20160979 Ver 1_AMP - IRT Comments_20210325

Strickland, Bev
From: Dailey, Samantha J CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2021 3:19 PM
To: Tugwell, Todd J CIV USARMY CESAW (US); Kim Browning; Haywood, Casey M CIV
(USA); Davis, Erin B; Wilson, Travis W.; Bowers, Todd
Subject: [External] FW: SAW-2016-01985 / EBX-Neuse I, LLC / Neu -Con UMBI / Poplar Creek
AMP - IRT Comments
Attachments: SAW-2016-01985 Poplar Creek Mitigation Bank Adaptive Management Plan
03232021.pdf
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as
an attachment to Report Spam.<mailto:[e-mail]>
The following attachment saw-2016-01985 poplar creek mitigation bank adaptive management plan
03232021.pdf has timed out, hence bypassing our Attachment Defense System. Only open it up if you are
truly expecting this file.
######################################################################
All,
Please see the response to comments for the Poplar Creek AMP. As indicated in Jamey's email below, they
plan to initiate work in the next couple of weeks. I will schedule a site visit after that point so we can re -visit
the site.
Best Regards,
Sam
Samantha Dailey
Regulatory Project Manager
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Division
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
[phone], Ext. 22
[e-mail]
Original Message
From: Jamey Mceachran <[e-mail]>
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2021 9:40 AM
To: Dailey, Samantha J CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>; Bradley Breslow
<[e-mail]>
i

Subject: [Non-DoD Source] RE: SAW-2016-01985 / EBX-Neuse I, LLC / Neu -Con UMBI / Poplar Creek AMP - IRT
Comments
Good Morning Sam,
Thank you for the comments on the RES Neu -Con, Poplar Creek Adaptive Management Plan. We have
provided a response to all of the comments below, updates to the Adaptive Management Plan, design sheets
to point out repair areas as they relate to the as -built redline, and the 401 that was omitted.
As a heads up they do plan to start work out there next week and it should be done in about 2 weeks. I will let
you know when the work is complete.
Please let us know if you have any further questions or comments.
Thanks!
Jamey
Jamey Redding McEachran
Ecology Team Lead
RES I res.us
Mobile: [phone]
Original Message
From: Dailey, Samantha J CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
Sent: Friday, March 5, 2021 7:21 AM
To: Jamey Mceachran <[e-mail]>; Bradley Breslow <[e-mail]>
Cc: Tugwell, Todd J CIV USARMY CESAW (USA)<[e-mail]>; Browning, Kimberly D CIV
USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>; Haywood, Casey M CIV (USA)
<[e-mail]>; Davis, Erin B <[e-mail]>; Wilson, Travis W.
<[e-mail]>; Bowers, Todd <[e-mail]>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] SAW-2016-01985 / EBX-Neuse I, LLC / Neu -Con UMBI / Poplar Creek AMP - IRT Comments
Good morning Jamey,
Comments were received regarding the RES Neu -Con, Poplar Creek Adaptive Management Plan. I do ask that
you provide a response to comments.
DWR Comments (Erin Davis):
1) DWR is concerned that this is the second year of structure and bank stability issues onsite. During the initial
as -built site walk, DWR noted that many of the log structures were installed without footer logs. Was this the
case with the structures proposed for repair? For the bank erosion and brush toe repairs not associated with
log structures, what factors were identified in contributing to the instability?
2) DWR is also concerned with the potential soil compaction and vegetation disturbance in the newly restored
riparian buffer from construction equipment. Please provide a brief plan on how the stream repair areas will
be accessed in order to minimize buffer impacts and how disturbed areas will be restored.
3) Area 10 specific comment, DWR questions whether the application of bentonite would inhibit the rooting of
proposed live cuttings. Can more detail please be provided on where and how bentonite is proposed for use.
2

4) Minor comment, the cover letter notes attachment of the 401 authorization, but the 401 approval letter
was not included in the submittal.
USACE (Casey Haywood):
5) It would be helpful if RES could provide a more complete AMP that discusses the cause(s) of the failures,
and provide a more detailed description of how the failures will be addressed. It would also be important to
identify access areas for the repairs and discuss how impacts to the buffer will be minimized if construction
equipment is being used.
6) Providing a design sheet that shows repairs and access areas is recommended. A few photos of the failures
for reference would also be helpful.
7) In the AMP, RES stated that after the maintenance activities were complete, planted areas that were
heavily disturbed would be replanted- Does RES anticipate that more than 20% of the site will need to be
replanted due to maintenance? Will the species used in the replanting match the original planting list? It is
recommended that an additional vegetation plot is established in the disturbed area to help monitor success.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Best Regards,
Sam
Samantha Dailey
Regulatory Project Manager
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Division
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
[phone], Ext. 22
[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>
3

fires
March 25, 2021
Sam Dailey
USACE — Regulatory Division
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
360o Glenwood Avenue, Suite ioo
Raleigh, NC 27612
Corporate Headquarters
6575 West Loop South, Suite 300
Bellaire, TX 77401
Main: 713.520.5400
RE: Poplar Creek (SAW-2016-01985) Stream Mitigation Site — Year 2 Monitoring Adaptive
Management Memo
Dear Ms. Dailey,
Thank you for the comments in response to the Poplar Creek (SAW-2016-01985) Stream Mitigation Site —
Year 2 Monitoring Adaptive Management Memo. Below are our responses to comments and the updated
Adaptive Management Plan addressing those comments.
1) DWR is concerned that this is the second year of structure and bank stability issues onsite. During
the initial as -built site walk, DWR noted that many of the log structures were installed without
footer logs. Was this the case with the structures proposed for repair? For the bank erosion and
brush toe repairs not associated with log structures, what factors were identified in contributing to
the instability?
RES understands the concern and is committed to ensuring the future stability and structure issues
are resolved. Observed log toe failures were behind the logs and these areas will be back filled and
capped with a soil lift and livestakes. RES footers are not proposed on the log toe repairs.
Causes of bank erosion has been attributed to a late livestake installation, point bars slightly higher
than the outside of meanders pushing flow onto the outside bend, concentrated floodplain flow onto
bank protection, and lack of properly keying in of brush toes.
2) DWR is also concerned with the potential soil compaction and vegetation disturbance in the newly
restored riparian buffer from construction equipment. Please provide a brief plan on how the stream
repair areas will be accessed in order to minimize buffer impacts and how disturbed areas will be
restored.
RES intends to minimize soil compaction and vegetation disturbance in the newly restored buffer
as much as possible. In response to both DWR's concern and USACE's concern in comment 5 and
6 the potential limit of disturbance with the access areas is included in the Figures below. The
access areas have been developed with the goal to minimize buffer impacts and have been walked
with the construction superintendent to ensure our goals of minimal impact are aligned. The
disturbed areas will be restored by reseeding with a combination of temporary and permanent seed
mix and then planting bare root trees and livestakes where necessary.
3) Area 10 specific comment, DWR questions whether the application of bentonite would inhibit the
rooting of proposed live cuttings. Can more detail please be provided on where and how bentonite
is proposed for use.
Area 10 has been revised to call for the installation of a new log toe and no longer using bentonite.
res.us

4) Minor comment, the cover letter notes attachment of the 401 authorization, but the 401 approval
letter was not included in the submittal.
Apologies, the 401 approval letter is now included.
USACE (Casey Haywood):
5) It would be helpful if RES could provide a more complete AMP that discusses the cause(s) of the
failures, and provide a more detailed description of how the failures will be addressed. It would
also be important to identify access areas for the repairs and discuss how impacts to the buffer will
be minimized if construction equipment is being used.
Additional details on our best guess as the causes of the failures as well as additional descriptions
of how the failures will be addressed were added to the Adaptive Management Plan and design
sheets with additional details were also provided. We provided the access area locations in the
Figures with the goal to minimize buffer impacts.
6) Providing a design sheet that shows repairs and access areas is recommended. A few photos of the
failures for reference would also be helpful.
Design sheet and photos have been added for reference. To provide an overview of the access area
and show the entirety of it, the limits of disturbance has been provided in the figures.
7) In the AMP, RES stated that after the maintenance activities were complete, planted areas that were
heavily disturbed would be replanted- Does RES anticipate that more than 20% of the site will need
to be replanted due to maintenance? Will the species used in the replanting match the original
planting list? It is recommended that an additional vegetation plot is established in the disturbed
area to help monitor success.
RES does not anticipate more than 20% of the site will need to be replanted due to maintenance.
based on the plans only 4.5% of the site could be impacted, as the limit of disturbance is about 0.54
acres. To the extent practical the construction team plans to avoid the more established trees onsite.
We intend to plant three species from the original planting list: American sycamore, willow oak,
and swamp chestnut oak. Additionally, due to availability of trees harvested this year, we would
like to propose adding an extra species: common buttonbush. We believe this species will do well
at the site and is a native species in the piedmont alluvial forest which is the targeted community
for this site. Per recommendations, RES will add a random vegetation plot in the disturbed areas to
help monitor success of the disturbed areas.
2

Poplar Creek Year 2 Adaptive Management Plan
During Year 1 (2020) monitoring activities performed September 2020, RES observed a number of failing
log toe structures and areas of bank erosion on YB1-C and a few bank erosion areas on YB2-B (see
Figures). The log toes were from the original construction and were functioning properly during the as -
built repairs that occurred in the winter of 2019/2020. However, they begun to show signs of failing in the
late summer, early fall of 2020. The failing log toes and bank erosion areas will be repaired with a
combination of minor bank grading, coir matting, livestake installation, sod mats, coir logs, and/or brush
toes. RES engineers visited the site in January 2021 and compiled a list of 15 structures/areas that needed
some form of repair. These repair areas are outlined below and correspond by number with the attached
maps. After maintenance activities are completed, planted areas that were heavily disturbed will be
replanted. Upon approval of this plan, RES would like to conduct these maintenance activities in March or
April of 2021.
Outside of this adaptive management plan, other maintenance activities that will be conducted this year
include the replanting of the 0.77-acre area in and around VP4 during the dormant season and continued
invasive treatments with aquatic safe herbicide in the YB2-A channel
YB1-C
Area 1
Issue: Erosion behind a log toe structure.
Cause: Livestake mortality.
Treatment: Backfill the eroded area with a straw bale and cap the area with matted soil lift and live cuttings.
Area 2
Issue: Erosion behind a log toe structure.
Cause: Livestake mortality.
Treatment: Backfill area eroding away with rock, cap with matted soil lift and live cuttings.
Area 3
Issue: Brush toe washed out.
Cause: Inadequate brush toe key -in.
Treatment: Grade bank back, mat, and livestake.
Area 4
Issue: Bank erosion.
Cause: Point bar grading slightly higher elevation than outside meander.
Treatment: Grade point bar to allow for more flow through channel and livestake and mat graded area.
Area 5
Issue: Brush toe washed out.
Cause: Inadequate brush toe key -in.
Treatment: Replace brush toe. Cap with soil lift and live cuttings.
Area 6
Issue: Damaged log toe.
Cause: Improper installation.
Treatment: Replace with brush toe. Cap with soil lift and live cuttings.
o
3

Area 7
Issue: Brush toe washed out.
Cause: Inadequate brush toe key -in.
Treatment: Grade bank back, mat, and livestake.
Area 8
Issue: Damaged log toe and bank erosion.
Cause: Improper installation and grading point bar at a higher elevation than outside meander.
Treatment: Grade point bar, mat and livestake. Replace log toe with a shorter log to widen pool. Backfill
with Class B/I rock. Cap with matted soil lift and live cuttings.
Area 9
Issue: Bank erosion and damaged log toe.
Cause: Improper installation and grading point bar at a higher elevation than outside meander.
Treatment: Grade point bar, mat and livestake. Replace log toe with brush toe. Cap with soil lift and live
cuttings.
Area 10
Issue: Bank erosion around log sill.
Cause: Lack of compaction on log sill backfill and livestake mortality
Treatment: Install new log toe.
Area 11
Issue: Bank erosion.
Cause: Lack of compaction on log sill backfill and livestake mortality.
Treatment: Notch the left side of the log sill. Rebuild bank with Class B/I rock. Cap with matted soil lift
and live cuttings.
Area 12
Issue: Bank erosion.
Cause: Livestake mortality.
Treatment: Grade point bar, mat and livestake.
Area 13
Issue: Bank erosion.
Cause: Wrong angle on log sill.
Treatment: Notch the left side of the log sill. Add brush toe. Cap with matted soil lift and live cuttings.
4

YB2-B
Area 14
Issue: Bank erosion.
Cause: Lack of compaction on log sill backiill.
Treatment: Rebuild bank with Class B/I rock. Cap with matted soil lift and live cuttings.
Area 15
Issue: Bank erosion.
Cause: Improper key in of log sill.
Treatment: Key in grade control a minimum of 5 feet into the bank.
The approved Erosion and Sediment Control (ESC) permit from the original construction remains open and
should permit for the work that is required if needed and is attached. Regarding 401/404 permitting, RES
believes that the proposed work falls within the treatment outlined in the approved Final Mitigation Plan
which has not expired at this time. The original 404/401 authorizations from the approved mitigation plan
are also attached.
Example photos:
Area 15 Bank erosion.
Thank you,
/ecrix-freo6-L
Ryan Medric I Ecologist
Area 6 — Damaged log toe.
5

res
0 25 50
Feet
Adaptive Management Plan
Reach YB1-C
Poplar Creek
Stream Mitigation Site
MY2 2021
Johnston County,
North Carolina
Date: 3/23/2021
Checked by: JRM
Drawn by: RTM
1 in = 50 feet
Legend
aConservation Easement
Vegetation Plot
>320 stems/acre
<320 stems/acre
Limit of Distrubance
Cross Section
As -Built Top of Bank
- Structure
Mitigation Plan Stream
- P1 Restoration
P2 Restoration
- Enhancement I
Enhancement 11
® Stage Recorder
• Flow Gauge
• Ambient
• Repair

res
0 25 50
Feet
Adaptive Management Plan
Reach YB2-B
Poplar Creek
Stream Mitigation Site
MY2 2021
Johnston County,
North Carolina
Date: 3/19/2021
Drawn by: RTM
Checked by: JRM
1 in = 50 feet
Legend
aConservation Easement
Vegetation Plot
>320 stems/acre
<320 stems/acre
Limit of Distrubance
Cross Section
As -Built Top of Bank
- Structure
Mitigation Plan Stream
- P1 Restoration
P2 Restoration
- Enhancement I
Enhancement 11
® Stage Recorder
© Flow Gauge
© Ambient
Repair

FILE NAME:R:\Resgis\dropboxgis\projects\NC\Poplar Creek (bank Site)\CAD\DWG\_As-built Redlines\2017024300RA_SHT_COVER.dwg SAVED BY: Tswartzfager
POPLAR CREEK ASBUILT REDLINES
NEUSE RIVER BASIN: HUC 03020201
APRIL 2018
RESOURCE ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, LLC
3600 GLENWOOD AVE, SUITE 100
RALEIGH, NC 27612
Sheet
List Table
Sheet Number
Sheet Title
--
Cover
51
KEACI-1 YB
52
ILEAC I-1 YB
53
KEACI-1 YB2
54
KEACI-1 YB2
55
KEACI-1 YB2
56
KEACI-1 YB2
57
KEACI-1 YB2
55
KEACI-1 YB2
59
KEACI-1 YB2
5 1 0
KEACI-1 YB3
5 1 1
KEACI-1 YB3
5 1 2
KEACI-1 YB3
SITE MAP
NTS
r 1
res
3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27612
Main: 919.829.9909
www.res.us
Engineering Services Provided By:
Angler Environmental LLC
License: F-1428
SEAL
11,
REVISIONS: PLOT DATE:
3/6/2020
RELEASED FOR:
FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY
PROJECT NUMBER:
PROJECT MANAGER:
DESIGNED:
DRAWN:
CHECKED:
20170243.00.R
####
####
####
####
SHEET NUMBER:
J

