20210456 Ver 1_ePCN Application_20210407

Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions
ACTION ID #: SAW- Begin Date (Date Received):
Prepare file folder ❑ Assign Action ID Number in ORM n
1. Project Name [PCN Form A2a]: WNC6 Fayetteville
2. Work Type: ❑Private ❑Institutional ❑Government ❑ Commercial
3. Project Description / Purpose [PCN Form B3d and B3e]:
NC Fayetteville Fort Worth, LLC proposes the renovation of an existing building along with a parking lot expansion on an
approximately 17-acre property located at 1005 Dunn Rd in Fayetteville, Cumberland County, NC (Figure 1).
4. Property Owner / Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A4]: NC Fayetteville Fort Worth, LLC
5. Agent / Consultant [PNC Form A5 — or ORM Consultant ID Number]:
Chris Tinklenberg, PWS (Kimley-Horn)
6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form B5b]:
7. Project Location — Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description [PCN Form Blb]:
The project is located at 1005 Dunn Road in Fayetteville, Cumberland County, NC. Project
Coordinates (decimal degrees): 35.061367 N,-78.840402 W
8. Project Location — Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form Bla]: 0447-76-8931
9. Project Location — County [PCN Form A2b]: Cumberland
10. Project Location — Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]: Fayetteville
11. Project Information — Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form B2a]: Locks Creek
12. Watershed / 8-Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form B2c]: Upper Cape Fear (03030004)
Authorization: Section 10 ❑ Section 404 ❑ Section 10 and 404 ❑
Regulatory Action Type:
0 Standard Permit
✓ Nationwide Permit #39
Regional General Permit #
✓ Jurisdictional Determination Request
Pre -Application Request
R
FlUnauthorized Activity
Compliance
No Permit Required
Revised 20150602

DWR
Division of Water Resources
Initial Review
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
April 4, 2021 Ver 4
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
6 Yes
✓ No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
C Yes ( No
Change Only 1 needed.
BIMS # Assigned*
20210456
Is a payment required for this project?*
✓ No payment required
✓ Fee received
6 Fee needed - send electronic notification
Reviewing Office *
Fayetteville Regional Office - [phone]
Information for Initial Review
la. Name of project:
WNC6 Fayetteville Site
la. Who is the Primary Contact?*
NC Fayetteville Fort Worth, LLC
Version#*
What amout is owed?*
r $240.00
6 $570.00
Select Project Reviewer*
Chad Turlington:eads\ccturlington
lb. Primary Contact Email:* lc. Primary Contact Phone:*
[e-mail]
Date Submitted
4/7/2021
Nearest Body of Water
Locks Creek
Basin
Cape Fear
Water Classification
C
Site Coordinates
Latitude:
35.061367
A. Processing Information
[phone]
Longitude:
-78.840402
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Cumberland
Is this a NCDMS Project
✓ Yes G No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
✓ Yes 6. No
Pre -Filing Meeting Information
Is this a courtesy copy notification?*
✓ Yes f• No

ID#
20210456
Version
1
Pre -fling Meeting or Request Date*
2/26/2021
Attach documentation of Pre -Filing Meeting Request here:*
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
DWR Pre -Filing Meeting Request Form.pdf
Fle type must be R:F
la. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
fJ Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
r Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
Has this PCN previously been submitted?*
✓ Yes
✓ No
1b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
7 Nationwide Permit (NWP)
I— Regional General Permit (RGP)
I— Standard (IP)
lc. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
✓ Yes r No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number: 39 - Commercial/Institutional Developments
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
Id. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
17 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
I— Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
I— Individual 401 Water Quality Certification
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
If. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
✓ Yes f No
52.01 KB
I— 401 Water Quality Certification - Express
I— Riparian Buffer Authorization
lg. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
(: Yes r No
lg. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
✓ Yes rNo
Acceptance Letter Attachment
12bWNC6 Fayetteville DMS Acceptance letter.pdf 436.16KB
1h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
✓ Yes r: No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
✓ Yes (7 No
B. Applicant Information
Id. Who is applying for the permit?
fJ Owner r Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?*
s Yes r No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
NC Fayetteville Fort Worth, LLC
✓ Yesr No
✓ Yes 6 No
2b. Deed book and page no.:

2c. Contact Person:
Eric Jackson
2d.Address
Street Address
201 Riverplace
Address Line 2
Suite 400
aty
Greenville
Postal / Zip aide
29601
2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:
Chris Tinklenberg, PWS
4b. Business Name:
Kimley-Horn and Associates
4c.Address
Street Address
200 South Tryon St
Address Line 2
Suite 200
Ca),
Charlotte
Postal / Zip Code
28202
4d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
4f. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
Agent Authorization Letter*
04a_Signed Agent Authorization.pdf
State / Bovine / Region
SC
Country
USA
2f. Fax Number:
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
4e. Fax Number:
63.61 KB
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Project Information
1b. Subdivision name:
(d appropriate)
lc. Nearest municipality/ town:
Fayetteville
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
0447-76-8931
2b. Property size:
17
2c. Project Address
Street Address
1005 Dunn Road
Address Line 2
a ly State / Rovince / Region
Fayetteville NC
Postal / Zlp Code Oountry
28312 USA
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:*
Locks Creek

3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:*
C
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Cape Fear
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030300040705
4. Project Description and History
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:*
The site is located at 1005 Dunn Road in Fayetteville, NC. The site is currently comprised of an existing warehouse building,
associated parking area, maintained grassy area, and two streams. The site is surrounded by 1-95, forested land, and
commercial and industrial businesses.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
✓ Yes F No r Unknown
4d. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of the project site. (for DWR)
Fig2_WNC6_Fayetteville_USGS Topo Map.pdf 1.02MB
4e. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey map depicting the project site. (for DWR)
Fig3_WNC6_Fayetteville_SSURGO.pdf 2.62MB
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0.27
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
1,961
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:*
The WNC6 Fayetteville Site is a proposed 17-acre commercial development located in Fayetteville, Cumberland County,
NC. The project proposes renovating the existing building to serve as a distribution center. Along with the renovation, the
site will be developed to provide line haul truck docking and parking, associate parking, box truck parking, van parking
and van queuing. The site will be brought into compliance with both state and local regulations for zoning, landscaping,
and stormwater.
4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:*
The project proposes renovating an existing warehouse to serve as a distribution center. Additional development on -site
includes the necessary parking and infrastructure improvements to serve the site. Permanent impacts include 466 LF
(0.043-ac) to Stream 1 and 0.017-ac to Wetland 1. General construction equipment includes, but are not limited to,
bulldozers, excavators, front-end loaders, etc. will be used for construction purposes.
4j. Please upload project drawings for the proposed project.
10a_ LOD E thibit.pdf 1.57MB
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
✓ Yes
Comments:
AJD is included in this submittal
r No O Unknown
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
✓ Preliminary r Approved G Not Verified r Unknown r N/A
Corps AID Number:
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
Kimley-Horn and Associates
5d1. Jurisdictional determination upload
05a_WNC6 Fayetteville_USACE_FINALSAW JD REQUEST FORM.pdf
05b_WNC6_NWPR AJD Form.pdf
01_WNC6 Fayetteville_ORM Data Entry Fields for NewActions_.pdf
6. Future Project Plans
336.37KB
110.67KB
209.62KB
6a. Is this a phased project?*
✓ Yes f•' No

Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
la. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
17 Wetlands fJ Streams -tributaries
r Open Waters r Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
r Buffers
2a. Site #*(?)
Impact 1
2a1 Reason (?)
Fill
2b. Impact type * (?)
P
2c. Type of W.*
Headwater Forest
2d. W. name*
W1
2e. Forested*
Yes
2f. Type of
Ju risdicition * (. )
Both
2g. Impact
area
0.017
(acres)
2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact
0.000
2g. Total Wetland Impact
0.017
2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0.017
2i. Comments:
The project proposes renovating an existing building and developing an associated parking lot. Authorization is requested under NWP 39 for stream
and wetland impacts associated with grading activities necessary to construct the parking lot expansion. The proposed project will result in 0.017-ac of
permanent impacts to Wetland 1.
3. Stream Impacts
S1
3a. Reason for impact (?)
Impact 2
3b.lmpact type*
Permanent
3c. Type of impact*
Fill
3d. S. name*
S1 - UT to Locks Creek
3e. Stream Type*
(?)
Perennial
3f. Type of
Jurisdiction*
Both
3g. S. width*
4
Average (feet)
3h. lmpact
length*
466
(linear feet)
3i. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0
3i. Total permanent stream impacts:
466
3i. Total stream and ditch impacts:
466
3i. Total temporary stream impacts:
0
3j. Comments:
The project proposes renovating an epsting building and developing an associated parking lot. Authorization is requested under NWP 39 for stream
and wetland impacts associated with grading activities necessary to construct the parking lot expansion.
The proposed project will result in 466 LF / 0.043-ac of permanent impacts to Stream 1.
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
u
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
Unavoidable impacts to Stream 1 and Wetland 1 are necessary to accomplish the purpose and goals of the project. Stream mitigation credits will be
purchased to offset the permanent impacts necessary for this project. As a final leg delivery station, appropriate vehicle mobility and vehicle storage is
required for the site. This limits the ability to compress the spacing between site features such as drive aisles, parking spaces, and sidewalks and still
transition grades throughout the site, provide stormwater control measures, and completely avoid impacts to streams and wetlands. Retaining walls
have been provided on site to completely avoid impacts to the stream on the western side of the site (S2) and minimize the overall impact.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
Stormwater facilities are sized and positioned to minimize impacts to the greatest extents practicable. Temporary erosion control measures, including
but not limited to skimmer basins and silt fence, will be implemented to minimize sediment laden runoff from exiting the site.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
( Yes r No
2c. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
r DWR 17 Corps

