Response Memo.doc Page 2 of 2

•.:sr ;.' 11 A
Ci,AT
Arcbitectrtre & Engineering
4000 I17ertCbase Blvd., 5uile 280
RaleiBb, North Cam iw 27607
9191828-1976
Fax [phone]
bttp: // 2vww. clarkne. sen. com
We transmit
5�G3/GJ�[01�44C°QL�
To: NCDIINR
127 Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405
[phone]
Attn: Christine Nelson
® herewith
® in accordance with your request
❑ under separate cover
Date: April 21, 2008
Project No: NC481 A
Stormwater Prej. No. SW8 080313
Reference: Dining Facility at
Stone Bay
For Your
® approval ❑ distribution to parries
❑ review and comment ❑ record
❑ use ❑ information
The Following
®
drawings
❑
computer file(s)
®
calculations
❑
samples
❑
change order
❑
product literature
❑
shop drawings
5�
other
Copies
Date
Description
1
4/21/08
Stormwater Fee for Additional Review - $1,000
1
April 2008
Comments Response Letter
1
April 2009
Infiltration Basin Supplement for Drainage Areas (DA) 1-5 (5 total)
I
April 2008
Level Spreader, Filter Strip and Restored Riparian Buffer
Supplement for Drainage Areas (DA) 1, 3, & 4; 2; 2 Bypass; & 5 (4 total)
1
April 2008
Revised Stormwater Calculations
2
April 2008
Plan Sheets C-001, CG101, and CG501 (full size)
Please feel free to contact me via email 0hurst a clarknexsen.com) or at [phone] if you have any questions or need anything
else from us for the express stonnwater review of this project. Thank you.
By: K. Joshua Hurst, P.1?., PTOB
Copies to:
APR4,A,1001
I+\JOINS\NC481.4 stonciiay MARSOC Dining Hall\faxes and'l'ransmittals\Submittal Transmittals\20080422 Christisic Nelson -NONNR.doc

22035
CLARK • NEXSEN
1523 ELIZABETH AVENUE, SUITE 300
CHARLOTTE, NC 28204
PH 704-377-8800
d /100
PAY one Ao✓sand
To 0C PErJ/Z
WACHOViA BANK, N.A.
66-21-530
CHECK DATE
+/21/2pa9
AMOUNT
41 10 000, 0 0
qd�r r<an a l S�-vrnr+�✓G �e ✓, e w , /V C# 5t. 4
AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE

'
J

W ATF
O`�O� RoG
0
April 18, 2008
Carl Baker - Deputy Public Works Officer
U.S. Government - MCB Camp Lejeune
1005 Micheal Road
Camp Lejeune, NC 28542
i\4iCh',W] F. Faslcy, Governor
William Cr. Ross,lr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of I"nvironment and Natural Resources
Subject: Request for Additional Information
Stormwater Project No. SW8 080313
P-1184 Dining Facility at Stone Bay MCB Camp Lejeune
Onlsow County
Dear Mr. Baker:
Coleco H, Sullins Director
Division of Water Quality
The Wilmington Regional Office received an NPDES Phase II Post Construction Permit
Application for P-1184 Dining Facility at Stone Bay MCB Camp Lejeune on March 26, 2008, A
review of that information has determined that the following information is needed to continue
the stormwater review:
Provide calculations for the drawdown rate specific to each infiltration basin using
the bottom surface area of the infiltration basins. The drawdown time for infiltration
system may be less than 2 days.
2. All runoff in excess of the design storm is required to bypass to a vegetated filter
strip prior -to entering the infiltration basin. A 50-foot wide filter strip and level
spreader device must be provided for the excess runoff that is bypassing infiltration
basin 2. Please refer to the major design elements required for infiltration devices
on page 16-1 and 2 of the BMP manual.
A bypass channel for the level spreader/filter strip is not required if the level
spreader and filter strip are designed to handle the peak flow from the 10-year storm
event.
3. Please verify the flow rates used in the level spread erlvegetated filter strip
supplements. The flow rates used to design the level spreader do not appear to
match the provided calculations and hydrograph reports.
Please complete the Section il: "For Level Spreaders Receiving Flow from the
Drainage Area" on the level spreader and filter strip supplement.
4. Please ensure that all elevations are presented consistently. The elevations on plan
sheet CG501 are inconsistent with the information in the supplements. For instance,
the SHWT for infiltration basin 3 and the storage elevations for infiltration basins 1
and 2 are inconsistent between the infiltration basin table presented on CG501 and
the supplements. The bypass elevations presented in the structure details for
basins 2, 3, and 4 are also inconsistent with the supplements.
5. Please submit a $1,000 fee for the additional review required for this application.
6. Please be aware that only two requests for additional information are permitted
within the Express Stormwater Permitting Program. If these outstanding issues are
not satisfactorily addressed, the project may be returned. Nor'cliCarolina
A111rfrrrrr!!Y
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 127 Cardinal Drive Extension Wilmington, NC 29405 Phone [phone] Customer Scrvice
Wilmington Regional 011ice Internet: tivtivw.newa[crqualit}�.or lax [phone] 1-877-623-6749
An Equal Opportunit /Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper

Carl Baker
April 18, 2008
Stormwater Application No. SW8 080313
Also, please keep in mind that changing one number may change other numbers and
require the calculations, supplements, and other supporting documentation to be
updated. Verify all numbers are correct to ensure consistency in the application
documents.
Please note that this request for additional information is in response to a preliminary
review. The requested information should be received in this Office prior to April 28,
2008, or the application will be returned as incomplete. The return of a project will
necessitate resubmittal of all required items, including the application fee.
The construction of any impervious surfaces, other than a construction entrance under
an approved Sedimentation Erosion Control Plan, is a violation of NCGS 143-215.1 and
is subject to enforcement action pursuant to NCGS 143-215.6A.
Please reference the State assigned project number on all correspondence. If you have
�anyl,que'stib' ns•concerning this matter please feel free to call me at'(91'0)-796-7323 or
email me at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Christine Nelson
Environmental Engineer
ENBJcan: S:IWQSISTORMWATERIADDINF0120081080313.apr08
cc: Joshua Hurst, Clark Nexsen
Christine Nelson
Wilmington Regional Office
Page 2 of 2

21,.Vucst for.addidoha1 information: Stormwater Project No. SW...
Subject: 2nd request for additional information: Stormwater Project No. SW8080313 Dining Facility
at Stone Bay
From: Christine Nelson <[e-mail]>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 09:40:37 -0400
To: Joshua Hurst <[e-mail]>, "Christopher H. Small" <[e-mail]>,
[e-mail], [e-mail]
CC: Janet Russell <Janet,Russel [e-mail]>
Gentlemen,
I have attached a pdf version of my second request for additional information for
Stormwater Project SW8 080313 - P-1184 Dining Facility at Stone Say. I will also
send copies via mail.
Thank you,
Christine
Express Stormwater Permitting
NC-DENR
SW8080313 - Camp Lejeune Dining Facility 042008.pdf Content -Type: application/pdf
Content -Encoding: base64
I -of 1 4/18/2008 9:40 AM

Architecture & Engineering
4000 RzesiChase Blvd, Sure 280
Iialeigli, Nodh Carolina 27607
9191828-1876
Fax [phone]
b11P://u ww.clarknmjeu.com
We transmit
For Your
The Following
�G/A
C�J�IJ���i�LQL�
To: NCDENR Date: April 14, 2008
127 Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405 � Project No: NC481.4
Stormwater Proj. No. SW8 080313
[phone] 4% 1 Reference; Dining facility at
Attn: Christine Nel` it �4'0Stone Bay ` 08
® herewith
® in accordance with your request
❑ under separate cover
® approval
❑ review and comment
❑ use
❑ distribution to parties
❑ record
❑ information
®
drawings
❑
computer file(s)
®
calculations
❑
samples
❑
change order
❑
product Iiterature
❑
shop drawings
®
other
Copies
Date
Description
1
4/4/08
Stormwater Fee for Additional Review - $1,000
2
April 2008
Revised Drainage Area Summary table to accompany Stormwater Management
Permit Application Form
1
April 2008
Infiltration Basin Supplement for Drainage Areas (DA) 1-5 (5 total)
1
April 2008
Level Spreader, Filter Strip and Restored Riparian Buffer
Supplement for Drainage Areas (DA) 1, 3, & 4; 2; and 5 (3 total)
2
April 2008
Revised Stormwater Calculations
2
April 2008
Plan Sheets CG101 and CG501 (full size)
1
April 2008
Comments Response Letter
Please feel free to contact me via email (jhurst a,clarknexsen.com) or at [phone] if you have any questions or need anything
else from us for the express stonnwater review of this project. Thank you.
By: K. Joshua 1-Iurst, P.E., PTOE
Copies to:
I-I:\JOBS\NC481A Stoncliay ,11ARS0C Dining Nall\Faxes and Transmittals\Submittal Traasmittals\20080414 Christine Ncko❑ - NCDC,:NR.doe

CLARK o NEXSEN
1523 ELIZABETH AVE., STE. 300
CHARLOTTE, NC 28204 -
PH. 704-377-8800
WACHOVIA BANK, N.A.
66-21-530 -
DATE
4%-12ooa
21999
0
AMOUNT B
�voo. 00
PAY
TO THE
ORDER ,,, ,,/
OF �/�2 �0✓SA'`� 06'.noe �DO
P2�mRe�/�e,✓ ""
� T ORIZED SIGNATURE
I'�p00

WE Uri , M, V 3' 1 M "Q.,
Architecture & Frrgirreerirrg
j�% D
Project:
P-II84 Dining.I'acility at Stone BayAIC13 Camp
CF} `
Lejeune
7APR 1 4 2008
NCDH.NR Slormxater ProjeatNa. 3'11t8 080313
Submittal:
StormwalerE%preys Review
Date of Submittal:
April 14, 2008
6160 Kempsville Circle, Suite 200A
Location:
Camp .L.ejeune, TVC
1\7o folk-, Virginia 23502
CN Ref. No.;
ATC481.4
7571455-5800
Fax [phone]
http: / / www. clark nexsen. com
Below are NCDENR's comments and Clark Nexsen's responses to the stormwater review of P-1184 Dining Facility
at Stone Bay MCB Camp Lejeune. NCDI,"-NR's comments are listed first, followed by our response in italics.
1. Provide calculations and/or a table of the basin elevations, areas, and volumes to demonstrate the volume
of storage provided in infiltration basins at the overflow/storage elevation. For several of the basins, the
provided storage volume indicated on the supplements could not be recreated (in particular infiltration basins
2, 3, and 4).
Response: In Appendix C storage volume sheets have been provided for each it fltration basin. The original confusion might
have beenfrom the additional storage that was provided as part of the calculations far storage outride the it f llration basin, this
problem has been eliminated from the redesigned 63pass slructtn-es.
2. Provide more detailed elevations for the areas surrounding the infiltration basins. It appears that portions
of the required storage volume are being contained outside the infiltration basin areas and prior to the
"offline" bypass. If so, the bypass must be relocated to provide an offline bypass so the runoff in excess of
the design volume will not enter the storage/ infiltration area. In addition, delineate the extent of the area
used to contain the required storage volume for the infiltration basins.
Response: The bypass slrzrctures have been redesigned to create more of an offline b)pass. Each infiltration basin now has a
bypass structure Truth a pipe that aces as an orijice type of feature that is j•i.�ed for the i:Year flow rate. Anything above the
storage volume of the infiltration basin will their overflow the bypass .truclure, thus diverting it away from the infiltration bairn.
3. Provide calculations for the drawdown rate specific to each infiltration basin using the designed infiltration
areas.
Response: Drawdown rate spec fc for each itrfzltratiotr basin is provided as part of the infiltration basinxi sheet in
Appenk C (time varies between 2 clays to 2.2 days).
4. In Appendix C of the report, the first page of the stor nwater calculations indicates that the drainage area
for infiltration basin 5 is 0.75 ac. This is inconsistent with the drainage area presented on the other documents
(0.77 ac). The pre -development and post -development runoff volumes for infiltration basin 5 presented on
this sheet of the calculations are also inconsistent with the supplement. Report areas and related information
accurately and consistently.
Response: Data in narrative, appendices, and supplements has been edited according:.
I- AJOBS\NC481.4 StoncBay ALARSOC Dining Hall\Faxes and Transmittals\Submittal Transmittals\2008-04-14 NCDENR
Stormwater Comments Response Mcmo.doc Page I of 3 Page 1

-�' �. ! •two.