\
1
:TIN
PLA
ESI_
156
153
150
147
144
141
138
135
132
0
I
/0
C
A
JUTFALL. TO BE
_D `TH SIPHON
JED F3Y OTHERS)
I \ 1
I \ I
\ 1 1
\
30-1
DWIGHT B. YOUNGBLOOD, JR. DB
/ 1908, PG 697 PB 55, PG 230-235
\LC
;A - l
0
\
\
30-1
FILL EXISTING CHANNEL
SEE DWG D2
0
o 00
REACH YB1-C
P1 RESTORATION
(STA. 00+25 TO 07+03)
FILL EXISTING CHANNEL
SEE DWG D2
1
WLB- -- i/- WI- _
C p ( --\---- -/ v *�
�
H
i a W2
*
L E
0
i
REMOVE
STOCKPILED
SEDIMENT
DWIGHT B. YOUNGBLOOD, JR. DB
1908, PG 697 PB 55, PG 230-235
FIL STING CHANNEL
SEE DWG
XS- 09RP
N \ •
\ XS-ORP a
0
I / //1.
XS-09LP
1 1
e L, 2
a
Ee---_„
, r GW3. '
EP
\
1
\
\
\
EXISTING
STREAM
GRADE
CENTERLI
A_ONG
VE
PROPOSED
\
ROCK
CROSS
VANE
STA 0+78
ELEV
148.08
LOG
SILL
CHANNEL
LOG
BOTTOM
SILL
LOG
SIL
DOUBLE
STA
3+09
LOG
DROP
- -
_ \
______.c.
STA 1+30
147.46
STA
ELEV
1+86
146.76
STA
ELEV
2+4
146.06
ELEV.
145.33
PROPOSED
TOP
OF
BANK
ELEV
LT
DOUBLE
LOG
DROP
LOG
SILL
-
\
STA
ELEV
4+01
143
93
STA
3+13
-
ELEV
14,
.80
v
LOG
S
LL
_
k.
STA
ELEV
4+29
'
43.3
8
f
,
-
STA 0+21.04 ELEV 148.40
STA 0+55.66 ELEV 148.25
I I I I
lommiiin
STA 0+44.45 ELEV 147.28
I I
-STA 1+01.63 ELEV 147.5
A 1+08.39 ELEV 147.06
STA 1+45.68 ELEV 146.93
STA 1+77.71 ELEV 146.82
1+88.52 ELEV 145.78
1+96.51 ELEV 145.77
TA 2+02.34 ELEV 146.23
FA 2+06.80 ELEV 146.21 i
2+30.00 ELEV 145.68
STA 1+39.03 ELEV 146.45
3TA 1+61.25 ELEV 146.38,
;TA 1+68.88 ELEV 146.35
2+12.37 ELEV 145.76 -
FA 2+17.65 ELEV 146.18
-A 2+22.76 ELEV 146.13
IIK
1 '
V
w
O
LLo
�
'Tr
Q
M
V
L(7
..,I.coM
V
00
M
LcS
Ln
>
o
id
>
V
co
•
W
>
W
W
>
W
W
Tr
W
>
W
W
>
W
W
W
>
W
W
i
W
W
w
W
N
O
4•
N
M
STA 3+57.06 ELEV 144.18
STA 3+65.13 ELEV 144.12
- STA 3+81.23 ELEV 144.09
A 4+07.67 ELEV 143.08
STA 4+17.51 ELEV 143.46
4+42.98 ELEV 142.87 j
4+49.90 ELEV 142.82
;TA 4+55.97 ELEV 142.33
co
}
J
1-1]
co
O
1.0
Lo
co.
CO
J
W,-
0+
N
W
LO
N
0N
00
N
W
N
O
>
>
>
J
.-
>
J
c4).
C)
v
v
1-
<
U)
n
CO
<
U
C)
()
Q
(n
LT
Q
u)
N
H
cn
N
N
H
nn-<-n-(n-<-(n--co-'M--M_-8.8
N
H
oc,
N
Ngi
H
QA
O
M Llij
jFiM
WW
Li
W
W
Wn
i I
+30.94 ELEV 142.52
1-37.97 ELEV 142.48
co
<
co
-SS
U)
N
H
V
M
cp
Ln
M
;TA 4+63.11 ELEV 1
u)
(1)
0)
co
cn
H
V
1
4
<
Q
cn
V
V
V
V V
156
153
150
147
144
141
138
135
132
+H(
4_
TYPICAL SHALLOW CROSS SECTION
5.0
1.6
1.8
1.6
BANKFULL STAGE
Q
TYPICAL POOL CROSS SECTION
5.0
3.0
BANKFULL STAGE
0.9
TYPICAL RIGHT MEANDER CROSS SECTION
5.0
0.9 3.0
BANKFULL STAGE
TYPICAL LEFT MEANDER CROSS
SECTION
NOTES:
1. IN GENERAL, STREAM CONSTRUCTION SHALL PROCEED FROM AN UPSTREAM TO
DOWNSTREAM DIRECTION.
2. ALL EXCAVATED MATERIAL MUST BE PLACED WITHIN DESIGNATED STOCKPILE AREAS.
3. ALL IMPERVIOUS DIKES AND BYPASS PUMPING EQUIPMENT SHALL BE MODIFIED AT THE
END OF EACH DAY TO RESTORE NORMAL FLOW BACK TO THE CHANNEL.
4. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT COMPACT SOIL AROUND ROOTS OR TREES TO REMAIN, AND
SHALL NOT DAMAGE SUCH TREES IN ANY WAY. EXCAVATED OR OTHER MATERIAL
SHALL NOT BE PLACED, PILED OR STORED WITHIN THE CRITICAL ROOT ZONE AREA OF
THE TREES TO BE SAVED.
5. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, FILL MATERIAL GENERATED FROM CHANNEL EXCAVATION
AND STABILIZATION SHALL BE PLACED INSIDE THE EXISTING CHANNEL TO BE
ABANDONED AT AN ELEVATION THAT PROVIDES POSITIVE DRAINAGE TOWARDS THE
PROPOSED CHANNEL.
6. REMOVE AND STOCKPILE GRAVEL SUBSTRATE LOCATED WITHIN EXISTING CHANNELS.
THIS MATERIAL SHALL BE INSTALLED ON THE PROPOSED BED OF SHALLOW CHANNEL
SECTIONS AND SHALL BE AT LEAST 6 INCHES DEEP WITH A MAXIMUM D50 OF 9mm FOR
REACH YB1-C. IF SUITABLE NATIVE GRAVEL SUBSTRATE IS NOT AVAILABLE THEN A MIX
OF #57 GRAVEL (50%) AND NATIVE MATERIALS (50%) IS TO BE USED FOR REACH YB1-C.
7. IN -STREAM STRUCTURES PROPOSED ALONG THE OUTSIDE OF MEANDER BENDS
(BRUSH TOES, LOG VANES, ROOT WADS, AND LOG TOES) MAY BE USED
INTERCHANGEABLY THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT PER APPROVAL FROM DESIGNER.
LEGEND
AS -BUILT IN -STREAM STRUCTURE
AS -BUILT CROSS SECTION •
AS -BUILT CHANNEL LIMITS
EXISTING CONTOUR MAJOR
EXISTING CONTOUR MINOR
PROPOSED CONTOUR MAJOR
PROPOSED CONTOUR MINOR
EXISTING WETLAND
EXISTING TOP OF BANK
EXISTING BOTTOM OF BANK
PROPOSED CENTERLINE OF
CHANNEL
EXISTING FENCELINE
EXISTING TREELINE
PROPOSED TOP OF BANK
LIMITS OF PROPOSED
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
PROPOSED CHANNEL PLUG
PROPOSED FILL AREA
DIFFUSE FLOW STRUCTURE
BRUSH TOE
DOUBLE LOG DROP
LOG TOE PROTECTION
LOG SILL
LOG GRADE CONTROL
LOG VANE
LOG J-HOOK
RIFFLE GRADE CONTROL
BRUSH BED SILL
FLOODPLAIN SILL
-(50 )
TB
BB
LCE
(
-
i
i
FULL SCALE: 1 "=30
0 30 60
2" = FULL SCALE
1" = HALF SCALE
DESCRIPTION
w
0
REVISIONS:
PLOT DATE:
RELEASED FOR:
_FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY
i
G7
W
z
0
cc
0
LLI
cc
IZ
W
n
z
1-
U
w
cc
0
Z_
J
0
cc
0
CC
O
D
0
0
VJ
2
0
DRAWING TITLE:
REACH YB1
(n
z
0
1-
J
O
(n
2
O
cc
cc
O
U
O
CC
N
CC
w
0
LC)
0
CO
N
U
z
2
C3
w
J
0
O
w
1-
5
U
1-
U
z
0
in
W
w
N
O
M
w
CC
0
0
w
0
0
0
Q
0
co
Ln
co
N
ti
cD
w w
Om
J
DRAWING NUMBER:
S1
SCALE: HOR 1"=30'; VERT 1 "=3'

156
153
150
147
144
141
138
135
132
4
- d
FILL EXISTING CHA.NNd
SEE,! G D2
FILL ' TING
CHAN EL
SEE DWG D2
PROPOSED 3.2' BASE DITCH
SIDE SLOPES = 2.5:1
MIN DEPTH = 0.6'
SLOPE = 2.36%
LOG SILL
'-TOP ELEV = 141.51
A BED ELEV. = 0.6'
LOG SILL
TOP ELEV = 143.57
A BED ELEV. = 0.6'
LOG SILL
TOP ELEV = 144.43
A BED ELEV. = 0.6'
LOG
SILL
PROPOSED
STA
ELEV
4+81
142.70
TOP
or
LOG
BANK
SILL
DOUBLE
STA
ELEV
6+00
140.77
DOUBLE
LOG
LOG
DROP
DROP
TA
ELEV
5+17
142.35
LOG
STA
SILL
5+70
ELEV
141
38
STA 6+05
LEV.
140.31
_OG
SILL
STA
ELEV
6+39
139.60
DOUBLE
STA
ELEV
6+68
139.05
LO
DR
P
��
`
`:,
1
DOUBLE
STA
6+73
LOG DROP
1
_0\�
--�
�`11
STA 4+82.87 ELEV 141.77
STA 4+93.19 ELEV 141.70
N
.,,.
Lc).1-'
.
��,.�
,_
V
�1►
LO
V
I
� ilif
1 it
r�
_
ELEV.
138.63
__
I
i'
`--"
-
W
s
>
>
E > Lli
>
>
V•
CC)ov
:'lI
;�
ill
LO
+
LO
w
w
J
W
N
N
w
w w
w
J
W
>
w
J
V
0
> >
J
w
-A 6+06.14 ELEV 139.33
STA 6+08.96 ELEV 139.32
STA 6+16.09 ELEV 139.76
STA 6+22.54 ELEV 139.70
I
STA 6+29.14 ELEV 139.21
STA 6+35.26 ELEV 139.69
STA 6+49.94 ELEV 139.14
STA 6+85.13 ELEV 138.05
STA A 6+59.54 ELEV 138.71
STA 6+64.23 ELEV 139.0!
H
(
76
<
u)<
w
O�
N
�,
0,-.)
<<
Cn
6
LLD]:O
(�
E LO
+
1 Q
Q u)
co
+
<
Q
u)
7
Z
+
<
H
V
+
<
H
CO
LO
J J
w w
W V
� C')
+ W
LoQ
<
I`
E
t
1
co
a
156
153
150
147
144
141
138
135
DWIGHT B. YOUNGBLOOD, JR. DB
1908, PG 697 PB 55, PG 230-235
4.9
1.6 0.85
BANKFULL STAGE
4_
TYPICAL SHALLOW CROSS SECTION
1.6 1.8 1.6
BANKFULL STAGE
TYPICAL POOL CROSS SECTION
5.0
3.0 0.9
Vow-
BANKFULL STAGE
TYPICAL RIGHT MEANDER CROSS SECTION
5.0
0.9
3.0
BANKFULL STAGE
Vow -
TYPICAL LEFT MEANDER CROSS
SECTION
NOTES:
1. IN GENERAL, STREAM CONSTRUCTION SHALL PROCEED FROM AN UPSTREAM TO
DOWNSTREAM DIRECTION.
2. ALL EXCAVATED MATERIAL MUST BE PLACED WITHIN DESIGNATED STOCKPILE AREAS.
3. ALL IMPERVIOUS DIKES AND BYPASS PUMPING EQUIPMENT SHALL BE MODIFIED AT THE
END OF EACH DAY TO RESTORE NORMAL FLOW BACK TO THE CHANNEL.
4. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT COMPACT SOIL AROUND ROOTS OR TREES TO REMAIN, AND
SHALL NOT DAMAGE SUCH TREES IN ANY WAY. EXCAVATED OR OTHER MATERIAL
SHALL NOT BE PLACED, PILED OR STORED WITHIN THE CRITICAL ROOT ZONE AREA OF
THE TREES TO BE SAVED.
5. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, FILL MATERIAL GENERATED FROM CHANNEL EXCAVATION
AND STABILIZATION SHALL BE PLACED INSIDE THE EXISTING CHANNEL TO BE
ABANDONED AT AN ELEVATION THAT PROVIDES POSITIVE DRAINAGE TOWARDS THE
PROPOSED CHANNEL.
6. REMOVE AND STOCKPILE GRAVEL SUBSTRATE LOCATED WITHIN EXISTING CHANNELS.
THIS MATERIAL SHALL BE INSTALLED ON THE PROPOSED BED OF SHALLOW CHANNEL
SECTIONS AND SHALL BE AT LEAST 6 INCHES DEEP WITH A MAXIMUM D50 OF 9mm FOR
REACH YB1-C. IF SUITABLE NATIVE GRAVEL SUBSTRATE IS NOT AVAILABLE THEN A MIX
OF #57 GRAVEL (50%) AND NATIVE MATERIALS (50%) IS TO BE USED FOR REACH YB1-C.
7. IN -STREAM STRUCTURES PROPOSED ALONG THE OUTSIDE OF MEANDER BENDS
(BRUSH TOES, LOG VANES, ROOT WADS, AND LOG TOES) MAY BE USED
INTERCHANGEABLY THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT PER APPROVAL FROM DESIGNER.
LEGEND
AS -BUILT IN -STREAM STRUCTURE
AS -BUILT CROSS SECTION •
AS -BUILT CHANNEL LIMITS
EXISTING CONTOUR MAJOR
EXISTING CONTOUR MINOR
PROPOSED CONTOUR MAJOR
PROPOSED CONTOUR MINOR
EXISTING WETLAND
EXISTING TOP OF BANK
EXISTING BOTTOM OF BANK
PROPOSED CENTERLINE OF
CHANNEL
EXISTING FENCELINE
EXISTING TREELINE
PROPOSED TOP OF BANK
LIMITS OF PROPOSED
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
PROPOSED CHANNEL PLUG
PROPOSED FILL AREA
DIFFUSE FLOW STRUCTURE
BRUSH TOE
DOUBLE LOG DROP
LOG TOE PROTECTION
LOG SILL
LOG GRADE CONTROL
LOG VANE
LOG J-HOOK
RIFFLE GRADE CONTROL
BRUSH BED SILL
FLOODPLAIN SILL
-(50 )
TB
BB
LCE
A
(
-
i
i
FULL SCALE: 1 "=30
0 30 60
2" = FULL SCALE
1" = HALF SCALE
DESCRIPTION
w
0
cc
REVISIONS:
PLOT DATE:
RELEASED FOR:
_FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY
W
z
J
0
cc
m
(/)
LIJ
0
cc
0_
a_
z
1-
0
w
cc
Z
J
0
cc
U
CC
0
z
0
U
Z
0
Z
0
DRAWING TITLE:
REACH YB1
U
Z
0
1-
J
O
U
w
2
O
cc
W
w
cc
O
U
O
CC
N
CC
W
0
CO
N
U
z
(3
w
J
0
O
w
1-
5
U
1-
z
0
w
W
N
O
P')
W
cc
0
0
DRAWING NUMBER:
S2
SCALE: HOR 1 "=30'; VERT 1 "=3'