2d. If yes, which mitigation option(s) will be used for this project?
r Mitigation bank 17 Payment to in -lieu fee r Permittee Responsible
program Mitigation
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
F Yes C No
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
(linear feet)
816
4c. If using stream mitigation, what is the stream temperature:
warm
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWR only): 4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
(square feet) (acres)
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested: 4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
(acres) (acres)
4h. Comments
Compensatory mitigation will be met by the purchase of credits through the NC Division of Mitigation Services (NCDMS) in -lieu fee program. 466 LF of
stream impacts will be mitigated through the purchase of stream mitigation credits. Based on an NCSAM assessment of Medium for Stream 1 mitigation
is proposed at a 1.75:1 ratio for impacts to these features, or 816 stream mitigation credits. In total, 816 stream mitigation credits will be purchased
from NCDMS to offset impacts associated with this project. A copy of the NCSAM form and the NCDMS In -Lieu Fee Acceptance Letter is attached.
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
CYes rNo
If no, explain why:
The project does not include / is not adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?*
C Yes f No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
C Yes 6 No
2c. Does this project have a stormwater management plan (SMP) reviewed and approved under a state stormwater program or state -approved local government stormwater
program?
6' Yes
C N/A - project disturbs < 1 acre
2d. Which of the following stormwater management program(s) apply:
I7 Local Government I— State
Local Government Stormwater Programs
17 Phase II I— NSW I— USMP I— Water Supply
Please identify which local government stormwater program you are using.
City of Fayetteville
C No
Comments:
The proposed stormwater management and erosion control measures have been sized and designed using methods prescribed
by the City of Fayetteville and NCDEQ resources. One proposed wet pond will be utilized as a water quantity and quality SCM.
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*
CYes FNo
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15ANCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?*
CYes 6-No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)

3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
✓ Yes r: No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
No additional or cumulative impacts are anticipated due to the construction of the proposed project.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
✓ Yes rNor N/A
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
✓ Yes f No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
✓ Yes C No
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Raleigh
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
✓ Yes
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
✓ Yes ('No
F No r Unknown
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
✓ Yes r: No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
✓ Yes ('No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
✓ Yes r: No
5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
✓ Yes ('No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
A review of the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) database on March 29, 2021, did not indicate known occurrences of threatened or
endangered species within the project boundary. Additionally, pedestrian surveys conducted by Kimley-Horn on February 23, 2021, did not identify
potentially suitable habitat for or occurrences of protected species within the property boundary. A concurrence request letter was submitted to the
USFWS on March 30, 2021. At the time of this report a response has not been received. A copy of the request is attached.
Consultation Documentation Upload
11a_20210330_WNC6 Fayetteville_USFWS Request.pdf 6.73MB
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
✓ Yes r No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
NCNHP element occurrence database did not indicate the presence of EFH within the project boundary.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
✓ Yes f No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
Kimley-Horn consulted the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) HPOWEB GIS service on March 29, 2021. No documented
architectural, historic, or archaeological sites of significance within the project boundary were identified. A request letter was submitted to SHPO to
determine the presence of archeological, cultural, or historic resources on March 30, 2021. At the time of the report, a response has not been
received. A copy of the request is attached.
7c. Historic or Prehistoric Information Upload
11b_20210330_WNC6 Fayetteville_SHPO Request.pdf 3.59MB
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?*
6'Yes rNo
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMArequirements:

A floodplain development permit and No-Rise/No-Impact certification will be submitted to satisfy the City of Fayetteville permitting requirements for a
floodplain development permit.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
FIRM Panel 3720044700K
Miscellaneous
Comments
An AJD is included in this request
Miscellaneous attachments not previously requested.
_20210406_WNC6 Fayetteville_AJD_NWP39.pdf 31.46MB
Signature
*
CJ By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief; and
• The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401 certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act');
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Chris Tinklenberg
Signature
Date
4/7/2021

ROY COOPER
Governor
DIONNE DELLI-GATTI
Secretary
TIM BAUMGARTNER
Director
Eric Jackson
NC Fayetteville Fort Worth, LLC
201 Riverplace, Suite 400
Greenville, SC 29601
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
April 5, 2021
Expiration of Acceptance: 10/5/2021
Project: WNC6 Fayetteville County: Cumberland
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) is willing to
accept payment for compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced project as
indicated in the table below. Please note that this decision does not assure that participation in the DMS in -
lieu fee mitigation program will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts.
It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact permitting agencies to determine if payment to the DMS will
be approved. You must also comply with all other state, federal or local government permits, regulations or
authorizations associated with the proposed activity including G.S. § 143-214.11.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not
received a copy of the issued 404 Permit/401 Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will
expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send copies of the permits to DMS. Once DMS receives a copy
of the permit(s) an invoice will be issued based on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must
be made prior to conducting the authorized work. The amount of the in -lieu fee to be paid by an applicant is
calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed on the DMS website.
Based on the information supplied by you in your request to use the DMS, the impacts for which you are
requesting compensatory mitigation credit are summarized in the following table. The amount of mitigation
required and assigned to DMS for this impact is determined by permitting agencies and may exceed the
impact amounts shown below.
River Basin
Impact Location
(8-digit HUC)
Impact Type
Impact Quantity
Cape Fear
03030004
Warm Stream
466
Upon receipt of payment, DMS will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. The
mitigation will be performed in accordance with the In -Lieu Fee Program instrument dated July 28, 2010.
Thank you for your interest in the DMS in -lieu fee mitigation program. If you have any questions or need
additional information, please contact [e-mail].
cc: Chris Tinklenberg, agent
Sincerely,
FOR James. B Stanfill
Asset Management Supervisor
NORTH CAROLINA
Departmental Environmental Quality
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Mitigation Services
217 West Jones Street 11652 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1652
919.707.8976

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
Name: NC Fayetteville Fort Worth LLC
Address: 201 Riverplace. Suite 400 Greenville SC 29601
Phone: [phone]
Email: ejackson[lrealtylinkdev.com
Project Name/Description: WNC6 Fayetteville
Date: March 25, 2021
The Department of the Army
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
Attention: Emily Greer
Re: Wetland Related Consulting and Permitting
NC Fayetteville Fort Worth LLC hereby designates and authorizes Kimley-Horn and
Associates, Inc. to act in my/our behalf as my/our agent solely for the purpose of processing
Jurisdictional Determinations, Section 404 permits/Section 401 Water Quality Certifications
applications and to furnish upon request supplemental information in support of applications,
etc. from this day forward until successful completion of the permitting process or revocation by
the owner.
In addition, I, the undersigned, under contract to purchase the property/properties identified
herein, do authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
(Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -site
investigations and issuing a determination associated with Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal
jurisdiction under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and
Harbors Act of 1899.
Authorized this the day of MitC , 202-1
�KIG\s©,j
Authorized Representative
(Print Name)
AUtil rwr.native
(S ig

DWR Pre -Filing Meeting Request Form
ID#*
Regional Office *
Reviewer List*
20210456
Version*
Fayetteville Regional Office - [phone]
Chad Turlington
Pre -Filing Meeting Request submitted 2/26/2021
Contact Name * Chris Tinklenberg
Contact Email Address* [e-mail]
Project Name * WNC6 - Fayetteville
Project Owner* M J Soffe Company
Project County* Cumberland
Owner Address: Street Address
P.O. Box 2507
Address Line 2
City State / Rovince / Region
Fayetteville NC
Fbstal / Zip Code Country
28302 USA
Is this a transportation project?* C Yes ( No
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
rJ 401 Water Quality Certification - I— 401 Water Quality Certification -
Reg ula r Express
I— Individual Permit I— Modification
I— Shoreline Stabilization
Does this project have an existing project ID#?*
C Yes ( No
Do you know the name of the staff member you would like to request a meeting with?
Please give a brief project description below.*
The project proposes redevelopment of the existing warehouse on -
site.
Please give a couple of dates you are available for a meeting.