Archileclum & Engiraeenns
• I ICI rNMU.-O
•
Project: 13-1184 Dining Facility at Stone Bay MCB Camp
L.ejeune
INCDENR Stormwater Project No. S1178 080313
Submittal: Stormwater Expre.rs Review
Date of Submittal: April 14, 2008
5. A soils report with the seasonal high water table and expected infiltration rate must be provided for each
i N11'. The soils report does not appear to provide specific soils information for infiltration basins 1 and 4.
For instance soil boring B-20, used to characterize the soil at both of these infiltration basins, appears to be
located approximately 100 feet to the south and at a lower elevation than the existing elevations at the
locations of the proposed infiltration basins.
Response: Additional infiltration report is provided in Appendix E.
6. It appears that the SI-I\trl' for infiltration basin 3 is reported inconsistently between the infiltration system
site visit request form, Vincent Lewis's findings, and the supplements. The elevation of the SHWT used for
the design of the infiltration system should be based on Vincent Lewis' SHUT determination.
Response: Elevations have been edited accordinDl .
7. The supplement for infiltration basin 4 reports the side slopes of the basin as 5:1 however the plans
indicate they slopes are 3:1. Report data accurately and consistently.
Response: Slope has been edited to he 3:1.
8. The filter strips must be designed to provide sheet flow over the entire width of the strip. The vegetated
filter strips associated with infiltration basins 1, 3, & 4 and 2 have existing or proposed draws in the filter
strip, which will likely cause the runoff to concentrate instead of proving sheet flow.
Response: All contours within the filter strips have been refined to provide sheet flow for the full length of the faller strip.
9. The level spreader supplement indicates that the level spreader for the excess runoff from infiltration basin
1, 3, & 4 is 68 feet, however the plans indicated that it is 75 feet. Report the level spreader and filter strip
length accurately and consistently.
-Response: The plan view has been revised to reflect the 68 feet calculated in the narrative and provided in the supplement.
10. The supplement for the filter strip associated with the bypass structure of drainage area 2 has a note
added that this filter strip is not expected to be used. Based on comment # 2 above, the filter strip and bypass
are expected to be used in order to bypass excess runoff. The runoff volume in excess of the design storm is
required to bypass the infiltration system. In addition, the note written an the level spreader supplements
states that a level spreader is not proposed for this location. A distribution device is required to provide even
runoff distribution and sustained sheet flow across the filter strip (IMajor Design Element 3 and 7, pages 13-1
and 13-2 of the BNW)
Response: Filler Stripfor the Gypa u structure has been eliminated from the project, since falter straps are not a requirrment for
bypass structuter. A filter strip has been provided for the level spreader on the nor(heasl corner of infiltration basin 2, Which is a
requiremenl.
11. The level spreader detail on plan sheet CG501 indicates that treated lumber is proposed for use as the lip
of the level spreader. The 2007 BI11I' Manual requires the level spreader lip to be constructed from concrete.
(Sections 8.1 and 8.3) Provide a level spreader that is designed per the 13M) Manual.
Response: The level spreader detail has been updated to indicate a 6 "--i6"concrete beam, see sheet CG501 for detail
1-1:\JOBS\NC481.4 StoneBay NiARSOC Dieting Hall\Faxes and Transmittals\Submittal Transmittals\2008-04-14 NCDI3NIZ
Stormwater Comments Response Meano.doc Page 2 of 3 Page 2

Architecture 6- Engineering
Project: P 1184 Dinirr, Pacility at Stone Bay MC8 Camp
Lejeune
JN7CDEAIR Stormwater Project No. SIV8 080313
Submittal: Stommater- xpress Review
Date of Submittal: April 14, 2008
12. Please note that Section 2 of the report indicates that the infiltration basins were designed based on L5
inches of rainfall instead of the difference in the runoff from the pre -development and post -development
conditions.
Response: Section 2 has been updated to reflect the rainfall difference in runo,(j from the pre -development and post -development
conditions.
13. Please submit a $1,000 fee for the additional review required for this application.
Response: Additional fee is attached.
H:\JOBS\NC481.4 StoncBay ILARSOC Dining Hall\Faxes and Transmittals\Submittal'1'ruismittals\2008-04-14 NCDLNR
Storinwater Comments Response Memo.doc Page 3 of 3 Page 3

Archit Cture e r<;ldt'I'll 071;19
April 8, 2008
\Ms. Christilie Nelson
I�;livironnienta! iWuguiecr
No,•th Carolina Division of'Water Quality
Wilmington Regional Office
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wihir ngton, NC 28405
RE: P-1184 DINING FACILITY A'I" STONE BAY MCB CAMP LEJEUNE
S I'ORNIVIATER PROJECT NO. SW8 0803.13
CLARK NEXSEN COMM NO, NC481 A
Dear Ms. Nelson
Tlianlc you for your letter on April 2, 2008, requesti,lg additional information for your review of ate
Stormwiter \Qanagement Pertrrit Application for the P-1194Dining Facility at Stone Bay 1MC13 Camp
Lejeune, We are i,i the process of proviclu,g die 6fo7liation requested, ht,(:ire havh)g difficulty meeting
die April 10 subeydttal date.
In response to your request for a soils report at basuis 1 and 4, to show the seasonal high water table
(SHWT) ;rue] uxpected infilu•ation mites, our geotechti ad eousultatit has completed the borings anti clata
collection at these two basilm Last week, we tried to schedule a tune for Viucent Leans to confirm die
SHWI', but lie was:not in the; office until yesterday, and wasti%able to Confiur, the SI- WI' in the Field until
tticlay. 13uc to this schedule, we are rcclucstinf ,t time e tension to allow for die revisal clesisy,i mid
calculatiolis to be complete for basins 1 antH. Instead of subinittuig the information prior to April 10, we
are requesting that die submittal be made on Monday, April 14, 2008.
Thant: you for your: consideration of this request. Please feel free to contact the via en -mil
(jhursC � .clark;nexsen.cotn) or at (91)) $?$-1$76 if }•nu har�e any clltestions or want to discuss taus fi,rdler.
Silicerch',
IG. shua I-Iurst, RE,
Associate, Civii Lngincer
4000 P.'"flebase 81vd., Scar 280, Rrrlrisit, ;l°(; 27607 91 WS?8.187r Pax .919/`! 848,-7 brr�>;lirrrtt+trsr/�rrl.�x<tt�rn.cuur
riI'r,�/•air,i::11('0,����r,1ri���i ;){]e'<-t: i�� "u� fn1�'. C.'I�arl,�ilr. ; �It.:rr�ahirr. �v�r;f��lr.' iritr� I�,tlzir,J.

Re: RJquest for Time Extension for SW8080313 Dining Facility at ...
Subject: Re: Request for Time Extension for SW8080313 Dining Facility at Stone Bay (NC481.4)
From: Christine Nelson <[e-mail]>
Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2008 15:58:08 -0400
To: Joshua Hurst <[e-mail]>
CC: Janet Russell <Janet.Russel [e-mail]>
Josh,
A new submittal date of April 14 for returning the requested additional information is fine with me.
I'll keep an eye out for it on Monday.
Christine
Joshua Hurst wrote:
Christine,
As we discussed, attached is a letter requesting a time extension for the stormwater design for the
Dining Facility at Stone Bay at Camp Lejeune. Please let me know if you have any questions on
this.
Thanks for considering this extension.
Josh
«20080408153012678. pdf>>
K. Joshua Hurst P.E., PTOE
Associate, Civil Engineer
CLARK*NEXSEN
Architecture & Engineering
4000 Westchase Boulevard suite 280
Raleigh, NC 27607
919.828.1876 Tel.
919.828.1877 Fax
ihurst clarknexsen.com
www.clarknexsen.com
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE: This e-mail and any files transmitted with it contain privileged and
confidential information and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which they
are addressed. If you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering the
e-mail to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination or copying of this
e-mail or any of its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please
immediately notify the sending individual or entity by e-mail and permanently delete the original
e-mail and attachments from your computer system.
'1 of 1 4/8/2008 3:58 PM

W A r�9pG
s
�• r
Michael R Easley, Governor
William G. Koss Jr., Secretary
Forth Carolina Department of'Environmcnt and Natural Resources
Coleen H. Sullins Director
Division of Water Quality
April 2, 2008
Carl Baker - Deputy Public Works Officer
U.S. Government - MCB Camp Lejeune
1005 Micheal Road
Camp Lejeune, NC 28542
Subject: Request for Additional information
Stormwater Project No. SW8 080313
P-1184 Dining Facility at Stone Bay MCB Camp Lejeune
Onlsow County
Dear Mr. Baker:
The Wilmington Regional Office received an NPDES Phase II Post Construction Permit
Application for P-1184 Dining Facility at*Stone Bay MCB Camp Lejeune on March 26, 2008. A
preliminary review of that information has determined that the application is not complete. The
following information is needed to continue the stormwater review:
1. Provide calculations and/or a table of the basin elevations, areas, and volumes to
demonstrate the volume of storage provided in infiltration basins at the
overflow/storage elevation. For several of the basins, the provided storage volume
indicated on the supplements could not be recreated (in particular infiltration basins
2, 3, and 4).
2. Provide more detailed elevations for the areas surrounding the infiltration basins. It
appears that portions of the required storage volume are being contained outside the
infiltration basin areas and prior to the "off line" bypass. If so, the bypass must be re-
located to provide an off line bypass so the runoff in excess of the design volume will
not enter the storage/ infiltration area. In addition, delineate the extent of the area
used to contain the required storage volume for the infiltration basins.
3. Provide calculations for the drawdown rate specific to each infiltration basin using
the designed infiltration areas.
4. In Appendix C of the report, the first page of the stormwater calculations indicates
that the drainage area for infiltration basin 5 is 0.75 ac. This is inconsistent with the
drainage area presented on the other documents (0.77 ac). The pre -development
and post -development runoff volumes for infiltration basin 5 presented on this sheet
of the calculations are also inconsistent with the supplement. Report areas and
related information accurately and consistently.
5. A soils report with the seasonal high water table and expected infiltration rate must
be provided for each BMP. The soils report does not appear to provide specific soils
information for infiltration basins 1 and 4. For instance soil boring B-20, used to
characterize the soil at both of these infiltration basins, appears to be located
approximately 100 feet to the south and at a lower elevation than the existing
elevations at the locations of the proposed infiltration basins.
No )Carolina
Naturallff
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 127 Cardinal Drive Extension Wilmington, NC 28405 Phone [phone] Customer Service
Wilmington Regional Office Internet: www.ncwa(er ualii .or fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper

Carl Baker
April 2, 2008
Stormwater Application No. SW8 080313
6. It appears that the SHWT for infiltration basin 3 is reported inconsistently
between the infiltration system site visit request form, Vincent Lewis's
findings, and the supplements. The elevation of the SHWT used for the
design of the infiltration system should be based on Vincent Lewis' SHWT
determination.
7. The supplement for infiltration basin 4 reports the side slopes of the basin as
5:1 however the plans indicate they slopes are 3:1. Report data accurately
and consistently.
8. The filter strips must be designed to provide sheet flow over the entire width
of the strip. The vegetated filter strips associated with infiltration basins 1, 3,
& 4 and 2 have existing or proposed draws in the filter strip, which will likely
cause the runoff to concentrate instead of proving sheet flow.
9. The level spreader supplement indicates that the level spreader for the
excess runoff from infiltration basin 1, 3, & 4 is.68 feet, however the plans
indicated that it is 75 feet. Report the level spreader and filter strip length
accurately and consistently.
10. The supplement for the filter strip associated with the bypass structure of
drainage area 2 has a note added that this filter strip is not expected to be
used. Based on comment # 2 above, the filter strip and bypass are expected
to be used in order to bypass excess runoff. The runoff volume in excess of
the design storm is required to bypass the infiltration system.
In addition, the note written on the level spreader supplements states that a
level spreader is not proposed for this location. A distribution device is
required to provide even runoff distribution and sustained sheet flow across
the filter strip (Major Design Element 3 and 7, pages 13-1 and 13-2 of the
BMP)
11. The level spreader detail on plan sheet CG501 indicates that treated lumber
is proposed for use as the lip of the level spreader. The 2007 BMP Manual
requires the level spreader lip to be constructed from concrete. (Sections 8.1
and 8.3) Provide a level spreader that is designed per the BMP Manual.
12. Please note that Section 2 of the report indicates that the infiltration basins
were designed based on 1.5 inches of rainfall instead of the difference in the
runoff from the pre -development and post -development conditions.
13. Please submit a $1,000 fee for the additional review required for this
application.
Please keep in mind that changing one number may change other numbers and require
the calculations, supplements, and other supporting documentation to be updated.
Verify all numbers are correct to ensure consistency in the application documents.
Please note that this request for additional information is in response to a preliminary
review. The requested information should be received in this Office prior to April 10,
2008, or the application will be returned as incomplete. The return of a project will
necessitate resubmittal of all required items, including the application fee.
Page 2 of 3