4
\M
4
4
4
183
180
177
174
171
168
165
162
160
0
J
4
DOUBLE LOG DROP
/ /
/ /
/ / /
/ /
/ / /
0
2+00
82 E 2C
DWIGHT B. YOUNGBLOOD, JR. DB
721, PG 582 DB 854, PG 705 DB
1399, PG 222 82 E 207
\
\ \ \
\ \ \ \
\
+00
REACH YB2-A \� \
P1 RESTORATION \ \
(STA. 00+17 TO 08+80) `
00
—
SIAU+io
ELEV 178.81
DOUBLE
LOG
DROP
1
STA 0+21
ELEV.
178.2.
■
DOUBLE
LOG
DROP
DOUBLE
STA
0+63
LOG
DROP
■
STA
ELEV.
0+4
177.73
ELEV
176.65
■
DOUBLE
STA
0+L4
LOG
DRY'
DIUBL
STA
0+67
L•
DRsP
ELEV
177.15
ELEV.
176.04
DOUBLE
LOG
DROP
EXIS—ING
GRADE
ALONG
�i''I
STA 0+86
STR
AM CENT=RLINE
1, �
ELEV.
175.53
VAL
EY
SILL
��
DOUBLE
LOG
DROP
LOG
JHOOK
�,
��
��
STA 0+91
�Ef�^-�
`
A_
ELEV
175.07
+
174.45
STA
ELE
3+76
173.72
—11'��.�'
`
_ELEV
iimilwaspalrammor
11
ff
lig
lipp
-STA 0+32.18 ELEV 177.;
w
TA 0+47.02 ELEV 176.31
I
STA 0+55.26 ELEV 176.6
r
3TA 0+23.37 I
STA 0+69.84 ELEV 175.21
STA 0+80.12 ELEV 175.5!
co
o
o[111=
.Aw1
TA 013.71 3.71 i LEV 1I74.291
-STA 1+01.47 ELEV 174.6
STA 1+09.51 ELEV 174.6!
TA 1+13.69 ELEV 174.27
STA 1+18.07 ELEV 174.61
STA 1+24.45 ELEV 174.5E
EA 1+32.43 ELEV 174.16-
-A 1+36.18 ELEV 174.14
I
STA 1+42.82 ELEV 174.52
� I
A 1+59.92 ELEV 174.06
4.32 ELEV 174.01
M
.4-
en
CV
O
.4
CV
..4
co
VN
co
N
R.
W
co
_N.coN.
STA 2+54.50 ELEV 174.13
STA 2+59.74 ELEV 173.73
2+68.07 ELEV 173.70
A 2+76.57 ELEV 174.07
I I
A 2+82.67 ELEV 174.02-I
!+88.34 ELEV 173.63
STA 3+35.03'ELEV '173.47
-S I A 3+42.b4 ELEV 1 /3.8b
STA 3+50.34 ELEV 173.81
In
O
r
■■
I ELEV 173.5!
a 3+08.28 ELEV 173
I I
STA 3+21.77 ELEV 173.52'
I
ELEV 173.40�
I6 ELEV 173.
I I I
STA 4+38.42 ELEV 173.51
EA 4+42.67 ELEV 173.15-1
I I I
STA 4+48.84 ELEV 173.49
I I I I I
>
W—W
>
N-WW
>
>
>
W
w
>
Lu
w>
�N.
>W
W
w
f)
J
W
w
V
w
a0
W
w
W
w
wrII::
W
WW
MWrnLn
J
Lo
W
■�MN.r
■
—
TA 3+81.95 ELEV 1
TA 3+91.71 ELEV 1
-STA 4+01.12 ELE\
.+12.30 ELEV
1.79 ELEV 1 i
STA 4+32.77 ELEV
STA 1+74
O
N
CV
<<
CV
N
Nu)u)
CV
N
N
<
N
Q
N
N
Q
ON<
+
3+57.81
STA 13+66.
r
n
C
H
— U)—(n
<
n
H
Q
~
j
j
Q
Q
+I—
Qu
—
co()
)
c
—
183
180
177
174
171
168
165
162
160
+tic
5.0
1.3
Joi7
1.2
BANKFULL STAGE
4_
TYPICAL SHALLOW CROSS SECTION
BANKFULL STAGE
TYPICAL POOL CROSS SECTION
5.1
3
1.2
BANKFULL STAGE
Q
TYPICAL RIGHT MEANDER CROSS SECTION
5.1
11
1.2
3
BANKFULL STAGE
TYPICAL LEFT MEANDER CROSS
SECTION
NOTES:
1. IN GENERAL, STREAM CONSTRUCTION SHALL PROCEED FROM AN UPSTREAM TO
DOWNSTREAM DIRECTION.
2. ALL EXCAVATED MATERIAL MUST BE PLACED WITHIN DESIGNATED STOCKPILE AREAS.
3. ALL IMPERVIOUS DIKES AND BYPASS PUMPING EQUIPMENT SHALL BE MODIFIED AT THE
END OF EACH DAY TO RESTORE NORMAL FLOW BACK TO THE CHANNEL.
4. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT COMPACT SOIL AROUND ROOTS OR TREES TO REMAIN, AND
SHALL NOT DAMAGE SUCH TREES IN ANY WAY. EXCAVATED OR OTHER MATERIAL
SHALL NOT BE PLACED, PILED OR STORED WITHIN THE CRITICAL ROOT ZONE AREA OF
THE TREES TO BE SAVED.
5. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, FILL MATERIAL GENERATED FROM CHANNEL EXCAVATION
AND STABILIZATION SHALL BE PLACED INSIDE THE EXISTING CHANNEL TO BE
ABANDONED AT AN ELEVATION THAT PROVIDES POSITIVE DRAINAGE TOWARDS THE
PROPOSED CHANNEL.
6. REMOVE AND STOCKPILE GRAVEL SUBSTRATE LOCATED WITHIN EXISTING CHANNELS.
THIS MATERIAL SHALL BE INSTALLED ON THE PROPOSED BED OF SHALLOW CHANNEL
SECTIONS AND SHALL BE AT LEAST 6 INCHES DEEP WITH A MAXIMUM D50 OF 8mm FOR
REACH YB2-A. IF SUITABLE NATIVE GRAVEL SUBSTRATE IS NOT AVAILABLE THEN A MIX
OF #57 GRAVEL (50%) AND NATIVE MATERIALS (50%) IS TO BE USED FOR REACH YB2-A.
7. IN -STREAM STRUCTURES PROPOSED ALONG THE OUTSIDE OF MEANDER BENDS
(BRUSH TOES, LOG VANES, ROOT WADS, AND LOG TOES) MAY BE USED
INTERCHANGEABLY THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT PER APPROVAL FROM DESIGNER.
LEGEND
AS -BUILT IN -STREAM STRUCTURE
AS -BUILT CROSS SECTION •
AS -BUILT CHANNEL LIMITS
EXISTING CONTOUR MAJOR
EXISTING CONTOUR MINOR
PROPOSED CONTOUR MAJOR
PROPOSED CONTOUR MINOR
EXISTING WETLAND
EXISTING TOP OF BANK
EXISTING BOTTOM OF BANK
PROPOSED CENTERLINE OF
CHANNEL
EXISTING FENCELINE
EXISTING TREELINE
PROPOSED TOP OF BANK
—(50 )
TB
BB
LIMITS OF PROPOSED
CONSERVATION EASEMENT L E
PROPOSED CHANNEL PLUG
PROPOSED FILL AREA
DIFFUSE FLOW STRUCTURE
BRUSH TOE
DOUBLE LOG DROP
LOG TOE PROTECTION
LOG SILL
LOG GRADE CONTROL
LOG VANE
LOG J-HOOK
RIFFLE GRADE CONTROL
BRUSH BED SILL
FLOODPLAIN SILL
(
SEIMMIla
—
3
i
i
FULL SCALE: 1 "=30
0 30 60
2" = FULL SCALE
1" = HALF SCALE
DESCRIPTION
w
0
cc
REVISIONS:
PLOT DATE:
RELEASED FOR:
_FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY
w
z
J
0
cc
m
(/)
w
w
0
qc
0
w
a_
z
H
0
w
cc
0
z_
J
cc
U
2
CC
O
D
0
0
0
z
0
DRAWING TITLE:
REACH YB2
z
0
J
O
Lu
2
O
cc
Lu
Lu
U
cc
O
Lu
U
O
cc
N
CC
w
LC)
o
co
N
0
Z
('3
w
J
0
O
uJ
1-
5
1-
(/)
z
0
uJ
LL
LL
Lu
N
O
UJ
cc
0
0
w
J
0
0
0
0
O
L()
0,
co
N
ti
a)
Ed
Om
0
l
DRAWING NUMBER:
S3
SCALE: HOR 1 "=30'; VERT 1 "=3'

O1k WAT=F =
O
XS-01RP
~�z
183
180
177
174
171
168
165
162
160
4
DWIGHT B. YOUNGBLOOD, JR. DB
721, PG 582 DB 354, PG 705 DB
G 222 82 E 207
_71.3,40
POND TOP OF WATER =
179.68'
XS—O 1 LP
XS-027P4CH YB2-A
P1 RESTORATION
(STA. 00+17 TO 08+80)
_XS \ 2RP
� l
i
I
I
I
I
VALLEY
SILL
GRADE
CENTERLINE
ALONG
STA
ELEV
7+09
172.60
LOG
SILL
EXISTING
STREAM
STA
ELEV
02
173.30
LOG
JHOOK
LOG
J'-IOOK
STA
ELEV
5+94
172.97
STA
ELEV
7+77
172.37
-�
'�
1
J
1\op-
ye►
.
1
STA 4+73.04 ELEV 173.41
I
STA 4+79.10 ELEV 173.37
STA 4+84.87 ELEV 172.97
STA 4+90.34 ELEV 172.95 •
STA 5+17.31 ELEV 172.86
STA 5+23.29 ELEV 173.24
STA 5+28.79 ELEV 173.21
STA 5+34.19 ELEV 172.80
STA 5+38.88 ELEV 172.79
STA 5+44.69 ELEV 173.17
STA 6+33.60 ELEV 172.87
STA 6+40.68 ELEV 172.47
STA 6+47.12 ELEV 172.82
I i i
STA 4+97.19 ELEV 173.33
I I I
STA 5+09.05 ELEV 172.89
STA 5+64.45 ELEV 172.70
111
I I I
5+77.59 ELEV 172.66
A 5+86.24 ELEV 173.03
STA 6+83.62 ELEV 172.70
TA 6+93.97 ELEV 172.26
STA 6+03.47 ELEV 172.5
I I �
STA 6+11.12 ELEV 172.5EI
STA 6+22.53 ELEV 172
6 ELEV 172.6
CO
N
STA 7+26.81 ELEV 172.5E
STA 7+40.46 ELEV 172.48
EV 171.95
EV 171.92
)4.54 ELEV 1'72.29
I
5.92 ELEV 172.23
10ELEV 171182
1.40 ELEV 172.20
I I
3TA 6+63.02 ELEV 1
TA 6+70.59 ELEV 1
STA 6+79.11 ELE'
IA 7+18.67 ELEV 1 i
A 7+52.47 ELEV 17:
I I
A 7+62.28 ELEV 17:
ELEV
-STA 7+02.5(
STA 7+68.57
J
w
N
CO
STA 7+97.68 ELL
STA 7+87.
Q
to
�
7
1-
N
ch
7
Q
u)
1
/
183
180
177
174
171
168
165
162
160
+41 l
5.0
1.3
1-0; \
1.2
BANKFULL STAGE
TYPICAL SHALLOW CROSS SECTION
BANKFULL STAGE
TYPICAL POOL CROSS SECTION
5.1
3
1.2
BANKFULL STAGE
1.1
Q
TYPICAL RIGHT MEANDER CROSS SECTION
5.1
1.2
BANKFULL STAGE
11
4_
TYPICAL LEFT MEANDER CROSS
SECTION
NOTES:
1. IN GENERAL, STREAM CONSTRUCTION SHALL PROCEED FROM AN UPSTREAM TO
DOWNSTREAM DIRECTION.
2. ALL EXCAVATED MATERIAL MUST BE PLACED WITHIN DESIGNATED STOCKPILE AREAS.
3. ALL IMPERVIOUS DIKES AND BYPASS PUMPING EQUIPMENT SHALL BE MODIFIED AT THE
END OF EACH DAY TO RESTORE NORMAL FLOW BACK TO THE CHANNEL.
4. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT COMPACT SOIL AROUND ROOTS OR TREES TO REMAIN, AND
SHALL NOT DAMAGE SUCH TREES IN ANY WAY. EXCAVATED OR OTHER MATERIAL
SHALL NOT BE PLACED, PILED OR STORED WITHIN THE CRITICAL ROOT ZONE AREA OF
THE TREES TO BE SAVED.
5. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, FILL MATERIAL GENERATED FROM CHANNEL EXCAVATION
AND STABILIZATION SHALL BE PLACED INSIDE THE EXISTING CHANNEL TO BE
ABANDONED AT AN ELEVATION THAT PROVIDES POSITIVE DRAINAGE TOWARDS THE
PROPOSED CHANNEL.
6. REMOVE AND STOCKPILE GRAVEL SUBSTRATE LOCATED WITHIN EXISTING CHANNELS.
THIS MATERIAL SHALL BE INSTALLED ON THE PROPOSED BED OF SHALLOW CHANNEL
SECTIONS AND SHALL BE AT LEAST 6 INCHES DEEP WITH A MAXIMUM D50 OF 8mm FOR
REACH YB2-A. IF SUITABLE NATIVE GRAVEL SUBSTRATE IS NOT AVAILABLE THEN A MIX
OF #57 GRAVEL (50%) AND NATIVE MATERIALS (50%) IS TO BE USED FOR REACH YB2-A.
7. IN -STREAM STRUCTURES PROPOSED ALONG THE OUTSIDE OF MEANDER BENDS
(BRUSH TOES, LOG VANES, ROOT WADS, AND LOG TOES) MAY BE USED
INTERCHANGEABLY THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT PER APPROVAL FROM DESIGNER.
LEGEND
AS -BUILT IN -STREAM STRUCTURE
AS -BUILT CROSS SECTION •
AS -BUILT CHANNEL LIMITS
EXISTING CONTOUR MAJOR
EXISTING CONTOUR MINOR
PROPOSED CONTOUR MAJOR
PROPOSED CONTOUR MINOR
EXISTING WETLAND
EXISTING TOP OF BANK
EXISTING BOTTOM OF BANK
PROPOSED CENTERLINE OF
CHANNEL
EXISTING FENCELINE
EXISTING TREELINE
PROPOSED TOP OF BANK
LIMITS OF PROPOSED
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
PROPOSED CHANNEL PLUG
PROPOSED FILL AREA
DIFFUSE FLOW STRUCTURE
BRUSH TOE
DOUBLE LOG DROP
LOG TOE PROTECTION
LOG SILL
LOG GRADE CONTROL
LOG VANE
LOG J-HOOK
RIFFLE GRADE CONTROL
BRUSH BED SILL
FLOODPLAIN SILL
-(50 )
TB
BB
LCE
(
3-
—
i
i
1T
FULL SCALE: 1 "=30
0 30 60
2" = FULL SCALE
1" = HALF SCALE
DESCRIPTION
w
0
cc
REVISIONS:
PLOT DATE:
RELEASED FOR:
_FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY
W
Z
J
0
LLI
cc
m
w
0
cc
0_
0
w0
a_
z
H
0
W
cc
0
Z
0
cc
U
2
CC
O
0
Z
0
cn
2
0
DRAWING TITLE:
REACH YB2
LC)
o
co
cJ
N
0
Z
c3
w
J
0
w
1-
5
1-
z
0
w
w
N
O
c')
w
o=
0
0
w
J
0
0
0
0
cO
LC)
co
N
O)
0)
Z
LLI w
Om
o_ 2
J
l
DRAWING NUMBER:
S4
SCALE: HOR 1 "=30'; VERT 1 "=3'