3/3/2021
3/4/2021
3/5/2021
Please attach the documentation you would like to have the meeting about.
WNC6_DelineationMap_20210223.pdf 2.06MB
pdf only
By digitally signing below, I certify that I have read and understood that per the Federal Clean Water Act Section
401 Certification Rule the following statements:
• This form completes the requirement of the Pre -Filing Meeting Request in the Clean Water Act Section 401 Certification
Rule.
• I understand by signing this form that I cannot submit my application until 30 calendar days after this pre -filing
meeting request.
• !also understand that DWR is not required to respond or grant the meeting request.
Your project's thirty -day clock started upon receipt of this application. You will receive notification regarding meeting location
and time if a meeting is necessary. You will receive notification when the thirty -day clock has expired, and you can submit an
application.
Signature
Submittal Date 2/26/2021

Legend
n Approximate Site Boundary
Kimley>» Horn
Figure 2
USGS Topographic (Vander) Map
WNC6 Fayetteville Site
Fayetteville, NC

Legend
Approximate Site Boundary
NWI
SSURGO Soils
Hydric Rating
Not Hydric (0%)
Hydric (1-32%)
Hydric (33-65%)
Feet
0 200 400
Kimley»>Horn
Figure 3
SSURGO Soils and NWI
WNC6 Fayetteville Site
Fayetteville, NC

/
FLOODWAV /
,/
- 50' BUILDING SETBAC
EXISTING STREAM CENTERLINE
100 YEAR FLOOD PLAINS
APPROXIMATE
TOP OF BANK
FLOODWAV
/
I
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
15' BUILDING/LANDSCAPE SETBACK
RO
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
I IAE0II �III�I: III �D
�11 [=MI: Imo
forma ram r/�1;'mll weal.
PPP 0000000
LANDSCAPE SETBACK
V X"
kN/ ROW— ROW— ROW
...,... LOD— — —Lao— — —LODy
I RO
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
0A Oj)
QJ
— ROW— ROW
0' BMP ACCESS
EASEMENT
IABLE WIDTH PUBLIC R/I/V
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS LEGEND
SITE - PROJECT DATA
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
BUILDING / STRUCTURE
STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PVNT.
HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENT
UGHT DUTY CONCRETE PVMT.
:•I HEAVY DUN CONCRETE PAVEMENT
CONCRETE 90EWAU(
=PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALK
PANTED ISLANDS (-2' 0.C. 0 45 )
} r 1. TRAFFIC ARROWS
= CID SIGNS - MONUMENT / PYLON
SIGNS - SINGLE / DOUBLE
• SITE UCHTING
• ® BOLLARD / WHEEL STOP
KP) I
P4
l I
i W STOP, STOP BAR,
& YEILO MARKINGS
J OPEN SPACE
— —PROPERTY BOUNDARY,
ROW FIGHT -OF -WAY
BUILDING EXPANSION
—BUILDING SETBACK
— - L_e LANDSCAPING BUFFER
CURB AND GUTTER
SPILL CURB
Ir RETAINING WALL
- - FENCE AND GATE
ARE LANE MARKING
NPFL ARE LANE STRIPING
CUARO RAIL
POND - RATER SURFACE
POND - MP OF BANK
POND - BOTTOM, TOE
—ol—ol—tLl—to—JERSEY BARRIER
15ITE AREA:
TOTAL
18.94 AC
737,780-SF
BUILDING FOOTPRINT:
BUILDING USE:
WAREHOUSE:
OFFICE. @ 5.84'4
COVERAGE'.
OPEN SPACE
128,474-SF
120,974-SF
7,500-SF
17.4Y,
TOTAL'.
REQUIRED'.
PROVIDED'.
ACTIVE'.
55,333 SF (7.514
149.320 SF (20.2%
REQUIRED'.
PROVIDED'.
IMPERVIOUS AREA
27.574 SF(3.75h
10.221 SF (20.2,
PROPOSED'.
EXISTING:
10.84 AC
8.0]A�
PARKING REQUIRED:
WAREHOUSE 1/1,250 SF
OFFICE 1/300 SF
TOTAL
REQ. 4CCESSIBLENAN:
PARKING PROVIDED:
AUTO:
PRO, ACCESSIBLENAN'.
TRAILER STALLS'.
DOCK -HIGH DOOR'.
97 STALL
25 STALL
122 STALL
511
138 STALL
8I
STALL
STALL
ZONING:
4X. COVERAGE:
BUILDING SETBACKS:
HI
75,
FRONT VARD 50'
SIDE YARD INTERIOR 15
SIDE VARD EXTERIOR 15
EAR YARD
LANDSCAPE SETBACKS:
FRONT YARD
SIDE YARDS
FEAR YARD
25
15
25
OFF•STREET PARKING
STANDARD'.
DRIVE AISLE'.
9'x18
24
DEVELOPMENT DATA:
TAX PARCEL ID 0447708931003
LEGAL DESCRIPTION LEGL DESC
LAND USE OFFICEM0AREHOUSE (DIST.)
ZONING DATA:
IIF''E'MA FLOOD PANEL
00ATERSHED:
3710459490K
NIA
ROW —
ROW —
OVER EADCANOP
ROW —
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
Row,.
/ 9S
opSiN
L CS
R� 5307
X
•one,:Pak.,,
1 PROPOSED OFFICE SPACE
m_
ROW
EXISTING BUILDING
OPERATIONAL SPACE=66,594 SF
ROW`
X
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
OONCRE7E PARKING
CONCRETE AREA
NOT PART OF LEASE
CONCRETS RAMP
NOT PART OF LEASE
62,141 SF
25' LANDSCAPE SETBACK
30' SEWER EASEMENT
— LSB — — — B — Ls5 — — — — Lse — — — — LSB — — — Ls5 —
50' BUILDING SETBACK
15' BUILDING/LANDSCAPE SETBACK
L ���CO�rSflilrr�pp� i etali2'�D — —L06 u�"" —L D .9w) L,B�-8QTJ
ROW
RO
RO fI
ARLARN Rw ETH PURE, RAN
ROW
ROW —
OW
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
30' SEWER EASEMENT
25' LANDSCAPE SETBACK
59' BUILDING SETBACK
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 30 60 120
ROW
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
Know what's below.
CaII before you dig.
>88
32 a0oE
FSST fly �•.
�ay9 v
SEAL
046983 2
9 R,yCI NFE@'lam:
A9C4RfT HOJaa
rT
wo
o r T
aN
0
< N
0 N
❑o
0
SCALE AS SHOWN
0
LOD EXHIBIT
1005 DUNN ROAD
NORTH CAROLINA
CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE
SHEET NUMBER
EX
This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as on instrument of servi e, is Intended only for .e specificpurpose and client far which It was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Klmley—Horn and Associates. Inc. shall be without Ilobili
to Klmley—Horn and Associates. Inc.

Jurisdictional Determination Request
US Army Corps
of Engineers
Wilmington District
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project
manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by
assigned counties can be found on-line at:
http: //www. saw. usace. army. mil/Missions/RegulatoryPermitProgram/Contact/CountyLocator. aspx,
by calling 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your
request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager.
ASHEVILLE & CHARLOIIL REGULATORY
FIELD OFFICES
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
RALEIGHREGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
General Number: 910-251-4633
Fax Number: [phone]
INSTRUCTIONS:
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E, F and G.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H.
NOTE ON PART D — PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that
all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to
proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when
necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s)
authorized agent to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for
JD requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD
may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Version: May 2017 Page 1