Carl Baker
April 2, 2008
Stormwater ADDlication No. SW8 080313
The construction of any impervious surfaces, other than a construction entrance under
an approved Sedimentation Erosion Control Plan, is a violation of NCGS 143-215.1 and
is subject to enforcement action pursuant to NCGS 143-215.6A,
Please reference the State assigned project number on all correspondence. If you have
any questions concerning this matter please feel free to call me at [phone] or
email me at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
C%J��
Christine Nelson
Environmental Engineer
ENBlcan: S:IWQSISTORMWATERIADDINFO120081080313.mar08
cc: Joshua Hurst, Clark Nexsen
Christine Nelson ._ __
tWilmi ngtori-Reg ional-Office
Page 3 of 3

request for additional information: Stormwater Project No. SW8080...
Subject: request for additional information: Stormwater Project No. SW8080313 Dining Facility at
Stone Bay
From: Christine Nelson <[e-mail]>
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2008 11:50:27 -0400
To: Joshua Hurst <jhurst cr ClarkNcxsen.com>, "Christopher I-1. Small" <csmall a ClarkNcxsen.com>,
carl.h.baker cr usmc.mil, [e-mail]
Gentlemen,
I have attached a pdf version of my request for additional information for
Stormwater Project SW8 080313 - P-1184 Dining Facility at Stone Bay. I will also
send copies via mail.
Thank you,
Christine
Express Stormwater Permitting
NC-DENR
SW8080313 - Camp Lejeune Dining Facility.pdf Content -Type.- application/pdf
i Content -Encoding: base64
1 ol' i 4/2/2008 1 1:50 AM

State Stormwater Permit ApElication Trackin Cover Sheet
Wilmington Regional Office
Project Name: CAMP LEJEUNE DINING FACILITY AT STONE BAY P1184
Project Category: NEW
Project Type: INFILTRATION SYSTEM
App Accept Date: 3/26/2008
Application Fee Anil., $
Fee Cheek Number: L
Reviewer Name: NELSON CHRISTINE
Record the following information from BIMS after project has been entered!
Permit Number (BIMS):
Please update the SW Access System by entering the Permit Number for the project!
Data Entered in Access:_ 'j
Entered in Access By:
Date Printed: 312612008 10:38:3.3 AM

21034
CLARK NEXSEN
1523:ELIZABETH AVE., STE, 300 WACHOVIA BANK, N.A.
CHARLOTTE, NC 28204 66-21-530
PH. 704-377-8800
DATE A
'2 o a 8 'AMOUNT
41oad. �p
PAY TO THE ' N6 D ak
m
ORDER J
`l OJr 1 Y�O�I S o�r�0 a r, l O o -
�I.� 4scKc �1
THOR4ZE0 SIGNATURE
j- ----) CA^—
a

Architecture & Engineering
4000 1ltestChase Blvd., Suite 290
Raleigh,lltorth Carolina 27607
9191828-1876
FaY 9191828-1877
I)Ilp://www.clarkne-,c,ren.c-om
We transmit
For Your
The Following
I3/�C�l��7ii ��i�LQ1
To: NCDENR
127 Cardinal Drive E%t.
Wilmington, NC 28405
Attn: Christine Nelson
® herewith
❑ in accordance with your request
❑ under separate cover
® approval
❑ review and comment
❑ use
Date: March 25, 2008
Project No: NC481.4
nce: Dining Facility at
Stone Bay
U distribution to parties
❑ record
❑ information
®
drawings
❑
computer file(s)
®
calculations
❑
samples
❑
change order
❑
product literature
❑
shop drawings
®
other
Copies
Date
Description
1
1 /8/08
Stormwater Express Review Fee - $4,000
2
March 2008
1 Original and 1 Copy of Stormwater Management Permit Application Form
I
March 2008
Infiltration Basin Supplement for Drainage Areas (DA) 1-5 (5 total)
I
March 2008
Level Spreader, Filter Strip and Restored Riparian Buffer
Supplement for Drainage Areas (DA) 1,3,&4; 2; and 5 (3 total)
1
March 2008
Infiltration Basin Inspection and Maintenance Agreements for DA 1-5 (5 total)
I
March 2008
Grassed Swale Inspection and Maintenance Agreement for DA 1-6 (1 total)
1
March 2008
Filter Strip, Restored Riparian Buffer and Level Spreader Inspection and
Maintenance Agreement for DA 1-5 (1 total)
2
March 2008
Stormwater Calculations (including soils report and wetland identification)
2
March 2008
Site Plans (full size)
Please contact me via email 6hurst a clarknexsen.com) or at [phone] if you have any questions or need anything else from us
for the express Stormwater review of this project. Thank you.
By: K. Joshua Hurst, P.E., PTOE
Copies to:
1+\J0BS\NC481.4 Stoncllny \MRSOC Dining 1-1a11\Vaxes and "Transmittals\SuUmitta]'Transmittals\20080325 Christine Nelson - NCDFN1Z.doc

DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
INFILTRATION SYSTEM INVESTIGATION
Complete and email this form to [e-mail]. if there are more than 7 areas to be tested,
attach a second sheet.
Scheduled Site Visit Date: 25 - Z(x�s Time:'.Q ' J6^
Project Name: P' 113q 0XN.TN(, FAcrLx { 5T01,a &Y County: QoSun-)
Street Address: NIA — ON RtPOE KA"Q, : RD. jag-rm or- 8-vxFR T 6A:XPJ6T01JAc.
Directions from the nearest intersection of two major roads:
SsIV, tS LocAICo v)T.114 1 r`i S10N1: 8A,r KTFLC RAMC-L: ACCESSeO OFF ILY 216
geTwsenl Pwy l! -ro Tdj5 "ozrH A4jo 14wy 172 ro -tdt 5ou7'H,
>1 acre being disturbed? DYES ONO LAMA Major required? OYES (ZNO
Consultant Name:_ K • ,nskvf% qOcf� If PC Phone: 4t`k -'6"2 S - 1'9-1 6
Consultant Firm Name: C{ARK ° N4ySC-M
e-1(. 0.1i 3-18 8-14 r)-10 s -I.i
Bore Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a) Existing Ground Elevation
s'O, s
11�. z
y8.9
W ,-�
L,9.11
SZ, -1
b Proposed Bottom Elevation
q!
Llc
14
`lb
qk
q8
c Differe_ nce a minus b
Z. z.
z, $-
1 1,
' . 9
I . "!
d Add 2 ft. Min. Bore De t�h}
6.�.2
4•S
�j. 7
S.
6,`T
f
e Hardpan De th?
3a"
3211
iq
dll�
a A
rJ
f Infiltration Rate OK?
7,1'-Ar•
2.2
00r,l,t
11.z(,fhr
t14,4;,�,r.
1
9) Approx. Elev. Of SHWT .
44q• I
qS, S
V7, 3
;l57. 7
ors, i
Y7. `t
h Max. lowest bottom elev.
50, s
11T s-
q�.11
ti-. -7
17,7
w� ,-7
3
S22,
a A340
Comments G)ITH 7HF 104FrLTAA7 ant RA7a3 AS 14IG-H -A3 °rr-tgr ARG or.r
This SITE IT rs T4E 0PXArt1)r1i OF -rAE iNGIM617P. THA"r _TIU9rLTftAaVIIJ
tos Avp Tiz6oc igeS ,.300 L
ELEVATION V)T101N 21 car T �d Tct`j�liil^� Jkn 0
Required Attachments:
1. Legible vicinity map.
2. Complete Soils Report.
3. PDF formatted site plan with the boring locations to be tested. Site plans should
be emailed or hand -delivered only. Illegible faxed maps will not be accepted.
All proposed infiltration areas and existing, active utility lines located vuthin the proposed
basin/trench must be marked and flagged. If these areas are ►lot flagged, the Soils Scientist
reserves the right to decline to do the investigation. If the proposed infiltration system will be
located in an area of existing pavement and there is no open area nearby, equipment capable of
breaking through the impervious layer must be provided. The soils investigation does not take
the place of a soils report prepared by an appropriate professional. The Soils Scientist will only
verify the soil conditions that are reported in the Soils Report, and make a determination as to
the suitability of the site to meet the infiltration design requirements under NCAC 2H.1000, and
assumes no liability should the system fall.
S:IWQSISTORMWATERIFORMSIinfiltration site visit.for Revised 8.07
4l � �ru,icr
fkv�t), Jr� i.%fir

1
0

LOCATION MAP
W SCALE, 0.2 mile = 1'-0*
G-% VICINIW MAP
IN SCALE. 0.5 mile = 1'-0'
6160 KEMPSVILLE CIRCLE
NORFOLK VIRGINA23502
757.455-SBW FAX757,45S•5638
'vWW.CLARKNE>(SEN 'COM Architecture &Engineering

IC-: Stone Bay Dining Stormwater Meeting
1 � 3 . f (D
Subject: RE: Stone Bay Dining Stormwater Meeting
From: "Joshua Hurst" <[e-mail]>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 14:17:00 -0500
To: "Janet Russell" <[e-mail]>
Janet,
I'm sorry to be late in getting back in touch with you. This date of
March 3 works just fine for Clark Nexsen. We'll plan to see you and/or
Christine then.
Thanks also for sending the information on the Phase II Stormwater
rules. We'll confirm that our submittal is in compliance. Please let
me know if you need anything else from us prior to the 3rd.
Have a good weekend.
Thanks,
Josh
-----Original Message -----
From: Janet Russell [mail to: Janet. [e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 5:19 PM
To: Joshua Hurst; Baker CIV Carl H; Towler GS05 David W
Subject: Re: Stone Bay Dining Stormwater Meeting
Josh:
Christine has given me a "scoping" meeting date of *March 3, 2008 at
1:30 PM* here at the Regional Office. The water Quality Supervisor
suggested that the meeting be a "scoping" meeting since that gives us
more control over our schedule. If the application and plans are
complete on the 3rd, Christine will give you a "mail -in" submittal date.
I don't think she'll require another meeting as long as a
representative(s) from Camp Lejeune attends on the 3rd.
If this date and time works for you and your client, please let me know
so that we can reserve the meeting date.
Thanks,
Janet
Joshua Hurst wrote:
Janet,
It was good to get to meet you in person yesterday afternoon!
As we discussed, we are close to having all of Christine's comments
addressed for the Stone Bay Dining Facility stormwater plan at Camp
Lejeune, and should be available to meet next week to submit the
plans. Unfortunately, only Tuesday (2/26), Thursday (2/28), or Friday
(2/29) of next week work with our schedules. Do any of these dates
work for your team?
We propose bringing the entire civil team that worked on this
stormwater design (3 PEs and 1 EI) to the meeting, in an effort to
gain an overall understanding of all of NC DENR's requirements. We
believe that we have adequately addressed DENR's comments with this
next submittal and look forward to our next meeting.
Thank you for your consideration
questions.
Thanks,
Josh
Please let me know if you have any
1 of 2 2/22/2008 3:00 PM

RE: Stone Bay Dining Stormwater Meeting
*K. Joshua Hurst:* P.E., PTOE
Associate, Civil Engineer
*CLARKuNEXSEN*
Architecture & Engineering
4000 Westchase Boulevard Suite 280
Raleigh, NC 27607
919.B2B.1876 Tel.,
919.828.1877 Fax
[e-mail]
www.clarknexsen.com <file://www.clarknexsen.com>
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE: This e-mail and any files transmitted with it
contain privileged and confidential information and are intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to which they are
addressed. If you are not the intended recipient or the person
responsible for delivering the e-mail to the intended recipient, you
are hereby notified that any dissemination or copying of this e-mail
or any of its attachment(s) is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sending
individual or entity by e-mail and permanently delete the original
e-mail and attachment(s) from your computer system. Any views
expressed in this e-mail are those of the individual sender, except
where the sender specifies and with authority, states them to be the
views of Clark Nexsen.
2 of 2 2/22/2008 3:00 PM