183
180
177
174
171
168
165
162
160
8
M
co
W
N.
g+00
N
REACH YB2-A
P1 RESTORATION
(STA. 00+17 TO 08+80)
331
-ccE
XS-03LP
'0+
XS-03/04RP
\---
DWIGHT B. YOUNGBLOOD, JR. DB
721, PG 582 DB 854, PG 705 DB
1399, PG 222 82 E 207
XS-04LP
11+00
— REACH YB2-A
P2 RESTORATION
(STA. 08+80 TO 12+30)
30-
EXISTING 15 INCH RCP —
CLEANOUT
\
/
\
/
\
/
\
EXISTING
STREAM
GRADE
CENTERLINE
ALONG
/
Z
`
\—
/
IOGSIII
/
STA
FLFV
9+32
171
82
'
�
/
LOG
JHOOK
S
ELEV
A 11
171.10
+49
-
_............_—;
- - .
-
-
- -_....
• • .
. - . .
- _ . ._..1_
_
_ _ _ .
•
- NI
i pi ... :
r iv.
•
IImo
STA 10+28.05 ELEV 171.54
_ I I
A 10+40.27 ELEV 171.10
. i
._ _ _
, . . . ,
„ II „ .
___a_._
m
. . . . . . .
STA 8+58.66 ELEV 171.71
STA 8+65.63 ELEV 172.09
STA 8+75.82 ELEV 172.01
STA 11+26.90 ELEV 170.81
r STA 8+41.10 ELEV 17
1
STA 8+89.71 ELEV 171
-STA 9+02.64 ELEV 171
- STA 9+22.12 ELEV 171
STA 9+47.58 ELEV 171.42
STA 9+90.88 ELEV 171.6
I I
STA 10+71.85 ELEV 171.34
STA 11+66.56 ELEV 171.07
STA 11+78.17 ELEV 171.02
STA 11+87.51 ELEV 170.60
I I
STA 11+93.32 ELEV 170.58 1
STA 11+99.34 ELEV 170.96
STA 12+08.26 ELEV 170.90
STA 12+15.67 ELEV 170.51
STA 12+28.33 ELEV 170.46
STA 12+37.29 ELEV 170.83
STA 12+46.09 ELEV 170.77
I LLtV 1 /U.323
V
1-:In R+Sn
A+nn
A+Sn
1n+nn
V V V V
1n+5n
11+nn
11+5n
V
1�+nn
V V
1�+5n 1�+;
183
180
177
174
171
168
165
162
160
0
5.0
1.3 1.2
Joi7
BANKFULL STAGE
4_
TYPICAL SHALLOW CROSS SECTION
BANKFULL STAGE
TYPICAL POOL CROSS SECTION
5.1
3
1.2
BANKFULL STAGE
4_
TYPICAL RIGHT MEANDER CROSS SECTION
5.1
1.2
3
BANKFULL STAGE
TYPICAL LEFT MEANDER CROSS
SECTION
NOTES:
1. IN GENERAL, STREAM CONSTRUCTION SHALL PROCEED FROM AN UPSTREAM TO
DOWNSTREAM DIRECTION.
2. ALL EXCAVATED MATERIAL MUST BE PLACED WITHIN DESIGNATED STOCKPILE AREAS.
3. ALL IMPERVIOUS DIKES AND BYPASS PUMPING EQUIPMENT SHALL BE MODIFIED AT THE
END OF EACH DAY TO RESTORE NORMAL FLOW BACK TO THE CHANNEL.
4. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT COMPACT SOIL AROUND ROOTS OR TREES TO REMAIN, AND
SHALL NOT DAMAGE SUCH TREES IN ANY WAY. EXCAVATED OR OTHER MATERIAL
SHALL NOT BE PLACED, PILED OR STORED WITHIN THE CRITICAL ROOT ZONE AREA OF
THE TREES TO BE SAVED.
5. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, FILL MATERIAL GENERATED FROM CHANNEL EXCAVATION
AND STABILIZATION SHALL BE PLACED INSIDE THE EXISTING CHANNEL TO BE
ABANDONED AT AN ELEVATION THAT PROVIDES POSITIVE DRAINAGE TOWARDS THE
PROPOSED CHANNEL.
6. REMOVE AND STOCKPILE GRAVEL SUBSTRATE LOCATED WITHIN EXISTING CHANNELS.
THIS MATERIAL SHALL BE INSTALLED ON THE PROPOSED BED OF SHALLOW CHANNEL
SECTIONS AND SHALL BE AT LEAST 6 INCHES DEEP WITH A MAXIMUM D50 OF 8mm FOR
REACH YB2-A. IF SUITABLE NATIVE GRAVEL SUBSTRATE IS NOT AVAILABLE THEN A MIX
OF #57 GRAVEL (50%) AND NATIVE MATERIALS (50%) IS TO BE USED FOR REACH YB2-A.
7. IN -STREAM STRUCTURES PROPOSED ALONG THE OUTSIDE OF MEANDER BENDS
(BRUSH TOES, LOG VANES, ROOT WADS, AND LOG TOES) MAY BE USED
INTERCHANGEABLY THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT PER APPROVAL FROM DESIGNER.
LEGEND
AS -BUILT IN -STREAM STRUCTURE
AS -BUILT CROSS SECTION •
AS -BUILT CHANNEL LIMITS
EXISTING CONTOUR MAJOR
EXISTING CONTOUR MINOR
PROPOSED CONTOUR MAJOR
PROPOSED CONTOUR MINOR
EXISTING WETLAND
EXISTING TOP OF BANK
EXISTING BOTTOM OF BANK
PROPOSED CENTERLINE OF
CHANNEL
EXISTING FENCELINE
EXISTING TREELINE
-(50 )
PROPOSED TOP OF BANK -
LIMITS OF PROPOSED
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
PROPOSED CHANNEL PLUG
PROPOSED FILL AREA
DIFFUSE FLOW STRUCTURE
BRUSH TOE
DOUBLE LOG DROP
LOG TOE PROTECTION
LOG SILL
LOG GRADE CONTROL
LOG VANE
LOG J-HOOK
RIFFLE GRADE CONTROL
BRUSH BED SILL
FLOODPLAIN SILL
TB
BB
LO
(
-
J
J
FULL SCALE: 1 "=30
0 30 60
2" = FULL SCALE
1" = HALF SCALE
DESCRIPTION
w
0
cc
REVISIONS:
PLOT DATE:
RELEASED FOR:
0
N
0
N
M
_FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY
z
J
0
cc
m
w
CC
CC
0
Li
z
H
U
w
cc
0
z_
J
0
cc
0
2
CC
O
0
0
cn
0
DRAWING TITLE:
REACH YB2
U
z
0
H
J
O
U
w
2
O
cc
W
w
cc
O
1-
U
O
CC
CC
w
O
Lc)
o
(0
cJ
N
U
Z
(3
w
J
CC
0
0
W
1-
5
1-
z
0
cc
w
W
N
O
P')
U
CD
UJ
CC
0
0
l
DRAWING NUMBER:
S5
SCALE: HOR 1 "=30'; VERT 1 "=3'

174
171
168
165
162
159
156
153
150
1
EXISTING 15 IN
CLEANOU j
/
r
c0
nl
///
///
///
//
4
4
� Iw
4
/ /4
i
3z el
4 / 4
4 4
/a
/4
4 GWT
4
--BIM --
Fitt EXtSTI. I�G CHANNEL
SEE DWG D2
REACH YB2-B
P1 RESTORATION
STA. 13+20 TQ26+70)
4
4
—� 4
4 \� �I� ✓�
— —8j — 4
41
DWIGHT B. YOUNGBLOOD, JR. DB
1908, PG 697 PB 55, PG 230-235
9
PROPOSED 'V' DITCH
SIDE SLOPES = 3:1
MIN DEPTH = 0.6'
SLOPE = 1.5%
I EN I-
I PROP. CLASS
B
r
E--V/s
RIPRAP APRON
ON TOP OF TYPE 2
.• r
STA '
A -1
3+50
A l
. f
/
\
\
c1.
GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
(40'L x 5W'x 18"T)
ELEV
168.91
DOU ,.
STA
LE
3+9
OG '
ROP
�Cp
\
A
ROCK
STA
13+553-
A -VANE
Ali
167.58
ROCK
A -VANE
ALONG
XIS
ING
RADE
\
♦
ELEV.
168.31
DOUR
STA
13+95
E LOG
D"OP
ELEV
166.07
STREAM
CENTERLINE
ROCK
A -VA
E
ELEV.
166.98
ROCK
STA 14+58
A -VANE
-■■
STA
ELEV.
16
161
61
90
::_.:_.
' ' '� :��
:_
�.,�
��:_
': i ''ida
-`
_
���ELII
ELEV.
165.50
iM
■■
ROCK
A-V�`NE
STA 13+08.17 ELEV 169.25
STA 13+12.26 ELEV 168.82
ill
him
_
■�
■�,LEV
OG
TA 15+31
SILL
164.42
EL
1F�+57
V 1.2.41
r'-"Nb....Pff11111Eril■S1TA
��__
.�'
`
L
LL
LOG
LOG
SIL_
����:��-
\
S
E
A 1 s
EV
+pg
63.2:
ELEV
+
-1—STA-1-6-
161.1
11H'���I
Kill
i
=�
MEM
I I I
f+56.87 ELEV 167.45
_ I
3TA 13+67.00 ELEV 167.37
STA 13+76.62 ELI
96.75 ELEV 166.13
STA 14+07.27 ELEV 166.05
STA 14+35.55 ELEV 165.82
STA 14+40.99 ELEV 166.18
■
1 1
AILNIIIIM
STA 16+30.47 ELEV 162.66
STA 16+34.93 ELEV 162.62
STA 16+52.13 ELEV 162.49 1
41
AIM"
STA 14+80.59 ELEV 164.86
STA 15+53.90 ELEV 163.77
TA 15+60.26 ELEV 163.32
_ I I
STA 15+74.56 ELEV 163.60
STA 15+82.11 ELEV 163.54
A 15+88.71 ELEV 163.09
� I
STA 15+13.42 ELEV 164.1
TA 15+18.38 ELEV 164.21
STA 15+42.18 ELEV 163.46
STA 15+48.95 ELEV 163.81
STA 16+11.43 ELEV 162.41
I
it
co
fA 16+39.04 ELEV 162.19
-A 16+46.98 ELEV 162.12
2.42 ELEV 160.99
49 ELEV 160.83
89.28 ELEV 161.18
ELEV 160.26
co
+71.74 ELEV 161.32
I �
F78.26 ELEV 161.27
c
co
W
co
u)
Q
H
u)
V
V
V
174
171
168
165
162
159
156
153
150
BANKFULL STAGE
TYPICAL SHALLOW CROSS SECTION
5.0
1.3
2.4
1.3
BANKFULL STAGE
TYPICAL POOL CROSS SECTION
5.1
3.0
BANKFULL STAGE
1.2
4_
TYPICAL RIGHT MEANDER CROSS SECTION
5.1
BANKFULL STAGE
4_
TYPICAL LEFT MEANDER CROSS
SECTION
NOTES:
1. IN GENERAL, STREAM CONSTRUCTION SHALL PROCEED FROM AN UPSTREAM TO
DOWNSTREAM DIRECTION.
2. ALL EXCAVATED MATERIAL MUST BE PLACED WITHIN DESIGNATED STOCKPILE AREAS.
3. ALL IMPERVIOUS DIKES AND BYPASS PUMPING EQUIPMENT SHALL BE MODIFIED AT THE
END OF EACH DAY TO RESTORE NORMAL FLOW BACK TO THE CHANNEL.
4. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT COMPACT SOIL AROUND ROOTS OR TREES TO REMAIN, AND
SHALL NOT DAMAGE SUCH TREES IN ANY WAY. EXCAVATED OR OTHER MATERIAL
SHALL NOT BE PLACED, PILED OR STORED WITHIN THE CRITICAL ROOT ZONE AREA OF
THE TREES TO BE SAVED.
5. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, FILL MATERIAL GENERATED FROM CHANNEL EXCAVATION
AND STABILIZATION SHALL BE PLACED INSIDE THE EXISTING CHANNEL TO BE
ABANDONED AT AN ELEVATION THAT PROVIDES POSITIVE DRAINAGE TOWARDS THE
PROPOSED CHANNEL.
6. REMOVE AND STOCKPILE GRAVEL SUBSTRATE LOCATED WITHIN EXISTING CHANNELS.
THIS MATERIAL SHALL BE INSTALLED ON THE PROPOSED BED OF SHALLOW CHANNEL
SECTIONS AND SHALL BE AT LEAST 6 INCHES DEEP WITH A MAXIMUM D50 OF 17mm FOR
REACH YB2-B. IF SUITABLE NATIVE GRAVEL SUBSTRATE IS NOT AVAILABLE THEN A MIX
OF #57 GRAVEL (20%), SURGE STONE (20%), AND NATIVE MATERIALS (50%) IS TO BE
USED FOR REACH YB2-B.
7. IN -STREAM STRUCTURES PROPOSED ALONG THE OUTSIDE OF MEANDER BENDS
(BRUSH TOES, LOG VANES, ROOT WADS, AND LOG TOES) MAY BE USED
INTERCHANGEABLY THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT PER APPROVAL FROM DESIGNER.
LEGEND
AS -BUILT IN -STREAM STRUCTURE
AS -BUILT CROSS SECTION •
AS -BUILT CHANNEL LIMITS
EXISTING CONTOUR MAJOR
EXISTING CONTOUR MINOR
PROPOSED CONTOUR MAJOR
PROPOSED CONTOUR MINOR
EXISTING WETLAND
EXISTING TOP OF BANK
EXISTING BOTTOM OF BANK
PROPOSED CENTERLINE OF
CHANNEL
EXISTING FENCELINE
EXISTING TREELINE
PROPOSED TOP OF BANK
LIMITS OF PROPOSED
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
PROPOSED CHANNEL PLUG
PROPOSED FILL AREA
DIFFUSE FLOW STRUCTURE
BRUSH TOE
DOUBLE LOG DROP
LOG TOE PROTECTION
LOG SILL
LOG GRADE CONTROL
LOG VANE
LOG J-HOOK
RIFFLE GRADE CONTROL
BRUSH BED SILL
FLOODPLAIN SILL
-(50 )
— TB
BB
LO
(
_
J
J
c;1
FULL SCALE: 1 "=30
0 30 60
2" = FULL SCALE
1" = HALF SCALE
DESCRIPTION
w
0
cc
REVISIONS:
PLOT DATE:
RELEASED FOR:
0
N
0
N
_FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY
i
w
z
J
0
cc
m
w
cc
0_
WO
z
H
0
w
cc
0
z_
J
0
cc
CC
0
z
D
0
0
z
0
DRAWING TITLE:
REACH YB2
z
0
1-
J
O
O
cc
W
U
cc
O
U
O
CC
CC
w
0
Lc)
O
CO
cJ
N
U
z
2
('3
w
J
CC
O
O
W
1-
5
1-
z
0
w
w
N
O
P')
w
0
0
w
J
0
0
(
0
Q
0
co
co
m
N
ti
O)
rn
LLI w
Om
J
DRAWING NUMBER:
S6
SCALE: HOR 1 "=30'; VERT 1 "=3'