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: 1005 Dunn Rd
City, State: Fayetteville, NC
County: Cumberland
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 0447768931000
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: Chris Tinklenberg, PWS
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address:
Select one:
200 South Tryon Street, Suite 200
Charlotte, NC
[phone]
[e-mail]
I am the current property owner.
I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant'
Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
Other, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION2
Name: NC Fayetteville Fort Worth, LLC
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address:
201 Riverplace, Suite 400
Greenville, SC 29601
864-263-5431
[e-mail]
i Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
2 Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
Version: May 2017 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION3,4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
Chris Tinklenberg, PWS
Print Name
Capacity: n Owner
4/2/2021
✓❑ Authorized Agents
Date
Signature
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
fl I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
❑ A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
❑ I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
n I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
❑ Other:
3 For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
4 If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
5 Must provide agent authorization foun/letter signed by owner(s).
Version: May 2017 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One)
u
I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may
be "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United States"on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional "waters of
the United States". PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
"preliminary" in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United
States" are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other "affected
party" (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
nSize of Property or Review Area 17 acres.
Iv
The property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
Version: May 2017
Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
H.
REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude: 35.061367 N
Longitude: -78.840402 W
A legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than 11x17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).6
• North Arrow
• Graphical Scale
• Boundary of Review Area
• Date
• Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
• Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
• Jurisdictional non -wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non -Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
• Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non -
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non -Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non jurisdictional (i.e.
"Isolated", "No Significant Nexus", or "Upland Feature"). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
• Wetland and non -wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non -wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
6 Please refer to the guidance document titled "Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Deteuninations" to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards. http://www.saw.usace.ainiy.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Pe
Pro gram/Jurisdiction/
Version: May 2017 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
LL
✓❑
IL
Completed appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
• PJDs, please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form' and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
• AJDs, please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form'
Vicinity Map
Aerial Photograph
USGS Topographic Map
Soil Survey Map
Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
Landscape Photos (if taken)
NCSAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
riNC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
u
Other Assessment Forms
' www. saw.usace. a ny.mil/Portals/59/docs/regulatory/regdocs/JD/RGL 08-02 App A Prelim JD Fofillable.pdf
' Please see http : //www. saw. usace. army mil/Missions/Regulatory -Permit-Pro gram/Jurisdiction/
Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to federal jurisdiction under the regulatory
authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local
government agencies, and the public, and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal
law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the
approved jurisdictional determination (AJD), which will be made available to the public on the District's web site
and onthe Headquarters USAGE web site.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the
request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued.
Version: May 2017 Page 6

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
REGULATORY PROGRAM
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM (INTERIM)
NAVIGABLE WATERS PROTECTION RULE
I. ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION
Completion Date of Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD): Select.
ORM Number: (e.g. HQS-2020-00001-MSW).
Associated JDs: N/A or ORM numbers and identifiers (e.g. HQS-2020-00001-MSW-MITSITE)
Review Area Location': State/Territory: NC City: Fayetteville County/Parish/Borough: Cumberland
Center Coordinates of Review Area: Latitude 35.061367° N Longitude --78.840402° W
II. FINDINGS
A. Summary: Check all that apply. At least one box from the following list MUST be selected. Complete the
corresponding sections/tables and summarize data sources.
The review area is comprised entirely of dry land (i.e., there are no waters or water features, including
wetlands, of any kind in the entire review area). Rationale: N/A or describe rationale.
▪ There are "navigable waters of the United States" within Rivers and Harbors Act jurisdiction within the
review area (complete table in Section II.B).
❑x There are "waters of the United States" within Clean Water Act jurisdiction within the review area
(complete appropriate tables in Section II.C).
❑x There are waters or water features excluded from Clean Water Act jurisdiction within the review area
(complete table in Section II.D).
B. Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 Section 10 (§ 10)2
§ 10 Name
§ 10 Size
§ 10 Criteria
Rationale for § 10 Determination
NI,
nl',. NI/
N/A.
C. Clean Water Act Section 404
Territorial Seas and Traditional Navigable Waters ((a)(1) waters):3
(a)(1) Name
(a)(1) Size
(a)(1) Criteria
Rationale for (a)(1) Determination
1 Map(s)/figure(s) are attached to the AJD provided to the requestor.
2 If the navigable water is not subject to the ebb and flow of the tide or included on the District's list of Rivers and Harbors Act Section 10 navigable
waters list, do NOT use this document to make the determination. The District must continue to follow the procedure outlined in 33 CFR part 329.14 to
make a Rivers and Harbors Act Section 10 navigability determination.
3 A stand-alone TNW determination is completed independently of a request for an AJD. A stand-alone TNW determination is conducted for a specific
segment of river or stream or other type of waterbody, such as a lake, where upstream or downstream limits or lake borders are established. A stand-
alone TNW determination should be completed following applicable guidance and should NOT be documented on the AJD Form.
Page 1 of 4 Form Version 10 June 2020

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
REGULATORY PROGRAM
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM (INTERIM)
NAVIGABLE WATERS PROTECTION RULE
Tributaries ((a)(2) waters):
(a)(2)
Name
(a)(2) Size
(a)(2) Criteria
Rationale for (a)(2) Determination
S1
linear
feet
(a)(2) Perennial tributary
contributes surface
water flow directly or
indirectly to an (a)(1)
water in a typical year.
Stream S1 originates on -site at the end of a
wetland and flows as a perennial stream to its
confluence with S2. S2 is Lock Creek which is a
tributary to the Cape Fear River. Based on this
information, S1 was determined to be an (a)(2)
water.
S2
1492
linear
feet
(a)(2) Perennial tributary
contributes surface
water flow directly or
indirectly to an (a)(1)
water in a typical year.
Stream S2 flows along the western boundary of the
site as a perennial stream. S2 is Lock Creek which
is a tributary to the Cape Fear River. Based on this
information, S2 was determined to be an (a)(2)
water.
Lakes and ponds, and impoundments of jurisdictional waters ((a)(3) waters):
(a)(3) Name
(a)(3) Size
(a)(3) Criteria
Rationale for (a)(3) Determination
N''
N''
N/A.
Adjacent wetlands ((a)(4) waters):
(a)(4) Name
(a)(4) Size
(a)(4) Criteria
Rationale for (a)(4) Determination
02
acre(s)
(a)(4) Wetland
abuts an (a)(1)-
(a)(3) water.
The wetland delineation was conducted utilizing the
1987 US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Wetlands
Delineation Manual and the USACE Regional
Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetlands
Delineation Manual: Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Region (Version 2.0). Wetland W1 is a small scrub -
shrub wetland. Hydrology is primarily influenced by
stormwater and groundwater and W1 drains into Stream
1. S1 flows into Lock Creek (S2) which is a tributary to
the Cape Fear River.
\A/7
0.25
acre(s)
(a)(4) Wetland
abuts an (a)(1)-
(a)(3) water.
The wetland delineation was conducted utilizing the
1987 US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Wetlands
Delineation Manual and the USACE Regional
Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetlands
Delineation Manual: Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Region (Version 2.0). Wetland W2 is a scrub -shrub
wetland that directly abuts S2. W2 is situated within a
natural topographic low point and hydrology is primarily
influenced by S2 floodplain. S2 flows into Lock Creek
(S2) which is a tributary to the Cape Fear River
Page 2 of 4 Form Version 10 June 2020

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
REGULATORY PROGRAM
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM (INTERIM)
NAVIGABLE WATERS PROTECTION RULE
D. Excluded Waters or Features
Excluded waters ((b)(1) — (b)(12)):4
Exclusion
Name
Exclusion Size
Exclusions
Rationale for Exclusion Determination
SCF1
.26
acre(s)
(b)(10) Stormwater control
feature constructed or
excavated in upland or in a
non -jurisdictional water to
convey, treat, infiltrate, or
store stormwater runoff
Stormwater Control Feature 1 is an isolated
artificial stormwater control feature that was
constructed in the uplands sometime between
1998 and 2001, according to a review of
historical aerial imagery. There is no direct
hydrologic connection to downstream waters.
D1
100
linear
feet
(b)(5) Ditch that is not an
(a)(1) or (a)(2) water, and
those portions of a ditch
constructed in an (a)(4)
water that do not satisfy
the conditions of (c)(1).
Ditch 1 is a man-made feature constructed in the
uplands - berms are present along each side of
the ditch. There is no evidence that D1 was
constructed in or is a relocated tributary. It is not
present on USGS maps. S1 receives water from
D1.
III. SUPPORTING INFORMATION
A. Select/enter all resources that were used to aid in this determination and attach data/maps to this
document and/or references/citations in the administrative record, as appropriate.
Information submitted by, or on behalf of, the applicant/consultant: Data Forms (2/23/2021)
This information is sufficient for purposes of this AJD.
Rationale: N/A
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps: Title(s) and/or date(s).
❑x Photographs: Aerial: 2021 Nearmap Aerial
❑ Corps site visit(s) conducted on: Date(s).
❑ Previous Jurisdictional Determinations (AJDs or PJDs): ORM Number(s) and date(s).
❑x Antecedent Precipitation Tool: provide detailed discussion in Section III.B.
❑x USDA NRCS Soil Survey: NRCS Soil Survey, Cumberland County, Current
❑x USFWS NWI maps: HUC 8 - 03030004 NWI Wetlands
❑x USGS topographic maps: Vander (1:12,000)
Other data sources used to aid in this determination:
Data Source (select)
Name and/or date and other relevant information
USGS Sources
N/A.
USDA Sources
N/A.
NOAA Sources
N/A.
USACE Sources
N/A.
4 Some excluded waters, such as (b)(2) and (b)(4), may not be specifically identified on the AJD form unless a requestor specifically asks a Corps district
to do so. Corps districts may, in case -by -case instances, choose to identify some or all of these waters within the review area.
5 Because of the broad nature of the (b)(1) exclusion and in an effort to collect data on specific types of waters that would be covered by the (b)(1)
exclusion, four sub -categories of (b)(1) exclusions were administratively created for the purposes of the AJD Form. These four sub -categories are not
new exclusions, but are simply administrative distinctions and remain (b)(1) exclusions as defined by the NWPR.
Page 3 of 4
Form Version 10 June 2020