Architecture & Engineering
4000 l[7erlChare 131nd, Suite 280
Raleigh, North Camlina 27607
9191828-1876
Fay 9191828.1877
blip:l/ivww.clarkiiexfen.com
We transmit
M 0
N,'LI [Swul ME
To: NCDENR
127 Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405
Attn: Christine Nelson
FIv ® herewith
❑ in accordance with your request
M ❑ under separate cover
For You
® approval
❑ review and comment
❑ use
The Following
Date: March 7, 2008
Project No: NC481.4
Reference: Dining Facility at
Stonebay
❑ distribution to parties
❑ record
❑ information
®
drawings
❑
computer file(s)
®
calculations
❑
samples
❑
change order
❑
product literature
❑
shop drawings
®
other
Copies
Date
Description
1
1 /8/08
Stormwater Express Review Fee - $4,000
2
March 2008
1 Original and l Copy of Stormwater Management Permit Application Form
1
March 2008
Infiltration Basin Supplement for Drainage Areas (DA) 1-5 (5 total)
1
March 2008
Infiltration Basin Inspection and Maintenance Agreements for DA 1-5 (5 total)
1
March 2008
Grassed Swale Inspection and Maintenance Agreement for DA 1-6 (1 total)
1
March 2008
Filter Strip, Restored Riparian Buffer and Level Spreader Inspection and
Maintenance Agreement for DA 1-5 (1 total)
2
March 2008
Stormwater Calculations (including soils report and wetland identification)
2
March 2008
Site Plans (full size)
Please contact me via email ([e-mail] clarknexsen.com) or at [phone] if you have any questions or need anything else from us
for the express stormwater review of this project. Thank you.
By: K. Joshua Hurst, RE, P T OI?
Copies to:
I-l:\JOBS\NC481.4 MARSOC Dining Hall\faxes and 'l*ransmittals\Submittal "Transmittals\20080307 Christine Nelson - NCDl"- NR.doe

Architecture & Lngrneering
4000 IVestClluse Blvd., Suite 280
RaleiS& North Carolina 27607
9191828-1876
Fax [phone]
b i ip: / / wwn,. clark u e vse u. co m
We transmit
For Your
The Following
U-KU-A HQ3101 I-ZA I
To: NCDFNR
127 Cardinal Drive 17st.
Wihnington, NC 28405
Attn: Christine Nelson
® herewith
❑ in accordance with your request
❑ under separate cover
® approval
❑ review and comment
❑ use
Date: 1\4arch 10, 2008
Project No: NC481.4
Reference: Dining 17'acility at
Stone Bay
❑ distribution to parties
❑ record
❑ information
❑
drawings
❑
computer file(s)
❑
calculations
❑
samples
❑
change order
❑
product literature
❑
shop drawings
®
other
Copies Date Description
1 March 2008 Level Spreader, Filter Strip and Restored Riparian Buffer
Supplement for Drainage Areas (DA) 1,3,&4; 2; and 5 (3 total)
The attached information supplements the information that was sent on 317/08 for-this-prMoject. Please contact me via email
(jhurstnclarknexsen.com} or at [phone] if you have any_gElest�s�or need.an th�ing else from us for the express stormwater
review of this project. Thank you.
MAR I I
Y:1
By: K. Joshua Hurst, P.F., PTOL Copies to:
1-1:\JOHS\NC48t.4 MARSOC Dining 1 lall\faxes and Transmittals\SubmittalTransmittals\20080310 Christine Nclson - NCI)ENR.doc

U' OF W A rFAQG
March 12, 2008
Carl Baker, Deputy Public Works Officer
US Government - MCB Camp Lejeune
1005 Micheal Road
Camp Lejeune, NC 28542
Subject: PROJECT RETURN
Stormwater Project No. SW8 NIA
P-1184 Dining Facility at Stone Bay
Onslow County
Dear Mr. Baker:
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Coleen H. Sullins Director
Division of Water Quality
Your recent stormwater management permit application for P-1184 Dining Facility at Stone
Bay MCB Camp Lejeune was found to be not acceptable for the Express Stormwater
Permitting Program on March 11, 2008 and is thus being returned. During the initial review for
completeness, the application documents were found to be inconsistent. One of the
inconsistency issues identified is that the site layout varied between the plans and the drainage
area map. The plans indicated that only 4 infiltration basins were proposed while the
remaining documentation indicated that there were 5 infiltration basins.
The stormwater management permit application forms and check # 21034 for the $4,000
Express application fee will be returned to Joshua Hurst with Clark Nexsen. The plans and
any other documentation that were submitted have been discarded or recycled.
You are reminded that the construction of any impervious surfaces, other than a construction
entrance under an approved Sedimentation Erosion Control Plan, is a violation of NCGS 143-
215.1 and is subject to enforcement action pursuant to NCGS 143-215.6A.
Please contact Janet Russell if you wish to re -schedule this project in the Express Program.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact Christine Nelson or me at
[phone],
Sincerely,
EcMard Beck
Regional Supervisor
Surface Water Protection Section
ENB/can: SAWQSISTORMWATERIRETURN1Camp Lejeune Dining Facility.mar08
cc: Joshua Hurst, Clark Nexsn
CCFiristine_Nelson=
N�iWiCarolina
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 127 Cardinal Drive Extension Wilmington, NC 28405 Phone [phone] Customer Service
Wilmington Regional Office Internet: www.ncwaterguality.ora Fax [phone]
An Equal OpportunitylAffirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper

21034
CLARK•NEXSEN.
1523 ELIZABETH AVE., STE. 306 WACHOVIA BANK, N.A.
CHARLOTTE, NC 28204 66-21-530
PH, 704-377-8800 -
I ' A
T
IVI
PAY !v� E
TO THE
ORDER �
OF
o�,, �1-.o�5and Q �•�. r o 0
IV
S w cypress
THORIZED SIGNATURE
51

P. 01
TRANSACTION REPORT
MAR-13-2008
THU 08:04 AM �
FOR: NCDENR 9103502004
SEND
DATE START RECEIVER TX TIME PAGES TYPE NOTE
M# DP �
MAR-13 08: 04 AM 919198281877 21" 1 FAX TX.., 'OK
!' X(
1994
TOTAL ' ` " 21 S PAGES:
1
yd A 111Z9 Michael F, Easley, Gmas ovc
WMiAM Cs. Rose )r., Secretary
r7
G North 0no11nx Depmtnenl offinvironment and N3turxl ilwwcaa
Cdeen H. Sullins OirteNr
Division of W1W Quality
March 12, 2008
Carl Baker, Deputy Public Works Officer
US Government -MCB Camp Lejeune
1005 Micheal Road
Camp Lejeune, NC 28b42
Subject: PROJECT RETURN
Stormwater Project No. SW8 NIA
Facility
P-1194 Dining at Stone Bay
Onslow County
Dear Mr. Baker:
Your recent stormwater management permit application for P-1184 Dining Facility Stone
to
Bay MCS Camp Lejeune was found to be not acceptable for the Express Sto[mwater
y
Permitting Program on March 11, 200E and is thus being returned. During the initial review for
LI
;
completeness, the application documents were found to be inconsistent. One of the
inconsistency Issues Identified is that the site layout varied between the plans and the drainage
area map. The plans Indicated that onty 4 infiltration basins were proposed while the •
remaining documentation Indicated that there were 5 Ipfittration basins. ;, S
i
The stormwater management permh application forms and check # 21034 for the $4,000
r
'
Express application fee will be returned to Joshua Hurst with Clark Nexsen. The plans and
I�
any other documentation that were submitted have been discarded or recycled.
r' You are reminded that the construction of any impervious surfaces, other than a construction
entrance under an approved Sedimentation Erosion Control Plan, is a violation of NCGS 143-
215.1 and is subject to enforcement action pursuant to NCGS 143-21 SAA.
Please contact Janet Russell if you wish to re -schedule this project in the Express Program.
If you have anyy questions concerning this matter, please contact Christine Nelson or me at
(910) 796- ,215.
Slnc ly,
E a Beck
Regional Supervisor
Surface Water Protection Section
ENBIean: S:1WQ51ST0RMWATERIRETURN1Camp Lejeune Dining Facilhy.mar08
cc: Joshua Hurst, Clark Nexon
Christine Nelson
I
. North Carolina Pivlsion or Water ouWily 127 Cardinal Drlve Exscmion WilmlgWn, NC 284of Phone (9i6) 796-7215 „' Coscoracr Service
' Wilmagon Repianal sec Inierrtet: .vww ncrv]lernuerhv.ore. Fa (918)350-21104 1-877-623-6748
. AnEq,alOppoldwllrylAtlhmaHwAcnonE�twer-5p!iRecydedlP%PwtConaumarPapar
,f',i

application being returned - Dining Facility at Stone Bay
Subject: application being returned - Dining Facility at Stone Bay
From: Christine Nelson <[e-mail]>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 16:18:19 -0400
To: Joshua Hurst <[e-mail]>, [e-mail]
CC: "Jeff J. Bass" <[e-mail]>, [e-mail], [e-mail],
Janet Russell <[e-mail]>
BCC: Cameron Weaver <Cameron. Weaver c)ncmail.net>
All,
The recent stormwater management permit application for the Dining Facility at
Stone Bay could not be accepted into the Express Stormwater Permitting Program.
During my initial review for application completeness, I found that the submitted
application documents were inconsistent. One of the issues identified is that the
site layout varied between the plans and the drainage area map. The plans
indicated Chat 4 infiltration basins were proposed while the remaining
documentation indicated that there were 5 infiltration basins.
Carl Baker & Josh Hurst will receive a copy of the project return letter in the
mail. In addition, .josh Hurst will receive the returned application forms and the
$4,000 check for the Express application fee. Please contact Janet Russell if you
wish to re -schedule this project in the Express Program.
Christine
1 of 1 3/27/2008 3:44 PM

RE: application being returned - Dining Facility at Stone Bay
Subject: RE: application being returned - Dining Facility at Stone Bay
From: "Christopher H. Small" <csmall a ClarkNexsen.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 09:30:54 -0400
To: "Christine Nelson" <[e-mail]>, "Jeff J. Bass" <[e-mail]>,
"Joshua Hurst" <jhurst a ClarkNexsen.com>
Not sure what she is talking about but we need to immediately get back on the
schedule... Jeff please check into the issue, and Josh talk to Janet to see when we
can reschedule our submittal.
Russell
-----Original Message -----
From; Christine Nelson [ mailto:Christine. [e-mail]]
Sent: Wed 3/12/2006 4:18 PM
To: Joshua Hurst; [e-mail]
Cc: Jeff J. Bass; [e-mail]; Christopher H. Small; Janet
Subject: application being returned - Dining Facility at Stone Bay
All,
The recent stormwater management permit application for the Dining
Facility at Stone Bay could not be accepted into the Express Stormwater
Permitting Program. During my initial review for application
completeness, I found that the submitted application documents were
inconsistent. One of the issues identified is that the site layout
varied between the plans and the drainage area map. The plans indicated
that 4 infiltration basins were proposed while the remaining
documentation indicated that there were 5 infiltration basins.
Carl Baker & Josh Hurst will receive a copy
in the mail. in addition, Josh Hurst will
application forms and the $4,000 check for
Please contact Janet Russell if you wish to
the Express Program.
Christine
of the project return letter
receive the returned
the Express application fee.
re -schedule this project in
ION 1 3/13/2008 2:41 PM

Re: application being returned - Dining Facility at Stone Bay
Subject: Re: application being returned - Dining Facility at Stone Bay
From: Christine Nelson <[e-mail]>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 14:40:58 -0400
To: Joshua Hurst <[e-mail]>
CC: "Jeff J. Bass" <[e-mail]>, "Christopher H_ Small" <csmall a ClarkNcxsen.com>
.rust a heads up - I noticed on the application that you had identified approx 950
sq ft of building BUA in the drainage area that wasn't getting treated by an
infiltration system. i will be looking for an explanation in the next submittal on
why that building area cannot be treated.
Christine
Joshua Hurst wrote:
I Christine,
I'm sorry to hear that you have to return this project due to the application
not being complete. We were surprised to hear that. However, in looking at our
copy of the submittal, it appears that there was a printing error when the plans
were printed, and the latest plans were not included in the package. I
apologize for this oversight. As requested, we will coordinate with Janet to
reschedule this Express Review.
Thank you,
Josh
-----Original Message----- From: Christine Nelson
[mailtc:[e-mail]] Sent: Wed 3/12/2008 4:18 PM To:
Joshua Hurst; [e-mail] Cc: Jeff J. Bass; [e-mail];
Christopher H. Small; Janet Russell Subject: application being returned -
Dining Facility at Stone Bay
All, The recent stormwater management permit application for the Dining
Facility at Stone Bay could not be accepted into the Express Stormwater
Permitting Program. During my initial review for application
completeness, I found that the submitted application documents were
inconsistent. One of the issues identified is that the site layout
varied between the plans and the drainage area map. The plans indicated
that 4 infiltration basins were proposed while the remaining
documentation indicated that there were 5 infiltration basins.
Carl Baker & Josh Hurst will receive a copy of the project return letter
in the mail. In addition, Josh Hurst will receive the returned
application forms and the $4,000 check for the Express application fee.
Please contact Janet Russell if you wish to re -schedule this project in
the Express Program.
Christine
of 1 3/13/2008 2:41 PM