165
162
159
156
153
150
147
144
141
140
1
301
301
DWIGHT B. YOUNGBI1:I71OEJ . DB
1232, PG766766
7
z 5,
301
337
ILt E-XIST1NGCFIA NN ELW
W-G-D2
REACH YB2-B
P1 RESTORATION
(STA. 13+20 TO 26+70)
337
LOG SILL
TOP ELEV = 153.70
A BED ELEV. = 0.6'
N
337
PROPOSED 4' BASE DITCH
SIDE SLOPES = 4:1
MIN DEPTH = 1.6'
SLOPE = 5.6%
XS-05LP�
DO
BLE LOG
DROP
ST'
EL:
17+29
. 160.37
DOUBLE
LOG
DROP
D •
UBLE LOG
DROP
ROCK
A-V'
NE
STA
ELEV
18+16
157.63
-
STA
EL
17+33
V 159.73
STA 17+6
ELEV
159.15
DOUBLE
LOC
DROP
/
\
\ROCK
A-V A
NE
STA
ELEV.
18+23
157.10
ROCK
STA
18+53
A -VANE
��= "
' 1 i
`
ELEV.
STA 17+73
158.
1
ELEV
ROCK
156.35
A -VANE
EXISTING
STREAM
CENTERLINE
GRADE
ALONG
STA
ELEV.
18+
15
�
.82
DOUBLE
LOG
DROP
-o�
';,
RO
STA
K A-
18+;3
AN E
STA
ELEV
19+23
154.26
rn
I
4/
�����
�
,_�
ELE
DOUBLE
LOG
DROP
i
LOG
SILL
L lti
`'
1 1
STA 17+15.18 ELEV 160.4
'''V'
v'
-v
STA
20+26
LEV
152.45
RO
K A -VANE
��
STA
E_EV.
19+28
153.74
STA 17+47.92 ELEV 158.84
!
-
ELE
15180
�,�;
w.�`�
w
Lo
STA 17+98.96 ELEV 157.80
R�ICKA-VANE
S
A 21
+06
I I 1
_STA 18+10.86 ELEV 157,
�!--
EV. 151.3C
�v
STA 17+74.47 ELEV 157.
1
STA 17+81.88 ELEV 157.!
1
STA 17+88.84 ELEV 15
-
-
eju
ELEVI154.34
73 ELEV 154.67
►1 `�
.
__
ft
>
w
A 18+41.61 ELEV 1
3TA 18+47.35 ELEV
JY. I J
54 06
likv
rNil
I
/
-'
fA 18+24.56 1
ELEV 154.3f.
1
)8 ELEV 154.1
154.3
v
I
j
"lir
-..0111'---,?..,--
ELEV 1
o
CD'
rn
c(s)
N
(N
co
95 ELEV 152.10
I
+34.77 ELEV 152.37
;TA 20+38.98 ELEVI152.34
I I I I
STA 20+75.06 ELEV 151.65
STA 21+58.13 ELEV 149.98 EMS
STA 21+68.48 ELEV 150.30 •II
P4)
.-
or)N
CO
+
CO
CO
00
.-'
ONO
°r
...
Lo
W
N
J-W
N �
> >
V
d
coN
N CV.
>
in
N
W-
STA2O±84.95 ELEV 151.57
~
(n
♦-
U)
rn
<
o
Q
-�_
Q
W
N
WWw-
V co,-W•
J
N
>
J _1W
W W
W
W
I I I I
STA 20+60.84 ELEV 1
1 1 1 I
STA 20+68.33 ELEV 1
-
I I
3TA 21+07.93 ELEV 150.38
;TA 21+13.33 ELEV 150.34
U)
0)
6
N
Q
In
W
�+
W Oo
t
0)
STA 21+23.05 ELEV 150.
I I
STA 21+29.80 ELEV 150.1
-A 21+ 8.60 ELEV 150.14
co
i-
(n
u) co
-
�+ w
'+1n
1
17+5n
1R+nn
1R+5n
19+nn
19+5n
2n+nn
2n+sn
21+nn
21+5n
21+1
165
162
159
156
153
150
147
144
141
140
0
UPSTREAM STA. 21+30 = 5.0
DOWNSTREAM STA. 21+30 = 5.3
1.2
1.25
0.7
0.7
BANKFULL STAGE
TYPICAL SHALLOW CROSS SECTION
UPSTREAM STA. 21+30 = 5.0
DOWNSTREAM STA. 21+30 = 5.4
BANKFULL STAGE
0.2
0.2
TYPICAL POOL CROSS SECTION
UPSTREAM STA. 21+30 = 5.1
DOWNSTREAM STA. 21+30 = 5.4
3.0
3.2
1.2
1.2
BANKFULL STAGE
1
0.9
0.9
TYPICAL RIGHT MEANDER CROSS SECTION
UPSTREAM STA. 21+30 = 5.1
DOWNSTREAM STA. 21+30 = 5.4
1.2
1.2
3.0
3.2
BANKFULL STAGE
4_
TYPICAL LEFT MEANDER CROSS
SECTION
NOTES:
1. IN GENERAL, STREAM CONSTRUCTION SHALL PROCEED FROM AN UPSTREAM TO
DOWNSTREAM DIRECTION.
2. ALL EXCAVATED MATERIAL MUST BE PLACED WITHIN DESIGNATED STOCKPILE AREAS.
3. ALL IMPERVIOUS DIKES AND BYPASS PUMPING EQUIPMENT SHALL BE MODIFIED AT THE
END OF EACH DAY TO RESTORE NORMAL FLOW BACK TO THE CHANNEL.
4. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT COMPACT SOIL AROUND ROOTS OR TREES TO REMAIN, AND
SHALL NOT DAMAGE SUCH TREES IN ANY WAY. EXCAVATED OR OTHER MATERIAL
SHALL NOT BE PLACED, PILED OR STORED WITHIN THE CRITICAL ROOT ZONE AREA OF
THE TREES TO BE SAVED.
5. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, FILL MATERIAL GENERATED FROM CHANNEL EXCAVATION
AND STABILIZATION SHALL BE PLACED INSIDE THE EXISTING CHANNEL TO BE
ABANDONED AT AN ELEVATION THAT PROVIDES POSITIVE DRAINAGE TOWARDS THE
PROPOSED CHANNEL.
6. REMOVE AND STOCKPILE GRAVEL SUBSTRATE LOCATED WITHIN EXISTING CHANNELS.
THIS MATERIAL SHALL BE INSTALLED ON THE PROPOSED BED OF SHALLOW CHANNEL
SECTIONS AND SHALL BE AT LEAST 6 INCHES DEEP WITH A MAXIMUM D50 OF 17mm FOR
REACH YB2-B. IF SUITABLE NATIVE GRAVEL SUBSTRATE IS NOT AVAILABLE THEN A MIX
OF #57 GRAVEL (20%), SURGE STONE (20%), AND NATIVE MATERIALS (50%) IS TO BE
USED FOR REACH YB2-B.
7. IN -STREAM STRUCTURES PROPOSED ALONG THE OUTSIDE OF MEANDER BENDS
(BRUSH TOES, LOG VANES, ROOT WADS, AND LOG TOES) MAY BE USED
INTERCHANGEABLY THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT PER APPROVAL FROM DESIGNER.
LEGEND
AS -BUILT IN -STREAM STRUCTURE
AS -BUILT CROSS SECTION •
AS -BUILT CHANNEL LIMITS
EXISTING CONTOUR MAJOR
EXISTING CONTOUR MINOR
PROPOSED CONTOUR MAJOR
PROPOSED CONTOUR MINOR
EXISTING WETLAND
EXISTING TOP OF BANK
EXISTING BOTTOM OF BANK
PROPOSED CENTERLINE OF
CHANNEL
EXISTING FENCELINE
EXISTING TREELINE
PROPOSED TOP OF BANK
LIMITS OF PROPOSED
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
PROPOSED CHANNEL PLUG
PROPOSED FILL AREA
DIFFUSE FLOW STRUCTURE
BRUSH TOE
DOUBLE LOG DROP
LOG TOE PROTECTION
LOG SILL
LOG GRADE CONTROL
LOG VANE
LOG J-HOOK
RIFFLE GRADE CONTROL
BRUSH BED SILL
FLOODPLAIN SILL
-(50 )
TB
BB
LO
(
-
3
J
J
FULL SCALE: 1 "=30
0 30 60
2" = FULL SCALE
1" = HALF SCALE
DESCRIPTION
w
0
cc
REVISIONS:
PLOT DATE:
RELEASED FOR:
0
N
0
N
M
_FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY
w
z
0
cc
_
5
w
cc
0
w
a_
z
1-
0
w
cc
0
z
J
0
cc
CC
O
z
H
D
0
0
VJ
2
0
DRAWING TITLE:
REACH YB2
z
0
1-
J
O
z
w
2
O
cc
cc
O
U
O
CC
N
CC
w
LC)
O
co
N
U
Z
2
('3
w
J
O
O
W
1-
5
U
1-
(/)
z
0
W
LL
LL
W
-)N
O
CD
w
CC
0
0
w
J
0
0
Q
0
O
L()
co
co
N
0)
rn
LLI w
Om
J
l
DRAWING NUMBER:
S7
SCALE: HOR 1 "=30'; VERT 1 "=3'

153
150
147
144
141
138
135
132
130
2
vz
7,
XS-06LP
.aJ
DWIUBNGBLOOD,
DB 190 PPG 697-P-n' 55,
\ \ PG 2-235
7,
/
/
7,
J'J
DWIGHT B. YOUNGBLOOD, JR. DB
1232, PG 766
44 +00
i
FILL EXISTING CHANNEL
SEE DWG D2 -�
REACH Y B2-B \ \
P1 RESTORATION \ � \ \
(STA. 13+20 TO 264 70) \
\ \\ \
e
DWIGHT B. YOUNGBLOOD, JR. DB
1908, PG 697 PB 55, PG 230-235
I rr
7
7
7
LCE
DOUBLE
STA
ELEV..
LOG
D'OP
50. 50.18
ROCK
STA
22+25
A -VANE
■
--■■■--■■
-■■■■
DOUR
STA
E LCG
D'
•'
ELEV
148.8
,
2
::
.. 6
ROCK
TA22
'
-VA
29
E
•OUBLE
LOG
D'OP
EXISTI
STREA
G GRAD:
CENTE"LINE
ALONG
' •
ANE
7
ELEV.
148.3
'
:LEV.
2
147.60
ROCK
A -VANE
ELE
14
.09
'
-;';�1I
STA
22+92
E LOG
D"OP
' o
-VANE
43
��►�
1OUBLE
LOG
D-OP
ELEV
146.27
D•UB
! r
��`
STA
22+56
�
A 2
44.6I
1i0IL1■
-■
Il
��l•
r :LEV
147.1
0
RCK
O
A
-VAE
N
MIS
EV.
STA 22+16.95 ELEV 148.93
I
_
�`um.
\
I
STA
ELEV.
22
145.74
98
ME
E LOG
D'
• '
MI
.TA
LEV
4+48
STA 21+90.16 ELEV 148.72
)3.81 ELEV 148.61
I I
).00 ELEV 147.40
STA 22+36.00 ELEV 147.34
STA 22+45.76 ELEV 147.67
STA 22+70.40 ELEV 146.05
-44,ci�
44.0
+4. '
11111■���
0
LOG
DROP
1111
-
A 24
EV.
83
41.24
DO
- ST
BLE
25+33
LOG
DR•
ROC
1
A -VANE
-
■
to �'
I -''�4���
_��
-..,..�mazi_�
'
��`71�I�E-I
OUBLE
L03
DROP
EL:V.
139.84
■
SLEV
138?
6
..�'
EV 140
66
DO
■
wog
`j,r
:��
DRO�,E
K A -VAN
u,
STA 22+3(
STA 23+02.90 ELEV 144.79
STA 23+14.17 ELEV 145.11
I\-
,,l
,
�
- T
ELEV
25+
139.26
7
•IIiSTA25+82
ELE
. 137.95
■
142.98 1
co Ln
II
i
„`
_
3+82.14 ELEV 143.
I I I I
STA 24+16.28 ELEV 14:
15 ELEV 141.11
I!IFvANE
STA 24+03.65 ELEV
r1lrinTivwele.„,iiti^7.42
\
o
HI
Q
w
■
W
J
W
J
W
-�
M
>
p
V
>
Lf)
M
i
��.7101111
IN
I
III
'�I
■
STA 24+49.
V
N
J
W
J
W
w
W
Lc)
W
W
W
J
>
J
W
M
EV 138.32
A 25+ 19.33 I ELEV I 138.58�
'�
`.
■--
N
Q
Q
H
I�
W
V
p
M
M
W
W
rn
>
Q
Q
~
N
N
J
W
LC).
25+53.49 EL
0I
EV 136.23
■
■-
M
LO
N
CO
J
EV 131
ELEV 1
ELEV 1
■
■-
■
fn�
W
N
m
_
p
a)
p
CO
-
W
0
N
p}
N
N
H
CO
N
N
M
N
ic co
co
0)
0)
_
1-
V
+fin 77+nn
77+5n
2R+nn
7
V
+5n
74+nn
74+5n
25+nn
V V V V V
75+5n 7A+nn 7A+:
153
150
147
144
141
138
135
132
130
0
5.3
1.4
Joi7\
1.25
BANKFULL STAGE
Ow-
4_
TYPICAL SHALLOW CROSS SECTION
BANKFULL STAGE
TYPICAL POOL CROSS SECTION
5.4
3.2
1.2
BANKFULL STAGE
4_
TYPICAL RIGHT MEANDER CROSS SECTION
5.4
1.2
3.2
BANKFULL STAGE
TYPICAL LEFT MEANDER CROSS
SECTION
NOTES:
1. IN GENERAL, STREAM CONSTRUCTION SHALL PROCEED FROM AN UPSTREAM TO
DOWNSTREAM DIRECTION.
2. ALL EXCAVATED MATERIAL MUST BE PLACED WITHIN DESIGNATED STOCKPILE AREAS.
3. ALL IMPERVIOUS DIKES AND BYPASS PUMPING EQUIPMENT SHALL BE MODIFIED AT THE
END OF EACH DAY TO RESTORE NORMAL FLOW BACK TO THE CHANNEL.
4. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT COMPACT SOIL AROUND ROOTS OR TREES TO REMAIN, AND
SHALL NOT DAMAGE SUCH TREES IN ANY WAY. EXCAVATED OR OTHER MATERIAL
SHALL NOT BE PLACED, PILED OR STORED WITHIN THE CRITICAL ROOT ZONE AREA OF
THE TREES TO BE SAVED.
5. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, FILL MATERIAL GENERATED FROM CHANNEL EXCAVATION
AND STABILIZATION SHALL BE PLACED INSIDE THE EXISTING CHANNEL TO BE
ABANDONED AT AN ELEVATION THAT PROVIDES POSITIVE DRAINAGE TOWARDS THE
PROPOSED CHANNEL.
6. REMOVE AND STOCKPILE GRAVEL SUBSTRATE LOCATED WITHIN EXISTING CHANNELS.
THIS MATERIAL SHALL BE INSTALLED ON THE PROPOSED BED OF SHALLOW CHANNEL
SECTIONS AND SHALL BE AT LEAST 6 INCHES DEEP WITH A MAXIMUM D50 OF 17mm FOR
REACH YB2-B. IF SUITABLE NATIVE GRAVEL SUBSTRATE IS NOT AVAILABLE THEN A MIX
OF #57 GRAVEL (20%), SURGE STONE (20%), AND NATIVE MATERIALS (50%) IS TO BE
USED FOR REACH YB2-B.
7. IN -STREAM STRUCTURES PROPOSED ALONG THE OUTSIDE OF MEANDER BENDS
(BRUSH TOES, LOG VANES, ROOT WADS, AND LOG TOES) MAY BE USED
INTERCHANGEABLY THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT PER APPROVAL FROM DESIGNER.
LEGEND
AS -BUILT IN -STREAM STRUCTURE
AS -BUILT CROSS SECTION •
AS -BUILT CHANNEL LIMITS
EXISTING CONTOUR MAJOR
EXISTING CONTOUR MINOR
PROPOSED CONTOUR MAJOR
PROPOSED CONTOUR MINOR
EXISTING WETLAND
EXISTING TOP OF BANK
EXISTING BOTTOM OF BANK
PROPOSED CENTERLINE OF
CHANNEL
EXISTING FENCELINE
EXISTING TREELINE
PROPOSED TOP OF BANK
LIMITS OF PROPOSED
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
PROPOSED CHANNEL PLUG
PROPOSED FILL AREA
DIFFUSE FLOW STRUCTURE
BRUSH TOE
DOUBLE LOG DROP
LOG TOE PROTECTION
LOG SILL
LOG GRADE CONTROL
LOG VANE
LOG J-HOOK
RIFFLE GRADE CONTROL
BRUSH BED SILL
FLOODPLAIN SILL
-(50 )
TB
BB
LCE
(
-
i
0
FULL SCALE: 1 "=30
0 30 60
2" = FULL SCALE
1" = HALF SCALE
DESCRIPTION
w
0
REVISIONS:
PLOT DATE:
RELEASED FOR:
0
N
0
N
M
_FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY
i
w
z
J
0
cc
_
5
w
cc
0_
W
z
1-
0
w
cc
0
z_
J
0
cc
2
CC
0
D
0
0
0
DRAWING TITLE:
REACH YB2
z
0
I-
J
O
w
2
O
cc
W
w
cc
O
W
U
0
CC
N
CC
w
O
o
(o
N
U
z
(3
w
J
CC
0
0
wl
1-
5
U
1-
z
0
cc
w
W
N
0
P')
efi
cc
0
0
w
J
0
0
0
Q
0
co
co
m
N
ti
.8)
LLI w
Om
J
DRAWING NUMBER:
S8
SCALE: HOR 1 "=30'; VERT 1 "=3'