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
REGULATORY PROGRAM
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM (INTERIM)
NAVIGABLE WATERS PROTECTION RULE
Data Source (select)
Name and/or date and other relevant information
State/Local/Tribal Sources
N/A.
Other Sources
N/A.
B. Typical year assessment(s): The Antecedent Precipitation Tool assessed the project area for February
23, 2021 as "Wetter than Normal" (See attached PDF). Features were primarily assessed based on the
presence of a OHWM, not the presence or absence of surface or groundwater.
C. Additional comments to support AJD: J/A
Page 4 of 4 Form Version 10 June 2020

U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
Project Review
Checklist
Step
Item
Required
Date completed/ Notes
1 and
2
Official Species List from IPaC
(will include map showing the
action area)
Yes
3/29/2021
3
NCDENER-Heritage Program
database results or correspon-
dence.
If Applicable
3/29/2021
4
Habitat Assessments or Species
Surveys
If Applicable
2/23/2021
6
Bald Eagle Conclusion Table
Yes
3/29/2021
7
NLEB
Yes
3/29/2021
8
Species Conclusion Table
Yes
3/29/2021
9
Online project review request
letter or Online project review
certification letter
Yes
3/29/2021
10
Other documentation to support
your conclusions
If Applicable
3/29/2021
Instructions
Submit project review packages electronically to Raleigh@fws.
gov. Please indicate in your email subject title if you are submit-
ting a "Review Request Letter" or a "Self -Certification Letter."
All project reviews will receive a return receipt to inform you
that your project has been successfully submitted to this office.
Please note that any single email, including attachments, must
be smaller than 25 MB. If a single email would be larger than
25 MB, please spread out multiple attachments among several
emails (use the same subject name and project reference in all
emails related to an individual project). If this is not practical,
please mail a hard copy or DVD containing the project review
package to our office:
Raleigh Field Office
P.O. Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Maintain a complete copy of the project review package
in your files since it will become an integral part of your official
record of compliance.
Contact us
If you have questions or
comments concerning this
process, please contact
Leigh Mann at (919)
856-4520 extension 10 or
via email at
[e-mail]
http://Raleigh.fws.gov
Federal Relay Service
for the deaf and hard -of -hearing
1 800/877 8339
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
http://www.fws.gov
1 800/344 WILD
January 2017

Kimley»>Horn
March 29, 2021
Raleigh Field Office
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
P.O. Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636
Re: WNC6 Fayetteville Site
Fayetteville, Cumberland County, North Carolina
Project Review Certification Letter
USFWS Raleigh Field Office,
On behalf of our client, NC Fayetteville Fort Worth, LLC, Kimley-Horn (KH) is submitting this letter
requesting concurrence regarding the results of the pedestrian survey performed for the above -referenced
project in accordance with the methodologies recommended by USFWS. The pedestrian survey was
conducted by Kimley-Horn staff Jason Hartshorn and Mackenzie Richards on February 23, 2021.
Background Information
The project is located on a parcel that consists of a warehouse building and associated area in Fayetteville,
Cumberland County, North Carolina. The area evaluated consists of undeveloped forested land, a stream,
a stormwater detention pond, warehouse building, associated parking areas, and access roads.
Future authorization from the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) may be required to develop the site
within potentially jurisdictional waters of the U.S.; therefore, NC Fayetteville Fort Worth, LLC, contracted
with Kimley-Horn to perform the pedestrian survey within areas of potentially suitable habitat in the project
area to identify and document occurrences of federally listed threatened and/or endangered species.
Methodology and Findings
As of March 29, 2021, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) lists six (6) federally protected
species for Cumberland County (Table 1). A brief description of each species' habitat requirements follows,
along with the Biological Conclusion rendered based on survey results in the study area.
Table 1: Federally protected listed species for Cumberland Count
Scientific Name
Common Name
Federal Status
Habitat Present
Biological
Conclusion
Picoides borealis
Red cockaded
Woodpecker
E
No
No Effect
Neonympha mitchellii
francisci
Saint Francis'
Satyr Butterfly
E
No
No Effect
Schwalbea americana
American
Chaffseed
E
No
No Effect
Rhus michauxii
Michaux's sumac
E
No
No Effect
Lindera melissifolia
Pondberry
E
No
No Effect
Lysimachia
asperulaefolia
Rough -leaved
Loosestrife
E
No
No Effect
*E = Endangered, T = Threatened
kimley-horn.com
200 South Tryon Street, Suite 200, Charlotte, NC 28202
704-333-5131

Kimley»>Horn
Red -cockaded Woodpecker
USFWS Optimal Survey Window: November — early March
Page 2
Habitat Description: Red -cockaded woodpecker's need old, living pine trees for their nest cavities. These
pine trees must be over 60 years old for suitable cavity construction. The Red -cockaded
woodpecker prefers longleaf, loblolly, shortleaf, slash, and pond pine trees.
Biological Conclusion: Potentially suitable habitat for Red -cockaded woodpecker is not present on the
subject property. A review of NCNHP records, updated February 1, 2021, indicates no known
occurrences within 1.0 mile of the subject property. Due to the absence of suitable habitat, the
project results in a "no effect" conclusion.
Saint Francis' Satyr Butterfly
USFWS Optimal Survey Window: May 5 - June 6 and July 26 - August 21
Habitat Description: The Saint Francis' Satyr Butterfly is found only in Cumberland and Hoke counties. The
butterfly prefers wet meadows maintained by fire and beaver. Vegetation of these meadows consist
primarily of sedges. In addition to disturbances created by fire and beaver, military practices at Fort
Bragg allow for a metapopulation of the butterfly to flourish.
Biological Conclusion: No Effect
Potentially suitable habitat for Sant Francis' Satyr butterfly is not present on the subject property.
A review of NCNHP records, updated February 1, 2021, indicates no known occurrences within 1.0
mile of the subject property. Due to the absence of suitable habitat, the project results in a "no
effect" conclusion.
American Chaffseed
USFWS Optimal Survey Window: May — August
Habitat Description: American chaffseed grows in sandy acidic, seasonally moist to dry soils in the coastal
plain. The species prefers fire -maintained savannas, moist pine flatwoods, and other open grass
ecosystems. American chaffseed is partially dependent upon another plant as a host, however, it
is not host specific. The species relies on fire -maintained ecosystems and it thrives in open areas,
such as the margin of forests.
Biological Conclusion: No Effect
Potentially suitable habitat for American chaffseed is not present on the subject property. A review
of NCNHP records, updated February 1, 2021, indicates no known occurrences within 1.0 mile of
the subject property. Due to the absence of suitable habitat, the project results in a "no effect"
conclusion.
Michaux's Sumac
USFWS Optimal Survey Window: May - October
Habitat Description: Michaux's sumac, endemic to the inner Coastal Plain and lower Piedmont, grows in
sandy or rocky, open, upland woods on acidic or circumneutral, well -drained sands or sandy loam
soils with low cation exchange capacities. The species is also found on sandy or submesic loamy
swales and depressions in the fall line Sandhills region as well as in openings along the rim of
Carolina bays; maintained railroad, roadside, power line, and utility rights -of -way; areas where
forest canopies have been opened up by blowdowns and/or storm damage; small wildlife food
plots; abandoned building sites; under sparse to moderately dense pine or pine/hardwood
kimley-horn.com
200 South Tryon Street, Suite 200, Charlotte, NC 28202
704-333-5131