If -- jphcation being returned - Dining Facility at Stone Bay
rM
i Subject: RE: FW: application being returned - Dining Facility at Stone Bay
From: "Joshua Hurst" <[e-mail]>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 08:30:11 -0400
To: "Janet Russell" <Janet.Russel I@nctnall, net>
CC: "Jeff J. Bass" <[e-mail]>, "Neil W. Sauer" <nsauer a ClarkNexsen.com>, "Terri
S. Hall" <[e-mail]>, "Christopher H. Small" <[e-mail]>
Janet,
I'm -sorry f'or-not-getting_back_to you_on Friday�my-email connection was
rdbwn-.—We-are-scheduled-to a- att d the-stormwater_suibmzttal` meeting -on ,
-�� -
3:/25= �We_ll.^plan�to_see_you th,.._ e. n�
Thanks,
Josh
-----Original Message -----
From: Janet Russell[mailto:Janet. Russel l@ncmaiI -net I
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2008 3:27 PM
To: Joshua Hurst
Cc: Jeff J. Bass; Neil W. Sauer; Terri S. Hall; Towler GS05 David W;
Baker CIV Carl H
Subject: Re: FW: application being returned - Dining Facility at Stone
Bay
March 13, 2008
Greetings:
NCDENR is requiring another face-to-face meeting for the re -submittal of
this project. Therefore, the first available date for the Express
stormwater submittal meeting for the Dining Facility at Stone Bay
project has been scheduled with *Christine Nelson on March 25, 2008 at
10:30 AM* here in the Wilmington Regional Office. *A representative for
Camp Le}eune is required to attend the meeting.*
Please respond within 2 business days to confirm and reserve the
submittal meeting date/time.
Thanks,
Janet Russell
Express Permitting
Joshua Hurst wrote:
I Janet,
As I mentioned to Christine earlier,.I'm sorry that you were not able
to accept our stormwater submittal for the Dining Facility at Stone Bay.
It appears that we had a printing error and submitted an old set of
plans, instead of the current plans. I do apologize for this
inconvenience.
Now that we have our printing straight, could you go ahead and
reschedule the Stormwater Express Review for this project? We can have
the submittal package submitted to you as early as Monday of next week.
Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions or need
anything else for this request. I am out of the office through
tomorrow, but can be reached on my cell phone at [phone].
1 of 2 3/17/2008 9:25 AM

FW: application being returned - Dining Facility at Stone Bay
k
u
r
Thank you,
Josh
-----Original Message -----
From: Christine Nelson [ mailto:Christine. [e-mail]]
Sent: Wed 3/12/2008 4:18 PM
To: Joshua Hurst; [e-mail]
Cc: Jeff J. Bass; [e-mail]; Christopher H. Small;
Janet Russell
ISubject: application being returned - Dining Facility at Stone
Bay
I All,
The recent stormwater management permit application for the
Dining
IFacility at Stone Say could not be accepted into the Express
Stormwater
Permitting Program. During my initial review for application
completeness, I found that the submitted application documents
were
Iinconsistent. One of the issues identified is that the site
layout
Ivaried between the plans and the drainage area map. The plans
indicated
I that 4 infiltration basins were proposed while the remaining
documentation indicated that there were 5 infiltration basins.
Carl Baker & Josh Hurst will receive a copy of the project
return letter
in the mail. In addition, Josh Hurst will receive the returned
application forms and the $4,000 check for the Express
application fee.
IPlease contact Janet Russell if you wish to re -schedule this
project in
the Express Program.
Christine
2 of 2 3/17/2008 9:25 AM

` [P ECS CAROLMAS, LLP
KOtI. ONAS Geotechnical a Construction Materials • Environmental ° Facilities
January 22, 2008
Mr. Aaron Volek
Whiting -Turner Contracting
900 Ridgefield Drive Suite 130
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
Re: ' Infiltration Evaluation
P-1184 Dining Facility at Stone Bay
Holly Ridge, North Carolina
ECS Project No. 22.13737
Dear Mr. Volek,
ECS Carolinas, LLP (ECS) recently conducted an infiltration evaluation for the proposed
infiltration area at the site located off of Rifle Range Road in Holly Ridge, North Carolina. This
letter, with attachments, is the report of our evaluation.
Field Testing
On January 21, 2008 ECS met with Mr. Ben Thomas with V-dting-Turner on site in order to
provide the requested test locations (boring numbers B-16 through B-21). The boring locations
were staked by personnel with Whiting -Turner. ECS then conducted an exploration of the
subsurface soil and ground water conditions at the six requested locations shown on the attached
Site Diagram. The purpose of this exploration was to obtain subsurface information of the
suitability of the iat-place soils for the proposed infiltration area. We explored the subsurface
soil and ground water conditions by advancing one hand auger boring into the existing ground
Surface at the six requested boring locations. We visually classified the subsurface soils and
obtained representative samples of each soil type encountered. We also recorded the ground
water level observed at the time of each hand auger boring. The attached Infiltration Evaluation
Form provides a summary of the subsurface conditions encountered at each hand auger boring
location.
The ground water level and the seasonal high ground water level (SHWL) were estimated at
each boring location below the existing grade elevation. Below is a sutnmary of each boring
location.
Location
Water Level
S11WL
B-16
65 inches
!/ 32 inches
B-17
60 inches
inches
B-18
40 inches
V 14 inches
B-19
70 inches
3,-) 36 inches
B-20
80 inches
50 inches
B-21
90 inches
60 inches
7211 Ogden Business Park *Suite 201 • Wihnirngton, NC 28411 • [phone] *Fax [phone] 'www.ecslimited.com
Asheville, NC Charlotte, NC • Greensboro, NC • Greenville, SC ' Raleigh, NC ' Swansboro. NC * • Wilmington, NC
* testing services only

Infiltration Evahiation
P-1184 Dining Facility
Holly Ridge, Norti3 Carolina
RCS Project No. 22,13737
We have conducted six infiltration tests near hand auger borings to estimate the infiltration rate
for the subsurface soils. The infiltration tests are typically conducted at two feet above the
SIIWL.
Field ,rest Results
Below is a summary of the infiltration test results:
Location
Description
Depth
Inches/hour
Inches/minute
13-16
Brown fine
SAND
12 inches
5.0
0.08
B-17
Gre fine SAND
12 inches
7.7
0.13
B-18
Grey fine SAND
10 inches
2.2
0.03
B-19
Grey/white fine
SAND
12 incites
14.7
0.25
B-20
Tan/yellow fine
SAND
26 inches
11.2
0.18
D-21
Tan/yellow fine
SAND
36 inches
18.4
0.30
Infiltration rates and SRWL may vazy within the proposed site due to changes in elevation and
subsurface conditions.
If you have any questions regarding this report, please contact us at [phone].
Respectfully,
ECS CAROLINAS, LLP
K. Brooks Wall
Staff' Geologist
Attaelunents: Site Diagram
Infiltration Evaluation
OJ4 M, sk—,
Walid M. Sobh, P. E.
Principal Engineer
NC License No. 22983

E
2 - A
i =
/STCHMOMMAGE INFORMATION x
Att
5^
�•
Qa�..a� Omn rcr
t ti
I5-16L �t9�Ai
�
r�
t
\Y.titi �Kyy
!
�
OM
;,�NS1RvCT6K.,
�• '�,
mare �wQ aura Lc
�y�EQ CSTYOO]Y
1111
Cy 10( mvL 00SS
`�•
�aQ�Uiro s
av
(EDMO 43 W Woe=
°
kt
yO
$
-^�•
CA AeDi'['FonFL KEanc[tiLji
a
o�
$ortaGS 4
�
' , y HIIIIil!lllIt, llltHIItitltit IAI tit IInIIIrlI1-[1-1111 °o.
�` GRAPHIC sc.�s --
�_ .. __
-�r•�EEb itsFlGTBA'rinnl Ra7� crI h�t< 3°ItW6S lt�a [arEo. �CG301
y 2 ' 3
Project No, 13Dravi hq No. "
Drawn B ntFEe-
Scale r

Infiltration Evaluation
P-1184 Dining Facility at Stone Bay
Holly Ridge, North Carolina
ECS Project No. 22.13737
January 21, 2008
.Location Depth Soil Description
B-16 0--2V Brown fine SAND
20"-32" Grey fine SAND
32"-40". Hardpan
40"-85" Tan/Brown/Grey fine SAND
85"-120" Hardpan
Seasonal High Water Table was estimated to be at 32 inches below the existing
grade elevation.
Infiltration Rate: 0.08 inches per minute (5.0 inches per hour)
Test was conducted at 12 inches below existing grade elevation
Ground water was encountered at 65 inches below the existing grade elevation.
Location Depth
Soil Description
B-17 0-8"
Black silty SAND
8"-32"
Grey fine SAND
32"-65"
Hardpan
65"-85"
Dark brown fine SAND
85" Cave in
Seasonal High Water Table was estimated to be at 32 inches below the existing
grade elevation.
.Infiltration Rate: 0.13 inches per minute (7.7 inches per hour)
Test was conducted at 12 inches below existing grade elevation
Ground water was encountered at 60 inches below the existing grade elevation.
Location Depth
Soil Description
B-18 0-6"
Grey silty SAND
6"-14"
Grey fine SAND
14"-40"
Hardpan
40"-85"
Black/grey silty SAND
85"
Cave in
Seasonal High Water Table was estimated to be at 14 inches below the existing
grade elevation.
Infiltration Rate: 0.03 inches per minute (2.2 inches per hour)
'rest was conducted at 10 inches below existing -grade elevation
Ground water was encountered at 40 inches below the existing grade elevation

Infiltration Evaluation
P-I 184 Dining Facility at Stone Bay
Holly Ridge, North Carolina
ECS Project No. 22.13737
January 21, 2008
Location Depth Soil Description
B-19 0-10" PEAT
10"-16" Grey fine SAND w/silt
16"-36" Grey/white fine SAND
36"-70" Black/grey silty SAND
70"-1.20" Brown fine SAND
Seasonal High Water Table was estimated to be at 36 inches below,the existing
grade elevation.
Infiltration Rate: 0.25 inches per minute (14.7 inches per hour)
Test was conducted at 12 inches below existing grade elevation
Ground water was encountered at 70 inches below the existing grade elevation
Location Dep Soil Description
B-20 0-3" Grass/topsoil
3"-10" Grey fine SAND wlsilt
10"-20" Grey fine SAND
20"-60" Tan/yellow fine SAND
60"-120" White/grey fine SAND
Seasonal High Water Table was estimated to be at 50 inches below the existing
grade elevation.
Infiltration Rate: 0.18 inches per minute (11.2 inches per hour)
Test was conducted at 26 inches below existing grade elevation
Ground water was encountered at 80 inches below the existing grade elevation
Location DDe th Soil_ Description
B-20 0-3" Grass/topsoil
3 "-10" Grey fine SAND wlsilt
10"-60" Tan/yellow fine SAND
60"-90" White/tan fine SAND
90"-120" Grey tine SAND
Seasonal High Water Table was estimated to be at 60 inches below the existing
grade elevation.
Infiltration Rate: 0.30 inches per minute (18.4 inches per hour)
Test was conducted at 36 inches below existing grade elevation
Ground water was encountered at 90 inches below the existing grade elevation

r
STORM DRAINAGE INFORMIATION
Q> its <DWW MR (D mww
W-4500 MR-5210 U .50
10,13A
opm mit Z m.(2�
am cuml am
gN,4136 Fa-m 10
cew MR
k� k' _46 05 rdw-50,70
sears or [�iLIH[Lvxr Tr
(D
rm. 033 M4.51.40
(Dy;w tap M,45M
M-52.40
(IDA CLEW OL9®STa01LM06LE
ww-5010 WN
to
49JU
SPAa C.-es)-Z
mw
-,j
51DD -
FSNM
�Slso
57k
Ufa
Sio
F
53
j�I
awIL14s0101, ICU)... min
W.-OX
El
TO(D 105 LF 12. 0 OJ%
(D io (S) isa Lf la'O O-u
(D TO is kr 6111,
To 12 62 If
to& 1W If 12' 4) 0,3%
12' 6 Gm
-
------- --- e To CD 65 Lr 12' D
(2) TO Q IDO IF 12' 0 on
NL70 'T I
TO � 121 tF 21' 0 OM
0 To CD 134 if 15
(D 10 (D w u le, a 0-IS3
OTO(O 4S kF 15.O 0�
0
?if C rilc' 7
E
6� 3 LIZ 7 91.
2
(9 LU
�Tvfl
----- -----------
GRAPHIC SCALE(S)
—w
rJCED jNr1L1L RA'TwO RAIFS nsN A+.L 3c.R1r4&,% KS eSTE D,
.—G I.-