144
141
138
135
132
129
126
123
120
2
331
DWIGHT B. YOUNGBIJ )JFt. 1VB
77 1232, PG 766766
/ GRADE POINT BAR w \
^ / (MAX SLOPE 3:1) � \
.."'XS O RP
REACH YB2-B
P1 RESTORATION
(STA. 13+20 TO 26+70)
LCE
DWIGHT B. YOUNGBLOOD, rJR..DB
1908, PG 697 PB 55, PG-2130-235
7,5
LCE
I I
337 I I
r<rThrThrY-rmfl--,47
REACH YB2-B
ENHANCEMENT I
(STA. 26+70 TO 29+42)
LCE
i
I
I
I
jl
I
I
I
I
DOUBLE
r S
A 26+39
LOG DROP
E
EV.
36.48
DPUBLE
S
A 26+43
LOG DROP
E
EV 135.91
'ROPOSED
OP OF
BANK
:._
BOT
*M
it
I
�,
��RT
., ,
\
STA 26+34.03 ELEV 136.52
`�
-��
EXISTING
GRADE
ALONG
5.29 ELEV 135.03
i I �
STA 26+58.87 ELEV 135.15
-
--
C/N.
CENTERLINE
_�'\
\
•N--
RT—
4STREAM
N
(J)
_
may.
`��
IT
\
\
,
+:ln
2A+511
27+nn
77+5n
2R+nn
7R+Sn
2A+nn
2A+511
m+nn
7fl+5n
:.in+s
144
141
138
135
132
129
126
123
120
7
5.3
1.4
1.25
BANKFULL STAGE
TYPICAL SHALLOW CROSS SECTION
5.4
1.3
2.8
1.3
►
BANKFULL STAGE
0.9
cL
0.2
TYPICAL POOL CROSS SECTION
5.4
3.2
1.2
BANKFULL STAGE
Q
TYPICAL RIGHT MEANDER CROSS SECTION
5.4
1.2
3.2
BANKFULL STAGE
4_
TYPICAL LEFT MEANDER CROSS
SECTION
NOTES:
1. IN GENERAL, STREAM CONSTRUCTION SHALL PROCEED FROM AN UPSTREAM TO
DOWNSTREAM DIRECTION.
2. ALL EXCAVATED MATERIAL MUST BE PLACED WITHIN DESIGNATED STOCKPILE AREAS.
3. ALL IMPERVIOUS DIKES AND BYPASS PUMPING EQUIPMENT SHALL BE MODIFIED AT THE
END OF EACH DAY TO RESTORE NORMAL FLOW BACK TO THE CHANNEL.
4. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT COMPACT SOIL AROUND ROOTS OR TREES TO REMAIN, AND
SHALL NOT DAMAGE SUCH TREES IN ANY WAY. EXCAVATED OR OTHER MATERIAL
SHALL NOT BE PLACED, PILED OR STORED WITHIN THE CRITICAL ROOT ZONE AREA OF
THE TREES TO BE SAVED.
5. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, FILL MATERIAL GENERATED FROM CHANNEL EXCAVATION
AND STABILIZATION SHALL BE PLACED INSIDE THE EXISTING CHANNEL TO BE
ABANDONED AT AN ELEVATION THAT PROVIDES POSITIVE DRAINAGE TOWARDS THE
PROPOSED CHANNEL.
6. REMOVE AND STOCKPILE GRAVEL SUBSTRATE LOCATED WITHIN EXISTING CHANNELS.
THIS MATERIAL SHALL BE INSTALLED ON THE PROPOSED BED OF SHALLOW CHANNEL
SECTIONS AND SHALL BE AT LEAST 6 INCHES DEEP WITH A MAXIMUM D50 OF 17mm FOR
REACH YB2-B. IF SUITABLE NATIVE GRAVEL SUBSTRATE IS NOT AVAILABLE THEN A MIX
OF #57 GRAVEL (20%), SURGE STONE (20%), AND NATIVE MATERIALS (50%) IS TO BE
USED FOR REACH YB2-B.
7. IN -STREAM STRUCTURES PROPOSED ALONG THE OUTSIDE OF MEANDER BENDS
(BRUSH TOES, LOG VANES, ROOT WADS, AND LOG TOES) MAY BE USED
INTERCHANGEABLY THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT PER APPROVAL FROM DESIGNER.
LEGEND
AS -BUILT IN -STREAM STRUCTURE
AS -BUILT CROSS SECTION •
AS -BUILT CHANNEL LIMITS
EXISTING CONTOUR MAJOR
EXISTING CONTOUR MINOR
PROPOSED CONTOUR MAJOR ( 50)
PROPOSED CONTOUR MINOR
EXISTING WETLAND
EXISTING TOP OF BANK
EXISTING BOTTOM OF BANK
PROPOSED CENTERLINE OF
CHANNEL
EXISTING FENCELINE
EXISTING TREELINE
PROPOSED TOP OF BANK
LIMITS OF PROPOSED
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
PROPOSED CHANNEL PLUG
PROPOSED FILL AREA
DIFFUSE FLOW STRUCTURE
BRUSH TOE
DOUBLE LOG DROP
LOG TOE PROTECTION
LOG SILL
LOG GRADE CONTROL
LOG VANE
LOG J-HOOK
RIFFLE GRADE CONTROL
BRUSH BED SILL
FLOODPLAIN SILL
TB
BB
LCE
(
-
J
J
FULL SCALE: 1 "=30
0 30 60
2" = FULL SCALE
1" = HALF SCALE
DESCRIPTION
w
0
cc
REVISIONS:
PLOT DATE:
RELEASED FOR:
_FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY
i
z
J
0
cc
_
5
m
LLl
U
QC
0_
w0
a_
z
H
0
w
cc
0
z_
J
0
cc
CC
0
z
D
0
z
0
z
0
DRAWING TITLE:
REACH YB2
z
0
I-
J
0
J LC)
CO
W N
z • z
5 0
z w
w
w <
U a
cc
Q Li j 5-2
LU
LU
°C � 0
C'J
U
< z >
- O
LU
C.)± to
_ ▪ N
CC
N ti
OM O)
N
• rn
w wUJLLI
z °Czm
o°O
O Q o_ 2
J
l
DRAWING NUMBER:
S9
SCALE: HOR 1"=30'; VERT 1 "=3'

70 al
\Oc
V)
Z
CS
U_
J
0 m
O O
U
m O
ZtS)
W
J
EXISTING 18 INCH RCP
174
171
168
165
162
159
156
(TERRY M. KEEN
PAMELA.RFKEEN DB
DB 41652 PG 109
0-}00
REACH YB3
ENHANCEMENT II
(STA. 00+34 TO 11+82)
D 1232, 733
_31 al
L cE
3+00
-8IM
— — — J
DWIGHT B. YOUNGBLOOD, JR. DB
1232, PG 766
301
LcE
(zr_---- WLB-
U)
,30",
EXISTING 18 INCH RCP
<T
EXIS
ST
-ING GRADE ALONG
REAM CENTERLINE
LT
J
J
N
174
171
168
165
162
159
153
J
J
150
0+00
0+50
1+00
1+50
2+00
2+50
3+00
3+50
4+00
J
156
153
150
4+50
NOTES:
1. IN GENERAL, STREAM CONSTRUCTION SHALL PROCEED FROM AN UPSTREAM TO
DOWNSTREAM DIRECTION.
2. ALL EXCAVATED MATERIAL MUST BE PLACED WITHIN DESIGNATED STOCKPILE AREAS.
3. ALL IMPERVIOUS DIKES AND BYPASS PUMPING EQUIPMENT SHALL BE MODIFIED AT THE
END OF EACH DAY TO RESTORE NORMAL FLOW BACK TO THE CHANNEL.
4. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT COMPACT SOIL AROUND ROOTS OR TREES TO REMAIN, AND
SHALL NOT DAMAGE SUCH TREES IN ANY WAY. EXCAVATED OR OTHER MATERIAL
SHALL NOT BE PLACED, PILED OR STORED WITHIN THE CRITICAL ROOT ZONE AREA OF
THE TREES TO BE SAVED.
5. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, FILL MATERIAL GENERATED FROM CHANNEL EXCAVATION
AND STABILIZATION SHALL BE PLACED INSIDE THE EXISTING CHANNEL TO BE
ABANDONED AT AN ELEVATION THAT PROVIDES POSITIVE DRAINAGE TOWARDS THE
PROPOSED CHANNEL.
6. IN -STREAM STRUCTURES PROPOSED ALONG THE OUTSIDE OF MEANDER BENDS
(BRUSH TOES, LOG VANES, ROOT WADS, AND LOG TOES) MAY BE USED
INTERCHANGEABLY THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT PER APPROVAL FROM DESIGNER.
LEGEND
AS -BUILT IN -STREAM STRUCTURE
AS -BUILT CROSS SECTION •
AS -BUILT CHANNEL LIMITS
EXISTING CONTOUR MAJOR
EXISTING CONTOUR MINOR
PROPOSED CONTOUR MAJOR
PROPOSED CONTOUR MINOR
EXISTING WETLAND
EXISTING TOP OF BANK
EXISTING BOTTOM OF BANK
PROPOSED CENTERLINE OF
CHANNEL
EXISTING FENCELINE
EXISTING TREELINE
PROPOSED TOP OF BANK
LIMITS OF PROPOSED
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
PROPOSED CHANNEL PLUG
PROPOSED FILL AREA
DIFFUSE FLOW STRUCTURE
BRUSH TOE
DOUBLE LOG DROP
LOG TOE PROTECTION
LOG SILL
LOG GRADE CONTROL
LOG VANE
LOG J-HOOK
RIFFLE GRADE CONTROL
BRUSH BED SILL
FLOODPLAIN SILL
-(50 )
TB
BB
LO
(
-
J
J
0
FULL SCALE: 1 "=30
30 60
2" = FULL SCALE
1" = HALF SCALE
DESCRIPTION
w
0
cc
REVISIONS:
PLOT DATE:
RELEASED FOR:
_FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY
(
w
z
0
cc
m
(/)
w
0
cc
0_
a_
z
H
0
w
cc
0
z_
J
0
cc
2
CC
0
z
D
0
0
2
0
DRAWING TITLE:
REACH YB3
U
z
0
1-
J
O
U
w
2
O
cc
w
cc
O
W
U
O
CC
N
CC
w
LC)
o
(o
I`
N
U
z
(3
W
J
CC
O
O
w
1-
5
U
1-
z
0
cc
w
w
N
O
P')
U
UJ
CC
0
0
w
J
0
0
0
0
Q
0
co
co
m
N
ti
O)
rn
LLI w
Om
J
DRAWING NUMBER:
S10
SCALE: HOR 1 "=30'; VERT 1 "=3'

165
162
159
156
153
150
147
144
141
140
4+50
N
5+00
LCE
LCE
WLB- -
— *LB-
00
1M — — — —e1M-----81M /
301
DWIQ3HT . YQIJNiGRIJAD . DB
DB 1232 GP766766
SCE
WLB-___
__ lko0
$ WLB-- --�LEV ---Wj--
TERRY M. KEEN
PAMELA R. KEEN DB
4652, PG 109
301
LCE
REACH YB3
ENHANCEMENT II
(STA. 00+34 TO 11+82)
30-1
W L,
SCE
— WLB_ oo-- ,— WLB--
87M
337 Ail"
L
T
11=1111•11 =MENNEN=
5+00 5+50 6+00 6+50 7+00 7+50 8+00 8+50
LCE
165
162
159
156
153
150
147
144
141
140
9+00
NOTES:
1. IN GENERAL, STREAM CONSTRUCTION SHALL PROCEED FROM AN UPSTREAM TO
DOWNSTREAM DIRECTION.
2. ALL EXCAVATED MATERIAL MUST BE PLACED WITHIN DESIGNATED STOCKPILE AREAS.
3. ALL IMPERVIOUS DIKES AND BYPASS PUMPING EQUIPMENT SHALL BE MODIFIED AT THE
END OF EACH DAY TO RESTORE NORMAL FLOW BACK TO THE CHANNEL.
4. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT COMPACT SOIL AROUND ROOTS OR TREES TO REMAIN, AND
SHALL NOT DAMAGE SUCH TREES IN ANY WAY. EXCAVATED OR OTHER MATERIAL
SHALL NOT BE PLACED, PILED OR STORED WITHIN THE CRITICAL ROOT ZONE AREA OF
THE TREES TO BE SAVED.
5. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, FILL MATERIAL GENERATED FROM CHANNEL EXCAVATION
AND STABILIZATION SHALL BE PLACED INSIDE THE EXISTING CHANNEL TO BE
ABANDONED AT AN ELEVATION THAT PROVIDES POSITIVE DRAINAGE TOWARDS THE
PROPOSED CHANNEL.
6. IN -STREAM STRUCTURES PROPOSED ALONG THE OUTSIDE OF MEANDER BENDS
(BRUSH TOES, LOG VANES, ROOT WADS, AND LOG TOES) MAY BE USED
INTERCHANGEABLY THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT PER APPROVAL FROM DESIGNER.
LEGEND
AS -BUILT IN -STREAM STRUCTURE
AS -BUILT CROSS SECTION •
AS -BUILT CHANNEL LIMITS
EXISTING CONTOUR MAJOR
EXISTING CONTOUR MINOR
PROPOSED CONTOUR MAJOR ( 50)
PROPOSED CONTOUR MINOR
EXISTING WETLAND
EXISTING TOP OF BANK
EXISTING BOTTOM OF BANK
PROPOSED CENTERLINE OF
CHANNEL
EXISTING FENCELINE
EXISTING TREELINE
PROPOSED TOP OF BANK
TB
BB
LIMITS OF PROPOSED
CONSERVATION EASEMENT LCE
PROPOSED CHANNEL PLUG
PROPOSED FILL AREA
DIFFUSE FLOW STRUCTURE
BRUSH TOE
DOUBLE LOG DROP
LOG TOE PROTECTION
LOG SILL
LOG GRADE CONTROL
LOG VANE
LOG J-HOOK
RIFFLE GRADE CONTROL
BRUSH BED SILL
FLOODPLAIN SILL
(
-
J
J
0
FULL SCALE: 1 "=30
30 60
2" = FULL SCALE
1" = HALF SCALE
DESCRIPTION
w
H
0
REVISIONS:
PLOT DATE:
RELEASED FOR:
_FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY
(
W
z
0
cc
_
5
W
cc
0
a_
Z
H
0
w
cc
D_
z_
J
0
cc
CC
0
z
D
0
0
z
0
DRAWING TITLE:
REACH YB3
z
0
H
J
O
J LC)
H- O
Z CO
w
2 U
Z Z
z CD
w
w o=
C.)a
cco
▪ 5-2
Q J
CC 5
ci) 0
C'3
U
< z >
o
w
C.)± CC c)
_ ▪ N
N ti
NoM rn
rn
w - wUJLLI
Z LLI
°CZ_
o°O
O Qo_2
J
l
DRAWING NUMBER:
sil
SCALE: HOR 1"=30'; VERT 1 "=3'