Kimley»>Horn
Page 3
canopies; and in and along edges of other artificially maintained clearings undergoing natural
succession. In the central Piedmont, it occurs on clayey soils derived from mafic rocks. The plant
is shade intolerant and, therefore, grows best where disturbance (e.g., mowing, clearing, grazing,
periodic fire) maintains its open habitat.
Biological Conclusion: No Effect
Potentially suitable habitat for Michaux's sumac is not present on the subject property. A review
of NCNHP records, updated February 1, 2021, indicates no known occurrences within 1.0 mile of
the subject property. Due to the absence of suitable habitat, the project results in a "no effect"
conclusion.
Pondberry
USFWS Optimal Survey Window: February - March, September — October
Habitat Description: In North Carolina, Pondberry is found in Sampson and Cumberland counties. The
species grows in bottomland and hardwood wetlands and around the margins of sinks, ponds, and
other depressions in coastal areas.
Biological Conclusion: No Effect
Potentially suitable habitat for Pondberry is not present on the subject property. A review of NCNHP
records, updated February 1, 2021, indicates no known occurrences within 1.0 mile of the subject
property. Due to the absence of suitable habitat, the project results in a "no effect" conclusion.
Rough -leaved Loosestrife
USFWS Optimal Survey Window: Mid May — September
Habitat Description: Rough -leaved loosestrife is a perennial herb that grows in moist areas between dry
pine forests and wet grassy areas. The species prefers moist to seasonally saturated sands.
Rough -leaved loosestrife thrives in fire -maintained ecosystems and does not tolerate shade. It is
mainly found along the coastal plain and in the sandhills of North and South Carolina.
Biological Conclusion: No Effect
Potentially suitable habitat for Rough -leaved loosestrife is not present on the subject property. A
review of NCNHP records, updated February 1, 2021, indicates no known occurrences within 1.0
mile of the subject property. Due to the absence of suitable habitat, the project results in a "no
effect" conclusion.
Bald Eagle and Golden Eagle Protection Act
USFWS optimal survey window: November - March
Habitat Description: Habitat for the bald eagle primarily consists of mature forest in proximity to large bodies
of open water for foraging. Large dominant trees are utilized for nesting sites, typically within 1.0
mile of open water. A desktop-GIS assessment of the project study area, as well as the area within
a 1.13-mile radius (1.0 mile plus 660 feet) of the project limits, was performed on March 29, 2021
using 2021 color aerials. No large bodies of open water were identified in the 1.13-mile radius. In
addition, a review of the NCNHP database, updated on February 1, 2021, revealed no known
occurrences within 1.0 mile of the study area. Due to the lack of known occurrences, and the lack
of observed individuals or nests on -site, it has been determined that the proposed project will not
affect this species.
Biological Conclusion: No Effect
kimley-horn.com
200 South Tryon Street, Suite 200, Charlotte, NC 28202
704-333-5131

Kimley»>Horn
Statement of Qualifications:
Investigator: Jason Hartshorn, PWS
Education: B.S. Environmental Technology, 2011
Experience: Environmental Analyst, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2011-Present
Responsibilities: Quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) for project deliverables
Investigator: Mackenzie Richards
Education: B.S. Natural Resources — Ecosystem Assessment, 2015;
M.S. Renewable Natural Resource - Fisheries and Aquaculture, 2017
Experience: Environmental Analyst, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2018-Present
Responsibilities: Document preparation, GPS/GIS, wetland and stream delineations
Page 4
Please provide concurrence regarding the survey results and biological conclusions as well as any other
possible issues that might emerge with respect to protected species as a result of the proposed project.
Thank you in advance for your timely response and cooperation. Please email (Chris.Tinklenberg@Kimley-
Horn.com) a copy of your reply to my attention and/or send an original copy by mail. Please feel free to
contact me at [phone] if you have any questions or if additional information is necessary.
Sincerely,
KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
Chris Tinklenberg, PWS
Environmental Scientist
kimley-horn.com
200 South Tryon Street, Suite 200, Charlotte, NC 28202
704-333-5131

3/29/2021 IPaC: Explore Location resources
IPaC
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
IPaC resource list
This report is an automatically generated list of species and other resources such as critical habitat
(collectively referred to as trust resources) under the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's (USFWS)
jurisdiction that are known or expected to be on or near the project area referenced below. The list
may also include trust resources that occur outside of the project area, but that could potentially be
directly or indirectly affected by activities in the project area. However, determining the likelihood
and extent of effects a project may have on trust resources typically requires gathering additional
site -specific (e.g., vegetation/species surveys) and project -specific (e.g., magnitude and timing of
proposed activities) information.
Below is a summary of the project information you provided and contact information for the
USFWS office(s) with jurisdiction in the defined project area. Please read the introduction to each
section that follows (Endangered Species, Migratory Birds, USFWS Facilities, and NWI Wetlands) for
additional information applicable to the trust resources addressed in that section.
Location
Cumberland County, North Carolina
Local office
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
k. [phone]
fi [phone]
MAILING ADDRESS
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
PHYSICAL ADDRESS
551 Pylon Drive, Suite F
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/S6LM763J 15H DBGCRSMM74A3DSQ/resources
1/12

3/29/2021 IPaC: Explore Location resources
Raleigh, NC 27606-1487
•cb-s\c'
Gios"�
,� FOB
�O
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/S6LM763J 15H DBGCRSMM74A3DSQ/resources
2/12

3/29/2021 IPaC: Explore Location resources
Endangered species
This resource list is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an analysis of
project level impacts.
The primary information used to generate this list is the known or expected range of each species.
Additional areas of influence (AOI) for species are also considered. An AOI includes areas outside of
the species range if the species could be indirectly affected by activities in that area (e.g., placing a
dam upstream of a fish population even if that fish does not occur at the dam site, may indirectly
impact the species by reducing or eliminating water flow downstream). Because species can move,
and site conditions can change, the species on this list are not guaranteed to be found on or near
the project area. To fully determine any potential effects to species, additional site -specific and
project -specific information is often required.
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act requires Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary
information whether any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area
of such proposed action" for any project that is conducted, permitted, funded, or licensed by any
Federal agency. A letter from the local office and a species list which fulfills this requirement can
only be obtained by requesting an official species list from either the Regulatory Review section in
IPaC (see directions below) or from the local field office directly.
For project evaluations that require USFWS concurrence/review, please return to the IPaC website
and request an official species list by doing the following:
1. Draw the project location and click CONTINUE.
2. Click DEFINE PROJECT.
3. Login (if directed to do so).
4. Provide a name and description for your project.
5. Click REQUEST SPECIES LIST.
Listed species and their critical habitats are managed by the Ecological Services Program of the
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the fisheries division of the National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA Fisheries- ).
Species and critical habitats under the sole responsibility of NOAA Fisheries are not shown on this
list. Please contact NOAA Fisheries for species under their jurisdiction.
1. Species listed under the Endangered Species Act are threatened or endangered; IPaC also
shows species that are candidates, or proposed, for listing. See the listing status page for more
information. IPaC only shows species that are regulated by USFWS (see FAQ).
2. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an office of the
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of Commerce.
The following species are potentially affected by activities in this location:
Birds
NAM E
STATUS
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/S6LM763J15HDBGCRSMM74A3DSQ/resources 3/12

3/29/2021 IPaC: Explore Location resources
Red -cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7614
Reptiles
NAME
American Alligator Alligator mississippiensis
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/776
Clams
Endangered
STATUS
SAT
NAME STATUS
Atlantic Pigtoe Fusconaia masoni Proposed Threatened
Wherever found IJ
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. The location of the
critical habitat is not available.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5164
Insects
NAME
STATUS
Saint Francis' Satyr Butterfly Neony pha mitchellii francisci Endangered
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://eco fCvs.go ecp/species/5419
loalorak
Flowering Plants
NAME STATUS
American Chaffseed Schwalbea americana
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1286
Michaux's Sumac Rhus michauxii
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5217
Endangered
Endangered
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/S6LM763J15HDBGCRSMM74A3DSQ/resources 4/12

3/29/2021 IPaC: Explore Location resources
Pondberry Lindera melissifolia
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1279
Rough -leaved Loosestrife Lysimachia asperulaefolia
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2747
Critical habitats
Endangered
Endangered
Potential effects to critical habitat(s) in this location must be analyzed along with the endangered
species themselves.
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS AT THIS LOCATION.
Migratory birds
•ci'b%
C..\)\114.
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Act .
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to migratory
birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider implementing
appropriate conservation measures, as described
1. The Miggot,v. Birelt Act of 1918.
2. The Ban Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
Additional information can be found using the following links:
• Birds of Conservation Concern http://www.fws.gov/birds/management/managed-species/
birds-of-conservation-concern.php
• Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds
http://www.fws.gov/birds/management/project-assessment-tools-and-guidance/
conservation-measures.php
• Nationwide conservation measures for birds
http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/pdf/management/nationwidestandardconservationmeasures.pdf
The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the USFWS Birds
of Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your project location. To learn
more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how this list is generated, see the FAQ
below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this location, nor a guarantee that every bird
on this list will be found in your project area. To see exact locations of where birders and the
general public have sighted birds in and around your project area, visit the E-bird data mapping
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/S6LM763J15HDBGCRSMM74A3DSQ/resources 5/12