r
}

1 y 4 5
STORM DRAINAGE INFORMATION
STRUCTURE -
e f
50' SI:3$ACK FROFd 11'ETL.4NDS
lJ'TITS OF WETLANDS
J -_ Q1 FES �7 CLEAN OUT
6 LOUTS OF w'ETUVJDS INY.=48-40 IW.=48.8
INV.= 48.84
CLEAN
13 ram. �l�i-�r� v & O DDROP511 oI 7A IM 50 4T 3
49.50
INV:=48.58IW,-;49.20
D 49-50 - 3 DROP INLET ® DROP INLET D
- - _ _ 3 RIM=51.10 RIV=52.10
f2
1
}' _ + + IhV.=4$.96 INV.=49.48
,A \ -.�_-:'�, ®FES ®CLEAN OUT
49.50 - +� -- r, i INV.=48.42 RL+GWd=53.85
49.60 r - WA 5
49-50 49.$ � 'o. ,1'i 'rs -___l'ia*
` 4 Q DROP INLET
: 6 - - i RIM=52.10
LWITS. OF DISTUF t0.;Gf 12 y f ` INV.=48.58 ®�
2 i' I '�� a I_ _ l Lo DROP INLET 1T1 1$i1E� MATE
G4'V.=4&79 +-
50.54 50.8 49.5 + 44.5 PiP
a ` 48
50.70 44 ;� _ti 13 �I D TO 0 93 LF 18- 13 0-28%
/+ 7$ 49,0
49.5 49�+ \ Q3 T4 Q 134 LF 15' @ 0.287.
50 00 9.0 49.50 3 -- i :J TO 4� 284 LF 18�
51.70' _ _ _ _ 33574
49.22 I T T I TO So 70 LF 12' ® un !
r 51.40 �1' i I �I _�-T' t i0 Q5 18 LF 32' @ 1.15x�`�� '~ C
L ;' 1Vr51.30 ` �v-- - I 49.5�xu.s
50.40/ 50.80 - 49.60 �' QC TO © 26 LF 12- @ 2.192
off _ I51 _ 50.2 �
0.60 _ � _ E 9�
I 54.00 { �t 1 ' E t'� TO © 48 LF 12- 8 0.17%
I 3 7A 7 ; 7A ':TO Q7 192 LF 12" B 0.17%
=' ih
51.5 51.5 T155.00 5 3 { lf.4C 1 5 _ x
-v�sv:c
50.33_ _ 54.95+, 5l40O yl 4:: I 5� 5220 { I I 1 I 5 49 cx? CONSTRUCTION
�L - - - I N NOTES
50.0 1,22 T.67 I l IFILTRATiON BASH �1 _
rrs - w
( 8 C1iAWL SPACE EL=49.67� 55.00 . i ' I 51.74 Ell
-
v 5 - m _ (T- - El INFIL T
RATION MIN 12 ocxia xxx
NEW N - i-55.00 - 3 -I I /f� ❑3 INFILTRATION BASIN 13DINiNG HALL ecen,+ a
' 51.73 55.00 FACILITY(, vac f�cTxn
F.F.E.5S.6JX54.50 -_ __ ❑ INFILTRATION BASIN 84
S5 U0', `w �4
54.9 ' 5500 54.$4,_ ; I _l __ o
Si.78, - 5. WI 1. f 1 _ o
a lU ---s' --------__ ❑5 GYFILTRATION BASIN JS U z
54.5`, f 54.5 TC53.2p'`. 0--+ I b
51.5 d 54.5 , �; 53 i3 { : I Fl 3 0 '4-10 __,54.10 � p
B 5 GO 54.
i7C52. ■.;,•.;.._: I ; s i S 12 a FILTER STRIP
FL52.3 L 4C53.80 { I _ FL53.� - 0 y W
E TC53.50 F153.30 �p !,# cam! } 54 �%'--' o
1. 7 O 9A i ® J + ❑7 BYPASS STRUCTURE p1 O ,
kJ FL53.00 52.78 . " 53.04 TC53.80 IS) --------v.__ z y
1'-;.,53.00.. O 14 ¢
TC55. ;' ❑ BYPASS STRUCTURE 12 `
ICI L5.0 NV=50.3 TC59.80 I ff ` t ' J_
--- !' y o L g 3 551Q F 5- ' y z 7 a
149w n _ 52 �� -' 54.30 V U }
FE54.3 Og 1 + f2q; 6 9 BYPASS STRUCTURE 4 c�
4v ❑ 0 ¢ z
6 --- - -- -- _ ___ - -_�-- y`
__ _
a _-- , -• •- n--� n---' ' _ _ -- WAS 51RUCT 4 U (} Ltl
e
- -a ` - -•-- CS-�- _ �_-s F !_ _`55� - e._ `+ � � --• z Z � o
o - 6 _ -. =r-'�� BYPASS STRUCTURE W Z_
"S - �' _ _ TC5�56_'!- G55 32 _ w
0 fi5=12SD908kzIj
- FL54. ? {� "-�-- d CA W
- = _ N��, ROA _,2SO®884 4. 2 ` z
-- --- - - INFILTRATION BA.S!
s 08d% --�' ' tk{G SD --� - FLSa:00 ' - ❑ INFL N STORAGE C4 00
- LSY a5 ETA, 3..__------ -- --- �-�----------^--
o ti = "t, a 4f- tN 34'-9 ,� I u -= INV=53. - -- - K Z z w 0O z
^----------- - "r [tr Fist= 5 l3'FG° ` ------------- - - 12 w W z r
" gr _ --- se --ate �_ }'}; ` �- , `- �--' "'p _' �1_.__ �� - �? 13 EA?ERGENCY 5P1LLYiAY AJ1D LfVEi SPREADER N� z
- - _ - --- -- - - - - - - - - - - - - u -- - .� ham w w
< -- -- __ yy
�, h
(Tl-TTT�� GCO[ 0. C [ C91 92i
i GRAPHIC SCALE(S)
car.,t ter,,. hc.
u`
a = { 125119b0
m - -
� � >a[tr 6 ar I6B
} 6 CG101 f
1 2 3 4 5

�' -6 4

NC®ENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
127 Cardinal Drive Extensimi, Wilmington, NC 28405 [phone] FAX [phone]
Request for Express Permit Review
FILL-IN all information below. FAX to Express Coordinator along with a completed
a detailed narrative and vicinity map of the project location. T
Reviewer G �
Submit 2-7
Time it a
Confirm 1- 2q"OS
APPLICANT, Name Carl Baker Title Deputy Public Works Officer
Company Name MCB Camp Leieune
Address 1005 Michael Road City Carnp Le'eune ^ Zip 28542
Phone [phone],13 Fax Email carl,h,[e-mail]
PROJECT: Name .IP.1184 Dining, Facilitat Stone Bay County Onslow
ENGINEER/CONSULTANT INFORMATION:
O Cep
N'a111C K_ .10sI1111 I-3urst. I'.E. Compatly- Clark Nexsell Architecttn'e && ) ngine�
Address 4000 Westchase Blvd. Suite 280 City Raleigh Slate NC Zip 27606
Phone [phone] Fax [phone] Email [e-mail]
-------------------- .------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
❑ SCORING MEETING ONLY DWQ DLR DCM
Other
-------------------------------------- --------------------------.--------------------------------------------------------.-._-----.--------------------..--------------
❑STREAM ORIGIN DETERMINATION # of Stream calls Stream Name
---------------------------- -------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
❑ STORMWATER ❑ Low Density ®Hi h Densit -Detention Pond ❑ High Density- Other
(check all that apply) ❑ Low Density -Curb & Gutter H�hDe sity-Infiltration Off -site
Wetlands MUST be addressed below N ❑ Plan Revision
❑ COASTAL MGT. ❑ Excavation & Fill ❑ Bridges & Culverts ❑ Structures Information ❑ Upland Dev.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------ ----------------------------------------
F] LAND QUALITY ❑ Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan with acres to be disturbed
---------------------- ----------------•---------------------.-.-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WETLANDS (401) Wetlands on Property ? ❑ Yes ❑ No Isolated Wetlands on Property? ❑ Yes ❑ No
(Check all that apply) Wetlands will be impacted? ❑ Yes ❑ No Wetland impacts: acre(s)
Wetlands delineation has been completed? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Buffers impacted; Acre(s)
USACOE Approval of Delineation completed? ❑ Yes ❑ No
404 Application in Process wIUSACOE? ❑ Yes ❑ No I Permit recv'd from USACOE❑Yes ❑ No
401 Application Required? ❑ Yes ❑ No If Yes, ❑ Regular ❑ Express
Additional fees, not to exceed 50% of the original Express Review permit application fee may be charged for
subsequent reviews due to the insufficiency of the permit application.
Total Fee;$. 4.000.00 Stormwater $_4,000,00
CAMA $
LQS $
401 $
Revised 101912007
Date Received
E C E I V E
JAN 2 5 2008
U16

G�
3-3
1 &o
(::�UNP 2 r
C, �
3/a5/Jg
10; 30
ocer„

Project Name: P-1184 Dining Facility at Stone Bay
Stormwater Express Questionnaire (1019/2007)
What is the applicant's full legal name? Carl Baiter
Is the applicant associated with Sole proprietor Corporation ❑ LLC
8 Partnership B Municipality US Govenment
If it's an LLC, is it ❑ Manager -managed or ❑ Member -managed?
UWhat is the applicant's title within the Corp., LLC or Partnership? Deputy Public Works
Officer
Will an agent (someone other than the applicant) be signing the application? ❑ Yes ® No
If Yes, what is the agent's name and title?
(t)Please note the application signature requirements are listed ir7 NCAC 2H.1003 (e). in
summary, only the sole proprietor of a sole proprietorship, the designated manager, member -
manager; president or vice president of a corporation or LLC, the general partner of a
partnership, or a ranking official of a municipality may sign permit applications and supplements.
The signature of the engineer or other agent can be accepted only if accompanied byy a signed
letter of authorization from one of the aforementioned individuals. Corporations, LLC's and
Partnerships most be registered with the NC Secretary of States Office, and be active. Please
mote that spelling, capitalization, and punctuation are extremely important. Please provide the
entity name exactly as on file with the NC Secretary of State.
2 Project Location, County Onslow Nearest Town/City Jacksonville
(Attach a detailed vicinity map with both local street naanes and SR, NC, US or Interstate
highway numbers, plus other relevant information such as town or city names, directions to, etc.
Show the nearest intersection of two major roads on the vicinity map. A major road is any 1, 2 or
3 digit NC, US or interstate highway.)
If the project is located in Brunswick, Onslow, or New Hanover Counties, or a small
portion of northern Pender County, NPDES Phase II Post -Construction rules will apply,
unless a vested development right, as described in the Session Law, can be
demonstrated, which is dated prior to July 1, 2007.
3. Receiving stream name N/A River Basin .New River
What is the classification of the receiving stream? SA
For SA or SR waters, a separate scaled topographic reap will be required. The project must be
accurately located on the wrap and the % mile radius from the property corner closest to the SA
or SR receiving stream must be drawn on the map. If you claim that the project is not within
mile of SA or SR waters, you must conduct a series of chlorides tests to demonstrate that the
chlorides /eve/ at a point in the receiving stream that is at least % mile from the project is less.
than 500 ppm. Samples must be sent to a State certified lab for testing.
4. If the project is high density, what type of stormwater management BMP's are being proposed?
(check all that apply)
Wet Detention Infiltration Trench Infiltration Basin Sand Filter
Bio-retention Wetlands Alternative Offsite
Dry Detention NPDES Phase II Other
How many separate BMP's are being proposed? 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Other
5. Is there offsite runoff from the adjacent properties or public right-of-way that will drain into any of
the proposed BMP's on the project and is not being diverted? [] Yes ® No ❑ NIA
6. Is a road across other property required to access the project? ❑ Yes Z No ❑ NIA
7. Is there any existing development or pre-1988 existing BUA located on the pro erty?
(Please document, delineate and identify on the plans:) © Yes n No ❑ NIA
8. Will the high density project collect all of the proposed BUA? ® Yes rJAN
oc [] N1A V E
Page 1 of 3Revised 10/9/2007 2 5 2008 �f
DWQ
P}IOJ #