307
153
150
147
144
141
138
135
132
130
9+00
/14
337
M-----13%
SCE
TERRY M. KEEN
PAMELA R. KEEN DB
4652, PG 109
REACH YB3
ENHANCEMENT II
(STA. 00+34 TO 11+82)
- WLB- - - - WLB- -
d�
4:Q* (a 0 * * T � I
k
__ eN"H -
— --aim ---- -aim
—g�M - —- -
0 CI
0 I
►
I
1
rP
1
DWIGHT :: YOUNG:H.001Q OR. GB
DB 1 232,2PG766766
3O \
12+00
I I
I 1 I
I 1 I
I 1
I I I
r
LT
L
9+50 10+00 10+50 11+00 11+50 12+00
1
153
150
147
144
141
138
135
132
130
12+50
NOTES:
1. IN GENERAL, STREAM CONSTRUCTION SHALL PROCEED FROM AN UPSTREAM TO
DOWNSTREAM DIRECTION.
2. ALL EXCAVATED MATERIAL MUST BE PLACED WITHIN DESIGNATED STOCKPILE AREAS.
3. ALL IMPERVIOUS DIKES AND BYPASS PUMPING EQUIPMENT SHALL BE MODIFIED AT THE
END OF EACH DAY TO RESTORE NORMAL FLOW BACK TO THE CHANNEL.
4. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT COMPACT SOIL AROUND ROOTS OR TREES TO REMAIN, AND
SHALL NOT DAMAGE SUCH TREES IN ANY WAY. EXCAVATED OR OTHER MATERIAL
SHALL NOT BE PLACED, PILED OR STORED WITHIN THE CRITICAL ROOT ZONE AREA OF
THE TREES TO BE SAVED.
5. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, FILL MATERIAL GENERATED FROM CHANNEL EXCAVATION
AND STABILIZATION SHALL BE PLACED INSIDE THE EXISTING CHANNEL TO BE
ABANDONED AT AN ELEVATION THAT PROVIDES POSITIVE DRAINAGE TOWARDS THE
PROPOSED CHANNEL.
6. IN -STREAM STRUCTURES PROPOSED ALONG THE OUTSIDE OF MEANDER BENDS
(BRUSH TOES, LOG VANES, ROOT WADS, AND LOG TOES) MAY BE USED
INTERCHANGEABLY THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT PER APPROVAL FROM DESIGNER.
LEGEND
AS -BUILT IN -STREAM STRUCTURE
AS -BUILT CROSS SECTION •
AS -BUILT CHANNEL LIMITS
EXISTING CONTOUR MAJOR
EXISTING CONTOUR MINOR
PROPOSED CONTOUR MAJOR ( 50)
PROPOSED CONTOUR MINOR
EXISTING WETLAND
EXISTING TOP OF BANK
EXISTING BOTTOM OF BANK
PROPOSED CENTERLINE OF
CHANNEL
EXISTING FENCELINE
EXISTING TREELINE
PROPOSED TOP OF BANK
TB
BB
LIMITS OF PROPOSED
CONSERVATION EASEMENT LE
PROPOSED CHANNEL PLUG
PROPOSED FILL AREA
DIFFUSE FLOW STRUCTURE
BRUSH TOE
DOUBLE LOG DROP
LOG TOE PROTECTION
LOG SILL
LOG GRADE CONTROL
LOG VANE
LOG J-HOOK
RIFFLE GRADE CONTROL
BRUSH BED SILL
FLOODPLAIN SILL
(
-
J
J
0
FULL SCALE: 1 "=30
30 60
2" = FULL SCALE
1" = HALF SCALE
DESCRIPTION
w
Q
0
cc
REVISIONS:
PLOT DATE:
RELEASED FOR:
_FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY
(
w
z
J
0
cc
_
5
03
(/)
w
0
QC
0_
wp
a_
z
H
0
w
cc
0
Z
J
0
cc
U
CC
0
Z
D
0
Z
0
z
0
DRAWING TITLE:
REACH YB3
Z
0
J
O
J LC)
o
Z N.
w N
2 U
Z Z
z • w
w
w
U a
°C
Q ▪ J
cc 5
ci) 0
C'3
U u) 0
< z >
Z o
O w o
C.)± CC c)
_ ▪ CO
N ti
d- OM O)
N
• CT,
w w w ui
z °Czm
o°O
O Qo_2
J
l
DRAWING NUMBER:
S12
SCALE: HOR 1 "=30'; VERT 1 "=3'

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
69 DARLINGTON AVENUE
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28403-1343
February 11, 2019
Regulatory Division
Action ID No: SAW-2016-01985
Re: NCIRT Review and USACE Approval of the Request for Modification to the Neu -Con
Umbrella Mitigation Banking Instrument (UMBI) to add the Poplar Creek Mitigation Site
Mr. Brad Breslow
EBX-Neuse I, LLC
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Raleigh, North Carolina 27605
Dear Mr. Breslow:
This letter is to inform you that the Wilmington District, Corps of Engineers (Corps) has
reviewed and approved the Poplar Creek Mitigation Site, dated November 2018. In addition, the
Corps has issued a Nationwide Permit 27 (NWP 27) verification letter authorizing work in waters
of the United States associated with restoration of aquatic resources on the mitigation bank site.
As bank sponsor you are required to comply with the approved Neu -Con UMBI, Final Mitigation
Plan —Poplar Creek Mitigation Site, the terms and conditions of your NWP 27 verification letter,
and the Corps' regulations regarding compensatory mitigation (33 CFR 332).
The bank sponsor accepts all risk, liability, and responsibility for the success of all mitigation
activities associated with the approved mitigation bank site. In accordance with the final
mitigation plan, the bank sponsor must prepare and submit annual monitoring reports to
document whether the stream (4,273 linear feet) restoration and enhancement areas on the
project site meet the necessary interim and final performance standards. When credits are
debited from the mitigation site, the bank sponsor must provide the Corps with an updated ledger
form identifying the purchaser of the credits, the project name, the permit number, and the
number and type of credits to be debited. When all stream (3,926 stream mitigation units
(SMUs)) credits have been consumed, no more credits may be sold from this mitigation site.
From the Corps' perspective, the next phase in the establishment of the Neu -Con UMBI,
Poplar Creek Mitigation Bank, includes recording the conservation easement to protect the
mitigation site, marking the boundary of the site with permanent signs, and executing the
necessary financial assurances. Once the conservation easement has been recorded and we
receive the required executed financial assurance documents, the Corps will be in a position to
approve an initial credit release for 15% of the total stream restoration and enhancement
mitigation credits. We look forward to working with you to ensure the Poplar Creek Mitigation
Site complies with the requirements of the approved UMBI and site -specific mitigation plan.

In all future correspondence concerning this matter, please refer to our file number, SAW-
2016-01985. If you have any questions regarding this letter, the mitigation plan review process, or
the requirements of the Mitigation Rule, please contact Ms. Samantha Dailey by email at
[e-mail] or by phone at [phone] extension 22.
Sincerely,
Digitally signed by WICKER.HENRY.M.JR.1229818267
WICKER.HENRY.M.JR.1229818267 Dn=WICKER.HEN YMJR. 229818267oD,ou=PKl,ou=USA,
Date: 2019.02.15 13:10:35 -05'00'
Henry Wicker
Deputy Chief, Regulatory Division
Enclosures
Electronic Copies Furnished:
NCIRT Distribution List

Applicant:
Address:
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. SAW-2016-01985 County: JOHNSTON U.S.G.S. Quad: NC — SELMA
GENERAL PERMIT (REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE) VERIFICATION
EBX-Neuse I, LLC
Mr. Brad Breslow
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Raleigh, North Carolina 27605
Size (acres) 23.59 Nearest Town Smithfield
Nearest Waterway Poplar River Basin Neuse River
USGS HUC 03020201 Coordinates Latitude: 35.5552
Longitude: -78.356735
Description of the project location: The project area is identified as an approximate 23.59 acre tract of land, located on Johnston
County, North Carolina Parcels 169500-16-5546, 69500-25-0748, 169500-25-9195, 169500-36-5192, 169500-36-8766, 169500-47-
2720, and 169500-34-9404. These parcels are located between 538-848 Lee Youngblood Loop, Smithfield, Johnston County,
North Carolina. Work in waters of the United States (U.S.) would occur in tributaries and wetlands within the Poplar Creek
watershed, a direct tributary of the Neuse River (8-digit HUC: 03020201).
Description of projects area and activity: The applicant, EBX-Neuse I, LLC, has requested a Department of the Army
authorization to discharge dredged and/or fill material into waters of the U.S. in conjunction with the Poplar Creek Mitigation
Site. Project activity will involve the aquatic restoration and enhancement of 4,273 linear feet of stream channel.
Implementation of the proposed restoration and enhancement activities will result in the discharge of fill material into 0.240
acres of wetland, 1,960 linear feet of stream channel, and 3.34 acres of open water in conjunction with the mechanized land
clearing, excavation, and stream relocation activities for the Poplar Creek Mitigation Site. Refer to the enclosed Table 1 for a
detailed summary of impacts.
Applicable Law: ® Section 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1344)
❑ Section 10 (Rivers and Harbors Act, 33 USC 403)
Authorization: Regional General Permit Number or Nationwide Permit Number: NWP 27 — Aquatic Habitat Restoration,
Enhancement, and Establishment Activities
SEE ATTACHED RGP or NWP GENERAL, REGIONAL AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS
Your work is authorized by the above referenced permit provided it is accomplished in strict accordance with the attached
conditions and your submitted application and attached information dated November 12, 2018. Any violation of the attached
conditions or deviation from your submitted plans may subject the permittee to a stop work order, a restoration order, a Class
I administrative penalty, and/or appropriate legal action.
This verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below unless the nationwide authorization is modified,
suspended or revoked. If, prior to the expiration date identified below, the nationwide permit authorization is reissued and/or
modified, this verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below, provided it complies with all requirements of
the modified nationwide permit. If the nationwide permit authorization expires or is suspended, revoked, or is modified, such that the
activity would no longer comply with the terms and conditions of the nationwide permit, activities which have commenced (i.e., are
under construction) or are under contract to commence in reliance upon the nationwide permit, will remain authorized provided the
activity is completed within twelve months of the date of the nationwide permit's expiration, modification or revocation, unless
discretionary authority has been exercised on a case -by -case basis to modify, suspend or revoke the authorization.
Activities subject to Section 404 (as indicated above) may also require an individual Section 401 Water Quality Certification. You
should contact the NC Division of Water Quality (telephone [phone]) to determine Section 401 requirements.
For activities occurring within the twenty coastal counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA),
prior to beginning work you must contact the N.C. Division of Coastal Management in Morehead City, NC, at [phone].
This Department of the Army verification does not relieve the permittee of the responsibility to obtain any other required Federal,
State or local approvals/permits.

If there are any questions regarding this verification, any of the conditions of the Permit, or the Corps of Engineers regulatory
program, please contact Samantha Dailey at 919-554-4884 x22 or [e-mail].
Digitally signed by
DAILEY.SAMANT DN:48
rUS, o AU.S. Government9ou=DoD,
HA.J.1387567948 con=DAILEY: AMANTHAJ.1387567948
Corps Regulatory Official: Date: 2019.02.11 11:48:31 -05'00'
Date: February 11, 2019
Expiration Date of Verification: March 18, 2022

Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination
X There are waters, including wetlands, on the above described project area, that may be subject to Section 404 of the Clean
Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). The
waters, including wetlands, have been delineated, and the delineation has been verified by the Corps to be sufficiently accurate
and reliable. Therefore this preliminary jurisdiction determination may be used in the permit evaluation process, including
determining compensatory mitigation. For purposes of computation of impacts, compensatory mitigation requirements, and other
resource protection measures, a permit decision made on the basis of a preliminary JD will treat all waters and wetlands that
would be affected in any way by the permitted activity on the site as if they are jurisdictional waters of the U.S. This preliminary
determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33 CFR Part
331). However, you may request an approved JD, which is an appealable action, by contacting the Corps district for further
instruction.
There are wetlands on the above described property, that may be subject to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33
USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). However, since the
waters, including wetlands, have not been properly delineated, this preliminary jurisdiction determination may not be used in the
permit evaluation process. Without a verified wetland delineation, this preliminary determination is merely an effective
presumption of CWA/RHA jurisdiction over all of the waters, including wetlands, at the project area, which is not sufficiently
accurate and reliable to support an enforceable permit decision. We recommend that you have the waters of the U.S. on your
property delineated. As the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to
obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that can be verified by the Corps.
B. Approved Determination
_ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described property subject to the permit requirements of
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403) and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC §
1344). Unless there is a change in law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to
exceed five years from the date of this notification.
_ There are waters of the U.S., including wetlands, on the above described project area subject to the permit requirements of
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) (33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations,
this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
_ We recommend you have the waters of the U.S. on your property delineated. As the Corps may not be able to accomplish
this wetland delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that can be verified by
the Corps.
_ The waters of the U.S., including wetlands, on your project area have been delineated and the delineation has been verified
by the Corps. We strongly suggest you have this delineation surveyed. Upon completion, this survey should be reviewed and
verified by the Corps. Once verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWA jurisdiction on
your property which, provided there is no change in the law or our published regulations, may be relied upon for a period not to
exceed five years.
_ The waters of the U.S., including wetlands, have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat signed
by the Corps Regulatory Official identified below on . Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
_ There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described project area which are subject to the permit
requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
_ The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA).
You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Morehead City, NC, at [phone] to determine their
requirements.

Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US, including wetlands, without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). Placement of dredged or fill material, construction or
placement of structures, or work within navigable waters of the United States without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Sections 9 and/or 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (33 USC § 401 and/or 403). If you have any questions
regarding this determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact Ms. Samantha Dailey at 919-554-4884, ext. 22 or
by email at Samantha.J.Dailey(ausace.army.mil.
C. Basis For Determination: Refer to the enclosed Preliminary JD Form, and Potential Wetland or Non -
Wetland Waters of the U.S. Map dated 11/5/2018 for a detailed summary of waters on -site
D. Remarks:
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the particular site
identified in this request. The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security
Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA programs, you should request
a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information for Approved Jurisdiction Determinations (as indicated in Section B. above)
If you object to this determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. Enclosed
you will find a Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and Request for Appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this
determination you must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Jason Steele, Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Room 10M15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for appeal
under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP. Should you
decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by N/A.
It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this
correspondence.
DAILEY,SAMANTHA, DAILEYSAMAN HA.J.1387567948
Digitally signed by
DN: c=US, o=U.S. Government, ou=DoD, ou=PKI,
ou=USA, Corps Regulatory Official: J • 1387567948 Date: 2019.0 DAI.11 " 4722-05'00' 11387567948
Samantha J. Dailey
Date: February 11, 2019 Expiration Date: N/A
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to do so, please complete our Customer Satisfaction Survey, located online at
http://corpsmapu.usace.army.mil/cm apex/f?p=136:4:0.