3/29/2021 IPaC: Explore Location resources
tool (Tip: enter your location, desired date range and a species on your list). For projects that occur
off the Atlantic Coast, additional maps and models detailing the relative occurrence and abundance
of bird species on your list are available. Links to additional information about Atlantic Coast birds,
and other important information about your migratory bird list, including how to properly interpret
and use your migratory bird report, can be found below.
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures to
reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE SUMMARY at
the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be present and breeding in your
project area.
NAME BREEDING SEASON (IFA
American Kestrel Falco sparverius paulusre%
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird
Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA
Eastern Whip -poor -will Antrostomus vociferus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.
Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.
Prothonotary Warbler Protonotaria citrea
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.
Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.
Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.
BREEDING SEASON IS INDICATED
FOR A BIRD ON YOUR LIST, THE
BIRD MAY BREED IN YOUR
PROJECT AREA SOMETIME WITHIN
THE TIMEFRAME SPECIFIED, 16
WHICH IS A VERY LIBER
ESTIMATE OF THE DATES INSIDE
WHICH THE BIRD BREEDS
likCROSS ITS ENTIRE RANGE.
"BRADS ELSEWHERE" INDICATES
THAT THE BIRD DOES NOT LIKELY
BREED IN YOUR PROJECT AREA.)
Breeds Apr 1 to Aug 31
Breeds May 1 to Aug 20
Breeds May 1 to Jul 31
Breeds Apr 1 to Jul 31
Breeds May 10 to Sep 10
Breeds May 10 to Aug 31
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/S6LM763J15HDBGCRSMM74A3DSQ/resources 6/12

3/29/2021 IPaC: Explore Location resources
Probability of Presence Summary
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be
present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project
activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read and understand the FAQ
"Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or attempting to
interpret this report.
Probability of Presence ( )
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your
project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-week months.)
A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey effort (see below) can be
used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One can have higher confidence in the
presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also high.
m.4%How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:
1. The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in the
week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events for that
week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted Towhee was
found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is 0.25.
2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of presence
is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum probability of presence
across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of presence in week 20 for the Spotted
Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week 12 (0.25) is the maximum of any
week of the year. The relative probability of presence on week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it
is 0.05/0.25 = 0.2.
3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical
conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the probability of
presence score. IF4,00
To see a bar's probability of presence score, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
Breeding Season ( )
Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time -frame inside which the bird breeds across its
entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project area.
Survey Effort (')
Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys
performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The number of
surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.
To see a bar's survey effort range, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
No Data ( )
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
Survey Timeframe
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant
information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based on all
years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/S6LM763J15HDBGCRSMM74A3DSQ/resources 7/12

3/29/2021 IPaC: Explore Location resources
- probability of presence breeding season I survey effort — no data
SPECIES
American Kestrel
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
++++ +1++ ++++ 4 I I I- ++++ +++-I 1 I 1 I- ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++
BCC - BCR (This is a .---- ilMh. A._ ____ NMI.
Bird of
Conservation
Concern (BCC) only
in particular Bird
Conservation
Regions (BCRs) in
the continental
USA)
Eastern Whip -
poor -will
BCC Rangewide
(CON) (This is a
Bird of
Conservation
Concern (BCC)
throughout its
range in the
continental USA
and Alaska.)
Prairie Warbler
BCC Rangewide
(CON) (This is a
Bird of
Conservation
Concern (BCC)
throughout its
range in the
continental USA
and Alaska.)
Prothonotary
Warbler
BCC Rangewide
(CON) (This is a
Bird of
Conservation
Concirn (BCC)
throughout its
range in the
continental USA
and Alaska.)
Red-headed
Woodpecker
BCC Rangewide
(CON) (This is a
Bird of
Conservation
Concern (BCC)
throughout its
range in the
continental USA
and Alaska.)
++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ +I 11 1 1 1 1 ! I I I II 1-+ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++
11%011111 ++++ ++++ +$++ IA+ ++I+ ++++ ++ SO ++I+ ++++ ++++ ++++
106
do
++ „H, 1iii 11111++++++++++++++++++++
ciC
+1
+0++ 0+++ ++++ +Ill 1111 1111 iiii 1111 1+1+ ++++ ++++ ++++
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/S6LM763J15HDBGCRSMM74A3DSQ/resources 8/12

3/29/2021 IPaC: Explore Location resources
++++ ++++ ++++ +•++ ++II I+++ ++I+ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++
Wood Thrush
BCC Rangewide
(CON) (This is a
Bird of
Conservation
Concern (BCC)
throughout its
range in the
continental USA
and Alaska.)
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds.
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize impacts to all birds at
any location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly important when birds are most likely to
occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and
avoiding their destruction is a very helpful impact minimization measure. To see when birds are most likely to
occur and be breeding in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures or
permits may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of infrastructure or
bird species present on your project site.
N#\ %lam°
What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) and other species
„wa'
that may warrant special attention in your project location.
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network
(AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets and is
queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as occurring in the 10km grid cell(s) which your project
intersects, and that have been identified as warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in that
area, an eagle (Eagle Act requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to offshore
activities or development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your project area. It is not
representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list of all birds potentially present in your
project area, please visit the AKN Phenology Tool.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds potentially
occurring in my specified location?
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data provided by the
Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). This data is derived from a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen
science datasets .
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information becomes available. To
learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and how to interpret them, go the
Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me about these graphs" link.
How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering, migrating or present year-round in my project area?
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding, wintering, migrating or
year-round), you may refer to the following resources: The Cornell Lab of Ornithology All About Birds Bird Guide,
or (if you are unsuccessful in locating the bird of interest there), the Cornell Lab of Ornithology Neotropical Birds
guide. If a bird on your migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated with it, if that bird does occur
in your project area, there may be nests present at some point within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds
elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not breed in your project area.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/S6LM763J15HDBGCRSMM74A3DSQ/resources 9/12

3/29/2021 IPaC: Explore Location resources
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern throughout their range
anywhere within the USA (including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands);
2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the
continental USA; and
3. "Non -BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on your list either because
of the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or (for non -eagles) potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from
certain types of development or activities (e.g. offshore energy development or longline fishing).
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made, in particular, to
avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC species of rangewide concern. For
more information on conservation measures you can implement to help avoid and minimize migratory bird
impacts and requirements for eagles, please see the FAQs for these topics.
Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species and groups of
bird species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal
also offers data and information about other taxa besides birds that may be helpful to you in your project review.
Alternately, you may download the bird model results files underlying the portal maps throughithe NOAA NCCOS
Integrative Statistical Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the
Atlantic Outer Continental Shelf project webpage.
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use throughout the year,
including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this information. For additional information on
marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study and the nanotag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam
Loring.
What if I have eagles on my list?
(.6
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid violating the
Eagle Act should such impacts occur.
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of birds of priority
concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for identifying what other birds may be
in your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring
in my specified location". Please be aware this report provides the "probability of presence" of birds within the 10
km grid cell(s) that overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look
carefully at the survey effort (indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the "no data" indicator (a
red horizontal bar). A high survey effort is the key component. If the survey effort is high, then the probability of
presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a
lack of data and, therefore, a lack of certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a
starting point for identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might
be there, and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you know what to
look for to confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement conservation measures to avoid
or minimize potential impacts from your project activities, should presence be confirmed. To learn more about
conservation measures, visit the FAQ "Tell me about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize
impacts to migratory birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/S6LM763J15HDBGCRSMM74A3DSQ/resources 10/12

3/29/2021 IPaC: Explore Location resources
Facilities
National Wildlife Refuge lands
Any activity proposed on lands managed by the National Wildlife Refuge system must undergo a
'Compatibility Determination' conducted by the Refuge. Please contact the individual Refuges to
discuss any questions or concerns.
THERE ARE NO REFUGE LANDS AT THIS LOCATION.
Fish hatcheries
THERE ARE NO FISH HATCHERIES AT THIS LOCATION.
•cb-s\c'
Wetlands in the National Wetlands Inventory
Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under Section
404 of the Clean Water Act, or other State/Federal statutes.
For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the local U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers District.
Please note that the NWI data being shown may be out of date. We are currently working to update
our NWI data set. We recommend you verify these results with a site visit to determine the actual
extent of wetlands on site.
This location overlaps the following wetlands:
FRLH�U TER FORESTED/SHRUB WETLAND
PFO1 C
RIVERINE
R5UBH
A full description for each wetland code can be found at the National Wetlands Inventory website
Data limitations
The Service's objective of mapping wetlands and deepwater habitats is to produce reconnaissance level
information on the location, type and size of these resources. The maps are prepared from the analysis of high
altitude imagery. Wetlands are identified based on vegetation, visible hydrology and geography. A margin of error
is inherent in the use of imagery; thus, detailed on -the -ground inspection of any particular site may result in
revision of the wetland boundaries or classification established through image analysis.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/S6LM763J15HDBGCRSMM74A3DSQ/resources 11/12