Project Name: P-1184 Dining Facility at Stone Bay
(If not, attach a separate explanation sheet)
Will the project involve the subdivision and sale of property? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NIA
Is the subdivision ❑ residential or ❑ commercial?
How many lots are proposed? NIA
(Deed restrictions are required for all residential, commercial, low density or high density sub-
divisions. Specific language for, the various types of subdivisions is available from DDENR,)
10. Will the plans show all delineated wetlands? 23 Yes ❑ No ❑ NIA
(All projects require either a signed wetlands delineation map or a wetlands repot to be
submitted with the application. Only a trained.professional may provide information regarding
the presence or absence of wetlands.)
11. Are wet detention ponds or other engineered controls proposed to be located adjacent
wetlands? ® Yes No ❑ NIA
(if, yes, a physical means to prevent the dewatering of the wetland must be provided, or the
SHWT must be provided to demonstrate that the permanent pool of the BMP is above the
SHWT and will not dewater the wetlands over time. Where possible, all BMP's and swales
should outlet into back the wetland (with level spreaders).
12. For infiltration projects, a site visit must be completed with the DENR soils scientist to verify the
soil type, water table and infiltration rate provided in the soils report.
What is/was the scheduled site visit date? NIA
(Include a copy of the consultant's soil report with the application.)
13. Level Spreaders are required at the outlet of all engineered controls and swales prior to entering
surface waters or wetlands. Will the plans reflect level spreaders? ® Yes ❑ No ❑ NIA
(The purpose of the level spreader is to reduce the energy of the incorning runoff and to
promote diffuse sheet flow to prevent erosion and scour into the receiving waters or' wetlands.)
14. Is this project A modification to an existing permit NIA
A lot that will be treated in an existing, previously permitted BMP? NIA
What is the name of the existing permitted facility? NIA
What is the permit number of the existing permitted facility? SW8 NIA
Is the permitted facility in compliance with its permit? Yes No NIA
Have the deed restrictions been recorded? Yes No NIA
Have the deed restrictions been submitted? Yes No NIA
Has the Designer's Certification been submitted? Yes No NIA
15. Do the plans reflect all information in 15A NCAC 2H.1003 (g)? ® Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A
16. Will all of the design requirements for each proposed BMP be met? ® Yes ❑ No ❑ NIA
(If not, attach a separate explanation sheet. Please note that the Express program is not set up
to handle any type of deviation from the standard design.)
17. For each BMP in all high density projects, and low density curb outlet swale projects, the
individual drainage area for each proposed BMP must be clearly delineated. Shown in drainage
area map
18. Any revisions made to the application as a result of this review may cause changes to the other
documentation. Plans, calculations, application, and supplements should be reviewed for any
necessary changes. For example, changing the orifice size will require a modification to the
calculations, the pond details on the plans, and page 1 of the supplement.
19. IS THE PROJECT DESIGNED AND THE APPLICATION READY TO SUBMIT? 0 Yes ❑ No
Page 2 of 3
Revised 10/9/2007

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0
PROJECT INFORMATION ........................................................ ................................... l
1.1
llx)Lc[l0CATzomANDsx/15ozCCONDITION »............... —...... ............... .......... ............ |
1.2
Pwxr[l)i-,;scmMooN1 -----------------------------------}
1.3
CSoTLCuNlCA|.|svGxT/GAo(xn.............................................................. ............ .............. 2
DESIGNAPPROACH
.................................................................................................................. 2
1A
SlrxMm 0xA|NxGE,l)|nmC .................. ................. ......................... .....................................
2.0
WXrIIDL QUALITY ANALYSIS ....................................................................................... 3
2.1
V7E3DETENTION POND DESIGN .......................................................................................... 3
2.2
W4`rnx()Va/or............................ —..................................... --............. 3
10
WATER QUANTITY 8NAl.yMS................................................................................... 4
3.1
CONDITIONS .......... ....... ...................... .......... .................................. 4
9.2
yoSrosvELoruENTCONDITIONS ....................................................................................... 4
APPENDIX A: VICINITY MAPS
APPENDlXB: EXPRESS COVER SHE E7
�� � ���~
��u"
� � .
� �
0l\ �A�� � � �nR�
u ° - -'
. D\NO
9RDJ#________

P-1184 Dining Facility at Stone Bay NC 481.4
S10111M'fItCr \M_111 VU C1nrk®Ncssai
1.0 PROJECT INFORMATION
1.1 PROJE1 CT LOCATION AND EXISTING CONDITIONS
The project sire of 13-1184 is located on the east sick of Riflc Range Roach approzinuitely 300 feet.
north of Booker '1.'. Washington Road ill the Stolle Bay Area of Cramp i..ejeune. The site is
approxi iia:ely 7.6 acres and eight: percent impervious, consisting of five residential tit lits and
:associated imp.rovctnents and latidscaping. The land is ,vooclecl to cite cast of the residcnrial are,:
bginning 200 to 300 feet case: of Rifle Range Road. The ground is cclatively flat and is sloping
generally to the exist at less than two percent. The ground within the woodcd area slopes at
approximately three percent towards a tributary of the \tew River. Overhead and ttnclerground
power. and communication lines and all uiWerground steam title tun ill the -north -south dircCti011
through the center of the site. A 6 inch water line, a roadside ditch and aii 8 inch sanitary saver
line .tun along the cast side of Rifle Range Road.
1.2 P1zajtlCT ll1:5cRII'TION
Site work will include the construction of a dining facility and associated site improvements. A
parking lot with '160 spaces will be provided on the South side of the dining facility and will be
accessed by two etitrance driveways from Rifle Range Road, Service access will be provided
through a Separate north ent.rance from Rifle Range Road to the loading clock on the re�ir side of
the building. Access to the loading area will be restricted by a swing gate. The gate xvill lac
located So that a truck is able to pull up to the swing gate without interfering with the rlprtnal
opetation of Rifle Mange Road, .I.iicycic, handicap, energy efficient vehicle '111d fast food pick-up
parking will be located closest to the south side of the building. .A nliriintunl anti-WTroliSill anti
fence protection setback of 82 feet will be p1ovidccl between roads and parking areas except in
the loading; area where controlled access will be provided. Sidewalks will be provided for
pcdcstrian t:ltculatiotl bct.weCn the parkilig area and t.hc building.
Tlie drainage area nlap and drainage area calculation indicate that the total dndnngc.arc•a for ncc
post Cleve loptilcnt condition is 7.63 acres. The post development- conditions are 56°/n
impervious with an itnperviacls area of 3.21 acres, and n Pen-ious area of 4.42 acres. '1.'he
drainage area inap and drainage area calculation indicate that the total drainage area fol: the
D E C E t V E D
1 ,TAN 2 5 2008
DWO
pROJ #

P-1184 Dining Facility at Stone Bay
Sturntn':atcr Narrntive
NC4s1,4
Clark*Nexsen
prcdevcloprnent condition A 7A 3 acres. The predevelopment conWizions are BA016 impervious.
with an impervious area of 164 acres, and a pervious area of 6.99 acres.
The project site has two outfall indicated in etc drainage area maps. Sixteen percent of the site
drains west to a roadside ditch along Rifle Rangc Road. The rest of the site drains east t mmnls
the Nvetlands. The preclevelopnient and host development drainage area naps are included in
Appendix A.
1.3 GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION
Gcotcchnical investigation was perf61:111cd by, 1'rigoti 11"'ul;inecrinl; Consultants, Inc. A copy of
the Gcotcchtucal report is included in Appendix D.
DESIGN APPROACH
1.4 S,roizm DRAINAGE PIPING
Pertn;anent storm drainage piping systems are designed for a 10--year Storni event using the
RaliOlaal Method for rainfall analysis. Rainfall intetasit5-- values were taken From the N0AA
website. Runoff coefficients are based on the following ValaieS:
Deicription
Runoff Coefficient, C
Paved and Roof Areas
000
Undisturbed areas and Lawns
OAS
Using 1-laestad StormCAD version 5.5, the post development storm water collection system
comprised of existing and proposed pipes :and structurcS was modeled. An analysis of the
hydraulic grade litre for the 10-y ear design rainfall event: found the existing and proposed
smuctores' rim elevations to be.. above the xvatcc level. ',;cc-. Appendix A for detailed information
of to rimlysis.
* he proposed system of pipes and inlets will collect storm water runoff from roof runoff, a
portion of be parking area and some lawn areas. The proposed collection system will outfall
into a sediment forebay and into a wet detention pout]. Oissite storm piping will be reinforced
concrete pipe .For the nui€i storm line. Storrn drainage calculation slicers arc included in
Appendix B.
0)

P-1184 Dining Facility at Stone Ray NC481.4
Storimvater Nanralive ClarkO,\'esse;r
Tlie dining facility will have roof drains. Roof runoff will be collected by roof laterals and roof
drain train lllleS. File llllntmum size of the roof laterals will be 6 incites and the collectet pipes
will be 12 inches.
2.0 WATER QUALITY ANALYSIS
l
l'hc calculation of wet cictenticm pond area is based on the North Carolina Depluxmcnt of
hnviroltntent and Natural Resources (1C:Dh.NR), Stonnwmcr Best: -M-nnagcment Practices
(13NIP) Nfanual, September, 2007. According to the manual, the design approach is based on
Driscoll's model (US EPA, 1986) to determine the appi-optiatc: surface area of the Permanent.
pool for: wet detention basins to achieve the requited TSS removal rate. Ali average depth of 3
feet was selected from 'fable 10-2 of the manual. "file irllPervicnls atea is 2.30 acres atld the
drainage area is 3.52 acres. The percent impervious cover of 65,3% was used to find a requited
surface area of 8,310 W. A surface area of 10,565 ft- is available at the Permanent pool elevation
of -15 feet. 13ecnuse the 85% TSS removal table was used, discharge to a 30-foot vegetated filter:
to mininmc erosion is Provided, 5
2.1 Wor DL:TLNTION POND DESIGN
The design of the wet Pond anti the scclitncrlt forebmrs were determilled front Chaptet 'l0 of the
NCIDI--.NR Stormwater B-IMP N rinu,al. The wet detention Pond has vegetated side slopes of 3:1,
has a 10-foot wick vegetated shelf al: the permanent Pool elevations, w}lrch is 6 uiclies below and
6 inches above the Permanent pool elevation, and has a length -to -width ratio of apptoaimately
2:1 to Prevent short-circuiting. The sediment storaage level of the pond is at'2-foot deep, v.?hich
tis appcosinlatcly 25%.of the total storage volume in dic permanent Pool.
Ttic two sediment forcbays ;recount foe: approsilnately 21.6% of the total calculated pool
volulllc. Seditllenl: storage in each forebay is at 1-foot deep, with a pool clev,rtion of 3-foot.
deep. Phis sediment storage ;recounts for appro�itnately 25% of the total storage volume in the
Pei orient pool. Side slopes of tllc sediiilent forebays are 2:1.
2.2 WATER QUALITYCALCULATIONS
According to the NC1-)V:N1k Design Guide, the stormwater Ueltnlc;rlt systeluls should be
designed to remove 80 Percent of the average annual post clevelopment tota Ds ncl6d tulids V E
[C�i G l
3 J,AN 2 5 200$
DWO
PROD #F — -

P-1184 Dining Facility at Stone Bay
Stormu•ater Narrative
NC481.4
CaarkoNexsen
('f'SS), and 40 percent of the average annual post development total phospllotus (IT), b)'
implememing Bcst'Management Practices (BIMP's).
The use of grassed swales, Sediment forebny mid wet detention pond will be used for the
stot mwater best management: practices. The assumed 'total Suspended Solids ('1'SS) was 85%
TSS removal faar wat detention panel and 35%`1'SS removal for grassed swales. r1 copy of die of
the TSS removal efficiencies is included in Appendix C.
3.0 WATER QUANTITY ANALYSIS
The stormwater basin routing .vas performccl using the triangular hydrograpli storage estimation
tnethod in the l-lydrotlow Hydrographs 2002 computer program. The analysis indicates that the
total site post development: condition peak runoff for the 2-}-ear, 10-y-ear and 100-ycar design
Storms is less than the predevelopment condition.
3.1 PREDE'VL:LOPMENT CONDITIONS
The (oral development. arca is 7.63 acres. Tlzc majorit), of the site, 6.43 acres, drains to the
%vctlalid area to the cast. whilc the remaining -1.20 acres chair( to all costing roadside ditch to t]ie
west. Both sub areas ultitnatCIV drain to the New Rivet. The table below sunimari7.cs the
prcdcvclopment conditions peak runoff
Predevelopment Condition l'eelc Runoff Stttnmaty
2-year Peale
Runoff (cfs)
10-year Peale
Runoff (cfs)
100-year Peak
Runoff (cfs)
Area to the Last
5.45
7.90
9.46
Area to the West
1.56
2.28
2.73
Total Existing Condition
6.87
10.05
'11.96
3.2 13Os'1' DE VELOPAIEN'1' COND1'FIONS
E C E I V K II —M*�,1
r'
aWa
PROJ' #