Table 1. Authorized discharge of fill material into waters of the United States in association with the
Poplar Creek Mitigation Site (SAW-2016-01985).
Impact Number/ Aquatic
Resource ID
Flow Regime or
Cowardin Class
Fill
Length of
Stream
(If)
Fill acreage
of wetland
(ac)
Duration of
Fill Material
Regulated Discharge
g g
of Fill Material
Activity
W1
Riverine Swamp
Forest
N/A
0.050
Permanent
Stream Relocation
Wetland WC
W2
Riverine Swamp
Forest
N/A
0.190
Temporary
Stream Relocation
Wetland WC
S1
YB1-C
Perennial
602
N/A
Permanent
Stream Relocation
S2
YB1-B
Perennial
1,358
N/A
Permanent
Stream Relocation
01
Pond B
Open Water
N/A
3.34
Permanent
Dewatering

SPECIAL CONDITIONS
ACTION ID: SAW-2016-01985
EBX-NEUSE I, LLC
POPLAR CREEK MITIGATION SITE
MITIGATION
1. The permittee understands and agrees that the document entitled "Final Mitigation Plan — Poplar Creek
Mitigation Site" dated November 2018, are incorporated and made part of this permit. Execution of the
work and terms given in the approved mitigation plan are a condition of this permit

Action ID Number: SAW-2016-01985 County: Johnston
Permittee: EBX-Neuse I, LLC
Mr. Brad Breslow
Project Name: Poplar Creek Mitigation Site
Date Verification Issued: February 11, 2019
Project Manager: Samantha Dailey
Upon completion of the activity authorized by this permit and any mitigation required by the permit,
sign this certification and return it to the following address:
US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Attn: Samantha Dailey
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27857
Please note that your permitted activity is subject to a compliance inspection by a U. S. Army Corps of
Engineers representative. Failure to comply with any terms or conditions of this authorization may
result in the Corps suspending, modifying or revoking the authorization and/or issuing a Class I
administrative penalty, or initiating other appropriate legal action.
I hereby certify that the work authorized by the above referenced permit has been completed in
accordance with the terms and condition of the said permit, and required mitigation was completed in
accordance with the permit conditions.
Signature of Permittee Date

PROCESS AND
NOTIFICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL OPTIONS AND
REQUEST FOR APPEAL
Applicant: EBX-Neuse I, LLC
(Attn: Mr. Brad Breslow)
File Number: SAW-2016-01985
Date: February 11, 2019
Attached is:
See Section below
E
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
A
PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
B
[
PERMIT DENIAL
C
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
D
E
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
E
SECTION
Additional
Corps
I - The following identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative appeal of the above decision.
information may be found at http://www.usace.army.mil/Missions/CivilWorks/RegulatoryProgramandPermits.aspx or
regulations at 33 CFR Part 331.
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature
on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the
permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit.
• OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request that the
permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district engineer. Your
objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will forfeit your right to appeal
the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your objections and may: (a) modify the
permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your objections, or (c) not modify the permit
having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After evaluating your objections, the district engineer
will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature
on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the
permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you
may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form
and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of
this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative
Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or
provide new information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the date of
this notice means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers Administrative
Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by
the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.

E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps
regarding the preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved
JD (which may be appealed), by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new
information for further consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the JD.
SECTION II - REQUEST FOR APPEAL or OBJECTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your
objections to an initial proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to
this form to clarify where your reasons or objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited
memorandum for the record of the appeal conference
review officer has determined is needed to clarify the
to a review of the administrative record, the Corps
or meeting, and any supplemental information that the
administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps
However, you may provide additional information to clarify
record.
may add new information or analyses to the record.
the location of information that is already in the administrative
POINT OF CONTACT FOR QUESTIONS OR INFORMATION:
If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the
appeal process you may contact:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Attn: Samantha Dailey
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may
also contact:
Mr. Jason Steele, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
CESAD-PDO
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
60 Forsyth Street, Room 10M15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government
consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a 15 day
notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportunity to participate in all site investigations.
Date:
Telephone number:
Signature of appellant or agent.
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Attn: Ms. Samantha Dailey, 69 Darlington Avenue, Wilmington, North
Carolina 28403
For Permit denials, Proffered Permits and approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:
Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Jason Steele, Administrative
Appeal Officer, CESAD-PDO, 60 Forsyth Street, Room 10M15, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]

APPENDIX 2
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD):
February 11, 2019
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD:
Applicant:
Address:
EBX-Neuse I, LLC
Mr. Brad Breslow
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Raleigh, North Carolina 27605
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Wilmington, Neu -Con UMBI, Poplar Creek Mitigation Site,
EBX-Neuse I, LLC, Johnston County, SAW-2016-01985
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE ATTACHED TABLE TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE WATERBODIES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: Johnston City: Smithfield
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat. 35.5552°N, Long. -78.356735° W.
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest water body: Poplar Creek
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLIES):
® Office (Desk) Determination. Date: February 11, 2019
® Field Determination. Date(s): June 22, 2017
1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, and the requestor of this
PJD is hereby advised of his or her option to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an informed
decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their characteristics and circumstances when they may be
appropriate.
2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other
general permit verification requiring "pre -construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or
other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made
aware that: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an official
determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the option to request an AJD before accepting the terms
and conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result in less
compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the applicant has the right to request an individual
permit rather than accepting the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can
accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including whatever
mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject
permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a
permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps
permit authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the review area affected in any way by
that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial
compliance or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7)whether the applicant elects to
use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and
all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R.
Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic
jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional aquatic
resources in the review area, the Corps will provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds
that there "may be" waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be" navigable waters of the U.S. on the subject review area, and
identifies all aquatic features in the review area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for preliminary JD (check all that apply): Checked items should be included in
subject file. Appropriately reference sources below where indicated for all checked items:
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor: EBX-Neuse I, LLC submitted a
Jurisdictional Determination Request on March 28, 2018, with revisions received on November 12, 2018.
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
® Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: 1:24K, NC -Selma
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Web Soil Survey: June 2017.
National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: Corps of Engineers SimSuite — June 2017.
State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
FEMA/FIRM maps:
100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
Photographs: ® Aerial (Name & Date): 1998 NAPP & 2010 ESRI World Imagery.
or ❑ Other (Name & Date):
Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
Other information (please specify):
❑❑ ®❑❑❑®®®
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been verified by the Corps and should
not be relied upon for later jurisdictional determinations.
Refer to the enclosed Table 1. Summary of On -Site Jurisdictional Waters
DAI LEY.SAM
ANTHA.J.13
87567948
Digitally signed by
DAI LEY.SAMANTHA.J.138756794
8
DN: c=US, o=U.S. Government,
ou=DoD, ou=PKI, ou=USA,
cn=DAI LEY. SAMANTHA.J.138756
7948
Date: 2019.02.11 11:43:47 -05'00'
Signature and date of Signature and date of
Regulatory Project Manager person requesting preliminary JD
(REQUIRED) (REQUIRED, unless obtaining the signature is
Impracticable)
1 Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not respond within the
established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is necessary prior to finalizing an
action.

Waters_Name State
YB1-C NORTH CAROLINA
YB2-B NORTH CAROLINA
YB3 NORTH CAROLINA
Wetland A (WA) NORTH CAROLINA
Wetland B (WB) NORTH CAROLINA
Wetland C (WC) NORTH CAROLINA
Wetland F (WF) NORTH CAROLINA
Pond A (PA) NORTH CAROLINA
Cowardin_Code HGM_Code
R4
R5
R4
PFO
PFO
PFO
PFO
POW
Meas_Type
Linear
Linear
Linear
Area
Area
Area
Area
Area
Amount Units
602 FOOT
1630 FOOT
760 FOOT
1.64 ACRE
0.02 ACRE
0.34 ACRE
0.24 ACRE
3.3 ACRE
Waters_Type
DELINEATE
DELINEATE
DELINEATE
DELINEATE
DELINEATE
DELINEATE
DELINEATE
DELINEATE
Latitude Longitude Local_Waterway
35.5511 -78.356 Poplar Creek
35.5504 -78.3517 Poplar Creek
35.5482 -78.3489 Poplar Creek
35.5485 -78.3487 Poplar Creek
35.5556 -78.3498 Poplar Creek
35.5519 -78.3512 Poplar Creek
35.5519 -78.3558 Poplar Creek
35.5541 -78.3506 Poplar Creek

fires
W E
0 200 400
Feet
1 in = 400 feet
Potential
Wetland or Non -Wetland Waters
of the U.S. Map
Poplar Creek
Mitigation Site
Johnston County,
North Carolina
Date: 03/28/2017
Revised: 11/5/2018
Drawn by: MDE
Checked by: JRM
Legend
Proposed Easement
® Upland Data Point
A Wetland Data Point
E Wetlands Within Easement
(2.25 ac)
Y Y
Wetland Outside Easement
(4.32 ac)
Open Water Within
Easement (3.29 ac)
Open Water Outside
Easement (3.34 ac)
— Streams (4,020 If)
REFERENCE
1) Horizontal Datum is NAD83 UTM Z15N.
2) Map Projection is NAD_1983_StatePlane_
North Carolina FIPS 3200 Feet

ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
LINDA CULPEPPER
Interim Director
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
January 2, 2019
DWR # 16-0979
Johnston County
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC
Attn: Bob White
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Raleigh, NC 27605
Subject: APPROVAL OF 401 WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION WITH
ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
Poplar Creek Mitigation Site
Dear Mr. White:
You have our approval for the impacts listed below for the purpose described in your
application dated November 14, 2018, received by the Division of Water Resources
November 14, 2018, with subsequent information (signed signatory page) on January 2,
2019. These impacts are covered by the attached Water Quality General Certification
Number 4134 and the conditions listed below. This certification is associated with the use
of Nationwide Permit Number 27once it is issued to you by the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers. Please note that you should get any other federal, state or local permits before
proceeding with your project, including those required by (but not limited to) Sediment
and Erosion Control, Non -Discharge, and Water Supply Watershed regulations.
This approval requires you to follow the conditions listed in the enclosed certification(s) or
general permit and the following additional conditions:
DEQ?)
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
512 North Salisbury Street 11611 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1611
919.707.9000

Poplar Creek Mitigation Site
DWR# 16-0979
Page 2 of 4
1. The following impacts are hereby approved provided that all of the other specific
and general conditions of the Certification are met. No other impacts are approved,
including incidental impacts. [15A NCAC 02H .0506(b) and/or (c)]
Type of Impact
Amount Approved
(units)
Permanent
Amount Approved
(units)
Temporary
404/401 Wetlands
W1
0.05 (acres)
0 (acres)
W2
0
0.19
Total
0.05
0.19
Stream
YB1-C
602 (linear feet)
0 (linear feet)
YB2_B
1,358
0
Total
1,960
0
Open Waters
01
3.34 (acres)
0 (acres)
Total
3.34
0
2. This approval is for the purpose and design described in your application. The plans
and specifications for this project are incorporated by reference as part of the
Certification. If you change your project, you must notify the Division and you may
be required to submit a new application package with the appropriate fee. If the
property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of this approval letter and
General Certification(s)/Permit/Authorization and is responsible for complying
with all conditions. [15A NCAC 02H .0507(d)(2)]
3. The issuance of the 401 Water Quality Certification for the
restoration/enhancement project does not represent an approval of credit yield for
the project. [15A NCAC 02H .0500(h)]
4. You have our approval for your proposed final stream enhancements/restorations
plan. The stream restorations/enhancements must be constructed, maintained, and
monitored according to the plans approved by this Office and this Certificate of
Coverage. Any repairs or adjustments to the site must be made according to the
approved plans or must receive written approval from this Office to make the
repairs or adjustments. [15A NCAC 02H .0506(h)
This approval and its conditions are final and binding unless contested. [G.S. 143-215.5]
NoRNAD.E
-#)
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
512 North Salisbury Street 11611 Mail Service Center I Raleigh. North Carolina 27699-1611
919.707.9000

Poplar Creek Mitigation Site
DWR# 16-0979
Page 3 of 4
This Certification can be contested as provided in Articles 3 and 4 of General Statute 150B
by filing a written petition for an administrative hearing to the Office of Administrative
Hearings (hereby known as OAH) within sixty (60) calendar days.
A petition form may be obtained from the OAH at http://www.ncoah.com/ or by calling the
OAH Clerk's Office at [phone] for information. A petition is considered filed when
the original and one (1) copy along with any applicable OAH filing fee is received in the OAH
during normal office hours (Monday through Friday between 8:00am and 5:00pm, excluding
official state holidays).
The petition may be faxed to the OAH at [phone], provided the original and one
copy of the petition along with any applicable OAH filing fee is received by the OAH within
five (5) business days following the faxed transmission.
Mailing address for the OAH:
If sending via US Postal Service:
Office of Administrative Hearings
6714 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-6714
If sending via delivery service (UPS,
FedEx, etc):
Office of Administrative Hearings
1711 New Hope Church Road
Raleigh, NC 27609-6285
One (1) copy of the petition must also be served to Department of Environmental Quality:
William F. Lane, General Counsel
Department of Environmental Quality
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1601
D_EW
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
512 North Salisbury Street 11611 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1611
919.707.9000

Poplar Creek Mitigation Site
DWR# 16-0979
Page 4 of 4
This letter completes the review of the Division under section 401 of the Clean Water Act.
Please contact Mac Haupt at 919-707-3632 or [e-mail] if you have any
questions or concerns.
Sincerely,
Karen Higgins, Supervisor
401 & Buffer Permitting Branch
Enclosures: GC 4134
cc: Samantha Dailey, USACE Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Stephanie Goss, DWR Raleigh Regulatory Office 401 file
DWR 401 & Buffer Permitting Branch file
Filename; 160979Pop1arCreek(Johnston) 401_approval ltr.January 2, 2019.docx
dD_EQO
al
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
512 North Salisbury Street 11611 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1611
919.707.9000

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES
Post Office Box 2263
SMITHFIELD, NC 27577
[phone]
March 12, 2019
LETTER OF APPROVAL
David Godley
Resources Environmental Solutions, Inc.
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Raleigh, NC 27605
RE: Project Name: Poplar Creek Mitigation Project
Project ID: JC# 19-003-P
Disturbed Acres Approved: 21
Stream Classification: Neuse River (WS-IV; NSW)
Submitted By: WK Dickson
Dear Mr. Godley:
Johnston County has reviewed the referenced erosion and sedimentation control plan, finds the plan
acceptable, and hereby issues this Letter of Approval. This plan approval shall expire three (3) years
following the date of approval, if no land -disturbing activity has been undertaken as required by Title
15A NCAC 4B .0129.
Please be aware that your project will be covered by the enclosed NPDES Construction Stormwater
General Permit NCG010000. You are required to comply with all the requirements and conditions of this
permit.
The enclosed Certificate of Approval must be posted at the job site. Title 15A NCAC 4B .0118(a)
requires that a copy of the approved erosion control plan be on file at the job site. Also, the letter gives
the notice required by G.S. 113A — 61.1 (a) of our right of periodic inspection to insure compliance with
the approved plan.
North Carolina's Sedimentation Pollution Control Act is performance oriented, requiring protection of
existing natural resources and adjoining properties. If, following the commencement of this project, it is
determined that the erosion and sedimentation control plan is inadequate to meet the requirements of the
Sedimentation Pollution Control Act of 1973 (North Carolina General Stature 113A-51 through 66), this
office may require revisions to the plan and implementation of the revisions to insure compliance with the
Act.
Acceptance and approval of this plan is condition upon your compliance with Federal, State, and Local
water quality laws, regulations, and rules. This approval does not supersede any other permit or approval.

Letter of Approval
Poplar Creek
Mitigation Project
JC# 19-003-P
March 12, 2019
Please note that this approval is based in part on the accuracy of the information provided in the Financial
Responsibility Form, which you provided. You are requested to file an amended form if there is any
change in the information included on the form. You are required to notify this office of the proposed
starting date for this project. In addition, please notify us if you plan to have a preconstruction
conference.
Sincerely,
0/2,,i.L
.7g7+0 5(11'-
Beth McLaughlin
McLaughlin Consulting
Contractor for Johnston County Public Utilities
cc: Charles Pender, Johnston County