3/29/2021 IPaC: Explore Location resources
The accuracy of image interpretation depends on the quality of the imagery, the experience of the image analysts,
the amount and quality of the collateral data and the amount of ground truth verification work conducted.
Metadata should be consulted to determine the date of the source imagery used and any mapping problems.
Wetlands or other mapped features may have changed since the date of the imagery or field work. There may be
occasional differences in polygon boundaries or classifications between the information depicted on the map and
the actual conditions on site.
Data exclusions
Certain wetland habitats are excluded from the National mapping program because of the limitations of aerial
imagery as the primary data source used to detect wetlands. These habitats include seagrasses or submerged
aquatic vegetation that are found in the intertidal and subtidal zones of estuaries and nearshore coastal waters.
Some deepwater reef communities (coral or tuberficid worm reefs) have also been excluded from the inventory.
These habitats, because of their depth, go undetected by aerial imagery.
Data precautions
Federal, state, and local regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over wetlands may define and describe wetlands in a
different manner than that used in this inventory. There is no attempt, in either the design or products of this
inventory, to define the limits of proprietary jurisdiction of any Federal, state, or local government or to establish
the geographical scope of the regulatory programs of government agencies. Persons intending to engage in
activities involving modifications within or adjacent to wetland areas should seek the advice of appropriate federal,
state, or local agencies concerning specified agency regulatory programs and proprietary jurisdictions that may
affect such activities.
o-s
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/S6LM763J15HDBGCRSMM74A3DSQ/resources 12/12

■ ■m
—E■~■ NC DEPARTMENT OF
■ EI= NATURAL AN❑ CULTURAL RESOURCES
■.■■■
March 29, 2021
Taylor Kiker
Kimley-Horn
200 South Tryon Street
Charlotte, NC 28202
RE: WNC6 Fayetteville
Dear Taylor Kiker:
Roy Cooper, Governor
D. Reid Wilson, Secretary
Walter Clark
Director, Division of Land and Water Stewardship
NCNHDE-14324
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
Based on the project area mapped with your request, a query of the NCNHP database indicates that
there are no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, and/or
conservation/managed areas within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there
may be no documentation of natural heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not
imply or confirm their absence; the area may not have been surveyed. The results of this query
should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists. In the event that rare
species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may update our
records.
The attached `Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is found within the project area or is indicated within a one -mile radius of
the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for
guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
https://www.fws.gov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a
Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Land and Water Fund easement, or Federally -
listed species are documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at [e-mail] or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOVRCES
Q 121 W. JONES STREET. RALEIGH. NC 27603 • 16S1 MAIL SERVICE CENTER. RALEIGH. NC 27699
OFC 'M9.707.9120 • FAX [phone]

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
WNC6 Fayetteville
March 29, 2021
NCNHDE-14324
Element Occurrences Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the
Taxonomic
Group
Dragonfly or 33195
Damselfly
Dragonfly or 33740 Somatochlora
Damselfly georgiana
Dragonfly or 33780 Stylurus ivae
Damselfly
Freshwater 37335 Lampsilis sp. 2
Bivalve
Natural
Community
Vascular Plant
EO ID Scientific Name Common Name
Gomphurus septima
Septima's Clubtail
Coppery Emerald
Shining Clubtail
Chameleon
Lampmussel
28433 Mesic Mixed Hardwood ---
Forest (Coastal Plain
Subtype)
22821 Crataegus munda Batesburg Hawthorn
Project Area
Last Element Accuracy
servation Occurrence
Date Rank
1986-04-12 H 3-Medium
Vascular Plant 8142 Gelsemium rankinii
Swamp Jessamine
Natural Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Site Name
CPF/Upper Cape Fear River Aquatic Habitat
Cape Fear Botanical Garden
2004-Pre
2004-Pre
2015-06-16
2000-06-29
H? 5-Very
Low
H? 5-Very
Low
E 3-Medium
B 2-High
1933-04-28 H 5-Very
Low
1930-04-01 H 5-Very
Low
Representational Rating
R2 (Very High)
R5 (General)
Managed Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Area Name
NC Land and Water Fund Project
Cape Fear Botanical Garden
NC Land and Water Fund Project
Owner
NC DNCR, NC Land and Water
Cape Fear Botanical Garden
NC DNCR, NC Land and Water
Collective Rating
C3 (High)
C5 (General)
Owner Type
Fund State
Private
Fund State
Federal
Status
State Global State
tatus Rank Rank
Significantly G3 S3
Rare
Significantly G3G4 S1?
Rare
Significantly G4 S1?
Rare
Significantly G2 S2
Rare
G3 S3
Significantly G4G5 S2?
Rare
Throughout
Special G5 S1S2
Concern
Vulnerable
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at https://ncnhde.natureserve.org/help. Data query generated on March 29, 2021
resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
source
NCNHP, Q4 January 2021. Please
Page 2 of 3

ooss Creel,
4°am at i
g z
r€
ITT Ik,. n st
y a-�- East card,rwi �,r
>>
m' Fayetteville
S ., f AF
P
NCNHDE-14324: WNC6 Fayetteville
March 29, 2021
Project Boundary
Buffered Project Boundary
1:3
NHP Natural Area (NHNA)
Managed Area (MAREA)
Simon St
pow to M St
0 0.175
1 s '
0 0.3
Downing Rd
1:22,635
0.35
0.6
0.7 mi
1.2 km
Sources' Esri, HERE, Garmia, Intermap, increment P Corp_. GEBCO, USGS,
FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esn Japan,
METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS
User Community
Page 3 of 3

NA
Feet
4,000 8,000
u
l
Cumberland
County
Legend
Kimley>>> Horn J Approximate Site Boundary
Cumberland County
Figure 1
Vicinity Map
WNC6 Fayetteville Site
Fayetteville, NC

Legend
n Approximate Site Boundary
Kimley>» Horn
Figure 2
USGS Topographic (Vander) Map
WNC6 Fayetteville Site
Fayetteville, NC

InApproximate Site Boundary
Kimley»>Horn
1,000 2,000
Feet
Figure 3
Aerial Map
WNC6 Fayetteville Site
Fayetteville, NC

Photo Pas e 1
Photo 1 — Maintained grass area on -site
Photo 2 — Maintained grass area on -site
Title
Project
Photo Pages
WNC6 Fayetteville Site
Fayetteville, Cumberland County, North Carolina
Date
2/23/21
Project Number
115243003
Prepared By
Kimley »Horn

Photo Page 2
Photo 3 — Perennial stream on -site
Photo 4 — Maintained grass area on -site and stream crossing
Title
Photo Pages
Project
WNC6 Fayetteville Site
Fayetteville, Cumberland County, North Carolina
Prepared By
Date
Project Number
2/23/21
115243003
Kimley »Horn

Kimley»>Horn
March 29, 2021
Ms. Renee Gledhill -Earley
Environmental Review Coordinator
North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office
4617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-4617
Re: WNC6 Fayetteville Site
Fayetteville, Cumberland County, North Carolina
Dear Ms. Gledhill -Earley,
Kimley-Horn is writing this letter on behalf of our client, NC Fayetteville Fort Worth, LLC, to
request a review and comment on any possible issues that might emerge with respect to
cultural resource issues associated with the proposed project in Fayetteville, North Carolina.
The proposed project site is located 1005 Dunn Road in Fayetteville, Cumberland County,
North Carolina (Figures 1-3). The proposed project seeks a parking lot expansion.
We request that you review the site based on the attached information to determine the
presence of any archeological, cultural, or historic resources. If a response has not been
received within 30 days, we will assume that you have reviewed the project area and that
there are no issues to address at the present time.
Thank you in advance for your timely response and cooperation. Please email
([e-mail]) a copy of your reply and/or send an original copy by mail.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please feel free to contact me at (980) 296-
0810.
Sincerely,
KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
Taylor Kiker
Environmental Scientist
kimley-horn.com
200 South Tryon Street, Suite 200, Charlotte, NC 28203
704 333 5131

NA
Feet
4,000 8,000
u
l
Cumberland
County
Legend
Kimley>>> Horn J Approximate Site Boundary
Cumberland County
Figure 1
Vicinity Map
WNC6 Fayetteville Site
Fayetteville, NC

Legend
n Approximate Site Boundary
Kimley>» Horn
Figure 2
USGS Topographic (Vander) Map
WNC6 Fayetteville Site
Fayetteville, NC

InApproximate Site Boundary
Kimley»>Horn
1,000 2,000
Feet
Figure 3
Aerial Map
WNC6 Fayetteville Site
Fayetteville, NC