P-1184 Dining Facility at stone Bay
Sionmvater Narrative
NC481.4
ClukONe\-;cn
'['he I11S1ority of the post development site continues to dtaiii east to the wetland area, 3,50 acres -
chain to the proposed detention pond and 2.66 acres dawn overland. The remaining; 1.47 acres
drain to ail existing roadside ditch to the west.
':I'he tempuraq storage volume, above the puman .ent pool elevation of the proposcd .vet pond
will be used to attctluate the post development peak runoff. The proposed riser ])OX consists of a
2.5" orifice set: ,ll: the perin;ment pool elevation of 45 FT to provide the t:ecluired 48 hOUr draw
down of the temporary clesig;n volume. A 2-foot \vcir is set at the '10-year design elevation 46.73
FT :tad the top of the structure, which will act as the crllergacttcy spillway, is set at elevation
47.50 FL The 100-}I w,iter surface in the basin is 46.95, which provides approximately 1.50 feet
of freeboard ro the top of the basin, elevation 18.50 FT. Details cite provided on the plaits and
the orifice sizing and basin routing? calculations ,ire provided in Appendix C.
Hie table beli>\V Sll[11111ar1ZeS the post dcvctopmenr conditions beak runoff.
Post development Condition Peak Runoff Summary
2-year Peak
Runoff (cfs)
10-year Peak
Runoff (cfs)
100-year Peale
Runoff (Cfs)
Area to the East (basin inflow)
10.72
15,13
16.57
Area to the Last (basin outflow)
0.14
0.19
0.67
Area to the East (undetained)
1.61
2.35
2.79
Area to the Last (overiatid)
1.34
1.95
2.30
Area to the Last (Total)
2.88
421
4.99
Area to the West
2.27
3.31
3.92
Total Post Developmelit Condition
5.13
7.50
8.88
E C E t V E
JAN 2 5 2 i8
owo
PROJ A _— _.---w•...-•

P-1184 pining Facility at Stone Bay
tiU�rm\cater �il[Tati\'C
NC481.4
Clark*Nexsei(
Flic analysis shoxvs a slight increase in post development runoff to the existing roadside dit:Ch
west of the dcvclopnient. T4C nnalysis also shmvs a decrease 'Hi post development runoff t:o the
east, this results ill a net reduction in Bost development runoff foe die entire site. The table
bclo-v SUmmarizes the total predeveloptnclit and post development runoff for the Project.
2-year Peak
Runoff (cfs)
10-year Peak
Runoff (cfs)
100-year Peak
Runoff (cfs)
Total ]'redevelopment Runoff
6.87
10.05
11.96
Total Post development Runoff
5.13
7.50
8.88
Net Difference in Runoff
-1.74
-2.55
-3.08
G

C Ut
j%1 •11 � E)J�,
{ m
�� N
1 t �
`�j� I F T
�Y�1
I'I ■�V{�C 1
}C I.t�
? Y '4 1
[
SITE
',;
.,s
Y � - a L X 1 T V I s 1� .•. r'� i3 [ S� ,C{, ;
'
Z } rU1 s
s
. LOCATION MAP
`�I SCALE: U mile = 1'-0"
�
r
Jt
1K411
'
VICINITY MAP
SCALE: 0.5 mile 1'-0"
6160 KEMPSVILLE CIRCLE101
Pkz
NORFOLK, VIRGINIA 23502
757-455.58DO VAX 757,455 5-
WWW.CI.Aft1 ND(SEN.COM Architecture & Eneineerina

FW: Exlwess Request - Dining Facility at Stone Bay
Subject: FW: Express Request - Dining Facility at Stone Bay
From: "Joshua Hurst" <[e-mail]>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 16:29:08 -0500
'1'o: "Janet Russell" <[e-mail]>
Janet,
As discussed, here is the original Express Request form for a Stormwater Permit for the Stone Bay
Dining Facility. Please let me know if you need additional information for scheduling a submittal
meeting.
Thank you,
Josh
K. Joshua Hurst, P.E., PTOE
CLARK NEXSEN
Architects & Engineers
4000 Westchase Boulevard, Suite 280
Raleigh, NC 27607
ph 919.828.1876 x308
fax [phone]
www.clarknexsen.com
[e-mail]
`-----Original Message -----
From: Christopher H. Small
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2007 2:53 PM
To: 'Cameron Weaver'
Cc: Joshua Hurst
Subject: Express Request - Dining Facility at Stone Bay
Cameron,
Attached is a .pdf containing all the necessary files (cover sheet, questionnaire, narrative, and vicinity
map) to request Express review for Stormwater Permit. Please contact either myself or Josh Hurst if
you need any other information to schedule this facility for Stormwater review. Thanks again for your
time.
<<SW Express App Forms.pdf>>
Christopher H. Small, El
4000 Westchase Blvd., Suite 280
Raleigh, NC 27607
csmall(c-)clarknexsen. com
Ph: 919-828-1876 ext. 246
Fax: [phone]
E C E I V D
AN 2 5 20
(M)
PROD #
l of 2 1/28/2008 9:09 AM

F?W: 17r#itess R,quest - DiPing Facility at Stone Bay
IMPORTANT NOTICE: This message (including any attachments) may
be privileged and/or confidential and intended solely for the use of the
individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received
this e-mail in error please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete
this message from your system. Any unauthorized use or dissemination
of this message or the attachments in whole or in part is strictly prohibited.
Any views expressed in this e-mail are those of the individual sender,
except where the sender specifies and with authority, states them to be
the views of Clark Nexsen, Architecture & Engineering.
Content -Description: SW Express App Fornis.pdf
SW Express App vorms.pdf Content -Type: application/octet-stream
Content -Encoding: base64
2 of 2 1/28/2008 9:09 AM

RE: Diiiiiig Facility a Slone [lay
Subject- RE: Dining Facility @ Stone Bay
From: "Joshua Hurst" <[e-mail]>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 12:09:35 -0500
I'o: ".Janet Russell" <Janet.Russel ]@ncmail.net>
CC: "Baker CIV Carl H" <[e-mail]>, "Christopher H. Small"
<csmal [e-mail]>
Janet,
Thanks for your email. Here are the answers to questions 1-4:
1. Yes, four (4) infiltration systems are proposed.
2. Yes, all runoff is being captured and treated by a stormwater
treatment measure.
3. Yes, we are within 0.5 miles of SA waters, which has been confirmed
by Joanne Steenhuis with DWQ.
4. Yes, all four systems are designed to handle the 1.5" runoff as
required.
Please let me know,if you need any additional information on any of
this.
Thanks.,
Josh
K. Joshua"Hurst, P.E., PTOE
CLARK NEXSEN
Architects & Engineers
4000 westchase Boulevard, Suite 280
Raleigh, NC 27607
ph 919.828.1876 x308
fax [phone]
www.clarknexsen.com
[e-mail]
-----Original Message -----
From: Janet Russell[mailto:Janet.Russell @ncmai1.net]
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 11:30 AM
To: Joshua Hurst; Baker CIV Carl H
Subject: Dining Facility @ Stone Bay
Dining Facility @ Stone Say
January 28, 200E
Gentlemen:
The Express Permitting Group is in receipt of the Request for an Express
Stormwater submittal for the above -referenced project. The email with
the Request indicates that the original Request information has been
resubmitted. Please clarify the following points:
1. Is a Stormwater infiltration System being proposed? Are there any
other measures besides 1 wet detention pond being proposed?
2. Is all runoff being captured in a stormwater treatment measure?
3. Is this project with 1/2 mile of SA Waters?
4. Has the stormwater treatment system been designed to handle 1 1/211
1 of 2 1128/2008 12:29 PNI

RE: Diiiiiig Faoility @ Stgne Bay
runoff with pre / post SW design considerations as required under the
federal Phase IT Stormwater Rules? See the *Session Law* Attachment,
pages 13, 14, 15 etc.
Please review the *September, 2007* revision to the wet detention design
requirements. I am attaching an attachment called "submittal
requirements". Contained therein is a link to the *BMP Manual *which
contains the new stormwater application, supplement sheets, maintenance
agreements, information checklist, etc. The cross-section of a standard
pond has changed. Please review this current information.
I am holding off on scheduling this submittal until I hear back from
you.
Thanks,
Janet Russell
Express Permitting
IMPORTANT NOTICE: This message (including any attachments) may
be privileged and/or confidential and intended solely for the use of the
individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received
this e-mail in error please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete
this message from your system. Any unauthorized use or dissemination
of this message or the attachments in whole or in part is strictly prohibited.
Any views expressed in this e-mail are those of the individual sender,
except where the sender specifies and with authority, states them to be
the views of Clark Nexsen, Architecture & Engineering.
2 of 2 1/28/2008 12:29 PM

about:blank
P 1184 Dining Facility @ Stone Bay
January 28, 2008
Gentlemen:
The Express Stormwater submittal meeting for the above -referenced project has been scheduled with
Christine Nelson on February 7, 2008 at 10:00 AM here in the Wilmington Regional Office. Mr.
Carl Baker or his representative must attend the meeting.
I have attached submittal requirements for your review.
Please respond within 2 business days to confirm and reserve the submittal meeting date.
Thanks,
Janet Russell
Express Permitting
of 1 1/28/2008 6:08 PM

R.1 : 11i'184 aitying Facility rr Stone Bay
Subject: RE: P1184 Dining Facility @ Stone Bay
From: "Baker GS 14 Carl H" <carLh.baker a usmc.mil>
Date: 'rue, 29 Jan 2008 12:21:12 -0500
To: "Janet Russell" <Janet.Russel l@ncmaiLnet>, <[e-mail]>
A Camp Lejeune representative will att the meeting.
Carl
-----Original Message -----
From: Janet Russell [mailto:Janet. Russel l@ncmaiLnet]
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 18:09
To: Baker GS14 Carl H; [e-mail]
Subject: P1184 Dining Facility ® Stone Bay
*P 1184 Dining Facility @1 Stone Bay *
January 28, 2008
Gentlemen:
The Express Stormwater submittal meeting for the above -referenced project
has been scheduled with *Christine Nelson on February 7, 2008 at 10:00 AM
Here in the Wilmington Regional Office. Mr. Carl. Baker or his
representative must attend the meeting.
i have attached submittal requirements for your review.
Please respond within 2 business days to confirm and reserve the submittal
meeting date.
Thanks,
Janet Russell
Express Permitting
1 of 1 1/30/2008 11:14 AM

RP: PI'1134 Dining Facility @ Stone Bay
Subject: RE: P1184 Dining Facility @ Stone Bay
From: "Joshua Hurst" <[e-mail]>
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 13:00:54 -0500
To: "Janet Russell" <Janet.Russel [e-mail]>
CC: "Baker C1V Carl H" <[e-mail]>, "Christopher H. Small"
<[e-mail]>, "Terry A. Riley" <[e-mail]>, "Neil W. Sauer"
<[e-mail]>, "Terri S. Hall" <[e-mail]>
Janet,
Clark Nexsen will also be in attendance next Thursday. Thank you for
scheduling this.
Josh
-----Original Message -----
From: Janet Russell[mailto:[e-mail]
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 6:09 PM
To: Baker CIV Carl H; Joshua Hurst
Subject: P1184 Dining Facility @ Stone Bay
*P 1184 pining Facility Q Stone Bay
January 28, 2008
Gentlemen:
The Express Stormwater submittal meeting for the above -referenced
project has been scheduled with *Christine Nelson on February 7, 2008 at
10:00 AM* here in the Wilmington Regional Office. ,Mr. Carl Baker or
his representative must attend the meeting.
I have attached submittal requirements for your review.
Please respond within 2 business days to confirm and reserve the
submittal meeting date.
Thanks,
Janet Russell
Express Permitting
IMPORTANT NOTICE: This message (including any attachments) may .
be privileged and/or confidential and intended solely for the use of the
individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received
this e-mail in error please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete
this message from your system. Any unauthorized use or dissemination
of this message or the attachments in whole or in part is strictly prohibited.
Any views expressed in this e-mail are those of the individual sender,
except where the sender specifies and with authority, states them to be
the views of Clark Nexsen, Architecture & Engineering.
1 of 1 1/30/2008 1 1:14 AM

4t
I

i
v
rr,CID
j